Breaking news from the Washington Post reveals the identity of the leaker behind the biggest leak in U.S. history. Glenn Beck explains who it is, and why it matters. Plus, a special Christmas gift from MyPillows.
00:25:09.860So they say that, well, they have one source and it's a kid.
00:25:15.240But they did talk to his mom before they put him on record.
00:25:18.840A kid says that he knows who the leaker is.
00:25:23.060He was a guy in this group of about a dozen kids and he worked on a military base and would go in and just leak these documents to the kids.
00:25:42.080Um, but I wanted to ask you because he worked on a military base and he said he had access to documents and servers that he could get in and see all these secrets.
00:25:53.080Um, how hard is that with the documents that you know and I know have come out?
00:26:00.080How hard would what kind of classification would you have to have?
00:26:03.780And do we have those kinds of skiffs on military bases that would allow access to anything?
00:26:27.120But the other thing too, is that I think there's probably two elements of this that are worth commenting on.
00:26:32.920Number one is that most of the stuff that we've seen, in fact, all of it is, is classified top secret, which is actually one of the lowest classifications.
00:26:42.860And so it probably, there's thousands of people who probably had access to a lot of these documents.
00:26:50.080And the second thing, Glenn, is that the whole presumption of the classification, number one is we over classify a lot of things.
00:26:58.480But some of these things, if you read them, you think, well, that doesn't seem terribly classified and seems actually fairly obvious.
00:27:04.420And I think that's the case with some of these documents, although not all of them.
00:27:08.040But my point is, is that the whole, whole process only works if there's a presumption of, of trust.
00:27:14.480And of course, there's some people that you can trust and you shouldn't trust.
00:27:17.380But it seems to me like there was a breakdown more broadly.
00:27:21.480And that is, uh, someone somewhere had enormous access and, and, uh, over a long period of time.
00:27:30.740And it seems like with just extraordinary ease, was able to have access to these documents and then walk out of the building with them.
00:27:38.040They didn't, you know, they didn't, uh, you know, break down through computers and get electronic access.
00:27:45.080It looks like they had physical access things.
00:27:47.060And actually we're walking around with them.
00:27:48.480That is actually quite surprising to me.
00:27:50.820So we're seeing now, um, with China, some of the leaks are about China, um, and us not being able to, um, have war with them.
00:28:00.560Um, um, the, the Taiwan thing, where are we headed on that is, is China.
00:28:08.600I mean, if I were China with this president and this Pentagon, man, I wouldn't, I would, if it looks like somebody else is going to win the white house, man, I would make my moves right now on Taiwan.
00:28:21.660Um, well, can they, yeah, yeah, well, they're, they're close to that.
00:28:28.740They're not quite where they want to be militarily, but militarily isn't it military.
00:28:34.280Isn't the only considerations they have one of the primary considerations, of course, is what you just indicated.
00:28:40.560What do they estimate the United States will do?
00:28:42.920What do they estimate the response of the leadership and the president of the United States would be?
00:28:47.380And it's very, very clear and everyone talks about Afghanistan, but you really just can't overemphasize the importance of that Glenn.
00:28:56.240I mean, as I've traveled around the world since then, I hear it all the time and not just from our friends, but from our adversaries as well.
00:29:04.100I mean, they'd look at that and they just go think what, what fickle, naive, weak leadership that was.
00:29:11.100And by the way, it's not just president Biden.
00:29:19.160So there's no question that president, she looks at that and goes, well, maybe now is the time.
00:29:23.240And if I could share one, one personal experience I had, I was on another interview and I, and they asked me, you know, well, what's the timeline?
00:29:30.060I said, well, it's hard to say the analyst course predicting the future, but I said, I think it's probably four to six years.
00:29:35.940And, and that weekend I was called by a former, the former national security advisor, Robert, a friend of mine.
00:29:41.460And then he said, no, Chris, I think it's probably closer to two years.
00:29:45.620And then an hour later, I got a phone call from another very, very senior military officer who called me and said, Chris, I think you're wrong.
00:30:43.900But one of the impressions I left there with was to those of us here in the United States who, who we've sent them as you and I have talked about tens per, perhaps more than a hundred billion dollars.
00:30:56.700But most Americans, you know, they, they, they may say, okay, well, we want to support that.
00:31:26.940There's recent analysis that said we would have a 9% reduction in our GDP the first year from only from the inability to access the chips and, and especially the exquisite chips.
00:31:41.0009%, the, the great depression reduction in GDP the first year was 7.5%.
00:31:50.780And Glenn, that doesn't count because we haven't yet finished the analysis on the reduction in GDP from the fact that you're not going to have container ships leaving China and coming to United States or coming to the West.
00:32:02.540We're just simply not going to continue to trade with them.
00:32:04.580So, so when you ask, what does it mean?
00:32:07.080I mean, the economic consequences of this are hard for us to imagine.
00:32:11.840Chris, why are we not having these conversations?
00:32:16.580It just seems like everything just happens.
00:32:19.500They just continue on with their, I think, diabolical plans.
00:32:24.580And, and, and nothing, nothing happens.
00:32:27.840I mean, Merrick Garland, I know you're on the weaponization committee.
00:32:32.300Merrick Garland has lied, lied to the committee about, you know, who they're surveying or surveilling and who they're trying to rope in as, as FBI informants.
00:32:44.920He said, we're not doing this with Catholics.
00:32:47.700And now we find out that, yeah, yeah, they, they are targeting Catholics and he's not going to pay a price.
00:32:56.960When does someone pay a price for any of this stuff?
00:33:03.260Yeah, Glenn, I've been asking myself that question for six years because you go back to the initial Russian hopes and the fact that director Comey lied to Congress again and again and again.
00:33:13.900And listen, when he was finally put under oath, under deposition, you may remember something like 257 times he says, you know, I don't remember.
00:33:55.000And as strong as an advocate as I am for national security, as someone who understands the value of intelligence, I would rather lose the tool than have the tool continue to be weaponized and continue to be used against the American people.
00:34:11.280There's a number of us in Congress who are saying, we simply won't reauthorize this unless there's enormous reforms put in place first.
00:34:18.640And it's one of the primary things we're concentrating right now on the Intelligence Committee.
00:34:23.300Oh, man, I hope you're, I hope you guys stand firm on that.
00:34:26.700And I mean, it would have to be enormous reforms because that, that, that whole thing is a cesspool.
00:34:35.260And with these leaks, the story out today is that Biden is looking again at, you know, different ways he can monitor and capture all of the information on the Web and surveil.
00:34:49.400I mean, we know what they're doing against the United States, the people of the United States.
00:34:59.100Number one, as you may know, that we subpoenaed, you know, the director and others yesterday on the Weaponization Committee regarding this absurdity of targeting Catholic dioceses, Catholic congregations.
00:35:12.560I mean, if you show me any reasonable person in the country who thinks that one of the, one of the threats to our security are believing Catholics, for heaven's sakes, it's, it's beyond absurd.
00:35:28.340I mean, we, we need to bring them in under oath once again and, and have an ability to question them.
00:35:32.700But the second point, Glenn, that you bring up is this.
00:35:35.100You know, the United States has government, government has extraordinary powers to surveil by themselves, but they also have brought in the entire industry around them.
00:35:45.920You know, Facebook, Twitter, et cetera, et cetera, as a partner.
00:35:50.080And if, for example, it's illegal for the United States to assassinate someone, they can't target a foreign leader, for example, and, and tell the CIA, go and assassinate that person.
00:36:11.400And that's what the government has done essentially with surveillance and with suppression of free speech, with, with the weaponization of many of these tools.
00:36:20.580If they don't do it themselves, they go to these tech companies and say, we want you to do it for us.
00:36:30.380Now they don't have to threaten them very often or very hard because it turns out these tech companies are more than willing to do this.
00:36:36.400I know it's government, but the fact that they work with a partner is still, is still offensive and wrong as much as if they had done it themselves.
00:36:46.240And once again, it's one of the things that we're trying to address and trying to expose.
00:37:09.060I mean, you've got the Republican house and many of us are saying that is the only tool that we have.
00:37:13.820And in fact, it is the only tool that we really have.
00:37:15.940And that is to say, we're just not going to fund you, but we don't control the Senate.
00:37:20.440So the house is going to push a lot of these things.
00:37:23.100For example, I'm not going to give a penny to the new FBI headquarters until Christopher Wray comes in and answers a boatload of questions.
00:37:30.800Under oath in a way where he has to go to jail.
00:37:36.980You know, you know, you just said Comey answered, you know, I don't remember when he was under oath.
00:37:42.920Well, he was under oath in Congress, but nobody cares.
00:37:46.680Nobody cares about that oath, it seems.
00:37:52.440Seems like that's something different.
00:37:53.660But back to the original question, Glenn, is the house is going to is going to defund some of these efforts.
00:37:59.140And and I think we're going to be broad and deep in some of those.
00:38:04.200But, of course, then that that budget goes to the Senate and we'll see what Schumer does.
00:38:09.180Well, because, well, you know what what he'll do and he won't.
00:38:11.960And that's where the fight is going to take place.
00:38:13.820And that's that we know we won't know the answer to that until sometime this summer or this fall when we actually have to fund the government.
00:38:21.200And we'll see how strong Republicans will stand.
00:38:49.000This is something near and dear to my heart because we adopted a child that could have been aborted, but the mother was extraordinarily brave.
00:40:35.920If you pay your taxes, if you keep your clothes on in public, if you're an upstanding citizen, you don't need to deal with home title fraud.
00:41:04.720After I've stolen the title, borrowed against it, or sold the property or done whatever I've done with it, it's 60 to 90 days to even figure out that they're the victim of this crime.
00:41:12.780You know, by that point, you start getting foreclosure notices and you realize you've got four mortgages on your house.
00:41:17.960Not only that, you don't even own your home anymore.
00:41:47.180Think about what he said about China, a 9% drop in GDP, and that's only one of the factors that would bring our GDP down, 9 percentage points.
00:44:49.160So CNN has been forecasting doom for Fox News.
00:44:56.380They say it is over for Fox because the trial begins next week.
00:45:02.240Now, this week they are doing jury selection.
00:45:06.440You know, I have to tell you, I, I'm not sure what it means.
00:45:12.080Nothing good, but I'm not sure what it means.
00:45:15.780The worst case scenario is this will affect everyone's free speech.
00:45:22.120I wanted to get Bill O'Reilly on to talk about a little bit of this because I'm going to, he's going to be paying attention to this like nobody's business because this is what he does.
00:45:30.300Uh, and, uh, I'd like him just, uh, I'd like him just to give us the updates as this trial goes on.
00:45:36.760Bill O'Reilly joins me in just 60 seconds.
00:45:40.060I look for quality, quality at a good price in almost everything and meats.
00:56:47.380It's not very often, but every once in a while, the most irritating things in life turn out to be the easiest things to fix.
00:56:54.880For instance, sleep, sometimes I just can't shut my brain off and I am laying up staring at the ceiling and I'm thinking about all the things that I have to do and all the things that are going on in the world.
00:57:09.120And then I just stare at the ceiling fan for a while.
00:58:35.860While debating legislation that bans gender affirming care for minors, the bill's sponsor, Missouri State Senator Mike Moon, expressed his support for children as young as 12 getting married to each other.
00:58:51.300When pressed by state state state rep, Peter Meredith, about a different bill Moon voted against in the past, which would make it illegal for adults to marry children.
00:59:05.120Moon doubled down on his support for underage marriage.
00:59:08.100Do you know any kids who have been married at the age 12?
00:59:19.240I mean, I'm hoping he's talking about two people that are 12 or maybe one's, you know, 13 or whatever, but not an adult marrying a 12 year old.
00:59:29.340Because otherwise I got to get my tooth out and polish it up and get my my banjo and start singing some songs about 12 year olds married to 30 year olds.
00:59:39.800But I think he's just talking about two 12 year olds.
00:59:43.360That used to be, by the way, the stereotype of what you would say for a 30 year old married to a 12 year old.
00:59:48.660I think we should start using Hollywood, though.
01:06:26.140It's a supplement that you put on top of the food, full of vitamins, minerals, probiotics, antioxidants, the things that makes your dog healthy and happy.
01:06:35.940You get your first bag of Rough Greens for free.
01:08:45.300Twenty percent of the entire U.S. population is under the jurisdiction of a Soros-backed prosecutor.
01:08:52.360On Glenn Beck.com today, we have compiled a complete list of all-no George Soros-backed prosecutors based on the research we put together from the Capital Research Center.
01:09:05.000All of the major cities in Texas alone are under the jurisdiction of a Soros-backed prosecutor.
01:09:12.260Dallas, Houston, San Antonio, and Austin.
01:10:40.820The customer first asked for reparations.
01:10:44.920And then she grew angry when the Target manager said, what?
01:10:50.200And she walked, quote, aggressively toward the manager.
01:10:54.960Ivory kept berating the manager about reparations and her privileged life.
01:11:00.520That's when Zach Cotter, the loss prevention officer, not a security guy, the loss prevention officer, intervened and asked Ivory to calm down and leave the store.
01:11:13.700Ivory then began screaming at the security guy, followed him to his office.
01:11:18.900When he tried to shut the door, Ivory alleged forced her way into the office, caught her through a punch.
01:11:26.960Ivory fell to the floor after the wallop.
01:11:30.680Now, a separate video shows the aftermath in the office as one of the cops tells Ivory that he has the goods on her through video evidence, in particular, security guard who feared for his safety after Ivory backed him into an office.
01:11:46.100And she said, when people are backed into a corner, they can choose to do the right thing or they can choose to lash out.
01:11:52.440I just am holding the line when the cops say to her, can you just calm down?
01:12:29.200And she should move from Ohio and she should move to California.
01:12:32.780California, the current proposal for reparations from the state of California, $360,000 for the roughly 1.8 million black residents in the Golden State that have at least one ancestor who was a slave.
01:12:49.300It could cost the state up to $800 billion.
01:12:52.940Now, I would say if you have that, you should move to California, get the reparations.
01:13:00.860You should actually move to San Francisco because San Francisco, they're a little upset that the press is just paying attention to all the money thing because that's the least important part of this.
01:13:13.900Well, if it's the least important part, then why are you offering so much?
01:13:17.200But anyway, what they've decided to do is they're going to make $5 million payments.
01:13:27.540So if you have one person in your family tree that was a slave, you're going to get $5 million, and they're going to eliminate your personal debt and your tax burdens.
01:13:46.040And they're going to guarantee you an annual income of $97,000 a year, but only for the next 250 years.
01:14:01.360And you can have a house in the city for a dollar.
01:16:10.460Now, that means that currently we owe 130% more than our gross domestic product.
01:16:21.540That's all products and services produced in a year by labor and property that was supplied by the citizens.
01:16:28.820Interest on that debt is now estimated this year to be almost $400 billion.
01:16:40.060That is more money just on the interest of our current debt at our current interest rate.
01:16:47.820It is more, by far, than the government spends on veterans, benefits, and services.
01:16:54.820It's more than it will spend on elementary and secondary education, disaster relief, agriculture, science, and space programs, foreign aid, and natural resources and environmental protection combined.
01:17:09.340And this year, we're going to spend that money just on the interest payment.
01:17:20.280The interest that we've paid on borrowed money is nearly twice what the federal government will spend on transportation infrastructure.
01:17:29.780Four times as much as much as much as it will spend on K-12 education, four times that it will spend on housing, eight times on what it will spend on science and space and technology.
01:17:43.380In 10 years, our interest payment will exceed the entire military budget.
01:17:50.520Now, every time we hire a politician to go in, Rutherford has a great piece on this.
01:18:08.280And he writes that every time we elect people, what happens?
01:18:16.780We elect them, and they promise that they're going to pay down the national debt, they're going to jumpstart the economy, they're going to rebuild our infrastructure, they're going to secure our borders, ensure our security, make us healthy, wealthy, and happy and wise, and it's going to be a picnic.
01:18:36.920None of that ever happens, and we're being loaded down with debt, and it has gotten to the point now where Congress doesn't vote on any of this.
01:18:49.340This is all the president's staff doing it.
01:18:53.640The entire administrative state, they're making all the decisions and all of the laws.
01:26:11.280Hello, America. Welcome to the Glenn Beck Program.
01:26:13.840If you really want to understand why Bud Light has gone on with, you know, the campaign and they don't seem to flinch, they don't really care.
01:26:25.600If you don't understand it, it's because you don't understand ESG.
01:27:16.760Almost every day, you hear about another major corporation that has gone woke, you know, tormenting their employees with leftist propaganda, funding organizations that hate the country, promoting new values and trashing traditional values in the Constitution.
01:27:33.000And honestly, it seems as though they don't care about their customer anymore.
01:27:39.580Well, there is one company that doesn't do any of that stuff.
01:27:42.660They actually believe in the Constitution.
01:27:46.180And they're actually standing with us on so many issues.
01:27:49.960But the best thing about them is it's a cell service company.
01:27:55.060They provide your cell service and they're going to give you the same coverage as the big boys because they're on all of the same cell towers as the big boys.
01:28:05.060They don't charge you as much money as the big boys do.
01:28:09.620They've got rates that will fit anybody's budget.
01:28:41.580So last night, I was trying to explain to the audience.
01:28:47.120And I thought, you're the guy who can really explain it really, really well.
01:28:53.240But it's the world that we live in is no longer a free market world.
01:29:00.680When corporations sat in their boardroom years ago, they would try to decide what was best for the shareholders and what was best for the shareholders was creating a product that the public wanted.
01:29:16.620That's no longer their concern because you have BlackRock and everybody that is dictating or they'll sell the stock or fire people on the board and replace them.
01:29:28.900You have all of these activists that will just make their life a nightmare.
01:29:34.100You have the insurance companies and the banks who, if they're not doing the right thing with the right score, they're not going to participate with you.
01:29:42.380And you have the government breathing down your throat.
01:29:44.200So is the is the average consumer even considered anymore in the boardrooms?
01:29:56.180The average consumer doesn't have anything like the power that even and even in large numbers of average consumers don't have anything like the power that these big financial institutions in collusion with the government have over these corporations.
01:30:09.680So not so much. That's why, you know, the reaction to go boycott these companies.
01:30:15.760Yeah, maybe it sends a message, but all you're doing is telling them that you're unhappy about something that they know you're going to be unhappy about, that they didn't take you into consideration when they did the calculation to do it in the first place.
01:30:31.660Maybe, you know, enough of these will get some attention.
01:30:34.680But for the most part, they are beholden to other forces that are not the consumer.
01:30:38.800They are not any of the traditional base of economic activity in a market.
01:30:46.720I was talking to a fairly successful businessman a couple of days ago, and he said, well, it's assuming we're in a free market, which I'm not sure.
01:30:56.100And I immediately responded, we're not in a free market anymore.
01:30:59.780This this is no longer capitalism as we know it.
01:31:27.920ESG was devised at the United Nations by a man named James Gifford in 2003.
01:31:32.020And it was devised to the purpose that it's being used for today, which is how do we take all of that latent money that's tied up in pensions?
01:31:39.940All these people put their retirements away for 30, 40 years.
01:31:45.220It's not being invested in things that could have a social or an environmental impact.
01:31:49.320How do we take that money and do social and environmental activist investing with it instead?
01:31:55.100And they came up with that 30 or 20 years ago.
01:31:57.460And it's grown in scope over the past 20 years.
01:32:02.720And it's come to the point now where they are controlling, like you said, in a very fascistic manner, how the market is going to operate using that gigantic reservoir of money that they figured out how to tap into.
01:32:15.200Can you explain CEI and the scoring system?
01:32:21.880This also is older than people realize.
01:32:23.760This is probably for a lot of people the first week they've ever heard of the Corporate Equality Index.
01:32:29.340But it was devised in 2002 at the Human Rights Campaign, which was a gay civil rights organization that eventually in the 2006, 7, 8 era seems to have received a large amount of money from the Open Society Foundation and George Soros' foundation and changed its direction to being very activist driven in a new way.
01:32:50.560And in 2002, they started this equality index to show how well to score companies on how well they are taking up with social causes related to the gay rights and the LGBTQ agendas.
01:33:05.200And this score is very useful because it's a part of the S, the social justice part of the ESG score.
01:33:14.040So it's very useful to these banks like BlackRock that are trying to figure out, well, is Nike or Coca-Cola or in this case, Anheuser-Busch and Bud Light, are they doing their part and to be socially corporate responsible?
01:33:30.900And so they use this score, and it has a number, it's scored out of 100, they use this score to determine, are you having internal policies at your company that are LGBTQ friendly?
01:33:43.460Are you going out of your way and bending over backwards for them inside the company?
01:33:47.320Are you making LGBTQ visibility into the public?
01:33:52.220Are you behaving in a corporate responsibility manner?
01:33:54.640And they give you points based on whether or not you do these things, and they can take away points if you do something they don't like.
01:34:01.020And if you don't have a 100 CEI score, you're not listed as the best place to work, and all kinds of consequences start to follow.
01:34:07.780So much so that corporations brag about earning their 100 for the first time and on their websites and put out press releases.
01:34:15.060And there are over 840 American corporations that have a 100 score from this human rights campaign quality index score.
01:34:23.520And it's really not just about equality or, you know, treating people right or having an open workspace or anything like that.
01:34:31.500A lot of that score comes from your advertising and your social outreach and promoting these things.
01:34:40.320So Dylan Mulvaney makes total sense when you understand the CEI score, correct?
01:34:50.820They come to you, the HRC, the Human Rights Campaign, sends agents every year to tell you what you have to do as a corporation in order to promote more LGBT visibility, to promote LGBT activism and social change.
01:35:06.840And if you want to have your score go up or you want to maintain your 100, you have to meet all these new demands.
01:35:12.080This is, in other words, racketeering.
01:35:16.220Well, in the past, they have been specifically, you know, that there's some piece of legislation that they want passed, some kind of equality legislation.
01:35:22.660So the corporation has to start to lobby for that or else they're going to lose their score.
01:35:28.020There are these ad campaigns, like you see, to put people like Dylan Mulvaney and push a new set of values into the American culture while tarnishing the old values, mocking the old values.
01:35:39.340And this is the kind of thing that increases, allegedly, LGBTQ invisibility.
01:35:47.020Last year, there was, as I've heard from some closed-door channels, there was a racket push on the three major airlines to give Pride activists free airline tickets to fly around to Pride events because airline tickets are expensive.
01:36:01.520And if they didn't give away millions of dollars in free flights to activists to fly to these Pride events all over the country through June and July, well, they might lose their 100.
01:36:09.860And all three major – actually, all four major airlines in the United States have a perfect CEI score.
01:36:15.500So every single year, they come with new demands, new things you have to do this year in order to maintain your score.
01:36:21.760And it's whatever their agenda items are for that particular year.
01:36:25.100So if you had a company that, like Bud Light, that had a great reputation, not being about politics, it's not even about beer, it's about the stupid Clydesdales, you know, all the time.
01:36:38.600They had a great reputation with the American people.
01:36:41.880If they decided, we're not doing any of this, you know, it's against our corporate culture.
01:36:49.480Or we might agree with you on a lot, but we're not going to be taken hostage.
01:36:59.300Well, a number of things would happen.
01:37:01.740First, they would get a shot across their bow.
01:37:04.040Their score would be threatened, and it may go down.
01:37:06.220At which point, all of the kind of ESG apparatus is going to start to rumble into action.
01:37:11.960So the HRC doesn't have any direct power over Anheuser-Busch, but Larry Fink at BlackRock does.
01:37:19.740So all of a sudden, they can say, well, you're not a best place to work anymore for LGBTQ, so let's go ahead and delist you, perhaps, from these index funds.
01:37:28.660So Anheuser-Busch stock right now is bundled up into all of these pension funds that, you know, states like California are dumping billions of dollars into every year.
01:37:37.560And that's a huge amount of, a huge reservoir of money that goes into your stock value.
01:37:44.740And if that causes a spook in the market that causes people to sell your stock and run away from your stock, well, so be it.
01:37:50.660And maybe we're going to have to replace some of your board members because your board members decided to take a stand against us.
01:37:55.420And since they're going to have some huge portion of the stocks controlling that company, they're going to be able to appoint and remove board members kind of at will.
01:38:06.380So there's a lot of kind of carrot stick incentives that they can press on this.
01:38:13.000It's also been tied into, what am I looking for, executive compensation packages.
01:38:18.940So these executives are also, if they are doing what it takes to keep that score up, they get bonuses.
01:38:24.420If they mess that score up, they lose their bonuses.
01:38:26.880It's a very simple economic proposition at that point for them.
01:38:31.740And so they aren't likely to take a stand because they're going to get the stick, as it were, if they try to take a stand against any of this.
01:38:39.940So besides being an entrepreneurial kind of community and a secondary economy, what can you do about it?
01:38:50.320Because, I mean, it's so far down the road.
01:39:20.440Everybody, when we think about how we're going to reverse this, because the stakes seem very high, we hope that we're going to just reverse it like overnight.
01:39:35.440What there is the opportunity to do is to slowly start exposing this, to show how it works, to reveal that this is a racketeering scheme.
01:39:43.640So Anheuser-Busch, if you stop thinking of them as the enemy for putting Dylan Mulvaney on a can and you start thinking of them as being an American company that's in a hostage situation.
01:39:51.440Yes, you start thinking about it in a different way.
01:39:54.920How do we start trying to reach out to our leaders that aren't completely on board with the regime's plans start to reach out to these entities and say, look, you do business in the state.
01:40:06.660You do a lot of business in the state.
01:40:09.720How do we help you get out from underneath this?
01:40:12.300In other words, when you're trying to turn over a cartel or a racket, you've got to start to get people who are caught up in the system to want to get out of the system to start telling stories about how it actually works.
01:40:24.380And in the meantime, we have to just continue to expose and delegitimize the process as much as possible.
01:40:31.620It's fine if we want to do these things like these boycotts.
01:40:34.000But I urge the American consumer to realize that it's not even just these cartel running kind of scores and banks that are the problem with companies like Nike, which also has promoted Dylan Mulvaney.
01:40:46.580Their largest market share right now is in China.
01:40:51.440And so American conservatives can try to boycott these things, but they don't realize that, you know, you're a very small percentage of the overall market.
01:41:00.420So we've got to start thinking in terms of what do we need to do with these gigantic multinational corporate conglomerates, because they've become big enough and international enough where there is no accountability whatsoever to the American people.
01:41:13.500And we've got to start rethinking how that happens.
01:41:24.840You know, start at the University of Portland, a guy that we would probably have never have talked back then to somebody who has just been relentless on research and found the truth.
02:02:28.500What do you mean to describe a hateful thing?
02:02:30.080Yeah, I mean, you know, just content that will solicit a reaction, something that may include something that is slightly racist or slightly sexist, those kinds of things.
02:02:41.740So you think if something is slightly sexist, it should be banned?
02:05:08.900I guarantee you, if he hadn't have recorded it or he hadn't have put it on Twitter, BBC would have put that on a shelf and you would have never seen it.
02:05:17.440Stop bringing a paper knife because your reporters begin to sweat and then it just gets soggy and it's hard to watch.