In honor of Martin Luther King Day, we take a look at the life and legacy of the civil rights activist and civil rights hero, Dr. Martin L. King. We talk about his life, his legacy, and the impact he had on the world.
00:19:17.820I mean, I think part of that is we've looked at it as sort of the things he was saying rather than the idea of someone who's offering radical change, right?
00:19:27.820And, you know, it's interesting in that, like, the big problem with racism pre-Martin Luther King, right, is that people make race too important, right?
00:19:38.960White people who were racists back in the day were the people who were saying white identity is important.
00:19:48.060And the same thing, of course, exists today in whatever white supremacist tiny, you know, sects there are and the alt-right and everything else.
00:19:56.580And I would say that it also exists in the African-American community in small sects as well, where they hate white people.
00:20:50.460And I don't know when the left is going to get that.
00:20:54.340Probably never because they really, they are filled with a lot of rage and a lot of hatred and a lot of misconceptions about what's real and what's not.
00:21:05.600Yeah, I mean, the goal is supposed to be you don't base relationships on these immutable characteristics, right?
00:21:12.500You don't base it on whatever sexual orientation or gender or these things are supposed to fade away and you're supposed to you're supposed to treat people as individuals.
00:21:20.900Well, that's a terrible message for today's collectivist, right?
00:21:24.680You can't be you can't be treating people as individuals if you're a collectivist.
00:21:27.940The whole point of this is to put people into groups and mass summarize them and say this group is evil and this group is evil and this group is evil.
00:21:35.820They just want to change the groups around, which doesn't solve the problem at all.
00:21:40.740You're going to go now into, what, 400 years of reverse racism and the pattern continues.
00:21:47.500We I think we were on the right track.
00:21:49.520I think we really had a few years of being on the right track where my generation, your generation, we don't see color.
00:21:59.820And now we're being taught that we have to see color and no, wait, that's the opposite of what Martin Luther King.
00:22:07.900And I really think that a lot of people, both black and white, thought we were we were not perfect, but we were moving in the right direction.
00:22:17.100And I will tell you now, 10 years, 15 years later, I think people would say we're moving in the wrong direction.
00:22:23.820Yeah, remember when Barack Obama was elected, everyone was told this is going to be a post-racial presidency.
00:23:01.000There's something almost mischievous about it, like you're pulling a fast one.
00:23:04.900However, nothing could be further from the truth when it comes to Mike Lindell's latest offer, a buy one, get one on his sets of Giza dream sheets.
00:24:19.980He absolutely is entitled to the best constitutional defense he can get.
00:24:46.340What he's not entitled to is Alan pretending like he's some sort of neutral observer instead of what he is, which is Donald Trump's lawyer.
00:24:55.840For some reason, you don't want to admit that, and that's up to you.
00:25:00.960But you are pretending that there is some sort of perfect constitutional sweet spot.
00:25:07.180It doesn't have to be a crime, but it can't be simply being a bad president.
00:25:12.960That there is some magical area in there that is an impeachable offense.
00:25:16.920And I think, straightforwardly, that abuse of power, the framers recognized it.
00:26:00.140The president's entitled to leave it to the courts to decide whether or not members of the executive have to comply with subpoenas.
00:26:06.900But they do also charge him in the Ukraine matter with abuse of power.
00:26:11.020But abuse of power was discussed by the framers.
00:26:13.880It was given as a reason why we should have impeachment in the Constitution at all.
00:26:19.060But then when it came to coming up with criteria for impeachment, the framers refused to include abuse of power because it was too broad, too open-ended.
00:26:27.300And in the words of James Madison, who's the father of our Constitution, would leave presidents to serve at the will of Congress.
00:26:35.640And that's exactly what the framers didn't want, which is why they were very specific and said a president can be impeached only for treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.
00:27:17.500It's just that his blood wouldn't be attainted.
00:27:19.920His family wouldn't be suffering because it wasn't a felony.
00:27:24.460But those misdemeanors could be very, very serious.
00:27:27.340They also included things like maladministration, but the frame is explicitly rejected.
00:27:33.400There was actually a vote on maladministration, and it went down, I think, 9 to 2 or something like that.
00:27:40.320And then the person who offered that amendment withdrew it and substituted high crimes and misdemeanors.
00:27:46.780I've now read, I think, every word of every framer debating impeachment.
00:27:52.920And I've also, of course, read the Federalist Papers, and I've read the statements made by the lawyers in the trial of Andrew Johnson.
00:28:00.360And I think I'm pretty well prepared to help inform the senators.
00:28:05.180Jeffrey Toobin seems to think somehow it's a sin for me to be presenting my case to the Senate because I'm not involved in every aspect of the trial.
00:28:18.460Very often I come into a case as of counsel on the constitutional issues.
00:28:22.980And I don't get involved in the day-to-day issues in the case, but I just present on the constitutional issues.
00:28:30.200And that's precisely what I'm doing in this case.
00:28:32.320It's consistent with what I've done in many, many other prior cases.
00:29:07.260If they're charging abuse of power in the Ukraine, they're saying basically that he was trying to withhold money, etc., etc.
00:29:17.220But how can you prove that without going into what the president was concerned about on the abuse of the Ukrainians through the State Department, you know, through our embassy in 2016 and also the use of our money being laundered and shipped back to Hunter Biden?
00:29:43.280How can you possibly make this case without going into what the president said?
00:29:53.460Well, I think there's a fair point for that.
00:29:55.860And if witnesses are called by the Democrats, obviously witnesses will have to be called by the Republicans.
00:30:00.580One of the issues will be when the president said on the telephone call to the president of Ukraine, I need you to look into whether or not there was an investigation of Hunter Biden.
00:30:14.100And we have to see, because remember, we do have a conversation between Joe Biden, who I like and I've known for many, many years.
00:30:24.640But there is that conversation, which he said he told the Ukrainians that unless they fire the prosecutor within six hours, the money will be withheld.
00:30:32.920Now, the question is, was that prosecutor corrupt?
00:30:39.500Was that abuse of power will have to come up and that will have to be.
00:30:44.260Look, I don't think abuse of power is a constitutionally impeachable offense, regardless of who does it.
00:30:50.280I don't distinguish between Democrats and Republicans.
00:30:52.900But I think that all these things would have to be looked at and the trial would be interminable.
00:30:58.300It would take forever if this is a call.
00:31:01.120But if that's what the Senate wants, excuse me, they have the authority to do it because they make the decisions.
00:31:06.940So wouldn't, wouldn't abuse of power be like what Nixon was doing, using federal agencies for his own, wouldn't abuse of power be Barack Obama with the IRS or his administration with the IRS?
00:31:23.500Well, with Nixon, he committed crimes.
00:31:26.700At least he was accused of committing crimes.
00:31:28.400That is, paying hush money to witnesses.
00:31:31.980He was accused of telling his associates the lie to the FBI, of erasing a tape.
00:31:38.240All of those would be criminal if they could be proved.
00:31:41.460Whereas what's alleged against President Trump is not criminal.
00:31:44.940If they had criminal issues to allege, you could be sure they would have done it.
00:31:49.600If they could establish bribery or treason, they would have done it.
00:31:54.820They instead used this concept of abuse of power, which is so broad and general, that any president could, as you say, any president could be charged with it.
00:32:04.380So is it, is it accurate to describe the impeachment?
00:32:09.020Because I don't think a lot of people even understand how this works.
00:32:12.280But, you know, on a very surface level, that what the House did is almost like a grand jury.
00:32:22.420And then it's passed over to the Senate.
00:32:24.520Now, can they continue to add new things?
00:32:28.800For instance, this Lev Parnas stuff, which I find interesting at best.
00:32:35.680But they, can they continue to evolve the charges?
00:32:40.980Well, they can add new evidence of the original charges, but they can't add new charges without going through the impeachment process in the House.
00:32:53.380And, you know, that's, so Lev Parnas would be a hard case.
00:32:56.940Because to the extent he's alleging something different, that may be required going back to the House.
00:33:02.720To the extent that he's simply allegedly adding evidence to what's already been charged, then it probably wouldn't have to go back to the House.
00:33:09.780But, you know, these are issues that would have to be determined by the House and the Senate because the Constitution doesn't lay out the procedures.
00:33:16.940It just says the House shall be the sole judge of impeachment and the Senate shall be the sole judge of conviction or acquittal.
00:33:23.540And what is the role of the chief justice?
00:33:30.980I mean, he's put there only in case of presidential impeachments.
00:33:34.840Now, you can argue one of the reasons he's there is because the president pro temp of the Senate is in the line of succession with the president.
00:33:46.960I think they wanted to add a judicial element to so important a job as removing a duly elected president.
00:33:53.140So I think the chief justice has some role to play.
00:33:56.380But what exactly it is, nobody's sure.
00:33:58.280What are the things that we should be watching for, Alan, from both sides?
00:34:04.900What are the things that will show us one way or another which way this is going?
00:34:09.280Well, I think the questions from the senators and the questions from the House managers, I'm looking forward to those questions already.
00:34:18.120The media and some of the media, particularly in the hard left media, are predicting that I will be devastated by the questions.
00:34:24.660I assure you I'm going to be very well prepared for any question that's asked me.
00:34:29.500I've argued 250 appeals over a 50-year period.
00:34:32.860I've never been asked a question during that period of time that I wasn't prepared for, and I intend to be prepared for the questions here.
00:34:40.260Whether my answer is suffice or not is going to be up to the senators, but I will be prepared.
00:34:44.400So are you going to be testifying or are you going to be advising because you're not?
00:34:51.280I'm going to be making the argument on the constitutional issue.
00:34:53.660I'm going to be presenting to the Senate an argument as to why the Constitution doesn't permit the conviction of Donald Trump based on these two articles of impeachment of counsel on the constitutional issue.
00:35:06.420Is this much different than the role you played with O.J. Simpson where you, if I remember right, you had a specific part of the trial you were taking on, right?
01:24:14.900There is a part of you that's cowboy, honorable in your daily dealings, authentic in the way we live, committed to the ideals that built the greatness that is America.
01:24:23.660And every pair is handmade with high quality full grain leathers by world class bootmakers with no shortcuts or compromises ever.
01:24:30.960The styles are classic and handsome up any room they're in.
01:27:42.140Shave Secret is a proprietary blend of essential oils and it dramatically reduces the nicks and the cuts and the ingrown hairs and even that pesky shaving rash that you might give.
01:27:54.440What you do is you just take, I think it's five drops.
01:27:58.180I just kind of squirt a little bit and five drops if you're counting and you just put it on your face or on your legs and you can shave and you will have the closest, most comfortable shave.
01:28:08.600You actually, it will actually help all of the shaving process.
01:29:37.580How is this race different than the other races that you've seen over the years?
01:29:44.940I think what makes this race different than any other is this is 2012 for the Democrats, where if you go back to the 2012 Republican primary, it was all about anybody but Obama, anybody but Obama, anybody but Obama.
01:29:58.900And then as the primary got going, it became anybody but Romney.
01:30:02.060Romney was clearly established as the establishment candidate.
01:30:05.940And so you had these flavors of the month come up and who could capture the imagination of the grassroots and stop Mitt Romney from being the nominee.
01:30:14.780That's how this process began for them.
01:30:17.200But they ended up with somebody who belly flopped as a Mitt Romney and is underperforming in the early states, dramatically so, compared to all of his national polling.
01:30:28.460And just to show you how ridiculous national polling is, today there's a presidential primary poll of New Jersey for reasons only a law knows.
01:30:41.340New Jersey's opinion on the presidential process is irrelevant.
01:30:44.440And so it goes back to what I told you guys a couple of weeks ago, that it doesn't matter what anybody thinks except that they live in Iowa, Nevada, South Carolina, and New Hampshire right now.
01:30:54.140And I think what we're – so there's this free-for-all because no one has established their lane.
01:30:58.720They don't have a clear establishment candidate.
01:31:01.360Biden is leading in that subprimary, but he can't close the sale because, frankly, he's incompetent.
01:31:06.460And you saw that come out in the debate last week, where as the debate were on, so did he.
01:31:14.600It is really, to use a wrestling term, it is a battle royale right now.
01:31:18.520They're all in the ring together taking shots.
01:31:21.800So who's up and who's down from last week?
01:31:26.640I think the – I think nothing has really changed from last week.
01:31:30.360I think right now you have a Warren, Bernie Sanders free-for-all for the grassroots – Bernie is the Ron Paul character.
01:31:41.660He has an insurgent wing of people that just want to disrupt the process and see him either personally or ideologically.
01:31:49.460And I'm not drawing a moral equivalency between the two, a situational one.
01:31:52.320So either they see him ideologically or personally as a disruptor.
01:31:57.180But there's not enough of those people to win.
01:31:59.660And so he's got to grow his coalition.
01:32:01.900And Elizabeth Warren has always ate into his ability to do that.
01:32:05.140And in the last couple of weeks, it looked like he had pushed her back or whether she had made enough mistakes to hurt herself.
01:32:10.360But now you're seeing, including with the New York Times editorial this morning, you're seeing the more establishment hard left now, meaning the more polished, softer side of Sears, as I call it.
01:32:19.720They're now coming – surging back to try to push her over the top on Bernie Sanders.
01:32:25.000And that's where they're doing body language analyses of Bernie on these channels that are all pro-Warren.
01:32:30.940And so I think that's really the only thing is there's now like a second Ted offensive on behalf of Elizabeth Warren from the media.
01:32:37.700So it's interesting to me that you saw that bias in the last debate with CNN where they just believed Warren and just dismissed Bernie Sanders.
01:32:47.480But also the New York Times now has – and I don't remember the New York Times offering two candidates before, but this time they're offering two candidates as their editorial pick.
01:33:25.540She's running in Joe Biden's subprimary.
01:33:28.380And so I think this is – I think the New York Times here is trying to do two things.
01:33:31.480Number one, they're trying to elevate Amy Klobuchar to diminish Joe Biden.
01:33:35.900I think there's a fear that Amy Klobuchar is fading and that Joe Biden will kind of get that.
01:33:41.040We've just got to win lane all to himself and overperform on caucus night.
01:33:44.780So they're trying to elevate Amy Klobuchar as a viable alternative to him.
01:33:48.620And then I think it's the idea that if she can do well enough promoting an all-female ticket for the presidency in the general election in the fall, a Warren Klobuchar ticket.
01:33:58.720So I think there's two different things going on here with what the New York Times did this morning.
01:34:03.100Steve, what do you think of the people in Iowa that matter, the big power players that are making these sort of calls and pushing voters and have the real influence there on the ground?
01:34:19.300What do they think is going to happen?
01:34:20.520Well, they don't know, and I think that's why you've seen, Stu, Tom Vilsack, who was our – I guess we call him more moderate Democrat governor in the early 2000s.
01:34:30.580And I think that's why you're seeing him and John Kerry, who won the Iowa caucuses here in 2004.
01:34:36.460I think that's why you're seeing a lot of the old guard come back in here.
01:34:42.100And I think if they thought for sure that he had this, they wouldn't risk outing themselves and alienating their own grassroots.
01:34:49.040I think this is triage, or maybe it takes a village to win a caucus.
01:34:53.360I think they're all trying to chip in and carry him across the finish line here.
01:34:57.840And I think the goal is just get Joe Biden the Super Tuesday in all those southern states with all those black voters and just have him be viable until then.
01:35:04.960And he can at least sweep enough of those states to force a convention, if not win the nomination.
01:35:09.320I think that's what their play is, and I think the fact that they're getting so active here down the street – or down the stretch, Stu, indicates they're concerned about his ability to close the sale.
01:35:19.980Well, that's – I mean, that's worse than a Romney candidacy.
01:35:25.600Romney, whatever you thought about him as a candidate, and I didn't think very highly on an ideological level, as a personal candidate, very polished, in charge, in command.
01:35:35.340And seldom did you see him get, you know, ruffled.
01:35:38.980You know, McCain did that to him in 08 in the New Hampshire primary, and he said, you are the candidate of change.
01:35:43.480And the race changed in 08 right at that moment because it was the first time we'd ever seen Mitt Romney not on his mark.
01:35:50.420In 2012, when I was on the Newt campaign and Newt bloodied him up in that South Carolina debate, that changed that whole primary was in that debate.
01:35:58.000But those are the rare instances where Mitt Romney did not command the stage when he was in the room with the other candidates.
01:37:17.380Regular Iowans on camera saying eventually we have to win.
01:37:21.400And so he was supposed to be the Mitt Romney of this race.
01:37:25.660He was supposed to be the adult in the room with experience while the grassroots kind of fiddled and played favorites and was going to kind of run and hide.
01:37:33.000He's ended up becoming the Jeb Bush here.
01:37:35.080And so what matters now is whether Bernie Sanders can be the Donald Trump, meaning, again, the disruptor who can widen his coalition beyond people who just want to watch the system burn because they hate it,
01:37:48.260or whether Elizabeth Warren can be the Ted Cruz, meaning, again, I'm not drawing moral equivalencies, just situational ones, meaning beyond people who just passed her ideological test.
01:38:02.920Cruz and Trump both passed those tests in 16, which is why they were the last two standing candidates after Jeb Bush folded.
01:38:09.720Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders are trying to pass that test right now.
01:38:13.700Imagine going back to the 2016 Republican primary, Trump and Cruz flail, and you're left with, well, I guess we go with Jeb Bush because there's nobody left.
01:38:21.480That's essentially the argument right now for Joe Biden.
01:38:40.320I mean, we had 33 counties that voted twice for Obama in 08 and 12, pardon me, that voted for Trump in 2016, and he lost a lot of those counties in the 2018 midterms.
01:38:54.700And, you know, that's why it was a good Democratic year in our state in the last election.
01:39:03.680It matters not as much as the national media thinks, okay, because that population has diminished, but it still matters more than most people probably believe.
01:39:14.060The truth is somewhere in the middle, but absolutely it does matter on some level, no doubt about it.
01:39:43.440The difference between having a dashboard and not having one is immense.
01:39:49.160When you're trying to make real decisions as a business owner, you don't know if you can really spend that money because you don't know where you are today.
01:39:57.060You don't know what money is still to come in, how much inventory you have.
01:40:01.640You don't have everything all in one place.
01:40:04.960You don't know what's happening with HR.
01:40:08.120Having a dashboard and knowing everything is going to help you win that arm wrestle with an octopus.
01:40:23.420It's a cloud-based business software system that gives you visibility and control that you need to be able to make the decisions to help your business grow.
01:40:30.500With NetSuite, you save time, money, and unnecessary headaches by managing sales, financing, accounting, orders, HR, all of it from your desktop or your phone.
01:41:14.600We're looking at some of the most recent polling out of Iowa.
01:41:17.220And there was a poll from the Des Moines Register, which is one of the highest-ranked pollsters around, that had Bernie Sanders in the lead, Warren in second, Buttigieg in third, and Biden in fourth.
01:41:29.220And, you know, it was a tight top of the ticket there between Sanders at 20 and Biden at 15.
01:41:35.520Since then, however, there's been several more polls released, and some of them from really good pollsters that have—all of them have Biden in the lead.
01:41:42.100There was one today that came out, Biden 24, Warren 18, Buttigieg 16, Sanders 14, Klobuchar 11.
01:41:49.500She's hitting double digits now in some of these.
01:41:51.160Same thing from yesterday, 23 for Biden, Buttigieg 17, Warren 15, Klobuchar 11, Sanders 10, which is the first time I've seen Klobuchar in the top four.
01:42:03.840But there's an interesting one from Monmouth University.
01:42:06.760And Monmouth, again, is a very highly rated pollster.
01:42:09.900They asked the question two different ways.
01:42:12.000First, they asked the typical Iowa field question, and it came out like this.
01:42:18.440Biden 24% leading the field, Sanders at 18 and second, Buttigieg 17 and third, Warren with 15 and fourth, then Klobuchar at eight.
01:42:26.440Then, you know, this is when Booker is still there, Booker 4% stire.
01:42:29.720So what was the question that they originally asked, the first question?
01:42:32.460The first question was just the normal one, what I just described.
01:42:35.380Normal poll, here's all the candidates.
01:44:18.580Well, it's the, the, this is sort of the lane theory of these elections where there's sort of multiple primaries being played out at the same time.
01:44:28.420Uh, and you have, and the way we've talked about it mainly, and I think it's the most dominant way, is the sort of crazy left socialist way and the just a liberal Democrat wing.
01:44:39.640They, most people would call that the moderate wing, though I see very little moderate out of any of these candidates that are supposedly moderate.
01:44:46.960They're not moderate as far as the national constitution.
01:44:50.800They're all crazy leftists in this primary.
01:44:54.220However, there's a difference between, obviously, Sanders and, uh, Warren and Steyer, who you'd put out there, and people who are, you know, the Buttigieg, the Biden, the Klobuchar.
01:45:05.880Um, but there's another way that these lanes break down, which is this sort of like, uh, white, suburban, intellectual, elite, wealthy, cul-de-sac person.
01:45:25.280So Buttigieg and Warren, who shouldn't necessarily share people on an ideological position, um, at least, at least in the theory of this, of the lanes.
01:45:35.880Um, wind up sharing a lot of voters because they kind of have a similar profile as a candidate where, uh, that's not necessarily the same as, you know, Sanders is coming at this as like a blue collar socialism, a workers of the world unite socialism.
01:45:50.600And Warren is coming at this as a Woodrow Wilson socialism, a, a, you know, from the top down, I'm, I'm an intellectual and I'll have all the plans for you sort of approach.
01:46:00.120So there's a lot of the same policies, but a different sort of messaging.
01:46:03.240But Warren doesn't get the, the nod in Iowa.
01:46:06.400If that's true, what you just said, Buttigieg could do quite well.
01:46:10.160And that's, you know, you kind of want to declare the Buttigieg thing over.
01:46:14.800I think there's a temptation and I think it's very still, it's still possible.
01:50:25.820We had integrated, Ricketts High School.
01:50:27.520So we were going through a lot of those issues on those days and pretty tumultuous times.
01:50:32.380But it was a time also where I can now reflect back, see the benefits of good men who did great things in that period, and now we're living the results of that today.
01:50:42.680And if I can say this, I was looking at the search engine Bing today, B-I-N-G, and there's a picture of Jackie Robinson and his wife and his son and a bunch of other men and women marching together.
01:50:55.400And I just highlight to people that was a – I think Martin Luther King Day represents the era of good men, respectful, patriotic, God-fearing, family-oriented, entrepreneurial, and visionary.
01:51:11.780If you take a picture of that, you see the environment I grew up in, and I'm so proud to say that that was part of that great generation that taught us good things.
01:51:19.800Well, there was a different way to go, and it was the Malcolm X way, and there was the Black Panthers.
01:51:27.080A lot of people were pushing for this to go towards violence.
01:51:31.660And I really feel, Burgess, that I don't see the Martin Luther King agent of change out there today.
01:51:40.780Somebody that – I mean, the left, it's crazy.
01:51:43.600The left has completely abandoned this guy because he's not radical enough.
01:51:49.800Well, the left never has embraced Martin Luther King, and this is what you have to understand.
01:51:54.480What Martin Luther King in that era represented was our Judeo-Christian values that made our country great.
01:51:59.660They represented the culture that every person, every people, every group that comes here, once they embrace, they succeed and they become part of the middle class.
01:52:08.700The left has always been anti this American culture.
01:52:14.040It has always been angry, it has always been undermining, and what they do best is they go after our kids.
01:52:20.960They attack the most vulnerable, which are children.
01:52:25.660Kids that are wide open, they're hopeful when they turn them off to school, and they want to do their very best, and they come out feeling very angry, anti-God, and anti-American.
01:52:35.060So, you know, the left has done what they're doing best, and unfortunately we've allowed them to weave their way into my great community, and what you see in that picture is no longer what we see today.
01:52:45.360We don't see respectful men and women marching and talking and articulating themselves in a very intelligent way.
01:52:52.160We don't see that because the left, again, has taken us in a different direction.
01:52:56.440So, Donald Trump is, we're looking at, I think, 3.9% unemployment, best unemployment since the 1960s, best unemployment for African-Americans of all time.
01:53:10.060And I have seen African-Americans, Candace Owen is going to be on my TV show tonight.
01:53:15.660This is the first time we're ever going to be doing something together, and I have a ton of respect for her.
01:53:21.440She has really grown into a remarkable individual.
01:53:25.720But that is the things that I'm starting to see, and maybe it's because I'm living in my white world with white privilege,
01:53:36.740but I'm starting to see African-Americans break out, be themselves, not just be, you know, I hate to use this phrase, but it's accurate,
01:53:46.920a slave to the Democratic Party doing whatever they tell them to do.
01:54:00.720Glenn, when I think of this, and when I was 30 years old, I wasn't even coming close to having the wisdom, the courage, the insight that that young lady has.
01:54:09.980And she represents this new generation that's waking up.
01:54:14.160And I'll say this, that the greatest present of President Obama was he was such a lousy president that America is now saying,
01:54:21.920what ever happened to hope and change?
01:54:23.240What happened to the promises that not only this black savior was going to give us, but the Democratic Party has been promising us for the last 30, 40 years.
01:54:29.500So, yes, we are not only waking up, we are advocating strongly, come off this plantation.
01:54:35.900We have more and more black Americans now wearing the MAGA hats.
01:54:38.640And I was talking to Sarah Carter today, and I asked the audience, you ever see a black American with a MAGA hat on?
01:54:45.160And please go up and shake his hand and say thank you, because they are on the front line.
01:54:49.620These are the guys, these are people, men and women, old and young, that say, you know what, I can care less when people call me.
01:54:55.400I can care less what the, quote, means of our community are right now, what they want us to believe.
01:55:01.340We are now saying we're going to run off this plantation, not only bring our kids back and our community back,
01:55:07.480but make sure the rest of America are realizing, do not trust these people.
01:55:12.140What they have done to us for the last 60, 70 years is exactly what they're trying to do in our country.
01:55:17.180So I'm very proud, number one, of our country overall, but I'm extremely proud of a president who is standing up against these elitists and has done a great job.
01:55:27.800And, again, I was one of those guys that was very reluctant four years ago, but when I saw the, three years ago, when I saw the promise, the new deal,
01:55:37.380the promise, the new deal for urban America, and I saw those 10 tenants that President, that candidate Trump had put together,
01:55:44.020I said, if only he does this, he'll be worth it for me.
02:01:39.280And he so appreciates what you've done to help build his company that he wants you to know that he's giving you the biggest discounts and the best prices he's ever given.
02:01:48.560He wants to say thank you in a big way.
02:01:51.260And with his Giza Dream Sheets, it's two for one.