'The World's Your Oyster' (Ryan Holiday joins Glenn) - 3⧸8⧸18
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 52 minutes
Words per Minute
169.62852
Summary
Florida passed a bill that allows teachers to carry guns in schools and sends a message to would-be mass murderers: you don t have to be 21 to own a gun in a Florida school. The bill also includes a 3-day waiting period to buy all guns and a mandate for background checks.
Transcript
00:00:16.640
Alrighty. Florida passed a school safety bill yesterday.
00:00:21.220
Our schools are going to be safe in Florida now.
00:00:23.500
First, let me tell you how the rest of the media is going to report on it,
00:00:27.760
If you're, you know, scrolling through the internet today,
00:00:32.580
Florida passes bill allowing school staff to be armed.
00:00:38.420
The new bill will allow librarians, media specialists, whatever the hell that is,
00:00:43.840
advisors and coaches and others to carry a gun on school grounds.
00:00:49.180
Not only does this make schools physically safer,
00:00:51.800
but it also sends a message to any would-be mass murderer
00:01:00.440
It'll now be in the back of their minds that if they raise their barrel in a school,
00:01:04.580
it's going to be met with multiple barrels aimed back at them.
00:01:09.000
The new bill also provides $300 million in funding for mental health programs,
00:01:16.380
school resource officers, and school safety upgrades.
00:01:20.040
Depending on what those things are, that's probably pretty good.
00:01:29.200
the state of Florida took a gigantic leap backwards.
00:01:32.540
Mixed in with all of the measures that actually will improve school safety,
00:01:36.580
the Florida House of Representatives got to work
00:01:38.820
doing what they really wanted to get out of this crisis,
00:01:43.960
First of all, the bill restricts firearm purchases for everyone under 21.
00:01:55.800
How can you approve a bill that nullifies the Second Amendment to anyone aged 18 to 20?
00:02:02.800
I mean, because when you get right down to it, that's what this does.
00:02:06.680
The state of Florida is now saying to their estimated 1 million or so adults
00:02:11.300
in this age bracket that the Bill of Rights does not apply to them.
00:02:16.540
Also, how many mass murderers in the past five years have been under the age of 21?
00:02:29.660
By the way, did any of those guys go out and buy those guns?
00:02:40.060
I want to give them any more fuel to crap all over the Second Amendment,
00:02:49.680
but we're not even targeting the right age group.
00:02:58.160
So to the 18-year-old living on your own and struggling to get by in a really rough neighborhood,
00:03:04.300
Florida has declared that it is safer for you not to be able to protect yourself.
00:03:09.060
If someone breaks into your home and attacks you, don't worry.
00:03:13.240
You only have to call the police and then wait.
00:03:17.580
Or most likely call the police after it's all over and hope that one of your neighbors will call the police.
00:03:23.980
The same applies to the 20-year-old single mother and the 19-year-old veteran who Florida agrees can carry a gun in a war zone,
00:03:35.620
The bill goes on to require a three-day waiting period to buy all guns, which is completely pointless,
00:03:43.080
and a mandate for background checks, which is already the law.
00:03:48.420
Florida took some good steps with allowing teachers to carry guns and allocating money for mental health and security upgrades.
00:03:55.420
But hidden within all of these cries of do something are always these little chunks of freedom that are slowly getting whittled away.
00:04:03.980
If you didn't watch last night's show, it is available on demand now at The Blaze.
00:04:10.600
We showed you how the Constitution is being raped, violently raped, every single one of the ten Bill of Rights, repeatedly.
00:04:26.040
We're losing them because we're all crying, something has to be done.
00:04:38.360
But in the end, the government blames you because the government is taking your rights away.
00:04:47.400
And if we are not careful, if we don't learn the Constitution and the Bill of Rights,
00:05:09.280
You know, any foreigner that I know is not concerned about our gun rights.
00:05:14.360
And the reason why is they say it's never going to happen in America.
00:05:28.240
It is such an important cornerstone of the American Constitution.
00:05:39.940
You guys, I don't know why you guys are freaked out.
00:05:46.700
All you need is a couple of more school shootings.
00:05:52.960
I can easily come up with a way where all of our rights are taken overnight.
00:05:59.680
And we will all be, we will all be chanting for it.
00:06:04.640
And I can 100% guarantee one scenario where the Second Amendment goes away, which is you stop defending it.
00:06:11.440
The second you stop defending it, they will take every little bit of it.
00:06:14.320
Because, I mean, look, that's their whole, that's the whole goal.
00:06:17.620
I mean, you could tell this by the way they talk about guns.
00:06:20.400
Because, you know, even when, you know, do we, I can't take it.
00:06:34.240
I want you to know, you don't have to be a gun expert to have an opinion on the Second Amendment.
00:06:40.960
The Second Amendment applies to all of us, whether you like it or not.
00:06:47.460
You don't have to be, well, I can tell you that the wind is now blowing from this direction,
00:06:59.700
You need to be able to know what a gun is, what it does, how it works.
00:07:05.840
If you're going to join and say, this gun has to be taken out.
00:07:12.600
Listen to the media and what they say about guns.
00:07:20.120
Making sure that we don't have high-capacity rapid-fire magazines that allow mass killings.
00:07:35.980
Seeing if we can get automatic weapons that kill folks in amazing numbers.
00:07:42.080
If I wanted to fire this on full semi-automatic, well, why do we need jumbo clips?
00:07:55.660
What the District of Columbia was trying to do was to protect toddlers from guns.
00:08:01.600
It is harder to buy cough medicine than it is to buy an AK-47 or 50 of them.
00:08:08.460
It is easier for a teenager to buy a Glock than get his hands on a computer or even a book.
00:08:14.320
It's legal to hunt humans with 15-round, 30-round, even 150-round magazines.
00:08:22.820
And he was not able to buy a weapon that shoots off 700 rounds in a minute.
00:08:30.280
An assault weapon, you basically hold it, it goes.
00:08:35.640
This right here has ability with a .30 caliber clip to disperse with 30 bullets within half a second.
00:08:44.100
Use these silencers to make them more available, which, as you can imagine, their ears were hurting.
00:08:50.780
If you want to protect yourself, get a double-barrel shotgun.
00:08:53.900
Put that double-barrel shotgun and fire two blasts outside the house.
00:08:59.600
If you ban them in the future, the number of these high-capacity magazines is going to decrease dramatically over time
00:09:07.780
because the bullets will have been shot and there won't be any more available.
00:09:11.600
But some of these bullets, as you saw, have an incendiary device on the tip of it, which is a heat-seeking device.
00:09:18.140
So you don't shoot deer with a bullet that size.
00:09:38.660
That's an inexplicable montage by the Washington Free Beacon.
00:09:42.780
The fact that those clips exist is so embarrassing.
00:09:47.260
And we're arguing with these people about the Second Amendment.
00:09:53.820
If I want to turn this into a full semi-automatic weapon, it either is or it isn't a semi-automatic weapon.
00:10:03.700
You don't turn it from a John Wayne six-shooter into a semi-automatic.
00:10:13.520
I'm going to push it into the fully automatic, which means now I hold the trigger down and it's a machine gun.
00:10:22.420
When in this clip where Obama is saying, we need to get rid of these automatic weapons, we've gotten rid of the automatic weapons.
00:10:39.740
It took me a year to be able to go through the process to get the license to be able to have a fully automatic weapon.
00:11:01.440
I don't fire them because the laws around them are so strict that I'm afraid anytime I touch that gun or take that gun or somebody, God forbid, is going to touch that gun, that I go to prison.
00:11:15.380
So we've already pretty much taken care of those guns.
00:11:20.020
You notice that the bad guys have stopped getting those?
00:11:28.920
If you're handy, if you can just read a book and you're good with tools, you can find somebody or make it fully automatic.
00:11:49.180
The choice is, I know somebody who can make one of these for me and just going to keep it quiet because I'm a drug dealer.
00:11:58.560
I don't care if it costs me $100,000 because I'm a drug dealer.
00:12:03.380
Yeah, a guy in California just got arrested because he had built several weapons.
00:12:12.580
In today's world with technology, you don't have to be a gunsmith.
00:12:17.600
But again, going to the arguments here, you know, when you're asking us to take you seriously
00:12:24.560
when you go for a semi-automatic assault rifle ban, you don't have to...
00:12:35.280
And it is frustrating, I will say, because there was an op-ed in the Washington Post.
00:12:38.920
And they were like, people are just gunsplaining to you.
00:12:42.020
So you bring up an argument and they just pick apart all the things that you said that
00:12:53.180
And now the argument is stop acting like I can't have an opinion because you know more
00:13:02.160
I want you to stop acting like I have no right to opinions on race because I'm white.
00:13:09.080
I want you to stop telling me that I have no opinions on abortion because I'm a man.
00:13:22.420
But you can have an opinion on the Second Amendment, but you cannot make the case about a certain
00:13:31.000
gun being banned if you don't know anything about that certain gun.
00:13:37.180
And what's interesting about it is there is one time where you can, I believe, you can
00:13:43.000
make an argument when you don't know anything about the difference between semi-automatic
00:13:46.940
and automatic or handguns and shotguns and assault rifles.
00:13:50.280
Or if you're the vice president and say, take your shotgun out and fire a couple of shots
00:13:56.740
If you were an NRA member, you'd know that, Joe.
00:14:01.820
But you know when it is okay to have that opinion?
00:14:04.180
And you know when it doesn't matter when you know the difference between semi-automatic
00:14:12.260
You don't need to know the difference between semi-automatic and automatic if you're going for
00:14:16.900
If your real argument is take them all away, then there's no need to learn about the differences
00:14:23.640
and why they are there and how they would be used and what effects they would have.
00:14:30.460
Because in reality, that's what they're arguing.
00:14:35.720
They're looking for progressive steps towards the removal of all of them.
00:14:41.360
So there's no need for them to know the difference because is it a gun or not is the only fact
00:14:52.360
By the way, I just want to remind you that the assault rifle is actually a modern sporting
00:15:02.920
It was not a weapon of war that was brought onto the market.
00:15:12.780
In the 1950s that the Pentagon saw and went, that's just a better rifle.
00:15:19.420
Can we buy the rights to that and be able to make these for the military?
00:15:26.820
Yes, they were on the market as deer rifles, as hunting rifles, a decade before they went
00:15:45.540
You know, there's a couple of things we have to do.
00:15:53.520
I want to take I want to take people to the range with me.
00:15:58.860
If you are afraid of guns, if you are somebody who, you know, I just don't know where I stand
00:16:07.320
I want to and we'll we'll we'll try to come up with a way to do this tomorrow and have you
00:16:13.400
call in tomorrow, but I want to take some people to go to fire guns who have never done
00:16:18.280
it before, because unless you fired them, unless you know, you you have no concept, no
00:16:25.120
concept of the sport of rifles, the sport of guns and how they actually can save your
00:16:37.500
Also, if you watched the push last night, we gave you a homework assignment.
00:16:41.640
If you watch the push, call us now, 888-727-BECK.
00:16:46.760
I want to switch gears and talk about the push.
00:16:54.720
Some experts are saying now that filing your taxes early prevents identity theft.
00:17:01.240
It can happen whether you file your taxes early or not.
00:17:04.780
If somebody has stolen your information, if it is out there, it can be used in other ways
00:17:09.060
like opening a credit card in your name, anything, anything that is out there on you is being
00:17:17.780
If it's part of a breach, don't get too comfortable just because you filed your taxes early.
00:17:22.840
Many threats out in today's world because we're all connected and it takes one hack, one break
00:17:31.060
That's why the new LifeLock Identity Theft Protection adds power of Norton Security to
00:17:36.800
help you protect against the threats against your identity, also your devices.
00:17:42.000
Now, nobody can stop all cyber threats, prevent all identity theft or monitor all transactions
00:17:46.720
But Norton and the new LifeLock Security is able to uncover the threats that you might miss.
00:17:53.260
So go to LifeLock.com right now or call 1-800-LIFELOCK, 1-800-LIFELOCK, use the promo code
00:18:01.980
That's promo code Beck, extra 10% at 1-800-LIFELOCK or LifeLock.com.
00:18:16.120
There's a lot to talk about today, a lot to cover.
00:18:23.500
We have, coming up in a little while, we have Ryan Holiday.
00:18:26.380
He wrote a book called Conspiracy that is really fascinating about one of the, I think, bigger
00:18:34.820
news stories of the day coming up in a little while.
00:18:38.040
Also, at the top of hour number three, we are going to talk a little bit about free trade.
00:18:55.700
And why is this an important thing for conservatives?
00:19:07.120
I like, Justin says, luckily, I was socially compliant and watched the push.
00:19:14.520
And also, another tweet at World of Stew is where you can tweet these.
00:19:30.180
Now, let me, before we start taking your phone calls on what you learned from it or what you
00:19:35.120
thought, it is a, it's a social experiment, except it's, it's, man, it's borderline reality show
00:19:46.460
Can you take an average person and convince them to murder a stranger in 90 minutes?
00:20:07.120
Can you get them to murder a stranger in 90 minutes?
00:20:14.080
People who watch the push on Netflix, call us now.
00:20:35.580
It was created by a, uh, a psychologist who is also a, a magician, uh, in, uh, England
00:20:54.160
And it's a documentary kind of, um, it's a cross between.
00:21:05.520
Um, but what, what he's doing is, can we convince somebody, the average person to murder in 90
00:21:15.640
And they start the episode with a, uh, with a phone call into a restaurant where a woman
00:21:26.720
And they, somebody from the restaurant just picks up and they say, Hey, is this a so-and-so's
00:21:42.920
Tell her that, that somebody is waiting for her on the phone, put the phone away, grab
00:21:47.340
the baby carriage, push it out of the restaurant, meet me at the corner.
00:21:51.880
So they convince in three minutes, they convince somebody to steal someone's baby just because
00:21:58.120
he's a known child of doctor, but she wasn't, she wasn't.
00:22:01.060
And, and, and you're only taking the word of a stranger on the phone that he is the
00:22:07.420
Um, so then they say, all right, but what we're going to try to do is a lot harder.
00:22:11.080
And I think they have 90 actors and 90 minutes.
00:22:15.840
They do it to four different people you find out.
00:22:19.280
Uh, and the idea is, can we create a social situation just through social pressure to get
00:22:26.620
these people to actually push a stranger off the top of a building in 90 minutes and kill
00:22:38.760
One of the most shocking things I've ever seen.
00:22:44.040
So, uh, we gave you homework yesterday to watch the show.
00:22:47.280
Um, if you didn't do your homework, that's going to be a problem.
00:22:50.980
However, uh, it won't cause it'll make you want to watch this even more.
00:22:55.040
Um, but, uh, if you are on the phone and you're calling in, we don't want to give away the
00:23:01.560
I mean, we can talk about what happened in it, but we don't want to say anybody push or
00:23:10.120
The rest of it, I think is generally speaking, fair game.
00:23:12.540
Um, if you, uh, are super, you know, if you're going to watch it tonight, you might want to
00:23:16.140
think about, uh, we're going to try to be as careful as we can, but we're not going
00:23:19.940
to just, as long as we don't say it's fascinating, even if you know all the way along, because
00:23:23.620
the way they pulled this off is really remarkable.
00:23:26.000
And you're asking yourself the whole question when I do that, would I do that?
00:23:37.820
I mean, the first one is funny for me because it's a vegetarian and, and it's, that's what
00:23:45.040
They put real meat hot dogs in the, and then they put flags that say they're vegetarian
00:23:49.340
in them because they don't have a vegetarian hot dogs.
00:23:51.620
Even that I wouldn't do because, but that's just a weird one for me.
00:23:54.820
I think in a normal situation, people would do that.
00:23:57.420
This whole situation is somebody is trying to help out this massive charity, well-known,
00:24:03.020
everybody who's anybody is involved and they're helping out the main person and their boss
00:24:12.400
And so the first thing is they're in the kitchen and like, geez, man, the meat didn't, the vegetarian
00:24:25.980
And it's breaking down your, your will and getting you to comply little pieces at a time.
00:24:33.020
And to build to 90 minutes, you're going to kill somebody because we're asking you to
00:24:38.480
I'm very interested to see where people feel that they might bail out of it.
00:24:44.000
So I think the worst of me, the best of me stops at the vegetarian.
00:24:49.340
You know, you're a vegetarian and you might have health reasons for doing that.
00:24:55.520
The worst of me says I stopped somewhere between giving the speech.
00:25:02.140
Hopefully I don't give the speech and, uh, and moving the body to the stairwell.
00:25:11.480
I, and I, I think, I think I, I could get to the point where I put them in a box outside
00:25:29.240
First of all, the show is incredibly disturbing.
00:25:32.560
Um, I found myself watching this and, and thinking in my head, I wouldn't do that.
00:25:37.400
But then when you replay and you think the situation, the gentleman's been put in and
00:25:40.700
balancing this overall good of this, this charitable donation to, you know, can I just do this
00:25:50.800
And what I found myself wondering is which percentages do these folks fall in about attending
00:26:00.000
What's, what's the constant moral north that was guiding these individuals, right?
00:26:05.260
And, uh, I'll throw this at you because I'm not, I don't have the perfect, uh, tinfoil hat
00:26:10.300
that you do, but I'm, I'm trying a second show that I'll turn you, turn you on to that.
00:26:15.880
I would suggest you overlay with the push, uh, Carrie Byron, formerly of Mythbusters.
00:26:21.780
Uh, the three of them started a show on Netflix entitled white rabbit project.
00:26:26.620
Now it's a series, but you only need to watch the first episode in this first episode.
00:26:31.040
They try to replicate superpowers and they find a gentleman who successfully took a living
00:26:35.800
cockroach and turned it into a cyborg that she could control with her telephone.
00:26:40.320
Tell this live cockroach when to walk left, when to walk right.
00:26:44.760
The ultimate conclusion of it was the scientist who did this was able to put electrodes on
00:26:49.900
his arm, bridge them by a wire to electrodes on her arm.
00:26:54.800
And he could move her arm for her, whether she wanted to or not, but it was all fake.
00:27:20.760
Um, my wife and I watched the show last night and I was initially really disturbed and was
00:27:27.080
thinking I would never do this stuff, especially once it got to putting the body in the crate.
00:27:30.980
That was where I was like, I definitely wouldn't do that.
00:27:33.040
I've always prided myself as being a critical thinker and being willing to stand up and challenge
00:27:44.640
I moved into libertarianism and then Christian anarchism, which is a whole nother thing.
00:27:58.020
Anyway, I'm still, I still consider myself that, but as I moved into that, I realized I
00:28:02.840
was, I was kind of more aligned with folks on the left.
00:28:06.460
Um, and I still occasionally would push back, but over the last, probably 2014 to 2016, I
00:28:13.080
was very much, I would even consider myself, I'd gotten to the point of being a social justice
00:28:17.560
And sometime in 2016, I finally realized that I'm not thinking for myself anymore.
00:28:22.760
And so watching this, I was like, this same sort of thing has happened to me in different
00:28:29.980
I will tell you, and I don't want to tell how people, uh, you know, what they did at
00:28:34.160
the end, but I thought it was really interesting.
00:28:35.620
The interviews with those subjects afterwards, um, who, uh, who talked and said, you know,
00:28:44.440
I mean, I don't think that's where you would land.
00:28:47.500
And if you take this and you, and you really watch this and you look at it as a science
00:28:53.060
experiment and you also have, if you've ever read ordinary men, uh, which is a, uh, a real
00:29:01.380
deep scholarly look at how the Nazis turned the pole, the Polish, um, uh, the really good
00:29:07.960
men, uh, who were police officers into brutal killers.
00:29:15.640
And so you kind of wonder, geez, would I do that or not?
00:29:30.960
Uh, yeah, I saw it last night and it was disturbing, honest and true.
00:29:36.020
Um, I started watching it and like you said earlier, I kept asking myself, would I do that?
00:29:43.180
And I really don't think I would have gotten any fruit once, once they took them out of
00:29:49.720
That's when I would have said, sorry, I'm done.
00:29:54.000
Did you, did you, did you, did you feel like, uh, it was morally okay for them to make that
00:30:03.700
I, I, in a way I think it, it, it, it is because it will open people's eyes to realizing
00:30:10.860
that we aren't as, um, oh, we're, we're, we're not, we're not as strong as we think we
00:30:18.360
We're not, we're not, we're a lot more vulnerable than we think we are, you know, than we'd like
00:30:23.780
Um, when you said, when you said you found it disturbing, I found it the same way, but it's
00:30:28.320
different than like a horror movie that you're like, okay, saw that was disturbing.
00:30:32.160
There was no, there was no re there's no redeeming value in it.
00:30:36.220
This was disturbing because in a good way, because it, it made me examine me.
00:30:43.560
It made me, it put me into a very uncomfortable situation going, geez, I don't know.
00:30:56.780
What would I do if I, if I was that, that guy, you know, how, how far would I have gotten?
00:31:11.680
But at the same point, I'm sure all of us have our limits.
00:31:18.780
It really is interesting because it's not just the social pressure.
00:31:22.460
I mean, the social pressure really comes in towards the end, but it's not just the social
00:31:26.500
It is the, the pressure of ends justify the means.
00:31:38.560
I know I'm bending my principles, but this time it's too important.
00:31:41.840
Quickly, just to review, we're talking about The Push.
00:31:44.960
If you haven't seen it, moderate spoilers are sort of applying here.
00:31:48.140
We're not giving away the ending or anything like that, but we are discussing it.
00:31:52.600
The idea is, would you, would you kill somebody?
00:31:56.960
In 90 minutes, can they take average people and, and, and in 90 minutes later, they've become
00:32:10.220
And, and it's interesting to hear every caller has said the same thing.
00:32:13.280
They'll go a little bit down this road, but I know I would have stopped here.
00:32:17.360
What I found interesting about it was, you know, I guess people, we are really more vulnerable
00:32:22.560
And I find that to be interesting because aren't the same people who were in this situation
00:32:29.180
on the show likely would have sounded just like the callers and us who would say we would
00:32:34.880
Um, but also the kind of judging others and saying like, Hey, you know, uh, we are more
00:32:39.540
vulnerable and that's the underlying, I think, message here.
00:32:41.840
There, there is an underlying message of the show, which is really informative for everything,
00:32:48.180
everything that you do in your life, which is you really need to have these decisions
00:32:56.120
Because when you get into the stressful moment, human beings will follow the path of least
00:33:02.420
You better have principles that stop you and, and the, each time.
00:33:07.040
And the answer would be every single time with these four people.
00:33:11.880
And it may have been, it may be this in the end that all four said, no, I won't kill.
00:33:19.480
But if you would have asked them at the beginning of the night, Hey, will you murder this person?
00:33:29.000
It's just that they had made compromises starting as small as putting a flag in a vegetarian,
00:33:37.120
uh, in a non-vegetarian dish that said vegetarian.
00:33:45.620
And that's the thing you read in, if you read ordinary men, it didn't happen.
00:33:50.080
They didn't just, they didn't just all say, okay, I'm a good cop now to, I can just shoot
00:33:56.040
children in the head in the middle of the woods and put them in a big burial, uh, mound.
00:34:03.680
It was small little things that they needed to get them to violate one at a time.
00:34:20.520
I really do want to have more of a conversation on, is it morally right to do this as a, almost as a reality show?
00:34:28.640
It wasn't, but it was so close to a reality show.
00:34:31.760
It was really, it's uncomfortable, uh, but I think important to watch.
00:34:37.480
If you're looking to hire somebody, you need great people, no better way to find them than with ZipRecruiter.
00:34:43.460
ZipRecruiter, uh, no, knew that there was a smarter way and smarter is the, is the key word here.
00:34:49.100
They built a platform that finds the right job candidate for you.
00:34:53.840
Now, the thing of the past was, okay, well, I can go online and I can post my job.
00:35:00.040
ZipRecruiter then took that in the next step and said, all right, I can post, I can post it at every place that there is job posted.
00:35:06.920
And that took a lot of, you know, time, uh, and frustration off of your hands and put it into ZipRecruiter.
00:35:13.180
Then they realized there's got to be a smarter way.
00:35:15.340
So what they do is the ZipRecruiter learns what you're looking for.
00:35:18.700
It identifies people with the right experience and then goes out and says, Hey, there's a job available.
00:35:25.040
The invitations have revolutionized how you're going to find your next hire.
00:35:28.600
80% of employers who post a job on ZipRecruiter get a quality candidate in the site the first day.
00:35:35.240
They even spotlight the strongest applications you receive.
00:35:44.240
ZipRecruiter been used by businesses of all sizes and industries.
00:35:47.260
Find the most qualified job candidates with immediate results right now.
00:36:09.300
Isn't it amazing how, how, how influenced we are by, by others and how we all like at the very beginning of the show on Netflix, the push.
00:36:22.780
They, they, they select people or they disqualify people that could, you know, be part of this experiment by just getting them to go into a room with three actors.
00:36:35.000
Um, and they go in with these actors, uh, and they're just filling out an application for something.
00:36:42.060
They're just all working and they're standing by these chairs.
00:36:44.260
When the bell rings, the three actors sit down.
00:36:49.320
Then does the person who they're trying to figure out can be on the show.
00:36:55.160
And then when the bell rings twice, they stand up, bell rings, sit down, stand up, sit down.
00:37:06.140
Are we just hearing the bell ring and we see a story, we see a reaction, we hear a bell ring and we go to social media and we react the way the crowd is reacting.
00:37:37.080
Political activism has infected one of the most important institutions in America.
00:37:45.340
Since today is International Women's Day, McDonald's in California has flipped its golden arches upside down to resemble W.
00:37:57.180
M, which is bad because a man, it starts with an M like McDonald's.
00:38:09.180
McDonald's is, you know, is, is following, following suit with all the digital platforms.
00:38:17.500
You know, maybe I'm, I'm crazy, but I think this is just a, you know, a cheap publicity.
00:38:22.800
So I don't think there's, there's not a single woman that I know or respect that would be driving by going, you know what?
00:38:28.580
Suddenly I am going to have that quarter pounder with cheese.
00:38:39.800
You know, they make sure that they have boy, boy and girl centric happy meal toy options.
00:38:44.580
I mean, do we need to really celebrate women even more?
00:38:47.420
How about we get a transgendered Ronald McDonald and Grimace has always been.
00:39:01.680
Anyone with a brain cell knows this is a pandering marketing campaign and it's working.
00:39:06.800
Everyone is covering it, but will it do anything?
00:39:09.760
I mean, does anybody think, oh, you know what I'm going to, I'm going to fight for that, that, uh, gender inequality in our society because McDonald's has turned their sign upside down.
00:39:23.080
I'm guessing it's not going to sell an extra hamburger.
00:39:26.980
No, I would argue that McDonald's already does a great job at eradicating inequality between the sexes.
00:39:34.540
We're all equal when we pull up to that drive-thru and that window late at night and embarrassingly bark out an order and ask for two Big Macs and large fries.
00:39:44.460
Something that all of our mothers would have said, do not eat that crap.
00:39:48.640
We do it male or female and we all feel the same shame.
00:40:07.260
Are there real white hats and black hats anymore?
00:40:11.920
Can you actually be a white hat taking down a black hat if you've done them in nefarious ways?
00:40:23.980
Are you wearing a gray hat or are you wearing a black hat?
00:40:28.040
There are so many things today that, uh, we'd all like to see, you know, dishonest, bad media go away and collapse on its own weight.
00:40:39.400
We, we might even cheer when something like Gawker, which was a despicable website.
00:40:47.040
When Gawker went out of business and, uh, had to shut down, we might all cheer.
00:40:52.720
However, are we comfortable with the idea that a billionaire can conspire and make that happen?
00:41:08.980
He wrote a great book called Trust Me, I'm Lying, which is a fantastic read to go back to see how the news you see every day gets to you.
00:41:25.120
Peter Thiel, Hulk Hogan, Gawker, and the Anatomy of Intrigue.
00:41:29.000
Uh, and it's, it brings us through this entire story and Ryan joins us now.
00:41:33.880
So Ryan, can you, can you tell this story like only you can tell this story before we get into what we are supposed to learn from it?
00:41:44.920
Uh, in 2007, Gawker Media, a gossip website in New York City, uh, has a Silicon Valley arm called Valleywag, and they out the Silicon Valley investor, Peter Thiel, as gay.
00:42:00.160
He was an early investor in Facebook, but a relatively unknown person whose sexuality was known to his friends, but he was not publicly gay.
00:42:13.740
Uh, Gawker's headline, I believe was Peter Thiel is totally gay people.
00:42:18.360
So imagine your most sensitive, you know, secret being made public in such a flippant way.
00:42:23.860
And he, he, he finds this, uh, not to be illegal, but to be disgusting.
00:42:29.140
And hang on just a second, uh, Ryan, when, when this happens with Gawker, is this, uh, because I find Gawker despicable.
00:42:36.700
They, they've done things to me and my family that are just despicable.
00:42:39.880
Um, but on this, people were saying, well, uh, you, we should out people because that's only going to make, you know, people more comfortable with, you know, with gay people if they know you're around them all the time.
00:42:53.200
So were they using the ends justify the means at that time to do something good?
00:43:00.320
I think it's, I think it's a little bit of both, right?
00:43:02.480
I think they thought, uh, why should he get to keep this secret?
00:43:06.500
And, and, and I think they also thought, why is it, why should it be a secret?
00:43:13.320
But the truth is he didn't want it to be public.
00:43:21.620
And so he sort of despairs of being able to do anything about it for five years.
00:43:32.140
And, uh, it's, it's only, um, in 2012, when Gawker makes, makes another enemy, they run
00:43:40.940
a illegally recorded sex tape of the professional wrestler, Hulk Hogan, uh, that Teal sees the
00:43:48.380
opportunity that he's been looking for this whole time that he'd been looking for.
00:43:52.480
He'd hired a lawyer to, to spot opportunities like this.
00:43:55.540
He approaches Hulk Hogan and he says, look, what they did to you is not only despicable.
00:43:59.400
I think it's illegal, both federally and in Florida, where you're a resident, I will fund
00:44:09.200
I will fund this case as far as you're willing to take it.
00:44:12.860
And he approaches a number of other people of similar cases.
00:44:15.540
And then, uh, for, for, for the next four years, this case winds its way through the legal system.
00:44:21.640
And he eventually wins a, uh, $140 million bankruptcy inducing verdict against Gawker in Florida to the
00:44:31.500
shock of, of all onlookers and, and legal strategists at the time.
00:44:36.260
Um, and, and, and he achieved that thing that he had set out to do in 2007, which was to both get his
00:44:42.400
revenge and to prevent this, uh, this website that he believed to be evil from doing what it did to
00:44:51.200
So I, I know Peter, he is a very, you know, generally quiet, uh, guy.
00:44:57.480
Um, uh, you know, he, he's, he's a, he's an odd duck.
00:45:05.060
Uh, doesn't seem like a guy who's driven by vengeance, but does sound like a guy or feels like a guy who
00:45:21.180
Well, that's what's so brilliant about what he did.
00:45:23.640
I think most of us, when something is done to us, we react.
00:45:28.740
A fight breaks out a conspiracy to me is more something that brews that develops.
00:45:36.480
He didn't, he said, look, what they did to me, I don't think was right.
00:45:39.640
And I'm, I'm, I'm angry about it, but it's never good to be driven by anger.
00:45:46.780
He never forgot what happened, but he looked for an opportunity where he actually had legal,
00:45:52.700
legal ground to stand on where he actually could have an impact where the
00:45:57.280
public would be so universally repulsed by what these people did that he would have a
00:46:04.080
And so I think both that patience and that ability to be strategic is why he was able
00:46:11.840
If that's what you want to call it, that many other powerful people had looked at and said,
00:46:16.840
basically, there's nothing you can do about this.
00:46:19.500
But he didn't do, did he become the thing that he despised?
00:46:31.200
The only thing, the reason why it's conspiracy is he didn't want to be out front, but now
00:46:40.160
I, look, I think secrecy is a fundamental element of a conspiracy and, and I, and I
00:46:45.760
respect that he was willing to see that the optics of a billionaire being publicly in front
00:46:51.100
of this thing completely changes how the public would look at it.
00:46:55.040
But he, you know, he said to me, he got this advice from one of his friends.
00:46:57.840
He, uh, his friend said, Peter, you know, you have to choose your enemies carefully because
00:47:04.060
And so that's really the, the danger of, you know, spending nine years scheming to destroy
00:47:09.700
or, uh, ruin someone or something is that you study them so much.
00:47:15.440
They consume so much, uh, of your mental bandwidth that you can kind of become like them.
00:47:20.900
I don't think that he became anything like, uh, Gawker, but, um, for instance, there's a
00:47:28.000
seminal moment in jury selection where they noticed that overweight female jurors are,
00:47:36.520
And now that's not, uh, disgusting, but there is an element of unpleasantness in selecting
00:47:42.600
a juror to then exploit their most vulnerable body issue.
00:47:46.960
But don't, don't you think that that, that that's done in the court system every day of
00:47:54.580
Well, I agreed, but my, my point is, I think we, we tend to be idealists, idealists about
00:48:01.900
We think that we can, we can make change without getting our hands dirty or without dealing
00:48:09.060
And so there's compromises in pursuing something of this magnitude.
00:48:13.360
And I think Peter was so committed to what he was, uh, doing that he, he felt that that,
00:48:18.740
that, that end did justify, that means did justify the end.
00:48:22.700
So Ryan has spent a lot of time with Peter Thiel, Peter Thiel.
00:48:34.460
Uh, and, uh, while Peter didn't, I don't think Ryan, unless there's another conspiracy,
00:48:41.960
Uh, he just gave, he just gave access more with Ryan holiday.
00:48:45.720
The book is conspiracy and there's some tough questions that we have to ask ourselves more
00:48:51.380
in a minute with volatility in the stock market, wild swings in Bitcoin, the constant turmoil
00:49:05.720
When things go unstable, gold is always the safe haven.
00:49:09.840
When in, when interest rates go up, gold is a safe haven.
00:49:22.000
Nobody that I know that is, you know, has half a brain cell is an all in person on gold.
00:49:30.000
It, it, you know, you have an IRA, you have some in, you know, maybe in stocks, you have
00:49:34.720
some in the bank, you have some in gold, you diversify because as some things go down,
00:49:45.840
I'm not a, I'm not a guy that's qualified to give you that.
00:49:49.560
I am a guy who buys gold myself as an insurance policy, the insurance against a world gone
00:50:00.140
If you've been thinking about adding to your IRA right now, gold line is offering $750 in
00:50:06.160
when you purchase 25,000 or more with their industry leading express IRA program.
00:50:11.120
So call them now, 866-GOLDLINE, 1-866-GOLDLINE, or goldline.com.
00:50:30.720
He is the author of a book called Conspiracy, Peter Thiel, Hulk Hogan, Gawker, and the anatomy
00:50:38.420
It's a really, it's a very tough question that we have to tackle, but I want to get a
00:50:42.460
couple of more facts out of the way here before we do with Ryan.
00:50:45.320
Ryan, a couple of things that have been picked up from the book.
00:50:47.220
One thing that Peter had conversations about his strategy trying to get Gawker to go away,
00:50:56.240
and they discussed at least seemingly, and it comes off a little flippantly, but at least
00:51:01.280
considered doing things that were actually illegal when it comes to the approach.
00:51:10.240
Well, I'm sure Ryan can walk us through the examples.
00:51:16.040
It struck me as a little bit of a tempest and a teapot of the media coverage, because
00:51:19.340
it's like getting in trouble for thinking about speeding and then not speeding.
00:51:23.260
But if you think about Thiel's position, he finds Gawker to be this great evil.
00:51:29.900
But as a billionaire, he has essentially limitless resources.
00:51:33.380
He's also the majority owner of one of the most powerful intelligence and defense companies
00:51:42.600
And so it's a question then of which of them is he going to use and what limitations is
00:51:51.320
So theoretically, could he hire private detectives to follow Gawker writers and attempt to find
00:52:01.140
Could he start a rival website that would focus nothing but nothing on their personal lives?
00:52:07.260
Could he bribe employees to leak information to him?
00:52:19.440
But what he decides actually early on, after sort of laying all these options out on the
00:52:24.420
table, is that he wants only to do what's legal and ethical because he's both, I think, an
00:52:32.100
ethical and moral person, but also because at some point your involvement is made public.
00:52:40.940
And then the public looks at what you did and they judge you for this, right?
00:52:45.260
And so his belief was that if they accomplished this thing they were trying to accomplish
00:52:50.120
with unethical or illegal means, the victory wouldn't stand.
00:52:55.340
And it would also be, as we were talking about earlier, it would be Pyrrhic in the sense that
00:52:59.420
it would come at a great cost to himself because he would have had to become the thing that
00:53:07.920
I have to tell you, this is kind of being spun as an anti-Peter Thiel book.
00:53:17.520
I mean, I don't know how many billionaires there are that would have the self-control
00:53:23.200
that he had to say, no, I want to do it the right way.
00:53:28.540
Because you have an exclusive in this about a guy named Mr. A.
00:53:34.420
I know you're not going to tell me who, but what is Mr. A's role?
00:53:37.920
Well, that is one of the weirdest twists of this story, this incredibly well-covered story.
00:53:42.360
I think people thought, I guess myself included, thought like Peter Thiel was involved on a
00:53:49.200
And in fact, he sort of follows the startup model, which is in 2011, he has dinner with
00:53:55.920
this promising young college graduate who has told Peter he has an idea.
00:54:02.320
And this kid says, Peter, I think I can solve your Gawker problem.
00:54:06.200
I think that buried in their archive of posts are illegal acts or acts that make them vulnerable
00:54:16.620
And I think he says, if you give me $10 million in three to five years of time, I think I can
00:54:24.220
And basically on the spot, Peter invests in this kid.
00:54:26.820
And this kid is Peter's go-between, his operative, who hires the attorneys, who vets the cases,
00:54:37.500
And Peter is, in the way that Peter puts $500,000 in Mark Zuckerberg's hands, and he goes and
00:54:44.140
makes Facebook, Mr. A goes and makes this conspiracy a reality.
00:54:49.040
So what do you think Mr. A is going to be doing now?
00:54:52.380
Well, I would imagine when you solve a problem for a billionaire like this, the world is sort
00:55:00.880
I think he's got basically limitless options now and has one patron who's probably willing
00:55:08.300
to back him on any project under any condition.
00:55:12.980
What was Peter's motivation in cooperating with you, Ryan, on this book?
00:55:19.660
Well, as I'm sure you guys have seen, just seeing the coverage and now talking to me,
00:55:25.420
this is a story that has been intensely covered, but with such bias and such sort of tribal instincts
00:55:32.840
on behalf of the media, because the media sees what happens to Gawker and they think,
00:55:41.240
So there's been this incredible amount of judgment about what's happened.
00:55:44.860
And I think that's greatly impacted the coverage, right?
00:55:47.760
It's to such a degree that Peter has become, in many people's eyes, this sort of James Bond villain.
00:55:55.620
And that's really not what he is when you meet him and you see what he did and why he did it.
00:56:01.380
And so I think, you know, I'd written critically about Gawker many times.
00:56:04.820
You know, myself, my emails were once hacked and leaked to Gawker.
00:56:13.740
You know, I told Peter, look, you're not going to get to see the book before it's printed.
00:56:20.260
But I think he at least believed that I would play it down the middle rather than, you know,
00:56:25.160
holding him up as the villain if that wasn't true.
00:56:34.220
If a billionaire, let's say George Soros, who is not a friend of mine.
00:56:37.160
If he decided to go after me and I was doing some...
00:56:43.660
The blaze was doing things that were blatantly illegal.
00:56:47.140
And I don't mean, you know, death by a million paper cuts with a billionaire could do.
00:56:52.900
I don't think I would have sympathy for Peter if he had just been paper cut after paper cut,
00:56:58.240
technicality after technicality, just keep him in court and bleed him dry.
00:57:01.500
I don't think this is a problem for the First Amendment
00:57:06.440
if they're going after things that are really, truly illegal and they're big.
00:57:14.640
And I'd like to get your response on that when we come back.
00:58:05.940
we've got to do something and how that always leads to bad things.
00:58:09.460
You just don't make good decisions when you're angry, upset, emotionally.
00:58:14.760
It usually also means I'll violate my principles because I want this pain to stop.
00:58:27.360
Gawker did some things that were dangerous for my family.
00:58:38.580
But I wouldn't have done anything to get them to go out of business.
00:58:47.540
He waited to see, is there something that they have done that breaks the law?
00:58:51.540
When they had Hulk Hogan, that was an illegally recorded tape.
00:59:04.000
The problem is, is he's a billionaire, has unlimited sources.
00:59:07.840
And are we setting a precedent that that somebody who has an axe to grind can put another company out of business?
00:59:17.080
One man can put a media company out of business if they want to.
00:59:21.640
Are we did anybody learn that lesson in a negative way?
00:59:27.040
Ryan Holliday is the author of the book Conspiracy.
00:59:29.520
Peter Thiel, Hulk Hogan, Gawker, and the Anatomy of Intrigue.
00:59:37.960
And it is potentially scary to think that a billionaire could shut a media outlet down.
00:59:43.540
And then when you step back, you know, your point about not reacting emotionally.
00:59:47.600
Well, did Peter actually do anything new that doesn't happen every day anyway, right?
00:59:52.220
The ACLU, the Sierra Club, the NRA, they back cases all the time that they think move their ideology forward or stands up for one of their constituents.
01:00:05.280
And so the idea of a wealthy person backing a lawsuit, not out of financial gain but out of ideological alignment, is actually, you know, not remotely new.
01:00:14.960
And if you were to ban it, society would undoubtedly become a worse place, right?
01:00:19.580
Why shouldn't your rich uncle be able to support you against a person who, you know, ran into you with their truck, right?
01:00:27.040
So there's the legal question, which I think he did everything right.
01:00:32.580
And then there's the ethical question, which I think he did everything right.
01:00:37.560
But you have to ask that ethical question, too.
01:00:41.640
And would you have felt different if he would have taken Gawker on with almost frivolous lawsuits and just done death by a thousand paper cuts?
01:00:51.980
Do you think it would have been a different story for you?
01:00:55.080
Absolutely, because there you're not actually attempting to win.
01:00:58.220
You're not attempting to have your argument validated.
01:01:01.780
You're attempting to destroy someone for something that they may have not actually done wrong.
01:01:08.340
And so Peter's decision, for instance, not even to attack on First Amendment grounds because he believes that that is sacred, but to look instead at the individual's right to privacy, right?
01:01:20.280
Is there a newsworthiness in this sex tape or is there a copyright claim here?
01:01:26.660
He specifically did not sue them on, say, frivolous, libel, or defamation grounds because he was worried about the precedent that it might set, and he didn't believe there was anything wrong there.
01:01:39.640
So his distinction is really, really important.
01:01:43.360
And I think, you know, a potential hypothetical would be what if a liberal had backed Shirley Sherrod in her lawsuit against Breitbart when they ran that deliberately edited manipulative tape of her in, I believe it was 2011.
01:02:01.420
And I don't think many of the people who are deeply upset about what happened to Gawker, I don't think they would be upset if Breitbart had gone out of business in 2012.
01:02:10.480
I think they'd be cheering it the exact same way.
01:02:17.320
I wanted to get your take out quickly on, I can't remember the guy's name who actually wrote the story, but he's become somewhat of a cause celeb on the left of a guy because he's not the guy, he's not Nick Denton who ran Gawker, but the guy who actually just did the post.
01:02:37.240
He's, you know, and like just a writer and he's working for Gawker, not making a ton of money.
01:02:41.500
He, and he was involved in this lawsuit and he has been presented as this guy who got in the middle of this thing and he was helpless in this situation.
01:02:52.960
He owes like, you know, an ungodly amount of money for this lawsuit and can't do anything about it.
01:03:00.720
Can you give any perspective on that and how you see that, that went, how that went down?
01:03:06.760
Like, Gawker publishes these stories all the time.
01:03:09.800
It's so unremarkable when he gets the whole Kogan tape that Nick Denton, the CEO, isn't even notified, right?
01:03:15.360
The case that bankrupts the company, the CEO doesn't know about it until after it's published because that's how run of the mill it actually was.
01:03:23.440
And so, yes, it was unfortunate that this individual, this writer doing this job, takes the full brunt of it in the public eye, you know, during the trial, and then is held liable.
01:03:35.300
So the jury says, holds him personally liable for about $100,000 of this $140 million judgment.
01:03:44.120
But what people forget is that months after the verdict, Peter and Hulk Hogan settle with Gawker that releases both Denton and Delario from these individual claims.
01:03:59.120
You know, they were not necessarily ruined by it.
01:04:02.920
And Peter said, like, look, my goal was to destroy Gawker, not to ruin these people personally, but individuals are held accountable for their actions, and that's life.
01:04:17.100
No matter if everybody else is doing it, we still have a choice.
01:04:23.200
I think he's a real force for good, and I think he's a deep and thoughtful man.
01:04:29.160
Um, uh, that doesn't make everything that he, everything that he does, uh, right or good, but he, he really seems to think about things.
01:04:39.920
And he, um, I heard him say once, I, it's not that I, I think I'm right.
01:04:47.800
I just don't think other people are even thinking about these things.
01:04:53.420
He would say that even about this case, that it's often not that, uh, he was right and other people were wrong.
01:05:00.320
It's that Gawker wasn't even, Gawker just assumed that this whole Kogan case would get settled.
01:05:07.620
And so Peter is a person who has theories about the world, and he's willing to, as Nassim Taleb would say, put some skin in the game, right?
01:05:15.320
He's, he's willing to, to throw some weight behind them and, and see what happens.
01:05:19.520
And I think, uh, to me, the lesson of what happened and what I tried to write about in the book is that you can fundamentally disagree with what Peter did.
01:05:27.620
And you can think that it's dangerous and alarming that Gawker doesn't exist anymore, but there is something to study, a lesson to learn about how this guy did it and why he did it and how he was able to effectuate the change that he believed needed to happen outside of, you know, writing op-eds or putting out a petition.
01:05:48.460
You know, he, he, he, he made real change in the real world where other people said there was nothing you could do about it.
01:05:56.000
And to me, that's a lesson that, that in some ways, that's an inspiring thing right now in this society where we're stuck, you know, on both sides of the aisle.
01:06:06.720
We, we, I think we just feel like change can't happen and hear a guy made something happen.
01:06:13.020
When, when, when I saw that in the book, that, uh, that phrase, um, I, I, I thought to myself, that is something that, uh, the, the world is not even, um, rewarding now.
01:06:25.700
It doesn't reward you to think it doesn't reward you to think out of the box and to think differently.
01:06:31.000
Um, and it doesn't reward you to say, I'm not sure if I'm right.
01:06:38.220
Uh, and, uh, and that's really what we're missing.
01:06:41.380
And the irony is that in some ways, Gawker was part of that problem, right?
01:06:46.900
I think one of Teal's objections to them is not just the despicable things that they did and the violations of privacy,
01:06:53.540
but as the site that just sort of made fun of everyone for every mistake, every failure, every personal idiosyncrasy,
01:07:01.840
they were disincentivizing people from thinking outside the box, from being weird.
01:07:07.020
And weirdness is where innovation comes from and creativity.
01:07:11.460
And we should want people to take risks and turn out to be wrong.
01:07:14.960
What we don't want to do is mercilessly mock them to the point where nobody tries anything
01:07:21.160
because they don't want to end up on the front page of Gawker.com or, or any website.
01:07:34.940
That's a, that's a pretty, uh, Ryan, Ryan tells it well.
01:07:37.860
And there's a lot in here that has not previously been reported on it.
01:07:41.340
Conspiracy, Peter Thiel, Hulk Hogan, Gawker, and the anatomy of intrigue by Ryan Holiday.
01:07:46.440
And also we should have Ryan back on at some point.
01:07:52.080
He is a guy who has a firsthand, uh, uh, firsthand experience really with, um, uh, with fake news.
01:08:02.980
I mean, it was really kind of his job as a PR person, uh, and he knows how it works and
01:08:11.720
He's, uh, quickly on the, the concept of that book was that he would, you know, those
01:08:15.840
weird stories that bubble up to the national media and you're like, how did we even hear
01:08:19.720
It was his job to try to get them elevated from, from a blog to local media, to regional
01:08:26.360
media, to national media, to try to get attention for clients and all sorts of stuff.
01:08:31.140
So he was like in the media manipulation business for a long time.
01:08:35.620
It goes to, remember the first thing that I said when we went to CNN and I said, I'm really
01:08:39.980
uncomfortable with this, the ingesting of news.
01:08:43.220
Because if you make one mistake, it, that is your basis forever.
01:08:47.240
Uh, and it's interesting because what he did was it was on a blog and then he would call
01:08:57.820
And then he'd go to the regional news and say, did you see this in the newspaper?
01:09:05.380
When an emergency strikes, what is your first reaction?
01:09:08.640
You're living up in Connecticut and, uh, new England, and you saw that there was a, yet
01:09:21.380
I got to leave early cause we're not going to have any food.
01:09:24.740
And then you go to the store and everybody is, it's, it's, it's become Lord of the flies.
01:09:31.960
Here's a really simple way to avoid all of this.
01:09:33.980
You just, you just have to have a plan, be prepared, know that no matter what happens,
01:09:40.520
I have trusted my Patriot supply for years to help me with food storage.
01:09:46.620
I mean, literally, I, you know, oh, you got to have a big, huge, you know, 20 gallon bucket
01:09:56.240
Honestly, I'm going to grind that and make my own bread in case of an emergency.
01:10:03.220
Right now, this week, you can get two weeks of emergency food supply, breakfast, lunch,
01:10:15.300
One person in your family, get one for every member of your family right now.
01:10:38.220
All you have to do is call or go on the website, preparewithglenn.com, preparewithglenn.com,
01:10:47.620
I mean, if I'm just, just one of the things I like to do, is that still allowed if I order
01:10:54.880
Yeah, I'll either put you in it or give it to you.
01:11:13.880
We're going to, coming up in a few minutes, the conservative case for free trade.
01:11:22.100
And we get into that coming up in just a second.
01:11:25.580
Apparently, America also has a drunk shopping problem.
01:11:31.920
Americans spent an average of $448 per person in drunk purchases in 2017, which seems really
01:11:41.940
But they did a survey of 2,000 adults and found out that number.
01:11:47.560
It is easier to buy things when you've had a couple.
01:11:52.200
It sounds like, speaking from experience there, Stu.
01:11:55.400
I did have an interesting experience fairly recently.
01:12:01.160
And I had a couple of adult beverages, which I tend to do time to time, but not super often.
01:12:06.840
And so I had a couple of adult purchases, and I was talking to a friend of mine who talked
01:12:11.800
to me about, he had just purchased a toilet light.
01:12:15.820
Now, a toilet light is a light, it's a little LED light, and it hangs over the side of your
01:12:24.740
The concept here is that when you walk up to the toilet in the middle of the night, you
01:12:29.040
don't have to turn all the lights on and blind yourself.
01:12:30.780
It just lights the inside of the toilet in a flash, like kind of a cool LED colored light.
01:12:41.420
Now, after a few drinks, that sounded like the greatest invention of all time.
01:12:46.180
And at the party, with Amazon in my pocket, I purchased the toilet light.
01:12:51.280
Shockingly, after a couple more drinks, I did not remember that I ordered a toilet light
01:12:56.340
until I came home and my wife was like, what the hell is this thing?
01:13:00.780
Now, I have toilet lights in, I think, every toilet in the house.
01:13:11.200
And then it was so great, I've now ordered two more for the kids' rooms.
01:13:15.980
If you don't have a toilet light, you need this in your life.
01:13:21.140
Take the podcast of today's show, have a couple beers, then listen to this segment, and you
01:13:32.680
If you're really drunk, you'll have the toilet light to light up when you're heaving over
01:13:36.960
the toilet in the middle of the night later on.
01:13:43.960
Conspiracy theory has spread among Facebook and Instagram users.
01:13:47.920
The company is tapping our microphones to target ads.
01:13:52.980
Facebook does not use your phone's microphone to inform ads or to change what you see in the
01:14:01.500
They say what they say what's happening is they're basically following everything that
01:14:09.860
you do because you give them permission to do that.
01:14:12.660
It's basically, no, we're not listening to you.
01:14:17.660
And, hey, Google, you're not listening to us all the time, are you?
01:14:30.300
Hey, Alexa, you're not listening to us, are you?
01:14:40.280
I only send audio back to Amazon when I hear you say the wake word.
01:14:44.320
For more information and to view Amazon's office.
01:15:04.500
Right now in America, we're having a discussion of principles, or we should be having a discussion
01:15:11.140
of principles, but sometimes it just turns into a discussion of teams.
01:15:16.520
The principles that set America up as the great changing force of the world was freedom
01:15:26.500
And it started with, really, can we just, can we be free to exchange between each other
01:15:32.200
At the very beginning, the Articles of Confederation, the reason why it was too weak is everybody
01:15:36.140
everybody had their own money, people were charging different taxes and tariffs across
01:15:42.100
the state borders, and we knew if we were going to be the United States, that wasn't going
01:15:48.000
We needed to be able to trade with each other and just have, and everybody will be on an
01:15:53.620
That's really one of the biggest problems of the Articles of Confederation and why we adopted
01:16:07.060
But right now we're having a discussion that maybe we shouldn't have free trade.
01:16:11.640
Maybe because of national interest or national security, we should have tariffs here, there,
01:16:27.620
Why is this important as a conservative principle?
01:16:31.180
Here to talk to us about that is Scott Lincecum.
01:16:33.400
He's an adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute and an expert on free trade.
01:16:43.840
Scott, tell me in a nutshell, so let's start at macro.
01:16:47.880
Why is this a fundamental conservative principle?
01:16:56.420
But most basically, and you brought it up with respect to trade among the states, free
01:17:00.900
trade really at its most basic is simply the absence of government in voluntary mutually
01:17:06.860
beneficial transactions that just so happen to go across borders.
01:17:11.560
You know, just as conservatives recoil at the thought of putting a bureaucrat between themselves
01:17:16.340
and their doctors, you'd think they'd be similarly opposed to putting a bureaucrat between themselves
01:17:24.620
Now, beyond that simple principle, when you then look at what protectionism is on the other
01:17:31.800
end of free trade, you see that protectionism is a hidden regressive tax on consumers who
01:17:38.160
are forced by government to subsidize certain well-connected producers.
01:17:41.820
And, you know, the only difference between a tariff and a subsidy is that the tariff money
01:17:45.720
comes right out of our own pockets instead of coming out of the treasury.
01:17:49.300
And this is kind of a classic bottom-up redistribution and one that actually hurts poor Americans more
01:17:55.880
than richer Americans because poor Americans have, you know, of course, smaller budgets to
01:18:00.960
Is there any difference between Illinois saying to Alabama, because Alabama got a new BMW plant
01:18:11.520
and all the workers are going to go down there, and Illinois saying, you know what, you brought
01:18:17.200
them in at an unfair advantage because you brought them in with tax incentives, and so anything
01:18:23.100
that comes from Alabama, if you buy that BMW in Illinois, we're going to charge you a little
01:18:31.260
No, you know, there's not any sort of fundamental difference between the border between two
01:18:40.980
You know, you can try to think of kind of nationalistic ideas, but the fact is, in terms
01:18:46.560
of kind of the economics and the principles of it, you're really dealing with the same thing.
01:18:52.300
So aren't we doing that then by saying, I'm going to give Boeing a tax incentive by coming
01:19:01.580
Why does it work with the states and it doesn't work with foreign countries?
01:19:06.880
Well, I mean, I think one of the reasons is that we kind of recognize the value of the
01:19:13.980
system of the free exchange of goods across borders when it comes to the states.
01:19:20.120
And we don't think that while we might not be thrilled with certain companies in certain
01:19:25.260
states getting these subsidies, we understand that, first of all, their taxpayers are, in
01:19:31.740
But second, that the system itself is so valuable that it's not worth destroying it just because
01:19:39.340
we might not like what happens every once in a while.
01:19:42.480
That there is kind of this greater importance to keeping the system alive.
01:19:47.300
Now, when you change that to international boundaries, for some reason, that whole calculus
01:19:56.020
And all of a sudden, you know, foreign governments subsidizing our consumption is a big problem.
01:20:02.840
And we are far more willing to accept government interference in our transactions because of these
01:20:12.060
vague kind of allegations on fairness or whatever.
01:20:14.440
Now, never mind that a lot of these allegations of unfairness are made by the foreign producers'
01:20:23.680
And in fact, those are the guys who got to write our unfair trade laws.
01:20:27.120
And those are the guys that you might imagine have a rather strong commercial interest in
01:20:33.040
ensuring that we as consumers buy from them and not from their foreign competition.
01:20:37.540
There's been about three main conversations, I feel like, going around this topic.
01:20:44.700
The first one, though, I think has been the least covered, which is, let's just say the
01:20:56.460
Are the circumstances with the steel industry in particular even there to justify it if it
01:21:09.080
So if you look at steel production over the last actually several decades, it's pretty
01:21:15.200
There was, of course, a huge drop in the Great Recession.
01:21:17.420
But over the last almost 10 years, steel output's been about 90 million tons.
01:21:26.520
And imports are still only about 25% to 27% of the market.
01:21:30.540
So the U.S. industry still has over 70% of the domestic market share.
01:21:36.760
They're actually making hundreds of millions of dollars in profits right now.
01:21:40.280
And then, of course, you look at the national security arguments here, which are what are
01:21:48.040
And you look at most of our imports actually come from our closest allies, like Canada, for
01:21:55.440
And these are countries with which we have security treaties.
01:21:59.400
I mean, Canada, for heaven's sakes, is part of the American national defense industrial
01:22:08.200
If we play this out, I mean, looking at World War II, we had the resources, we had the factories,
01:22:17.900
If we were down to 10% steel, we were only making 10% of our own steel, you could make
01:22:26.160
the case that a country to be strong has got to have these plants.
01:22:33.660
So in fact, Secretary Mattis himself wrote a letter to the Department of Commerce, as
01:22:38.620
was required under the statute we're dealing with right now.
01:22:41.720
And he noted that only 3% of current Department of Defense needs could be satisfied.
01:22:50.760
So only 3% of total domestic steel production could satisfy all of DOD's needs.
01:22:57.420
So DOD only needs a tiny fraction of our actual U.S. steel output.
01:23:03.480
So the idea that we have this withering steel industry, then we can't build tanks and planes
01:23:09.200
and the rest, just simply is nonsense, as Secretary Mattis himself made clear.
01:23:16.360
Pretty much every president from both parties has always talked about and many times enacted
01:23:30.960
And so in a paper I wrote for Cato last year, I actually documented the long history of
01:23:40.980
And if you look at over the years, over and over and over again, steel protectionism imposed
01:23:49.400
And not just American families, but also a lot of American businesses and workers, you know,
01:23:53.980
manufacturers that need steel, construction companies that, of course, need steel.
01:23:59.360
So not only did it impose immense costs, hundreds of thousands of dollars per year for any steel
01:24:05.880
job saved or created, but also didn't even lead to the revitalization of the industry.
01:24:16.740
The industry still came back for even more protection.
01:24:19.260
And so over and over again, you see that it just simply didn't work.
01:24:24.960
And in fact, you see, in some cases, the industry refusing to innovate, refusing to reinvest, refusing
01:24:32.340
to get lean and mean and competitive again, and instead relying on government protection.
01:24:42.280
So Scott, because in one other part of this is you could argue that you can save a few
01:24:50.840
But the overall effect on employment in America is actually negative with these things.
01:24:58.160
So if you look, for example, at the – so, of course, President Bush imposed steel safeguard
01:25:06.680
And the net result was a destruction of about 250,000 jobs, according to one report, 100,000
01:25:17.540
The fact is that you saw a net destruction of jobs overall.
01:25:22.600
And that's just basic common sense, really, especially in something like steel that's
01:25:29.840
Steel workers in this country are outnumbered by steel-consuming workers by something like
01:25:38.380
So it's inevitable that if you tax the inputs of these 45 to save the 1, you're going to
01:25:46.200
And that's, of course, what happens over and over.
01:25:47.920
And that's leaving out the kind of egg-heady economics on deadweight loss and the rest.
01:25:53.060
I mean, just looking at the common sense angle of it, you're going to end up with losses
01:25:59.540
So let me ask you the third question, and that is trade wars are easy to win.
01:26:09.100
Yeah, the sad thing about a trade war is that everyone loses.
01:26:18.880
All you've really done is you end up, you're poorer.
01:26:22.140
In fact, trade wars are simply when both sides yell across the ocean and then turn inward
01:26:29.500
And that's really what happens over and over again.
01:26:31.880
You know, as we tax imports of whether it be steel or automobiles, we simply harm American
01:26:38.780
And, you know, foreign exporters will get hurt, too, but you're taking a lot of casualties
01:26:45.980
And then, of course, if a foreign government retaliates, which many have promised to do
01:26:50.780
in the case of the current steel and aluminum tariffs, then, of course, our exporters get
01:26:57.180
And at the end of the day, everybody's just poor and worse off.
01:27:00.900
And when the thing finally ends, there is no real victor here.
01:27:05.840
So I want to take a quick break and then I want to come back because there's I want you
01:27:10.440
to make the case for the person who is just hardworking, is really struggling, sees jobs
01:27:18.120
going overseas, sees their jobs not getting any better.
01:27:24.100
It's because we're being taken advantage of by Europe and China.
01:27:27.980
And I want you to speak directly to that person when we come back.
01:27:31.580
It's Scott Lincecum from the Cato Institute, and it's nobody better.
01:27:41.780
You can read his, he just wrote a story for, he referenced the paper from Cato.
01:27:46.140
You can find it, we'll tweet it out at World of Stew and at Glenn Beck.
01:27:49.300
Paying off debt can take forever and it piles up really fast, but it didn't have to be this
01:27:53.700
If you own a home and you have some equity, refinancing to consolidate and pay off debt
01:28:05.040
But a great way to tell is by making a 10 minute phone call to the salary based mortgage consultants
01:28:11.500
These guys have access to every loan in the industry.
01:28:14.900
They work for you and they will only offer refinance options if they make sense for your
01:28:20.580
financial goals and they'll walk you through it step by step.
01:28:23.440
Again, they're not trying to sell you anything.
01:28:27.000
They're trying to help you make the best decision on which loans you should get from
01:28:36.220
American Financing can review your current mortgage, look for options that lower your
01:28:40.000
monthly payments or help you achieve a better financial status.
01:28:42.960
And with American Financing, it's straightforward and effortless mortgage experiences every time.
01:28:53.380
That's 800-906-2440 or online at AmericanFinancing.net.
01:28:59.880
American Financing Corporation, NMLS 1-82334, www.nmlsconsumeraccess.org.
01:29:10.740
Talking free trade in layman's terms on why this is a conservative principle, why it's
01:29:27.040
And Scott, I want you to speak directly to the person who is not into global politics.
01:29:32.940
They look at globalism and say, yeah, I want to be a part of the global community, but
01:29:36.800
we're being ripped off and I'm struggling and I feel like our jobs are going overseas and
01:29:54.040
So, you know, I think there are a lot of responses there.
01:29:58.220
I mean, the first, of course, is that, you know, I think free traders generally need to
01:30:02.280
be a bit more sympathetic to the concerns and fears of, you know, a lot of average Americans.
01:30:07.560
You know, we're dealing right now in a very disruptive economic period.
01:30:14.820
In fact, the vast majority of job losses, particularly manufacturing, over the last few decades have
01:30:23.000
come from automation and technological change than from trade.
01:30:29.160
And of course, there are changing consumer tastes that just simply we prefer services more
01:30:36.020
these days than we do to certain manufactured goods and so forth.
01:30:39.040
And so, you know, there is a necessary amount of sympathy that goes to kind of being in this
01:30:48.440
But again, it's important to note that this isn't just or even primarily a globalization thing.
01:30:55.020
The second thing to note is, though, that the parts of disruption that are trade related
01:31:00.640
are really just manifestations of kind of free market competition, which we kind of all
01:31:06.680
inherently understand are really good and not just good, but important for our economy.
01:31:12.860
And, you know, the American economy is this kind of dynamic, churning beast of sorts that
01:31:18.980
if you start to slow that down or if you start to prevent the adjustment that the economy kind
01:31:25.880
of does naturally in a free market, if you start thwarting all of these great things that
01:31:30.140
come from free market competition, we actually all will end up even worse off.
01:31:35.020
And, you know, on trade, that's not just cheaper T-shirts.
01:31:39.380
It's jobs, whether it be trucking or ports or in, again, import-consuming manufacturing and
01:31:52.060
But look, that still doesn't help the guy whose job actually did get, you know, outsourced
01:32:03.700
But, again, it's a part of this kind of greater economic dynamism.
01:32:10.620
And the other point, you know, oftentimes unmentioned is that, you know, if you have jobs that were
01:32:17.600
literally, that literally existed only because they were behind a tariff wall or because they
01:32:23.580
were receiving a government subsidy, you know, you do, of course, have to ask the question
01:32:27.280
about whether that job, whether that subsidy or that tariff really needs should be staying
01:32:33.960
I mean, you know, you're, again, are kind of dealing with this redistribution idea.
01:32:37.340
Should some of us be forced to subsidize others?
01:32:41.300
But, you know, look, finally, there is an adjustment thing.
01:32:45.120
You know, something that we talk about a lot is we really do need better policies in place
01:32:51.140
when it comes to helping workers, helping individuals adjust.
01:32:55.520
You know, we just have not updated our policies to reflect how disruptive an era we have right now.
01:33:06.660
In fact, it's far more about all these other things that are going on.
01:33:10.240
And particularly information technology, and to have policies that are from the 1950s and 60s
01:33:18.300
to help workers that are disrupted, displaced in 2018 really makes no sense.
01:33:25.260
I think there really is a place for a legitimate government action or at least reform of our systems.
01:33:31.400
You know, one of the things I love to talk about, the example I love to use, is that for a long time
01:33:35.720
we had a tax credit for people who were training in their same job, but they couldn't get that exact same benefit
01:33:48.160
Quick, Scott Lintigam, we have got about 30 seconds left, 40 seconds.
01:33:53.960
I read the Constitution, Article 1, Section 8, 2 say,
01:33:57.400
the Congress shall have power to regulate commerce with foreign nations.
01:34:01.440
Yet we were talking about this as if the Congress can't do anything to stop these tariffs.
01:34:08.180
Right, so because Congress has over the years delegated so much of its trade powers to the
01:34:14.160
president, you're really looking now that the Congress would have to act, would have to
01:34:19.700
pass some sort of legislation, and I guess it would have to be veto-proof legislation.
01:34:25.280
Under this very same law, Congress in 1980 actually did pass a law against its own, a president
01:34:36.440
So there is potential for action, and Congress does have the constitutional authority to do
01:34:40.760
But more broadly, we really need to have a talk about whether the trade powers delegated to
01:34:45.680
the president still makes sense in today's economy, but not only in today's economy, with today's
01:34:53.320
Adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute, and probably the leading authority on trade, and why free
01:35:00.600
trade is something we should all be a champion of.
01:35:23.940
We just talked about steel, and we were not wearing a hard hat.
01:35:27.700
I don't know if you've seen all of the people on location, all of the reporters that are talking
01:35:32.560
about steel, they're all wearing hard hats now.
01:35:35.960
I will say, I did roll my sleeves up for that last segment if you weren't watching on television.
01:35:49.840
Natasha, I need at least two hard hats in the studio at all times in case we need to talk
01:36:02.060
I just want to mention, though, that I've got permanent calluses on a couple of my fingers,
01:36:06.900
I've never done an ounce of hard work in my life.
01:36:20.220
The only hard work you've ever done is like when car doors were heavy and you had to open
01:36:39.900
What's really funny is you go out to farm or something.
01:37:02.360
The minute the minute I would have to farm my land.
01:37:05.900
I love I love being the farmer that I am because I'm only up and I'll plow the fields and I'll
01:37:11.820
you know, I'll cut the hay and everything else.
01:37:16.360
And the minute I say I'm done, I just turn the tractor off, walk away.
01:37:25.460
Well, I think people that listen to this show recognize that I'm the real American here.
01:37:29.400
You know, you guys both started in radio very young.
01:37:31.960
Now, I had I've had difficult manufacturing type jobs.
01:37:44.420
Which basically like if you think you're like a spot welder, right?
01:37:47.440
And there's a big sheet of metal and it's sitting up on a table.
01:37:53.460
And what I would do is I would get under the table and they would do that.
01:37:57.340
They would do the spot weld above my head and then sparks would fall on me.
01:38:10.680
It was 100 degrees and there were sparks in my face.
01:38:14.540
If you were doing that because you were going to make a metal table yourself.
01:38:19.880
You'd be out there and be like, this is the greatest.
01:38:22.760
That's the people like, I want to restore old cars.
01:38:28.220
When we actually had no money to buy cars and they were breaking down all the time.
01:38:37.480
Do you remember the days when you could just reach behind the instrument panel and you
01:38:50.760
And you would do that because I'm not fixing it and I'm tired of looking at it.
01:38:58.140
Now the check engine light comes on and you're like, oh, crap.
01:39:02.640
Well, now you can't even have access to the battery anymore.
01:39:12.200
I've had to jump my car a couple of times, which is about as deep into car repair as I
01:39:19.180
But now the two places you put the thingies, you know what I'm saying?
01:39:25.060
If you're not a car person, I don't understand.
01:39:26.920
The places you put the thingies are not next to each other on the battery anymore.
01:39:30.380
There's one, like in one place, and then you got to reach down underneath the car to
01:39:34.100
a completely different section of the engine block.
01:39:37.540
There might be things down there that could cut your fingers off.
01:39:51.780
When Tanya bought me, she bought this old truck, 1957, and it's, I mean, the engine
01:39:58.820
is huge, but it just looks like there's nothing to it.
01:40:04.820
You can get to any side, and the truck is so damn big that you could probably almost
01:40:09.160
stand next to the engine in between, you know, inside under the hood.
01:40:14.920
And so when we first got it, you know, I know nothing about cars.
01:40:19.760
And so Rafe and I were looking at it, and we, you know, he jumped up on the bumper, and
01:40:23.340
he was looking into the engine, and I was telling him, you know, I think these are the
01:40:32.200
And then we got underneath the car, and we were just laying there, and we were just looking
01:40:49.460
We ended up spending like 40 minutes just laying underneath the car, and Tanya came
01:40:56.040
out, and she said, what the hell are you guys doing?
01:40:59.120
And I said, we're just learning about the truck.
01:41:01.320
She said, neither of you know anything about it.
01:41:06.320
But there was something about laying underneath the car and pretending that we did.
01:41:12.000
But I contend, if I actually would have had to fix that truck, and there was nobody else
01:41:19.360
to fix it, it wouldn't have been a fun experience with me and my son.
01:41:23.520
I would have come out with a finger that was bleeding, and I would have thrown, not that
01:41:30.480
I would have been saying things at that level to him.
01:41:34.560
I mean, people sort of romanticize, I guess is the right word, of manufacturing jobs.
01:41:39.600
And it's like, well, you know, anyone losing their job, you don't want to lose your income,
01:41:44.760
It doesn't mean that we should glorify manufacturing jobs as this thing that we want the entire
01:41:49.500
economy to be based on in the future and make sure all of them return.
01:41:53.040
I'd rather have, I mean, I think most people would rather have, if they had a choice between
01:41:56.940
a manufacturing job and a job where they flap their fat mouth for three hours on radio,
01:42:05.080
You don't have to know what the hell you're doing.
01:42:07.360
And two out of the three have no calluses on their hands.
01:42:09.900
And the one who does has no idea how they appeared.
01:42:19.460
But you know, what's interesting is, is if you look at the stats that we went over yesterday,
01:42:25.840
60 or 80% of jobs now are white collar in America.
01:42:31.940
And something that we all would have said is really, really good.
01:42:37.360
That used to be, they used to say, oh, we don't want these low paying jobs.
01:42:40.180
Now they're saying, because manufacturing jobs has a really good political sort of connotation
01:42:45.600
You're talking about things, because it's like what you were talking about.
01:42:48.060
You're talking about people who, men who actually look like men.
01:42:54.340
But they're jobs people complained about, right?
01:42:58.280
I've been in a factory my whole life, and you think, oh, dang it, I'm sorry.
01:43:01.460
Right, like you get, it was something, I mean, it was.
01:43:04.520
And there's a nostalgia related to it, just like you were talking about fixing cars.
01:43:08.900
You get your hands dirty, you get in there, but it's a, it's a picture.
01:43:14.760
Yeah, I mean, you wind up with, you know, long-term problems.
01:43:17.080
Why do you think, unions are always complaining that they need larger healthcare plans and better
01:43:23.420
It's not just because, you know, there are legitimate health problems that arise from
01:43:32.120
My grandfather had a finger cut off in a job that he had, and it was just like, oh, yeah,
01:43:43.040
I was out, and I was out with the tractor, and we were, I don't know what it is, but
01:43:49.300
you got a spiky thing that goes off the side, and it kind of fluffs up the, fluffs up the
01:44:07.020
You have no idea what you're talking about right now.
01:44:15.440
You sound like every liberal on guns right now.
01:44:19.000
Good thing is, there's only about five farmers left in America.
01:44:22.320
So, so, but it got, it, some, I can't remember, it's been a few years, something got tangled
01:44:28.920
up, or, oh, because the alfalfa, it can, it can start to get caught up in this, like,
01:44:40.220
So, so, so, you know, you get out and you're immediately looking at it and you're like,
01:44:47.920
And if you don't, if you don't turn the fluffer off, it's just jammed and you've got your hands
01:44:54.560
and arms in there and if the fluffer starts to fluff again, it's going to rip your arms
01:44:58.500
That's why farming is one of the most dangerous jobs you can have.
01:45:01.820
And when you, you know, when you're, when you don't have a farm hand that you go, hey, the
01:45:09.420
Uh, and then he gets out and then you're logically just sitting there going, I don't know what
01:45:17.300
That's when you say, should I turn the fluffer off?
01:45:23.600
Now this is a very specific hypothetical situation, but it could happen.
01:45:29.500
I'm, I have no idea of what you're saying makes any sense, but I cannot hear it in the
01:45:47.380
If I remember, if I guys have to call me, you have to call me.
01:45:52.460
Oh, you have to remember it's seven o'clock central.
01:45:55.300
So eight Eastern, and this is the one that was done, what, 10, 12 years ago when they
01:46:07.320
Cause the, uh, the Goldman's were pissed and they stopped it and they were like, Hey, maybe
01:46:12.840
you shouldn't be making millions of dollars off from our kids murder.
01:46:15.720
Um, so they, it became such a controversy at the time.
01:46:18.660
And so whoever did it in the first place, I think it was Fox, wasn't it?
01:46:21.840
And so now they're bringing it back out after all this time and putting it on the
01:46:25.520
air and they're putting it on the air now because, ah, nobody cares about the Goldman's
01:46:33.140
So, um, so they're going to play it and he goes through this hypothetical and he starts
01:46:39.400
And then all of a sudden it turns first person and it's chilling when he does, uh, because
01:46:44.380
he starts talking about his friend, Charlie, uh, that came over to his house.
01:46:48.120
And he said to me, in the words of OJ, he said to me, OJ, you're not going to believe
01:46:55.500
And he said, whatever is going on, it's got to stop.
01:47:00.900
We have the, I think we have the trailer of it.
01:47:04.400
In 2006, OJ Simpson gave a no holds barred interview, including his gripping account
01:47:10.520
of what might've happened that fateful night for over a decade.
01:47:14.260
The tapes of that infamous interview were lost until now.
01:47:18.740
I'm going to tell you a story you've never heard before.
01:47:25.140
And it concerns the murders of my ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her young friend, Ronald
01:47:30.220
Forget everything you think you know about that night, because I know the facts better
01:47:48.840
It was sitting in some vault someplace and somebody was licking their chops going, oh my gosh.
01:47:55.780
Now that he's out, they can, uh, they can actually play this, I guess.
01:47:59.440
I mean, it's, it's, it's amazing because he does do it in a first person, but wasn't
01:48:06.540
It's one of the strangest things in American history.
01:48:09.060
Well, because he starts talking like if it happened, here's how it might've happened.
01:48:13.740
But then he switches to, I did this and he said this to me.
01:48:18.280
And it's a chilling kind of switch into first person speak where it sounds like he's talking
01:48:27.620
Can you imagine going to someone who, who was accused of a crime and his freedom, you
01:48:31.580
know, is dependent on the idea that he did not commit it and going to him and saying,
01:48:35.620
Hey, would you write a book describing a hypothetical way that you'd commit the crime you're accused
01:48:41.320
of what person, what, what would possibly motivate you other than the fact that you did do it
01:48:47.580
and you believe you wanted to confess for some reason, either money or for, uh, to get
01:48:53.200
it off your chest, but you knew you couldn't do it without going to prison.
01:48:56.820
I just, I just want to also point out it's worse than that.
01:48:58.980
It is imagine your wife has been killed a brutal, brutal killing.
01:49:06.400
You are busy looking for the killer on every golf course in America.
01:49:14.640
And you would be, you would say that's obscene.
01:49:19.520
If I, if I remember, if I remember, I am going to definitely watch this on Sunday night.
01:49:23.780
If you remember, well, you might be out fixing old cars, uh, in the garage.
01:49:27.400
Well, I'm not fixing exactly sitting under them.
01:49:30.880
You need to put a flat screen underneath the car.
01:49:33.080
I've already got one because the car doesn't work because I have no idea how to fix it.
01:49:38.600
The home security company that I have worked with since they had only 10 employees and
01:49:43.560
they have transformed now into the fastest growing home security company in the nation.
01:49:49.700
They just released a brand new home security system.
01:49:53.340
It has been completely rebuilt and redesigned and they've added new safeguards to
01:49:57.220
protect against power outages, down wifi, cut landlines, bats, hammers, everything in
01:50:02.160
between the all new simply safe redesigned to be practically invisible with powerful new
01:50:08.800
Now, what's really remarkable is they've spent all of this time and money and, and, and
01:50:13.160
redesigned the system into state of the art smart technology.
01:50:17.300
And you still get it at a fair and honest price.
01:50:28.460
It's smaller, it's faster, and it's stronger than anything they've built before, but supply
01:50:33.640
So visit simply safe back.com to order right now.
01:50:36.520
In fact, you go to the website, just take a look at how much money you will save by not
01:50:41.540
having a contract and not having wired security, but instead keeping your family safe.
01:50:46.420
The simple way with simply safe back.com simply safe back.com Glenn Beck, they think that
01:51:05.000
they may have found Amelia Earhart and don't get excited.
01:51:15.640
Uh, anyway, new scientific study shows that, uh, bounds of the bones found in 1940 on a
01:51:25.960
Um, uh, they said that 1941, these were not her bones.
01:51:33.460
And, uh, they've said that these are, it looks, I don't know the full story.
01:51:44.080
They found a sextant, uh, there, uh, they found herbal liqueur.
01:51:49.460
Uh, and, you know, this is a better ending for her, I think, being a possible castaway on
01:51:55.780
this island than the other theory is, is that she was captured by the Japanese and tortured
01:52:00.920
to death because they thought she was a, a, uh, an American spy, but we'll give you the