The Great America Show - May 22, 2022


SUSSMANN TRIAL IS A WINDOW INTO OBAMA & CLINTON CORRUPTION


Episode Stats

Length

40 minutes

Words per Minute

166.90703

Word Count

6,751

Sentence Count

385

Misogynist Sentences

2

Hate Speech Sentences

13


Summary

A year and a half later, the John Durham Special Counsel investigation is unfolding in federal court in Washington, D.C. against Hillary Clinton's former campaign attorney Michael Sussman, who is facing one count of lying to the FBI.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hello, everybody. I'm Lou Dobbs, and you're listening to The Great America Show, and here
00:00:05.620 we're all about truth, justice, and the American way, every day. Welcome to the show, and it's
00:00:12.040 great to have you with us as we take on the dark forces at work in our country and our enemies in
00:00:17.860 foreign lands, mainly China, Russia, and Iran. We like to name names here, but there are others,
00:00:25.120 and named or not, we will take them up in due course. Sometimes it takes more time than any of
00:00:32.100 us would like or have to bear. The John Durham special counsel investigation is just such an
00:00:37.500 instance. A.G. William Barr chose to appoint Durham special counsel to investigate the origins of the
00:00:44.660 FBI investigation of Russian collusion and Russian interference in the 2016 election. Barr chose to
00:00:52.060 appoint Durham in absolute secrecy on the 19th of October. That would be just five days after the
00:00:59.780 country had watched as social media, big tech, and corporate news outlets had brought down a wall of
00:01:05.960 disinformation and silence around the Hunter Biden laptop from hell, and three days before the final
00:01:12.900 presidential debate that year. The election was still two weeks away, but one new development,
00:01:19.920 unsuspected by the American people, was already at work. A letter signed by 51 intel veterans,
00:01:27.980 including five former CIA chiefs, was released to the media and to others, declaring their best
00:01:34.860 judgment was that Hunter's laptop and its contents were Russian disinformation. They might as well have
00:01:42.160 sworn on a stack of Bibles. That intel letter effectively killed the authentic evidence that the laptop was
00:01:49.780 Hunter's and its disgusting contents proved Biden family corruption. All true, as we now know.
00:01:57.800 Attorney General Barr says he didn't want to intervene in the election, which is why he made his
00:02:02.900 appointment of John Durham to lead the special counsel investigation an absolute secret. But then,
00:02:09.720 three days later, Joe Biden lied to the American people during the second and final presidential
00:02:15.640 debate. And Attorney General Barr, again, chose not to tell America that the intel letter and the chiefs
00:02:22.980 who had produced it were the real authors of election disinformation, nor tell them that former Vice
00:02:29.560 President Joe Biden was lying through his teeth to the American people in that final debate.
00:02:35.840 Barr's choices and decisions changed American history, and Joe Biden was elected president on November 3rd.
00:02:43.640 Now, a year and a half later, John Durham's investigation is unfolding in federal court in Washington, D.C.
00:02:52.140 Durham is prosecuting Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign attorney, Michael Sussman. He's facing one
00:02:59.780 charge, lying to the FBI. And the evidence is compelling. But of course, there's more evidence to come.
00:03:07.700 We hope much more. Our guest today is covering this massive and long-awaited case. Our guest is Joel Pollack,
00:03:16.300 Breitbart News senior editor-at-large. Joel is among the very best of American journalism. And Joel, it's great to
00:03:23.620 have you back with us here on The Great America Show. This is obviously a hugely important case,
00:03:30.440 representing really the inception of Russiagate, the Russia hoax, as President Trump appropriately and correctly
00:03:36.600 called it. Please give us your view, Joel.
00:03:40.000 Well, this was the Russia collusion hoax that the Hillary Clinton campaign was working on over the course of the
00:03:50.320 2016 presidential election. And there was a particular offshoot of this hoax called the Alpha Bank hoax, where they
00:03:58.340 tried to connect Trump to Russia via Alpha Bank. Now, there are a number of interesting things that have emerged from the
00:04:04.640 trial of Michael Sussman, who is accused of lying to the FBI about whether he was working for the Clinton campaign or
00:04:10.720 merely providing information as a concerned citizen. And one of the more interesting things is that Sussman and the others
00:04:17.960 planned for this revelation about Alpha Bank to be an October surprise. And indeed, it was. Jake Sullivan, who is now the
00:04:26.440 national security advisor, released a statement from the Hillary Clinton campaign that she tweeted and that
00:04:32.080 everybody on the left shared, including our soon to be resigning ministry of disinformation diva, Nina Jankiewicz.
00:04:42.000 She also shared this little piece of disinformation. But he put out a statement saying that there was this
00:04:46.140 Alpha Bank server that was connecting Trump Tower to the Russians somehow. And this is a major problem. So they
00:04:52.740 unrolled this as a political hit job. And they did whatever they could to make the story credible,
00:05:02.360 including saying that they'd gone to the FBI and so forth. Now, Durham was not allowed by the court to
00:05:08.820 bring in the whole story of the Clinton campaign conspiracy. So he's only allowed to focus on the parts
00:05:15.360 that relate to whether Sussman lied to the FBI or not. But we've learned a lot already about the inner
00:05:20.900 workings of that campaign. There were some people who didn't know it was a hoax. They testified in court
00:05:26.580 that they were convinced this was a legitimate national security issue. And I think some of them
00:05:33.420 have to be believed. But keep in mind, they had been told for months already that Trump was colluding
00:05:38.800 with Russia. They had been told by the media that when Trump joked about Russia looking for Hillary's
00:05:43.720 missing 33,000 emails, that he was serious about somehow inviting Russian intervention. So they were led by
00:05:50.900 the malevolent and the humorless down into this rabbit hole. And they participated in this hoax.
00:05:57.980 The FBI knew almost immediately that it was a hoax. And yet the story continued and was fed to the media.
00:06:05.120 And we're getting at least part of the story today in the Sussman trial. There are more witnesses to
00:06:11.020 come, a whole roster of Democratic Party bigwigs and Hillary Clinton campaign officials, including
00:06:16.700 Robbie Mook, who ran the campaign and, according to some accounts, was partly responsible for cooking
00:06:22.080 up the claim that Russia stole the election. So we're going to get at least some of the picture
00:06:27.800 of what happened in 2016 when Hillary Clinton and the Democrats, in collusion with the mainstream media,
00:06:35.000 did their best to undermine a sitting president and to reverse the results of a Democratic election.
00:06:41.340 And they laid a foundation for this while he was still campaigning for the job. He has the
00:06:50.380 distinction of being persecuted by his political opponent, both as a candidate, a president and
00:06:57.820 post-presidency. It's quite remarkable to see the effort that has been undertaken by the intelligence
00:07:04.880 community, the Democratic Party elites, I'll put it that way, and Clinton elites, as well as the permanent
00:07:13.580 bureaucracy, or as we affectionately refer to them here on this podcast as the deep state. To see Durham so
00:07:22.960 patiently go through this is both, I'm sure, frustrating to everyone. I know it is to me. But to see the way in which he is
00:07:32.940 now bringing much of it together, or at least appearing to do so, it really gives me some hope that we're going to see
00:07:42.440 revelation after revelation here, unless Obama judges do their job, as they've done in other instances of the
00:07:53.660 pursuit of truth, and work against those revelations. What do you think?
00:07:58.000 Well, this is an Obama-appointed judge, and he has been okay so far, but he has narrowed the evidence
00:08:06.740 to that which pertains directly to the charge. So he has not allowed this broader conspiracy
00:08:12.020 to be described in full. So I guess if he has a bias, it was against revealing the full extent of the
00:08:18.820 Clinton and Obama administration conspiracy to paint this Russia collusion picture. But
00:08:24.480 I do think the judge has been fair, and he has allowed in a lot of other evidence that Durham's
00:08:30.120 going to use. And probably the most important piece of evidence is a text message in which
00:08:35.200 Michael Sussman, the Clinton campaign attorney who is on trial, said to the FBI agent that he was
00:08:41.340 speaking to that he was only giving this information about Alpha Bank as a concerned citizen,
00:08:46.460 and was very explicit about not working on anyone's behalf. The testimony thus far has gone deeply into
00:08:54.900 the question of when billable hours were charged and who was paying for them and so forth. But it does
00:09:01.400 look pretty clear that Sussman was billing the Clinton campaign for hours during which he was working
00:09:08.020 on opposition research, which was probably related to this outreach to the FBI. So this is looking
00:09:14.820 pretty bad for the defense. And they seem to think that it's ludicrous to believe that Michael Sussman
00:09:22.980 would throw away his whole career with a lie to the FBI. Why would he do that? That was in the opening
00:09:29.340 statement to the jury. They are also trying to say that the lie was immaterial and so forth. But I don't
00:09:36.420 think they're going to do very well here. Meanwhile, by going to trial, they have given Durham an
00:09:42.780 opportunity to bring all of this other stuff into the light. And the media have ignored the origins
00:09:48.760 of the Russia collusion hoax. In fact, a few years ago, when the inspector general of the Department
00:09:53.800 of Justice came out with his review of the Russia collusion hoax and the phony FISA warrants lying to
00:10:01.240 the FISA court and so forth, he came out and said, well, mistakes were made, but he doesn't think there was
00:10:07.120 a political motive at the origins of all this. And then remember, Attorney General Bill Barr said,
00:10:11.560 whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, I absolutely think there was a political motive at the start of all this.
00:10:15.740 And he made it clear that John Durham believed there was a political motive at the start of all
00:10:19.380 of this. And now we see the political motives. This was cooked up by the Clinton campaign in an attempt
00:10:24.500 to create an October surprise in 2016. Even though they were way ahead in the polls, they wanted to
00:10:29.260 create an October surprise to remove any chance that Donald Trump could win. And all of this blew up in
00:10:35.140 their faces when the director of the FBI at the time, James Comey, apparently acting on a false
00:10:43.180 belief that Russia had intercepted some Clinton communications, went out there and said they were
00:10:48.660 going to reopen the investigation. This is in late October 2016. I think it was October 28.
00:10:53.080 They were going to go reopen the investigation into Hillary Clinton's emails because of the Anthony
00:10:57.200 Wiener laptop that was found in an investigation for which he later went to jail for having inappropriate
00:11:02.700 sexual conversations with a minor online. So it all comes back to Andrew Breitbart and Wienergate
00:11:08.460 10 years before somehow. But, you know, this was the entire, as you put it, deep state colluding with
00:11:17.600 the media, colluding with the Democratic Party to create this insurance policy, to use the words of
00:11:23.800 Peter Stroke, to make sure that Trump would not become president or that if he did become president, he could
00:11:29.660 be removed through investigation and impeachment. And there you have certainly an October surprise in
00:11:37.340 the making. It didn't, as you say, work out exactly as they intended, as these things often don't.
00:11:44.300 What is interesting when you raise the Breitbart connection to Wienergate is whatever happened to that
00:11:54.660 laptop, all of its sordid contents. And why has there been so little inquiry, in your judgment,
00:12:02.520 about it from the ever so curious, always, and ready to protect the American democracy, corporate media outlets?
00:12:14.340 Well, that laptop was apparently reviewed by the FBI, but they did it very quickly, absurdly quickly.
00:12:20.400 They wanted to get it done before the November election, November 8th, 2016. And they said they
00:12:25.800 went through all the emails, there was nothing new. They hadn't known about this cache of emails on an
00:12:30.180 unsecured hard drive, some of which may have had classified markings. But they said, oh, we've seen
00:12:35.060 all these emails before, there's nothing new here. And I'm not sure whether that was the right conclusion,
00:12:40.140 but that's what they told the public, they went through all of it. But what it did was it reminded
00:12:46.220 the public, and I think particularly Republican voters who had been wavering on whether or not
00:12:50.780 to trust Donald Trump, it reminded the public that there was a cloud of suspicion hanging over
00:12:54.740 Hillary Clinton. Now, what was it? It wasn't just that she had some technicality that she violated
00:12:59.460 the Espionage Act by mistake or whatever, because she had this private email server at home.
00:13:05.500 And, you know, lots of government officials, fortunately or unfortunately,
00:13:09.440 use private emails for various reasons, even while they're in government service. They probably
00:13:13.520 shouldn't do that. But it's been done by Republican and Democratic administrations. And, you know,
00:13:18.900 it looks a little bit like a misdemeanor, no harm, no foul, not the kind of foul that sends you to the
00:13:24.640 free throw line, you know, in basketball. But the reason she had the private server, and this is where
00:13:30.160 we really get into the problem with Hillary Clinton as a candidate. The reason she had the private
00:13:35.840 server was there was evidence from my colleague, Peter Schweitzer and his research, evidence that she was
00:13:41.860 using her position as Secretary of State to enrich herself and her family and her foundation,
00:13:47.240 because the donations to the Clinton Foundation went way up while she was Secretary of State,
00:13:53.000 Bill Clinton going around the world getting half a million dollars a speech, that sort of thing.
00:13:57.300 And it was an influence peddling operation that they had to keep off the government servers.
00:14:02.340 So it couldn't be FOIA. In other words, it couldn't be produced to the public on demand.
00:14:06.740 And they destroyed all the cell phones, and they lost all the emails. So this was a way for her to
00:14:12.380 control the information that many people believe, including myself, documented this influence peddling
00:14:19.400 that was going on. And we see that now with the Biden administration, Joe Biden and Hunter Biden
00:14:25.860 were in business together, Joe Biden used his position as vice president to enrich his son.
00:14:30.060 When he was out of office, he and his son went into business together. And this relationship
00:14:34.240 continued. It's all documented there on Hunter Biden's laptop. And much like Hillary Clinton's
00:14:40.160 private email server, they had to make sure nobody saw it. So when it was discovered accidentally,
00:14:45.080 the media and big tech and the Biden campaign had to pretend it was all Russian disinformation.
00:14:52.500 They had to pretend it was a lie. And it wasn't a lie. It was a repeat of what happened with Hillary
00:14:57.040 Clinton. There was basically a business grafted onto senior levels of the United States executive.
00:15:05.440 And we have the same problem in the Biden administration. And now anytime Biden does
00:15:10.440 something or doesn't do something on, let's say, China, or even on Ukraine and Russia, where Hunter
00:15:15.140 Biden had some dealings, we don't know if he's acting on his own behalf or the country's behalf.
00:15:21.260 I mean, there are serious criticisms out there saying, why is Joe Biden sending so much money to
00:15:26.480 Ukraine, when there's a clear conflict of interest, that his son was serving on this prominent energy
00:15:32.100 board in Ukraine, and so on and so forth. Now, I think there are independent reasons for and against
00:15:36.240 sending that money overseas. But people are asking the question, is this really an act on behalf of the
00:15:42.380 country or on behalf of his son, his family, and so forth. And especially with China, where we're not
00:15:48.700 really even clear yet whether Hunter Biden has completely unwound his Chinese investments.
00:15:52.800 That's a really important question. How much is Biden doing for the country? And how much is he
00:15:57.460 doing for the Biden family?
00:15:59.100 It's, we're talking about, we haven't even gotten into the bio labs, the research laboratories,
00:16:07.400 and all of the exploratory talks, we're told that that's all they were, exploratory talks by Hunter
00:16:16.620 Biden and his erstwhile professional associates. Meanwhile, we know they're there. We had it
00:16:25.260 validated by Victoria Nuland, no less. And again, not even artfully did the left-wing media
00:16:35.680 just subtly recede from any interest in the story. And it's sort of gone on by. It's a very
00:16:44.500 important story, it seems to me, but you can't convince CNN, the New York Times, or the Washington
00:16:51.160 Post of that, can you?
00:16:53.200 Well, you know, once in a while, they do tell the truth. And one of the more interesting revelations
00:16:58.360 in this whole saga did come from the Washington Post. They were the ones who broke the story
00:17:02.940 that this fellow Mark Elias was the lawyer responsible for arranging the hiring of Fusion
00:17:10.520 GPS, the opposition research firm, to produce the phony Russia dossier, which led to this entire
00:17:15.780 collusion story. And he hired Fusion on behalf of the Clinton campaign and on behalf of the
00:17:22.240 Democratic National Committee. He laundered that money essentially through his law firm at the time,
00:17:26.440 Perkins Coie. And the FEC recently fined Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee
00:17:32.460 for failing to disclose that expenditure properly. They disguised it as legal expenses, but it was
00:17:39.220 spent on Fusion GPS producing this fraudulent document. So that actually came up from the
00:17:45.040 Washington Post. Once in a while, they do get to the heart of this. But what's interesting to me is
00:17:50.340 to watch these White House briefings. You know, we had Jake Sullivan at the briefing this week,
00:17:54.080 and he's appeared many times before. And mostly what he speaks about these days is Russia.
00:17:59.140 And yet Jake Sullivan was one of the authors of the Russia collusion conspiracy theory. How are we to
00:18:04.400 take anything he says seriously about Russia? When he lied to the media, he lied to the public about the
00:18:10.960 Russia collusion hoax. And he lied to Congress. He was investigated or he testified in front of the
00:18:16.500 House Intelligence Committee in 2017 as part of their investigation. And he said falsely that Michael
00:18:22.800 Flynn was colluding with the Russians and that Donald Trump had been colluding with the Russians. Now, he can't
00:18:27.860 be prosecuted for perjury because he was giving his opinion to Representative Adam Schiff. But still, he said
00:18:33.560 something false to Congress about this. He lied to everybody. Now, I accept that the administration's policy
00:18:40.760 of isolating Russia might be in the right direction. I happen to agree that we should support Ukraine against
00:18:48.100 Russia in general. But how can we trust anything this particular individual is telling us about this?
00:18:55.120 Because he has lied repeatedly about supposed collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.
00:19:03.100 And that's important because those lies created mistrust and blocked relations between the U.S. and Russia
00:19:10.860 in a way that might have led to the present crisis. We are not, if you'll notice, we're not even
00:19:15.920 participating in any diplomacy, at least openly with Russia. We're leaving that up to other people.
00:19:21.560 Biden, who said diplomacy is back. Namely China.
00:19:25.160 Right. But, you know, we're leaving it to the Ukrainians themselves or the Israelis or the Turks
00:19:29.380 or the Chinese or whoever. And Biden's big thing was diplomacy is back, but he's not doing any
00:19:34.160 diplomacy. And maybe he can't do diplomacy with Russia because he has spent the last several years,
00:19:39.200 along with the rest of his party, demonizing Russia for partisan domestic political reasons.
00:19:43.840 When, if they had not told this lie, if they had not created this hoax, we could actually have the
00:19:49.880 possibility of some sort of diplomatic settlement of this thing that wouldn't involve billions and
00:19:53.980 billions of dollars that would bring this war to a close without costing thousands more lives. I
00:19:58.060 mean, I'm a very hawkish person in terms of my foreign policy orientation. I don't see a way,
00:20:03.480 even with Ukraine holding out as bravely as they have done, I don't see a way to bring this to a
00:20:07.740 conclusion without some kind of agreement, because you're dealing with a nuclear power controlled by an
00:20:12.400 unpredictable individual. I don't think that's a situation in which you can really go on the
00:20:16.320 offensive with any great degree of confidence. This president has been in office since January,
00:20:23.200 almost a year and a half ago. And no one's taking into account what the policies were of this
00:20:30.080 administration in the months, the year leading up to this invasion of Ukraine. I am not so easily
00:20:38.800 persuaded that we need to be spending in excess of what will be over 50 billion dollars on military
00:20:46.160 equipment and whatever other aid is provided for in the legislation. But I'm also deeply troubled by
00:20:53.920 Zelensky saying to the president's emissaries, do not, do not return here with empty hands. It wasn't a
00:21:03.520 request. It was a demand. And given the checkered history of both men, that's deeply troubling.
00:21:12.260 And again, I see very few following up on that and comparing this aid of the United States and the
00:21:19.320 positioning of our troops in Poland, the eastern flank, and the suggestion that we're going to send
00:21:27.840 more trips to Somalia. This is a more than just a reversal of Trump doctrine.
00:21:34.000 Yeah. Well, we really don't know why the administration is pursuing the course that
00:21:39.260 they are. There seems to be no reason. And they're not explaining what their goals are in Ukraine. So
00:21:44.460 they're going to Congress and asking for 40 billion dollars and Congress is giving it to them, it looks
00:21:48.300 like. Yeah. But they're not saying what the strategy is. And really, whenever you're going to spend that
00:21:52.760 kind of money, I mean, if this were a business, the board would say to the CEO, well, what are the
00:21:57.740 other alternatives to spending this money? I mean, can you do the same thing? Can you get to the same
00:22:02.780 outcome more cheaply? What's the cost going to be if we sit down at the table with the Russians and say,
00:22:08.240 all right, let's negotiate an end to this border dispute. And you end the war and Ukraine
00:22:13.680 makes some concessions and then we call it a day. And then we don't have to spend 40 billion
00:22:19.100 dollars and continue the war that's displaced so many millions of people and cause such trouble to
00:22:25.720 the rest of the world. And, you know, there really is a risk here of the deployment of technical
00:22:31.400 nuclear weapons by the Russians. They've said as much essentially. And we have to be wary of that.
00:22:37.500 You know, this is not just science fiction. This is not out of a comic book, graphic novel or
00:22:43.020 something. This is the real world. And the Biden people seem to think that they've got the upper
00:22:48.440 hand. But the Trump card, no pun intended, is really still held by Putin in the form of
00:22:55.840 nuclear retaliation. And he may not attack the U.S. homeland. He may not attack a NATO member.
00:23:02.400 But what would he do? What would we do if he attacked Ukraine? I mean, we're not treaty bound
00:23:07.740 to defend Ukraine. And would we really want to risk a more global nuclear confrontation by retaliating?
00:23:13.660 So so so I don't think that the Biden people have thought this through.
00:23:18.160 Oh, I'm I'm afraid that this is one of the few things they may have thought through because they
00:23:24.460 have been prodding Putin from the time Biden got in office and the conversations began with Zelensky
00:23:33.360 talking about bringing him into NATO, expanding NATO. And this went on and the talks got greater energy as
00:23:44.480 we approach the fall of 2021. And and it makes no sense because that is a red line. It has always
00:23:53.760 been a red line for Vladimir Putin. The expansion, the military expansion of the NATO defensive alliance
00:23:59.940 is a an absolute no. And it will be met with a response. He's said as much. He's reiterated as
00:24:07.660 much. He is accepting Sweden and Finland so long as there is no military expansion of NATO power
00:24:16.080 in those two countries. And that's you know, those are two of the better run countries in the
00:24:24.100 in Europe. They're small, but they're they're mighty. It's so it's it's troubling to me and I think to
00:24:32.180 many others that Biden sometimes you have to take what something is at face value. And this at face
00:24:41.000 value looks like an effort by the Biden administration to provoke the results that we witnessed on February
00:24:47.880 24th. Your thoughts? Well, I think there's also domestic politics involved here. I think that
00:24:55.980 for Biden and the Democrats and much of the foreign policy establishment, they see an opportunity to
00:25:01.360 punish Vladimir Putin for what they still view as the stolen election of 2016. And there's a bit of
00:25:08.620 vengeance at work, I think psychologically, at least I don't know if that's guiding their foreign policy
00:25:13.380 decisions, but it does seem to be the sentiment that they share. I don't know that they want to
00:25:17.700 provoke Russia into a war, but you have to consider that possibility that they want to provoke Russia to
00:25:23.340 act so that they have a pretext for acting in an even more overtly offensive manner. Because something
00:25:32.700 like a no fly zone, for example, would involve having to attack Russian assets on the ground in Belarus,
00:25:38.800 which is an ally of Russia and possibly within Russia itself. So they don't want to do that and
00:25:43.760 risk provoking a much larger confrontation unless they can say, well, we were attacked first. So I
00:25:48.860 think they're daring Putin to do something. Look, maybe they also just feel that there's a win to be
00:25:53.780 had here in a broader strategic sense. Maybe they're enticed by the idea of removing a major geopolitical
00:26:01.080 rival or at least a geopolitical problem from the map. And then they can pivot to China and focus on
00:26:07.260 China. I mean, that's probably the most charitable reading of it. But I also think that they're not
00:26:11.760 being clear with the public. When you're asking the American people to make sacrifices on the order
00:26:15.460 of $40 billion, which is far more than we spend securing our southern border. Okay, I don't think
00:26:20.760 the two are mutually exclusive. But how do you say we don't have money for a border wall? And it's a
00:26:26.240 waste of money to build a wall on the border when you're sending many times that amount to defend
00:26:31.160 someone else's border? It doesn't make any sense to me.
00:26:33.260 No, but the Biden administration, again, in one of its few instances of being forthright,
00:26:38.380 has said the reason. They intend to flood this country with illegal immigrants across that southern
00:26:46.220 border. That's the reason they do not have a wall. They are pulled back the border patrol and that they
00:26:54.300 have suspended effectively the operations of immigration and custom enforcement. It's, again,
00:27:01.520 it's straightforward. And as you know, this administration isn't straightforward about
00:27:07.040 many things. It's been absolutely forthright on those matters. Let's look at something that's a
00:27:13.640 very interesting contrast. Vladimir Putin, before the war began, used migrant flows across the borders
00:27:22.820 of Eastern Europe to try to disrupt the societies and the governments of his rivals in that region.
00:27:32.060 He was deliberately funneling migrants into Europe across the Eastern European frontier.
00:27:37.860 And we spoke out against that. Now, how do we speak out against Putin using migration,
00:27:44.120 essentially to invade his neighbors and disrupt their lives when we won't stop the caravans and the
00:27:54.080 millions of people who are pouring across our borders, shepherded by the cartels? Why are we so
00:27:59.920 sensitive to Putin sending migrants across the border, but we are not doing anything about the
00:28:04.420 migrants coming into our country? And part of it is class, if I can use a Marxist term, because
00:28:09.960 the people making these policies live very far away from the communities that are impacted by the
00:28:16.980 rapid influx of migrants. If you live in a nice apartment in Northwest Washington, D.C., a nice
00:28:22.060 condo or whatever, maybe you don't have to deal with this. But if you live in a border county in Texas,
00:28:26.400 you do. The other possibility is just they think that this is part of a broader political strategy.
00:28:34.060 And that's very controversial to say right now. And there's a sort of white supremacist,
00:28:38.380 racist version of this, which I think is abhorrent and discredited and not to be taken seriously. But
00:28:43.220 Democrats do resist any effort to distinguish between legal immigrants on the one hand and
00:28:51.300 illegal aliens on the other. When the Trump administration tried to count residents and to
00:28:57.940 exclude those who were illegally in the country in the census, Democrats went to court over that.
00:29:02.740 They did not want the illegal population to be excluded from the census count because they wanted
00:29:08.220 to make sure they had enough congressional seats in the blue states where there are large numbers
00:29:12.760 of illegal residents such as California. So the good offices of the of the blue judges
00:29:18.920 that they put put the case in front of, they won and without any basis for appeal.
00:29:26.260 It is just the same stratagem that you would expect. And it goes on. Their simple answers are
00:29:35.960 straightforward. And and I don't understand why people have any doubt about the purpose of the of
00:29:46.220 the left, the purpose of the Democrat Party. And and the real reason that Trump drove in my judgment,
00:29:55.420 drove drove drove the left not is because he was not a racist. He was absolutely securing the border.
00:30:06.120 And he was working to find ways to do it, irrespective of the rhetoric, the rationale or rationalizations
00:30:13.120 of the left. It drove them utterly nuts. You don't agree?
00:30:18.480 No, you know, this is this is something we see in our politics, that they're manipulating the
00:30:24.540 immigration issue. You know, when John McCain ran for president back in 2007, 2008, his chief of staff,
00:30:32.020 Mark Salter, wrote a piece in Real Clear Politics in which he pointed out that Barack Obama, who was then
00:30:38.660 the likely Democratic nominee for president, Barack Obama had torpedoed on several occasions
00:30:45.240 bipartisan efforts to create a comprehensive immigration reform. So when it when it looked
00:30:52.800 like it was going to happen and the Bush administration supported it and the Democrats in
00:30:56.460 Congress supported it, Barack Obama found a reason, even though he was supposed to be working on this
00:31:00.520 deal, he found a reason to undermine it. And the reasons kept changing. The unions didn't want it or
00:31:05.200 so forth. But essentially, the reason was always the same underlying reason, which is that Obama preferred
00:31:10.000 to have immigration as an election issue, rather than solving the problem. Democrats don't want to
00:31:15.120 solve the problem. If they wanted to solve the problem, it could have been done a long time ago.
00:31:20.120 And whenever the prospect of finding a bipartisan path arose, even under the Trump administration,
00:31:29.360 Democrats rejected it. Remember, in his second State of the Union, it was actually technically his
00:31:34.360 first State of the Union, but his second address to Congress, Trump outlined the four pillars
00:31:38.480 of immigration reform. And Democrats immediately rejected those pillars because they did not want
00:31:44.040 anything that would prevent future chain migration. That was the big sticking point. Trump wanted
00:31:49.500 immigration based on skills. Democrats want to continue the family based chain migration system,
00:31:54.720 which has been so abused and has allowed so many people to come in in such an uncontrolled way.
00:32:00.000 So it was a nonstarter for Democrats, but that's what the country wants. I mean, the country wants a
00:32:05.060 solution to this problem. And Democrats, well, look, they're going to pay a price in November,
00:32:08.460 but they're going to try to get as many people across the border before November as they can.
00:32:12.800 You know, and this was about Title 42. The fact of the matter is, with or without Title 42,
00:32:19.540 the Biden administration will figure out a way to bring in the estimated 7 to 8 million more
00:32:25.520 illegal immigrants over the course of the next year. It's that someone has come up with a number
00:32:30.920 that is critical mass, if you will. And I truly believe that. To what purpose? You know, we have a lot
00:32:39.340 of theories on that, but none of them are in the interest of the United States.
00:32:44.760 Well, I agree with you there. And Democrats have yet to explain why it is that they won't
00:32:49.660 stop the influx over the border. Now, there are possible reasons, but these are all just
00:32:56.340 conjectural. One is the political motive you and I have discussed. Another is just sentiment. They
00:33:01.540 want to be nice. They don't like enforcing laws in any context. So maybe they don't want to do the
00:33:06.360 hard work, the sometimes difficult work of enforcing immigration law. And they just leave us out there
00:33:13.020 to speculate because they don't explain it to the public. Why are you allowing this to happen? All they
00:33:17.740 can do is say, well, Donald Trump's policy was inhumane or whatever that means. But it's not humane or
00:33:22.480 compassionate to allow the cartels to smuggle these people, to abuse these people, to leave them
00:33:28.340 abandoned in rivers or in deserts to die. That's not compassionate. What's compassionate is an orderly
00:33:34.020 immigration system. And Democrats don't want that. But they don't explain that. And I think, look,
00:33:39.340 I do think there are going to be political consequences, but there are also societal consequences
00:33:43.020 because they're telling us that if you even challenge that policy, then you're a racist who
00:33:48.120 supports mass murder and so forth. And, you know, it's just toxic. And that the accusation
00:33:57.240 has become, I think, significantly less effective over time. It's a bit diluted. And people have
00:34:05.560 the experience of knowing what is racism and what is not. And this is this Democrat party is now so
00:34:13.020 obvious, obviously a party of division and racial identity at its core that I personally believe that
00:34:24.100 the Democrat party will suffer, as you said, in November for a lot of reasons, but certainly large
00:34:29.860 among them. Is this now, I think, obvious to most judgment of the party as being really a retrograde
00:34:41.440 party? It styles itself as progressive. It's retrograde. And it's disgusting. And it's got all
00:34:52.420 sorts of these Marxist elements, whether we're talking about ESG, CRT, EID, you know, and corporate
00:35:01.420 America is in league with it. And I think, again, they're on the wrong side of history. They are working
00:35:08.280 between parents and their children. They are trying to divide by race. It's really a, the Democratic
00:35:16.960 party is in shambles and they, they just don't know it. Yeah, they really are. And they don't
00:35:23.260 have much to stand on. So you're going to hear a lot of hysteria and look, I'm surprised and somewhat
00:35:27.640 impressed by how organized the hysteria is. I mean, they're really out there getting their message out,
00:35:32.340 trying to scare as many people as possible. I just don't know that the average American voter is
00:35:35.820 listening anymore. I think people are looking at the gas price. People are worried about their
00:35:40.060 household budgets. People are looking at their stock market portfolios, tanking their 401ks.
00:35:44.680 Remember Trump used to be mocked for saying the stock market was going to crash and then
00:35:47.720 Biden took office and it kept going up for a while. Well, now the headlines are all about the
00:35:52.060 stock market crashing and people are looking at their E-Trade accounts and their 401ks and they're
00:35:56.720 starting to panic. And that's a result of inflation, but the inflation is also a result of the
00:36:02.300 Biden administration's policy of spending as much money as possible. So I think that those
00:36:08.020 issues are going to dominate, but we'll have to see. It is not going to be a walk for Republicans.
00:36:11.680 It's going to be quite a battle. Oh, I hope it will be because the better the battle, the more facts
00:36:18.320 will be out in front of the American people. I hope it's as, I hope this is as aggressive of political
00:36:24.020 fight as we've had in a merry moon, because I truly believe that in the arena, truth is found in this
00:36:30.680 great Republic. And what I hate is when people try to stifle truth and pervert it, which is
00:36:38.400 a hobby for most of the left in this country. Joel, I want to say, first of all, thank you. I always
00:36:46.740 enjoy talking with you. And if we're not ending on too sweet a note, I think I should point out one
00:36:53.880 thing in case everyone's feeling jolly about the Republican Party. Remember, 40 Republican senators
00:37:00.460 sent a letter to Biden asking for that no-fly zone that was a sure mark for war with Russia. 40
00:37:09.400 Republican senators. Don't you find that stunning, Joel?
00:37:13.200 Well, I just find it stunning that nobody thinks about the consequences and nobody asks the
00:37:19.420 questions. And again, nobody asks, is this the most cost effective way of pursuing the same goal?
00:37:27.560 What is the goal? Is your goal to get rid of Putin like Biden let slip in Warsaw? Is your goal to
00:37:33.600 reach peace? I mean, what is the goal here? And why are we throwing money at this without asking what
00:37:39.340 the goal is? I mean, look, I am all for supporting Ukraine. I think Russia ought to be condemned for
00:37:44.680 its aggression and all of that. And I would not like to see Ukraine lose this war. But I also think
00:37:50.980 that the way we should proceed is diplomacy. That's what Biden ran on. He ran on diplomacy. And instead
00:37:56.540 of that, he's just sending more weapons overseas. And if he's going to cast that as our approach,
00:38:03.420 well, I want to know what he thinks the goal is. I mean, if weapons are the means, what are the
00:38:07.560 ends? And he hasn't told us. Well, and I'm not sure that if he knew he would fully comprehend
00:38:13.920 sufficiently to convey that meaning. Joel, we always give our guests the last word. Your concluding
00:38:23.140 thoughts, if you will. Well, I think the world is in a tough spot at the moment. We're all going to
00:38:29.100 go through a pretty rough patch and it's not going to be solved after November. I think simply having
00:38:34.100 control of Congress if Republicans manage to win is not going to be enough. But I do think we should
00:38:38.900 welcome an open contest in the 2024 primary. I do think President Trump is going to run. I think
00:38:44.820 there may be other candidates who run. But I think what we're learning through these early primaries
00:38:48.960 so far in the midterm elections is that more voices don't actually hurt the Republican Party or
00:38:57.460 the Democratic Party. More voices are good for the process. And I think that we should welcome
00:39:02.280 the contest and debate that's coming. But it becomes more and more urgent with every day.
00:39:07.120 So we all have to take it more seriously because this is really turning out to be a crucial moment.
00:39:13.000 Can we save our country from going over the cliff? I was mocked when I predicted that Joe Biden would
00:39:17.640 be the most left-wing president in American history. And here we are. So this is really important.
00:39:23.020 And right you are. It's good to talk so long with a fellow who is right so often. Joel Pollack,
00:39:31.620 Breitbart, editor-at-large, thanks so much for being with us. We appreciate it.
00:39:36.280 Always a pleasure.
00:39:37.460 God bless.
00:39:38.860 Joel Pollack, great American. Coming up this week, I'll be sitting down with President Donald J. Trump.
00:39:45.480 That's Wednesday the 25th. I'll be talking with President Trump. I'm really looking forward to that,
00:39:50.680 as you might guess. And with us Tuesday, Steve Bannon will be here. Our good friend will be
00:39:55.380 with us to talk about how much trouble this country is in. We'll have Steve's view on everything from
00:40:00.620 runaway inflation to this disastrous administration. Joining us here tomorrow will be General Michael
00:40:06.440 Flynn. General Flynn is preparing lawsuits against those who've wronged him and this country,
00:40:11.740 who have inflicted great pain on the general and his family, and for whom it appears there will now be
00:40:17.920 an accounting. That's General Michael Flynn here tomorrow. Please be with us. Till then,
00:40:24.160 God bless you, and God bless America.