The Great America Show - November 20, 2021


WILL THE GOP SURVIVE RINOS?


Episode Stats

Length

55 minutes

Words per Minute

151.20128

Word Count

8,345

Sentence Count

444

Misogynist Sentences

7

Hate Speech Sentences

5


Summary

Sean Davis, founder of the Federalist Web Magazine, Sean Davis joins us to talk about the 2020 presidential election, and why he believes there may have been significant fraud and irregularities in the vote count. Sean also talks about the recent indictments of Hillary Clinton's campaign manager John Durham and her campaign finance chief, Donna Brazile.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Great America Podcast with Lou Dobbs,
00:00:04.200 always in the fight for truth, justice, and yes, our American way of life.
00:00:09.220 And now, here he is, the Peabody award-winning voice of truth, the great Lou Dobbs.
00:00:14.720 Hello, everybody, and welcome back to the Great America Show.
00:00:18.520 Here we always keep in view what a great nation America is and what a great people we Americans are.
00:00:24.860 Our perspective, obviously, the opposite of the left-wing national media and the Marxist left
00:00:30.500 that controls the Democratic Party and insidiously permeates now our schools from kindergarten through university.
00:00:38.780 Teachers in our public schools seem more energized by indoctrination rather than education of our young people.
00:00:46.700 But we are coming to terms, aren't we, with the threats that this nation faces,
00:00:51.300 whether from the left and the Democratic Party, or from within the Republican Party
00:00:56.380 and the RINOs who further empowered the Biden administration and its socialist agenda.
00:01:03.180 It may be more than socialist, but we'll leave it at socialist for now.
00:01:07.460 Thirteen Republican members of the House, 19 senators,
00:01:10.700 supporting the multi-trillion dollar spending plan of Mr. Biden.
00:01:15.000 And Biden's buddy, Mitch McConnell, the Senate Majority Leader, hailed that bipartisan legislation.
00:01:22.220 Thanks to his RINO stewardship, Biden was able to move this nation closer to being a debtor nation in perpetuity.
00:01:29.340 There's much political confusion raging through our body politic now, and no wonder.
00:01:35.160 We have a president and vice president who together have historic low approval ratings,
00:01:39.920 who insult the intelligence of American voters almost daily,
00:01:44.800 while blaming, for example, American consumers for supply chain disruptions.
00:01:51.260 President Biden is keeping our border wide open and importing poverty and uneducated labor
00:01:57.380 by bringing in what is estimated to be 2 million illegal immigrants in Biden's first full year in office.
00:02:04.940 Yes, these times are a bit confused.
00:02:07.020 But amidst these confounding times, there are rays of transparency and some great clarity.
00:02:14.340 With his recent indictment, special counsel, John Durham, is bringing facts to life to support
00:02:20.560 what many of us have suspected for years and some of us have actually known.
00:02:25.840 The Trump dossier was a fraud, a smear job organized by the Clinton campaign,
00:02:31.220 the Democratic National Committee, a leading Democratic law firm,
00:02:34.540 and, of course, the national left-wing media, obliging at almost every turn.
00:02:40.260 Chronicling the outrages against President Donald Trump,
00:02:43.880 the Federalist Web magazine has been amongst the most prominent news organizations
00:02:47.940 covering the Russia hoax, the attempted impeachments of President Trump,
00:02:53.040 the political carnival of 2020, and the presidential election beset by fraud, irregularities,
00:02:58.540 and still unanswered questions about how the vote was counted and by whom.
00:03:04.340 The Justice Department, the FBI, other investigative law enforcement agencies
00:03:08.980 chose not to investigate, not to inquire, and simply stepped aside,
00:03:14.340 leaving open the central and still red-hot political question,
00:03:18.120 was there sufficient fraud and irregularities in the 2020 presidential election
00:03:23.860 to have altered the outcome in favor of President Biden?
00:03:29.100 Joining us now, the founder of the Federalist Web magazine, Sean Davis.
00:03:34.200 He's also a great, great American.
00:03:37.340 He's also an entrepreneur, a journalist, a graduate of Texas Tech University,
00:03:42.260 the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania.
00:03:44.440 Sean, with those credentials, we're especially delighted to have you here,
00:03:49.360 being a Texas Tech Red Raider.
00:03:52.420 Good to have you here.
00:03:53.840 Well, it's good to be here.
00:03:54.700 Thank you so much for having me.
00:03:56.420 Well, let's start with that red-hot question.
00:03:58.740 Will we ever know if there was sufficient fraud and irregularities in 2020
00:04:03.720 to have altered the outcome of a presidential election?
00:04:08.480 I actually don't think we'll ever know,
00:04:10.840 and it has to do with what I believe is the root of the problem.
00:04:15.600 So I don't, personally, I do not believe that the balance of power was changed,
00:04:21.620 that vote tallies were changed in the middle of the night,
00:04:24.340 or that voting machines were, you know, changing results and all that.
00:04:29.040 I actually think it was a lot more insidious than that.
00:04:33.320 And it mainly did with how all the rules of how we've done elections were changed,
00:04:39.020 you know, just a couple months before the election,
00:04:41.500 especially with respect to all the mail-in ballots.
00:04:44.420 So we had a system that was not really designed or prepared
00:04:48.560 to be able to handle securely all that influx of ballots.
00:04:53.460 You had, you know, in some states,
00:04:55.800 ballots being mailed to just any address they had on file.
00:04:58.600 There was reports all over of people getting, you know, six or seven ballots in their mail.
00:05:03.220 I think the moment that the Democrat Party and the Biden campaign were able to use COVID
00:05:11.000 to basically kind of sideline in-person voting
00:05:14.700 and move everything towards mail-in balloting,
00:05:16.960 where you're not really having to check an ID,
00:05:19.140 you don't know if the person who's filling out the ballot
00:05:21.260 is the person who's actually allowed to vote.
00:05:22.960 I believe that once that happened, not only had the die been cast really for what the results were going to be,
00:05:30.260 but also at that time, you kind of eliminated the ability to be able to go back in
00:05:35.060 and figure out which votes were legal, which votes weren't legal.
00:05:38.320 In some states, you had them throwing away ballot envelopes,
00:05:40.980 so you couldn't even compare the envelope with the ballot that was in there.
00:05:46.100 So I personally don't believe we will ever really know.
00:05:48.780 Maybe it was totally on the up and up.
00:05:50.360 Maybe, as the left says, it was the most safe and secure election ever.
00:05:54.060 I don't think that's the case, but I think just the nature of how the system was kind of manipulated,
00:05:59.280 we're never going to have in black and white and smoking gun
00:06:02.620 what the numbers were and what they should have been.
00:06:05.280 Yeah, I agree with you on your outlook for resolution and for answers.
00:06:12.540 And I do think the great shame of this is not that fraud was perpetrated.
00:06:17.560 It is not that irregularities occurred.
00:06:21.380 It is that, first, the Republican Party lacked the intelligence and the guts
00:06:28.460 and just simply the sense to be aware of what the Democrats were pulling off
00:06:35.660 in the year preceding that election using, as you said, COVID as a screen and a shield and a fog
00:06:44.280 in which to change election day to election months.
00:06:49.220 And the result was an election with the least oversight, I believe, of any election,
00:06:55.140 certainly in my memory and in my knowledge, ever occurring in this country.
00:07:00.260 Right. And it wasn't just kind of a Democrat versus Republican thing.
00:07:06.020 You also have to look at the role the courts played in here.
00:07:08.780 There were there were indications in Pennsylvania, for example,
00:07:12.660 where the courts just rewrote arbitrarily state law.
00:07:17.600 They rewrote things that were required in the Constitution for how elections have to be run,
00:07:22.600 namely that only the legislature can change these certain things.
00:07:25.220 And you had the courts just go in and say, yeah, we're not going to do any of that.
00:07:28.780 We just don't feel like it.
00:07:30.180 And, you know, come at us.
00:07:32.240 And then when either the Trump campaign or the party goes to the courts on the front end,
00:07:36.880 you had the court saying, well, there's no there's no injury yet.
00:07:40.080 So we don't you don't have standing.
00:07:41.560 There's no been not been an actual injury because we haven't had the election yet.
00:07:45.160 And then when they went back after the election, when they could show injury,
00:07:49.020 they said, oh, I mean, we already had the election.
00:07:50.680 So your points kind of moot it was the courts took a, you know, a tails.
00:07:56.200 They the other side wins heads.
00:07:58.540 You lose approach to it.
00:08:00.040 You even had it with the Texas case where you had Texas suing other states and the Supreme
00:08:05.480 Court, which is required by the Constitution to to adjudicate all disputes between states.
00:08:11.540 It doesn't say the Supreme Court can do it if it feels like that's the that's the original
00:08:16.640 court of jurisdiction for disputes between states.
00:08:19.220 They have to take it up.
00:08:20.220 And the Supreme Court said, no, we're not going to do it.
00:08:22.680 So it's to me, it's not just Republicans kind of being their typical feckless selves and
00:08:28.000 being outmaneuvered by them.
00:08:29.460 You had the whole system really engineered against anyone who thought anything that was happening
00:08:36.060 to Trump was maybe bad and might have really bad long term implications for the country.
00:08:40.180 And the Supreme Court had two opportunities to intercede and to, if not be an investigative
00:08:52.100 arm, but at least carry out its role as the supreme adjudicator of law and activities and
00:09:01.840 judge whether they're lawful.
00:09:03.520 It refused to do so.
00:09:05.700 It was if I think the word feckless moves now from an adjective for for Republicans to the
00:09:12.700 Supreme Court itself.
00:09:13.900 What do you think?
00:09:15.460 Oh, absolutely.
00:09:16.660 And we kind of see that time and time again with with the Roberts court in particular with
00:09:21.140 Roberts creating this idea in his head that the purpose of the court is to remain legitimate,
00:09:27.600 whatever that means, in the eyes of the public, rather than having the constitutional duty
00:09:32.700 to look at the law and the facts and do what the Constitution requires.
00:09:36.800 So what what happens there with him is what happened in the Obamacare case, where he apparently
00:09:42.760 knew how he was going to vote.
00:09:44.200 And then the left wing corporate media bullied him.
00:09:46.860 And then he ends up coming kind of on the back end with this completely tortured, incoherent,
00:09:52.980 internally inconsistent reason why Obamacare was legal.
00:09:56.940 This is a guy who said he can be he's shown that his court can be bullied into doing certain
00:10:03.620 things with certain political outcomes by the corporate left wing media.
00:10:07.240 And I think we saw that same dynamic play out in a lot of these election suits.
00:10:12.740 And I'm not talking about the ones about like Dominion or vote stealing or whatever.
00:10:16.500 I'm talking about very grave constitutional issues about who in this country is allowed to
00:10:22.180 set the rules for elections.
00:10:23.580 It ain't the courts.
00:10:24.620 It's the legislatures.
00:10:25.720 And clearly the legislatures had their authority usurped and the Supreme Court just kind of
00:10:31.900 said, yeah, whatever.
00:10:33.660 That's hugely problematic, regardless of which party it helps or hurts.
00:10:37.740 Right.
00:10:38.020 It was stunning.
00:10:39.760 But as you suggest, to be stunned by Justice Roberts' ability to torture both the law and
00:10:50.400 the facts, we should, I suppose, have been stunned.
00:10:54.420 But when you see him become subtly an advanced semanticist who can turn the word tax into a fee
00:11:04.200 and then do double backflips to get to where he wants to be in the outcome of that case, the
00:11:11.980 Obamacare case, it's just a mark on the court that will last, I guess, forever.
00:11:20.680 You know, we're talking about the GOP leadership.
00:11:24.320 It was happy to leave the questions about the 2020 elections.
00:11:28.800 And like so many others in this country, just let it all be buried in the dustbin of history.
00:11:36.260 But suddenly, a man many of us had given up on after two and a half years of investigation,
00:11:43.260 suddenly arises and special counsel John Durham is indicted not only Democratic lawyer David
00:11:52.480 Sussman, Igor Danchico, operative of the Brookings Institution, and Kevin Clinesmith.
00:12:00.000 My goodness, we now have before us a foundation for judging the facts of the origins of Russiagate,
00:12:12.040 just as John Durham was supposed to.
00:12:15.120 Were you amongst those stunned at what we've seen develop over the last days?
00:12:22.640 Yes.
00:12:23.140 So I hadn't given up on Durham yet, although I was getting to be a little despondent.
00:12:27.240 He clearly moves very deliberately and at his own pace.
00:12:31.060 What really shocked me about the Sussman indictment, now Sussman was an attorney for the Clinton
00:12:36.620 campaign in DNC, who was part of a scheme to go in and defraud the FBI about a bunch of
00:12:44.060 lies about the Trump campaign in Russia.
00:12:46.660 So the Sussman thing and then the Danchenko one, the Sussman indictment to me came out of
00:12:53.000 absolutely nowhere.
00:12:54.500 I followed every little twist and turn in this thing.
00:12:56.900 I thought I knew all the cast of characters.
00:12:59.220 Obviously, I knew that he had testified in the House and that he had some kind of role,
00:13:03.580 but he was not at all on my radar as someone who might be in legal jeopardy.
00:13:10.440 So the way that indictment was written, both for his alleged lies to the FBI and the case
00:13:17.940 that it laid out for the whole Alphabank story being a complete Clinton campaign concocted fraud
00:13:23.500 from the beginning, the detail there, I was stunned by.
00:13:27.320 And then he comes with the Igor Danchenko, the indictment.
00:13:30.820 This was the guy who is Christopher Steele, Clinton campaign subcontractor's primary subsource
00:13:35.460 and the alleged source of so many of the sensational claims, which are all fabricated in the dossier.
00:13:41.500 The specificity and the details and the facts in that indictment, including the fact that a Clinton campaign surrogate,
00:13:48.940 a former Clinton presidency appointee, a former State Department official, was one of the people feeding lies to Danchenko.
00:13:56.100 That blew me away because, again, that guy, his name is Charles Dolan, was this Clinton campaign surrogate.
00:14:01.740 He was on no one's radar, no one.
00:14:05.020 So to read that specificity and how Durham kind of told the story of the dossier, it was quite a read.
00:14:14.220 And what I find most interesting is when you look back to when that original Inspector General report came out on the FISA stuff
00:14:21.440 and what they did to Carter Page, Michael Horowitz, the DOJ IG, it said,
00:14:26.360 all this stuff was bad, but I looked into it and I still think the whole Crossfire Hurricane case was properly predicated.
00:14:33.140 And when that came out, you had both Attorney General William Barr and John Durham issue statements saying,
00:14:40.260 we do not believe that that is the case.
00:14:42.340 And so I think that's the big thing that we're still waiting from Durham.
00:14:47.000 He has already put a marker down saying, I don't think that case, even from the beginning, was properly predicated.
00:14:54.100 And I think each little indictment he's doing is putting meat on the bones of that claim.
00:15:00.200 But I'm looking forward to him telling that entire story, because once that's out,
00:15:05.640 we know that everything from the whole 2016 campaign Russian collusion thing
00:15:11.620 was a lie from beginning to end.
00:15:14.000 So I'm eager for him to continue and hopefully soon complete his work.
00:15:18.920 Well, you're reporting at the Federalist.
00:15:21.560 I highlighted something that I completely missed, and that is the reference to
00:15:26.140 Biden administration, the president's national security advisor, Jake Sullivan,
00:15:31.440 being referenced in the Durham indictment of the Clinton lawyer, Michael Sussman.
00:15:40.760 I mean, what is happening here?
00:15:46.700 How much jeopardy is he in, in your judgment?
00:15:48.980 So I, you know, two weeks ago, I would have said probably none legally, you know, legal jeopardy.
00:15:56.020 But having seen the Sussman thing and then now reading about what happened in the Dan
00:16:01.280 Shinko indictment, I don't know.
00:16:03.240 Maybe he is.
00:16:04.240 My inclination is not, because in each of these different indictments and arrests, you had
00:16:11.260 Kevin Kleinsmith, the FBI lawyer who fabricated claims in a FISA document in order to spy on
00:16:18.040 Carter Page.
00:16:18.840 You had Sussman lying to the FBI about who he was actually working for when he brought
00:16:23.780 these fake claims about AltaBank to the FBI, who's working for the Clintons.
00:16:27.500 And then Dan Shinko lying to the feds repeatedly about a whole bunch of stuff.
00:16:31.720 Each one of these allegations has to do with lies that an individual told to a federal law
00:16:38.880 enforcement, either body or agency.
00:16:41.540 I'm not aware of Jake Sullivan having walked in a bunch of nonsense to the FBI, authenticated
00:16:48.940 and said, this is all true.
00:16:50.760 Now, if he did that, I think he very much would be in legal jeopardy.
00:16:54.600 And again, I don't know what John Durham knows, and he clearly knows way more than I do.
00:16:59.060 So maybe he is in jeopardy, but my guess is probably not.
00:17:02.000 I think there had to be exposure and interaction between individuals and the FBI in order for them
00:17:08.560 to be at risk at this point.
00:17:11.140 Well, give me, give us your judgment as to how far has John Durham advanced the refutation
00:17:20.160 of the lies of the Democrats, in particular on Capitol Hill, as they went after President
00:17:30.320 Trump, two attempts at impeachment and overthrowing the president from the office.
00:17:37.320 It is now an established wide conspiracy to attack a sitting president of the United States
00:17:45.700 by a principal party of one of the two major parties in this country.
00:17:52.280 Is it not?
00:17:53.800 Absolutely.
00:17:54.440 And I actually think it's even worse than that.
00:17:56.000 I almost kind of accept that the other side in a campaign or the loser after campaign is
00:18:01.240 going to do whatever they can to screw over the person who beat him.
00:18:04.140 Um, what I find most horrific, distasteful and awful for the long-term survival of the
00:18:10.700 Republic is the FBI's role in it.
00:18:12.940 You know, specifically James Comey, uh, who held this completely fake briefing for Trump
00:18:19.580 on allegations, which they all knew were false, uh, for the purpose of leaking it in order
00:18:24.380 to legitimize a document that everyone knew was nonsense and couldn't be legitimized.
00:18:29.120 Um, so you have Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Clinesmith, that to me is absolutely horrific.
00:18:37.680 Um, but to your question, you know, what, what does this do to kind of cement the reality
00:18:42.360 of what happened?
00:18:43.140 Well, to those of us who follow the facts, it's, I mean, it's a, it's a completely damning
00:18:47.780 indictment of that entire organization.
00:18:49.260 But the problem is, you know, you don't control what most of the country hears in the news.
00:18:54.640 I certainly don't.
00:18:55.920 Um, that, that job is held by the New York times and the Washington post, uh, NBC, CBS,
00:19:02.220 MSNBC, CNN.
00:19:03.880 They're not telling the truth about what's happening.
00:19:06.200 They spent years bleeding about collusion and all these allegations.
00:19:09.380 And the second we learned that all these allegations were nonsense, they're nowhere to
00:19:13.000 be found.
00:19:13.520 So as far as, you know, the long-term public perception of what actually happened, uh, I
00:19:19.120 don't know if it's going to change or not because of the power of these corrupt media
00:19:23.540 companies have to just lie to their audience for the sole purpose of helping the Democrat
00:19:28.820 party.
00:19:29.880 I couldn't agree with you more.
00:19:31.900 And for, uh, what I call the corporate left-wing media, uh, I, I don't think most people, uh,
00:19:39.060 really appreciate the degree to which this is a, uh, a corporate enterprise, uh, whether
00:19:46.280 it's, uh, AT&T, it's ownership of CNN, uh, Comcast, it's ownership of NBC and all of
00:19:53.660 its, uh, uh, uh, ancillary, uh, networks, including in MSNBC and CNBC and the list goes
00:20:01.640 on or CBS Viacom and CBS news, Disney and ABC, uh, Jeff Bezos, the world's second richest
00:20:11.200 man, uh, ownership of the Washington post, Carlos Slim and others who have concentrated
00:20:17.360 ownership of the New York times.
00:20:19.040 This is, this is extraordinary.
00:20:22.140 This is, these are oligarchs in control of our principal news media in this country.
00:20:27.980 And people go about their days thinking blissfully, this is an independent, uh, press.
00:20:33.720 What utter nonsense, don't you think?
00:20:36.440 Absolutely.
00:20:37.160 So much of the information we're, we're fed is controlled by tech oligarchs.
00:20:41.800 Uh, and a good example is Mark Zuckerberg.
00:20:43.940 If you say things he and his little minions don't like on Facebook, they're going to ban
00:20:48.400 you.
00:20:48.660 For example, we have the Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Wisconsin.
00:20:51.060 If you tried to go and post a link to his, uh, GoFundMe to help fund his defense, and by
00:20:57.000 the way, everyone in this country is entitled to defend themselves in courts of law.
00:21:01.100 They're entitled to have attorneys and to be able to pay them.
00:21:04.500 And Facebook went and shut that down.
00:21:07.300 That, that it, to me, it's unconscionable.
00:21:08.900 And it's not like the Zuckerberg is some disinterested observer.
00:21:12.500 You had him throwing out 450 million some odd dollars, uh, during the 2020 election to
00:21:18.620 privatize election offices in key States and counties, uh, throughout the country.
00:21:24.160 You had his people going in to various election bureaus, finding ballots that they thought
00:21:29.720 would be for Democrats and might have some problems with them and going and curing them
00:21:34.200 and leaving alone all the ballots that they thought might go to Republicans alone to be
00:21:38.220 disqualified.
00:21:38.960 So you have these oligarchs buying up control of our election offices, uh, controlling the
00:21:44.520 information that we see.
00:21:46.120 It's, it's a recipe for disaster.
00:21:48.060 And it's certainly not the country I grew up in.
00:21:50.600 And I know it's not the country you grew up in.
00:21:52.240 I remember on the playground when I was growing up and you'd get in arguments and fights and
00:21:56.660 kids would say, if someone got mad at him, well, I can say whatever I want.
00:21:59.740 It's a free country.
00:22:00.980 I don't feel like it's the same country anymore.
00:22:03.700 Well, and I'm sure you and I also, uh, suffer, uh, have suffered the consequences of, uh, trying
00:22:12.120 to speak the truth as often as we, uh, uh, felt, uh, obliged or, uh, are responsible.
00:22:19.060 Uh, the fact is, you know, I've gotten used to, uh, to consequences when I speak truth.
00:22:25.400 I don't think most of the country, uh, has.
00:22:28.220 And the, the fact of the matter is, uh, there's a, there's a little ray of sunshine over at
00:22:35.680 the Washington post.
00:22:36.520 I want to close, uh, in this conversation.
00:22:39.300 Uh, and that's Eric Wimple, uh, the, uh, Wimple, uh, the Washington post media critic
00:22:45.740 actually suggesting that those who use the dossier in this business, the journalists, uh,
00:22:53.400 fine folks from the mother Jones, MSNBC, you know, Rachel Maddow, the McClatchy newspapers.
00:23:00.400 Did I mention CNN?
00:23:01.680 Uh, it, it, it's really stunning that he acknowledged the problems created for those, uh, papers and
00:23:10.860 news outlets, including the Washington post.
00:23:13.260 Uh, I give him great credit because he says they have a lot of, uh, I will paraphrase.
00:23:20.380 They've got a lot to account for your, your reaction.
00:23:24.220 Absolutely.
00:23:24.860 I mean, these, these are institutions and individuals who received Pulitzer prizes, the
00:23:29.540 highest award in all of journalism, uh, for their reporting on Russian collusion.
00:23:33.760 And it turns out the reporting was all nonsense.
00:23:36.420 It was all lies.
00:23:37.820 Everything they reported were lies fed to them, uh, by partisan operatives, either in the government
00:23:43.240 or on campaigns.
00:23:44.420 Uh, it tells me that the spirit of Walter Durante, uh, is alive and well, if these people, if these
00:23:50.680 institutions had any shame, any sense of ethics or self-respect, they would return those Pulitzers
00:23:57.040 immediately and they would burn every single source that fed them lies for years and years
00:24:02.740 and years.
00:24:03.120 And it's telling to me that not a single one of them has done that.
00:24:06.640 And, uh, I'll even go farther if I may.
00:24:10.460 They, they should be launching huge investigative teams right now to dig in to, uh, Russiagate
00:24:18.920 the origins of the Russia collusion hoax, uh, and renew their efforts to, to satisfy the
00:24:27.460 public's right to know and to correct, correct the history, at least the last five years of
00:24:32.600 history.
00:24:33.340 Uh, I think that's really their obligation here.
00:24:36.200 Don't you?
00:24:37.280 Absolutely.
00:24:37.620 And then they'll never do it because they're not actually journalistic organizations.
00:24:41.100 They're Democrats, super PACs with bylines, broadcast licenses.
00:24:45.080 And Sean Davis, co-founder of a terrific, terrific, uh, web magazine called the Federalist.
00:24:53.300 And it, uh, it's worthy of the title, its content and its energy and, uh, all that it does to,
00:25:00.360 uh, uh, honor the public's right to know.
00:25:03.880 Sean, thanks for being with us.
00:25:05.400 Enjoy the conversation.
00:25:06.500 Hope you'll come back soon.
00:25:08.280 Oh, it was an honor.
00:25:09.060 Thank you, sir.
00:25:09.880 Thank you, Sean Davis.
00:25:11.700 We will continue in just one moment.
00:25:14.100 Stay with us for more of the great America show.
00:25:17.600 America is, and always will be great.
00:25:20.320 If you and I have anything to say about it, but under the Biden administration, we, well,
00:25:26.020 we've got a little less freedom to say anything at all.
00:25:28.920 At certain times, it's clear that President Biden and Vice President Harris are on a course toward
00:25:34.620 outright disaster.
00:25:36.040 They're authoritarian by nature and training and would prefer to rule by edict or fiat issuing
00:25:42.940 mandate after mandate, executive order after executive order without, of course, justification
00:25:49.360 or explanation to the American people.
00:25:52.060 Their legislative agenda is simply a catastrophe for many Americans.
00:25:57.840 Biden has now signed $3 trillion of spending into law.
00:26:02.060 And of course, no one knows what's precisely in that spending legislation, but we do know
00:26:07.100 that it will significantly add to our already $30 trillion national debt.
00:26:13.160 Biden and Harris have put this country on track to be a debtor nation forever.
00:26:18.500 However, Biden administration's withdrawal from Afghanistan is simply an outrage.
00:26:23.920 It's an insult for everything the country stands for.
00:26:27.380 His inability to speak coherently or find his way into or out of a room without assistance
00:26:33.600 is embarrassing enough.
00:26:36.040 But after the climate meeting fiasco, he's become a global laughingstock, appearing to fall
00:26:41.380 asleep in the midst of those meetings he had told all of us were so important.
00:26:46.220 And then it was passing wind, apparently in the presence of the royal family.
00:26:53.400 Kamala could hardly speak of anything else, we have been told.
00:26:57.920 As Mr. Biden would say, come on, man, give us all a break.
00:27:02.380 And certainly not that kind of break.
00:27:05.260 The ineptitude and rank ideological fanaticism of the Biden administration is, of course, ignored
00:27:11.700 by nearly all of the left-wing media, but not the American people.
00:27:16.660 The most recent USA Today poll shows Biden's approval rating has plummeted to 38 percent.
00:27:23.600 And he's been in office not even a year.
00:27:25.760 And the American people are quite obviously fed up with his antics and inadequacies.
00:27:31.880 And as bad as his poll numbers are, his vice president's numbers are even worse.
00:27:36.840 Vice President Harris's approval rating in the same USA Today poll plunged to, are you ready,
00:27:43.540 28 percent, a historic low for any vice president in the modern era.
00:27:49.740 She was the least popular Democratic presidential candidate back in 2020.
00:27:54.520 And now she's even more unpopular than her unpopular boss.
00:27:59.280 We don't have to ask why those numbers have plunged.
00:28:01.940 It's evident.
00:28:02.800 They seem committed to destroying the nation with their feverish advocacy of Marxist radicalism
00:28:08.880 and the outright lies that flow constantly from the Biden White House.
00:28:14.220 They don't like to talk much to the news media, not even the left-wing news media.
00:28:19.400 But fortunately, they can't hide from all of us.
00:28:21.980 And amongst those investigating the Biden administration, their open border policies,
00:28:26.660 their open arms to human smugglers that will result in 2 million illegal immigrants entering
00:28:32.900 the United States this year.
00:28:34.880 And of course, investigations into the Russia collusion hoax.
00:28:39.400 The organization Judicial Watch is prominent among those organizations committed to discovering
00:28:45.560 truth and revealing the facts.
00:28:48.080 Judicial Watch is led by its president, Tom Fitton.
00:28:51.820 He's a conservative activist.
00:28:53.360 And Tom, it's great to have you with us here and to talk once again.
00:28:58.500 Let's talk first those numbers.
00:29:00.640 President Biden at 38 percent and Kamala Harris at 28 percent.
00:29:09.580 Extraordinary.
00:29:11.080 It is.
00:29:11.980 And those numbers are, despite having all of the big media in his back pocket, Lou,
00:29:18.300 first of all, it's good to be back with you again.
00:29:21.160 Great to have you here.
00:29:21.860 Yeah, and I was glad to hear your opening statement, which was pithy and honest as always.
00:29:29.320 You know, he's come in as one of the weakest presidents in recent memory in the sense that
00:29:33.740 you have half of the country question his election.
00:29:38.600 He's barely controlling Congress.
00:29:41.000 As you highlight, he's got all these cognitive challenges.
00:29:43.860 And he's got all these personal corruption issues.
00:29:48.200 What he's governing is if he's Ronald Reagan in his second term.
00:29:52.320 And he doesn't have the mandate for that.
00:29:54.940 And so rather than kind of going for big majorities in terms of policies, he's taking this hard
00:30:02.800 turn to the left and the American people don't like it.
00:30:06.820 A hard turn to the left, and it certainly couldn't be much more left wing than pushing critical race theory,
00:30:17.640 driving restorative justice and psychoeducation, as Judicial Watch pointed out in Montgomery County schools.
00:30:25.300 It's stunning what they are up to, what the Democratic Party is up to, what the Marxist left is insisting on
00:30:34.760 and insinuating into schools, into government, into education.
00:30:40.700 It really is.
00:30:43.160 I mean, you know, taking it one step back, you've got Biden also having to manage the kind of the corrupt
00:30:48.320 corporatist wing of the Democratic Party, which is bipartisan in nature, as you know, Lou,
00:30:54.180 and the rising communist wing.
00:30:55.920 And to that end, you've got this fanaticism behind this repackaged Marxism known as critical race theory,
00:31:05.020 infecting all of our schools.
00:31:06.620 The real pandemic schoolchildren we should be worrying about in terms of schoolchildren is critical race theory.
00:31:13.000 And, you know, call it whatever you will, critical theory, critical race theory, climate justice.
00:31:19.000 Every left wing narrative is essentially has Marx behind it.
00:31:26.060 And they're lying because we're getting the documents showing that it is they're pursuing this fundamentally racist,
00:31:34.800 anti-American attitude.
00:31:36.580 I mean, in Montgomery County, you're pointing out in Maryland, one of the I'm still shaking my head at this one.
00:31:42.980 Montgomery County is the biggest school district in Maryland, for those of you not in the area.
00:31:47.440 And they've got this recommendation that teachers should be pushing anti-racist baby, right, by Abram Kendi,
00:31:55.480 one of the big promoters of critical race theory.
00:31:57.740 And they said it's great for babies to toddlers, to three-year-olds.
00:32:03.860 So they're pushing CRT on our babies, Lou.
00:32:08.060 Forget about adults.
00:32:09.380 It's bad enough for targeting children.
00:32:11.000 Now they're going after toddlers.
00:32:13.440 So, you know, this fanaticism, and as you pointed out, the totalitarianism of this movement knows no bounds
00:32:22.160 because, you know, it's in the word, totalitarian, it's total.
00:32:27.020 And it's global.
00:32:30.300 Your investigation into Fauci and the relationship with the CCP in China
00:32:36.860 and the public health agencies there that are the analogs to our own,
00:32:42.860 whether it be the CDC, the NIH, or virology labs like the one in Wuhan,
00:32:48.840 there is obviously a great deal of communication, a great deal of networking and concerted efforts
00:32:59.180 in the placement of Chinese officials and international health organizations, including WHO.
00:33:06.920 Tell us about that and what you've learned.
00:33:10.800 Well, you know, let's go back to the beginning.
00:33:12.920 WHO is an international organization, like most international transnational organizations.
00:33:18.800 They're controlled by the bad guys, and in this case, China.
00:33:23.240 So one of the first things that happened after it became known, that this China virus,
00:33:28.640 was WHO started collaborating with all the various countries, including China,
00:33:34.300 and they issued a press release on it, we found, on the international response to COVID.
00:33:40.360 And the release, it was noted in the documents, went out of its way to praise China.
00:33:47.280 And who signed off on that? Fauci.
00:33:50.700 And then later, as they're investigating China, China starts requiring, it looks like in the documents,
00:33:58.440 additional confidentiality terms for our government officials, Fauci's deputy, to go and investigate China.
00:34:05.880 Of course, they signed off on it.
00:34:07.200 And then when you look further back, you see this collaboration with China.
00:34:12.980 It's just like, it's jaw-dropping in the breadth and scope and length of how far back it's been going
00:34:21.820 in terms of the Chinese research agencies and research entities working with government money,
00:34:29.700 our government money, to do all sorts of biologic research, including, it's now confirmed,
00:34:36.920 thanks to pressure from Judicial Watch litigation, gate of function research.
00:34:41.860 And, I mean, when you see documents, I didn't know, did you know, Lou, that Fauci's agency had a person in Beijing
00:34:49.880 who was charged with monitoring what was going on there, including visiting Wuhan often.
00:34:57.900 And they were very nervous about what was going on in Wuhan.
00:35:00.660 And it's incredible.
00:35:01.520 They've got a spy operation running against Wuhan while giving them money at the same time.
00:35:06.720 Only, you know, Fauci's got a lot to answer for, I tell you.
00:35:10.220 But he's been brought to account, certainly.
00:35:14.960 He just straightforwardly and bald-facedly lied to Senate committees, in particular, Senator Rand Paul,
00:35:24.620 who challenged him straightforwardly and directly on the relationship between Fauci and the Chinese,
00:35:32.940 the NIH, the CDC, and those public health agencies in China, and the virology labs in Wuhan and around China itself.
00:35:44.540 Interesting in the material that, all of it's interesting, but it just drew my eye.
00:35:51.760 The reference in your FOIA on HHS regarding Fauci on the contracts there,
00:35:59.600 that they helped raise, quote, raise China's voice of governance
00:36:05.260 by placing representatives from China on important international councils
00:36:10.260 as high-level commitment from China, end quote.
00:36:13.700 It seems like a blathering rationalization suggesting that China was giving something up
00:36:20.260 in order for its officials, Chinese officials, to be placed on the World Health Organization,
00:36:27.840 whatever the agency might be.
00:36:30.060 Oh, well, you're kind of getting, there's a key detail that I think you may be missing,
00:36:36.600 is that this is the Gates Foundation helping China.
00:36:39.560 So we've got our people there talking with the Gates Foundation in China
00:36:43.360 about how the Gates Foundation is advocating for China on these,
00:36:47.720 as you point out, WHO and organizations like that.
00:36:50.840 I don't know what else you would describe as being international agencies
00:36:54.840 other than something like WHO.
00:36:57.340 So you've got Gates people, the foundation, according to this government document,
00:37:03.600 as I said, Fauci's woman in China was reporting back on her meeting with the Gates Foundation,
00:37:09.620 describing their efforts to lift China up.
00:37:13.000 It's extraordinary.
00:37:14.420 I didn't know about that.
00:37:15.820 Did you?
00:37:16.380 You always have it in your head.
00:37:17.940 They're always working with bad guys abroad.
00:37:20.440 But when they're admitting to government officials,
00:37:22.900 hey, we're actually advocating for Chinese government officials internationally.
00:37:28.720 It's like, whoa.
00:37:30.560 And of course, the big media doesn't want to cover this.
00:37:33.120 You know, they've been protecting Fauci.
00:37:37.520 And it goes back in the Trump administration.
00:37:40.700 Obviously, it's even worse during the Biden administration because Fauci is now seen as an avatar for Biden.
00:37:47.800 They're going to protect him no matter what.
00:37:50.400 Absolutely.
00:37:50.660 And to me, what is striking is that the Chinese have demanded that representation on WHO with the express complicity,
00:38:03.000 I would say assistance, but it's complicity from our public health agencies,
00:38:08.220 including Fauci, the NIH, the CDC, and the list goes on,
00:38:13.680 to the United Nations and placing the top officials of the WHO are all Chinese or Chinese-sponsored representatives of their policies.
00:38:27.280 It's really staggering.
00:38:29.220 And no one wants to report on this except for Judicial Watch and a handful of other folks.
00:38:36.020 Well, it's pretty clear that any biologic research the Chinese were doing was hand in glove with Fauci's agency.
00:38:45.880 I mean, when you look at the documents we've uncovered going back years and years,
00:38:50.740 you have to wonder what the Chinese were doing that didn't have government funding from U.S. taxpayers.
00:38:56.300 And when you look at the nature of this sort of biologic research,
00:39:01.860 I don't know if I'm using a technical term, but it's someone I can pronounce, which is biologic.
00:39:06.020 But you've got to wonder, you know, who's fooling whom here in the sense that is this defense-related work?
00:39:15.380 Is this biological warfare-related work?
00:39:20.300 It would seem to me you don't want to providing expertise in this area to our adversaries,
00:39:28.880 but that's what they were doing.
00:39:30.300 And, you know, as we've seen more recently, there's no doubt it was gate of function.
00:39:37.180 Yeah.
00:39:37.800 And striking is that in the midst of all of this, during the Trump administration, of course,
00:39:44.340 nothing was bolder or brighter or more animated than the Hillary Clinton-inspired Russia collusion
00:39:52.420 conspiracy with the deep state, with the law enforcement agencies, federal law enforcement agencies driving.
00:40:01.300 So here's, on one hand, you have the deep state represented by the public health agencies and Dr. Fauci,
00:40:10.360 working with the communist Chinese, but at the same time,
00:40:14.240 doing everything they can to smear a sitting president with charges of collusion that were utterly baseless charges of collusion with Russia.
00:40:26.540 It's a breathtaking irony and dichotomy, don't you think?
00:40:30.780 Yeah, I mean, you know, you had, and on top of that, you had Biden's personal relationship with China through Hunter,
00:40:41.960 where Hunter went on a trip to China on the vice president's plane at the time and engaged in business dealings that by the accounts of Hunter's laptop
00:40:54.160 and other independent witnesses benefited Joe Biden directly and personally.
00:41:01.760 So, you know, and, you know, when you look at it, it's pretty clear that everything they were accusing Trump of doing,
00:41:07.340 they were doing, but so much worse.
00:41:09.940 Having compromised business relationships with foreign countries, using the powers of government to,
00:41:16.400 and using the powers of government to advance those interests.
00:41:19.280 You know, the irony with Trump, I mean, with Obama, the Obama administration,
00:41:25.000 I mean, just look at how many countries they work with just to go after Trump.
00:41:28.300 You had the Australians, you had the UK, you had Ukraine, you had Russia.
00:41:37.120 And, of course, you had all of the intelligence agencies in the United States all going after Trump.
00:41:43.860 It's really incredible.
00:41:44.940 I'm glad to see Durham finally getting off his duff and doing something.
00:41:50.020 Boy, has he done something.
00:41:51.560 I mean, he's delivered two charges here.
00:41:54.040 But, boy, are they important, implicating the Democrat law firm.
00:42:00.840 And a Brookings Institution hack, if I can put it that way, who was a foundation for the farcical dossier,
00:42:16.480 a fraudulent effort created by the Hillary Clinton campaign and maneuvered through to the Justice
00:42:25.800 Department itself and the FBI by the friends of Hillary, if not Bill.
00:42:33.300 Yeah, the latest Durham indictment, you know, as alleged, confirms that the author of the dossier,
00:42:40.600 the key salacious falsehoods against Trump, is a liar.
00:42:45.940 He made it up.
00:42:47.100 He took a factoid, would add facts to it.
00:42:51.200 Like, for instance, Trump visited the Moscow Hotel, he learned.
00:42:54.480 And what did he do?
00:42:55.760 He added all the salacious sex allegations.
00:42:59.000 He pretended that every rumor and allegation he heard was fact.
00:43:02.700 He changed it all up.
00:43:04.580 And all of that ended up in these FISA warrants.
00:43:08.960 And so what I think is interesting here is that we've got, as you point out, the Trump,
00:43:13.440 the Clinton law firm, one of the two top lawyers, the guy who wrote the dossier for Christopher
00:43:19.420 Steele, who was on the payroll of the Clinton campaign.
00:43:22.520 So you've got the Clinton campaign really dead to rights here.
00:43:26.940 And the question is, how high up will Durham go?
00:43:29.620 But the next big step, it seems to me, is what is Durham going to do about the other side
00:43:34.620 of the legionary?
00:43:36.140 Which who, and if I'm the defense attorneys for Sussman and Don Jenko, I'd be like, well,
00:43:43.160 you know, how could we lie to our co-conspirators?
00:43:45.180 They all knew what we were up to, that we were lying on them.
00:43:48.960 They were lying on us.
00:43:49.860 And we all liked it because we were helping Hillary and going after Trump.
00:43:54.200 And so the question is, is Durham going to go after the FBI and DOJ for engaging with
00:43:58.900 these folks and pushing this, knowing it was a big, it was a smear and a falsity.
00:44:04.080 Yeah, we know, we understand clearly the connections within the FBI and the Justice Department and
00:44:13.440 the upper echelons of the Democratic apparatus in Washington, D.C.
00:44:17.800 They were working hand in glove to do the bidding of Hillary Clinton's campaign.
00:44:25.700 And we've known it for five years now.
00:44:30.480 Five, 2016, let's make it four years.
00:44:33.740 Yeah.
00:44:33.920 We know that they were framing the national security advisor of an elected president.
00:44:42.260 Right.
00:44:43.160 You know, in his first month in office, for crying out loud.
00:44:46.500 Uh, this is, it's, it's, it's breathtaking that we're still having this discussion on one
00:44:51.420 hand, uh, that it's necessary, but on the other, it is an, it's an extraordinary gift
00:44:59.280 that Durham has delivered, which is a reopening of, uh, these issues that the left has tried to
00:45:07.800 bury and to cover up and to just move on from, uh, now open because of that, uh, that indictment
00:45:16.080 and all that has unfolded around it, uh, we're, we're able to talk about a president who was
00:45:22.760 impeached not once, but twice who went through an almost two year special counsel investigation,
00:45:28.620 all because of the Hillary Clinton campaign and it's fraudulent, uh, efforts to overthrow
00:45:35.320 a president, uh, in concert with the deep state and the democratic party.
00:45:40.580 I mean, that's where we are now.
00:45:42.260 Is it not?
00:45:44.140 It is.
00:45:45.180 And unfortunately the Republicans gave up on the corruption issue, um, after Joe Biden came in.
00:45:51.080 Is there anything they haven't given up on just if, because I, I've missed it.
00:45:55.340 If there's anything that they have not given up on.
00:45:59.980 Well, they're, they're riding the CRT wave, whether it'll be substantive, um, work.
00:46:05.540 There is an open question, uh, but, uh, you know, Republicans win despite themselves.
00:46:11.760 I should say Republican leaders win despite themselves because, you know, in my view, the
00:46:16.620 Republican leadership has zero interest in these issues.
00:46:19.180 And that's one of the reasons we're talking about it five years from that five years after
00:46:23.120 the information should have been released.
00:46:25.400 I mean, we couldn't even get the Republican house and Senate to honestly investigate the
00:46:34.980 misconduct of, in theory, they're the, the opposite party, even if, even when Trump was
00:46:43.500 running the white house and the administration, that's how awful it was.
00:46:47.620 Well, and let's get credit where credits do.
00:46:50.320 Uh, one of the reasons there were so many problems in the early days of the, uh, Trump
00:46:55.820 white house is because the former head of the Republican national committee rights previous
00:47:00.460 was his chief of staff representing the establishment of the Republican party.
00:47:05.420 And if by extension, a good margin of that membership would be never Trumpers.
00:47:11.460 And currently the Ronna McDaniel, who is the head of the RNC, who assured everybody that
00:47:19.120 she had 2 million people in the field and that had everything under control and was
00:47:24.140 rolled, uh, you know, like a, uh, a boy scout at a, uh, you know, a boxing camp.
00:47:31.140 It was just, I mean, it's pitiful what we've witnessed.
00:47:34.640 And as you point out on CRT, what did it take for Ronna McDaniel and the RNC to take up
00:47:40.660 the issue?
00:47:41.660 It took Virginia and Youngkin victory there because school boards and parents decided
00:47:50.600 the hell with this.
00:47:52.360 We're not going to put up with it anymore.
00:47:54.380 With Terry McAuliffe representing the Marxist left saying, you know, parents really don't
00:47:59.840 have any place telling schools what they want their, their children to be taught.
00:48:04.480 I mean, it's outrageous trying to turn our heritage upside down in public education.
00:48:11.020 You know, and what I like about the Virginia story, um, is that that CRT issue was organic.
00:48:20.420 It was the people took the lead and politicians either, you know, got with the program in the
00:48:27.800 case of Youngkin or they were rolled over in the case of McAuliffe.
00:48:31.800 And it wasn't because of brilliant Republican strategy.
00:48:34.660 It was the parents.
00:48:36.600 They, they were outraged and, uh, there was a wave as a result.
00:48:41.180 So a lot of this, as I say, is, you know, are, are we going to have leaders that reflect
00:48:46.300 the, you know, kind of taking the bigger picture here?
00:48:49.240 And I'm going to advise politicians and vote parties because I'm concerned, you know, I'm
00:48:53.080 concerned that the communists are ruining a major political party.
00:48:57.500 I mean, it's in our interest to make sure the Democrats are just regular liberals as
00:49:00.820 opposed to communists.
00:49:01.780 We don't want that in a Republic is that, you know, do we have leaders in the political
00:49:06.240 class that reflect the will of the people or are they going to be antagonistic?
00:49:11.160 And, uh, you know, and I think to the degree they're able to reflect and, and in good faith,
00:49:17.240 uh, promote their views, uh, they'll do well.
00:49:20.400 And if they're seen on the wrong side, they get shellacked as we saw in Virginia.
00:49:26.240 Well, when you say you're, I don't know how much comfort I take from what I'm inferring
00:49:33.340 you're saying, which is you're worried about the democratic party turning into a bunch of
00:49:37.700 communists.
00:49:38.540 Uh, I, I, I'm more worried about the democratic party that is already led by Marxist leftists
00:49:45.260 and are absolutely antithetical in every part of their ideology, their philosophy, their
00:49:52.760 operating mechanisms as a political party and structure.
00:49:56.680 Uh, I, I, I'm trying to destroy America.
00:50:01.240 This is, this is not an abstraction.
00:50:04.160 I agree.
00:50:05.400 Are trying to rest control of school boards and, uh, from, and, and public education from
00:50:12.360 the hands of the parents and the people they elect to run local schools and education,
00:50:19.620 uh, it's, it's bald face, uh, a, a, a counter and, uh, a counter attack, uh, within, uh, the
00:50:30.560 education system.
00:50:31.800 I agree.
00:50:32.700 It's a revolutionary period we're in and, you know, when they see for the communists, they
00:50:37.780 don't see a repudiation, uh, last week, whether it be in New York or Virginia or Pennsylvania
00:50:44.020 or anywhere else, New Jersey, they see it as, uh, you know, when they, when elections
00:50:48.640 like that happen, they see it as confirmation that America needs, the system needs to be
00:50:53.200 overturned because the people aren't allowed to have a voice.
00:50:56.340 We can't have that.
00:50:57.280 That's their point of view.
00:50:58.700 Yeah.
00:50:58.740 We can't have objective testing because that they say that is racist, uh, and unfair,
00:51:05.040 which is, you know, pure balderdash, but people haven't got the guts to say directly
00:51:10.500 that this is nonsense and that it's got to stop.
00:51:14.900 I mean, I love some of the language that was tortured in the last few days.
00:51:19.300 Barack Obama says Donald Trump's nationalism failed the world on climate change.
00:51:26.660 Yeah.
00:51:27.840 Kind of moronic nonsense is that his nationalism it's populism.
00:51:33.060 And that populism means that the people will have power and demonstrate, uh, that power
00:51:38.820 just as they did in Virginia and almost in New Jersey, AOC comes out with more rhetorical
00:51:45.380 nonsense and semantic, uh, uh, gymnastics.
00:51:48.620 She says Republicans using woke the expression woke as quote derogatory euphemism for civil rights.
00:51:57.560 These people are utterly mad.
00:51:59.960 They're putting, they're putting out nonsense and spewing what is nothing more than, uh,
00:52:06.440 you know, asinine gibberish trying to take away accountability, uh, from them, from themselves.
00:52:15.320 Well, to outsiders, it looks crazy too, but if you're a communist, it makes perfect sense.
00:52:20.040 For instance, when they say, you know, the new Lieutenant governor, Ms. Sears in Virginia,
00:52:26.300 who's, um, African-American conservative, you know, they imply she's a white supremacist.
00:52:32.300 Now we laugh at that and rightly so.
00:52:35.320 I don't laugh at it, to be honest with you, Tom, but I think it's pure propaganda.
00:52:38.700 It's an insult to her and everybody who voted for her and her, her service to the country
00:52:43.780 already.
00:52:44.300 Well, I, I, I agree.
00:52:46.280 And my point is that they're being perfect.
00:52:49.260 That is internally consistent for the communist approach.
00:52:53.520 We don't understand how they can call a black person a white supremacist, but for the communists,
00:52:58.900 they believe unless you're with the program, you're the enemy.
00:53:03.320 Well, you know what?
00:53:04.860 They're right.
00:53:05.960 And, uh, by the way, they're making lots of enemies.
00:53:09.040 They're called the American people and they see in real terms, in vivid terms, what they
00:53:16.360 just tried to do with our school system.
00:53:18.420 And now the veil is gone.
00:53:21.960 The scales have dropped from our eyes and we know exactly what the left is trying to do.
00:53:27.080 They can't recover from this.
00:53:28.520 And if the Republican party led by Ronald McDaniel doesn't have, and Mitch McConnell, of course,
00:53:33.860 Mitch McConnell, who is cheering the bipartisan spending legislation, the infrastructure bill,
00:53:39.560 like some sort of, I mean, his fraudulence is overwhelming, frankly, but the Republican
00:53:45.540 party either finds new leadership or it dies.
00:53:48.880 I mean, I really believe that, but you get the last word here today, Tom.
00:53:52.620 Well, you know, all we can do is what we can do.
00:53:55.520 And, you know, this is, this is my critique of my allies in the house and the Senate, our
00:54:01.780 friends in the media.
00:54:02.840 It's like, are you doing everything you can do to save the Republic against, against this
00:54:07.520 rising communism?
00:54:08.460 And, you know, Lord knows judicial watch is doing what we can do and trying to do more.
00:54:13.600 Uh, but I tell you, this is a significant threat, uh, to our Republic.
00:54:18.340 Our Republic is tottering.
00:54:19.600 We didn't even get to the, to the border crisis.
00:54:22.360 Uh, but, uh, we need the leadership to step up.
00:54:25.280 And if the leadership won't step up, we need new leadership.
00:54:27.680 That's for sure.
00:54:29.680 Well said, Tom.
00:54:30.780 And, uh, as to the issues we didn't get to today, I hope you'll be back with us soon
00:54:35.560 and often, uh, here on the, uh, the great America show.
00:54:39.500 Uh, this podcast is dedicated to those issues you hold dearest as well.
00:54:43.880 Uh, so I hope you'll be back soon.
00:54:45.720 It's great talking with you and I wish you all the best, my friend.
00:54:48.620 Thank you, Tom Fitton.
00:54:50.520 Thank you very much.
00:54:51.320 Thanks for all you do and your leadership of judicial watch, the important work your organization,
00:54:58.640 uh, has accomplished for the country.
00:55:01.940 Join us again tomorrow for the great America podcast.
00:55:04.840 Stay in the fight.
00:55:06.040 Truth, justice, and the American way will prevail against all enemies, against all odds.