Democrats suffer BIGGEST BLOW yet after SCOTUS hands Trump MASSIVE WIN
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 1 minute
Words per Minute
174.40327
Summary
Record day on Wall Street and on the Nasdaq and S&P 500 and Dow hit new intraday all time highs. It was a far different tone than two months ago when people were going crazy about how Donald Trump was going to get us into a recession.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
it was a record day on wall street the s&p 500 and the nasdaq both hitting new intraday highs
00:00:10.160
and now closing at new record highs hello everybody and welcome to the great america
00:00:16.180
show you heard that correctly it wasn't a joke it's not april fools another record high for
00:00:21.180
president trump second this week for the s&p and the nasdaq the nasdaq closed at 20,273 up 105 points
00:00:29.120
on the day the s&p 500 uh 6,173 uh up 32 points on the day a far different tone the marxist democrats
00:00:38.980
have been quiet they've been silent about everything gas prices uh the war in gaza that's
00:00:45.600
about to end iran russia ukraine egg prices the stock market these are all things two months ago
00:00:52.780
these people were going crazy about they were telling us donald trump's getting us into world
00:00:56.720
war three donald trump's driving us into a recession he's ruining this country he doesn't
00:01:01.600
know what he's doing with tariffs someone take the controls from him turns out they made the whole
00:01:07.540
thing up and i say this all with such a great smile on my face as a man who loves this country
00:01:13.180
and wants it to do well regardless of who the president is under joe biden i was rooting for
00:01:19.620
the country should kamala have one i would be rooting for the country because all of our fate depends on
00:01:26.140
it our 401ks our children our grandchildren our grandparents medicare and medicaid social security
00:01:33.140
it all depends on the country doing well the marxist dams were so happy just a few short months ago
00:01:41.060
that they can barely hold back their excitement that donald trump may be getting us into a recession
00:01:46.380
that he was going a little rogue as they said with the trade wars with all these countries
00:01:53.100
take a listen cnn just a few months ago as we come on the air new warning signs for president trump
00:02:00.960
about the real world impact of his shock and awe move fast and break things politics and policies
00:02:07.040
just moments ago u.s stocks closing deep in the red off to the worst start of the year since 2020
00:02:13.940
as inflation and trump's trade war leave investors freaked out and consumers low on confidence
00:02:22.340
you heard that right move fast and break things trade war you're not hearing trade wars anymore you're
00:02:31.400
not even hearing anything about it tariffs what's a tariff you're not hearing a darn thing about it
00:02:38.080
inflation he's driving inflation through the roof that was cnn just a few months ago they could barely
00:02:45.980
hold back their excitement but it wasn't just the fake news it's the marxist dams as well
00:02:50.360
take for example pocahontas elizabeth warren comes in and basically starts the dumbest trade war in the
00:02:59.100
history of this country this is going to be about potentially millions of people losing their jobs
00:03:04.860
it's going to be about millions of people losing their savings many of people losing their retirement
00:03:11.040
security and at the same time taking on even higher costs for everything they buy so that's going to
00:03:19.540
push us in potentially to foreclosures or uh people being pushed out of their apartments
00:03:27.040
you know i remember this from 2008 and how long it took us to dig our way out and to this day
00:03:37.120
there are families there are communities that still haven't recovered recessions can be all those fancy
00:03:44.660
charts and graphs but at the end of the day people feel them one person at a time and they can be
00:03:51.460
devastated to hear her or even mutter the words dumb uh for a woman with a double digit iq she's
00:03:58.880
literally been wrong on every single economic issue she's ever spoken out about she doesn't know what
00:04:05.340
she's talking about she's either wrong on everything or she's lying about something could be both it most
00:04:12.900
likely is both she lies and gets herself into a deeper hole by lying some more kind of like michael
00:04:19.640
cohen did these people don't like america they hate america and she's one of them and her in
00:04:27.800
conjunction with the mainstream media is such a massive threat to democracy there is no trade war
00:04:33.480
regardless of what she wants it's donald trump uh balancing out unfair trade practices
00:04:39.540
that have been done for 25 years bill clinton george w bush hw bush barack hussein obama
00:04:49.640
w bush if i hadn't said him yet joe biden trade deals but it really started uh the
00:04:56.480
the brunt of it under bill clinton offshoring just about everything he could in america
00:05:03.540
to every other country for slave labor and every other president since him has progressively gotten
00:05:10.540
worse and worse and worse offshore so donald trump came in and he told us this is what he was going to do
00:05:16.200
for months in his first term tariffs to try to level the playing field with these countries
00:05:22.320
to stop taking advantage of us it's not that they're taking advantage of america as a country
00:05:28.920
i think donald trump would be a little bit more privy to to making something work if that were the case
00:05:35.080
because everyone takes advantage of america let's just be honest about it
00:05:38.120
we're the the piggy bank of the world everyone takes advantage of us folks in mexico come through
00:05:45.440
our southern border with drugs and human trafficking as they please ukraine calls up tells us we need
00:05:50.460
another billion dollars everyone takes advantage of america we are the rug mat of the world and it's
00:05:56.920
because of presidents like the past so donald trump comes in and says this is done those days are over
00:06:04.120
and the world melts down the not the world but the mainstream media that world the marxist end that
00:06:14.320
world so he's taking on the fight canada she says the dumbest fight but senator warren is it a dumb fight
00:06:21.860
when they're killing our american farmers in the midwest i know you don't care about them because they
00:06:29.040
don't vote for you because they know you're a liar and your party's a bunch of liars
00:06:32.720
and they're a threat to democracy but it's not a trade war when donald trump is standing up for 400
00:06:39.920
product increased prices on our farmers that can't compete with canada there's nothing dumb about
00:06:48.560
that because you're not one of these farmers out there who's getting killed so let's just get that
00:06:55.280
straight so canada today decided they wanted to act like fools adding a tax on american tech
00:07:04.220
donald trump is not going to stand for it he says we don't need canada
00:07:09.760
so effective immediately any trade negotiations with canada are off the table so canada i put a
00:07:18.780
charge on some of our companies and canada has been a very difficult country to deal with uh over
00:07:24.640
the years uh you know we hear canada we have a great relationship with the people of canada but
00:07:29.940
it's been very difficult and they put a charge and they were a little bit early we found out about it
00:07:35.060
so and we have all the cards we will every single one we don't want to do anything bad but
00:07:40.020
uh they have uh economically we have such power over canada i'd rather not use it but they did
00:07:48.300
something with our tech companies today trying to copy europe you know they copied europe it's not
00:07:53.240
going to work out well for europe either and it's not going to work out well for canada they were
00:07:58.020
foolish to do it and so i said we're going to stop all negotiations with canada right now until they
00:08:03.740
straighten out their act is there anything canada can change your mind about this
00:08:08.420
well no they put a tax on uh companies that were american companies that they shouldn't very
00:08:13.600
very severe tax and uh yeah i guess they could remove it they will but i don't really i mean it
00:08:21.200
doesn't matter to me we have all the cards we have all the cards you know we do a lot of business
00:08:27.020
with canada but relatively little they do most of their businesses with us and when you have that
00:08:33.100
circumstance you treat people better uh they've had farmers uh that are getting like 300 400 200
00:08:40.660
percent in tariffs nobody's ever seen anything like it we have cases uh you don't read this and the
00:08:46.060
people don't report but uh they charge us 400 on some uh dairy products 400 nobody writes that
00:08:55.180
and it's not fair to our farmers and we've got to protect our farmers
00:08:59.980
the demeanor of president trump there should tell you all you need to know about where he stands
00:09:05.400
with canada he doesn't really care they've inflicted this wound on themselves so now let's
00:09:11.540
watch the mainstream media go out there and parade it that donald trump has started another trade war
00:09:16.480
now this happened about uh one o'clock this afternoon the markets still rallied you had the
00:09:22.120
record close in the s&p you had the record close on the nasdaq and the dow jones still ended up
00:09:28.040
just over 400 points so not a bad day uh for the dow which is uh the rip roaring now uh up on the one
00:09:36.360
year up on the year to date so the democrats uh frightened and scared there didn't work that's
00:09:43.140
what they've tried to do so now canada's got themselves into a pickle and it's up to them to
00:09:48.460
get themselves out i wish i could tell you that was the only big news of the day
00:09:53.620
but before that even happened a massive massive case for the supreme court who
00:09:59.500
wrapped up their uh their term this afternoon uh they'll go off into summer vacation i know it's
00:10:06.480
nice they don't have to work in the summers they get to relax and get ready for their next term
00:10:10.840
but they did do some major major things and we're going to take all of it up uh with a very brilliant
00:10:18.040
scholar mind a law mind professor william jacobson of cornell university he's going to be joining us in
00:10:23.560
just a few moments um with his take on everything that's going on in this country everything that's
00:10:29.360
going on with the law fair and that the supreme court uh with their massive massive cases uh we'll
00:10:35.700
go through a few of them just briefly lgbtq case uh which muslim plaintiffs brought a case against
00:10:42.900
schools uh that they don't want their children indoctrinated and that they can opt out of these
00:10:50.480
books in these classes supreme court upholding those parents today saying their children um
00:10:56.800
should not be subject to this and they cannot can no longer be subject to this another big case
00:11:02.840
down in texas free speech coalition versus paxton uh upholding a texas law requiring websites
00:11:09.960
with substantial sexual content to verify users ages user ages before uh granting access to that content
00:11:17.540
a massive win uh for parents and and protecting our children uh across this great country but perhaps
00:11:25.000
the bigger issues that the supreme court uh took uh issue with i should say is listing policies and
00:11:35.280
lifting injunctions on which these marxist rogue judges and which we're going to talk about with
00:11:40.160
professor jacobson in just a few moments but lifting injunctions from lower courts on birthright
00:11:47.040
citizenship uh on funding for sanctuary cities on suspending refugee settlement on freezing unnecessary
00:11:54.240
federal funding and on stopping taxpayer funded tranny surgeries pam bondi addressed it in the oval office
00:12:02.480
earlier this afternoon next to president trump americans are finally getting what they voted for
00:12:09.500
no longer no longer will we have rogue judges striking down president trump's policies across the entire
00:12:16.640
nation no longer today in the 6-3 opinion justice barrett correctly holds that the district court lacks
00:12:24.240
authority to enter nationwide or universal injunctions these lawless injunctions gave relief to everyone
00:12:32.580
in the world instead of the parties before the court as the supreme court held today
00:12:38.740
they turned district courts into the imperial judiciary active liberal justices judges have used these
00:12:48.200
injunctions to block virtually all of president trump's policies to put this in perspective there are 94
00:12:56.560
federal judicial districts five of those districts throughout this country held 35 of the nationwide
00:13:06.620
injunctions think about that 94 districts and 35 out of the 40 opinions with nationwide injunctions came from five
00:13:16.080
liberal districts in this country no longer you heard her correctly 94 districts and five of them
00:13:26.400
gave rulings on 35 cases it's good old-fashioned uh judge shopping by the marxist dems president trump
00:13:34.180
immediately after the supreme court hearing laid out just how he plans to proceed with these liftings of these injunctions
00:13:42.720
thanks to this decision we can now promptly file to proceed with numerous policies that have been wrongly enjoined on
00:13:50.280
a nationwide basis and some of the cases we're talking about would be ending birthright citizenship which
00:13:58.640
now comes to the fore that was meant for the babies of slaves it wasn't meant for people trying to scam
00:14:04.200
the system and come into the country on a vacation this was in fact it was the same date the exact same
00:14:10.980
date the end of the civil war it was meant for the babies of slaves and it's so clean and so obvious
00:14:15.680
but this lets us go there and finally win that case because hundreds of thousands of people are pouring into our
00:14:22.300
country under birthright citizenship and it wasn't meant for that reason it was meant for the babies of
00:14:28.340
slaves so thanks to this decision we can now properly file to proceed with these numerous policies and
00:14:36.260
those that have been wrongly enjoined on a nationwide basis including birthright citizenship
00:14:41.580
ending sanctuary city funding suspending refugee resettlement freezing unnecessary funding stopping federal
00:14:49.620
taxpayers from paying for transgender surgeries and numerous other priorities of the american people
00:14:56.300
and most importantly making america great again folks we're going to take a quick break here
00:15:01.640
on the other side of this break we're going to be joined by cornell university law professor
00:15:05.460
william jacobson we're going to break all these cases down for you and figure out where we go from
00:15:10.660
here and just how fast president trump can start these proceedings with deportations and the ending of
00:15:17.040
birthright citizenship can we get it passed stay with us we're coming right back
00:15:20.900
professor jacobson as always it's a delight to talk to you happy friday i'm sorry to pull you out of
00:15:31.920
summer mode but it was a massive day as i just laid out for the audience here the supreme court with a slew
00:15:39.560
of rulings but the overwhelming uh theme of it was a double bird to the democrat marxist judges who have
00:15:47.180
tried to stifle this administration at every uh point along the way standing we heard standing in
00:15:54.440
2020 like there was no tomorrow it's like standing doesn't even exist anymore tell the audience if you
00:15:59.440
will what happened today in the supreme court well there were several big decisions um there was a
00:16:06.620
decision out of montgomery county maryland um saying that parents have a right to opt their kids
00:16:14.700
out of lgbtq plus plus um really programming in the school uh interest very interesting case the lead
00:16:24.800
plaintiffs were muslim parents who didn't want their kids to have to sit through it and the school
00:16:28.800
district wouldn't let them opt out supreme court reversed that said they have a constitutional
00:16:33.880
religious freedom right to opt out there was another case out of texas where the supreme court
00:16:40.760
upheld a texas law requiring age verification for pornography sites um hugely popular measure
00:16:50.740
didn't cut them off but just said you got to make sure it's not like 12 year olds okay um and so the
00:16:56.520
supreme court ruled on that but the one everybody's talking about is being called the birthright citizenship
00:17:01.760
case which actually wasn't about birthright citizenship so it was a case where donald trump
00:17:09.120
issued an executive order saying we the federal government will not accept papers will not recognize
00:17:17.220
claims to citizenship where the mother was not a citizen and neither was the father or is here
00:17:23.600
illegally or we're transitory where the mother was transitory and the father's not a citizen we're not
00:17:30.300
going to recognize that and uh there was a lawsuit and an injunction issued a so-called universal injunction
00:17:36.980
which where a single federal judge said nationwide i'm going to enjoin this and i'm going to force the
00:17:44.080
federal government to recognize anybody recognize the not the concept of birthright citizenship birthright
00:17:52.580
citizenship is loosely based on the 14th amendment that says any person subject to the jurisdiction
00:18:00.660
of the united states i'm paraphrasing obviously and present here is a citizen and there's a question
00:18:07.600
what does that mean does that mean that someone who's here illegally becomes a citizen their kids
00:18:13.100
and that's how people have treated it for several decades at least for almost a century people have
00:18:18.100
treated it that way but there's never been a judiciary supreme court ruling that the children of illegal
00:18:24.260
aliens are citizens so we've cut they kind of made it up as they went the political system and that was
00:18:30.300
the issue that trump was addressing but that was not the issue that the supreme court decided all they
00:18:35.980
decided is can a federal district court judge issue a universal injunction and the nub of the ruling was no
00:18:46.440
that that that is not within the power of a single federal judge to issue a universal injunction which
00:18:53.800
binds people who aren't even before the court they're not parties they have no say in anything they can't
00:19:00.100
present their side of the story and that the federal courts don't have the power to do that and that's
00:19:05.060
hugely hugely important for the trump administration because both trump 1.0 and now trump 2.0 have really been
00:19:13.860
hamstrung by these universal injunctions because the trump administration needs to win every single
00:19:21.380
case if the challengers find one judge out of 650 plus in the country who will issue a universal injunction
00:19:30.000
they win so and i saw this i remember this back in the first term trump won a lot of the immigration
00:19:36.440
cases but lost one or two and therefore it took him two years to get the case to the supreme court
00:19:44.280
and he ultimately won but he'd lost two years of his term so that was the issue and that's the big
00:19:50.380
ruling there's a lot of nuances to that and consequences i'm happy to get into yeah let's do i
00:19:55.960
want to do that but i have a short attention span here professor uh i couldn't have got into cornell if i
00:20:01.320
had cheated on my sat so just bear with me a little bit here you had mentioned the injunctions right and
00:20:08.260
and as i mentioned earlier standing right in 2020 we heard out of every single court that donald trump
00:20:14.740
went to that his lawyers went to for election integrity for election fraud that they had no
00:20:19.480
standing i haven't heard that and correct me if i'm wrong but i haven't heard that one time from one of
00:20:25.980
these marxist dem judges well i i don't know if it's never happened this time around but out of
00:20:33.380
i think 400 cases it's a rarity i mean normally when you go to federal court the first thing the judge
00:20:39.900
does is examine do i even have jurisdiction here uh do i have jurisdiction over it now a lot of these
00:20:46.340
immigration cases the legislation divests the federal courts of jurisdiction you've got to go to
00:20:52.160
the immigration and the judges just ignore that uh and plus the issue of standing and in fact i think
00:20:57.580
it was justice elito in a concurring decision today um said we really need to address this issue of
00:21:05.180
standing and we're not in this decision which was for trump we're not addressing the issue of standing
00:21:11.640
and we've got to clamp down on that so you're absolutely right that this has not been a um situation
00:21:18.620
where the judges have exercised the extreme caution that they have when it was the other shoe on the
00:21:25.680
other foot and people challenging the elections it's sorry to go off on a tangent there but that's
00:21:30.840
just it's it's so crazy that that that you know that's what we saw in 2020 and you know what if some
00:21:36.160
of the judges would have uh had uh the intestinal fortitude maybe things would have ended differently in
00:21:41.200
2020 i'm convinced of it going back to the birthright citizenship uh question president trump
00:21:47.620
mentioning today that what it was really intended for was for children of slaves to be able to be
00:21:53.580
citizens here after uh what was gone through what was gone through why has it taken so long for us to
00:21:59.540
get to this inception point where this is you know 100 years uh not exactly 100 years but some years now
00:22:07.180
in the past yeah i mean i'm not sure he's totally correct that it was only for the children of slaves
00:22:13.080
it was meant also to make sure that slaves themselves free slaves were considered citizens
00:22:19.120
of the united states and in fact i think that was probably the primary motivation is that you know
00:22:24.280
1865 you have uh hundreds of thousands of freed slaves who were are they citizens or are they not and i
00:22:34.320
think that's what it was mostly intended for not just their children there was a case which had held
00:22:40.620
that the children of permanent lawful resident aliens are considered children but there has never been
00:22:48.960
a supreme court ruling that the children of people who are here illegally are citizens and that's really
00:22:55.420
a huge issue because birthright citizenship is an incentive for people to come here illegally you cross
00:23:02.320
the border or you overstay your visa and all of a sudden your kids are american citizens there's a
00:23:08.820
large tourism business uh they i think they call it birthright tourism from asia where people fly
00:23:15.680
here and there are travel companies that set it up and they stay in a hotel in los angeles for a couple
00:23:22.600
of last couple of months of pregnancy and they give birth here and they now have an american citizen
00:23:27.160
child and they fly back to wherever they came from uh and and is that really what we intended uh by this
00:23:33.560
that someone can fly to los angeles stay a month or two give birth and now that child is a citizen and
00:23:40.100
that that's the issue and there's a lot of scholarship which has been denigrated has been
00:23:44.400
put down saying this is not what it was intended to be and if we look back at the history of the 14th
00:23:51.520
amendment they did not intend this to happen what the supreme court will do with it on the merits i don't
00:23:57.480
know but the merits weren't before the supreme court now so it was a very strange posture we're talking
00:24:04.000
about birthright citizenship but we're not ruling on birthright citizenship we're dealing with an
00:24:09.720
injunction so it was a very strange posture at some point they're going to get to the merits of it i'm
00:24:16.420
not sure what that point is and that's the one that scares the heck out of me is what they're going
00:24:22.160
to wind up doing there uh to me it's very black and white i think it seems like to you it's very
00:24:27.100
black and white that this thing has just gone rogue i mean it's it's people who have no intention of of
00:24:34.140
of becoming americans they don't care about america they don't care about this country
00:24:38.220
they just care about getting that citizenship so they can work here because it is the greatest
00:24:42.860
country in the world regardless of what anybody tells you or what anybody wants you to believe this
00:24:47.460
is the greatest country in the world there is no place like it the benefits we are afforded you
00:24:52.060
go to any other country uh with maybe the exception of canada and you burn a flag there your ass is
00:24:57.700
grass yet in america we tolerate this stuff and i think we've tolerated it for for far too long so
00:25:04.820
now that we have the question of birthright citizenship being allowed to be brought to a court
00:25:09.480
number one what court do you believe that that gets brought to does that go right to the supreme court
00:25:14.140
or does it have to go to another court first number one number two what do you think the process looks
00:25:19.640
like and the timeline yeah i'm not sure i did hear reference today i think it was by pam bondy
00:25:25.560
attorney general saying that this was going to be heard by the supreme court in the fall i'm not
00:25:31.180
familiar with that case i don't know if it's the same case it might be this case um remember what we
00:25:36.560
were dealing with now was really a stay of putting a halt to a lower court injunction that's all the
00:25:44.240
court the supreme court ruled on so it might be uh what she's referring to is that this case will be
00:25:49.840
heard in the supreme court this executive order on the merits but that won't be to the fall i don't
00:25:55.820
know more than what she said about that so this will make its way in the normal course it's a usually
00:26:00.920
important issue the supreme court should rule on it we should have a uniform national standard on what
00:26:06.560
the 14th amendment means but we had this weird procedural thing where the trump administration
00:26:12.320
and in hindsight 2020 hindsight it was a brilliant tactical move they decided only to bring the
00:26:18.620
procedural issue right now to the supreme court and not the merits issue they've been proven right
00:26:25.460
some but even if they've been proven wrong it's not certainly a bad strategy but that was clearly
00:26:30.440
their strategy and the reason for the strategy is as i mentioned that they are being hamstrung not just
00:26:36.440
on birthright citizenship but on a whole host of other issues by these universal injunctions and they
00:26:41.960
obviously viewed this for whatever the reason as the right case to bring to challenge those universal
00:26:48.880
injunctions i'm going to tell you something that is just so mind-blowing to me the great lou dobbs did
00:26:54.080
not like attorneys you were one of the few that he actually liked and respected because let's be honest
00:26:59.560
it's a dime a dozen now it's like people go to law school wherever they're going to go to law school
00:27:03.640
to get the degree to think they're going to make a lot of money people don't realize is the majority of
00:27:07.720
lawyers don't really make a lot of money uh you know some people get lucky uh some people are smart
00:27:13.980
like you and and they make money because they're smart but uh it seems that everyone these days is
00:27:18.960
just you know i'm going to become a lawyer and i'm going to do this and i'm going to go chase ambulances
00:27:22.600
or whatever they decide they want to do the funniest part about this all professor is that these top top
00:27:30.200
lawyers for whatever the southern poverty law center whatever the heck acl whatever firm they're coming
00:27:35.900
from are getting beat by a man named steven miller who is not a lawyer i mean what does it tell you
00:27:42.560
about these people well you know they have been very comfortable with a judiciary that has been
00:27:49.020
favorably inclined towards them and a media that's been favorably inclined towards them and one of the
00:27:55.120
reasons they hate donald trump so much is that he consistently beats them and this is one where let's
00:28:02.400
put it in perspective are we in month five or six of his second term we're only at the beginning
00:28:09.180
they've got three and a half more years of this he came into this and and his people came into this
00:28:16.040
much better prepared than in 2016 in 2017 when he took office i don't think he really knew what to do now
00:28:24.500
and the bureaucracy was able to take advantage of him in that way james comey at the fbi they were
00:28:31.220
really able to go no he came into this with an agenda and while they're the democrats have achieved
00:28:37.540
some measure of delay they haven't achieved a lot i mean we're going into i think it's month six
00:28:43.420
somebody do the math for me yeah i'll have to do it on my fingers but me too but we're we're not that
00:28:51.100
far into it okay and you know they've got three more years solid three more years of this and he's got a
00:28:58.380
mostly favorable supreme court they don't rule his way on everything and people have been all over
00:29:03.580
amy coney barrett saying you know she stabbed him in the back but interestingly she wrote the opinion
00:29:09.400
today and interestingly trump always stood by her publicly when everybody was criticizing her and i
00:29:15.740
can't remember what it was about a month ago everybody was all over her about siding with the
00:29:21.420
liberals i think it had something to do with elmer abrigo garcia the guy who got yes yes you know
00:29:26.940
she's a good person um um you know and so he and she came through this time and she came through
00:29:34.140
in one of the best ways i mean this is so perfect she really you know took a hammer to katanji
00:29:41.660
brown jackson okay i mean when i say she took a hammer i mean the whole internet is now laughing
00:29:49.180
at katanji brown jackson they were just some absolutely brilliant lines in her opinion uh and
00:29:56.060
one of them which i'll just read because it's so great she says we will not dwell on justice jackson's
00:30:03.180
arguments which is at odds with more than two centuries worth of precedent not to mention the
00:30:08.780
constitution itself we only observe this justice jackson decries an imperial executive while embracing
00:30:17.180
an imperial judiciary and everybody's like standing up and cheering because that's exactly what it
00:30:23.580
is and there were several other lines where she went right after jackson didn't use the word stupid
00:30:30.860
didn't use the word ignorant but used a whole bunch of words that basically said that and really that's
00:30:38.540
what everybody's talking about and the other interesting thing is remember this is a 6-3 decision so there were
00:30:44.780
six five other justices who signed on to this opinion knowing in it was multiple swipes at justice
00:30:54.060
jackson right so you know they could have just concurred in the result and not signed on to the opinion but
00:31:00.220
they signed on to the opinion so the six conservatives on the court do not think very highly of justice
00:31:06.860
jackson in fact i'm not even sure the two other liberals do because jackson wrote a dissent which nobody
00:31:13.500
joined it okay yeah so sotomayor wrote the main dissent which was joined by kagan and jackson and
00:31:21.820
jackson wrote her own dissent which nobody joined her in and her own dissent was completely political
00:31:26.940
wasn't it like like two sentences or something no it was long it was long but it could be boiled down to
00:31:33.260
two sentences which is the sky is falling it's the end of democracy
00:31:36.780
and there were several other swipes i mean it was truly amazing barrett's opinion uh and and i think
00:31:48.140
it made a laughing stock of justice jackson because it's one thing for me to say such things or you to
00:31:53.820
say such things but when six of the supreme court justices basically call her a fool uh untethered to
00:32:01.900
legal doctrine i think was one of the terms again paraphrasing um somebody who seems bothered by all
00:32:09.740
this legalese okay let me let me read that because i have it up in front of me justice jackson skips
00:32:16.460
over the part because analyzing the government statute involves boring legalese pretty much telling her
00:32:22.220
she doesn't know how to read well and telling that she's not concerned it's all political that you
00:32:26.940
know let's not get bogged down in the statutory language okay this is the result we want and you
00:32:33.420
know it's easy to laugh now and fortunately she's only one out of nine but this is uh a prototype of
00:32:42.620
a progressive judge after the affirmative action case which i think was maybe her first case that she was
00:32:50.220
on if not her first then her second or third she didn't write obviously the majority decision but she
00:32:55.660
wrote a dissent and i said to people if you want to see what critical race theory looks like when
00:33:02.380
it's adopted by a judge read her dissent in the students for fair admissions case it is straight
00:33:09.180
out of critical race theory textbooks and this is what we have fortunately she is hopefully for at
00:33:17.580
least the next three and a half years the last supreme court justice who's going to engage in this
00:33:23.260
uh she's much worse than sotomayor um who's very liberal kagan is liberal but kind of can go with
00:33:30.940
the flow a little bit uh but jackson is way out there uh devoid and divorced from the american legal
00:33:39.180
tradition in a way i don't think we've ever seen a justice on the supreme court you know what scares
00:33:44.700
the heck out of me and this is something i ponder about very often and i don't know the right answer i don't
00:33:49.180
know the wrong answer but clarence thomas who's been one of the greatest champions on that supreme
00:33:54.380
court in history who's been attacked disgustfully by the democrats for nonsense is getting up there in
00:34:02.460
age and you know it scares the heck out of me because you put another by the way i did the math
00:34:08.780
uh while you were talking i it's five months and seven days so okay but it scares the heck out of me
00:34:16.140
knowing that he's getting up there in age and donald trump's got i'm not going to do the math
00:34:20.460
here but three months uh three years and six months and a few days left in office and it's even less
00:34:26.380
than that because you're not going to bring a judicial appointment after the election november so
00:34:29.740
we'll call it three years and then you got to worry about the possibility of the democrats winning
00:34:34.700
four years so that puts you at a seven-year timetable maybe another four years on top of that it
00:34:39.340
puts you in an 11-year timetable worst case scenario for you know some of these
00:34:44.620
the judges who are getting up there and i'm not suggesting that he's in bad health at any
00:34:49.740
way but it's things that i think you have to wonder in the back of your head and if someone's
00:34:53.420
going to wonder about it i think clarence thomas himself is going to do it because he's that good
00:34:57.020
of a man that he knows if the time is coming if if the lord's calling for him or he wants to take
00:35:02.860
some time and right back to say he's not going to put this country in a bad place in my opinion
00:35:07.980
yeah i mean i hope he lives to 100 and if he could live to 100 and be on the court the whole
00:35:13.340
time i would be thrilled but it's the old ruth bader ginsburg paradox that democrats were urging
00:35:20.700
her openly please retire while we have the white house okay and she didn't she hung on too long
00:35:29.980
and she died and donald trump got to appoint her successor and democrats have are furious about that
00:35:36.220
do i worry about that sure sure i mean the first issue is not so much the next three years it's do
00:35:43.580
republicans retain the senate because if they don't then you might have hard time getting a proper
00:35:49.420
replacement confirmed nobody can predict to a certainty it does look highly likely that republicans
00:35:56.780
will retain the senate not necessarily the house but the senate very likely but that's a risk you never
00:36:03.020
know you never know what happens and so that is the risk number one you could make an argument that
00:36:07.820
trump really has a year year and a half not three three years but again as we look at the senate map now
00:36:16.060
it seems highly likely republicans will retain it at least 50 seats because then you have the vice
00:36:22.860
president do the tiebreaker yeah and so uh and that that's an issue i mean i hate i would hate to see
00:36:31.260
him go but i would also hate to see him go and we can't confirm an equivalent of clarence thomas there
00:36:40.220
are some very high profile very good um appeals court judges who i think would be a proper replacement the
00:36:48.620
most clear one that everybody talks about is james hoe out of the fifth circuit um and i think he is
00:36:55.820
probably the leading likelihood uh to if but you know alito's getting up there in years thomas getting
00:37:02.780
up there in years let's go so to my nar and kagan as well so i think more so than kagan kagan's much
00:37:09.500
younger horribly i have to say so do my are yeah she's not she is legit not in good health i mean i think
00:37:17.180
that's pretty pretty well known um you know but uh but i don't know that she's an imminent you know
00:37:25.900
no no i'm not suggesting that clarence thomas is either i'm just you know looking at the timetable
00:37:30.460
of what it is and like i said i he is an american patriot that man a good friend i mean he's 77 years
00:37:37.740
old so by the actuarial tables okay by the more the mortality tables he should have you know at
00:37:47.020
least five years left hopefully like i said he's got 20 but um you know that'll be his decision you
00:37:54.380
know somebody like that who's very proud of what he's accomplished very proud to be in the position
00:38:00.060
he's on very proud to be able to write the decisions he writes he's not that often writing the
00:38:06.860
majority decision but he writes great concurring decisions uh he's probably having the time of his
00:38:12.860
life right now enjoying what's going on and so you know i i'd hate to see him go alito i'm not sure how
00:38:20.860
alito old alito is i think about the same as thomas so we've got a couple of justices there who are
00:38:27.020
getting on in age and they happen to be the two best justices on the court okay you know barrett wrote
00:38:34.140
a good decision this time kavanaugh can sometimes be good sometimes not same with gorsuch and
00:38:40.940
obviously we know about the chief um lose these two people and you do not replace them with
00:38:46.460
equivalence yeah and that's a real blow to the court yeah yeah you're absolutely right the truth of
00:38:51.980
the matter is that the age is just a number i mean the great lou dobbs passed away a few months
00:38:56.780
short of his 79th birthday and you never know what's going to happen never know you know one day
00:39:01.660
it's good and then three days later you're told that something is going to happen and
00:39:07.100
that person's over there so you know it's it's a terrible thing um you'd mentioned ginsburg lou
00:39:13.020
dobbs used to say to me all the time pigs get fat and hogs get slaughtered and that's exactly a case
00:39:19.260
well good for her i'm glad she stood her ground and didn't cave
00:39:27.900
and so does amy coney barrett yeah you know what we'd mentioned i'm not entirely sure she's much
00:39:34.460
different than her but i'm going to hold out hope and reserve that uh there are some things in amy's
00:39:40.780
life that make me a little nervous that she's going to rule on birthright citizenship i believe all of her
00:39:45.980
kids are adopted from foreign nations so i don't know if that plays a role in it but uh it it sits
00:39:51.900
in the back of my head that there's a possibility she could have a soft spot for immigrants in the
00:39:57.020
country well there's nothing to prevent an immigrant from gaining citizenship if the question is whether
00:40:03.100
if they are here or if their parents are here illegally they automatically gain it by virtue of their birth
00:40:09.420
nothing to prevent uh an adopted immigrant child from gaining citizenship regardless of how this
00:40:15.580
ruling turns out yeah you're yeah you're absolutely right and and we got to just hope and pray the
00:40:20.780
other thing that was big in this was the the funding for sanctuary cities so imagine that a court
00:40:25.260
came and said well donald trump you can't cut funding to the city because they want to harbor
00:40:29.340
illegals well on the flip side who says that the american people have to pay for illegals to be living in
00:40:35.420
new york or chicago or wherever the heck they want to live i don't want to pay for it you don't want
00:40:40.140
to pay for it if if someone wants to pay for it let that city pay for it and we deduct it out of their
00:40:44.780
federal funding how is that even something that gets to the national level yeah well i i think
00:40:50.460
the issue there in a lot of these funding cases is if there is legislation which requires
00:40:56.700
certain funding be provided can the president on his own just terminate it and that's typically
00:41:02.700
the arguments is that he doesn't have a choice as president that this funding was provided by the
00:41:08.620
congress and the congress mandated it whether that's accurate or not courts will decide but that's
00:41:14.220
the argument uh is that it's already been funded and you can't interrupt something that's already been
00:41:21.180
funded but that doesn't mean can't cut off future funding
00:41:24.940
going back to it's just in my head now steven miller you we had spoken about a little bit
00:41:35.420
and how well prepared this trump administration was i had the feeling that this is how it was going to be
00:41:41.020
but i can almost bet you any amount of money in the world that on january 21st of 2021 steven miller
00:41:46.700
was at the drawing board figuring out how they're going to do things and you had mentioned we're only
00:41:53.260
five five five months and seven days in and they've already managed to get rulings on being able to
00:42:01.020
proceed forward with lawsuits on key things that president trump ran a sanctuary city funding
00:42:07.820
birthright citizenship suspending a refugee resettlement uh unnecessary for a freezing of
00:42:14.300
unnecessary federal funding uh stop the uh taxpayer funded slush funds uh parents being able to pull
00:42:21.020
their kids out of lgbtq uh programs this is just five months and seven days in it scares the heck
00:42:27.100
out of me but in a good way that they were able to accomplish this month in five months that they
00:42:33.100
couldn't get through in four years last term in 2016 yeah i i think that's important one thing people
00:42:41.340
need to keep in mind is the supreme court ruling doesn't mean that the federal judiciary is going to go
00:42:47.660
along with it uh there are openings in the decision this decision said you can't issue universal
00:42:53.740
injunctions you have to tailor the injunction to providing the remedies for these plaintiffs
00:43:00.300
but also dangled out there which also came out in oral argument that maybe the way to go is through
00:43:05.980
class actions not universal injunctions so i think what you're going to see and i've read some place
00:43:12.460
they've already refiled in one of these cases what you're going to see are federal judges being very
00:43:18.780
aggressive and granting class certification accomplishing the rough equivalent of a universal
00:43:25.740
injunction by another means and i have no doubt that that will happen so nobody should think that just
00:43:30.700
because the supreme court ruled this way all of the sudden all the problems are solved it's just a
00:43:36.780
major problem has been removed and the alternative procedures are much more cumbersome and more
00:43:42.940
subject to review than these universal injunctions i'd go even a step further than you that this has
00:43:49.580
probably fired up these marxist judges even more to make even crazier decisions because they know that
00:43:54.780
they're losing on every direction polling it shows overwhelmingly uh the supreme court shows overwhelmingly
00:44:01.980
all across the board these people are losing and they're losing a professor in one very key spot
00:44:07.420
it's the court of public opinion and that's the court i think that matters most in the grand scheme
00:44:12.380
of things it was the court that mattered most back in november when donald trump won the popular vote of
00:44:17.100
this country what's stopping the republicans from doing the same thing and going judge shopping
00:44:21.500
why don't they follow their lawsuits down in texas somewhere or down in a very favorable district
00:44:26.220
in florida somewhere or somewhere in missouri what's stopping the republicans from doing that
00:44:31.260
well well they did that during the biden administration that and not with the volume
00:44:36.060
that you're seeing now under you know there was in the new york times of all places in late november
00:44:43.100
2024 they ran a story about the organize organizing efforts for lawfare against the trump campaign and i
00:44:52.140
think i'm remembering their statistics correctly they had lined up over 800 lawyers to participate in this
00:45:00.300
and over 40 groups and they were already setting up trainings and setting up programs to find
00:45:07.900
plaintiffs plaintiffs who have standing okay and so this was a very highly organized effort
00:45:15.100
at to time to use lawfare to thwart the will of the american people and unfortunately some federal judges
00:45:23.740
have brought that attitude forward i should say not all of them we've gotten some good rulings and even
00:45:29.420
rulings where you lose it's one thing to lose a ruling it's another thing to lose a ruling where
00:45:34.860
you feel the judge has been manipulative where the judge has done things in a way that suggests the
00:45:39.900
judge is not disinterested and that's part of the problem here the use of temporary restraining orders
00:45:45.580
by a lot of these judges has looked very manipulative because a temporary restraining order as a general
00:45:51.980
matter there are some exceptions as a general matter is not appealable so it's very as opposed to a
00:45:57.820
preliminary injunction a longer term injunction a temporary restraining order is basically somebody
00:46:04.220
comes into court and says if you don't do this right now the world is going to end for me okay and you
00:46:11.740
can't even wait a week you can't wait two weeks you i need relief immediately and in a lot of these
00:46:17.660
cases that's just not been true i remember there was a kid one of the first cases in early february
00:46:23.660
out of new york city southern district of new york of course um involved involving which treasury
00:46:30.780
officials could have access to treasury payment systems since they were working with doge with at
00:46:37.260
the time elon musk's people and they went into court on a friday night at 10 pm knowing that in the
00:46:44.380
southern district of new york there is an emergency duty judge so you know which judge you're going to
00:46:49.980
get if you file at 10 pm whereas if you file at 4 pm you get a random assignment it's not literally
00:46:57.340
random but you don't know who you're going to get so they knew who they get and that judge issued an
00:47:02.060
injunction at one in the morning on a saturday without even giving the government a chance to be
00:47:08.940
heard and argue against it and he essentially decapitated the treasury department by the
00:47:15.180
following tuesday another judge pretty much reversed him but that's what you've gotten and that leaves a
00:47:21.020
very sour taste in a lot of people's mouths and at the end of the day i think that you the credibility
00:47:26.860
and trustworthiness of the judiciary has been severely damaged not because 600 judges have gone rogue
00:47:33.740
but enough might only be 20 enough have gone rogue that it's infected the whole system yeah and it's
00:47:41.900
some of those judges you described sounds exactly like every single case that donald trump was involved
00:47:46.220
in in the law fair against him for the last four years with the exception of one and that was judge
00:47:51.660
ellen cannon down in florida who was the only person with uh with the courage to stand up to the
00:47:57.820
atrocities that the democrats are bringing upon him you had that judge you mentioned new york
00:48:02.700
judge juan marchant his daughter was fundraising eight million dollars for kamala harris this is
00:48:07.580
an hyperbole this is factual things and you have judges who were clearly complicit you couldn't get
00:48:14.300
a fair shot and and and they're just railroading this man railroading this man perp walking him
00:48:20.300
convicted felon this convicted felon that while these people are on the payrolls and their family
00:48:25.180
members are on the payrolls of the democratic party the corruption that we saw in america during that
00:48:31.020
time is one that i hope we never see again both republicans and democrats going back to a point you
00:48:37.100
made the problem i think i see is that the democrats are smarter when it comes to being a vindictive
00:48:43.340
maniacal people the republicans don't have an aclu the republicans don't have a southern poverty
00:48:49.020
law center we have things like judicial watch who do a great job but they're not about lawfare they're
00:48:54.620
about going out and suing for things that are atrocities things are going wrong we don't have
00:49:00.620
the funding we don't have the lawyers we don't have any of the resources that these democrats have
00:49:05.420
because these people don't care they hate donald trump so much that they'd go stand in front of a
00:49:09.740
train track and kill themselves if you told them that it would make donald trump disappear it's a mental
00:49:15.100
health crisis in my opinion worse than anything yeah i mean there's a huge difference the liberal
00:49:21.100
activist um lawfare system is so enormous relative to the conservative side i mean it's not even close
00:49:30.940
it's not even close they have all these groups aclu spLC you literally probably a hundred different
00:49:38.860
groups who are very well funded who are very well staffed and who exist to bring litigation there's
00:49:46.140
just no comparison there is no real equivalent on the right there are groups that do litigation on
00:49:52.300
the right you mentioned judicial watch there's pacific legal we do some at equal protection project
00:49:58.300
but we're minuscule compared to the infrastructure and the ecosystem on the left and part of that is
00:50:05.020
because leftist billionaires have invested in that system george soros has invested in that system he knows
00:50:11.980
that if you create these groups and you give them enough money that they're self-sustaining you will
00:50:17.020
create a political force and it's worked we should acknowledge it's it's largely worked the problem
00:50:22.940
that they have is the american people voted for the person voted them out okay but that infrastructure is
00:50:30.620
is truly massive they have the ability the day after trump does something to be in three different courts
00:50:36.860
the next day the right does not have that ability no it's because you know why people there's not
00:50:41.900
very many people who are like you are willing to put everything on the line to come out and speak in
00:50:46.300
truth justice in the american way they're terrified donald trump couldn't find a dang lawyer who would
00:50:52.460
represent him in any of his cases because of the retribution these people did uh what they do to
00:50:58.380
anyone who is associated with donald trump you go down the list of people rudy giuliani an elderly man
00:51:03.980
they tried to ruin this man's life peter navarro they put in jail it's a good thing that peter navarro
00:51:07.980
is a tough guy so it didn't matter steve bannon they put in jail roger stone they tried to put in jail
00:51:12.700
anybody who associated themselves with donald trump they ran so i don't even know professor if i can
00:51:17.980
blame your people in your profession for having to stay away from him is it worth ruining everything i
00:51:24.940
have is it worth losing my wife my kids my family to stand up i it's a question i think that you really
00:51:31.100
probably have to ponder about and say and it's so sick that we came to that point in this country is
00:51:37.100
you have lawyers out there defending some of the worst people possible p diddy's got lawyers right
00:51:41.980
now who will probably get higher profile clients after they're done representing him yet donald trump
00:51:48.140
couldn't get anybody to represent him if he paid billions of dollars and that's the problem do you
00:51:53.900
see that changing now in america that it's become a lot more mainstream to support donald trump
00:52:01.580
maybe temporarily i don't think there's been a long-term change i don't think so i mean
00:52:06.860
there was an organized democrat effort organized by one of their worst operatives david brock and this
00:52:14.220
is public this is not like they announced it okay they created a project to try to get republican
00:52:19.820
lawyers who represented republicans in the election disputes disbarred okay and an organized effort to
00:52:27.500
file bar complaints against people i mean this was again not me saying it they were proud of this
00:52:33.660
that this is what they were going to do i think the term they wanted to make republican lawyers toxic in
00:52:39.980
their communities so you don't see the reverse happening you don't see that and in a few cases a small
00:52:47.820
number of cases they were actually successful but they only need to be successful once or twice to
00:52:53.260
scare away a thousand republican lawyers yeah it's it's it's so sad that this is the inception point
00:52:59.740
that we've come into in this country before we wrap up and i know we went so over time but i can
00:53:05.180
probably talk to you for another two hours maybe three uh you bring such a fascinating insight and and
00:53:11.340
to the audience i don't know who professor william jacobson voted for i've never even asked him he could
00:53:16.220
have voted for kamala harris for all i know but that's not what matters what matters is is the fact
00:53:21.420
that he's here speaking like i say truth justice in the american way which is so important and it's
00:53:27.900
something that we've all been so deprived of for the last 10 years really because that's when the uh
00:53:33.180
the the problems against donald trump started they started spying on this man in uh 2015 when he
00:53:38.780
decided he was going to come down the escalator and beat out 16 incoming republicans with a baseball bat
00:53:44.220
metaphorically of course um and it's only been uphill from there you know they've tried to
00:53:49.900
dismantle this man at every point another record stock market uh closed today for the nasdaq and
00:53:55.020
the s p three months ago they were cheering for this thing to crash it's so sick you'd mentioned
00:54:01.180
temporarily that you think that the the uh lawfare will stop and people will be able to defend what's
00:54:07.180
right uh what is your your outlook going forward for the trump administration as we mentioned we've got
00:54:14.220
three and a half years more than three and a half years left for him to get his agenda through which
00:54:20.220
includes building a border wall securing this border which is for the first time we're seeing
00:54:24.620
a negative import of immigrants in this country it seems he's got this thing on track and it's steaming
00:54:31.500
do you see him going full force ahead and everything turning out good for him and the administration in
00:54:37.660
this country yeah i i think you have to look at it and say he's built tremendous momentum it wasn't
00:54:44.540
a smooth road okay um but he's got a lot of momentum if you look at you know the stock market
00:54:51.340
is a barometer of things and it's always a little risky to do that but you know it's at all-time highs
00:54:57.820
after having dropped when he announced the towers everybody panicked um if you look at what's happened
00:55:02.780
in the middle east he seems to have a lot of momentum he made the right call on iran and he
00:55:08.540
had a lot of opposition from some pundits in the conservative world but not from the base you know
00:55:15.180
you heard a lot of people about oh the you're going to splinter the base well every single poll i've
00:55:20.860
seen says that something like 90 to 95 percent of people who self-identify as mega republicans
00:55:28.540
supported the bombing of iran okay he he knew the base better than some of these big pundits knew
00:55:34.700
the base um and you know he's got a lot of momentum there of course you know he's got a lot of momentum
00:55:40.220
on the economy uh with nato with you have to look at where he is five months and seven days into his
00:55:48.780
second term and say he's on track to do amazing things you never know what's going to happen tomorrow
00:55:54.700
i mean we all know that and we can't predict that but barring something unforeseen happening
00:56:01.500
you think i i think he's gonna be extraordinarily popular he's way ahead in favorability and popularity
00:56:10.220
you know favorable versus unfavorable uh i think he's up depending on the poll you know several points
00:56:16.460
which is rare okay use rasmussen on this show professor yeah i mean and you know the um
00:56:23.500
rasmussen poll i think for the first time in its history found uh right right track that
00:56:31.260
more a majority of people think we're on the right track okay and that's a different measure than
00:56:36.620
favorability do you like the person you're going to vote is the country fundamentally on the right track
00:56:42.460
and it actually shocked me when i heard that you've never had 50 plus one say it's on the right track i
00:56:49.820
would have thought you would have had that but so i think he's got tremendous momentum uh no sign of
00:56:56.700
slowing down he's hasn't won the immigration battle but he's won you know hasn't won the immigration
00:57:05.260
lord war but he's won a huge battle which is the southern border is under control i mean the notion that
00:57:11.420
we have zero gotaways or getaways people being captured on the border and shipped to the interior
00:57:19.740
of the country zero in may unheard of versus 160 000 a year ago under biden in one month uh so he's
00:57:28.700
gone a long way he's gone a long way it's really turning out to be a lot more productive than i think
00:57:33.500
anybody could have predicted and he's so focused even on the iran thing you know you had the split and
00:57:38.460
you know tucker carlson i speak to him very often he's a good friend of mine i don't think tucker
00:57:44.060
carlson came out here to make donald trump look bad and say this this and this all these people
00:57:49.100
i believe are looking out for the best interests of donald trump and they don't want donald trump
00:57:52.700
to be the next george w bush and donald and donald trump didn't want to be the next george w bush and
00:57:56.620
he's not going to be the next george w bush with going into iraq with no wmb's wmds and
00:58:02.540
some discourse in the party is good for people to agree on everything to my opinion is unhealthy
00:58:08.940
so you had a little bump in the road and usually you said a rough road smooth seas never made a
00:58:13.500
skilled sailor so you know you have some discourse we're not going to agree 100 on everything but if
00:58:18.940
we're 90 of the way there i think it puts us in a good position donald trump did wind up being right
00:58:23.420
i was skeptical about going in and bombing iran myself and i've said it on the show and i came out
00:58:27.980
a week later and i said i was wrong that's what's important is we identify we make up because i don't
00:58:33.740
like being in the middle of something i don't like saying well he could do this or that i like
00:58:37.260
taking a position if i'm wrong i correct myself if i'm right even better so he did wind up being
00:58:42.940
right about that and i am happy for it because it makes america a safer place right now uh i want
00:58:47.900
to give you some time before we wrap up to talk about your project aside from being a cornell uh
00:58:53.340
university law professor the equal protection project and what you're doing uh you can go to
00:58:58.380
equalprotect.org equalprotect.org to look at what professor william jacobson is doing to donate there
00:59:05.820
because it is important these things aren't multi-million dollar operations these are small
00:59:10.460
money operations that rely on people like us to make donations if you will tell the audience maybe
00:59:15.900
what you're working on right now or what you guys are up to sure um equalprotect.org is the website
00:59:21.740
it's part of the legal insurrection foundation which is a non-profit 501c3 so donations are tax
00:59:28.300
deductible and what we do at epp is we bring legal challenges to discrimination done in the name of
00:59:35.260
diversity equity and inclusion so we have challenged over 100 colleges and universities with regard to over
00:59:42.620
400 discriminatory programs and we're branching out we've also done it against other entities not just
00:59:50.060
colleges and universities and we've um you know accomplished a lot we have over 75 wins we might
00:59:57.260
have more than that it's not always easy to tell when you've won or when you haven't but we've done
01:00:02.780
productive stuff we're very small we certainly appreciate any support we can get we don't have
01:00:08.460
george soros behind us uh we you know every dollar counts and we try to be very frugal and very careful
01:00:14.620
with donor money and we try to get results and we have so far in two years like i said only two years
01:00:21.420
we've brought a tremendous number of cases with tremendous results so please come by and visit
01:00:27.020
equalprotect.org you heard the professor equalprotect.org and folks we don't promote anything
01:00:31.820
on this show that we don't partake in ourselves if you don't believe what we're saying go to the
01:00:35.100
website equalprotect.org and see exactly what they are working on don't take our word for it professor
01:00:40.860
william jacobson it's always a delight to talk to you like i said i think your dog is barking he's
01:00:44.540
hungry wants some dinner so we're gonna let you go we appreciate you joining us on this very very
01:00:49.340
monumental friday in america great thanks for having me on again always happy to come back
01:00:54.940
a big thanks to professor william jacobson for joining us on this friday night here on the great
01:00:58.860
america show folks the website once again equalprotect.org we invite you to go check out all the great work
01:01:04.940
that he's doing with this 501 c3 i hope you all have a great weekend and we hope to see you back
01:01:10.620
here monday same time same place we'll be here waiting for you have a great weekend as i said be
01:01:16.540
safe monday you have a meeting with me 6 p.m here on the great america show until then folks may god
01:01:22.700
bless you may god bless america and may god bless the great blue dobs have a great weekend