Glenn Beck is back with a new segment on his radio show, The Glenn Beck Show. He talks about the Kellogg's CEO saying that Americans could save money by eating cereal for dinner, and why that's a bad idea.
00:03:11.200That's always been a possibility for me.
00:03:13.980And I know you're trying to sell cereal, but it's a little offensive to suggest that, you know, hey, we're under pressure and, you know, eat cereal.
00:03:25.720People keep beating up the CEO on this, though, but it's not his fault that everything sucks.
00:04:00.000I don't, that's, he's not, he's just saying, hey, please consume my, like crunchy sugar cookie things that you're supposed to eat for breakfast for some reason.
00:04:09.380And you can also, hey, you can also just pour vodka in your gas tank, too.
00:07:22.760And the old married couple that argues for fun and just has no intention of ever breaking up, although I have spoken to my attorneys anyway.
00:07:34.340Hey, come see me in the office on Friday.
00:07:48.420No individuals associated with the left who engaged in far-right speech and violently suppressed the protected speech of Trump supporters were charged with a federal crime for their part in starting riots at a political event.
00:08:06.680This is textbook viewpoint discrimination.
00:08:53.240So what the charge was is these guys were holding a rally and the Antifa guys came with, you know, all those things that they do, intimidated and beat some of the people in this.
00:09:08.900Police came, only arrested the far-right people, not anybody in Antifa.
00:09:14.260And a judge said, nope, sorry, can't do it.
00:09:30.400Why did you arrest all of those people when you had people stealing, breaking windows, burning cities, and none of those people were arrested?
00:09:37.800Yeah, I think my preference would be everyone on both sides gets arrested for burning things down.
00:10:29.020What if we let a guy build an entire business based on this thing that we were okay with and then just pull the rug right out and make him send, what was it, 80 pallets of unused and unsold bump stocks to be melted down?
00:10:46.080It's one of the worst things that I think Donald Trump did in his administration was just use that executive administrative branch just to single-handedly say, nope, can't do it.
00:10:57.620But Supreme Court looks like they're torn usual lines, but there's a chance the bump stocks survive.
00:12:50.340And, you know, they – this is just completely unfair.
00:12:54.200They changed tens of thousands of U.S. citizens into felons overnight.
00:12:59.760So there is another court case that the Supreme Court yesterday said they were going to take up.
00:13:07.040I think this is good news and not just politically good news.
00:13:11.620The real question here is presidential immunity.
00:13:17.780Does the president – is he immune from a criminal trial for things that he did as president, not while president, as president?
00:13:30.040The answer to me would be yes, no trial for the – because that should have been stopped by Congress or the Supreme Court or whatever.
00:13:45.000As an official act, there should be – we shouldn't have a bunch of people putting their hands in their pockets going, well, I was just following orders.
00:13:58.540But can the president do an official act and then be held in criminal court?
00:14:06.000If that happens, you will just continue to be able to prosecute any president that's running a second term.
00:14:14.720So – and I think pretty much the line is set that while president – like if you do something as president and you're currently still president, the answer to this is pretty much you – they can't throw you in prison while you're president of the United States.
00:15:21.240But still, like if he was – if they went to this level of they found enough evidence and they decided they were going to criminally convict Biden.
00:16:01.260Otherwise, your president, if he decides to execute military operations and somebody says that's illegal, then it has to go to a court, it would be – it would be very bad for the presidency.
00:16:14.680It would just completely gut our president.
00:16:17.460Listen, this goes to the trial now that everybody's so excited to hear.
00:16:32.200And for a very, very long time, he has been man's best friend.
00:16:35.640Now, they're pacing around the campfire at night long, long ago, looking out with protective eyes towards the possibility of danger, or hopping around in joy to the point of peeing themselves when you walk through the front door.
00:17:47.040So the Supreme Court is hearing this, which would stop, or at least because they're going to hear it, slow down the Jack Smith trial on Donald Trump,
00:19:38.060But what person, you know, picture the Trump voter with a Trump sign in their lawn and then they're just like, they walk out one day and say,
00:19:46.380I'm ripping this thing out of the ground.
00:20:31.420I mean, we are deep into the election at this point.
00:20:34.180Maybe they'll still try it, but it's going to be very difficult and really amps up all of the problems with trying to persecute your opponents even more.
00:20:44.800And then the last one is Fonnie Willis, which is completely falling apart.
00:20:49.660I mean, the text that came out from this lawyer who was texting the lawyers of the defense saying, yes, absolutely.
00:20:58.000Basically, this happened in 2019, and I'll tell you exactly where they met.
00:21:03.140And then he's on the stand saying, I don't know.
00:21:05.940I'm just speculating about that, which is not what he was doing.
00:21:08.920He was given multiple chances to correct the actual filing about this and said there was no problem with it.
00:21:15.960I mean, and that's just what we know so far.
00:21:18.580I mean, they completely lied to the court.
00:21:20.260So far, there are three attorneys that should lose their license.
00:26:06.740Brennan Carr is the FCC commissioner who I just am a big fan of because he actually will speak out on behalf of the American people and freedom of speech.
00:26:17.880He issued a warning a couple of days ago.
00:26:21.960The FCC just ordered every broadcaster to start posting a race and gender scorecard that breaks down the demographics of their workforce.
00:26:32.740Activists lobbied for this because they want to see businesses pressured into hiring people based on their race and gender.
00:26:40.060We welcome Brennan Carr to the program now.
00:26:57.260Yeah, this is a pretty wild decision by the FCC.
00:27:00.780And you're right that it has to do with broadcasters.
00:27:02.480But it's also part of a more broad effort to sort of compel businesses at large, even outside the broadcaster context, to hire or not hire people based on their race and gender.
00:27:16.580And so the FCC tried to do this many, many years ago.
00:27:19.560In fact, twice before the FCC has sought to pressure broadcasters into hiring people based on race and gender in violation of the equal protection components of the Constitution.
00:27:31.420And the courts have struck the FCC down twice.
00:27:33.640But now here the FCC goes again for a third time.
00:27:36.960And as you noted, it's going to require every single broadcaster to publicly disclose a race and gender scorecard that lists every employee across these demographics lines.
00:27:49.780The one reason why activist groups and others wanted the FCC to do this is because they want to launch public pressure campaigns targeting individual stations if they don't have what the activists view as some proper balance or the right number of some unspecified amount of race and ethnicity employees.
00:28:11.000And so it's deeply, deeply concerning.
00:28:13.180So what is terrifying to me is the arrogance of so many people on the left.
00:28:20.920This whole woke thing is completely falling apart.
00:28:25.120It's falling apart like in ways I never expected.
00:28:28.720I don't know if anybody saw the opening monologue of Saturday Night Live this last weekend.
00:28:33.900And the answer should be for most people, no.
00:28:36.500But it was actually funny because it broke rules, the woke rules.
00:29:02.320The government's not the fastest moving entity.
00:29:04.580And so when in sort of the real world you see the tide turning slowly against these sort of radical versions of DEI, that's the precise moment when the FCC decides to jump in and double down on that type of approach.
00:29:19.760There are a number of entities that have appealed this before in one.
00:29:23.520And so I'm hopeful that some groups of broadcasters or otherwise will take this to court.
00:29:28.880But it's also part and parcel of a broader trend we're seeing with free speech in the country where the government is outsourcing censorship to third parties, whether it's Facebook and Google.
00:29:39.700And this is the same type of pattern as well.
00:29:41.840We are trying to sort of co-opt these activist organizations to force people into hiring based on race and gender.
00:29:51.140And the Constitution and the constitutional law is very clear.
00:29:54.040The government can't do indirectly that which it is prohibited from doing directly.
00:29:58.460So I do hope that somebody takes this up and goes to court because it is part of these, you know, very broadly speaking, concerning trends.
00:30:05.980So last time you were on with me, I think was back in November, and we talked about how the Biden administration wants to control the Internet in the name of equity.
00:30:18.020I've seen the FCC lean one direction or another on trying to silence people.
00:30:29.980You know, they always try to use the FCC to go after Rush Limbaugh, and it's always failed.
00:31:00.140How do you feel about the future of free speech on radio?
00:31:05.300Yeah, I think you're right to notice this broader trend.
00:31:08.040I mean, when I was growing up in high school in the 1990s, you're right, there was sort of a surge of FCC activity there, whether it was, you know, censorship or political censorship.
00:31:18.200In fact, I remember very famously when I was in high school, Eminem, the FCC won't let me be.
00:31:22.780And for a little while there, the FCC sort of turned a corner, as you noted, in sort of the mid-2000s and for a while stayed out of this type of political censorship type of activity.
00:31:33.020And it is concerning as to where things are going now.
00:31:35.220As you pointed out, the Biden administration is engaged in a lot of regulatory actions that are ultimately about increasing government control and then down the road, increasing of censorship.
00:31:47.040And what's clear in this country as a cultural matter is we have to return to an embrace of free speech for a lot of reasons.
00:31:54.220But one is the soapbox is directly connected to the ballot box.
00:31:59.440And what I mean by that is once people start not trusting Americans with the freedom to speak their minds on the soapbox, they very naturally go into, well, I also don't trust you to make your own decisions at the ballot box.
00:32:11.240And I think in some ways we're starting to see that.
00:32:13.420And again, sort of switching back to this FCC order on race and gender scorecards, the FCC claimed it wasn't doing it to pressure people.
00:32:20.540In fact, one of the lead justifications they gave for publicly disclosing this is that it said they wanted the public to be able to have the data so that they could verify the accuracy of these disclosures by broadcasters, which doesn't make a lot of sense to me.
00:32:34.480What exactly does the federal government want the public to do to verify the race and gender of employees?
00:32:40.900How exactly are they going to verify that, particularly when the FCC is adding newly a category of gender non-binary?
00:32:47.300But whatever that mechanism is that the FCC wants the public to verify the race and gender of broadcasters, I'm not sure we should be encouraging that type of conduct.
00:32:55.220So I think this is a continuing trend of the story that came out today where the president directed all agencies to work on a plan to register more voters, which is not the job of the State Department or the FCC or anybody else.
00:33:16.600And there was a lawsuit by the government accountability office to be able to see those plans.
00:33:27.280The DOJ has just rejected offering those plans and turning those plans over in this court case because they say it will be confusing for the American public.
00:33:43.440Who do they think they are and who do they think we are that we'd be confused by evidence of of whatever it is you're doing, good or bad?
00:33:53.300Yeah, you know, it's concerning this sort of paternalistic approach of not trusting the American people.
00:34:00.860That's the fundamental component of democracy is that we have to trust people.
00:34:06.060And, you know, the other sort of interesting development of the last couple of days or so, you know, I'm sure you've been tracking was this Google AI that has been sort of widely criticized for being biased.
00:34:17.260And I think there's actually something that we should give Google credit for with this in terms of a contribution to public discourse.
00:34:24.180And that is that it has laid bare for the American people to see in the clearest terms yet the bias and sort of partisan ideology that has been embedded in so much of the products coming out of Silicon Valley.
00:34:37.740And for years, people said, well, there's no conservative bias in Silicon Valley.
00:34:42.700And these Google AI chatbots really made that clear.
00:34:47.320In fact, last weekend, I went on it and I asked it to write an op ed against President Biden's signature effort to control the Internet known as net neutrality.
00:34:59.340And I asked it to write one in support of that exact same policy, net neutrality.
00:35:03.480And it wrote a very long, flourishing one about it.
00:35:06.080And so as things move more into this space of artificial intelligence and AI, it's deeply concerning the really serious partisan bias that clearly has been embedded in these algorithms.
00:35:19.200And Google came out and said, well, mea culpa, it was a mistake.
00:36:22.480Yeah, well, thanks so much for having me on.
00:36:24.020I think these are really important issues to track.
00:36:26.100Again, each one individually looks like it could be a one off, whether it's these digital equity rules for the Internet or the government working with Silicon Valley to censor Americans' political speech or these race and gender scorecards.
00:36:37.280But you have to put them all together because they're not pinpricks.
00:36:40.980At the end of the day, it's about more and more government control.
00:36:44.640And, you know, the government is colluding with these large technology companies to carry out an effort to put more controls on more speech than we've ever seen in our history.
00:36:53.780And I think the good news is things are turning slightly.
00:36:56.640I think, you know, the maximum effort of censorship happened during COVID whenever there's, you know, government control.
00:37:07.600But it's also it's kind of downstream from this extreme version of identity politics, because once you divide the world into oppressors and oppressed, then it's very easy to take all the rights away, including free speech rights of the oppressor group.
00:37:20.980And there's no sort of free exchange of information and free debate.
00:37:24.420But but we've got to get back to that as a cultural matter.
00:38:00.820Tunnel to Towers is our sponsor this half hour and out of the ashes of the 9-11 tragedy.
00:38:05.580The Tunnel to Towers Foundation has risen to the channel challenge of supporting America's fallen, injured and homeless heroes and their families.
00:52:02.360And you're seeing really good things coming from some states.
00:52:08.600Your attorney general, if you are in an election where your state attorney general is open, you've got to make sure they understand the Constitution
00:52:17.660and are just, you know, virulent on the Constitution and vigilant and watching and making sure that your state holds everybody accountable and holds them to the Constitution.
00:52:33.220Sometimes the answer to a problem you're facing in life is staring you right in the face.
00:52:38.600Neither you don't notice it or you've been ignoring it.
00:52:41.000I'm one of those people that ignored it because I just didn't think it would work.
00:54:01.600Next hour, we're going to be talking about, I mean, the liberals are just melting down over what happened to the Supreme Court,
00:54:09.680where they're saying, you know, let's take our time on this and hear the arguments.
00:54:15.980Should a president be held criminally accountable, or does the president have immunity while he's acting as the president?
00:54:28.100So if he went and killed somebody or robbed a bank, he still could be held criminally for that after his term.
00:54:36.180But if he's doing something as president, he can't be held criminally accountable, right?
00:54:45.000So in other words, if he says, we're going to fly these drones over and we're going to kill this guy.
00:54:53.700If people disagree with him and he could be held criminally accountable, then as soon as he got out of office, people could sue him and say, you killed so-and-so and you were wrong.
00:55:56.260The line, I guess, is what's interesting here, because this is obviously in between a drone attack in Yemen that he believes is taking out a terrorist and him raping someone in the streets.
00:56:14.140I don't expect the Supreme Court to side with Trump on that, but it really it doesn't matter.
00:56:19.680Frankly, I don't I don't expect he's going to win.
00:56:22.820However, it's going to delay this long enough that he's probably not going to deal with this case before the election, which is a massive, massive win for Donald Trump.
00:56:33.600You know, I I think at the end of the day, I'm very skeptical that the Supreme Court is going to say, you know, yes, pretty much everything is going to give you immunity.
00:56:45.920That's not really what this is about here.
00:56:47.540The fact that Trump was able to get six months of six months of delay on this case is a win when it comes to the 2024 election.
00:56:55.140The rest of the stuff you can deal with later.
00:56:57.160But as far as the 2024 election goes, which is, of course, why look, it might not be what Donald Trump is focused on because he's got to deal with all this craziness.
00:57:05.140But when it comes to the country and what we're focused on is the 2024 election and as far as the 2024 election goes, you see a situation, as we mentioned earlier, that looks as optimistic as you have seen when it comes to these legal challenges for Donald Trump.
00:57:22.480Probably the most optimistic picture we've seen since the beginning of it.
00:57:26.140Now, of course, you know, the other cases, there's obviously nine digit fees that are going after him on and he's going to have to challenge that.
00:57:34.000He's going to be in court throughout this election, which is bizarre, bizarre, bizarre thing.
00:57:40.920But as far as him actually losing votes, where do you see them?
00:57:44.300Where do you see them being lost on this?
00:57:47.720Glenn, do you see are there people out there that are thinking to themselves, you know, I would really consider voting for Donald Trump.
00:57:53.520But if there is a conviction in the documents case, I'm gone.
00:57:57.180If there's a conviction in the Stormy Daniels case, you know what?
00:58:57.520The documents thing, maybe I'm understating it.
00:58:59.980I definitely feel like at times I have less of a care about this than other people.
00:59:04.040But look, he was the president of the United States.
00:59:06.220He saw all these documents when he was in the Oval Office.
00:59:08.540The fact that he had him stored, you know, maybe it's a, hey, don't do that again type of issue.
00:59:15.500I don't think it's a changing election type of issue.
00:59:19.160You know, look, he, you know, some of that stuff is going to hit him.
00:59:22.260He's going to have a tough time, I think, legally in that case.
00:59:25.920But I just don't think it's the type of thing that moves votes.
00:59:28.320January 6th, if they found something on January 6th that made people believe he really did do the things he's accused of, I think that would move voters.
01:00:15.860Yeah, and look, I think if they found something—let's say they went through evidence and something came up that really changed people's perspective on this.
01:00:25.260I think you could move voters, especially voters in the middle, on an issue like that.
01:00:31.260That was a serious day, whether you like it or not.
01:00:34.280You know, whether people, like, think it was a good—you know, like a situation that's Donald Trump's fault or not, if they could tie it to Donald Trump, it could move people.
01:00:43.340And, of course, this was their goal here.
01:26:22.400No, back two and a half years ago when they initially threatened me and said that I would be arrested within the week in November of 21,
01:26:29.860they actually told my attorney at the time what the charges were going to be then, but because I'm a little outspoken and vocal about what's happening with me,
01:26:39.360we were told at the time by an assistant U.S. attorney that a judge would not be happy with me going out to the press in the manner that I've done.
01:26:49.120So I just intensified that and accelerated that and lit that candle brighter.
01:27:49.300Now, fast forward two years under the current threat, and they won't tell me the charges this time, literally, quote, unquote, from the U.S. attorney, because he'll tweet it out.
01:28:42.640It's easier to change into the orange jumpsuit and leg chains.
01:28:51.460And is that something that everybody does?
01:28:56.820When they bust down somebody's door, do they say, hey, change into a T-shirt and some flip-flops?
01:29:02.500I don't think that when they bust in your door, you get that opportunity or that choice.
01:29:07.740When they invite people to turn themselves in.
01:29:10.460I've never seen people turn themselves in.
01:29:13.840This is exactly what they did to the independent journalist Stephen Horn from Raleigh, North Carolina, coincidentally, where I live.
01:29:19.860And when they arrested him and they brought him in, they did exactly the same thing.
01:29:24.820They put him in an orange jumpsuit, put leg chains on him, and made him march before the magistrate in the leg chains on misdemeanor offenses.
01:29:34.000That's one of the interesting parts here, because you don't know, as you point out, what you're being charged with.
01:29:42.480But you do know that they are misdemeanors, right?
01:29:44.600That is what they have told my attorney.
01:29:46.820So why on earth would you need to be in leg chains?
01:29:50.000We have prosecutors all over the country that won't charge people who've sexually assaulted individuals with crimes, and they won't hold them, and they release the next day.
01:30:01.980And they're going to put you in leg chains for misdemeanors?
01:30:04.340Well, let's start with the bigger question, and we'll work our way to that specific answer.
01:30:09.980This is the first time in history since January 6th that the FBI is even involving themselves in misdemeanor offenses and with misdemeanor defendants and swatting misdemeanor defendants with sometimes 15, 20, 25 agents swatting misdemeanor.
01:30:28.840No, the FBI has never done that in their history until ordered to do so by Merrick Garland's DOJ after January 6th.
01:30:43.620My attorney told me when he told me that this was what they were going to have me requesting that I arrive dressed in flip-flops and shorts.
01:30:53.020I said, why are they doing this to me?
01:31:05.080When you have a government, I mean, I don't know if you saw the story today from California, but there was a judge in California who said, you can't arrest just people on the right when Antifa was there and they were being violent, beating up these people.
01:31:20.240You arrest the people they were beating up, and you don't arrest Antifa.
01:31:26.120When a United States government can come after individuals, and we've been saying this from the beginning, if they'll do this to Trump, you don't think they'll do it to you?
01:31:40.480Well, the selective prosecution is exactly what's happening right here.
01:31:46.760We have documented over 60 journalists that entered through those doors or broken windows that day.
01:31:55.400The fifth person through the broken window that day was a New York Times reporter.
01:32:00.120The New Yorker reporter, Luke Mogelson, went through the broken window, and he paralleled another independent photojournalist.
01:32:07.400They went through the same window, they went through the same window, paralleled the other journalist.
01:32:11.040He had spent a lot of time working on the Latinos for Trump campaign.
01:32:18.120Well, even though he didn't parade, he didn't do any protesting, he did no chanting, anything of the sort, and was contracted at the time as a video photojournalist for a TV station in Mobile, Alabama.
01:32:33.840Even though that was the groundwork laid, four misdemeanors, swatted by over 20 agents at his home with red dots on his wife, his children, and of course, obviously himself at 6.30 in the morning.
01:33:02.380He was convicted on all four misdemeanors, and because he went to trial and he wasted the government's time and resources and not taking the plea deal that he was offered, the judge put him in prison for eight months, sentenced him to eight months.
01:33:15.380They put him in a medium security facility in Georgia, where, after spending the first two months in solitary confinement, and gets out into the general population, he learns from all the other prisoners that they never put misdemeanor defendants in that prison.
01:33:34.720All of the other guys were, actually, they distrusted him.
01:33:36.720They thought he was some sort of plant, you know, inside the prison.
01:33:38.980They're like, people don't come here for misdemeanors.
01:33:41.160We're, you know, this is what we do for a living.
01:35:26.820I don't know why they would have a Rolodex still, but, you know, has a lot of names in their contacts.
01:35:32.960And it can help you with home repairs, you know, with the person that does the inspection to really get the job done right and make it easy for you.
01:35:44.440Somebody who has contractors that are not going to cut corners.
01:35:48.620This is just one of the things that we look for when we're looking for a competent agent for you to recommend to you.
01:35:57.520We look for somebody who really knows how to get the job done, already has assembled a team because they've been in the business for a long time.
01:36:05.780They know which photographer is the best for your home.
01:36:09.280My company is dedicated 100% to pair you with the real estate agent that you can trust to get the job done.
01:36:17.580So whether you're buying, selling, or you just have questions, we've been helping this audience for 10 years now and billions in sales.
01:36:26.580It's amazing to me, Steve, that I'm doing an interview with a man that I'm doing.
01:36:56.580Who I know is innocent, who I know is a journalist, who I know just did the job of being a journalist, and tomorrow might be your first day going to jail and then prison.
01:37:12.060You know, I'll correct you on one thing.
01:37:16.480We are guilty of crossing a restricted line, and that is common for law enforcement to allow the press to come inside the police line to document the public interest.
01:37:35.060There is no license, there is no credential, there is no press pass on the planet, or in the United States of America, local, state, or federal, that allows any journalist to cross a restricted line.
01:37:51.600But over 60 did, and only those whose voice is more on the right side of the political spectrum are being prosecuted.
01:38:07.520So what is your, I mean, if you care to share it, what's your game plan?
01:38:12.500I think that the first thing we have to do is find out who our judge is.
01:38:15.520That's the most important aspect, and it's the first major piece of the puzzle, because the judges in the J6 lottery are, they come in all shapes and sizes and intensities.
01:38:30.380So it'll depend upon whether we get a hanging judge or we get one of the more reasonable common sense.
01:38:35.640Let's say you get a hanging judge and they offer you a deal.
01:38:38.880That'll, that'll be very tempting if it's one of the hanging judges to take the deal, because we already know what the threat of not taking the deal is, is that would be a superseding indictment that would include a felony.
01:39:38.100I know you've done a lot of work, Steve, going back on when you're doing your reporting and looking through all these videos and you've been able to isolate a bunch of really interesting things that no one knew about.
01:40:54.900Every second of me inside the Capitol doing my job, never participating in any parading, milling around, you know, or as they say, you know, picketing, protesting, never chanting, none of that.
01:42:09.120I had Capitol Police officers, my sources, unnamed and known, that have told me over and over and over again, you do not understand how powerful the Capitol Police are.
01:42:19.160So I'm thinking to myself, okay, okay, right, right.
01:42:23.180And then I talk with Speaker Johnson, and Speaker Johnson tells me, his lips to my ears, that he says, I have 100% authority over the distribution of those videos.
01:42:34.820I can either let them out, not – it's all on me.
01:53:30.100And we kind of do have to worry about that.
01:53:32.860Did you see that Putin released yesterday the things that would cause a nuclear war, that would launch?
01:53:42.080Any NATO country that crosses their border, any time that they are up against troops that they can't handle, they're overwhelmed by nuclear.
01:53:55.300I mean, it's a lot, lot lower threshold than we have.
01:56:16.000And, you know, it has, you know, uncontroversial things like, you know, tackling child pornography online, blah, blah, blah.
01:56:25.660However, it has hate speech rules as well.
01:56:31.160The government will define hate speech.
01:56:34.840And according to the Trudeau government, the bill would, quote, create stronger online protection for children, better safeguard everyone in Canada from online hate and other types of harmful content.
01:56:48.900So what they're going to do is they're establishing a brand new legal and legislative regulatory framework.
01:57:00.220They're going to create a new digital safety czar.
01:57:04.980And a definition of hatred is going to be put into the criminal code.
01:57:11.100So when somebody sees something that is hateful or hate propaganda offenses, they're establishing with this a standalone hate crime offense and creating an additional set of remedies for online hate speech.
01:57:40.200So if you express detestation or vilification of an individual or group of individuals on the basis of a prohibited ground of discrimination and that given the content which is communicated is likely to foment more vilification of an individual or a group of individuals on the basis of such prohibited ground.
01:58:10.200You can face, you can face, are you ready, life in prison for digital hate speech, life in prison.
01:59:46.940And it's just getting worse and worse and worse and worse.
01:59:50.840You know, the whole, you think, I don't know, maybe it's American culture.
01:59:55.240And I think one of the great things about America is that when you have sort of a popular uprising of sorts, things tend to change a little more often.
02:00:03.380But like the trucker thing in Canada didn't change anything there.