The Great America Show - WHEN THE DOJ CAN GET AWAY WITH TELLING U.S. SENATORS THAT THEY WON’T COOPERATE, KEVIN EVANS ASKS WHAT WILL THEY TELL THE REST OF US？

00:00:00.000 Hello, everybody. I'm Lou Dobbs, and welcome to The Great America Show. It is great to have you with us, and as usual, we have a lot to talk about.

00:00:09.560 Let's begin with a man the corporate media fears most. You may not hear about him, but others may have heard a lot about him, but very few people know much about him.

00:00:20.620 Marxist-dim multi-billionaire George Soros. He's always been the creature behind the curtain in the American left-wing political arena.

00:00:30.640 The man media tightens themselves fear, afraid even to mention his name. But that seems to be changing.

00:00:38.800 Not that Soros is in any way less powerful. He is, in fact, more powerful. Nor has he changed his dark politics and evildoer policies.

00:00:47.600 Thanks to the extraordinary reporting of author Matt Palumbo, we have a fascinating glimpse now of the Machiavellian Soros in Palumbo's new book.

00:00:58.700 We learn more about the unprecedented, pervasive influence of Soros in American politics.

00:01:04.880 The book is entitled appropriately, The Man Behind the Curtain, Inside the Secret Network of George Soros.

00:01:11.800 You can pre-order the book on Lou Dobbs.com. That's Lou Dobbs.com.

00:01:17.820 Just go to the upper right-hand corner of the homepage and click on Great America Book List.

00:01:24.160 Lou Dobbs.com, Great America Book List.

00:01:27.760 Matt is our guest here next week, so please join us.

00:01:31.000 And George Soros is, for many, the symbol of left-wing, even Marxist ideology,

00:01:36.140 that is driving much of the Democratic Party these days and politics.

00:01:40.560 Soros has put billions of his money into soft-on-crime prosecutors, facilitating more immigration, 0.76

00:01:48.460 criminal justice reform, as they style it, and arguably, he is the architect of the Biden presidency.

00:01:55.560 We'll take up George Soros and his power with author Matt Palumbo here next week.

00:02:01.660 Please be with us. I think you'll find it fascinating.

00:02:03.980 And speaking of the Biden presidency, some legal experts and scholars are now suggesting Biden's taking of top-secret documents

00:02:13.220 as a senator, vice president, and president, and lying about how many of them he had scattered about,

00:02:20.500 and his condemnation of President Trump for his possession of documents that were actually his,

00:02:26.400 were secured by the Secret Service, and a SCIF, and which he had the authority to declassify,

00:02:33.060 all combining to make it likely there will be no further persecution of President Trump,

00:02:38.820 at least on the issues of these classified documents.

00:02:42.460 There's really no such thing as a special counsel either,

00:02:46.000 when a special counsel has to be assigned to potentially all-living vice presidents and presidents.

00:02:52.620 In fact, the National Archives just sent notices to representatives of Presidents Barack Obama,

00:03:00.340 George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Vice President Dick Cheney, Al Gore, and Dan Quayle.

00:03:07.180 No need, of course, for obvious reasons to send notices to either President Biden or former Vice President Mike Pence.

00:03:15.340 There may be a political purpose for the archivists to have sent out those notices, it seems to me.

00:03:20.620 Perhaps it's simply an effort to create the appearance that how can President Biden be prosecuted,

00:03:27.660 because they all did it.

00:03:30.380 We'll see if it works.

00:03:31.720 We'll see if there is, in fact, a crowd of offenders who emerged who served as president and vice president.

00:03:38.860 What do you think?

00:03:39.940 The archives are getting more attention than at any time before,

00:03:43.780 since the hiding, I mean the sealing, of all the JFK assassination records,

00:03:49.680 many of which are still in the archives, hidden from the prying public's eyes for almost six decades.

00:03:56.360 It's become customary for our government to scoff at the very notion of the public's right to know,

00:04:02.740 better, they say, to bury the secrets.

00:04:05.160 I believe for some time that the Justice Department and the CIA have become, well, over the ages,

00:04:11.740 burial grounds for truth.

00:04:13.620 And don't forget laptops.

00:04:15.320 Let's see.

00:04:16.380 There was the Clinton Uma Abedin laptop, or was it the Wiener laptop, or was it both?

00:04:22.920 And then there was the Seth Rich laptop.

00:04:25.700 The FBI is still trying to explain that one.

00:04:28.100 And, of course, the laptop with a name of its own, the Laptop from Hell,

00:04:34.060 which belongs, of course, to Hunter Biden.

00:04:36.200 But for some reason, he doesn't appear to want it back.

00:04:39.580 When it comes to the Bidens, the Justice Department likes its secrets.

00:04:43.720 A Colorado attorney, Kevin Evans, sued the DOJ more than a year ago

00:04:48.680 to comply with his Freedom of Information request.

00:04:51.400 He's seeking documents relating to communications, gifts, kickbacks, or payments of any kind

00:04:58.480 from Biden associates in China, Russia, and Ukraine.

00:05:03.700 That's a lot of associates.

00:05:05.540 The Department of Justice admitted there were, in particular,

00:05:09.140 400 potentially responsive documents related to Evans' FOIA request.

00:05:15.980 But DOJ needed to review them further.

00:05:18.820 That was last May.

00:05:19.840 Two months later, the DOJ sent Evans a letter

00:05:23.400 saying the DOJ would not admit or deny there were additional documents

00:05:28.400 and asserted a FOIA exemption for, guess what, for invasion of privacy.

00:05:34.900 No one wants to invade Joe and Hunter and Frank and James' privacy, do they?

00:05:40.240 So DOJ gives Kevin Evans some documents, none directly pertinent to his request,

00:05:45.860 admits they have more, 400 pages or thereabouts.

00:05:49.420 But they don't want to invade the privacy of Hunter and James Biden.

00:05:55.160 Now that is being considerate.

00:05:57.720 Our guest is attorney Kevin Evans, and great to have you with us, Kevin, here on The Great

00:06:01.660 America Show.

00:06:02.940 Your motivation to seek answers to file your FOIA goes back to 2020,

00:06:07.260 when you didn't buy what the former vice president was selling in that last presidential debate.

00:06:14.320 So the motivation was, I think it was actually in late October when the debate occurred between

00:06:22.320 Trump and Biden, where Biden disclaimed knowledge of his son's activities, disclaimed involvement in his son's activities, disclaimed any participation.

00:06:33.340 And to me, as I was in my hotel room after a long day's deposition, that struck me as a Clintonian finger wag moment.

00:06:43.280 And it didn't set well with me.

00:06:46.200 And it's that simple.

00:06:47.780 That's what prompted me to file the FOIA, serve the FOIA on the Department of Justice.

00:06:53.860 And in doing so, what was the immediate reaction of DOJ in response to you?

00:07:00.840 So DOJ initially did nothing, said nothing, responded in no way until I reached out to them in February of 2021.

00:07:12.560 This would have been about two months after, or a month and a half after the FOIA was served.

00:07:17.700 And they got right back to me, the Department of DOJ's Office of Information Policy,

00:07:23.240 and said that it would take about 10 months for them to respond to my FOIA request, simple as it was.

00:07:31.320 And there was some back and forth.

00:07:34.080 And then eventually in March of 2021, I got 87 pages from the Department of Justice, all public documents.

00:07:41.560 They were all letters between senators, congressmen, and the DOJ, and a report, a public report from one of the Senate committees.

00:07:50.720 And that led to another series of communications between myself and the Department of Justice back and forth over the next several months, leading up to the end of September of 2021,

00:08:04.640 where somebody higher up in the Office of Information Policy got involved, said they had located a handful of documents, his words, not mine,

00:08:12.260 that appeared to be responsive, and that would require six to eight weeks of consultations with other offices, direct quote,

00:08:20.520 before they could determine their response to whether they were going to produce those documents.

00:08:24.920 So, mind you, they recognized and admitted that there were documents.

00:08:28.980 They just needed to talk about them internally as to what they were going to do in terms of response to the FOIA.

00:08:36.380 Several more weeks went by, certainly more than six to eight weeks, and when I didn't hear back from them,

00:08:41.220 I sent them an email on January 28th of this year, excuse me, last year, and said that I would be filing suit if they didn't give me a specific time when they were going to produce.

00:08:54.840 They said they could not give me a time on February 1, and so I filed suit on March 1.

00:08:59.920 Well, with all of that, you know there are documents.

00:09:07.220 Has anyone from DOJ talked to you personally, i.e. by phone, communicated to you through any other medium other than email?

00:09:19.620 Well, the lawyer who's handling the case for DOJ, the assistant, who I get along with quite well, decent guy, good guy,

00:09:28.720 he communicated to me, I want to say it was in April of last year, and said that there were roughly 400 pages of documents that were, quote,

00:09:43.320 potentially responsive to my request, additional documents.

00:09:47.580 And he repeated that comment during a status conference in federal court on May 26th.

00:09:54.720 So there were 400 pages of potentially responsive documents, and they would get back to me with their position on what they were going to do with those documents by the end of June.

00:10:05.360 It was actually on July 15, when they asked for a couple of extra weeks, I gave it to them, where they got back to me with a GLOMAR response,

00:10:14.800 which basically, in a nutshell, is a response by the government when they want to say,

00:10:22.900 we neither admit nor deny the existence of documents.

00:10:25.700 Mind you, after they've already admitted that potentially responsive documents exist.

00:10:30.360 Well, that's not an unusual pattern of behavior for the Department of Justice, particularly in the area of FOIA.

00:10:44.360 But what is unusual is for them to acknowledge that they do have the documents,

00:10:50.020 and in a greater number than they initially acknowledged, went from a handful to 400 pages of records.

00:10:57.500 And now they want to somehow hide behind the GLOMAR response, which is neither, you know, affirm or deny that they have those documents.

00:11:09.420 It's preposterous.

00:11:11.500 What is the next move here?

00:11:14.520 Is there a judge who will arbitrate on this?

00:11:16.880 Maybe three, four weeks ago, I sent the AUSA a two discovery requests, one request for admissions, and one set of interrogatories.

00:11:28.800 I didn't serve them.

00:11:30.000 I said I was not serving them.

00:11:31.140 I was just giving them to them, and I wanted to talk about the position that the Department would take with respect to those discovery requests.

00:11:37.420 And his response eventually, when he got back to me, was, we will object.

00:11:41.820 We don't think discovery is appropriate in this case.

00:11:44.580 We will fight discovery.

00:11:46.560 We think we should just go right to summary judgment.

00:11:49.060 And my response was, well, wait a second.

00:11:51.580 You guys admitted that these documents exist.

00:11:53.800 My discovery requests go to the heart of what you've done with these documents.

00:11:58.740 So, for instance, certain of the interrogatories asked, have you shared these documents with anyone outside the department?

00:12:04.180 If you have, my position will be that your exemptions, and they've asserted two exemptions under FOIA, your exemptions don't apply.

00:12:12.160 They've been waived.

00:12:13.340 And then I want to know the factual basis for your assertion of these two exemptions.

00:12:18.340 And I think I'm entitled to know that.

00:12:20.860 And they disagree.

00:12:22.020 So that will be the focus of Monday's hearing before the magistrate.

00:12:26.040 You know, Kevin, I'm appreciative of the legal system and some of its capacity to set things right that are wrong.

00:12:38.220 I'm not a fan of the bureaucracy nor the judiciary when we get to this point.

00:12:43.680 Because there is nothing urgent about it in the minds of either the, and I'm being kind, in the minds, obviously, of the Department of Justice.

00:12:51.500 Because the documents they hold and which they only hold, presumably, a judge that is not ready to move this case, the idea that you would have to wait 10 months for a response, a material response to the Department of Justice, it's outrageous.

00:13:08.140 And the federal judiciary is a mess of the highest order, whether it's civil or criminal litigation.

00:13:18.260 How in the world can anyone expect this government to work when it can just basically tell a citizen that's what FOIA is for, so that an average citizen can inquire of their government?

00:13:32.080 And here they are telling you, a practicing defense attorney, that you just have to wait and you have to pretend that these absurdities and conflicting statements are somehow acceptable and we'll just move on from here.

00:13:54.440 Are you surprised that the DOJ is covering up for the Biden family because that's what this looks like it is?

00:14:00.280 Well, as someone with a fair amount of experience in FOIA, no, it doesn't surprise me.

00:14:07.080 I wish senators like Grassley and others who have spent so much time looking at the False Claims Act and key TAM statutes would pay as much attention to FOIA and how it's been abused over the years by the government agencies.

00:14:20.360 Because it really is, I think, not to mix metaphors, but it really has become a toothless vehicle.

00:14:26.700 You know, the government can basically thumb their nose at you.

00:14:29.220 The agencies can thumb their nose at you.

00:14:30.860 You're lucky to get, you know, scraps from them and they hide behind these exemptions, which really have swallowed the statute.

00:14:37.040 At what point, Kevin, do you think the American people will awaken to the reality that their government, whether it's FOIA, is telling them to go to hell?

00:14:47.460 Whether it is their use of subpoena, search and seizure or telling them to go to hell, that they will not be held accountable on any basis for their conduct or their behavior, no matter how in at least prime a face is criminal, absolutely criminal.

00:15:09.640 We're sitting there with a U.S. attorney in Delaware who's been looking at tax records and various other documents, four years of investigation, including grand jury, and he has not moved to find out what is the deal with the standing of the president's son and all of his activities, including tax evasion and the list goes on.

00:15:36.140 It is an obvious cover-up by the federal government, bureaucracy, the deep state for the Biden family, and you are the latest example of it, of what?

00:15:47.880 We're talking about two years, two years in a fight to have an honest answer to an honest question.

00:15:56.360 Well, isn't it curious that they chose Delaware, the U.S. attorney in Delaware, to investigate this?

00:16:02.380 You know, if I were Barr at the time, he would have been my last choice.

00:16:06.140 Not that I know them, not that I'm suggesting there's anything, you know, nefarious about that selection, but the optics are horrible.

00:16:15.220 And, you know, another reason you asked me before why I did this, there had started to be at the time, not many media outlets, as you remember, were reporting on this.

00:16:25.340 But eventually there started being some discussion or talk about SARS violations and tax violations, basically slaps on the wrist, right?

00:16:35.320 And so, you know, without any attempt to uncover or get to the meat of the matter, that's what the American people would have been led to believe or would be led to believe that, you know, you were just talking about minor violations here.

00:16:50.480 Yeah, it's, it is clear that there is this cover-up.

00:16:56.480 Bill Barr, a Trump-appointed attorney general, in point of fact, was part of the cover-up, we now know.

00:17:03.320 And he acknowledges it.

00:17:05.660 He doesn't acknowledge it directly, but certainly by circumstance and inference from his statements, as well as his actions.

00:17:14.600 He didn't, after claiming that he had investigated the elections of 2020, we now know there were no, no investigations whatsoever.

00:17:24.120 And by the way, that includes the one area where a U.S. attorney in Pennsylvania was denied his request to prosecute irregularities, I'll put it that way, and fraud in the 2020 election.

00:17:42.860 It, the cover-up of the DOJ is extensive, and House Republicans investigating can't, can't get banking records, the SRO, the suspicious banking records on the Biden family.

00:17:59.760 There is an iron curtain around what appears to be a criminal family at the top of our government.

00:18:06.960 Well, you know, the one thing that's interesting that struck me is interesting that from the documents that they did produce initially, the letters back and forth between, in particular, Johnson and Grassley to Barr, were the, sorry, we're not going to, we're not going to give you anything.

00:18:25.200 We're not going to respond.

00:18:26.600 We're not going to tell you whether these documents exist.

00:18:29.640 We're just not going to, we're not going to say anything.

00:18:32.000 You can write as many letters as you want, but you're not going to get a response back.

00:18:36.480 I mean, if they can do that to long-time, well-respected senators, you know, what does that say for the rest of us?

00:18:46.780 Well, precisely, and what it does say for us is that we are now the targets of our Department of Justice and FBI.

00:18:54.140 We are no longer mere citizens.

00:18:56.020 We are, because we are active and are politically active, and we are inquiring of our public officials that we are an enemy.

00:19:07.040 And they have weaponized the Department of Justice beyond question.

00:19:11.400 And it goes on and on.

00:19:14.440 What is your next step in this?

00:19:17.980 Just simply wait to be patient through the process?

00:19:22.320 I don't know what options you have.

00:19:24.460 Yeah, it's just, I mean, it's in the legal system now, so it just plays out, right?

00:19:27.580 It's, am I going to get discovery?

00:19:30.040 If I don't get discovery, the government's simply going to do what they've done in the past,

00:19:34.500 which is file a motion for summary judgment.

00:19:38.700 They'll attach an affidavit from somebody.

00:19:40.780 In the past, I've had interesting affidavits from interesting officials that, high-ranking officials and government agencies in connection with some other FOIAs,

00:19:53.520 particularly one where they tried to take advantage of a client of mine, the SEC did.

00:19:58.580 And so that's what we'll get.

00:20:00.400 We'll get a motion for summary judgment.

00:20:01.820 We'll get a conclusory affidavit just filled with, you know, conclusory assertions, no facts.

00:20:07.460 And they will suggest that that suffices.

00:20:11.020 And my experience with the courts have been, they bend over backwards to, if the government asserts an exemption, to find an exemption.

00:20:19.360 So at the end of the day, do I expect to get anything?

00:20:22.380 No.

00:20:22.940 But what I have gotten so far is, I think, quite telling.

00:20:27.440 Yeah, we know there are 400 potentially responsive documents that we're now going to neither admit nor deny exist.

00:20:33.160 What a circus.

00:20:33.940 It is a circus and absurdity on its face.

00:20:39.400 And by the way, when we were talking about these Biden documents, it's not simply the Hunter Biden tax issues,

00:20:48.340 his income that he presumably did not pay sufficient or any tax on, his dealings with foreign governments.

00:20:58.140 The University of Delaware is saying that he still has absolutely no plans to release President Biden's Senate papers that are sealed at the University of Delaware.

00:21:13.140 And that is absolutely outrageous that a public servant, I mean, all the pro, you know, the nonsense over President Trump's tax records.

00:21:23.480 Well, they finally got the tax records and people are going ho-hum.

00:21:28.140 But no one is complaining about the fact that this man, three-fourths of his, more than that, 90% of his career in public service is hidden from the American people through a contrivance at the University of Delaware,

00:21:41.680 which is a public university, which is a public university, by the way, and should be open public records, period.

00:21:49.280 What do you, and no one is saying a word.

00:21:52.320 And last of all, of course, the corporate globalist media that is, you know, up to their eyeballs in the Marxist Dems interest,

00:22:02.620 the Marxist Dems who run the Democrat Party and who are the masters of this puppet president? 0.69

00:22:09.540 Well, look, those who know me, full disclosure here, those who know me know I'm no fan of Donald Trump at all.

00:22:16.340 I didn't do this for those reasons.

00:22:19.420 I don't like him.

00:22:20.620 Let me interject.

00:22:23.220 I haven't mentioned the word Donald Trump.

00:22:25.760 No, no, I'm just saying.

00:22:26.600 No, but to be clear, I am saying this as an outraged citizen of this country who believes fundamentally in our Constitution, our values.

00:22:37.500 This is a country in which justice is supposed to both be speedy and fair.

00:22:42.460 It is neither.

00:22:44.460 Yeah, where I was going with that was, even though I'm no fan of Trump's, I think what they did with respect to the tax returns was outrageous.

00:22:51.260 And if you're going to do that, then you better be prepared to turn over the kind of records that you just suggested exist at the University of Delaware.

00:23:02.160 The hypocrisy is monumental. 0.96

00:23:06.540 The hypocrisy, the arrogance. 0.93

00:23:09.460 And by the way, I think the absolute corrupt behavior is monumental.

00:23:15.380 And we have a legal profession, and again, I want to compliment you again for trying to seek truth, which is what we're both doing here.

00:23:28.880 The public has a right to know.

00:23:30.840 That's the tradition of my craft.

00:23:32.960 I believe in the public's right to know is absolutely paramount for a democracy, for this constitutional republic to work.

00:23:42.080 And the public has been told to go to hell by their government, whether it is the Department of Justice, the FBI, the CIA, the intelligence community.

00:23:55.320 And it goes on throughout the federal bureaucracy, the deep state, the permanent bureaucracy.

00:24:00.740 And let me ask you, as an attorney, we're looking at a federal judiciary that is not responding to acts of corruption and outrageous abuse of power and allowing this machine, this machine of justice to work.

00:24:22.840 It is clogged up.

00:24:24.560 It is oxidizing.

00:24:27.340 It is absolutely broken right now, in my opinion.

00:24:30.740 Am I being too harsh?

00:24:32.960 Well, I mean, I have a lot of good friends who are judges, so I can't be careful.

00:24:38.340 You know, the judiciary as a whole, I think, does its best.

00:24:42.420 I will tell you where I think the blame lies.

00:24:45.680 I think the blame lies, and again, I'm no Trumpian, but the blame lies, the media has been totally corrupted, totally derelict.

00:24:54.520 There is no such thing as journalism these days, for the most part, because if journalists were doing their jobs and a lot of this information were brought to light, and it could be and it should be, then I think we would be in a different environment.

00:25:08.740 But I fear that without a return to fair-minded, honest, inquisitive, intellectually honest journalists, we're in trouble.

00:25:23.120 Well, let's talk about why we're in trouble.

00:25:29.080 First of all, I think there's way too much activism and way too much partisanship that is now insinuated into the legal system.

00:25:37.280 If I may respond to that part of what you're saying, when we're talking about lawfare, when we're talking about the abuse of the Justice Department, the FBI, we're also talking about the big firms that right now will not take a case named Donald Trump or attached to it in any way.

00:25:54.760 Their attorneys are not permitted to represent the disruptive figure that is Donald Trump, either as president or his post-presidency, or certainly to defend him personally against the assaults that have been mounted in our legal system.

00:26:14.640 We have a judicial system that is rampant with partisan corruption, in my judgment.

00:26:25.740 Is there too much activism, would you say, in the legal system?

00:26:29.480 Is there any way to pull that back once it has now been established?

00:26:34.900 Is there any way to stop it, to control it, to rid it?

00:26:43.300 Good question.

00:26:44.640 If there is, it's going to take a long time.

00:26:48.620 And the problem with that is, you know, when you have changes in administrations with different, drastically different judicial philosophies, then you're stuck in the stalemate.

00:26:59.620 I fear we're stuck in stalemate.

00:27:01.380 I fear we're, you know, the balance will swing a little bit here and there.

00:27:05.520 But what you see now is probably what you're going to get.

00:27:09.780 I was afraid that would be your answer, Kevin.

00:27:12.960 I don't see a solution on the horizon in any way short of.

00:27:19.380 An absolute purge of the federal government.

00:27:22.600 And to think that we're in this state is, to me, I don't think too many, I don't think certainly enough people understand that this is an existential crisis in governance.

00:27:37.440 That this government doesn't have a way to respond.

00:27:40.240 This legal system doesn't have a way to respond to known corruption, to known actors who have violated law.

00:27:50.360 We know the history of the political persecution of Donald Trump for six years.

00:27:55.480 And there is not a single person who's been held responsible by any law enforcement agency, any intelligence agency, any arm of the federal government.

00:28:07.600 It just hasn't happened.

00:28:09.180 And I don't see a way that it will.

00:28:10.820 We're watching political corruption subvert and subsume our way of life through our government.

00:28:20.460 Well, you know, that's why I said what I said before about journalists.

00:28:26.380 I think deep down in my soul, I think that's really the only way this is going to get turned around is if we, you know, Thomas Paine's of the world, Benjamin Franklin's of the world, you know, rise up and start acting like real journalists and real investigative reporters.

00:28:44.660 Until that happens, I just don't see any fix.

00:28:50.060 And to do that, they would somehow have to overthrow their masters, the corporate masters who own and control 95% of all media in this country.

00:29:03.580 Well, I thought CNN was showing some signs of perhaps soul searching revelations and decisions, but they're not going to go nearly far enough.

00:29:14.660 And, you know, no one, for instance, Lou, would put somebody like you or me on the air to investigate and dig and decipher and ask the hard questions.

00:29:25.420 I mean, they put you on the air, but they would never put somebody like me who has a background in doing this kind of thing because it just doesn't fit their political narrative.

00:29:34.360 Well, and by the way, they were kind enough to put me on the air and twice we reached a point, first at CNN, where they didn't like my criticism.

00:29:46.260 I was perfectly fine as long as I was criticizing President Bush, who, by the way, blackballed me at the White House because of my criticism.

00:29:53.300 And then at Fox, because, again, on a different level, I had different views about the body politic and the direction the country was headed and for what reasons.

00:30:08.400 So, you know, but, you know, I give both the news organizations credit for putting up with me as long as they did.

00:30:14.040 So in combination, some 40 years.

00:30:17.500 So I think that's a good run.

00:30:19.840 Now I can say to you straightforwardly that here on The Great America Show, we are independent.

00:30:26.560 We make our own decisions.

00:30:28.160 And any time you want to be on the air to talk about seeking truth and criticizing this government or perhaps even applauding this government, should it find its better nature and its stars.

00:30:45.340 We always give our guests the last word here, Kevin, on The Great America Show.

00:30:49.620 And if I could, I would like to extend the opportunity to you for your concluding thoughts here.

00:30:55.740 Well, I appreciate it.

00:30:56.540 And I guess my concluding thought is, as much as I'd like to think that we will be successful and uncover the type of information and documents that I'm seeking, no one should hold their breath.

00:31:10.560 I suspect that at the end of the day, while we should get these documents, we won't.

00:31:17.140 And, you know, it'll just be status quo, business as usual.

00:31:22.740 Well, sadder.

00:31:24.060 Those are sad words.

00:31:26.040 And they sound like the truth to me.

00:31:29.660 Kevin, we appreciate you being with us.

00:31:32.780 Thanks so much.

00:31:34.240 Sadly, again, I meant what I said about truth going to our nation's capital to die at DOJ, the CIA, other agencies as well.

00:31:42.920 Well, the Marxist Dems and the deep state operate as the usual morticians.

00:31:47.900 And there's always a role, of course, for the rhinos and neocon Republicans who want to pay their respects to truth's passing. 0.78

00:31:56.420 Solemnly, they mutter a few words over truth's grave.

00:31:59.520 And then they move on.

00:32:01.460 What a sorry mess we have permitted.

00:32:03.960 And one of the people trying to make a difference, working to keep truth alive in the news, is journalist John Solomon.

00:32:11.280 He's the founder of JustTheNews.com, editor-in-chief.

00:32:15.020 He's our guest here tomorrow, so please join us.

00:32:18.440 Till then, God bless you.

00:32:20.700 And God bless America.

00:32:22.360 God bless America.

The Great America Show - January 27, 2023

WHEN THE DOJ CAN GET AWAY WITH TELLING U.S. SENATORS THAT THEY WON’T COOPERATE, KEVIN EVANS ASKS WHAT WILL THEY TELL THE REST OF US？

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript