The Joe Rogan Experience - March 31, 2023


Joe Rogan Experience #1964 - Rick Doblin


Episode Stats

Length

2 hours and 49 minutes

Words per Minute

169.14842

Word Count

28,603

Sentence Count

2,054

Misogynist Sentences

14

Hate Speech Sentences

10


Summary

On this episode of the Joe Rogan Experience, I sit down with the founder of MAPS, a psychedelic research center that focuses on psychedelics and counterculture, Dr. Robert Kiyosaki. We talk about his early life growing up in the 60s and 70s, his experience with psychedelics, and how he went on to become one of the most influential people in the counterculture movement of the time. We also talk about what it was like being drafted into the military as a young man in the early 60s, and why he decided to turn his life around and become a counterculture activist. And, of course, we talk about psychedelics. This episode was produced and edited by Alex Blumberg. It was edited by Annie-Rose Strasser. Our theme music was made by Micah Vellian and our ad music was written and performed by Mark Phillips. Additional music was mixed by Matthew Boll and Matthew Boll. Additional production by Patrick Muldowney. Additional mixing and mastering was done by Haley Shaw. The show was mixed and produced by Rachel Ward and Rachel Ward. Thanks to Rachel Ward for her contributions to this episode and for the use of her music stylings. Music by Haley Ward and Sarah Abdurrahman. Thank you to Sarah Ward for producing and mastering the music, and for her sound design and editing, and thanks to Matthew Boll for his editing and mixing, and Jeff Perla for his mixing, mastering and mastering, and additional engineering, and our mixing, for the production assistance, and mastering of the sound design, and editing by Matthew Perla, and his mixing and mixing. of the music and mastering at the music in this episode, and the mixing at The Joe Rogans podcast, and all of his mixing at the show, and also the production and mastering and editing at the sound in the music at the Afterbreeze, and Bobby Lord for his excellent mixing at Columbia Records, and at the New York City radio station, and other locations in Los Angeles, and on location in London, California, and New York, PA, and Los Angeles and Chicago, and San Francisco, PA. Thank you for your support, and thank you for all of your support throughout the podcast, for making it all of this podcast, we really appreciate it! - Thank you so much for all the support and thanks for all your support and support, all of the support we can do.


Transcript

00:00:01.000 Joe Rogan Podcast, check it out!
00:00:03.000 The Joe Rogan Experience.
00:00:06.000 Showing my day, Joe Rogan Podcast by night, all day!
00:00:13.000 Hello, Rick.
00:00:13.000 Good to see you again, my friend.
00:00:14.000 How are you?
00:00:15.000 Yeah, I'm doing great.
00:00:16.000 It was so nice to be with you a couple weeks ago.
00:00:19.000 Yeah, it was fun to have you at the club.
00:00:21.000 You were there like one of the first days.
00:00:23.000 Yeah, I think I saw the first event in the small room.
00:00:27.000 Yes.
00:00:27.000 Yes.
00:00:28.000 Yeah, did you see Dave Chappelle?
00:00:30.000 I did.
00:00:30.000 Yeah, that was the first one.
00:00:32.000 Yeah, we had Dave there.
00:00:32.000 He wanted to do that room.
00:00:34.000 We opened it specifically for him.
00:00:36.000 That was the first time we did a show there.
00:00:37.000 It was very exciting.
00:00:38.000 Yeah, I really liked having the opportunity to just talk to him a little bit afterwards and to listen to him.
00:00:44.000 It was hilarious.
00:00:45.000 Yeah, he's a big fan of what you guys are doing, as is everybody.
00:00:49.000 I think what you guys are doing at MAPS is one of the most important things for society and culture and just consciousness in general.
00:00:58.000 That's happening today, and I'm very, very happy that you're doing that.
00:01:02.000 Thank you.
00:01:02.000 Yeah.
00:01:03.000 Yeah, I'm pretty extremely lucky that 51 years ago when I was 18 in 1972 and I decided to focus my life on psychedelics, that now I'm 69 all these years later and it still makes sense.
00:01:17.000 Well, back then it must have been a big risk because in the 1970s, when you focused your life on psychedelics, that was like right after that whole sweeping Schedule I psychedelics act was passed, right?
00:01:28.000 Yeah, that was in 1970. Yeah, things look grim.
00:01:32.000 Didn't look good.
00:01:32.000 Yeah.
00:01:33.000 Well, I was a draft resistor.
00:01:36.000 I thought that I would serve my country by going to jail.
00:01:41.000 Which is kind of a funny way to say it, but I had felt that I'm not a conscientious objector.
00:01:47.000 In order to do that, you have to be a pacifist.
00:01:49.000 And so I'm not a pacifist.
00:01:51.000 I think there are some times you need to fight and defend yourselves.
00:01:55.000 So the only options for me as I studied how to respond to Vietnam I didn't want to pretend I had bone spurs or run away to Canada or anything like that.
00:02:10.000 And I studied Tolstoy and Gandhi and nonviolent resistance and decided that the thing that I would do would be to not register for the draft.
00:02:21.000 And I was paying taxes.
00:02:23.000 I had a social security number.
00:02:24.000 I had a driver's license.
00:02:26.000 I was in high school.
00:02:28.000 I figured the government knows who I am and knows where I am and knows my age.
00:02:32.000 And so I assumed that I would go to jail and that that would be a way to drain the system of energy and to register my protest that way.
00:02:42.000 Martin Luther King actually said a great thing.
00:02:44.000 He said, the person that thinks the law is unjust and violates it and is willing to suffer the consequences as an example to others About the unjust nature of the law actually has the highest respect for the law.
00:02:56.000 He was trying to reframe civil disobedience as patriotism.
00:03:00.000 And it made sense to me.
00:03:02.000 And so when I talked to my parents about it, they were like, well, okay, you know, we don't think you should go to Vietnam either.
00:03:08.000 We don't think it's in America's best interest.
00:03:11.000 But you're never going to be a doctor or lawyer.
00:03:13.000 My dad was a doctor.
00:03:15.000 Because you'll be a felon.
00:03:16.000 And I'm like, that's a price I'll have to pay.
00:03:18.000 What am I going to do with my life?
00:03:20.000 I can't have a normal job in a way.
00:03:23.000 So then when I stumbled on psychedelics, I was like, great!
00:03:27.000 I could be an underground psychedelic therapist that doesn't need a license.
00:03:31.000 Whatever happened?
00:03:32.000 Did you wind up getting in trouble?
00:03:34.000 No, it's astonishing.
00:03:35.000 I think a lot of times we overestimate the efficiency of the government.
00:03:39.000 And so nothing happened at all.
00:03:43.000 I mean, I turned 18. Later was the lottery.
00:03:47.000 I did have a higher lottery number, but nothing ever happened, and I just was shocked by that.
00:03:53.000 And later, what happened was that Jimmy Carter, on his first day in office, he pardoned all the draft resistors.
00:04:00.000 And that made me sort of move from my identification as a counterculture drug-using criminal to somebody who wasn't quite a criminal in that same way.
00:04:10.000 What year was that?
00:04:11.000 Was it 76?
00:04:12.000 Yeah, well, as soon as he got inaugurated, 77 is when he did that, the first day in office.
00:04:17.000 And I later read there was about 60,000 people that never registered for the draft.
00:04:22.000 But enough people were going in that they were able to find enough bodies and people to send to Vietnam.
00:04:30.000 Yeah, it's one of the rare military operations in history that's like universally regarded as a terrible thing.
00:04:39.000 Yes.
00:04:41.000 I mean, nobody today defends the Vietnam War.
00:04:43.000 There's still some people that think it was a good idea that we got Saddam Hussein out of power despite all the horrible collateral damage and the million people that are innocent that wound up dying in Iraq because of that invasion, but nobody thinks Vietnam was good.
00:04:59.000 Right.
00:04:59.000 It was starting to be this imperial overreach.
00:05:03.000 Yeah.
00:05:04.000 And we've had a fair amount of that.
00:05:06.000 Based on a false flag.
00:05:08.000 Yeah.
00:05:09.000 Yeah.
00:05:09.000 Which is very scary.
00:05:11.000 It's very scary that that was just, you know, 1960s.
00:05:14.000 It just happened.
00:05:14.000 Yeah.
00:05:15.000 Well, one of the people also quite interested and supportive of psychedelic therapy is Daniel Ellsberg, who was the person that released the Pentagon Papers.
00:05:23.000 But the false flag began with the Gulf of Tonkin incident.
00:05:26.000 And so we're told that our ships were being attacked.
00:05:31.000 And he was, I've gotten to spend some time talking to him, and he said that he had just started the National Security Administration at that time, was looking at some of these cables and realized it didn't make sense, but he thought somebody above him knew more than he did.
00:05:48.000 And he didn't feel like he should say anything about it.
00:05:52.000 And then all these years later when he released the Pentagon Papers, And people think of him as a hero because he was willing to go to jail for decades and decades, potentially the rest of his life, which is what the government was trying to do for him.
00:06:05.000 Went all the way up to the Supreme Court and he won the case, or the New York Times also won the case.
00:06:10.000 But he thinks of himself not just as a hero, but that he should have had more courage early on.
00:06:17.000 And if he would have done something early on, maybe more people would have realized that this wasn't the way the government was saying it was.
00:06:25.000 But I do think that there is patriotism in civil disobedience.
00:06:32.000 Yeah, certainly.
00:06:33.000 Especially when you feel it's morally wrong to participate in whatever this thing that you're being obligated to do.
00:06:40.000 Yeah, and I think it's really remarkable for me now that because I was not a pacifist and I was not a conscientious objector, I always felt that the freedom that I had was defended by our military in World War II. If we had lost and I'm Jewish,
00:06:57.000 I probably would have been killed along with others.
00:06:59.000 So I always felt that the military was essential and it was protecting my freedom.
00:07:05.000 And so now, all these years later, to have so much work to be done with veterans and in the Veterans Administrations and with, you know, special operators and all sorts of people with PTSD, it feels right in a way that a draft resistor should form an alliance with suffering veterans.
00:07:28.000 Yeah, I think that's one of the best aspects, at least publicly, of what you guys are doing, is that you are working with all these soldiers.
00:07:37.000 And so you've got a lot of support from people that traditionally wouldn't be invested in psychedelics.
00:07:44.000 Which has really kind of opened up.
00:07:46.000 It used to be that a lot of people on the right thought of psychedelics as a way to waste your life and you're going to be a hippie and a loser.
00:07:53.000 But because of the benefits that it's been showing to people with PTSD and people coming back from all these various foreign conflicts, now you're getting support from veterans.
00:08:06.000 You're getting support from the people on the right and people that know veterans that have had incredible experiences with psychedelics.
00:08:12.000 Where it's completely changed their life and sort of reset their mind.
00:08:15.000 Yeah, just several days ago I was in Nashville with Sean Ryan doing his podcast and he is a former Navy SEAL and CIA contractor and he was just talking about how much he had benefited from his experience with Ibogaine in Mexico.
00:08:33.000 And how it's changed his views about things.
00:08:35.000 And we've heard this a lot.
00:08:37.000 But he still said that if he were to be attacked, if America was to be attacked, he would defend it.
00:08:42.000 It doesn't turn people, again, into pacifists, necessarily, in that same way.
00:08:47.000 And there's something noble and honorable about willing to serve your country and be willing to give your life to protect others.
00:08:54.000 I think it's a problem in some cases when the political leadership makes terrible choices.
00:09:00.000 And, you know, you've enlisted to do that.
00:09:02.000 I think the other part, last week I was in Dallas, and we had an event that Governor Rick Perry attended, and Marcus Capone, and Jeff George, who's the chair of the board of directors of our MAPS Public Benefit Corp.,
00:09:19.000 and then also Amy Emerson, who's the CEO of that.
00:09:23.000 We have Governor Perry's support because he's heard from so many veterans.
00:09:29.000 He's also talked about Marcus Luttrell, who lived with him at the State House when he was very emotionally damaged from his time in the military.
00:09:39.000 And then he saw Marcus get a lot better when he went down to Mexico and got Ibogaine.
00:09:46.000 And so Governor Perry...
00:09:47.000 There's people that I have never thought that I would find common ground with.
00:09:52.000 And one of the ones that I thought was the most far that I couldn't imagine building a bridge, I mean, one of our themes is Be the Bridge, but it was with Ted Nugent.
00:10:05.000 And I thought, you know, how would I build a bridge with Ted Nugent?
00:10:09.000 Well, Rocco Moon, his son, connected us, and Rocco is interested in being a psychedelic therapist.
00:10:18.000 And he's been doing a lot of work educating his dad.
00:10:22.000 And we had a really remarkable conversation.
00:10:26.000 And Ted actually said that he could be extremely effective for helping us because he's known as being so anti-drug.
00:10:34.000 Yeah.
00:10:35.000 And yet, even he can see that in a therapeutic setting for veterans, that's what he cares about the most, but others, that these things can be helpful.
00:10:44.000 So this idea of building bridges.
00:10:47.000 There was one point in time, one of the most important lessons I learned was actually...
00:10:55.000 From a Supreme Court Justice, where I was sitting next to him at Passover Seder.
00:11:01.000 This is Stephen Breyer.
00:11:03.000 And I had accepted a donation from Rebecca Mercer.
00:11:08.000 Now, Rebecca Mercer, her father and she, they own Cambridge Analytica, they own Breitbart, you know, she's very much a supporter of Republican causes.
00:11:18.000 And she gave us a million dollars and said that it was restricted to use in veterans.
00:11:24.000 And I thought this is really a good thing to do to take this.
00:11:29.000 But I've gotten more criticism from taking that donation from Rebecca Mercer than most anything I've done in the entire 37 years of MAPS. And so at this Passover Seder, my wife and I got there late.
00:11:42.000 Our friends were somewhere else.
00:11:43.000 There was this old couple sitting next to us.
00:11:46.000 And I didn't know who they were, and I thought, oh, this will be boring, you know.
00:11:49.000 And so I talked to this guy, and I said, well, everybody else was pretty much scientists.
00:11:53.000 And I said, are you a scientist?
00:11:56.000 He said, no, I'm a judge.
00:11:57.000 And then his wife started talking about how she had written a book about grieving parents who have illnesses, that their kids have fatal illnesses, and how to handle grief.
00:12:08.000 And so we had this incredible conversation about MDMA therapy and about how it can be helpful for grief and all.
00:12:15.000 And then after hours, Passover Seder steak, hours and hours, I finally realized that there was something more going on.
00:12:23.000 And I thought, this guy is not just a judge.
00:12:26.000 I think he's Stephen Breyer, the Supreme Court judge.
00:12:29.000 And I said, are you Stephen Breyer?
00:12:31.000 And he said, yes.
00:12:33.000 And I said, well, I have an ethical question to ask you.
00:12:37.000 You know, I have taken this resources from Rebecca Mercer, and she's very much supporting Trump and supporting Bannon and others.
00:12:45.000 And I said, what do you think about that choice ethically?
00:12:48.000 Was that a wise idea?
00:12:51.000 And he said...
00:12:53.000 That the essence of democracy is trying to find common ground with people with whom you may disagree on everything else.
00:13:00.000 And he said, in our hyper-partisan, polarized world, there's not nearly enough of that.
00:13:06.000 And so he supported that.
00:13:07.000 And so I felt that that was like the judgment of the Supreme Court.
00:13:11.000 It was okay what I did.
00:13:13.000 At least one.
00:13:13.000 At least one.
00:13:15.000 But I like that concept, is that we need to find common ground.
00:13:19.000 I mean, I thought that was one of the things that Dave Chappelle was saying.
00:13:22.000 I thought it was very interesting.
00:13:25.000 Dave, he very much is in tune with that and speaks about that all the time.
00:13:28.000 It's very important to him because it's just too easy to just dig in your heels and embrace the conflict and push away any ideas that are connected to the other side.
00:13:40.000 If you can get someone who's a Republican, who's a Trump supporter to engage in psychedelics, understand the benefits of psychedelics for whether it's for soldiers or whether it's for grieving parents or anyone, if that can make it into their life and perhaps they can have an experience...
00:13:58.000 I think a psychedelic experience is one of the greatest ways that someone can relax any ideological, dogmatic ideas that they might have that restrict them from taking in some of the opinions of the left.
00:14:12.000 Yeah.
00:14:12.000 Would you feel comfortable sharing some of your own experiences?
00:14:16.000 Well, sure.
00:14:17.000 Well, I've never been a right-wing person.
00:14:19.000 I'm very left-wing for the most part, other than support for the Second Amendment and some other things.
00:14:27.000 And just a general distrust of government.
00:14:31.000 I, you know, I was raised by hippies.
00:14:36.000 You know, I lived in San Francisco during the Vietnam War when I was a little kid.
00:14:40.000 I mean, we were, you know, my stepdad had long hair when I was a kid.
00:14:47.000 So I was, you know, but then I also grew up and I was a fighter.
00:14:51.000 So I was always around these like hard-nosed, like very tough, you know, no-nonsense people.
00:14:58.000 And a lot of them were very right-wing.
00:15:00.000 And, you know, I knew a lot of cops from martial arts and You know, people have these ideas about what, you know, what drugs are and that blanket term, which I really don't like the term drugs and drug users, what drug users are.
00:15:14.000 And one of, you know, one of the things that I'm kind of proud of is that if anybody wants to say that people who enjoy psychedelics People that enjoy marijuana are lazy and they don't contribute or they don't you know like what about me?
00:15:29.000 Like what about me?
00:15:30.000 Like I work hard and I work a lot and I work out a lot and I have a lot of friends that are very much like me and they're very open-minded people that are They embrace all cultures and ideas and all kinds of different things,
00:15:46.000 but they're also You know, these hard-nosed, determined, very disciplined people that you would sort of automatically, maybe callously, lump in with people who are cruel or unkind or not embracing other ideas.
00:16:07.000 And I just think that these ideas that we have of people It's so convenient to push people into one category or another and it's also very convenient to embrace one category and adopt their sort of predetermined pattern of ideas.
00:16:25.000 Yeah, but would you be comfortable sharing some of your own psychedelic experiences?
00:16:30.000 Sure, sure.
00:16:31.000 I mean the DMT experiences are by far the most profound and those are the ones that have really Every time I've done it, it's just completely made me rethink how I interface with people,
00:16:47.000 what life is, and what that experience...
00:16:52.000 What is that?
00:16:53.000 Is that a well of souls you're entering into?
00:16:56.000 Is it another dimension?
00:16:57.000 Is it some sort of parallel dimension of Disembodied consciousness that you seem to be engaging with life forms, with things that know you, that can see your thoughts and see resistance and see bullshit in you.
00:17:16.000 I mean, every time I've done it, it's sort of just like, in one way or another, just removed one layer of the onion.
00:17:24.000 You know, one layer of bullshit that keeps you from just embracing the great mystery of this existence, whatever it is.
00:17:34.000 Yeah, I think we're built on these layers and layers of billions of dollars, billions of dollars, billions of years.
00:17:39.000 Yeah.
00:17:40.000 Of evolution and sort of from the single cellular organisms.
00:17:43.000 It's all in a still.
00:17:45.000 And that our prefrontal cortex, our brain, has kind of helped us focus on what we need as humans in our transition from birth to death.
00:17:54.000 But that when you sort of, well, we talk about the default mode network, which is sort of the part of the brain that's identified as the sense of self.
00:18:01.000 And the classic psychedelics weaken that part.
00:18:04.000 And then more information floods.
00:18:06.000 So I think we can get back through all of the intercellular knowledge that is stored in our bodies and connect with this deeper, unitive sense.
00:18:16.000 It's amazing.
00:18:17.000 Yeah, it's also—they help so much to abandon preconceived notions and just sort of—we don't realize how much of the way we sort of see ourselves and see the world is kind of a convenient set of armor that we put on to try to protect us from uncomfortable thoughts and protect us from— You know,
00:18:40.000 just mystery.
00:18:42.000 But there is a lot of mystery in life.
00:18:45.000 It's mostly mystery.
00:18:47.000 And I think psychedelics are the greatest mystery.
00:18:51.000 And there's something about them that's just The idea that it exists that you can smoke a thing and then 15 seconds later be transported into an impossible realm and that that exists and no one's discussing it.
00:19:06.000 Every day on the news they're talking about a million different things that seem so trivial once you've had a DMT experience.
00:19:14.000 Yeah, you're reminding me of my 5-MeO DMT experience that I had.
00:19:18.000 And it felt like I went sort of back to the moment of creation.
00:19:23.000 Yeah.
00:19:23.000 But I realized that so much of our life is patterns, like you're saying, that we have these habits and we have these patterns and we take them as fixed.
00:19:32.000 But they're not actually fixed.
00:19:33.000 We have put them into motion.
00:19:35.000 And this 5-MeO, by bringing me back to this moment of creation...
00:19:40.000 It helped me realize that the new can enter at any moment.
00:19:44.000 And so I've actually felt that that experience, which I had one time back in 1985, has been a big part of our success to get to the place that we're at now with psychedelic research, with MDMA therapy,
00:20:01.000 because it helped me to realize that whenever I felt blocked or stuck, that I could We're good to go.
00:20:29.000 It's just so easy to fall into patterns.
00:20:31.000 You know, you fall into the patterns of the group that you hang out with.
00:20:33.000 You fall into patterns of accents and, you know, dress and the way people behave and think about things and the concepts that they adopt.
00:20:42.000 And when you have like a real breakthrough psychedelic experience, it just makes all that seem so trivial.
00:20:48.000 My DMT experience, my first 5-MeO experience, I've done both multiple times, but the first 5-MeO experience, I thought I fucked up.
00:20:58.000 I thought it's over.
00:20:59.000 There was a moment when you're entering into whatever that great white...
00:21:07.000 Field of Geometry is you know where where you go?
00:21:12.000 Oh my god am I dying?
00:21:13.000 Like it feels like there's no way I'm coming back from this like like I've gone so far and then that fear That fear subsided once the experience just fully kicked in.
00:21:27.000 Like, the fear was at the doorway to the experience.
00:21:31.000 Like, oh no, what have I done?
00:21:33.000 And then...
00:21:34.000 You go into that...
00:21:37.000 The weirdest thing about 5-MeO, too, is the lack of visuals.
00:21:41.000 It's just this great white pattern.
00:21:45.000 This thing where you don't have any memory, you're barely a conscious entity, and you're experiencing what seems to be like the source code of the universe.
00:21:59.000 I mean, it's just a gap.
00:22:00.000 I felt like I was shot through a rocket to the center of everything.
00:22:05.000 And yet there is an aspect of memory, and there is an aspect of us paying attention.
00:22:12.000 There's still this observer in some ways.
00:22:15.000 Yeah.
00:22:16.000 It's pretty compromised, but there's something that you come back with.
00:22:20.000 But it's also very difficult to hold on to, right?
00:22:22.000 Yeah.
00:22:22.000 It is, and that's this process of integration that's necessary, but also for the 5-MeO, it's so brief.
00:22:28.000 Yeah.
00:22:28.000 So that's where the Ibogaine experience can be 12 hours or more, or the MDMA experiences, we make them into 8-hour sessions.
00:22:36.000 I haven't done Ibogaine.
00:22:37.000 Oh.
00:22:38.000 Yeah, I've heard really great things from people that have addiction problems, like people that are addicted to pills in particular, have gone to Mexico.
00:22:47.000 One of them was my friend, Ed Clay, who went down to Mexico because of a pill problem he had.
00:22:53.000 And then he wound up opening up an Ibogaine Center down there once he had been cured of it.
00:22:57.000 There is that phenomena where people, once they get healed, they want to help others.
00:23:01.000 And in particular, in the military, you're trained to leave nobody behind.
00:23:05.000 And many people have said that, that once they've gotten help, now they want to bring all their brothers to...
00:23:12.000 Yeah.
00:23:31.000 For both PTSD, depression, traumatic brain injury, addiction, and he's heard just remarkable stories.
00:23:38.000 But now that you mention, or that we're talking about Ibogaine, I just would like to say a bit of, we have a mutual friend, Aubrey Marcus, and I've been texting him this morning and it's a bit sad his father died.
00:23:52.000 And so he's sitting Shiva, which is this Jewish tradition where for a week after someone dies, people come over to the house and you just mourn for a week.
00:24:01.000 So I'll be there tomorrow morning.
00:24:03.000 But his father, Michael Marcus, actually helped start Ibogaine research.
00:24:07.000 And so I'd like to explain that just a tiny bit.
00:24:11.000 Michael had studied a bit of holotropic breathwork with Stan Grof.
00:24:16.000 So Stanislav Grof is the world's leading LSD researcher.
00:24:19.000 He's almost 92 years old, but he worked at Johns Hopkins.
00:24:23.000 He did LSD research in the Czech Republic, and when the Russians came in in 68 to crush their rebellion, he escaped and came to the U.S. But Michael got to know Stan and did work with him where once psychedelics were criminalized,
00:24:39.000 Stan realized that you can catalyze similar experiences through hyperventilation without a drug.
00:24:47.000 I mean, it is like a drug.
00:24:49.000 It changes the chemistry in your brain.
00:24:51.000 And so I got to know Michael, and at one point he was a stock trader, and he felt like he was losing his edge.
00:25:00.000 And this is probably, you know, 15 more years ago.
00:25:03.000 And what he said was he wondered maybe a psychedelic experience could be helpful for him, and I suggested Ibogaine.
00:25:12.000 And he went down to Mexico for an Ibogaine experience, and it helped him.
00:25:16.000 And then he felt like he regained his confidence, and then he bet that there was going to be a massive stock crash.
00:25:23.000 He shorted the market, and then there was a major crash.
00:25:27.000 And then he contacted me and he said, this Ibogaine really helped him and he would like to know how he might pay it back.
00:25:35.000 And I said, well, we've got this project.
00:25:38.000 We're trying to start for a long time.
00:25:40.000 It's the first project where we're going to look at a clinic in Mexico and test people do before and after.
00:25:47.000 Just how are they doing?
00:25:48.000 It'd be a long-term follow-up because Ibogaine For no good reason at all, other than the drug war, is illegal in the United States.
00:25:55.000 And it's not a drug of abuse.
00:25:57.000 It helps treat drug of abuse, but it is legal in Mexico and in Canada.
00:26:02.000 And so just the day before, I had gotten a matching grant offer of $10,000 for a $20,000 study.
00:26:09.000 And I said, Michael, would you be willing to match this?
00:26:13.000 And he said, sure, yeah.
00:26:15.000 I said, great, now we're going to have this first Ibogaine study.
00:26:18.000 And then he said, what else do you have?
00:26:21.000 And I was like, well, okay, if you want to know more, I'd say the most difficult thing for us to fund, the most idealistic thing we're doing, this was at the time, was we're trying to start research in Jordan.
00:26:32.000 You know, we have research in Israel, we have research in Canada, we have research, but we've no research in the Arab countries.
00:26:38.000 And I thought, if we could do something in Jordan, and I had incredible connections in Jordan with the mayor of Amman, whose son-in-law actually had found LSD helpful for cluster headaches.
00:26:51.000 And anyway, I went to Michael and I said, the most idealistic thing, the most far-reaching at this point would be to do this study in Amman.
00:26:59.000 And he said, well, how much does that cost?
00:27:01.000 And I said, well, it's about $85,000, something like that, $90,000.
00:27:06.000 And he said, all right, I'll do that too.
00:27:09.000 And so that started the first project with Ibogaine.
00:27:13.000 And then we eventually did another long-term follow-up in New Zealand.
00:27:17.000 And now there are people now, there's a project in Spain with a group called ICERs.
00:27:23.000 And it's to take increasing amounts of Ibogaine to help people withdraw from methadone.
00:27:29.000 There's projects in Brazil with Ibogaine.
00:27:32.000 There's a company, Atai, that's one of the for-profit psychedelic companies that's working with Deborah Mass from Demaracks.
00:27:40.000 They've merged and they're interested in Ibogaine.
00:27:43.000 So Ibogaine is one of the classic examples of disastrous drug policy.
00:27:49.000 It turns out that there were LSD dealers in the 60s who got busted, and they happened to have Ibogaine.
00:27:58.000 And so the government made Ibogaine illegal.
00:28:01.000 But these LSD dealers, Howard Lotsoff, was also experimenting with opiates.
00:28:06.000 And when they tried Ibogaine, they felt no desire for opiates, and they went through the withdrawal without any pain.
00:28:12.000 It's just remarkable what opiates do for you when you go through the withdrawal.
00:28:16.000 It's terrible.
00:28:18.000 But if you have Ibogaine, you can go through it in a couple days and you have a lot of psychological experiences about why you might want to run away from your problems into opiates.
00:28:26.000 Isn't there something that happens with Ibogaine where it like literally rewires?
00:28:32.000 Yes.
00:28:33.000 Now, that's true with other psychedelics as well.
00:28:35.000 It's called neuroplasticity.
00:28:37.000 And so what that means is that there is this ability for our neurons to have new synaptic connections.
00:28:47.000 And that's what we mean is neuroplasticity.
00:28:50.000 Our brain is constantly being rewired.
00:28:52.000 Every time we do anything, we have memories, and the memories are encoded.
00:28:57.000 And sometimes they get encoded in harmful ways, like with trauma, with PTSD. The memories are so painful that they never really get fully processed, they never really get put into long-term storage.
00:29:10.000 There's a lot of changes in your brain when you have PTSD. But this idea that you can then rewire your brain once you experience them.
00:29:22.000 And so there's researchers at, Goul Dolan is at Johns Hopkins.
00:29:26.000 She's done studies in mice with MDMA and showed that it releases oxytocin, which is the hormone that we have for love and connection, nursing mothers, but it also promotes this new neural growth.
00:29:39.000 So Ibogaine does that, LSD does that, psilocybin does that, and what Goul has found, which is really interesting, Is that the longer you're in the psychedelic state, the longer afterwards this period of neuroplasticity lasts,
00:29:55.000 where you can do more integration work, where you have this enhanced ability to reroute patterns in your brain.
00:30:03.000 And so Ibogaine opens up this period of neuroplasticity for several weeks after, because the experience can last for more than a day or two.
00:30:14.000 Is there any headway that's being made on bringing Ibogaine to the United States?
00:30:20.000 Because if you think about the opiate crisis that we have here, that seems like one of the very best sort of remedies for that.
00:30:27.000 It is.
00:30:28.000 And this is where, if you were to look back over the last...
00:30:32.000 Fifty years.
00:30:33.000 I doubt that there's more than five cases that the government has about anybody abusing Ibogaine, if at all.
00:30:41.000 Well, it's a 24-hour drug, right?
00:30:43.000 I've never done it.
00:30:45.000 It knocks you down.
00:30:46.000 I would highly recommend it.
00:30:48.000 Yeah?
00:30:50.000 I'd say one of the most important experiences of my whole life was Ibogaine.
00:30:56.000 Yeah?
00:30:57.000 Yeah.
00:30:57.000 What happened?
00:30:58.000 Well, so there's a fellow named Leo Zeff who is the, we called him the secret chief.
00:31:06.000 So he was the leader of the underground psychedelic therapy movement.
00:31:10.000 And he worked closely with Sasha Shulgin.
00:31:13.000 And Sasha Shulgin was the chemist that invented hundreds of psychedelics.
00:31:18.000 He worked for Dow in the 60s and he invented a biodegradable insecticide.
00:31:24.000 I think?
00:31:45.000 And they would then, Sasha would take it himself, and then if he thought it was okay, he would give it to his wife, Anne.
00:31:53.000 And they would do these together, and then they had a group of 12 people that would meet like once a month, and they would try these new drugs.
00:31:59.000 Sasha, by the way, did go to the Bohemian Grove, where he was a musician there, and so he was able to go, but he would test new drugs with people at Bohemian Grove.
00:32:08.000 Oh my god.
00:32:10.000 So like presidents and bankers?
00:32:12.000 Different kinds of people like that.
00:32:13.000 Yes, they would try these new things.
00:32:15.000 They'd go for walks in the woods because you go to Bohemian Grove for a week or two.
00:32:19.000 And so it's not like you're there for a day or so.
00:32:21.000 But so this small group of 12 people decided that MDMA had incredible potential.
00:32:27.000 This is in the middle 70s.
00:32:29.000 And they gave this to Leo Zeff and Leo said, wow, he was about to retire.
00:32:36.000 He was a clinical psych PhD and he was getting up there in years and he was about to retire.
00:32:41.000 He trained a lot of people with LSD and other things.
00:32:44.000 And so he did not retire in order to bring forth MDMA. And so he really pioneered the use of therapeutic use of MDMA. And this is now MDMA being a therapy drug before it became ecstasy as a party drug.
00:32:58.000 And that a lot happened in Dallas at the Star Club, which is, you know, a public place where, you know, incredible stories of the Star Club.
00:33:07.000 There's going to be a documentary by Michael Caine is working on a documentary about the Star Club.
00:33:14.000 But that attracted Lloyd Benson, the senator from Texas.
00:33:16.000 He heard about this and then he complained to the DEA. And then the DEA moved to criminalize.
00:33:21.000 We knew that this public use of MDMA was going to eventually result in DEA crackdown.
00:33:27.000 This is Nancy Reagan and Ronald Reagan and all of that.
00:33:31.000 And so we had a jumpstart in a sense that the DEA didn't know we were there.
00:33:35.000 They only knew the party drug.
00:33:37.000 They didn't know the therapy parts.
00:33:38.000 But we knew that the DEA was there and they were coming after us.
00:33:41.000 So I started a non-profit before MAPS in 84 and that was to prepare and gather this community together in order to defend MDMA once the DEA moved.
00:33:52.000 And so Leo Zeff came to me and he said, you're starting to be an advocate and I'd like to offer you an IBM experience.
00:33:59.000 Because we need to own our own shadow, own our own weaknesses, own our own things that we're not comfortable with and also, you know, have spiritual connections and things like that.
00:34:13.000 And he said, if I can help you, this might help in your political work because then you'll see that we're mixtures of good and bad.
00:34:21.000 Everybody is and that you won't demonize the DEA and that you may be able to find a way To, you know, build a bridge.
00:34:28.000 And so he offered me this Ibogaine experience.
00:34:30.000 And I said, great, I would love to do this.
00:34:33.000 And so we had this whole long day to set aside to do this.
00:34:38.000 And Ibogaine in plant form takes a while to take an effect.
00:34:42.000 So Leo said, I'd like to give you a bunch of LSD at the same time.
00:34:48.000 It was 350 micrograms of LSD, which is a pretty hefty dose.
00:34:52.000 The first LSD experience that we know of, Albert Hoffman, April 19, 1943, was an amount that he thought would have no real effect because it would be so small, 250 micrograms, which is a major existential challenge.
00:35:10.000 So 350 micrograms is pretty good.
00:35:14.000 And so I actually got administered Ibogaine, a bunch of it in plant form, and then also the LSD at the same time.
00:35:21.000 And I could tell the differences between the drugs.
00:35:24.000 I could tell coming up on the LSD and moving towards this kind of ego dissolution and opening up and different my emotions and how am I going to do this political work and who am I and, you know, am I qualified and all of this.
00:35:40.000 And I sort of had a lot of experience with LSD, had never done Ibogaine before, and I was able to open up pretty well for the LSD. But then this sort of low guttural rumble started from the Ibogaine.
00:35:53.000 The LSD peaks around three hours or so.
00:35:55.000 And I could feel this Ibogaine building and building and building.
00:35:59.000 LSD is also very much in your head, very ethereal, more so than psilocybin mushrooms, which are more embodied.
00:36:06.000 And so this Ibogaine started coming up, this experience, and I started feeling like if I could just let go, if I could just fully have this experience, and if I didn't have these fears and anxieties, then I would be a better advocate, and I needed to,
00:36:22.000 and so much was at stake.
00:36:24.000 But then I felt I couldn't let go because I was too scared.
00:36:27.000 And then I would be hating myself.
00:36:30.000 So I felt that there was this cycle of, oh, I'm not as good as I should be.
00:36:36.000 I wish I could let go.
00:36:38.000 I do have these emotions of fear.
00:36:40.000 And then I would feel that and get nauseous.
00:36:42.000 And then I would vomit.
00:36:44.000 And then I would feel relief for like a minute or so.
00:36:48.000 And then the swirl would begin.
00:36:50.000 And each of them is like 15 or 20 minute cycles and stuff.
00:36:52.000 And then I would get to this peak And then I would vomit again and over and over and over.
00:36:58.000 And for a Jewish person, the imagery that I had was that I was being crucified on the cross of self-perfectionism.
00:37:08.000 That I didn't want to be human in a way.
00:37:10.000 I wanted to be perfect.
00:37:11.000 I wanted to be more than I was.
00:37:13.000 And that this idea that I was not perfect, that, you know, it just...
00:37:21.000 Was this connection between self-criticism and self-hatred.
00:37:25.000 And I could see that.
00:37:26.000 And it just made me sick.
00:37:27.000 And I wished I could do more.
00:37:29.000 But I couldn't get out of it.
00:37:31.000 And I had like a 12-hour cycle of that.
00:37:33.000 Over and over and over.
00:37:34.000 I mean, you know, I was like dry heaving.
00:37:36.000 I had nothing left to throw up anymore.
00:37:38.000 And I just so saw this connection between wanting to be perfect, not wanting to be human, being super self-critical, leading to self-hatred and shutting myself down.
00:37:49.000 And so at the end of that day, I was so exhausted.
00:37:54.000 I called it transcendence through exhaustion.
00:37:58.000 You know, I just gave up.
00:38:00.000 I just beat myself up so much.
00:38:02.000 I just gave up and I had the most blissful night.
00:38:04.000 It was so beautiful.
00:38:05.000 It was like no struggle, completely open, everything.
00:38:08.000 And I realized that what I needed to do was keep the self-criticism because that is the drive for quality.
00:38:13.000 You need access to the self-critical part of your mind.
00:38:17.000 But if it's connected to self-hatred, you don't listen as much because then you're a bad person.
00:38:23.000 So I sort of I severed the connection between self-criticism and self-hatred.
00:38:28.000 I accepted myself as a flawed human being that had a lot of room to grow and that I made friends in a way.
00:38:36.000 I made an ally out of the self-critical part of my brain.
00:38:39.000 And it, I think, has helped me to learn and grow because we're doing things that have never done before.
00:38:45.000 We're doing things I've never done before, nobody's never done before, bringing this through the FDA, psychedelic psychotherapy.
00:38:50.000 And we're constantly making mistakes.
00:38:53.000 I like to say that I'm just a fuck-up who just keeps on trying.
00:38:59.000 But I told myself this story.
00:39:02.000 This was the most beautiful night all night.
00:39:03.000 I was just super alert, didn't sleep at all, and just saw the stars.
00:39:07.000 But I told myself a story, and so much is governed by stories, as you know.
00:39:12.000 But the story was that I was telling myself is that I had not earned this.
00:39:16.000 I hadn't had a breakthrough.
00:39:17.000 I just exhausted myself.
00:39:19.000 So I said, when the sun comes up, I'll be back stuck in this nauseous space.
00:39:24.000 I don't know why I told myself that story, but I did.
00:39:27.000 And the sun comes up, and then I was like stuck and nauseous again, and I couldn't move for a day.
00:39:32.000 I actually had to sit there or lie there, really, in a fetal position.
00:39:36.000 A friend was supposed to come pick me up.
00:39:37.000 I said, I can't move.
00:39:38.000 Do you think you brought that on yourself?
00:39:39.000 In a way, I do.
00:39:41.000 I think the stories we tell ourselves, I mean, that's sort of PTSD or depression.
00:39:46.000 And that's what we're saying about you get in these grooves.
00:39:49.000 And that's where the psychedelics can shake things up.
00:39:52.000 And the neuroplasticity is what really permits you to see it in a different way.
00:39:57.000 So I spent the whole next day just curled in a puddle, basically.
00:40:01.000 Occasionally they'd bring me a banana to eat or something like that.
00:40:04.000 And then by the third day, finally, I was able to stand up without being nauseous, and a friend came and picked me up and ended up driving me away.
00:40:16.000 And as we were driving, I'd only been there once.
00:40:19.000 This was at a house I'd never been to before, and we were going back to familiar ground in the same way.
00:40:25.000 And I had this sense in my mind that I knew what was around the corner.
00:40:30.000 And I would say, oh, I think we're going to see this.
00:40:32.000 And a couple times we did.
00:40:34.000 And so what I think happened is that I was taking it in peripherally, but I wasn't paying attention to it when I was going there.
00:40:41.000 It wasn't like I was, you know...
00:40:44.000 Telepathic in a way or anything like that.
00:40:45.000 It was just that all these experiences had sort of been there but hadn't registered.
00:40:50.000 And I think I cleared out a lot of space in my mind from this constant self-criticism.
00:40:56.000 So I had more openness in space and I could remember things.
00:41:00.000 It was the fourth day that I could finally drive.
00:41:04.000 But I felt that ever since then, I've had this Increasing ability to be self-critical without it being so connected to self-hatred and so painful.
00:41:16.000 And I really feel that that I begin to experience, although I've not done it since.
00:41:22.000 Because it was pretty heavy and exhausting and painful.
00:41:29.000 And I've had other psychedelic experiences since.
00:41:32.000 But that, I think, was one of the pivotal ones in my mind.
00:41:35.000 And so here we have an opioid epidemic.
00:41:38.000 Over 100,000 people died last year with overdoses, connected sometimes with fentanyl and others.
00:41:43.000 And a tool that can be tremendously helpful is something that is not being studied at all in the United States, and we're forcing people to go to other countries.
00:41:53.000 So MAPS is developing what's called an investigator brochure.
00:41:59.000 And what that means is that any time a pharmaceutical company wants to develop a drug through the FDA, you have to summarize the world's literature in the peer-reviewed journals, and you look at it from a safety and efficacy perspective.
00:42:13.000 And so we prepare this brochure for the FDA, and it will bring us to what is the latest science.
00:42:20.000 It'll include the study that ICERS is doing in Spain with Ibogaine for Helping people withdraw from methadone or the studies in Mexico also for opiate addiction.
00:42:33.000 And then we will propose a new study.
00:42:37.000 Ibogaine is in some ways one of the most dangerous of the psychedelics in that there are a small group of people that can have problems with the heart.
00:42:45.000 And so some people have died from taking ibogaine.
00:42:49.000 But if you do it under medical supervision, particularly for people who are in weaker physical states because of drug addiction, that nobody needs to die and you can reverse it if something does happen.
00:43:00.000 So we are probably going to propose And we're working with Joe Barsuglia and Martin Polanco, who have developed a company to try to make Ibogaine into a medicine.
00:43:16.000 And they ran a lot of the clinics also in Mexico.
00:43:20.000 So a medicine like a pharmaceutical medicine that will be available for prescription?
00:43:24.000 Yes.
00:43:25.000 Well, there's two tracks, again, and that's one track.
00:43:29.000 But the other track is from a policy point of view.
00:43:32.000 So MAPS, our nonprofit, we have a policy and advocacy team.
00:43:36.000 So if ever there was a drug that we could make a strong case that should be removed from Schedule I. Schedule I is a drug, high potential for abuse, no accepted medical use.
00:43:46.000 It's the worst drugs, according to our scheduling system.
00:43:50.000 You know, if we make MDMA into a medicine, what's going to happen is that we'll have what's called bifurcated scheduling.
00:43:58.000 And that means is that our particular product in this particular capsule for PTSD would move out of Schedule I, potentially Schedule III or Schedule IV, but MDMA itself would still stay in Schedule I. So getting MDMA out of Schedule 1 so that it's hopefully more accessible,
00:44:19.000 not just for medicine, is part of our goal as well.
00:44:22.000 Drug policy reform, post-prohibition world.
00:44:25.000 But Ibogaine...
00:44:27.000 There's no reason for it to be in Schedule 1 or Schedule 2. Schedule 2 is drugs that have a high potential for abuse but also have a medical use.
00:44:36.000 So I think we need to have a two-pronged strategy with Ibogaine.
00:44:40.000 One is to try to work through the FDA to make it into medicine, but other is to try to make the case that it never should have been criminalized in the first place, and it's not a drug of abuse.
00:44:50.000 And at a time where we have so many people dying from opiate overdoses, and so many other people suffering even if they're not dying from this that this is something that a logical rational country would make this available and we should have clinics right here in Austin and all over the country because we have a massive problem and and yet it's this remnant of the drug war which and again I would say Nixon well John Ehrlichman who was Nixon's domestic policy advisor It came out in the
00:45:20.000 late 70s, and he said that the Nixon White House had two main enemies.
00:45:25.000 Those were the blacks for civil rights and the hippies, the anti-war.
00:45:29.000 And what Ehrlichman said is, we realized that if we could criminalize the drugs that they did, we could bust them up, we could arrest their leaders, we could bust up their meetings.
00:45:39.000 And then Ehrlichman said, did we know we are exaggerating the risks of those drugs?
00:45:43.000 Of course we did.
00:45:44.000 So I think we could make a good scientific and rational case Now that Ibogaine never should have been criminalized and it should be legally available, but by trained therapists in proper circumstances so that the safety is fine.
00:46:00.000 But I think what has happened and what we've seen with medical marijuana leading to marijuana legalization, changing people's attitudes, We see that a lot of the psychedelic research with MDMA and psilocybin has led to Oregon decriminalizing drugs and making the Oregon psilocybin initiative with a sort of state legal program that they're trying to implement with local guides.
00:46:22.000 Colorado in November, the last election, legalized natural plant medicines.
00:46:29.000 So I think with Ibogaine we will see a similar kind of a thing, that there will be a lot of, hopefully, research over the next couple years and that will change people's attitudes and then maybe we can remove Ibogaine from Schedule I. And then the bigger question is,
00:46:46.000 you're saying like, you know, nobody really looks back and thinks Vietnam was a good idea.
00:46:52.000 I'm going to pause you right here because I have to pee so bad.
00:46:54.000 I'm really sorry.
00:46:55.000 Just hold on one second.
00:46:57.000 Yeah.
00:46:58.000 Vietnam.
00:46:59.000 Yeah, so nobody looks back and thinks Vietnam was a good idea, you said.
00:47:04.000 But I think it's going to be the same way for the drug war.
00:47:07.000 Yeah, for sure.
00:47:08.000 And so I think we will think of it as a massive tragic experiment that has been exported all over the world, caused enormous violence, and I think the The idea of Ibogaine removing, getting it removed from Schedule 1 could be really important.
00:47:23.000 But I have a little pee joke, if I could tell you.
00:47:26.000 Okay.
00:47:27.000 People will know that you just went out to pee and come back, but that's what brought this to mind.
00:47:30.000 So I actually was very lucky.
00:47:33.000 I had prostate cancer.
00:47:35.000 And it was caught early.
00:47:38.000 But I had prostate surgery and now I'm fine.
00:47:41.000 But it affects your ability to control your bladder for a while.
00:47:45.000 So I had to wear and still do these sort of basic depends and pads and all this kind of stuff.
00:47:51.000 But there was a time shortly after the operation.
00:47:54.000 This is very short.
00:47:55.000 I was at Burning Man.
00:47:56.000 And we have a village at Burning Man.
00:47:59.000 We do psychedelic harm reduction there.
00:48:00.000 So a group of us were in this Sort of cuddle-puddle in this, you know, I was not doing MDMA at the time, but other people were.
00:48:09.000 And it was like 3 in the morning, and we'd been there for hours, and we're just, like, 14 of us or something just talking, and this one woman goes out to pee and comes back, and, you know, other people do that.
00:48:19.000 And then this woman turned to me and said, I don't understand.
00:48:22.000 You just had this operation.
00:48:24.000 You're supposed to, you know, pee more often.
00:48:27.000 You know, what's up with you?
00:48:29.000 You're just sitting here the whole time.
00:48:30.000 I said, I've been peeing the entire time.
00:48:35.000 It doesn't matter.
00:48:36.000 So, you know, diapers at Burning Man is like a new fashion trend.
00:48:40.000 Jesus Christ.
00:48:43.000 Have other people adopted this?
00:48:46.000 People were joking about it.
00:48:47.000 Oh, my God.
00:48:48.000 You started a trend.
00:48:50.000 That seems like it would be uncomfortable.
00:48:52.000 Like, it would be better to just go pee somewhere.
00:48:54.000 It would be, but then you interrupt the conversation flow and stuff.
00:48:58.000 Like I just did.
00:48:59.000 Maybe I should do a podcast with a diaper on.
00:49:00.000 Well, it wicks it away.
00:49:01.000 It's not even that uncomfortable.
00:49:03.000 I mean, anyway.
00:49:05.000 I just...
00:49:06.000 I just had to do the pee joke, I'm sorry.
00:49:08.000 Yeah, no worries.
00:49:10.000 So, back to this idea that in the future we're going to look at the drug war as being an overall negative thing and a mistake.
00:49:18.000 For sure, I think the biggest thing is going to be this blanket definition of drugs.
00:49:25.000 You know, that there's, especially things, when you have things like psilocybin in Schedule I, Where it can help people in so many ways, and we're denying that help.
00:49:36.000 And I think one of the keys, just like Rocco was the key to get the TED, I think that someone's son having a bad experience with opiates, someone in a great position of power, someone who's a politician or a governor or someone like that,
00:49:53.000 who sees a big turnaround from someone using Ibogaine or using psilocybin.
00:49:58.000 Like, that's going to aid us.
00:50:00.000 It's when people see members of their family or somebody that they care about that's suffering, that gets better, that's when change really happens.
00:50:09.000 And I think it's sad that it takes that, that you can't sort of look at the world and think, you know, those might not be me or my friends, but something new should change.
00:50:20.000 Well, it's just not having an understanding of what it actually is.
00:50:24.000 And it's because of that term, drugs.
00:50:27.000 The term drugs is almost always associated with someone being foolish, wasting their life, doing something dumb.
00:50:35.000 And the word hallucinogen, too.
00:50:37.000 Yeah.
00:50:37.000 I mean, it's a delusion.
00:50:38.000 It's fake.
00:50:39.000 It's not real.
00:50:40.000 It's like pink elephants when you're on alcohol or something.
00:50:44.000 It's not real.
00:50:45.000 And so I think it's very pejorative, the language that we use about it.
00:50:48.000 We try to talk about these things as medicines instead of drugs.
00:50:52.000 Yeah.
00:50:52.000 And I think that the way in which we have – drugs have become scapegoats.
00:51:00.000 So they become the shadow.
00:51:03.000 They become the source of all the problems.
00:51:06.000 And the fundamental mistake, I would say, of the drug war – has been to say that certain things themselves are good or bad.
00:51:14.000 These are bad drugs, and they have to be illegal.
00:51:17.000 These are okay drugs, or these are good drugs.
00:51:19.000 Of course, good drugs have included tobacco and alcohol.
00:51:23.000 But we make the thing itself good or bad, and what we miss is that it's about the relationship that we have with the thing.
00:51:32.000 And that it's not the substance, it's the relationship.
00:51:35.000 And so by focusing on the thing, then we say, oh, we've got to reduce the supply.
00:51:39.000 We've got to do all this kind of work to make it so difficult or expensive for people to get to.
00:51:46.000 And then we have to threaten them.
00:51:47.000 There's a man named Carl Hart who is on our… Yeah, I know Dr. Carl Hart.
00:51:52.000 Yeah, he's fantastic.
00:51:54.000 He's on our board of directors.
00:51:56.000 And he's a neuroscientist.
00:52:02.000 And he is, you know, in New York City, and he's a drug policy reformer.
00:52:07.000 And one time we were talking about drugs, and I said, you know, I think that the more dangerous the drug, the more important it is that it be legal.
00:52:18.000 And he said he liked to say that and that he believed that also.
00:52:22.000 And what I mean by that is that the dangerous drugs are ones which, when people get into problems with them, we need to offer them help as soon as possible.
00:52:34.000 And then we stigmatize them and drive them away.
00:52:37.000 The more dangerous drugs also get mixed with other things.
00:52:40.000 So like fentanyl mixed with opiates and that's where you have the overdoses.
00:52:44.000 So people don't get pure drugs.
00:52:46.000 They don't get support.
00:52:47.000 They don't get help.
00:52:49.000 They're not treated as humans.
00:52:51.000 They don't get really access to treatment as much.
00:52:53.000 We just punish, punish, punish.
00:52:55.000 So our goal is to make drug users, particularly these people, feel worse off so that they're an example So nobody will want to do it.
00:53:01.000 But that's not a really good example.
00:53:03.000 People won't do that.
00:53:04.000 So I think this idea of the more dangerous the drug, the more important it is that it be legal, I think makes a lot of sense.
00:53:12.000 And we need to really offer treatment on demand and peer support.
00:53:16.000 And when we think about drug policy too, you know, people don't understand as much lost opportunities.
00:53:24.000 You can see things that have gone wrong, but lost opportunities are like invisible.
00:53:29.000 But when I think about MDMA having been criminalized in 1985 by the DEA on an emergency basis for bogus reasons about neurotoxicity, but they used that as a rationale, then the hearings that we had going on with the DEA administrative law judge,
00:53:47.000 they said that it should stay as a medicine.
00:53:49.000 And the DEA overruled them, and we sued them twice in the appeals courts and won, and on the third time, DEA lawyers figured out how to Satisfy the courts to keep it illegal.
00:54:00.000 And that's why, again, in 86, I started maps to go through the FDA. But that when I think of the number of suicides that have happened in both veteran communities and everywhere since 1985, Hundreds and hundreds of thousands, I think, of lives.
00:54:15.000 We should talk about this while we're being brought up.
00:54:18.000 Because there's a common misconception about MDMA that has been proven to be false.
00:54:23.000 And it is that it makes holes in your brain.
00:54:27.000 Well, yes.
00:54:28.000 Yeah.
00:54:30.000 Oprah is a big person responsible for that, actually.
00:54:35.000 So, there was...
00:54:38.000 It started on MTV and went to Oprah.
00:54:40.000 This was around 2001. So what had happened was that there was a young woman, her mother worked at a drug abuse treatment center, and she had problems with cocaine, she had problems with marijuana, she had problems with ecstasy, other things.
00:54:55.000 And so they arranged, and this was for this MTV show, that this woman would go and do a brain scan, a spec scan, which is blood flow in the brain, and then they would reveal the results to her live on TV. And this was at this drug abuse treatment center that her mother worked at,
00:55:16.000 and they revealed the results, and the results showed these holes in the brain.
00:55:20.000 And it was a graphically manipulated image.
00:55:25.000 So spec scans show blood flow through the brain, and there's certain areas that light up when you have more blood flow than others.
00:55:31.000 And so they took an arbitrary cutoff.
00:55:33.000 Any place that had lower than a certain amount of blood flow, they showed as a hole.
00:55:39.000 And it was just complete propaganda.
00:55:40.000 It was to scare this young woman to supposedly do it.
00:55:43.000 She'd done all these other drugs and ecstasy anyway.
00:55:45.000 So short time after that, Oprah decides that she's going to do a show.
00:55:49.000 And she contacts me and us because we are now advocates and she knew about what we're doing and we're trying to start MDMA research.
00:55:57.000 Her team says that they want to do two shows on ecstasy.
00:56:01.000 It's such a big thing.
00:56:02.000 They want to do one on the risks and one on the benefits.
00:56:05.000 I'm like, great.
00:56:06.000 Sounds great.
00:56:06.000 And they say, well, we're going to do the one on the risks first.
00:56:09.000 And they brought this woman who had all these holes in the brain, supposedly, to be on the show.
00:56:16.000 If you had all the holes in the brain that they showed, you wouldn't be walking and talking.
00:56:21.000 It was just big holes in her brain.
00:56:23.000 So nobody seemed to put it together.
00:56:25.000 Here, this woman, she seems fine, but this is her damaged brain.
00:56:29.000 And we told Oprah's team, don't show this.
00:56:31.000 This is fake.
00:56:32.000 This is not real.
00:56:33.000 And they did it anyway.
00:56:36.000 And they had one woman who was a 24-year-old woman that was a raver, but she had positive experiences about MDMA. So they said, okay, she would be the one that would sort of say something positive about MDMA. And then Oprah said to her,
00:56:53.000 do you know what you might be doing to your brain with all these holes in the brain?
00:56:58.000 We'd like to offer you a brain scan.
00:57:00.000 And if your brain scan looked like hers, would you, I think it was Lynn Smith was her name that had the holes in the brain, would you stop using if your brain looked like that?
00:57:11.000 And she said, well, I'd be willing to do a brain scan.
00:57:14.000 But the very next day she contacted MAPS. She contacted us and said that, should she do this brain scan?
00:57:21.000 And I said, you definitely should do it, but do it with different people.
00:57:24.000 Don't do it with the people.
00:57:25.000 But definitely do this brain scan and then you'll be on the show again and you can show what the results are.
00:57:31.000 So she did the brain scan and then she wrote me back and she said, well, no holes and they've canceled the next show.
00:57:40.000 There's no show on the benefits and they're not bringing me back.
00:57:44.000 They tricked you.
00:57:46.000 They did.
00:57:47.000 That's a normal Hollywood producer show.
00:57:50.000 Yeah, no show on the benefits.
00:57:52.000 But then years later, over a decade later, when Oprah was just a short time from closing her show, but she had O Magazine.
00:58:02.000 So she decided she would assign a senior editor to do a story on MDMA and the therapeutic use.
00:58:11.000 And it was like Oprah doing Atonement.
00:58:13.000 I said, would you be willing, though, to do another show on your TV show and bring this woman back who had all these holes in the brain and let's see what she's doing now?
00:58:21.000 And she actually did show some signs of brain damage in that she was working for the Partnership for a Drug-Free America.
00:58:31.000 And she was...
00:58:33.000 As the exhibit of, oh, you know, MDMA is terrible.
00:58:35.000 So do you think they scared her with the holes in the brain to the point where she thought that drugs were ruining her life and she wanted to save other people?
00:58:42.000 I think there was that, yeah.
00:58:43.000 And I think that she wanted to get back in the good graces with her mother, that then she gets supportive and then she gets a job and this whole thing.
00:58:50.000 And so Oprah said, no, she's not willing to do another show, but this article would go forward in O Magazine.
00:58:57.000 And the article was great.
00:58:59.000 And the woman who was the reporter ended up going for an underground MDMA experience, which I helped arrange.
00:59:09.000 And it was very successful.
00:59:11.000 And that's how the article ends.
00:59:13.000 But it's great because it didn't make a big deal of, oh, this is illegal underground.
00:59:17.000 It was just like, here's what happened to her.
00:59:18.000 The MDMA. But it was, in some ways, propaganda in the positive way.
00:59:25.000 It was like, can a single pill save your life?
00:59:28.000 You know, before it's like, this is going to cause holes in your brain.
00:59:32.000 Now, one pill is all you need, a magic pill, and then you're going to be better for everything.
00:59:36.000 Ignores the whole point that it's about the therapy and the context and the relationship.
00:59:41.000 It seems like, unfortunately, because of those kind of television shows and because of up until podcasts and the internet, you had a limited sort of ability to fully express the pros and the cons and explain...
01:00:00.000 The nuance of what these experiences are about.
01:00:03.000 You're instead dealing with this sensationalist perspective where they're just trying to highlight whatever the most wildest aspects of the experience, pro or con, would be so they can get a lot of people to pay attention to it.
01:00:20.000 It becomes prostituted.
01:00:22.000 Yeah.
01:00:22.000 Yeah.
01:00:23.000 And I think that like long form podcasts where you can have the whole story, you can get the whole story out unedited by people that are wanting to do it.
01:00:31.000 But I will say in terms of educating people about psychedelics, what we're doing is a lot of maps is about public education.
01:00:38.000 And so we're hosting the world's largest conference on psychedelics ever.
01:00:43.000 And it's going to take place June 19th to the 23rd.
01:00:47.000 How many DEA agents do you think will be in the audience?
01:00:49.000 Well, I think some.
01:00:52.000 We also have some police officers who are – we have one.
01:00:57.000 Sarko Gregarian is a full-time police officer in Winthrop near Boston, but he's also a psychotherapist.
01:01:03.000 And he's been through our training program in order to give MDMA therapy to other police officers.
01:01:11.000 We just had an incredible – the first psychedelic conference in Iceland.
01:01:15.000 And Sarko came and also did his – police chief came.
01:01:20.000 And we met with the Minister of Justice in Iceland.
01:01:23.000 The conference was phenomenal, the second old conference in Iceland.
01:01:26.000 And now the Minister of Justice is interested in having Iceland fund a study to give MDMA to prisoners to work with them to see about dealing with their traumas to reduce recidivism, also with victims of crime.
01:01:42.000 To help them deal with their PTSD and also with prison guards and police.
01:01:46.000 So we have this opportunity in Iceland to potentially make it an example of a countrywide approach.
01:01:57.000 Our new big vision, and I'll get back to the Psychedelic Science Conference in just a second, but our new big vision is a world of net trauma by 2070. So this idea of every year we're adding to the burden of trauma that people are experiencing.
01:02:13.000 And then it lasts.
01:02:15.000 There are some people that get better, but there's many people that get stuck in PTSD. And then there's multi-generational PTSD. There's what's called epigenetics, which is, you know, biological evolution takes place over long periods of time.
01:02:28.000 But what turns the genes on and off is epigenetics above the genes.
01:02:33.000 That can change from your own experience.
01:02:35.000 And there's a woman, Rachel Yehuda, at the Bronx VA that has done studies with Holocaust survivors and their children and has identified an epigenetic mechanism by which this is passed on.
01:02:46.000 From parent to child and it could be either from the father or the mother line.
01:02:50.000 It's in either of our genetics.
01:02:52.000 So this idea that we are increasing the burden of trauma by, there's some estimates that by 2050 that if climate change continues as it does that there will be about a billion climate refugees from droughts and poor crops and you know lack of water and all this so that it feels like The humanity is going to be burdened more by trauma.
01:03:17.000 We have incredible problems with mental health because of both the COVID and other things.
01:03:24.000 So that what we want to do is reduce the burden of trauma every year and get to net zero trauma.
01:03:31.000 And it will take multi-generations.
01:03:34.000 And the end goal is mass mental health and a spiritualized humanity.
01:03:39.000 And that's the hope for the future.
01:03:41.000 And we will be talking about this at the Psychedelic Science Conference.
01:03:44.000 So it's going to be at the Denver Convention Center.
01:03:47.000 We have the entire Denver Convention Center.
01:03:50.000 We already have, yes, be part of the breakthrough.
01:03:54.000 Yeah.
01:03:55.000 And we've got over 5,000 people coming.
01:03:58.000 We hope there'll be about 10,000.
01:03:59.000 And we'd also like to say that we have a special discount code for people who are listening.
01:04:06.000 So it's psychedelicscience.org.
01:04:08.000 And if you just put in Rogan20, it's a 20% discount.
01:04:12.000 All right.
01:04:17.000 Field in any way to be a therapist or to run clinics or to manufacture drugs or start new companies or just...
01:04:25.000 How do you blend this with meditation?
01:04:27.000 Anything.
01:04:28.000 There's going to be over 300 speakers.
01:04:30.000 We have incredible opportunities for people to learn and grow and get involved.
01:04:37.000 We have this...
01:04:38.000 The Denver Convention Center, we have an enormous number of exhibits from, you know, probably 150, 175 different exhibits.
01:04:46.000 And, you know, Deepak Chopra will be there.
01:04:49.000 You know, I mentioned Aubrey Marcus.
01:04:51.000 He's coming with Aaron Rodgers, the football player who's used ayahuasca, which is DMT in tea form.
01:04:59.000 Michael Pollan is going to be there.
01:05:01.000 Paul Stamets is going to be there.
01:05:02.000 You know, pretty much the research community from around the world doing psychedelics.
01:05:07.000 And also drug policy reformers.
01:05:09.000 And Denver was the first city that made mushrooms the lowest enforcement priority.
01:05:14.000 So we're going to have experiential opportunities for people that will be federally legal.
01:05:20.000 I think Denver was also the first city that decriminalized marijuana.
01:05:24.000 Yeah, they have done...
01:05:26.000 Because it was a long time ago when marijuana was not state legal.
01:05:30.000 Yeah, I think Ann Arbor might have been one of them.
01:05:32.000 Oh, really?
01:05:33.000 Michigan?
01:05:33.000 Yeah, well, just because of the college there.
01:05:35.000 Oh, interesting.
01:05:36.000 Yeah, but Denver and Colorado is very progressive.
01:05:39.000 The mayor's going to help us open the conference.
01:05:41.000 We've got the support of the governor.
01:05:43.000 We're actually doing a project with the Denver police.
01:05:47.000 Because mushrooms are the lowest enforcement priority, and we want to educate police on what happens when you encounter somebody with a difficult trip.
01:05:55.000 You know, you could make it worse for them, or you could try to treat them in a certain way so that you calm them down and, you know, they don't need to be tased or, you know, however.
01:06:05.000 So we're trying to educate police on how to de-escalate people with difficult psychedelic experiences.
01:06:11.000 So the conference...
01:06:16.000 This is our fourth psychedelic science conference that we call it, where we bring everybody together.
01:06:21.000 The first was in 2010, and we had about 400 people, something like that.
01:06:26.000 But that was enormous for us.
01:06:29.000 And that was in San Jose.
01:06:30.000 The second one was in 2013, and we had, at this point, about 1,000 people.
01:06:36.000 And that was in Oakland.
01:06:37.000 And then in 2017, we had another one, and that was over 2,000 people.
01:06:42.000 And that now is still the world's largest conference.
01:06:47.000 We had like 2,500.
01:06:48.000 And now this one we think is going to be way more.
01:06:51.000 And the theme of it, why we've waited so many years between 2017 now, is that we are now at the doorway to a new world.
01:06:59.000 And what I mean by that is that we are at an incredible moment in time where there have been Probably two and a half or more billion dollars have gone into for-profit psychedelic companies.
01:07:14.000 They haven't done so great in the stock market.
01:07:17.000 A bunch of them have gone broke.
01:07:19.000 What is the idea behind these companies?
01:07:20.000 What are they trying to accomplish?
01:07:21.000 Well, some of them were trying to develop new drugs.
01:07:24.000 A lot of them were trying to set up networks of clinics.
01:07:27.000 We also have ketamine, which has now been S-ketamine.
01:07:30.000 An isomer of ketamine has been approved for a treatment of depression.
01:07:34.000 You know, we ended up...
01:07:37.000 In November 29, 2016, we had what's called an End of Phase 2 meeting with the FDA about our research with MDMA-assisted therapy for PTSD. So it took us 30 years, from the start of MAPS, 1986 to 2016, where we presented our data to the FDA and they said,
01:07:55.000 yes, you can go into Phase 3. Phase 3 is the final stage of research where you need to do safety and efficacy.
01:08:03.000 And if you prove that to the satisfaction of the FDA, you get permission to So some of the new for-profit companies, Compass Pathways is one, and USONA is a non-profit, are trying to develop psilocybin into a method, a treatment with therapy,
01:08:19.000 Compass for treatment-resistant depression, USONA for major depressive disorder.
01:08:27.000 And so a bunch of these companies are trying to develop new drugs.
01:08:30.000 And I think some of them are thinking, well, the classic psychedelics like LSD, MDMA, psilocybin, MDMA, we wouldn't say classic, but the classic psychedelics like, you know, Ibogaine, Mescaline, psilocybin,
01:08:45.000 LSD, DMT, all these are in the public domain.
01:08:48.000 And so there's no patents on them.
01:08:51.000 So people have tried to say, well, we'll patent the manufacturing process or we'll do something.
01:08:56.000 But there's also use patents.
01:08:58.000 But the use of psychedelics for therapy in different conditions is also in the public domain.
01:09:04.000 So a lot of these companies are going to try to develop new molecules that they can patent.
01:09:11.000 So that's sort of a classic pharma strategy.
01:09:13.000 Sounds horrible.
01:09:15.000 The good thing is that it'll be legal.
01:09:17.000 The bad thing is it'll be owned by pharmaceutical companies.
01:09:20.000 Well, I think it's true.
01:09:23.000 It will eventually, these new drugs.
01:09:25.000 No one should own them.
01:09:27.000 That doesn't make any sense.
01:09:28.000 Anybody should get a patent on it.
01:09:30.000 I understand that we're trying to undo 53 years of criminalization, but I just think that that's a bad strategy and you're getting in bed with some demons.
01:09:41.000 Well, there is that tendency.
01:09:43.000 And then you see what pharma does to try to protect the patents.
01:09:48.000 It deserves to be legal.
01:09:51.000 Well, the classic ones that are off patent do.
01:09:53.000 I mean, I am supportive of people patenting original ideas.
01:09:58.000 Sure.
01:09:59.000 And so if somebody develops some new molecule and, you know, for us, it's going to cost us hundreds of millions of dollars to make MDMA into a medicine.
01:10:07.000 And so we've done that in an incredible set of ways.
01:10:14.000 And I think this is why what I explained to you just a couple weeks ago and why you were so gracious to invite me back now is because I talked about this crossroads that we're at.
01:10:25.000 And so MAPS has raised about $145 million in grants and most of it donations in our history.
01:10:36.000 And we have gotten enormous value in people's donated time, expertise of all sorts.
01:10:42.000 And it's hard to even put a dollar number on that, but it's been tremendous.
01:10:46.000 And so we have used that to do this MDMA research.
01:10:49.000 A couple years ago...
01:10:52.000 With the rise of all these for-profit psychedelic companies, it became more difficult for us to raise donations because people were like, why should I donate now?
01:11:01.000 I can just invest over here and you've got a story now.
01:11:04.000 Your story is that it looks like you're moving into phase three.
01:11:07.000 Maybe you can get investors.
01:11:10.000 And so we didn't want to sell equity at the time.
01:11:15.000 And so we do have, as I said, about $145 million in grants and donations and a lot of free donated time.
01:11:21.000 But we also have $43 million in what's called a royalty share.
01:11:26.000 So it is money from investors.
01:11:28.000 They're mission-aligned investors.
01:11:30.000 Ryan Zuer organized it as the lead one called Vine Ventures.
01:11:34.000 And they have about 3.8% of North American revenues from MDMA once we make it into a medicine for about 8 to 10 years afterwards.
01:11:43.000 And if we don't give them a certain amount of money back, then it continues.
01:11:46.000 But they don't have ownership, and they don't control what we do, and we can end up prioritizing public benefit over profits.
01:11:56.000 So we also have around $20 million in a loan that's potentially convertible into equity if we don't repay the loan.
01:12:07.000 And we've got a couple of years there.
01:12:08.000 But we have reached this spot where we have the nonprofit MAPS, which has about 35 people, Is the 100% owner of the MAPS Public Benefit Corp., which is about 135 people, something like that.
01:12:23.000 And so we have this situation.
01:12:26.000 We also tried to do something new with pharma so that And something new with capitalism.
01:12:35.000 So that capitalism, when you have for-profit companies, you're supposed to maximize profits.
01:12:40.000 And if minority shareholders don't like the fact that the management isn't maximizing profits, they can try to throw them out.
01:12:47.000 And so that produces a prioritization of profits over people, profits over social benefit.
01:12:54.000 And so capitalism has been modified in a way with the public benefit corporation.
01:13:01.000 So that's a new corporate structure, maybe 20 years old, but relatively new.
01:13:06.000 And there's thousands, you know, not hundreds of thousands, not tens of thousands, I don't think, but there's thousands of these public benefit corporations.
01:13:13.000 And what you do is you can maximize public benefit over profit so that you cannot be sued by minority shareholders to try to force out the executives because you're not maximizing profits because your goal is public benefit over profit.
01:13:30.000 So we want to create a new model for how pharma drugs can be distributed.
01:13:35.000 So we have this It's a remarkable moment where we have the nonprofit is 100% owner of a for-profit but public benefit pharmaceutical company.
01:13:47.000 But we need to raise additional capital.
01:13:50.000 We are now at a place where we recently announced that our second Phase III study was successful.
01:13:58.000 And was confirmatory.
01:13:59.000 Our first Phase III study was incredibly successful.
01:14:03.000 And to give you a sense of how successful, and we published this in Nature Medicine, the FDA looks at statistical significance.
01:14:12.000 So there's efficacy and safety.
01:14:14.000 So efficacy is determined by basically statistical significance.
01:14:20.000 And you have to have.05, which means 1 in 20 chance that it's random, that it's not from what you think it was.
01:14:28.000 You know, that your intervention, your experiment said, yes, it's statistically significant.
01:14:31.000 That means it's 1 in 20 or lower chance that your finding is random.
01:14:37.000 And you have to have two of those.
01:14:41.000 And so if you have 1 in 20 and then you multiply them another 1 in 20, it's 1 in 400 chance that these two independent studies have produced results that are random, and then the FDA will approve it.
01:14:54.000 Our first study was 1 in 10,000 chance that it was random.
01:15:02.000 It was just incredible.
01:15:04.000 Now how do you do that?
01:15:05.000 How do you get such great statistical significance?
01:15:07.000 You get it because you have a big difference between the two groups and you also have not that much variability.
01:15:16.000 So what it means is the people that got MDMA Pretty much of them got major benefits, and the people that got the therapy without MDMA, so I should say, the people got therapy with MDMA, did great, pretty, not very much variability,
01:15:32.000 it doesn't work for everybody, but we had 88% responders.
01:15:36.000 We had 67% no longer had a diagnosis of PTSD. These are severe PTSD patients that had PTSD an average of 14 years, one-third over 20 years, and then we had Just another 21% had what's called clinically significant response.
01:15:58.000 And they still have PTSD, but over time they might get better.
01:16:03.000 If they could have had a forced session, they might get better.
01:16:05.000 And we had a great safety record.
01:16:07.000 We had actually nobody in the MDMA therapy group tried to kill themselves, tried to hurt themselves.
01:16:14.000 We enroll people that have previously attempted suicide.
01:16:16.000 We did have one woman try to kill herself twice during the study, but she was in the placebo group.
01:16:21.000 She got therapy without MDMA. We had another woman, it was so difficult for her to confront her trauma that she checked herself into a hospital to not self harm.
01:16:31.000 She also was in the placebo group.
01:16:33.000 So the results were phenomenal.
01:16:35.000 And science, the journal Science, one of the most important journals in the world in science, at the end of every year, they publish a list of what they think are the top 10 scientific breakthroughs of the year.
01:16:50.000 And they chose our study in Nature Medicine as one of the world's top 10 breakthroughs of the year.
01:16:56.000 It was phenomenal.
01:16:58.000 And we had special appreciation for what science was willing to do.
01:17:05.000 Because you talked about beforehand about holes in the brain.
01:17:09.000 So 20 years before, science had published this article that they never should have published.
01:17:14.000 And this was by researchers at Johns Hopkins that had been funded by the Nationalist on Drug Abuse.
01:17:19.000 And what they claimed is Yeah.
01:17:45.000 And we had done studies in primates before with these same researchers where none of the primates died from overdoses.
01:17:52.000 There didn't seem to be any problems with dopamine.
01:17:56.000 But the narrative of the anti-drug people and the National Institute of Drug Abuse about serotonin neurotoxicity was sort of Diminishing.
01:18:04.000 People weren't showing problems.
01:18:06.000 And so what they were saying was, well, you're reducing your cognitive reserves.
01:18:12.000 And so you don't show problems now, but when you get older, you're going to show problems.
01:18:15.000 So the time bomb theory.
01:18:17.000 Did they have evidence of this?
01:18:18.000 No.
01:18:18.000 And not only did they not have evidence, but a lot of older people took MDMA and they were fine.
01:18:22.000 So if they had had this, you know, decline of aging, age-related decline, they were all right.
01:18:27.000 But it does drop your dopamine levels, right?
01:18:30.000 Or serotonin levels.
01:18:31.000 In a short term, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes.
01:18:34.000 It does, but it doesn't do this kind of damage to the brain in that way.
01:18:37.000 They recover within a day or so.
01:18:39.000 And there's mitigation techniques like with 5-HTP. We don't use those, but people do use those.
01:18:45.000 Why don't you use those?
01:18:46.000 Because we don't think it's necessary.
01:18:47.000 So what we first proposed in 1992 is when we got permission for the first study with MDMA. And people had been using 5-HTP after MDMA. But there is a benefit to using 5-HTP. It boosts your serotonin levels quicker,
01:19:03.000 correct?
01:19:04.000 Yes, yes.
01:19:05.000 It can be helpful.
01:19:06.000 But what we do in a therapy context, so the FDA, we said, should we try administering with 5-HTP or something like that?
01:19:14.000 They said, don't do that.
01:19:16.000 Let's do everything under observation and see what the problems are.
01:19:19.000 And if you see problems, then we should figure out how to mitigate the problems.
01:19:23.000 So the key thing that we do is to say to people that when you take MDMA, it's a two-day experience.
01:19:30.000 It's not a one-day experience.
01:19:32.000 And the second day is for rest and for reflection.
01:19:35.000 And they have no obligations, no appointments, nothing that you need to do.
01:19:40.000 Just take the second day and rest.
01:19:43.000 And that's where people would take 5-HDP if they wanted to.
01:19:46.000 But we don't see this dip in mood.
01:19:50.000 Anymore in the MDMA group than in the group that gets therapy without it.
01:19:53.000 So people talk about suicide Tuesdays or, you know, this depression after you've used up serotonin.
01:20:00.000 But I think the rest part is part of the therapeutic process.
01:20:06.000 So we have never felt the need to recommend that people do 5-HTP. I don't think it's a bad idea to do.
01:20:12.000 I mean, if people wanted to do it, it can be helpful.
01:20:14.000 But we just feel that the rest is just as helpful and it's more therapeutic.
01:20:21.000 But they're not mutually exclusive.
01:20:23.000 No, we could do both.
01:20:24.000 Yeah, for sure.
01:20:25.000 For sure.
01:20:25.000 But we don't in the research.
01:20:27.000 We haven't found the need.
01:20:28.000 But what science had...
01:20:31.000 So this idea of serotonergic neurotoxicity and holes in your brain and time bomb theories just wasn't working anymore.
01:20:39.000 It wasn't persuading people.
01:20:40.000 It wasn't persuading the FDA. So NIDA funded this study, Una McCann and George Riccardi, and it was in primates.
01:20:49.000 And as it turned out, a bunch of the primates died of overdoses, and they published a paper in Science that said that MDMA could cause Parkinson's, it could hurt dopamine.
01:21:04.000 Science is published by the American Association for the Advancement of Science.
01:21:08.000 The president of that was Alan Leshner.
01:21:10.000 He used to be the head of NIDA. And he fanned the fears of MDMA and he did that in Congress and it was great because then he got more money for NIDA. He got over a billion dollars a year.
01:21:20.000 So he published a press release about this article and it said that taking MDMA was like playing Russian roulette with your brain.
01:21:29.000 So it didn't seem right, this article.
01:21:32.000 We knew that we'd given MDMA two primates for research and nobody died of overdoses.
01:21:38.000 None of them did.
01:21:39.000 So we wrote a letter to the editor and we questioned it.
01:21:43.000 They didn't give it the way people take it, which is orally as well.
01:21:47.000 How did they give it?
01:21:48.000 They gave it subcutaneously.
01:21:50.000 So they injected it sub-Q. And so we ended up forcing them in their minds to try to replicate their results.
01:21:58.000 Can I pause you for a second?
01:21:59.000 How did these primates die of overdoses?
01:22:01.000 They would just have, like, heart attacks or something like that.
01:22:05.000 Is that common with humans?
01:22:08.000 No, no.
01:22:08.000 So here's how this continues.
01:22:12.000 Also, you get more neurotoxicity in crowds for some reason when animals or people are together than when they're alone.
01:22:20.000 And when the temperature is higher, there's more neurotoxicity.
01:22:24.000 So they tried giving more MDMA to primates with higher temperatures, more crowded in the cages, and they couldn't replicate the results.
01:22:33.000 But they kept defending it in public.
01:22:35.000 And finally, a year later, they said that – and this was super embarrassing – they had to retract the study because they were puzzled why they couldn't replicate the results.
01:22:44.000 And so they took some of the tissue from one of the animals that had overdosed and died.
01:22:50.000 And they discovered that they had mistakenly given methamphetamine instead of MDMA. And that the bottles, they said, that were labeled MDMA actually had methamphetamine in them.
01:23:03.000 And so they got these bottles from a group called Research Triangle Institute in North Carolina.
01:23:09.000 They provide all the Schedule I drugs for all the NIDA-funded researchers.
01:23:13.000 So the Hopkins people blamed the people at Research Triangle Institute and said they switched the labels on the bottles.
01:23:20.000 The people from Research Triangle Institute said they never do that.
01:23:24.000 They always test it.
01:23:25.000 They have quality control.
01:23:26.000 They think that it got switched something or other at the site at Johns Hopkins.
01:23:30.000 The National Institute of Drug Abuse didn't want to find out what was going on, or if they did want to find out, they never made it public.
01:23:36.000 So it's never clear how did this happen.
01:23:39.000 But they had to retract this data and retract their papers.
01:23:45.000 And it was the high watermark of neurotoxicity fears.
01:23:51.000 And at the same time, Peter Jennings was doing a documentary called Ecstasy Rising.
01:23:56.000 And this was the first documentary that really had a bunch of people talking about the benefits.
01:24:00.000 And he also talked about this...
01:24:04.000 The other thing about methamphetamine versus MDMA is that, you know, for people that know about Adderall and other things, 10-15 milligrams is a hefty dose.
01:24:13.000 But MDMA, it's 125 milligrams, is a full dose.
01:24:16.000 And so they were giving the wrong drug in MDMA quantities.
01:24:22.000 And that's why they knocked off a bunch of these primates.
01:24:24.000 And that's why they claimed that they saw this dopaminergic problems.
01:24:28.000 And so ever since then, and that's been 20 years ago now— Do you have speculation that was sabotage?
01:24:35.000 Somebody sabotaged it somewhere.
01:24:37.000 I don't think it was from research trying to listen to it.
01:24:39.000 Do you think it's accidental sabotage, or do you think it— I think that the researchers wouldn't have done that intentionally, but maybe somebody in the lab did it or something.
01:24:51.000 But I do think that the researchers were fundamentally irresponsible to put the paper out because they should have known that there was prior primate studies where dopamine hadn't been damaged.
01:25:04.000 The other thing is in the late 1980s, early 1990s, we were trying to Talk about, yeah, MDMA, serotonergic neurotoxicity.
01:25:15.000 And so I went to George Riccardi, the same researcher that did the primate study with the methamphetamine instead.
01:25:20.000 And I said, I want to buy you some monkeys.
01:25:22.000 You've just done studies in rats.
01:25:24.000 Can you study this in monkeys, in primates?
01:25:27.000 And he said he did.
01:25:29.000 And again, there was no evidence of overdoses or dopamine.
01:25:34.000 Also, this was before brain scans came in.
01:25:37.000 And so the most sophisticated way that was available at the time to look at what's going on in the brain was to do spinal taps and to take spinal fluid and look for metabolites of neurotransmitters in the brain.
01:25:51.000 And I felt like I could not...
01:25:55.000 I wouldn't recommend try to get other people to volunteer for it unless I did it myself.
01:26:00.000 So I was the first one to get a spinal tap.
01:26:03.000 And it was really hard.
01:26:05.000 But the imagery that I did, and again, this is kind of this idea about storytelling.
01:26:09.000 So the story I was telling myself as this big needle is going into my spine to try to draw out the spinal fluid was that if a woman could give birth to a child, I could at least give birth to my spinal fluid.
01:26:21.000 It was like way less painful, much shorter, but I could do it.
01:26:25.000 And so the imagery was I'm giving my birth to my spinal fluid to these researchers so that we can understand what's really going on with MDMA and hopefully make it into a medicine.
01:26:36.000 And it didn't hurt terribly.
01:26:39.000 And there was spinal headaches that you get afterwards.
01:26:41.000 So a couple days afterwards I had headaches.
01:26:43.000 But I felt like I could enroll other people.
01:26:47.000 I could encourage other people to do it.
01:26:48.000 So I was going to a new college in Sarasota, Florida, which, by the way, DeSantis is now trying to kill and has fired the president.
01:26:57.000 It's the honors college of the state of Florida.
01:27:01.000 Why is he trying to kill it?
01:27:03.000 It's just what he's doing to public education.
01:27:06.000 I mean, this was the symbol of what he called the most woke school in a bunch of transgender people, a bunch of open-minded people.
01:27:15.000 It started as a private school in the 60s, merged with the state when they ran out of money.
01:27:20.000 So he fired the president, he stacked the board of trustees, and he wants to turn it into a conservative school.
01:27:26.000 He's doing it for political purposes.
01:27:28.000 To try to show that he's anti-woke and that he is wanting to – what's going on in public education in Florida is really frightening.
01:27:39.000 George Soros is actually interested in trying to help out at New College because George Soros actually, even though he's the boogeyman for a lot of the right wing, he funded the Central European University in Florida.
01:27:52.000 I think we're good to go.
01:27:59.000 I think we're good to go.
01:28:09.000 And so I got about 35 people or so to get spinal taps, not just from New College, but from all over.
01:28:15.000 And the spinal tap showed that there was no problems with dopamine.
01:28:19.000 There was a little bit less serotonin metabolites, but also lower serotonin has been linked to risk-taking behavior.
01:28:27.000 And so taking drugs is risk-taking behavior, particularly when they're heavily criminalized.
01:28:32.000 So it was not evidence that it was serotonin neurotoxicity from MDMA, but it cleared dopamine.
01:28:38.000 So these researchers should never have ignored their prior data.
01:28:43.000 They were just so willing to demonize MDMA to get more grant money.
01:28:49.000 So they were addicted to grant money.
01:28:51.000 Yeah, that seems to be the case with a lot of scientific studies, isn't it?
01:28:56.000 It's a real problem when you're not just trying to find out what the truth is.
01:29:02.000 You're trying to find data that would reinforce whatever idea that you went into it looking to find in the first place and throw out information that is contrary to that.
01:29:12.000 Yeah, I'll say the best example of that for me was that I've done long-term follow-up studies to the work that Timothy Leary did at Harvard.
01:29:22.000 So the Good Friday experiment was in 1962. The Good Friday Experiment?
01:29:26.000 Yeah, the Good Friday Experiment is incredible.
01:29:29.000 So this was, Aldous Huxley had written The Doors of Perception and was talking about mescaline and spiritual experiences.
01:29:36.000 And a lot of people who are doing work with LSD, with alcoholics and others in the 50s would have these spiritual experiences.
01:29:43.000 And Bill W., who started Alcoholics Anonymous, Actually had an LSD experience in the 50s and actually his first place getting sober was Belladonna.
01:29:55.000 So Bill W., the founder of AA, had a psychedelic experience that got him sober in the first place.
01:30:01.000 And then later, about a decade or more later, he experimented with LSD and he felt that this LSD could be tremendous for...
01:30:10.000 What was his initial psychedelic experience that led him to get sober?
01:30:14.000 Well, it was Belladonna.
01:30:15.000 What is Melodon?
01:30:16.000 It's kind of, when you think about what drugs did the witches use in the Middle Ages, it's a disorienting psychedelic.
01:30:23.000 I think it's scopolamine.
01:30:24.000 Oh.
01:30:26.000 That stuff is crazy.
01:30:28.000 That's that devil's dust shit.
01:30:30.000 Yes, exactly.
01:30:31.000 Exactly.
01:30:32.000 That's the stuff that's supposed to turn people essentially into zombies that are very easy to suggest.
01:30:37.000 Yeah, Wade Davis has done studies about the voodoo cults in Haiti and what drugs they use.
01:30:44.000 And they kind of can tranquilize people.
01:30:46.000 They bear them alive.
01:30:46.000 Yeah, they blow dust in their nose.
01:30:49.000 Yeah.
01:30:49.000 Scopolamine is also the stuff they use to stop people from getting motion sickness on boats, which is really crazy, like Dramamine patches.
01:30:57.000 Well, that illustrates the exact point, though, that it's not the thing itself.
01:31:01.000 It's how it's used.
01:31:02.000 It's the relationship you have with it.
01:31:04.000 It's the dose.
01:31:05.000 It's the route of administration.
01:31:06.000 It's how you do it.
01:31:08.000 So he had scopolamine, helped him get off of alcohol.
01:31:12.000 Yeah.
01:31:13.000 You have this terrifying experience.
01:31:14.000 Things come to the surface.
01:31:16.000 Yeah.
01:31:17.000 And it did help him.
01:31:19.000 And then when he did LSD in the 50s, and I met one of the women that gave him the LSD, Sydney Cohn.
01:31:26.000 Was the man.
01:31:28.000 And what he felt was that...
01:31:31.000 We talk about in AA about hitting bottom.
01:31:35.000 You know, that people's lives, when they hit bottom, then they're finally ready to make a change.
01:31:40.000 But that means that they've destroyed their families.
01:31:44.000 They've destroyed their jobs, their health.
01:31:47.000 And so what Bill W. felt is that you could give LSD to people and they could psychologically hit bottom.
01:31:53.000 Yes.
01:31:54.000 While they still had some intact relationships that would then help support them as they tried to move to sobriety.
01:32:02.000 And he felt that this could have a major role to play in AA. Why didn't he ever incorporate it?
01:32:08.000 It became too controversial, and so he ended up...
01:32:13.000 Working with Cruder tools.
01:32:14.000 Working with Cruder tools, but there was a lot of work with LSD in the 60s for alcohol use disorder, and it proved to be quite effective when supported, so that these substances can be extremely helpful, again,
01:32:29.000 used in a careful way, So the Good Friday experiment was an attempt to understand, can psychedelics produce a mystical experience?
01:32:43.000 And Walter Pankey was a doctor and a minister, and he was getting a PhD at Harvard.
01:32:51.000 And he was interested in looking at the spiritual potential of psilocybin and he worked with Timothy Leary and they did this experiment and they did it with a Reverend Howard Thurman.
01:33:05.000 So Howard Thurman was an African-American minister at Boston University's Marsh Chapel.
01:33:13.000 And Howard Thurman is someone who deserves a lot more attention because he studied with Gandhi.
01:33:20.000 He studied nonviolence with Gandhi.
01:33:22.000 And then he became Martin Luther King's mentor.
01:33:25.000 And Martin Luther King got a PhD at Boston University.
01:33:28.000 And Howard Thurman was his mentor.
01:33:30.000 So Howard Thurman really helped the...
01:33:33.000 American Civil Rights Movement adopt the strategy of nonviolence that he got from Gandhi.
01:33:41.000 And that's what we see in all of the stories about people being beaten by police, trying to protest different things, and they try to react.
01:33:51.000 So nonviolent resistance was a key to the American Civil Rights Movement.
01:33:55.000 And Howard Thurman was very interested in this connection between the mystical experience and political action.
01:34:03.000 So the mystical experience, you move beyond your sense of, I'm, you know, this biographical person.
01:34:10.000 You know, I'm my tribe.
01:34:11.000 I'm my country.
01:34:12.000 I'm my religion.
01:34:13.000 There's something deeper.
01:34:15.000 That we're a part of humanity.
01:34:16.000 We're part of energy.
01:34:17.000 I mean, if you look at the quantum level, right?
01:34:19.000 We're all energy.
01:34:20.000 We're all connected in these different ways.
01:34:22.000 So when you feel that, and Rita Marley has this incredible album about Marley's wife, and it's called...
01:34:31.000 Who feels it, knows it.
01:34:33.000 Who feels it, knows it.
01:34:35.000 So you can say this, and I can say this, and people can hear it, but if you have an experience that you feel it, then you know it.
01:34:41.000 And so Howard Thurman was very interested in this idea of...
01:34:46.000 What are the political implications of this mystical experience?
01:34:50.000 And so Walter Pankey was willing to work with him.
01:34:56.000 And Howard Thurman said, I will let you come to my church, Marsh Chapel, on Good Friday, and you can do an experiment with 20 divinity students from Andover Newton Theological Seminary, and you can Give them all a pill and half will be psilocybin,
01:35:14.000 half will be placebo, which was nicotinic acid, which gives you a flush.
01:35:19.000 And so this was done and it was considered to be the most eloquently designed experiment ever done on whether psychedelics could produce a mystical experience.
01:35:33.000 And it showed that nine out of the 20 people had a mystical experience, eight out of the nine had the psilocybin, and then they did some long-term, like six-month follow-ups, and they said it impacted their lives in certain ways.
01:35:47.000 And then Walter Pankey died in a terrible scuba diving accident in 1971. And so a lot was ended with him.
01:35:59.000 And then the 1970 and the backlash against psychedelics.
01:36:02.000 So now it's in the 80s and I'm an undergraduate.
01:36:07.000 I dropped out of college for 10 years from 1972 to 1982. And you have to do a thesis, a senior thesis at New College.
01:36:16.000 And I wanted to do psychedelic research, but psychedelic research was wiped out at the time, nothing to do.
01:36:21.000 You couldn't get permission to give psychedelics.
01:36:23.000 But I thought, if I go back to the Good Friday experiment, that I could do a long-term follow-up that is just asking people what happened to them when they took the psilocybin and how do they think about it now.
01:36:36.000 And I wouldn't have to get permission from the FDA or the DEA. I would just have to get permission from what's called an Institutional Review Board, which our college had, just about the safety of the subject.
01:36:45.000 But I'm just asking them questions.
01:36:47.000 So that was the only way that I could do psychedelic research.
01:36:51.000 And it was incredible because in the mystical literature, the real test of the validity of a mystical spiritual experience is called the fruits test.
01:37:01.000 Means, what are the consequences in your life?
01:37:04.000 What are the fruits of the experience?
01:37:05.000 Does it make you more peaceful, more loving?
01:37:07.000 Does it make you more, reduce your fear of death?
01:37:10.000 Does it give you a more spiritual sense of how we're connected?
01:37:12.000 So that's the fruits test.
01:37:14.000 And so what I, you know, because people can describe all sorts of things, but what impact does it have in your life?
01:37:20.000 So I figured I can do a long-term follow-up, and that's the fruits test.
01:37:24.000 And Walter Pankey would have done it if he hadn't died.
01:37:29.000 But nobody else was doing it.
01:37:31.000 So I ended up...
01:37:34.000 Trying to figure out how to do it.
01:37:36.000 I went to Andover Newton School, and I said, nobody knew who the subjects were in the study.
01:37:41.000 So I went to the school, which is outside of Boston, and I said, I'd like to put a note in the alumni newsletter.
01:37:48.000 Would you be willing to do that?
01:37:51.000 And they said no.
01:37:52.000 They refused.
01:37:53.000 I said, this is the most important experiment ever in the history of mystical experiences and psychedelics with your students.
01:37:59.000 And I just want to ask them questions.
01:38:01.000 Would you let me put something in the alumni newsletter?
01:38:04.000 And they said no.
01:38:04.000 This is now 1986. And so I was like, God, I was blocked.
01:38:12.000 Tim Leary, nobody had the list.
01:38:14.000 So I went to their library and I thought maybe I'll see some books or something on this experiment.
01:38:19.000 Nothing.
01:38:20.000 The thesis that was done at Harvard, nothing.
01:38:22.000 They had zero about this experiment.
01:38:25.000 It's like cultural amnesia.
01:38:26.000 But I'm wandering through the library, and I notice that they've got some books of the alumni, and one of them had the list of all the students that were in school in 1962, and their names and their addresses.
01:38:38.000 I was like, wow, this is a bonanza!
01:38:40.000 So I photocopied it all, and then there was like 350 of them, and I wrote a postcard to every single one of them, and that led me to three of them wrote back, saying that they were in the study.
01:38:50.000 And over years and years, it took me, but I identified 19 out of the 20. I was able to go see them in person and interview them.
01:39:00.000 And this really validated my theory of change.
01:39:03.000 So my theory of change also, which you've shared a bit, is that if you have these spiritual connections, these spiritual experiences, that will make you Think about the world in a different way.
01:39:14.000 Think about others in a different way.
01:39:15.000 And so what people said is that their mystical experiences really did reduce their fear of death, made them feel more connected to other people from different faiths, made them more ecumenical in a way, deepened their faith in their own religion.
01:39:28.000 It didn't turn them away, but they saw it in a more symbolic rather than literal way.
01:39:34.000 But what I discovered, so it validated the results, but what I discovered is a big mistake, that one of the persons in the study had heard the...
01:39:46.000 Howard Thurman, by the way, the audio of that service is up on our website.
01:39:51.000 If you go Good Friday Experiment, you can listen to Howard Thurman's Good Friday Experiment speech, you know, his sermons and stuff from 1962. One of them Was you have to tell people there's a man on the cross.
01:40:03.000 You must tell people there's a man on the cross.
01:40:05.000 And one of the students under the influence of psilocybin said, yeah, I got to tell people there's a man on the cross.
01:40:11.000 I'm going to do it right now.
01:40:12.000 And I'm going to run out of this room and I'm going to run down the road and I should tell the president.
01:40:16.000 But the president is in D.C. So I'll tell the president of the university.
01:40:20.000 And he goes running down the street and Walter Pankey and Houston Smith go, you know, running after him.
01:40:26.000 It's a busy street on Commonwealth Ave in front of the Marsh Chapel.
01:40:30.000 And they finally catch him.
01:40:31.000 And he doesn't want to go inside.
01:40:33.000 He's outside.
01:40:34.000 He's tripping.
01:40:35.000 He's like, got this mission.
01:40:36.000 And they give him a shot of Thorazine.
01:40:39.000 To tranquilize him, to bring him back inside.
01:40:42.000 And they never mentioned that at all.
01:40:45.000 Completely not mentioned it.
01:40:46.000 So I had this decision when I'm going to write this follow-up study.
01:40:50.000 You know, I said, I can't hide that.
01:40:52.000 So I did report that.
01:40:54.000 And what was going on, I think, was In the culture was this exaggeration of the risks and suppression and minimization of the benefits.
01:41:07.000 And I think what Timothy Leary did in response was the opposite.
01:41:10.000 He's like, okay, I can exaggerate the benefits.
01:41:13.000 One dose, you're enlightened, you know more than everybody else.
01:41:16.000 And then he would minimize the risks.
01:41:18.000 Yeah, that's not good.
01:41:20.000 It's terrible.
01:41:20.000 You can't do that.
01:41:21.000 You know, I think I had, I don't know if you ever saw the podcast, I had Alex Berenson on, who wrote a book called Tell Your Children, and it's all about the dangers of marijuana.
01:41:32.000 And I had him on with Dr. Mike Hart, who is a cannabis doctor in Canada.
01:41:38.000 And, you know, one of the things that he was talking about was people, for whatever reason, When they have a high dose of marijuana, there's something that happens to some of them where they have like a schizophrenic break.
01:41:55.000 And I have heard of it.
01:41:56.000 I know people who have had this.
01:41:58.000 And the pro-marijuana people do not want to acknowledge this danger.
01:42:03.000 They want to paint marijuana as a completely innocuous substance that no one should worry about.
01:42:10.000 And I think it's way too powerful for that.
01:42:13.000 And I think too many people are psychologically or physiologically vulnerable.
01:42:19.000 We're not all the same.
01:42:21.000 And if someone is particularly vulnerable, whether it's towards schizophrenia or whatever mental illness it might be, there's something about these experiences that seem to send them over the edge.
01:42:33.000 And that's something that we should be concerned with.
01:42:35.000 We should talk about it.
01:42:36.000 We have to, because if we become what we...
01:42:39.000 The opposite of what we are worried about.
01:42:42.000 Or actually, we don't become the opposite.
01:42:44.000 We become like them.
01:42:45.000 We just do the same.
01:42:46.000 It's the same thing.
01:42:47.000 It's like we become the polar opposite.
01:42:49.000 We just justify things that we find morally reprehensible, we find ethically terrible, and we justify it because we're doing it for the right side.
01:43:00.000 You can't.
01:43:01.000 You can't do that.
01:43:01.000 It's completely wrong.
01:43:02.000 With anything, right?
01:43:04.000 People talk to me a lot about where might the backlash come from.
01:43:07.000 You know, for now, we're very close.
01:43:10.000 We think now with two successful phase three studies, the second one was confirmatory.
01:43:14.000 So it's, you know, millions of chances that it was random and not real.
01:43:20.000 You know, it's incredible results.
01:43:22.000 So we think by potentially June of 2024, we should have FDA, we have a good chance of having FDA approval.
01:43:31.000 I have a question for you.
01:43:32.000 Are there people, I've heard of people, that are, for whatever reason, resistant to DMT experiences?
01:43:40.000 Like, it doesn't work with them.
01:43:41.000 I think there are some, and it could be biological.
01:43:46.000 We don't know.
01:43:47.000 It could be that they're just so...
01:43:49.000 Okay, it could be that they're so resisting the experience.
01:43:52.000 So Stan Grof actually talked about work with obsessive compulsives that he did with LSD, and he had some that he could give over a thousand micrograms of LSD, enormous amounts of LSD, and they could still play chess.
01:44:03.000 So there's a way where you can control your mind so much that even psychedelics won't happen.
01:44:11.000 Wow.
01:44:12.000 I wonder, but there are people, like, Jamie has a thing about edibles.
01:44:19.000 Like, Jamie can kind of eat like a foot-long sub from Subway.
01:44:26.000 I'm not kidding!
01:44:27.000 He can put down extraordinary amounts of edibles and he feels nothing.
01:44:31.000 $13.50 is the highest I've gone.
01:44:34.000 Do you know how crazy that is?
01:44:36.000 It's amazing.
01:44:38.000 1350. Dude, 200 will put you on the moon.
01:44:41.000 I was at a concert, watching a concert, having conversations.
01:44:44.000 Well, what about when you smoke?
01:44:46.000 Is it different?
01:44:46.000 No, sure.
01:44:47.000 Smoking works just fine.
01:44:48.000 Smoking works, but edible stuff.
01:44:49.000 It is a different drug when it's passed through your digestive system.
01:44:53.000 And that's right.
01:44:55.000 Yeah, we've talked about it ad nauseum.
01:44:57.000 It's 11-hydroxymetabolite, right?
01:44:59.000 Yeah, yeah.
01:44:59.000 So I'll just tell a funny story about my wife, Lynn, which was that her mother had pain.
01:45:05.000 Marianne, her mother had pain.
01:45:07.000 And Lynn thought that, and I suggested actually, maybe small amounts of THC or CBD might help her mom.
01:45:15.000 And so Linda was like, okay, I will try it first before I give it to my mom.
01:45:19.000 So I brought home edible, some chocolates, and she took one square, which was 10 milligrams of cannabis.
01:45:28.000 She took it at her mom's assisted living place about a mile away from where we live.
01:45:33.000 And then she's ready to drive home.
01:45:35.000 And so she's driving home.
01:45:36.000 And she thinks nothing is going to happen.
01:45:38.000 So the road starts tilting.
01:45:40.000 She starts having a terrible time.
01:45:42.000 She barely gets to our house.
01:45:43.000 And then she's got this panic reaction because she is thinking that she might forget to breathe.
01:45:50.000 She might die because she's going to forget to breathe.
01:45:53.000 Oh, boy.
01:45:54.000 Our daughter Lila and our daughter Ellie were there with us and we were like trying to cheer her up and like, you're not going to die.
01:46:00.000 But we're also like massaging her feet and laughing at her.
01:46:02.000 But it was a horrible experience.
01:46:04.000 So some people have edibles and they just have horrible experiences.
01:46:09.000 And other people I guess get edibles and nothing happens.
01:46:12.000 It depends on so many factors, right?
01:46:14.000 I think there's biological factors, there's your current level of anxiety.
01:46:18.000 But to just claim that it's innocuous, I think, is just so foolish.
01:46:21.000 Yeah.
01:46:22.000 I think if there is a backlash where I... You know, the backlash in the 60s was political, you know, against psychedelics and hippies and stuff.
01:46:29.000 The backlash that happened in the late 70s, early 80s, when it looked like marijuana might be legalized, was parents against the...
01:46:37.000 Right.
01:46:38.000 Well, it's also all that Nancy Reagan, just say no shit.
01:46:42.000 Yeah, yeah.
01:46:42.000 That was when...
01:46:44.000 We have to really...
01:46:45.000 For a person that's alive today...
01:46:48.000 To understand the influence that media had on you when you were a child, it's almost impossible for you to wrap your head around.
01:46:55.000 But I want you to try.
01:46:56.000 The kids of today, you kids with your internet and your Google and being able to watch whatever you want to watch on television at any given time.
01:47:03.000 When I was a kid, when you saw something on television, everybody talked about it.
01:47:09.000 Those Just Say No commercials.
01:47:11.000 This is your brain on drugs.
01:47:13.000 Any questions?
01:47:14.000 It's someone frying an egg.
01:47:15.000 Well, it led to a lot of funny stand-up comedy bits.
01:47:19.000 Bill Hicks had a funny bit about it.
01:47:21.000 But it also led to a lot of people thinking, literally, you're gonna fry your brain with drugs.
01:47:26.000 And it worked.
01:47:27.000 It worked on us.
01:47:28.000 It worked on a lot of fucking people.
01:47:30.000 Like, the influence that they had by being able to do those kind of things and put them on television back then, It sets things back.
01:47:39.000 Everything takes a whole generation for people to get over.
01:47:42.000 If we go back to the early days of cannabis prohibition, when you watch the Reefer Madness films, and you find out about this whole Harry Anslinger, William Randolph Hearst connection, and that it actually had a lot to do with commodities,
01:48:01.000 like hemp.
01:48:02.000 Yeah.
01:48:03.000 Versus nylon.
01:48:04.000 There's so many aspects to it that you would have never guessed.
01:48:07.000 But the point is that that propaganda from the 1930s turned something that had thousands of years of human use, demonized it, created a new name for it, used a Mexican slang name for tobacco.
01:48:23.000 Yeah.
01:48:24.000 And they turned it into this new drug.
01:48:26.000 And they labeled it saying that it was Mexicans and black men were raping white women on this drug.
01:48:34.000 And then they have the guy smoking pot and jumping out a window.
01:48:36.000 Reefer Madness is hilarious.
01:48:38.000 It is.
01:48:39.000 I have a poster of it.
01:48:40.000 But it worked for so long.
01:48:41.000 It does.
01:48:41.000 I have a poster from Reefer Madness.
01:48:43.000 Think about that time, right?
01:48:46.000 So that's the 30s, right?
01:48:47.000 And then you've got to get into the 60s before marijuana is popular again.
01:48:52.000 Literally, it has to burn through a generation of propaganda.
01:48:55.000 Their children have to learn from their parents' mistakes and realize that their parents are dumbasses, and then they experiment with things, and they have to learn from other people that are doing it.
01:49:06.000 And then it goes to a point where it's at now.
01:49:08.000 We're now, because of the internet, these conversations are just everywhere.
01:49:13.000 There's so many maps videos.
01:49:15.000 The work that you guys have done is so extraordinary and so important.
01:49:18.000 Guys like Dr. Karl Hart, all these different people, Michael Pollan and his amazing book, all these people that are talking about these experiences, now there's just this flood of information.
01:49:29.000 So you can't demonize it the same way, but it's very important that the people that are on this side Don't bullshit anybody.
01:49:37.000 It's so important.
01:49:38.000 And all these people will be at Psychedelic Science, too.
01:49:41.000 And I think that the trap that we have to avoid falling into is, and where the backlash will come from now if there is, is if we exaggerate the results and minimize the risks.
01:49:51.000 Yes.
01:49:52.000 And we have to be very careful that we don't do that.
01:49:55.000 It should be honest across the board, and I think if it is, there'll be an understanding by most people that you should be able to make educated, informed decisions as to what to do with your consciousness because there might be a significant benefit available if you do that.
01:50:09.000 Yes.
01:50:09.000 Now, how will you educate your own kids?
01:50:12.000 I know they're little, but how will you educate your own kids about drugs?
01:50:15.000 I tell them.
01:50:16.000 I talk to my children the same way I would talk to A regular grown person.
01:50:22.000 I mean, I treat them with much more gentleness and kindness and as much love as I have, but I try to talk to them about things.
01:50:29.000 I'm like, there are drugs that are very, very dangerous.
01:50:32.000 They can kill you.
01:50:33.000 And one of the reasons why they can kill you is because they're illegal.
01:50:36.000 And I explained the whole thing.
01:50:38.000 I explained that if drugs were legal, then you would know what the dose is, you would know who's making it, and it would be taxed.
01:50:45.000 But these drugs are made in these other countries where no one's watching.
01:50:50.000 And so they're bringing across drugs, and to make these drugs cheaper for them and make it more potent, they mix in fentanyl.
01:50:59.000 And I was explaining fentanyl.
01:51:01.000 And I was explaining that fentanyl is not just in cocaine, but it's also in Fake Ambien.
01:51:06.000 Somebody might give you a sleeping pill.
01:51:08.000 Fake Xanax.
01:51:09.000 So we talk about these things.
01:51:11.000 That's so good.
01:51:12.000 Ecstasy has gotten...
01:51:13.000 People have gotten contaminated ecstasy with fentanyl and people have died from that.
01:51:16.000 In the stand-up comedy community, there was a group of guys who died from fentanyl-laced cocaine, I believe.
01:51:24.000 That was what it was proven to be.
01:51:25.000 Was it, Jamie?
01:51:27.000 I think, pretty sure.
01:51:29.000 It's a real problem.
01:51:31.000 It's a real problem.
01:51:32.000 So I talked to them about it and I explained that we have stuck our heels in the sand.
01:51:40.000 We've dug our heels in on something that is objectively not just ineffective, but very detrimental to society as a whole, and that's having drugs be illegal.
01:51:51.000 Because if you have drugs illegal, you're not going to stop people from taking drugs.
01:51:55.000 What you're going to do is funnel all the cash to criminals.
01:51:59.000 It's what happened in Prohibition, the 1900s in America, and it's what's happening right now in Mexico.
01:52:06.000 Well, and after Prohibition ended of alcohol, shortly after that, marijuana became...
01:52:10.000 We had the police apparatus.
01:52:12.000 They needed something to prohibit.
01:52:13.000 And they said, oh, we'll go after Mexicans and blacks and cannabis and marijuana.
01:52:19.000 Exactly.
01:52:20.000 It was literally right after prohibition ended, then the marijuana prohibition began.
01:52:24.000 It was very, very closely connected.
01:52:26.000 And such a coordinated effort.
01:52:28.000 But back then, if you had the newspaper, if you were William Randolph Hearst and you had the newspaper, you could write whatever the fuck you wanted.
01:52:36.000 You could just make up the news.
01:52:38.000 Well, we've got a lot of that going on right now.
01:52:40.000 We do have a little bit of that going on right now.
01:52:41.000 But at least now you have enough people that can point that out and say that's not true.
01:52:46.000 But back then you had nothing.
01:52:47.000 Yeah, but people may not be willing to go to multiple sources.
01:52:51.000 A lot of times people only stay with them.
01:52:53.000 Right.
01:52:53.000 And it's also when you find out that someone that you respect, like a newspaper you respect, is bullshitting.
01:52:59.000 Which does happen.
01:53:00.000 You go, God damn it, why are you guys bullshitting?
01:53:03.000 You can't bullshit.
01:53:03.000 I love you.
01:53:04.000 I trust you.
01:53:05.000 You're the journalist.
01:53:06.000 You're the real journalist.
01:53:08.000 We need them.
01:53:09.000 We need the New York Times.
01:53:10.000 We need these people.
01:53:10.000 But they have to be real journalists.
01:53:13.000 You can't be an ideological soldier who hides certain information to protect what you think is right.
01:53:20.000 Okay, so that gets me to the Concord Prison Experiment.
01:53:23.000 That was the other thing that Timothy Leary did.
01:53:26.000 So what he said was that...
01:53:28.000 Yeah, people talk about their mystical experiences and then maybe they can say how that's changed their lives, but that's sort of subjective.
01:53:35.000 But if we can give psilocybin to prisoners and then help them have these pro-social experiences, work through their traumas, and then when they're released, then we can reduce their recidivism.
01:53:46.000 They will now be ready to make a new re-entry into society and that that's an objective thing.
01:53:52.000 So the next thing that Timothy Leary decided to do was the Concord Prison Experiment.
01:53:56.000 And this was a tremendous experiment, and they gave about 35 people psilocybin experiences inside prison.
01:54:06.000 Timothy Leary and others, the researchers would go into the prison, and half the researchers would also take psilocybin.
01:54:12.000 And with the prisoners in prison.
01:54:15.000 And this was a way to try to help them to reduce the experimenter-experimentee kind of idea.
01:54:21.000 And the Concord Prison Experiment was considered to be one of the most successful psychedelic experiences and studies of the 60s that ever there was.
01:54:31.000 And unfortunately, all the records were lost of who was in the experiment.
01:54:37.000 So after I did the Good Friday Experiment follow-up, after 25 years and found 19 out of the 20, I went to Tim and others and like, do you have any idea who was in the Concord Prison Experiment?
01:54:48.000 They had no records whatsoever.
01:54:50.000 So I didn't think I could do anything.
01:54:52.000 1991, I published a paper in the Journal of Transpersonal Psychology about the Good Friday Experiment.
01:54:58.000 And there was an editorial in the Boston Globe about it, op-ed.
01:55:02.000 And I got a call afterwards from a fellow, Michael Forcier, and he said that he worked for the Department of Corrections, and they had a special room where they collect the records of their famous and interesting prisoners.
01:55:13.000 Like they had Malcolm X and his records and others.
01:55:17.000 And they had the records of all the people from the Concord Prison Experiment.
01:55:21.000 And he said, would you like to do a follow-up study?
01:55:24.000 I said, I would love to do it.
01:55:26.000 And it took us a whole year to get permission.
01:55:29.000 We had to go all the way up to the governor.
01:55:30.000 It was Governor Weld at the time.
01:55:32.000 And the paper that came back was hilarious that said that we got permission because somebody had scribbled on it, no psilocybin.
01:55:39.000 Like, we were not planning to give psilocybin.
01:55:41.000 We were just going to look at their prison records, but they were like, no psilocybin.
01:55:45.000 For sure.
01:55:46.000 Isn't that funny?
01:55:48.000 Imagine if they had done psilocybin.
01:55:50.000 They would have never written that.
01:55:51.000 They would not have.
01:55:53.000 Never.
01:55:53.000 It's only people that haven't done it.
01:55:55.000 They must be curious.
01:55:56.000 Well, I have had a lot of good conversations with DEA people and police because what they're taught about drugs, if they believe it, nobody would ever do these drugs.
01:56:05.000 Right.
01:56:06.000 Why is everyone doing it if they're not awesome?
01:56:09.000 If they're horrible.
01:56:10.000 So I've tried to explain to them, and I could, oh, I did it when I was legal.
01:56:12.000 But you try to do it in a way where you don't encourage them to react in a negative way.
01:56:16.000 So I did this follow-up to the Concord Prison Experiment.
01:56:20.000 All right, so while I'm doing this experiment and tracking people's criminal justice system records in the decades—this was like a 34-year follow-up—it started becoming clear to me that the experiment wasn't a success.
01:56:36.000 And I was the one that was wanting to do the follow-up to bring attention to it because I thought it was a success.
01:56:44.000 Now, here's a thought.
01:56:46.000 Were these people still in jail or are they free?
01:56:48.000 Some of them were in jail.
01:56:50.000 Some of them were free.
01:56:52.000 But what I discovered was a trick that Leary had done to try to make the results look good.
01:57:00.000 And the trick is simple.
01:57:03.000 Just think about this.
01:57:04.000 When you're in jail, the first day that you get off jail, nobody goes back to jail.
01:57:12.000 But if you look two years out, more people will have had a chance to commit crimes and go back to jail.
01:57:17.000 So the longer you're out of jail, the more likely you are to go back.
01:57:20.000 So the group of people that had been in this experiment had been – on average, they'd been out of jail 10 months when they looked at their recidivism.
01:57:33.000 Some had been longer.
01:57:34.000 Some had been shorter.
01:57:36.000 And the researchers, Ralph Metzner and Tim Leary, they had done a base rate study of all the people that got released from the Concord Prison Experiment in the years before they did it, and they published their results.
01:57:47.000 So they compared it.
01:57:48.000 It was a little bit historical, so things don't always say the same exactly in history, but that was the best that they could do to compare it.
01:57:54.000 But what I discovered is that they had published the results of this base rate study in a really obscure journal, a British criminology journal, And, you know, I had to go down in the dusty libraries of Harvard Law Library, the Widener Library to even find this journal.
01:58:10.000 And when I read it, what I learned is that they had taken data from people that were out of prison for 30 months and compared it to people that were out of prison for 10 months.
01:58:22.000 Complete scientific fraud.
01:58:24.000 And so then I'm like, shit, how is it that all the people that hate psychedelics didn't discover this?
01:58:32.000 And everybody has thought, including me, that this is a great experiment and tremendously successful.
01:58:37.000 And now what do I do?
01:58:39.000 And I'm like, I've got to report what I find.
01:58:43.000 So I ended up...
01:58:44.000 So what were they pretending they had done?
01:58:47.000 They were pretending to have reduced recidivism.
01:58:50.000 Then they were also pretending that...
01:58:52.000 By a significant amount?
01:58:53.000 By a substantial amount, yeah.
01:58:56.000 And they were just monkeying with the numbers.
01:58:58.000 Well, the farther away it was in time from the original experiment, the better the results were reported over and over in time.
01:59:06.000 So what they'd also said is that some of the people that had gone back to prison who'd gotten psilocybin didn't go back to prison for new crimes.
01:59:15.000 They'd gone back because they had violated their probation for something.
01:59:20.000 Here's a thought on this.
01:59:22.000 The recidivism stuff is definitely fraud.
01:59:25.000 But asking...
01:59:28.000 For someone to not go back to a life of crime after they've been incarcerated is a tremendous ask.
01:59:35.000 And I think that if you're measuring the success of a psychedelic experience for the normal person, if a normal person doesn't have a pattern in their life of committing crime and being incarcerated, The problem with becoming sort of institutionalized and you become accustomed to certain patterns of behavior,
01:59:56.000 to ask someone to just stop doing that forever, it's a huge life shift.
02:00:03.000 Like even if they had a positive net benefit of their psychedelic experience, asking them to not commit crime.
02:00:10.000 If you know a guy who's been in jail a couple of times, And, you know, he grows up in a terrible neighborhood and there's crime all around him.
02:00:17.000 His parents are committing crime.
02:00:19.000 It's normal to just do crime.
02:00:21.000 And if you have a psychedelic experience, getting you to stop doing any crime ever again is a big ask.
02:00:27.000 It's a big ask.
02:00:29.000 Yes.
02:00:29.000 The recidivism rate is really high for a lot of criminals, right?
02:00:34.000 Yeah.
02:00:34.000 And Leary and Ralph Metzner, they realized that what they needed to do was to provide support and aftercare after people got out of prison.
02:00:44.000 And just as they realized that, they started creating support groups.
02:00:48.000 That's where they got kicked out of Harvard.
02:00:50.000 And so those support groups fell apart.
02:00:52.000 And so what kind of an experiment we would need to do today would be to both...
02:00:59.000 See, this was an overvaluation of the psychedelic experience by itself.
02:01:03.000 And it didn't really understand the social support that you need and all the cultural determinants of people that go back to prison.
02:01:09.000 And so the experiment that needs to be done is...
02:01:14.000 Helping people have these psychedelic experiences, move through their traumas, kind of have these powerful, positive experiences of connection, but then the support that you need afterwards.
02:01:24.000 Just the same way in our research, you do the therapy with MDMA. And then you do integrative work without the MDMA afterwards.
02:01:32.000 And that's what makes it last.
02:01:35.000 And so what we're going to try to do in Iceland will be, with the Minister of Justice, it will be the proper kind of experiment.
02:01:43.000 And so it would be both work inside prison and then support afterwards.
02:01:47.000 And so I think there is this tendency, yeah, to overvalue the psychedelic experience and separate it out from the therapy and from the aftercare and from the integration.
02:01:57.000 So I felt like I had to report and debunk this experiment that was considered to be one of the best examples of the power of psychedelic therapy.
02:02:08.000 I'm glad you did.
02:02:09.000 It's very powerful.
02:02:10.000 And that's absolutely the correct thing to do.
02:02:12.000 I feel like having one psychedelic experience for someone who's gone through a lifetime of crime, is currently incarcerated, or just got out of jail.
02:02:21.000 Is like someone having a terrible staph infection and giving them a small amount of antibiotics and going, oh, it didn't work.
02:02:30.000 Like, you don't have the right dose, you don't have the right duration, and you don't have the right care.
02:02:35.000 I think someone who's in that bad, like, there's people that have pulled themselves out of being incarcerated.
02:02:42.000 And become exemplary human beings, right?
02:02:44.000 Bernard Hopkins, one of my favorite boxers of all time, is a great example of that.
02:02:48.000 Learned how to box in jail, got out, and became like a just all-time great.
02:02:53.000 And was super disciplined, never drank, never smoked, just ate clean.
02:02:57.000 But to get someone out of that life and have them reincorporate into society, it's a task.
02:03:05.000 I think it's a task.
02:03:06.000 And I think it's a task that could be accomplished with the right tools.
02:03:11.000 And I think the right tools are psychedelics along with counseling.
02:03:14.000 If they could do...
02:03:15.000 I mean, they do that with drug counseling, right?
02:03:17.000 Where someone has an addiction, They'll put them in a rehab.
02:03:20.000 They have this rehab place they stay at for three months.
02:03:23.000 They do that to people all the time.
02:03:25.000 Why can't they do that the other way?
02:03:29.000 Like, rehabilitate them back into society.
02:03:31.000 Not just...
02:03:31.000 Well, and not just that, but when people get out of the military.
02:03:34.000 Yes.
02:03:35.000 Right?
02:03:35.000 You could do all the boot camp to get into the military, and then when you're done, you're just like, okay, you're done.
02:03:40.000 Especially guys that have seen violent combat.
02:03:43.000 Yeah, I think that there should be...
02:03:45.000 Well, that raises another issue, which is that we're now in about...
02:03:49.000 Starting research in about eight different VAs with different studies with MDMA. Actually, one thing I did last night, which was tremendous, and what I really like to do, because I got here early so I could be here on time today, is that I love to smoke pot and go wandering around cities after midnight.
02:04:10.000 Whoa.
02:04:10.000 Because...
02:04:12.000 You're a risk taker, Rick Toblin!
02:04:14.000 Well, you kind of get a feel for the city a little bit different at night than during the day.
02:04:19.000 Yeah, for sure.
02:04:20.000 Okay, so what I did is I went from the hotel, I just wandered, and I wandered to the Capitol.
02:04:26.000 And I just walked around.
02:04:27.000 The Capitol is a beautiful building.
02:04:29.000 But nobody was there.
02:04:30.000 Nobody was there at all.
02:04:32.000 Occasionally I would pass people who were homeless or people talking about crack or something to get there.
02:04:38.000 They were talking about crack?
02:04:39.000 Were they offering it to you?
02:04:40.000 No, I heard somebody across the street yelling about crack.
02:04:44.000 But I get to the Texas State House, and I'm just like, it's gorgeous, it's beautiful.
02:04:53.000 I noticed that there was a lot of scaffolding on it.
02:04:56.000 But I thought, here...
02:05:00.000 Not quite the middle of the night, but well after midnight.
02:05:05.000 In a place where so much conservative policies are coming out of it.
02:05:10.000 The Texas legislature is currently considering a rider to allocate $2.1 million to a study of MDMA at the Houston VA with veterans with PTSD. And two years before,
02:05:26.000 they have allocated a similar amount of money for a psilocybin study in veterans with PTSD. At the Houston VA. And Lynette Avril, who's going to be the principal investigator, she hasn't started the psilocybin study quite yet because she got pregnant and had a child and now she's getting back to it,
02:05:43.000 but it's going to Baylor College of Medicine and the Houston VA. So I just had this feeling of the legislature is under repair with all of the scaffolding, but in this place out of which so much conservative policies are coming, so is support for psychedelics.
02:06:00.000 And it just gave me such a warm feeling.
02:06:02.000 And again, it's like not demonizing everything's all bad.
02:06:05.000 But it was really a nice way to feel the grandeur of the building and to think that, yeah, we need to do a lot of renovation of our policies.
02:06:17.000 And this work that's being done, yeah, Governor Perry is helping with it.
02:06:22.000 Well, that's great.
02:06:23.000 Some people of his generation in particular get invested, like people like Nugent.
02:06:28.000 But it seems like we're on the right end of this cycle.
02:06:31.000 Because of the internet, I don't think you're ever going to experience a this is your brain on drugs moment again.
02:06:36.000 That's not going to work anymore.
02:06:38.000 I don't think so.
02:06:39.000 I think you're right.
02:06:39.000 So because of the information that's available, because of the work that you guys have done, because of all the...
02:06:44.000 Various videos and podcasts and books.
02:06:47.000 There's so much work.
02:06:48.000 Documentaries.
02:06:49.000 There's so much work that's been done that people kind of understand there's real great benefits.
02:06:54.000 I think the Michael Pollan's book, How to Change Your Mind, and then the Netflix series, the four series about that, has changed lots of people's minds.
02:07:01.000 Well, he's such a respected journalist.
02:07:03.000 Doing The Omnivore's Dilemma was amazing.
02:07:06.000 So to get him invested in something like this is...
02:07:09.000 Very, very powerful.
02:07:11.000 Very influential.
02:07:13.000 Again, what you're saying is so important.
02:07:16.000 Everything has to be completely honest.
02:07:18.000 All of it.
02:07:20.000 And it doesn't work for everybody.
02:07:21.000 We don't have to say it works for everybody.
02:07:23.000 And we shouldn't get in the trap.
02:07:24.000 It doesn't even mean it doesn't work.
02:07:25.000 It just didn't work that way.
02:07:26.000 And also there can be risks.
02:07:29.000 Because it's always a benefit-risk balance.
02:07:31.000 We don't have to pretend there's no risks.
02:07:33.000 So the moment that we're at is just this incredible moment.
02:07:37.000 So now we have two successful Phase III studies.
02:07:39.000 We have a non-profit that is 100% owner of a public benefit corp.
02:07:43.000 We do have Some money from investors, but our challenge now over the next couple months is where do we get the money to get us to two different points.
02:07:55.000 The first point is from here to FDA approval.
02:07:58.000 We think that's going to be potentially, if all goes well, something like June 2024. But then there's going to be about another year and a half or a bit more, potentially, until we reach what's called sustainability.
02:08:11.000 And so sustainability is when income from the sale of MDMA equals what all of our costs are, and then we start amassing resources for more research, for more studies, for work that MAPS is doing.
02:08:27.000 Because MAPS would still be the...
02:08:28.000 So what we have this chance to either keep MAPS as the sole owner of the Public Benefit Corp or we may have to turn it into a publicly traded company if we don't find the philanthropy that we need and we need to take investors and these investors want us to turn this into...
02:08:49.000 Yeah, that was a wild conversation that we had the other night at the bar.
02:08:52.000 Yes, and one of the things that you said struck me, and I thought about it a lot, is you said these are sacred substances.
02:08:58.000 And when you get them mixed with commerce, you have to be really careful.
02:09:02.000 It's very dangerous.
02:09:04.000 You're mixing something that could potentially change the way the whole world looks at life.
02:09:13.000 And you're mixing them with something that doesn't give a fuck about anything other than profit.
02:09:17.000 And that's just what the nature of that thing is.
02:09:21.000 That's the nature of corporations and capitalism.
02:09:25.000 They constantly want to make more money.
02:09:29.000 Every quarter, every year, more money, more money.
02:09:32.000 And they're trying to figure out a way to benefit their stockholders.
02:09:36.000 That's their primary concern.
02:09:37.000 Unless you've got some...
02:09:40.000 Well, it would have to be private.
02:09:41.000 It would still have to be some genius benefactor or some Elon Musk type character who comes along and decides to fund it, which could happen and would save you from that.
02:09:51.000 But if you just went public, my worry is that you're getting involved in You're getting involved in commerce with psychedelics and that just doesn't feel like the way to do it.
02:10:05.000 It feels like all that stuff should be completely legal and we should kind of wait until you guys and the way your work kicks in and all the influence and the people that vote get an understanding of what the real landscape is.
02:10:22.000 Yeah.
02:10:23.000 Now, there's a fellow that, Jeff George, he's the chair of the board of the MAPS Public Benefit Corp.
02:10:30.000 And he used to be the CEO of Sandoz, which is one of the world's largest generics, but also Sandoz was where Albert Hoffman invented LSD and where Albert also first synthesized psilocybin.
02:10:42.000 So Jeff has got incredible pharmaceutical experience and he's been trying to help educate me about that we have a tremendous opportunity in a way, if we do need to take investors and do need to become a publicly traded company,
02:10:59.000 that we could be an example for the entire pharmaceutical industry.
02:11:03.000 That we could be an example of a public benefit psychedelic pharmaceutical company with majority control.
02:11:09.000 Hopefully we could remain a majority control owner of a nonprofit.
02:11:14.000 And so I appreciate your reaction to this because he said there may be several different ways in which there could be benefits from going public.
02:11:23.000 I got to pee again.
02:11:24.000 I hate to say it.
02:11:25.000 But I want to hear these benefits though.
02:11:27.000 So when I come back, we'll go over these benefits.
02:11:29.000 The diaper idea.
02:11:30.000 No, no, no.
02:11:31.000 No diapers, man.
02:11:31.000 I'm just drinking a lot of water.
02:11:32.000 Sorry.
02:11:33.000 Sorry, folks.
02:11:34.000 We're back.
02:11:35.000 Okay.
02:11:35.000 So where were we?
02:11:37.000 The benefits of taking your company maps public.
02:11:41.000 Yeah.
02:11:41.000 And I'd appreciate your reaction.
02:11:43.000 My reaction and my initial knee-jerk reaction in the bar and even now is like idealistic.
02:11:51.000 I'm looking at it like, man, don't mix love with money, man.
02:11:56.000 So I recognize my own bias in it, but I just get nervous when you're talking about it.
02:12:01.000 But then there probably is some upside, and one of the upsides is maybe that would accelerate the path to legalization.
02:12:09.000 Well, my preference is philanthropy.
02:12:13.000 And so I'd like to appeal to anybody who's listening if they want to donate substantial amounts of money.
02:12:19.000 How much do you need?
02:12:20.000 Well, we are currently developing a budget in the range of $75 million to FDA approval.
02:12:28.000 And then after FDA approval, there is going to be another raise that we're going to need to make to get to this sustainability point.
02:12:38.000 But once we have FDA approval, there's many options that we will have that were not so much open to us now.
02:12:44.000 So, for example, we've been approached by people, a big company in Korea that was interested in buying the rights for Asia for MDMA. So we're trying to narrow them down to Korea.
02:12:57.000 But we could, with FDA approval, it'll be pretty clear that other countries will give reciprocity, that we can make it.
02:13:04.000 So we might be able to sell rights to different countries so that we can keep the nonprofit, the 100% owner of the Public Benefit Corp.
02:13:12.000 We would have more options to do royalty shares because then there are people that, the mission-related people that have, through Ryan Zura, that have given us this $43 million They're gambling that we may get it approved.
02:13:27.000 And then the royalties come only if we get it approved.
02:13:29.000 Post-approval, we'll be able to get a much better deal.
02:13:33.000 Our valuation will be higher.
02:13:34.000 We could get loans, potentially, on this income form that looks like...
02:13:39.000 What's the downside?
02:13:41.000 Of...
02:13:42.000 Going public.
02:13:43.000 Okay, so, well, the downside for me is right now, the potential downside is right now, With MAPS as the 100% owner of the Benefit Corp, net zero trauma by 2070 is the new vision.
02:13:58.000 And what that means is we've talked about working with prisoners.
02:14:02.000 But I want to work with refugees.
02:14:04.000 I want to work with people in Rwanda that have been traumatized by genocide.
02:14:07.000 I want to go all over the world and try to globalize MDMA-assisted therapy in a way where we go where the trauma is, not necessarily where the money is.
02:14:17.000 And that we put this global perspective of net zero trauma by 2070, mass mental health, spiritualized humanity, you know, we're destroying the environment, we've got incredible proliferation of nuclear weapons, you know, whether humans survive is not a sure thing.
02:14:35.000 And so I think if we're more stable, if we're not seeing the world through all these filters of pain and past traumas, so I think one of the upsides, you could say, of having the public benefit corp be wholly owned by the nonprofit is that we can focus on public benefit and that that's the thing.
02:14:52.000 I think that when you start having publicly traded companies, you could say there's no one, it's not pure public benefit or pure returns to investors.
02:15:02.000 But it's somewhere along the line.
02:15:04.000 We're along this line.
02:15:05.000 Some ethical capitalism balance.
02:15:09.000 Yeah.
02:15:09.000 And so I think that with all the money from philanthropists, it will be towards public benefit.
02:15:14.000 We're not going to be trying to prioritize giving returns.
02:15:18.000 The returns to the donors are in a better world.
02:15:21.000 That's the return.
02:15:25.000 And that's, I'd say, the advantage.
02:15:26.000 The risk, depending on where the capital comes from and what kind of conditions they put on it, is that we start now maybe need to think about more returns to investors and where do we go for the money rather than where do we go to reduce the trauma.
02:15:44.000 So, but I think we can have a good example of a public benefit corp, hopefully at least majority owned by the nonprofit, that can do an enormous amount of good in the world.
02:15:58.000 But I just think that we could do an enormous amount of good plus if it's funded by philanthropy.
02:16:03.000 So I think the worst loss of public benefit for us would be to run out of money and to never make it into a medicine at all.
02:16:11.000 So if we have to take money from investors, I think we should do that.
02:16:16.000 And so we're exploring different options.
02:16:19.000 You know, is it biotech investors?
02:16:21.000 All the hippies are definitely going to push back, right?
02:16:25.000 They will, but...
02:16:27.000 And I hope that some of those wealthy hippies decide to donate to make it into a philanthropy.
02:16:34.000 But I do think that it's our obligation to make it into a medicine one way or another.
02:16:40.000 And if we do take it from investors to do it in structured in such a way where It's still within a public benefit structure, and so we will try to develop metrics to evaluate public benefit.
02:16:54.000 We will try to ensure governance controls so that it does stay more focused on public benefit.
02:17:00.000 But, you know, it would be a lot easier if we could do this, in a way, through philanthropy.
02:17:06.000 And also, we are the leading—there's hundreds of psychedelic for-profit companies and a few non-profits, but we're the only one that has completed Phase 3. So we have two successful Phase III studies.
02:17:17.000 I'd like us to be a model for the entire field.
02:17:20.000 And again, what you're saying about telling the truth or underestimating risks or overresting benefits, I would like us to be a model.
02:17:28.000 And that was my dream from...
02:17:31.000 When I first started MAPS in 1986, because I assumed, erroneously, that MDMA would immediately become generic if it was made into a medicine.
02:17:42.000 Because I knew it was invented by Merck in 1912, and so the molecules in the public domain.
02:17:47.000 And I also knew that the use of MDMA for PTSD was going on before I even knew about MDMA. You know, I worked with the first person with PTSD. I talked about it in my TED Talk.
02:17:58.000 In 1984 is the first person that I actually saw suicidal with MDMA, no other options, and she was able to get better.
02:18:08.000 And Marcella is her name, and now she's one of our lead therapists and trains other therapists.
02:18:14.000 But I thought it would be coming generic.
02:18:16.000 I did my PhD, I got it in 2001, focused on how to FDA regulation of psychedelics and marijuana.
02:18:24.000 I took a class at Harvard Law School around 96 from the leading pharmaceutical expert, Peter Burton-Hutt.
02:18:31.000 He wrote the textbook, Food and Drug Law.
02:18:34.000 And he later became on my dissertation committee.
02:18:36.000 He's with Covington Burling.
02:18:38.000 He's in his 80s.
02:18:38.000 He represents us pro bono.
02:18:40.000 But throughout my entire education, I still thought that MDMA would immediately become generic.
02:18:47.000 It wasn't until 2014 that I went to a party, in a way, and ran into a patent lawyer.
02:18:55.000 So my wife was head of what's called Foundation for Belmont Education, which is a local group that raises money to supplement the money that goes into public education.
02:19:05.000 And so she was president.
02:19:07.000 She had to give a little talk.
02:19:08.000 And it's mostly a lot of food and silent auction and stuff.
02:19:11.000 So I'd worked all that day.
02:19:12.000 And I thought, okay, great.
02:19:14.000 I'm just going to get super high.
02:19:16.000 I'm going to get the munchies.
02:19:17.000 I'm going to go eat all this food.
02:19:18.000 I don't have to talk to anybody.
02:19:20.000 My wife can do the speech, and I'm done working.
02:19:24.000 So this moment where I was done working and just going to munch on all this food is where I ran into a patent attorney who I had known.
02:19:33.000 He was from locally, and he had previously gotten patents for Bromo LSD, which is a non-psychedelic version of LSD. And bromo LSD... What's the benefit of it?
02:19:45.000 For cluster headaches.
02:19:47.000 So people that have cluster headaches had discovered that LSD or psilocybin breaks the cycle of cluster headaches.
02:19:54.000 Cluster headaches are suicide headaches.
02:19:55.000 They're way worse than migraines.
02:19:56.000 And there's not many good treatments for it.
02:19:59.000 They had approached me around 2004, 2005, saying, we don't want to be criminals anymore.
02:20:03.000 What can we do?
02:20:04.000 And I started doing work with them at Harvard.
02:20:07.000 And they did medical records of all these people.
02:20:12.000 They had terrible cholesterol headaches, then they didn't, and intervening was LSD or psilocybin.
02:20:17.000 So it's just one trip to break a cycle?
02:20:20.000 Well, they do it three times every three days.
02:20:23.000 So over nine days, you'll do the psilocybin or the LSD. I mentioned about this project in Jordan that Michael Marcus helped fund.
02:20:37.000 It was because a young Jordanian came by to McLean Hospital at Harvard to learn about the cluster headache study, and it turned out that his cycle began, and they weren't giving Psilocybin or LSD at the time, they were just studying it.
02:20:53.000 And so his cluster headaches started and they referred him to me.
02:20:58.000 And so I thought, okay, I'll give him LSD. But I thought, he's never done LSD before.
02:21:07.000 And I said, we have no idea why LSD works.
02:21:10.000 We have no idea why psilocybin works.
02:21:13.000 And I thought he's scared of these drugs.
02:21:15.000 You have to give it in a fairly, you know, it's not microdosing.
02:21:20.000 So I thought maybe give him MDMA too.
02:21:22.000 At the same time, the MDMA will calm him down and maybe whatever LSD does, it won't be blocked by the MDMA. I didn't know, but I thought let's give it a try.
02:21:31.000 And it worked.
02:21:32.000 It worked.
02:21:33.000 And it was incredible.
02:21:34.000 So anyway, he goes back to Jordan.
02:21:36.000 And after a bunch of months, he said, you know, my life has changed.
02:21:40.000 I feel much better.
02:21:40.000 It was a terrible burden.
02:21:41.000 I've met this girl.
02:21:42.000 And we've fallen in love.
02:21:43.000 We're going to get married.
02:21:45.000 And I would like you to come to the betrothal ceremony.
02:21:47.000 Turned out her father was the mayor of Oman.
02:21:50.000 And I'm like, great!
02:21:51.000 Now we can do research in Jordan.
02:21:54.000 We can finally get into an Arab country to do Arab-Israeli stuff.
02:21:57.000 So that's what I talked to Michael Marcus about, and that's why he supported that project.
02:22:02.000 But in any case, the Harvard people said, oh, Timothy Leary was here, and this is like, we're not going to let you do psychedelic research unless it's the last resort.
02:22:12.000 So Torsten Pasi, John Halpern were the two that were doing this.
02:22:16.000 Torsten was at Hanover University in Germany, and they said, all right, let's do Bromo LSD. We don't know why it works, but Bromo-LSD is a non-psychological version of LSD, and we'll give it to a bunch of people, and it won't work, and then we'll come back to Harvard and say, we've got to start giving LSD or psilocyme to people.
02:22:33.000 So, I say, great idea, great plan.
02:22:35.000 So, I keep waiting for the results, and waiting for the results, and waiting for the results, and they're not telling me, they're not telling me, they're telling me, I'm like, what is going on here?
02:22:43.000 Finally, they told me that they thought I would be terribly disappointed, but Bromo-LSD worked.
02:22:51.000 And not only did it work, but it worked better than LSD or psilocybin.
02:22:55.000 So they were hiding it from you.
02:22:56.000 They were hiding it from me because they thought I would be really disappointed.
02:22:59.000 And I'm like, it's not psychedelic therapy.
02:23:01.000 I'm about the patients.
02:23:02.000 If this helps the patients.
02:23:04.000 Because LSD you give in micrograms.
02:23:07.000 Psilocybin you give in milligrams.
02:23:09.000 But bromo LSD, because it's not psychedelic, you can give it in grams.
02:23:13.000 So whatever it does floods the brain.
02:23:15.000 So it works better than LSD or psilocybin.
02:23:18.000 Because you're just...
02:23:18.000 We still don't know why.
02:23:19.000 Anyway, so Harvard then gets a patent on Bromo LSD. For cluster headaches with the University of Hanover.
02:23:27.000 And a fellow, Kerry Turnbull, is now trying to move this through the FDA. So the patent attorney for Harvard was also part of this, you know, local.
02:23:37.000 So he was there at this party.
02:23:39.000 And so I go to him, again, keep in mind, I'm super stoned, just munching on all this food.
02:23:43.000 And I'm like, oh, it's very interesting.
02:23:46.000 How's this going with the patent for bromo LSD? And I said, too bad there's nothing like that for MDMA. And he said, well, there is something.
02:23:54.000 It's called data exclusivity.
02:23:57.000 I'm like, data exclusivity?
02:23:58.000 What's that?
02:23:59.000 He said, well, it turns out in 1984, Ronald Reagan signed a bill to provide incentives to develop drugs that are off patent.
02:24:07.000 And what it means is that if you are the first to produce the evidence to make a drug into a medicine, even if there's no patents, you have exclusive use of your data for five years.
02:24:18.000 Now, it's different from a patent in that another person, another company, can develop their own data.
02:24:24.000 So it doesn't block anybody like a patent would block anybody.
02:24:28.000 Then, if you do studies in pediatric populations, so the FDA has right now forbidden us to do studies in people that are younger than 18. We can only work with 18 or older.
02:24:40.000 We've had a mother with a daughter who'd been terribly raped and was mute and wanted to be in the study, and the FDA said no.
02:24:48.000 But what they did say is that if you succeed in adults, if we do give you permission to work in adults, you must do studies in adolescence, and you get an extra six months date exclusivity.
02:24:59.000 So that's five and a half years.
02:25:01.000 Then it blocks the FDA from reviewing a generic applicant's file until the five and a half years is over, and it takes FDA an average of two years to review a file.
02:25:12.000 So there's this period of data exclusivity that we would have a monopoly potentially on the sale of MDMA for PTSD. And Europe, the European Medicines Agency, after Ronald Reagan signed this in 1984,
02:25:27.000 they said, yeah, this is a good idea.
02:25:28.000 We should provide incentives for drugs that are off patent.
02:25:31.000 So it's 10 years data exclusivity in Europe.
02:25:34.000 So everything changed.
02:25:35.000 I thought, how is it that I took the class from the expert, I read the textbook, my whole dissertation is on it, and I never even heard about this.
02:25:44.000 And the reason is pharma doesn't use it.
02:25:45.000 They only want drugs that they have patented.
02:25:48.000 And we've had a bunch of potential biotech investors tell us that they don't really want to invest because they don't like the fact that data exclusivity isn't as long as a patent.
02:26:00.000 But that changed everything for me.
02:26:03.000 Now, that's why we created the MAPS Public Benefit Corp, because now it's not going to necessarily go generic.
02:26:09.000 We can then have this period of time where we can make an income, and then what I can tell...
02:26:14.000 And how much is left on that time?
02:26:16.000 Well, it doesn't start until the FDA says yes.
02:26:20.000 So June 2024 is when it starts.
02:26:22.000 Now, I'll say that the DEA then has to reschedule, and that will take a maximum of 90 days.
02:26:29.000 DEA, by law, must reschedule within 90 days after FDA has said yes.
02:26:34.000 So there will be this five and a half years, and then it could be a year and a half, two years, or six months, or who knows how long it'll take the FDA to actually review this file.
02:26:45.000 But I think that we have this period of time where we have this opportunity for income.
02:26:50.000 So that's the story to the donors has been, and the story to the investors and donors is, if you help us make MDMA into medicine, we're not going to be coming to you for money all the time because we will be able to make money to use to more research.
02:27:05.000 MDMA is not just good for PTSD. It's tremendous for couples therapy.
02:27:09.000 It's tremendous.
02:27:10.000 We think it would be tremendous for eating disorders, for postpartum depression.
02:27:13.000 Of course, we have to do all the research to see if this is really the case.
02:27:16.000 It has to be data-driven, but We have this opportunity to become self-sustaining.
02:27:22.000 And so that's the situation that we were able to tell both donors and then also investors, that we can return money during this period of data exclusivity.
02:27:31.000 Do you feel confident about this?
02:27:33.000 Do you feel like this is an inevitability?
02:27:35.000 You automatically get it.
02:27:36.000 Yes, you don't have to apply for it.
02:27:38.000 You automatically get data exclusivity.
02:27:40.000 No, no, that's what I mean.
02:27:41.000 I mean, them deciding to let...
02:27:45.000 No, I don't think it's inevitable.
02:27:48.000 But I do think it's extremely likely.
02:27:51.000 And one of the things that...
02:27:52.000 Why so?
02:27:53.000 Okay, so we've done this very patiently, step by step.
02:27:58.000 And so there's a big methodological problem from a scientific perspective.
02:28:03.000 You have to do double-blind studies.
02:28:06.000 And that's required.
02:28:07.000 You need randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies.
02:28:10.000 That's the gold standard for Phase III studies.
02:28:14.000 So, well, Jamie, you may get these edibles and nothing happens, you know, but most people that get MDMA or LSD know they've got it, or psilocybin.
02:28:24.000 So the double-blind doesn't work too well in these kind of studies.
02:28:28.000 So the FDA offers what they call special protocol assessment.
02:28:33.000 And that's a process where you can opt in once you've been approved to go to phase three and you negotiate every aspect of the design with the FDA and all the other material and other scientific studies, all the other data that they want to see in the review package.
02:28:50.000 And the goal is to have these special protocol assessment negotiations to end up with what's called an approval letter.
02:28:58.000 An agreement, yeah, a formal agreement that they agree with this special protocol assessment.
02:29:05.000 Often you don't get that and Big Pharma doesn't use this a lot of times anyway because it delays things by quite a long time.
02:29:11.000 But they often don't need to do it because they're not doing something novel, they're not doing something controversial, they're not doing something that's a challenge with the double blind.
02:29:20.000 So we decided to elect to do this.
02:29:22.000 So we went through this special protocol assessment, and it took us eight months.
02:29:27.000 And in the end, we did get an agreement letter.
02:29:29.000 And the FDA brought in the old wise man of the FDA, a fellow named Bob Temple.
02:29:35.000 Who was at the FDA since 1972, their Office of Science Policy.
02:29:40.000 And what we said to them is, it was kind of funny, we said to them that there's a quote from an early president of Harvard, which says, never forget, there's always a Harvard man on the wrong side of every issue.
02:29:57.000 All right.
02:29:58.000 So I opened the meeting and I said, this is the quote and the person on the wrong side is me because my dissertation was, I thought I solved the double blind problem.
02:30:07.000 And it would be therapy with low dose MDMA versus therapy with full dose MDMA. And people would be confused about what they got.
02:30:15.000 And our challenge would be to find the dose of MDMA. The low dose that was high enough to cause confusion, but not so high that it caused so much benefits that we'd never be able to see the difference between the two groups.
02:30:27.000 So over the course of from 2000 to 2016, when we did all these phase 2 studies, we tested inactive placebo, 25 milligrams, 30 milligrams, 40 milligrams, 50 milligrams, 75, 100, 125, and 150. And what we discovered,
02:30:44.000 which was again a little bit difficult for me to discover, is my dissertation was wrong.
02:30:49.000 I was not right.
02:30:51.000 I was partially right, is a better way to say it.
02:30:53.000 That it did cause confusion between the low dose and the high dose, but it made people uncomfortable.
02:31:00.000 So the low doses, it's like turbulence when you take off of an airplane.
02:31:04.000 At the very beginning there's more turbulence, and then when you get above clouds or so, your cruise control is smooth.
02:31:10.000 So early small doses of MDMA, they have an activating effect without as much of the fear reduction.
02:31:17.000 So what we showed is that people who got these low doses, they all still got better, but they didn't get as much benefit as if we gave them an inactive placebo.
02:31:30.000 If they got therapy with nothing, they did better than if they got therapy with low dose.
02:31:34.000 And we discovered that the 75 milligram dose group was actually surprisingly helpful and beneficial.
02:31:40.000 So it's a narrow range between when you're in the turbulent zone to when you're getting benefits, when you're cruising.
02:31:48.000 So there's no practical way to do that.
02:31:50.000 So we went to the FDA at this final meeting for this special protocol assessment, and we said, I'm wrong.
02:31:58.000 We'll do whatever you want.
02:31:59.000 You tell us what you want us to do.
02:32:01.000 But we can give you blinding, but you're going to make it easier for us to tell a difference between the two groups.
02:32:07.000 Because the people with the low dose don't do as well as the people that got nothing.
02:32:12.000 And the real challenge is to show if we can do this with therapy, why bother add a drug?
02:32:17.000 So we said to the FDA, we suggest you make it harder for us to find a difference by letting us use inactive placebo.
02:32:25.000 And what they said is that oftentimes, what Bob Temple helped them come to this conclusion, is that oftentimes the double-blind doesn't actually work anyway.
02:32:34.000 Like there's sexual side effects from SSRIs.
02:32:37.000 So you can learn from side effect profiles that people talk to you.
02:32:41.000 If you're doing an experiment and you're collecting adverse events, they'll tell you what the problems are and you'll say, oh, this is probably this or that.
02:32:48.000 So they said there's two main ways to reduce experimental bias.
02:32:52.000 The first is random assignment.
02:32:56.000 That means everybody is similarly motivated, they come from the same kind of background, they all fit the inclusion criteria, and then they're all willing to do whatever and then half get your treatment, half get the control.
02:33:07.000 The other is a robust system of independent raters to evaluate the outcomes.
02:33:12.000 We don't want the therapist to say how well people did, because they will most likely, over 90% of the time, they can tell who got MDMA, who didn't.
02:33:21.000 There still is some confusion.
02:33:22.000 Sometimes people are not responding very much.
02:33:25.000 Maybe like, Jamie, they have something biological where MDMA doesn't do that much, or they're...
02:33:30.000 They're controlling or something.
02:33:33.000 But most of the time, people are able to tell the difference.
02:33:40.000 But the question is also that the side effect profile will be better if it's no MDMA as well.
02:33:47.000 So when I said that we had one woman try to kill herself twice and she had the placebo, it's from the therapy.
02:33:54.000 If she had gotten low-dose MDMA, Maybe it's this low-dose MDMA that made her uncomfortable.
02:33:59.000 But now we know if you have severe PTSD and you go into therapy and you're starting to uncover things, that's a risk because you've got some balance.
02:34:09.000 It's difficult.
02:34:10.000 It's not healthy.
02:34:11.000 But when stuff comes to the surface, it can make you really disturbed.
02:34:14.000 So Bob Temple came and said, we will approve this idea of therapy with inactive placebo.
02:34:23.000 So we got an agreement letter from the Special Protocol Assessment.
02:34:26.000 So we have a situation now, to address your question, how likely is it that it's going to be approved, is that the FDA is legally bound to approve our drug if we get statistical significance, which we've got in spades, tremendous, If we have an excellent safety record,
02:34:43.000 which we do, and if we've gathered the data in a proper way so that the FDA considers it valid.
02:34:49.000 And we've recently had a big inspection by FDA and Health Canada.
02:34:54.000 We've had loads of people from the Public Benefit Corp who did a phenomenal job to try to respond to all the questions from the FDA, and we got some findings but nothing serious, so we know that they're going to consider the data to be valid.
02:35:07.000 So I do think that the chances are they cannot say we don't like your design because the double line didn't work because we have prior agreement to use that design.
02:35:18.000 There's no safety issues that they can point to of significance.
02:35:23.000 I mean there's acute effects from MDMA. Most of it was like sweating or muscle tension or these are transitory side effects from the MDMA. All more from the MDMA than placebo.
02:35:34.000 I think the other big factor that makes me somewhat confident is that we have bipartisan support.
02:35:42.000 It's not a political issue.
02:35:45.000 So much in America is politicized, is part of the culture wars.
02:35:49.000 But we have managed somehow, well, consciously, intentionally, and a lot of it is working with veterans and others, is to take the psychedelics out of the culture wars.
02:36:00.000 So I don't think there's going to be political efforts to...
02:36:05.000 There's actually, I won't mention names or anything, but there is a member of Congress that has PTSD, that's a Republican, That wants to go through, if possible, a study in the open, a legal study, then to publicize the effects of MDMA therapy for PTSD. It's amazing.
02:36:26.000 So I think that we're in good shape.
02:36:28.000 I think how it gets regulated is going to be more of an issue than if it gets approved.
02:36:34.000 What kind of controls are put on it?
02:36:37.000 If it does get approved and if MDMA does get rescheduled, how quickly do you think that would open up the door for other similar substances?
02:36:47.000 Well, the other similar substances, the next one in the line is psilocybin, and they're going to have to generate their own data.
02:36:52.000 So we got breakthrough therapy designation in 2017. Right after we completed the special protocol assessment, we got breakthrough therapy, and we were the first one for any kind of psychedelics.
02:37:09.000 A year or two later, the psilocybin, Compass got breakthrough therapy for psilocybin for treatment-resistant depression, and then USONA got breakthrough therapy for psilocybin for major depressive disorder.
02:37:21.000 So I think that the psilocybin people are going to be the next through the FDA system.
02:37:26.000 They're just starting their Phase III studies.
02:37:28.000 So I think by 2026 maybe psilocybin will be there.
02:37:32.000 So we're opening the door politically, but they have to come through with their own data.
02:37:36.000 And then there will be other people trying to work with 5-MeO to make that into a medicine, potentially for depression or something.
02:37:41.000 Ibogaine hopefully we can get.
02:37:43.000 So I think that we are the leading example.
02:37:46.000 That's why I would like to ideally do it through philanthropy.
02:37:50.000 But I think that we've got a real hope that this will be approved.
02:37:56.000 Well, listen, you just shot out the bat signal.
02:37:59.000 So we'll see who responds in terms of philanthropy or what hardcore capitalists think that you could save the world with this idea and make a shitload of money.
02:38:08.000 Yeah, and all those that want to go to the Psychedelic Science Conference, Rogan 20, to get a discount.
02:38:13.000 But I'd like to read you these potential benefits, just to see what you think about that.
02:38:18.000 Okay.
02:38:18.000 Okay, so the first potential benefit is that it permits us to scale to reach our full potential.
02:38:28.000 Now, what that is assuming, and I'll say, is that there's more access to capital from going public than from philanthropy.
02:38:37.000 Now, that's not necessarily true.
02:38:38.000 Now, I'm writing this, by the way, my notes are on Allen Institute.
02:38:42.000 So it's Paul Allen, who is the co-founder of Microsoft.
02:38:46.000 And he started this Allen Institute for Brain Science, and he's donated almost a billion dollars to that.
02:38:52.000 So if we can, you know, Paul Allen, this was one of my frustrations years ago.
02:38:57.000 Paul Allen donated $25 million to the SETI project, the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence.
02:39:04.000 And I'm like, where's the intelligence on Earth?
02:39:06.000 Why don't you give us 25 million to find if there's intelligence on Earth?
02:39:10.000 Let us do psychedelic research, but you're wanting to see if there, you know.
02:39:13.000 Well, how about both?
02:39:14.000 Both, exactly.
02:39:15.000 Both are interesting.
02:39:16.000 Yeah, yeah.
02:39:17.000 So, okay, so I think that this idea of scale to reach full potential...
02:39:21.000 Do you know what this list sounds like?
02:39:23.000 You have kids?
02:39:24.000 I have three kids, yeah.
02:39:25.000 You know when your kids say they want to do something and you don't think it's a good idea?
02:39:30.000 We'll say, well, why don't you give me three examples of why I should let you spend the night at Cindy's house?
02:39:40.000 And then they go, because I think it'll teach me responsibility, and even though sometimes I stay up late with her, this time I definitely won't.
02:39:48.000 That's what it sounds like.
02:39:49.000 That's funny.
02:39:50.000 Well, before I get to the rest of this, just about kids.
02:39:53.000 So I've got Eden is 28, Lila is 26, and Ellie is 24. But when they were their bar mitzvah age, and this is where I'm curious more how you're going to teach your kids, is that I remember my bar mitzvah as being a massive disappointment.
02:40:10.000 Why?
02:40:10.000 Because you thought you'd feel different when you went through it?
02:40:13.000 I thought I would be different.
02:40:14.000 You'd be a grown man?
02:40:15.000 Yeah, I did.
02:40:16.000 I'd skip adolescence.
02:40:17.000 I'd have spiritual experience.
02:40:19.000 God would come.
02:40:20.000 I'm the oldest of four kids in my family, so I had no older siblings to tell me it doesn't happen that way.
02:40:26.000 I just thought, oh, okay, great.
02:40:29.000 But in the bed in the morning after my bar mitzvah, I'm like, God didn't come.
02:40:35.000 I'm still the same.
02:40:36.000 Still the same.
02:40:37.000 I like the party.
02:40:38.000 Well, yeah, it's a rites of passage ritual, right?
02:40:42.000 Yeah.
02:40:42.000 So when each of our kids turned 13, my wife and I, we went to them and we said, if you want marijuana or MDMA, we think you're old enough for it and we'll do it together and you can have it.
02:40:56.000 And all of them were like freaked out, like, no, no, we're not ready!
02:41:00.000 Do drugs with my parents!
02:41:01.000 No way!
02:41:02.000 It turned to be the best anti-drug strategy we could have thought of.
02:41:07.000 Just give it to them, and they're like, oh no.
02:41:09.000 Now, they did come around later, I will say.
02:41:13.000 So I'm curious, for your own kids, are you going to say, don't do it when you're teenagers, but do it later?
02:41:18.000 Or how do you think that?
02:41:20.000 We're going to have that conversation.
02:41:23.000 I think my concern is I don't want them doing things with people.
02:41:28.000 They don't know the source of those things.
02:41:29.000 That's very important.
02:41:32.000 My concern is they understand there's a giant difference between different types of substances.
02:41:39.000 And these are the kind of conversations I think everybody has to have with their kids.
02:41:42.000 Like there's a giant difference between smoking pot with your friends and doing coke.
02:41:46.000 It's a giant difference.
02:41:47.000 And it's not just the cocaine, it's the potential for it being laced.
02:41:50.000 It's very high.
02:41:52.000 That's the most dangerous thing about drugs today.
02:41:55.000 I mean, really, what we said earlier is the illegality.
02:42:00.000 That's the most dangerous thing.
02:42:02.000 So, what are the other fake reasons on this list?
02:42:08.000 Well, Dad.
02:42:10.000 Well, the other is that there'll be more support for MAPS. I mean, if the Benefit Corp does well and MAPS is the owner, then we'll have more reason.
02:42:17.000 Sure, to make money.
02:42:29.000 The third one, I think, is somewhat different.
02:42:35.000 It supports the organizational maturation and development.
02:42:39.000 So we may have investors that have lots of pharma experience or something, and then they may help us to improve our operations in some ways.
02:42:52.000 Right.
02:42:59.000 We can get expertise in other ways, but there's something there to it.
02:43:03.000 And then the discipline of the marketplace.
02:43:05.000 The discipline of the marketplace is about efficiency and maximizing profits.
02:43:10.000 It's not necessarily about maximizing public benefit, but that's something.
02:43:14.000 Then the other part is attract outside talent.
02:43:20.000 So this argument is this idea that we don't have stock bonuses for anybody.
02:43:29.000 Without equity investments, then we can't use that as incentives for the staff.
02:43:37.000 So this idea is that if you do go public and then people get invested in stocks...
02:43:42.000 You get killers.
02:43:43.000 You get aggressive people.
02:43:45.000 On the other hand, I think that there are other ways to reward people through royalty share.
02:43:51.000 It doesn't have to be equity.
02:43:53.000 The same way that we could do royalty share to investors, we should be able to do that to staff.
02:43:58.000 But this, I think, is the best argument of what might be a benefit of going public.
02:44:06.000 And it's that we could build a new public benefit-driven, mission-led model for the entire pharmaceutical industry.
02:44:14.000 Because most of the pharmaceutical industry is for profit.
02:44:17.000 It's not run by nonprofits.
02:44:18.000 Most of it is not public benefit.
02:44:20.000 But we could become a model for the The industry.
02:44:26.000 So I think there's a lot of merit in that idea.
02:44:29.000 Well, I hope you figure out the right path.
02:44:32.000 I do not know what it will be, but I appreciate everything you guys do.
02:44:37.000 Yeah, and I think that once we talked about it a couple weeks ago, why you invited me back is because you wanted to help us highlight this crossroads that we're at.
02:44:48.000 Yeah, it's fascinating.
02:44:49.000 Look, I'm not the person to ask about business.
02:44:52.000 Again, my reaction to it was completely knee-jerk, like, don't mix business and psychedelics.
02:44:58.000 Those things are sacred.
02:44:59.000 And I think they should just be legal.
02:45:02.000 I mean, that should be the primary concern, that we're being deprived of these experiences because of ignorance.
02:45:07.000 And because of propaganda and because of whatever fucking weird political reasons.
02:45:13.000 I've got to wrap this up.
02:45:15.000 Oh, okay.
02:45:16.000 I've got another quick thing to get your reaction to.
02:45:18.000 Okay.
02:45:19.000 So Dan Grossman is also on the board of the MAPS Public Benefit Corp.
02:45:25.000 And he is from the Boston Consulting Group.
02:45:28.000 So he's a managing director, senior partner, and he does a lot of biofarm stuff.
02:45:34.000 So I'll just say that there's various theories of pricing.
02:45:38.000 So once we make it into medicine, whether we do it even in a public benefit with only philanthropy or if it's investors, we still are going to be looking at how do we price the drug.
02:45:50.000 And there's interesting ways to do this.
02:45:53.000 So the first is called price to value.
02:45:56.000 And when you consider the value, and this is how insurance companies will often look at it, it's both to the individual, the family, and the society.
02:46:04.000 So there are substantial values in taking people who have moderate to severe PTSD. They can't work, things like that.
02:46:13.000 But you also want it to be available for everyone.
02:46:15.000 Yeah.
02:46:15.000 Okay, then...
02:46:16.000 Very much.
02:46:18.000 And so the key challenge that we have is that when you look at pharmaceutical ads on TV, They'll say, oh, if you can't afford the drug, you know, we'll give it to you.
02:46:28.000 You know, we have a patient assistance program, you know, and apply to us.
02:46:32.000 So our situation is fundamentally different because the treatment is therapy augmented by the drug.
02:46:38.000 So if we give people MDMA, it's not going to do them any good whatsoever if they can't afford the therapy.
02:46:43.000 Right.
02:46:44.000 The therapy will be ten, fifteen thousand dollars.
02:46:47.000 So, in order for us to really have an effective patient assistance program, we can't just give people the drug.
02:46:54.000 We also have to give them $10,000 or $15,000 worth of therapy, and the drug is going to cost a tiny, tiny, tiny fraction of that.
02:47:04.000 So that's one argument for making it equitably available.
02:47:08.000 The other, I think, is the drug legalization.
02:47:10.000 We need to make it available for people outside of medicine, outside of religion, at a low cost.
02:47:16.000 Well, that way, also, it doesn't encourage people to sell it illegally.
02:47:20.000 Yeah.
02:47:20.000 Which is going to be a problem if it becomes legal.
02:47:22.000 If it becomes legal and you're the only ones manufacturing it.
02:47:26.000 Well, I don't think it'll be a problem because, again, the difference is that it's not a take-home medicine.
02:47:30.000 So it's only administered under direct supervision of a therapist.
02:47:34.000 You know, we've heard about ketamine sometimes is available.
02:47:37.000 But don't you think that just opening up the door to legality is going to make it more prevalent?
02:47:42.000 Well, not our supplies.
02:47:42.000 It's going to put it more in the public zeitgeist.
02:47:45.000 It will.
02:47:46.000 It will.
02:47:46.000 Which will potentially open up the door for criminal activity, right?
02:47:50.000 I think so, yes.
02:47:52.000 I think that there'll be more demand, right?
02:47:54.000 Rick, I really have to end.
02:47:55.000 I'm really sorry.
02:47:56.000 I've got to get out of here.
02:47:57.000 I have a hard out today.
02:47:59.000 Okay, could I just – one more minute.
02:48:01.000 I'll just list these things.
02:48:02.000 Okay, so one is price to out-of-pocket, which is really good, meaning that you just make it so that people don't have to pay more.
02:48:08.000 Whatever the price is, insurance companies pay, but you price to make sure.
02:48:12.000 And that is the lower profits, the least.
02:48:15.000 Then there's price to savings.
02:48:17.000 That's to the payers.
02:48:18.000 So you try to make it so that insurance companies – then there's price to ROI, return on investment.
02:48:23.000 So that's where you – Profit maximize.
02:48:25.000 We're getting in the financial weeds.
02:48:27.000 I really do have to wrap this up.
02:48:28.000 But I appreciate you very much.
02:48:29.000 Thanks.
02:48:30.000 Thanks for coming on here, man.
02:48:31.000 And thank you for all that you do to legalize psychedelics.
02:48:35.000 Thank you, Joe, for having me.
02:48:36.000 Tell everybody the website and the social media.
02:48:38.000 Oh, okay.
02:48:39.000 So the social media.
02:48:41.000 Yeah.
02:48:42.000 Great.
02:48:42.000 And then just, again, Rogan20 for psychedelics and our social media.
02:48:48.000 So psychedelicscience.org is for the conference in June.
02:48:54.000 Yeah, yes.
02:48:55.000 And then maps, maps.org.
02:48:56.000 Yeah, and Twitter is at maps and at Rick Doblin and Instagram is at mapsnews and at Rick Doblin.
02:49:02.000 Thank you very much.
02:49:03.000 Thank you.
02:49:04.000 Appreciate you, brother.
02:49:04.000 Bye.
02:49:05.000 Bye, everybody.
02:49:06.000 Bye.