On today's show, Pat and Stu discuss the latest in the Supreme Court nomination process, the latest on Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett, and why they think he's the most likely nominee to replace Justice Kennedy.
00:17:47.840Anyway, in the Vox article, he continues, of course, evaluating the wisdom of the American Revolution means dealing with counterfactuals.
00:17:55.080As any historian would tell you, this is a messy business.
00:17:59.320We obviously can't be entirely sure how America would have fared if it had stayed in the British Empire longer.
00:18:06.140But I'm reasonably confident a world in which the revolution never happened would be a better one than the one we live in now for three main reasons.
00:18:13.840Slavery would have been abolished earlier.
00:18:16.540I don't see how you draw that conclusion at all.
00:18:19.940Look at the first draft of the Declaration of Independence that we had at the Mercury Museum a couple weeks ago where Thomas Jefferson lays into the king for allowing slavery to continue and for stopping the legislative efforts in the United States to stop it.
00:18:38.900Which was not the United States at that point.
00:18:41.200But they were trying to stop it legislatively and the king kept blocking the efforts.
00:18:46.460We'll deal with this a little bit more coming up here on the Glenn Beck Program.
00:18:49.760I love how one of the major events that everybody looks forward to on the 4th of July now is the hot dog eating contest where people just jam hot dogs into their mouths for 10 minutes.
00:19:09.760It's like a great way to celebrate our independence.
00:19:13.760I think don't you I just see how many if you can jam 74 hot dogs into your gullet in the first 10 minutes of the competition that says America right there.
00:19:24.360It's like it's like one of those, you know, it's like American flag with fireworks times an eagle plus the White House.
00:19:34.460It's like it's just like every American thing jammed into one.
00:19:41.580I don't know how I don't know why people show up and watch that thing because it is it's nasty.
00:19:46.060I can't even watch it on television when the highlights come on and it's not even just that eat like watching someone eat is something you don't want to do anyway.
00:24:48.760And you see that, again, I keep coming back to the same document, but it's a struggle where Thomas Jefferson's out there saying, like, this is the worst thing the king has ever done.
00:24:56.740And he goes on for paragraph after paragraph after paragraph, bashing the king for slavery.
00:25:01.460And then in the end, the final document, that gets removed because of states, I think it was Georgia and South Carolina specifically, that decided they didn't want it in there.
00:25:55.260Even upon your death, you couldn't free your slaves, especially if you were in debt, which he was when he died in 1826.
00:26:04.480So, there's a lot of explanations for the Thomas Jefferson thing, but he was definitely against slavery and wrote really passionately about it.
00:26:14.100Really glad you guys found that section because it's pretty amazing and very telling.
00:26:18.800So, first of all, they believe in Vox that slavery would have been abolished earlier.
00:26:23.900American Indians would have faced rampant persecution, but not the outright ethnic cleansing Andrew Jackson and other American leaders perpetrated.
00:26:32.760And America would have a parliamentary system of government that makes policymaking easier and lessens the risk of democratic collapse.
00:26:45.560There's the, when you go into the parliamentary democracy thing, which is something that, you know, a lot of people on the left say they want.
00:26:53.900And as opposed to our presidential based system.
00:28:17.740You know, it's just like, you know, the Oklahoma City Thunder are going to go into the luxury tax this year for, in the NBA and spend up to, it looks like $300 million on their salaries this year.
00:28:58.300Forget even increasing it, turning all the cars off, all the power plants off, people stop exhaling, all of the things that create carbon dioxide.
00:29:50.980That's just something, it's like a, it's like a psychiatrist tool to like create a habit so you support their larger policies.
00:29:58.180Like, if you're at home and you're unplugging all of your appliances before you use them every day, you are much more likely because you've taken that physical step to walk in line with their actual policy goals.
00:30:11.340And you're much more likely to give in to their demands of power that they don't have constitutional right to.
00:30:18.180If you're at home, you know, sifting through garbage every day, you have a physical, a physical statement of loyalty to them.
00:30:35.520And once you take those steps, well, you've, I've already gone to the point where I'm literally sifting through my own waste to try to, to try to please this planet, to please mother nature.
00:30:46.800Well, of course I'm on board for cap and trade.
00:30:49.040Of course I want the president to be able to just institute a carbon tax whenever they want.
00:30:54.380That's exactly why we have the process we do, because it's supposed to be hard to get things like that, uh, through and, and to make them law.
00:31:04.840There's got to be that process so that you don't have carbon taxes just show up and ruin the economy almost overnight.
00:31:14.260I mean, can you imagine had we done all the carbon taxing that Al Gore and the rest wanted to do, what situation our energy sector would be in right now?
00:41:10.900But once you know the real motivation behind it, you, you feel better about it.
00:41:15.100According to Carrie Kennedy, who is organizing the protests, the hunger strike is designed to raise money for an organization called break bread.
00:41:53.800Um, and they're now there's reports of them trying to do DNA testing to make sure that you're not just handing it off to some human trafficker.
00:42:00.860Um, but that's of course also being vilified as this, like, they're taking their DNA.
00:42:06.260The abs, the essence of their humanity.
00:46:00.660It's only there's some magical line between 10,000 and 12,000
00:46:04.640that set off like a bright red line that set off a media firestorm between the 10,000 and 12,000.
00:46:11.360And you know, it seems that started when the Trump administration did something Obama never did, and that's to check on the kids who were separated to find out how they're doing, where they are, can we reunite them with their families?
00:46:55.940It's interesting, too, this 2000, this group of 2000, which is the whole focus of this entire controversy, is actually broke up into three different categories, not just one.
00:47:05.020Everyone's saying, okay, well, they separated them from their families.
00:47:33.620It's that third group that we're talking about.
00:47:35.520And even that group is broken into two categories.
00:47:37.440I was watching, I think it was CNN a couple of weeks ago, and I was fascinated by this, by this breakdown.
00:47:42.440They talked about how there are some of these kids came in with their parent, and the parent was given an option.
00:47:53.300One, you can take your child home with you to your home country.
00:47:57.820Two, you can leave your child here and let them go through the immigration process and then be joined with someone else on the other side.
00:48:04.900And some, we don't know what the number is, some percentage of this 2000 decided to go home on their own and be, you know, not quite deported isn't the right word.
00:48:18.560But you get to leave, they're leaving the country, going back to their home country.
00:48:22.260And left their children by themselves on purpose to go through the immigration process because they believe whatever's on the other side is better for them.
00:56:30.040It's interesting with Amy Coney Barrett that I think you have somebody who the idea is you'd go to a Susan Collins, you'd go to a Lisa Murkowski, and there'd be something pulling on them to say, I want, you know, a conservative female or a female in that position.
00:56:47.420You know, and I, you know, I, again, think picking Supreme Court justices, picking presidents, picking anyone based on their, the type of their genitals is not typically the best way to doing it.
00:57:01.220Like, there's actually usually almost always a better way of picking.
00:57:06.340And I don't know why we get into this identity politics world where it's just like, well, it's just where we are.
00:57:14.840It's going to play better if you have a woman overturning Roe versus Wade than a man.
00:57:20.080And I, again, like I, is it Roe versus Wade is a terribly decided case, whether a man or a woman overturns it.
00:57:27.620It's still the same crap, crappy case.
00:57:30.780Stole a case that led to the destruction of 60 million babies over the last 45 years.
00:57:36.120On the morning cup of Postum today, they were, Joe and Mika were kicking this around a little bit.
00:57:42.320And that's why we have these two favorites that we just saw there.
00:57:45.560The inside line is that Amy Barrett would be better for the base, but a tougher confirmation fight.
00:57:52.940So that's the calculus aides are making.
00:57:56.540But Mika and Joe, this won't surprise you.
00:57:59.020People who are involved in the vetting tell us that for the president, it's going to be all about the personal connection, who he feels comfortable with in the moment.
00:58:08.760So you're saying he's going to pick the man, the white man.
00:58:12.180Oh, no, I totally don't think you disagree.
00:58:17.080So what's interesting about that to me is this is the guy, Joe Scarborough, who claims, oh, I'm conservative.
01:01:37.480So, you know, I think there is an element of that, you know, this is not a new thing.
01:01:45.240It does seem that since the romance started with Mika, that the move has been, that the tone of his commentary has become more overtly left-wing.
01:01:56.120And now he's come to the point, apparently, where he's actually moved past Mika.
01:03:34.200If you're, if you're progressive, you've got the presidency, you're getting someone through.
01:03:37.960I mean, remember, we had Republicans calling us up and saying, hey, well, look, you know, you got to, you got to cede to the president's wishes.
01:03:47.500You know, in nominations, you let it go.
01:03:49.420It's kind of what, seems like it was Rand Paul that was saying that at the time, right?
01:03:53.880That he was just going to vote for him because that's the president's prerogative.
01:03:57.320Well, yeah, but the Senate's prerogative is to say no to the president.
01:04:00.320Yeah, and oddly, Paul seems to be against Kavanaugh, like, saying that he will not vote for Kavanaugh, which is bizarre to me because he was the guy who called up.
01:04:09.280And I don't remember if he voted for Sotomayor or Kagan or not.
01:04:12.320I don't remember if it was either about the judges or if it was, it was about the Supreme Court justice, I think.
01:04:38.720Maybe that wasn't, maybe it was just cabinet and not Supreme Court.
01:04:41.980Bottom line, though, is that he's come out and said probably he might not vote for Kavanaugh, which is a huge deal here because you can't lose anybody.
01:04:50.140That's why this is a really hard pick for the president.
01:04:51.980Because the last one, you're going from Scalia to, no matter where you go from Scalia, the court makeup isn't going to change if you pick, you can't pick someone too conservative, right?
01:05:03.080Like, you know, if you're a left-wing person and you're worried about the balance of the court, going from Scalia to Gorsuch is not much of a difference.
01:06:36.080And then when this second one happens, whether it's Kennedy or God forbid on their from their perspective, Ruth Bader Ginsburg or Breyer or somebody else leaves the court.
01:06:44.580Then you would have an argument to go to the people and say, look, we we would absolutely allow someone sensible like Gorsuch.
01:06:51.740I mean, we all voted for Gorsuch, but this is crazy.
01:06:55.500And then they'd have to change the rule after they had already approved of somebody.
01:06:59.940Now they don't have that argument, which was it's a real blown opportunity.
01:07:13.320I think it'll be less effective, though.
01:07:14.420I think the like, sure, you're going to get your liberal activists to get on board for this, but you actually probably could have won some people over with that.
01:07:21.800They put someone so extreme that they have to change the rules to get them through.
01:07:26.800You know, now, like, you know, they've already blown that opportunity.
01:07:30.320And it was, you know, they couldn't even make that point because everybody watched everybody who watched the hearing knew that Gorsuch was completely reasonable, was not anywhere near an extremist.
01:07:42.920Triple eight, nine hundred thirty three or triple eight, seven to seven B.E.C.K.
01:11:05.680But when it really kicks in, I think it's going to be a disaster.
01:11:10.160They already said Facebook and Twitter and Apple are all trying to figure out how to weed out fake news during this upcoming election cycle.
01:11:19.000And I don't know how you'd do that necessarily because who deems what's fake and what isn't?
01:11:49.020People are like, oh, well, the media started it because they wanted to say that Trump supporters were floating fake stories to support Trump.
01:11:58.800And they wanted to come up with a term to do that.
01:15:23.620You know, it's your responsibility to click on an article and then see if it's real and follow it down those lines.
01:15:28.600And, you know, we obviously, like, are upset when – because there's plenty of liberal nonsense like this, too, where things that are completely fake about the president or about the senators or whatever Supreme Court justice is going to be named on Monday,
01:15:42.140there will be tons of fake things that are printed to make those people look as bad as possible.
01:15:46.700But, I mean, is it really Facebook's responsibility to go through each individual post and try to find the ones that aren't real?
01:15:58.980I mean, if you wanted to do anything on it, you could start banning certain sites that do this often.
01:16:06.160I mean, the problem is they just keep creating new ones, you know.
01:16:08.200But when you find a certain site that really is legitimately posting fake things, but, again, you're going to get down this, you know, this road.
01:16:18.460It's like if people want to go on that are conspiracy theorists and put all the stuff that Alex Jones says every day and keep posting it, should he be limited in that?
01:16:26.520Should they stop Alex Jones just because what he says isn't true?
01:16:29.700I mean, to me, the answer to that is no.
01:16:33.160Like, it's like saying that the, you know, the phone company should, like, step in and say, well, the conversation you're having right now isn't based on reality.
01:17:15.500So I can understand why they think that making those improvements will be something good, but I think it's going to cause more problems than not.
01:17:21.900I mean, they really, do we have any idea like how this turned out with the Declaration of Independence thing?
01:17:25.760It wasn't, you know, now it's okay and they figured it out.
01:17:30.420Well, since June 24th, the Liberty County vindicator of Liberty County, Texas has been sharing daily excerpts from the Declaration in the run-up to the 4th.
01:17:40.280The idea was to encourage historical literacy.
01:17:42.920So the first nine posts went up without incident, but part 10 did not appear.
01:17:50.900Instead, they received a notice from Facebook saying the post goes against our standards on hate speech.
01:17:57.000The post in question contained paragraphs 27 through 31, the grievance section of the document where the put-upon colonists detail their irreconcilable differences they have with King George.
01:18:10.460So they say that they can't be sure which exact grievance ran afoul of Facebook's policy, but he assumes it's paragraph 31, which excoriates the king for inciting domestic insurrections amongst us and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian savages.
01:18:32.080So maybe just the phrase Indian savages prompted them to remove it.
01:18:39.260So the automated response from Facebook was that they took it off, sent a feedback message with the hopes of reaching a human being who could then exempt the declaration from its hate speech restrictions,
01:18:57.080fearful that sharing more of the text might trigger the deletion of its Facebook page.
01:19:04.140So that was kind of the resolution of the problem.
01:19:07.160They just stopped sharing portions of the declaration of independence because they didn't, they weren't able to get a hold of a human being and say, Hey, it's the declaration of independence.
01:19:55.900When we have issues, like it takes a long time.
01:19:58.480You have to develop relationships with, with individual people, or you just don't have any way of addressing things that it's not like Facebook hates certain, you know, like they may very well.
01:20:08.600I mean, obviously we all know there's left leaning, it's left leaning company, but I mean, it's, you know, they, they also want money.
01:20:13.540They're really just a company that, you know, they, they want money and so they want to help their big media partners be able to get people to the platform.
01:20:20.860And sometimes they can't even address those things and they have people, but it's like, think of how much is being posted and there's people that post a hundred times a day.
01:20:54.640You can come up with an algorithm that, you know, where, so I'm going to see the stuff that I like, but if I like all fake news, you know, all, every single piece of it is a lie.
01:21:21.580The people who are in, like, if I start sharing all lies, uh, about, you know, if, if my entire feed are all lies about LeBron James, which is certainly possible that my feed might be that someday.
01:21:33.560If that were the case, the people who like LeBron James in my feed will, will not like me anymore or block my posts.
01:21:41.060And over time, those things kind of have a way of working themselves out.
01:21:44.240I think Facebook's position is, no, they didn't.
01:21:48.720But again, like you're telling your consumers what they want to consume is wrong.
01:21:54.260You know, you're telling them, Hey, you know, we don't like, it's like if, if people started, uh, you know, when I was a kid, they used to make those, um, uh, like Coca-Cola, uh, popsicles.
01:22:06.440Like you'd put them in the little popsicle containers, you put Coca-Cola in there and then you freeze them up.
01:22:10.240Like if Coca-Cola was like, that is not what it was said.
01:22:29.480There's an interesting story with McDonald's going back in the day.
01:22:32.300They had these little tiny spoons for stirs.
01:22:36.160They were little mini stirs and people were supposedly in media reports using them for drugs because they were little tiny spoons and they were easy to like snort a little bit of whatever drug you were doing.
01:22:47.680I don't know if it was cocaine at the time or whatever.
01:22:50.400And they, McDonald's had to come out and change their entire product line because people were accusing them of helping people who were doing drugs with their stirs.
01:34:56.120And then, of course, it's also people you know, like actual NFL players who know stuff about the defense and the offense.
01:35:01.980I mean, there's been large stories written about how they come up with their player ratings and how the guy who comes up with them, and he did for many years at Madden and EA Sports, would actually get lobbied from players.
01:37:00.660Well, it's going to take more than that to get them out now with the with the way the caves have flooded because they're talking now that they've brought in.
01:37:06.260You can't ask these full face diving masks and they're trying to train them to dive.
01:37:37.260It's going to, you know, they're all going to be, all going to be dead.
01:37:40.440So now they're they they say that some kids believe that they heard other sounds, outdoor sounds when they were in there the first time they were trapped.
01:37:49.880So they're looking around to see if there's some air hole or air vent that they can drill in to get them out before the rains come.