The Great America Show - Democrats suffer BIGGEST BLOW yet after SCOTUS hands Trump MASSIVE WIN

00:00:00.000 it was a record day on wall street the s&p 500 and the nasdaq both hitting new intraday highs

00:00:10.160 and now closing at new record highs hello everybody and welcome to the great america

00:00:16.180 show you heard that correctly it wasn't a joke it's not april fools another record high for

00:00:21.180 president trump second this week for the s&p and the nasdaq the nasdaq closed at 20,273 up 105 points

00:00:29.120 on the day the s&p 500 uh 6,173 uh up 32 points on the day a far different tone the marxist democrats

00:00:38.980 have been quiet they've been silent about everything gas prices uh the war in gaza that's

00:00:45.600 about to end iran russia ukraine egg prices the stock market these are all things two months ago

00:00:52.780 these people were going crazy about they were telling us donald trump's getting us into world

00:00:56.720 war three donald trump's driving us into a recession he's ruining this country he doesn't

00:01:01.600 know what he's doing with tariffs someone take the controls from him turns out they made the whole

00:01:07.540 thing up and i say this all with such a great smile on my face as a man who loves this country

00:01:13.180 and wants it to do well regardless of who the president is under joe biden i was rooting for

00:01:19.620 the country should kamala have one i would be rooting for the country because all of our fate depends on

00:01:26.140 it our 401ks our children our grandchildren our grandparents medicare and medicaid social security

00:01:33.140 it all depends on the country doing well the marxist dams were so happy just a few short months ago

00:01:41.060 that they can barely hold back their excitement that donald trump may be getting us into a recession

00:01:46.380 that he was going a little rogue as they said with the trade wars with all these countries

00:01:53.100 take a listen cnn just a few months ago as we come on the air new warning signs for president trump

00:02:00.960 about the real world impact of his shock and awe move fast and break things politics and policies

00:02:07.040 just moments ago u.s stocks closing deep in the red off to the worst start of the year since 2020

00:02:13.940 as inflation and trump's trade war leave investors freaked out and consumers low on confidence

00:02:20.220 according to a new report out today

00:02:22.340 you heard that right move fast and break things trade war you're not hearing trade wars anymore you're

00:02:31.400 not even hearing anything about it tariffs what's a tariff you're not hearing a darn thing about it

00:02:38.080 inflation he's driving inflation through the roof that was cnn just a few months ago they could barely

00:02:45.980 hold back their excitement but it wasn't just the fake news it's the marxist dams as well

00:02:50.360 take for example pocahontas elizabeth warren comes in and basically starts the dumbest trade war in the 0.97

00:02:59.100 history of this country this is going to be about potentially millions of people losing their jobs

00:03:04.860 it's going to be about millions of people losing their savings many of people losing their retirement

00:03:11.040 security and at the same time taking on even higher costs for everything they buy so that's going to

00:03:19.540 push us in potentially to foreclosures or uh people being pushed out of their apartments

00:03:27.040 you know i remember this from 2008 and how long it took us to dig our way out and to this day

00:03:37.120 there are families there are communities that still haven't recovered recessions can be all those fancy

00:03:44.660 charts and graphs but at the end of the day people feel them one person at a time and they can be

00:03:51.460 devastated to hear her or even mutter the words dumb uh for a woman with a double digit iq she's 1.00

00:03:58.880 literally been wrong on every single economic issue she's ever spoken out about she doesn't know what

00:04:05.340 she's talking about she's either wrong on everything or she's lying about something could be both it most

00:04:12.900 likely is both she lies and gets herself into a deeper hole by lying some more kind of like michael

00:04:19.640 cohen did these people don't like america they hate america and she's one of them and her in

00:04:27.800 conjunction with the mainstream media is such a massive threat to democracy there is no trade war

00:04:33.480 regardless of what she wants it's donald trump uh balancing out unfair trade practices

00:04:39.540 that have been done for 25 years bill clinton george w bush hw bush barack hussein obama

00:04:49.640 w bush if i hadn't said him yet joe biden trade deals but it really started uh the

00:04:56.480 the brunt of it under bill clinton offshoring just about everything he could in america

00:05:03.540 to every other country for slave labor and every other president since him has progressively gotten

00:05:10.540 worse and worse and worse offshore so donald trump came in and he told us this is what he was going to do

00:05:16.200 for months in his first term tariffs to try to level the playing field with these countries

00:05:22.320 to stop taking advantage of us it's not that they're taking advantage of america as a country

00:05:28.920 i think donald trump would be a little bit more privy to to making something work if that were the case

00:05:35.080 because everyone takes advantage of america let's just be honest about it

00:05:38.120 we're the the piggy bank of the world everyone takes advantage of us folks in mexico come through

00:05:45.440 our southern border with drugs and human trafficking as they please ukraine calls up tells us we need 1.00

00:05:50.460 another billion dollars everyone takes advantage of america we are the rug mat of the world and it's

00:05:56.920 because of presidents like the past so donald trump comes in and says this is done those days are over

00:06:04.120 and the world melts down the not the world but the mainstream media that world the marxist end that

00:06:14.320 world so he's taking on the fight canada she says the dumbest fight but senator warren is it a dumb fight

00:06:21.860 when they're killing our american farmers in the midwest i know you don't care about them because they

00:06:29.040 don't vote for you because they know you're a liar and your party's a bunch of liars

00:06:32.720 and they're a threat to democracy but it's not a trade war when donald trump is standing up for 400

00:06:39.920 product increased prices on our farmers that can't compete with canada there's nothing dumb about

00:06:48.560 that because you're not one of these farmers out there who's getting killed so let's just get that

00:06:55.280 straight so canada today decided they wanted to act like fools adding a tax on american tech

00:07:04.220 donald trump is not going to stand for it he says we don't need canada

00:07:09.760 so effective immediately any trade negotiations with canada are off the table so canada i put a

00:07:18.780 charge on some of our companies and canada has been a very difficult country to deal with uh over

00:07:24.640 the years uh you know we hear canada we have a great relationship with the people of canada but

00:07:29.940 it's been very difficult and they put a charge and they were a little bit early we found out about it

00:07:35.060 so and we have all the cards we will every single one we don't want to do anything bad but

00:07:40.020 uh they have uh economically we have such power over canada i'd rather not use it but they did

00:07:48.300 something with our tech companies today trying to copy europe you know they copied europe it's not

00:07:53.240 going to work out well for europe either and it's not going to work out well for canada they were

00:07:58.020 foolish to do it and so i said we're going to stop all negotiations with canada right now until they

00:08:03.740 straighten out their act is there anything canada can change your mind about this

00:08:08.420 well no they put a tax on uh companies that were american companies that they shouldn't very

00:08:13.600 very severe tax and uh yeah i guess they could remove it they will but i don't really i mean it

00:08:21.200 doesn't matter to me we have all the cards we have all the cards you know we do a lot of business

00:08:27.020 with canada but relatively little they do most of their businesses with us and when you have that

00:08:33.100 circumstance you treat people better uh they've had farmers uh that are getting like 300 400 200

00:08:40.660 percent in tariffs nobody's ever seen anything like it we have cases uh you don't read this and the

00:08:46.060 people don't report but uh they charge us 400 on some uh dairy products 400 nobody writes that

00:08:55.180 and it's not fair to our farmers and we've got to protect our farmers

00:08:59.980 the demeanor of president trump there should tell you all you need to know about where he stands

00:09:05.400 with canada he doesn't really care they've inflicted this wound on themselves so now let's

00:09:11.540 watch the mainstream media go out there and parade it that donald trump has started another trade war

00:09:16.480 now this happened about uh one o'clock this afternoon the markets still rallied you had the

00:09:22.120 record close in the s&p you had the record close on the nasdaq and the dow jones still ended up

00:09:28.040 just over 400 points so not a bad day uh for the dow which is uh the rip roaring now uh up on the one

00:09:36.360 year up on the year to date so the democrats uh frightened and scared there didn't work that's

00:09:43.140 what they've tried to do so now canada's got themselves into a pickle and it's up to them to

00:09:48.460 get themselves out i wish i could tell you that was the only big news of the day

00:09:53.620 but before that even happened a massive massive case for the supreme court who

00:09:59.500 wrapped up their uh their term this afternoon uh they'll go off into summer vacation i know it's

00:10:06.480 nice they don't have to work in the summers they get to relax and get ready for their next term

00:10:10.840 but they did do some major major things and we're going to take all of it up uh with a very brilliant

00:10:18.040 scholar mind a law mind professor william jacobson of cornell university he's going to be joining us in

00:10:23.560 just a few moments um with his take on everything that's going on in this country everything that's

00:10:29.360 going on with the law fair and that the supreme court uh with their massive massive cases uh we'll

00:10:35.700 go through a few of them just briefly lgbtq case uh which muslim plaintiffs brought a case against

00:10:42.900 schools uh that they don't want their children indoctrinated and that they can opt out of these

00:10:50.480 books in these classes supreme court upholding those parents today saying their children um

00:10:56.800 should not be subject to this and they cannot can no longer be subject to this another big case

00:11:02.840 down in texas free speech coalition versus paxton uh upholding a texas law requiring websites

00:11:09.960 with substantial sexual content to verify users ages user ages before uh granting access to that content

00:11:17.540 a massive win uh for parents and and protecting our children uh across this great country but perhaps

00:11:25.000 the bigger issues that the supreme court uh took uh issue with i should say is listing policies and

00:11:35.280 lifting injunctions on which these marxist rogue judges and which we're going to talk about with 0.92

00:11:40.160 professor jacobson in just a few moments but lifting injunctions from lower courts on birthright

00:11:47.040 citizenship uh on funding for sanctuary cities on suspending refugee settlement on freezing unnecessary

00:11:54.240 federal funding and on stopping taxpayer funded tranny surgeries pam bondi addressed it in the oval office

00:12:02.480 earlier this afternoon next to president trump americans are finally getting what they voted for

00:12:09.500 no longer no longer will we have rogue judges striking down president trump's policies across the entire

00:12:16.640 nation no longer today in the 6-3 opinion justice barrett correctly holds that the district court lacks

00:12:24.240 authority to enter nationwide or universal injunctions these lawless injunctions gave relief to everyone

00:12:32.580 in the world instead of the parties before the court as the supreme court held today

00:12:38.740 they turned district courts into the imperial judiciary active liberal justices judges have used these

00:12:48.200 injunctions to block virtually all of president trump's policies to put this in perspective there are 94

00:12:56.560 federal judicial districts five of those districts throughout this country held 35 of the nationwide

00:13:06.620 injunctions think about that 94 districts and 35 out of the 40 opinions with nationwide injunctions came from five

00:13:16.080 liberal districts in this country no longer you heard her correctly 94 districts and five of them

00:13:26.400 gave rulings on 35 cases it's good old-fashioned uh judge shopping by the marxist dems president trump

00:13:34.180 immediately after the supreme court hearing laid out just how he plans to proceed with these liftings of these injunctions

00:13:42.720 thanks to this decision we can now promptly file to proceed with numerous policies that have been wrongly enjoined on

00:13:50.280 a nationwide basis and some of the cases we're talking about would be ending birthright citizenship which

00:13:58.640 now comes to the fore that was meant for the babies of slaves it wasn't meant for people trying to scam

00:14:04.200 the system and come into the country on a vacation this was in fact it was the same date the exact same

00:14:10.980 date the end of the civil war it was meant for the babies of slaves and it's so clean and so obvious

00:14:15.680 but this lets us go there and finally win that case because hundreds of thousands of people are pouring into our

00:14:22.300 country under birthright citizenship and it wasn't meant for that reason it was meant for the babies of 1.00

00:14:28.340 slaves so thanks to this decision we can now properly file to proceed with these numerous policies and

00:14:36.260 those that have been wrongly enjoined on a nationwide basis including birthright citizenship

00:14:41.580 ending sanctuary city funding suspending refugee resettlement freezing unnecessary funding stopping federal

00:14:49.620 taxpayers from paying for transgender surgeries and numerous other priorities of the american people

00:14:56.300 and most importantly making america great again folks we're going to take a quick break here

00:15:01.640 on the other side of this break we're going to be joined by cornell university law professor

00:15:05.460 william jacobson we're going to break all these cases down for you and figure out where we go from

00:15:10.660 here and just how fast president trump can start these proceedings with deportations and the ending of

00:15:17.040 birthright citizenship can we get it passed stay with us we're coming right back

00:15:20.900 professor jacobson as always it's a delight to talk to you happy friday i'm sorry to pull you out of

00:15:31.920 summer mode but it was a massive day as i just laid out for the audience here the supreme court with a slew

00:15:39.560 of rulings but the overwhelming uh theme of it was a double bird to the democrat marxist judges who have

00:15:47.180 tried to stifle this administration at every uh point along the way standing we heard standing in

00:15:54.440 2020 like there was no tomorrow it's like standing doesn't even exist anymore tell the audience if you

00:15:59.440 will what happened today in the supreme court well there were several big decisions um there was a

00:16:06.620 decision out of montgomery county maryland um saying that parents have a right to opt their kids

00:16:14.700 out of lgbtq plus plus um really programming in the school uh interest very interesting case the lead

00:16:24.800 plaintiffs were muslim parents who didn't want their kids to have to sit through it and the school

00:16:28.800 district wouldn't let them opt out supreme court reversed that said they have a constitutional

00:16:33.880 religious freedom right to opt out there was another case out of texas where the supreme court

00:16:40.760 upheld a texas law requiring age verification for pornography sites um hugely popular measure

00:16:50.740 didn't cut them off but just said you got to make sure it's not like 12 year olds okay um and so the

00:16:56.520 supreme court ruled on that but the one everybody's talking about is being called the birthright citizenship

00:17:01.760 case which actually wasn't about birthright citizenship so it was a case where donald trump

00:17:09.120 issued an executive order saying we the federal government will not accept papers will not recognize

00:17:17.220 claims to citizenship where the mother was not a citizen and neither was the father or is here

00:17:23.600 illegally or we're transitory where the mother was transitory and the father's not a citizen we're not

00:17:30.300 going to recognize that and uh there was a lawsuit and an injunction issued a so-called universal injunction

00:17:36.980 which where a single federal judge said nationwide i'm going to enjoin this and i'm going to force the

00:17:44.080 federal government to recognize anybody recognize the not the concept of birthright citizenship birthright

00:17:52.580 citizenship is loosely based on the 14th amendment that says any person subject to the jurisdiction

00:18:00.660 of the united states i'm paraphrasing obviously and present here is a citizen and there's a question

00:18:07.600 what does that mean does that mean that someone who's here illegally becomes a citizen their kids

00:18:13.100 and that's how people have treated it for several decades at least for almost a century people have

00:18:18.100 treated it that way but there's never been a judiciary supreme court ruling that the children of illegal

00:18:24.260 aliens are citizens so we've cut they kind of made it up as they went the political system and that was 0.98

00:18:30.300 the issue that trump was addressing but that was not the issue that the supreme court decided all they

00:18:35.980 decided is can a federal district court judge issue a universal injunction and the nub of the ruling was no

00:18:46.440 that that that is not within the power of a single federal judge to issue a universal injunction which

00:18:53.800 binds people who aren't even before the court they're not parties they have no say in anything they can't

00:19:00.100 present their side of the story and that the federal courts don't have the power to do that and that's

00:19:05.060 hugely hugely important for the trump administration because both trump 1.0 and now trump 2.0 have really been

00:19:13.860 hamstrung by these universal injunctions because the trump administration needs to win every single

00:19:21.380 case if the challengers find one judge out of 650 plus in the country who will issue a universal injunction

00:19:30.000 they win so and i saw this i remember this back in the first term trump won a lot of the immigration

00:19:36.440 cases but lost one or two and therefore it took him two years to get the case to the supreme court

00:19:44.280 and he ultimately won but he'd lost two years of his term so that was the issue and that's the big

00:19:50.380 ruling there's a lot of nuances to that and consequences i'm happy to get into yeah let's do i

00:19:55.960 want to do that but i have a short attention span here professor uh i couldn't have got into cornell if i

00:20:01.320 had cheated on my sat so just bear with me a little bit here you had mentioned the injunctions right and

00:20:08.260 and as i mentioned earlier standing right in 2020 we heard out of every single court that donald trump

00:20:14.740 went to that his lawyers went to for election integrity for election fraud that they had no

00:20:19.480 standing i haven't heard that and correct me if i'm wrong but i haven't heard that one time from one of

00:20:25.980 these marxist dem judges well i i don't know if it's never happened this time around but out of

00:20:33.380 i think 400 cases it's a rarity i mean normally when you go to federal court the first thing the judge

00:20:39.900 does is examine do i even have jurisdiction here uh do i have jurisdiction over it now a lot of these

00:20:46.340 immigration cases the legislation divests the federal courts of jurisdiction you've got to go to

00:20:52.160 the immigration and the judges just ignore that uh and plus the issue of standing and in fact i think

00:20:57.580 it was justice elito in a concurring decision today um said we really need to address this issue of

00:21:05.180 standing and we're not in this decision which was for trump we're not addressing the issue of standing

00:21:11.640 and we've got to clamp down on that so you're absolutely right that this has not been a um situation

00:21:18.620 where the judges have exercised the extreme caution that they have when it was the other shoe on the

00:21:25.680 other foot and people challenging the elections it's sorry to go off on a tangent there but that's

00:21:30.840 just it's it's so crazy that that that you know that's what we saw in 2020 and you know what if some

00:21:36.160 of the judges would have uh had uh the intestinal fortitude maybe things would have ended differently in

00:21:41.200 2020 i'm convinced of it going back to the birthright citizenship uh question president trump

00:21:47.620 mentioning today that what it was really intended for was for children of slaves to be able to be

00:21:53.580 citizens here after uh what was gone through what was gone through why has it taken so long for us to

00:21:59.540 get to this inception point where this is you know 100 years uh not exactly 100 years but some years now

00:22:07.180 in the past yeah i mean i'm not sure he's totally correct that it was only for the children of slaves

00:22:13.080 it was meant also to make sure that slaves themselves free slaves were considered citizens

00:22:19.120 of the united states and in fact i think that was probably the primary motivation is that you know

00:22:24.280 1865 you have uh hundreds of thousands of freed slaves who were are they citizens or are they not and i

00:22:34.320 think that's what it was mostly intended for not just their children there was a case which had held

00:22:40.620 that the children of permanent lawful resident aliens are considered children but there has never been

00:22:48.960 a supreme court ruling that the children of people who are here illegally are citizens and that's really

00:22:55.420 a huge issue because birthright citizenship is an incentive for people to come here illegally you cross 1.00

00:23:02.320 the border or you overstay your visa and all of a sudden your kids are american citizens there's a

00:23:08.820 large tourism business uh they i think they call it birthright tourism from asia where people fly

00:23:15.680 here and there are travel companies that set it up and they stay in a hotel in los angeles for a couple

00:23:22.600 of last couple of months of pregnancy and they give birth here and they now have an american citizen

00:23:27.160 child and they fly back to wherever they came from uh and and is that really what we intended uh by this

00:23:33.560 that someone can fly to los angeles stay a month or two give birth and now that child is a citizen and

00:23:40.100 that that's the issue and there's a lot of scholarship which has been denigrated has been

00:23:44.400 put down saying this is not what it was intended to be and if we look back at the history of the 14th

00:23:51.520 amendment they did not intend this to happen what the supreme court will do with it on the merits i don't

00:23:57.480 know but the merits weren't before the supreme court now so it was a very strange posture we're talking

00:24:04.000 about birthright citizenship but we're not ruling on birthright citizenship we're dealing with an

00:24:09.720 injunction so it was a very strange posture at some point they're going to get to the merits of it i'm

00:24:16.420 not sure what that point is and that's the one that scares the heck out of me is what they're going

00:24:22.160 to wind up doing there uh to me it's very black and white i think it seems like to you it's very

00:24:27.100 black and white that this thing has just gone rogue i mean it's it's people who have no intention of of

00:24:34.140 of becoming americans they don't care about america they don't care about this country

00:24:38.220 they just care about getting that citizenship so they can work here because it is the greatest

00:24:42.860 country in the world regardless of what anybody tells you or what anybody wants you to believe this

00:24:47.460 is the greatest country in the world there is no place like it the benefits we are afforded you

00:24:52.060 go to any other country uh with maybe the exception of canada and you burn a flag there your ass is 0.72

00:24:57.700 grass yet in america we tolerate this stuff and i think we've tolerated it for for far too long so

00:25:04.820 now that we have the question of birthright citizenship being allowed to be brought to a court

00:25:09.480 number one what court do you believe that that gets brought to does that go right to the supreme court

00:25:14.140 or does it have to go to another court first number one number two what do you think the process looks

00:25:19.640 like and the timeline yeah i'm not sure i did hear reference today i think it was by pam bondy

00:25:25.560 attorney general saying that this was going to be heard by the supreme court in the fall i'm not

00:25:31.180 familiar with that case i don't know if it's the same case it might be this case um remember what we

00:25:36.560 were dealing with now was really a stay of putting a halt to a lower court injunction that's all the

00:25:44.240 court the supreme court ruled on so it might be uh what she's referring to is that this case will be

00:25:49.840 heard in the supreme court this executive order on the merits but that won't be to the fall i don't

00:25:55.820 know more than what she said about that so this will make its way in the normal course it's a usually

00:26:00.920 important issue the supreme court should rule on it we should have a uniform national standard on what

00:26:06.560 the 14th amendment means but we had this weird procedural thing where the trump administration

00:26:12.320 and in hindsight 2020 hindsight it was a brilliant tactical move they decided only to bring the

00:26:18.620 procedural issue right now to the supreme court and not the merits issue they've been proven right

00:26:25.460 some but even if they've been proven wrong it's not certainly a bad strategy but that was clearly

00:26:30.440 their strategy and the reason for the strategy is as i mentioned that they are being hamstrung not just

00:26:36.440 on birthright citizenship but on a whole host of other issues by these universal injunctions and they

00:26:41.960 obviously viewed this for whatever the reason as the right case to bring to challenge those universal

00:26:48.880 injunctions i'm going to tell you something that is just so mind-blowing to me the great lou dobbs did

00:26:54.080 not like attorneys you were one of the few that he actually liked and respected because let's be honest

00:26:59.560 it's a dime a dozen now it's like people go to law school wherever they're going to go to law school

00:27:03.640 to get the degree to think they're going to make a lot of money people don't realize is the majority of

00:27:07.720 lawyers don't really make a lot of money uh you know some people get lucky uh some people are smart

00:27:13.980 like you and and they make money because they're smart but uh it seems that everyone these days is

00:27:18.960 just you know i'm going to become a lawyer and i'm going to do this and i'm going to go chase ambulances

00:27:22.600 or whatever they decide they want to do the funniest part about this all professor is that these top top

00:27:30.200 lawyers for whatever the southern poverty law center whatever the heck acl whatever firm they're coming

00:27:35.900 from are getting beat by a man named steven miller who is not a lawyer i mean what does it tell you

00:27:42.560 about these people well you know they have been very comfortable with a judiciary that has been

00:27:49.020 favorably inclined towards them and a media that's been favorably inclined towards them and one of the

00:27:55.120 reasons they hate donald trump so much is that he consistently beats them and this is one where let's

00:28:02.400 put it in perspective are we in month five or six of his second term we're only at the beginning

00:28:09.180 they've got three and a half more years of this he came into this and and his people came into this

00:28:16.040 much better prepared than in 2016 in 2017 when he took office i don't think he really knew what to do now

00:28:24.500 and the bureaucracy was able to take advantage of him in that way james comey at the fbi they were

00:28:31.220 really able to go no he came into this with an agenda and while they're the democrats have achieved

00:28:37.540 some measure of delay they haven't achieved a lot i mean we're going into i think it's month six

00:28:43.420 somebody do the math for me yeah i'll have to do it on my fingers but me too but we're we're not that

00:28:51.100 far into it okay and you know they've got three more years solid three more years of this and he's got a

00:28:58.380 mostly favorable supreme court they don't rule his way on everything and people have been all over

00:29:03.580 amy coney barrett saying you know she stabbed him in the back but interestingly she wrote the opinion

00:29:09.400 today and interestingly trump always stood by her publicly when everybody was criticizing her and i

00:29:15.740 can't remember what it was about a month ago everybody was all over her about siding with the 0.99

00:29:21.420 liberals i think it had something to do with elmer abrigo garcia the guy who got yes yes you know

00:29:26.940 she's a good person um um you know and so he and she came through this time and she came through

00:29:34.140 in one of the best ways i mean this is so perfect she really you know took a hammer to katanji

00:29:41.660 brown jackson okay i mean when i say she took a hammer i mean the whole internet is now laughing

00:29:49.180 at katanji brown jackson they were just some absolutely brilliant lines in her opinion uh and

00:29:56.060 one of them which i'll just read because it's so great she says we will not dwell on justice jackson's

00:30:03.180 arguments which is at odds with more than two centuries worth of precedent not to mention the

00:30:08.780 constitution itself we only observe this justice jackson decries an imperial executive while embracing

00:30:17.180 an imperial judiciary and everybody's like standing up and cheering because that's exactly what it

00:30:23.580 is and there were several other lines where she went right after jackson didn't use the word stupid

00:30:30.860 didn't use the word ignorant but used a whole bunch of words that basically said that and really that's

00:30:38.540 what everybody's talking about and the other interesting thing is remember this is a 6-3 decision so there were

00:30:44.780 six five other justices who signed on to this opinion knowing in it was multiple swipes at justice

00:30:54.060 jackson right so you know they could have just concurred in the result and not signed on to the opinion but

00:31:00.220 they signed on to the opinion so the six conservatives on the court do not think very highly of justice

00:31:06.860 jackson in fact i'm not even sure the two other liberals do because jackson wrote a dissent which nobody

00:31:13.500 joined it okay yeah so sotomayor wrote the main dissent which was joined by kagan and jackson and

00:31:21.820 jackson wrote her own dissent which nobody joined her in and her own dissent was completely political

00:31:26.940 wasn't it like like two sentences or something no it was long it was long but it could be boiled down to

00:31:33.260 two sentences which is the sky is falling it's the end of democracy

00:31:36.780 and there were several other swipes i mean it was truly amazing barrett's opinion uh and and i think

00:31:48.140 it made a laughing stock of justice jackson because it's one thing for me to say such things or you to

00:31:53.820 say such things but when six of the supreme court justices basically call her a fool uh untethered to

00:32:01.900 legal doctrine i think was one of the terms again paraphrasing um somebody who seems bothered by all

00:32:09.740 this legalese okay let me let me read that because i have it up in front of me justice jackson skips

00:32:16.460 over the part because analyzing the government statute involves boring legalese pretty much telling her

00:32:22.220 she doesn't know how to read well and telling that she's not concerned it's all political that you

00:32:26.940 know let's not get bogged down in the statutory language okay this is the result we want and you

00:32:33.420 know it's easy to laugh now and fortunately she's only one out of nine but this is uh a prototype of

00:32:42.620 a progressive judge after the affirmative action case which i think was maybe her first case that she was

00:32:50.220 on if not her first then her second or third she didn't write obviously the majority decision but she

00:32:55.660 wrote a dissent and i said to people if you want to see what critical race theory looks like when

00:33:02.380 it's adopted by a judge read her dissent in the students for fair admissions case it is straight

00:33:09.180 out of critical race theory textbooks and this is what we have fortunately she is hopefully for at

00:33:17.580 least the next three and a half years the last supreme court justice who's going to engage in this

00:33:23.260 uh she's much worse than sotomayor um who's very liberal kagan is liberal but kind of can go with 0.91

00:33:30.940 the flow a little bit uh but jackson is way out there uh devoid and divorced from the american legal

00:33:39.180 tradition in a way i don't think we've ever seen a justice on the supreme court you know what scares

00:33:44.700 the heck out of me and this is something i ponder about very often and i don't know the right answer i don't

00:33:49.180 know the wrong answer but clarence thomas who's been one of the greatest champions on that supreme

00:33:54.380 court in history who's been attacked disgustfully by the democrats for nonsense is getting up there in

00:34:02.460 age and you know it scares the heck out of me because you put another by the way i did the math

00:34:08.780 uh while you were talking i it's five months and seven days so okay but it scares the heck out of me

00:34:16.140 knowing that he's getting up there in age and donald trump's got i'm not going to do the math

00:34:20.460 here but three months uh three years and six months and a few days left in office and it's even less

00:34:26.380 than that because you're not going to bring a judicial appointment after the election november so

00:34:29.740 we'll call it three years and then you got to worry about the possibility of the democrats winning

00:34:34.700 four years so that puts you at a seven-year timetable maybe another four years on top of that it

00:34:39.340 puts you in an 11-year timetable worst case scenario for you know some of these

00:34:44.620 the judges who are getting up there and i'm not suggesting that he's in bad health at any

00:34:49.740 way but it's things that i think you have to wonder in the back of your head and if someone's

00:34:53.420 going to wonder about it i think clarence thomas himself is going to do it because he's that good

00:34:57.020 of a man that he knows if the time is coming if if the lord's calling for him or he wants to take

00:35:02.860 some time and right back to say he's not going to put this country in a bad place in my opinion

00:35:07.980 yeah i mean i hope he lives to 100 and if he could live to 100 and be on the court the whole

00:35:13.340 time i would be thrilled but it's the old ruth bader ginsburg paradox that democrats were urging

00:35:20.700 her openly please retire while we have the white house okay and she didn't she hung on too long 0.98

00:35:29.980 and she died and donald trump got to appoint her successor and democrats have are furious about that

00:35:36.220 do i worry about that sure sure i mean the first issue is not so much the next three years it's do

00:35:43.580 republicans retain the senate because if they don't then you might have hard time getting a proper

00:35:49.420 replacement confirmed nobody can predict to a certainty it does look highly likely that republicans

00:35:56.780 will retain the senate not necessarily the house but the senate very likely but that's a risk you never

00:36:03.020 know you never know what happens and so that is the risk number one you could make an argument that

00:36:07.820 trump really has a year year and a half not three three years but again as we look at the senate map now

00:36:16.060 it seems highly likely republicans will retain it at least 50 seats because then you have the vice

00:36:22.860 president do the tiebreaker yeah and so uh and that that's an issue i mean i hate i would hate to see

00:36:31.260 him go but i would also hate to see him go and we can't confirm an equivalent of clarence thomas there

00:36:40.220 are some very high profile very good um appeals court judges who i think would be a proper replacement the

00:36:48.620 most clear one that everybody talks about is james hoe out of the fifth circuit um and i think he is 0.92

00:36:55.820 probably the leading likelihood uh to if but you know alito's getting up there in years thomas getting

00:37:02.780 up there in years let's go so to my nar and kagan as well so i think more so than kagan kagan's much

00:37:09.500 younger horribly i have to say so do my are yeah she's not she is legit not in good health i mean i think

00:37:17.180 that's pretty pretty well known um you know but uh but i don't know that she's an imminent you know

00:37:25.900 no no i'm not suggesting that clarence thomas is either i'm just you know looking at the timetable

00:37:30.460 of what it is and like i said i he is an american patriot that man a good friend i mean he's 77 years

00:37:37.740 old so by the actuarial tables okay by the more the mortality tables he should have you know at

00:37:47.020 least five years left hopefully like i said he's got 20 but um you know that'll be his decision you

00:37:54.380 know somebody like that who's very proud of what he's accomplished very proud to be in the position

00:38:00.060 he's on very proud to be able to write the decisions he writes he's not that often writing the

00:38:06.860 majority decision but he writes great concurring decisions uh he's probably having the time of his

00:38:12.860 life right now enjoying what's going on and so you know i i'd hate to see him go alito i'm not sure how

00:38:20.860 alito old alito is i think about the same as thomas so we've got a couple of justices there who are

00:38:27.020 getting on in age and they happen to be the two best justices on the court okay you know barrett wrote

00:38:34.140 a good decision this time kavanaugh can sometimes be good sometimes not same with gorsuch and

00:38:40.940 obviously we know about the chief um lose these two people and you do not replace them with

00:38:46.460 equivalence yeah and that's a real blow to the court yeah yeah you're absolutely right the truth of

00:38:51.980 the matter is that the age is just a number i mean the great lou dobbs passed away a few months

00:38:56.780 short of his 79th birthday and you never know what's going to happen never know you know one day

00:39:01.660 it's good and then three days later you're told that something is going to happen and

00:39:07.100 that person's over there so you know it's it's a terrible thing um you'd mentioned ginsburg lou

00:39:13.020 dobbs used to say to me all the time pigs get fat and hogs get slaughtered and that's exactly a case 1.00

00:39:19.260 well good for her i'm glad she stood her ground and didn't cave 0.93

00:39:21.980 like i appreciate her principled stand

00:39:27.900 and so does amy coney barrett yeah you know what we'd mentioned i'm not entirely sure she's much

00:39:34.460 different than her but i'm going to hold out hope and reserve that uh there are some things in amy's

00:39:40.780 life that make me a little nervous that she's going to rule on birthright citizenship i believe all of her

00:39:45.980 kids are adopted from foreign nations so i don't know if that plays a role in it but uh it it sits

00:39:51.900 in the back of my head that there's a possibility she could have a soft spot for immigrants in the

00:39:57.020 country well there's nothing to prevent an immigrant from gaining citizenship if the question is whether

00:40:03.100 if they are here or if their parents are here illegally they automatically gain it by virtue of their birth 1.00

00:40:09.420 nothing to prevent uh an adopted immigrant child from gaining citizenship regardless of how this

00:40:15.580 ruling turns out yeah you're yeah you're absolutely right and and we got to just hope and pray the

00:40:20.780 other thing that was big in this was the the funding for sanctuary cities so imagine that a court

00:40:25.260 came and said well donald trump you can't cut funding to the city because they want to harbor

00:40:29.340 illegals well on the flip side who says that the american people have to pay for illegals to be living in

00:40:35.420 new york or chicago or wherever the heck they want to live i don't want to pay for it you don't want

00:40:40.140 to pay for it if if someone wants to pay for it let that city pay for it and we deduct it out of their

00:40:44.780 federal funding how is that even something that gets to the national level yeah well i i think

00:40:50.460 the issue there in a lot of these funding cases is if there is legislation which requires

00:40:56.700 certain funding be provided can the president on his own just terminate it and that's typically

00:41:02.700 the arguments is that he doesn't have a choice as president that this funding was provided by the

00:41:08.620 congress and the congress mandated it whether that's accurate or not courts will decide but that's

00:41:14.220 the argument uh is that it's already been funded and you can't interrupt something that's already been

00:41:21.180 funded but that doesn't mean can't cut off future funding

00:41:24.940 going back to it's just in my head now steven miller you we had spoken about a little bit

00:41:35.420 and how well prepared this trump administration was i had the feeling that this is how it was going to be

00:41:41.020 but i can almost bet you any amount of money in the world that on january 21st of 2021 steven miller

00:41:46.700 was at the drawing board figuring out how they're going to do things and you had mentioned we're only

00:41:53.260 five five five months and seven days in and they've already managed to get rulings on being able to

00:42:01.020 proceed forward with lawsuits on key things that president trump ran a sanctuary city funding

00:42:07.820 birthright citizenship suspending a refugee resettlement uh unnecessary for a freezing of

00:42:14.300 unnecessary federal funding uh stop the uh taxpayer funded slush funds uh parents being able to pull

00:42:21.020 their kids out of lgbtq uh programs this is just five months and seven days in it scares the heck

00:42:27.100 out of me but in a good way that they were able to accomplish this month in five months that they

00:42:33.100 couldn't get through in four years last term in 2016 yeah i i think that's important one thing people

00:42:41.340 need to keep in mind is the supreme court ruling doesn't mean that the federal judiciary is going to go

00:42:47.660 along with it uh there are openings in the decision this decision said you can't issue universal

00:42:53.740 injunctions you have to tailor the injunction to providing the remedies for these plaintiffs

00:43:00.300 but also dangled out there which also came out in oral argument that maybe the way to go is through

00:43:05.980 class actions not universal injunctions so i think what you're going to see and i've read some place

00:43:12.460 they've already refiled in one of these cases what you're going to see are federal judges being very

00:43:18.780 aggressive and granting class certification accomplishing the rough equivalent of a universal

00:43:25.740 injunction by another means and i have no doubt that that will happen so nobody should think that just

00:43:30.700 because the supreme court ruled this way all of the sudden all the problems are solved it's just a

00:43:36.780 major problem has been removed and the alternative procedures are much more cumbersome and more

00:43:42.940 subject to review than these universal injunctions i'd go even a step further than you that this has

00:43:49.580 probably fired up these marxist judges even more to make even crazier decisions because they know that 0.93

00:43:54.780 they're losing on every direction polling it shows overwhelmingly uh the supreme court shows overwhelmingly

00:44:01.980 all across the board these people are losing and they're losing a professor in one very key spot

00:44:07.420 it's the court of public opinion and that's the court i think that matters most in the grand scheme

00:44:12.380 of things it was the court that mattered most back in november when donald trump won the popular vote of

00:44:17.100 this country what's stopping the republicans from doing the same thing and going judge shopping

00:44:21.500 why don't they follow their lawsuits down in texas somewhere or down in a very favorable district 0.95

00:44:26.220 in florida somewhere or somewhere in missouri what's stopping the republicans from doing that

00:44:31.260 well well they did that during the biden administration that and not with the volume

00:44:36.060 that you're seeing now under you know there was in the new york times of all places in late november

00:44:43.100 2024 they ran a story about the organize organizing efforts for lawfare against the trump campaign and i

00:44:52.140 think i'm remembering their statistics correctly they had lined up over 800 lawyers to participate in this

00:45:00.300 and over 40 groups and they were already setting up trainings and setting up programs to find

00:45:07.900 plaintiffs plaintiffs who have standing okay and so this was a very highly organized effort

00:45:15.100 at to time to use lawfare to thwart the will of the american people and unfortunately some federal judges

00:45:23.740 have brought that attitude forward i should say not all of them we've gotten some good rulings and even

00:45:29.420 rulings where you lose it's one thing to lose a ruling it's another thing to lose a ruling where

00:45:34.860 you feel the judge has been manipulative where the judge has done things in a way that suggests the

00:45:39.900 judge is not disinterested and that's part of the problem here the use of temporary restraining orders

00:45:45.580 by a lot of these judges has looked very manipulative because a temporary restraining order as a general

00:45:51.980 matter there are some exceptions as a general matter is not appealable so it's very as opposed to a

00:45:57.820 preliminary injunction a longer term injunction a temporary restraining order is basically somebody

00:46:04.220 comes into court and says if you don't do this right now the world is going to end for me okay and you

00:46:11.740 can't even wait a week you can't wait two weeks you i need relief immediately and in a lot of these

00:46:17.660 cases that's just not been true i remember there was a kid one of the first cases in early february

00:46:23.660 out of new york city southern district of new york of course um involved involving which treasury

00:46:30.780 officials could have access to treasury payment systems since they were working with doge with at

00:46:37.260 the time elon musk's people and they went into court on a friday night at 10 pm knowing that in the

00:46:44.380 southern district of new york there is an emergency duty judge so you know which judge you're going to

00:46:49.980 get if you file at 10 pm whereas if you file at 4 pm you get a random assignment it's not literally

00:46:57.340 random but you don't know who you're going to get so they knew who they get and that judge issued an

00:47:02.060 injunction at one in the morning on a saturday without even giving the government a chance to be

00:47:08.940 heard and argue against it and he essentially decapitated the treasury department by the

00:47:15.180 following tuesday another judge pretty much reversed him but that's what you've gotten and that leaves a

00:47:21.020 very sour taste in a lot of people's mouths and at the end of the day i think that you the credibility

00:47:26.860 and trustworthiness of the judiciary has been severely damaged not because 600 judges have gone rogue

00:47:33.740 but enough might only be 20 enough have gone rogue that it's infected the whole system yeah and it's

00:47:41.900 some of those judges you described sounds exactly like every single case that donald trump was involved

00:47:46.220 in in the law fair against him for the last four years with the exception of one and that was judge

00:47:51.660 ellen cannon down in florida who was the only person with uh with the courage to stand up to the

00:47:57.820 atrocities that the democrats are bringing upon him you had that judge you mentioned new york

00:48:02.700 judge juan marchant his daughter was fundraising eight million dollars for kamala harris this is

00:48:07.580 an hyperbole this is factual things and you have judges who were clearly complicit you couldn't get

00:48:14.300 a fair shot and and and they're just railroading this man railroading this man perp walking him

00:48:20.300 convicted felon this convicted felon that while these people are on the payrolls and their family

00:48:25.180 members are on the payrolls of the democratic party the corruption that we saw in america during that

00:48:31.020 time is one that i hope we never see again both republicans and democrats going back to a point you

00:48:37.100 made the problem i think i see is that the democrats are smarter when it comes to being a vindictive

00:48:43.340 maniacal people the republicans don't have an aclu the republicans don't have a southern poverty

00:48:49.020 law center we have things like judicial watch who do a great job but they're not about lawfare they're

00:48:54.620 about going out and suing for things that are atrocities things are going wrong we don't have

00:49:00.620 the funding we don't have the lawyers we don't have any of the resources that these democrats have

00:49:05.420 because these people don't care they hate donald trump so much that they'd go stand in front of a

00:49:09.740 train track and kill themselves if you told them that it would make donald trump disappear it's a mental

00:49:15.100 health crisis in my opinion worse than anything yeah i mean there's a huge difference the liberal

00:49:21.100 activist um lawfare system is so enormous relative to the conservative side i mean it's not even close

00:49:30.940 it's not even close they have all these groups aclu spLC you literally probably a hundred different

00:49:38.860 groups who are very well funded who are very well staffed and who exist to bring litigation there's

00:49:46.140 just no comparison there is no real equivalent on the right there are groups that do litigation on

00:49:52.300 the right you mentioned judicial watch there's pacific legal we do some at equal protection project

00:49:58.300 but we're minuscule compared to the infrastructure and the ecosystem on the left and part of that is

00:50:05.020 because leftist billionaires have invested in that system george soros has invested in that system he knows

00:50:11.980 that if you create these groups and you give them enough money that they're self-sustaining you will

00:50:17.020 create a political force and it's worked we should acknowledge it's it's largely worked the problem

00:50:22.940 that they have is the american people voted for the person voted them out okay but that infrastructure is

00:50:30.620 is truly massive they have the ability the day after trump does something to be in three different courts

00:50:36.860 the next day the right does not have that ability no it's because you know why people there's not

00:50:41.900 very many people who are like you are willing to put everything on the line to come out and speak in

00:50:46.300 truth justice in the american way they're terrified donald trump couldn't find a dang lawyer who would

00:50:52.460 represent him in any of his cases because of the retribution these people did uh what they do to

00:50:58.380 anyone who is associated with donald trump you go down the list of people rudy giuliani an elderly man

00:51:03.980 they tried to ruin this man's life peter navarro they put in jail it's a good thing that peter navarro

00:51:07.980 is a tough guy so it didn't matter steve bannon they put in jail roger stone they tried to put in jail

00:51:12.700 anybody who associated themselves with donald trump they ran so i don't even know professor if i can

00:51:17.980 blame your people in your profession for having to stay away from him is it worth ruining everything i 0.72

00:51:24.940 have is it worth losing my wife my kids my family to stand up i it's a question i think that you really

00:51:31.100 probably have to ponder about and say and it's so sick that we came to that point in this country is

00:51:37.100 you have lawyers out there defending some of the worst people possible p diddy's got lawyers right 1.00

00:51:41.980 now who will probably get higher profile clients after they're done representing him yet donald trump

00:51:48.140 couldn't get anybody to represent him if he paid billions of dollars and that's the problem do you

00:51:53.900 see that changing now in america that it's become a lot more mainstream to support donald trump

00:52:01.580 maybe temporarily i don't think there's been a long-term change i don't think so i mean

00:52:06.860 there was an organized democrat effort organized by one of their worst operatives david brock and this

00:52:14.220 is public this is not like they announced it okay they created a project to try to get republican

00:52:19.820 lawyers who represented republicans in the election disputes disbarred okay and an organized effort to

00:52:27.500 file bar complaints against people i mean this was again not me saying it they were proud of this

00:52:33.660 that this is what they were going to do i think the term they wanted to make republican lawyers toxic in

00:52:39.980 their communities so you don't see the reverse happening you don't see that and in a few cases a small

00:52:47.820 number of cases they were actually successful but they only need to be successful once or twice to

00:52:53.260 scare away a thousand republican lawyers yeah it's it's it's so sad that this is the inception point

00:52:59.740 that we've come into in this country before we wrap up and i know we went so over time but i can

00:53:05.180 probably talk to you for another two hours maybe three uh you bring such a fascinating insight and and

00:53:11.340 to the audience i don't know who professor william jacobson voted for i've never even asked him he could

00:53:16.220 have voted for kamala harris for all i know but that's not what matters what matters is is the fact

00:53:21.420 that he's here speaking like i say truth justice in the american way which is so important and it's

00:53:27.900 something that we've all been so deprived of for the last 10 years really because that's when the uh

00:53:33.180 the the problems against donald trump started they started spying on this man in uh 2015 when he

00:53:38.780 decided he was going to come down the escalator and beat out 16 incoming republicans with a baseball bat

00:53:44.220 metaphorically of course um and it's only been uphill from there you know they've tried to

00:53:49.900 dismantle this man at every point another record stock market uh closed today for the nasdaq and

00:53:55.020 the s p three months ago they were cheering for this thing to crash it's so sick you'd mentioned

00:54:01.180 temporarily that you think that the the uh lawfare will stop and people will be able to defend what's

00:54:07.180 right uh what is your your outlook going forward for the trump administration as we mentioned we've got

00:54:14.220 three and a half years more than three and a half years left for him to get his agenda through which

00:54:20.220 includes building a border wall securing this border which is for the first time we're seeing

00:54:24.620 a negative import of immigrants in this country it seems he's got this thing on track and it's steaming 0.99

00:54:31.500 do you see him going full force ahead and everything turning out good for him and the administration in

00:54:37.660 this country yeah i i think you have to look at it and say he's built tremendous momentum it wasn't

00:54:44.540 a smooth road okay um but he's got a lot of momentum if you look at you know the stock market

00:54:51.340 is a barometer of things and it's always a little risky to do that but you know it's at all-time highs

00:54:57.820 after having dropped when he announced the towers everybody panicked um if you look at what's happened

00:55:02.780 in the middle east he seems to have a lot of momentum he made the right call on iran and he

00:55:08.540 had a lot of opposition from some pundits in the conservative world but not from the base you know

00:55:15.180 you heard a lot of people about oh the you're going to splinter the base well every single poll i've

00:55:20.860 seen says that something like 90 to 95 percent of people who self-identify as mega republicans

00:55:28.540 supported the bombing of iran okay he he knew the base better than some of these big pundits knew

00:55:34.700 the base um and you know he's got a lot of momentum there of course you know he's got a lot of momentum

00:55:40.220 on the economy uh with nato with you have to look at where he is five months and seven days into his

00:55:48.780 second term and say he's on track to do amazing things you never know what's going to happen tomorrow

00:55:54.700 i mean we all know that and we can't predict that but barring something unforeseen happening

00:56:01.500 you think i i think he's gonna be extraordinarily popular he's way ahead in favorability and popularity

00:56:10.220 you know favorable versus unfavorable uh i think he's up depending on the poll you know several points

00:56:16.460 which is rare okay use rasmussen on this show professor yeah i mean and you know the um

00:56:23.500 rasmussen poll i think for the first time in its history found uh right right track that

00:56:31.260 more a majority of people think we're on the right track okay and that's a different measure than

00:56:36.620 favorability do you like the person you're going to vote is the country fundamentally on the right track

00:56:42.460 and it actually shocked me when i heard that you've never had 50 plus one say it's on the right track i

00:56:49.820 would have thought you would have had that but so i think he's got tremendous momentum uh no sign of

00:56:56.700 slowing down he's hasn't won the immigration battle but he's won you know hasn't won the immigration

00:57:05.260 lord war but he's won a huge battle which is the southern border is under control i mean the notion that

00:57:11.420 we have zero gotaways or getaways people being captured on the border and shipped to the interior

00:57:19.740 of the country zero in may unheard of versus 160 000 a year ago under biden in one month uh so he's

00:57:28.700 gone a long way he's gone a long way it's really turning out to be a lot more productive than i think

00:57:33.500 anybody could have predicted and he's so focused even on the iran thing you know you had the split and

00:57:38.460 you know tucker carlson i speak to him very often he's a good friend of mine i don't think tucker

00:57:44.060 carlson came out here to make donald trump look bad and say this this and this all these people

00:57:49.100 i believe are looking out for the best interests of donald trump and they don't want donald trump

00:57:52.700 to be the next george w bush and donald and donald trump didn't want to be the next george w bush and

00:57:56.620 he's not going to be the next george w bush with going into iraq with no wmb's wmds and

00:58:02.540 some discourse in the party is good for people to agree on everything to my opinion is unhealthy

00:58:08.940 so you had a little bump in the road and usually you said a rough road smooth seas never made a

00:58:13.500 skilled sailor so you know you have some discourse we're not going to agree 100 on everything but if

00:58:18.940 we're 90 of the way there i think it puts us in a good position donald trump did wind up being right

00:58:23.420 i was skeptical about going in and bombing iran myself and i've said it on the show and i came out

00:58:27.980 a week later and i said i was wrong that's what's important is we identify we make up because i don't

00:58:33.740 like being in the middle of something i don't like saying well he could do this or that i like

00:58:37.260 taking a position if i'm wrong i correct myself if i'm right even better so he did wind up being

00:58:42.940 right about that and i am happy for it because it makes america a safer place right now uh i want

00:58:47.900 to give you some time before we wrap up to talk about your project aside from being a cornell uh

00:58:53.340 university law professor the equal protection project and what you're doing uh you can go to

00:58:58.380 equalprotect.org equalprotect.org to look at what professor william jacobson is doing to donate there

00:59:05.820 because it is important these things aren't multi-million dollar operations these are small

00:59:10.460 money operations that rely on people like us to make donations if you will tell the audience maybe

00:59:15.900 what you're working on right now or what you guys are up to sure um equalprotect.org is the website

00:59:21.740 it's part of the legal insurrection foundation which is a non-profit 501c3 so donations are tax

00:59:28.300 deductible and what we do at epp is we bring legal challenges to discrimination done in the name of

00:59:35.260 diversity equity and inclusion so we have challenged over 100 colleges and universities with regard to over

00:59:42.620 400 discriminatory programs and we're branching out we've also done it against other entities not just

00:59:50.060 colleges and universities and we've um you know accomplished a lot we have over 75 wins we might

00:59:57.260 have more than that it's not always easy to tell when you've won or when you haven't but we've done

01:00:02.780 productive stuff we're very small we certainly appreciate any support we can get we don't have

01:00:08.460 george soros behind us uh we you know every dollar counts and we try to be very frugal and very careful

01:00:14.620 with donor money and we try to get results and we have so far in two years like i said only two years

01:00:21.420 we've brought a tremendous number of cases with tremendous results so please come by and visit

01:00:27.020 equalprotect.org you heard the professor equalprotect.org and folks we don't promote anything

01:00:31.820 on this show that we don't partake in ourselves if you don't believe what we're saying go to the

01:00:35.100 website equalprotect.org and see exactly what they are working on don't take our word for it professor

01:00:40.860 william jacobson it's always a delight to talk to you like i said i think your dog is barking he's

01:00:44.540 hungry wants some dinner so we're gonna let you go we appreciate you joining us on this very very

01:00:49.340 monumental friday in america great thanks for having me on again always happy to come back

01:00:54.940 a big thanks to professor william jacobson for joining us on this friday night here on the great

01:00:58.860 america show folks the website once again equalprotect.org we invite you to go check out all the great work

01:01:04.940 that he's doing with this 501 c3 i hope you all have a great weekend and we hope to see you back 0.99

01:01:10.620 here monday same time same place we'll be here waiting for you have a great weekend as i said be

01:01:16.540 safe monday you have a meeting with me 6 p.m here on the great america show until then folks may god

01:01:22.700 bless you may god bless america and may god bless the great blue dobs have a great weekend

The Great America Show - June 27, 2025

Democrats suffer BIGGEST BLOW yet after SCOTUS hands Trump MASSIVE WIN

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript