The Joe Rogan Experience - November 06, 2026


Joe Rogan Experience #2578 - Calley Means

Joe Rogan Experience #2577 - Gregory Forth

Episode Stats


Length

2 hours and 18 minutes

Words per minute

161.66

Word count

22,355

Sentence count

2,058

Harmful content

Misogyny

24

sentences flagged

Toxicity

96

sentences flagged

Hate speech

28

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcripts from "The Joe Rogan Experience" are sourced from the Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool. Explore them interactively here.
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:02.000 Joe Rogan Podcast, check it out.
00:00:04.000 The Joe Rogan Experience.
00:00:06.000 Train by day, Joe Rogan Podcast by night, all day.
00:00:09.000 Hey, good to see you.
00:00:15.000 How are you doing?
00:00:15.000 Good to see you.
00:00:17.000 Well, I just recently resigned from my job.
00:00:21.000 How was that?
00:00:27.000 You know, two years ago when Bobby Kennedy joined President Trump, it was one of the greatest, I think, political miracles in history.
00:00:34.000 I think we were all so excited.
00:00:36.000 It showed that there was a real political animation around a Democrat working with a Republican.
00:00:42.000 I think it showed the country that the Trump administration was going to fight not just partisan stuff but special interests and the swamp.
00:00:49.000 I helped set that up, came in, dropped everything I was doing, came in, was a senior advisor at the White House, led MAHA implementation, fought really hard.
00:00:58.000 I was optimistic because I'm a realist and things get done in politics.
00:01:04.000 Two ways.
00:01:05.000 One is there's special interest in money.
00:01:07.000 That's how a lot of things get done.
00:01:09.000 That's why we spend three times more than any other country on health care.
00:01:12.000 That's why we have such high housing prices.
00:01:15.000 A lot of the things we're complaining about and dealing with are because the system's been rigged on the inside.
00:01:19.000 We all know that.
00:01:20.000 But the other way things get done is real public pressure and real public shame on the political system.
00:01:24.000 What Bobby Kennedy and President Trump did is showed that there's a lot of voters that care about American health.
00:01:29.000 I was optimistic we could use that coalition to bust through the D.C. swamp to get some things done.
00:01:35.000 We did get some things done, but all of them were through public shame.
00:01:39.000 The psychedelic thing.
00:01:41.000 That was being totally blocked.
00:01:43.000 Full directive from the top that we were going to slow that down and not do it.
00:01:48.000 And your call to President Trump.
00:01:51.000 President Trump, whenever there was an issue which was on his radar, he's like, let's get it done, let's go hard. 0.97
00:01:56.000 He said, we need to get this done, get this on my fucking desk in the next week. 0.97
00:02:00.000 And it busted through the system. 0.98
00:02:02.000 I was able to engender a coalition to get that same dynamic happening with things like dietary guidelines, the food dyes.
00:02:09.000 Getting those out of the system.
00:02:11.000 These were all just the system of DC does not want any change to happen.
00:02:14.000 The fact that we had a voter coalition and could use that and say, this coalition, you, other people are going to be pissed off if we don't get things done.
00:02:21.000 We were able to get things done.
00:02:22.000 But the simple reality and why I left is that there is a very concentrated group of people in the Trump administration that are antagonistic to what people voted for and are frankly I think it's very clear.
00:02:40.000 Doing things for other reasons, particularly in many cases to enrich their families.
00:02:46.000 So, walk us through this.
00:02:49.000 So, you get in there, you have your first days on the job.
00:02:55.000 When did you realize it was going to be an issue?
00:02:58.000 And you were very hopeful at first, right?
00:03:00.000 It's very exciting.
00:03:01.000 A lot of people were very excited about the coalition.
00:03:03.000 They felt like this was one of the main things that I was excited about with Trump getting into office.
00:03:10.000 Bobby Kennedy was going to be in there, and there was a lot of these things that you just discussed, a lot of these things about peptides and stem cells, for sure, the psychedelics, and then just making people aware of additives and food that were completely unnecessary, that were ruining people's health.
00:03:29.000 So there's all this promise.
00:03:30.000 Everybody was very excited about it.
00:03:32.000 It was electric two years ago.
00:03:33.000 I mean, we remember it.
00:03:35.000 It was absolutely electric, and that compared to what we felt this week, right?
00:03:38.000 That's the real issue.
00:03:39.000 There was a real sense.
00:03:41.000 Every single person in the first day of the Trump administration thought we were.
00:03:44.000 Working for a presidency that would be absolutely historic.
00:03:47.000 We thought Trump was going to be better than George Washington.
00:03:50.000 The energy was we felt like we were in the most consequential moment in American history.
00:03:54.000 We were going to go hard and we were going to be able to channel what voters voted for.
00:03:58.000 I cannot express to you how electric it felt in there in the early days.
00:04:03.000 So, what was the process like where you felt like it was off the rails?
00:04:08.000 Yeah.
00:04:09.000 So, I want to get into specifics.
00:04:11.000 We all know things are corrupt and bad, but I'll just get right into specifics.
00:04:16.000 What I learned, and I don't think anyone would dispute this the way the White House, this White House is set up, is the most centralized control up to the chief of staff office of any administration in American history.
00:04:29.000 So, I'll just get into details about who runs the White House.
00:04:33.000 There's a picture I have of the key people. 1.00
00:04:36.000 But the White House - Susie Wiles is the most powerful chief of staff in modern American history. 1.00
00:04:41.000 And she has taken a stranglehold on any policy decision. 1.00
00:04:45.000 No policy decision gets done without her office giving it the okay.
00:04:49.000 And it's absolutely systematic.
00:04:51.000 So, every single cabinet secretary - they're spending meetings constantly worrying about how to get on Susie's good side and how to win favor with her.
00:05:03.000 She has a couple deputies.
00:05:05.000 The deputies are James Blair, another guy named Walker Barrett, and another guy who recently came in named Richard Walters.
00:05:17.000 These are the most powerful people in the country.
00:05:19.000 All right, we're back.
00:05:20.000 Yeah.
00:05:21.000 We had a glitch.
00:05:22.000 These are the most powerful people in the country.
00:05:24.000 Let me just go through dispassionately, just factually, who these people are.
00:05:29.000 Susie Wiles, the chief of staff, before she joined the Trump administration, was one of the top lobbyists in the country.
00:05:35.000 She spent her career taking money from Benjamin Netanyahu, who she was a top consultant for, the pharmaceutical industry, the pesticide industry.
00:05:44.000 So, just passionately, just as a statement of economic facts, Suzy Wiles, her career has been taking money from the industries and foreign governments who would pay her the most money.
00:05:53.000 That's what she did.
00:05:54.000 Nobody disputes that.
00:05:57.000 James Blair, who was the head of political operations, is her friend from Florida and a long term political consultant.
00:06:08.000 A lot of money from industries like the sugar industry, but that's been his career, running some campaigns, taking money from special interests.
00:06:14.000 She brought him along and really propped him up with Trump.
00:06:17.000 Tony Fabrizio is one of the most powerful people in the country.
00:06:20.000 He's Trump's chief pollster, very good friends with Susie.
00:06:25.000 He is on the outside the whole time, and every single policy issue goes through him because he tells the team whether it's politically appropriate to do or not based on his polling.
00:06:36.000 As he's been working in the Trump administration in this extremely powerful role where every single cabinet secretary is trying to get on his good side, He is, and this is actually on his website.
00:06:46.000 He takes money from Pepsi.
00:06:47.000 He takes money from pharmaceutical companies.
00:06:50.000 He takes money from almost every single industry we're fighting against right now to this day.
00:06:54.000 So he's taking money at the same time.
00:06:55.000 I don't even know if President Trump fully knows that.
00:06:58.000 But as we were fighting things like school lunch reform and getting an ultra processed food definition, 90 percent of the country wants this.
00:07:05.000 We're going to define ultra processed food.
00:07:06.000 70 percent of a child's diet is ultra processed food.
00:07:08.000 We need to define it.
00:07:09.000 We need to figure out what to do there.
00:07:10.000 It's a widely popular promise from the administration.
00:07:13.000 He is getting paid by Pepsi and giving political analysis that the juice isn't worth the squeeze on doing policies like that, as simple as school lunch reform.
00:07:21.000 So that's Tony Fabrizio.
00:07:22.000 Every single issue goes through him, goes through James.
00:07:26.000 Tony and James were also in charge of the midterm efforts.
00:07:30.000 So James left the White House to be in charge of the midterm efforts, but still very involved.
00:07:35.000 And the key thing Susie did is from almost day one, we made the midterm strategy the policy strategy.
00:07:41.000 So they would often say, That we can't do certain things because that would hurt special interest configurations for the midterms.
00:07:50.000 Walker Barrett is Susie's neighbor in Florida, junior guy, but extremely powerful.
00:07:57.000 He was a congressional staffer for a long time.
00:07:59.000 Richard Walters is a kind of mid level fundraiser.
00:08:03.000 His whole career has been consulting and fundraising.
00:08:06.000 He came from a lobbying firm in the past year that lobbied for pesticides, lobbied for pharma.
00:08:13.000 Richard was, for a while, the most powerful person in the country because as Susie was out getting cancer treatment, Richard was effectively chief of staff.
00:08:21.000 And Chris Lacevita ran the campaign with Susie.
00:08:25.000 He's been on the outside.
00:08:27.000 He's a lobbyist consultant, getting paid a lot of money by special interests.
00:08:32.000 And the other thing I note: Susie's daughter became a lobbyist.
00:08:38.000 And I don't know if you have the graph, continental strategies, but this is really interesting.
00:08:46.000 Susie's daughter went to a lobbying firm, and it was an open discussion in the White House.
00:08:52.000 If a company hired Susie's daughter, then that was getting a high priority.
00:08:59.000 There's a chart that shows Continental Strategies, the group Susie's daughter worked for, had almost zero in revenue before the Trump administration, shot up to 30 ish million dollars a year in revenue.
00:09:11.000 If you're a special interest and you want to get something done, the secret's out.
00:09:14.000 You pay Susie's daughter.
00:09:16.000 It was openly discussed that when they had a client.
00:09:20.000 This is what happened to Continental once Susie's daughter worked there.
00:09:26.000 Then Chris Lesavita's daughter, again, the person who ran the Trump campaign, if you go to Checkmate.
00:09:31.000 The person who ran the Trump campaign and is highly influential in various policy decisions.
00:09:37.000 It's the same graph.
00:09:38.000 The firm didn't exist before the Trump administration shot up.
00:09:42.000 And then Susie worked at a firm called Ballard Partners.
00:09:47.000 Ballard Partners has become the highest revenue generating lobbying firm in history.
00:09:53.000 And when Ballard, it's just an open, everyone knows this if you hire Ballard, you get a meeting with Susie and you can get things done.
00:10:02.000 And their revenue went from middling to the highest revenue.
00:10:05.000 Lobbying firm ever.
00:10:06.000 So I'm just trying to state facts.
00:10:08.000 That's who these people are.
00:10:10.000 That's their background.
00:10:12.000 You know, everyone's, this is Ballard, just go to the 2026, you know, $98 million.
00:10:20.000 And the key thing I'd say here is you talk to any lobbyist, that $98 million is what's reported.
00:10:28.000 That's the down payment.
00:10:29.000 That's then Ballard advising people on how to shift money to other dark money groups.
00:10:34.000 So you probably put a 10x multiple on that.
00:10:37.000 Ballard basically helps then pay other groups, pay other people to get things done.
00:10:46.000 Ballard, again, the secret's out in D.C. You have to pay Ballard to get something done, and they've generated more revenue than any other firm in American history.
00:10:56.000 That's who these people are.
00:10:57.000 Is this normal?
00:10:58.000 This is the key point I want to make, and I think it's very important as we decipher the election.
00:11:04.000 I want to go into specifics to explain how this works.
00:11:08.000 This is how it works for 30 years.
00:11:11.000 It is a massive mistake.
00:11:13.000 I don't think President Trump knows about most of this.
00:11:16.000 He can't be everywhere at once.
00:11:19.000 It is absolutely true that his administration has been infiltrated by the very people that he energized voters to say he would get out of D.C.
00:11:27.000 And what I'm going to talk about today and the specific things I'm going to talk about are not idiosyncratic to the Trump administration.
00:11:34.000 This is how D.C. works.
00:11:37.000 It is impossible to describe to you. 0.99
00:11:39.000 How demonic this culture is.
00:11:41.000 Before I went on, I actually spoke to some of my friends who are top lobbyists.
00:11:44.000 I'm like, is this right to you?
00:11:47.000 We are at a precipice in American history.
00:11:49.000 This is civilizational.
00:11:50.000 Like, civilizational.
00:11:51.000 Like, Americans are going to have social unrest and rebel against it.
00:11:54.000 Like, we're robbing the American people.
00:11:56.000 Like, right?
00:11:57.000 And they're like, yeah, yeah.
00:11:58.000 I'm like, well, why are you doing this?
00:12:00.000 I don't have any control.
00:12:01.000 It's the game.
00:12:02.000 I have a good career, good life.
00:12:03.000 Like, everyone, like, this is how DC works.
00:12:07.000 You know, Chuck Schumer gave a speech to the hospital lobbyists two weeks ago saying, you know, I'm going to have your back.
00:12:14.000 He went around to all the lobbyists saying, we're going to help you out.
00:12:17.000 You know, Jeffries and Schumer, all of their people became lobbying firms.
00:12:21.000 Their lobbying firms are going to get this type of money.
00:12:23.000 That's already happening.
00:12:24.000 Every firm and every company in D.C. is shifting to Schumer's former staffers or Jeffrey's former staffers.
00:12:30.000 This is how it works.
00:12:34.000 This is a core point.
00:12:36.000 We need to grasp as Americans it's not one party to the next.
00:12:41.000 We're playing the shell game, right?
00:12:43.000 When Congress and the Senate I don't think they've passed a bill in the past 20 years that's significantly taken on special interests.
00:12:49.000 This is a game at the end of the day, debating partisan politics or having the delusion.
00:12:54.000 That this is a Trump problem or a Democratic problem.
00:12:56.000 This is a structural problem.
00:12:58.000 Americans did not vote for Trump or, frankly, the Democrats recently, who are basically copying Trump's messages against the swamp, they didn't vote to have people like this that are accepting money from foreign countries while they're running the midterm strategy have their kids working at lobbying firms that are making tens of millions of dollars.
00:13:16.000 And really having the most populist president ever elected, Donald Trump, have a centralized policy process that is.
00:13:25.000 Entirely dictated, not by voters, but by who's paying a ballot.
00:13:31.000 At one point, I was arguing for, I think, school lunches or this no brainer policy to Tony Fabrizio.
00:13:38.000 And I said to him, I said, President Trump really galvanized a lot of voters with Bobby Kennedy.
00:13:45.000 I know Joe Rogan's listeners would really love to see some getting healthier school meals.
00:13:50.000 The processed food companies might not like that.
00:13:52.000 And he said, it's not a big part of our strategy.
00:13:55.000 He said, you know, those voters kind of dismissed me bringing up your listeners who I felt like I was advocating for.
00:14:02.000 He said, that's not really, and Maha's not really a big part of our strategy.
00:14:06.000 So I, you know, had What did he say the strategy was?
00:14:12.000 They were obsessed with a highly kind of surgical strategy of redistricting.
00:14:18.000 They were obsessed with redistricting.
00:14:21.000 And Explain that to people.
00:14:24.000 Yeah.
00:14:26.000 So James Blair and Tony Fabrizio and Susie.
00:14:29.000 Their entire strategy to win the midterms was to gerrymander various states to change the congressional map so they're more favorable to Republicans.
00:14:38.000 That's all they cared about with the midterm strategy.
00:14:45.000 Then I can't speak to exactly what's in their head, but everyone has their own biases.
00:14:52.000 When you come from this world where you're being paid at the current moment by Pepsi and all these other companies, all your friends are lobbyists.
00:14:59.000 You know, everything, you kind of convince yourself that politics all rests on money.
00:15:05.000 And Susie and James and other people said this a lot.
00:15:08.000 Susie said to me many times, We need money for the midterms, Callie.
00:15:11.000 We need money for the midterms.
00:15:13.000 So when you convince yourself that money is the most important thing for the midterms and for the future political dynamics, and this was the narrative in the Trump administration by Susie from almost the beginning, then you can justify almost anything.
00:15:28.000 And what Tony Fabrizio did with this polling is that, oh, people don't really care about the food issues, people don't really care about the pesticide issues, people don't really care about the Care about the taking on farm or whatever.
00:15:37.000 So that's the big shell game, I think, that happened everything in the political strategy was based on getting enough money for the midterms, not actually doing the things that would then energize voters enough.
00:15:49.000 Well, what do they think people do care about?
00:15:51.000 If they don't think people care about the very things that they voted for, that they were excited about with this whole coalition with Maha, what do they think?
00:16:00.000 Yeah.
00:16:00.000 Aaron Ross Powell, Jr.
00:16:00.000 James and the political team were really obsessed with these gimmicks.
00:16:05.000 They gave a presentation to the entire cabinet, and Susie said, Tony Fabrizio is smarter than anyone in this room.
00:16:11.000 He's driving our strategy.
00:16:11.000 Listen to him.
00:16:13.000 He talked about how - That's still good for him.
00:16:21.000 In the midterms, we need to talk about no tax on tips and affordability and the tax cut that we got from the one big beautiful bill.
00:16:31.000 My opinion is that you look at recent polls, and this is Pew, this is CNBC, this is Fox News.
00:16:38.000 They ask Americans what the biggest issue in the country was, and it's the same in every poll it's corruption, it's money, and politics.
00:16:45.000 I think Americans feel spiritually, and this is what helped get Trump elected, is American.
00:16:53.000 Competitiveness does not rest on whether we pass no tax on tips.
00:16:57.000 I don't think Trump got shot in the face and almost killed and has gone through everything he's gone through to run on these gimmicks.
00:17:07.000 It's because we have corruption, it's because we have a broken system.
00:17:11.000 It is a joke that we're going to actually address big issues without institutional reform, which is really what Trump ran on.
00:17:18.000 But they pushed these gimmicks.
00:17:20.000 They were obsessed with this.
00:17:23.000 The only thing on healthcare was.
00:17:24.000 That we lowered drug prices.
00:17:26.000 We had some drug price negotiations.
00:17:28.000 So it was very targeted things instead of big, bold ideas.
00:17:33.000 Think DraftKings isn't available where you live?
00:17:35.000 Think again.
00:17:36.000 DraftKings, an official partner of the NBA, is now available in all 50 states.
00:17:42.000 So wherever you live, follow your favorite NBA stars, get excited about the biggest matchups, and lock in on those buzzer beating moments.
00:17:51.000 And with DraftKings, it's all in one app.
00:17:54.000 Plus, new customers get three months of NBA league pass.
00:17:58.000 On us, so you can catch more NBA action anytime, anywhere.
00:18:02.000 Download the DraftKings Sports app today and use code ROGAN.
00:18:06.000 New DraftKings customers spend $5 and get $200 in total bonuses, plus three months of NBA league pass on us.
00:18:16.000 That's code ROGAN in partnership with DraftKings.
00:18:19.000 The crown is yours.
00:18:20.000 Bet with DK Sportsbook.
00:18:22.000 Gambling problem?
00:18:23.000 Call 1 800 GAMBLER.
00:18:24.000 1 800 MyRESET.
00:18:25.000 Connecticut?
00:18:26.000 Call 888 789 7777.
00:18:28.000 Visit CCPG.org.
00:18:30.000 On behalf of Boothill Casino in Kansas.
00:18:32.000 Bet tax pass through may apply in Illinois.
00:18:34.000 21 and over.
00:18:35.000 Event contract trading with DraftKings predictions involves risk of loss.
00:18:35.000 Void in Canada.
00:18:39.000 Availability varies.
00:18:40.000 Predictions offer void in New York.
00:18:41.000 Bet to get bonus bets that expire in seven days.
00:18:44.000 Trade to get predictions dollars that expire in one year.
00:18:46.000 $50 in rewards issued every seven days via click to claim for 21 days.
00:18:50.000 One non-withdrawable reward redeemable.
00:18:52.000 NBA league pass auto renews until canceled.
00:18:54.000 Terms at DKNG.co slash audio.
00:18:57.000 Limited time offer.
00:18:58.000 Nationwide based on sportsbook predictions and free to play sports contest availability.
00:19:02.000 Varies by state.
00:19:03.000 So, when he got into office, how do these people become a part of the cabinet?
00:19:09.000 Is it simply that you have, because I understand that first administration that he had back in 2016, it was a giant issue that he had brought.
00:19:17.000 He thought he was draining the swamp.
00:19:18.000 He was bringing in the swamp to try to drain the swamp.
00:19:21.000 This time, supposedly, he had learned from the mistakes from the first administration and that things were going to be different.
00:19:28.000 Did he get duped?
00:19:30.000 What do you think it is?
00:19:31.000 Do you think there's 100 plus jobs to fill?
00:19:35.000 There's no way he can micromanage all of them and sit down with every individual person and go in depth on their resume, what their plans are, what financial ties do you have?
00:19:44.000 So he.
00:19:45.000 I think that he.
00:19:47.000 The first thing I'll say, there are a lot of good people in the administration.
00:19:51.000 Like Bobby Kennedy is a hero.
00:19:53.000 There's a lot of other cabinet secretaries that want to go hard.
00:19:58.000 But those cabinet secretaries are often talking about how exasperated they are by these dynamics, by these Ballard dynamics, and by the absolutely centralized control and paralysis that Susie's driven.
00:20:08.000 So it's frustrating. 0.78
00:20:11.000 But Susie, I mean, just the history is she ran Trump's campaign.
00:20:18.000 Then she was chosen as the chief of staff.
00:20:21.000 And then I know she brought these other people in based on her word.
00:20:27.000 I think Trump was right to learn lessons from his first term.
00:20:32.000 But I'm just saying what the reality is right now.
00:20:35.000 Like, Americans did not vote to have a group of lobbyists from Tallahassee be slowing down every policy that people voted for.
00:20:47.000 And often saying that's because we need to get special interest money.
00:20:52.000 I mean, that is not what people voted for, and it's a real serious problem.
00:20:55.000 And when she was running his campaign, was it that the campaign was successful?
00:21:01.000 He became president, so he said, okay, I'm just going to make you chief of staff.
00:21:04.000 Aaron Ross Powell, Jr. 0.94
00:21:05.000 Yeah, her reputation has been that she's a steady hand, that she's an adult in the room.
00:21:10.000 That was kind of her reputation.
00:21:11.000 There was a big force to get her in as the chief of staff, and I was really excited about that.
00:21:18.000 I worked with her and with Bobby and worked to get the Maha agenda through.
00:21:24.000 But I think we're at a pretty consequential time in American history.
00:21:29.000 I think, frankly, and we can get into specific stories, but I think what's happening is a case study, not just what's wrong with Trump, but what we need to exercise from the system in general.
00:21:38.000 So you get in, and when do you start realizing what these issues are, and how does it unveil itself?
00:21:47.000 I mean, I can go into what happened with glyphosate.
00:21:50.000 Yes, please, because that's a big one.
00:21:52.000 Because I mean, I really love Bobby, he's a great guy.
00:21:56.000 But when he was on here, he seemed so dejected when he had to explain how they got blocked.
00:22:02.000 Right.
00:22:03.000 Let's just set the table.
00:22:03.000 Tell me.
00:22:07.000 Let's just set the table about glyphosate.
00:22:10.000 Let me set the table about glyphosate in general.
00:22:10.000 Yeah, yeah, yeah.
00:22:12.000 American children are the sickest children in the developed world.
00:22:18.000 We're hitting puberty much younger than we did 50 years ago, two to three years.
00:22:23.000 The New York Times recently did an article.
00:22:27.000 They say nobody knows why.
00:22:28.000 We have the highest rates of autoimmune conditions, hormone conditions, cancer, pediatric cancer, diabetes, every chronic disease you can think of.
00:22:41.000 We have the highest rates among kids of any society in human history.
00:22:44.000 I definitely think that solving that was a major voter promise.
00:22:49.000 Obviously, what we're spraying on our food is very important.
00:22:54.000 The United States, we're 4% of the world's population.
00:22:57.000 By some measures, we use 20% of the world's glyphosate.
00:23:00.000 And herbicides and pesticides.
00:23:03.000 So, our system is addicted to these chemicals.
00:23:08.000 It's also interesting to me when you look at us versus other countries, we actually spend half as much of our national income on food than Europe.
00:23:17.000 They spend double the relative amount on food, but we spend three times more on health care.
00:23:24.000 So, we've got this real issue.
00:23:25.000 We're eating, we have these incentives for the cheapest possible food riddled with these chemicals.
00:23:30.000 And that was a big issue.
00:23:34.000 Tony Fabrizio did a poll.
00:23:36.000 92% of Republicans want to regulate pesticides.
00:23:38.000 Republicans want to regulate pesticides.
00:23:41.000 I mean, this is a universal issue and a real mandate for the MAHA movement.
00:23:46.000 When President Trump, during the endorsement ceremony, he said specifically, We are going to look into pesticides.
00:23:52.000 We're going to clean up the pesticides.
00:23:55.000 This is a top issue.
00:23:57.000 So, kind of in the administration, the first thing we had was the MAHA report, which was just basically listing what President Trump said he wanted to look into, such as pesticides.
00:24:08.000 And it was the greatest fight I've ever experienced up to that time in my life.
00:24:11.000 To have the word glyphosate in that report.
00:24:16.000 The amount of almost violent reaction against that from industry calls to Susie, calls to everyone to have that word not even have it in the report, not even have a government report mention that this could potentially be a problem was the biggest policy battle I had seen up to that time.
00:24:35.000 Just a word.
00:24:36.000 Just a word.
00:24:37.000 But it's very clear that health dangers of glyphosate.
00:24:41.000 I would say there is actually no medical disagreement on that.
00:24:47.000 But you have to understand the EPA hasn't reviewed glyphosate in close to 30 years.
00:24:53.000 They currently say that it does not cause cancer.
00:24:56.000 Now, five years ago, it was up for review and they were going to review it and they said no cancer.
00:25:02.000 Then it came out in court that Bayer, the maker of glyphosate, ghostwrote research for the EPA report and bribed EPA officials.
00:25:10.000 So Bayer, right now, is running PR campaigns saying, Attacking Bobby saying we can't have misinformation, we're the pro science company.
00:25:18.000 Literally, the last review of glyphosate was thrown out because they ghost wrote research.
00:25:23.000 The amount of pressure - this is the first thing I realized - the pressure was not even on policy on glyphosate and pesticides.
00:25:33.000 They didn't want any inquiry.
00:25:35.000 This is where bipartisan senators come in from agriculture states. 0.92
00:25:39.000 There's tremendous pressure on the NIH not to study it.
00:25:42.000 I'm saying people are threatening appropriations if we even look into it.
00:25:46.000 Aggression to not legitimize this topic, and it hasn't been legitimized.
00:25:52.000 The MAHA report, literally saying that glyphosate might be a problem, was the first time the US government has actually ever recognized even that potential reality, but it was totally watered down.
00:26:02.000 So that's the first step.
00:26:05.000 The industry is very concerned because there have been lawsuits that have been settled for billions of dollars that prove that.
00:26:18.000 This chemical gives people, especially kids, in many cases, cancer.
00:26:23.000 Those lawsuits are threatening Bayer.
00:26:27.000 The top issue for them was getting those lawsuits off their back.
00:26:32.000 They worked to go state by state and pass laws, jam laws through, giving them legal immunity, basically enabling making it the second product after vaccines in America that you can't sue for.
00:26:46.000 Even in most deep red, very agricultural states, This was a step too far.
00:26:52.000 So, they had trouble passing these bills in the states. 1.00
00:26:55.000 Then they tried to jam something into the farm bill in Congress, and there was such a maha uprising, including from Republicans, that this just doesn't make any sense. 0.98
00:27:04.000 They were having trouble getting it through Congress. 0.89
00:27:07.000 So, I knew being at the White House as the maha person, I knew that this was a politically explosive issue because it's obviously bad politics if the administration looks like they're putting their thumb on the scale to provide a product that has been proven to give.
00:27:23.000 Kids' cancer legal immunity.
00:27:25.000 Obviously, that's a massive political loser.
00:27:27.000 So I chatted with Susie's team.
00:27:31.000 I chatted with the USDA leadership.
00:27:34.000 I'm like, we agree.
00:27:36.000 Agreed.
00:27:37.000 The administration, at the very least, should not be weighing in on this.
00:27:41.000 We should not be putting that's a political disaster.
00:27:46.000 Time goes on, and I was called into a room, and Susie's person, Walker Bear, is there.
00:27:57.000 He puts an executive order down on the desk and he says, Please review.
00:28:04.000 It was the glyphosate EO that Says as a national security issue, we need to have glyphosate and alluded to liability protection using national defense reasons.
00:28:14.000 Trevor Burrus, national security.
00:28:16.000 Trevor Burrus, yeah, national security.
00:28:17.000 Trevor Burrus, to make sure that we have glyphosate use.
00:28:19.000 Trevor Burrus, and I will tell you the Secretary of War, the major generals, they don't see our lack of glyphosate on U.S. farms as a national security issue.
00:28:31.000 And the EO was all about farming, all about glyphosate.
00:28:33.000 Nobody in military leadership sees this as a national security issue.
00:28:37.000 So Walker put that on the table.
00:28:41.000 I read it.
00:28:42.000 I said, This is a political disaster.
00:28:45.000 You know, we need to talk about this.
00:28:48.000 And he said, This is final.
00:28:50.000 It's national security.
00:28:52.000 It's coming out tomorrow.
00:28:54.000 I know the people in the room.
00:28:56.000 And he said, Please inform Bobby, and this is not up for discussion.
00:29:00.000 And Bobby should not be calling the president or calling anyone.
00:29:02.000 This is not up for discussion.
00:29:04.000 Susie then called Bobby's office and said, We're not discussing this.
00:29:09.000 I went and informed Bobby, and it was announced the next day.
00:29:14.000 Around the same time, the Supreme Court was deciding whether to take a case that revolved around liability protection for glyphosate.
00:29:28.000 I again, over previous months, had talked to many people and said this is a political disaster because the Trump administration had a decision of whether to weigh in on that case.
00:29:37.000 So the Supreme Court probably wasn't going to take the case.
00:29:40.000 And when the Trump Department of Justice, when the President's Department of Justice weighs in, they can basically weigh in and say, please take this case.
00:29:46.000 And it was basically hinging on whether the administration weighed in and said, please take this case.
00:29:49.000 And the administration can weigh in on cases.
00:29:52.000 The Biden administration chose not to.
00:29:53.000 So I'm like, we just follow suit.
00:29:55.000 This is a political disaster. 1.00
00:29:58.000 Heidi Overton, who now is Susie's person, who's now up for the FDA commissioner, worked with the Department of Justice to construct a legal argument about why the Supreme Court could take the case. 0.84
00:30:20.000 And why they should be supporting liability protection for the pesticide makers.
00:30:26.000 She did not consult Bobby Kennedy on that. 0.78
00:30:30.000 The Department of Justice brought in a lawyer named Sarah Harris to the Solicitor General's office.
00:30:37.000 Sarah came from the law firm that is Bayer's main law firm, and she wrote an opinion saying that the Supreme Court should take the case and give liability protection to Bayer.
00:30:50.000 And that came out.
00:30:52.000 So both of these things were completely done without Bobby Kennedy throughout any policy process.
00:30:58.000 So did they get the liability protection?
00:31:01.000 Aaron Powell, Jr.
00:31:02.000 Yeah.
00:31:02.000 The Supreme Court ended up siding with the case, which they wouldn't have taken without that brief and urging from the administration to take it.
00:31:09.000 How is that possible that something that gives people cancer, that's known to give people cancer, gets liability protection?
00:31:14.000 Aaron Powell, Jr.
00:31:16.000 It's indefensible.
00:31:16.000 Aaron Powell, Jr.
00:31:17.000 We've talked about it on the podcast before, but the idea that your food system, in order for it to function, It relies on poison is really insane, especially when you realize that that's not being used in other countries.
00:31:29.000 Trevor Burrus Well, here's what I'd say, Joe.
00:31:31.000 I'd say, Joe, it's even again, I'm not a realist.
00:31:38.000 I wasn't in there to argue for unreasonable things.
00:31:42.000 We have a very complicated, interconnected economy.
00:31:46.000 I even buy the argument that we can't ban this stuff tomorrow.
00:31:50.000 99% of corn is sprayed with it, 98% of soybeans.
00:31:54.000 It's used in other countries, it's a lot less.
00:31:56.000 What's also used in wheat, which is really crazy.
00:32:00.000 And they use it for desiccation.
00:32:01.000 Have you seen there's a case of a young man who had glyphosate spilled on him and his neck and everything swollen up?
00:32:14.000 And he had like this insane reaction that a lot of people saw online.
00:32:19.000 They thought it was fake.
00:32:20.000 They thought this was like, oh, this is either AI or this is like, you know, someone put prosthetics on this young guy.
00:32:27.000 But no, this guy, there was some sort of an accident and glyphosate spilled on one side of his face.
00:32:34.000 So you could find it, Jamie.
00:32:36.000 I'm only seeing it in memes, so I'm going to try to find a non-meme source.
00:32:40.000 Okay.
00:32:42.000 I was going to say: this wasn't a crazy stance to ban anything.
00:32:48.000 It was about whether people could sue if they get cancer.
00:32:53.000 And in a free market, like that, to me, that's a perfect dynamic.
00:32:56.000 Like, we're not banning it, but there needs to be in a free market recourse if it's causing harm for the externalities.
00:33:04.000 So it actually was a perfect situation that we had the legal system taking lawsuits.
00:33:09.000 And adjudicating.
00:33:10.000 And by cutting that out, it's actually an assault on the market because I was actually happy with what's happening.
00:33:17.000 The MAHA is putting pressure on glyphosate.
00:33:18.000 There's lawsuits, which is appropriate, and they're going to invest and they're going to figure out something different.
00:33:24.000 And that's happening to a large degree.
00:33:25.000 There's been a lot of success with the MAHA movement.
00:33:27.000 Like every borderman in America realizes that people are pissed off.
00:33:30.000 But to take the legal recourse out, to make it the second product after vaccines, where I mean, what does that say to moms whose kids have cancer?
00:33:39.000 You can't even sue.
00:33:40.000 So this is the young man.
00:33:42.000 Tennessee teen drenched in glyphosate spent the next seven years fighting massive alien tumor.
00:33:52.000 Just months after being completely doused by glyphosate while working on a cell tower maintenance crew, Tennessee teenager Arden Allison developed one of the worst cases of Hodgkin lymphoma his doctor had ever seen.
00:34:06.000 Arden and his mother told chd.tv how the seven year battle transformed them into outspoken advocates pushing to get this disgusting poison.
00:34:15.000 Out of our food supply.
00:34:18.000 Look at him on the left.
00:34:20.000 Look at the side of his face. 1.00
00:34:21.000 That is fucking insane. 0.99
00:34:24.000 We're hitting a precipice right now because the top issue in Iowa right now is that they have the highest cancer rates in the world. 0.99
00:34:34.000 So this is happening.
00:34:36.000 Iowa has the highest cancer rates in the world?
00:34:39.000 Of any geographic location in the history of human civilization across the world, Iowa and Kentucky and other U.S. farm states.
00:34:48.000 Had the highest cancer rates of any location in the world.
00:34:51.000 And this substance just got liability removed.
00:34:57.000 After paying Ballard a ton of money.
00:35:03.000 Wow. 1.00
00:35:03.000 If you pull up Courtney Nupp, K N U P P, soybean. 1.00
00:35:11.000 Have you spoken to Trump about this? 0.98
00:35:16.000 Well, this is what's really interesting.
00:35:18.000 I, seeing this work out, Had a strong suspicion that this was happening under his nose.
00:35:28.000 His nose.
00:35:31.000 We had a meeting with him and Bobby and some other folks.
00:35:36.000 A farmer who was there, a regenerative farmer, brought it up.
00:35:44.000 President Trump reacted to the Supreme Court decision saying it's a terrible idea.
00:35:47.000 How the hell did this happen?
00:35:48.000 Had no idea the Department of Justice.
00:35:49.000 Jesus Christ.
00:35:50.000 I think it's emblematic.
00:35:53.000 I will say certainly what I saw when President Trump heard about an issue, his inclination was right.
00:36:01.000 And the people around him, I think, treat him horribly.
00:36:06.000 They treat him like they talk about him like a baby.
00:36:09.000 And they say it's because we're, you know, the political experts.
00:36:12.000 But, you know, Trump wanted to go hard on investigating vaccines.
00:36:16.000 Tony Fabrizio got paid by Pharma and did a poll saying that it's not a popular issue.
00:36:20.000 And Susie and Tony Fabrizio in that world put a full halt for a year on any vaccine inquiry.
00:36:25.000 The president busted that up just like he did with the psychedelic thing.
00:36:28.000 The president did not know about the.
00:36:32.000 Department of Justice memo.
00:36:36.000 He didn't know about the Supreme Court ruling on glyphosate.
00:36:40.000 And he didn't know the administration supported it.
00:36:42.000 His initial reaction was that that's a terrible decision.
00:36:45.000 Did he investigate and find out who was responsible for it?
00:36:48.000 I can't speak to that, but I can listen, the president I'm not making he has a lot going on.
00:36:52.000 Yeah, obviously.
00:36:53.000 And this is like I've never seen him be presented an issue on the MAHA stuff, and I'm going to speak to the MAHA stuff and not his inclination not to go hard.
00:37:04.000 It is clear.
00:37:05.000 That the glyphosate example is a case study of what is happening throughout the MAHA agenda and the health agenda, but also throughout the entire government.
00:37:19.000 But let me.
00:37:20.000 Did Americans vote for this extremely not transparent process where we have immunity for?
00:37:35.000 Pesticide makers be jammed down our throats with no public discussion.
00:37:40.000 At the very least, I think they voted for Bobby Kennedy with me and others at the table with whoever's arguing for the liability to have a discussion, for the chief of staff office to level that up to the president if there was an impasse and a real discussion.
00:37:58.000 But what they frequently did is they tried to take Bobby out of the discussion.
00:38:04.000 I mean, again, Susie's person sat me down, put the EO on the table, and said it's not up for discussion.
00:38:10.000 Bobby was put in a really tough place.
00:38:13.000 It is just extraordinary to me that people who were not elected can have that kind of power where they can push something through the Supreme Court where the president doesn't even know about it.
00:38:28.000 And it's something that the mass percentage of our country that doesn't have a vested financial interest would not want to happen.
00:38:36.000 Like that, that is something, especially the legal liability protection.
00:38:39.000 There's not, I don't, if you had a vote, just if we just had a wide scale country vote, I think it would be like off the charts.
00:38:52.000 95%.
00:38:52.000 We have both.
00:38:54.000 We have both. 0.99
00:38:55.000 And the 5%, like who the fuck are those people? 1.00
00:38:58.000 Like, this is not something that is necessary. 0.99
00:39:02.000 It's something that's necessary with the way the current system is structured.
00:39:07.000 It doesn't mean that this is the only way to do it.
00:39:10.000 It's not like this is the only way to grow food.
00:39:12.000 People have been growing food throughout human history.
00:39:14.000 Growing food throughout human history.
00:39:17.000 The idea that the only way that we can grow food in the United States of America, the greatest country the world has ever known, is we have to grow food with poison because there are some corporations that profit off of this and that use this.
00:39:31.000 The system does not want us to know the truth and they don't want us to talk about this stuff openly.
00:39:40.000 Again, the other massive pressure from the industry was just not studying the issue.
00:39:46.000 Listen, in order, everyone agrees corruption is a problem.
00:39:54.000 Polling says it's the number one issue in America.
00:39:58.000 You have to identify what the problem is before solving it, and there's a lot of forces that don't want us to identify it.
00:40:04.000 I feel like it is vital to identify what the problem is specifically and how this works.
00:40:11.000 Well, I agree with that 100%.
00:40:14.000 I just don't understand how this can be happening right under his nose.
00:40:20.000 There's so much going on.
00:40:22.000 This is glyphosate is just one.
00:40:24.000 But I mean, getting it to the Supreme Court and how did the Supreme Court agree on this?
00:40:30.000 There's 15.
00:40:31.000 The government's millions of people.
00:40:34.000 The DOJ is one part of it.
00:40:37.000 The DOJ, one bureaucrat, could write a memo saying that the Supreme Court could take this case.
00:40:42.000 But why would they agree to that?
00:40:43.000 That's what I don't understand.
00:40:44.000 Why would they agree to moving?
00:40:45.000 It gets into legal complexity in a law that's rigged saying that the EPA should have preeminent authority over.
00:40:53.000 So, they go by the Supreme Court, which mentions that EPA should be the dominant force.
00:41:01.000 And it's not really the Supreme Court's job to note that the EPA is rigged to the point that glyphosate hasn't been reviewed in 30 years and the last review was thrown out for ghost-ridden research and bribery to EPA officials.
00:41:13.000 So, the law itself says stuff about EPA supremacy.
00:41:16.000 The case was kind of technical, and they went off what the laws are.
00:41:24.000 The administration and the memo from the DOJ to take the case made them take the case, and we would not have had it if they didn't.
00:41:32.000 Jamie, do me a favor and put this into perplexity, please.
00:41:34.000 Ask what is the amount of money spent on glyphosate in this country annually?
00:41:42.000 What do you think that is?
00:41:47.000 You mean by farmers, like in farms? 0.99
00:41:48.000 Yeah, farmers, you know, all that stuff, all the Roundup sales, all that shit. 0.98
00:41:53.000 I mean, because it's available commercially as well for consumers. 0.98
00:41:56.000 You can still buy Roundup, can't you?
00:42:00.000 It's being limited more, but yes.
00:42:04.000 Let's guess.
00:42:04.000 What do you think the amount of money we're talking about here is that's in use by farmers?
00:42:10.000 Callie, what do you think it is?
00:42:13.000 I don't know what the raw numbers are.
00:42:16.000 I know our agriculture system is dependent on it.
00:42:18.000 It's 99% of U.S. corn.
00:42:19.000 They're dependent upon it as an herbicide.
00:42:22.000 Yeah.
00:42:23.000 And the seeds are genetically modified for it not to kill.
00:42:29.000 So a corn farmer, soybean farmer, Puts the seeds down, gets in their tractor, sprays, and then it kills everything but the seed.
00:42:37.000 Here we go.
00:42:37.000 Worldwide, annual spending on glyphosate based weed killers is roughly $7 to $12 billion.
00:42:42.000 Seems low.
00:42:43.000 Is the one universally agreed total.
00:42:49.000 Global market insight estimates $6.8 billion.
00:42:51.000 Insight 8 estimates $9.3.
00:42:53.000 Transparency market research estimates $12.4.
00:42:56.000 These are commercial market estimates, not an audited tally of everyone's purchases.
00:43:05.000 So there's not a clear number.
00:43:07.000 So, there's not a clear number.
00:43:12.000 But either way, we're talking about billions.
00:43:15.000 Yeah.
00:43:18.000 What the industry does first off, they're an aggressive lobby.
00:43:23.000 I mean, you talk about when you're looking at the firms I mentioned, they're backing up the truck.
00:43:27.000 Richard Walters, who came in and de facto chief of staff for a while, his former firm, FSG Global, was paid by Crop Life right before he left.
00:43:39.000 So they're backing up the truck on traditional lobbying.
00:43:41.000 The other thing that they have is that the large agriculture companies feel like it's existential to maintain their lead in low prices to have copious amounts of regulated pesticides and herbicides.
00:43:58.000 So they've bought off the senators from farm states.
00:44:01.000 You have an interesting dynamic where, because each state gets two senators, the small agriculture states are actually overrepresented.
00:44:06.000 And a lot of the strategy was highly coordinated with those agriculture senators.
00:44:14.000 It's changing though, and I think a positive sign is my friend Zach Lane.
00:44:19.000 He lost, but he ran as a Republican governor candidate in Iowa, and his chief message was we're going to figure out what the hell is going on with Iowa's cancer rates.
00:44:28.000 The number one issue in Iowa for the election was water quality because their water in Iowa is undrinkable with all the crap in the water from all the runoff.
00:44:36.000 It's the number one issue in the state.
00:44:38.000 Actually, both the Republican, this guy really led on the issue, and the Democrat who won.
00:44:43.000 Both ran on opposing liability protection and really figuring out what the hell is going on with the cancer rate.
00:44:49.000 So, even in Iowa, the epicenter of this, you've got people pissed off, which is a point I made to the political folks at the White House. 0.87
00:44:59.000 This is clearly a political loser to do.
00:45:04.000 I don't even think it's right on the politics of the farmers. 0.87
00:45:06.000 Farmers don't like cancer.
00:45:08.000 This is not banning anything.
00:45:10.000 Again, I can't stress this enough.
00:45:12.000 This is literally whether there should be a legal recourse.
00:45:16.000 That's it.
00:45:17.000 95% issue.
00:45:20.000 But it's one case study.
00:45:22.000 But, Joe, the problem there's thousands of these issues.
00:45:28.000 There's thousands and thousands and thousands of these things.
00:45:32.000 And they're all very similar in that way.
00:45:34.000 I'll talk about more stories, but I can give stories from my.
00:45:39.000 I think more people should have the courage to say what's going on.
00:45:41.000 I think there's way too much of a culture of just going along with the system.
00:45:46.000 I mean, you tell me, like, are we at a time right now where it feels like we're just going to be status quo for the next four years?
00:45:54.000 I'm worried about socialists taking over because I think unless the Republican Party actually has an anti corruption plan to actually fix this, Americans are going to vote for a different solution.
00:46:02.000 They're going to vote for something different than whatever's defending the current.
00:46:05.000 You know, Republicans are, you know, respond to socialists.
00:46:07.000 Oh, we, you know, we support free markets.
00:46:10.000 It's like talking points from 20 years ago.
00:46:12.000 We don't have a free market in healthcare.
00:46:14.000 We don't have a free market in agriculture.
00:46:16.000 We don't have a free market in housing.
00:46:18.000 Like, we don't have that. 0.89
00:46:20.000 If the Republican Party does not listen to what Trump said during the campaign, stop trying to subvert him, but actually try to do what he said and resonate with voters on, we're screwed.
00:46:32.000 Before you have a free market, you have to fix this structural problem. 0.60
00:46:37.000 It's actually what President Trump is saying, very similar to what the people on the left are saying, to what AOC, El Sayed are saying.
00:46:45.000 They're saying there's mass uniformity here.
00:46:49.000 Americans don't want this.
00:46:52.000 But it is absolutely how it works.
00:46:54.000 And I'm happy to get into it.
00:46:56.000 It's just amazing that a small handful of people in the White House can have this kind of an impact on the entirety of the population.
00:47:02.000 I don't think anyone would dispute that Susie's created with her team a historic amount of top down control.
00:47:11.000 I don't think anyone would dispute that.
00:47:16.000 I don't think many would dispute what I'm saying about the general culture that's engendered.
00:47:22.000 I'm speaking for many staff members and cabinet secretaries in the Trump administration right now.
00:47:27.000 Now, what is the support like for her from the president?
00:47:31.000 Does he understand this?
00:47:34.000 Aaron Ross Powell, Jr. I think he was caught off guard by the fact that Susie approved her two top deputies to go collect hundreds of thousands of dollars from a foreign government.
00:47:44.000 I think he was caught off guard by that.
00:47:47.000 My intuition would be that information has been protected so much he doesn't fully understand all these micro stories, nor could he.
00:47:59.000 I'm giving a couple stories out of thousands.
00:48:01.000 This is the culture that has been created.
00:48:04.000 I mean, it's why we lost the midterms.
00:48:06.000 We have been discordant from what was run on two years ago.
00:48:11.000 That I believe President Trump wants to be a great president.
00:48:13.000 I think actually there's a massive opportunity to correct the course and, frankly, take some of the Democrats at their word that they want to fix corruption and fix the swamp.
00:48:22.000 I think there's huge opportunity.
00:48:24.000 We've got more time.
00:48:25.000 He's the president for longer.
00:48:27.000 I think his inclination is to go hard.
00:48:30.000 I think his inclination is to be a historic figure that he's suffered greatly and wants to do that.
00:48:35.000 There's still time.
00:48:35.000 But, Joe, like, I don't think anyone would say that I wasn't one of the most effective internal patient policy advocates in the White House.
00:48:44.000 I got a lot done.
00:48:46.000 I worked well with people.
00:48:47.000 Susie sent me a text saying how much she admired me when I left and asked me not to speak negatively of her.
00:48:55.000 But I was praised by the USDA, praised by the White House, praised by HHS.
00:49:01.000 I tried, and I feel like the most important thing we can do again, it's either they've got the corporate money, they've got the complete and utter stranglehold of the D.C. You know, environment which is demonic.
00:49:14.000 It's demonic.
00:49:15.000 We have you.
00:49:17.000 We have truth getting out there and shaming the system.
00:49:21.000 Shame works.
00:49:22.000 Like the truth getting out there actually works, changes culture.
00:49:25.000 We have to get the truth and have real conversations in America.
00:49:29.000 We have to have some bravery.
00:49:30.000 That's what I believe.
00:49:32.000 Even if he removed the people that are responsible, are there people that could replace them that would change course?
00:49:40.000 No.
00:49:40.000 Aaron Powell, Jr.
00:49:41.000 Americans need to understand that if they are getting whipped up and excited about policy promises through our existing structure, they are being duped and gaslighted and lied to.
00:49:56.000 We need to have systemic reform.
00:49:57.000 We should not have it legal to have government advisors, influential government advisors, taking money from foreign governments.
00:50:06.000 I think 95% of people would agree that we need a constitutional amendment.
00:50:12.000 Why do we have this?
00:50:13.000 Why do we have corporations able to totally rig the system?
00:50:16.000 The founders I've been reading the Federalist Papers.
00:50:19.000 I don't see what I'm saying as a pessimistic thing.
00:50:22.000 America wasn't founded on idealism.
00:50:24.000 The Federalist Papers are deeply skeptical of human nature.
00:50:28.000 The entire founding of our country and Constitution was based on the premise that humans are corrupt, humans are really bad.
00:50:34.000 Their motivations are bad.
00:50:36.000 They created sets of checks and balances for that.
00:50:40.000 The administrative state and what's happened has gotten out of control.
00:50:44.000 I think the founders would be shocked that we have had so few amendments and structural changes to our system as we've modernized.
00:50:49.000 Do simple things that 90% of people agree with.
00:50:54.000 The hardest things to get done actually are not the partisan issues, but the things actually most people agree with because the swamp doesn't want that.
00:50:54.000 People agree with.
00:51:03.000 I cannot express to you how broken the Senate and Congress are.
00:51:07.000 They don't go against special interests.
00:51:10.000 Why is that?
00:51:11.000 A senator spends 90% of their time fundraising.
00:51:14.000 A senator spends 90%.
00:51:18.000 Yeah.
00:51:18.000 In the original founding, the Constitution, Senators weren't directly elected.
00:51:26.000 They were appointed by state legislators.
00:51:27.000 So you voted for your state legislator and then they would appoint a senator.
00:51:31.000 So there wasn't there was actually a little bit of a buffer and you had to rely on your state legislator.
00:51:36.000 During the populist era, the 17th Amendment passed, which did direct election.
00:51:42.000 I think that's a disaster.
00:51:43.000 I think we should go back because a senator's 90% of their time is not being spent with voters, it's being spent on this.
00:51:51.000 And I think it's a little bit of a game where everyone in D.C. convinces themselves that money is more important than voters.
00:51:56.000 Again, that's the Susie Wiles premise.
00:51:58.000 Directly, Callie, we can't do this.
00:52:01.000 I need sugar money.
00:52:02.000 Direct quote.
00:52:04.000 I need the money from the sugar people to win them at terms.
00:52:06.000 So I think it's a lie.
00:52:10.000 Trump has won elections with much less money.
00:52:13.000 I think the message and actually what you're promising and what you're doing matter a lot more.
00:52:17.000 What gives me hope, we will get nothing out of Congress.
00:52:22.000 You are deluding yourself if you think Congress is going to pass some major bill to constrain themselves or structurally change.
00:52:22.000 Nothing.
00:52:28.000 There's an incentive for a presidential candidate to really run on reform because they are trying to be popular to the mass base of people.
00:52:35.000 I do think there's an effort for President Trump, for additional presidential candidates to run on actual structural reform to blow up DC.
00:52:44.000 Why do we have super PACs?
00:52:46.000 Can we pull that? 0.92
00:52:47.000 Do Americans want super PACs? 0.98
00:52:49.000 Do Americans want Bayer rigging the political system?
00:52:51.000 Can we have a conversation about just flat out corporate money and politics?
00:52:58.000 Other countries don't do that.
00:53:00.000 Like, why can't we have a one page constitutional amendment to start structurally changing these things?
00:53:09.000 What would that entail?
00:53:10.000 Like, how would that be passed?
00:53:13.000 How would you get people on board that have already compromised?
00:53:15.000 You have to have the president run on it as a mandate, as a central campaign promise, and say, This is my central campaign promise.
00:53:23.000 We are going to have this simple document passed.
00:53:27.000 The document needs to be 100 percent bipartisan, it has to go after Corporate money versus the same amount they go after union money.
00:53:38.000 It needs to be totally up the fairway, 90% issue about corruption in politics and structural reform of money in politics.
00:53:45.000 They pulled that.
00:53:47.000 It's the number one issue in America.
00:53:48.000 But how would you say that?
00:53:49.000 And then they win on that issue and then they run.
00:53:51.000 It's so important what a president runs on, right?
00:53:53.000 And that's, I think, the disconnect with the people being frustrated in the past two years.
00:53:57.000 The president has a lot of power on what they marshal the country's attention to and run on.
00:54:01.000 This is the number one issue in America.
00:54:02.000 Say they run on that.
00:54:03.000 They should say, this is. 0.99
00:54:04.000 Is going to Congress the day I get into office, and I'm not signing a fucking bill until Congress passes this. 0.97
00:54:12.000 And if you vote for me, this is a mandate to actually pass structural reforms. 0.98
00:54:16.000 And they hold Congress's and shame, it's shame.
00:54:20.000 They shame Congress to do it.
00:54:23.000 That's the only way it will work.
00:54:24.000 Congress will never originate it themselves. 0.98
00:54:26.000 It needs to be a very popular president with a mandate to get this thing passed.
00:54:29.000 And it needs to be extremely simple, one page, start and chip away at this.
00:54:34.000 That's it.
00:54:34.000 This episode is brought to you by Onyx Hunt.
00:54:36.000 Do you hunt or recreate?
00:54:38.000 Outside, or are you in real estate or other fields where you need to know property boundaries and/or ownership?
00:54:43.000 Property boundaries andor ownership?
00:54:46.000 Listen up.
00:54:47.000 Millions of hunters, including me, use the Onyx Hunt app, and here's why it turns your phone into a GPS that works anywhere, even without cell service.
00:54:56.000 You'll see exactly where you are in relation to every property line as well as who owns the land.
00:55:02.000 No more second guessing boundaries or wondering what's over the next ridge.
00:55:07.000 Whether you're chasing elk out west or hunting whitetails in the back 40, Onyx Hunt delivers 3D and LIDAR mapping.
00:55:15.000 Custom waypoints and more, and new this year in app location sharing so you know where your buddies are in real time.
00:55:24.000 The best hunters are prepared, that's what this app does.
00:55:28.000 It turns guesswork into a plan.
00:55:30.000 I use it every time I hunt.
00:55:31.000 Before your next hunt, get on Onyx Hunt, download it today.
00:55:37.000 Use code JRE for 20% off your membership at onxhunt.com.
00:55:43.000 I think a part of the problem is most people are not aware.
00:55:47.000 Of how significant all this is.
00:55:50.000 Most people are not aware of how deep this web goes.
00:55:54.000 Like what you're saying right now, that you're so eloquently articulating, most people do not have this information available to them.
00:56:02.000 And most people have very idealistic narratives as to what their party represents and what their politicians represent.
00:56:12.000 And I don't think they really truly understand the extent of the influence that money has.
00:56:18.000 It's almost like a vague notion.
00:56:21.000 That we have to take money out of politics, right?
00:56:23.000 Sure.
00:56:24.000 But do they actually understand the extent of how intertwined it is and how difficult it would be? 0.88
00:56:31.000 Just imagine the resistance a presidential campaign would receive from whether it's Congress or whether it's lobbyists or whether it's all this money if they knew that this guy's going to get in, this woman's going to get in office and kill the gravy train. 0.56
00:56:49.000 But it's hard to have that pressure when you're saying something that's Demonstratively obvious, and everyone agrees with.
00:56:54.000 That's what I tried to do with Maha.
00:56:55.000 I tried to focus on the big things first. 0.99
00:56:58.000 I tried to focus on issues which made people like Susie and Tony look stupid for disagreeing with. 0.99
00:57:03.000 They were going to battle on school lunches. 0.98
00:57:05.000 They were going to battle on And what were they saying?
00:57:07.000 There were dozens of meetings and calls saying that taking junk food out of school lunches would hurt the companies that sell junk food.
00:57:18.000 Yeah.
00:57:19.000 And when I left, the day I left, the stocks of the major junk food companies went up 8%.
00:57:23.000 Oh, that's so dirty.
00:57:30.000 So, no, no.
00:57:32.000 But these, and my, I thought we were operating at a rational, again, I'm not a zealot.
00:57:38.000 I'm not, you know, immune or I'm not blind to DC dynamics, right?
00:57:45.000 Having the right argument in DC doesn't matter.
00:57:47.000 But it's, we have Bobby Kennedy's coalition.
00:57:50.000 It's popular.
00:57:51.000 It pulls well. 0.99
00:57:52.000 And we look really stupid for not improving school lunches. 0.96
00:57:56.000 I think the ultra-pole position is probably the only thing that's still supported. 0.98
00:58:01.000 It's the most popular part of domestic policy for Republicans.
00:58:05.000 Bobby Kennedy is the most popular figure by far in the Republican Party. 1.00
00:58:09.000 Yeah, I think Democrats are stupid to be attacked. 1.00
00:58:14.000 They're saying they want to impeach him. 1.00
00:58:15.000 Bobby Kennedy-you look at Ballard's money that they're paying for the special interests, it's all against Bobby Kennedy.
00:58:23.000 He's fighting what everyone wants to fight.
00:58:27.000 And would gladly work with people across the aisle and is the most popular.
00:58:32.000 He's actually the most popular, according to Harvard Harris Poll, the most popular public official in America today.
00:58:36.000 America today.
00:58:39.000 So there was a tremendous energy to diminish his impact on the election, to diminish him.
00:58:50.000 I think based on some of these dynamics we're talking about, the Republican Party is not going to exist unless we listen to what Trump said during the campaign and become an anti corruption party.
00:59:03.000 You cannot have a free market without fighting corruption first.
00:59:06.000 Trevor Burrus Do you think it's possible?
00:59:08.000 This deepened the administration.
00:59:09.000 Here we are.
00:59:10.000 It's November 2026, just after the midterms.
00:59:13.000 Do you think it's possible to course correct now?
00:59:15.000 I think it's possible for President Trump to exercise the Tallahassee lobbyists from the White House and - And replace them with who?
00:59:23.000 This is the point earlier.
00:59:26.000 There's some good people in the White House.
00:59:27.000 There is a lot of people that are very frustrated.
00:59:29.000 There are people that would not sell him under the bus for a foreign government.
00:59:32.000 Aaron Powell, Jr.: Okay.
00:59:33.000 But if he did remove these people that you highlighted, that you say are the issue, Are there people that you could get into place that would not immediately be compromised?
00:59:45.000 Aaron Ross Powell You need to, we have to get to a moment in America where presidents are running on true institutional reform.
00:59:53.000 There's two ways that you can drive institutional reform in this country.
00:59:57.000 One is, as I mentioned, the president jams it down as their top priority.
01:00:00.000 There's actually a second route in the Constitution where states can create a constitutional amendment without Congress at all.
01:00:07.000 It's never happened, but if two thirds of states actually vote to have a constitutional convention, They can meet all 50 states and pass amendments without the federal legislature.
01:00:19.000 It's actually an issue that I think a lot of people should look into that's very interesting.
01:00:23.000 But those are the two routes we can have institutional reform.
01:00:27.000 My thesis is I think President Trump can save this presidency, can change staff, and get back on more of an America first fighting position against the swamp and get a lot done and maybe even get some things done with Democrats.
01:00:43.000 I think President Trump.
01:00:43.000 I believe that.
01:00:45.000 Wants to be a historic figure and realizes that it's gone off course.
01:00:50.000 For true reform, my argument is we are deluding ourselves.
01:00:55.000 We're playing this game where we're just ping pong back and forth between the parties with an absolutely broken system in Congress.
01:01:03.000 Again, can anyone name a bill that's really taken on special interest that's actually been really populist in the past 20 years?
01:01:10.000 It doesn't happen.
01:01:11.000 It will not happen.
01:01:12.000 So, you know, we've got to bring this to the top of the conversation.
01:01:18.000 And I think.
01:01:19.000 That's primed because these are the most important issues in America.
01:01:23.000 To your point about Americans and what voters think, my intuition is that actually Americans get what's going on. 0.66
01:01:30.000 I think we can all feel that we're entering a consequential moment in American history and things are really fucking broken.
01:01:38.000 I think people can buy into this idea that we're not going to have some silver bullet policy solves without real institutional reform.
01:01:45.000 The institutional reform, again, starts simple.
01:01:48.000 Should we have super PACs?
01:01:49.000 Should we have the ability for corporations to completely buy off? 0.97
01:01:54.000 The political process?
01:01:55.000 Should senators be spending 90% of their time fundraising?
01:01:58.000 Should 90% of generals leave and immediately go become military contractors?
01:02:04.000 Is that appropriate?
01:02:05.000 Is that really what they're doing?
01:02:07.000 90%.
01:02:08.000 We're talking about war and we're talking about these bad incentives.
01:02:11.000 Oh, why do we have such high health care costs?
01:02:12.000 Because the 20 people I worked with at HHS, I laid them out.
01:02:17.000 19 out of 20 will be lobbyists for the interest that we're trying to fight the day after they leave.
01:02:25.000 And they're aware of this, and this is the golden parachute.
01:02:27.000 Parachute.
01:02:27.000 Aaron Powell, Jr.
01:02:28.000 100%.
01:02:28.000 I mean, it's just these are things we learn about in sixth grade civics class, but like everyone has motivations.
01:02:35.000 Every single person that Bobby Kennedy works with on healthcare policy, almost to the person, maybe one or two exceptions, will be working for the industries that Bobby Kennedy is trying to fight the day they leave.
01:02:50.000 Aaron Powell, Jr.
01:02:50.000 And do you think that there's direct communication with these people to try to stop things, or do you think there's an understanding that there's an incentive?
01:02:59.000 To do things that are beneficial for the industry because you're going to be leaving and entering into the private sector as soon as you get out of public office.
01:03:06.000 One of my first couple months in D.C., I was invited to a dinner with Dave Ricks, the CEO of Eli Lilly.
01:03:16.000 He's in D.C. every week.
01:03:17.000 He's in D.C. all the time.
01:03:20.000 And he practically lives in D.C.
01:03:21.000 And I'm like, this is interesting.
01:03:23.000 I don't know if he knows what he's dealing with.
01:03:24.000 I'll go to this dinner.
01:03:26.000 Another White House staffer was there, a mid level staffer.
01:03:29.000 I can see very clearly.
01:03:31.000 He comes to DC.
01:03:33.000 He invites the staffers to dinner.
01:03:36.000 I expressed to him the opinions of Maha voters to pharmaceutical incentives and how we have a real problem that Americans are lashing out about, which is that our healthcare system is incentivized for Americans to be sick.
01:03:48.000 He rolled his eyes, talked to the other person we were having dinner with. 0.87
01:03:52.000 She ended up leaving the White House and becoming a lobbyist.
01:03:56.000 He feels people out.
01:03:58.000 These CEOs are having dinner all the time with.
01:04:02.000 The mid level White House staffers, all the time.
01:04:05.000 And they're just figuring out who's going to be the best.
01:04:06.000 Dave Ricks, the CEO of the largest pharmaceutical company, is in DC all the time having dinner with mid level staffers.
01:04:11.000 You go to the Ned Club in DC, the special club there.
01:04:14.000 I mean, it's just staffers having dinner with lobbyists and CEOs.
01:04:18.000 Jesus Christ.
01:04:19.000 Pull up Courtney Nupp.
01:04:21.000 Courtney Nupp.
01:04:21.000 I sent you Courtney Nupp Soybean.
01:04:25.000 So, you know, on the glyphosate thing, this wasn't generals or Pete Hexess saying we need a CEO on glyphosate.
01:04:35.000 You had this woman, Courtney Nupp, who was a staffer at the National Security Council.
01:04:42.000 This congressional staffer who became National Security for Agriculture.
01:04:48.000 She, with Susie, drove the EO.
01:04:51.000 She's at National Security.
01:04:53.000 She then left and became the CEO of the Soybean Board, which is the Soybean Board is a glyphosate lobbying group.
01:05:05.000 This doesn't even get attention, but that's who I was dealing with.
01:05:09.000 She currently serves as the director of global supply chain at the National Security Council, USB's board of farmer leaders representing more than 30 states, ratified the decision at its July board meeting in Indianapolis.
01:05:26.000 Yeah.
01:05:26.000 And, you know, I think at these meetings, right, with her and with Susie's people, I think about all the advocates, all the people that come on this podcast.
01:05:39.000 It's like all the people that, like, Care about this issue, like people dying of poisoning.
01:05:45.000 And it's like, these are where it happens.
01:05:47.000 And people like her are really, really, really powerful. 0.99
01:05:51.000 And they just don't give a shit about what, you know, so many people have advocated, you know, left and right, you know, and they just, there's hatred. 0.99
01:06:04.000 Like, I don't think it's in their brains fully or in their hearts, but there's like a hatred in the system to like, It's crazy. 0.99
01:06:14.000 It's demonic. 1.00
01:06:17.000 She got this fake national security argument through and then goes and probably makes millions of dollars lobbying for them.
01:06:25.000 But I don't even understand the national security argument.
01:06:28.000 There's not one.
01:06:29.000 But how do they write it?
01:06:31.000 How do they write it out?
01:06:32.000 It was written by I mean, I assume it was written by Bayer.
01:06:37.000 But did you see the language?
01:06:39.000 What is the language?
01:06:40.000 How do you.
01:06:41.000 Oh, they argued that something about phosphorus, which is a component to glyphosate, is needed for munitions.
01:06:49.000 But the EO was all about how. 0.93
01:06:52.000 What the fuck does that have to do with using it on corn? 0.83
01:06:54.000 Promoting the national defense by ensuring an adequate supply of elemental phosphorus and glyphosate based herbicides. 0.98
01:07:00.000 This is the presidential actions from Whitehouse.gov.
01:07:04.000 Wouldn't it be possible to have a supply chain of phosphorus outside of this mandate of.
01:07:12.000 This was lobbied, right, to send a middle finger to Maha and Bobby.
01:07:19.000 Like they could have, the Department of War could have easily issued a guidance to shore up supply chains of phosphorus, right?
01:07:25.000 I mean, it's not.
01:07:25.000 Right.
01:07:26.000 But then you go down, there's all this stuff about glyphosate, too.
01:07:30.000 It's not mutually exclusive.
01:07:31.000 So, elemental phosphorus is also a critical precursor element for the production of glyphosate based herbicides, which play a critical role in maintaining America's agricultural advantage by enabling farmers to efficiently and cost effectively produce food and livestock feed.
01:07:48.000 Boy, the way this is phrased is so crazy.
01:07:52.000 This is so nuts.
01:07:53.000 Yeah.
01:07:54.000 It starts to talk about weapons and then quickly moves on to.
01:08:00.000 Yeah, I see.
01:08:01.000 Yeah.
01:08:01.000 So it's a critical component for manufacturing semiconductors that are central to numerous defense technologies radar, solar cells, sensors, optoelectronics, increasingly important in modern lithium ion battery chemistries.
01:08:20.000 Boy.
01:08:20.000 And so when Trump was passing this, Did you discuss this with him?
01:08:31.000 Aaron Powell, Jr.: No, this was Susie Wiles' person sitting me down saying that this is final, do not have Bobby push anyone.
01:08:38.000 Susie calling Bobby's office saying don't litigate this, and that this was getting out the next day and it was signed.
01:08:44.000 There was no public signing.
01:08:45.000 So I can't speak to whether President Trump knew about this.
01:08:48.000 Doesn't it seem like you can sufficiently supply phosphorus?
01:08:50.000 Aaron Powell, Jr.: No, of course.
01:08:53.000 Of course.
01:08:54.000 It's not even worth it.
01:08:56.000 It's a joke.
01:08:57.000 It's a joke.
01:08:57.000 That's a joke.
01:08:59.000 How many countries are using glyphosate for their agriculture?
01:09:05.000 Aaron Ross Powell, Jr.
01:09:07.000 So, again, this gets to the cool point.
01:09:11.000 We are not arguing to ban it tomorrow.
01:09:13.000 The system, unfortunately, over the past several decades, has become addicted to this chemical.
01:09:17.000 Europe is aggressively trying to and uses much less of it and is trying to get it out of their system, but is on the process of phasing it out much higher than America.
01:09:26.000 Also, other major regulatory authorities have Recognize the cancer link.
01:09:29.000 It is so notable that the EPA, right, and the review is coming up.
01:09:41.000 And the HHS, I just will say this again, was extremely pressured in the run up to the EPA review not to study glyphosate.
01:09:51.000 Like by senators and other people.
01:09:54.000 Like people talk about pro science, like trust the science.
01:10:03.000 I'm telling you, leading nutrition policy, leading food policy in the United States government, we cannot trust what we're hearing.
01:10:12.000 We can't.
01:10:12.000 It's broken.
01:10:13.000 We cannot trust what we're hearing.
01:10:18.000 Like, we can't.
01:10:20.000 It's broken.
01:10:22.000 Has there been a single study by our government or others to come up with strategies to figure out a way to remove glyphosate and still maintain the food supply?
01:10:38.000 See, this is where I don't even think it's that complicated.
01:10:38.000 Yeah.
01:10:41.000 The market does work if it's a functioning market.
01:10:45.000 So if people get sued.
01:10:47.000 Yes.
01:10:47.000 Like Bayer's argument to the Ballard argument was: we're getting so screwed by these lawsuits, we need to get these lawsuits off our back.
01:11:00.000 You should be figuring out - that creates an incentive to create a better solution.
01:11:00.000 That's a bad argument.
01:11:06.000 The market works in that respect.
01:11:10.000 Especially if these lawsuits have merit.
01:11:12.000 Yes.
01:11:12.000 And they do.
01:11:13.000 Settle for billions of dollars.
01:11:14.000 You were saying that Iowa's drinking water.
01:11:16.000 Is the number one issue in Iowa.
01:11:19.000 So, people in Iowa, they can't drink out of the tap?
01:11:23.000 There's probably articles on this.
01:11:24.000 But, oh, like out of every issue in Iowa, it's the number one issue in Iowa.
01:11:31.000 So, it's like Flint, Michigan.
01:11:32.000 Yeah.
01:11:32.000 It's a massive issue, and Iowa has the second highest cancer rates in the country, which means the world.
01:11:32.000 Same sort of deal.
01:11:40.000 God.
01:11:40.000 If you look at a map of where glyphosate's used and then a map of cancer in the United States, it's almost identical.
01:11:48.000 What has the first highest?
01:11:49.000 Kentucky.
01:11:49.000 And that same thing.
01:11:51.000 Yeah, they're like the same.
01:11:53.000 Farmerland.
01:11:53.000 Yeah, it's all the farm states.
01:11:55.000 God.
01:11:56.000 Yeah.
01:11:56.000 And is it a specific type of cancer or is it just?
01:12:02.000 I think it's not Hopkins lymphoma is a big one.
01:12:04.000 Just like that young man got on his neck.
01:12:07.000 Good Lord.
01:12:07.000 It's evil.
01:12:08.000 And again, like, and this is what farmers are starting to realize, right?
01:12:15.000 We had this monolith of like farmers don't want any touching of pesticides.
01:12:18.000 It's like we pulled it.
01:12:19.000 Like farmers want to know why they're getting cancer.
01:12:22.000 Can't we just be honest?
01:12:23.000 Who was the regenerative farmer that you guys met with in the White House?
01:12:28.000 We brought several regenerative farmers John Lundgren, Will Harris.
01:12:30.000 Will Harris.
01:12:31.000 Yeah.
01:12:32.000 Who I, you know, Casey and I met through after reaching him out on your show.
01:12:37.000 Some of those guys.
01:12:38.000 That guy spent 20 years converting his family farm from an industrial based farm to regenerative.
01:12:43.000 It's possible.
01:12:44.000 Yeah.
01:12:44.000 And, you know, our policy was, you know, let's not remove the Let's have the legal route and let's really promote regenerative farming and try to incentivize it.
01:12:55.000 There was several billion dollars that moved from the USDA.
01:13:01.000 I will say, Brooke at the USDA has been game.
01:13:04.000 She dug in with us on trying to get some of this done.
01:13:10.000 She has her constituency.
01:13:11.000 I would say there's a lot of people that want to move harder on things but feel constrained right now.
01:13:16.000 I don't want to take away from this.
01:13:19.000 I think Maha and a lot of what we've done.
01:13:23.000 Is nudging this forward, but we're not getting real change without institutional reform.
01:13:27.000 So let me take you back to the cabinet.
01:13:27.000 It's too much.
01:13:31.000 What would be like I want you to imagine that Trump hears this podcast and says, I want to talk to you.
01:13:42.000 Tell me what we should do.
01:13:44.000 What do you tell him?
01:13:46.000 I would recommend that he clears house.
01:13:47.000 I think he's getting there.
01:13:49.000 You do?
01:13:53.000 It's fully my intuition.
01:13:53.000 What makes you?
01:13:55.000 I hope he's getting there.
01:13:57.000 You do?
01:13:58.000 What makes you do it?
01:14:00.000 It's fully my intuition.
01:14:01.000 I hope he's getting there.
01:14:03.000 I would say, Mr. President, you have suffered.
01:14:08.000 You've been shot to drive significant change.
01:14:14.000 You've been dealing with a lot of things.
01:14:15.000 A lot of great things have happened.
01:14:17.000 We have had crime go to an all time low.
01:14:19.000 We have secured the border.
01:14:21.000 We have combated the woke mind virus, which is very important.
01:14:26.000 There's a lot of cultural accomplishments that we've made.
01:14:30.000 But he still has an opportunity to do what he wants to do, which is go down as a great president by really combating special interests, combating the swamp, combating the real institutions of DC that he knows is broken.
01:14:42.000 He should not be trying to make friends with John Thune anymore, who's a demon, like the majority leader of the Republicans.
01:14:49.000 He knows.
01:14:50.000 He knows these people are broken.
01:14:52.000 He needs to go to war with Congress, go to war with the Senate, take some of the new lefties at their word that they are not taking corporate money and really want to drive institutional reform.
01:15:04.000 Meet with them. 0.57
01:15:05.000 I think the best chance the president has to get things done is meeting with Barney, meeting with El Sayed.
01:15:09.000 They ran on a Trump message.
01:15:12.000 If you close your eyes and listen to what the socialists are saying, they're, oh no, we don't want to do socialist stuff.
01:15:17.000 We don't want to do DEI stuff.
01:15:18.000 We want to help the middle class. 0.98
01:15:19.000 We want to combat the swamp.
01:15:22.000 They are running as Trump.
01:15:24.000 So there's an opportunity for the president to get back to basics.
01:15:30.000 I'm not going to name names on this one, but there's There's people in that administration and people that have left that will come back that want to drive historic reform.
01:15:43.000 At the mid level, there's a lot of people that joined to drive historic reform.
01:15:48.000 This is not over.
01:15:49.000 But it just seems like from your description that all of these elected officials are contacted and most of them are in one way compromised.
01:15:58.000 The next president's going to win by running against the Senate and Congress.
01:16:02.000 This is why I'm optimistic.
01:16:03.000 The president is unique because they're the only person elected by everyone, so they have an incentive to say what's Widely popular.
01:16:09.000 They have an incentive to say what's widely popular.
01:16:12.000 The most widely popular thing you can do right now is actually run on blowing up DC.
01:16:16.000 I actually do, just from an incentive standpoint, I actually have a lot of optimism that we're going to get there on a true reform agenda.
01:16:26.000 I'm trying to jam this out of the ecosystem.
01:16:29.000 We all need to get together in America to realize people can complain about President Trump, people complain about the Democrats.
01:16:37.000 The foundational issues are structural.
01:16:39.000 And I think we all can feel that.
01:16:41.000 And unless people are talking about real structural reforms, if the rules of the game are rigged, we're just going to keep getting a rigged outcome, and the rules of the game are rigged.
01:16:50.000 And this is not what the founders wanted.
01:16:51.000 Like, we are not taking into account what the founding documents said.
01:16:54.000 The founders would be shocked that we haven't reformed more.
01:16:57.000 So we've got to have structural reform.
01:17:00.000 And I think there's a serious incentive to have that more in the conversation.
01:17:07.000 And I think the president could, frankly, inject that into the conversation.
01:17:11.000 I think that there's an opportunity for him to do great things in the next two years, and I think he wants to.
01:17:17.000 I really do.
01:17:18.000 I think he wants to empower Bobby more.
01:17:22.000 I think he wants to empower the changemakers in the administration more.
01:17:26.000 I believe just my intuition is that he wants that, and I think that'd be a good thing.
01:17:31.000 And what is stopping him from doing that?
01:17:33.000 I think Like he's the president.
01:17:40.000 Yeah, he's got a lot going on.
01:17:43.000 I understand that.
01:17:43.000 But obviously, there are some things that have made his administration deeply unpopular with some of the American people.
01:17:50.000 This isn't to make an excuse, but I spent every day with Bobby Kennedy, who is my hero.
01:17:54.000 Who is my hero?
01:17:56.000 I left with more respect for him than ever.
01:18:01.000 I've never just full integrity, never seen him do anything that wasn't in the best interest in his mind for the American people.
01:18:11.000 But I spent a lot of time with him.
01:18:12.000 He's got a 90,000 person agency.
01:18:15.000 He's surrounded by demons who want him out and want him just destroyed.
01:18:22.000 That's his staff.
01:18:22.000 Really?
01:18:23.000 It's that bad.
01:18:24.000 And Trump's sitting at 2 million people.
01:18:26.000 So his staff is all completely compromised.
01:18:27.000 For the most, especially the whole infrastructure, they were sending around a memo, a CIA manual about how to be a bad bureaucrat and subvert an institution from within.
01:18:36.000 That's like sent around by all the career officials.
01:18:39.000 Like, they hate President Trump. 0.82
01:18:40.000 Yeah, about how to be a bad bureaucrat and subvert from within by being incompetent.
01:18:44.000 So, just like taking that, what I know, it's like, it's kind of, I'm not making excuses for anyone, but it's like, it's kind of crazy, right?
01:18:44.000 Wow.
01:18:56.000 It's like, what the hell do I do? 0.53
01:18:57.000 This is an unruly government, and the president is orders of magnitude more than that.
01:19:04.000 So, yes, I do think it's possible for him to recognize that there's frustration over the past two years of not aggressively moving on the policies that he ran on that are widely popular, that there's been a severe consolidation of power using the fact that he's very busy to slow many policies down.
01:19:33.000 Speaking for many cabinet agencies, when I say this, I'm going to give my I'm happy to give more specific stories.
01:19:38.000 But yes, he can make a change to his staff.
01:19:42.000 The president knows who the people are that are not going to sell him out to a foreign government.
01:19:47.000 The president knows the people around him that will try to go hard to really drive some compelling change to have an impact on the country that he wants to have.
01:19:57.000 I think there's actually opportunity there's opportunity in the fact that the president ran on saying the same thing that people on the left are saying, which are actually not partisan.
01:20:07.000 There is an opportunity to get some things done that are not partisan but anti institution, like reform the institution.
01:20:20.000 I believe that.
01:20:21.000 I know there's been an incredible amount of resistance from the people that I worked with to meet with him at the White House about Ibogaine and psychedelic use for veterans, for people with addictions, and all the things that we talked about during that historic meeting.
01:20:36.000 He signed the executive order and everyone.
01:20:39.000 That's involved in it on my side is saying it's unbelievably bogged down.
01:20:45.000 Aaron Powell, Jr.: Oh, yeah.
01:20:47.000 I would say that the psychedelic is moving more positively than almost any other issue because the president is very engaged on it.
01:20:58.000 But you have an infrastructure that is trying to wait us out and bog down everything.
01:21:02.000 But out of all the issues, I am optimistic.
01:21:05.000 We've got-I won't even name them now, but just to protect them-but we've got people I think you know, people that are good people.
01:21:14.000 That are still in there, I'm communicating regularly with that are flagging issues and making sure this goes through.
01:21:21.000 But it is an interesting issue, right?
01:21:23.000 It's like one small issue.
01:21:24.000 It is a massive issue because it's an issue for you.
01:21:28.000 And it's just like we shouldn't need that.
01:21:30.000 Like we're using that.
01:21:31.000 I was using that a ton. 0.99
01:21:34.000 Get this fucking done right now. 0.99
01:21:36.000 Like the president wants this. 0.99
01:21:37.000 The problem is most issues don't get to that level.
01:21:41.000 That level, like a lipid state didn't.
01:21:41.000 Like glyphosate didn't.
01:21:44.000 But I mean, to me, the fact that Heidi Overton is now going to be the FDA commissioner, was trying to block psychedelics without understanding what they were, it's just a representation of the demonic nature of DC.
01:21:58.000 I mean, this is one of the great things the Trump administration is going to do.
01:22:02.000 I promise you that there's people in there and me still, we're going to do whatever possible to make sure that gets out, which means that there's a path to have some of the drugs reviewed, that there's Fast-tracked on the research that this stuff gets out of the box.
01:22:18.000 It's going to be one of the greatest accomplishments of the Trump administration.
01:22:18.000 It has to happen.
01:22:21.000 I think so as well because I think it's going to change mankind.
01:22:24.000 I really genuinely believe this.
01:22:26.000 I know people think I'm naive or that I have some very idealistic and utopian view of what this stuff can accomplish, but we have a gigantic problem with people who have drug addictions in this country.
01:22:39.000 It's one of the most effective things that's ever been studied by far.
01:22:44.000 I don't understand what the resistance is.
01:22:46.000 So, can you give me some information about that?
01:22:48.000 Like, what and who is trying to slow this down and put the brakes on it and why?
01:22:55.000 Yeah.
01:22:56.000 So, this is what I've been dealing with the chatter you're getting.
01:22:58.000 I would say I think this is moving pretty well right now.
01:23:03.000 It's been unblocked.
01:23:05.000 You always have to be vigilant for institutional blockages.
01:23:08.000 But all I'm hearing until my last day is that things are moving about as well as they can.
01:23:14.000 Psychedelics was interesting because it wasn't a widely Lobbied issue.
01:23:20.000 I think there was a little bit from pharma because I do think it's very disruptive to have a substance that can be potentially one time and just transformative.
01:23:28.000 It's not the usual pharma business model.
01:23:30.000 But it was just institutional resistance to doing anything new.
01:23:37.000 The top people at the White House, Heidi Overton included, didn't have a full understanding of what they were, no interest, right?
01:23:45.000 She talked about these in the same class as street drugs.
01:23:48.000 I'm like, people aren't doing recreational Ibogaine.
01:23:50.000 That's not how it works.
01:23:53.000 What was the conversation when she talked about in the same classes?
01:23:56.000 Oh, that's how her and other people.
01:23:57.000 Oh, the president's anti drug. 0.99
01:23:59.000 This is just putting another drug on the street, referring to it like a street drug that there's going to be some.
01:24:05.000 That was a mass White House talking point that got out from Heidi.
01:24:08.000 And this is after I had contacted him about it?
01:24:10.000 No, no, no, no.
01:24:11.000 This is before.
01:24:11.000 So when you contacted.
01:24:13.000 This was something we ran on.
01:24:15.000 This was something the president said good.
01:24:16.000 This had a halt from Heidi, Susie.
01:24:18.000 This had a halt.
01:24:20.000 Heidi at one point got very frustrated with the FDA commissioner and me saying that this just was going to be stalled.
01:24:29.000 There's nothing we can do about it.
01:24:31.000 Everyone invokes the president, actually, when they invoke Susie, invoking the president.
01:24:36.000 So it was being stalled.
01:24:39.000 There was a huge just paralysis to getting anything innovative or new done.
01:24:45.000 To me, this was demonic.
01:24:47.000 This was something I believe this would be one of the great accomplishments of our time, getting this out.
01:24:52.000 It's something that I think we don't understand how societally impactful it can be if done right.
01:24:59.000 People were very pissed about that call, kind of the cadre of White House people.
01:24:59.000 So you called.
01:25:06.000 At one point, a person said to me, This is an end run.
01:25:11.000 This is an end run of the policy process.
01:25:13.000 And I said back that you calling the president is not an end run.
01:25:19.000 You represent a lot of people.
01:25:21.000 You have your finger in the pulse.
01:25:22.000 You help the president.
01:25:23.000 You have every prerogative to call the president.
01:25:25.000 And that is not an interim process.
01:25:28.000 And the president doesn't only need to meet with Ballard lobbyists.
01:25:30.000 He actually can talk to people like Joe, and the president can take that into account and make his own opinion.
01:25:37.000 Make his own opinion.
01:25:39.000 But they were very upset that an external force came in to push that.
01:25:47.000 Yeah, I felt that.
01:25:48.000 Yeah.
01:25:51.000 And that's how I tried to operate throughout.
01:25:55.000 Again, it's either money or shame with the dietary guidelines, with taking soda off SNAP.
01:26:02.000 We've gotten a lot of major food policies.
01:26:05.000 The top item on food stamps is soda.
01:26:08.000 Isn't that crazy?
01:26:08.000 Soda.
01:26:08.000 We took that off in 30 states.
01:26:11.000 You know, we had landmark food safety reform.
01:26:14.000 So we've gotten a lot of that.
01:26:15.000 What are the 20 states that didn't go along with that?
01:26:16.000 California is one.
01:26:18.000 Wow.
01:26:19.000 California is one.
01:26:20.000 Texas did it.
01:26:21.000 Super healthy California.
01:26:23.000 Texas, Governor Abbott, they were flying private jets at food companies.
01:26:28.000 Tom Nantu, he did it.
01:26:29.000 Wow.
01:26:30.000 Yeah.
01:26:30.000 Florida, blue states did it, but mostly red.
01:26:35.000 But every state should do that. 0.57
01:26:36.000 I mean, if Democrats are running saying that they're going to be more Maha than Republican, every single state should do that.
01:26:41.000 I mean, that is un.
01:26:43.000 Unexcusable that we're, you know, Coca Cola is making, you know, $8 billion or whatever it is from taxpayer money to give soda to kids who are then on Medicaid and bankrupt the system.
01:26:56.000 And like 38% of teens have pre diabetes.
01:26:59.000 I mean, it's like so we got say that number 38% of teens in the United States have pre diabetes. 0.99
01:27:07.000 Holy shit. 0.99
01:27:11.000 I mean, it's dark. 1.00
01:27:12.000 Holy shit. 1.00
01:27:15.000 That's crazy. 0.99
01:27:19.000 But for each of those things.
01:27:20.000 Oh my God.
01:27:22.000 38% of kids have prediabetes.
01:27:26.000 You're talking type 2 diabetes that's sugar induced, correct?
01:27:29.000 Pre diabetes.
01:27:30.000 Yeah, pre type 2 diabetes.
01:27:31.000 Oh my God.
01:27:32.000 That's recent USDA statistics.
01:27:36.000 It's the biggest issue in the country.
01:27:38.000 And it's directly from incentives.
01:27:41.000 You know, this is what was so popular, this is what's still popular.
01:27:44.000 You know, Republicans, we believe in free choice, but when 38% of kids have pre diabetes, 45% of teens are overweight or obese, 20% of young adults have fatty liver disease, almost 80% of American adults are obese or overweight, we're beyond a personal choice issue.
01:28:00.000 We have a systemic breakdown, and it's obvious.
01:28:03.000 We have SNAP that 15% of Americans depend on.
01:28:08.000 Its number one item is soda, number two, three item is candy, top item is potato chips.
01:28:13.000 No other country does that.
01:28:14.000 So we're force feeding.
01:28:16.000 Then they're lobbying, right?
01:28:18.000 And we got the snap through, but again, it's public pressure that I used.
01:28:22.000 I would threaten a lot, right?
01:28:24.000 That various people would get mad, that we get bad press.
01:28:28.000 That works, and sometimes it had to happen.
01:28:31.000 But that's all that moves anything. 0.98
01:28:33.000 Nobody gives a shit. 0.99
01:28:35.000 Nobody gives a shit about these things. 0.99
01:28:39.000 You don't have meetings in D.C. and talk about those statistics and people say, we better do something. 0.99
01:28:44.000 Nobody cares.
01:28:46.000 I cannot express to you how strong that is. 0.99
01:28:48.000 Nobody gives a shit. 0.98
01:28:50.000 All that matters is special interest money or whether they're going to get a bad article about them. 0.99
01:28:55.000 That's it.
01:28:57.000 So that's what Maha did.
01:28:58.000 We had this, you know, they were, people were worried that, you know, we might disappoint the voters or have influencers get upset.
01:29:08.000 And I tried to use that as much as possible.
01:29:10.000 And Bobby, we got a lot done.
01:29:13.000 But like the ecosystem wants to expel any of this, like expel.
01:29:23.000 I wish Democrats and Republicans, everyone would just kind of see it's what Trump actually talked about during the campaign.
01:29:31.000 This is wider than partisan.
01:29:33.000 It's just like a structural problem.
01:29:35.000 But there's, you know, you can get into another story or two that's just specific because I think the specific stories are helpful.
01:29:43.000 Okay, sure.
01:29:46.000 Another issue that was very unsettling was childhood vaping.
01:29:52.000 Are you familiar with that issue?
01:29:55.000 Vaping with kids?
01:29:56.000 Sure. 0.96
01:29:57.000 You might see it with, it's rampant in high schools.
01:29:57.000 Yeah, yeah, yeah.
01:30:01.000 There's a study from one of the leading groups that, They asked kids how many of your friends vape.
01:30:06.000 By all the best statistics, it was about 50 percent.
01:30:09.000 50?
01:30:09.000 Yeah.
01:30:11.000 Yeah. 1.00
01:30:12.000 Holy shit. 0.99
01:30:13.000 So the survey asked this is actually pertinent. 1.00
01:30:17.000 It asked, Do you vape?
01:30:19.000 It's like kids answering a survey.
01:30:20.000 They're like, It was like 5 percent.
01:30:24.000 What percentage of your friends vape?
01:30:25.000 50 percent.
01:30:26.000 So I think any parent with high schoolers sees that it's a huge, huge issue and it's disastrous health impacts.
01:30:34.000 On the surveys, it's clear that it's all about the flavored vapes.
01:30:40.000 So, flavored vapes are very appealing to kids, and like 70% of kids said that people wouldn't vape if there weren't flavored vapes.
01:30:48.000 So, some of these folks I put up earlier, there's significant money flowing around to some of the folks that I mentioned from the vaping industry.
01:31:00.000 It's a massive, massive industry.
01:31:03.000 And it's also the big tobacco guys who are really getting into this.
01:31:07.000 Funneling a lot of money to Ballard.
01:31:09.000 It was well known at the White House.
01:31:12.000 I don't know if I think it's Ballard, but one of the top firms.
01:31:15.000 It was well known this is a tagged issue that this is a big one.
01:31:18.000 These guys are donating to the various causes.
01:31:23.000 They're hiring the right people.
01:31:26.000 It was the single, in my opinion, the single most prioritized issue at HHS among any health issue for James Blair, who really has a stranglehold on policy.
01:31:36.000 Policy has to go through him.
01:31:37.000 I'm talking like Medicare, health access, food, anything at HHS, this was the top issue for the White House.
01:31:45.000 The issue was to get a better pathway for fruit flavored vapes.
01:31:51.000 Oh my God.
01:31:52.000 There's a law that says that this is from Congress that says before any FDA approval, you need to have a study saying that this isn't harmful to kids.
01:32:04.000 Marty McCary, who was fired, was pounded on this, like meeting after meeting, West Wing.
01:32:12.000 Like he wasn't getting called up to, you know, talk about, you know, our dietary guidelines reform or healthy food or, you know, anything that Bobby Kennedy talked about.
01:32:22.000 And James and the other people, they said, this is where these guys, you know, being kind of immersed in this world and then being the gate on policy, but also the midterm strategy, he would argue that approving vapes was a core midterm issue that young men, that your listeners, I guess, really want their kids, you know, that really want their.
01:32:47.000 Fruit flavored vapes.
01:32:48.000 This was an emphatic argument.
01:32:50.000 This is the problem, right?
01:32:51.000 When you have these people in charge of the polling, in charge of the policy, and they're using the midterms as a reason to jam vaping.
01:32:59.000 I'm thinking, I'm like, well, geez, okay.
01:33:02.000 I helped.
01:33:02.000 I've never heard that once.
01:33:05.000 The number one issue.
01:33:07.000 This is the top issue among these people for all of health.
01:33:12.000 I remember thinking, I'm like, huh, I was pretty involved in the campaign.
01:33:18.000 I connected.
01:33:19.000 Secretary Kennedy and President Trump, and was a top advocate and put together the whole policy plan for the Maha and polling.
01:33:27.000 And polling.
01:33:29.000 I don't remember approving vapes being a top issue, but that was their argument.
01:33:35.000 When I brought up how we really need to cater to your audience, who I felt like I was fighting for, and Maha voters and fast track some of these ultra processed food definitions and other things, James told me that we really got to be careful because these guys have played by the rules of the food industry.
01:33:52.000 We don't want to beat up on them too much.
01:33:54.000 Then Tony Fabrizio in other meetings said that juice wasn't worth the squeeze on some of those policies.
01:33:58.000 But on vaping, no, no, this was a very important.
01:34:01.000 So, Marty stood his ground and worked to kind of create some solution, but stood his ground.
01:34:11.000 He was later fired.
01:34:15.000 And when he was fired, Heidi Overton, who really just kind of did whatever Susie wanted, that's how you get ahead in D.C., did whatever Susie wanted, she wrote up a policy to relax standards on. 1.00
01:34:31.000 Fruit flavored vapes.
01:34:33.000 They released that, got sued by various people of the American Heart Association, noting the law that you need to have studies saying this isn't harmful for kids.
01:34:41.000 Still to this day, it is a top issue.
01:34:43.000 James left, still very involved in it.
01:34:45.000 I've heard, I can't substantiate this.
01:34:47.000 I have heard that he's currently taking money from the vaping industry.
01:34:49.000 He can deny that.
01:34:50.000 I don't know.
01:34:51.000 That's what I've heard.
01:34:52.000 I'm not making that statement factually.
01:34:53.000 I'm trying to be very specific.
01:34:56.000 But Richard Walters, who replaced him, it's his top issue.
01:34:58.000 I mean, he's pounding, trying to find whatever possible way we can.
01:35:03.000 approve more fruit flavored vapes for the specific, and it's not defensible.
01:35:10.000 Like, this is so, those are on the market and kids buy them.
01:35:14.000 So I want to be in the room when that guy's pushing that as the number one thing.
01:35:18.000 The thing is, it's like normal.
01:35:20.000 It's like, and I think, you know, I won't name everyone, but like, there's people, one thing I'd say, these people just, and I don't mean this like in a really dismissive way, these aren't, The best and brightest, these staffers.
01:35:36.000 They have tremendous power though, but they're just like DC, they play the game.
01:35:43.000 Yeah, it's crazy.
01:35:44.000 It is crazy.
01:35:46.000 But this is happening on every issue and it's so antagonistic to the sin for me is it's not even good politics.
01:35:56.000 It's bad.
01:35:58.000 It's just total co option.
01:36:00.000 Trevor Burrus, total co option.
01:36:02.000 This is personal benefit 100%.
01:36:04.000 There's no way, shape, or form you could convince anybody in this country that.
01:36:08.000 Vaping was the number one thing in the midterms.
01:36:11.000 But this was the.
01:36:12.000 From my perspective, this is the issue that that orbit was facing.
01:36:16.000 Freedom to vape.
01:36:17.000 Yeah.
01:36:17.000 So, and you know, it has ramifications for millions of children.
01:36:23.000 Also around that time that Marty was in the hot seat, the FDA sent a.
01:36:33.000 basically sent an application back on the Moderna mRNA flu vaccine.
01:36:39.000 Did you ever.
01:36:40.000 Talk about, do you remember that?
01:36:42.000 Okay. 1.00
01:36:42.000 So, this is a big uproar among some of the Maha folks. 1.00
01:36:45.000 But Moderna was using their mRNA technology to create a flu vaccine. 0.97
01:36:51.000 They had a joint venture with, I believe, Blackstone, hundreds of millions into this drug.
01:37:01.000 And the FDA reviewed it, and there were two major issues.
01:37:06.000 One is that the study, you always want to compare the drug to whatever the best standard of care is currently.
01:37:12.000 So, like whatever the best flu vaccine is, and they used purposely used an antiquated old one to make it look better.
01:37:22.000 And they got a warning basically, a letter from the Biden administration saying this isn't a great study design.
01:37:26.000 Study design, they've been warned on it.
01:37:28.000 So that was one issue.
01:37:29.000 The second is it didn't work.
01:37:31.000 It had a 0.8% absolute risk reduction, which is almost nothing, and a significant side effect profile based on the clinical trials.
01:37:39.000 So they weren't even comparing it to the standard of care, even though they rigged the study.
01:37:44.000 I'm going to be careful with my words, in my opinion, rigged the study, but I think that's safe to say given that they purposely used not the standard of care for what it would be compared to.
01:37:55.000 Very, very low, based on that study, risk reduction, like almost negligible.
01:38:01.000 And then massive side effects.
01:38:02.000 And what were the side effects?
01:38:03.000 So it can't be definitively said, but there were deaths.
01:38:09.000 From the trial.
01:38:11.000 Yeah.
01:38:11.000 There were deaths in the trial group.
01:38:14.000 Oh, God.
01:38:16.000 From the.
01:38:17.000 There were deaths in the trial group and a host of other issues.
01:38:23.000 And they were still trying to push it through.
01:38:25.000 So Marty said, didn't even reject it, said, push it back, we need to do another study.
01:38:29.000 Unrelenting pressure from the Ballard world and all that.
01:38:39.000 If any special interest is watching and you're trying to rig the system, unless it changes, pay Ballard, pay Continental, Susie's daughter, pay Checkmate, Chrysalis Avida's son.
01:38:52.000 That's another one that shot up.
01:38:55.000 And pound Susie with donations and calls.
01:39:00.000 Everyone knows this playbook.
01:39:01.000 It's an open secret in DC.
01:39:04.000 But that's what they did.
01:39:06.000 They followed the playbook.
01:39:06.000 I remember, yeah, the new FDA nominee, Heidi, who was basically like Marty's intern.
01:39:06.000 The playbook's out.
01:39:14.000 Marty mentored her.
01:39:15.000 Marty helped her whole career at Johns Hopkins, was her advisor.
01:39:20.000 I remember she was sitting with Marty and me, and she basically said, This corporate pressure is getting so much.
01:39:31.000 I don't know what I can do for you anymore.
01:39:33.000 And I'm like, Oh, okay. 0.58
01:39:35.000 This place turns you into demons. 0.99
01:39:37.000 This place just turns you into a demon.
01:39:39.000 She was breaking with Marty.
01:39:41.000 Because he refused to bend on something that clearly, like scientifically, he did the right thing.
01:39:49.000 Heidi wasn't reading studies or like, you know, doing any stuff.
01:39:54.000 He's just responding to corporate pressure.
01:39:55.000 And this is a vaccine that's going to go out and be called safe and effective.
01:40:00.000 And Marty was fired. 0.99
01:40:00.000 And kill people. 0.99
01:40:02.000 Heidi drove the jamming through of a re review where they set up a sham advisory committee of. 0.98
01:40:11.000 You know, run by this guy, the head of the vaccine center, Caslow, was the head of vaccines for Merck.
01:40:19.000 He has a license plate that says vaccinate, wears an N95 mask.
01:40:23.000 So he led vaccines for Merck.
01:40:25.000 His license plate says vaccinate, and he has an N95 mask.
01:40:30.000 Wait a minute, he wears an N95 mask all the time?
01:40:35.000 That guy must be cool.
01:40:35.000 Every day.
01:40:37.000 What kind of car is he driving?
01:40:39.000 It's nice.
01:40:39.000 I don't know.
01:40:40.000 I bet he is.
01:40:40.000 He's very wealthy.
01:40:42.000 So he's in charge of vaccines.
01:40:44.000 So You know, his group puts together a sham advisory committee, says, Oh, this is perfect.
01:40:48.000 And now it's proved.
01:40:49.000 Now that vaccine is safe and effective.
01:40:51.000 And, you know, I was attacked by some of the mob people for not, like, vaccines weren't my issue.
01:40:59.000 I'll tell you, like, we need to grapple with this.
01:41:03.000 And I'll just speak to everybody, right?
01:41:05.000 Like, this is how it worked.
01:41:06.000 Nobody was looking at studies.
01:41:08.000 Like, the study was not good.
01:41:09.000 And due to political pressure and the former head of Merck.
01:41:14.000 Vaccines, who's running the vaccine center, who's never seen a jab he doesn't like, waving it through.
01:41:20.000 Jabby doesn't like waving it through.
01:41:23.000 Like, we have a vaccine in the market that the FDA did not think was appropriate or at least needed more studies. 0.99
01:41:27.000 Like, that's how it fucking works. 0.97
01:41:30.000 And we need to grapple with that. 0.99
01:41:31.000 Like, the Democrats are saying they want to trot Bobby in and talk about his vaccine decisions.
01:41:36.000 I would love that.
01:41:37.000 Like, we need to have a real conversation here.
01:41:40.000 But, you know, it's damn right people have questions about this stuff.
01:41:45.000 And I can tell you, I have very little confidence, again, from being very close to the center of this.
01:41:51.000 Like, we can't say with a straight face, These processes are legitimate.
01:41:55.000 It's a real problem in this country where the liability protection has coincided with an ideology.
01:42:01.000 That ideology is that vaccines it's like if you just have a product and you call it a vaccine, it immediately gets respected.
01:42:10.000 Aaron Ross Powell, Jr.
01:42:12.000 90 percent of Americans distrust the pharmaceutical industry, right?
01:42:15.000 But there used to be good vaccine actually, trust is declining.
01:42:19.000 But like vaccine, oh, okay, that pulls well.
01:42:22.000 There's a huge effort among pharma to label as many things as they can a vaccine.
01:42:27.000 It's this weird thing, right?
01:42:28.000 Because of liability protection.
01:42:30.000 For liability protection, and because vaccine sounds, once you're labeled that, you know, it's like you can't question it.
01:42:36.000 So it's this weird thing, which is, and I think the left is actually going to change on this.
01:42:41.000 And frankly, the left used to be leaders on this issue.
01:42:43.000 But, you know, I think they've really kind of lost the vaccine debate.
01:42:49.000 They tried to bully Bobby into not talking about it, but he kept doing it.
01:42:53.000 The president has been amazing at this.
01:42:55.000 Again, Tony Fabrizio put a block.
01:42:58.000 On any study, like anything on vaccines.
01:43:01.000 Block.
01:43:01.000 Direct White House order.
01:43:02.000 Block.
01:43:03.000 Trump, the president unblocked that.
01:43:05.000 That's crazy.
01:43:06.000 Tony Fabrizio put a block and he takes money from pharma.
01:43:10.000 His website, I mean, Pfizer is on his website right now, today.
01:43:10.000 It's on his website.
01:43:15.000 Look at that.
01:43:15.000 So.
01:43:18.000 Corporate public affairs, New York Post.
01:43:20.000 This is his website.
01:43:21.000 Penn National Games.
01:43:22.000 This is the most.
01:43:23.000 Pfizer Pharmaceutical, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturing of America, Philip Morris.
01:43:28.000 Procter Gamble, R.J. Reynolds, tobacco, vaping, Heritage Foundation.
01:43:33.000 Wow.
01:43:35.000 Most powerful, one of the single most powerful people in the country.
01:43:38.000 Dow Chemical.
01:43:39.000 Full veto on any policy.
01:43:41.000 Every cabinet leader in the Trump administration is working to get his approval.
01:43:49.000 Wow.
01:43:51.000 He's taking that money today.
01:43:52.000 I don't know if the president knows that.
01:43:54.000 But.
01:43:59.000 Yeah, so that's the mRNA.
01:44:05.000 I've got another one.
01:44:06.000 Give me another one.
01:44:07.000 You know about Kratom?
01:44:08.000 Yes.
01:44:09.000 What do you think of it?
01:44:11.000 Well, I have a story.
01:44:14.000 I've told the story.
01:44:15.000 If you've heard it before, I apologize.
01:44:16.000 No.
01:44:17.000 Listeners, there's this guy that I had on my podcast, a nice guy, and he had Kratom, and he was telling me how great it was.
01:44:25.000 He's had previous addictions.
01:44:26.000 And I go, well, what does it do?
01:44:29.000 Oh, well, at low doses, it acts as like a mild stimulant, like coffee.
01:44:34.000 At higher doses.
01:44:35.000 And I know this guy's had problems with addictions.
01:44:38.000 And I go, okay, how many should I take?
01:44:41.000 Well, he says, well, when you're about to do a podcast or something, take two.
01:44:45.000 So I take two of these little capsules.
01:44:47.000 And I'm like, hmm, it's kind of interesting.
01:44:49.000 All right.
01:44:50.000 There's something going on.
01:44:51.000 It does something, a little bit of a stimulant.
01:44:52.000 And then I tell him, I go, yeah, it's kind of cool.
01:44:55.000 I go, what do you take?
01:44:56.000 And he goes, when I work out, I take 10.
01:44:59.000 So I go, 10.
01:45:01.000 I go, you take 10?
01:45:02.000 I go, what does that do?
01:45:04.000 And he goes, oh, it's great.
01:45:05.000 I don't have any problem with it.
01:45:06.000 I go, really?
01:45:07.000 So, you know, I'm a crash test dummy.
01:45:07.000 10.
01:45:11.000 I'm like, I'll take 10. 1.00
01:45:12.000 So I took 10, and I was like, holy fuck, dude. 1.00
01:45:15.000 I'm like, you're high. 1.00
01:45:17.000 High.
01:45:18.000 And I talked to him and I said, Hey, man, you're not sober.
01:45:21.000 This is not sober.
01:45:22.000 I'm like, it was a weird high.
01:45:24.000 It wasn't affecting my motor skills.
01:45:26.000 It was really interesting.
01:45:27.000 It wasn't affecting my ability, which is why I understand.
01:45:29.000 I guess he lifts weights on it.
01:45:32.000 It wasn't affecting my ability to control my fine motor skills.
01:45:37.000 But I was 100% in some way, shape, or form intoxicated.
01:45:42.000 I don't know what part of the opiate receptors it works with, but it's not.
01:45:50.000 That simple.
01:45:51.000 And then there was a bunch of these feel free drinks that were going around the club.
01:45:55.000 And like Duncan kept drinking them.
01:45:57.000 He was drinking them like incessantly. 1.00
01:45:59.000 And I was like, man, I don't know about these fucking things. 0.99
01:46:02.000 And then I started seeing all these lawsuits and I started seeing all these people that got really addicted to them. 0.98
01:46:06.000 And then we had a guy come in and did an episode of the podcast.
01:46:10.000 And someone had sent us some Kratom stuff.
01:46:12.000 And it was sitting on the countertop next to the coffee machine.
01:46:16.000 And he just immediately points and goes, do not take that.
01:46:19.000 And I go, really? 1.00
01:46:21.000 And he goes, dude, I am so addicted to that shit. 1.00
01:46:23.000 I can't get off of it. 1.00
01:46:24.000 And it's fucking horrible. 0.99
01:46:26.000 He goes, it's a horrible high, and I can't get off. 0.99
01:46:27.000 I'm like, I go, really?
01:46:29.000 So I thought it was like a safe alternative to people that were addicted to opiates.
01:46:34.000 And I have heard that from other people that are very functional.
01:46:37.000 And they said they've had problems with Oxycontin and oxycodone and all these pills in the past, but now they're taking Kratom and they're fully functional.
01:46:46.000 And I'm like, okay, well, I guess for them, maybe, but it seems like it's addictive, at least for some people.
01:46:55.000 It's an opioid.
01:46:56.000 Just straight up.
01:46:57.000 It's a straight up opioid.
01:47:00.000 It's called gas station heroin.
01:47:02.000 It is an opioid, period.
01:47:05.000 It is a legal gray zone.
01:47:08.000 I don't think many people know about this, but this is a $3 billion industry.
01:47:14.000 This is massive, billions of dollars.
01:47:16.000 Just in the United States?
01:47:18.000 Yeah.
01:47:18.000 That's my understanding.
01:47:20.000 This is rampant right now.
01:47:25.000 Many people probably do know about this.
01:47:25.000 In America.
01:47:28.000 But this is an opioid and it comes from a leaf.
01:47:32.000 You can concentrate the 70H, which is the molecule, but it's through a legal gray area, has been able to be put into products that are sold at gas stations, stores, vases.
01:47:43.000 Yeah, yeah.
01:47:43.000 Juice shops.
01:47:44.000 That's where I first encountered it.
01:47:46.000 It was at a healthy juice shop in Los Angeles.
01:47:48.000 It's an opioid and it's causing devastation.
01:47:51.000 So people that have been coming off of You know, drug addiction, end up taking it, going right back on the wagon.
01:47:59.000 It's causing devastation.
01:47:59.000 It's causing deaths.
01:48:00.000 It is an opioid.
01:48:02.000 This is a just black and white area we've been behind on.
01:48:08.000 And it's, you know, there's no real discussion among anybody in public health that this is a disaster.
01:48:14.000 So this seemed like, you know, no brainer, right?
01:48:19.000 The president, you know, is trying to, you know, push on opioids.
01:48:24.000 It's devastating his voters.
01:48:26.000 And Marty had an amazing initiative and press conference where he was going to take this on.
01:48:35.000 And he stood with moms who've lost sons and it was cross government.
01:48:40.000 I mean, this is like, okay, great.
01:48:42.000 This is early on.
01:48:43.000 It's like, okay, this is a no brainer.
01:48:44.000 Let's just keep doing this stuff.
01:48:45.000 The amount of lobbying on this was unrelenting.
01:48:51.000 So you have these like vape shop people and these companies that are, it's these guys that just got in and just like rode this wave.
01:49:00.000 I mean, we were selling.
01:49:01.000 You know, it's pretty addictive.
01:49:04.000 Well, not only that, this has been a long time going on.
01:49:08.000 Like, so this was before the pandemic because I saw it in Los Angeles.
01:49:11.000 Yeah.
01:49:12.000 And I think I even bought it there before.
01:49:14.000 Before.
01:49:15.000 I think I even bought a.
01:49:17.000 Not only that, but those little bottles, they're supposed to be two doses.
01:49:20.000 Right.
01:49:20.000 And you can't see through the bottle.
01:49:23.000 Of course.
01:49:24.000 It's a dark glass.
01:49:24.000 Right?
01:49:26.000 And so when you're drinking it, how do you measure out two doses?
01:49:32.000 So this is the key thing.
01:49:34.000 So what the FDA and DA and everyone did early on in the term was put an extremely high tolerance limit on the amount of the compound.
01:49:45.000 0.05% concentration of the 7 OH of the core opioid compound.
01:49:52.000 So, because people still sometimes have drinks with the Kratom leaf, which has a trace amount, and 0.05% is a very low amount.
01:50:00.000 You'd have to drink like 20 or 30 or 40, like a ton of the bottles to get a high, right? 0.59
01:50:08.000 So, that went through as a big victory.
01:50:11.000 Unrelenting lobbying happened, and this Suzy world. 0.72
01:50:17.000 Huge pushing, huge, huge pushing.
01:50:19.000 Meetings pushing from the West Wing to relax the standards.
01:50:26.000 The administration, again, I don't think Trump even knows about this, they increased the tolerance 20x.
01:50:33.000 Oh, Jesus.
01:50:35.000 So 20x versus what the recommendation was.
01:50:40.000 That's cleared then, and everyone knows the game.
01:50:43.000 That's that maybe you have to buy two bottles or three.
01:50:47.000 And chug them to get the high.
01:50:49.000 But everyone knows the game there, right?
01:50:51.000 So, and it's exactly why they lobbied to do that.
01:50:55.000 And that happened.
01:50:57.000 So, we have vaping, you know, 50%.
01:51:01.000 And, you know, again, it's.
01:51:04.000 How big is the vaping industry?
01:51:06.000 Like, what is the.
01:51:06.000 It's massive.
01:51:07.000 So, it's becoming the whole tobacco industry.
01:51:09.000 They're all getting away from cigarettes, and, you know, the Reynolds, you know, Altria, the big players are now all in on the vaping.
01:51:17.000 So, there's.
01:51:19.000 Hiring all the lobbyists doing a lot.
01:51:21.000 So it's a nicotine is a very big business.
01:51:24.000 Yeah, but see, like, there's something uniquely addictive about it.
01:51:28.000 Wow.
01:51:29.000 Well, e cigarette vaping industry is estimated at 24 billion in 2026.
01:51:36.000 This is global.
01:51:40.000 Can we get on the United States?
01:51:42.000 Is that available?
01:51:44.000 U.S. tracked retail, 6 billion in 2025.
01:51:49.000 U.S. electronic cigarettes and vape shots, 8 billion in 2026. 1.00
01:51:54.000 Fuck. 1.00
01:51:57.000 That's crazy. 1.00
01:52:00.000 That's so much money.
01:52:03.000 Wow.
01:52:05.000 This kratom opiate effect, why is it so different than, I mean, I haven't done Oxycontins or anything like that, but I did get an operation once on my knee and they gave me a drip of morphine, which is also an opiate.
01:52:20.000 And I remember thinking, this is crazy.
01:52:23.000 This stuff is nuts.
01:52:25.000 It was so potent.
01:52:26.000 It was so intense, and I could totally understand why people get addicted to it.
01:52:30.000 It was one of those things like if you felt pain, you could press a button. 1.00
01:52:33.000 It was pressing that fucking button. 1.00
01:52:33.000 Right. 1.00
01:52:35.000 I had a reconstruction of my knee, so it was like, who cares?
01:52:39.000 Let's get high.
01:52:41.000 But the kratom thing seems different, right?
01:52:45.000 Like, what is it?
01:52:46.000 The high was different.
01:52:47.000 Yeah.
01:52:47.000 It's weird.
01:52:48.000 You're functional, which is just felt so strange to me.
01:52:52.000 Maybe if you took more, I don't know.
01:52:54.000 Right.
01:52:55.000 I only took 10.
01:52:56.000 I don't even know.
01:52:57.000 I mean, these are capsules that this guy's company was making.
01:53:00.000 I don't even know.
01:53:01.000 What the dosage was.
01:53:02.000 I can't speak to the impact of it or the differences, but it is an opioid.
01:53:09.000 I mean, that's not a dispute.
01:53:11.000 It's a huge problem right now of people that have opioid addictions using this.
01:53:16.000 It's a massive problem.
01:53:18.000 The reports to authorities and incidents are skyrocketing in the past year.
01:53:26.000 It's a real societal issue.
01:53:27.000 You go into any of the blue collar states, and this is a real problem.
01:53:34.000 It's a multi billion dollar industry, and it's a loophole for an opioid that you can buy at gas stations.
01:53:43.000 And you have this 20x increase into what Marty solidified, which is going to cause death.
01:53:52.000 I mean, it's going to cause nothing good.
01:53:55.000 Oh, unrelenting.
01:53:55.000 And this is all lobbyists.
01:53:57.000 I mean, again, the playbook is out, right?
01:53:57.000 Yeah.
01:54:01.000 And I don't, again, I just, I don't, you shouldn't fault him for that.
01:54:06.000 I don't think the president fully understands.
01:54:08.000 I'm telling what I know and saw.
01:54:11.000 This is happening everywhere.
01:54:15.000 Like, everywhere.
01:54:17.000 Like, totally, totally unconnected parts of the government.
01:54:22.000 Like, this is what cabinet secretaries complain deeply about.
01:54:28.000 It's a real, real problem. 0.94
01:54:30.000 Give me another one.
01:54:35.000 I sent you David Kessler's petition thing to 60 Minutes clip.
01:54:43.000 Do you have that?
01:54:45.000 This is a cool one or a cool policy.
01:54:51.000 The whole promise of Maha is that we build bridges and really solve no brainer issues.
01:54:57.000 I really worked to build bridges with Democrats and left wing groups because these issues have been talked about by everyone.
01:55:07.000 One guy that was a great ally was David Kessler, who was the FDA commissioner during Clinton, who Really took bravery and put his job at risk by taking on the cigarette industry.
01:55:18.000 This is the initiative.
01:55:21.000 This is just a little bit about him.
01:55:23.000 I think it's.
01:55:23.000 Let's just.
01:55:24.000 He was commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration during the 1990s when he helped expose how the tobacco companies manipulated nicotine levels to hook consumers.
01:55:35.000 I am here to provide you with actual instances of nicotine control and manipulation in the tobacco industry.
01:55:45.000 If you raise your right hand.
01:55:48.000 He was a driving force in bringing tobacco executives before Congress and turning public attention to the industry.
01:55:54.000 He's now aiming to do the same with the food industry.
01:55:58.000 In terms of a public health crisis, how does this compare with tobacco?
01:56:06.000 It's as large, if not larger.
01:56:08.000 It's that significant.
01:56:10.000 The scale of this, this affects everybody.
01:56:14.000 Understand, not everybody smokes.
01:56:17.000 But look at the number of people who consume.
01:56:20.000 Ultra processed food.
01:56:23.000 It touches all of them.
01:56:24.000 So, this is a guy that's a Democrat.
01:56:28.000 He came to us.
01:56:29.000 He came to Bobby.
01:56:31.000 He said on that 60 Minutes profile, which also interviewed Bobby, that Bobby Kennedy will be a historic figure, that he supports Bobby Kennedy on this issue.
01:56:38.000 Like it was real bridge building.
01:56:39.000 And what he did was he submitted a petition to the FDA, which would basically compel the FDA to ask about the amounts of sugar and refined carbohydrates in our diet from a real scientific area, like kind of with the tobacco industry, and actually start investigating in a real Scientific way whether this explosion of these simple things like sugar and refined carbohydrates in our diet have had an impact on children's health.
01:56:59.000 It's like the most no brainer thing imaginable.
01:57:00.000 Thing imaginable.
01:57:02.000 We would do an FDA initiative with him, potentially have some of these food companies answer some questions.
01:57:10.000 His mechanism that he found was really interesting because, as you might know, the FDA, up until we just closed it, did not know what's in our food, doesn't know.
01:57:19.000 It's been a full self policing from the food industry where they are able to self certify both in the ingredients and, importantly, the amount of the ingredient having an impact or not.
01:57:28.000 You have all these things marketed to kids with high sugar.
01:57:31.000 They're actually legally responsible for having studies.
01:57:34.000 Showing how the amount of sugar that they're recommending for daily use for kids actually doesn't harm kids.
01:57:40.000 I would imagine they don't have that.
01:57:41.000 They're legally required to have that.
01:57:43.000 This would open up the door to start that conversation, getting the truth out, nothing regulatory.
01:57:49.000 We did a 60 minute, we got full White House approval, we went through the interagency process, and we were going to do a big initiative on basic food safety, asking whether the amount of sugar in a children's diet was appropriate.
01:58:01.000 And that's where Susie told me, We can't do that.
01:58:03.000 I need the sugar industry money.
01:58:05.000 Trevor Burrus, need the money for the midterms.
01:58:10.000 Yeah.
01:58:11.000 Trevor Burrus, okay.
01:58:12.000 Now what?
01:58:12.000 The midterms are over.
01:58:13.000 Aaron Powell, well, the point I would consciously make is why the hell aren't we doing these now because these are the highest polling domestic policy issues that the administration has in many cases.
01:58:22.000 I mean, these things pull off the charts, obviously.
01:58:26.000 And why would we be making deals with special interests and then stab the special interests in the back right after the midterms and we don't have a political reason to do it?
01:58:34.000 That was my question.
01:58:37.000 There was a political reason to do it before the midterms.
01:58:39.000 We have no political reason to do it now.
01:58:42.000 So I never understood the argument to wait till after the midterms.
01:58:44.000 Well, it doesn't make any sense.
01:58:45.000 They would say sometimes, I think, but they would, I assume behind that I don't understand the political calculations they're having to measure.
01:58:53.000 These are core, core central campaign promises of MAHA.
01:58:58.000 Not only that, but clearly it didn't work.
01:59:01.000 Like whatever they're thinking about how you don't understand how the political system works and we need to win the midterms, they got destroyed.
01:59:10.000 Historic.
01:59:10.000 Yeah.
01:59:11.000 And fully from the strategy of James Blair and Tony Furrier and Susie.
01:59:11.000 Yeah.
01:59:17.000 End the war.
01:59:18.000 End the war. 0.77
01:59:19.000 Jesus.
01:59:19.000 It sounds so daunting.
01:59:27.000 But the strategy, like, I'll just hit it again.
01:59:31.000 When you buy into the belief that money for campaigns is the most important thing, you can excuse anything.
01:59:40.000 And I don't even think it's true.
01:59:44.000 Like, I think there's kind of this lie around DC.
01:59:47.000 Like, it was clear to me that the money, this is not a money campaign.
01:59:50.000 We're in a huge moment in America, like a disruptive moment.
01:59:55.000 Like, Trump, the Trump campaign wasn't about money.
01:59:59.000 It was about him going out there, letting it rip.
02:00:02.000 That's what won the election.
02:00:04.000 I was really surprised, you know, how kind of dismissive this world was to President Trump, you know, that explained to me that, you know, that you're.
02:00:12.000 You know, coalition that you brought in, or maybe impacted didn't matter, that Maha didn't matter, you know, that the real populist messaging didn't matter much.
02:00:23.000 It was really about the micro targeting.
02:00:25.000 It was about getting the money for the targeted ads.
02:00:28.000 It was about the redistricting.
02:00:29.000 Like it felt very wrong to me and very against what President Trump ran on.
02:00:34.000 And that construct, which I don't think any cabinet secretary would really could possibly dispute this, that midterm kind of Paralysis impacted the administration about six months after the term started and it became the dominant guiding force.
02:00:54.000 I think it's based on a lie.
02:00:56.000 a lie.
02:00:58.000 Politically, it's based on a lie.
02:00:59.000 But you have to go into the motivations of people, right?
02:01:03.000 And I don't want to assume what people are thinking.
02:01:05.000 I can just look at what they've done in their lives, look at where they're probably going to work after, assume that they are motivated by getting money for their family, and look at where their children are working.
02:01:18.000 Clearly, and also if that's the narrative, the whole thing is just about money, and that's the most important aspect of it.
02:01:25.000 You can't imagine how accepted that belief is.
02:01:32.000 The 90% of senator time being fundraising.
02:01:36.000 It's just like this isn't right.
02:01:38.000 Can we step back and just ask do we think senators should be spending 90% of their time fundraising from corporate donors?
02:01:45.000 Is that a good thing?
02:01:47.000 We kind of just have like honestly, I feel like there's gaslighting about preventing Americans from just having common sense discussions on things 90% of people care about.
02:02:01.000 Driving a strategy would be like, we're actually going to take a hold on policy for a year if we have a new administration.
02:02:09.000 We are going to take on Congress, take on the Senate, take on DC and demand structural reform so we actually have more of a terrain where we can actually get some things done.
02:02:24.000 Unless we fix that, we're not getting anything done.
02:02:28.000 This place is demonic.
02:02:30.000 It's demonic.
02:02:31.000 I'm not here.
02:02:34.000 To just beat up on Susie or James.
02:02:38.000 These are case studies, right?
02:02:41.000 They're totally bipartisan.
02:02:43.000 The Dems are doing the exact same thing right now.
02:02:45.000 The Dems have done it before.
02:02:47.000 I'm trying to share specific stories from where I was leading to kind of color this.
02:02:54.000 We were talking a while ago and you're like, how does this corruption actually work?
02:02:57.000 It's like we need to identify what the problem is.
02:02:59.000 But yeah, the president needs to exercise these people from the administration.
02:03:04.000 That's not the root cause of the problem.
02:03:10.000 Okay.
02:03:13.000 Got some more?
02:03:14.000 Give me some more.
02:03:16.000 Just so we can hammer this down and let people know that this is not just a few things.
02:03:20.000 This is all going to get out there.
02:03:22.000 It's going to be all clipped up.
02:03:23.000 This is kind of important that we lay out as many of these as possible.
02:03:27.000 Revealed how Susie Wiles kept Trump in the dark about looming GOP disaster.
02:03:32.000 This is an article I saw today.
02:03:35.000 If you Google her name, there's tons of articles in the last 24 hours saying she should resign now.
02:03:40.000 So, was she gaslighting him about the polls?
02:03:45.000 Yeah, this is that they were going to win. 0.62
02:03:49.000 White House Chief of Staff, Susie Wiles in particular, would often shut down conversations regarding a likely onslaught of oversight probes into those operating at the highest levels of the administration.
02:03:49.000 Yeah.
02:03:58.000 One of the advisors said, believing it could pull focus away from the campaign.
02:04:02.000 Oh, no, no.
02:04:03.000 She would always say, We are going to win.
02:04:05.000 We're going to put all our energy into winning.
02:04:08.000 The advisor marked Wiles' attitude in the months leading up to the midterm elections.
02:04:11.000 How did she think they were going to win?
02:04:13.000 No one thought they were going to win.
02:04:15.000 Susie and her team, in my opinion, right, they're leaking machines and they're now aggressively.
02:04:15.000 Yeah.
02:04:20.000 It actually happened before.
02:04:22.000 I was shocked before the election.
02:04:23.000 There was an article with quotes from Susie and James Blair.
02:04:26.000 And the article is quasi blaming the president for the race and saying how brilliant their strategy was, like quotes from them before the election even happened.
02:04:34.000 You know, during the campaign in 2024, you know, James had penned tweets and it was all about his political strategy.
02:04:42.000 Dude, you guys managed the ship.
02:04:45.000 You guys did not win this election.
02:04:46.000 President Trump won this election.
02:04:48.000 But they're in crisis mode.
02:04:51.000 Mode, there's a lot of people in crisis mode to basically blame the president, which I think is wrong.
02:04:59.000 For the midterms, you mean?
02:05:01.000 But don't you think he takes some responsibility?
02:05:02.000 Aaron Ross Powell, Jr.
02:05:04.000 Of course he's the ultimate responsibility. 0.60
02:05:05.000 The war on Iran is a big deal.
02:05:07.000 I think that there's a lot institutionally happening under his nose.
02:05:09.000 I'm not here Yeah.
02:05:11.000 It's not just that.
02:05:12.000 It's very complicated.
02:05:14.000 The cryptocurrency thing, there's a lot of stuff that's deeply unpopular.
02:05:18.000 And there's a mass effort among staffers right now, senior staffers, to throw him under the bus when there's many finger pointing to go around.
02:05:29.000 What you just said is completely right.
02:05:33.000 I believe that there's still an opportunity to get stuff done in the next two years, and I believe that President Trump wants to be a historic president and do big things.
02:05:42.000 I believe that, and I think there's an opportunity to do it.
02:05:44.000 So what else are you going to say?
02:05:46.000 There was one interesting thing on the COVID.
02:05:48.000 I actually thought Vinay Prasad, who got pushed out by Susie, who's a hero, and leading the vaccine stuff, and Marty, I thought they had a really elegant solution for the COVID vaccine where when they re approved Pfizer's model, they required that they do a test.
02:06:10.000 They haven't done a safety test in a long time.
02:06:16.000 They required that they have to do an immediate new study showing and that the approval was contingent on doing that study and that study showing efficacious benefit.
02:06:25.000 And they asked for a real study.
02:06:26.000 So Pfizer agreed to that for their condition of their approval.
02:06:31.000 And Marty then got fired.
02:06:33.000 And then just recently, they, you know, the FDA and kind of the deep arms of that world told Pfizer they don't have to do the study.
02:06:48.000 So we were going to have a real, like, actual study.
02:06:52.000 And I think my opinion is they didn't do the study because they knew it would show.
02:06:57.000 Bad things.
02:06:58.000 But they waited out.
02:06:58.000 They pushed for Marty to get fired.
02:07:04.000 And now they don't have to do a study.
02:07:08.000 I don't think that's been talked about enough, but that was a precondition of them continuing to give the COVID vaccine.
02:07:12.000 And I thought it was kind of an elegant solution.
02:07:15.000 So, how did the requirement to do the study get dismissed?
02:07:18.000 The FDA let it happen.
02:07:20.000 I don't have personal insight, but nothing.
02:07:20.000 And nothing.
02:07:26.000 Nothing like that happens without directive from the top.
02:07:30.000 And I think there was a huge effort by Pfizer to not want the results of that to come out.
02:07:46.000 But I'll say again, you know, and just reiterate on the vaccines, like, I've never seen Bobby put his finger on the scale for anything.
02:08:01.000 I mean, he legitimately was just like, Begging people to just have like studies, science, like real studies.
02:08:06.000 It's like the pesticides.
02:08:07.000 People just do not want to know anything.
02:08:10.000 And sorted on that at every step.
02:08:12.000 And the president's been the real ally on that.
02:08:18.000 But just - the other thing about DC is this machine is so complex and Byzantine.
02:08:25.000 These creatures that have existed there for 20 years just know how to operate it.
02:08:30.000 But it's just frustrating to me that - we actually would have had a real win there where.
02:08:37.000 Actually, we would have had a real win there where we would have had a really legitimate study have to be conducted by Pfizer.
02:08:45.000 And they did a ton of work to get out of that.
02:08:52.000 Again, these guys, these CEOs are talking to everyone.
02:08:56.000 Like they're communicating with people all the time deep into the FDA.
02:09:00.000 You know, oh, you got to beat up on these compounders a little bit.
02:09:06.000 You know, like they're giving us some trouble.
02:09:08.000 It's all related.
02:09:09.000 Huge relationships deep.
02:09:11.000 And these people, again, the vaccine guy worked for Merck, they'll work again.
02:09:14.000 I mean, it's that simple.
02:09:16.000 Trevor Burrus Good Lord. 1.00
02:09:19.000 So it will not be changed by some stupid bill. 1.00
02:09:29.000 I do think we can. 1.00
02:09:32.000 It's a question for Americans.
02:09:34.000 Are we at the moment of fiddling around on incremental change, or are we entering an interesting time?
02:09:41.000 We at least have to take the possibility of what some people are saying with AI that we're entering the most disruptive period of human history in the next four years.
02:09:48.000 I mean, Elon thinks we won't be working soon.
02:09:51.000 I mean, I don't know.
02:09:52.000 But we're entering a very interesting time.
02:09:54.000 Like, inequality is not going down, social anxiety is not going down.
02:10:00.000 Like, we're how far along are we?
02:10:01.000 I think we're actually institutionally pretty far along.
02:10:04.000 Like, are we going to have a serious conversation or not?
02:10:09.000 And to me, like, I am optimistic because.
02:10:13.000 I think Americans want this.
02:10:14.000 I think there's an incentive for political leaders at the presidential level to actually start jamming this in the conversation. 0.96
02:10:19.000 But I think Americans should be intolerant of any leader that does not talk about actually how to fix the rules of the game instead of just bullshit policies. 1.00
02:10:29.000 Policies are bullshit. 1.00
02:10:31.000 Obamacare, Obamacare. 1.00
02:10:33.000 That's one of the biggest policies in the past 20 years, written by the insurance industry.
02:10:37.000 Insurance premiums have gone up 1.5x since then.
02:10:41.000 It's now 25% of the US economy is healthcare.
02:10:43.000 It was written by the insurance industries.
02:10:45.000 It created a thing where you can raise premiums and get 15% of a larger and larger pie, created direct incentives, and the stocks of insurance companies have gone up 15x.
02:10:54.000 Like that was the great liberal populace.
02:10:56.000 It was the worst law in American history. 0.98
02:11:00.000 It exploded healthcare costs.
02:11:01.000 We spend three times more than any other country today on healthcare, any country in the world, and live less than any other developed country.
02:11:08.000 Like the policy process is broken, it has to be fixed structurally. 0.98
02:11:16.000 It's simple, but money in politics is a big fucking deal.
02:11:20.000 And the leaders of the government, not President Trump that I've seen, but Susie Wiles, and she's the same as many others, left right, use this importance of money as an excuse to basically be antagonistic to what voters said and help gas station heroin, help vaping, help pharma companies, help glyphosate. 0.97
02:11:48.000 Those are like. 0.83
02:11:50.000 That's the issue that was being pushed down from the White House.
02:11:54.000 It wasn't healthy food at all.
02:11:59.000 Wow. I had to fucking bulldoze that stuff. 0.98
02:12:05.000 What was the last straw for you when you wound up leaving? 0.98
02:12:13.000 I had a huge issue that the administration had agreed to release an ultra processed food definition.
02:12:22.000 This is important because the processed food definition is super simple.
02:12:27.000 It includes a color.
02:12:28.000 It includes a non nutritious sweetener.
02:12:32.000 It includes one of these factory derived chemicals that there's an FDA list on.
02:12:38.000 I worked with left, right, and center.
02:12:40.000 I purposely worked with every academic I could find, these people that did not like President Trump.
02:12:46.000 And I had every academic group that I could find, Harvard and Tufts and everywhere, aligned on the definition.
02:12:54.000 I had the American Heart Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics.
02:12:57.000 American Medical Association, all these groups that are like suing the Trump administration, other things.
02:13:01.000 They're like, we'll stand in an event with you.
02:13:03.000 We'll say this is the most important public health issue in the country, ultra processed food consumption.
02:13:07.000 Again, 70% of a child's diet in the US is ultra processed food, and it's 10% in Spain.
02:13:12.000 That's the problem.
02:13:14.000 That's the problem.
02:13:15.000 And we incentivize it.
02:13:16.000 So we define it.
02:13:18.000 Now, what was so interesting to me is that this was simply a definition, not even tied to regulation.
02:13:25.000 But the amount of vitriol and lobbying on this issue, just having a simple definition out.
02:13:30.000 Because the food companies don't want people to know the truth.
02:13:34.000 They don't want people to have transparency.
02:13:36.000 Even just a definition would come out.
02:13:38.000 People would be able to look on apps.
02:13:40.000 Maybe they could do voluntary labels.
02:13:42.000 Maybe there would be some momentum eventually to have this on a label where states could pass laws to restrict it in school lunches, things like that.
02:13:49.000 But it would continue the momentum.
02:13:51.000 They lobbied aggressively.
02:14:00.000 I met with everybody.
02:14:01.000 I met with Coca Cola, Mondelez, the Oreo lobbyist from Mondelez.
02:14:01.000 This is six months.
02:14:08.000 He just told me, he's like, I'm like, do you have any scientific feedback on this?
02:14:13.000 They're like, we don't want it done.
02:14:15.000 This will hurt our business.
02:14:17.000 And I'm like, well, we have a mandate behind us.
02:14:19.000 This is an administration priority.
02:14:20.000 We're going to get it done.
02:14:21.000 He's like, I'm going to call Mark Pilot. 0.59
02:14:23.000 I'm going to call Susie.
02:14:24.000 I'm going to call.
02:14:25.000 And he talked about these people at the White House like they were extensions of him. 1.00
02:14:30.000 He's like, fuck you. 1.00
02:14:31.000 I'm going to call them. 1.00
02:14:32.000 And he called them.
02:14:34.000 And this policy that Brooke Rowlands at the USDA, who has a lot of constituency that don't want it, she agreed to it.
02:14:41.000 Everyone agreed to it.
02:14:42.000 We had a meeting.
02:14:44.000 And then it got delayed, delayed, delayed.
02:14:47.000 And Bobby and I went with Susie.
02:14:49.000 She's like, oh, you guys are doing great.
02:14:50.000 I don't know about any special interest concerns.
02:14:54.000 Lied to us to our face. 0.96
02:14:57.000 Then I heard her complaining about us after that meeting and talking about how we need to do something about Maha.
02:15:05.000 That's what I heard. 0.97
02:15:05.000 You mean do something about it because. 0.97
02:15:07.000 Yeah, do something about me and do just that they were being annoying.
02:15:10.000 That's what I heard. 0.87
02:15:11.000 Getting in the way of them making money.
02:15:13.000 And I'm like, if.
02:15:16.000 And then tied into this was and I just couldn't, right?
02:15:19.000 School lunches.
02:15:19.000 Like the school lunch reg I worked for six months on, full alignment throughout the entire government, the full policy process, right?
02:15:29.000 You know, the OMB, the USDA, HHS, every stakeholder, the National Economic Council.
02:15:35.000 Hundreds of meetings.
02:15:36.000 This isn't everything I wanted, but we don't require protein at breakfast.
02:15:43.000 Do you know what the number one breakfast for school children is in America?
02:15:47.000 Donuts and sugary pastries.
02:15:49.000 We have tens of millions of donuts and sugary pastries going government funded to kids every day, destroying their metabolic health. 0.98
02:15:58.000 It's fucking excusable. 0.97
02:15:59.000 There's no protein requirement. 0.99
02:16:04.000 We said you can't have sugary desserts for breakfast.
02:16:07.000 And we're going to put a protein requirement at breakfast so maybe people can have some eggs.
02:16:11.000 We raise protein a little bit.
02:16:16.000 We put that you should prioritize whole food proteins instead of a menu right now.
02:16:22.000 You look at a school, it's pizza and fried chicken nuggets.
02:16:24.000 And fried chicken nuggets.
02:16:26.000 I mean, it's disgusting.
02:16:27.000 It's a national embarrassment what's happened with school lunches.
02:16:29.000 It's not even a money issue.
02:16:31.000 We spend more than any other country on school lunches. 0.99
02:16:33.000 You compare us to Japan, it's a national embarrassment. 0.93
02:16:37.000 And the industry comes in on this issue that's central to Bobby Kennedy, central to a political coalition, so popular and impactful, quite frankly.
02:16:51.000 And they say it's going to hurt our sales.
02:16:54.000 And I'm like, if we're going to block.
02:16:57.000 School lunches and a quarter page definition of ultra processed food that doesn't even have a regulatory impact.
02:17:06.000 When Bobby Kennedy is the most popular figure in America, this is the most popular part of the domestic policy.
02:17:13.000 Not to mention that it's just critically important for the future of America that we continue the trend away from ultra processed food, which is literally destroying our country.
02:17:24.000 And just hearing just a lot like lying to my face, you know.
02:17:31.000 I'm like, the journey's still going.
02:17:34.000 I mean, my goal, I think we're in early stages.
02:17:37.000 I'm actually optimistic, but I did what I felt was the best thing to do at the time.
02:17:42.000 And I think when this type of subversion is happening, maybe the best thing you can do is tell the truth.
02:17:52.000 I agree.
02:17:54.000 Listen, man, thank you for being here.
02:17:55.000 Thank you for sticking your neck out.
02:17:57.000 Thank you for all this information.
02:17:59.000 It's really sobering.
02:18:02.000 I was aware that it was a huge issue, but I didn't know.
02:18:06.000 I didn't know to the extent, and I think a lot of people listening to this are going to have the same feeling after this podcast.
02:18:14.000 Thank you.
02:18:14.000 Thank you.
02:18:15.000 Bye, everybody.