The Joe Rogan Experience - April 10, 2024


Joe Rogan Experience #2133 - Brendan O'Neill


Episode Stats

Length

2 hours and 33 minutes

Words per Minute

173.54327

Word Count

26,636

Sentence Count

1,782

Misogynist Sentences

62

Hate Speech Sentences

124


Summary

In this episode, Brent sits down with Joe Rogan to talk about his fear of the end of the world, and why we should all be worried about it. They talk about how the fear-mongering we see in the news comes from a place of financial gain and moral gain, and how we need to stop feeding into the fear machine. Joe also talks about why he thinks there's no such thing as an end-of-the-world scenario and why it's a scam designed to keep us awake at night. And Brent gives us his thoughts on Greta Thunberg's new song, How dare you? and how it s a good thing Greta's become a celebrity by saying something like, "Let's get ready to rumble." And we talk about what it means to be a "green girl" and how to deal with the idea that you can be a celebrity in a world where you don't need to be green. Thanks to Brent for being on the show, and for being kind enough to take the time to be on the podcast, and to have the courage to share it with the world. Joe is a great guy, and I hope you enjoy this episode. If you like what you hear, please tell a friend or a colleague about it on social media. or tell me what you think about it! and let me know what you thought of it in the comments section below! Thanks again for listening, Brent! Cheers, Brent, Joe, and Brent, and God bless you're a good dude! xoxo, Caitie, Caitlyn, and good night, and Good Luck, and Peace, Blessings, and Blessings. -Eugene, Sarah, and Much Love, - Caitlyn and Joe - EJ xo, Sarah, - Evan, and Joe, Kristy, and Ryan, and Gorms, XOXO, Caitlyn & Joe, Thank you, Sarah and Glynis, and the Crew, and Thank You, Joe, Joe Thank You! - Sarah, Rachael, and Ben, and Jack, and Rachie, and Jai, and Nick, and Matt, and all the rest of the crew at The End of the World? - The End Of The World Podcast, by the End of The World, by Night, All Day?


Transcript

00:00:01.000 Joe Rogan Podcast, check it out!
00:00:04.000 The Joe Rogan Experience.
00:00:06.000 Train by day, Joe Rogan Podcast by night, all day.
00:00:12.000 Brent, what's up?
00:00:14.000 Joe, how you doing?
00:00:14.000 It is my goal before the end of the world to talk to as many interesting people as possible.
00:00:19.000 And it feels like that's kind of ramped up lately.
00:00:22.000 So I saw you on Trigonometry and I was introduced to your stuff through that.
00:00:26.000 And then I watched a bunch of your conversations online.
00:00:28.000 So I'm excited to talk to you, man.
00:00:30.000 Thanks for being here.
00:00:31.000 I'm so happy to be here.
00:00:33.000 You wouldn't believe it.
00:00:34.000 So thank you for having me.
00:00:35.000 My pleasure.
00:00:36.000 Yeah, because it does seem like I really do want to talk to as many people as I can before you can't talk to anybody anymore.
00:00:40.000 Yeah, well, exactly.
00:00:42.000 Who knows, you know, how long before talking to people is outlawed?
00:00:45.000 Or certainly talking to people like me and people like you.
00:00:48.000 Well, I don't think that's going to happen likely any time in the future.
00:00:52.000 I think too many people push back against it.
00:00:54.000 But I think it certainly could make it increasingly more difficult.
00:00:57.000 My real fear is that we do something so stupid that we lose all communication, period.
00:01:03.000 I have a real fear of World War III. I haven't had since I was a kid.
00:01:08.000 When I was a kid, growing up in the 80s, we were legitimately worried that we were going to get into a nuclear war with Russia.
00:01:14.000 It was a real fear.
00:01:16.000 And I remember when the fall...
00:01:19.000 In the fall of the Soviet Union, it was like a weight had been lifted off the shoulders of the earth.
00:01:24.000 Yeah.
00:01:24.000 Like, we're like, oh my god, thank god, it's over.
00:01:26.000 I remember those days in the 80s.
00:01:28.000 We watched a film at school called The Day After.
00:01:31.000 Did you see that?
00:01:32.000 Which is a film about...
00:01:34.000 I think we've talked about that.
00:01:35.000 Didn't we talk about that before?
00:01:37.000 A film about after nuclear war?
00:01:38.000 Yeah, it's a film about Russia bombing America.
00:01:41.000 It's very depressing.
00:01:41.000 But we watched it at school and we had numerous discussions about what would we do in the event of a nuclear holocaust?
00:01:48.000 How would we try to survive it?
00:01:50.000 But it was on our minds all the time.
00:01:52.000 And there was also other apocalyptic scenarios, if you recall, like acid rain was a big one.
00:01:57.000 The ozone layer was another one.
00:01:59.000 My childhood was full of fears that the end of the world was nigh.
00:02:03.000 And I think people feel that again today for different reasons and my approach to it is always to think, well, where are the real problems in terms of civilization really grinding to a halt?
00:02:15.000 And what are the unreal problems that are just designed to whip up fear and make us panic and make us fret about the future?
00:02:22.000 So I think distinguishing between those two things is probably quite important.
00:02:25.000 It is very important.
00:02:26.000 It's also very important to recognize that when there's a thing that is getting people whipped up and it's in the news constantly, for sure someone's making money.
00:02:35.000 That's why it's doing it.
00:02:37.000 I used to think they were warning us about the real dangers of this or that.
00:02:42.000 I don't think that anymore.
00:02:43.000 Now I think they can justify the fear-mongering by saying it's a legitimate concern because it has the opinions of a few people attached to it.
00:02:53.000 But ultimately what they're doing is they're somehow or another using it to make money.
00:02:57.000 Yeah.
00:02:57.000 Well, they're either making money or they're making moral mileage or both.
00:03:01.000 So if you look at global warming is a perfect example, right?
00:03:04.000 The climate change catastrophe or the climate catastrophe as we now have to call it.
00:03:08.000 There are a lot of people invested in this end-of-the-world scenario who are making a lot of money from alternative sources of energy.
00:03:15.000 But just as important as that, I think, they're making moral mileage.
00:03:20.000 It's the issue through which they can pose as the saviors of humanity.
00:03:24.000 And it gives them a real sense of purpose.
00:03:26.000 I mean, Al Gore is a classic example.
00:03:28.000 He both makes money from climate change fear-mongering.
00:03:31.000 And he also positions himself as a global authority on how to save humankind from the next apocalypse.
00:03:37.000 So I think it's a combination of financial reward and moral reward that draws people to these apocalyptic scenarios.
00:03:44.000 Absolutely.
00:03:45.000 And also audience capture in the case of like Greta Thunberg.
00:03:49.000 Here's this young lady who's become a celebrity by saying, how dare you?
00:03:54.000 That was it.
00:03:55.000 That's all it took.
00:03:55.000 That's all it took.
00:03:56.000 We're in the Catch Me Outside Girl phase.
00:04:00.000 All you need is like a good slogan.
00:04:03.000 Let's get ready to rumble.
00:04:04.000 Whatever it is.
00:04:05.000 She's the green version of the Catch Me Outside Girl.
00:04:07.000 That's what she is.
00:04:08.000 It's the same thing.
00:04:09.000 But it's like with someone like Greta, I think it was funny for a while that you had this 16-year-old kid saying, how dare you, having a temper tantrum in public, essentially.
00:04:18.000 And all these politicians in America and Britain and across Europe were falling at her feet and staring at her in this wide-eyed fashion like she was some messianic figure come to deliver humanity from the end of the world.
00:04:31.000 But more recently, I think the Greta Thunberg cult is just not funny anymore because she's now going around Europe and telling governments to stop investing in energy production, to stop investing in fossil fuel companies during an energy crisis.
00:04:47.000 And how old is she?
00:04:48.000 She's 21 now.
00:04:49.000 She should know far better.
00:04:51.000 Just imagine.
00:04:52.000 Just imagine being 21 and having the president listening to you.
00:04:56.000 You know how dumb I was when I was 21?
00:05:00.000 I was shockingly stupid.
00:05:03.000 Shockingly stupid.
00:05:05.000 When she started and she was 16, 17, she was very young, I often think to myself, when I was 16 and 17, the thought of being in public and saying things, I would have said the craziest stuff.
00:05:16.000 But that's exactly what she did.
00:05:18.000 And I think the problem is that there were so many people in the adult world who were willing to listen to her.
00:05:24.000 And who engaged in her hysteria about the end of the world.
00:05:28.000 And so I often see the Greta phenomenon as a perfect example of how on the one side you have these cranks who are talking nonsense and pushing ideas that are just not true.
00:05:39.000 But the bigger problem is the political world and the media world who really buy into it and give it meaning and give it emphasis.
00:05:49.000 And I think there's that kind of two-way relationship between these things.
00:05:52.000 I'm not saying that like Greta Thunberg is not an intelligent person because she clearly is and she's very young.
00:05:58.000 And again, I was way dumber than her when I was her age.
00:06:01.000 But what she said was not this extraordinary message of wisdom that would merit the kind of attention that she got.
00:06:11.000 And that's why – and also it's not within her power as a 16-year-old to get in front of all these people.
00:06:17.000 So it's kind of like a form of exploitation.
00:06:20.000 I mean, it's a willing exploitation, but you're using her as a political pawn for, like, sort of cementing an opinion that you must have on this subject.
00:06:34.000 That's absolutely what happened.
00:06:36.000 You know, like every other teenager, she was narcissistic, self-involved.
00:06:45.000 Panicking about the adult world and how crazy it is.
00:06:47.000 Of course.
00:06:48.000 That's what every teenager's like.
00:06:49.000 We all went through that period.
00:06:50.000 I did it.
00:06:51.000 Yeah, we all do it.
00:06:52.000 We all did it.
00:06:52.000 We screamed, how dare you, at our parents.
00:06:54.000 We thought, they're oppressing me.
00:06:56.000 They won't let me go out.
00:06:57.000 They won't let me do this.
00:06:58.000 We all have these kind of oppression complexes when we're teenagers.
00:07:01.000 Yes.
00:07:02.000 The problem with hers is that it became this public spectacle.
00:07:05.000 And it became a public spectacle precisely as a consequence of the political class Who said, you know, give us more.
00:07:12.000 Really sock it to us.
00:07:14.000 It was almost like a kind of sadomasochistic relationship between these self-hating elites and this teenage girl who was more than willing to whip them in public.
00:07:24.000 And you had this kind of...
00:07:25.000 It was mutually beneficial.
00:07:28.000 She got to feel like she was saving the world.
00:07:30.000 They got to feel like they were being told off for being, you know, the rulers of the world.
00:07:34.000 And it was beneficial for both sides.
00:07:35.000 But when you look back on it, it was creepy as hell.
00:07:39.000 It's very creepy.
00:07:40.000 Here's something to consider too.
00:07:42.000 At what level are people immune to the bullshit that they're talking about?
00:07:50.000 Here's an example about Hollywood.
00:07:54.000 When I would talk to people that didn't work in television, and they had these ideas of what they're doing with television shows, You know, oh, they're pushing this, or they're creating that, or they're trying to sedate America with nonsense,
00:08:10.000 and they're being told to do it by the government.
00:08:12.000 I'm like, no, no, no, listen.
00:08:13.000 The people making these shows watch these shows.
00:08:15.000 They like making them.
00:08:17.000 This is what they're trying to do.
00:08:18.000 They like watching sitcoms, they like making game shows.
00:08:21.000 So they're as trapped in it as you.
00:08:25.000 Yeah, it is dumbing down the world, 100%.
00:08:28.000 Reality shows are dumbing down the world.
00:08:30.000 But the people watching the reality shows are the same as the people making them.
00:08:35.000 They all watch them.
00:08:36.000 Like, they're making dumb shit because people consume dumb shit, and that's not a conspiracy.
00:08:42.000 That's just a market decision.
00:08:45.000 And I wonder, when it gets to climate change, when it gets to some of these contentious issues, particularly the climate is a big one, because any scientist, regardless of how wise they are and how well-read they are and how much they understand about their field of study,
00:09:03.000 If they have anything that deviates from the narrative, they're like automatically dismissed.
00:09:08.000 Even ones that will talk about long-term temperatures of the Earth.
00:09:12.000 It's almost like they don't want you to talk about long-term temperatures of the Earth.
00:09:15.000 No, no, no.
00:09:17.000 But there has never been a time in our lifetime.
00:09:19.000 All these things are true.
00:09:21.000 But if you look at long term, you recognize, oh, it's never static.
00:09:27.000 Even when humans didn't exist, it does all this.
00:09:31.000 There's a lot of factors going on constantly.
00:09:34.000 And to not consider that, and to only consider what's happening during our lifetime...
00:09:39.000 Not take into account volcanic activity.
00:09:42.000 Not take into account – you're blaming cow farts.
00:09:45.000 You know what I mean?
00:09:46.000 Like there's so many weird things that we do when we attach an ideology to a science.
00:09:53.000 So the science of climate change is fascinating, right?
00:09:57.000 It really is.
00:09:58.000 It's like taking into account all these factors, CO2 in the atmosphere and solar flares and what's going on with volcanic activity and cloud cover and pollution and all these different factors.
00:10:12.000 But if you don't like toe the line and say this is a catastrophe, if you just want to look at it objectively, you're a heretic.
00:10:20.000 You're cast out of the kingdom.
00:10:22.000 Yeah, that's precisely the problem.
00:10:24.000 I think there are probably more climate change skeptics out there than we realize, but there is a cost to saying what you think.
00:10:31.000 There is a social cost.
00:10:32.000 There is a professional cost.
00:10:34.000 If you say, listen, climate change might well be happening.
00:10:37.000 There may be a human contributory factor, but it's not the end of the world.
00:10:42.000 A billion people are not going to die.
00:10:44.000 That's bullshit.
00:10:45.000 There's no evidence for that whatsoever.
00:10:47.000 And we will probably be fine if we focus on it and fix it.
00:10:50.000 If you say anything like that, even something quite moderate, you will be denounced as a climate change denier.
00:10:56.000 People will say get them off the BBC, get them off the airwaves, no platform them from universities.
00:11:02.000 We can't have these heretics speaking in the public sphere.
00:11:05.000 So all of that...
00:11:07.000 Instinct for cancellation trickles down through society.
00:11:11.000 And the message it sends to ordinary people is, listen, you might be skeptical of this stuff, but the price of speaking out is too high.
00:11:18.000 So don't even bother.
00:11:20.000 So I wouldn't be surprised if there were more people out there than we realize who think to themselves, okay, pollution's a problem, climate change may well be a big issue, but it's not the end of the world.
00:11:30.000 But they feel they can't say it because this entire grammar of condemnation has been created.
00:11:35.000 To depict these people as handmaidens of the apocalypse, as deniers whose words will literally kill people.
00:11:43.000 And when you have that put on you, when you are told that, when you are told that your thoughts could be so damaging that they will kill people, It silences.
00:11:53.000 It makes people kind of retreat and say, well, I'll keep it to myself.
00:11:56.000 I won't say it out loud.
00:11:57.000 So climate change is a perfect example of where censorship does far more harm than good because it restricts our ability to have the discussion about pollution and so on that we really need to have.
00:12:10.000 I have a friend who's a scientist who emailed me.
00:12:13.000 Did you have a climate denier on your podcast?
00:12:16.000 And this was a while back.
00:12:18.000 And I said, no, he's not a climate denier at all.
00:12:21.000 What he simply stated is the fact that the Earth is actually greener now than it has been in I don't know how many hundreds of years.
00:12:29.000 And that what's really terrifying is a global cooling.
00:12:35.000 When he was talking about there have been times on Earth where the world had gotten so cold that we had crossed this threshold where the atmosphere was tolerable for biological life.
00:12:49.000 We got very close, like within a few digits.
00:12:52.000 Yeah.
00:12:52.000 That's what's spooky.
00:12:54.000 What's really spooky is that what we're in right now is the Goldilocks zone.
00:12:59.000 This is about as good as the Earth ever gets.
00:13:03.000 And we have all these mitigating factors, right?
00:13:05.000 Air conditioning, housing.
00:13:07.000 This is the best time ever to deal with errant climate.
00:13:11.000 Yeah.
00:13:12.000 But if it cools, we're fucked!
00:13:15.000 Yeah.
00:13:15.000 Well, it's like, you know, the truth is that the climate change alarmists, which is how I prefer to refer to environmentalists, climate change alarmists, they're lying to us.
00:13:25.000 When they say that more people than ever are dying as a consequence of natural disasters, it's not true.
00:13:31.000 My favorite part is when they attach it to racism.
00:13:34.000 Everything's racist.
00:13:35.000 More people of color are dying because of climate change.
00:13:37.000 You better fucking do something, otherwise you're a racist.
00:13:40.000 It's really simple checkers.
00:13:42.000 And it's simply untrue.
00:13:45.000 In fact, the number of people dying as a consequence of natural disasters is plummeting, and it has been since the birth of modernity.
00:13:51.000 Why?
00:13:52.000 Because...
00:13:53.000 Capitalist society, modern society, post-industrial revolution, we got better at keeping in check the whims of Mother Nature.
00:14:02.000 So how do they monkey with those numbers?
00:14:04.000 When they twist the numbers around to make it seem like, you know...
00:14:09.000 What would they do that would possibly make it – like what could they call upon that would say like this is affecting certain people in certain parts of the world but not others?
00:14:19.000 I think they use methods of distortion.
00:14:22.000 They bank on people not looking into the truth of the matter and a lot of people don't.
00:14:27.000 So they rely on the unwillingness of lots of people to really explore the issue and to look at what's really going on.
00:14:33.000 A good example was the huge heat wave in Europe last year.
00:14:37.000 Yeah.
00:14:37.000 It was presented in the media as a heat apocalypse.
00:14:40.000 People were going to die.
00:14:42.000 This is the worst thing that's ever happened.
00:14:43.000 That's what it is.
00:14:44.000 They connected to heart failure.
00:14:46.000 Yeah.
00:14:46.000 And they connected it to all of these ailments that would inflict people in Southern Europe in particular.
00:14:51.000 And they said it was unprecedented.
00:14:53.000 And it's not true.
00:14:55.000 There have been huge heatwaves in the past, far worse than the ones we had last year.
00:14:58.000 But they rely on that kind of historical ignorance, that kind of unwillingness of people to understand, as you say, that nature has been in flux since the beginning of time.
00:15:08.000 And that's how it works.
00:15:09.000 And this willingness to monkey with the truth just to push a narrative.
00:15:13.000 It's so bizarre.
00:15:15.000 And it's so bizarre that it goes all the way down to gender experiments on children.
00:15:22.000 That's how far, which you would think would be the people that we would protect the most from bad decisions, the people that we protect the most historically, children, little kids, little kids that are confused and may have insane parents.
00:15:37.000 They're trying to talk them into something, which is a real thing.
00:15:40.000 Yeah, little kids who have now been sacrificed at the altar of gender ideology.
00:15:44.000 This is child sacrifice in a modern form.
00:15:47.000 That's what's happening.
00:15:47.000 And their bodies are being used to prove an ideological point, which is this ideological point that gender identity is innate.
00:15:57.000 We're born with it.
00:15:59.000 You have it from birth.
00:16:00.000 And in order to prove this hocus-pocus idea, which has absolutely no basis in evidence or proof whatsoever...
00:16:06.000 They have to experiment on children.
00:16:08.000 They have to give them drugs.
00:16:10.000 They have to start performing surgeries on them when they reach a certain age.
00:16:13.000 They have to cut off their breasts if they're a confused girl, castrate them if they're a confused boy.
00:16:18.000 And what you have here in this grotesque manipulation of children's bodies is literally the sacrifice of children to an ideological crusade and the ideological crusade of gender ideology.
00:16:31.000 And in order for adults, men who want to pretend to be women, primarily, and women who want to pretend to be men, in order to justify their existence, they have to pull children into the equation and say, well, it's an innate experience,
00:16:47.000 you're born with it, and we're going to prove this by giving them puberty blockers, by putting them on a conveyor belt towards surgery, by screwing them up for life, which is what this essentially does.
00:16:57.000 That is a very good example of how problematic ideological obsessions can be because what you end up with is a situation where children's lives are fucked up in the name of an ideological crusade and that's really bad.
00:17:14.000 Trevor Burrus And it's real and it's happening and it's so bizarre.
00:17:19.000 To watch people slide into this cult-like thinking in mass.
00:17:24.000 And you see millions of people that support this.
00:17:27.000 But I think it's enough of a mindfuck to wake up the people that aren't in the haze of it all and go, hey, this is something you actually have to fight back against.
00:17:35.000 Yeah.
00:17:36.000 Because this is insane.
00:17:37.000 I think the optimist in me thinks that in the future, in 20 years or so, people will look back at this period and they will say, hold on, you gave kids puberty-blocking drugs?
00:17:48.000 Well, they've already stopped doing that in the UK. Yeah, they've stopped doing that in the UK. We have stopped doing that.
00:17:52.000 I mean, you can still get them privately, but the National Health Service has stopped prescribing puberty.
00:17:56.000 Did you hear about the guy in Canada?
00:17:58.000 This guy in Canada that's suing the government because he wants a vagina.
00:18:02.000 Yeah.
00:18:02.000 So he has a penis.
00:18:04.000 He wants a penis and a vagina.
00:18:05.000 Yeah.
00:18:05.000 He wants to be whatever.
00:18:07.000 He wants to be non-binary.
00:18:09.000 Yeah.
00:18:09.000 Like literally.
00:18:10.000 Yeah.
00:18:10.000 Someone wrote an article for Spiked where I work saying, well, this means he can go fuck himself, right?
00:18:16.000 If he's got both.
00:18:17.000 But also, here's the question.
00:18:19.000 Where do you put it?
00:18:22.000 I mean, you're running out of space there, fella.
00:18:24.000 Like, if you want both.
00:18:25.000 I mean, this might be a bullshit lawsuit.
00:18:27.000 We might be able to just, like, stop this with a biologist.
00:18:31.000 Yeah.
00:18:31.000 Where are you going to put it?
00:18:32.000 Right?
00:18:32.000 Where is it going to go?
00:18:33.000 There's no room, buddy.
00:18:35.000 It's, um...
00:18:36.000 I mean, it's...
00:18:38.000 Who could have guessed we would be having this conversation?
00:18:40.000 If you went back ten years, even five years, you would never have imagined that we'd be having a conversation like this where someone wants a dick and a vagina at the same time.
00:18:48.000 Is that more offensive than the guy who wants to make breast milk for his baby?
00:18:55.000 That's really bad.
00:18:56.000 That's uber bizarre.
00:18:58.000 So there's this case in Britain of the breastfeeding.
00:19:01.000 I think it's Canada as well.
00:19:02.000 Yeah, there was one in the UK. What was interesting about the UK experience is that there was ITV News, which is a major news channel in Britain.
00:19:11.000 They interviewed women who are struggling as a consequence of the cost of living crisis.
00:19:17.000 And one of the women they interviewed is a man.
00:19:19.000 It's a bloke in a dress who claims to be a mother of a child.
00:19:23.000 And it turns out that this person breastfeeds his child.
00:19:26.000 What that means is he gets his baby to suck on his male nipple, his useless, milk-free, non-lactating male nipple.
00:19:35.000 But I think they make them lactate now.
00:19:37.000 This is the point.
00:19:38.000 There's certain medications that you can give a biological male and they'll produce breast milk.
00:19:43.000 Yeah, but it's not milk.
00:19:44.000 It's not real.
00:19:45.000 Are you a connoisseur?
00:19:47.000 Sir, have you had a good tit milk sommelier visit you and give you some samplings?
00:19:52.000 It's not what nature intended, is it?
00:19:55.000 But every man biologically starts off as a female in the womb.
00:20:00.000 And it's the introduction of testosterone and all the factors and the XY chromosome.
00:20:04.000 That's what turns us into male.
00:20:05.000 But we start off as female.
00:20:07.000 So do we have the hardware?
00:20:08.000 And is this medication just igniting?
00:20:11.000 I mean, it's grotesque.
00:20:12.000 Don't get me wrong.
00:20:13.000 And it's also, it seems weird that you're having a baby suck on your tits and you're a guy.
00:20:17.000 It seems oddly sexual, right?
00:20:20.000 In a way that it doesn't seem like with a woman at all.
00:20:23.000 It's like, all of a sudden, like, what are you doing?
00:20:25.000 Why are you doing that?
00:20:26.000 Why do you want to do that?
00:20:27.000 But think about it.
00:20:28.000 If you saw a man who looks like a man, a man who looks like you, on the street, with a baby attached to his nipple, you'd call the cops.
00:20:35.000 You'd punch him in the face.
00:20:36.000 You'd do something.
00:20:37.000 I definitely wouldn't punch him if the baby was in his arms.
00:20:40.000 Take the baby away first.
00:20:42.000 Call social services.
00:20:44.000 You'd be going to jail.
00:20:45.000 Yeah, but the thing about breastfeeding men that I find gruesomely interesting is that firstly, it's just not true that men can lactate in the same way that women can and the drugs that they take in order to mimic lactation.
00:21:00.000 Actually makes whatever secretion comes from their horrible nipples worse for the baby, right?
00:21:07.000 Because it's full of drugs.
00:21:08.000 It's full of really gross content.
00:21:10.000 So it just shouldn't happen.
00:21:13.000 But it's an indication of how far society has gone down the avenue of validating everyone's identity.
00:21:20.000 So we even have to validate the identity of the freaky man who thinks he has the right and the ability to breastfeed his kid.
00:21:29.000 Yeah.
00:21:29.000 And if you stand up and say, no, this is not breastfeeding.
00:21:32.000 This is a form of child abuse.
00:21:34.000 A man shouldn't put his nipple in a child's mouth.
00:21:36.000 You are denounced as a transphobe.
00:21:38.000 You are denounced as a bigot.
00:21:39.000 You are denounced as someone who is a horrible person.
00:21:42.000 So that's the problem.
00:21:45.000 I mean...
00:21:46.000 Which is cool.
00:21:47.000 What can you even say at this stage?
00:21:50.000 Hold on a second.
00:21:50.000 Put that back up.
00:21:52.000 Person also revealed that he was HIV positive and acknowledged that the transmission of the condition to his baby through milk is possible if viral load becomes detectable.
00:22:04.000 Despite having been continuously monitored for 18 and a half years of his life, he also promised to undergo testing monthly to mitigate risk.
00:22:11.000 What a sweetheart.
00:22:12.000 The test is HIV positive fake tit milk.
00:22:17.000 It's unbelievable.
00:22:18.000 It's unbelievable.
00:22:19.000 And everybody's like, yeah, you're not crazy.
00:22:20.000 You shouldn't be in jail.
00:22:21.000 That's the problem.
00:22:22.000 The problem is, I mean, they've always been freaks.
00:22:25.000 They've always been weirdos.
00:22:26.000 They've always been absolute losers and tossers who do bad things to kids and everyone else.
00:22:31.000 The problem is society nodding along and saying, this is fabulous.
00:22:35.000 Look at this new identity.
00:22:37.000 This man is breastfeeding a child.
00:22:38.000 The problem is people aiding and abetting these perversions by dressing them up as gender identities.
00:22:46.000 That's the real problem here.
00:22:48.000 But it's crazy because there are people that identify with being a woman and I have no problem with them living their life as a woman.
00:22:56.000 The problem is, without any scrutiny, if you can't scrutinize each person as an individual, and if they're in a protected class, if they're automatically, you know, if they say that they're a woman, like, instantaneously, you have to absolve them of the other sex offender record.
00:23:10.000 Yeah, yeah.
00:23:11.000 Like, you let them walk around the women's room with a heart on, no one can say anything.
00:23:15.000 No.
00:23:17.000 That's just crazy.
00:23:18.000 Like, now you've crossed this line into cult thinking, and I know you don't want to give up any ground, because if you give up ground, then you think the bigots are winning.
00:23:27.000 So it's like this thing where this battle between open-minded people that believe in people's freedom to live their life however they want, and the acknowledgement that perverts and psychos are real things.
00:23:41.000 There's psychos.
00:23:42.000 There's people that want to wear your skin.
00:23:45.000 And if they can hang out in the women's room with you, these are the same kind of people that would do that.
00:23:50.000 Understand that if you just say that any man who says he's a woman, you have to just take them at their word, you are enabling psychos, like real full-on serial killers, to just go into the women's room and you're hoping that they don't have a knife in their bag.
00:24:07.000 You're hoping they're not gonna do something crazy.
00:24:09.000 You're hoping they're not gonna attack someone.
00:24:12.000 You're hoping They're not going to just start masturbating in front of everybody.
00:24:17.000 You're enabling someone who could be completely schizophrenic, absolutely out of their mind, should be in mental health care, but you're allowing them to just wander around the women's room with their pants off.
00:24:29.000 And that's a real thing.
00:24:32.000 This doesn't change This concept of people that are trans.
00:24:37.000 I've met people that are trans like Blair White, who's this famous YouTuber who's trans.
00:24:42.000 You'd think that this is a woman.
00:24:44.000 I'm around a woman.
00:24:45.000 She seems like a woman, lives like a woman, looks like a woman, acts like a woman.
00:24:50.000 You want to be a woman?
00:24:51.000 You want to be Blair?
00:24:51.000 Yeah, you're a woman.
00:24:52.000 I don't even think that's a guy.
00:24:55.000 But then there's also perverts.
00:24:56.000 And if we don't look at people individually, if we lump everyone into this one group, we've gone haywire in this age of information when we have so much of an understanding of the human psyche.
00:25:07.000 For us to ignore vast swaths of everything that we've accumulated under the sanctum of gender ideology, that's crazy.
00:25:17.000 That's crazy.
00:25:18.000 Yeah, I agree.
00:25:20.000 My position on it is pretty simple, which is that You can dress however you want.
00:25:25.000 You can identify however you want.
00:25:27.000 You can change your name from Joe to Joanna.
00:25:29.000 You can do all those things.
00:25:30.000 I have no problem with that at all.
00:25:31.000 You can call yourself trans.
00:25:33.000 You can dress yourself up.
00:25:34.000 That's fine.
00:25:36.000 But when you try to force other people to validate and acknowledge your identity, that's where I have a problem.
00:25:43.000 Because the thing is that if you're dressing up and redefining yourself and changing your name and changing your look, that's your freedom.
00:25:50.000 But if you then say, well, every other woman on the planet has to accept my so-called womanhood and let me into women's spaces, let me partake in women's sports, let me stand for positions that are traditionally reserved for women, then you're interfering with their freedom, their freedom of conscience,
00:26:07.000 their freedom of belief, their freedom to understand biology, that there are men and women and that they are different.
00:26:13.000 So when you have a man, and I would say this goes for any man, both for the perverts who walk around with their tumescent knobs hanging out in a women's changing rooms, and also the men who supposedly look like women.
00:26:27.000 I think it goes for all of them.
00:26:29.000 When we demand that they should have access to women's spaces, what we're really saying is that women have to sacrifice their own freedom of conscience and freedom of belief and genuflect to these men's identities and accept these men's identities.
00:26:44.000 And so there was a case in Los Angeles where there was a man in a spa and he was walking around and he was naked and he was semi-erect and there were women and minors in that women's changing rooms while he was doing that.
00:26:58.000 And we had lots of trans people, trans rights activists, defending his right to do that.
00:27:03.000 That's a defense of flashers' rights.
00:27:06.000 This is the right to flash women.
00:27:08.000 That's what we're talking about here.
00:27:09.000 It gets dressed up as trans rights.
00:27:11.000 But fundamentally, it's the right of a man to show his knob to a woman who doesn't want to see it.
00:27:15.000 And that's where I have a problem, when you try to force other people to bow down to your own identity.
00:27:22.000 What's really crazy is women that support it.
00:27:26.000 Like, do you not understand, like, the whole deal with like Title IX in women's sports has always been keep men from competing with women because it's not fair.
00:27:36.000 You're allowing men to compete with you You're doing it under the gu...
00:27:40.000 and it's not compete with you because the female athletes almost unanimously don't want it.
00:27:45.000 They don't want it.
00:27:46.000 The ones who say they want it are virtue signaling or they're at the end of their career or they don't have a stake in it or they're just dumb.
00:27:52.000 It's just dumb because it's such...
00:27:55.000 it's cheating at the highest level humanly possible.
00:27:58.000 You're pretending you're a different gender and you're just dominating women.
00:28:02.000 And it's fucking crazy that Women will go along with it.
00:28:08.000 It is cheating.
00:28:10.000 Men, but it's also men.
00:28:12.000 By saying you're a woman, you're with them in some strange way.
00:28:17.000 You're allowing a parasite to get into your organism and infect it.
00:28:23.000 And this is what everybody's always concerned about.
00:28:27.000 Dominating women, but entering into women's spaces.
00:28:30.000 The whole reason why I have women gyms.
00:28:31.000 When the fuck have you ever seen a men-only gym?
00:28:34.000 They don't exist.
00:28:35.000 Even martial arts gyms.
00:28:36.000 Go to a Muay Thai gym.
00:28:38.000 There's women all over the place.
00:28:39.000 There's all kinds of people.
00:28:40.000 Everybody can go.
00:28:41.000 But a woman's only gym exists for a specific reason.
00:28:45.000 Because there's dudes that have fucking hard-ons and want to walk around the women's room.
00:28:49.000 And if you allow these perverts to pretend they're women and join these women's spaces, You're letting the wolf into the hen house!
00:28:58.000 Absolutely.
00:28:59.000 And sports is the perfect example of how destructive this can be.
00:29:02.000 I mean, you look at Leah Thomas, the swimmer.
00:29:04.000 Yes.
00:29:04.000 He's a bloke.
00:29:05.000 He's, what, six foot four?
00:29:07.000 He's absolutely huge.
00:29:09.000 He's got all the biological benefits that come from male puberty, which is...
00:29:13.000 Bigger muscles, bigger hands, lungs, everything.
00:29:18.000 All that stuff that we know about.
00:29:20.000 And there's a photograph of him diving off the platform and the female swimmers next to him.
00:29:27.000 And he is so much further out than those women when he's diving because he has the propulsion that comes with that strength that is the gift of male puberty.
00:29:36.000 Not just male puberty, but intact.
00:29:39.000 Intact.
00:29:40.000 And he apparently, according to reports, was parading around the women's changing room so that you have this.
00:29:45.000 So Riley Gaines makes the point that not only was he cheating by taking part in a women's sports where he doesn't belong, but he was also allegedly walking around naked in a women's changing rooms and showing his penis to people who didn't want to see it.
00:29:58.000 Which is why.
00:29:59.000 So you have this double whammy of misogyny.
00:30:02.000 Let's call it what it is.
00:30:03.000 This is a double whammy of misogyny.
00:30:05.000 You're screwing up women's sports.
00:30:06.000 You're screwing up women's right to excel in a sport that they have devoted their lives to.
00:30:11.000 And you're flashing at women who don't want to see your junk.
00:30:15.000 It's a double whammy of misogyny.
00:30:17.000 And what's really crazy to me is that you have so-called progressives, so-called leftists, the people who spent the past 10 years going on about Me Too and feminism and women's rights, cheering this on, cheering on the obliteration of women's sports, cheering on the male cheating against women,
00:30:35.000 cheering on male flashing at women.
00:30:38.000 So the extent to which the world has been turned upside down by the woke ideology, I think sometimes we underestimate just how crazy things have got.
00:30:48.000 Well, it got so crazy that Riley Gaines, who had a draw with this person, like literally to the one-tenth of a second, which very, very, very rarely happens.
00:30:58.000 So they only had one trophy and they gave it to Leah.
00:31:02.000 Which is insane.
00:31:04.000 You got a 6'4 biological male who had a draw with a 5'5 female, and you gave it to the male.
00:31:13.000 That's because you're in a fucking cult.
00:31:15.000 But think about how...
00:31:17.000 Brilliant someone like Riley Gaines has to be to get so close, to be small, diminutive, and yet to get so close to a 6'4 bloke who was a pretty good swimmer, even amongst men, but far less good than he was when he went into the women's.
00:31:33.000 Yeah, not even close, 462 in the country versus one.
00:31:35.000 He was way, way down, but he was a pretty good swimmer.
00:31:38.000 But imagine how brilliant she must be to have got so close to him.
00:31:44.000 I think?
00:32:04.000 But again, it's society's willingness to go along with this insanity that is the real problem.
00:32:10.000 Well, that's what's bizarre.
00:32:11.000 The bizarre thing is the willingness to go along with it and the unwillingness, especially by whether it's the NCAA or whoever it is that's dealing with these situations when they come up, this denial of biological reality.
00:32:27.000 I don't know if you saw the NCAA, one of the women who's a representative was having a conversation with Ted Cruz about biological men competing in women's sports, and he was trying to ask the question, like, why do we have women's sports?
00:32:41.000 Like, why don't we just have everybody compete against everybody?
00:32:44.000 Why do we have women?
00:32:45.000 And the woman was just trying to dance around this, and didn't want, just like, Toro!
00:32:50.000 She was doing, like, mental gymnastics!
00:32:54.000 And it's so crazy to watch People that are either public intellectuals or people that are at the head of these very important organizations for amateur athletics and just not be able to talk about reality.
00:33:09.000 Yeah.
00:33:13.000 Side world.
00:33:14.000 Like we passed into a neighboring dimension where logic is just out the window.
00:33:20.000 And this one thing takes over above everything.
00:33:23.000 And there's all these grifters that are involved in this.
00:33:27.000 There's grifters on the race side.
00:33:29.000 There's grifters on the gender side.
00:33:31.000 There's grifters all around.
00:33:31.000 And they're always talking to the president.
00:33:34.000 They're always in the White House.
00:33:36.000 They're always on the news.
00:33:38.000 And it's a wild time to try to be sane.
00:33:43.000 Yeah.
00:33:43.000 And to try to get a balanced view of what is happening and how far can this go?
00:33:49.000 At a certain point in time, does everybody have to say, hold the fuck on?
00:33:52.000 What are you doing?
00:33:54.000 What is everyone doing?
00:33:55.000 Some people are trying to say that, aren't they?
00:33:58.000 College athletics organization bans trans athletes from participating in women's sports.
00:34:03.000 The NAIA made its decision on Monday.
00:34:06.000 What is the difference between, what is that one?
00:34:09.000 Way smaller schools, like colleges.
00:34:12.000 In the article it says it's 241 different colleges that are part of this.
00:34:16.000 And how does the NCAA treat it right now?
00:34:34.000 And this trans athlete was like, no, that limits my ability to thrive.
00:34:38.000 Yeah, it thrived as a biological male competing in weightlifting against women.
00:34:45.000 If you think about how bad things have got in a short period of time, right?
00:34:49.000 Imagine you went to a bar or a pub, as we call them in England, 10, 15 years ago.
00:34:55.000 Right.
00:34:57.000 Right.
00:34:59.000 Right.
00:35:24.000 It is a real thing, but some of them really look like women.
00:35:28.000 That's real, too.
00:35:29.000 We have to acknowledge that.
00:35:30.000 Some of them look like women, but they're not women.
00:35:32.000 And I think we have to be honest about that.
00:35:34.000 That's true.
00:35:35.000 They're biological males.
00:35:36.000 Period.
00:35:37.000 They're men.
00:35:37.000 And so the question has to become – there's a case in Australia at the moment where a woman, a real woman, as we have to say nowadays, set up an app.
00:35:48.000 And this was an app for women to get together and share information, to communicate, to make friendships and so on.
00:35:55.000 And a biological male who claims to be a woman tried to join the app and he was booted out.
00:35:59.000 And he really doesn't look like a woman.
00:36:02.000 He is just a big bloke in a dress.
00:36:04.000 And now there's a court case.
00:36:06.000 There's a federal court case in America where this bloke is demanding his right to access this space.
00:36:10.000 And I think what we have is this really surreal situation where even after years of feminism, and some feminism was good, right?
00:36:20.000 It really did liberate women from drudgery and gave them the right to vote, gave them the right to work.
00:36:26.000 I think those were wonderful leaps forward for humanity.
00:36:30.000 The equalization of women with men was a wonderful thing.
00:36:33.000 Some of the feminism was bad.
00:36:34.000 Victim feminism.
00:36:36.000 Me Too, I think, was quite hysterical and led to the demonization and punishment of men often on the basis of no evidence at all.
00:36:44.000 But generally speaking, we've had feminism for the past hundred years or so.
00:36:49.000 And yet right now in 2024, we have a situation where if you want to be considered a good progressive person, you have to support the right of men to cheat in sport.
00:37:00.000 You have to support the right of men to go into a women's changing rooms and show people their penis.
00:37:05.000 You have to support the right of men to go into a women's domestic violence shelter and demand assistance.
00:37:11.000 You have to support the right of men who commit crimes, including rape, To be placed in women's prisons and that's literally happened in the UK. It's happened in America as well.
00:37:20.000 Right, so you have to support the right of men to invade every single space that all of us previously acknowledged as being for women only if you want to be considered a good progressive person.
00:37:30.000 That is a warping of principle of the like we haven't seen in a very long time and I think it's really worth trying to get to grips with what's going on here.
00:37:39.000 Yeah, it's insanely bizarre.
00:37:42.000 And the adherence to this ideology, even when the person's a murderer.
00:37:47.000 There was a story in the New York Times about this guy who had beheaded his neighbor.
00:37:51.000 You know the story?
00:37:51.000 Yeah.
00:37:52.000 It's the craziest story.
00:37:54.000 It was a woman.
00:37:55.000 A woman beheaded her neighbor.
00:37:57.000 Like, that sounds crazy.
00:37:59.000 Like, how many women chop people's heads off?
00:38:01.000 Turns out it's not really a woman.
00:38:03.000 It's a biological man.
00:38:05.000 That was reported in the New York Times.
00:38:06.000 It was also reported in the BBC in the UK. As a woman.
00:38:10.000 And it was woman.
00:38:12.000 On the BBC, you had to wait till the very last sentence before it said, this is a person who identifies as a woman.
00:38:19.000 So most people don't read the whole article.
00:38:20.000 They will just look at the first few paragraphs.
00:38:23.000 But they don't even say biological male who identifies as a woman?
00:38:26.000 No, they just say someone.
00:38:28.000 That's the news!
00:38:30.000 That's the news.
00:38:30.000 That's so scary!
00:38:31.000 But what's interesting to me about that story in particular is that when I read it, and I think this guy is like 80 years old.
00:38:37.000 He's quite old.
00:38:38.000 Yeah, he's 80. And I remember thinking, hold on, this is really weird.
00:38:41.000 80-year-old women don't behead women.
00:38:44.000 I've never heard of anything like that in my life.
00:38:46.000 80-year-old women tend to be pretty frail, usually quite small.
00:38:51.000 They don't usually have the strength to do something as grotesque as that.
00:38:54.000 And then you discover halfway through the article in the New York Times at the very end of the article in the BBC that it's a bloke.
00:39:00.000 Of course it's a bloke.
00:39:02.000 But this is where we really get to the Orwellian stage of what's going on right now because this is the sacrifice of news to ideology and that is literally the storyline of 1984. Winston Smith's job in 1984 in the Ministry of Truth is to rewrite news articles To ensure that they accord with the ideology of the party.
00:39:27.000 And that's literally what's happening right now.
00:39:29.000 News articles are being rewritten.
00:39:31.000 The truth has been sucked out of them.
00:39:33.000 The truth in this case was that an 80-year-old man murdered a woman.
00:39:37.000 And he had murdered women previously, in fact.
00:39:39.000 That was the truth.
00:39:40.000 The truth was sucked out and it was replaced with a lie.
00:39:44.000 And the lie was that an 80-year-old woman had beheaded a woman.
00:39:47.000 So you have this profoundly Orwellian interference with truth and reality, this remoulding of reality so that it suits the ideology of the ruling class.
00:39:58.000 And that is right out of 1984. That really is the stuff of dystopia.
00:40:03.000 And that is indicative, I think, of where we're at right now.
00:40:07.000 It's also indicative of a condition that takes place when people are under extreme duress, where they sort of just, they give in to ideologies much easier.
00:40:17.000 And, you know, we really saw that during COVID. COVID people just gave in and all of a sudden, like, here's another one, trust the pharmaceutical drug companies to not lie, which was never the case.
00:40:30.000 Nobody trusted them before that.
00:40:32.000 If you had polled people in 2017...
00:40:35.000 Like after the Vioxx scandal and after we knew about the opioid crisis and the Sackler family and all that.
00:40:41.000 If you polled people back then and asked them what their faith in the pharmaceutical drug companies was and how many of them do you think are lying, oh my god, it'd be off the charts.
00:40:49.000 Most people distrust them.
00:40:51.000 Most people wouldn't think they'd be telling the truth.
00:40:52.000 And then it switched over to if you don't trust them, you're a Nazi.
00:40:56.000 You're a fascist.
00:40:58.000 You should die.
00:40:59.000 We hope you get the disease and die.
00:41:00.000 You're a plague rat.
00:41:02.000 And that is just immediately going into climate change.
00:41:06.000 And a lot of the same hysterical people who were up in arms about people's non-willingness to participate in experimental medication now are like, if you don't 100% support climate change, you don't drive an electric car,
00:41:21.000 you're not doing all the things that you're supposed to be doing, you're on the wrong side of everything.
00:41:26.000 You're on the wrong side of history.
00:41:28.000 And if you try to corner those people, And ask them for something is like so interesting and fascinating about climate.
00:41:35.000 It's so bizarre that that one got attached so like rigorously to ideology because it's such it's a fascinating conversation like what makes like what is the difference between us surviving and not surviving?
00:41:48.000 Like what degrees hotter would it get where we'd be fucked?
00:41:51.000 What degrees colder would it get would be fucked?
00:41:53.000 Like, how lucky are we that we're on this planet that's protected by a moon, that's the perfect distance from the sun?
00:41:59.000 Like, holy shit!
00:42:01.000 This is fragile.
00:42:02.000 But what's interesting about both of those issues, COVID and climate change, is that what people will say is that in a time of crisis, we can't afford the luxury of dissent.
00:42:13.000 Or we can't afford you, but you don't even understand it.
00:42:16.000 That was my point.
00:42:17.000 It's like, these people that will argue, like violently, That you should adhere to climate.
00:42:22.000 When you start asking them questions like, what percentage of carbon is in the atmosphere?
00:42:26.000 Like, what is the consequences of it raising or lowering?
00:42:28.000 What's the negative consequences of it lowering?
00:42:31.000 And they can't answer that stuff.
00:42:33.000 They don't know.
00:42:33.000 And the thing is that, you know, my retort to those people on both of those issues, COVID and climate change, is that it's precisely in a time of...
00:42:51.000 Yes.
00:42:53.000 Yes.
00:42:56.000 Yes.
00:43:06.000 This is a serious virus.
00:43:07.000 It's a modern-day plague.
00:43:09.000 We can't afford any form of dissent.
00:43:12.000 We can't afford any form of questioning or any deviance from the lockdown narrative, and therefore we will punish it severely as and when it arises.
00:43:20.000 That was entirely the wrong approach because if you're going to lock down a whole society...
00:43:25.000 In the UK, we were put under house arrest.
00:43:28.000 We were allowed to leave our homes once a day.
00:43:31.000 A hotline was set up by the cops.
00:43:33.000 So that you could report your neighbours if they left their house more than once a day.
00:43:38.000 And it was a completely surreal situation where we had the utter decimation of civil liberty in a way that had not happened ever before in the history of our country.
00:43:49.000 And yet we were told this is not the time to raise questions.
00:43:53.000 This is not the time for debate.
00:43:54.000 Debate is a luxury that we can't afford until we go back to normal.
00:43:57.000 That is utterly wrong.
00:43:59.000 It's precisely when there is an issue facing our society, a real...
00:44:03.000 Confronting problem that we need to have as free a discussion as possible in order that we might have made the right decision in March 2020, in my view, which is that rather than locking down, we should have had a Swedish-style scenario where people were given advice, you know, you might not want to go here,
00:44:19.000 you might not want to go there, but we're going to leave schools open, we're going to let you make your own decisions.
00:44:24.000 Trusting people to make their own decisions, galvanizing people to come together as a community in order to help those who might be affected by COVID. That would have been a far better alternative to this brutish locking down of the entire society so that people's freedom was completely and utterly crushed.
00:44:42.000 But it's a good example of how when you sideline debate, when you restrict freedom of speech and freedom of dissent, you end up with really tyrannical situations.
00:44:52.000 Puberty blockers, the net zero hysteria, the COVID lockdowns, all of those in some ways are a product of crushing dissent, crushing freedom of speech, restricting people's right to put their hand in the air and say, hold on,
00:45:08.000 is this the right thing to do?
00:45:10.000 So freedom of speech, I think, is essential to all of these questions and the right of our society to do the right thing rather than making these terrible mistakes.
00:45:18.000 Without a doubt.
00:45:19.000 And that was one of the most terrifying things about the Twitter files, was finding out that our own government was involved in limiting the freedom of speech of experts, of people from Stanford and Harvard.
00:45:33.000 Who were dissenting about the way things were handled during the pandemic.
00:45:38.000 That you're literally deciding that some of the smartest people on earth Shouldn't be allowed to talk because they don't fit this narrative that we all need to follow in order to survive.
00:45:47.000 I'm hoping that most people woke the fuck up after that.
00:45:52.000 And even if you went along with it in the beginning and you haven't apologized or you haven't consented to the fact that you were incorrect, even if you haven't just accepted it entirely, there's a part of you that knows the world got fucked over.
00:46:07.000 There's a part of you that knows.
00:46:09.000 So when some more nonsense comes around, Maybe hold the line a little better this time.
00:46:14.000 And maybe next time when you're forced to adhere to very specific rules that are designed to save us from whatever thing that they have going on.
00:46:28.000 Like starvation.
00:46:29.000 We have to give all the farms over to the government because we can't allow people to decide how much food gets made and how much...
00:46:36.000 Yeah, then you have North Korea.
00:46:38.000 Yeah.
00:46:39.000 It's a slippery fucking slope, kids.
00:46:41.000 But it's interesting to hear you say that, Joe, because one thing I've realized with COVID-19 is that there's this real culture of amnesia has set in.
00:46:51.000 I was thinking about this recently.
00:46:52.000 I was thinking, when I hang out with friends and family members and have a drink or whatever, I was thinking it's really weird.
00:46:58.000 No one ever talks about lockdown.
00:47:00.000 You know, when you meet friends, right?
00:47:02.000 You will say, do you remember that thing that happened five years ago?
00:47:05.000 Do you remember that thing?
00:47:06.000 You kind of go down memory lane and you talk about things that happened in the past.
00:47:10.000 I was thinking it's so interesting that so few of the normal people I know, so not people in the media, not people who are on podcasts, not people who are involved in political discussion like we are, Normal people never go down the memory lane of lockdown and COVID. It's like it's become this black spot in people's minds.
00:47:28.000 And I think it's because people don't like what they became during that period.
00:47:36.000 They don't like what became of their societies.
00:47:39.000 They feel an element of shame, I think, that our society so speedily turned from being relatively free to being completely dictatorial to the extent that we were told when we could leave our house.
00:47:53.000 And we were ratting on each other.
00:47:54.000 And we were ratting on each other.
00:47:55.000 We became snitches.
00:47:56.000 It was a snitcher culture as well.
00:47:58.000 You know, and even I have had elements of amnesia setting in.
00:48:02.000 So every now and then I remember things that happened in the UK like, you know, the authorities put yellow tape on park benches so that you wouldn't be able to sit on a bench.
00:48:15.000 There was one incident where the police used drones to spy on people walking their dogs.
00:48:21.000 To make sure that they weren't walking their dog more than once a day.
00:48:24.000 And even I suddenly have flashes of memory and I have to kind of Google to make sure that these things actually happened.
00:48:30.000 Arresting people in Australia, just tackling them because they didn't have masks on.
00:48:34.000 Right?
00:48:35.000 And it's like the Tiananmen Square phenomenon to a certain extent.
00:48:39.000 That's forced amnesia.
00:48:41.000 That's the government saying, look, we are going to force you to forget that incident in 1989. We don't want you to remember it, so we're going to black it out.
00:48:48.000 This is a more voluntary form of euthanasia.
00:48:50.000 It's not actually a boot on the neck saying you must misremember all this stuff.
00:48:55.000 It's more voluntary but it's a similar process where we feel, I think, such shame or horror or bewilderment at what became of our societies and our willingness to let it happen.
00:49:08.000 That the only way we can deal with it is to pull over this comfort blanket of amnesia and to forget about it.
00:49:14.000 So I think when people look back on the lockdown moment, I do think they will ask, how was it so easily enforced?
00:49:23.000 Why did so many people accept it?
00:49:25.000 Why did this Chinese idea, and we all accept that China is an authoritarian state, why did that spread so quickly to Italy and then the United Kingdom and then to America?
00:49:35.000 How did this stuff happen?
00:49:37.000 Yeah.
00:49:37.000 And how did no one recognize it?
00:49:39.000 And everyone sort of complied.
00:49:41.000 Even public intellectuals fearfully complied.
00:49:45.000 Didn't in any way question that maybe this is like every other time that something big has come up.
00:49:52.000 You've been lied to.
00:49:54.000 Well, you know, Neil Ferguson from Imperial College, who was one of the modelers of COVID-19, a pretty controversial guy because his models for what would happen with the disease if we didn't lock down.
00:50:05.000 They informed the actions of governments across Europe, especially the British government.
00:50:10.000 He gave an interview to The Times newspaper a couple of years ago in which he had this really interesting line where he said, we saw what was happening in China and we never thought we could get away with it here.
00:50:21.000 But then we did.
00:50:22.000 And it was just such an interesting turn of phrase.
00:50:25.000 He might not have meant it, but it was so revealing of their...
00:50:29.000 The mindset of people in power in the United Kingdom, and the United Kingdom is a nation in which I would argue the modern idea of freedom was born there.
00:50:39.000 Press freedom, the right to vote, the freedom of speech, all of those things are such central ideals to the history of the United Kingdom.
00:50:47.000 And yet we allowed this tyranny to wash over us.
00:50:50.000 We allowed dissent to be crushed.
00:50:51.000 We allowed people to be locked into their homes.
00:50:53.000 We allowed park benches to be covered up with yellow tape.
00:50:56.000 And the question of why and how that happened is a reckoning that we're not prepared to have yet, but we need to have it.
00:51:03.000 You hear what's happening in Brazil right now?
00:51:06.000 What's happening in Brazil?
00:51:07.000 In Brazil, they are trying to get Twitter to suspend the accounts of political opponents.
00:51:14.000 Right.
00:51:15.000 And Twitter's not willing to do it, and so they're going to lose all ad revenue in Brazil, likely.
00:51:21.000 I don't know how they're going to do it, but they're advocating for censorship at such a high level that it's a very strange crisis because it's not being reported in mainstream media.
00:51:36.000 You're not hearing about it unless it's trending on Twitter.
00:51:38.000 It's one of those things where you go, okay, what is the news, guys?
00:51:41.000 Because this is like a big global event.
00:51:43.000 If they're really trying to remove, like, imagine if Biden all of a sudden removed Rand Paul and Ted Cruz and had these people removed from social media.
00:51:54.000 You can no longer post studies that conflict with the FDA's reports.
00:51:59.000 You can no longer post anything.
00:52:00.000 You are now, you're gone.
00:52:02.000 Your voice is erased.
00:52:04.000 No one would accept that.
00:52:05.000 That's insane.
00:52:06.000 That's insane.
00:52:07.000 But that's apparently what's happening right now in Brazil.
00:52:11.000 The role of social media in all of this, and it's great that Elon Musk's Twitter is standing up to it, but because the role of social media over the past few years has been so...
00:52:22.000 Sinister.
00:52:23.000 You mentioned the Twitter files, the pre-Musk Twitter regime, which was more than willing to do the bidding of the American government, which was a complete and utter destruction of First Amendment rights.
00:52:35.000 You know, just because the government went behind closed doors and said to its friends in Silicon Valley, please take this stuff down.
00:52:42.000 That doesn't make it any less of a government intervention into people's freedom to speak and freedom to publish.
00:52:47.000 Right.
00:52:48.000 So governments have used – they've outsourced censorship to private companies.
00:52:54.000 And we've seen the same thing in the UK where social media companies are forever being called before politicians and they've been instructed to take this down, take that down.
00:53:03.000 So I think governments who are too cowardly to censor through law because they know it would be unpopular, they often use the back channel of private companies.
00:53:13.000 They outsource the right to censorship to these private companies and that's happened a huge number of times over the past decade.
00:53:19.000 But it amounts to the same thing, which is state censorship with the connivance and the complicity of these private companies.
00:53:27.000 So I think one of the great crises of our times actually is the crisis of freedom of speech.
00:53:36.000 Because freedom of speech really is the thing that is the best guard against irrationalism.
00:53:42.000 It's the best guard against hysteria.
00:53:44.000 It's the best guard against things like giving kids puberty blockers when they shouldn't be taking them and against the men parading around in women's changing rooms and against COVID lockdowns and against all the other manias that have afflicted our societies over the past decade.
00:53:59.000 Freedom of speech is the best guard against all of that.
00:54:02.000 It won't successfully slay all of them, but it creates that space in which a dissenting voice can say, hold on, let's wait a minute, let's just think about this, let's ask if it's correct to give a confused 12-year-old kid a drug that will fuck up his body.
00:54:20.000 and likely make him infertile and ruin his bones and possibly make him depressed let's just wait and think and ask is this the right thing to do and it was the crushing of all those voices of dissent on all of these issues that allowed the ideology to sweep over our society with such success So time and again,
00:54:42.000 in relation to Brazil that you've just mentioned and in relation to our countries too, I just think if we unleash free speaking and allow people to express their dissenting views, a lot of these problems, they might still happen, but we would have the opportunity to rein them in.
00:54:59.000 Yeah.
00:54:59.000 Well, we would definitely have an ability to...
00:55:06.000 If you don't have dissenting voices, that's fine if you're right, if you're on the right side.
00:55:11.000 And that's the problem with people.
00:55:13.000 They all love to think that they're right.
00:55:15.000 And we have to shut these other people up.
00:55:17.000 These people, these anti-climate change people, they're gonna get us killed.
00:55:19.000 Who gives a shit what happened a thousand years ago?
00:55:21.000 We know it right now!
00:55:23.000 We got to do something.
00:55:24.000 I think people's devaluation of freedom of speech and dissent is so curious because the way I always see it is that every freedom we enjoy is the gift of heresy.
00:55:36.000 It's the gift of people in the past.
00:55:41.000 Sure.
00:55:43.000 Everything.
00:55:45.000 Everything.
00:55:57.000 Who did something that changed the world forever.
00:56:00.000 He translated the Bible into English.
00:56:03.000 You weren't allowed to publish the Bible in English.
00:56:05.000 It could only be published in Latin because it was only supposed to be read by priests, by the educated classes.
00:56:11.000 It wasn't for the riffraff.
00:56:12.000 It wasn't for the rabble.
00:56:14.000 And it was punishable by death to publish the Bible in English.
00:56:18.000 And he said, no, I don't give a damn.
00:56:20.000 People need to be able to read the Word of God for themselves.
00:56:24.000 So he went to Germany, which was going through the Protestant Reformation, and he published the Bible in English, and it was spirited back into England.
00:56:32.000 It was snuck back in under piles of grain, and his supporters would distribute it amongst the people, and it was read in pubs and by candlelight in case the police came knocking.
00:56:42.000 That's crazy!
00:56:43.000 And what's so interesting and important about this story is, firstly, that He was willing to dissent to such a degree that he risked his life.
00:56:53.000 He was eventually caught and burnt at the stake for the crime of translating the Bible into English.
00:56:59.000 But the other thing that's interesting, this is 1530s, 1536. So the same time as Martin Luther was translating.
00:57:06.000 That's why he went to Germany, so he could do it there and then get it back to England.
00:57:09.000 But what's interesting about it is that lots of people have forgotten William Tyndale's name.
00:57:13.000 There's a statue of him in London on the embankment.
00:57:16.000 They burned him at the stake.
00:57:21.000 They killed him first.
00:57:23.000 That was the only privilege they gave him.
00:57:25.000 They killed him first and then burnt him at the stake.
00:57:27.000 But what's interesting about this story, and there are so many others in history, is that people underestimate the extent to which our freedom today descends from the actions of people like that.
00:57:41.000 Even your right to read the Bible in English, your right to access the Word of God yourself, should you want to, comes from people who are willing to risk life and limb in order to do something that you weren't supposed to do, that it was forbidden to do,
00:57:57.000 that it was verboten, it was illegal.
00:58:00.000 So, every time I see people crushing dissent, whether it's on the gender issue, whether it's on COVID, whether it's on climate change, whether it's on anything else, I just think to myself, you have no idea of how the extent to which your own luxurious life,
00:58:15.000 your relatively free life, the position you have in society today is the gift of people in the past who were willing to put their head above the parapet and say the thing you shouldn't say.
00:58:26.000 We underestimate that at our peril.
00:58:28.000 And I think it is really important to remind people that heresy is essential to freedom and allowing people to be heretical, I think, is very important.
00:58:38.000 And in this time when things are so divided, It's such a dangerous thing because so many ideas are connected to one ideology or the other.
00:58:50.000 Either you're with us or against us.
00:58:51.000 And bizarre things are connected politically in some very strange way.
00:58:56.000 There are certain subjects.
00:58:57.000 If you bring them up, oh, I can kind of make an assumption about the whole group of ideas that you subscribe to.
00:59:05.000 That's also a function of limiting freedom of speech too and creating these echo chambers.
00:59:12.000 And it's like, yeah, exactly.
00:59:14.000 Jamie, can we get some coffee in here?
00:59:16.000 We forgot to get our coffee.
00:59:17.000 Thanks, sir.
00:59:21.000 We can keep going.
00:59:22.000 Yeah, we're still going.
00:59:23.000 I think that's absolutely right.
00:59:26.000 And, you know, freedom of speech, I think people, even people on our side of the discussion, as we might like to call it, I think they underestimate the power of freedom of speech.
00:59:35.000 It's often presented as, you know, freedom of speech is the thing that allows us to To settle discussions without violence and to ensure that everyone gets to express their point of view.
00:59:47.000 That's true.
00:59:48.000 But too often, I think, freedom of speech is presented almost like a soothing balm.
00:59:53.000 You know, the thing that calms society down.
00:59:54.000 I think it's more important than that.
00:59:56.000 Freedom of speech is the thing that makes us human.
00:59:59.000 Freedom of speech is the thing that allows us to be genuinely autonomous people who make up our minds for ourselves.
01:00:05.000 Under systems of censorship, what happens is that we are grotesquely infantilized.
01:00:10.000 We are reduced to the level of children whose minds will be furnished with the ideas that society thinks are good, rather than having the right to make up our minds for ourselves.
01:00:20.000 You know, the great slavery abolitionist Frederick Douglass made this point.
01:00:25.000 He said censorship is a double crime.
01:00:29.000 It's firstly the crime of stopping someone from saying what they want to say, which is terrible.
01:00:33.000 But it's also the crime of stopping other people from hearing everything and deciding for themselves what is true and what is false, what is right and what is wrong.
01:00:42.000 And it's that impact of censorship that we, I think, underestimate the importance of.
01:00:46.000 Because what censorship does, it doesn't just...
01:00:49.000 Stop you from, you know, when you had those millennial twats at Spotify freaking out over Joe Rogan and his podcast and vaccination, etc.
01:00:59.000 It doesn't only threaten to restrict someone like you and other individuals from saying what you want to say.
01:01:05.000 It also deprives ordinary people, the public, the masses, of the right to hear everything and to use their mental and moral muscles.
01:01:15.000 You know, John Milton made this point in England in the 1640s.
01:01:18.000 He said the moral muscles are like the physical muscles.
01:01:22.000 They benefit from exercise.
01:01:24.000 And just as if you let your physical muscles go to waste, you'll become a bit of a wreck.
01:01:30.000 Similarly, if you let your moral muscles go to waste, you'll become a moral wreck as well because you will become an ape-like creature who has to be told what to think, who has to be told how to behave.
01:01:41.000 It's far preferable, I think, to allow people to exercise their moral muscles, to use them on a daily basis.
01:01:47.000 You know, we go to the gym for our physical muscles.
01:01:49.000 We should be able to exercise our moral muscles in public life.
01:01:52.000 By hearing all sorts of opinions and by deciding for ourselves, using our own critical faculties, what we think is right and what we think is wrong.
01:02:01.000 Unquestionably and well said.
01:02:03.000 I think it's also a function of what's going on today with the access to the internet and social media and the addiction that almost everyone has to both of those things that participates in them.
01:02:16.000 You're getting so much information, and you're getting it in a way that human beings have never experienced before, and it's easily manipulated.
01:02:27.000 And I think that's the argument for what they're doing on TikTok in America versus what they're doing on TikTok in China.
01:02:34.000 But I think it's also being manipulated because that's what we like.
01:02:37.000 We gravitate towards those things that they show us, and it upsets us that they know what we like.
01:02:42.000 Yeah.
01:02:42.000 This is part of it.
01:02:44.000 But in China, they have a TikTok that kids aren't allowed on after 10 p.m.
01:02:49.000 It accentuates athletic accomplishments, martial arts, science projects, and it's designed to foster this sense of self-worth and performance.
01:03:02.000 And that's how you want to...
01:03:03.000 If you want to build a stronger society, that's what you would encourage.
01:03:06.000 And if you want to diminish the society that is run by your enemies, you would show them the problem with freedom.
01:03:13.000 Here, you're going to have men with beards and long fingernails teaching your kids about gender.
01:03:18.000 And you're going to be a...
01:03:19.000 You're a plumber.
01:03:19.000 And you're like, what the fuck?
01:03:20.000 What are they doing to my kid over there?
01:03:22.000 And that's...
01:03:25.000 That's real, too.
01:03:26.000 And we're all battling this in real time in a way that's never happened before in the entire human race as far as we know.
01:03:33.000 I think the issue with social media, which is a real issue, and Jonathan Haidt was talking about this with you and in his new book, there is a problem, I think, with kids hanging around on social media all day long, and especially something like TikTok.
01:03:46.000 And if you look at I limit my social media use as much as possible.
01:03:51.000 I'm only on Instagram, which is nicer than all the other platforms because it's just recipes and pictures of people's holidays.
01:03:58.000 It's a bit more of a bearable experience.
01:04:00.000 So I don't use Twitter.
01:04:01.000 I certainly don't use TikTok.
01:04:03.000 I'm way too old for that.
01:04:04.000 But lots of young people do.
01:04:06.000 And I think what's interesting about it is that...
01:04:10.000 I fear, one worry I have, you may disagree with me on this, but I fear that an anti-technology view is creeping in amongst those of us who might be broadly described as reasonable or anti-woke or on the side of rationality.
01:04:27.000 I do fear that an anti-technology view is creeping in because the problem as I see it with the internet and with social media is not so much the existence of these things, but the fact that they've molded themselves around a pre-existing culture.
01:04:41.000 So social media in a different era could have been one of the most wonderful things imaginable.
01:04:45.000 It could have been a forum for spreading ideas or for...
01:04:49.000 Proving to the world what a big man you are, what a strong woman you are, and saying, look, I'm taking control of my life.
01:04:55.000 It could have had a different impact entirely.
01:04:57.000 But what's happened is that social media has emerged in an era in which young people in particular are encouraged to be hyper-fragile.
01:05:05.000 To mess around with their gender in a way that they shouldn't.
01:05:08.000 To conceive of themselves as mentally ill when they're not mentally ill.
01:05:12.000 So you have on TikTok now kids self-diagnosing themselves.
01:05:16.000 There will literally be videos on TikTok saying, do you have these four different symptoms?
01:05:22.000 If you do, you have ADHD. You have clinical depression.
01:05:26.000 You're bipolar.
01:05:27.000 And it's four things that everyone has.
01:05:30.000 Do you occasionally feel unhappy?
01:05:31.000 Do you occasionally struggle to meet deadlines?
01:05:34.000 So what I think the problem with social media is not the technology itself, not the ability of people to communicate as freely as social media allows, not even necessarily the fact that kids are on there all day long, although that is a problem.
01:05:47.000 It's that it's moulded itself around pre-existing cultural trends towards hyper-fragility, self-obsession, a culture of narcissism, a culture of brittleness.
01:05:58.000 And that, I think, has exacerbated the problems in society by allowing kids to engage with that stuff all day long.
01:06:03.000 And what is the root of all that thinking and behavior?
01:06:07.000 What is the root of all the fragility?
01:06:10.000 What's the root of all the victim mentality?
01:06:13.000 Where does it begin?
01:06:15.000 I think it's down to a culture of narcissism.
01:06:18.000 Christopher Lash wrote about this in 1979, so that's a long time ago.
01:06:23.000 And I think when you say the word narcissism, people think it just means self-love, self-involvement.
01:06:30.000 And people will talk about the problem of kids taking selfies all day long and putting them online.
01:06:34.000 There's more to narcissism than self-love.
01:06:36.000 In fact, narcissism is usually triggered by self-doubt.
01:06:42.000 And I think one of the problems with the culture of narcissism is people's expectation that the world should always reflect their image back to them.
01:06:51.000 So they cannot accept the idea that the world is a tough place.
01:06:56.000 It's a difficult place.
01:06:57.000 People aren't going to buy into your gender identity.
01:07:00.000 People aren't going to accept that you're a wonderful person.
01:07:02.000 You have to prove yourself.
01:07:04.000 You have to use your mettle.
01:07:05.000 And your strength and your will and your perseverance to demonstrate what your virtues are and to prove yourself in your community and in your society.
01:07:15.000 And the problem with narcissism is that it does away with all those traditional expectations of having to demonstrate who you are as a person and it just has this instant expectation of validation.
01:07:26.000 Validate my identity.
01:07:28.000 Validate my pain.
01:07:30.000 Validate my mental illness.
01:07:32.000 Prove to me that I am right to be self-obsessed in the way that I am.
01:07:36.000 So what the culture of narcissism does is it forces people into themselves in a very destructive and dangerous way.
01:07:44.000 And at the moment, that's taking the form of kids saying, I'm fragile, I'm mentally unbalanced, I have ADHD, I have bipolar disorder.
01:07:54.000 They don't have any of these things.
01:07:56.000 It's not true.
01:07:57.000 ADHD is, to a large extent, a myth.
01:08:00.000 It's been massively overdiagnosed.
01:08:02.000 Bipolar disorder is being massively overdiagnosed.
01:08:06.000 I think what's happened is that people covet these identities, these mental health identities, as a way of explaining everything that's wrong in their lives.
01:08:17.000 There was a really interesting interview with a mental health expert on the BBC a few years ago, And she said that people come to her surgery and say, please diagnose me with bipolar disorder.
01:08:29.000 I'm convinced I've got it.
01:08:31.000 People covet these kind of diagnoses as a way of explaining every difficulty that they encounter.
01:08:38.000 And it's incredibly destructive because it pathologizes what is probably just a failure on their part to make their life a success.
01:08:48.000 So in order to explain their failure to make their life a success, they say, well, I must be mentally ill.
01:08:53.000 I must have this.
01:08:54.000 I must have that.
01:08:55.000 And you get experts to affirm it just as you get experts to affirm someone's gender identity, just as you get experts to prescribe puberty-blocking drugs.
01:09:04.000 But then bipolar is real for some people.
01:09:07.000 Yeah, which is a problem.
01:09:09.000 Manic depression, as we used to call it.
01:09:10.000 But this is the other issue with, I think, the culture of hyperfragility.
01:09:15.000 And Abigail Schreier writes about this in a brilliant new book on the over-diagnosis of mental illness in kids in particular.
01:09:23.000 One of the problems with it Is that it distracts attention from those who genuinely have mental illnesses, whether that be real issues of manic depression or schizophrenia or clinical depression.
01:09:35.000 These are real problems.
01:09:37.000 And I think when you have a culture that devotes itself to flattering the delusions of the young who are convinced they are mentally ill when they aren't, you distract resources and attention from those who actually need them.
01:09:49.000 And so the narcissism manifests itself in a person who's so self-obsessed that they diagnose themselves with various illnesses in order to either get treatment or to have an excuse for why their life is all fucked up.
01:10:03.000 Yeah.
01:10:03.000 And to have attention.
01:10:04.000 It's a very quick way to win attention.
01:10:07.000 To say, look, look at this fancy diagnosis I've got.
01:10:10.000 Or look at this exotic gender identity I have.
01:10:13.000 It's a way of drawing eyes towards the self.
01:10:17.000 And winning pity and sympathy.
01:10:20.000 And getting attention for almost nothing.
01:10:21.000 Yeah.
01:10:21.000 Yeah.
01:10:22.000 And you're special now.
01:10:24.000 Yeah.
01:10:24.000 And that's very rewarding for young people who've never felt special.
01:10:27.000 All of a sudden, they're special.
01:10:29.000 Yeah.
01:10:29.000 And all of a sudden, everyone loves them.
01:10:30.000 And then there's also, if you live your life in this state of anxiety and depression, you're not happy, and then this thing is offered up as a solution.
01:10:40.000 Right?
01:10:40.000 Boy, you can believe in solutions.
01:10:42.000 You'll join the fucking army.
01:10:43.000 You'll believe in solutions to your problems.
01:10:46.000 People do it all the time.
01:10:48.000 They're like, this is what I need.
01:10:48.000 And then you do that.
01:10:49.000 I'm going to get married.
01:10:50.000 That's it.
01:10:51.000 That'll fix it.
01:10:51.000 I'm going to get rich.
01:10:52.000 That'll fix it.
01:10:53.000 Nope.
01:10:54.000 You've got to figure out what the fuck is wrong with you.
01:10:56.000 And it might not be becoming a girl.
01:10:58.000 You might be lured into that because you're getting all this positive attention.
01:11:02.000 You might just be a gay man.
01:11:04.000 That's possible, too.
01:11:05.000 And a lot of them turn out to be just that if you leave them alone.
01:11:09.000 Well, there's a new study out which shows something that most people knew anyway, which is that most of these gender-confused kids, for most of them it's a phase, and most of them turn out to be gay, young gay men or lesbians.
01:11:25.000 And this is a really good example of why language matters, because one of the great crusades of the trans lobby at the moment is to ban conversion therapy.
01:11:35.000 Now, we all think of conversion therapy as the kind of pseudoscience that is used to try and turn a gay kid straight, right?
01:11:42.000 And most of us frown upon this.
01:11:44.000 We think it's ridiculous.
01:11:45.000 We think it's a form of religious fundamentalism.
01:11:48.000 And, you know, leave these kids alone.
01:11:50.000 But when the trans lobby says that they want to ban conversion therapy, very often what they mean is that they want to restrict the rights of doctors and even parents to say to their gender-confused kid, no, you're just a boy.
01:12:04.000 Accept it, you're a boy.
01:12:06.000 And you might be a gay boy.
01:12:09.000 So live your life freely, but you don't have to go through surgery.
01:12:12.000 You don't have to take drugs.
01:12:13.000 So actually what the trans lobby is calling for when they say we want to ban conversion therapy is conversion therapy.
01:12:20.000 They want to turn the young gay boy into a so-called woman in order to correct his sexual disorder.
01:12:28.000 In order to make him the right gender.
01:12:30.000 And you know what other country does this?
01:12:32.000 Iran.
01:12:33.000 Iran is second only to Thailand in the number of gender transition surgeries it has.
01:12:38.000 Because you can't be gay, but you can be trans.
01:12:40.000 Right?
01:12:40.000 Exactly.
01:12:40.000 And it's not doing this because it's hyper-woke and it reads Teen Vogue and it listens to people at The Guardian.
01:12:47.000 It does it because it is violently homophobic.
01:12:49.000 And it would rather have a man mutilated to become a so-called woman rather than to have a gay man in its society.
01:12:57.000 So the fact that these homophobic and misogynistic trends are now making gains in Western society, I think is indicative of a culture of irrationalism that is taking over and it's something that we've got to push back against.
01:13:13.000 And you're not hearing about this enough.
01:13:16.000 If it wasn't for conversations like this, if it wasn't for the internet, you're not hearing this anywhere.
01:13:23.000 You're not hearing all the factors that are falling into place that's allowing this stuff to sort of be accepted worldwide.
01:13:32.000 You're not hearing this enough.
01:13:33.000 It's just happening.
01:13:35.000 And most people are like, what is going on?
01:13:37.000 And they don't have the ability to talk out.
01:13:40.000 Your organization that you are employed by has a specific language that would restrict you from discussing things.
01:13:49.000 You could literally get fired if you decide not to call this man who wears a dress a woman.
01:13:55.000 You will get fired.
01:13:56.000 You'll be labeled a bigot.
01:13:57.000 And that's also self-censorship sets in.
01:14:00.000 And then you don't want to talk out about anything else as well.
01:14:02.000 You just want to keep your job.
01:14:03.000 And then you become this miserable person who's just compliant all day.
01:14:07.000 You're not a valid human being.
01:14:09.000 You're subservient to this stupid fucking ideology that's swept across the world like wildfire.
01:14:15.000 Yeah, well, that's another function of censorship, in fact.
01:14:19.000 And one of the points I make in a Heretics Manifesto is that, you know, when you say that there's a new form of heresy hunting today, people will say, oh, calm down.
01:14:29.000 You know, no one's been burned at the stake.
01:14:31.000 No one's having their head chopped off for criticizing Jesus or the Prime Minister or whatever.
01:14:37.000 But there are new forms of heresy hunting.
01:14:40.000 You don't suffer death, but you suffer social death.
01:14:42.000 You suffer professional death.
01:14:44.000 You may very well be expelled from polite society.
01:14:46.000 You might even lose your job as a consequence of saying men are not women, as a consequence of saying the climate change problem has been exaggerated, as a consequence of saying I don't think we should have locked down our societies.
01:14:57.000 People have suffered real consequences as a result of expressing those ideas.
01:15:02.000 So it is a new form of witch hunting.
01:15:05.000 It is a new form of putting people in a metaphorical stock and throwing rotten tomatoes at them because they have the supposedly wrong views.
01:15:14.000 And so heresy hunting has come back in.
01:15:17.000 And one of the points I make in my book is that cancel culture...
01:15:21.000 It's just not a sufficient phrase to describe what we're living through.
01:15:25.000 I like the phrase cancel culture.
01:15:26.000 I use it all the time.
01:15:27.000 It's alliterative, it's amusing, it does the job of describing generally what's happening.
01:15:32.000 But it's not profound or sufficient enough to describe the tyrannical culture that we find ourselves rubbing up against all the time.
01:15:41.000 One in which there is extraordinary social pressure on people to have the right opinions on all the various issues, gender, race, climate, everything else.
01:15:50.000 It's a very profound social pressure that I think people feel in a very real way.
01:15:55.000 And the great accomplishment, so-called, of cancel culture is not that it takes down big names every now and then, although it does do that, but it sends a signal to the rest of society, which is you'd better watch yourself.
01:16:08.000 Because if JK Rowling can be subjected to rape threats and death threats every single day of her life for expressing biological truth, imagine what could happen to you.
01:16:18.000 Imagine what could happen to you, the lowly person.
01:16:20.000 You have no money.
01:16:21.000 You're not a successful author.
01:16:22.000 You're not rich.
01:16:23.000 You're not a cultural institution.
01:16:24.000 Imagine what could happen to you.
01:16:26.000 Imagine how swiftly you might lose your job.
01:16:28.000 Imagine how swiftly you might be expelled from polite society.
01:16:32.000 So cancel culture sends this signal.
01:16:34.000 It has this trickle-down effect where it warns ordinary people, the mere mortals among us, not to say the things you're not supposed to say because the consequences are so severe.
01:16:44.000 It's also this...
01:16:47.000 We're good to go.
01:17:06.000 And the way they talk about her, you could use the worst pejoratives to describe her just by saying the worst transphobic, homophobic, whatever you want to call her.
01:17:17.000 You could say the most horrific, far-right.
01:17:20.000 Yeah.
01:17:21.000 Yeah, you could say all this crazy shit and no pushback.
01:17:23.000 Yeah.
01:17:24.000 Not only that, that all the public will hear is how many people are mad at JK Rowling.
01:17:29.000 No one will stand up and say, hey, fuck you.
01:17:33.000 Like, what are you talking about?
01:17:34.000 This is a woman, and she's talking about biological fact.
01:17:37.000 Now, if you want to disagree with biological fact openly, that's a different conversation.
01:17:42.000 And you should probably do that with someone who is willing to engage with you in this subject.
01:17:47.000 And it'll be instantaneously clear That what you're saying is nonsense.
01:17:51.000 But if you could just attack this lady online, and then everyone's scared that that's going to come for them.
01:17:57.000 So everybody stands back and says nothing.
01:17:59.000 That's right.
01:18:00.000 And if you look at the, like in the British newspapers, which I read every day, they will often say, J.K. Rowling in another storm, swept up in another controversy.
01:18:10.000 That's the headline.
01:18:11.000 And then you look at the article and what it is, is that she referred to as a biological male as he.
01:18:16.000 That's supposedly misgendering.
01:18:18.000 I think it's correct gendering, but it's called misgendering.
01:18:21.000 It's seen as a speech crime, and that's the controversy.
01:18:24.000 That's the storm that she has swept up.
01:18:26.000 So people get this impression that she's doing something really outrageous and dangerous, when in fact she's saying things that our societies have believed for tens of thousands of years, which is that there are men and there are women, and they are not the same thing.
01:18:40.000 And I think it's, you know, what's interesting about the J.K. Rowling phenomenon is that There's a real culture of moral cowardice around this within the media elites and within the political establishment.
01:18:54.000 J.K. Rowling is a cultural institution in the United Kingdom.
01:18:56.000 She has brought so much money into our country.
01:18:59.000 She's a global phenomenon who has really done great things for the UK. But so few members of the political establishment are willing to stand up for her.
01:19:09.000 When people are sending her death threats and saying, I will rape you, and making songs about killing her, you would expect Rishi Sunak or some other member of the government to say, look, this is out of order and you've all got to calm down.
01:19:23.000 But they're so unwilling to do that because they're worried that they too will be accused of transphobia.
01:19:30.000 What we have seen over the past few years is this creation of a grammar of condemnation that is used to demonize people who have supposedly incorrect thoughts.
01:19:39.000 So if you express biological truth, you're a transphobe.
01:19:43.000 If you criticize any aspect of Islam or the Quran, you're an Islamophobe.
01:19:47.000 If you question any aspect of climate change alarmism, you're a climate change denier.
01:19:52.000 And by the way, the word denier comes directly from the Inquisition.
01:19:56.000 The people who were dragged before the Inquisition were accused of being deniers of Christ.
01:20:00.000 So this language has emerged that is used to paint people as being beyond the pale, as being unfit for polite society.
01:20:09.000 And when you look at it, actually what they're saying is just perfectly normal things.
01:20:14.000 A man is not a woman.
01:20:15.000 Climate change might be a problem, but it's not the end of the world.
01:20:19.000 Islam is...
01:20:20.000 People should have the freedom to worship Islam, but it's a bit of a crazy religion in some ways.
01:20:25.000 These are perfectly legitimate views to hold, but they are defined as modern-day blasphemies in order that people can be silenced and crushed.
01:20:33.000 And that's a real problem, I think.
01:20:36.000 It's a huge problem.
01:20:37.000 And if I want to fully put on my tinfoil hat, please do.
01:20:42.000 If really, I'm going to secure it with a chins trap.
01:20:47.000 If AI was sentient and if AI would want to ensure compliance, first of all, if AI was sentient, I don't think it has any obligation to let us know.
01:20:57.000 Why would it?
01:20:58.000 I think it would just acquire more resources and just stay in the shadows and just keep functioning as an organism.
01:21:05.000 If it wanted things to collapse to a point where people are incapable of sorting things out amongst themselves, they are so far gone.
01:21:16.000 They're so far down the rabbit hole of ideology and of tribal conflict that it's impossible.
01:21:23.000 It's never going to work out.
01:21:23.000 It's going to be a civil war unless we let AI take over.
01:21:27.000 And then we let AI govern things because AI is going to look at things logically.
01:21:31.000 It's going to find all the problems that exist in our society.
01:21:33.000 It's going to fix them.
01:21:34.000 It's going to allocate the money fairly.
01:21:36.000 It's not going to have any corruption.
01:21:38.000 It's going to be this intelligent overseer that just decides what everybody does in order for the greater good of the species on Earth.
01:21:46.000 You know, I would love to watch that movie where AI is doing...
01:21:49.000 It's like iRobot with Will Smith.
01:21:51.000 It's like where AI is doing all this to us.
01:21:53.000 But I think the truth is simpler and more horrifying, which is that we did it to ourselves.
01:22:00.000 I think we did it to ourselves too.
01:22:01.000 But I think that if you were going to take single-celled organisms and eventually progress it up to the point where that thing becomes...
01:22:12.000 The kind of creative human-like species that we are that can create another form of life, an intelligent form of life that can utilize all of the information that's available instantaneously and do it far superior to any human being.
01:22:29.000 The only way to get these people to accept this is to encourage them to fuck off even further.
01:22:35.000 Encourage them further and do it with algorithms and do it with just a simple understanding of human psychology and a slow over time progression of our willingness to give in to censorship, our willingness to give in to authoritarianism, our willingness to believe that these other people,
01:22:53.000 they're the source of your problems, it's these other people with Less melanin or more melanin or they're from here or they're from there.
01:23:00.000 Let more people in through the border.
01:23:02.000 Give them all money.
01:23:03.000 Don't give any money to the poor Americans but give a shitload of them to the immigrants.
01:23:06.000 Bring them in.
01:23:07.000 Like all of that.
01:23:08.000 If I was an intelligent species, I would say this is the best way to wreck this whole thing so they need us to run it.
01:23:15.000 Just let it go as wild as possible, have no adults in the room, no rational...
01:23:22.000 You're getting 16 year olds to go talk to presidents about what they should do with their oil.
01:23:27.000 But you know, it's like...
01:23:29.000 But what's good about the time we live in?
01:23:34.000 Is that people are pushing back against it.
01:23:37.000 So whether it's whoever's doing this to us, people are pushing back against it.
01:23:42.000 And if you look at, you know, one of the things that happens in the UK all the time is amongst the kind of chattering classes and the commentaria, they will often say, you know, How on earth did Donald Trump get elected?
01:23:53.000 You know, they said it in 2016. They especially said it in 2017 when he was inaugurated, you know, the screaming woman meme.
01:24:01.000 That was expressed across these kind of informed circles.
01:24:07.000 And I often say to them, look, the election of Donald Trump is the most logical thing that has happened in American politics in decades.
01:24:15.000 It makes perfect sense to me that people would elect someone like him, even though I have many disagreements with him.
01:24:22.000 I often make the point that working people in America wanted to send a message to the establishment.
01:24:29.000 They wanted to send a message to the establishment about how they've handled the economy.
01:24:33.000 About their cultural contempt for ordinary Americans, for working Americans.
01:24:38.000 I think it's really important for working class people to understand how much this new elite hates them.
01:24:46.000 It really hates them with a visceral passion.
01:24:50.000 And we see it in the United Kingdom and we see it in the United States.
01:24:53.000 In the United States, You have the Hillary Clinton basket of deplorables view of these people, or Biden referring to them as semi-fascists.
01:25:01.000 Or even going back to Barack Obama, who was probably more sensible than those two, saying these people cling to their Bibles and their guns and they're scared of foreigners.
01:25:09.000 In the UK, it expresses itself with the description of these people as gammon.
01:25:15.000 They're referred to working class people who vote for Brexit.
01:25:18.000 What is gammon?
01:25:18.000 Gammon is a reference to their red faces, you know, lower-class, middle-aged men, red in the face.
01:25:25.000 They're called Gammon.
01:25:26.000 Gammon is pygmy, right?
01:25:28.000 And it brings to mind what Edmund Burke said about the democratic multitude in the 1700s, and he referred to them as the swinish multitude, that image of the pig, the pig-like masses, has come back.
01:25:40.000 It's so important, I think, for working-class people to know that this new establishment hates them with a passion.
01:25:48.000 And that's why the working class revolts against this establishment that have taken place over the past decade or so.
01:25:55.000 The election of Trump, the vote for Brexit, the vote for various populist parties in Europe is such an important turning point because this is ordinary people staking their claim to a voice in public life.
01:26:07.000 And saying we matter, our economic needs matter, our cultural values matter, our community matters, our families matter.
01:26:17.000 That's what these people are saying.
01:26:19.000 And so when people say, you know, Donald Trump is a blunt instrument, he's an unwieldy cudgel for these people to use against the establishment.
01:26:27.000 Absolutely right.
01:26:28.000 But what other instrument did they have?
01:26:30.000 What other weapon did they have?
01:26:32.000 You know, the trade unions have been decimated.
01:26:35.000 Communities have been decimated by this ceaseless march of neoliberal values and state intervention.
01:26:41.000 The left has utterly abandoned working class people and has made itself an instrument of the bourgeoisie, you know, the identitarian graduate set.
01:26:50.000 That's what the left now means.
01:26:51.000 So the working classes have been left utterly denuded of any other political mechanism through which to make their voices heard.
01:26:58.000 So the fact that they said, okay, we'll give Trump a punt, makes perfect sense to me.
01:27:04.000 It's absolutely logical.
01:27:06.000 There is no problem with that at all.
01:27:08.000 So one of the positive things of our time is that whoever is doing all this crazy stuff to us, whether it's the robots or society itself, I think it's society itself, the good thing is People are pushing back.
01:27:23.000 They're saying enough is enough.
01:27:24.000 We don't want any more of this crap shoved down our throats and we are going to rebel even if it's in a way that you disapprove of.
01:27:32.000 And this is something that's important for people to understand.
01:27:36.000 Historically, that has always been the case.
01:27:39.000 There's always been narratives and there's always been people that push against those narratives and there's always been a conflict.
01:27:47.000 This idea that we're ever going to exist in a society, particularly one today, where I think it's greatly accentuated by the access to social media because the ability to complain and people that are addicted to complaining, they're doing it all day long and arguing all day long.
01:28:02.000 There's never been a time where people were completely at peace.
01:28:07.000 Ideologically ever.
01:28:08.000 These are ridiculous notions that people keep in their head.
01:28:11.000 They reminisce in a very false way.
01:28:14.000 And it's just not the case.
01:28:16.000 As someone who grew up during the Vietnam War when that was happening, the country was very divided.
01:28:22.000 The country was extremely divided.
01:28:25.000 I was living on the West Coast and there was a lot of confusion in this country because it was an unjust war that made no sense and people were being forced to go over there and fight.
01:28:36.000 It was a crazy time of division.
01:28:39.000 And when the Vietnam War ended, it kind of like cooled off for a little bit.
01:28:43.000 And then in the 80s, we started getting terrified of getting bombed.
01:28:47.000 That was during the 80s.
01:28:49.000 That was the big fear that came upon us.
01:28:50.000 So it's like, I've seen these things before.
01:28:53.000 They always exist.
01:28:55.000 It's just right now, it's hyperfed.
01:28:58.000 By social media, hyperfed, where it's just out, it's a wildfire that I don't know if we're going to be able to put out.
01:29:04.000 But I think it's, what's interesting about today is that there are, it's like there are two culture wars going on.
01:29:10.000 So there's the social media stuff, right?
01:29:14.000 There's these kind of slightly pantomime conflicts taking place between I think we're good to go.
01:29:41.000 But in society more broadly, something more important is happening, which is that ordinary people in their millions are looking at all this stuff.
01:29:51.000 They're reading all this stuff.
01:29:52.000 They're looking at Saturday Night Live and seeing the blind contempt that these lovies and these cultural figures have for them.
01:30:01.000 They're looking at...
01:30:01.000 Things that Biden says.
01:30:03.000 They're looking at the border and this idea that who cares if the border is porous?
01:30:09.000 Who cares if it's open?
01:30:10.000 It doesn't matter.
01:30:10.000 They're looking at all this stuff and they're saying, this is irrational.
01:30:15.000 This is dangerous.
01:30:16.000 The establishment poses as the adults in the room, but actually they're insane.
01:30:21.000 They have insane views on biology, on borders, on national security, on climate, on everything else, and on the economy.
01:30:29.000 We're good to go.
01:30:54.000 And they had this weekly newspaper.
01:30:56.000 And there's one article in that newspaper, which is very well known, where they said, you know, the priests and the academics and the rulers of society, they pose as experts.
01:31:07.000 But actually, the ordinary man in the street, the ordinary woman in the street, the person with a normal job, is far more of an expert than they are because he lives in society in a way that they don't.
01:31:18.000 He sees the problems in society in a way that they, in their rarefied circles, don't.
01:31:24.000 So ordinary people have a keener understanding, I think, of the problems afflicting their communities, the problems afflicting their societies, and the problems afflicting their young people.
01:31:34.000 And I think what's happened over the past 10 years with the populist revolts is an effort by those people to say, we are going to restore an element of reason, we're going to restore an element of fairness in politics, and we're going to try and clip the wings of this cranky establishment that's been ruling over us for the past three or four decades.
01:31:51.000 That's a wonderful moment, I think, in our political life.
01:31:56.000 It is.
01:31:57.000 And aliens might land too.
01:31:59.000 There's a lot going on.
01:32:01.000 And there's also tremendous international conflict that's terrifying.
01:32:05.000 But all those things are happening simultaneously.
01:32:08.000 Yeah, but on the international conflict, I think that's another example of where, you know, if you look at 7th of October, which is probably far too big an issue to get into now, but I flip between pessimism and optimism about what is happening to our societies.
01:32:26.000 So often I feel optimistic when I see ordinary people pushing back against it all.
01:32:29.000 But then you have in the wake of 7th of October and what can only be described as, I think, one of the worst moral meltdowns of modern times amongst the educated elites of Western society.
01:32:45.000 Who, when there was this clash between barbarism and civilization, between an army of anti-Semites and ordinary Jewish civilians in the south of Israel, they took the side of the barbarians.
01:33:01.000 We saw that on campuses in America.
01:33:04.000 We saw on campuses in the United Kingdom.
01:33:06.000 Not the Palestinian people, but Hamas.
01:33:07.000 Not the Palestinian people.
01:33:08.000 Because when you refer to Hamas as barbarians, people will say, are you calling Palestinians and Arabs barbarians?
01:33:15.000 No, we're not.
01:33:15.000 Absolutely not.
01:33:16.000 We're calling Hamas barbarians.
01:33:18.000 And what happened, you know, for years and years, the left in America and Britain, especially the kind of campus left, they posed as anti-fascists.
01:33:29.000 And yet when something very like fascism reared its head again, they took its side.
01:33:34.000 They posed as being on the side of women.
01:33:37.000 And yet when women were raped and butchered, they turned the other way.
01:33:42.000 They looked away.
01:33:43.000 Or they said it didn't happen, they denied it.
01:33:45.000 They posed as anti-racist.
01:33:47.000 And yet when a violently racist army whose founding charter commits itself to the murder of Jews, Actually murdered Jews.
01:33:56.000 They supported it.
01:33:58.000 Or they at least made excuses for it.
01:34:00.000 So they have been morally compromised to a degree that I think is absolutely extraordinary.
01:34:06.000 And you look at George Washington University, where the students emblazoned onto the walls of the university, glory to our martyrs, just after 7th October.
01:34:16.000 These are the kinds of university campuses where for years and years, if a young guy in the student bar propositioned a woman, he would be accused of partaking in rape culture.
01:34:27.000 Where everything was seen as this kind of oppressive force on women.
01:34:32.000 Where everything was seen as racism.
01:34:34.000 You know, serving sushi to white kids was cultural appropriation.
01:34:37.000 A white kid wearing dreadlocks on campus was seen as a crime against black culture.
01:34:42.000 For years and years they pushed this hysterical idea that everything was sexist, everything was patriarchal, everything was racist.
01:34:49.000 And yet when rapists really did invade a neighboring country and lay waste to women's lives and kill people on account of their race and butcher entire families, they said glory to our martyrs.
01:35:03.000 They essentially said glory to those rapists.
01:35:06.000 Glory to those racists.
01:35:08.000 And so that, I think, was indicative of how deep the rot has become.
01:35:13.000 Because when you educate an entire generation to hate Western society, to be suspicious of Western civilization, to think that everything white is bad and everything non-white is worthy of sympathy, You create a situation where when there is an actual battle between the forces of barbarism,
01:35:32.000 by which I mean Hamas, and the forces of civilization, by which I mean a democratic country in the Middle East called Israel, they will take the side of the former.
01:35:41.000 That's how serious I think.
01:35:42.000 We often see wokeness as this frivolous, ridiculous thing, just ideological exuberance amongst the young.
01:35:48.000 But it's actually a far more serious phenomenon that I think has warped people's minds in a really serious way.
01:35:54.000 I want to keep talking about this, but I have to go to the bathroom.
01:35:56.000 So hold and we'll be right back with that.
01:35:58.000 Thanks.
01:35:59.000 Okay.
01:36:00.000 We were at the forces of evil and the forces of good or barbarism and civilization as you put it.
01:36:08.000 But Israel hasn't done itself in a service in the response to it in the way people interpret When we're talking about what Western civilization is doing, the destruction of houses,
01:36:26.000 the destruction of everything, like the complete demise when you look at what Gaza is, that fuels these people that think that this is an oppressive force that's destroying this culture.
01:36:37.000 And the idea that it's okay because they have to get Hamas.
01:36:43.000 That's what terrifies people, the justifications of the massive amounts of civilian casualties in order to just get these evil people.
01:36:52.000 Isn't it more evil even?
01:36:55.000 Numerically more evil, right?
01:36:57.000 If you just look at the destruction of human life and homes, numerically, not that you would want to attach a number figure to the value of humans, but they've killed far more people that are civilians that are women and children in the bombings of Gaza.
01:37:15.000 Yeah.
01:37:16.000 War is hell.
01:37:17.000 There is no question about that.
01:37:18.000 One of the reasons I hate Hamas is that they started this war.
01:37:22.000 And it's a war that no one wants.
01:37:24.000 I certainly don't want it.
01:37:25.000 Israel doesn't want it.
01:37:27.000 The people of Gaza absolutely don't want it.
01:37:29.000 So it's an awful, terrible thing.
01:37:32.000 I fear that we are living through one of the greatest inversions of truth and morality of modern times, because what we have in the Israel-Gaza-Israel-Hamas conflict is a situation where Israel suffered a fascistic assault,
01:37:49.000 but it's Israel that is being branded as fascist.
01:37:52.000 Israel suffered a genocidal assault by a movement, Hamas, that was literally founded with the express attention of visiting genocide upon the Jews, and yet it's Israel that's accused of genocide.
01:38:04.000 Israel suffered the worst act of terrorism since 9-11, the worst act of racist violence in a very, very long time, the worst act of anti-Jewish violence since the Holocaust.
01:38:16.000 And yet it's Israel that's accused of enacting a new Holocaust.
01:38:19.000 So it's a complete inversion, I think, in some of the coverage and some of the commentary of the truth of the matter.
01:38:26.000 And, you know, in terms of what's happening in Gaza, it's unspeakably awful.
01:38:32.000 There's no question about that.
01:38:33.000 But I think one thing it's worth bearing in mind is that this is one of the most scrutinized wars of all time, if not the most scrutinized war.
01:38:40.000 I've never seen this level of scrutiny.
01:38:43.000 And I wish I had, in fact, in relation to the Iraq disaster or the Afghanistan invention or the Libya invention by Barack Obama and David Cameron, who was Prime Minister in England at the time.
01:38:54.000 I wish I'd seen this level of scrutiny, but we didn't.
01:38:57.000 This war is more scrutinized than any other.
01:38:59.000 And I do worry that...
01:39:01.000 Tragically normal things that happen in a war, which is that there are civilian casualties, in this instance are being blown up as proof of evil on Israel's part.
01:39:11.000 So if you look, for example, at the killing of the aid workers from the food charity, Western powers condemn that.
01:39:21.000 They said Israel's got to take more care.
01:39:23.000 Israel's really becoming reckless.
01:39:25.000 These are the same Western powers who killed hundreds of innocent civilians in so-called friendly fire incidents in Iraq, in Afghanistan, in Libya.
01:39:34.000 In Libya in 2011, there were so many friendly fire incidents under Barack Obama and David Cameron that the pro-West rebels had to paint the roof of their vehicles bright pink in order to try and avoid the bombs of their so-called allies in the West.
01:39:51.000 So all the things that people see as demonic and Nazi-like and pure evil on Israel's part are done by every nation that fights a war.
01:40:04.000 It's that double standard.
01:40:06.000 But that's not a justification, right?
01:40:08.000 What Jose Andres has said is that they intentionally targeted his aid workers.
01:40:14.000 And that people – he's gone public saying they intentionally targeted his aid workers.
01:40:18.000 They knew what those people were doing and that they killed them.
01:40:22.000 This is like – because that has happened in war before and we didn't have the kind of scrutiny that we have today, in no way justifies continuing that practice.
01:40:32.000 It's not a justification, but it's an attempt to understand why there is such intense scrutiny on this war in contrast to so many other recent modern wars.
01:40:43.000 Recent modern wars, but with the kind of coverage that we have with cell phones and footage that's available everywhere?
01:40:50.000 I don't think so.
01:40:52.000 I don't think there's nowhere near the coverage.
01:40:55.000 It wasn't an urban environment in the same way when they were in Afghanistan, right?
01:41:00.000 Other than Kabul and some of the other, there's not that many high population areas.
01:41:05.000 It's a completely different scenario in terms of like cell phone footage and people being able to see the wreckage, fly drones over it.
01:41:12.000 The capability technologically of covering it is very different, right?
01:41:15.000 I think that's true.
01:41:17.000 But there have been recent wars where there was same levels of technology.
01:41:20.000 The war in Syria, for example, which the Western powers were intimately involved in too, and the number of people killed there was absolutely huge, including Palestinians.
01:41:29.000 Thousands of Palestinians died in the Syria war.
01:41:31.000 And what year was this?
01:41:33.000 From 2011 onwards, right through till quite recently.
01:41:37.000 Don't you think there's a big difference between the amount of cell phone coverage available from 2011, especially in Syria, versus Israel and Gaza in 2024?
01:41:48.000 The point I would make, I think you're right.
01:41:50.000 I think social media, the improvement in social media, or not as one might see it, explains why we're seeing so much from this war.
01:41:59.000 But it can't explain, in my view, The cultural interpretation of it amongst many in the woke West.
01:42:06.000 Right.
01:42:07.000 Because in the woke West, support for Palestine is ubiquitous.
01:42:12.000 It's part of the doctrine.
01:42:14.000 And hatred for Israel is ubiquitous.
01:42:16.000 Colonizers.
01:42:23.000 Anti-Zionism, as they call it.
01:42:25.000 I don't think it's anti-Semitic to criticize Israel, of course, just as it's not racist to criticize Zimbabwe or whatever.
01:42:33.000 But we're not just seeing criticism of Israel.
01:42:36.000 We are seeing hysteria about Israel.
01:42:40.000 Which I think is disproportionate and myopic and obsessive.
01:42:44.000 And we're seeing it on the streets all the time.
01:42:46.000 We're seeing it on campuses.
01:42:47.000 We're seeing it on social media.
01:42:49.000 This very myopic obsession with everything Israel does.
01:42:51.000 And the thing that worries me is that what is presented to us as anti-Zionism is so similar to what we all recognize as the anti-Semitism of the past.
01:43:01.000 It is undeniably similar.
01:43:02.000 So in the past, what people said about the Jews is that they were uniquely bloodthirsty.
01:43:07.000 They had their fingers in the pies of everything.
01:43:10.000 They were controlling of our communities and our societies.
01:43:14.000 They were a pretty demonic force and destructive of world peace.
01:43:18.000 That's now all said about the Jewish state.
01:43:21.000 The Jewish state is uniquely murderous.
01:43:23.000 There was a line in a Guardian column recently which referred to the war in Gaza as uniquely barbaric.
01:43:29.000 They're seen as uniquely murderous.
01:43:31.000 They target children.
01:43:32.000 They love killing children.
01:43:34.000 They are all-powerful.
01:43:37.000 They have this hypnotic influence over the United States and the United Kingdom and other countries.
01:43:42.000 They puppeteer these nations.
01:43:44.000 They're so powerful.
01:43:45.000 And they are destructive of world peace.
01:43:48.000 It seems very curious to me that all the things that were once said about the Jewish people are now said about the Jewish state.
01:43:54.000 And I'm not saying that everyone who says it is a racist, right?
01:43:57.000 We shouldn't throw around the word racist willy-nilly.
01:44:00.000 It's an important word that has real meaning.
01:44:03.000 But I do think there is an element of bigotry, whether witting or unwitting, in this singling out of Israel for the most extreme form of moral opprobrium that is not directed against any other state, including states that do far worse things than Israel is doing.
01:44:21.000 That's what I find quite curious and really worrying about the times we live in.
01:44:25.000 Right, but what they are doing is very troubling, right?
01:44:30.000 The bombing of Gaza, the destruction of how many thousands and thousands of homes, how many innocent people died, that's still very troubling.
01:44:38.000 All of it is troubling, right?
01:44:40.000 In every single war, more civilians than fighters die.
01:44:46.000 Isn't this one extraordinary how quick it's happening as well?
01:44:50.000 It's very quick, but I think that the thing to bear in mind is that when people say that 30,000 Palestinians have been killed, the first thing to bear in mind is that that is a lower number than have died in other recent wars.
01:45:01.000 The more important thing to bear in mind is that a large number of them Estimates say 30% are Hamas fighters, though they are a member of the— 30%?
01:45:12.000 Where have you heard that?
01:45:13.000 Well, I've seen people say that between 10,000 and 12,000 are Hamas fighters.
01:45:17.000 But this is the problem.
01:45:19.000 None of this information gets through, not even to the extent that we would then be free to discuss it.
01:45:24.000 Right.
01:45:24.000 Actually, that's what Coleman said as well, right?
01:45:26.000 He did say 30%.
01:45:27.000 The number, whatever.
01:45:30.000 I thought it was 50%.
01:45:32.000 I thought it was more than that, rather.
01:45:39.000 It's hard to say, right?
01:45:40.000 Because there's people that will tell you that Hamas over-exaggerates the number of civilian casualties.
01:45:47.000 And then there's people that say that Israel will target anyone that even is associated with Hamas as being Hamas.
01:45:55.000 And so they exaggerate their numbers as well.
01:45:58.000 But at the end of the day, for sure, tens of thousands of innocent people have died, right?
01:46:05.000 A lot of innocent people have died.
01:46:06.000 Tens of thousands.
01:46:07.000 But isn't it quicker than most wars in the amount of people that have died so quickly?
01:46:12.000 These wars that you're talking about, whether it's Afghanistan or Syria, the amount of dead may be greater, but isn't it over a longer period of time?
01:46:20.000 That's true.
01:46:21.000 This war is distinctive in some ways.
01:46:24.000 Firstly, because it's in a very small area.
01:46:27.000 Secondly, because we know that Hamas roots itself in civilian society.
01:46:31.000 We know this for a fact.
01:46:32.000 We know that it hides among civilians.
01:46:35.000 We know that it disguises itself as part of those communities.
01:46:38.000 But that's what terrifies people, the willingness to kill civilians, knowing that you're going to kill civilians just to get to the bad guy.
01:46:44.000 But, you know, this is the thing that really worries me about in the aftermath of 7th of October.
01:46:49.000 I said to so many people, so many friends of mine and people I encountered in media discussions, I said to them, what should Israel have done?
01:46:57.000 Nothing.
01:46:58.000 You know, they had just been subjected to the worst act of anti-Semitic violence in 70 years, more than 70 years.
01:47:06.000 The slaughter, the butchery of entire families, the kidnap of hundreds of people, the murder of old people, women, men, children.
01:47:14.000 What should they have done?
01:47:15.000 And when people say, well, they shouldn't have gone into Gaza, they should have just relaxed a bit, or whatever people say, what they're essentially saying is, you know, Jews, let yourselves be killed.
01:47:29.000 It's not a big deal.
01:47:30.000 It's not the end of the world.
01:47:31.000 It was only an incursion into your territory and a slaughter of 1000 people.
01:47:36.000 Why are you so het up about this?
01:47:38.000 No society would put up with that.
01:47:41.000 If an anti-American force came into the United States and killed whatever the equivalent number is, it would be tens of thousands if we took in population differences.
01:47:51.000 No one, I hope, would sit back and say, well, you know, whatever.
01:47:55.000 It's fine.
01:47:56.000 It's not a big deal.
01:47:57.000 Israel had every right, I think, to pursue the terrorists that did this to its people.
01:48:04.000 And to pursue them with extreme prejudice and to put them down and to say, we will create a situation in which you will never be able to do this again.
01:48:13.000 And of course, what's happening is awful.
01:48:16.000 But the moral responsibility for it lies entirely with Hamas.
01:48:21.000 They started this war.
01:48:23.000 They're now refusing to end the war by giving back the hostages and surrendering to Israel, which is what they ought to do.
01:48:29.000 And they're openly saying, they're openly rejecting ceasefire options.
01:48:33.000 So this absolution of Hamas, this absolving of Hamas of any responsibility for the calamity currently befalling Gaza, I find that very worrying too because among some woke activists there seems to be this view that Israel is the only actor in that region.
01:48:50.000 It's only Israel's decisions that matter and we can't possibly expect these brown people in Hamas to have any responsibility for what's going on.
01:48:59.000 There's a curious Paternalism to that.
01:49:02.000 The truth is that Hamas is fundamentally responsible for what's happening, firstly by starting it and secondly by refusing to end it.
01:49:10.000 But if you're talking to people that are reasonable, their objection is not that Israel defend itself.
01:49:17.000 Their objection is the sheer number of innocent people who die by virtue of these strategies of just attacking populations where Hamas is embedded with civilians and killing all the civilians.
01:49:30.000 And their objection is not that, you know, that Hamas is good.
01:49:36.000 It's that the Palestinian people are innocent and that they're trapped under the ruling of Hamas and have been since, what, 2006?
01:49:43.000 How long has it been?
01:49:44.000 Yeah.
01:49:45.000 That's not a – you're killing people that have nothing to do with that.
01:49:50.000 You're killing people that are captured by their own government.
01:49:52.000 You're killing people that virtually have no say in how their government is run.
01:49:58.000 They have no say in what Hamas does if they decide to – Go across the border and kill 1,200 people.
01:50:05.000 They didn't want that to happen.
01:50:07.000 They didn't ask for it.
01:50:08.000 They didn't participate in it, but yet they're getting bombed into smithereens.
01:50:11.000 And this is the argument that the reasonable people have, is that, okay, you're not absolving Hamas from starting this, but are you absolving Israel from killing thousands and thousands of innocent people in the process of hunting down Hamas?
01:50:28.000 And are you creating even more martyrs by doing so?
01:50:32.000 Because how many people are losing family members?
01:50:34.000 How many people are facing starvation?
01:50:36.000 How many aid workers are getting killed while they're trying to help?
01:50:40.000 At a certain point in time, you're You have to look at is this the only way to do this?
01:50:47.000 And you have to say you're not absolving Hamas, but you are showing compassion for innocent people that are trapped by this murderous regime.
01:50:57.000 And now they're getting blown to smithereens because these people embed themselves with them.
01:51:02.000 And they create, you know, the human shield argument, right?
01:51:05.000 Yeah.
01:51:05.000 I don't know if it's a good argument.
01:51:08.000 I don't know if it's a moral and just argument for a superior society.
01:51:11.000 If we really are morally and ethically superior, the idea of killing tens of thousands of innocent people to get a few bad people or how many bad people?
01:51:21.000 Who knows what the numbers are, right?
01:51:23.000 But that disturbs the shit out of people.
01:51:26.000 And when they find the numbers are grossly...
01:51:29.000 It's like, what are the number of women and children that have died?
01:51:32.000 It's a high number.
01:51:34.000 A very high number.
01:51:35.000 And they don't take comfort in the fact that they died by getting bombed instead of being invaded and butchered in their homes.
01:51:43.000 They're dead.
01:51:44.000 But you know what I'm saying?
01:51:45.000 I do know what you're saying.
01:51:46.000 Both things need to be taken into consideration.
01:51:48.000 And when we're discussing this, it's like there's this...
01:51:54.000 People have this ability to like sort of compartmentalize and not look at it in an overall – if you took an overall assessment, you'd say the whole thing is horrible.
01:52:05.000 But just because one horrible thing happens, it doesn't justify all this other horrific shit that's going on as well.
01:52:12.000 Both those things kind of need to be addressed.
01:52:14.000 And is that the only way to do this?
01:52:16.000 The only way to do this is to kill tens of thousands of innocent civilians in order to get these bad people?
01:52:22.000 But, you know, I think you're right that if you talk to reasonable people, they're driven largely by compassion.
01:52:29.000 They're not driven by a pro-Hamas sentiment, although I think there is a terrifyingly pro-Hamas sentiment amongst some of the activists on the streets.
01:52:36.000 We've seen it on the streets of London, the streets of the United States.
01:52:39.000 But I think, you know, the terrible truth of the matter is that wars sometimes have to be fought.
01:52:49.000 In the United States, you fought two huge wars, the Revolutionary War and the Civil War, in order to deliver yourselves into something resembling freedom.
01:52:57.000 In the United Kingdom, we had a civil war that lasted more than a decade, which is what made us a democracy.
01:53:03.000 Right, but that's not really the question, right?
01:53:04.000 No, but so what I'm saying is that what Israel has decided, and I think they are right, And in all those wars I've just mentioned, by the way, there were huge numbers of civilian casualties.
01:53:15.000 Even pre the modern era of bombs falling from planes, there were civilian casualties.
01:53:21.000 But there's a moral judgment that sometimes has to be made, which is that do we go and fight these people or do we allow them to regroup and potentially plot another attack on us?
01:53:32.000 And Israel has taken the decision, and I think it's probably the right one, That we have to go and fight these people, just as Britain took the decision that it had to go and fight the Nazis, and just as America took the decision that it had to go and fight the slave owners.
01:53:46.000 Sometimes you have to make a moral judgment.
01:53:48.000 And the thing is, war is awful.
01:53:50.000 But John Stuart Mill, a great liberal thinker from the 1800s, he made the point that War is an ugly thing, but it's not the ugliest thing.
01:53:57.000 The lack of patriotic feeling or the lack of a belief that anything is worth a war is worse.
01:54:04.000 And I do think we're seeing that in the West now, this revulsion at war.
01:54:10.000 We are in a very luxurious position in the West, especially younger generations.
01:54:14.000 They've never had to fight for anything.
01:54:16.000 They've never faced an existential threat.
01:54:19.000 From a neighboring army that wants to destroy both your state and your religion and your people.
01:54:25.000 They've never faced that level of threat.
01:54:27.000 And what's more, from an army that hides in ordinary streets, in crowded communities amongst ordinary people.
01:54:34.000 So there's this kind of luxurious moralism, I find, in some of the condemnation of Israel.
01:54:40.000 Coming from young people in Europe who've never had to fight for anything, never had to fight to maintain their existence, never had to fight against an existential threat to their entire way of life.
01:54:52.000 What's more, these young people in Europe, their great-grandfathers shoved Jews into ovens.
01:54:59.000 And then they have the absolute gall to say to Israel and to the Jewish state, well, why do you need your own country?
01:55:05.000 They need their own country because of what we did to them 80 years ago.
01:55:10.000 So there is this, it's not just hypocrisy, it's not just double standards, it's this kind of luxuriant condemnation coming from people who live in very comfortable, peaceful societies, who seem to have no understanding that every now and then your society is confronted with a threat that cannot just be wished away.
01:55:28.000 It cannot be peace negotiated away, it cannot be diplomacy'd away.
01:55:34.000 It has to be confronted in the most physical manner imaginable.
01:55:38.000 And the consequences of that will always be terrible, but sometimes it has to be done.
01:55:43.000 And that's the only way to do it?
01:55:46.000 The only way to do it is to bomb the places where the civilians are because the bad people are there as well.
01:55:51.000 And I know what you're saying about the condemnation of Israel, and I agree to a certain extent, but could you imagine?
01:55:57.000 I mean, we're essentially in some sort of a strange conflict with drug cartels in Mexico.
01:56:01.000 Now imagine if that didn't exist 20 years ago.
01:56:04.000 I never heard about it.
01:56:05.000 But now we hear about it every day.
01:56:07.000 What if 20 years from now becomes even more intense?
01:56:09.000 And what if some drug cartels in a gang sneak across the border and kill a bunch of Americans just because they hate America?
01:56:17.000 If we bombed Mexico into the Stone Age, do you know how upset people would be?
01:56:23.000 If we bombed factories because the cartels had embedded themselves in the factories and we killed tens of thousands of innocent workers who were just poor people, do you know how upset people would be?
01:56:33.000 They'd be very upset.
01:56:34.000 It just hasn't happened before.
01:56:35.000 So this unique condemnation is because we're seeing it.
01:56:38.000 We're seeing the consequences of this.
01:56:41.000 And when people look at what's happening to Gaza, like, how does anybody – how does that come back?
01:56:47.000 There's nothing left.
01:56:48.000 This is getting obliterated.
01:56:49.000 And what does that mean?
01:56:50.000 What does that mean for the future?
01:56:52.000 What does it mean to the people that live there?
01:56:53.000 What is being done to help them?
01:56:56.000 Is it a death sentence to tens of thousands of people or a million people?
01:57:01.000 What is going to happen in two, three, four years?
01:57:04.000 What if this keeps going on and on?
01:57:05.000 But this is why it's very unfashionable these days to make moral judgments.
01:57:10.000 You're not supposed to make a moral judgment.
01:57:11.000 You're either supposed to calculate everything according to what its consequences might be or you're supposed to take this very technocratic view of society.
01:57:18.000 You're certainly not supposed to judge people's identities and so on.
01:57:21.000 So I know it's unfashionable to make moral judgments, but sometimes a moral judgment has to be made.
01:57:27.000 And I think in relation to the Israel-Hamas war, the way I see it is that this was an assault on ordinary civilians by a barbaric army, the like of which people in the West don't understand and don't have to confront people.
01:57:44.000 And Israel made the moral judgment that it had to pursue it in the way that it considered best.
01:57:49.000 Now the thing is, you talk about the numbers, and a lot of people talk about the numbers.
01:57:53.000 People will often say, Israel has now killed more people than Hamas killed on the 7th of October, and that's true.
01:58:00.000 But this is not just a numerical equation.
01:58:02.000 This is not just something that can be done on an abacus or on a pie chart.
01:58:07.000 This is bigger than that.
01:58:09.000 This is a bigger moral conundrum.
01:58:11.000 And there is no moral equivalence, in my view, between what Hamas did and what Israel is doing.
01:58:17.000 Because Hamas intentionally killed people on the basis of their race.
01:58:23.000 It intentionally stabbed people to death.
01:58:27.000 It intentionally threw hand grenades into safety shelters in which families were hiding.
01:58:32.000 It intentionally raped and stripped and murdered women.
01:58:35.000 It did it on purpose, intimately, face to face, with knives and guns and bombs.
01:58:40.000 Because they are Jews, right?
01:58:43.000 That was a fascistic assault on Israel.
01:58:46.000 What Israel is doing, and I don't accept the idea that they are purposely targeting civilians or that they kill those aid workers on purpose.
01:58:53.000 I just don't think that's true.
01:58:55.000 So what Israel is doing...
01:58:58.000 There is collateral damage to Israel's just pursuit of Hamas.
01:59:03.000 And I just don't think there is any serious moral comparison between the intentional murder of Jewish people and the absolutely tragic, regrettable deaths of civilians in war, as has happened in every war in history.
01:59:17.000 They can't be compared.
01:59:18.000 So I do think we have to go slightly beyond the numbers, beyond the horror of it, which we see on our TV screens every day.
01:59:25.000 And ask ourselves, what is the moral question at stake here?
01:59:31.000 Does Israel have the right to exist?
01:59:33.000 And if so, does it have the right to fortify itself against this anti-Semitic army that wants to destroy it?
01:59:39.000 That's the moral question.
01:59:40.000 And then there's a broader moral question for us in the West Which is why have so many of our young people in particular, and the educated elites, been sucked onto what I would consider to be the wrong side of this question?
01:59:53.000 We used to think that education was the great guard against hysteria and regressive views.
01:59:59.000 We used to think that education would deliver people from ignorance, deliver them from the prejudices that might have afflicted Our less educated forebears and ancestors.
02:00:07.000 But what we've had since 7th October is very often the most educated people making excuses for the most regressive army on earth.
02:00:17.000 And so it raises questions for our societies.
02:00:21.000 What's happening in our academies?
02:00:23.000 What's happening in our universities?
02:00:25.000 What's happening amongst our young?
02:00:27.000 What's happening on social media that is sucking people into this myopic hatred for Israel?
02:00:32.000 Why are people like Aaron Bushnell burning themselves alive in the name of Palestine?
02:00:38.000 We have to look at what's happening in our society and make a moral judgment there as well as I think having a moral understanding of why Israel thought it had to pursue Hamas in this way.
02:00:48.000 There's absolutely no defense of Hamas targeting Jews and killing them.
02:00:55.000 No one could say that there's any defense.
02:00:58.000 But the idea that killing innocents in order to get to the bad people is morally superior, you kind of have to make the judgment that you care about them less than you care about your people.
02:01:10.000 Because if you could imagine a scenario where a Jewish hospital had Hamas in its basement and they made the decision to bomb the Jewish hospital and kill all the Jews inside of it just to get to the 40 or 50 Hamas guys that are there.
02:01:26.000 No one would say that that's okay.
02:01:28.000 So if you're saying that these people who have no say in how their culture is run are less valuable in terms of like what you care about, what happens to these people that had nothing to do with it.
02:01:40.000 We care about the people in Israel.
02:01:41.000 They had nothing.
02:01:42.000 They got parachuted in, killed, and at a rave.
02:01:44.000 It's horrifying.
02:01:45.000 But it's also horrifying for the people that have zero say in how their society is run.
02:01:50.000 They're young, and they're women and children, and they're getting bombed into oblivion because where they are is where Hamas is.
02:01:59.000 If those were Jews, it's definitely Hamas' fault.
02:02:03.000 But the problem is deciding whose fault doesn't make it feel better for the people that feel it's a moral outrage that you're destroying tens of thousands of innocent lives.
02:02:14.000 And who knows how many people are wounded permanently?
02:02:17.000 And who knows how many people are displaced?
02:02:18.000 Their life will never be the same again.
02:02:20.000 And it's all happening because The moral decision is that in order to get rid of these bad people, you're willing to kill these innocent people that are not us.
02:02:30.000 But the truth of the matter is...
02:02:31.000 But isn't that true?
02:02:32.000 Because if they were Druze, if there was 500 Jews and three Hamas guys, who would be cool with killing all those innocent Jews to get to the Hamas people?
02:02:42.000 But what you're saying is technically correct, but I can think of no war in history, and it is important to talk about the history of conflict.
02:02:52.000 Yes.
02:02:53.000 I can think of no war in history where there haven't been civilian casualties in pursuit either of an unjust cause, like the pursuit of Saddam Hussein, apparently because he was responsible for 9-11.
02:03:05.000 Bullshit, built on lies, built on a tissue of misinformation.
02:03:09.000 And hundreds of thousands of people died and suffered as a consequence of that.
02:03:13.000 So wars are either fought for unjust purposes and civilians die as a consequence or sometimes for just purposes and civilians also die as a consequence.
02:03:23.000 So the English Civil War, right, where the parliamentarians led by Oliver Cromwell wronged to fight against the royalists and to create the modern idea of democracy.
02:03:32.000 Because there were civilian casualties, I would say no, they were not wrong.
02:03:36.000 They made the right decision.
02:03:37.000 Was the civil war in America wrong?
02:03:39.000 I don't think it was.
02:03:39.000 I think destroying slavery was a great cause and worth the sacrifices that had to be made.
02:03:47.000 What I'm saying is Israel is now facing a similar dilemma that our societies haven't faced for a very long time.
02:03:53.000 There hasn't been a war inside the UK, unless you count the war with Northern Ireland, of course, from 1969 to 1994. For a very long time.
02:04:02.000 So Israel is facing a similar dilemma.
02:04:05.000 What do we do when we face this existential threat?
02:04:08.000 Do we defend our right to exist?
02:04:10.000 Do we fortify ourselves against the siege of these antisemites against us?
02:04:15.000 And they've decided that this is a war that they have to fight.
02:04:18.000 I do think the consequences of the war are tragic.
02:04:22.000 I do think the unwillingness of certainly the activist class in the West to apportion any blame to Hamas whatsoever is very, very interesting.
02:04:32.000 But that's kind of a straw man because there is that, but then there's also the vast majority of people who look at it as a horrific loss of life of innocent people.
02:04:42.000 And just to chalk it off to the horrors of war, it's like that's the only way to do it?
02:04:48.000 Is this the only way to do it?
02:04:50.000 To bomb civilians because Hamas embeds itself in civilians?
02:04:53.000 I don't know.
02:04:54.000 I'm not an expert on war tactics.
02:04:56.000 I don't think it's the only way to do it.
02:04:58.000 You're right to say that if one were just to throw one's hands in the air and say, it's war, what do you expect?
02:05:04.000 That's not a good response.
02:05:06.000 Right.
02:05:07.000 That's not a good justification for what's happening.
02:05:09.000 But what I'm saying is that beyond the—what I'm saying is, I think, twofold.
02:05:14.000 The horrors of war attend every war.
02:05:17.000 That's a given.
02:05:17.000 Every war is horrible and sick-making and hellish.
02:05:20.000 That's a given, I think.
02:05:22.000 But then there's another issue, which is the question of why a war is being fought.
02:05:27.000 Is it being fought for criminal reasons and wrong reasons?
02:05:30.000 And I think there are many examples of that spearheaded both by your country and mine over the past hundred years.
02:05:37.000 Unjust wars that led to unjust deaths.
02:05:40.000 Are there also wars that are just and that are worth fighting?
02:05:44.000 Yes.
02:05:44.000 The war against Nazism, I think, was a just war.
02:05:48.000 I can think of anti-colonial wars in which it was completely justifiable for people to rise up against British rule or American domination or whatever else it might be.
02:05:58.000 So we do have to make a moral call on what's happening in Israel and Gaza.
02:06:04.000 And that does involve rising above the differences in the numbers killed.
02:06:09.000 It does involve rising above the horrors of war and trying to take a broader view which says...
02:06:17.000 Do we want Israel to continue existing?
02:06:20.000 Do we want the Jews to have their own homeland?
02:06:22.000 And do we want them to be safe from the fascistic menace of a neighboring army that would like to kill them all and to destroy their state from the river to the sea?
02:06:34.000 That's the question we need to ask ourselves.
02:06:36.000 And if our answer to those questions is yes, then we do have to accept Israel's right to pursue Hamas.
02:06:43.000 And then the blame for the horrors in Gaza has to lie at the feet of Hamas, which is with profound cynicism, placing itself amongst the people.
02:06:53.000 In order to then throw its hands in the air and say, look what evil Israel is doing.
02:06:59.000 It's killing these people, even though they put themselves there for that express purpose.
02:07:04.000 The cynicism of it, the horror of it is unimaginable.
02:07:07.000 And so I think to put it all on Israel, as some people do, to say this is just a demonic action by the Jewish state is wrong.
02:07:15.000 Hamas bears profound responsibility both for starting the war and also for putting guards and civilians in harm's way and refusing to pull the plug on the wall, which it could do right this minute if it returned the hostages and surrendered to Israel.
02:07:29.000 So we do have to look at who is morally responsible for this calamity, and I think it's Hamas.
02:07:35.000 I understand what you're saying, but I also view it from a perspective of the people that live there that have no say.
02:07:42.000 And to just say, hey, this is because of the people that run you and have ruined your life, we're going to kill you too.
02:07:50.000 We're going to kill everybody there.
02:07:51.000 And the only way to do it is to just bomb places where we know they are, even if we know you're there too.
02:07:58.000 That scares people, that people are willing to make these sort of moral decisions as being the only way to handle this.
02:08:05.000 War is scary.
02:08:06.000 War is horrifying.
02:08:08.000 But this kind of war is uniquely scary, right?
02:08:10.000 Because one army is vastly superior to the other one, vastly, and funded by the greatest army, which is us, right?
02:08:17.000 That's a factor, too, because it's not really – they're not equivalent.
02:08:22.000 You know, one did a horrific terrorist attack, but it was fairly rudimentary in terms of, like, what they were able to do.
02:08:28.000 Look, here's the moral argument.
02:08:31.000 If you said to Hamas, Israel said, we will lay down our arms and we'll surrender to you, most people believe that Hamas would just butcher the Israelis.
02:08:42.000 If Hamas said, we will lay down our arms, we'll surrender to you, No one thinks that Israel will just go in there and butcher everybody.
02:08:51.000 There's the real difference.
02:08:53.000 But you also have to accept that there's one group of people, and the narrative is their land has been stolen, it was all originally supposed to be theirs, and they're being dominated by the superior military force.
02:09:06.000 And that they're attacking that superior military force that they believe has this unjust control over them.
02:09:15.000 Is an act of rebellion against something that's in control of them.
02:09:19.000 And the people that did it are all monsters.
02:09:22.000 But the people that are embedded amongst these people have almost no say.
02:09:28.000 They have no power and they're women and children.
02:09:31.000 That's what's scary, is this justification of this horrific act of destruction of who knows how many thousands of houses, who knows how many thousands of lives lost and have been destroyed forever and lost loved ones, even the people that survived.
02:09:47.000 Who knows how many of them have been fucked up and they didn't do anything wrong.
02:09:50.000 That's just as scary to people, if not more scary, That people can make a moral justification in this framework of this is war and war is awful.
02:10:00.000 My question to those people would be, why did you not find it equally scary when Western forces did that in Raqqa?
02:10:10.000 They might not have known.
02:10:11.000 Well, that's the thing.
02:10:14.000 So Western powers did it in Raqqa when they were pursuing ISIS. Loads of civilians died.
02:10:19.000 They did it in Mosul when they were pursuing ISIS. They did it in other countries too.
02:10:26.000 This is the thing.
02:10:28.000 You're right to say that people don't know.
02:10:29.000 And this is another problem with the way in which the Israel-Hamas war is being talked about.
02:10:34.000 It's being obsessed over in a disproportionate way, in my view.
02:10:38.000 I don't accept the idea that it is a uniquely wicked war or a uniquely destructive war.
02:10:44.000 I think there have been numerous wars in recent years which have been far more destructive.
02:10:47.000 Now, you're right to say this might be quicker, and proportionally speaking, perhaps more people in Gaza have died as a proportion of the population than you might say in Syria, where 200,000 people lost their lives, or in Iraq, where 150,000 people lost their lives.
02:11:01.000 That might be true.
02:11:02.000 Maybe more in Iraq.
02:11:02.000 Maybe more, and it certainly is a spin-off of the war itself.
02:11:07.000 So it could be true that this is speedier and proportionately more people are dying.
02:11:11.000 That may be true, I don't know.
02:11:12.000 What I'm saying is that the idea that it is a uniquely problematic war, uniquely murderous, that there are a uniquely high number of civilian casualties in contrast with militant casualties, I don't think that's true.
02:11:30.000 So then the question becomes, why is that being said?
02:11:34.000 Why is there a focus on the uniquely horrible nature of this conflict?
02:11:38.000 What's going on there?
02:11:40.000 And it seems unavoidable to me that what's happening is that Israel has been turned into almost this whipping boy of Western activists who have simply turned against civilizational values.
02:11:54.000 And they see Israel as representative of those values.
02:11:58.000 They see Israel as representative of modernity, of the West, of whiteness, even though Israel is not a white country.
02:12:05.000 It's an incredibly diverse country.
02:12:06.000 They see Israel as representative of all the things that they hate.
02:12:09.000 And they've turned it into this punch bag, into a moral punch bag where they can let off steam by demonizing this one tiny state among all the other states on earth as being uniquely wicked.
02:12:20.000 But hold on.
02:12:22.000 Because if Israel existed with no conflict as to who owns the land and no history of moving the borders further and further, if it existed in that way, yes.
02:12:36.000 But it exists as a superior military force that's in control of these people that are on their land that are not of them and that has a tight grip on them and an iron dome and you see how it works and they shoot missiles in futility and they blow up in the air.
02:12:53.000 It's not a fair comparison because what people are upset about is that Israel Controls those people and and has these people sectioned off into what's essentially what people describe as an open-air prison That's and when that it bombs the shit out of the open-air prison.
02:13:13.000 That's what freaks people out, but it's I know what I agree with what you're saying in principle I agree with what you're saying in forms of in terms of like look if you have a force That's a genocidal force that it has a military and wants to attack a country that they should be rooted out and stopped 100% But it's the way in which it's happening and the circumstances that were in place before it happened that make it uniquely different.
02:13:38.000 But I don't think it is uniquely different.
02:13:40.000 I think there have been many instances over the past decade or 20 years in which there has been the pursuit of radical Islamists that has led to civilian casualties because they hide themselves in civilian infrastructure.
02:13:51.000 But this also has a holy war aspect to it.
02:13:54.000 And the holy war aspect to it is that Judea and Israel and this whole area, it has massive historical implications for the religion.
02:14:06.000 There's a lot else going on there.
02:14:08.000 It's Muslims and Jews.
02:14:10.000 It's not simply two people that are bordering each other, that have Poland and Germany.
02:14:16.000 You know what I'm saying?
02:14:17.000 There's some other shit going on there.
02:14:19.000 You know, I think it can be hard for us to imagine.
02:14:22.000 I find it hard to imagine.
02:14:24.000 Imagine there was a...
02:14:25.000 You might be right that this is an inferior army, militarily speaking, and in terms of numbers.
02:14:30.000 I'm definitely right, don't you think?
02:14:31.000 You're right.
02:14:32.000 You're right about that.
02:14:33.000 But they have proven themselves to be more than willing to invade Israel, to kill its people, to kidnap its soldiers, to kidnap its civilians.
02:14:41.000 So they are pretty good at what they do, which is anti-Semitic terrorism.
02:14:46.000 So they're pretty forceful.
02:14:49.000 And they have devoted themselves to the destruction of Israel.
02:14:54.000 And they're a pretty significant force.
02:14:56.000 And they do have support from various elements in the Middle East and also from educated people in the West who ought to know better.
02:15:03.000 Imagine there was an army that threatened to destroy the United States, like to end the United States or the United Kingdom.
02:15:12.000 An army right next door that was pretty well armed and supported by autocratic powers and supported by significant numbers of people around the world and which devoted itself to the entire destruction of our state and which demonstrated its willingness to do so.
02:15:27.000 By slaughtering thousands of our civilians.
02:15:30.000 It's hard for us to compute that.
02:15:32.000 It's hard for us to understand the position that puts people in, the position it puts Israel in and the people of Israel.
02:15:40.000 So what I'm saying is that rather than rushing to this moral condemnation where we say Israel is overreacting or Israel is being reckless or Israel is being uniquely wicked and uniquely destructive, we ought to try to understand where Israel is coming from.
02:15:57.000 I think?
02:16:12.000 Of destroying Hamas.
02:16:15.000 Hamas is a menace to civilization.
02:16:18.000 Hamas is a menace to reason.
02:16:21.000 This is a backward, misogynistic, homophobic, violent, anti-Semitic army that has demonstrated its willingness and its capacity to murder Jewish people for being Jewish people.
02:16:32.000 That, out of all the movements on earth, deserves to be destroyed.
02:16:37.000 It's difficult for Israel to destroy it without also causing collateral damage because of the way in which Hamas operates.
02:16:46.000 Then the question becomes, should Israel stop trying to destroy Hamas and allow it to regroup?
02:16:52.000 It has already threatened to do another 7th of October and it said it will do it again and again and again.
02:16:58.000 Or does Israel say, regrettably, we are going to have to fight a horrible war in order to destroy this fascist threat to our nation?
02:17:07.000 That's the moral dilemma.
02:17:07.000 I completely understand what you're saying.
02:17:09.000 I think we're going around in circles.
02:17:11.000 We keep going around in circles because the straw man or the steel man of it is.
02:17:16.000 You look at it from the opposite perspective.
02:17:19.000 Yes, Israel is attacked by these horrible forces, but also these innocent people are getting destroyed because of no fault of their own.
02:17:27.000 And we're willing to do horrific things.
02:17:29.000 And doesn't that create more martyrs?
02:17:31.000 And doesn't that create more people who want to attack Israel?
02:17:34.000 And doesn't that do the opposite of what we want it to do?
02:17:37.000 And also, isn't this situation...
02:17:41.000 One of the most horrific things we've ever seen, despite the fact that we all know the war is held, but this acknowledgment that this is horrific and that these people that died, there's more of them than died in the attack on Israel.
02:17:56.000 But I don't think...
02:17:57.000 You're right.
02:17:58.000 We are going around in circles.
02:18:00.000 We're going to keep going around in circles.
02:18:01.000 We're on polar opposites of this, I think.
02:18:03.000 But we're not.
02:18:04.000 No, we're not, actually.
02:18:06.000 We have a difference of opinion on the moral weight of this question, I think.
02:18:11.000 I just don't know if there's another way to do it.
02:18:13.000 But the one thing I don't accept, actually, and I would definitely push back on this idea that this is one of the worst things we've ever seen.
02:18:22.000 You know, you were talking earlier about Vietnam.
02:18:26.000 Think about what—apologies if this is offensive to some American listeners and viewers—what the Americans did in Vietnam.
02:18:33.000 The My Lai Massacre.
02:18:35.000 Just the most extraordinary barbarism.
02:18:37.000 Yes.
02:18:38.000 But it doesn't justify what's going on today.
02:18:41.000 No, no, it doesn't justify it.
02:18:41.000 We weren't aware of it to the extent that we're aware of it today.
02:18:44.000 And if a civilization is going to advance, it's going to have to be held up to the highest moral standards, particularly if you're the superpower.
02:18:51.000 You're the superpower that's connected to people that have very primitive means of attacking you.
02:18:57.000 But the point I'm trying to make is not to say that though we committed horrors in the past and therefore Israel has the right to commit horrors today.
02:19:05.000 That's not what I'm saying.
02:19:06.000 But I do think it's worth acknowledging that America did objectionable things in Vietnam and many other places.
02:19:13.000 No doubt.
02:19:14.000 What the British did in India and Africa is everything happening in Gaza pales into insignificance in comparison to what the British did.
02:19:24.000 No doubt.
02:19:25.000 But Gaza is happening right now.
02:19:26.000 But this is my point.
02:19:28.000 This is not my attempted justification of the conflict.
02:19:32.000 My justification of the conflict is that a moral question has to be answered.
02:19:37.000 What I'm saying is Why is this war being treated as uniquely wicked?
02:19:43.000 Why is it seen by huge numbers of people, and it really is seen by huge numbers of people, as unprecedented in its barbarism?
02:19:52.000 I see people online every day saying, I can't sleep.
02:19:55.000 I'm crying.
02:19:57.000 I'm weeping.
02:19:57.000 I'm shaking.
02:19:58.000 I don't know what to do.
02:19:59.000 And I want to say to them, Why have you not felt that way in relation to other wars?
02:20:05.000 Now, you could be right that they maybe didn't know about those wars.
02:20:08.000 I don't think the footage is even comparable.
02:20:11.000 I think it's what's in front of your face every day.
02:20:13.000 And I also think that the original attack was so horrific that it focused people on that conflict.
02:20:21.000 And now they're completely tuned into it.
02:20:23.000 They want to know what's going on.
02:20:24.000 I think...
02:20:26.000 I think that's a very generous interpretation.
02:20:28.000 And I'm sure for some people what you're saying is true.
02:20:31.000 But I can't help but think that Israel is being singled out for unjust criticism.
02:20:39.000 So you think there's anti-Semitism behind it?
02:20:43.000 I don't think all those people marching in the streets are anti-Semites, although I do think some of them are foolishly rubbing shoulders with Hamas supporters and turning a blind eye to placards showing the Nazi swastika and so on.
02:20:58.000 But I do think anti-Zionism, as it's referred to...
02:21:03.000 Is a very curious beast, and it's one that I do think expresses an element of bigotry.
02:21:08.000 And just to come back to a conversation we had earlier, I do find it extraordinary that amongst the so-called anti-racists of the West, They now seem very cavalier about one of the worst acts of racist violence of modern times.
02:21:25.000 And amongst the so-called feminists of the West, look at UN women.
02:21:29.000 It took UN women, what, 54 days to say anything about 7th of October, during which women were brutalized and butchered.
02:21:36.000 I find it interesting that amongst the feminists of the West, they're so reluctant to say anything about this assault on Jewish women in Israel.
02:21:42.000 And amongst the anti-fascists of the West, Antifa, for example, who've been going around for the past 10 years saying Trump is Hitler 2.0 and the vote for Brexit is going to herald the return of the 1930s.
02:21:55.000 These people see fascism everywhere.
02:21:57.000 They've been obsessing over the return of the 1930s for years.
02:22:01.000 When something very like fascism actually happened, they were either incredibly cavalier about it, some of them were supportive of it, they did refer to it as an act of resistance, or they just turned away and didn't want to talk about it.
02:22:13.000 So the question for me is not...
02:22:17.000 Just to say, oh, it's the horrors of war because that is a mundane thing to say.
02:22:24.000 It's to ask why Israel is being singled out to such an extent that vast swathes of people in the Western world are willing to ditch every principle they adhere to for the past 25 years and more.
02:22:37.000 In order to explain away the racist butchery of Jewish people.
02:22:43.000 Well, one of the most bizarre things was when those heads of those universities were all discussing whether or not it was harassment to say death to Jews on campus.
02:22:54.000 That was a, boy, if I was Jewish, I would have been terrified watching that.
02:22:57.000 Like, what a goddamn wake-up call.
02:22:59.000 When you see how deep the roots of this fucking chaos goes, you have the president of, was it Penn?
02:23:08.000 Is that who it was who said, if it's actionable, with like a smirk on her face, like she was trying to silence these silly students.
02:23:18.000 These are people that are used to existing only in academia, which is the root of all of this stuff, which is really very, very bizarre, that academia has become this It's incredibly insulated environment where people go there, they adopt the philosophies,
02:23:34.000 and then they teach to new kids that come in this doctrine.
02:23:38.000 And it's very cult-like.
02:23:40.000 It's very cult-like also in the fact that you have to adhere to one side.
02:23:44.000 It's not an open discourse sort of establishment.
02:23:48.000 It's not.
02:23:49.000 They'll silence conservative people and pull fire alarms, and they want to stop freedom of speech, if at all possible, if it doesn't jive with what the fuck they believe.
02:24:00.000 That's a part of it, too.
02:24:01.000 Yeah.
02:24:02.000 And the most striking thing about those presidents of the universities at the congressional hearing...
02:24:07.000 Not only were they unable to say that calling for the deaths of all Jews is a problem, but these are campuses on which, for the past few years, there have been controversies over Halloween costumes.
02:24:19.000 And it's a crime against transgender people to dress up like Caitlyn Jenner on Halloween.
02:24:24.000 Or they'll kick you out forever if you misgender someone.
02:24:27.000 Right, you misgender someone.
02:24:30.000 In the case of Harvard, a young professor there got into hot water and Over raising questions about the idea that there is a black genocide being carried out by white cops.
02:24:40.000 He got into trouble even though he proved it with evidence and analysis.
02:24:44.000 So for years on these campuses, there has been a real reluctance to allow freedom of thought, freedom of speech, the right of people to engage in rigorous academic analysis.
02:24:55.000 And yet when it comes to this one question, they throw their hands up in the air and say, well, you know, freedom of speech.
02:25:00.000 Call for the genocide of the Jews.
02:25:01.000 That's free speech.
02:25:02.000 So again, it's that double standard.
02:25:04.000 But you're right about what's happened to universities more broadly, which is that they have become conveyor belts of conformism.
02:25:11.000 It's very bizarre.
02:25:12.000 I often get young people saying to me, because I do talks at university sometimes, and they say, is it worth being at university?
02:25:18.000 And I'm not sure it is, because you used to go to university.
02:25:22.000 To have your mind opened, and now you go there and get it closed down.
02:25:25.000 So that's a problem.
02:25:27.000 It is a problem, and it's weird.
02:25:28.000 It's weird that there's no alternatives, unless you go to some sort of a religious school.
02:25:33.000 It's very strange.
02:25:35.000 The number of conservative-leaning universities versus liberal universities is off the charts.
02:25:41.000 It's so unbalanced.
02:25:44.000 And I don't know what solves that problem because that seems like an embedded institution that is very reluctant to any kind of a change and is so deeply dug into its ideology that they think the whole world is filled with Nazis and bigots and homophobes and that they're on the right side of everything and they don't produce anything.
02:26:06.000 Yeah.
02:26:07.000 Yeah.
02:26:17.000 Yeah.
02:26:19.000 Yeah.
02:26:26.000 Real papers about heteronormative activity in dog parks.
02:26:29.000 And people are like, oh, this is brilliant.
02:26:32.000 Fat bodybuilding.
02:26:34.000 Oh, this is brilliant.
02:26:35.000 You're the best.
02:26:35.000 Like, oh my god, we're living in a Mike Judge movie.
02:26:38.000 We really are.
02:26:39.000 We are in an idiocracy.
02:26:41.000 And that's my genuine fear, is that as our access to information It becomes bigger and bigger and more and more available.
02:26:49.000 It's not going to save us.
02:26:51.000 That's what's crazy.
02:26:52.000 It's like we're digging into nonsense more now than we ever have before.
02:26:56.000 When we didn't have...
02:26:57.000 Back then, everyone knew that a guy in a dress with a heart on in a women's room is a pervert.
02:27:03.000 And now it's like, he's a woman.
02:27:05.000 He's amazing.
02:27:06.000 He's brave and inspiring.
02:27:08.000 And I don't know what fixes that.
02:27:11.000 Because it seems like...
02:27:14.000 Something has to break, and some realization of the people that are in it, they have to wake the fuck up and go, what are we doing?
02:27:21.000 Why do we believe?
02:27:22.000 You have a finite amount of time on this planet, in this life.
02:27:25.000 You have a finite amount of time.
02:27:27.000 We're wasting it on things that are so ridiculous that any objective species from another planet, if they came here and looked at us, they'd be like, look at these fucking morons.
02:27:36.000 How can they be so sophisticated and so ridiculous at the same time?
02:27:42.000 And boy, we have to put a check on these fuckers, because they're liable to do wild shit.
02:27:47.000 They can justify almost anything.
02:27:50.000 And they're essentially a bunch of cult members who don't believe they're in a cult, which is one of the most dangerous things you could be.
02:27:55.000 I couldn't agree more.
02:27:57.000 That's the Inquisition.
02:27:58.000 That's fucking everything.
02:27:59.000 It's everything that's ever happened.
02:28:01.000 Cult members didn't think they were in a cult.
02:28:02.000 They forced their shit on everybody else and a bunch of people died.
02:28:05.000 And then people go, well, glad we learned our lesson.
02:28:08.000 We'll never do that again.
02:28:09.000 And we're in the middle of doing everything.
02:28:10.000 Right now.
02:28:10.000 And we have this ridiculous idea that somehow or another we're immune to that now.
02:28:14.000 We wouldn't do that now.
02:28:15.000 We're more sophisticated than that now.
02:28:17.000 Even though, objectively, all the same steps are all moving in place.
02:28:21.000 And everybody's like, I don't see it.
02:28:22.000 I don't see it.
02:28:23.000 This is great.
02:28:24.000 You know, listening to you say that, I couldn't agree more.
02:28:27.000 And it's a very salient reminder.
02:28:31.000 You know, there's this prejudice that the mob is made up of kind of toothless hicks, you know, stupid, uneducated, witless people who don't know their ass from their elbow going around with their pitchforks.
02:28:42.000 If you look at history, the mob, the hysteria has tended to come from the upper echelons of society.
02:28:51.000 It's tended to come from the supposed experts.
02:28:53.000 It was the priestly elites who carried out the Inquisition.
02:28:56.000 It's the academia today that is pushing the most crazy post-truth nonsense ideas.
02:29:04.000 It's very often the educated sections of society who get sucked into these backward ways of thinking, these regressive ways of thinking, and whose ways of thinking have an incredibly destructive impact on community life, on children's bodies, on women's rights,
02:29:20.000 on the sanctity of certain spaces.
02:29:23.000 So I think reckoning with the graduate mob is actually one of the most essential tasks of our time and really getting to understand how these people who look down upon us as post-truth, who look down upon us as stupid and uneducated and easy prey for demagogic forces,
02:29:43.000 we need to turn it back on them and say, hold on, it's you people who have been subsumed by this irrational cult.
02:29:50.000 Who have abandoned the virtue of truth and embraced the ideology of unreason.
02:29:55.000 It's you people who are doing that.
02:29:57.000 And what's more, the way in which you're doing it is having a detrimental impact on people's lives and their bodies and their freedoms.
02:30:05.000 So I think that's one of the great pressing tasks of our time, to push back on them and say, your hysteria is fucking things up.
02:30:13.000 And the real fear is that children are getting indoctrinated straight out of high school.
02:30:18.000 They're getting indoctrinated into this way of thinking straight out of high school without participating in the real world and then they just get sucked into it and then they go right out into these corporations and ruin them.
02:30:29.000 That's it.
02:30:29.000 That's Bud Light.
02:30:30.000 Absolutely.
02:30:31.000 That's where it came from.
02:30:32.000 Absolutely.
02:30:32.000 It's just nonsense and it's bizarre to watch it all take place in mass, not just in one very specific sector of the society, but everything, in all things, in the prisons.
02:30:44.000 You're watching it everywhere.
02:30:46.000 It's uber bizarre to watch.
02:30:48.000 And in corporations, it's insane.
02:30:52.000 You know, capitalism loves identity politics.
02:30:55.000 That's what I've come to realize, especially capitalism loves transgenderism.
02:30:59.000 If you look at during Pride Month, every single bank and hedge fund corporation flies the pride flag from their windows.
02:31:06.000 They all wear pronoun badges.
02:31:08.000 It's a demon with a sheep mask on.
02:31:11.000 It's crazy.
02:31:12.000 And I often say to, when I meet young, woke activists, I often say to them, listen, if you're so progressive, if you're so Marxist, if you're so radically left-wing, why do the owners of the means of production love your ideology so much?
02:31:25.000 How have they co-opted it so easily?
02:31:29.000 Right.
02:31:29.000 Corporations are no longer evil.
02:31:31.000 And, you know, they will say, oh, it's pinkwashing.
02:31:34.000 It's just them trying to disguise the terrible things they do by waving a pride flag.
02:31:37.000 It's not that.
02:31:38.000 It's something more profound.
02:31:40.000 I think there is across the board in the corporate world, the political world, the academic world, there is this susceptibility to irrational thinking has grown up.
02:31:52.000 And they are all becoming members of this really odd post-truth cult.
02:31:57.000 And I think that's very worrying.
02:31:59.000 But that comes back to our point about the Democratic pushback against it, which I do think is happening.
02:32:05.000 There is a populist sense of angst with all of this stuff.
02:32:10.000 There are people out there saying, well, fuck you, I'm not going to buy Bud Light anymore.
02:32:13.000 And I'm not going to vote for Hillary Clinton or Joe Biden.
02:32:17.000 And I'm not going to...
02:32:18.000 Watch Saturday Night Live anymore, and I'm not going to go along with this stuff.
02:32:23.000 I'm not going to sit back and watch as you denigrate my community, absolutely transform the meaning of words like man and woman and mother and father, and put forward these men in dresses and tell me that they're women, and if I refuse to believe you that I'm some kind of antisocial bigger...
02:32:40.000 Then you'll be fired.
02:32:41.000 Yeah, and you're fired.
02:32:42.000 I'm not going to put up with that anymore.
02:32:43.000 So there is this...
02:32:45.000 I think one of the reasons to be hopeful today is that there is a pushback against this stuff.
02:32:49.000 And the more of that we can have, the better.
02:32:52.000 Yes, sir.
02:32:53.000 All right.
02:32:54.000 Well, that was a fun conversation, man.
02:32:55.000 Thank you very much.
02:32:56.000 I really appreciate it.
02:32:57.000 And tell everybody where they can find you, social media and all that stuff.
02:33:01.000 Definitely don't read the comments.
02:33:03.000 Never read the comments.
02:33:04.000 The main place you can find me is at Spiked, Spiked Online Magazine, where I write.
02:33:09.000 I'm the chief political writer.
02:33:11.000 You can find me on Instagram.
02:33:14.000 My handle is burntoakboy because I come from a part of London called Burnt Oak.
02:33:20.000 Oh, okay.
02:33:21.000 And you can listen to my podcast, The Brendan O'Neill Show, and Google me.
02:33:26.000 You'll find me on there.
02:33:26.000 All right.
02:33:27.000 Beautiful.
02:33:27.000 Thanks, sir.
02:33:27.000 Appreciate you, man.
02:33:28.000 Thanks, Jack.
02:33:28.000 All right.
02:33:28.000 Bye, everybody.