The Joe Rogan Experience - March 08, 2012


Joe Rogan Experience #192 - Sam Harris


Episode Stats

Length

2 hours and 49 minutes

Words per Minute

159.50343

Word Count

27,089

Sentence Count

1,748

Misogynist Sentences

18


Summary

In this episode, Sam Harris joins me to talk about jiu-jitsu, debate, and his new book, The Joe Rogan Experience: A Jiu-Jitsu Journey. We talk about how he got started in jiu jitsu, how he started his YouTube channel, and what it's like being a martial artist and a podcaster at the same time. We also talk about why he thinks jiujitsu is a better martial arts than boxing, and how he thinks debate is better than it really is. And, of course, we talk about his book, which is out now. If you haven't read it yet, you should definitely do so. It's a great read, and it's a must-listen, especially if you're a martial arts fan like me. You won't want to miss this one! I'm sure you'll agree that it's worth the price of admission if you've ever watched one of Sam's videos, or watched a bunch of them. I mean, who doesn't like debate, right? It's one of the most fun things I've ever done, and one of my favorite things to do in general, and I think it's probably the most intellectually challenging thing I've done to date. Thanks to Sam for coming on the pod, and for taking the time to talk to me about it. I hope you enjoy it. -Joe Rogan -Jon Sorrentino and Sam Harris (and the rest of the crew at The JuiJiuJitsu Experience Podcast and the book he wrote about it, "Training by Day by Day: A Journey by Night by Night, a Book by Day, a Podcast by Night All Day by Night" by Sam Harris, and much more. (The Juijitsu Journey: A Book About Jiu Jitsu, a Journey by Sam's Journey, a Guide to the JiuJitsu Revolution, a Journalist's Journey by the Jiujitsu Experience, and a lot more! ) --Jon and Sam discuss the importance of debate and the value of debate in the martial arts world, and why it's more fun than it's work, not less important than it actually being fun, and the most important thing than it gets you to think about what you should be doing than you're doing it in real life. --The importance of a good time, not more than that.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 *meow* is that it?
00:00:09.000 Yeah.
00:00:09.000 Did you start?
00:00:10.000 Did you launch?
00:00:10.000 Yeah, that was the meow.
00:00:11.000 Guess what?
00:00:12.000 No sponsors.
00:00:14.000 Just fucking cue the music.
00:00:15.000 Can I give you a dollar at least?
00:00:16.000 Yes.
00:00:17.000 Give me a book.
00:00:17.000 Alright, cool.
00:00:18.000 Hit it.
00:00:19.000 The Joe Rogan experience train by day Joe Rogan podcast by night all day Yeah, we have music It's ridiculous, but it makes me feel like something's actually happening.
00:00:33.000 Sam Harris, ladies and gentlemen.
00:00:34.000 Thanks for joining me, man.
00:00:35.000 This is really cool.
00:00:36.000 It's an excellent opportunity.
00:00:37.000 The internets are abuzz.
00:00:39.000 I've gotten more response for this as far as questions for you than, I think, any guests we've ever had.
00:00:45.000 Oh, great.
00:00:45.000 Well, I'm very happy to be here.
00:00:47.000 I'm happy you're here too, man.
00:00:48.000 I've watched a lot of your videos online.
00:00:49.000 I've enjoyed every one of them.
00:00:51.000 And I liken some of those debates that you get into with those old Gracie in Action videos.
00:00:56.000 Have you ever seen those old Gracie in Action videos?
00:00:59.000 I'm not entirely sure, though.
00:01:00.000 I know the ones you're talking about.
00:01:01.000 I've seen a lot of Gracie material.
00:01:03.000 Yeah.
00:01:03.000 Well, the Gracie in Action videos were really the first videos that Horry and Gracie...
00:01:06.000 Horry and Gracie, who's Hitlio's son, you know, Hoyce's brother, is a brilliant businessman.
00:01:12.000 And he realized that all he needed to do was put together a series of real-life encounters.
00:01:18.000 Between a trained jiu-jitsu practitioner and some guy who thinks he knows how to fight, he's sure he knows how to fight.
00:01:24.000 And then he just gets mangled every time.
00:01:26.000 Every single fight.
00:01:27.000 This wasn't the Gracie Challenge at all?
00:01:29.000 Well, they've got a bunch of them.
00:01:30.000 There's Gracie in Action 1 and 2. It's basically just compilations of home videos that they have.
00:01:37.000 Of really, for martial artists, really brilliant stuff to watch.
00:01:41.000 Because, you know, until the Gracies came along, nobody really knew that there was one guy out there that could just sort of manhandle people like that and just strangle them and choke them.
00:01:49.000 That there was one martial art that was so superior when it came to a grappling situation that you would watch those and you'd almost feel bad for the guy getting strangled, but not really.
00:01:57.000 That's how I feel when I watch a lot of your debates.
00:02:00.000 It was.
00:02:01.000 That's very high praise.
00:02:02.000 I can tell you it's not as satisfying in the debate format as it is on the mat.
00:02:06.000 Oh, I'm sure.
00:02:07.000 Because no one ever taps.
00:02:09.000 Exactly.
00:02:09.000 It's like you're fighting an army of zombies that they've lost, but they can't be forced to admit that they've lost.
00:02:16.000 It must be a very bizarre thing for you, because as far as people who have spent hours and hours debating publicly, debating the merits of the idea of religion, you might be top ten on YouTube of all the different information that's available.
00:02:32.000 Have you ever seen anybody in all these different debates you've been in where you knock something into their head and you see a light go off?
00:02:38.000 Like, holy shit.
00:02:39.000 What if you're right?
00:02:41.000 Do you ever get that?
00:02:42.000 It's hard to see in real time.
00:02:45.000 People are pretty good about not having epiphanies in real time in front of you.
00:02:50.000 You can see people get uncomfortable and you can see them want to make a lateral move to a new subject.
00:02:56.000 One of the great strategies or one of the less noble but effective strategies of debate is to If you've lost a point, you don't concede it.
00:03:07.000 You just kind of move on to something else and hope no one notices.
00:03:11.000 And in a formal debate format, there's often no mechanism for your opponent to score that as conquered ground because you can't address each other in real time.
00:03:24.000 So it's like I talk for 10 minutes.
00:03:26.000 Someone else talks for 10 minutes.
00:03:28.000 The moderator doesn't necessarily interrupt us.
00:03:31.000 And the two discussants can't actually address one another.
00:03:35.000 Formal debates are actually, ironically, the worst format to actually prove who's right because it's like fighting someone.
00:03:46.000 You're separated.
00:03:48.000 It's like boxing.
00:03:50.000 You get a clinch and the ref separates you.
00:03:53.000 And so you can't really test every tool in that context.
00:04:01.000 So you can just kind of talk past each other and not address the thing that was brought up ten minutes ago and it never really gets scored.
00:04:08.000 So it's amazingly unsatisfying even when you feel like you have said exactly what you should have said.
00:04:17.000 Because they just won't buy it.
00:04:19.000 It's just like fighting with fog.
00:04:22.000 No one ever falls down.
00:04:25.000 Occasionally you score a blow that you know The audience has noticed.
00:04:30.000 But even then, the audience is partitioned into your side and the other side.
00:04:36.000 It's amazing how invulnerable people's prejudices and biases are to argument.
00:04:43.000 It also becomes a team.
00:04:45.000 It becomes something that defines you.
00:04:48.000 A lot of people are defined by their ideas, especially when it comes to their religion or their politics.
00:04:54.000 They're defined by them to the point where they act within certain parameters because they think that's what you're supposed to do if you're on this team.
00:05:02.000 People like that.
00:05:03.000 It's a weird, creepy desire that we have to become part of a team and defend that team.
00:05:09.000 And I think that happens when it gets into religious arguments.
00:05:13.000 It's like you're not just Attacking an idea that someone planted in their head.
00:05:18.000 You're attacking how they define themselves.
00:05:21.000 Yeah, yeah.
00:05:22.000 It is.
00:05:22.000 It's people's extended identity.
00:05:25.000 Yeah, I'm a Windows user.
00:05:26.000 Yeah, yeah.
00:05:27.000 It's like, I'm a Christian.
00:05:28.000 I'm a Catholic.
00:05:29.000 And it really becomes a big part of how they view.
00:05:33.000 And if you want to take that away from them, it's like, you know...
00:05:37.000 Yeah, so you can see that when you're having the discussion, it's especially obvious in a debate format because basically nobody has any hope that either side is going to change their mind in the context of the debate.
00:05:51.000 I mean, they've come there to represent their views, and they've got so much invested in doing that as well as they can that even if their mind was changed, they're not going to admit it.
00:06:01.000 So it's not really an honest discussion.
00:06:03.000 When you are having an honest discussion, let's say one-on-one with somebody of deep conviction about faith, you can see the emotional hijacking of the conversation on their side very quickly.
00:06:17.000 It's basically like debating whether their wife is attractive or something.
00:06:21.000 It goes to something at the core.
00:06:24.000 And it's no longer about the ideas or evidence.
00:06:27.000 And so it's one skill, which admittedly I don't have such a firm grasp on, but one skill to acquire just as a person is to figure out how to have these conversations where you're being as rational and intellectually honest as possible, but you're actually making the right jujitsu moves around people's emotional response.
00:06:52.000 Well, you do it with comedy.
00:06:55.000 Well, yeah, that's what's brilliant about comedy.
00:06:57.000 You do it with comedy.
00:06:58.000 I've seen you do it.
00:07:00.000 You compared Elvis being alive and knowing that Elvis is alive, feeling that he's alive.
00:07:06.000 It was really very funny how you did it.
00:07:08.000 It was the perfect way to do it because you did it very politely.
00:07:12.000 There was no name-calling.
00:07:13.000 You didn't get all shouty.
00:07:15.000 Yeah, but that is what is brilliant about pure comedy.
00:07:19.000 Because if you make someone laugh at themself or at the idea that they would otherwise defend, that actually is a visible sign that you have made contact.
00:07:33.000 And you don't get that when you're playing it totally straight.
00:07:37.000 And so comedy is very powerful.
00:07:39.000 Yeah, and also, obviously, you're restricted in the language that you can use in these things.
00:07:44.000 Right, right.
00:07:45.000 It is a fascinating sort of exchange.
00:07:50.000 It's fascinating to watch the psychological wheels spin, you know, when people really get behind an idea, whether it's religion or whatever the fuck it is, when they really get behind it to the point where, you know, they're not budging at all.
00:08:04.000 They're not thinking at all.
00:08:05.000 They're attached and married to it.
00:08:06.000 Yeah.
00:08:07.000 It's very dangerous, right?
00:08:08.000 I mean, isn't it?
00:08:09.000 Well, yeah, insofar as someone really believes something and the beliefs have any point of contact with behavior and the rest of physical reality, I think it's the most consequential thing.
00:08:22.000 I think what people believe is that is the The lever that moves most things in our world.
00:08:30.000 It's politics.
00:08:31.000 It's public policy.
00:08:32.000 It's the laws we write and the laws we choose to truly defend.
00:08:37.000 They're all just ideas that have a certain number of subscribers.
00:08:42.000 Is it possible that religion in its form is useful for some people because they're just, whether it's psychologically, they need some scaffolding, whether it's, you know, to use it as a tool, not to use it to control anyone, but to use it as like a personal growth tool.
00:09:03.000 Do you ever look at it like that?
00:09:05.000 Well, insofar as it can be taken Out of the belief space.
00:09:13.000 There's the doctrinal belief-based part of religion, which is where people are making claims about reality on bad evidence.
00:09:21.000 That's just a problem.
00:09:22.000 So far as you're pretending to be certain about something you shouldn't be certain about, And then teaching your kids to do that, that's just a problem for our conversation with one another as human beings.
00:09:33.000 There's all this other stuff that people are attached to that isn't inherently problematic.
00:09:38.000 So they like the music.
00:09:39.000 They like the buildings.
00:09:40.000 They like the style.
00:09:42.000 They like the artwork.
00:09:46.000 They like to think about certain historic figures who they have this sort of emotional bonding with.
00:09:51.000 They love the stories about Jesus in the New Testament.
00:09:56.000 All of that is—some of that could be intrinsically good.
00:10:00.000 I mean, if you get the right—you get beautiful buildings and beautiful music and a reason to come together and holidays.
00:10:05.000 So I think we actually want something very much like that in secular culture.
00:10:10.000 And we, I think, are suffering from— The fact that we don't have an obvious alternative, a secular, reasonable alternative to that, that we can just point religious people to and say, you know, how come you're not doing that?
00:10:24.000 You know, this has everything you want without the bullshit.
00:10:26.000 That's very important.
00:10:27.000 And, you know, if someone tried to form some sort of a secular group like that, it would quickly devolve into being a cult, most likely.
00:10:34.000 Yeah, depending on...
00:10:36.000 It would become someone trying to fuck everybody's wife.
00:10:39.000 Well, that comes when someone's at the top who has the eternal wisdom and is imparting it to you, and part of that process of dispensation is to fuck your wife.
00:10:52.000 There's actually a story I think I had told in an end note of the end of faith.
00:10:58.000 I knew some guys who brought out a guru from India.
00:11:02.000 Who they just thought was just the, quite literally, the messiah.
00:11:06.000 He was a kind of naked yogi.
00:11:07.000 I mean, yogi who just wore this little speedo, like a speedo, yeah.
00:11:14.000 And long jetta, you know, long dreadlocks.
00:11:17.000 And he was kind of this gorgeous 25-year-old Indian sadhu who was silent.
00:11:22.000 So he would never speak.
00:11:23.000 So the only wisdom is very kind of low-bandwidth teaching.
00:11:26.000 The only wisdom you're going to get from him is What he could write out on an 8x10 chalkboard.
00:11:32.000 So he'd write these gnomic little sentences in response to your questions.
00:11:37.000 And he was a really good drummer.
00:11:39.000 So he would lead these kirtans, these devotional chanting sessions where he would drum and people would get quite out of their minds and happy.
00:11:49.000 So they were just worshipping this guy.
00:11:51.000 They brought him out.
00:11:53.000 And at a certain point, he...
00:11:57.000 I don't know how he must have communicated this on his chalkboard.
00:11:59.000 He said he needed to start sleeping with the various, you know, as luck would have it, the most beautiful wives of his devotees.
00:12:09.000 And so he was doing that.
00:12:11.000 But the breaking point came when the one guy who was his host, whose wife was sleeping with him...
00:12:20.000 The sadhu wanted to eat Haagen-Dazs vanilla ice cream with cashews for breakfast.
00:12:26.000 Someone gave him Haagen-Dazs and it blew his mind and so he needed this for breakfast.
00:12:33.000 This guy was walking through the Ralph's freezer aisle in the morning getting a resupply of vanilla ice cream and that was the moment.
00:12:43.000 That was the final straw where he realized, okay, this guy is We're just this guy's tool, and they just sent him back to India.
00:12:52.000 You know, he's like, put the ice cream back on the shelf.
00:12:53.000 That's hilarious.
00:12:54.000 That would be the tipping point.
00:12:56.000 After fucking everybody's wife.
00:12:57.000 It wasn't the wife, it was the Haagen-Dazs.
00:12:59.000 That's ridiculous.
00:13:01.000 So what, did the Haagen-Dazs just represent something so silly that it couldn't be argued?
00:13:05.000 It was just too obviously carnal.
00:13:07.000 You know, like there's no tantra.
00:13:09.000 You might be doing tantra with my wife, but you're not doing tantra with the Haagen-Dazs for breakfast.
00:13:13.000 It's obviously carnal.
00:13:14.000 Ice cream being carnal, that's very funny.
00:13:17.000 Yeah, man.
00:13:17.000 I mean, I think it's just the primate instinct when any man is in any position where he's got ultimate power over a group of people.
00:13:24.000 That's a terrible idea.
00:13:25.000 Yeah.
00:13:26.000 That's why everybody's afraid of what's going on right now in terms of government and new laws that are being passed every day.
00:13:32.000 It gets kind of spooky.
00:13:34.000 How much control do you really need over people?
00:13:37.000 I understand that we're in trouble sometimes.
00:13:40.000 I understand that we're at war.
00:13:42.000 How much control does the government really deserve over people?
00:13:46.000 Do we really need to be in the situation we're in right now?
00:13:52.000 Well, for the most part, I'm kind of a libertarian on this subject.
00:13:57.000 I get a lot of flack from libertarians based on the 5% where I depart from classic libertarianism.
00:14:06.000 Like national defense authorization?
00:14:08.000 Well, I just think the principle is that Peaceful, honest people have the right to be left alone.
00:14:15.000 If you're not harming other people and you're not stealing from them, and you're honoring your contracts, we can define what all that means.
00:14:25.000 But if you are not infringing on other people's happiness, then you should have the right to be left alone.
00:14:31.000 And what that means is we as a society shouldn't want The police to kick in the door of a peaceful, honest person to stop him from doing whatever it is he's doing.
00:14:43.000 Smoking pot or whatever victimless crime is currently illegal.
00:14:48.000 And if you draw the line there, I think you get a very sane Response or a very sane idea of the limits of state power.
00:14:58.000 It's all about mitigating harm and keeping people safe.
00:15:06.000 There's a trade-off between freedom and risk.
00:15:12.000 There's a tension between, let's say, the right to privacy and finding actual terrorists.
00:15:22.000 You know, so it's like if we wanted to maximize, we're going to find everyone who's a terrorist, well then we would just, there'd be no such thing as privacy, and the government could read all our email and look in our windows, etc.
00:15:33.000 So there's a tension there, and we have to keep finding the sweet spot.
00:15:39.000 But it's a tension that everyone should recognize.
00:15:42.000 So do you think that these new laws that are being passed, like the NDAA, do you think that that's, the idea is that as the population increases, as Is crime going to keep up or pick up to a point where they're going to need something like this?
00:15:56.000 When you think of someone being able to detain people without warrants and not even have to inform their family, that could be an American citizen.
00:16:05.000 At what point in time would that be effective?
00:16:07.000 Yeah, I don't see—and again, this is not really my area to have a very strong opinion, so I would be open to any counterargument on this, but I've never seen the wisdom or necessity of infringing on our existing laws to fight the war on terror.
00:16:28.000 So the idea that the people at Guantanamo—I understand that different things apply— On a battlefield and in a crime-fighting scenario in the States.
00:16:40.000 But why people don't have the right to counsel or the right to see the evidence against them, it seems like if they're guilty, they'll let the truth shine on the data.
00:16:54.000 Well, what always hurt is that growing up, there was always a problem with Russia and there was always this idea that we could go to war with Russia.
00:17:02.000 But there was a really strong belief amongst people that we were the good guys.
00:17:07.000 That we did all good guy stuff only.
00:17:10.000 You know, that America was making sure the rest of the world didn't start speaking German or Japanese or any crazy...
00:17:16.000 It doesn't feel like that anymore.
00:17:19.000 Now it seems like as the age of information has gotten us to this 2012 date, like where we're at right now, it's so easy to get information.
00:17:28.000 People are just so much more cynical about their intentions.
00:17:30.000 So if you see laws like this, what's the motivation to crack down more on civil liberties?
00:17:36.000 Is it just to make it easier for them?
00:17:38.000 Is it to create bigger government?
00:17:41.000 What is the motivation for that?
00:17:44.000 Well, it is fear and some perception of the necessity of taking the friction out of the system, the system that would keep us safe or respond to an attack or detect an attack.
00:17:58.000 And it's understandable.
00:18:00.000 When you think about what the president's daily briefing must look like, it's got to be absolutely terrifying.
00:18:08.000 The reality of the prospect of nuclear terrorism, once you actually just put those goggles on and say, yes, nuclear nonproliferation is more or less a lost cause.
00:18:23.000 I mean, the technology is spreading, the material is spreading.
00:18:27.000 You've got 30,000 out-of-work scientists in the former Soviet Union who are not taken care of, who have every economic incentive to not be entirely ethical.
00:18:40.000 So if you feel, as many people do, that it's just a matter of time, A nuke in some form gets into the hands of terrorists, and we have a massively porous border.
00:18:53.000 The joke is if you want to get nukes into the U.S., you just hide it in a bale of marijuana.
00:18:58.000 We can't fight the war on drugs, so the idea that we can keep everything out is pretty much a pipe dream.
00:19:08.000 When you start thinking about the idea of a nuke going off in a major American city, and forget about the loss of life, just what would that do to the world economy?
00:19:17.000 It's easy to see how the paranoia ramps up.
00:19:20.000 These are obviously hard calls to make for anyone.
00:19:27.000 Just imagine the day after an act of terrorism, orders of magnitude bigger than September 11th.
00:19:36.000 To have to talk about the reasons why we didn't do all these things that we could have done to keep us safe.
00:19:43.000 I share your concerns about infringing on civil liberties, but it's just...
00:19:50.000 The way you look at it, it's scarier on the other side.
00:19:55.000 The threat is scarier.
00:19:56.000 I think the threat of nuclear terrorism is quite real.
00:20:02.000 And anyone who thinks that it's not, or that's just fear-mongering, I just think it's not reading the books or papers of experts whose job it is to actually worry about this.
00:20:17.000 It's just not a...
00:20:22.000 It's a real problem.
00:20:26.000 The question is, in the face of that, what do you do?
00:20:30.000 I'm as annoyed as...
00:20:32.000 The thing you don't do is force everyone to take their shoes off in airports until the end of time.
00:20:38.000 We're so inefficient in how we filter.
00:20:46.000 Yeah, I mean, it's a big problem.
00:20:49.000 It's a problem, actually, I don't know that much about.
00:20:51.000 I mean, my file on what we should do is pretty thin, but it's pretty clear that, you know, every time I'm in an airport and I see some old Norwegian lady who obviously is not a terrorist submitting to the same search as somebody who looks like Osama bin Laden, it seems like a misallocation of attentional resources.
00:21:14.000 Yeah.
00:21:15.000 Yeah, it seems ridiculous.
00:21:16.000 Yeah.
00:21:17.000 It's just...
00:21:18.000 The idea behind it...
00:21:19.000 And you know what else freaks me out is all the fucking radiation.
00:21:22.000 How much radiation are those big body scanners?
00:21:25.000 Is that something to be concerned about?
00:21:26.000 I don't know.
00:21:28.000 But I would be concerned that the manufacturers are not entirely candid about...
00:21:35.000 Or even cognizant of the health effects of them.
00:21:38.000 So I don't know.
00:21:39.000 I mean, I haven't seen the data on them.
00:21:42.000 But yeah, you want to minimize the amount of x-rays you get.
00:21:45.000 But every time you go on a plane, you're getting dosed.
00:21:48.000 So it's not...
00:21:49.000 I don't know how it compares to the actual plane flight.
00:21:52.000 How much time of your day do you think about nuclear terrorism?
00:21:54.000 Because if I was as convinced as you are...
00:21:56.000 No, it's not even every day.
00:21:58.000 I put it out of my mind like anyone else.
00:22:00.000 Well, no, it's just...
00:22:01.000 It's...
00:22:06.000 The truth is, I believe, if you ask me rationally how big a risk do I think it is, I think it's a big risk.
00:22:14.000 It's not a 1 in 100 risk.
00:22:15.000 I think it's...
00:22:17.000 50-50?
00:22:18.000 Well, that's what experts like Graham Allison think in this next decade.
00:22:24.000 He wrote his book about...
00:22:26.000 Five years ago, but he thought the next 10 or 20 year period, the chance of a nuke going off in a major American city was like 50-50.
00:22:35.000 Not 1 in 100. And no one really criticized him for that.
00:22:41.000 A panel of experts, I think, came up with 30%, right?
00:22:47.000 But again, you're not hearing the people say, no, it's one in a thousand.
00:22:52.000 Yeah, 30% is terrifying.
00:22:53.000 That's terrifying.
00:22:54.000 And yet, I don't feel that I have...
00:22:57.000 I don't really live with that piece of software humming on the hard drive very much.
00:23:03.000 I haven't integrated that into my sense of daily risk.
00:23:07.000 So it's not entirely...
00:23:10.000 I haven't responded entirely rationally to that information.
00:23:14.000 Well, with all the different books that you've written about religion and all the different debates that you've gotten into with people about it, I mean, you can't have a rosy view of how this is gonna turn out.
00:23:25.000 Do you think it's possible that the human race can pull out of this crazy dilemma we're in right now and move to the next level?
00:23:32.000 The truth is I actually don't think in terms of optimism and pessimism very much.
00:23:39.000 I think by default I'm slightly pessimistic, but you've got to live life.
00:23:49.000 We all are just trying to find our way toward the high points of of well-being and I think I think culture can change quickly.
00:24:05.000 It's easy to deny how risky our situation is, and I think that we shouldn't do that.
00:24:14.000 But it's also easy to overlook how quickly we can get our act together.
00:24:18.000 And so when you look at just how...
00:24:20.000 I mean, the example for me is the change in views of race in the United States.
00:24:26.000 When you roll back the clock, Even 70 years, the level of racism in this country was just unrecognizable.
00:24:35.000 It's not that racism isn't still a problem, but people were being lynched.
00:24:42.000 Senators would come out and get their photo taken in front of the dangling body.
00:24:46.000 It was just insanity.
00:24:49.000 It's amazing when you think of how little time has passed since then and now.
00:24:53.000 That is a very good point.
00:24:55.000 Racism probably is the one thing that we've made the biggest amount of progress.
00:24:59.000 As far as culturally, yeah.
00:25:01.000 And it's undeniable progress.
00:25:03.000 And it's progress of a sort that It's very hard to picture what would cause us to sort of roll that back.
00:25:11.000 I mean, it feels like those are gains, kind of just gains in terms of...
00:25:16.000 Understanding.
00:25:16.000 Yeah, that we can't lose.
00:25:18.000 I don't think we've fully felt the impact of the internet on culture either, because the first couple generations who grew up exclusively with full access to information like that, they haven't really reached adulthood yet.
00:25:29.000 Yeah.
00:25:29.000 And once these kids that grew up With the internet their entire life and constantly having access to new ideas that aren't, you know, not regional people that they have to talk to, people in their neighborhood, people in their state, but instead being able to talk to people all over the world and get, watch a lot of your shit online, watch a lot of different lectures online.
00:25:48.000 I mean, that kind of, there was nothing like that when we were kids.
00:25:51.000 The impact of that generation, I think that's going to be pretty substantial.
00:25:55.000 When the kids now, I think that's going to be the next big leap of cultural evolution, the internet kids, when they become adults and start running shit.
00:26:03.000 I think it's just the attitude online, it does not mirror the attitude that's expressed in laws and the ideas that people have about our society.
00:26:16.000 I'm a little worried.
00:26:17.000 I think it can go either way there.
00:26:21.000 I think the Internet enables two very different antagonistic processes.
00:26:26.000 On the one hand, it allows you to Cancel bad ideas very quickly.
00:26:36.000 It's very hard to lie about yourself or about anything given access to information.
00:26:40.000 So that's very good and it connects people and people can see how other people live and so all of that breaks down barriers between people.
00:26:50.000 It also amplifies certain voices in a way that never would have happened before, and they're just terrible voices.
00:26:57.000 So, for instance, global jihad, the phenomenon of exporting al-Qaeda-style Islam to the rest of the world more or less without friction, It's entirely an internet phenomenon.
00:27:08.000 It's very hard to see that happening the way it has in the last 10 years without the internet.
00:27:16.000 Any crazy person with his crazy idea can create a little subculture on the internet and you have this walled garden where People can just talk endlessly in a very self-confirming way, whether it's certain conspiracy theories or just racist subgroups, whatever, and that you just get in there and you never get out.
00:27:41.000 And you find enough people who are echoing back your bad ideas that you And the other problem is you never meet these people.
00:27:51.000 And then also the role of anonymity online, I think, is pretty destructive.
00:27:57.000 I mean, if you've ever read a YouTube comment thread, which I'm sure you have, it's just the most poisonous lunacy.
00:28:02.000 It's amazing.
00:28:03.000 Yeah, it's amazing.
00:28:04.000 If you ran into people like that in real life, you'd want to have a sword.
00:28:08.000 You'd want to just be hacking through them everywhere you went.
00:28:11.000 Yeah, I see your point.
00:28:15.000 The anonymity makes a big difference.
00:28:18.000 Having a lack of any sort of repercussions for shitty behavior, that's not natural for humans.
00:28:25.000 It's not natural for humans to be able to affect each other with ideas, without social cues, without feeling the emotions of someone whose feelings you're hurting.
00:28:33.000 To be able to do it like this is just so cunty, is what it is.
00:28:37.000 And it's not even just internet comment threads or even anonymity.
00:28:41.000 I find it with email.
00:28:44.000 This is now trivial to point out, but everyone has sent the email that they shouldn't have sent.
00:28:53.000 Watch this, even a very good relationship, unravel based on the fact that you're not being modulated by facial cues when you're dropping these bombs on your friend or your brother or whatever.
00:29:06.000 It escalates.
00:29:08.000 On the other hand, it's a good way to tell someone they're fucking up.
00:29:11.000 To get all the information in one place.
00:29:14.000 Be in a room with them and have them argue with you about it.
00:29:18.000 In that sense, right?
00:29:21.000 Yeah.
00:29:22.000 So, when you look at the possibility of nuclear terrorism, and you're a fairly young guy, and you look at all this This insanity and chaos in the world.
00:29:36.000 What way do you think is going to be the way out of this?
00:29:39.000 Is it a technological solution?
00:29:41.000 What's going to elevate people or make people's ideas evolve to the point where they realize that, you know, this idea is completely ridiculous.
00:29:49.000 Nuclear war is absolutely ridiculous.
00:29:51.000 It can't even be on the table.
00:29:52.000 It can't be an option for anyone in the world.
00:29:54.000 What's going to get us to that?
00:29:57.000 That's a big question.
00:29:59.000 I think one piece of it is, so actually this connects back with something you said, this idea that we are the good guys and that our enemies aren't.
00:30:12.000 There's not actually moral parity between the two sides in these conflicts.
00:30:17.000 I think that's still true.
00:30:19.000 You know, Guantanamo Bay can make it as bad as you want it.
00:30:22.000 It's still true that we're the good guys in this particular conflict.
00:30:26.000 And now, I wish we were better than we are.
00:30:30.000 And there's obviously some bad guys on our side in any given moment.
00:30:33.000 But I think the one thing we have to get past is this The kind of moral relativism that you tend to hear from the left, and I'm very much on the left in almost every respect, but this disempowering idea that we...
00:30:56.000 So, for instance, to talk about nuclear bombs, what gives us the right to have nuclear bombs?
00:31:03.000 If we are going to have them, Iran should have them.
00:31:06.000 We have no argument to keep Iran nuclear-free if we keep bombs ourselves.
00:31:11.000 Well, We're very different from Iran at this moment.
00:31:15.000 We're not, you know, our president doesn't get in front of the microphone and say that he's going to wipe out, turn a country into a lake of fire.
00:31:22.000 And he's not waiting for the messiah to come back and rapture everybody.
00:31:27.000 Now if we had a sufficiently crazy president, well then all of a sudden we would have a similar liability.
00:31:38.000 We're not prone to use nuclear bombs in a flagrantly crazy, apocalyptic way.
00:31:46.000 And from everything Iran says, they certainly seem capable of being just as crazy as we could fear.
00:31:54.000 And so that's a difference that we have to just acknowledge.
00:31:59.000 And so it matters who gets the bombs.
00:32:01.000 And if people who are quite zealous to die People who are literally happy to set off the bomb in their laps just for the pleasure of setting it off.
00:32:15.000 That's a very different kind of mind to be engaged with.
00:32:20.000 And it raises the stakes.
00:32:22.000 These people are not rational.
00:32:24.000 I'm not saying the entire Muslim world fits this description, but there are people who are not rational actors based on their ideology.
00:32:30.000 I mean, they want to get to paradise.
00:32:32.000 They think you win if you blow the place up at the right moment.
00:32:37.000 And the moment you take on board that certain people actually believe that, then you have to play a different game with respect to the risk they pose.
00:32:46.000 So what we should do, I think we need to, one, acknowledge that there are very different There are moments of tension in this world, those where we're dealing with rational actors and those where we're dealing with either completely irrational actors or actors where they have an ideology that's motivating them to do things that should be unthinkable.
00:33:12.000 Well, I completely agree with you that we have to be aware of religious zealots and we have to be aware of crazy people willing to blow themselves up, but you gotta wonder why they're mad at us in the first place.
00:33:22.000 And I agree that for the most part, I mean, I think our idea still sort of holds that we're the good guy in comparison to the rest of the world.
00:33:32.000 Does that mean you have to Be a certain amount of evil just to keep up?
00:33:37.000 You know, just to compete?
00:33:38.000 I mean, is that what's fucked up with our foreign policy?
00:33:41.000 Is that why we go into places like Iraq with false information about weapons of mass destruction, where there's a clear motivation to get in there?
00:33:48.000 Well, I think Iraq, I mean, I'm not going to defend Iraq.
00:33:52.000 That, I think, was a stupid war to fight.
00:33:56.000 But that's...
00:33:56.000 But going into Afghanistan...
00:33:57.000 That just ended, you know what I'm saying?
00:33:58.000 I mean, that still is us.
00:33:59.000 But look at Afghanistan as the clearer case, because we really...
00:34:02.000 I think, had to go in after September 11th.
00:34:06.000 So you think we had to go in to control Al-Qaeda?
00:34:09.000 Well, it was rational to go in and try to kill Osama bin Laden and the rest of the people who brought us September 11th.
00:34:21.000 September 11th, to some degree, was a price paid for never having dealt with these people in the first place.
00:34:26.000 When you listen to the chatter on their side about how we were a paper tiger, that they could blow up the coal, they could blow up embassies in Kenya, we got bombed in Lebanon and we just left.
00:34:39.000 So we were scared of conflict after Vietnam.
00:34:44.000 That was noticeable to everyone on their side.
00:34:48.000 So to some degree, this problem was just getting bigger and bigger and bigger.
00:34:52.000 So do you think it's possible September 11th happened because we didn't invade Iraq earlier?
00:34:57.000 Because we didn't go into Afghanistan earlier?
00:34:59.000 Well, no, we didn't deal with the threat of jihadi terrorism earlier.
00:35:04.000 Weren't they upset in the first place because we have troops on their land?
00:35:09.000 Well, you've got to be precise about exactly why that's offensive.
00:35:14.000 When you look at why Osama bin Laden and the rest of al-Qaeda were upset, It was because, it was not because, it was not a nationalistic concern of, you know, we're proud Saudis and our...
00:35:29.000 It was Holy Land, right?
00:35:29.000 This was a theological grievance.
00:35:31.000 I mean, they were, Osama bin Laden was already out of sorts with the Saudi government at that point, and he's...
00:35:41.000 Osama and anyone else enamored of this whole notion of global jihad want a global caliphate.
00:35:47.000 I mean, this is the idea that we're living in a perverse time where Islam has been derogated and subjugated and has not yet triumphed, and it has a mandate to triumph in this world.
00:36:04.000 And so if you really believe that, if you believe that you have to fight to spread the true faith For the glory of God in this life and win the game, you know, Genghis Khan style or more relevantly Muhammad style in this life.
00:36:20.000 That dictates a certain kind of grandiosity and arrogance and expansionism.
00:36:27.000 And people like Osam bin Laden I really believe that.
00:36:32.000 He was free to live a very different life than he lived.
00:36:36.000 He didn't have to spend his time in caves scheming to defeat the great Satan.
00:36:42.000 He could have just been chilling in Paris.
00:36:45.000 He had a lot of money.
00:36:48.000 A lot of opportunity.
00:36:49.000 Do you buy the official story?
00:36:51.000 How they killed him and threw him in the ocean?
00:36:55.000 I haven't thought about what might not be true in it, but I buy the official story that we went in and killed him and what happened to his body.
00:37:06.000 Or why, I'm not sure.
00:37:08.000 I think we didn't...
00:37:09.000 I think it would be amazing if he was dead a long time ago and they just concocted a crazy hero rescue story, Jessica Lynch-style.
00:37:17.000 No, no.
00:37:17.000 I think that would be...
00:37:18.000 I think the...
00:37:21.000 No, I mean, because there would have been so many other...
00:37:23.000 If you were going to fake something like that...
00:37:25.000 First of all, it's just so hard to fake anything.
00:37:27.000 We couldn't fake Jessica Lynch.
00:37:29.000 You know, it's like people's...
00:37:31.000 This is what's wrong with most...
00:37:32.000 Why fake it with helicopters, right?
00:37:34.000 Why do it like that?
00:37:36.000 And it's...
00:37:37.000 There's just too...
00:37:39.000 These things, operations like that go wrong spectacularly, and everyone knows about it, and they go right sometimes, and it's very difficult to fake it.
00:37:47.000 The Pakistanis aren't acting like we faked it.
00:37:50.000 They're just pissed that we actually successfully got in there, SEAL Team 6 style, and got out.
00:37:58.000 But the problem with any...
00:38:01.000 Conspiracy of that sort and especially a bigger one like a 9-11 truth style conspiracy is that it just takes so much perfect collaboration to bring it off and we know that people are so bad at that.
00:38:16.000 We know that interests don't align so perfectly.
00:38:18.000 We know that there's always somebody who just wants to sell their story to a tabloid or feels guilty about their the part they played or Most likely.
00:38:26.000 They're getting divorced and they just can't stop talking.
00:38:29.000 And Bill Clinton couldn't keep a semen-stained dress off of the news.
00:38:34.000 It's like that's the simplest thing.
00:38:36.000 He's just like the President of the United States with a terrified intern.
00:38:41.000 And this is going to wreck his presidency.
00:38:43.000 And he still couldn't keep the dress a secret.
00:38:46.000 Well, he couldn't keep that dress.
00:38:47.000 But how many freaks do you think he banged while he was president?
00:38:50.000 That guy was just whipping out his dick left and right and getting away with it.
00:38:53.000 What if it was thousands?
00:38:54.000 I think there usually could have been.
00:38:55.000 That's probably why he isn't talking about it.
00:38:57.000 Once you're a freak, you're a freak.
00:38:59.000 And when you're a freak of the highest order where you want to be the king of the world and you're whipping your dick out in meetings, he would meet with women and just whip his dick out and run out of the room screaming.
00:39:07.000 That guy did that shit a lot.
00:39:09.000 But again, we happen to know about that.
00:39:11.000 We know about one.
00:39:12.000 No, we know that.
00:39:12.000 They did September 11th every other month.
00:39:14.000 Yeah, but you read...
00:39:15.000 Well, you know, he got a few girls who got mad at him.
00:39:18.000 Hitch wrote a great book, No One Left to Lie To, The Triangulations of William Jefferson Clinton.
00:39:23.000 Really?
00:39:24.000 He just took him down hard.
00:39:26.000 You say Hitch, Christopher Hitch.
00:39:27.000 Yeah, for about short books, like 150 pages.
00:39:30.000 Really?
00:39:34.000 Brutal.
00:39:34.000 You'll never quite think about Clinton the same way.
00:39:37.000 It just puts a fine point on everything you just said.
00:39:42.000 It's pretty brutal.
00:39:43.000 He has a tinge of ego when he talks.
00:39:45.000 It always makes me wonder what he's really like.
00:39:47.000 They have these big political speeches.
00:39:51.000 They didn't do this.
00:39:51.000 We did this.
00:39:52.000 The Democrats, we did this and we did that.
00:39:56.000 Sort of bragging about stuff.
00:39:58.000 It's very unleader-like at this stage of the game.
00:40:01.000 When you go and look into his past dealings, I read The Strange Death of Vince Foster.
00:40:08.000 That's a creepy goddamn book.
00:40:09.000 I'd like to go back and reread that.
00:40:11.000 He's a guy who was somehow involved in that crazy real estate deal that they were with, and they found him.
00:40:16.000 He shot himself, but there was no blood at the scene, so it was clear that his body had been moved.
00:40:21.000 Yeah, see, that's the kind of...
00:40:25.000 Again, I'm not saying no one has ever murdered, no one ever conspires, but it's just so easy to manufacture details like that that are then impossible to debunk.
00:40:34.000 Like, so how do we know there was no blood at the scene?
00:40:35.000 How do we know that some 18-year-old didn't just say that on his website, and now that's the meme that gets spread, and now you have it in your head that there was no blood at the scene?
00:40:43.000 Right, it's true.
00:40:44.000 So many conspiracies seem to be engineered by that kind of chatter.
00:40:50.000 But if you and I wanted to say, okay, we're going to devote the next month of our lives To just knocking down each one of those points, how would we do it?
00:40:58.000 So you're going to have to travel to find out whether there was blood at the scene and talk to the local cops.
00:41:03.000 Even then you wouldn't know, right?
00:41:04.000 You wouldn't know.
00:41:04.000 It's an endless sinkhole of energy, and yet it just takes a second to set that fire.
00:41:11.000 And that's what actually happens in debate, too.
00:41:14.000 There are certain people who you debate on the subject of religion.
00:41:18.000 Who know that they can start many small fires.
00:41:23.000 They're given eight minutes for their side, and they can set 30 small fires, half-truths, untruths, stuff that you really should respond to because it's just false.
00:41:36.000 But it takes you so long to put the fires out that you can basically put half of them out, and then you haven't said any of what you came to say, and then they just come back and say, well, he didn't put out fires three, four, eight, and nine, and so he's clearly conceded my points.
00:41:51.000 And it's just a debating game.
00:41:54.000 Dinesh D'Souza is an egregious example of that technique.
00:41:59.000 It's just, if you ever see he did a debate with Daniel Dennett, which really didn't serve Dan very well because it was a technique that was quite effective.
00:42:13.000 He's a fast talker and he can just make a mess and it would take you an hour and a half to clean it up.
00:42:22.000 But I absolutely agree with you on everything you've said, but do you think that there are real conspiracies?
00:42:30.000 Do you think that every one of these things is bullshit?
00:42:32.000 I mean, people clearly do conspire, right?
00:42:35.000 Enron was clearly a conspiracy.
00:42:37.000 It might have been a conspiracy that we entered into the Iraq war under false pretenses.
00:42:41.000 I mean, it might have been a conspiracy.
00:42:43.000 The Gulf of Tonkin incident in Vietnam, that might have been a big conspiracy.
00:42:47.000 Yeah, there's no question that from time to time, powerful people get into some star chamber and twirl their mustaches and conspire.
00:42:56.000 I think that probably happens.
00:42:57.000 But it's just hard.
00:42:59.000 It's hard to bring it off and you should never Assume that's the case.
00:43:05.000 And there's an adage on this subject that you never ascribe to conspiracy what can be explained by incompetence or something like that.
00:43:13.000 And it's just so obvious.
00:43:15.000 The incompetence factor in many of these situations is so high and so obvious.
00:43:20.000 As it is almost everywhere.
00:43:22.000 Especially in government.
00:43:24.000 With September 11th, it's just the crushing variable.
00:43:32.000 We're not prepared to deal with that kind of problem.
00:43:38.000 Anyone who thinks this was a conspiracy thinks that At least hundreds, probably thousands of people woke up one day, perfectly normal people, people in the FAA, people in the military, people in government, woke up Perfect psychopaths willing, with a clear conscience, to murder 3,000 of their innocent neighbors.
00:44:02.000 This wasn't Tuskegee.
00:44:03.000 This wasn't the poor and disenfranchised of a race that you're not so fond of.
00:44:08.000 These are some of those powerful people in our society just blown up one day.
00:44:13.000 And all of this was perfectly attuned to leave The person at the top of the conspiracy, presumably, George Bush sitting reading My Pet Goat when the whole thing kicked off.
00:44:24.000 I mean, it's just ridiculous.
00:44:26.000 And then as a pretext to go into Iraq, first of all, it would have been so much easier to think of a pretext to go into Iraq, but why make it look like that we got bombed or attacked by Saudis and Yemenis and Egyptians, which in fact...
00:44:43.000 So you're saying as a motivation to do it?
00:44:45.000 Yeah, the general idea is...
00:44:46.000 We did it on purpose so that we could go to war with Iraq.
00:44:49.000 Yeah, if you're thinking about sort of the false flag operation thesis, that we wanted to go to Iraq and steal their oil, and we're perfectly evil and perfectly Machiavellian and could bring this whole thing off without any leaks to this day.
00:45:04.000 Ten years hence, no one has come forward and said, this is the part I played in and I feel terrible about it.
00:45:10.000 And yet, we botched it in these huge ways where we had to go to Afghanistan before Iraq, and we really didn't want to go to Afghanistan.
00:45:20.000 No one suggests we actually wanted to be running around Tora Bora fighting the Taliban.
00:45:26.000 And we go to Iraq, that worked out well.
00:45:31.000 I mean, the idea that that was the easiest way to get their oil is crazy.
00:45:35.000 It would have been far cheaper to buy it.
00:45:39.000 But isn't the argument, though, that we wanted to control Iraq?
00:45:42.000 I mean, that we wanted to take over and control their oil, which we kind of do now, right?
00:45:47.000 So if we just wanted to go into Iraq, let's buy the oil.
00:45:53.000 The idea that people conspire and that actually certain people in our government are willing to run a false flag operation so that we can go into Iraq.
00:46:03.000 What would you have done?
00:46:04.000 You would have shot down one of our planes over Iraq.
00:46:08.000 We wouldn't even have needed that because Saddam was shooting in our planes.
00:46:13.000 We had a no-fly zone in force for 10 years.
00:46:15.000 The war wasn't over as far as he was concerned.
00:46:18.000 He just kept shooting at planes.
00:46:19.000 He didn't hit any.
00:46:21.000 So let him hit one.
00:46:23.000 And then we would go in.
00:46:25.000 But killing 3,000 people in downtown Manhattan, people who are well-connected and send the global economy into a tailspin, it just doesn't have the right shape of it.
00:46:38.000 I completely agree with you that it would take way too many people to plan it out, most likely.
00:46:42.000 And when I look at it, I just see that someone's going to tell.
00:46:45.000 There's just too many things that have to be coordinated.
00:46:48.000 Too many people are going to start talking.
00:46:51.000 I agree with you that it's much more likely incompetence.
00:46:53.000 But there was definitely a motivation to go into Iraq.
00:46:56.000 They wanted to go into Iraq already.
00:46:58.000 That's something they had been planning on even before September 11th, like looking for motivation.
00:47:02.000 So it's possible, right, that this incompetent government allowed this attack to take place and then they capitalized on it.
00:47:09.000 But what was their motivation to go to Iraq in the first place?
00:47:12.000 If they weren't going over there to try to control the oil, then why were they so desperate to go to Iraq?
00:47:17.000 Because it was pretty clear that they wanted to.
00:47:19.000 Well, I think...
00:47:24.000 And again, to some degree I'm talking out of my depth here because I'm not really a policy guy, but the argument which was made publicly at the time by many so-called neocons is that Iraq was the perfect test case to create a A vibrant democracy in the heart of the Arab world.
00:47:47.000 I mean, this is a basically educated population.
00:47:50.000 We completely underestimated the level of sectarianism there.
00:47:54.000 But again, that is easily ascribed to incompetence.
00:47:59.000 I mean, we were sending in 23-year-old You know, friends of Bush with no expertise at all just because they were the nephew of somebody who had donated to the campaign, and all of a sudden these people are in charge of some major piece of the machine of how to create a democracy in Iraq.
00:48:16.000 I mean, to read any of those books about what we did in Iraq is to just, above everything else, just to come face to face with a shocking degree of incompetence.
00:48:28.000 So we're the good guys, we're just incompetent.
00:48:31.000 Well, look who he had in the Oval Office at that moment.
00:48:36.000 A lot of words come to mind when you think about Bush, and competence is not one of them.
00:48:41.000 Well, you know, Bush is a strange case.
00:48:43.000 Obviously, he's not the smartest guy in the world, but when you look at the policies that he put into place, it's really similar to what Obama's doing.
00:48:52.000 It's not much difference at all.
00:48:54.000 Right, but I think there are crucial differences, but Two important things.
00:49:01.000 One is that Obama has inherited the world that Bush helped make.
00:49:06.000 So Obama's got the hardest job on planet Earth at the moment.
00:49:10.000 So you blame Bush for the whole Iraq mess, or his administration at least?
00:49:15.000 Yeah, well, we didn't have to go into Iraq.
00:49:17.000 And we could have...
00:49:23.000 Arguably, we had to go into Afghanistan.
00:49:25.000 I think our approach to fighting the war on terror is fundamentally ill-conceived.
00:49:34.000 I don't see why we need to be fighting wars and taking credit for fighting wars.
00:49:40.000 This should, from my point of view, be all covert, all...
00:49:45.000 Navy SEALs and stuff?
00:49:46.000 Yeah, I mean, insofar as all that, I mean, there may be situations where that's not possible, but I don't see why we need to be, we should fight the war on terror as an international crime problem and that has occasional military solutions, but from my point of view, people, you know, jihadis in Al-Qaeda should just have been disappearing and no one takes credit for it.
00:50:14.000 I see what you're saying.
00:50:15.000 Why should we ever say, we did it, you know, yes, we did it, and now there's a possible blowback to that.
00:50:21.000 And the reality is, you know, whenever you put Navy SEALs on the ground and let them shoot, or drop bombs from, you know, Predator drones, you're going to be killing some number of innocent people, and that's terrible.
00:50:34.000 And the terrible truth is there's no alternative to that.
00:50:37.000 I mean, unless you're going to be a pacifist, You're going to run the risk of killing innocent people when you have to fight certain conflicts.
00:50:45.000 And so that's...
00:50:46.000 I just don't see any...
00:50:48.000 Do you ever look at it from their point of view?
00:50:51.000 Do you ever look at it from...
00:50:52.000 Oh, yeah.
00:50:52.000 You try to look at it from the Al-Qaeda's point of view, the Taliban's point of view, the point of view of someone who is watching this giant military machine coming in and raping their country's national resources and stealing minerals and what's going on in Afghanistan?
00:51:06.000 Think about Afghanistan for a moment.
00:51:08.000 What's the point of view of a woman in a burqa in Afghanistan?
00:51:12.000 Now, from my point of view, it's very likely, whether she knows it or not, there is a much better life she could be living.
00:51:21.000 The average life expectancy in Afghanistan for women is 44 years.
00:51:25.000 It's got almost the highest maternal mortality and infant mortality in the world.
00:51:33.000 Most women are illiterate.
00:51:35.000 It's a terrible life for women.
00:51:38.000 When we think of having to leave Afghanistan, one of the real ethical problems, from my point of view, is we're just abandoning them to the Taliban.
00:51:47.000 We're abandoning the women to the Taliban.
00:51:50.000 And if there was a way to actually help them, We would have a moral obligation to do it.
00:51:58.000 The problem is it's so costly to do, it's so intrusive to do, and so many people shoot at you or blow themselves up while you do it that it's completely impractical to do.
00:52:11.000 I think we have a real problem, ethically, to just abandon women to getting their noses cut off because they decided not to marry the octogenarian that their father sold them to.
00:52:23.000 Well, you know, obviously I don't agree with any of that stuff or any of those social restrictions that they put on, but do you really think that we should have troops overseas to try to reinforce our moral standards on this country that's a mess?
00:52:34.000 I mean, should we really do that?
00:52:36.000 I think we...
00:52:37.000 Is that what we're doing, though?
00:52:39.000 No, but I think we need...
00:52:41.000 Well, we are attempting to do that, but it's just not doable.
00:52:44.000 Do you really think that's our motivation, though?
00:52:46.000 To some degree.
00:52:48.000 But what about the amount of money that they're pulling out of there?
00:52:50.000 What about the amount of money that they're making just in minerals?
00:52:52.000 Let me sidestep that for a second and just talk about what I think the endgame is.
00:52:58.000 The endgame is to have a global civilization that actually works.
00:53:03.000 And what would that look like?
00:53:06.000 More or less what it looks like in any country.
00:53:08.000 Now, whether you have a world government that achieves this or some federation of states that works better certainly than the UN, you need to have...
00:53:18.000 If girls were getting their noses cut off and being forced to live in burkas in Florida, It would be a crime problem.
00:53:29.000 And we would send in police to force people to treat their daughters better or treat their wives better.
00:53:36.000 And that's necessary and appropriate.
00:53:41.000 It's just there's no mechanism that allows us to do that as a matter of international law.
00:53:46.000 And so we clearly have to get to a time where when You have a hostage crisis where an entire country is held hostage by some lunatic or a group of lunatics in the government.
00:54:01.000 The matter of national sovereignty is not an issue.
00:54:03.000 Who cares about the national sovereignty of North Korea?
00:54:06.000 That's a hostage situation.
00:54:08.000 Well, that's a really interesting point because we negotiate with North Korea and we give them money and we're not even thinking about going over there.
00:54:15.000 We give them money out of compassion to alleviate starvation.
00:54:19.000 Why aren't we going over there?
00:54:20.000 Because they have nukes.
00:54:21.000 Is that what it is?
00:54:22.000 And they have so much artillery pointed at South Korea, and the distance is so small that nukes aside, it would just be a disaster.
00:54:31.000 But again, that's an argument for not letting these...
00:54:38.000 Failed states and deranged states get too strong.
00:54:44.000 We need a way to...
00:54:51.000 We need a way to convince the entire civilized world of functional democracies to apply quasi-global pressure to any one of these regions demanding that they get their act together.
00:55:05.000 And Afghanistan is definitely a place where it would be compassionate.
00:55:11.000 If we could come in, if Russia and China and everyone else could get on the same page with us, And we could all agree, alright, the women of Afghanistan, We actually need to help you.
00:55:23.000 So how are we going to do this?
00:55:26.000 The first pass, any guy who's throwing battery acid in the face of little girls because they want to go to school, we're going to deal with that guy as the sociopath that he is.
00:55:41.000 And if it just so happens that there's a culture of those guys and they call themselves the Taliban, we're going to deal with the Taliban as a gang of sociopaths.
00:55:52.000 But, again, we tried it on our own, more or less on our own, and the results have been terrible.
00:56:00.000 And the results have been terrible largely because of the role that religious thinking plays there.
00:56:08.000 I mean, you burn a Koran by accident and basically...
00:56:14.000 The war is almost over and well lost because everyone takes to the streets and begins killing people.
00:56:22.000 There's nothing more inflammatory than trespassing on their religious sensitivities.
00:56:28.000 If you accidentally bomb a wedding and kill 50 children, You don't get the response we recently got with, you know, this Quran incident.
00:56:37.000 And so it's just, it's not, we're not dealing with a culture that can have a sane discussion about the proper goals of human life and how to, you know, how to safeguard human happiness and...
00:56:52.000 So in your mind, we need to be the police of the world.
00:56:54.000 We're the only ones who know what's right.
00:56:56.000 We're the only ones who are going to enforce it.
00:56:58.000 We're the good guys.
00:56:59.000 And so we need to go over there.
00:57:01.000 America, I guess?
00:57:02.000 The military industrial complex that runs America?
00:57:04.000 I mean, what is it?
00:57:06.000 Who's we?
00:57:07.000 We is—well, just look at—again, take one piece that you agreed on are the gains we've made socially and culturally and morally around racism.
00:57:21.000 So we have—we're at least seeing the daylight on the subject of race in this country.
00:57:28.000 Now, so then we have the benefit of a kind of a running start ahead of South Africa, and we see they've got their apartheid thing going on, and we begin, it takes us a while, but we begin to apply pressure to them, you know, boycotting trade with South Africa or blocking trade, and that has an effect.
00:57:51.000 Now, that's If you could get the entire world on the same page on each of these questions, I mean, so the treatment of women is even a bigger variable than notions of race.
00:58:04.000 Because here you're talking about fully half of the human population.
00:58:07.000 So wherever they're treating women terribly, And systematically, not just by accident, but because there's some ideology that women can be treated terribly, that's a human rights problem that every society that has a robust conception of human rights can figure out how to apply pressure to.
00:58:35.000 Stopping trade may not be enough.
00:58:37.000 And then you have all of these other secondary effects of when you apply sanctions to a country, then women and kids and everyone else suffer.
00:58:47.000 And so it's such a blunt instrument.
00:58:50.000 We don't have...
00:58:51.000 We don't have good tools to deal with these problems.
00:58:53.000 I could see it as a justification, one of many, as to why a part of the world was run by bad people with bad ideas.
00:59:03.000 But I don't think that's the motivation to go there.
00:59:06.000 I don't think that's the main motivation to go there.
00:59:09.000 I don't believe that the army would act that way, that they would spend so much money to go somewhere to save some women.
00:59:15.000 I don't buy it.
00:59:17.000 Well, I'm not saying it's the only motivation, but it's...
00:59:20.000 But it's one that you think is being a primary one.
00:59:22.000 Well, again, I just would have to focus on any specific conflict we're talking about.
00:59:29.000 But when you ask yourself, why...
00:59:36.000 They're soldiers who've done multiple tours of duty in Afghanistan and feel committed to the project and feel reasonably good about what they've done.
00:59:48.000 Why do they feel that way?
00:59:50.000 Why don't they get up every morning feeling like they're completely wasting their life and taking massive risks for no reason at all?
00:59:58.000 Well, you know, I'd have to interview each individual one to find out what their motivation was, but I look at Afghanistan as a giant money-making effort.
01:00:06.000 I look at how much money they're making in minerals.
01:00:09.000 I don't think they send tanks to save women.
01:00:13.000 I don't believe that.
01:00:15.000 It's not a money.
01:00:17.000 Afghanistan and Iraq have been the most costly things.
01:00:21.000 Sure, for the taxpayers and for the American people, but aren't huge military companies like Halberton and people that rebuild these places and contractors.
01:00:34.000 There's a lot of money being spent, right?
01:00:36.000 Well, yeah.
01:00:37.000 Companies make money in times of war.
01:00:42.000 Yeah, so the people who make bullets make money when they get to sell bullets.
01:00:45.000 But in terms of the...
01:00:49.000 The cost to our economy in general and the cost in the lives of the men and women in our military serving over there.
01:01:01.000 None of the soldiers are extracting wealth from the ground in Afghanistan or extracting oil.
01:01:08.000 And yet, when you hear them talk about Their experience, what you don't hear is a litany of, we never should have done that, that was a complete waste of time, I can't believe that our government has done this.
01:01:19.000 Wow, that's not true at all.
01:01:21.000 I hear a lot of people online that are soldiers, former soldiers, that have a lot of those stories.
01:01:25.000 No, there's some of that.
01:01:27.000 You can't say you never hear, because you do.
01:01:30.000 No, I'm not saying, but it's not all of what you hear.
01:01:34.000 What you also hear is an experience of...
01:01:39.000 Really trying to, you know, building schools or building infrastructure and really trying to help a democracy grow in these places.
01:01:48.000 Now, it is such a thankless job.
01:01:51.000 And, I mean, again, don't mistake me for being optimistic or at all sanguine about what's happened in Iraq and Afghanistan.
01:01:59.000 I think it's been a disaster.
01:02:02.000 But you think ultimately it's a good idea?
01:02:04.000 No.
01:02:05.000 Well, Iraq, no.
01:02:07.000 Afghanistan, I think it was absolutely essential that we do something.
01:02:12.000 Now, we clearly, we did it badly from day one, committing far too few troops and letting our proxies do it for us and do it badly, and Osama bin Laden got away.
01:02:23.000 But you see it as a war of culture.
01:02:25.000 You see it to get bad people out of control of a country.
01:02:30.000 That they could potentially be dangerous to us that was worth the preemptive strike.
01:02:34.000 Well, again, let's just sort of talk about the big picture.
01:02:38.000 If you're a pacifist, you think we should never do anything like this.
01:02:42.000 You never pull out a gun and start shooting or threaten to shoot because nothing is worth killing for.
01:02:48.000 Now, I'm not a pacifist.
01:02:49.000 I think if we all took a Gandhian response to these problems and just got on our Facebook page and made a lot of noise, That there are certain enemies we could have and do have who will just inherit the earth.
01:03:06.000 I mean, so the thugs will win in that case.
01:03:11.000 Gandhi's non-violence worked against the British because the British were the British and they had enough of a conscience not to just kill everybody.
01:03:19.000 It wouldn't have worked against Hitler.
01:03:21.000 And Gandhi actually knew that.
01:03:27.000 So if you're not going to be a pacifist, then the question is just when do you pull out the guns?
01:03:34.000 And we can then have an intelligent discussion about whether it made any sense to pull out the guns vis-a-vis Iraq or Afghanistan.
01:03:46.000 Then it's just a pragmatic question of when you do it and how it's best to do it.
01:03:52.000 So I can agree with that.
01:03:53.000 I can agree that we need guns because there are bad people in the world.
01:03:56.000 We need an army.
01:03:57.000 We need a military because there are bad people in the world.
01:03:59.000 But then when you look about our actions that define What our purpose is with this army.
01:04:05.000 Look at our two main campaigns, Iraq and Afghanistan.
01:04:07.000 You've admitted they're both complete fuck-ups and disasters.
01:04:10.000 So if that's the case, how do you think the rest of the world will look at us?
01:04:15.000 Why wouldn't they be upset with us?
01:04:16.000 It seems to me that these campaigns have done far more to hurt the way the rest of the world wants to treat us than anything else we could have ever done.
01:04:25.000 Going to these places and blowing up Buildings and killing.
01:04:29.000 How many hundreds of thousands of innocent people died in Iraq?
01:04:33.000 And how many people are dying every day in Afghanistan?
01:04:35.000 Do you think about the numbers that have been piled up, just the actual raw statistics as motivation for these people?
01:04:43.000 Well, I think it's had, paradoxically, it's had both effects.
01:04:47.000 It has, because you look at, if we didn't go into certain situations, so it's like when Libya was kicking off, The resistance was desperate for us to come in, and we looked at the mealy-mouthed approach we took, just sort of letting our allies to take the lead.
01:05:05.000 That looked a little bit like cowardice, and we got a lot of grief for not actually being active enough to help prop up the Libyan resistance.
01:05:16.000 Right, but that's a pretty extreme case.
01:05:18.000 You've got a guy who's been a dictator forever, and the people literally are rioting in the streets.
01:05:21.000 But Saddam Hussein was the same case.
01:05:22.000 But the people were not rioting in the streets.
01:05:25.000 Because he was a better dictator.
01:05:26.000 It was arguably worse in Iraq.
01:05:30.000 There were more reasons to go in.
01:05:34.000 There was every expectation that enough of the people were ready to be rid of Saddam that we could have been greeted as friends.
01:05:46.000 And yeah, it was a disaster.
01:05:49.000 Mainly because we underestimated the level of sectarian violence that was going to begin the moment we took the lid off.
01:05:57.000 And again, that's just incompetence.
01:06:02.000 But it's not...
01:06:02.000 So when you have...
01:06:05.000 Sunni Muslims who are going to blow up a Shia mosque.
01:06:11.000 People didn't even know about that before they went in, did they?
01:06:13.000 Well, a lot of people didn't know.
01:06:15.000 We didn't even know the difference between Sunni and Shia.
01:06:18.000 I mean, you had bloopers of our White House press conferences where they're getting people's affiliation wrong and not even thinking they're interchangeable.
01:06:30.000 Do you think that these debates that you've had with all these Like, fiercely religious people.
01:06:36.000 Have they given you more of a pessimistic Thought or idea on how we need to handle people in other parts of the world where their entire cultures are run by religion?
01:06:49.000 I mean, do you lose a bit of hope for rational conversations to the point where you're like, you know what?
01:06:56.000 You have to engage militarily.
01:06:59.000 There's no other options.
01:07:00.000 You're never going to get by with debate.
01:07:01.000 You're never going to get by with rational thought.
01:07:03.000 You're never going to get by with reason.
01:07:04.000 You're talking about cultures that want to murder you for burning some pages accidentally.
01:07:08.000 You're talking about a culture that wants to murder you for drawing their guy.
01:07:12.000 Right, right.
01:07:13.000 Yeah, well, I think it's not partitioned so easily by state, but I think I view it as kind of concentric circles.
01:07:22.000 So again, we're talking about Islam here for the moment.
01:07:25.000 You have this sort of the center of the bullseye of doctrinal, crazy, global jihadist Islam, where, yeah, I think, you know, Al-Qaeda and Al-Qaeda-like thinking, that's just a deal breaker.
01:07:39.000 I mean, so we're at war with that subset of the Muslim world.
01:07:42.000 And they are—I mean, it's not our idea that we're at war with them.
01:07:46.000 They're at war with us.
01:07:48.000 They'd endlessly talk about it.
01:07:50.000 So we're innocent?
01:07:51.000 We've done nothing?
01:07:52.000 They are running a very different game in their heads.
01:07:57.000 It's not about land.
01:07:58.000 It's not about the Palestinians.
01:08:00.000 They've got these 7th century or 14th century goggles that they're looking at the world through.
01:08:09.000 If we pipe Baywatch over on the satellite dish, That's an offense that they're willing to die for.
01:08:18.000 It's a very different game they're playing.
01:08:22.000 You've got to imagine what it's like to really believe in paradise.
01:08:26.000 To really want to get there, to know that if you blow yourself up killing infidels, you're going to get there and you're going to get everyone you love there.
01:08:35.000 There's just this velvet rope in front of paradise and you're going to walk right past because the angel is going to lift it up for you and the way to get there is to be a jihadi.
01:08:48.000 It's like being James Bond who's going to get 72 virgins in paradise.
01:08:53.000 And you have got no other problems in life you need to worry about.
01:08:57.000 You don't have to worry about getting an education or getting a job or making it work in this world or building a civil society.
01:09:02.000 You just have to play your side of the game right and die in the right circumstances.
01:09:09.000 But how many of those are there?
01:09:11.000 I think there are tens of thousands of people who went to training camps in Afghanistan.
01:09:20.000 So again, so...
01:09:22.000 Concentric circles.
01:09:23.000 So the center of the bullseye, let's say that's just...
01:09:25.000 Let's say that's half of a percent of the Muslim world.
01:09:32.000 Okay?
01:09:32.000 Which is a time...
01:09:33.000 So whenever you...
01:09:35.000 Half a percent is a...
01:09:37.000 You know, one percent of humanity is schizophrenic.
01:09:39.000 I mean, so half a percent is a tiny segment of any population.
01:09:43.000 There's...
01:09:46.000 There's no idea so crazy that only half a percent of Americans believe in it.
01:09:51.000 You know, if you ask people...
01:09:52.000 Flat Earth.
01:09:52.000 Yeah, yeah.
01:09:53.000 So you're going to get more than half a percent.
01:09:54.000 It's just...
01:09:55.000 So...
01:09:56.000 But even half a percent...
01:09:58.000 What is that?
01:10:01.000 It's like...
01:10:02.000 You know, it's millions of people who are just the diehard of the diehard.
01:10:09.000 Now, there's 1.4 billion Muslims.
01:10:12.000 Yeah.
01:10:14.000 So you think it's possible that half a percent of them are willing to blow themselves up for virgins?
01:10:19.000 Well, it's worse.
01:10:19.000 So let's say there's potentially a million jihadis, right?
01:10:25.000 I think it's probably worse than that.
01:10:26.000 Really?
01:10:27.000 Yeah.
01:10:28.000 Wow.
01:10:29.000 But when you say just define it, you mean guys who are willing to become suicide bombers?
01:10:34.000 Yes.
01:10:34.000 More than a million.
01:10:36.000 Well, I think that wouldn't be a crazy guess.
01:10:38.000 I mean, I have no way of knowing apart from the fact that in every Muslim country, it's 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, depending on the country, up to 70% who think suicide bombing is a good thing.
01:10:54.000 Wow.
01:10:56.000 When you run the poll, which has been done by Pew and other organizations, and you start asking people, do you think suicide bombing in defense of Islam is ever justifiable?
01:11:14.000 Yes, sometimes, rarely, and never are the possible responses.
01:11:20.000 The number of yeses and sometimes It gives you, if not a majority, a significant minority of every Muslim country.
01:11:30.000 Even in the UK, you would get something like 20-25% of young Muslims thinking that it's justifiable.
01:11:39.000 And you'd get that immediately after the suicide bombings in London.
01:11:42.000 These polls have been run.
01:11:43.000 Do you want to live under Sharia law?
01:11:45.000 You get like 30% in the UK among Muslims, 18 to 24. Now, so one question is, do people actually believe what they say they believe when you are taking a poll?
01:11:57.000 And what does it actually mean to say yes to that?
01:12:00.000 How does that inform your life?
01:12:01.000 So let's just dial it all the way down to half a percent, okay?
01:12:06.000 Everyone else is just bluffing.
01:12:07.000 Half a percent is still, with the spread of weapons of high yield, whether it's nuclear weapons or biological weapons, Half a percent of any significant population can do a lot of damage.
01:12:28.000 We have to win a war of ideas, ultimately, and we have to discredit these ideas so that the next generation Doesn't find it so easy to believe these things, but...
01:12:41.000 But how do they accept us?
01:12:44.000 How do they accept anything, any real solution coming from us when they know what we did in Iraq, when they know what we did in Afghanistan, when they know what a fuckery we've made out of the whole thing, when they know how much rampant corruption there is, when they know how much missing money there is?
01:12:57.000 How do they ever look at this as anything other than a money grab?
01:13:00.000 How do they ever look at it as like, oh, these are the Americans, they're going to teach us how to live?
01:13:04.000 How could anybody accept that?
01:13:06.000 Well, it's not, but when you look at, again...
01:13:08.000 It's just necessary?
01:13:09.000 It doesn't matter how they accept it?
01:13:10.000 We just have to do it anyway?
01:13:11.000 When you're talking about the center of the bullseye, these people are truly unpersuadable.
01:13:16.000 There was nothing we were going to do that was going to get Osama bin Laden to say, you know, I had you guys all wrong.
01:13:22.000 This is, you know, we're friends now.
01:13:25.000 And, I mean, so I think...
01:13:31.000 A certain percentage of people are unpersuadable, and the force or the threat of force is the only game to play.
01:13:38.000 And then what we have to do is win a war of ideas around that first circle where they become marginalized, sufficiently marginalized, and not supported within their society.
01:13:54.000 Arguably, that has happened To some degree, even with how chaotic Afghanistan and Iraq look.
01:14:03.000 Well, there's certainly been more penetration than there was like 50 or 60 years ago, but the majority of the population is still like really deep into their culture, right?
01:14:13.000 Yeah, yeah.
01:14:13.000 I mean, they have a weird setup.
01:14:14.000 They only have one city.
01:14:15.000 Kabul's the only real city, right?
01:14:17.000 And Afghanistan is just filled with like tribes, right?
01:14:21.000 Essentially, Yeah.
01:14:23.000 I mean, I haven't been there, so I'm, again, speaking...
01:14:26.000 Yeah, I've only read...
01:14:26.000 Third hand, but...
01:14:27.000 Yeah, and heard McCain talk about it, where he...
01:14:31.000 I believe one of his quotes was that it's run the same way as it was when Alexander the Great was around.
01:14:36.000 Right, and some of that tribalism isn't strictly a religious problem.
01:14:41.000 I mean, so tribalism is a problem, and religious tribalism is a problem, and these are, you know, these are...
01:14:48.000 Any ideology that fundamentally divides one group from another and prevents them from recognizing their common humanity is a problem, and so not all of that's religious.
01:14:57.000 Some of it's racist, some of it's tribal, but the role that religion plays in confounding this Our best intentions, even if we only had our best intentions and they were not mingled with our worst intentions,
01:15:14.000 even if we were just going to Rwanda to help people, even though they don't have oil and we got no national security interest, but they take out the machetes and start killing their neighbors, and we're going to put our lives on the line to just stop the violence.
01:15:30.000 The problem is there's no elegant way to do it.
01:15:35.000 You wind up killing innocent people.
01:15:39.000 You can't commit enough resources to build a civil society.
01:15:44.000 It takes too long to teach people what they should want.
01:15:53.000 It's a hard problem.
01:15:54.000 You sort of reconcile our military actions.
01:15:56.000 You reconcile the corruption, all the fuck-ups.
01:16:00.000 They are what they are, and there's nothing we can do about them now.
01:16:03.000 But what's important is we keep these crazy people from developing nuclear bombs and from...
01:16:09.000 Because the very real possibility of nuclear terrorism to you is far more important than whatever mistakes or corruption that we've put out as a country that have gotten these people to have this sort of a perception of us.
01:16:25.000 I think, well...
01:16:26.000 We have to be pragmatic.
01:16:27.000 Yeah, I can't sign on to all of that because I think our screw-ups have been huge.
01:16:31.000 And I think we have a huge moral debt to all the people we have accidentally blown up.
01:16:42.000 I mean, obviously collateral damage is a huge problem.
01:16:44.000 And I think we are...
01:16:49.000 And it's been a problem in every war we've ever fought.
01:16:51.000 One of the things we've now, which is an advantage on the one hand, but also a disadvantage, is that there's so much more transparency.
01:16:58.000 We know so much more about the bad stuff we do, whether inadvertent or not, that if we didn't know this in World War II, and we're bombing Dresden and incinerating hundreds of thousands of people, innocent bystanders for the most part, Non-military targets.
01:17:23.000 Arguably, we should never have done that, but we arguably couldn't do that now, given what the images would do to us on the nightly news.
01:17:33.000 And I think that's all to the good.
01:17:35.000 I think we should understand the cost of war more than we do, and we should understand how horrible collateral damage is more than we do.
01:17:43.000 How do you feel about WikiLeaks?
01:17:46.000 Well, I think Assange is just, he's a creepy bastard.
01:17:54.000 I like transparency.
01:17:57.000 I think the journalistic aspect of it to some degree was legitimate.
01:18:02.000 But I think it's also, if you're going to release Certain secrets shouldn't be released.
01:18:09.000 Certain secrets are there because they're keeping people safe.
01:18:13.000 And to release those secrets irresponsibly is to put people in harm's way.
01:18:18.000 And so it's a very mixed thing.
01:18:21.000 How did you feel about the initial video that he released?
01:18:24.000 Collateral murder, the one that showed the guys in the helicopters shooting the people on the ground and a car full of children and them saying, well, they shouldn't have brought their kids.
01:18:32.000 Right, right.
01:18:33.000 Well, the thing that's horrible about that is that we're just not wired to understand the consequences of our actions once we can fight war remotely.
01:18:53.000 If we were just fighting, if it was all just bayonets, there's the inescapability of the horror of war.
01:19:03.000 But the moment you can fly something, you're sitting in your office park outside of Las Vegas and you're flying a Predator drone 13,000 miles away, I'm not suggesting those guys don't have a hard time sleeping at night,
01:19:20.000 some of them, but it's a very different kind of violence and one of the scariest things about Technology is that it uncouples us from our emotions from The reality of the consequences of our actions so that the most harmful things aren't actually the most disturbing things you know,
01:19:41.000 so this is so if you This is an example actually I used in I think the end of faith You know if you hear that you're Grandfather fought in World War II and he dropped bombs.
01:19:53.000 He was a bomber pilot and he dropped bombs over Dresden.
01:19:58.000 That's one kind of level of abstraction of his actions that doesn't really disturb you about him.
01:20:05.000 And it needn't have disturbed him.
01:20:06.000 He's at 30,000 feet dropping bombs, not really getting what he's doing.
01:20:10.000 But if you hear Granddad killed a woman and her kids with a shovel, All of a sudden, he's the scariest guy I've ever heard of, and probably he couldn't sleep for the rest of his life either, because it takes a very different kind of person to do that.
01:20:25.000 But the guy dropping bombs killed far many more women and children than the guy with the shovel.
01:20:31.000 And so that...
01:20:33.000 It's fascinating, isn't it?
01:20:35.000 And now we're moving into drones, which moves even more.
01:20:39.000 So we need...
01:20:40.000 The burden is to...
01:20:43.000 Figure out how to have an appropriate emotional response to reality and to be guided by...
01:20:51.000 It's not to say that our emotions are always the perfect guide.
01:20:57.000 I mean, there may be ways in which we are wired to have a strong response to something that We should just get over and we're not wired to have an appropriately emotional response to something that really is a massive danger.
01:21:12.000 And so our perception of risk and our perception of harm is not what it needs to be for us to make intelligent decisions and compassionate decisions in these kinds of conflicts.
01:21:23.000 Did you agree with the video being released?
01:21:25.000 Did you think it was a bad idea?
01:21:30.000 For morale, for the cause.
01:21:31.000 Well, it's hard to separate that from everything else that has happened.
01:21:35.000 As far as WikiLeaks, you mean?
01:21:37.000 Yeah, yeah.
01:21:38.000 So I think WikiLeaks...
01:21:39.000 Truth is, I don't even know the ultimate consequences of WikiLeaks.
01:21:43.000 It would just matter what the consequences actually are.
01:21:45.000 But isn't transparency good?
01:21:48.000 Yeah, but up to a certain point.
01:21:49.000 But do I think Obama should be forced at his next press conference to just share his White House briefing with the world?
01:21:57.000 No.
01:21:58.000 I think I think he there are certain things that I understand that he and people like him need to know that I don't need to know, and if I knew and blogged about it, I would be harming our national security.
01:22:12.000 So, yeah, no, I'm not for the just unlimited...
01:22:17.000 Distribution of secrets.
01:22:18.000 Yeah, yeah.
01:22:20.000 So you allow them to have certain secrets just for national security?
01:22:24.000 Well, it's just, clearly we...
01:22:26.000 They need that.
01:22:27.000 Yeah, they absolutely need that.
01:22:28.000 To what level?
01:22:29.000 I agree with that 100%.
01:22:30.000 To what?
01:22:31.000 Yeah, sure.
01:22:31.000 Absolutely, right?
01:22:32.000 If there's bad guys.
01:22:32.000 But to what level?
01:22:34.000 Like, at what point?
01:22:35.000 How do you...
01:22:35.000 You know, that's where...
01:22:36.000 It's weird.
01:22:36.000 How do you make the distinction?
01:22:37.000 How do you decide that, you know, they shouldn't be able to have...
01:22:41.000 You know, certain secrets that may, in fact, be damaging to American civilians or we might, you know, disagree with it.
01:22:47.000 It might change the way we feel about a president or our policy.
01:22:51.000 It's probably not that complicated, though.
01:22:53.000 I don't think so?
01:22:53.000 No, it's probably pretty basic.
01:22:55.000 It's probably like, all right, we should definitely not tell them about where nuclear warheads throughout the United States are located everywhere.
01:23:02.000 Yeah, you would think so, but I think it's a lot more complicated than that.
01:23:06.000 Yeah, well, again, there are trade-offs between some of these things where it's just hard to really be satisfied that you've hit the right answer because it's the...
01:23:17.000 So, for instance, going through security in the airport, there's this issue of fairness, and there's this issue of intelligent use of attentional resources.
01:23:27.000 So the fairness would say, yes...
01:23:29.000 Frisk the 75-year-old woman who looks like she just got out of her evangelical church just as much as you frisk the guy who just prayed on his knees to Mecca before passing through security.
01:23:46.000 It's only fair to be blind to those otherwise salient differences between them.
01:23:53.000 But it's stupid, too, when you know that the person who's gonna blow himself up on the plane is a jihadi and not an ordinary-looking old woman.
01:24:05.000 So, again, what are the consequences of being starkly unfair, where you just profile nakedly and say, yes, without apology, we profile.
01:24:15.000 If you're Muslim, we are going to subject you to a harrowing search at the airport because we're worried about your brothers.
01:24:26.000 We have to find a balance.
01:24:28.000 We're struggling to find a balance between those two things.
01:24:34.000 In the current environment, I think we're wise to err on the side of being fair.
01:24:40.000 And I think you would want us to err in that direction, to be fair and to be transparent.
01:24:48.000 But that's what's so scary about something like nuclear terrorism.
01:24:52.000 One thing has to happen.
01:24:54.000 And all of a sudden, we'll all be desperate for a level of security that will radically transform our lives.
01:25:02.000 And it'll be, again, it could be completely out of scale with the actual damage.
01:25:08.000 So if a nuke went off in Los Angeles and killed 100,000 people, so a small nuke, killed 100,000 people and rendered some area uninhabitable for a while, That would be such a rattling event that we would all be demanding huge changes and we would be forfeiting our civil liberties happily with both hands.
01:25:34.000 As was clearly evident after 9-11.
01:25:38.000 Right, but this would be orders of magnitude worse and yet It would be rational to say, well, listen, 400,000 people died of heart disease last year.
01:25:47.000 No one is forfeiting their civil liberties or going nuts over that figure.
01:25:53.000 We're talking about 100,000 people.
01:25:56.000 What is the real risk we're talking about?
01:25:58.000 Well, there's a sudden death over a long, slow, self-administered death.
01:26:02.000 Even if that would be...
01:26:05.000 Even if we...
01:26:07.000 I'm not saying that's the right way to look at it, but even if you could show a commensurate body count from some other source...
01:26:16.000 Actually, Bill Maher once made this point where...
01:26:19.000 I think he was talking about Hurricane Katrina.
01:26:21.000 He said, look at what happened with Hurricane Katrina and the billions of dollars in cost and a thousand lives lost.
01:26:28.000 If a terrorist had done this...
01:26:30.000 We would completely freak out as a nation because it's the weather, we basically can't get our act together and don't really worry about it.
01:26:40.000 That difference in response is...
01:26:45.000 Something we have to be cognizant of.
01:26:47.000 And so one reason, one rational reason to want to protect against certain especially salient events like nuclear terrorism is because we are guaranteed to overreact in such a way that the consequences will be...
01:27:06.000 Horrendous.
01:27:07.000 I mean, just economic consequences.
01:27:09.000 That's a very good point.
01:27:10.000 So your point is cut back on civil liberties so that we don't have to cut back on them in the future when the shit hits the fan.
01:27:15.000 Well, to some degree...
01:27:16.000 It's an argument.
01:27:17.000 You're not committed to it, but it's an argument.
01:27:19.000 Yeah, no, but cut back on them...
01:27:21.000 And again, I wouldn't phrase it in terms of cutting back on civil liberties, but I... It comes back to moments like airport security for me.
01:27:32.000 It's like, how much security do I want when I get on an airplane?
01:27:35.000 I want intelligent security.
01:27:37.000 And I also want fairness.
01:27:40.000 And I'm willing to put up with a certain level of inconvenience to know that basically this is being done sanely.
01:27:50.000 Now, do I want huge inconvenience?
01:27:53.000 Do I want to be bombarded with x-rays?
01:27:55.000 Do I want to, you know, do I want to have to take my clothes off every time I get on a plane?
01:27:59.000 No, but it's just...
01:28:03.000 We have, as a society, we...
01:28:07.000 There's something very corrosive about the signs that these efforts are ineffectual and not being done intelligently.
01:28:17.000 If we could all just see an airport security protocol that just looked right, then I think everyone would understand why we had to do it.
01:28:29.000 But it looks so wrong and it feels so wrong.
01:28:34.000 It doesn't feel like it's improving.
01:28:36.000 It's not like they're figuring out the system better and this is an easier way to do it, less intrusive.
01:28:41.000 There's no easier way to do it.
01:28:43.000 And I'm not even putting myself...
01:28:44.000 It's like I'm not...
01:28:46.000 You know, I don't actually look, I don't think I look like I'm Al Qaeda, but I don't look, I'm not as benign.
01:28:54.000 I once saw a little girl when we first got the shoe bomber effect and we were all having to take off our shoes.
01:29:04.000 I saw, you know, I saw a three-year-old girl in her, you know, whatever those black and white shoes that little girls wear are called.
01:29:14.000 Jellies?
01:29:15.000 Uggs?
01:29:16.000 I don't know.
01:29:17.000 There's some older school name.
01:29:18.000 Anyway, she was like holding up a line.
01:29:21.000 She was being forced to take her shoes off.
01:29:23.000 She was terrified.
01:29:24.000 It was like her first flight, you know, and like the parents were being traumatized.
01:29:27.000 And it was just the most insane misapplication of human resources.
01:29:34.000 And meanwhile, that was a flight where I had accidentally taken a bag that I used to keep a gun in, and I went through security with a double handful of bullets, just inadvertently, right?
01:29:50.000 So I'm getting through with bullets, and they're looking at this girl like she's, you know, she's Al Qaeda.
01:29:58.000 Al Gore got frisked.
01:30:00.000 Do you remember that?
01:30:01.000 No, but...
01:30:02.000 Yeah, Al Gore made a big deal out of it because he was flying commercial on one of these flights and he got frisked.
01:30:08.000 I was like, what the fuck, man?
01:30:11.000 How ridiculous is that?
01:30:12.000 That's a symbolic demonstration of fairness.
01:30:15.000 Yeah, it is, I guess.
01:30:16.000 At a certain point in time, you go, come on, you think the ex-vice president is going to become a suicide bomber?
01:30:22.000 Is that what we're looking at here?
01:30:23.000 Yeah, yeah.
01:30:24.000 So it's that kind of thing that I think is corrosive.
01:30:27.000 And the...
01:30:30.000 The missteps and failures we've had at the level of foreign policy and in fighting wars have been corrosive for the same reason.
01:30:37.000 It's just the ineptitude and the unacknowledged and unanticipated costs.
01:30:43.000 It's all just, yeah, it's very hard to be idealistic or feel like anything is being done right.
01:30:51.000 But again, think of just what That's what Obama's got to deal with when he drinks his first cup of coffee in the morning.
01:31:00.000 They're getting information from a world of intelligence which is struggling to quantify certain risks, and there is no question that there are people who are Desperate to blow up whole cities in this country, not because they have said they have a long list of rational grievances against our foreign policy, but because they're fighting a cosmic war.
01:31:27.000 And that's just something we have to absorb, as bizarre a fact as it is.
01:31:34.000 So you think for most people it's almost impossible to sort of understand their mindset, to really put yourself into their shoes.
01:31:41.000 It's virtually impossible to really have that kind of a crazed, deep belief.
01:31:46.000 I don't find it actually.
01:31:47.000 I feel like I can put myself in their shoes.
01:31:50.000 If I read the Koran and I read the Hadith and I read what people like Osama bin Laden say about their intentions and why they're doing what they're doing, you watch a few Suicide videos, you know, Last Testament videos of suicide bombers.
01:32:10.000 You just have to imagine what it would be like if you really believed that this was the structure of the universe, where this human life that people like us really value is just this This irredeemable,
01:32:27.000 fallen, really revolting circumstance of separation from God, and it's just this anteroom to the better place that you get into if you live this way and die in the right way at the right time.
01:32:50.000 Eternity awaits.
01:32:51.000 Eternity, where all the good people get to be happy forever, awaits.
01:32:56.000 Now, why would you want to stick around here?
01:32:59.000 I have to talk about this more, but I also have to pee.
01:33:03.000 So what I'm going to do is I'm going to put my headphones down, and I'm going to ask you a question when we get back, though.
01:33:07.000 How the fuck does anything get fixed?
01:33:09.000 How do we fix this?
01:33:10.000 If you were the grand social engineer of the universe, think about that.
01:33:14.000 I will follow you.
01:33:17.000 So now, what do we do while you pee?
01:33:18.000 Brian?
01:33:20.000 Hey, how's it going?
01:33:24.000 Sorry, I'm just readjusting everything.
01:33:29.000 Is this something that you fell into?
01:33:32.000 Did you think like this growing up?
01:33:35.000 Or did you have somebody that inspired your beliefs in the way that you think?
01:33:40.000 I guess your stance on everything?
01:33:44.000 Have you always been interested in it?
01:33:48.000 Well, I've always been interested in...
01:33:54.000 Religious experience.
01:33:55.000 Right.
01:33:56.000 Just what it means for people personally and just what the possibilities are.
01:34:02.000 As a teenager, I was as interested in just what are the limits of reality as anyone else.
01:34:10.000 And so to some degree, my research there has been scientific and now increasingly scientific.
01:34:15.000 But early on, I was interested in religion as a possible account of what's true.
01:34:24.000 And I was also interested in the kinds of experiences that the founders of the world's religions have had or seem to have had.
01:34:31.000 So I'm interested in the kind of experience that would get Jesus talking like Jesus or Buddha talking like Buddha and I've sought those experiences with drugs and meditation and it's absolutely clear to me that there is a range of experience there that is hugely motivating and real and accessible and has been traditionally described only in religious language and seems to
01:35:01.000 cash out the crazy claims of of the various religions.
01:35:06.000 So if you're a devout Muslim, And you start having the kinds of experiences that we've had on acid or that people have had in intensive meditation retreats, they get framed in very much in doctrinal ways.
01:35:23.000 So it seems to justify your infatuation with this one revelation, a revelation which is intrinsically divisive, which argues that you should hate everyone who's not In the fold.
01:35:38.000 So clearly we need a way of talking about these kinds of experiences and valuing them, which is just as generalizable and scalable as the larger conversation of reason and science-based thinking about the nature of reality, and therefore is not in principle divisive.
01:35:58.000 One of the things that McKenna always said in describing the difference between religion and the psychedelic experience is that in the psychedelic experience you don't have to believe anything.
01:36:06.000 Right.
01:36:06.000 Just go on in and you're going to experience it whether you like it or not.
01:36:10.000 You're going to get hit by it.
01:36:12.000 How you interpret it and how you disseminate it inside your own head is one thing.
01:36:15.000 Right.
01:36:15.000 It's not like a religious experience in that you don't have to believe.
01:36:18.000 Yeah.
01:36:19.000 Oh, yeah.
01:36:19.000 Which is probably the beauty of it because, you know, the ego wants you to hold back to all and retain all control of your faculties at any given time.
01:36:27.000 You don't want to relinquish control to some sort of a foreign substance, some sort of a drug, some sort of a thing that, you know, you're going to give up your whole body and your mind for three hours?
01:36:36.000 Fuck that.
01:36:36.000 That's too long.
01:36:37.000 That freaks people out.
01:36:39.000 Yeah.
01:36:39.000 Well, it freaks me.
01:36:41.000 You know, I... It freaks people out with good reason because there is a chaos factor to psychedelics which you don't get doing yoga.
01:36:49.000 Now, that's their power and their peril because the other thing that McKenna said, which is obviously quite true, which is that if you teach someone to meditate or you teach them to do yoga or you tell them to do whatever spiritual discipline you think is so potent, Based on their talents or based on their happenstance, nothing might happen.
01:37:16.000 They just might get bored.
01:37:18.000 It doesn't matter if they do it for an hour or a week.
01:37:21.000 It's not necessarily going to move them, but if you give them 100 micrograms of LSD or a sufficient dose of anything in that family, There is just no question something's going to happen.
01:37:36.000 Now, it could be very pleasant.
01:37:38.000 It could be very unpleasant.
01:37:39.000 It could be mixed.
01:37:39.000 But there's going to be a break with their ordinary consensus trance of egoity.
01:37:47.000 And that's huge.
01:37:50.000 So it's a huge shortcut.
01:37:51.000 But the problem is it does just sort of just puts you in a slingshot and you're not quite sure where it's pointed.
01:37:57.000 And then it's...
01:37:59.000 You're going there.
01:38:00.000 So it's a method, but you think that meditation is probably an equally effective method if you really follow it through.
01:38:06.000 I mean, I think of meditation the same way I think of martial arts.
01:38:09.000 You know, I could teach you a spinning wheel kick.
01:38:12.000 I could show you it.
01:38:13.000 And you might not ever be able to do it right.
01:38:16.000 You might not have the flexibility, the coordination, whether it's mental flexibility.
01:38:20.000 You might not be able to focus on it enough or be intense enough or be disciplined enough to stretch yourself enough to pull something off.
01:38:27.000 But you can't say that Another person can't pull it off.
01:38:30.000 It is possible to pull it off.
01:38:31.000 It's possible to be an expert at it.
01:38:33.000 But out of all the people that you teach this, you know, like Kundalini or some intense form of meditation where you achieve altered states of consciousness, how many people are going to have the focus, the drive, the discipline?
01:38:43.000 How many people are going to put in the time and the numbers to actually pull off an altered state?
01:38:48.000 I have never done it.
01:38:54.000 I completely agree with that, except there's one caveat, which is I think the center of the bullseye of altered states of meditation is not so altered.
01:39:04.000 It's actually the thing that you want to realize from a contemplative point of view.
01:39:12.000 It's not actually the same as the full kaleidoscope of effects you get from psychedelics.
01:39:21.000 It's not just, and this is a distinction I made, I think again in The End of Faith, between the content of consciousness and realizing a specific property of the nature of consciousness.
01:39:36.000 There's no question that in our ordinary waking consciousness that the content, the spectrum of content is trimmed down.
01:39:46.000 I mean, we have, you know, there's just kind of a feeling of it's all solid and it's just me here in my body.
01:39:51.000 I'm kind of locked in my head and it's you over there and there's no, the energy of the situation is quite limited.
01:40:01.000 Yeah, and There are not too many surprises.
01:40:04.000 We have all kind of been taught neurologically to just perceive ourselves in the world.
01:40:09.000 You give someone LSD or psilocybin or mescaline and that begins to change radically and it changes for everyone and it can be terrifying, it can be incredibly blissful.
01:40:24.000 But what happens is people are flooded with new content and new feelings of meaning and just the energetics change.
01:40:35.000 So you put your hand on a tree and you feel like the buzz of kind of living contact with a tree, which you have never felt in your life.
01:40:47.000 All of that kind of the more aspect that you get with psychedelics isn't really what isn't the point of meditation and it comes with meditation so if you go on you know a three-month retreat where you're just meditating 18 hours a day and every time your mind gets lost in thought you come back to the practice whether it's you know mindfulness like Vipassana meditation or whatever it is it could be yoga That,
01:41:14.000 you know, being in a pressure cooker of intensive retreat can give you that some experience of more.
01:41:20.000 I've never quite had it like what you get in a psychedelic experience.
01:41:23.000 How close have you come?
01:41:27.000 Well, it's not the...
01:41:30.000 You can certainly get what you get with MDMA. I mean, the full-blown, empathic, unconditional love thing.
01:41:39.000 Really?
01:41:39.000 Yeah.
01:41:39.000 You've had that?
01:41:40.000 Oh, yeah, yeah.
01:41:41.000 Wow.
01:41:42.000 And they're actually, within Buddhism, there are practices that are just tuned to that.
01:41:47.000 So the practice of loving-kindness, called metta in Pali, It's just, you're just trying to stoke that emotion.
01:41:55.000 And you're just thinking, it's a very simple practice.
01:42:00.000 You bring to mind people you love.
01:42:02.000 Not romantic love, but people who you just, you know, your best friend, say.
01:42:07.000 And you just meditate on that person and you just think, you know, thoughts of well-wishing for them.
01:42:14.000 May you be happy.
01:42:15.000 May you be free from suffering.
01:42:17.000 And just connect with your wish for that person's happiness.
01:42:20.000 And you just train that up.
01:42:22.000 The crucial piece is once you get concentrated, once your mind is no longer wandering into the chatter of just distraction, and you can actually focus You get the feeling going and you can focus on the actual practice.
01:42:40.000 Then you can do it.
01:42:42.000 Then it gets kindled and then you're feeling very much what you feel on ecstasy where there's just this...
01:42:51.000 It becomes like ecstasy the moment you move it off.
01:42:58.000 You start with someone who's very easy to love, like your best friend, and then...
01:43:05.000 Then the practice evolves, and then you move it to a neutral person, and then you even move it to an enemy.
01:43:10.000 And so then you get it, then it's just broad spectrum, you know, 360, I love, I wish everyone happiness.
01:43:18.000 That's the goal of the practice.
01:43:19.000 But wishing with a totally focused mind that is not lost in thought.
01:43:27.000 I mean, the truth is, just having a concentrated mind that's not getting lost in thought It's just intrinsically pleasurable.
01:43:36.000 It's intrinsically blissful.
01:43:38.000 It's like the emotional base note of all the good drug experiences.
01:43:46.000 It's like the opiate happy feeling comes just with concentration.
01:43:52.000 It doesn't matter what you're concentrated on.
01:43:54.000 If you're just concentrated on a I mean Buddhists do practices where they'll just focus on a colored disc and they reach levels of concentration.
01:44:04.000 So you're just focusing on a piece of, a swatch of red and you're reaching states of consciousness that are just extraordinarily blissful.
01:44:18.000 But again, that's not the ultimate point of meditation.
01:44:24.000 Concentration is just a tool to use to actually glimpse something about the nature of consciousness.
01:44:30.000 And so this comes back to what I was saying before, that the actual goal, and this is a difference between just getting more content and getting the wisdom that comes with recognizing something about consciousness.
01:44:45.000 The goal is to recognize that ordinary consciousness, without anything getting psychedelic, is a circumstance of genuine freedom.
01:44:56.000 That the sense of being a neurotic self, locked in the head, worried about what other people are thinking, that can be cut through Fully, so that it's just gone.
01:45:13.000 So that you can recognize the intrinsic selflessness of consciousness.
01:45:17.000 And that can happen without any of the pyrotechnics.
01:45:19.000 It can happen without the rush of energy in the body.
01:45:23.000 It can happen without the colors changing.
01:45:25.000 It can happen without any luminosity of any kind.
01:45:30.000 You don't feel like you've taken a drug.
01:45:35.000 Your awareness is crystal clear.
01:45:37.000 It's compatible with ordinary behavior.
01:45:41.000 You can drive a car.
01:45:43.000 If someone says, can you pass the salt?
01:45:45.000 You're not this dazzled, stoned person who can't find the salt.
01:45:50.000 You're fully here.
01:45:52.000 And integrated and yet the center has dropped out of experience and you can just...
01:45:58.000 only the world remains in some sense.
01:46:01.000 You're no longer on this side of it.
01:46:04.000 Obsessing personally.
01:46:05.000 Or even just...
01:46:07.000 even the sense of subject-object perception.
01:46:11.000 Even just...
01:46:12.000 it's like there's a way of looking...
01:46:13.000 you take any object And there's a way of looking at it as an object, where I feel like I'm over here looking at it.
01:46:23.000 And then there's also a way of still seeing it, but Seeing it so clearly that you're no longer the seer.
01:46:35.000 You're no longer on the outside or on the inside looking out.
01:46:40.000 There's just seeing.
01:46:41.000 There's just a totality.
01:46:42.000 This is some karate kid type shit.
01:46:44.000 You're like, become the cap.
01:46:46.000 That's what you're saying.
01:46:47.000 No, but it's not becoming the cap.
01:46:48.000 It's just become the world.
01:46:49.000 Become the whole world.
01:46:50.000 Become whatever you focus on.
01:46:52.000 Most of us feel like we are...
01:46:57.000 Having an experience like there's there's our experience There's the world of our experience and then there's us over here having the experience You know like we're on the outside looking in or we're looking over our own shoulder There's a distance there's a subject and then there's all the objects and it's possible to collapse that distance You know in a way that is doesn't require any psychedelic explosion and From a meditational
01:47:27.000 point of view, that's the center of the bullseye.
01:47:30.000 You want to find that intrinsic property of consciousness, and then you meditate on that.
01:47:36.000 Then you drop your distraction, and you fall back into that space of just being open.
01:47:42.000 And aware and then it doesn't matter what happens then it doesn't matter whether you feel bliss or you don't You're not waiting for the meditation to get good.
01:47:50.000 You're not trying to have an experience that you had yesterday that you That you lost and you're trying to get back to it.
01:47:57.000 I mean that's all of the seeking That tends to come in people's spiritual lives where they're just trying to get someplace that's The irony is that the seeking is your problem.
01:48:08.000 Trying to become happy, positing a goal.
01:48:15.000 And then seeking it from a contemplative point of view is the trap that you want to avoid.
01:48:21.000 You mean as far as behavior is concerned?
01:48:25.000 You don't mean that as far as goal setting in life, right?
01:48:27.000 No.
01:48:29.000 There's certainly a place for goal setting.
01:48:31.000 I was going to say, how do you have this attitude and still write your books?
01:48:33.000 How is it possible?
01:48:35.000 I'm not nullifying all purpose-based behavior, obviously.
01:48:39.000 But from a contemplative point of view, so the question is, What is available to realize now, in the present moment, that is liberating?
01:48:50.000 So it's just me, neurotic me, unhappy me, me who's disappointed with yesterday.
01:48:56.000 What can I do right now to be free?
01:49:02.000 Is that even possible?
01:49:05.000 Does the question even make any sense?
01:49:06.000 Now, some people would say, well, that doesn't make any sense.
01:49:10.000 You are just a monkey, or you're just an ape with various needs and desires, and you can be as happy as you can be, but there's nothing really profound to be realized about the nature of consciousness in the present.
01:49:25.000 There's just you believing in certain things, wanting certain things, etc.
01:49:33.000 That's just not true.
01:49:34.000 Now, it's completely rational that many people think it's true because they haven't had certain kinds of experiences, but the truth is, and this is a truth that, inconveniently for our sake, is only really ever acknowledged in the context of religion, The truth is there actually is something more profound to realize about the present moment.
01:49:56.000 And you get one look at that truth through the psychedelic experience because It's just you being neurotic and someone hands you a tab of acid and all of a sudden you are awash in an ocean of new content that is completely profound and you've had no idea life could be so rich.
01:50:21.000 Now, if you have a bad experience, you have a bad experience and that's something else.
01:50:28.000 But if you have a good psychedelic experience where you feel like Jesus, That proves to you that it's possible to be much, much deeper and happier and fulfilled than you realized.
01:50:43.000 I read that you had a very similar experience to me the first time you did MDMA. And that was a real behavior-changing experience for me.
01:50:56.000 And I remember when I did it, I really couldn't stop thinking after it was over, like, why can't people be like that all the time?
01:51:04.000 What an incredible world it would be if people thought like that all the time.
01:51:08.000 Would anything ever get done?
01:51:09.000 I don't know.
01:51:09.000 But, you know, boy, human interaction would be blissful all the time.
01:51:13.000 Yeah, and again, I keep feeling just a civic responsibility to bracket all of my There's enthusiasm for psychedelics with the warning that I think some of them are just biochemically more riskier than others, and some are just psychologically risky, and it's possible to have a bad experience and to really regret taking any of these drugs.
01:51:41.000 Well, if you have a hard time with reality, I say stay the fuck away from psychedelics.
01:51:46.000 But even if you've had nothing but good experiences, you can suddenly start having bad experiences.
01:51:53.000 I mean, that was my course.
01:51:54.000 I took...
01:51:55.000 MDMA a few times.
01:51:57.000 I took psilocybin a few times.
01:52:00.000 I took acid a dozen times or so.
01:52:02.000 And I had, for the most part, especially with LSD, I had 10 perfect experiences where Afterwards, it was unthinkable to me that anyone ever had a bad trip.
01:52:17.000 I didn't even know what that...
01:52:19.000 I couldn't even see the direction you would head to have a bad trip.
01:52:24.000 Did anything change in your life before you had the bad trip?
01:52:27.000 I don't know what the process was.
01:52:30.000 Relationship?
01:52:31.000 Insecurities?
01:52:32.000 No, I mean, but it's just...
01:52:34.000 But then...
01:52:36.000 I think this is...
01:52:37.000 I don't know.
01:52:38.000 I don't have any science to go on here, but anecdotally, I think this is a reasonably common experience where...
01:52:43.000 Once you've had a bad trip, then the door is slightly ajar there, and you can find your way there in a way, kind of reliably.
01:52:53.000 So I approach psychedelics with more caution now, and it's been years since I've done anything.
01:53:00.000 But it's not that I wouldn't do it again.
01:53:03.000 I probably would, but I would just pick my moment.
01:53:07.000 Wisely, because as good as the good trips were, the bad trips were just as bad.
01:53:14.000 The legal situation is very unfortunate, because if it was legal, then we could have people that were experts on it, that were professionals, and they could distribute it, and they could do it properly in the right environment, and we'd have I agree with
01:53:46.000 you that you should be really careful about anything you do.
01:53:50.000 I know people that they just, you know, they get on Xanax and they lose their mind.
01:53:55.000 You know, I know people that just, things that seem to be mild and acceptable.
01:53:59.000 I know people who can't drink.
01:54:00.000 You know, everyone's mind is very different biochemically the way it reacts to different substances, you know.
01:54:07.000 Some people can't smoke.
01:54:08.000 We were talking about this before.
01:54:09.000 I know people that have given them pot and they swear there's something in it.
01:54:12.000 They swear this is not pot.
01:54:14.000 You're drugging me.
01:54:15.000 No, it's just pot, man.
01:54:18.000 Your setup's different.
01:54:20.000 There's a certain amount of immunity that I've developed.
01:54:22.000 That you don't have.
01:54:24.000 Tolerance, rather.
01:54:25.000 I think it's really unfortunate, though, that we can't experiment with these things.
01:54:30.000 They aren't at a university level, that this isn't normal.
01:54:34.000 People are quietly doing research on basically everything now.
01:54:37.000 I don't know if there's anything that you can't do research with at the moment, but it all is pretty quiet.
01:54:45.000 But they're doing MDMA research, and actually the...
01:54:48.000 I was at TED, and someone who's somewhat close to this research told me that they've been having such success with two sessions of MDMA therapy for PTSD that the military is now looking at using MDMA for...
01:55:05.000 Yeah, I'd heard about that.
01:55:06.000 Two or three session protocol, which sort of...
01:55:10.000 I think the jury's still out on the neurotoxicity of MDMA. I think it's...
01:55:16.000 I mean, there have been studies on both sides, but if it's just two sessions and you get some huge response rate for PTSD, that sort of gets around the neurotoxicity question because it's not so toxic that you can't do it a few times or...
01:55:34.000 Even a few more times than that.
01:55:37.000 But yeah, so anyway, I'm not a...
01:55:41.000 Psychedelics were truly indispensable for me at a certain time in my life in terms of just...
01:55:49.000 I was so...
01:55:50.000 I was a hard enough case and skeptical enough that there was anything worth realizing through introspection that it took just getting hurled over...
01:56:03.000 The wall for me to realize that there was any any more to the world and and and so and then that gave me a basis from which to Practice meditation and kind of look into these things.
01:56:14.000 What do you think is happening in the psychedelic experience?
01:56:17.000 I've heard the broad spectrum of you know, you're just changing the brain chemistry or adding in a different element it creates hallucinations and I Because of those hallucinations, you know, you get these profound feelings, and you can learn and grow from those feelings.
01:56:33.000 Two, it's a radio, and you're tuning into another life form that only communicates with you through eating it.
01:56:39.000 It's from another planet, and that's why there's a logos.
01:56:42.000 That's why when you take especially high doses of mushrooms, you'll have a language.
01:56:47.000 Whether it's internal or not, you don't really know.
01:56:49.000 I mean, it could all be...
01:56:52.000 If you can see any of that stuff, how much of that is just firing against the different parts of your brain that causes visions?
01:57:01.000 What do you think is happening in a psychedelic experience?
01:57:04.000 I blogged about this.
01:57:06.000 I wrote an article titled Drugs and the Meaning of Life.
01:57:13.000 In a footnote, I differentiated those two Kinds of psychedelic experience because there is the one experience which is Again, personal, even if it's trans-personal, it doesn't put you in dialogue with anything else, or doesn't seem to put you in dialogue with anything else.
01:57:37.000 And that's the only kind I've ever had.
01:57:39.000 I've never had the experience where you're the Terrence McKenna style, I'm now in the presence of the other talking and receiving information that I couldn't have had any other way, or I don't think I could have had any other way.
01:57:54.000 So So for people who have had that experience, it seems rational to say that it's putting you in touch with another in some sense.
01:58:04.000 It's not just an expanded you or just the universe without your ego involved.
01:58:11.000 It's actually...
01:58:14.000 Putting somebody else's attention on you and now you're in dialogue.
01:58:18.000 Now that's an experience I haven't had and so I can't really...
01:58:22.000 But the thing is that the test of the validity of that experience is pretty straightforward.
01:58:28.000 I mean, if you're getting information that you couldn't have any other way, that should be provable.
01:58:34.000 And one of the fishy things about Terrence's account of these states is that At many moments, he really did claim to have a compelling experience of being in dialogue with a kind of omniscient other.
01:58:54.000 I don't know if you read his book, True Hallucination.
01:58:57.000 He's in the Amazon, he's walking around, and he's had more mushrooms than any person in human history.
01:59:07.000 He is in dialogue with, it's a very readable book, very fun read, some very out there ideas in there.
01:59:19.000 And so I'm going to falsify by summarizing what he was claiming to be in dialogue with.
01:59:26.000 But he's in dialogue with some omniscient other.
01:59:30.000 So he's pointing to a species of plant that he doesn't know the name of.
01:59:35.000 Terence had a lot of botanical knowledge, but he's pointing to plants that he doesn't know the name of.
01:59:40.000 And he claimed he's just getting the Latin name in his head beamed to him by the other.
01:59:46.000 Right now, that would be a he he it's been a little while since I looked at the book, but it.
01:59:54.000 If you're of a scientific frame of mind and you actually want to establish whether this is more than just your experience, that's the kind of thing that's very testable.
02:00:03.000 You could say, listen, I didn't know any of these plants, and I've never taken a course in botany, or I'm going to give the same dose to someone who I really know doesn't know a damn thing about botany, and we're going to see how many of these species of plants he can name.
02:00:18.000 And that's just, I mean, that would be, it's as easy as testing psychic phenomenon in an ordinary sense.
02:00:25.000 Sure, if you could attach it scientifically.
02:00:27.000 If you could just get information.
02:00:28.000 One unique experience, though.
02:00:30.000 Did you remember any of those names?
02:00:35.000 Well, yeah, he didn't.
02:00:36.000 So, Terrence was so smart, but...
02:00:43.000 He was not the most rigorous at the margins of his rap on what is real.
02:00:51.000 He was more poet than scientist when he would get to some of these crucial moments.
02:00:59.000 I haven't seen in his work any effort to be really rigorous and say, Okay, I had this experience where I was getting information that I know was not my own content.
02:01:14.000 It was not based on prior learning and it was not just merely imagined.
02:01:17.000 It was real information.
02:01:18.000 And here is how I went about trying to authenticate that it was real information.
02:01:22.000 Because he talks about just being able to close his eyes and see Alien civilizations, obviously that's hard to authenticate, but see historical periods and see...
02:01:35.000 He used to say that?
02:01:35.000 Yeah, yeah.
02:01:36.000 What book is that in?
02:01:39.000 It was in some of his talks.
02:01:42.000 Oh, he's probably high as fuck.
02:01:44.000 Yeah, so obviously it's possible to be completely stoned and have these wild experiences that are basically just dreams or hypnagogic images.
02:01:54.000 Unless you can bring back those Latin names.
02:01:56.000 Yeah, if you can't bring back something that's clearly information...
02:02:00.000 Then my feeling is there's no reason to claim that it is.
02:02:03.000 You can claim that this is...
02:02:05.000 The one thing that...
02:02:06.000 What's indisputable is that people can have a range of experience that is incredibly beautiful and life-changing.
02:02:17.000 And then...
02:02:20.000 Certain percentage of people feel the need to tell a metaphysical story about the significance of those experiences and in religion is in the business of Enshrining specific metaphysical stories as the ultimate truth We know they can't all be true because they're all mutually canceling Which is to say if Christianity is true Islam is false and vice versa but The psychedelic experience falls under the same rubric.
02:02:50.000 I mean, you can have all of these experiences and not know what they mean and be very humble about what you don't know and still value the experiences.
02:02:59.000 Or you can say, oh no, I'm in contact with the Pleiadians and they live in a star system and they're sending messages, blah, blah, blah.
02:03:08.000 And then you're just part of the cacophony of New Age claims that are Unsubstantiated.
02:03:15.000 Yeah, unsubstantiated.
02:03:16.000 So, I didn't know that he had claimed that.
02:03:18.000 That's really pretty funny.
02:03:20.000 But one of the things that he did claim was that he was high on mushrooms, and they were communicating with him, telling him to create a map of time out of the I Ching.
02:03:29.000 That's something he worked on.
02:03:30.000 Yeah, that was the whole time wave.
02:03:32.000 Yeah.
02:03:32.000 That's another thing that just, you know, he...
02:03:36.000 He played some mathematical game with the...
02:03:39.000 The end date, right?
02:03:40.000 The King Wen sequence and the I Ching.
02:03:42.000 And I don't think he did it.
02:03:45.000 I don't think he was alone for this.
02:03:46.000 I think he found some mathematically talented or crazy grad student to help him with this game.
02:03:53.000 But he got some pattern of novelty.
02:03:57.000 Innovation, yeah.
02:03:57.000 But again, how you define novelty is so sketchy and...
02:04:02.000 I never wanted to go down that particular rabbit hole with him.
02:04:08.000 But yeah, if the world ends in eight months or whatever it is, as he predicted, or the singularity happened or something huge, what he predicted is the asymptotic achievement of novelty on December 21st, 2012. Whatever that means, it's going to be the most novel day in the history of the universe, and nothing will be the same.
02:04:38.000 So if December 22nd dawns, and basically we've just had another news cycle, and it's just Fox News versus CNN, we'll know that that novelty theory was wrong, and then there'll be the percentage of devotees who just think it's kind of time-shifted in some, you know, Crucial way, giving us a few more years.
02:05:01.000 He's fun to follow, because he was such an entertaining speaker, and I think that was part of the problem.
02:05:05.000 The problem was that he was so entertaining and engaging that he sort of was a prisoner to his gift, and his gift was to tell these compelling stories, and if the story wasn't so compelling, well, move things around and make it compelling.
02:05:19.000 Unfortunately, I really found out recently, because the people on my message board kind of illuminated this to me, he changed the end date.
02:05:25.000 The December 21st, 2012 end date that he always said was...
02:05:29.000 That he magically arrived at with his mathematical program, which was to the day, the same end date of the mind calendar.
02:05:37.000 Brian, you gotta throw that fucking stupid clock away, man.
02:05:40.000 That shit's annoying.
02:05:43.000 Ridiculous meow clock.
02:05:45.000 You're a grown man.
02:05:46.000 But apparently it was really in November.
02:05:49.000 It wasn't...
02:05:50.000 His original calculations were in November.
02:05:53.000 And then when he found out about the end date of the Mayan calendar, then he just shifted in a month.
02:05:58.000 Which is so convenient.
02:05:59.000 But it's ridiculous.
02:06:00.000 Because he used to say to the day.
02:06:02.000 So he was a great speaker.
02:06:04.000 It was a really cool idea.
02:06:06.000 It was a lot of fun to follow.
02:06:07.000 But when you do that much mushrooms...
02:06:11.000 You know, reality must become like a slippery fish in your hand.
02:06:14.000 You know, really, really difficult to constantly have control of.
02:06:19.000 Yeah, yeah.
02:06:20.000 I mean, it is a bit of a liability.
02:06:22.000 When you say it so well, you can get carried away with just the experience of saying it that well.
02:06:31.000 And to some degree it's true with writing.
02:06:34.000 I mean, you can have...
02:06:35.000 I think Freud's influence...
02:06:39.000 His outside influence, which is kind of inexplicable given how crazy some of his ideas were, is born of just the quality of his writing.
02:06:52.000 I mean, Freud was a great writer, and it's just, I mean, the whole mythology he created for what's going on in our heads.
02:07:02.000 Fascinating.
02:07:02.000 Yeah, it's fascinating, but it's like, you know, so much of it is...
02:07:05.000 Cocaine-based.
02:07:06.000 Should have been obviously bogus, but...
02:07:08.000 He's a damn good writer.
02:07:10.000 Yeah, well, to this day, people talk about Freudian slips.
02:07:14.000 Somehow there's dick going on in the back of your mind all day.
02:07:17.000 Well, it's not that it is.
02:07:20.000 There's a lot of unconscious processing going on.
02:07:23.000 And this is actually the subject of my current book, a very short book on free will, speaks to that, that it's just...
02:07:34.000 The sense that we have of being the conscious authors of our thoughts and actions we know is false.
02:07:41.000 Now, it's not false in the Freudian sense that we've got the id and the superego and the ego at war and it's all being driven from behind by a kind of Intelligence that's consciously editing what we can consciously know.
02:07:56.000 But most of what's going on in the brain is unconscious.
02:08:03.000 And most of it's not even potentially conscious.
02:08:05.000 And that actually explains a lot of the change you get with psychedelics because you change the biochemistry enough You're playing with the margin of what's conscious and what's potentially conscious, and we are potentially conscious of a lot of things we don't tend to be conscious of, and that it completely transforms our experience.
02:08:30.000 But there's a lot that we're not just potentially conscious of, that the brain is doing, and everything we are conscious of is dependent upon all of that work.
02:08:40.000 So, for instance, the fact that you are Hearing my words as words right now because you speak English and I'm speaking in English and you're parsing this I'm making sounds and you're just you're not making any special effort to hear words You're just hearing words.
02:08:53.000 In fact, you couldn't not hear words if you tried and they're just the words are coming and you're understanding them and I'm gonna get to the end of this sentence sometime and we'll both recognize that it was more or less grammatically correct all of that is It's happening unconsciously and you're not...
02:09:14.000 You're just conscious of understanding what I'm saying or not, based on whether I'm following the rules of English grammar or not.
02:09:22.000 But I'm not aware of what's allowing me to follow the rules.
02:09:25.000 You're not aware of what's allowing you to detect my errors.
02:09:31.000 And the truth is, from a conscious perspective, I don't know how I get to the end of the sentence.
02:09:37.000 This is really, like, all of this experience of talking is riding atop a machinery That I can't inspect.
02:09:44.000 And when it fails, it's a surprise, and I don't know why it failed.
02:09:50.000 So that's just talking about parsing speech, but all of our thinking and behaving and wanting and doing, all of our inner life is made of unconscious processing of that sort.
02:10:08.000 And so there are experiments where you can show that people When you think you have consciously decided to do something, your brain is actually committed to doing it a half a second or some seconds while you still think you're making up your mind.
02:10:25.000 So this really nullifies a conventional notion of free will because if you give me two buttons to push and I can push either one I want and I can push them when I want and you just tell me to make up my mind and I go back and forth and back and forth and say, I'm going to push the left one.
02:10:43.000 It's a completely free choice.
02:10:44.000 I did it.
02:10:45.000 No one forced me to do it.
02:10:47.000 The truth is, if you were recording from my scalp with EEG or looking with fMRI at brain function, you could detect that before I thought I was committed, because in these experiments, subjects watch a clock.
02:11:06.000 So I'm like watching the hands of a clock or watching random numbers appear on a screen.
02:11:13.000 My only goal is to just look at when I've decided, when I'm committed.
02:11:17.000 I go back and forth between left and right, left and right, and then I say, okay, that's the hand to the six, I'm going to go left.
02:11:25.000 All the experiments show that for some decisions, several seconds before, we could tell from the brain whether the subject was going to go left or right.
02:11:36.000 So your subjective sense of being truly upstream of your decision-making process is a false one.
02:11:44.000 The only problem I have with that is two-fold.
02:11:46.000 One is that if you're gonna study something like that, and you make a clear study where there's a red and a green, and you have to make a choice as to which one, and you monitor the subject's brain, is that real?
02:11:58.000 Is that real life?
02:11:59.000 I mean, it's a fucking test, you know?
02:12:01.000 I mean, how do we know what's going on in a real-life scenario?
02:12:03.000 How do we know that there's not a lot of overthinking going on?
02:12:06.000 How do we know there's not a lot of shit going on behind the scenes?
02:12:09.000 Like, in this sort of a situation because you're setting up this test.
02:12:12.000 Right.
02:12:13.000 Could psychedelics change free will?
02:12:16.000 If a psychedelic experience changes your whole tune, could it literally change what decisions you would automatically make?
02:12:25.000 I mean, if there is no free will, a free will is just your mind for whatever reason goes left or right based on morals or ethics or what feels right or what feels wrong.
02:12:33.000 In that sense, wouldn't psychedelics be able to change free will?
02:12:38.000 Well, I think free will is a truly incoherent concept.
02:12:41.000 Right, it's a crazy word.
02:12:42.000 It just doesn't make any...
02:12:43.000 It's a placeholder.
02:12:44.000 We have causality, and no one has ever described a way in which mental or physical events can arise that make sense of this idea of free will, of being the true locus of the causes of your thoughts and actions.
02:12:58.000 And this is...
02:12:58.000 Most people think that we have this...
02:13:03.000 There's a mystery here that we have this subjective experience of free will, but we can't map it on to a notion of physical cause and effect.
02:13:10.000 But I think if you look closely, you realize you don't even have this subjective experience of free will.
02:13:15.000 So if I ask you, think of an MMA fighter.
02:13:21.000 Okay.
02:13:21.000 Did you get one?
02:13:23.000 Yes.
02:13:23.000 Who did you think of?
02:13:24.000 George St. Pierre.
02:13:26.000 Why didn't you think of Matt Hughes?
02:13:31.000 Whatever story you're going to tell now is meaningless.
02:13:33.000 The truth is, you're not in a position to know why you thought of George St. Pierre.
02:13:41.000 So, okay, there are all these MMA fighters whose names you know, and you know them as well as you know George St. Pierre's name.
02:13:48.000 You could have thought of Overeem, or I mean, there's hundreds you could have thought of, right?
02:13:52.000 Right.
02:13:53.000 And let's say you thought of a few, and then you settled on one for the purposes of telling me.
02:14:00.000 Right.
02:14:00.000 So you thought of, so you got Hughes, and you got Overeem, you got St. Pierre, and then I said, well, who was it?
02:14:04.000 And you say, well, St. Pierre, right?
02:14:06.000 You can't explain why you...
02:14:10.000 Fixated on him as opposed to Hughes or whoever the other candidates were in your mind all of that's being driven from behind Unconsciously and there's no way to ever even if it wasn't even if there was no time lag even if we knew that then the neurophysiology and the and the conscious thought were truly simultaneous So there was no part of your brain that was going George St. Pierre before you were aware of it, right?
02:14:35.000 It's still a mystery as to why it is what it is Right, but that's sort of an answer to a question with no consequence.
02:14:41.000 When it comes to something with consequences, isn't there free will then when someone contemplates the results of their actions?
02:14:48.000 I mean, isn't that what we really truly consider to be free will?
02:14:51.000 You look at something and you say, should I hit this old lady with my car?
02:14:54.000 No, I should not because I have free will.
02:14:56.000 I mean, even if there's some sort of a decision that had greenlit in your brain seconds earlier than that, no, we're not going to run over this old lady, Sort of that's free will, right?
02:15:07.000 I mean, what leads someone to murder someone?
02:15:11.000 Is every murderer innocent because they don't have free will?
02:15:14.000 Are they an accumulation of their past histories and their emotional responses to various stimuli, good or bad, in their environment that's led them down this road, and here they are in this moment in time, in this physical altercation, and they murder somebody?
02:15:25.000 Do they not have free will?
02:15:27.000 Right.
02:15:27.000 Yeah, so all good concerns.
02:15:31.000 Clearly, there's a difference between voluntary and involuntary action, and so we can talk about that difference without ever invoking free will.
02:15:39.000 So they're the things I choose to do, and I'm reaching for the water because I want to pick it up, and that's different from me accidentally knocking it over, and those differences matter.
02:15:51.000 So if you intentionally Shot me.
02:15:54.000 That's one thing.
02:15:55.000 You're a murderer, an attempted murderer.
02:15:57.000 If you accidentally shot me because you were cleaning your gun, there was no intent, and that says a lot of—you're a very different person in the world.
02:16:05.000 You're not the person who intentionally shot me.
02:16:08.000 So we don't have to worry about you in the same way.
02:16:11.000 So for the purposes of our legal system, the difference between intent and lack of intent is huge.
02:16:18.000 But it's huge because it says a lot about what someone's likely to do in the future.
02:16:25.000 The payoff is that there are, one, I think, understanding that the incoherence of free will does subtly change your morality and would change our legal system in small but crucial ways because it changes your morality because you have to acknowledge that There's a huge role for luck in this world
02:16:55.000 that is morally relevant that we don't acknowledge.
02:16:58.000 So you are not responsible for the fact That you have your genes, that you were born into this society, that you've had your life experience.
02:17:07.000 You didn't make your brain.
02:17:08.000 Your brain isn't exactly the state it's in.
02:17:12.000 It's not an accomplishment of yours.
02:17:17.000 You can't take credit for the fact that you're not a psychopath.
02:17:20.000 You are lucky that you're not a psychopath.
02:17:23.000 On some basic level, you would be unlucky to have the genes and the life experience that would make you want to get up tomorrow morning and kill kids.
02:17:29.000 Do you think that sort of a pathology is inherently genetic?
02:17:34.000 Do you think that's environmental?
02:17:37.000 It's significantly genetic, but it's a combination of environment, but you didn't pick your environment either.
02:17:42.000 But it's not something that someone can avoid based on a bunch of different circumstances.
02:17:45.000 Yeah, so I'm not negating the role of human effort and human intention and we can change ourselves, we can get in shape, we can learn new skills, we can improve relationships.
02:17:58.000 Everything about what people want to do with their lives can be conserved.
02:18:05.000 The truth is, some people are much luckier than others.
02:18:09.000 Absolutely.
02:18:10.000 And no one can take credit for the fact that they're intelligent, that they're good looking.
02:18:15.000 You say this, but what about the secret?
02:18:19.000 Yes.
02:18:19.000 Talk about dangerous nonsense.
02:18:22.000 Did that drive you crazy when that was all coming out?
02:18:26.000 That was the most irresponsible thing in the world.
02:18:32.000 Oprah's boosting of that book was journalistically irresponsible in a way that few things...
02:18:39.000 It was amazing watching people run with it though.
02:18:41.000 People that were convinced that all of a sudden they were going to create their life with their imagination.
02:18:45.000 But there is some sort of an impact that your thoughts and mind have on the real world.
02:18:52.000 Positive energy, psychic energy, there's something there.
02:18:56.000 Yeah, if you're a nice person and you're thinking nice thoughts about people, they're going to notice that and like you.
02:19:02.000 And that becomes a self-fulfilling loop.
02:19:04.000 If you are an angry person who's always noticing what's wrong with the people around you, That's very hard to keep to yourself.
02:19:13.000 And people begin to treat you a certain way and it becomes self-fulfilling.
02:19:16.000 So you think it's entirely social as far as the consequences of thought?
02:19:21.000 Well, I wouldn't attribute any spooky level to it.
02:19:29.000 It's all understandable.
02:19:31.000 Have you ever seen, like, mass prayers where they work on a certain, you know, thing and, you know, everybody together try to pool up their energy?
02:19:40.000 Well, that would be so easy to demonstrate that.
02:19:45.000 And there's been so much prayer.
02:19:50.000 I mean, this is what the great...
02:19:57.000 The website, why does God hate amputees?
02:20:01.000 You have all these people who believe they've been healed through intercessory prayer of their cancer and all these other diseases that are self-limiting.
02:20:11.000 You never hear of somebody who's prayed to grow back an arm and said, look, here's a picture of me without an arm and now they're both back.
02:20:19.000 I'm like the human salamander.
02:20:21.000 If prayer worked, you'd be able to pray for lost arms.
02:20:26.000 Well, you say that, but what if prayer only works a really tiny bit, and you've got to get a lot of people involved?
02:20:31.000 So it just boosts your immune system?
02:20:33.000 Oh, no, I mean, it's just not perfect.
02:20:34.000 It's not magic.
02:20:35.000 Is there power in thought?
02:20:38.000 But it is billed as magic.
02:20:40.000 Yes, it is.
02:20:41.000 Build his magic, but we're assuming...
02:20:42.000 God can do whatever he wants.
02:20:43.000 Okay, God.
02:20:43.000 If we're talking about God, I'm talking about groups of people praying for things.
02:20:46.000 I'm talking about using their energy of their thoughts.
02:20:48.000 I'm not really talking about invoking a higher power.
02:20:50.000 I'm just talking about...
02:20:51.000 Okay, but they think they are.
02:20:53.000 Sometimes maybe...
02:20:54.000 But with Art Bell, you remember that show?
02:20:57.000 Yeah.
02:20:57.000 Art Bell, Coast to Coast, werewolves at 3 o'clock in the morning when you're driving on AM radio.
02:21:01.000 Right.
02:21:02.000 I believe he did some sort of a test where he tried to...
02:21:05.000 They tried to influence something, whether it's weather or something, with a gigantic mind meld.
02:21:11.000 But it wasn't a religious thing.
02:21:13.000 I think the idea was, can you get a bunch of people to concentrate on something, and do we have the most minute ability to influence things, and together we could do something measurable.
02:21:25.000 But I don't know if anybody ever did anything that was actually measurable.
02:21:27.000 Well, there are a lot of people who have done research of that kind, and what they claim is just that these micro-departures These micro-effects that, when you aggregate them over many, many trials, represent huge statistical departures from chance.
02:21:44.000 And most people in the skeptic community find that completely unpersuasive.
02:21:49.000 Have you looked into it at all?
02:21:50.000 Like random number generator influence?
02:21:52.000 Yeah.
02:21:52.000 Apart from just reading a couple of books, like Dean Radin's book on the conscious universe, What you come down to there are just meta-analyses of someone's statistics and the concern on the part of skeptics that there are frauds involved or there's just a file drawer effect where people are not reporting their failures and they are reporting the The positive results.
02:22:23.000 What you should be able to find is if these are real abilities that really matter in terms of...
02:22:32.000 Tangible results.
02:22:34.000 You should find someone who can come into the lab and demonstrate telepathy or clairvoyance or whatever the thing is you're interested in.
02:22:42.000 So that it's really...
02:22:44.000 It should survive the presence of a skeptic like James Randi, who's a professional magician who knows how to fake these mentalist games.
02:22:53.000 You should be able to test it.
02:22:56.000 I spoke to Rupert Sheldrake about this once.
02:22:59.000 Do you know Rupert?
02:23:01.000 Morphic Resonance.
02:23:02.000 He's a big advocate of the scientific...
02:23:08.000 Testing of these phenomenon, but he's very...
02:23:13.000 He's a believer.
02:23:15.000 He's a real believer, and he's published essays or articles on pets that know when their owners are going to come home, and so he's got the camera on the dog, and the owner's headed home, and he's got them time synced and showing the effect of the dog getting up at the right time.
02:23:36.000 And...
02:23:37.000 He's very into the idea of democratizing science where you can get thousands of people doing these tests on their own and showing some effect.
02:23:45.000 But what he hasn't wanted to do is just actually submit to James Randi's challenge of showing up and doing an experiment that will survive the The scrutiny of professional magicians, and I'll just allow this thing to be done.
02:24:04.000 It's just, you know, people find James Randi's skepticism so unpleasant that they think that that would nullify the experiment somehow, or they're not going to submit to it.
02:24:16.000 But, I mean, James Randi has put up a million dollars to anyone who can show some positive result.
02:24:22.000 Now, no doubt he's not the easiest guy to deal with.
02:24:25.000 If you are committed to the reality of psychic phenomenon and you have to go in and meet with James Randi and design an experiment, I'm sure he's going to make you jump through hoops that you feel like you don't have to jump through.
02:24:40.000 But it would be trivially easy to design a valid experiment that could demonstrate these effects.
02:24:47.000 And so I'm open-minded that This stuff is possible, but it's fishy that...
02:24:55.000 He hasn't taken the challenge.
02:24:57.000 People should just come forward and demonstrate the effect.
02:25:01.000 Well, what is Rupert's claims?
02:25:03.000 I mean, is it that every single time a dog knows?
02:25:06.000 Rupert's claim was that...
02:25:09.000 He doesn't think science should be decided by Contest essentially it's like it's not that's not how you do science you don't do science to answer a million dollar challenge put up by a magician and That's a okay.
02:25:22.000 I understand this kind of the his aesthetic objection or his interpersonal objection to working with with a cranky person like Randy but Cranky not in the flaky sense, but Cranky just in the, you know, he's a...
02:25:36.000 Confrontational.
02:25:37.000 Yeah, he's confrontational.
02:25:39.000 But given how the whole field of parapsychology and, you know, psi studies is treated like intellectual pornography, given how discredited it is in the view of mainstream science, If there's an effect there and you've got a protocol that has demonstrated it, just come forward and do it in every context where you can shine light on it and just prove it.
02:26:07.000 And Sheldrake has never done this?
02:26:09.000 Well, not to anyone's satisfaction that can move the conversation forward.
02:26:17.000 There's many people who say they've done it, but when you actually look at what they...
02:26:21.000 What hasn't happened is...
02:26:24.000 You haven't discovered people where there's a really strong effect, where you get one person who's like the Tiger Woods of mind reading, where they can actually show a departure from chance that is huge.
02:26:41.000 In their own trial, what you get is if you get 6,000 people staring at a random number generator trying to make it depart, you know, to the high side as opposed to the low side, you get people saying that there was this tiny effect.
02:26:56.000 So it should have been 50-50.
02:26:58.000 It was actually 51 percent over all those trials.
02:27:02.000 And that, when you do the stats on it, is, you know, you would expect a one in 10 billion due to chance.
02:27:12.000 That's subject to many kind of experimenter problems that people are right to worry about, which is one, people have been caught not reporting their failed experiments.
02:27:24.000 There's kind of a true believer syndrome that happens even in certain wings.
02:27:29.000 There's a phenomenon of scientific fraud across science, which is a problem we guard against, but it's also been true of parapsychology as well.
02:27:40.000 Do you think it's possible that people have these certain senses that have not evolved yet?
02:27:46.000 And that that's why, like, sometimes, you know, you know someone's gonna call you and you pick up the phone and it's them?
02:27:51.000 You know, there's weird non-duplicatable, that's not a word.
02:27:58.000 There's weird experiences that you can't duplicate.
02:28:01.000 There's random weird things that can't be controlled, but sometimes the right frequency kicks in and you catch a radio station from San Diego when you're in San Francisco and it doesn't make any sense and it only lasts for a little while.
02:28:14.000 Is it possible?
02:28:16.000 Have you ever had personal experiences?
02:28:19.000 Where, you know, you knew someone was staring at you, and you looked, and they were.
02:28:22.000 You knew the phone was going to ring, and it did.
02:28:24.000 Oh, yeah.
02:28:26.000 A lot.
02:28:27.000 Is that all bullshit?
02:28:27.000 Well, no, it's not bullshit, but...
02:28:32.000 A huge component, and perhaps the component that explains all of those experiences, is what's called sampling bias, where you notice all the hits and you don't notice the non-hits.
02:28:43.000 You don't notice all the time you pick up the phone and you had no idea who was calling you, which is most of the time.
02:28:50.000 This is before caller ID, obviously.
02:28:52.000 Caller ID has ruled out this sort of psychic phenomenon.
02:29:00.000 So we know we don't keep track.
02:29:04.000 The hits are salient to us and the failures aren't.
02:29:08.000 And religious people do this all the time.
02:29:09.000 God always gets credit for the good things he does, but he doesn't get scored for all the disasters he fails to prevent.
02:29:17.000 So, you know, a bus crashes and everyone's dead except one little girl.
02:29:21.000 And it's God's miracle that she walked away, but what about all the dead people?
02:29:26.000 Right, of course.
02:29:27.000 And so the non-hits always outweigh the hits.
02:29:31.000 And if you actually do...
02:29:32.000 And the classic demonstration of this, which is still shocking to people, is the...
02:29:37.000 It's called the hot hand fallacy in basketball.
02:29:42.000 The idea that people get on a shooting streak.
02:29:45.000 You know, Michael Jordan, he would shoot two outside jumpers.
02:29:49.000 And when he goes up for his third...
02:29:52.000 There's this sense both in him and in the audience that he's actually more likely to make that third shot having made those prior to because he's just on a roll.
02:30:04.000 So that whole feeling of being on a roll in basketball has been studied because What's amazing about professional sports like basketball is the statistics are every single game that has ever been played is completely broken down.
02:30:19.000 We know every shot and every basket and every rebound.
02:30:27.000 Statisticians could just sit down and analyze, is there such a thing as the hot hand?
02:30:31.000 Is it actually true that if a guy has made three jumpers in a row, he's more likely to make the fourth?
02:30:37.000 Or is the fourth truly independent of everything that's gone before?
02:30:41.000 And they found that despite the personal experience of being on a roll and despite the fact that we feel like we've all seen someone on a roll, there's really no such thing as being on a roll in basketball.
02:30:54.000 Now, there may be other sports where it's different, but there's so much chaos and so much uncertainty.
02:31:00.000 And once that ball leaves your hand, it's a low percentage enough phenomenon that it is actually insensitive to statistical analysis.
02:31:11.000 No, it's insensitive to the fact that you feel great and everything's going well for you and you just sank two baskets and you go up to sink a third.
02:31:20.000 That third is, you're no more likely to sink that third than you were if it was your first one.
02:31:25.000 Or you just failed to...
02:31:29.000 You just miss two, and then you go up for the third.
02:31:31.000 So do you completely discount the player's comfort?
02:31:34.000 Like when they feel like they're in the zone, that doesn't exist?
02:31:36.000 I mean, what is the zone?
02:31:37.000 I mean, isn't it just a state of mind created by confidence?
02:31:40.000 They're having an experience.
02:31:41.000 So what's amazing about this is this is...
02:31:43.000 So no one's ever more likely to make a basket?
02:31:45.000 Is that what you're saying?
02:31:46.000 No.
02:31:46.000 Even though they're confident and they make the basket knowing that they're going to make the basket?
02:31:50.000 Statistically, you say that that doesn't...
02:31:51.000 Yes.
02:31:51.000 There's no sign of...
02:31:54.000 So it's a myth.
02:31:55.000 This research is probably...
02:31:57.000 He's probably 10 years old or so, so maybe something's happened in the last decade.
02:32:01.000 Jeremy Lin just fucked up the whole thing.
02:32:03.000 Right, exactly.
02:32:04.000 But my understanding is there is zero evidence of what's called the hot hand in basketball.
02:32:11.000 So that literally it is a subjective error that everyone feels powerfully.
02:32:17.000 And so given that, just map that on to all of our so-called psychic experiences where you feel like you knew who was going to call.
02:32:25.000 Someone was going to call.
02:32:26.000 We're just...
02:32:27.000 It's just luck.
02:32:28.000 Yeah.
02:32:29.000 It's just...
02:32:29.000 There's going to be some...
02:32:31.000 How do you know, though?
02:32:32.000 How do you know it's just luck?
02:32:34.000 How do you know it's not either or?
02:32:36.000 How do you know it's not...
02:32:37.000 Well, it's testable.
02:32:37.000 Sometimes there's a brief...
02:32:39.000 It shouldn't be testable.
02:32:40.000 But when you're testing it, you're...
02:32:42.000 By placing an experiment on anything, don't you automatically alter the results of it, especially when you're talking about something so ethereal as an idea of a friend, and then, boom, there's an email in your box, you haven't talked to them in years.
02:32:55.000 I'm just playing devil's advocate here, because I don't believe in it.
02:32:57.000 Listen, I've had an experience...
02:32:59.000 But I don't know that I don't believe in it either.
02:33:00.000 So here's one weird experience like that that I've had, which, I mean, statistically, it seems...
02:33:07.000 Completely beyond the pale, but it's, again, there are going to be low probability events that happen every day.
02:33:15.000 And so, you know, I know a guy who went, for instance, his college girlfriend broke up with him and went to Europe And he was convinced the relationship wasn't over, and he decided he was going to go to Europe to find her.
02:33:31.000 So he was like 18, right?
02:33:32.000 Not a crazy guy, just a really romantic guy, and it was not a scary breakup.
02:33:36.000 So anyway, nice story.
02:33:37.000 They got back together.
02:33:38.000 But what happened is Only an 18 year old could get it into his head to do this.
02:33:45.000 He gets on a plane and he doesn't even know which country she went to.
02:33:49.000 So he just goes to Europe.
02:33:51.000 He goes to Spain because he speaks Spanish and he's like 10 days into his trip and so he's in Barcelona and some tourists hand him a camera and said will you take our picture?
02:34:04.000 And he picks up the camera and he's taking their picture and into frame walks his ex-girlfriend.
02:34:11.000 So within 10 days he just found her.
02:34:14.000 So what are the chances of that happening?
02:34:16.000 Well, it's pretty small.
02:34:20.000 But that stuff happens to people.
02:34:23.000 It would be a miracle if low probability events never happened.
02:34:28.000 It would be a miracle if no one in human history ever had a story like that to tell.
02:34:35.000 Yes.
02:34:37.000 We're in a system where there's bound to be very low probability events.
02:34:42.000 Or it's just not fully evolved and this kid went on his instincts and he tapped into the information in the universe and he knew instinctively where to go.
02:34:50.000 And he met his sweetheart like a goddamn Sandra Bullock movie.
02:34:53.000 If it's an ability that anyone should care about, it should be testable.
02:34:58.000 It should be strong enough that we can test it.
02:35:00.000 But how can you test something when it's an unique event that very rarely takes place, completely uncontrollable, and it's something that's just almost like a natural phenomenon that rarely occurs?
02:35:12.000 I mean, how are you going to put something in a testing environment, in the environment of a laboratory, and see if it really does make sense that you think about someone else?
02:35:20.000 It might be Sheldrake who's doing this.
02:35:22.000 There's a test of the phone call phenomenon where you get, people can subscribe to get their, they get a call at, they enlist like their five closest people in their lives and to call them at random intervals, you know, I guess they disable their caller ID or whatever, and you can just set this up so that, you know.
02:35:42.000 It's still not a true moment because they're acting on an experiment.
02:35:46.000 How do you know that someone calling you might not just be calling you because they tapped into this idea of loving you and this idea of missing you, and that is the tune that breaks through all the way to you and causes you to look at your phone right when they tune in?
02:35:59.000 That's not replicatable.
02:36:01.000 Replicatable?
02:36:01.000 That's how it works.
02:36:02.000 Yeah, that's what it's for.
02:36:03.000 Replicable.
02:36:04.000 Replicable, yeah.
02:36:05.000 It's not, I mean, you know what I'm saying?
02:36:07.000 I mean, it's the idea of unique events isn't disproven by experimenting with it.
02:36:13.000 Look, I don't know that it's true that sometimes you know when someone is calling, but I've had the experience myself, but I haven't had in years.
02:36:21.000 Right.
02:36:22.000 It's been years and years since I knew who was going to call me and I looked at it.
02:36:25.000 But I do remember it having it happen in my life several times.
02:36:29.000 What if it's something that just, you know, on a fucking summer solstice, the planets are aligned, your own biology, you have a certain amount of water in your system, and boom, there's a certain amount of love and the thought gets through.
02:36:40.000 Is that possible?
02:36:41.000 Well...
02:36:43.000 Sure, it's possible, but the question is, even if it's true, given this description, it doesn't really seem to matter.
02:36:52.000 Because then they're all...
02:36:52.000 That's fascinating.
02:36:54.000 No, but it doesn't...
02:36:55.000 It's not a matter of just...
02:36:58.000 It's not a sign of how connected you are with the person because sometimes you know it's somebody you don't even like, right?
02:37:05.000 It's not a measure of how crucial it is that they reach you at that moment because sometimes it's completely trivial and then other times when someone really had to get a hold of you because your dad was sick They couldn't find you, and you were just blissfully ignorant of the fact that the closest person in your life is having a medical emergency, right?
02:37:25.000 Well, no one's saying that it works all the time, and that because it works on a blue moon that it can't, you know...
02:37:30.000 But then that's not working.
02:37:31.000 Well, it's not that it's not working.
02:37:33.000 It just doesn't work all the time.
02:37:34.000 It's a rare event.
02:37:36.000 Is it possible that there are rare events like that?
02:37:39.000 Or do you think it's all just much more likely scientifically to be just...
02:37:44.000 Well, given what we're talking about now, this is all much more likely to be...
02:37:49.000 Coincidence.
02:37:50.000 You don't have that many people in your life you think about.
02:37:54.000 You think about them, and you don't have that many people in your life who call you.
02:37:58.000 I mean, we just actually run the numbers on this.
02:38:00.000 One problem is that we have very bad intuitions of probability.
02:38:04.000 So, have you heard of the birthday party problem?
02:38:07.000 No.
02:38:08.000 So, if I got a room, put you in a room of just random strangers, right?
02:38:14.000 How many would I have to have in the room for you to be confident that two people in the room had the same birthday?
02:38:23.000 So you'd be willing to bet.
02:38:24.000 I'll bet you...
02:38:26.000 It would have to be thousands for me.
02:38:27.000 Okay.
02:38:28.000 And that would just be a guess.
02:38:30.000 Okay.
02:38:31.000 So that's basically everyone's guess.
02:38:33.000 That it's just...
02:38:34.000 There's 365 days in the year.
02:38:36.000 We've got to get two people on the same day.
02:38:39.000 That's going to be a lot of people, right?
02:38:41.000 The truth is...
02:38:43.000 And this is just a fact, that if you get 23 people in the room, you have crossed the 50% threshold so that it's more likely than not that two of them have the same birthday.
02:38:55.000 That's amazing.
02:38:56.000 23 people.
02:38:57.000 Now, what's crucial to understand is that it's...
02:39:04.000 The crucial piece, and this actually goes to, this deflates so many conspiracy theories and other bad ideas, is that it's absolutely crucial that we didn't specify which birthday, right?
02:39:15.000 So it's any two birthdays.
02:39:17.000 It's any single birthday.
02:39:18.000 Any two people and any single birthday.
02:39:20.000 23 people, that's amazing.
02:39:21.000 And that makes it, that changes the game entirely.
02:39:24.000 But if I said, how many people do I need in a room to find one with my birthday, that changes it.
02:39:31.000 Right.
02:39:32.000 But any two people on any given birthday, it's...
02:39:36.000 Yeah, if you go with just your birthday, that's thousands.
02:39:39.000 That would have to be thousands.
02:39:40.000 I don't know what that would be.
02:39:42.000 But anyway, that's...
02:39:44.000 So anyway, our intuitions...
02:39:46.000 Our intuitions are bad about probability.
02:39:50.000 And so when you look at 9-11 truth stuff...
02:39:56.000 It's so much about finding these little anomalies that strike people as intuitively highly unlikely and in desperate need of explanation.
02:40:06.000 Whereas you can always look at...
02:40:10.000 Anything you look at after the fact can be described as a miracle.
02:40:16.000 So like I could say to you...
02:40:17.000 What are the chances that all of the wires and objects on this desk would be exactly in this position on this day?
02:40:25.000 Well, isn't that a creationist argument for the evolution of the eyeball?
02:40:29.000 Like, how is it possible?
02:40:30.000 Yeah, well, at least there's actually more to talk about there.
02:40:33.000 I mean, you have to...
02:40:34.000 You know, it is kind of inscrutable how this stuff happens through genetic...
02:40:45.000 Mutation and environmental pressure, but we can tell that story.
02:40:49.000 But this is just post hoc, after the fact, I say, this is just inexplicable that the wires are tangled in exactly this way.
02:40:57.000 If you were going to kind of randomly do this again, you'd never get them in this position.
02:41:02.000 But of course, it's completely meaningless.
02:41:04.000 The wires have to be some way.
02:41:07.000 They just happen to be this way.
02:41:09.000 And I'm putting a completely gratuitous burden on you to explain the fact that they're just this way.
02:41:17.000 And so in any situation, certainly any situation as complicated as September 11th, you're going to see all these anomalies.
02:41:26.000 How do you explain the fact that On that day, the Navy was running a fighter jet test and we had F-16s that were out over the ocean.
02:41:39.000 Whatever the thing is, they only run that test two days a year and they were running it that day.
02:41:46.000 If it wasn't that anomaly, you'd find some other anomaly.
02:41:50.000 As long as you're picking after the fact, you can always find something weird that is in desperate need of explanation.
02:41:57.000 Have there been statistical...
02:41:59.000 Have there been studies that have proven statistics on people knowing that people are watching them?
02:42:05.000 I've heard there's been studies done...
02:42:07.000 People say...
02:42:08.000 If you had Rupert Sheldrake on here, he would say yes.
02:42:11.000 But you would say no?
02:42:12.000 I'm not close enough to the research to have any sense...
02:42:17.000 To some degree...
02:42:19.000 It's unsubstantiated, though?
02:42:20.000 Well, you just have to take people at their word.
02:42:22.000 So, I've talked to Rupert.
02:42:23.000 I don't think Rupert...
02:42:25.000 I don't think he's a conscious fraud.
02:42:27.000 I think he's a smart guy.
02:42:29.000 He's a very earnest guy.
02:42:31.000 Is he lying about what he thinks he knows?
02:42:34.000 Or is he self-deceived?
02:42:35.000 Or has he been deceived by unscrupulous people?
02:42:38.000 Confirmation bias.
02:42:40.000 Yeah, exactly.
02:42:41.000 The problem is that it's so...
02:42:46.000 It's a fringe, and so many people want to believe it's true, that it's easy to worry that it hasn't really been fully—the bushes haven't been beaten hard enough to find all the errors and the biases and the frauds.
02:43:01.000 But if there's a real phenomenon there, it should be testable, and it shouldn't be vulnerable to the slightest quirk of, That experimenter had a bad vibe or was too skeptical and therefore killed the effect.
02:43:16.000 Especially when you're talking about people who actually claim...
02:43:19.000 So that's not real.
02:43:20.000 Is it possible that someone could be the experimenter that could have a bad vibe and be too skeptical and that is negative energy?
02:43:28.000 You could set up an experiment where...
02:43:31.000 The experimenter was 5,000 miles away or had really good vibes.
02:43:35.000 You could put the true believers in, you know, kind of the coach.
02:43:38.000 You could put a completely friendly coach who was, you know, Sylvia Brown, you know, crazy, fraudulent, psychic Sylvia Brown.
02:43:46.000 She could be there working her magic, you know, and just helping every...
02:43:52.000 You could surround them with only true believers if you wanted to.
02:43:55.000 You could design the experiment in such a way.
02:43:59.000 So you can make the vibes as nice as you want.
02:44:04.000 There's a fundamentally unscientific attitude you get from many, many people in this area of the human conversation, which is science is reductionistic.
02:44:16.000 It's hypercritical.
02:44:19.000 It's life-destroying.
02:44:21.000 There's this whole area of truth that science in principle can't touch.
02:44:28.000 And that's just not true.
02:44:29.000 It's like, if it's a real phenomenon, science is the best way to touch it.
02:44:33.000 There's certain things that it's hard to figure out how you would do the experiments, hard to figure out how to get it in the lab.
02:44:38.000 And how to get it to where the person who's doing the experiment is not being influenced by the fact you're experimenting on them.
02:44:45.000 Yes, exactly.
02:44:46.000 So there's certain, you know, the scientific research I've done is with functional magnetic resonance imaging where you have to put people in an MRI scanner And it hugely limits what you can study because people can't move.
02:45:00.000 If you move, you destroy the image.
02:45:02.000 So you've got to lie in a clattering machine, motionless, and do some cognitive task That you can do looking at computer goggles or looking at a mirror across your feet out into the room.
02:45:22.000 A brain scanning experiment is hugely limited.
02:45:25.000 You can't put somebody on their bike and have them ride off into the distance while scanning their brain.
02:45:33.000 Those things aside, and here we're not talking about experiments with those kinds of limitations.
02:45:39.000 If people have an ability to know who's calling on the phone, if there's even one guy on planet Earth who has this ability...
02:45:50.000 It should be...
02:45:51.000 We could easily design an experiment that would demonstrate that.
02:45:54.000 And the people who claim...
02:45:56.000 There are people who really claim these abilities.
02:45:58.000 They claim it on a repeatable basis.
02:46:00.000 Yeah.
02:46:01.000 There are people who...
02:46:04.000 Well, they're the sort of kind of shyster Western New Age psychics who, I'm not sure, but I imagine they just never submit to being tested for obvious reasons.
02:46:20.000 And then there's the...
02:46:23.000 Buddhist, Hindu, Yogi, contemplative world where people imagine that great meditators have developed these abilities.
02:46:31.000 And even some of the meditators will, you know, wink-wink, suggest that they probably have these abilities but are just too humble to demonstrate them.
02:46:41.000 And there's sort of a kind of religious taboo against demonstrating them or challenging them or submitting them to tests.
02:46:51.000 Yeah, in the contemplative world, among Buddhists and Indian yogis, there's actually a straightforward path to developing these skills.
02:47:01.000 I mean, there's just a recipe.
02:47:02.000 You could go ask the Dalai Lama, how could I learn to read people's minds?
02:47:08.000 He has an answer to that question.
02:47:11.000 I mean, it's not like, well, it's just a matter of whether you're gifted or not.
02:47:14.000 You can basically get a PhD in reading people's minds among Buddhists and Hindus.
02:47:21.000 So the people who've done that, why don't they get tested?
02:47:26.000 Because what they're claiming is not an ability to make a random number generator jump slightly if they've got 5,000 people sitting next to them also doing it.
02:47:36.000 They claim just huge abilities are possible for meditators who've reached certain levels of concentration.
02:47:44.000 I mean, there are people who...
02:47:47.000 The stories are as crazy as anything you've heard.
02:47:50.000 What about remote viewing?
02:47:52.000 That's probably the craziest shit of all time, right?
02:47:55.000 Has that ever been disproven?
02:47:57.000 That's clearly disproven?
02:47:59.000 Well, it's just vague enough.
02:48:01.000 Well, first of all, there are magicians, like the British magician, Darren Brown.
02:48:09.000 I've got to pee again.
02:48:09.000 I forgot to pee.
02:48:11.000 I'm drinking these gigantic drinks.
02:48:12.000 I'm so non-psychic that I forgot I had to pee.
02:48:18.000 That's how in touch I am with...
02:48:20.000 My physical reality.
02:48:21.000 This has been a really fascinating conversation, man.
02:48:24.000 We could go on for hours and hours.
02:48:25.000 How long was that?
02:48:26.000 Almost three hours.
02:48:27.000 No, really?
02:48:28.000 Yeah, yeah, yeah.
02:48:29.000 We're five minutes away from three hours.
02:48:31.000 Well, I hope we didn't kill our audience.
02:48:32.000 No, are you kidding, man?
02:48:33.000 People love this shit.
02:48:34.000 Look, I think you're...
02:48:37.000 Your devotion to the scientific method and exploring everything is very admirable.
02:48:41.000 It's very interesting and unique, and we've never had anybody on the show that breaks things down in that way before.
02:48:46.000 It's really been really cool.
02:48:48.000 Follow him on Twitter, SamHarrisOrg, and check out all of his books, from Letter to a Christian Nation was the first one that I ever read, to End of Faith, and what is the most recent one?
02:48:59.000 The Moral Landscape and Free Will is the most recent one.
02:49:01.000 And Free Will is the PDF. It's a downloadable, small...
02:49:04.000 No, that line was a short...
02:49:08.000 A book on the ethics of Lyons.
02:49:10.000 Is it samharris.org?
02:49:11.000 Is that the best place to go to for everything?
02:49:13.000 Yep.
02:49:13.000 Dude, we've got to do this again, man.
02:49:15.000 We didn't even touch jujitsu.
02:49:16.000 It was a real pleasure.
02:49:16.000 We didn't talk about martial arts.
02:49:18.000 We got all up in jihad and a little bit of drugs.
02:49:21.000 It was great, man.
02:49:22.000 Awesome, awesome time.
02:49:23.000 We can do this over and over again.
02:49:24.000 So, ladies and gentlemen, that's it.
02:49:26.000 Follow him, buy his stuff.
02:49:27.000 Sam Harris is the fucking man, and this show's over.
02:49:29.000 Thanks, everybody.
02:49:30.000 See you soon.
02:49:31.000 See you this week.
02:49:32.000 We've got a lot of people coming up.
02:49:33.000 Who the fuck do we got, Brian?
02:49:35.000 At the Ice House.
02:49:36.000 Yeah, we got Joey Diaz doing a podcast on Friday.
02:49:39.000 Jason Silva's coming back on Tuesday.
02:49:42.000 Aubrey Marcus is coming back next week.
02:49:44.000 We got a lot of people, too.
02:49:46.000 We got a lot of people.
02:49:47.000 Alright, we love you, bitches.
02:49:48.000 Thanks for everything.
02:49:49.000 Bye-bye.