The Great America Show - TOUGH TIME FOR TRUTH

00:00:00.000 Folks, we're teetering on what could be an economic meltdown, threatening to wash away

00:00:04.800 our savings and retirement. Inflation has surged to levels unseen in 40 years. Gold is the smartest

00:00:11.600 and most responsible investment you can make for you and your family in times like these.

00:00:17.600 A safe haven asset that protects your purchasing power and your wallet from inflation. When it

00:00:23.100 comes to protecting your IRA or 401k, trust only the best. My friends at Allegiance Gold.

00:00:30.300 Allegiance Gold has earned the highest trust ratings in the precious metals industry

00:00:34.400 and builds relationships based on integrity, expertise and impeccable service. Get up to

00:00:40.780 $5,000 in free silver on a qualifying purchase when you visit protectwithlew.com today or give

00:00:48.340 them a call at 844-6484-LOU. Don't wait. Take control of your retirement today. Call 844-6484-LOU

00:01:01.260 and speak with one of their experts. Time is of the essence. Protect your future with Allegiance

00:01:07.480 Gold. Visit protectwithlew.com or call 844-6484-LOU.

00:01:18.340 Hello, everybody. I'm Lou Dobbs. Welcome to The Great America Show. Thanks for being with us.

00:01:23.020 It's been a tough week for the Republicans. The Lankford-Schumer-McConnell immigration bill,

00:01:28.360 dead on arrival and the impeachment of the world's leading enabler of drug and sex trafficking,

00:01:33.700 failed. By a vote of 216 to 214, Congressman Ken Buck, Tom McClintock and Mike Gallagher.

00:01:41.220 Those three men are a disgrace to the country. They should be ashamed of themselves.

00:01:44.980 They aligned themselves with sex and drug traffickers that Mayorkas has refused to shut

00:01:50.480 down. Speaker Mike Johnson later was asked about whether impeachment of Mayorkas will be brought

00:01:56.180 back. On impeachment, last night was a setback, but democracy is messy. We live in a time of divided

00:02:00.960 government. We have a razor thin margin here and every vote counts. Sometimes when you're counting

00:02:06.720 votes and people show up when they're not expected to be in the building, it changes the equation.

00:02:10.160 But listen, we have a duty and a responsibility to take care of this issue. We have to hold

00:02:15.320 the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security accountable. Mayorkas needs to be held

00:02:19.520 accountable. The Biden administration needs to be held accountable. And we will pass those articles

00:02:23.140 of impeachment. We'll do it on the next round. So Johnson is confident that it'll pass on the

00:02:28.500 next vote. And Senator Lankford, who's responsible for that horrendous amnesty bill, says even if Johnson

00:02:34.960 passes the impeachment, it'll be dead on arrival in the Senate. It'll fail in the Senate.

00:02:40.160 If I can use the House term, it'll be dead on arrival when it comes over. But it'll still be

00:02:45.760 the same policy. Even if Mayorkas left, we're going to have the same result because we've got

00:02:50.300 the same president who's driving the policy just like we did under Trump. Well, that's one sorry

00:02:54.360 rhino, that Lankford fella. And rhino Romney McDaniel will reportedly step down from the RNC in the coming

00:03:01.780 weeks. McDaniel to resign after the South Carolina primary. Our guest today is Kurt Olson, conservative

00:03:08.840 attorney, a great legal mind, a man who has his finger on the pulse of the body politic as well.

00:03:14.840 Kurt, great to have you with us. There's a lot to take up here. But I'd like to start with the

00:03:19.760 Georgia trial in which Judge Amy Totenberg, federal judge Amy Totenberg, is deliberating

00:03:26.480 a path toward a verdict in the Curling v. Raffensperger case on electronic voting machines.

00:03:32.640 Well, closing arguments, Lou, and it's great to be with you, by the way, closing arguments

00:03:37.760 in Curling were held on Thursday. The judge now has all of the evidence, has taken it under

00:03:43.480 advisement. I suspect it could be at least several weeks before a ruling is issued. The interesting

00:03:50.820 aspect of Curling was how one of the plaintiff's groups bent over backwards to limit the vulnerabilities

00:03:59.800 with the machines and the issues therein to just what are called ballot marking devices.

00:04:06.040 These are touchscreen voting machines where there is not a paper ballot that is hand-filled out and

00:04:12.600 then tabulated. And so that system is only used statewide in Georgia. And that particular plaintiff

00:04:23.360 group bent over backwards to not say anything about the tabulators, which is a device that reads paper

00:04:31.440 ballots, takes an image, tabulates the vote, and then gives the result. And tabulators are a component

00:04:41.760 that is extremely vulnerable to manipulation and to rigging an election. So it was odd that one of the

00:04:50.160 plaintiffs' groups tried to avoid that. But Garland Favorito, voter GA, and Ricardo Davis, the plaintiff

00:04:56.640 there, with their counsel, David Oles, made great headway in upsetting those plans to avoid discussions

00:05:05.520 about the tabulators and just brought forward tremendous evidence of how the tabulators can be

00:05:11.600 used to manipulate elections. And also, importantly, that 2020 was affected by such manipulation. And that is

00:05:19.920 something I think the court and the other plaintiff's group were trying to avoid.

00:05:25.840 We know, at least circumstantially, by inference that the powers that be do not want this case

00:05:35.520 to move forward to a conclusion that will have significant impact. They have been, for example,

00:05:42.880 it's one of the few cases I've ever seen where Curlin B. Raffensperger, an appellate court, has already

00:05:48.240 decided that the defendant in the case, the state and the secretary of state, Brad Raffensperger,

00:05:55.120 doesn't have to be in a trial. Because he's in such a high office with the thinking of the circuit

00:06:03.600 court. That's in and of itself is bizarre. The trial judge, in this case, it's a bench trial. There's no

00:06:12.400 jury. And she put the leading expert witnesses study of the vulnerability and the anomalies of these

00:06:23.760 voting machines, put his research and study and conclusions under seal for two years.

00:06:32.640 This doesn't bode well for a decision based on the evidence and, if you will, a high level of integrity.

00:06:44.560 Well, no, it doesn't. I mean, when you look at the use of electronic voting machines

00:06:51.920 and the fact that every step of the way, there have been efforts by the voting machine companies

00:06:58.560 and election officials to stop anybody from peeking inside, to know what goes on. And then you have to

00:07:05.360 ask yourself why. We, for 200 years, we had hand counted paper ballots. It was done in the open.

00:07:12.160 What is so secret that we can't know how the voting machines actually process the votes?

00:07:20.960 And so if there was nothing to be concerned about, and it's always there, the mantra is basically

00:07:26.880 trust us. It's EAC certified. We do logic and accuracy tests. We do risk limiting audits and so

00:07:35.280 forth. So just trust us. And every time something pops up,

00:07:39.200 they had like the interim glitch where 6,000 votes were flipped from Trump to Biden in 2020.

00:07:45.840 It always is a an administrative error or something like that.

00:07:49.200 All right. It's never a full investigation. So the question is, what are they trying to hide?

00:07:54.160 Well, it is interesting to me that not only are they trying to hide it, they're trying to at the same

00:08:00.960 time save their industry by through obfuscation. And the trial court seems seem to be and I'm talking

00:08:09.840 state courts and federal courts seem to affix themselves to the fortunes of the electronic voting

00:08:16.080 companies. I don't know if I don't know the degree to which there is any crooked manipulation going on.

00:08:25.440 But I do know this. What I was asking for in 2020 was that a strong, vast investigation,

00:08:33.280 because we had so many questions, common sense questions like what were they doing in Wayne County,

00:08:39.200 putting up boards around the the election counting section of what, what, what the heck happened to

00:08:47.680 to those all those votes in Georgia? And what was it two in the morning? I can't remember what time it was.

00:08:53.040 But yeah, and suddenly, you know, the votes changed magically. And and everyone wanted to poop who

00:09:00.080 that is, if you know, there were there were some sort of sophisticated level of knowledge about this

00:09:04.320 that we just simply couldn't get to. By the way, it turns out they were right. They're hiding

00:09:08.880 everything about those machines. And now we have we have Halderman, Alex Halderman, the professor from

00:09:16.240 University of Michigan, actually, in a matter of seconds, demonstrating that the machines can be hacked

00:09:22.960 in the courtroom. He did it in the courtroom. They can be hacked. They can be manipulated,

00:09:28.640 changing both candidate names and votes and vote totals. I mean, how do they how did they survive that?

00:09:36.800 Well, they're going to survive it by bobbing and weaving, I think, like they always do.

00:09:41.920 And so if you look at Professor Halder, and yes, he demonstrated how easy it is to hack into a machine

00:09:50.000 or these ballot marking devices. Again, he limited to the BMDs, not to tabulate. But his report inspired

00:09:58.080 CISA belatedly to come out with an advisory in June of 2022, where they highlighted nine critical

00:10:06.320 vulnerabilities. But here's what they said. There's no evidence that any of these vulnerabilities were

00:10:13.680 exploited. Right, right. But the question is, they never looked. Exactly.

00:10:18.480 They never looked. And so this is the bob and weave that I mentioned earlier.

00:10:22.960 Kurt, I want to take that up. We got a quick break here. We're coming right back. We're talking with

00:10:28.880 Kurt Olson, a former SEAL and now a trial attorney. And by the way, when you say cause of action around

00:10:37.840 him, you better understand you'll get one or the other. We're coming right back.

00:10:42.720 Lou Dobbs here. I'm delighted to let you all know that the program Lou Dobbs tonight has returned to

00:10:48.720 the air. That's right. Lou Dobbs tonight is back. We're live each and every weeknight at 7 p.m.

00:10:57.040 Eastern and 6 p.m. Central on rumble.com slash Lou Dobbs. That's rumble.com slash Lou Dobbs.

00:11:06.000 I hope you'll be joining us for Lou Dobbs tonight as our fight to save this country has only begun.

00:11:18.720 We're back now. We're talking with Kurt Olson, conservative attorney, as I said, former U.S. Navy SEAL.

00:11:24.560 Kurt, as we broke for break there, you were talking about, in effect, a shell game that's

00:11:34.320 played by the various parties. Is there an opportunity here to break the shell game to

00:11:40.720 actually get down to what is inside those machines and make it known to the voting public so that they

00:11:46.640 understand the complete depth of concern on the part of those who want a electoral system of great

00:11:54.080 integrity? I think there is, because regardless, curling has broken the log jam that says, you know,

00:12:03.200 2020 was the most secure election in history or that these machines are secure and there's nothing to

00:12:09.200 see here. So even though the case was focused on the ballot marking devices, it shows that, yes,

00:12:17.360 you can hack into these machines easily. And I think it advances public awareness that these machines

00:12:23.760 should not be used to hold our most precious right to vote.

00:12:28.160 Kurt Olson- And yet, here we are, the whole country, it seems, it's not the whole country,

00:12:32.960 but it seems the whole country, is using these electronic voting machines. And when I think about

00:12:39.600 this, I mean, I think of, you know, the 2001 Space Odyssey, and not how, but rather the monolith,

00:12:49.600 as everybody, you know, is it draws everyone's attention into the movie. It's a black box. It's a,

00:12:58.240 it might as well be a monolith, because it's impenetrable. It is, it evades any inspection.

00:13:08.160 And we really don't know the purpose, but we know what we're supposed to do. And that is

00:13:12.560 is genuflect in its presence, and take whatever follows, you know, as gospel. This is, this is a

00:13:21.920 mindless way for a country, a nation, a superpower, in point of fact, to vote. Okay, we'll just take

00:13:29.760 your word for it. Where else in our society do we just take somebody's word for something?

00:13:35.120 It's crazy.

00:13:35.680 Kurt Olson- Well, not only that, but, you know, there are countries that refuse to use

00:13:39.760 electronic voting machines, such as Taiwan, which just recently held an election without

00:13:44.160 voting machines. And the same thing in France, and federal elections in Canada do not use

00:13:50.320 electronic voting machines for all the reasons, you know, that we're talking about.

00:13:55.920 And, and wondering why, how is it we got to this point, right now, with Curling v. Raffensperger,

00:14:06.640 for the first time, watching a, an expert manipulate the machine, hack the machine,

00:14:15.120 which was, we were told by all of the voting companies, that these machines are not hackable,

00:14:20.240 they're not available to the internet, there is no way there can be any communication,

00:14:25.120 all of this. And in one, one showing, Professor Haldeman demonstrated that it was all a fiction,

00:14:36.880 and that they weren't protected. And they're, and they're in great need of protection, because

00:14:42.560 they can't even tell if it's been exploited, no matter what the cyber security and infrastructure

00:14:50.160 agency said, it's pure pablum that they're putting out. It's a second run of telling the truth. And,

00:14:56.160 and, and, and Sypha is, Sypha has just whipped at both.

00:15:01.760 Yeah, no, I mean, that's true. I mean, there's, so, first of all, there's nothing magical about these

00:15:08.400 voting machines, they use, you know, off the shelf components that are made in China and elsewhere,

00:15:14.640 their software is Windows based software. Often it, there's nothing magical about it. I mean,

00:15:21.600 we hear time and time again, of all these other electronic systems, not voting systems,

00:15:26.320 but these electronic systems being hacked. So, for example, you know, on December 15, 2020,

00:15:32.160 just a month after the election, we had the largest breach called solar winds, right, that penetrated

00:15:38.640 over 15,000 companies and government agencies. And so there's nothing magical about voting machines.

00:15:45.680 All computers can be hacked. And here's, here's did what came out in curly one.

00:15:50.000 Okay, just interject. Sure. That was a, a Microsoft product that was vulnerable. Is that right?

00:15:57.760 It was a software manufactured by, by a company called solar winds, but it used a Windows based system.

00:16:04.960 Exactly. Right. Now, but it came out in curling, for example, that the machines, you know,

00:16:11.040 we're all told that they're not online, no connection to the internet. Well, no,

00:16:14.640 it was shown in curling that those machines are set up for wireless access.

00:16:20.160 So this is Bernard that there is no connection to the internet and, you know, or, you know, outside,

00:16:26.880 outside entities was shown in curling to not be accurate. Well, don't they all, and I understand that it's

00:16:34.640 very difficult to have considerable technology, technological knowledge. If you're a county clerk

00:16:40.880 and you're running the elections, whomever you may be associated with it, or the secretary of state,

00:16:46.960 for that matter, taking care of the election for the whole state. There's no way these folks are going

00:16:52.000 to be technologically so adroit. So they seek protection, do they not? The guarantees of the

00:17:00.800 integrity of these machines, do they have such a guarantee or not? They have the facade of guarantees.

00:17:10.000 Even Professor Haldeman testified under oath that he could defeat risk limiting audits and logic and

00:17:17.040 accuracy tests. Those two tests are designed supposedly to give the public confidence that

00:17:23.600 the machines are accurately reading and tabulating votes, and they can be easily defeated. And as

00:17:29.280 Professor Haldeman testified as such. And so, when you talk about election officials not understanding

00:17:36.720 the complexity of these machines, that makes the point. If the election officials don't understand how

00:17:42.960 they work, why should we be using them to conduct our elections? Because Dominion actually provides,

00:17:50.400 for example, employees on site in many jurisdictions to help run the elections because the election

00:17:56.640 officials don't have the skills. Right. That is a very loud point, frankly. That should reverberate across

00:18:07.440 the country, what you just said. And the more we learn about these machines, the more we learn about

00:18:16.000 the vulnerabilities, which are now demonstrated, proved in court. And there is no response. There's

00:18:24.320 been no reasonable response. As far as I know, there was some rebuttal in the courtroom in Curling v.

00:18:33.520 Raffensperger down in Atlanta, Georgia. But it was all, in my opinion, it was an exchange of

00:18:41.520 legal points and procedure and trying to score rhetorical points more than actually bring forward

00:18:50.160 knowledge that would be helpful. Let's go to where we go from here. Amy Totenberg, the judge,

00:18:57.680 is a highly experienced federal judge. She is also considered very left wing. I'm going to ask you,

00:19:10.240 when we come back, what you think of the judge here, what you think of the prospects to reveal enough

00:19:18.800 to cause pause in the state of Georgia with those voting machines before the next election.

00:19:24.000 We're talking with Kurt Olson, and we'll be right back.

00:19:32.480 We're back now talking with Kurt Olson. And Kurt, I want to talk to you about the prospects and the

00:19:37.120 judge, Judge Totenberg. But I also want to get to just two quick points, if I may,

00:19:43.040 the adverse decision by the appellate court on presidential immunity. Your reaction?

00:19:48.400 I think that the decision by the D.C. Circuit is a continuation of the establishment's efforts to

00:20:01.840 get rid of President Trump. And that started back in 2015 when he announced his candidacy,

00:20:09.200 continued through the FBI lying to the FISA court and unlawfully spying on his campaign. And then when

00:20:17.520 he was president, the Russia hoax, Bill Barr in the 2020 election, telling US attorneys to stand down and

00:20:27.680 not investigate election fraud. I think that this is just another, it's a continuation of that effort. I

00:20:37.520 think the decision is wrong. They have stayed their opinion pending an appeal by President Trump's

00:20:45.920 attorneys to the US Supreme Court. But what that opinion does is it basically says that a President

00:20:54.000 who is conducting official duties and, you know, the President has a duty, if he has evidence that

00:21:03.360 elections are being subverted, to follow that. But the D.C. Circuit basically, you know, repeated the trope

00:21:12.560 that Trump spread false claims about the November 2020 election and that he tried to block the

00:21:19.280 the certification on January 6th, both of which are demonstrably untrue.

00:21:26.240 And that trial, as you point out, is headed toward the Supreme Court for the next round. And

00:21:34.000 there are two possibilities. One, they refuse to hear the appeal, which I think would create,

00:21:40.160 to say the least, a strong reaction from the body politic, without question. And the other is taking

00:21:50.080 it up and relying on this nonsense about, you know, the Constitution and their specific readings and so

00:22:00.560 forethought, whether it be on immunity, whether it be on the ballot and whether or not it can move forward.

00:22:10.800 It looks straightforward to me. He is not an insurrectionist and he has immunity. How in the

00:22:17.200 world could there be any other reasonable reading of the Constitution?

00:22:22.240 Well, nobody, I don't believe anybody in this country has ever been charged with insurrection to

00:22:26.560 begin, not even the January 6th protesters. So they throw out that term, but which has a precise

00:22:32.720 legal connotation, but nobody's been charged with that. And, you know, the president, they tried to

00:22:40.000 impeach and convict him for the events of January 6th and he was acquitted in the Senate. And so how can

00:22:48.080 a, you know, an appellate court, uh, without pursuing a criminal trial or, you know, weighing evidence

00:22:56.080 come to their own conclusion that the president's guilty of insurrection that would bar him from

00:23:01.520 the ballot under the 14th amendment is beyond me. Yeah. It's, it's beyond any reason. It's beyond

00:23:06.800 anything this country's ever, uh, even thought of dabbling in such far-fetched nonsense. Uh, but it

00:23:13.520 tells you, and I think they've gone too far this time. I, I think this is all such a, uh, such a

00:23:19.840 righteous abuse of power that I don't think anybody can ignore it. Uh, let's the Supreme Court deciding

00:23:26.320 on that ballot in Colorado tomorrow. What do you think happens? Oh, I don't think that the Supreme

00:23:32.320 Court is not going to decide. They're going to argue it. Right. They're going to argue, but I cannot

00:23:36.960 believe that the Supreme Court would, uh, affirm that decision. I just, it has no basis in law. I,

00:23:45.440 I would be shocked if this is not a nine to zero reversal. Yeah. You know, I'm shocked that there

00:23:52.240 was a five to four decision out of the Supreme Court that aligned them with, uh, the Biden regime,

00:23:58.160 uh, the Marxist Dems who managed this puppet president, and of course, the Mexican drug cartels.

00:24:05.360 Uh, that is one of the most ridiculous, and I certainly found it shocking decision, uh,

00:24:11.120 that I could have imagined coming out of that. All right. I wouldn't disagree with you on that.

00:24:16.320 And what is interesting is that Texas openly defied that order, said, we're going to protect the board.

00:24:22.480 And so that, that is the dangerousness when the court starts treading into uncharted territory and,

00:24:29.520 and political territory as well. For example, with Trump, their credibility

00:24:34.640 rests on people obeying what they say. They don't have an enforcement mechanism. And so,

00:24:41.600 you know, there is a concept of judicial restraint where they stay out of political, uh, fights and

00:24:48.240 things like that, which of course, their charges against the president are. It's a political battle

00:24:53.840 between the deep state and the president. Yeah. And they're,

00:24:57.040 uh, excuse me. I mean, they're, they're woefully short of staying out of the political battles.

00:25:04.400 They now have been told to go to hell by the Biden regime on affirmative action. They've been told to

00:25:09.600 go to hell on his plan to forgive student loan debt. The list goes on. It's quite a long list where

00:25:17.120 they've overstepped, uh, the Biden regime's abuse of power. Uh, and, uh, in this instance,

00:25:24.560 in Texas, thank God for Greg Abbott and the, uh, and the, his Republican government, because otherwise

00:25:31.440 this thing would be, uh, we could be on a very serious, a quick slope, uh, to, to anarchy and

00:25:39.440 chaos on that border. So let's get back to, to the issue at hand and that is Totenberg, Judge Totenberg.

00:25:48.400 Uh, she's got, it seems to me she's looking for cover because otherwise the facts are obvious and

00:25:53.440 out in front of everyone. Uh, your thoughts on what transpires? Well, first we, we, we know that

00:26:01.280 this case began actually in 2017. And so it's been before the court for over six years.

00:26:09.840 And in 2019 is when Georgia made the contract to get Dominion machines. And that just continued,

00:26:15.920 uh, under the guise of that system. And a month before the 2020 elections, Judge Totenberg,

00:26:22.960 in a very well-reasoned 150 page opinion, came out and a discredited the secretary of state's

00:26:32.080 experts and any experts by Dominion that were offered credited the plaintiffs and said, look,

00:26:37.920 it's not a question of if these machines will be used to manipulate an election. And I'm paraphrasing.

00:26:43.760 It's just a question of when. And so she came down strongly on the side that these machines are

00:26:52.320 open to manipulation. The reason why she didn't grant the injunction that is because she said it 0.57

00:26:57.680 was too close to the election. It's how the heck could that be the consideration? I mean,

00:27:05.280 they're going to be crooked. Uh, and if they're crooked, you shouldn't use them. And if, you know,

00:27:11.120 it's like the old saying, uh, you know, do you know, uh, you know, bill that the only poker game

00:27:17.920 in town is crooked. You shouldn't play. He says, yeah, but it's the only poker game. I mean,

00:27:23.120 that's where we are with this. It's that ludicrous.

00:27:25.200 Well, there is a doctrine. It's called the Purcell doctrine that arises out of a Supreme Court case

00:27:30.000 out of that out of the same name that you can't make changes in election laws too close to an

00:27:36.640 election. Now, what's too close, of course, is in the eye of the beholder. But, you know,

00:27:42.000 so 2020 happened. We've learned a lot since 2020. I mean, the past three years, we have learned

00:27:47.600 so much about the machines and other areas, whether it's mail in ballots and chain of custody and the like.

00:27:52.880 And so it's not as if the three years have been spent in vain. And part of this is educating the

00:28:00.640 public. And that's exactly what this trial did. What the court will do. I'm not sure. I mean,

00:28:07.280 it is a momentous decision. And regardless of what happens, it will be appealed that much.

00:28:15.200 I'm confident of. Yeah. And by the way, if it's appealed by either party, I don't know what

00:28:21.120 the result will be. But I do know I do know this, that it's not the people who really need to be

00:28:26.240 educated here. It is those county clerks. It is the Congress of the United States. This president,

00:28:33.680 if he had the next president, if you will. But these judges to suggest you go ahead with a crooked

00:28:40.720 election because you've got a machine that is everything that they said it wasn't. And no one can

00:28:47.280 trust the outcome. So what you know, one of the I read all the comments of folks who write in when

00:28:54.320 we're on the air or whether it's, you know, the podcast TV or social media. The reality is

00:29:04.720 one guy said it and got said this. And I think it's exactly right. What does a voting machine have to do

00:29:11.040 besides add? It's got one thing. Simply add. And why is that such a complicated deal? Why do we need

00:29:20.640 sophisticated software? The truth is you can sit there with a machine and the county clerk talking

00:29:26.160 away and make sure it all runs together. We've overcomplicated something that is really very

00:29:34.560 simple. No, I don't think that's by accident. I think transparency is being used to cover up

00:29:43.760 voting machines that are being used to manipulate elections. I think that lack of transparency and

00:29:48.720 complexity is planned. And that's that is part of the system in which they can cover up manipulation in

00:29:58.400 elections. And there are a number of plaintiffs and there really seem to be a lot of plaintiff defendants

00:30:06.320 as well, but unspoken. It seems like this is an industry wide defense. It is an industry wide concern

00:30:16.000 because right now voting machines hang on the judgment, the verdict of one federal district court

00:30:22.320 judge, Amy Totenberg. As we wrap up here, we're out of time. Which way does she rule? Best judge? 0.97

00:30:30.400 I'm not going to take that. I honestly don't know. I think you can look at what is presented.

00:30:38.560 She clearly recognizes that these machines should not be used. She has said as much. Whether she will say

00:30:47.280 that that violates the Constitution under the claims that were brought, I would hope that she 1.00

00:30:56.320 rules that they shouldn't be used. But judges have gone the other way from what I think they should do

00:31:04.480 many times in recent years. So yeah, who knows? You know, I've got a funny feeling. I haven't been in

00:31:10.880 the courtroom. We've had very good reporting from that courtroom. Amber Conner did a wonderful job for us. 0.81

00:31:21.760 I have a picture of Amy Totenberg right now, left wing as she is, liberal as she is. I don't think 1.00

00:31:28.880 she can get by that. I think it's 135 to 150 pages that she wrote in making the decision to go to trial.

00:31:35.280 It was fresh in its honesty. I think she rules against Georgia and the voting machines. That's 1.00

00:31:46.800 not me just hoping. I really think she has that much integrity. I may have to eat those words.

00:31:52.880 But I think there may be one, we know there's more than one honest judge in the federal system.

00:31:58.240 I think she certainly will be among them. I hope so.

00:32:02.080 Colonel Olson, as always, great to talk with you. Thanks for being here. We appreciate you so much.

00:32:06.960 God bless. God bless you, Lou. Thank you very much.

00:32:09.920 Thanks, everybody, for being with us today. Join us here tomorrow and watch, if you will,

00:32:15.120 Lou Dobbs tonight, each and every weeknight on Rumble, Twitter, Frank's Speech at 7 p.m. Eastern,

00:32:21.520 6 p.m. Central. Follow me on Twitter and True Social as well at Lou Dobbs.

00:32:26.720 Thank you, everybody, for being with us. God bless you, and may God bless America.

The Great America Show - February 08, 2024

TOUGH TIME FOR TRUTH

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript