Joe Biden was arrested for standing on a porch with a black family during the civil rights movement in the late 60's and early 70's. Joe Biden was a member of the Democratic National Committee and served as a US Senator from Delaware from 1972 to 1987. He is now running for President of the United States in 2020.
00:17:41.580That's cheap political slappings of the day to achieve a political end state.
00:17:46.700And I think, you know, these headlines that the mainstream media, of course, is going to garble until the Supreme Court justices issue their decision,
00:17:54.660which is going to be predominantly in favor of President Trump for his presidential immunity because every president must have it.
00:18:01.780Otherwise, every president, literally every president from now until the end of time will be charged with a crime from their political opponent.
00:18:17.200This is what the presidential immunity privilege is for.
00:18:19.940And the constitutional jurors on the Supreme Court know it.
00:18:22.660Well, let's go back to your federal prosecutor days and deal with this issue.
00:18:29.580We are looking at a, to me, a seminal moment in time.
00:18:36.040Either the Supreme Court now intervenes in this political persecution by one political party against the other and its standard bearer, or we lose the constitutional republic.
00:18:50.320This is not something, as I've seen a number of legal analysts saying, you know, we can remand this back and we can issue this and that'll get a delay.
00:19:02.880They know neither law nor politics or common sense.
00:19:07.320Your sense of where this is, where we're headed here and what the inclination in your judgment will be of these justices, or at least the majority of them.
00:19:19.160This is probably the most consequential decision in U.S. history that the Supreme Court has to make.
00:19:24.860And it's been foisted upon them by political animals in D.C. who have abused the court system, federally and state court system, for political gain.
00:19:35.620There is only one stop, one place where Donald Trump can get justice and America can get constitutional law restored.
00:19:44.980And that's this decision at the Supreme Court.
00:19:47.160And it's highlighted, again, we go to the people, the government gangsters and the corrupt animals that are bringing these charges against Donald Trump.
00:19:55.440And let's go to their arguments before the Supreme Court.
00:19:58.540There are these DOJ lawyers, these career prosecutors, supposedly the most brilliant minds in America, have gone to the United States Supreme Court and said, you have to decide this case quickly because there's an election coming up.
00:20:13.760And that has never been the ethos of my department of justice where I work.
00:20:19.500That is actually not permitted by the law.
00:20:23.200There is no dictation, no mandate that we go to a federal judge and say, judge, I need this case decided by X because I got to vote.
00:20:30.040That is literally the argument that the brightest legal minds of Biden's DOJ have put forth.
00:20:47.340They just want a decision so that Donald Trump has tried this summer.
00:20:50.380They don't care about the legal ramifications for the future because they will rig the system if they are able to rig it here against Donald Trump.
00:21:01.180And so for me as a former federal prosecutor, the fact that the legal argument they're putting forward is expediency and time during a presidential election is outrageous and should shock the conscience of the Supreme Court.
00:21:13.400And they should throttle Jack Smith in the DOJ.
00:21:15.860And there is also an irony in all of this in that Jack Smith has come to the court for the court to say, oh, please, we cannot proceed with the legal test of all these ideas.
00:21:32.300We've got to have your judgment now as a as a precedent to the actual finding of fact and application of law in the district court.
00:21:47.440I think Jack Smith right now is probably thinking about that old saw.
00:21:51.420Be careful what you ask for, because now he has it.
00:21:55.540And the court, as much as they want to be reticent and reserved and retiring even, you know, for those 70 to 120, say, cases a year they do.
00:22:07.340This one has taken the this is this owns the court right now.
00:22:12.260The court will be nothing after it if they decide improperly against the Constitution and the law.
00:22:18.480And if they do not intervene in this, they will be cowards for evermore.
00:22:25.720They will have destroyed they will have destroyed the country.
00:22:28.900Look, the juror, even the radical left wing jurist on there, Ketanji Brown, Jackson and Sotomayor and Kagan.
00:22:35.200They know they know what the right decision is.
00:22:39.380They know what the constitutional decision is, but they also know what the politically expedient decision is for them in their base.
00:22:46.800And they are going to go with the latter rather than the former.
00:22:49.320They're going to violate their oath to the Constitution and come out.
00:22:52.960And the justices, as if Jack Smith's behavior wasn't shocking enough about talking about going to court fast for presidential election purposes, those justices actually ask questions to Trump's defense counsels about why shouldn't this case be tried before the election?
00:24:31.500And Cash, thanks so much for being with us.
00:24:33.180I just want to turn to let's get out of D.C. for a minute and go to Judge Cannon.
00:24:39.880And unsealing documents, you know, with alleging Jack Smith's lead prosecutor threat and Trump valet attorney, you know, kind of said, well, if you want to be in the game, you're going to have to go along with the game.
00:25:03.840Monumentally so, Lou, and I'm glad we're talking about this.
00:25:06.640Judge Cannon had the federal gumption necessary to call out Jack Smith and his lunatic DOJ co-counsels by saying, why are you hiding this information from the defendant?
00:25:18.680Why have you chosen a typical D.C. corruption cover-up scheme, redactions, and not provided this defendant with his due process constitutional rights?
00:25:27.940The Trump attorneys had to file a motion to get this unredacted.
00:25:31.280Now, let's talk about what the judge had the temerity to unredact.
00:25:34.840The entire time, the Biden administration of justice from the White House on down has said, we have nothing to do with the Trump prosecution.
00:25:42.720It's being handled entirely separately by the DOJ special counsel.
00:25:46.220We have no relationship with them whatsoever.
00:25:51.220This document singularly shreds that statement.
00:25:56.680And it's a document from the DOJ because it says when the NARA reps, the NARA chief of staff, librarians, whatever you want to call them, when they were in discussions with me, me, President Trump's representative,
00:26:09.960to obtain the documents after he left the White House, as his, President Trump's NARA representative, NARA refused to give me those documents and access to those documents.
00:26:34.380They, the chief counsel there, Gary Stern, immediately picked up the phone and called DOJ, the White House counsel's office, and said, what do you want us to do here?
00:26:43.000And the White House counsel's office and the headshed at DOJ said, essentially, don't work with them, don't provide them anything, let us intervene.
00:26:52.000Don't believe me, Lou, read the documentation and the emails that have now been exposed by Judge Cannon's brave order.
00:26:58.920All of this shows a direct quarterback engineering and architecting of the Donald Trump unconstitutional prosecution by the Biden administration, by Joe Biden, by his White House, by his DOJ.
00:27:09.460And furthermore, it shows, to me, the unconstitutional prevention of the disclosure of class, excuse me, the disclosure of declassified information that President Trump put forth at the end of his term.
00:27:22.660And now you got to ask yourself, Lou, what else have they redacted and what else have they not shown us?
00:27:30.000They, the DOJ, under Merrick Garland, are more corrupt than any Justice Department in the history of this country.
00:27:38.380The FBI, a lawless and reckless and highly partisan organization now.
00:27:47.460Christopher Wray talking about, well, we just don't want to have any sort of surveillance of those anti-Semitic, anti-America, anti-Israel protests on college campuses.
00:28:06.740They are disrupting and destabilizing the entire university system of this country.
00:28:16.140And what campuses are these riots aren't on, they will soon be visited upon them if the Marxist left have their way.
00:28:24.300So I look at this as a moment in history where the choices keep getting narrower and narrower for the John Roberts court.
00:28:33.760John Roberts has not been a man of great fortitude.
00:28:37.000He has not been historic in any way in his adherence to the principles that he has sworn to uphold, and that is the tenets of the U.S. Constitution.
00:28:48.660To me, frankly, and I admit being a partisan in all of this, I am pro-Trump through and through.
00:28:57.180The fact of the matter is, it seems to me that the Supreme Court right now has sufficient evidence in the streets of everywhere from Boston to New York to Cornell to USC, Texas.
00:29:13.800My gosh, they have enough evidence in the streets of how destabilized this country is.
00:29:22.140And it's because of an anti-Semitic, anti-America, anti-Israel administration that's trying to kill one man, Donald Trump.
00:30:03.360He's also going to use FISA and break the law and illegally surveil you if you are a Trump MAGA supporter.
00:30:11.260He did that 274,000 times last year alone.
00:30:14.640That's the Chris Wray running this FBI.
00:30:16.800Any other top cop in America would say that these riots, as you have pointed out, these violent riots across the country, across campuses, across this nation that are pro-terrorism are interconnected and funded by the likes of George Soros and company.
00:30:31.460That is a federal level investigation that the FBI should be architecting right now.
00:30:38.840But because it destroys the political narrative of the value of an America first movement, they won't do it.
00:30:45.880It is the opposite of putting MAGA on trial baselessly.
00:30:49.680We need to investigate these folks and follow the money and ask them, why are you supporting terrorism over America and our number one ally in Israel?
00:30:58.240And why are these universities who are publicly funded allowed to host these types of events?
00:31:04.800And at the core, the FBI needs to find out, because I believe it's fraudulent criminal activity to fund this type of behavior that leads to violence, who's at the back end of this?
00:31:26.300We have Chris Wray, a government gangster of the first order, who continues to break the law and illegally surveil Trump supporters and, quote unquote, domestic terrorists.
00:31:35.180Cash, I wonder if there are undercover FBI agents in these demonstrations.
00:31:41.480I wonder if they've sent anyone in to to be informants or to incite.
00:31:47.180Maybe that's what's behind all of this.
00:31:49.960And maybe that's why Chris Wray demurs.
00:31:52.300And this becomes simply a sentinel who tells us, oh, by the way, there's a cyber attack underway from mainland China against the U.S. government.
00:32:01.480We don't know what to do, but wanted to let you know.
00:32:04.900We will continue to observe the goings on.
00:32:10.580The FBI is corrupt and indolent, it seems to me.
00:32:15.320But anyway, it's as we conclude, if we may, your thoughts about where the Supreme Court comes down.
00:32:25.720I'm putting you in the business, but who better to do it?
00:32:31.880Look, I think the Supreme Court needs to come down on the side of the Constitution.
00:32:35.900That's it. And if they choose to follow that path, there is only one ruling that President Trump and every president before him and every president after him has full presidential immunity for all public acts conducted while they were president of the United States of America.
00:32:53.460What that does to any current, future or prosecution from yesteryear is irrelevant to the constitutional analysis put before the Supreme Court.
00:33:04.860And that's another thing this DOJ and Jack Smith and their corrupt thugs with Merrick Garland are going at.
00:33:09.200Oh, you're if you if you don't decide for us, this is going to happen.