The Great America Show - ROBERT CAHALY TELLS US THE NEXT TWO WEEKS WILL TELL US A LOT OF WHAT 2022 WILL LOOK LIKE

00:00:00.000 Hello everybody, I'm Lou Dobbs. This is the Great America Show and welcome. We're delighted you're

00:00:06.360 with us and we'll be talking about politics today, of course, and where the country's headed. We'll

00:00:11.440 be getting lots of clues as to direction over the next several weeks. Primary elections are underway

00:00:17.800 and it appears this will be a very good year for Republicans. That's not only an understatement,

00:00:24.020 of course, but it's also a safer way to proceed in the forecasting business. Everything almost

00:00:29.840 everything points to a route for the Republicans, but it's still too early to say that or much more.

00:00:36.800 Although that will not stop any of us from remarking on it all, Texas kicked it all off on March 1st,

00:00:43.740 then Indiana and Ohio followed on May 3rd, Nebraska and West Virginia on May 10th, and Idaho, Kentucky,

00:00:51.320 North Carolina, Oregon, and Pennsylvania on the 17th of May. And coming up in a week, Alabama,

00:00:58.460 Arkansas, and Georgia. President Biden continues to be beaten and bruised in the polls. His advisors,

00:01:06.160 whether political or policy, can't produce, it seems, even a single reasonable position

00:01:11.700 on anything. President Biden and his advisors simply out of touch with the American people,

00:01:18.580 and that continues to be reflected in the polls as he hits new lows in just about every one of them.

00:01:25.380 President Trump, meanwhile, is running strong. His candidates are winning, but Pennsylvania and

00:01:31.860 Georgia will be big tests of his pull and power. With us today is prominent Republican pollster

00:01:38.380 and strategist Robert Cahaley, the mastermind behind the Trafalgar Group, which has proved over and over

00:01:45.380 its overarching philosophy. Superior strategy, innovative tactics, and bold leadership can prevail over larger

00:01:54.200 numbers, greater resources, and conventional wisdom. Robert Cahaley, thanks for joining us here on The Great

00:02:01.380 America Show. With all of these primaries, give us your thoughts about the most important of the primary season

00:02:10.120 and whatever the major takeaway is. Well, I don't think, to me, there's no question that Pennsylvania is what's most

00:02:19.020 important. It is the, it is the battleground on those who want to have a kind of a, an America first

00:02:32.460 agenda, and those who want to see that be something that we, that the Republican Party has moved on from.

00:02:40.740 And so that's what this is really kind of coming down to. And there's a lot of effort being put in this

00:02:46.920 thing. And, you know, there's some certainly some good candidates. But in the end, you have to, you have to

00:02:53.500 wonder about the, the focus on the general election. One of the things that I think that we've seen, and I guess this

00:03:02.480 was a criticism people anticipated Trump would do, but he did not. You know, there's a lot of folks who were worried that

00:03:08.280 he would ghost pick people who would be very difficult general election candidates and kind of say, you know, we would have

00:03:15.200 won, but for the fact that Trump supported this person. Right. And so we've seen some discipline on Trump's part in

00:03:22.860 not always picking the people that his supporters even liked best, but the people he thought had the best chance in the

00:03:29.480 general election. And I think, I mean, with J.D. Vance's case, I mean, that was somebody who had been very critical of

00:03:35.900 him. Right. So I think that's, that's a future focus. And in many ways, a understanding that the goal for the

00:03:45.300 Republicans has to be to win the general election. And so this, there's a lot of folks who have kind of

00:03:51.600 weighed in this thing. And I don't know what certainly the agenda was. I mean, we can, no matter what happens

00:03:58.120 today, I think it'll be clear that three fourths of the people who vote will vote for a candidate who

00:04:03.040 espouses in the Republican primary, who espouses Trump values and make America great, America versus agenda values.

00:04:12.920 But, you know, how that's going to manifest itself in the fall really depends on which candidate they pick.

00:04:18.380 Well, in Pennsylvania, you know, the voting is underway. When we're talking, people will know who the winners are.

00:04:25.520 And let's, let's talk about the president's choices and your choices in your polling. Your, your polls are always wildly

00:04:34.360 accurate. And you're thinking always rigorous and revealing. So let's, let's start with Pennsylvania.

00:04:42.520 What outcome do you expect in the governor's race? First of all,

00:04:47.860 Well, we expect Mastriano to walk away with it. Mastriano has been in the lead. Uh, every time we

00:04:54.700 pulled this thing in the last few months, what we did see is coming into Friday with, uh, two candidates

00:05:02.080 having dropped out and endorsed Barletta. We saw Barletta right on Mastriano's heels, uh, by Saturday

00:05:09.180 morning. Now, what happened after that was Trump kind of surprised everybody and endorsed Mastriano.

00:05:14.640 And that literally was like afterburners for him to move right past Barletta. I think at that point,

00:05:21.320 had Trump chosen Barletta, he could have put Barletta in first, but Trump's choice of Mastriano kind of

00:05:27.000 ended that race. And we expect a significant, uh, victory, uh, for Mastriano tonight.

00:05:33.320 And what was the, the, the determinant, uh, in the president's choice? What was it that convinced him

00:05:40.920 versus, uh, Barletta say? Now you are asking me to do something I have no ability to do.

00:05:49.040 I have no idea. President Trump has his own internal ability to read a room, react and make

00:05:57.500 his own decisions. And that is something that I think only he can answer. I do not understand,

00:06:03.360 but, uh, I'm sure he had his reasons and I'm not here to question him. I'm just saying,

00:06:07.260 I don't understand. Well, lucky for us, uh, president Trump is going to be with us next

00:06:12.740 Wednesday right here on the great America show. So I'll make a note and I'll tell him

00:06:17.100 Robert Cahaly told me I had to ask you this question and we will. He said, Robert doesn't

00:06:23.880 said he doesn't know what's in your head. And only you can answer that. Cause I think he'll agree

00:06:27.900 with that. Well, I think he'd agree with it with, uh, nearly all of us. Don't you? Uh, he is,

00:06:34.000 you talk about a man who has his own mind, uh, and thank God, uh, it's Donald J. Trump.

00:06:41.200 So let's move to the Senate race. Now there, there could have hardly been more controversy

00:06:46.540 over what effectively was a three person race, uh, in the Republican party. Uh, those folks don't

00:06:52.940 like each other. Uh, how's it going to end up? Well, let's start with something else. And we've,

00:06:59.220 we've put this on Twitter and we've had a little fun with this. Uh, if you go back and look at our

00:07:03.500 March 13th poll, we told the world that, uh, Barnett was for real and should be taken seriously.

00:07:09.700 We had her in a very close third, right behind, uh, McCormick. We said every, at the time she's

00:07:18.440 very close, she should be taken seriously. And no one listened. And as usual, three more weeks

00:07:24.240 passed, no one did any vetting. And then every, the world figured out that she was in, uh, in

00:07:29.100 contention. So what we saw, uh, post that, what post those polls that, uh, I think it

00:07:34.640 was myself. Well, we, we put a Trafalgar poll and then Matt Tower put an insider advantage

00:07:39.460 with Fox 46 in Philadelphia and then, uh, Fox news channel all put together polls, uh, showing

00:07:45.880 them very tight at the top three. What we saw since then, as we've been following it, uh,

00:07:51.100 almost daily is, uh, there's, there's a certain amount of the votes that Oz is going to get.

00:07:57.980 And then there are votes that are, you know, kind of America first Trump votes that aren't

00:08:03.240 for Oz. And they were evenly divided between McCormick and, uh, between Barnett. So as Barnett

00:08:11.280 grew, it costs McCormick. And there was a lot of attention, uh, spent, uh, popping McCormick,

00:08:17.380 but you know, you're popping somebody who's also in the midst of growing. And so what we

00:08:22.400 saw was McCormick kind of fell, fell out. And so our, our final numbers, I believe we have

00:08:28.200 McCormick about five points back. Uh, we, and we saw the whole weekend, it was between Oz 0.99

00:08:33.720 and, uh, Barnett. I mean, back and forth tight as it could be through the weekend. Uh, we think

00:08:40.760 with the, uh, edge that Oz got in early voting, cause he was in the lead for a significant

00:08:46.940 portion of early voting when over a 40% of the votes were cast. And, um, with, uh, he

00:08:53.040 had a very good Monday compared to his Saturday and Sunday. We've got a, I think a 1.8, uh,

00:08:59.380 1.9 margin for Oz ahead. But, uh, this thing is still to the point where if the undecided

00:09:05.100 broke any direction, uh, one of the top three could win, but, uh, we do have, uh, Oz up

00:09:12.080 by, uh, you know, just under two points over her with McCormick, a, uh, kind of a few

00:09:18.340 points back in third. And if, how do you think it's going to break, uh, in the final

00:09:22.620 count? I think that's a bit, I think that's going to be very close to where it is. I

00:09:27.580 expect, I actually expect us to quite possibly with the estimate being that of the 190,000

00:09:34.300 electoral, I mean, uh, absentee, uh, ballots that have been requested in the 140 or so that

00:09:41.340 have been received as of now. I think we could be opening absentee ballots to figure

00:09:45.620 out who won when it's all said and done. Wow. We love that. Don't we? Oh yeah. Here

00:09:50.440 we go again. Uh, what did, what kind of influence did Pompeo have when he butted

00:09:57.620 into that race, um, and butted heads with the president? I think Pompeo had a, I would

00:10:04.860 be, I would want to tell you that I saw a significant, uh, even though Trump, the

00:10:10.820 reason Oz did not take the dive that I think he would have taken if Pompeo had happened in

00:10:18.000 a vacuum, uh, Oz had the benefit of Trump having been in town being for Oz the same

00:10:24.240 day. And, but I do think it, it, it, it actually, it, it hurt because part of what Pompeo did

00:10:31.340 and this, and we, we picked this up with some voters saying Pompeo suggested there was more

00:10:36.020 than he was allowed to say that made him not want to support Oz. And when someone who's

00:10:41.800 been in a position like CA, like secretary of state who suggests there's things I can't

00:10:46.640 tell you, but you have to trust me. It really makes people wonder what's going on. And so

00:10:53.780 I I I'm not saying that, uh, that was intentional, but it definitely, when someone who back and

00:11:01.620 has access to that kind of information, they're not allowed to share says that it makes people

00:11:06.360 question it. Uh, and we also have the experience Robert of, uh, uh, uh, 2020 with those, uh, 50,

00:11:13.480 uh, veteran, uh, intelligence community, uh, folks, uh, and five former CIA directors saying

00:11:21.740 that the laptop from hell, Hunter Biden's laptop was Russian disinformation. I mean, we have been

00:11:29.440 spun and abused by official, official voices. I thought it was really degrading of Pompeo and I

00:11:38.780 took him to account on Twitter. I did. I just couldn't stand it. And yes, you did. And I think

00:11:44.880 that the point is, is just like you said, there is a built-in Republican skepticism, but that skepticism

00:11:50.520 has never been directed to Pompeo. So it's what, what, you know, there are certainly people who

00:11:56.680 listened to it, certain people who wanted to see what he was talking about, but it, it, it definitely

00:12:01.640 took him from an authority that Republicans who were skeptical of, you know, the national security

00:12:07.840 apparatus. Uh, it made him one of the people they're skeptical of, not as someone who is an

00:12:14.600 outlier who they respected. So, you know, as you, as you analyze this, is there something that, uh,

00:12:24.120 Oz could have done that would have overcome all of this, uh, noise that was created around him?

00:12:29.260 You mean that Pompeo stuff? I think that was late in the game. And so I'm not sure what he could have

00:12:35.560 done. I, I will, all I would say is Oz has the, uh, the luck of that happening the same day. Trump

00:12:44.420 was in town saying good things about him, you know? So it's kind of like when you have a car wreck on

00:12:49.680 the way home, but he found out you won the lottery too. Right. Well, indeed he did. Uh, and, uh, the

00:12:57.820 winning isn't going to stop is my guess. Uh, is, is Trump, how strong is he with his base, uh, particularly

00:13:04.660 in Pennsylvania? Cause that seems to me to be a pretty good test for minority support, uh, for

00:13:10.880 blacks, Hispanics, women, uh, evangelicals, uh, give us, give us your sense of that.

00:13:17.660 Trump is strong with his base. However, there are people who can say, I like Trump, but I don't

00:13:26.620 like this particular choice because it is, it is always a hard sell. Uh, when you, when you try to

00:13:34.120 tell me this, this has been the, if this has been a problem with conservatism from the very beginning,

00:13:39.700 what was it? Buckley used to say that you have to pick the most conservative person who can win,

00:13:44.260 you know, or so often conservatives and Republicans in the primary want to pick somebody that is just

00:13:51.460 totally agrees with them, irrespective of their chances in the fall. And, and sometimes find

00:13:57.180 themselves picking somebody who just can't win the fall, but gosh, darn it. They feel good about that 0.93

00:14:01.240 choice in the primary. And so it is an intellectual exercise to have to put aside someone that you

00:14:08.620 agree with completely to pick someone who you agree with enough, who can win. And so I think

00:14:14.640 that that is even among those who support Trump and even among Trump's followers, some of the people

00:14:19.980 don't, that is a hard sell. You have to pick someone that you don't agree with just as much, but

00:14:25.620 you know, you gotta be focused in Pennsylvania is a unique duck. I don't think just a candidate who

00:14:31.580 barely wins in the fall in Pennsylvania is what you're looking for. I think you want one who wins

00:14:36.220 by a pretty sizable margin. If they're going to win Pennsylvania. I, you know, I worry about

00:14:41.260 Barletta because he's, I will tell you, I consider him the most likable politician I've ever met.

00:14:47.440 Nobody is more likable on the other side of it. He's lost three times. Uh, and it's,

00:14:53.980 that's not a good trajectory. Uh, so I understand the president's hesitation and choice. Um,

00:15:01.000 it also had to hurt, uh, in Pennsylvania for the president to go up against Barletta on that.

00:15:07.840 I can certainly see that Barletta has unusually dedicated and is a really good fellow and, um,

00:15:16.320 has an appeal to people beyond just, uh, some stereotypical Republicans, but you know, it, it,

00:15:22.720 it is, it is part and parcel of what's happening. And, you know, this, this election, I know there

00:15:30.020 are people who are concerned, uh, what Mastriano can and can't do in the fall. And, you know,

00:15:34.620 it's a big step, uh, from being, you know, being a Senator, but I will say this, the good news is,

00:15:41.240 yes, they're running against Shapiro. Yes. They're probably running against Fetterman,

00:15:44.760 but really they're kind of running against Joe Bob. They're kind of running against gas prices and

00:15:51.840 baby formula and pronouns and radical environmentalism. So I wouldn't write any, uh,

00:15:58.960 Republican nominee off at this point, because unless something changes radically,

00:16:04.640 and I don't expect it to go radical in a way that makes things better. It is set to be a pretty good

00:16:10.640 ball. Yep. As you have forecast from the outset, uh, let, let's turn to the, the base itself,

00:16:19.160 the country, the cross currents at work. One of the polls that grabbed me just stepping away from the

00:16:24.980 primaries for a minute here, uh, was Disney's positive rating, uh, falling from 77% to 33%

00:16:37.460 in recent weeks at this, after the so-called woke company came out against a Florida, uh, uh, parental

00:16:45.040 rights law. Uh, and I think just teed off the entire country, uh, for the most part, what, what is,

00:16:53.760 what are the implications of that rating and what's it going to take if, if there is anything at all

00:16:59.920 to build it back? Well, you know, maybe they should build it back better. Maybe building it back

00:17:07.740 better is about building something that is focused on return for the shareholders and providing

00:17:13.400 entertainment for the public and not, uh, uh, catering to a very small amount of people and

00:17:20.600 their woke sensitivities. I thought that Netflix's announcement that they were just going to focus

00:17:25.760 on programming their people wanted and not be so influenced. I thought that was the most positive

00:17:31.300 corporate message I've seen in quite some time. And maybe Disney could, could learn from them.

00:17:36.100 I mean, these companies need to focus on delivering for their shareholders and delivering for their

00:17:42.160 customers and not, not, you know, basically acting as if they don't act like their customers,

00:17:49.020 wish their customers were somebody else. I mean, the hypocrisy of some of these places is very

00:17:54.580 frustrating. And we, you know, we saw it firsthand in Georgia, uh, with a law they didn't even

00:18:00.640 understand. And frankly, it wasn't even a very good law. I mean, it, it put the cameras indoors,

00:18:05.580 uh, and took, it put the, uh, drop boxes indoors and took the cameras off of them. They should have

00:18:11.480 loved this new law, but you know, the way they were going on, it was, it was ridiculous. So I think it 0.92

00:18:17.600 was a, Netflix is a positive step. I think Disney getting in this situation, shareholders are going to

00:18:24.560 start to react and everybody needs to be a little less focused on ESG and a little, uh, more focused

00:18:31.120 on ROI. You better believe it. Uh, it's, uh, I, I think this about, uh, Disney. I think that Bob

00:18:39.680 JPEC has made a huge mistake, but they, you know, in these instances, he's a new CEO and a lot of people

00:18:46.800 would say, Norman, boy, I wish we had Bob Iger back. But Iger weeks before he had JPEC and the top

00:18:53.940 officials had decided to take a pass on discussing parental rights laws in Florida. Uh, Bob Iger

00:19:01.320 was out showing everybody what a woke liberal he still is. And he would have made the same mistake

00:19:07.940 only. I think he would have been worse. Uh, I think it would have been a more stubborn approach.

00:19:13.160 And I think that the number with it's 33 today would have been around 15% because Iger still 0.72

00:19:20.280 wanted that job badly. And he'd love being at the, uh, the premieres. Uh, and I just, I absolutely have

00:19:28.140 nothing but contempt for corporate America using this woke nonsense to peddle their wares. And that's

00:19:35.100 exactly what they're doing. The president of Disney entertainment saying that she wanted, um,

00:19:40.160 um, half of their programming to be LGBTQ plus, uh, underrepresented, uh, folks, uh, was one of 0.66

00:19:50.360 the most ignorant things I've ever heard anybody say, but it tells you where we are. We're in a

00:19:56.160 society where the left, they think, by God, this is just our country and that's the way it's going to

00:20:01.940 be. And we don't care if we have to intercede between children and their parents. It shouldn't

00:20:07.520 have taken a genius to understand, uh, there in Hollywood that, you know, one thing you don't do

00:20:13.660 is get between children and their parents. And when you do, you're going to pay a hell of a price.

00:20:19.840 Your thoughts. There's no question about it. I think that, that it, there is a, there is a,

00:20:27.640 a massive consumers who feel very strongly. These companies are not representing their values

00:20:34.060 and that they're, they're starting to show it. And, you know, we have some of these guys pushing

00:20:39.900 back. Uh, I wish we'd had a little more pushback when major league baseball did what they did in

00:20:45.360 Atlanta. I mean, they do have antitrust, uh, exemption. And I think there's some times in

00:20:51.180 history. Uh, I remember something with Senator Symington that I read about where they started to

00:20:56.560 challenge it. Baseball buckled. Well, maybe that we need a little more of that corporate world and

00:21:00.660 in the entertainment world and the sports world is they're not representing their customers,

00:21:05.380 their constituents, their fans, and they, they have to be held accountable. And I think it's

00:21:09.380 turning the right way. Yeah. I I'm hopeful as well. Uh, when you, when you talk about doing more,

00:21:15.500 we don't have a counter bailing influence right now up against the woke, uh, corporate media,

00:21:22.360 the woke corporate executives in this country. They almost have a playground right now. It's changing

00:21:29.940 as you said, it is changing, but it needs a lot more changing before parents can be trustful

00:21:37.480 of the Disney company ever again. I truly believe that they are going to see a profound impact,

00:21:43.820 whether it's in streaming, whether it is in there, uh, in the, uh, the resorts, whatever it may be.

00:21:51.580 Uh, I, I just think it'll show up there. I want to quickly get your thoughts about the Supreme

00:21:56.940 Court protests and the Biden White House refusal to condemn those protests of these left wingers

00:22:04.460 at the homes of conservative judges. You know, it's interesting. I actually in Washington day

00:22:11.240 and last night, uh, a few of us walked over the Supreme Court and there wasn't a single person

00:22:16.500 there. Now that is the place. If you disagree with what they're doing or contemplating or might do

00:22:22.040 your protests belong and that's America and you should be there, but being at their homes,

00:22:27.440 we have specific laws about trying to intimidate judges. And so, you know, we, we find ourselves in

00:22:35.300 this juxtaposition that where the conservative movement is becoming the spokesman for free speech

00:22:42.420 and the other side is becoming the one that will condone certain sorts of censorship. And it seems

00:22:50.920 very interesting when the only free speech that they seem to be concerned about is free speech

00:22:56.240 that is designed to intimidate. And, you know, there are specific laws on that. And every single

00:23:02.240 person is at a judge's home. There's plenty of room right in front of the Supreme Court. Everything

00:23:08.880 is there. That's where you belong. That's where your voice can be heard. That's where you can actually

00:23:13.280 exercise your rights to citizens, but we don't intimidate judges. That's just not acceptable.

00:23:17.900 We've had judges that have lost their lives, the lives of their spouses and their children. It's

00:23:23.740 just not acceptable. And it is unacceptable for the Biden administration to stand in the way. It's

00:23:29.100 unacceptable for the Justice Department to stand in the way. And again, this is something we polled in

00:23:33.020 the majority of the Republic agree with that, that there's, that is inappropriate. That should not be

00:23:38.220 allowed to happen. There is a place to protest and it's right there in front of the Capitol in front of

00:23:42.600 the Capitol. Maybe that will give the Republican Party some guts, uh, the leadership in particular,

00:23:48.200 uh, to respond to these challenges, to, uh, Americana, the American way, and to this great

00:23:54.680 Republic of ours. Uh, I, we always give our guests the last word, as you know, Robert, uh, and it's that

00:24:01.220 time, uh, your concluding thoughts, if you will. Well, I think the next few weeks are going to tell us a

00:24:08.440 lot about what 2022 is going to look like in the fall. Um, we, as, as we approach more and more of

00:24:16.040 these primaries, what, what we saw in Ohio, what I, what I expect it we'll see in Pennsylvania is

00:24:23.020 this, uh, the majority of the people are some people who support this, uh, new, the new, I would say

00:24:32.340 the new Republican party, which is the Republican party, uh, the conservative movement that is more

00:24:37.260 aligned with the, the business owner, uh, the waitress, the truck driver, the, the, the person,

00:24:46.820 the farmer, the person who cleans up the restaurant. I mean, this is a party that is of working people.

00:24:54.780 And this is a, this is a move. And there are a lot of forces that would like their good old fashioned

00:25:01.260 country club Republican party back. And we're going to be battling for that soul through these

00:25:07.660 primaries. And I think if this remains, uh, this movement remains a movement of average people and

00:25:14.700 average people's common sense, regular values, it is going to be a very successful election in 2022.

00:25:21.560 But if we turn back into the party of the, uh, disassociated, uh, country club type Republicans who are

00:25:31.720 not, don't we believe in the core core values, then I wouldn't count on the fall to be as good as it could be

00:25:37.580 for the Republican. So what this party is, is to become is going to be determined, uh, in the prime

00:25:43.700 race from now until September.

00:25:44.960 You know, I say to people, the Republican party has no room for rhinos and I don't care how many 1.00

00:25:51.740 they are. Uh, I don't want them in the Republican party. Uh, I'll take, I'll take the lumps, uh, for

00:25:58.200 that, uh, that judgment, uh, and that insistence, but we can't handle Mitch McConnell and Kevin

00:26:05.080 McCarthy and their like anymore. Uh, it's just, it's just not sensible. It doesn't make, uh, uh, not only

00:26:13.280 not sense. It's doesn't make a political sense to continue it. Uh, I, I'm stepping on your last

00:26:20.080 word. So your reaction to that thought.

00:26:22.960 Well, what I would say is there are a lot of Democrats who are realizing how much their party

00:26:29.160 has left them like it left Ronald Reagan. And there are a lot of people who have realized they

00:26:34.320 don't really like either one of the parties, but they like a kind of a, a more conservative

00:26:38.680 movement that's focused on working people. And so to all, you know, to any of those working people,

00:26:44.360 this is, they're candidates that you can support and it does. And they don't care what color you

00:26:50.440 are. As a matter of fact, they'd love to have a lot of diversity in this party because what we care

00:26:54.240 about is purpose and, and, and what people believe in the values they hold. And there's plenty of room.

00:27:02.940 Um, so, you know, rhinos, not so much, but if you want to be a Democrat name only, and you want to

00:27:08.160 hold the values of the conservative, then I think this is a party would welcome. Yeah. Yeah. It sounds

00:27:14.680 like you and I disagree about rhinos and that's all right too. We've got room for both of us in the

00:27:20.900 Republican party. I think we disagree with the definition of rhino is, uh, sometimes, but, uh, I,

00:27:26.720 we definitely agree on the fact that those in charge of this party need to be the people who

00:27:31.480 understand the base of this party. Amen, brother. Robert Cahaly, America's greatest pollster.

00:27:38.640 Great to have you with us. Robert Cahaly, pollster par excellence, great American. Tomorrow we'll be

00:27:45.640 joined by a leader in the fight to restore integrity and security to our elections. She's

00:27:51.320 Catherine Engelbrecht, the head of True the Vote, whose work is a central feature of the documentary

00:27:57.200 2000 mules. We'll be talking about ballot harvesting, ballot trafficking, and the mules

00:28:03.820 who run fraudulent ballots back and forth from the drop boxes and more. You don't want to miss her 0.98

00:28:10.500 story and the state of our upcoming elections. That's here tomorrow. Please be with us till then.

00:28:16.800 Thanks for joining us. God bless you and God bless America.

The Great America Show - May 18, 2022

ROBERT CAHALY TELLS US THE NEXT TWO WEEKS WILL TELL US A LOT OF WHAT 2022 WILL LOOK LIKE

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript