Giorgia Maloney is Italy s first woman prime minister, and she s a conservative powerhouse. She served notice early that she is no friend of the Biden liberal world order, saying the Italian left attacks national identity, religious identity, gender identity, and family identity.
00:15:01.400I mean, it's the fact, the way they behave, the way they treat a president of the United
00:15:05.960States, the way they treat a successful businessman, the way they operate throwing, you know,
00:15:14.920old guys, you know, into the street with a SWAT team surrounding their homes like they did
00:15:20.040with Roger Stone, Paul Manafort, various others, it's, it's very troubling, you said, the norm, it's, and I hadn't thought of it quite that way.
00:15:30.800It is the normalization of the police state, the surveillance state.
00:15:37.340We just should expect it and accept it.
00:15:39.760And thank goodness that Mike Lindell is not.
00:15:42.860So tell us what happens now, if you will.
00:15:45.060So we have filed our TRO last night, we need to, the court will issue an order, it could just grant
00:15:53.440our TRO right away without a hearing, but most likely the court will order a hearing.
00:15:59.040We're hoping for that to occur as early as next week.
00:16:03.520We will have, today we are going to be serving the Department of Justice, the U.S. Attorney's
00:16:10.300Office in Minnesota, and, and the FBI director with the TRO.
00:16:16.980And so it's, it's on a, you know, kind of a wait and see plan right now, but things should
00:16:23.280move very, very quickly because a temporary restraining order is a request for emergency
00:21:26.440And so when you see the FBI in three unmarked cars blocking in Mike Lindell in a dramatic fashion at a Hardee's restaurant,
00:21:39.560questioning him, telling him when he asked for counsel that he can't have counsel,
00:21:44.420and they only relented after he insisted.
00:21:47.820And then producing a warrant to seize his cell phone.
00:21:53.000You know, these are the kinds of actions that violate the Constitution that, again, are the normalization of a surveillance and police state.
00:22:04.760I don't know if you saw, but last night there was a report on, I believe, Tucker,
00:22:10.480where there are about 20 FBI agents have come forward to, as whistleblowers, to protest against these kinds of abuses.
00:22:17.640And the one agent that they highlighted has been retaliated against for objecting to SWAT teams being used to go after, you know, nonviolent people.
00:22:29.940And that whistleblower, he's a special agent of the FBI.
00:22:38.600He's amongst the 20 whistleblowers that particularly Congressman Jim Jordan has been speaking about and who offer real hope that we're going to get to the bottom of the extent
00:22:54.240and the actual specific character of all of the corruption within the FBI and ultimately the Department of Justice.
00:23:03.900Yeah, let me just add one, another couple of points about this TRO and the complaint.
00:23:11.680And so people understand because about what their rights are under the Constitution.
00:23:16.580The FBI cannot just seize a cell phone.
00:23:20.040You know, cell phones today hold more data than the, you know, 30 years ago, a mainframe computer would take up entire rooms.
00:23:29.000Well, now cell phones, everything is advanced technologically so much so that a cell phone can hand hold, you know, all the data that 30 years ago would require a whole house basically to hold.
00:23:39.880And so, you know, particularly with Mike, his whole life is on that phone.
00:23:55.540Attorney-client communications with hundreds of people who are also involved in efforts to expose election fraud and the like.
00:24:06.380Who, you know, warrants, this is what's called, when you seize a cell phone, that's a general warrant, which is specifically in violation of the Constitution.
00:24:16.840You know, back, you know, in the 1700s, you know, they gave rise to our independence.
00:24:22.640When we wrote the Fourth Amendment, it was because British soldiers were kicking down doors and going into houses and looking for anything in search of a crime.
00:24:32.600Well, that's why we have the Fourth Amendment that the framers put into our Constitution.
00:24:37.100You don't get to just go knock down doors and search for evidence in search of a crime.
00:24:43.440And a cell phone now has so much information stored on it.
00:24:48.780The FBI or any law enforcement official seeking to obtain that must first specify with particularity the exact data that they're going to try to seize.
00:25:03.420This is they need to present it to the court who will then either deny the warrant or grant it.
00:25:08.960They have to show exactly what they need, exactly how they're going to segregate that data so that they don't get to go rummage through everything on the cell phone in search of a crime.
00:25:21.380Or in this case, they could the FBI could be looking for, you know, all the hundreds of people who who who who want to remain anonymous, who simply are talking with Mike about election integrity and election fraud.
00:25:33.680But, you know, the FBI now has the contents of that entire cell phone and can rummage roughshod.
00:25:41.980And, you know, we've talked earlier about the surveillance and the surveillance state.
00:25:45.960Well, now all of those people, if the FBI gets to use the contents of that phone, are going to be on a list.
00:25:53.940The hundreds of people that Mike is talking with, they're going to be on a list.
00:25:58.040Well, I'm on that list then, because Mike and I have talked about these issues frequently and the idea that that would then become a leverage point to say, well, let's go after Dobbs.
00:26:12.680Of course, the issue with that is everybody knows that I am very much opposed to the FBI and the Department of Justice carrying out these sort of wide sweeping statements saying there's no corruption.
00:26:37.020And and I just I just I my blood boils when I think about what they're doing to this country, the FBI and the Department of Justice.
00:26:46.720I think I should be talking about what a great agency they are if they're going to come after me.
00:26:50.960But I'm going to I'm going to stick with the original story.
00:26:54.080The original story is they have been trampling our rights for years now, and they have been carrying out a campaign of political persecution against Donald Trump.
00:27:04.620We're now in the seventh year of that persecution, Kurt.
00:27:24.580So, you know, in the intelligence community, there is a phrase called pattern of life.
00:27:29.880And so they'll take one person and they will build a pattern of life around that person, who they talk with, who they contact and so forth.
00:27:38.440And then who those people talk with and who they contact with.
00:27:42.020And so, you know, the cell phone and this is recognized in the courts now, you just don't get to seize a cell phone and that's it.
00:27:49.760In other words, when you present your application for a search warrant to the magistrate to say there's probable cause that a crime is committed and we need to to seize this evidence.
00:28:01.840You don't just get to open the house, so to speak, and start rummaging through.
00:28:06.780And given technology now and the database technology, once you're on a list, it never goes away.
00:28:13.800And so what's being created here is, you know, is the surveillance state.
00:28:17.860And in China, you have the social credit score.
00:28:20.540This is all tied in with, for example, the move to have a central bank digital currency and a digital ID where everything goes into a database which allows total social control.
00:28:52.060Everyone should find it alarming what is happening right now in Washington, D.C., not just simply with the FBI nor the Department of Justice, although that's that's a hand.
00:30:04.600And, you know, there are some very good judges.
00:30:07.820I mean, for example, you know, the district court judge out in Florida who issued the order against the Department of Justice involved in the raid.
00:30:17.500Yes, so she issued, you know, what I thought was a very well-reasoned order, staying the Department of Justice use of the materials they've seen, and then appointing a special master to review the documents that the Department of Justice claimed were classified.
00:30:36.740And, you know, as, you know, one of the points that Judge Cannon noted was, you know, in terms of the Department of Justice's objections to,
00:30:47.500to a special master being appointed, and is that, you know, the only, and they would complain that there might be leaks.
00:30:54.980And as, as the district court judge said, the only leak came from the Department of Justice when they leaked that picture on Twitter of a bunch of covers saying classified strewn over the floor.
00:31:08.200So the only, the only leaker was the Department of Justice, which tells you the political nature of that raid and what they're doing now.
00:31:18.580They leaked that photo on Twitter to create a narrative.
00:31:22.540And, by the way, this has become their standard method of operation, leaking, leaking, and leaking.
00:31:33.720Meanwhile, saying, well, we've got an investigation underway, so we can't tell you, the media, anything, and the public certainly doesn't need to know.
00:31:40.320We'll leak to you what we think you should have in order to support our point of view.
00:31:47.080Yeah. And, and, you know, just to follow on this, this thread here, what's, what's very scary is that the 11, a panel, three judge panel on the 11th circuit just reversed Judge Cannon's order.
00:32:00.700And, and one of the, the, in, in, in their analysis was that only the Department of Justice, that they're going to defer to the Department of Justice over what is classified and what is not.
00:32:12.880Therefore, Judge Cannon's order that a special master review that, they, they reverse that, saying that, again, only the Department of Justice, we're going to, you know, we're a court, but we're going to defer to the Department of Justice.
00:32:24.720Do you know what, what that means is, is that the Department of Justice has zero oversight over what, over what they determined is classified and what people can see.
00:32:36.620And so you see the abuse and the raid at Mar-a-Lago, same type of abuses that were associated with the raid on Mike Lindell.
00:32:44.300There's a pattern here, and there is no, the, the court abdicated its oversight to the government on an issue critical to preserving President Trump's rights in that situation.
00:32:59.400But it sends a message for everybody because they're saying, well, we're always going to defer to the Department of Justice.
00:33:06.340So, I mean, I, I really think that their attorneys, the circuit court justice, you know, overseeing that, the Ville Leavitt Circuit is Justice Thomas.
00:33:16.420And I, I really think that the president's attorneys should be looking at a, an emergency application for stay of that order because the issues raised there go far beyond the president himself.
00:33:29.600That is a precedent setting decision that says, we're going to always defer to the Department of Justice on matters of a document that's involved in a criminal investigation, whether it's classified or not.
00:33:47.380We've reached a scary point as we were discussing.
00:33:51.000This is a scary point in this country's history.
00:33:53.160The, the, the 11th Circuit ruling, by the way, just so everybody understands, there were three, three judges, and two of them were Trump judges, and they ruled unanimously against the former president's rights here.
00:34:09.160They just crushed the idea of the presidency, presidential possession of classified documents.
00:34:18.920They put, uh, they put, uh, effectively an FBI agent, uh, above the president when it comes to classified documents.
00:34:44.460Decisions like this will be used in any type of proceeding where somebody, where classic, allegedly classified material is at issue, will be used to shield judicial oversight.
00:34:57.800And so that affects all Americans and their rights.
00:35:02.140Well, when you think about it, though, Kurt, the, the, the reality is there is no oversight.
00:35:07.860The House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate have given up their oversight, uh, uh, powers over the Justice Department and the FBI.
00:35:17.380There's no other way to say this, correct?
00:35:20.040There is no oversight from Congress as there should be.
00:35:23.940Well, I'll give you, I'll give you a discreet example, which you may remember.
00:35:27.740So back in 2015, somebody hacked into the Senate Intelligence Committee computers when they were investigating the CIA's, the rendition programs associated with terrorism.
00:35:42.000And there's YouTube video where Director Brennan had to admit it was the CIA who hacked into the Senate Intelligence Committee computers.
00:36:00.620Could you imagine if you remember the church hearings back in the 1970s, investigating abuses by the CIA, their assassination programs and stuff?
00:36:11.120Could you imagine any of those senators wearing those hearings if the CIA had, had, uh, stolen their information, hacked into, you know, maybe the, I'm not sure if they used computers back then, but, you know, went in their files like Watergate fashion.
00:36:26.140And took them out of the desk drawer, which is the physical equivalent, what would have happened?
00:36:31.460And so the fact that the Senate, the most powerful deliberative body in the world, and the Senate Intelligence Committee, which has oversight over the intelligence agencies, would allow one of those agencies to hack into their computer systems and do nothing is scary.
00:36:56.460And the chairman of the chairman of the committee was Dianne Feinstein, right?
00:37:44.420I was just going to say there's the, I was going to say there's the famous line by Senator Schumer when President Trump announced that he was going to be reigning in the intelligence community.
00:37:54.400And he said, they have six ways to Sunday to get back at you.
00:37:57.240And that, I think, is indicative of the level of fear that exists and the power that these, the intelligence committee community has over the most powerful deliberative body in the world, as the U.S. Senate is called.
00:38:14.300And I, I, I laugh sometimes when various conservatives talk about the compromised, the compromised President Joe Biden, because we now know that, uh, there is plenty of evidence of the, his, his, uh, family's involvement in influence peddling and millions of dollars in deals around the globe through his son, uh, Hunter Biden.
00:38:38.600And, but the, the reality, and we talked about him being compromised by China, by, uh, Ukraine, by Russia.
00:38:45.140Well, there's a, there's a fundamental compromise that obviously is extant here.
00:38:50.820And that is with the intelligence communities themselves.
00:38:54.300Can you imagine the dirt they've got on that guy?
00:39:13.140Well, look at, you had 51 intelligence professionals sign a letter saying that the Hunter Biden laptop, this is before the election, that that was Russian disinformation.
00:39:29.740But this shows, you know, the interplay with the intelligence community and those that support it and the, the, the power that they exercise here to try to defeat President Trump in the 2020 election.
00:39:47.200I mean, this is, this is very scary stuff where we are at this point in our country.
00:39:55.540You had, I mean, that's a discreet example of a deliberate act to subvert the truth about something that's a matter of national security.
00:40:06.400The information on the Hunter Biden laptop showing business dealings between Hunter Biden and allusions to his father, President Joe Biden, the big guy with his cut.
00:40:33.200All the polling data shows that had people known the truth, there's a significant number would not have voted for Joe Biden.
00:40:42.500And that number, by the way, was large enough to change the outcome of the 2020 election.
00:40:47.700What they did and what they got away with changed American history.
00:40:52.980Yes, and it changed American history, not just with the election of the president, but with the policies that he's now pursuing.
00:41:02.580So, you know, as, as you know, the first, one of the, his first acts as president was to stop construction of the Keystone pipeline and then to eviscerate our domestic energy production.
00:41:14.280So where are we are? Where are we now? We have inflation that runs not just with fuel, but with food and the entire, you know, economic structure on the price of goods is affected by this huge increase in the price of gas.
00:41:28.400This affects everybody. So kind of gets the old saying, you know, elections have consequences.
00:41:33.060And I would say stolen elections have catastrophic consequences.
00:41:36.840Well, let's let's turn to further to Bill Barr, speaking of people who contributed to the changing history.
00:41:49.580He decided not to intervene, even though he knew Biden was lying and he knew those 51 intelligence officers were lying.
00:42:01.480Because that would be intervening in the election.
00:42:03.680So what he did was intervene by not intervening in behalf.
00:42:10.100He intervened in behalf of a corrupt president that we now have in office who should not be there were it not for his decision not to, quote unquote, intervene.
00:42:24.420By the way, he did intervene, though, actively, not just passively.
00:42:29.860He also sent out agents to strike the fear of God in them to in social media, in big tech to make certain that they and, of course, big corporate media to make certain that they didn't follow that Hunter Biden corruption story because it was Russian disinformation.
00:42:49.440It would be an act against the interests of the U.S.
00:42:56.180Well, Bill Barr has come out publicly and demeaned people like myself who have been pursuing evidence of election fraud and illegal voting and so forth.
00:43:17.540And the evidence is clear that there was outcome determinative election fraud and illegal voting in enough states right now that would reverse the 2020 decision.
00:43:33.920And so, for example, in Wisconsin, the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled in July of this year that the scheme to place unmanned drop boxes, which are not monitored, violated, this is in Wisconsin, violated Wisconsin law.
00:43:52.920Wisconsin specifically says that any location where ballots are dropped off must be manned.
00:44:03.180You know, you can have just as the movie 2000 Mule showed, you'll have people showing up with bagfuls of ballots.
00:44:08.600And it's kind of like something you'd want to know.
00:44:10.940And, you know, are these ballots legitimate?
00:44:13.520And, you know, who's throwing these things in the ballot boxes?
00:44:16.420But those drop boxes, those unmanned drop boxes, which were used throughout Wisconsin with millions of votes being processed through them, that was all funded by Mark Zuckerberg and the CTCL with millions of dollars from that.
00:44:33.980And the Wisconsin Supreme Court, three of the justices that ruled, it was a 4-3 decision, but three of them wrote in their opinion that when elections are not conducted according to law, they are presumptively illegal.
00:44:49.560And the consent of the people has not been given.
00:44:52.780And the vote, the election is, you know, is illegal and cannot be counted.
00:44:59.260And the point there is that when you conduct an illegal election, as they found in Wisconsin, you don't have to show the other guy would have won.
00:45:07.960When you have an illegal election, sometimes you can't tell.
00:45:11.480And so the fact that the election was not conducted in accordance with law means that the consent of the government has not been granted and the election should be redone.
00:45:20.500In Arizona, for example, Dr. Shiva did an analysis of the 1.9 million signatures on the ballot envelopes.
00:45:31.300He took a statistically significant sample, about 3,000 randomly selected ones, and compared the signatures to signatures, official signatures on file in Arizona.
00:45:49.040That's several hundred thousand did not match.
00:45:51.120And it wasn't him finding, I should say.
00:45:53.440He had six people, three certified forensic document examiners, and three people trained in the procedures at Maricopa for signature verification.
00:46:03.980And only where all six agreed that the signature did not match did he include that as a non-matching signature.
00:46:10.060That's over 200,000 ballots in Maricopa alone.
00:46:16.560And so there's no follow-up investigation because A.G. Barr said there was, you know, nothing to see it.
00:46:21.580Well, no, there's quite a bit of evidence that shows.
00:46:26.080I mean, I could go on and on about this.
00:46:28.400And, you know, the idea that the 2020 election was the most secure election in history, as we are told by the Mockingbird media, is simply not true.
00:46:43.800But when you look at courts where we have been filing these cases, they're repeatedly dismissing these cases, ruling that there was no standing.
00:46:54.740And that avoids having to get to the merits.
00:46:58.240And so no court is getting to the merits of this, which is really troubling.
00:47:03.520Well, it's troubling because it implies, certainly, that the courts are in many cases aligned with the Department of Justice, the FBI, the deep state that is in control of our federal government.
00:47:18.720And make no mistake, the deep state is in control.
00:47:22.260They are, to some degree, co-managed by the Marxist Dems who are directing the Democratic Party.
00:47:30.140But this is a sorry, sorry time in American history.
00:47:35.920The judiciary, the Congress, the executive, the in-your-face corruption is extraordinary.
00:47:48.020There are some hopeful developments, though.
00:47:50.140And I want to talk about one of them, Fulton County, suing Dominion just to find out what's going on, because they're concerned about anomalies and failures of software and programs and bandwidth and connectivity.
00:48:12.760There is no regulation over these companies, and they are pushing little black boxes out to polling stations.
00:48:22.120And I mean black boxes, because no one gets to see what's in them.
00:48:26.500Well, they're not just suing Dominion over a general allegation.
00:48:31.680It's a breach of contract case, because, you know, they found scripts that were located, you know, in other words, when they analyzed the EMS, there were IP addresses located outside of this country, which the question is, why is that there?
00:48:51.620And there were what are called scripts, what has been called a Python script, that can be used to exploit access to the system.
00:49:01.600And whether it's, you know, remote access to data export, I mean, none of that stuff should have been on on these systems.
00:49:11.860This goes back to when I mentioned earlier about Mesa County.
00:49:14.580There's unauthorized software installed by Dominion on that system that's been certified before that was installed.
00:49:26.160And that installation of unauthorized voids the certification.
00:49:30.620So, you know, again, if you're going to, if people want to come out there, the vendors and the EAC and CESA all want to say, well, the most secure election in history, these machines are certified, they're tested.
00:49:43.400Well, no, there's unauthorized software that's been installed on a number of them.
00:49:48.740Everywhere we've looked, in terms of the Dominion machines, whether it's Michigan, Maricopa, Georgia, Mesa County, Colorado, they have unauthorized Microsoft Server SQL management suite on there that is not authorized.
00:50:07.880And it's only, the purpose of it, it allows the manipulation of boats on a large scale and remote access.
00:50:17.840So, this case out of Fulton County, Pennsylvania is very interesting, but it exposes the lie that these machines are secure, that certification somehow makes them, you know, can give the public confidence that they're secure.
00:50:39.340And that, you know, any of these other safety procedures, which all of which can be defeated very easily, any computer can be hacked.
00:50:46.260And even Dominion executives have admitted that any computer can be hacked.
00:50:53.460He was one of their vice presidents of their engine.
00:50:57.540He admitted in a declaration that any computer can be hacked given enough time and access.
00:51:03.080Which is, I mean, it's just stating the obvious.
00:51:06.000There's nothing, you know, that's not some great, you know, you know, but it does beg the question, you know, why, you know, why is there this kabuki theater that somehow certification and logic and access rate tests make these machines safe?
00:51:24.500I'll give you, if I may, just give you one quick recent example.
00:51:29.080So, out of Georgia, a computer science expert from the University of Michigan, J. Alex Halderman, raised the alarm about Dominion voting machines that use their ICX software, the touchscreen.
00:51:42.640And he has an opportunity to examine a server for 12 weeks.
00:51:47.740And why everybody shouldn't get an opportunity to, the public shouldn't have an opportunity to examine, just like Professor Halderman, is beyond me.
00:51:54.660But he had 12 weeks to examine, and he found a, what he called a critical vulnerability that exists in machines used in 16 states that can, quote, be used to, quote, steal votes.
00:52:08.020And that this, he thought this was so dangerous that he wanted to have his report unsealed and given to CISA.
00:52:14.920And eventually it was, and CISA issued in June an advisory.
00:52:22.600And here's the, here's the point that, that shows the cover-up.
00:52:26.740In that advisory, they said they found nine vulnerabilities required 13 mitigation steps.
00:52:33.360But what they said is that, we have found no evidence of any exploitation of these vulnerabilities.
00:52:40.240Exploitation meaning somebody hacked in and manipulated voids, boats.
00:52:54.260CISA never looked at any machines to see if these vulnerabilities had been exploited.
00:53:01.420And so, when they say there's no evidence, it's because they didn't look.
00:53:05.920And if you think CISA, and that's short for the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, just part of DHS, and it's supposed to guard our votes and the security, why the heck aren't they looking?
00:53:19.100And why are they giving such an obvious misleading statement to kind of do this kabuki theater to assure the public that the voting machines are safe?
00:53:29.800I mean, the first thing they should have done is had a full-on exploration of a forensic examination of all these machines to see if there's evidence.
00:53:39.400And what you see in this Fulton County case with this Python script and IP addresses from Canada and elsewhere, I believe, located on the machine, which shows how did that IP address get on the machine from outside the country?
00:53:59.180You know, this is, you know, the world we live on.
00:54:03.400I mean, when you talk about how the system that has grown up, it's designed to protect itself.
00:54:09.900And people are being misled as to the security, not only of their vote, but really of their rights under the Constitution.
00:54:24.260We started off talking about the normalization of the surveillance state and the police state.
00:54:29.220And that's exactly, this is all connected.
00:54:31.780And Bill Barr, again, and I said this from almost the very beginning, Bill Barr was lying when he said that there was no corruption or problem in the election of 2020.
00:54:48.300Because when he said that he was still Attorney General of the United States, and they hadn't filed a single investigative report, there was no concluding report, and there had been no time for any investigation of any depth or breadth whatsoever.
00:55:04.660It was straightforward what he was doing.
00:55:12.540But thank goodness, Kurt, that you're working on all of this.
00:55:15.980Kurt Olson, we owe a great debt to for everything that he is working and doing for Mike Lindell, for all of us as he investigates what has happened in the 2020 election.
00:55:31.380And, of course, Mike Lindell himself, he has been beyond a stalwart.
00:55:36.220He has been at the, they talk about the point of the spear.
00:55:39.700He's been at the point of the spear for two years now, trying to bring to ground those responsible for what was, obviously, in various parts of the country, a puron-rigged election.
00:55:55.940Kurt, we always give our guests the last word.
00:55:58.620Your concluding thoughts, if you would, sir.
00:56:01.440Well, thank you very much, Lou, for having me.
00:56:03.580I do want to say that the complaint and the TRO filing that we made on Mike Lindell's behalf is posted on frankspeech.com.
00:56:13.240I would encourage everyone to go there and to read those filings.
00:56:18.480This case and the issues we raised there are not just impacting on Mike Lindell, but it's impacting on all of our rights.
00:56:27.960We have to stop what is the takeover of this country by the surveillance state and a police state, which is being implemented.
00:56:38.800And there is no, there's no tomorrow on this.
00:56:41.620It has to be done today or else we're going to lose our country.
00:57:01.920I think it's incumbent upon me to say that Dominion Voting Machines, the company, has denied every allegation brought against them for any kind of problem with the election and their counting machines and tabulating machines.