The Joe Rogan Experience


Joe Rogan Experience #698 - Dr. Carl Hart


Summary

Dr. Hart joins me in Mexico City to talk about drugs and addiction, and why we should all be using more of them. Dr. Hart is a professor of psychology at the University of Southern California and the author of a new book on the subject, "Addiction: The New Black Plague." He's also a regular contributor to the New York Times, and a frequent guest on Fox News and the Bill O'Reilly Show. He's been around a long time and has a lot of experience in the drug and addiction field, but he's not a doctor, so it's not like he's some sort of expert on the topic. He just happened to be a guest on a Fox News show a few weeks ago, and we had a good ol' chin wag about it, so I thought it would be fun to have him on the show again. I hope you enjoy this episode, and if you do, please leave us a rating and review on Apple Podcasts, and tell a friend about it. We really appreciate it! XOXO, Dr. Kevin Hart xoxo - Kevin McLeod - The Narcissistic Epidemic and Dr. John Rocha (The Narcissism Project) The Narcotics Anonymous Podcast is a production of Gimlet Media. Please don't forget to rate, review, subscribe, subscribe and subscribe to our other shows, and spread the word to your friends about what you're listening to this podcast. and sharing it around the wide and far and wide. . Thank you for listening to our podcast! Love ya, bye! - Kevin, Kevin, Kristy, Kristian, and Mike, Mike, and Sarah. - EJ, EJ & Sarah, and the Crews. Love you, Jon, Sarah, Mike and Sarah, & the Crew, - Thank you so much, Thank you, John R. Hart, Rachael, and your support is so much love, Jon and R.A. & Mike, etc, etc., etc. - MURPHY, etc. etc. , etc. <3 - ETC, R. & JUICY, KEVIN MURCHEY, RYANTHORO, JAYE, JEANNA & KERODO, RAYLEY, AND SONGS, etc.. -


Transcript

00:00:01.000 Yes!
00:00:02.000 Welcome back, Dr. Hart.
00:00:03.000 Good to see you, brother.
00:00:04.000 Good to be here, man.
00:00:05.000 Pull this sucker right up to you right there.
00:00:07.000 It's good to be here.
00:00:08.000 I was in Mexico City, and I'm in my hotel room, and there's only like two different channels that speak English, so I'm forced to watch Fox News.
00:00:17.000 And I saw you on the Bill O'Reilly show.
00:00:20.000 Those clusterfuck shows where they have...
00:00:24.000 One person, like Bill O'Reilly's the host, and then they have all these boxes with all these different people, and everybody's talking over everybody, and the whole thing only lasts like three minutes, and they're tackling these complex subjects.
00:00:38.000 You got maybe like a half a sentence out before you got interrupted.
00:00:43.000 I don't even remember what the topic was.
00:00:45.000 It must have had something to do with drugs and addiction.
00:00:47.000 They brought you on, right?
00:00:49.000 Yeah, I think that episode was drugs and texting addiction.
00:00:54.000 Texting addiction?
00:00:55.000 Really?
00:00:55.000 That's what it was?
00:00:56.000 It degenerated into texting addiction, yeah.
00:01:01.000 Jesus Christ.
00:01:03.000 I thought it was marijuana or something.
00:01:05.000 No, it was marijuana initially, right?
00:01:08.000 Because we were concerned about, well, they were concerned about the supposed high number of marijuana users, the new high number.
00:01:16.000 Right.
00:01:17.000 And then the thing is, is that I was trying to make clear that the numbers of marijuana users today is considerably lower than what they were in 1978 or 1980. But they weren't aware of the information from 1978 or 1980. Is that like the numbers per capita?
00:01:33.000 Because there's so many more people now.
00:01:35.000 No, it was the percentage of, in this case, the percentage of high school students who were reporting marijuana use in the past 30 days or the past year.
00:01:44.000 Okay, it's like, I recently found out that there's 100 million less Americans in 1970 than there are today.
00:01:53.000 Yeah, that sounds about right.
00:01:54.000 That is fucking crazy!
00:01:56.000 If you really stop and think about that, I mean, 40 whatever years ago, 100 million less people.
00:02:04.000 Yeah, yeah.
00:02:05.000 We're still growing, yeah.
00:02:06.000 God, we're fucking crazy.
00:02:08.000 We can't keep this up.
00:02:09.000 That's ridiculous.
00:02:10.000 So they were smoking more pot back then.
00:02:13.000 More kids, a higher percentage.
00:02:16.000 Yeah, the highest percentage of Americans who were smoking or using any illegal drug was about 1978 to 1980, about that time period.
00:02:24.000 It hasn't been anywhere near that high today.
00:02:29.000 It was probably right after the Nixon administration.
00:02:32.000 That fucking idiot probably had everybody just doing drugs.
00:02:35.000 When you got a president that's that messed up, gets busted with Watergate and just all the foolishness involved in his administration, I bet he led people to drugs.
00:02:46.000 Well, you know, there's a whole lot of theories about it.
00:02:48.000 But, you know, one of the theories is that people became distrustful of government and things that government was saying.
00:02:54.000 So not only that, kids were experimenting in the 60s.
00:02:57.000 And this was later in the 70s.
00:02:59.000 They were still experimenting and being distrustful of the government.
00:03:02.000 So it's not surprising.
00:03:04.000 But the thing is, is that even then, drug use rates weren't that high, really.
00:03:09.000 I mean, because the people who were using marijuana at the time, they're now running the country.
00:03:14.000 They're now doing these, they're in these responsible positions.
00:03:17.000 And they're doing about as well as previous generations.
00:03:20.000 And so it's not a big deal that people use drugs.
00:03:25.000 In fact, you know, I'm working on a new book.
00:03:27.000 And the thing is, is that what I'm going to argue in the new book is that more people should be using drugs.
00:03:34.000 Like, when you say more people should be using drugs, here's the thing about, I hate the term, there's two terms that I have a real problem with.
00:03:43.000 I don't hate them, but I think they're weighted.
00:03:47.000 Addiction is one of them, and drugs is another one.
00:03:50.000 Because addiction is like, when you start talking about being addicted to texting, I have friends that are definitely, they definitely are inclined to check their phone way too much.
00:04:00.000 Like, they feel compelled when they're in traffic.
00:04:03.000 They feel like there's a red light, and they're like, oh, good, let me check my phone.
00:04:07.000 Like, I'm at a red light.
00:04:08.000 Like, Jesus Christ, what the fuck is going on?
00:04:11.000 But I think that's an impulse.
00:04:12.000 It's just a foolish pattern of thought.
00:04:14.000 To call that an addiction, and then to call, like, alcoholism the same thing, where you could literally die if you stopped drinking.
00:04:22.000 Well, that's crazy.
00:04:23.000 These are not the same things.
00:04:25.000 Yeah, well, you know, when we think about addiction, it's a simple sort of definition that we use in medicine, and the definition is that does it cause you a tremendous amount of distress, and is it disrupting your social occupation or your family's sort of functioning?
00:04:40.000 That's kind of it.
00:04:42.000 I mean, so people can indulge in a behavior every day, multiple times a day, but they're handling their responsibilities and they are not distressed about this behavior.
00:04:52.000 They wouldn't meet criteria for addiction, whereas somebody could like use alcohol or cocaine or some drug once a month or once a week or what have you, and then they have all of these disruptions surrounding that drug use.
00:05:06.000 And they may meet criteria for addiction, whereas I could be using cocaine every day, but handling my responsibilities, I'm not distressed by it.
00:05:15.000 I don't have these problems related to it.
00:05:17.000 I'm not an addict, even though I'm using it every day.
00:05:20.000 So addiction has to do with social disruptions and being distressed, not actual amount of use or how many times you engage in the behavior.
00:05:29.000 But this sort of definition is missed upon many of people in the general population.
00:05:36.000 Yeah, most people don't think about it that way.
00:05:38.000 Most people think that if you don't use it, you're...
00:05:41.000 Like, if you don't...
00:05:43.000 Say if you do something every day.
00:05:45.000 Like, I had a friend who was a longshoreman, and he worked with this guy that would shoot heroin every day at lunch.
00:05:51.000 And that always freaked me out, because the guy showed up for work every day on time.
00:05:55.000 He was a responsible guy.
00:05:57.000 He was married.
00:05:58.000 He had children.
00:05:59.000 And this guy would get heroin, he would cop every morning, he would go there, and he would sit in his truck, and he would shoot up and, you know, whatever, however long that lasts, you know, he gets an hour lunch break, and he would come back and go to work.
00:06:13.000 And I'm like, every day?
00:06:14.000 He goes, every day.
00:06:15.000 That guy did it every day.
00:06:16.000 Well, you know, this past summer, the past three months or so, I was in Geneva.
00:06:21.000 I just got back in the States.
00:06:23.000 And I was working in a heroin clinic where they administer heroin every day, seven days a week, twice a day, to people who meet criteria for heroin addiction.
00:06:34.000 And when I say they administer heroin, I don't mean like small doses.
00:06:39.000 I mean doses that go up to like a gram a day, a thousand milligrams a day, a lot more than what people use here in the states typically.
00:06:48.000 And these people who are getting heroin every day, a large percentage of them also go to work.
00:06:55.000 A large percentage of them have families and they're taking care of their responsibilities.
00:07:00.000 This is their treatment and this is a treatment that works for them.
00:07:04.000 But their treatment includes two daily doses of intravenous heroin.
00:07:11.000 Seven days a week, you know, and and so like when I think about Well, one of the reasons I went there and I did this because of the way we think of heroin in this country We think of it as such as evil drug and that's just American mythology and that's just wrong and that's ignorance and but that's how many including drug experts in this country think of heroin,
00:07:32.000 but that's just We have all of this great technology, but we're so ignorant when it comes to many of these drugs So heroin administered intravenously on a daily basis, it's not devastating?
00:07:46.000 No.
00:07:47.000 In fact, some people would do better by having a daily dose of heroin or another opiate.
00:07:55.000 No, it's not devastating.
00:07:56.000 See, even me, I would go, fuck, man, that's got to fuck you up, like taking heroin every day.
00:08:02.000 Yeah, and it's been this whole journey, man, since I saw you last time, I've been all over the world.
00:08:08.000 And this whole journey to see what people do with drugs or what drugs they're using and how they do it, it's been so eye-opening.
00:08:17.000 Even for me, someone who has spent their life studying drugs, and I'm learning so much more now.
00:08:23.000 But the Swiss experience, but the Dutch also do this.
00:08:26.000 There are some parts of Germany that does this.
00:08:29.000 They have small programs in the UK. They had small programs.
00:08:32.000 There are other countries, but the Swiss by far have the biggest program, and they've been the most successful.
00:08:37.000 They've been doing this for more than 20 years now.
00:08:39.000 And they started doing this in response to HIV concern.
00:08:45.000 People were worried about folks getting HIV, so they had to do something.
00:08:48.000 They had to have clean needles.
00:08:50.000 They had to make sure that The drugs were pure, so they were worried about death, HIV, all of those things, and this was the rational response where they put it in a medical community where people got treatment along with their heroin, and they have no plans of going back,
00:09:06.000 nor should they, because it works.
00:09:09.000 Boy, that's hard for Americans to swallow, right?
00:09:12.000 And is it because of all the propaganda we've been fed?
00:09:15.000 Is it because just of misinformation?
00:09:16.000 I mean, you would say propaganda, but even me, someone who's a pro-drug for the most part person, I would say, God, heroin every day is probably going to fuck you up.
00:09:28.000 Yeah, I mean, but you raise a good question.
00:09:30.000 Is that part of the propaganda?
00:09:31.000 I don't know.
00:09:33.000 I mean, obviously, there are people who use this as part of propaganda, in part, but I don't think they're trying to use it as propaganda.
00:09:40.000 I think they're ignorant in their clothes, many people.
00:09:43.000 But then there are other people.
00:09:44.000 Just think about some of the films, Trainspotting.
00:09:47.000 You think of a number of these films.
00:09:49.000 All of those films now can't use that salacious story anymore to grip us.
00:09:55.000 It's not reality, but it makes great films.
00:09:59.000 It makes great sort of subjects for documentaries.
00:10:01.000 When we think about musical heroes and people who say, well, they were misunderstood, so they used heroin.
00:10:09.000 I mean, they use heroin because it's a rational sort of use of the drug when you think about its ability to decrease anxiety, its ability to make people or have people relaxed and just be in a space where they finally can get some peace.
00:10:24.000 When you think about all of the things that many of these sort of musical icons or these great artists have to deal with, It's rational.
00:10:33.000 It makes rational sense.
00:10:34.000 The thing that I'm trying to do is, how do we allow people to do these things and be safe?
00:10:41.000 How do we still keep them safe?
00:10:43.000 Because people are going to do it.
00:10:45.000 That's a fact.
00:10:46.000 I mean, we've been trying to get rid of heroin in our country for some times, but every year we have 100,000 to 200,000 new heroin users every year.
00:10:55.000 That number has not changed for 40 years.
00:10:58.000 And I don't expect it to change.
00:11:00.000 Well, if that number hasn't changed, but the population has increased, how does that work?
00:11:06.000 Well, that's why it's like between 100 and 200,000 every year.
00:11:09.000 I mean, it's been fluctuating between those numbers.
00:11:13.000 But the point is that we're going to have a substantial proportion of heroin users, new heroin users.
00:11:21.000 These are new heroin users every year.
00:11:23.000 And on top of that, People don't consider the people that take opiates in pill form that are prescribed by their doctors, which is incredibly high.
00:11:32.000 And I've known many people, I have close family members that have ruined their lives getting fucked up on pills.
00:11:41.000 You know, I want to say addicted, but now I'm reluctant to say addicted.
00:11:44.000 Well, maybe some were addicted.
00:11:46.000 I mean, maybe that describes some people.
00:11:49.000 But please understand, the majority of people who use those pills use them responsibly, and they know what they're doing.
00:11:56.000 But there are people, like you said, who ruin their lives as a result.
00:12:01.000 But the thing that we have to think about is that if the majority of the users of these pills are fine, and then you have this subset, this smaller subset who are not, it tells you that it's not the pills.
00:12:13.000 But by that same token, there are still some issues I have with the way we have our pills, or the way we do our pills in this country, opiate pills.
00:12:23.000 We put acetaminophen in these pills.
00:12:26.000 And which I am not a fan of having acetomedicine in those pills because acetomedicine is the number one reason for liver toxicity.
00:12:33.000 And so sometimes if people really want to push a dose of their opiate, they have to get even more acetaminophen.
00:12:41.000 That's the more dangerous of the two in this situation.
00:12:45.000 Why do they put acetaminophen in the pill?
00:12:48.000 What is the function of it?
00:12:50.000 It is stated that they put acetaminophen in the pill because it's an added pain reliever.
00:12:56.000 But I don't think that's the real reason.
00:12:58.000 I think the real reason that it's in the pill is, think of it this way, on the California Highway, I think the maximum speed limit is like 65 or 70. Now imagine if someone designed a car that had tires on it that blew out when you reached 75 miles per hour.
00:13:16.000 So it's like this safety valve.
00:13:18.000 So you blow out the tires or somebody exceed the speed limit.
00:13:21.000 I think acetaminophen is in the pills and opiate pills for that reason.
00:13:26.000 You take too much, you blow out your liver.
00:13:28.000 You die.
00:13:29.000 Really?
00:13:30.000 So you think they put it in there for added liver toxicity to make sure people don't take too much of the opiates?
00:13:36.000 I think it's in there, yeah, to discourage the use of opiates.
00:13:40.000 Absolutely.
00:13:40.000 Wow!
00:13:41.000 And I think that's sick.
00:13:44.000 And I think that that's a problem because when you think about even other countries like Geneva or Switzerland, you don't see acetaminophen in these medications like they are here.
00:13:57.000 You certainly don't have people prescribing them like they do here with the acetaminophen.
00:14:02.000 You know, it's like you don't need that in there.
00:14:05.000 If you want somebody to take an additional pain reliever, you prescribe it or you tell them you recommend it, but you don't need The number one reason for liver toxicity with opiates, I think, is there to have people blow out their livers or to discourage people from taking more opiates.
00:14:24.000 So would that be to alleviate their responsibility, to make sure that less people have opiate addictions?
00:14:31.000 That doesn't make any sense to me.
00:14:33.000 Yeah, so it's like, okay, if you know that you, if you take too much acetaminophen, then that would discourage you from taking the opiate.
00:14:41.000 That's what I think the reason is.
00:14:44.000 Wow, that seems weird to me.
00:14:45.000 That seems like they would have to have had a paper trail in order to, I mean, it seems like that has to be something that would be discussed.
00:14:52.000 Well, I think, like I said, the stated reason is that it provides an additional pain reliever.
00:14:58.000 And I'm saying it doesn't make any sense.
00:15:01.000 If you want to have that additional pain reliever, simply give somebody acetaminophen or ibuprofen or something else, but you don't need to put it in with each other.
00:15:13.000 Yeah, so would they do that to make some sort of a proprietary blend or something like that?
00:15:19.000 Where their pills would be different than others?
00:15:21.000 Does that make any sense?
00:15:22.000 No?
00:15:22.000 No, because these things are all generic now.
00:15:25.000 Right.
00:15:26.000 So there's no one making tons of money as a result of this.
00:15:30.000 They're all generic.
00:15:31.000 And they all have that stuff in them?
00:15:34.000 In the United States, you've heard of Vicodin?
00:15:38.000 Vicodin is, I think, oxycodone and acetaminophen.
00:15:43.000 Percocet actually is oxycodone.
00:15:46.000 Vicodin is hydrocodone and acetaminophen.
00:15:50.000 All of these, Percocet, Percodan, Vicodin, all of these things have acetaminophen in them.
00:15:56.000 Wow.
00:15:57.000 You know, I don't have a lot of experience with opiates, but I did get a knee surgery once, and they gave me this morphine drip.
00:16:04.000 They gave me this little thing that you could press anytime you want.
00:16:07.000 That didn't have acetaminophen.
00:16:08.000 I pressed the shit out of that button.
00:16:10.000 It was amazing.
00:16:11.000 But that did not have it.
00:16:11.000 That did not...
00:16:13.000 That didn't have a seat of metaphor.
00:16:14.000 And then, like you say, you pressed that button and you probably needed it.
00:16:18.000 And that's cool.
00:16:19.000 And you were successful.
00:16:20.000 You're doing your thing.
00:16:21.000 You have a successful podcast.
00:16:24.000 Luckily, I don't know, man.
00:16:26.000 If you kept me with that button...
00:16:28.000 Might be stealing that hospital bed.
00:16:30.000 Nah.
00:16:30.000 Nah.
00:16:31.000 You know that's...
00:16:33.000 I'm just fucking around.
00:16:35.000 I'm just fucking around.
00:16:36.000 But I do have a friend that broke his nose.
00:16:38.000 My friend Brendan Chopp.
00:16:39.000 He broke his nose and they put him on those pills.
00:16:42.000 They put him on OxyContin's.
00:16:44.000 After they gave him a nose surgery, and his friends wound up taking him away from him after a couple months.
00:16:50.000 He was just taking him all day.
00:16:52.000 He could have, certainly could have.
00:16:54.000 Like I said, Ben, there are some people who get in trouble, but the vast majority of people don't.
00:16:58.000 But the problem is that people, their simple refrain is that it's these pills.
00:17:03.000 It's not these pills.
00:17:05.000 So you think that some people just have that sort of compulsive behavior, and that behavior could manifest itself in drinking too much coffee, or it could manifest itself in taking those pills, or it's essentially the behavior that's an issue more than it is the actual substance or the medicine?
00:17:22.000 Well, you know, people overindulge in activities for a variety of reasons.
00:17:26.000 And if we really want to understand why they do it, we have to understand that individual person's situation.
00:17:32.000 Right.
00:17:33.000 And oftentimes, we're too damn lazy to do that.
00:17:36.000 And then it's so much easier just to blame the drug.
00:17:39.000 But when we blame the drug, there are some serious consequences.
00:17:42.000 And that's what I'm saying.
00:17:44.000 It's like the consequences is that now we have this new legislation.
00:17:47.000 We have this new effort to go at the people who use these drugs.
00:17:51.000 And that consequence, those consequences are...
00:17:54.000 Inappropriate.
00:17:55.000 And so that's why I try and get people to be like, well, look at the individual person's situation.
00:18:00.000 What happened with that person?
00:18:01.000 Because it ain't the drug.
00:18:02.000 I assure you that.
00:18:04.000 It's fascinating that in Switzerland they're doing that.
00:18:09.000 Geneva, that's where you said it was?
00:18:11.000 Well, Geneva, Zurich, Bern, yeah, throughout the major cities in Switzerland.
00:18:16.000 And they're giving them these high doses.
00:18:18.000 Do they have a program if they want to wean off, if these people want to stop doing it?
00:18:24.000 Yeah, so this program is for people who want to stop, people who want to continue.
00:18:29.000 They also have methadone, they have buprenorphine, they have other sort of treatments as well, but this is just one of many options.
00:18:37.000 That's all.
00:18:37.000 And the methadone is what we always heard of in America.
00:18:42.000 I think I told this story last time you were here, but I used to play pool at this place that was right next to a methadone clinic, and these people would go and they'd get their methadone.
00:18:50.000 Then they'd come over and play pool and they just looked like zombies.
00:18:52.000 We'd call them methadoneians.
00:18:54.000 That's what we used to call them.
00:18:55.000 But they would come over just zoned out and they were just fucking out of it.
00:18:59.000 And this guy that I work with was saying, he was like, you know, that methadone shit they give him is actually worse than the heroin.
00:19:07.000 And I was like, that doesn't make any sense.
00:19:08.000 Why wouldn't they just give him heroin?
00:19:11.000 Well, I mean, that's the question that the Swiss asked.
00:19:14.000 Why don't you just give people what they want?
00:19:16.000 Right.
00:19:17.000 I mean, so there are answers to that question.
00:19:20.000 I mean, you said that methadone was probably worse.
00:19:23.000 It certainly can be for some people because the half-life of methadone is a lot longer.
00:19:29.000 It lasts forever.
00:19:31.000 It stays in your blood for a long time compared to heroin.
00:19:35.000 So some people say, well, you know, I don't want to have a long-acting opiate such that it makes me feel kind of slow.
00:19:42.000 That's why I want to use heroin as opposed to methadone.
00:19:45.000 Whereas other people, methadone worked for it.
00:19:47.000 That's fine.
00:19:47.000 Whatever works.
00:19:49.000 But then there are people who say, well, just give folks what they want.
00:19:54.000 And that's what the Swiss say in this case with heroin.
00:19:58.000 There'll be some heroin users who say, I want to get off of heroin.
00:20:02.000 I want to do whatever I can do to get off because I don't want to shoot a needle, for example.
00:20:07.000 And methadone works well for them.
00:20:09.000 Buprenorphine works well for them.
00:20:11.000 But then there are other people who just say, no, I want to continue to use heroin with the needle.
00:20:16.000 And as an adult...
00:20:18.000 You should have that right.
00:20:19.000 You should have that option.
00:20:21.000 Yeah, that is the issue, right?
00:20:22.000 Isn't it?
00:20:23.000 Because if we can freely purchase alcohol and even more insidious in a way is the amount of sugar consumption that people In this country especially, our consumption of sugar, and this is something I've really been focusing on a lot lately because I've been educating my kids about how much sugar is in things.
00:20:42.000 It's really hilarious because my seven-year-old was talking to my five-year-old yesterday, and she's like, there's nine grams of sugar in that.
00:20:50.000 They're having this little conversation about this thing that she wants to drink that's supposed to be healthy.
00:20:55.000 She's like reading it.
00:20:56.000 There's nine grams of sugar.
00:20:57.000 To see a seven-year-old do that, I'm like, wow, this is kind of cool.
00:21:02.000 But sugar can fuck people's lives up, for sure.
00:21:05.000 And I know a lot of people that are addicted to sugar.
00:21:08.000 Not just compelled to eat it, but it actually changes their gut flora.
00:21:12.000 You know, the actual flora inside their body craves this to the point where these people, they get crazy for it.
00:21:20.000 People get really crazy for sugar.
00:21:22.000 And it just causes all sorts of health consequences.
00:21:25.000 But no one wants to say, hey, we should outlaw candy bars.
00:21:29.000 No one should say that.
00:21:30.000 Right, exactly, right?
00:21:31.000 Right.
00:21:32.000 Same thing with booze, right?
00:21:33.000 Right.
00:21:33.000 We could, everyone in this room, we could drink ourselves to death just with the shit that I have in my closet over here.
00:21:40.000 In that little kitchen, we could go in there and just chug those bottles and we'd all be dead.
00:21:44.000 They'd find us all dead.
00:21:46.000 That's crazy, right?
00:21:48.000 But we won't do it.
00:21:49.000 Right, exactly.
00:21:50.000 But we just drove a car here.
00:21:53.000 I mean, I could have just driven that car off of a cliff.
00:21:56.000 But we don't do that.
00:21:57.000 Because we are adults and we have some autonomy.
00:22:01.000 The same should be true with sugar.
00:22:03.000 The same should be true with these drugs.
00:22:06.000 But the thing is, is that one of the things that concerns us about sugar...
00:22:10.000 Is that for so long we've been lied to about the role of sugar in disease.
00:22:15.000 And so people didn't realize that sugar was causing all of these problems, and so people felt like they were misled.
00:22:22.000 That's okay.
00:22:23.000 Now we have better education, so now you make these decisions with your eyes open.
00:22:29.000 The same could be done with drugs.
00:22:31.000 You make these decisions with your eyes open.
00:22:33.000 You're an adult.
00:22:34.000 You certainly can get in trouble with this particular drug or that particular drug, but here's how you do it more safely.
00:22:40.000 You certainly can get in trouble with sugar, but here's how you can do it in a way that's reasonable and more safe than not.
00:22:47.000 And through education, instead of by demonizing things and by propaganda.
00:22:53.000 And being moralistic.
00:22:55.000 We are very judgmental and moralistic about a number of things.
00:22:59.000 And I think that the drug issue is ideal for perpetuating our moralism.
00:23:07.000 Yeah, and it's a weird one, too, right?
00:23:09.000 Because don't you drink wine in church?
00:23:11.000 You serve wine?
00:23:12.000 That's a drug.
00:23:13.000 I don't know.
00:23:14.000 I haven't been to church in a while.
00:23:16.000 I haven't either, but I'm pretty sure it's supposed to signify the blood of Christ, right?
00:23:21.000 Is that it?
00:23:22.000 Yeah, it's booze.
00:23:24.000 They're getting hooched up for Jesus.
00:23:29.000 But we're very strange in what we allow and don't allow other adult human beings to do.
00:23:37.000 And that really sort of gets to the heart of all this.
00:23:42.000 And then we're also very squeamish about the idea of needles.
00:23:46.000 And when you say this program in Geneva is super successful and they're giving people intravenous heroin up to a thousand milligrams a day, I'm like, wow, needles?
00:23:55.000 Jesus.
00:23:56.000 You know, that's something, the actual administration of it, like the method of administration, makes people squeamish.
00:24:04.000 Yeah, you know, but we give needles in hospitals.
00:24:06.000 We do those sorts of things.
00:24:07.000 And one of the things about this program that's nice is that they have clean needles.
00:24:11.000 They have clean drugs.
00:24:12.000 And so it decreases the likelihood that they will have abscesses and those sorts of things or other sort of blood-borne illnesses or concerns.
00:24:21.000 They are decreased.
00:24:22.000 In fact, people are more healthy being in these programs, obviously, than not being in these programs.
00:24:28.000 So they've convinced me.
00:24:32.000 So intravenous heroin can in effect act in a lot of the ways that maybe some prescription drugs like Xanax or maybe some antidepressants do where they alleviate the anxiety that certain people have?
00:24:44.000 Oh yeah, I mean...
00:24:48.000 A number of these people, I have to tell you, they have psychiatric illnesses.
00:24:52.000 Some of them have schizophrenia, some of them have depression.
00:24:55.000 They have a wide range of illnesses, just like any other identified addictive population.
00:25:01.000 Heroin, for example, helps people in many cases control their psychotic behaviors, their delusions.
00:25:10.000 And so heroin can be a very useful drug for a wide range of symptoms.
00:25:17.000 We know this.
00:25:18.000 At least people in medicine know this.
00:25:21.000 Well, let me clarify.
00:25:23.000 At least people in medicine outside of the United States know this.
00:25:27.000 This is not anything that's earth-shattering or groundbreaking.
00:25:32.000 Well, what is the difference between the education that they receive outside the United States and inside the United States?
00:25:37.000 Just the bias that we have about certain medicines?
00:25:40.000 Yeah, we cannot divorce our drug education from our social control.
00:25:49.000 And so when we think about how drugs or drug policy has been used to go at the groups that we don't like, and if we're not a part of the out-group, we just kind of accept this information uncritically.
00:26:02.000 And we've been told that people who use heroin, they have those issues, and they're not like us.
00:26:07.000 They're those people.
00:26:09.000 And why should we question it?
00:26:11.000 We don't know them very well, and we see people putting a needle in their arm.
00:26:15.000 Something must be wrong with them.
00:26:17.000 And so you can tell all of these incredible stories.
00:26:20.000 Physicians believe these stories in this country.
00:26:22.000 Our medical experts or addiction experts believe this sort of stuff.
00:26:27.000 But it's not true.
00:26:28.000 It's not reality.
00:26:30.000 And so that's one of the reasons that I travel and I continue to travel and to learn.
00:26:36.000 And I'm learning so much about my biases that I held and that I'm trying to get rid of.
00:26:43.000 I'm trying to really just focus on the evidence.
00:26:47.000 So, in a sense, like, the United States is very unique in its propaganda and unique in its sort of singular view on drugs?
00:26:57.000 Well, given that we have such a big military, it's hard for us to be unique because other countries, with our military might and our money, we kind of tell them what to think, too.
00:27:06.000 So we're not unique.
00:27:08.000 Canada.
00:27:09.000 Canada is one, but all of South America or a large portion of South America, even some places in Europe, Asia, you know, a number of places share our screwed-up views on drugs because they've been told to share our screwed-up views because they get some money for having these screwed-up views.
00:27:27.000 Like, we support various programs in Colombia about drugs, eradication of drugs, and all around the world.
00:27:34.000 So these countries share our views, but places like Geneva, that's really autonomous, and there are some other autonomous nations that actually look at the evidence and see what's best for their population, and not what's best for the people of the United States.
00:27:50.000 And they don't just accept the propaganda without thinking about their population.
00:27:56.000 Have you seen, there's a new TV show, Fear the Walking Dead?
00:28:00.000 It's like the new spin-off that's in LA. I have not, no.
00:28:05.000 I mean, I've been away, you know, from the United States, so...
00:28:08.000 I watched it and I thought immediately of you.
00:28:10.000 Because there's a character in it that's a heroin addict.
00:28:13.000 This young son is a heroin addict.
00:28:15.000 And while he was in this...
00:28:17.000 Spoiler alert, everybody!
00:28:20.000 If you're a fan of the show and you haven't watched any of the...
00:28:22.000 I don't know.
00:28:23.000 Spoiler alert.
00:28:24.000 Here it comes.
00:28:25.000 Fast forward.
00:28:26.000 The kid's a junkie and he's in this drug den and he's shooting up and this chick he's friends with turns into a zombie and starts eating people's faces and shit.
00:28:36.000 Sounds like something I should watch.
00:28:38.000 Yeah, it's great stuff.
00:28:39.000 Well, they get him to a hospital, right?
00:28:43.000 They've got him in the hospital for days, right?
00:28:45.000 He's a little sick at first, and then he seems fine, and then his withdrawals kick in, and his cravings kick in, like, fucking days later.
00:28:55.000 Like, days later, he can't take it anymore.
00:28:57.000 He's shaking, and he's throwing up all over himself, and he falls to the ground.
00:29:00.000 He has seizures and throws up on himself.
00:29:03.000 A day ago, the kid was fine.
00:29:05.000 A day ago, his face has all the color in it, looks normal, and I remember what you had said last time you were here, that withdrawal is a lot like getting the flu.
00:29:17.000 It's like getting sick, and then it goes away, and everything else is just sort of in your head.
00:29:22.000 Well, yeah, you know, the severity can vary based on the extent of how long people have been using the drug, obviously.
00:29:30.000 But yeah, it's the flu, basically.
00:29:33.000 And you're not going to die.
00:29:35.000 And all of these sort of dramatic characterizations that we see on TV, it's to sell their product.
00:29:41.000 It's really to sell their product.
00:29:43.000 And the problem is that people get educated on that sort of stuff.
00:29:47.000 Yeah, you were going to say bullshit.
00:29:49.000 That's the right way to say it.
00:29:50.000 Yeah.
00:29:50.000 It is bullshit.
00:29:51.000 I forgot where I'm at.
00:29:52.000 I thought I was on O'Reilly.
00:29:53.000 My bad.
00:29:55.000 If you were on O'Reilly, you would have been interrupted 150 times already.
00:30:00.000 We've already gone to 30 commercials.
00:30:02.000 Yeah, this kid in the show, his mother actually breaks...
00:30:06.000 Spoiler alert!
00:30:08.000 Spoiler alert!
00:30:09.000 His mother actually breaks into the school to get pills for him.
00:30:14.000 She breaks back into school and then she has to fight zombies and shit.
00:30:17.000 But she breaks into the school to get pills for her son and she's gonna like slowly wean him off with these pills.
00:30:24.000 But the fucking kid was normal just a day ago, you know?
00:30:29.000 Yeah, you know, man, it's too hard for me to watch this stuff.
00:30:32.000 I mean, you know, on the one hand, it's like I'm trying to be a regular citizen and just, you know, appreciate art or what other people do.
00:30:39.000 But then on the other hand, it's just that I just know the consequences of that rubbish.
00:30:44.000 You know, the consequences that it gives some idiotic politician raison d'etre.
00:30:50.000 So they feel like this is their reason for being now and they can go after this drug because they saw it on this awful TV show.
00:30:57.000 The TV show's actually really good.
00:30:59.000 I think the real issue is, like many people, the writers and the producers probably aren't heroin users.
00:31:09.000 So their idea is based on the popular mythology, the popular culture, the idea that we've all been sort of fed by Trainspotting and all these other films, they're sort of just repeating that.
00:31:21.000 No, I'm glad you pointed out that you can have a good TV show but get the drug issue wrong.
00:31:27.000 That's a great point.
00:31:28.000 It's real wrong, obviously.
00:31:31.000 But a lot of us have this idea, and I swear, before I met you, and I'm a person who's not averse to drugs, I thought of it all as, I thought heroin, like, oh yeah, man, you can get addicted.
00:31:43.000 You do it once, you're addicted, and then you're fucked.
00:31:46.000 It just, somehow or another, becomes a part of you.
00:31:50.000 That's why I've always had a problem when they start talking about marijuana addiction, like how many people get addicted to marijuana, because I don't understand what even the mechanism would be for you to get addicted to that.
00:32:02.000 Yeah, I mean, again, if we go back to the definition that I talked at the start of the week, when we think about social disruption, disruption of family function, work, and that sort of thing, and it's causing you distress, you can clearly see how somebody might be addicted to marijuana.
00:32:19.000 A low percentage of people become addicted to marijuana, but you certainly can see that, yeah, somebody might get distressed by their marijuana use.
00:32:27.000 Fine.
00:32:28.000 So they can meet criteria for addiction.
00:32:30.000 But when you compare marijuana addiction to alcohol, nicotine, cocaine, or any other drug, it's lower than all the rest of those drugs.
00:32:38.000 But certainly, it's possible that somebody has some distress and have...
00:32:44.000 Psychosocial disruptions and functioning.
00:32:46.000 So the disruptions and functioning is what really identifies someone as being an addict.
00:32:52.000 But if someone is a person who's using heroin on a daily basis but shows no disruption in their life, shows no problems with their social situation or their job functioning or anything like that, but then they get off of it.
00:33:06.000 Yeah.
00:33:07.000 Then they're an addict.
00:33:08.000 Because if they get off of it, or they try to quit cold turkey, and then they get all fucked up because of that, well then you would have to kind of qualify them.
00:33:16.000 Well, that's just one criteria.
00:33:18.000 Withdrawal symptoms are only one criteria, and you have to have...
00:33:21.000 I mean, that's only one symptom.
00:33:23.000 So you have to have several symptoms in order to meet criteria for addiction.
00:33:27.000 But if you only have withdrawal, that's not an addict.
00:33:29.000 I mean, because you can think about somebody who's taking an antidepressant medication or somebody who's taking morphine for pain.
00:33:36.000 All those people can experience withdrawal, but we wouldn't call them an addict.
00:33:40.000 I mean, it's just like withdrawal is just a common sort of drug effect after a long-term use of a drug.
00:33:48.000 Caffeine withdrawal.
00:33:49.000 All of these things are, I mean, when people have a hangover, oftentimes that's acute withdrawal.
00:33:56.000 That's just an acute sort of manifestation of withdrawal symptoms.
00:33:59.000 But we wouldn't call them an alcoholic simply because they went out and partied for a couple of nights.
00:34:05.000 And so withdrawal is not the only criteria that we use to determine addiction.
00:34:11.000 But most people would.
00:34:13.000 And most people would be wrong, and that's part of the problem here, right?
00:34:17.000 Because they are looking only at withdrawal.
00:34:21.000 Withdrawal is not a big deal.
00:34:23.000 It only becomes a big deal when we're talking about alcohol withdrawal from chronic alcohol use, or when we're talking about barbiturate withdrawal from chronic use, because the person can die.
00:34:35.000 Outside of those drugs, I mean, those are the only sort of more commonly used drugs that we worry about withdraw.
00:34:42.000 The rest, you'll be fine.
00:34:44.000 People constantly throw around the term addiction then, I guess, in an incorrect way, in a technically incorrect way, because I know a lot of people that I would say are addicted to coffee, where they need to have coffee in order to wake up and function.
00:34:59.000 Yeah.
00:35:00.000 But like you said, they use it wrong.
00:35:02.000 Yeah.
00:35:03.000 I mean, because the coffee is actually helping them to maybe do their job better and not disrupting their job.
00:35:09.000 The coffee is helping them in their human function.
00:35:14.000 Well, the last time you were here, you explained something that really I never knew either.
00:35:19.000 It's the thing you just discussed, that...
00:35:22.000 A withdrawal is actually, or rather a hangover, is actually your body withdrawing.
00:35:27.000 Like the compensatory mechanisms that your body uses to deal with the alcohol in your system, that's what the feeling of being hungover is.
00:35:35.000 Is your body just withdrawing from that alcohol?
00:35:38.000 Certainly that can be a symptom of withdrawal, the hangover.
00:35:42.000 Absolutely.
00:35:43.000 I mean, you put a foreign substance into your body and your body tries to adjust.
00:35:47.000 We call it homostasis.
00:35:50.000 This is a normal response.
00:35:51.000 And then alcohol's half-life is so short that it's in the body.
00:35:55.000 And then before your body gets a chance to adjust completely, it's gone.
00:36:00.000 But your body has already overcompensated.
00:36:02.000 And so what you're seeing is this expression in some cases.
00:36:06.000 How difficult is this?
00:36:09.000 If you try to discuss this to the Bill O'Reilly crowd, there's a lot of people that are not going to swallow this definition.
00:36:18.000 Their definition of addiction is very different than what you're saying.
00:36:22.000 You know, before we went on air, you and I was talking a little bit.
00:36:27.000 This past summer, I've been all over.
00:36:30.000 Since I saw you last, I've been all over the globe.
00:36:35.000 And one of the things that when I give these talks, when people say, I heard you on the Joe Rogan Show, you know, all over the world from Vancouver to Brazil to Geneva to the Philippines, all over, I know when they say that I heard you on the Joe Rogan Show,
00:36:53.000 I know that they are thinking people.
00:36:55.000 I know that these are people who look for information outside of the normal sort of source of information.
00:37:03.000 And so those are the people who I'm trying to reach, the people who are actually grappling and struggling with these ideas and trying to evaluate the ideas for the merits, based on their merits, and that's it.
00:37:16.000 Whereas when you talk about the O'Reilly's and you talk about the politicians and you talk about these people, Those are the people who I like talking to least.
00:37:25.000 I mean, not necessarily O'Reilly himself, but some of the people who watch him.
00:37:31.000 And so I'm trying to reach the general public, the people who watch your show, the people who are into what you do, the common folk who are out there who are struggling and they're trying to learn.
00:37:45.000 And I think if we reach them, the politicians will follow them, not the opposite of way around.
00:37:51.000 And so my least favorite people to talk to are politicians.
00:37:55.000 I mean, it's as an adult, me and you, you like to talk to people who take you seriously, particularly when you're respecting them.
00:38:06.000 Politicians oftentimes don't give a shit about you.
00:38:09.000 They only care about their votes and how they can use you for those votes.
00:38:15.000 You know, it's insulting to me to talk to people in that way, and so I try to avoid them.
00:38:21.000 Coming here to this place, I know that there will be people out here who listen to you who will struggle with this, but they will evaluate it based on its merits.
00:38:30.000 And that's all you can ask, is that people evaluate your arguments based on the merits, and then you have conversations, discussions, and you go back and forth, and the best evidence wins.
00:38:41.000 And everybody understands those rules, and those are your listeners.
00:38:45.000 That's not the politicians.
00:38:47.000 That's not the talk show host.
00:38:49.000 Those are not those people.
00:38:50.000 And so they're not the people who I'm trying to reach.
00:38:53.000 And it helps to keep me sane because I can't deal with people who don't use evidence or don't play with evidence as part of the rules.
00:39:02.000 Yeah, that's a great quote that's on your website about, I make sure that I don't engage in conversations with people that don't abide by the rules of evidence.
00:39:11.000 That's a great quote.
00:39:13.000 And I agree with you about politicians, too, because essentially politicians just go where the wind of public opinion goes.
00:39:20.000 And so many of them, they have a team of people deciding what they're talking about.
00:39:26.000 A team of idiots often tell.
00:39:28.000 Yes.
00:39:28.000 And unfortunately, those people oftentimes, when these politicians, they'll get involved in debates or get involved in some sort of a public function where they're discussing something or giving a speech, and they can say things that are just absolutely inaccurate.
00:39:45.000 And those things, when people aren't really discerning or they don't have the time maybe to go over the evidence, these people take that as fact.
00:39:55.000 Yeah, I know.
00:39:55.000 You know, this is why I continue to be out here, because when people make those kind of statements based on no evidence and they're just lies, they're just inaccurate, the consequences of those lies and inaccuracies are so great, and there are so many poor people who pay the price for it.
00:40:12.000 That's why I continue to stay out here, and I stay out here to call those people out on it and try to embarrass those people.
00:40:18.000 I mean, I'm a firm believer in embarrassing politicians when they tell these lies, when they make up this information, because they are ruining too many people's lives as a result.
00:40:30.000 Well, they're agents of poor information oftentimes, whether they want to be or not.
00:40:35.000 I think all they want to do is get elected and stay in power and then serve whoever paid for their campaign.
00:40:44.000 That's it.
00:40:45.000 That's exactly it.
00:40:46.000 It's a terrible system, if you think about it that way.
00:40:48.000 That's it.
00:40:49.000 It's a terrible system.
00:40:50.000 That's why I'm glad you do your thing, and I'm glad that people all around the world are checking you out.
00:40:56.000 Well, now when you're on these travels and you're going around the world, did you go to Portugal at all?
00:41:01.000 Did you talk to anybody from there?
00:41:02.000 I talked to people there, like high officials there, but I haven't been to Portugal yet.
00:41:08.000 And, you know, I think you bring up Portugal because they decriminalized all drugs.
00:41:13.000 So too did the Czech Republic.
00:41:15.000 The Czech Republic did it before Portugal, but we all know about Portugal.
00:41:18.000 Yeah.
00:41:19.000 And so that's a good thing.
00:41:21.000 I mean, it just simply means that people can't be arrested for drug possessions.
00:41:26.000 And drug possession is considered like a 10-day supply of drugs in Portugal, which is a good thing.
00:41:32.000 And then there are other places around the world that people are doing other innovative things, like in Sao Paulo, In Brazil, the mayor is paying drug addicts or drug users, paying them a salary,
00:41:49.000 giving them housing, giving them food, three meals, and that sort of thing to make sure they show up for work.
00:41:57.000 And if they're coming to work, that means they're not getting into other activities.
00:42:01.000 And so he's trying to keep He has certain areas of his city safe doing that.
00:42:06.000 And then we talked about the Swiss.
00:42:08.000 And so there are a number of people thinking about innovative ways to deal with drugs and to treat people like adults and not children, like in our country.
00:42:18.000 We're still concerned about moralism, even though there have been some states that have said, as you well know, Colorado, Alaska, Oregon, Washington, they've said that we're going to legalize marijuana for adults.
00:42:32.000 And they have.
00:42:33.000 And I suspect California will vote in November 16 to see if they want to do the same thing.
00:42:42.000 Despite the sort of moralism, we still have some people out here pushing for progressive, rational, adult sort of drug laws.
00:42:53.000 And so I hope we continue to see this.
00:42:56.000 Well, when I look at the current state of politics in America, and I look at What we call our leaders and the way they discuss drugs.
00:43:06.000 What I'm looking at is it's almost like they're trapped in an ancient way of thinking that doesn't work anymore because of the Internet.
00:43:14.000 Because of the Internet, we have so much access to information now.
00:43:19.000 We have a freedom to actually find the truth.
00:43:22.000 So like what you're talking about where people have these misconceptions and then you come on and you give the absolute truth fact-based evidence and you're forced to like examine like why do I have these assumptions in my head?
00:43:37.000 Why do I have and why do I? I mean I was forced to confront these when I talked to you the first time.
00:43:43.000 I was like why do I have these ideas in my head?
00:43:45.000 Have I really researched them?
00:43:47.000 Is this something that I've...
00:43:49.000 Am I out there in the field talking to people that are addicts, talking to people that are treating them?
00:43:53.000 Absolutely not.
00:43:54.000 No.
00:43:55.000 This is just train-spotting.
00:43:56.000 This is just, you know, popular culture, politicians giving speeches.
00:44:02.000 That's all I know of it.
00:44:04.000 And I think our base of understanding is expanding now.
00:44:08.000 I agree.
00:44:09.000 Thanks to people like you.
00:44:10.000 Well, thank you.
00:44:11.000 I mean, because of what you're doing.
00:44:12.000 Obviously, these alternative media forms, right?
00:44:15.000 I mean, when I think about coming to your show, my publicists and those people, they wasn't on the book radar, which is a mistake.
00:44:24.000 But I mean, we know better now.
00:44:25.000 People are learning now.
00:44:27.000 So that's really encouraging to me that we have these alternative forms of media out here on the one hand.
00:44:35.000 But you made a point.
00:44:39.000 It slips my mind now.
00:44:41.000 We can go on.
00:44:42.000 I forgot the point.
00:44:43.000 About politics being stuck in this...
00:44:48.000 Oh, yeah.
00:44:49.000 So as we think about the politician, as we think about the politician, I think the last Republican debate, there were a couple politicians, I think, Bush and Christie, and they were saying how they would bring the federal government in to change what's going on in Colorado.
00:45:08.000 Oh, the Chris Christie guy.
00:45:09.000 Yeah, yeah, those guys.
00:45:10.000 You know, that kind of logic and thinking...
00:45:16.000 I think that if he actually got the nomination, that wouldn't happen.
00:45:20.000 I don't know if they have to say these kinds of things, but it would be nice if the American people really punished these idiots who say things like that.
00:45:29.000 Because on the one hand, we think about the folks of Colorado taking this vote and the whole issue of states' rights.
00:45:38.000 And this is what the Republicans say they really like.
00:45:41.000 Well, I don't mean to go after the Republicans because I think they're the same as Democrats, quite frankly.
00:45:46.000 So this is not a knock on them as a party.
00:45:52.000 But when people talk about states' rights, that's what this is.
00:45:58.000 The state have decided.
00:46:00.000 And so the public The American people should really slam idiots who say things like they're going to go after a state.
00:46:07.000 What about this issue of states' rights?
00:46:09.000 I mean, and so I think Republicans and Democrats should really go after these people for saying remarks like that.
00:46:17.000 Well, Chris Christie in particular, because a lot of the things that he says are totally inaccurate, and then on top of it, What is his concern?
00:46:25.000 I'm assuming his concern is the health consequences of marijuana use.
00:46:29.000 Well, the health consequences of being a gigantic fat fuck are way worse than the health consequences of marijuana use.
00:46:35.000 I mean, that guy is morbidly obese, and he's talking about people who smoke a plant that makes them happy.
00:46:41.000 That's ridiculous.
00:46:42.000 The idea that you're going to take that right away from responsible adults like me.
00:46:48.000 I don't know how old he is, but I don't think he's much older than me.
00:46:52.000 Yeah, no, I feel you.
00:46:52.000 No, I hear you.
00:46:53.000 I love your outrage about this.
00:46:56.000 I mean, but this is how, this is what Americans have to do about heroin, about cocaine.
00:47:02.000 Boy, that's a tough sell, man.
00:47:04.000 That's why I said it.
00:47:05.000 It's a tough sell, but people think of coke as dudes who won't shut the fuck up at the parties, want to start businesses with you, want to tell you about some shit that they never really did.
00:47:15.000 That's what people think about coke, assholes.
00:47:17.000 Well, they haven't done coke with people I know.
00:47:20.000 Damn, I need to be around at least people you know that do coke, because everybody I've been around that's on coke is an idiot.
00:47:28.000 Well, you know, some of the people who do coke around me are in government, so I guess they can pass as idiots too.
00:47:36.000 Well, it's the same thing with alcohol, right?
00:47:39.000 I mean, here's an example.
00:47:41.000 There was a guy that I know that's a soldier.
00:47:44.000 That came back from Afghanistan.
00:47:47.000 He's got all sorts of pain and issues from the war.
00:47:50.000 And he takes Oxycontin.
00:47:54.000 And he's trying to get off of it.
00:47:56.000 He's slowly weaning himself off.
00:47:57.000 But he'll take like a couple a day every day.
00:48:00.000 And he was describing it to me when I was at a bar.
00:48:04.000 And my immediate reaction was like, wow, man, that dude's on it right now.
00:48:07.000 He seems so normal.
00:48:08.000 Yeah.
00:48:09.000 And then, while I'm thinking that, I'm next to people that are drunk off their ass at this fucking bar at the improv.
00:48:17.000 I mean, these people are hammered, just sloshed, and they're probably doing way more damage to their body right there.
00:48:23.000 And I'm like, wow, those poor fucks on pills.
00:48:25.000 You know, I mean, it's interesting how we have these categorizations that, like, the pill, the Oxycontin pill, like, oh, this guy's, he's gotta be fucked up.
00:48:35.000 Meanwhile, to my left, there's a bar filled with people just throwing back this liquid poison and torturing their liver and their brain.
00:48:44.000 Yeah, man.
00:48:45.000 See, this is the new book.
00:48:47.000 When it comes out, I'm going to have to come here.
00:48:49.000 But this is precisely what I'm trying to deal with.
00:48:51.000 I'm trying to show people how to use drugs to enhance human functioning experience and so forth.
00:48:58.000 Now, that means that as we get older, we may have to change our drug use from something like alcohol.
00:49:04.000 Alcohol might be a little too toxic on some of our livers as we get older.
00:49:09.000 Toxic in other ways for us as we get older and some other drug like oxycontin or something else might be more beneficial for you to achieve that goal that you're trying to achieve and that's what the new book is trying to trying to look at to help people change their drug use according to their age their maturity all of these things and how to keep them safe and also to help them to accomplish that goal that they seek to enhance human experiences when we go to parties We take drugs,
00:49:37.000 we take alcohol in order to, as a social lubricant, you know, but maybe that social lubricant isn't working for me as much these days.
00:49:45.000 Alcohol disrupts my sleep, you know, whereas an opiate is perfect.
00:49:50.000 You know, I can chill, I can relax, and I can get some great sleep, and I can be here to do your show and be bright and bushy-tailed and I'm ready to go.
00:50:00.000 As opposed to having that drink the night before, but have an Oxycontin or something else.
00:50:07.000 That's interesting.
00:50:08.000 You know, I think also we're dealing with a reaction.
00:50:12.000 Like when you were talking about people in the 1970s that were doing the higher percentage of them were smoking marijuana and it could have been a reaction to the Nixon administration.
00:50:23.000 I think in a situation like that, you get that preacher's daughter sort of effect.
00:50:29.000 The suppression, where people just want to react to that suppression.
00:50:33.000 People don't like being told what to do.
00:50:36.000 And in the case of things like cocaine, there's that naughty factor.
00:50:41.000 There's the fact that it's forbidden.
00:50:43.000 There's this factor That what you're doing is something that's illegal, and that makes it more exciting.
00:50:49.000 I think that's one of the things that was highlighted by the decriminalization in Portugal and the subsequent effects, and even Colorado.
00:50:57.000 What they've shown in Colorado is the lowest instances of drunk driving in, I think, something like 15 years, lowest instances of violent crime that they've had in a long time, and no deaths.
00:51:11.000 You know, they're talking about, like, one guy jumped off of a building when he was high on pot edibles.
00:51:16.000 Listen, people make shitty choices all the time, whether on pot edibles, or they drink too much Dr. Pepper, or they have too many fucking Twinkies.
00:51:26.000 I mean, wasn't there a guy in San Francisco that killed somebody that used Twinkies as a defense?
00:51:32.000 A Twinkie defense.
00:51:32.000 Yeah, it was like a famous defense.
00:51:35.000 Because sugar is a drug.
00:51:37.000 I think that...
00:51:39.000 Responsible adults being able to make choices based on evidence and based on reality and fact, that should be the foundation of our society, how we treat almost everything.
00:51:50.000 Joe, man, you just laid it out with marijuana.
00:51:54.000 I absolutely agree with you, but I want to push you to think about heroin in the same way, cocaine in the same way, because what you just said about marijuana, you're absolutely right, but it also applies to these other psychoactive drugs.
00:52:09.000 We just need to make sure people know how to do these things safely.
00:52:13.000 I'm opening my mind to this.
00:52:15.000 I just don't have any experience in any of those.
00:52:18.000 I was always scared of Coke because when I grew up, I had a friend and his cousin got...
00:52:24.000 He became a mess.
00:52:26.000 He was selling it and all this dude did was do Coke and hang out in his house and watch TV and sell Coke and he lost a ton of weight and he looked like shit and it's just like...
00:52:36.000 He made some bad choices, but he could have made those bad choices doing a lot of different things.
00:52:41.000 Just like you talked about the guy who possibly jumped out of the building after the edibles and had some other issues.
00:52:48.000 You're absolutely right.
00:52:49.000 There are a lot of issues.
00:52:50.000 I mean, you can, I'm sure, you can look at my talks, you can look at other people, you can see, you'd be like, okay, can you tell what drug...
00:53:00.000 I'm on.
00:53:01.000 Can you tell what drug this person is on?
00:53:03.000 Of course you can't.
00:53:04.000 Right.
00:53:06.000 Because people are, most of us, are adults and responsible and know what we're doing.
00:53:12.000 What's a good drug to take right before you do the O'Reilly show?
00:53:16.000 Oh, um...
00:53:19.000 No, actually with the O'Reilly...
00:53:21.000 Beta blockers?
00:53:21.000 Nah, a beta blocker might be helpful, but you might want to just take a low dose of amphetamine so you can be really alert and attentive and ready to go.
00:53:31.000 Ready to attack?
00:53:32.000 Yeah, you'd be ready to go.
00:53:33.000 That's that style.
00:53:34.000 You know, I had Peter Schiff.
00:53:36.000 Do you know who he is?
00:53:37.000 He's a financial genius.
00:53:41.000 Very controversial character, very successful, but has these, like, controversial ideas about economics.
00:53:48.000 But I had him on the podcast, and I don't know how many podcasts he's done, but he started off the show like...
00:53:56.000 Because that's how they do it.
00:53:57.000 When you go on those talk shows, you've got to be able to fucking fire.
00:54:03.000 But this shows three hours of just chilling out and talking.
00:54:08.000 So about an hour and a half in, he starts to slow down.
00:54:10.000 I'm like, you want a drink?
00:54:11.000 He's like, yeah, I'll have a drink.
00:54:12.000 So we got him at Jack Daniels, on The Rocks.
00:54:14.000 And then he got casual about an hour and a half in, and it became an actual conversation.
00:54:20.000 I know virtually nothing about finances, so I wasn't challenging him.
00:54:25.000 I was just asking questions and I wanted to get him to illuminate certain perspectives.
00:54:31.000 But he was ready for someone to jump in.
00:54:33.000 He was ready to be that split-screen thing when you have one person on one side, one on the other, and they have opposing viewpoints and they're just talking over each other.
00:54:42.000 I understand.
00:54:43.000 I sympathize with the cat because I know how it is.
00:54:47.000 And then before you know it, it's over.
00:54:49.000 And then you don't really get...
00:54:52.000 Many of us think that, all right, it's not our opportunity to educate the American public.
00:54:57.000 It's not.
00:54:58.000 It's really an opportunity for the host to show how smart they are.
00:55:02.000 That's what it is.
00:55:03.000 Yeah, it's just also a lot of just preaching to the choir nonsense, and they want the conflict of two people with opposing viewpoints yelling at each other and calling each other morons.
00:55:14.000 Pseudosymmetry is what they want, to pretend that each issue has a certain amount of evidence over here and a certain amount of evidence over here.
00:55:23.000 And the sort of real story is somewhere in the middle.
00:55:27.000 No, most issues don't happen like that, but that's how non-thinking people can see the world.
00:55:33.000 But the world doesn't work like that.
00:55:35.000 No, it doesn't.
00:55:36.000 What was that documentary, Jamie?
00:55:38.000 Do you remember the name of the documentary that I was talking about where these people that were hired to go on and talk about...
00:55:45.000 Jesus Christ, I just watched it really recently.
00:55:47.000 What is it?
00:55:48.000 Mirage Man?
00:55:48.000 Was it Mirage Man?
00:55:49.000 Yeah.
00:55:50.000 They were hired to go on these shows and talk about whether it was, initially, it was whether or not cigarettes and nicotine were bad for your health and addictive, and then it became about global warming.
00:56:04.000 The same people.
00:56:05.000 And they would go on all these different talk shows and just spout out this stuff very loudly and with confidence, and that was literally their job.
00:56:14.000 They were being hired to do this.
00:56:16.000 So they'd go on these talk shows, and they would just yap.
00:56:19.000 They would just talk real loud and real confidently and talk over people, and their function or their career was to try to change opinion with these short little bursts.
00:56:31.000 Yeah.
00:56:31.000 Yeah, that's what they do, and I don't do that very well.
00:56:36.000 Yeah, well, that's why I had to contact you after I saw you on O'Reilly.
00:56:39.000 I was like, you look so frustrated.
00:56:42.000 Because that show is just so fucking retarded.
00:56:45.000 You know, I try not to show frustration.
00:56:47.000 I really do.
00:56:48.000 So if I did, that's not good.
00:56:51.000 I try not.
00:56:52.000 I should say, knowing you, you looked mildly perturbed on the outside.
00:56:58.000 If I didn't know you, I'd be like, well, that guy handled that really well.
00:57:01.000 They just fucking talked over him.
00:57:03.000 I mean, they give you like, I mean, I'm not even exaggerating.
00:57:06.000 You might have had a talk for, you might have got out 20 seconds worth of talking before they were talking over you.
00:57:12.000 Yeah, you know, the thing is just so perplexing to me that you can be so irresponsible and have this stuff be on the airwaves and not get in trouble for it.
00:57:26.000 And then what they're doing on many of these shows, they're doing more harm to the American education than most people.
00:57:39.000 Yet, they're not in jail.
00:57:41.000 In fact, they're being rewarded handsomely for this sort of thing.
00:57:44.000 And then we're putting people in jail for these other minor infractions.
00:57:48.000 It's distorted, man.
00:57:50.000 It's something really sick about this system.
00:57:52.000 It is, and it seems like it's trapped in momentum that these shows have always existed the way they have, you know, with these seven-minute segments that go to ad break, you know, one host, loud, boisterous guy talks over everybody.
00:58:07.000 These shows have been around for so long like that that they're a comfortable model for us.
00:58:12.000 Yeah, for some people, they're not comfortable for me because I tell you, I've been really trying to, rethinking, like, where can I live in this world?
00:58:21.000 But, you know, the U.S., they're making it very hard for me to want to stay here.
00:58:26.000 But, you know, I have children that I have to raise here.
00:58:29.000 But after that, I'm out.
00:58:32.000 Really?
00:58:32.000 Where are you going to go?
00:58:33.000 Canada?
00:58:34.000 Canada's good.
00:58:34.000 Fuck no.
00:58:35.000 I mean, no disrespect to Canada.
00:58:37.000 I mean, I love it up there.
00:58:40.000 Canada is really U.S. light, man.
00:58:43.000 Really?
00:58:44.000 Yeah, I mean, Vancouver is a little different, but the rest of Canada is trying to be like the U.S., particularly when it comes to drugs and all of these issues.
00:58:54.000 Yeah, Vancouver is the most open-minded when it comes to drugs.
00:58:57.000 Yeah, I mean, Vancouver, I really dig the folks at Vancouver.
00:59:00.000 Don't they have some sort of a heroin program in Vancouver as well?
00:59:03.000 They do.
00:59:03.000 It's on the DL. It's for research purposes, but they certainly have a program where they're giving heroin, and it's a research project at the University of British Columbia.
00:59:16.000 I was there on Friday night.
00:59:17.000 I did a theater there, and you could drive by the theater and get a contact high with your window open.
00:59:22.000 Literally just driving by.
00:59:24.000 Marijuana is so open.
00:59:26.000 You know that contact hot thing is not real, right?
00:59:29.000 It's not real?
00:59:30.000 I've hotboxed people in this very room.
00:59:32.000 How dare you?
00:59:33.000 I'm gonna change your research.
00:59:34.000 We've fucked some people up in this room.
00:59:36.000 We can do it today.
00:59:39.000 Right where you're sitting.
00:59:40.000 We have wrecked some people.
00:59:42.000 Let's do it today.
00:59:43.000 Let's see if it's real.
00:59:45.000 I don't think it's real.
00:59:46.000 You don't think it's real?
00:59:47.000 But we can do an experiment.
00:59:48.000 Here's another reason why I think it's real.
00:59:50.000 There's this place in Toronto and they have, I don't want to give them up because I don't think it's legal, but they do a comedy show there and they have, the front is like a bong shop and then the back they have a comedy club.
01:00:03.000 And they have no ventilation whatsoever.
01:00:05.000 You walk into the back room.
01:00:07.000 You are in a fucking cloud of marijuana smoke.
01:00:09.000 The candles are no longer burning on oxygen.
01:00:13.000 They're burning on marijuana smoke.
01:00:14.000 There's no oxygen in the room.
01:00:16.000 You're breathing pot only.
01:00:18.000 And you will get high as fuck.
01:00:20.000 Because I have a friend who doesn't even smoke pot.
01:00:22.000 And I took him to the show.
01:00:23.000 He's like straight edge.
01:00:25.000 He was high as fuck.
01:00:27.000 He was like, dude, I don't even know if I can walk.
01:00:29.000 And I was like, exactly.
01:00:31.000 This is a reality.
01:00:33.000 You just need to be in extreme situations.
01:00:36.000 I'll take you to Toronto.
01:00:37.000 Right on, man.
01:00:38.000 I'll show you.
01:00:39.000 I bet.
01:00:40.000 Let's do it.
01:00:40.000 That room will fuck you up.
01:00:41.000 I guarantee you.
01:00:42.000 What we need to do is take someone who's totally clean, like someone who doesn't do any marijuana whatsoever, and make them sit in that audience and watch an hour and a half comedy show and then get up.
01:00:53.000 That's cool.
01:00:54.000 Let's do it.
01:00:54.000 And then we can also test our urine.
01:00:57.000 We can do all that stuff.
01:00:58.000 Yeah, let's do it.
01:00:58.000 Well, don't they test positive, though, if you're at a party?
01:01:01.000 I mean, can't you test positive for some of those more stringent drug tests?
01:01:05.000 You know, I know people say that, you know, but I haven't seen that.
01:01:11.000 But I don't know for sure.
01:01:12.000 I certainly haven't seen it.
01:01:14.000 But maybe.
01:01:15.000 Maybe it's possible.
01:01:16.000 Do you know the issue that's going on right now with the UFC and this guy named Nick Diaz?
01:01:20.000 No.
01:01:21.000 This is a huge story in the world of sports because Nick Diaz, who is one of the most popular fighters in the UFC, and is a very outspoken marijuana enthusiast.
01:01:32.000 He's also extremely healthy.
01:01:35.000 I think he eats mostly vegan, except I believe he eats some fish.
01:01:38.000 He runs triathlons on a regular basis.
01:01:41.000 He swam back from Alcatraz twice.
01:01:44.000 He's known for being one of the most fit guys in the sport, but he loves marijuana, and he smokes it all the time.
01:01:50.000 The UFC has instituted, the Nevada State Athletic Commission has instituted a new drug policy in regards to marijuana where they've lowered the threshold considerably, like much, much lower.
01:02:02.000 So you literally would have to be high like the day of the fight in order to test positive.
01:02:09.000 He has administered tests from two different organizations.
01:02:13.000 One of them, the World Anti-Doping Agency, WADA. And WADA is a blood test, which is much more accurate than what Nevada State Athletic Commission uses.
01:02:22.000 Nevada State Athletic Commission uses a urine test.
01:02:25.000 The blood tests, both before and after the fight, fined him to be under the threshold, so he passes.
01:02:32.000 But Nevada, using their urinalysis test, say that he fails.
01:02:37.000 They fine him $165,000, and then they ban him from the sport for five years.
01:02:45.000 It's a huge outrage.
01:02:47.000 Well, it should be.
01:02:48.000 I mean, really, marijuana shouldn't even be on any of these, even WADA. I know WADA increased their thresholds that's required to trigger the penalty, which is a good thing.
01:02:59.000 But it shouldn't even be on WADA's list because when we think about...
01:03:05.000 Drugs and performing enhancing drugs.
01:03:07.000 Clearly, people are not using marijuana to enhance performance.
01:03:10.000 That's not where they're using it for recreational purposes.
01:03:14.000 And maybe that was the day before or several days before.
01:03:17.000 But it certainly has nothing to do with their competition.
01:03:20.000 And so it should be off of those lists.
01:03:22.000 I mean, this is what people should...
01:03:25.000 Protest and argue about, demonstrate about the NFL, the NBA, all of these things.
01:03:30.000 They should remove marijuana from that.
01:03:32.000 They should also remove cocaine.
01:03:34.000 Cocaine would not be used to enhance performance.
01:03:38.000 But inside, in competition, you don't think it would enhance performance as a stimulant?
01:03:43.000 Barely.
01:03:44.000 I mean, it's such a short-lived thing.
01:03:46.000 Amphetamines can do a better job of that, but cocaine would be barely.
01:03:51.000 It really would be.
01:03:51.000 I mean, but if we start talking about drugs and sports, and then we're really being honest, we have to think about why are drugs banned from sports in the first place?
01:04:01.000 I mean, and so we start doing that, and then we can systematically go through the illogical sort of reasoning behind these bans.
01:04:11.000 People say, well, we care about the health of the athletes and drugs.
01:04:15.000 Okay.
01:04:16.000 Okay, regulate drug use in sports and make sure that they have a physician and so forth.
01:04:20.000 But if you really cared about the health of athletes in sports, you ban boxing, you ban all of these sorts of things.
01:04:27.000 You ban football.
01:04:28.000 You ban all these.
01:04:29.000 So that's like, that's bullshit.
01:04:30.000 That's not why you, that's not why we care about drugs in sports.
01:04:35.000 Not because of the health of the athletes.
01:04:36.000 That's just not true.
01:04:38.000 Well, we say that athletes are role models.
01:04:41.000 Why should athletes have an additional responsibility more so than anybody else?
01:04:45.000 That's a very good point.
01:04:47.000 You know, so that's crap.
01:04:48.000 And you just go down the list and think about why we ban these things and it just doesn't fit.
01:04:54.000 We ban them because of moralisms and the war on drugs.
01:04:58.000 And that's just inappropriate because we're now starting to see that the rationale on which the war on drugs is built is problematic at best.
01:05:10.000 What do you think of a situation like, say, the Lance Armstrong situation, where he's involved in a sport where he tests positive for some stuff.
01:05:19.000 I don't even think he did test positive.
01:05:21.000 That's right.
01:05:22.000 I think they weaseled their way around the test so well that...
01:05:25.000 He never really tested positive, but he ultimately had to admit to using performance-enhancing drugs.
01:05:32.000 They strip him of his Tour de France titles.
01:05:34.000 Then on top of that, because he was sponsored by the post office, he gets hit with defrauding the government.
01:05:43.000 When you defraud the government, they are allowed to sue you for three times the amount that they gave you.
01:05:48.000 So if they gave him $30 million, they're suing him for $90 million or something crazy like that.
01:05:55.000 On top of that once you strip him if you're going to give that title to the next person who didn't test positive for that You got to go down to like 18th place.
01:06:05.000 Yeah, which is hilarious So like my friend Bill Burr hilarious comedian had a great bit that he did about this on the Conan O'Brien show he was like So basically, our steroided up guy beat your steroided up guy.
01:06:21.000 I mean, they're all steroided up.
01:06:22.000 The whole sport is predicated on it.
01:06:25.000 I mean, this sport.
01:06:27.000 And I've even heard it argued by doctors that doing the Tour de France without the drugs is arguably more dangerous for the athlete's body than doing it with the drugs.
01:06:40.000 Well, Tour de France has always had drugs, isn't it?
01:06:42.000 I mean, everyone knows this, and so this notion that it's going to be clean or should be clean, it's a pipe dream.
01:06:49.000 It's really ridiculous.
01:06:50.000 I think that, you know, the whole Lance Armstrong issue, not talking about him specifically, But we should allow drugs in sports.
01:06:59.000 That's what we should do.
01:07:00.000 We should just regulate it and be honest and upfront about it.
01:07:06.000 Is that possible?
01:07:07.000 Do you think that's possible in this environment that we're in right now?
01:07:11.000 Of course it's possible.
01:07:13.000 It was possible right before we got in this environment, drugs were in sports.
01:07:17.000 I mean, we think about the Olympics.
01:07:19.000 For most of the Olympics, people were using performance-enhancing drugs.
01:07:23.000 That's how we got more selective anabolic steroids, because of the Olympics and East Germans and that whole sort of thing.
01:07:31.000 But actually, they were here in America, but it was competition with the old Soviet Union.
01:07:36.000 So I think that, yeah, it's possible.
01:07:40.000 It's possible if we stop being hypocrites about it and say, people say, well, it gives some people an unfair advantage.
01:07:47.000 Yeah, that's a big one.
01:07:48.000 Now, that's a joke.
01:07:49.000 That's really a joke.
01:07:50.000 I mean, particularly when I think about every four years when the Olympics come around and Americans get proud about all the medals we win when we fight.
01:07:59.000 Fucking win medals from a country like Switzerland that has seven million people.
01:08:03.000 New York City has more people in it than Switzerland, the entire country.
01:08:07.000 Of course we're gonna have more medals than Switzerland or some other small country.
01:08:12.000 Is that an unfair advantage?
01:08:15.000 Not yes, but hell yes, it is.
01:08:17.000 But do we talk about that?
01:08:18.000 There are some people who have resources and other people don't have resources.
01:08:22.000 We're gonna always have this unfair...
01:08:25.000 Life is unfair.
01:08:26.000 Well, the most unfair advantage in the Olympics, in my opinion, is when the NBA players play basketball.
01:08:33.000 Like, Jesus fucking Christ!
01:08:34.000 I mean, I know we want to win, but holy shit!
01:08:37.000 I mean, you let Michael Jordan or LeBron James or someone along those lines play in the Olympics against some dude from Czechoslovakia?
01:08:45.000 That's kind of fucked up.
01:08:46.000 Well, you know, their argument was that the other countries were allowing their NBA players to play.
01:08:51.000 Yeah.
01:08:51.000 Fine.
01:08:52.000 I mean, but...
01:08:53.000 From the outset, when you have these huge countries like the U.S. and competing with these other smaller countries who have limited resources, come on.
01:09:03.000 Are you kidding me?
01:09:04.000 And we talk about fair advantage and unfair.
01:09:09.000 There's also there's people that have natural advantages like LeBron James again like that guy if you look at him that is a genetic freak of nature Well, you have very few people that are ever gonna have a body like his right I know but they're in the NBA Right.
01:09:25.000 But I'm saying, even amongst the NBA, he sort of stands, he's an outlier.
01:09:29.000 Obviously, he's incredibly disciplined.
01:09:31.000 Obviously, he's talented.
01:09:32.000 Obviously, his massive work ethic.
01:09:35.000 No question about it.
01:09:36.000 Obviously, he has basketball intelligence that surpasses 99.999% of the people in the game.
01:09:43.000 There's all these other things on top.
01:09:45.000 But then, on top of it, he has this fucking race car body, you know?
01:09:49.000 I mean, that, like...
01:09:52.000 Take someone who's less physically talented.
01:09:57.000 If they both do the same amount of work, they both try as hard, you're never going to be that guy.
01:10:03.000 But you know, there are people who have bodies like his, and they're not him.
01:10:07.000 I mean, you've seen this throughout sports, where people have these...
01:10:12.000 Phenomenal bodies, but they're not him.
01:10:14.000 So it's not only their sort of physical makeup, it's people's drive, their work ethics, all of these things I don't think are emphasized enough.
01:10:22.000 I mean, you and I, the thing about it, we're talking about LeBron James and not Jack Brown, because we don't know him.
01:10:30.000 But Jack Brown has a hell of a body, but we don't know him because he doesn't have the ethics.
01:10:35.000 He doesn't have the drive.
01:10:37.000 He doesn't have all of these things.
01:10:38.000 But you and I can go and look at the NFL roster or some roster, and we can see some guys who are just built, and they just look great.
01:10:47.000 And then we don't know who the hell they are.
01:10:50.000 But we're talking about him because this is a selection bias, because we see him and he's doing it.
01:10:56.000 But the whole genetic thing, I need to see some evidence before I start to talk about genetics.
01:11:04.000 I don't know to what extent that contributes.
01:11:08.000 But what I do know is that work ethics and drive and people putting in the work, I know that pays off.
01:11:16.000 I absolutely know that.
01:11:17.000 It certainly does.
01:11:18.000 And you need all those things.
01:11:20.000 You can't just have genetics.
01:11:21.000 Genetics just, what is that expression?
01:11:25.000 Hard work beats talent when talent refuses to work hard.
01:11:28.000 Is that it?
01:11:29.000 Yeah.
01:11:30.000 And that is absolutely the fact.
01:11:31.000 When you've got a guy like LeBron James who has talent and hard work, then you get a superstar.
01:11:36.000 And you get that in all sports.
01:11:38.000 But the argument being that he does have this advantage physically that the average person with an average body just does not have.
01:11:48.000 But the average person in the NBA does.
01:11:50.000 They have this body.
01:11:52.000 They can look like LeBron.
01:11:54.000 Could they not?
01:11:55.000 Could a lot of them?
01:11:56.000 Oh, yeah.
01:11:57.000 I mean, there are some guys who are pretty big and fast and those sorts of things.
01:12:05.000 Well, here's a good example.
01:12:07.000 In the UFC, in mixed martial arts, they used to allow testosterone replacement therapy.
01:12:13.000 And it was kind of abused.
01:12:15.000 And the way it was abused is...
01:12:17.000 The way the male endocrine system works, as it's been explained to me, obviously I'm not a doctor, when you take testosterone, your body stops producing it.
01:12:30.000 So what these people would do is they would take it and then they would get off of it and their body would have very low testosterone and then they would get a blood test.
01:12:39.000 And the doctor would say, hey, you have low testosterone, you need testosterone replacement therapy.
01:12:44.000 So we had guys that were in their 20s that were getting testosterone replacement therapy, which is kind of crazy.
01:12:49.000 They would take it, and then they would take large amounts of it and recover much better than other people would.
01:12:56.000 They would be able to work harder and train harder.
01:12:58.000 And we had some instances, and there's this one guy named Vitor Belfort, who was the poster boy for testosterone replacement therapy, because his career was kind of in a lull.
01:13:09.000 He got on testosterone placement therapy.
01:13:10.000 He's a guy who's been fighting in the UFC since 1997, okay?
01:13:14.000 And he's in his late 30s.
01:13:16.000 And then all of a sudden in his late 30s, he is fucking smashing people.
01:13:21.000 And he looks like a god.
01:13:23.000 I mean, his body's just chiseled.
01:13:25.000 He's got super confidence.
01:13:27.000 He's super aggressive attacking.
01:13:29.000 And he's just highlight reel knockout after highlight reel knockout in his late 30s.
01:13:34.000 Then...
01:13:35.000 They take away testosterone replacement therapy.
01:13:37.000 The Nevada State Athletic Commission says, you know what?
01:13:40.000 This is just, we don't believe in this anymore.
01:13:42.000 We think this is being abused.
01:13:44.000 Everyone's going to have to get off of it.
01:13:45.000 And one of the reasons why they did it is because they tested him out of competition, just randomly.
01:13:50.000 They grabbed him and he was off the charts, like non-human levels.
01:13:56.000 So they make him get off of it.
01:13:58.000 He then fights for the title after he gets off of it, and he looks like a shell of himself.
01:14:04.000 His body is soft.
01:14:06.000 His skin is loose.
01:14:08.000 He doesn't have endurance.
01:14:11.000 He got destroyed in the first round by the champion.
01:14:15.000 And everybody looks at it and goes, well, see, you know, this is what happens when you take a guy like that and you get him off the stuff.
01:14:20.000 But there's a certain amount of people that look at a guy like that and go, man, wouldn't you like to see him fight on it?
01:14:27.000 Wouldn't you like to see what he could do if you kept him on it?
01:14:30.000 Because he seemed like a monster.
01:14:32.000 Yeah, I mean, I know I would.
01:14:34.000 I'd like to see, you know, because if we're going to draw the conclusion that the steroids was the reason that he was fighting like that.
01:14:41.000 So now that we did the A portion or the AB portion, so now we need to go back to A, put him back on the steroids, and then I'll feel more confident that, yeah, it was a steroids.
01:14:52.000 But the question is, though, is that an unfair advantage for him versus the person he's competing against who is clean and natural?
01:14:59.000 His opponent, Chris Weidman, who's the champion, is notoriously clean.
01:15:04.000 He's just hard work, looks clean, doesn't look like a guy who does any steroids at all.
01:15:08.000 He just works hard, he's smart, he's tough.
01:15:10.000 Yeah, so we should give the champion an option to use steroids.
01:15:15.000 If he wants to use them, he can do it.
01:15:17.000 If he doesn't, he doesn't have to.
01:15:19.000 But the other guy, we should also give him that option and then let's see what happens.
01:15:23.000 The problem with that in mixed martial arts as opposed to any other sport is that giving someone testosterone or a steroid is going to allow them to administer damage to their opponent that they might not be able to do without it.
01:15:38.000 So their opponent is going to suffer because of it.
01:15:40.000 It's a different thing, like the ability to deliver a basketball into a net is one thing, but the ability to kick somebody in the head is a completely different thing.
01:15:51.000 And the idea being that if you give someone EPO, for instance, which expands your endurance threshold, you will be able to throw more strikes, you'll be able to attack more aggressively without worrying about conserving your gas tank, and that you could damage someone in a way that you would not have damaged them naturally.
01:16:07.000 I don't see that as a problem.
01:16:09.000 I remember when Mike Tyson was knocking people out, when people walked in the ring with him, there was always that potential that you might get damaged in ways that you might.
01:16:18.000 That's right.
01:16:19.000 And so I don't see this as a problem.
01:16:21.000 We should let it into sports, and this is part of the risk of what you do.
01:16:28.000 It's as simple as that for me.
01:16:30.000 And then we should also monitor the athletes and make sure that They are.
01:16:34.000 They do have healthy levels and levels that are not going to cause toxicity to them.
01:16:39.000 But I don't see that as a problem.
01:16:40.000 You know, it's interesting, conversely, guys who have gotten off of it, they can't take punishment.
01:16:45.000 Like, there's one specific guy, and this guy, if anybody has an argument for taking it, it's this guy.
01:16:52.000 His name is Bigfoot Silva, and he actually is a giant.
01:16:56.000 He has gigantism.
01:16:57.000 So he has a tumor on his pituitary gland, and he was taking external, what is it, exogenous, that's how you say it?
01:17:05.000 Exogenous.
01:17:06.000 Exogenous testosterone.
01:17:07.000 And if anybody has an excuse for taking it, it's this guy.
01:17:11.000 Well, when he was on it, God, this guy could take a fucking punch.
01:17:15.000 I mean, he had this war with this guy, Mark Hunt, this epic five-round fight.
01:17:21.000 And then when he got off of it, he gets hit and he just goes down.
01:17:24.000 Like, it's really shocking, the difference in his ability to take punishment while on it and then while off of it.
01:17:31.000 See, you know, I have to tell you, I'm a bit outside of my expertise, so I don't really know these guys, but you certainly have piqued my interest, and I want to know more about it because...
01:17:43.000 You know, just to be logically consistent, I think that these things should be allowed in sports.
01:17:49.000 And if I'm going to have that position, I'd like to know more about, like, the things that you're saying.
01:17:55.000 Like, when he was on it, he could take a punch.
01:17:57.000 Then when he got off, he couldn't take a punch.
01:17:59.000 I don't know how many years between that and age, what role age plays and all of these sorts of things, but I'd like to know more.
01:18:06.000 I'm just at a disadvantage because I just don't know.
01:18:11.000 I don't know enough of the details about it.
01:18:15.000 But I would just challenge people to think about Hey, what if we allow drugs in sports?
01:18:23.000 Well, one of the things that it does do that it helps, it helps recovery, and apparently it mitigates the effects of damage.
01:18:30.000 It can mitigate the effects of damage that you take, not just in training, but also in competition.
01:18:37.000 Yeah.
01:18:37.000 And in that sense, it would benefit people.
01:18:40.000 But I do see the argument, and Ronda Rousey's made it pretty eloquently, that if someone is taking a steroid, if they're cheating, quote-unquote, that it's going to allow them to administer damage that they would not have been allowed to do or would not have been able to do with just hard work.
01:18:59.000 Well, I know that's a conjecture, but I don't know if that's true.
01:19:05.000 I have no idea if that's true.
01:19:07.000 I understand.
01:19:08.000 I understand.
01:19:10.000 It's the most extreme version of sports, fighting is.
01:19:14.000 So it's the most extreme consequences for this debate.
01:19:17.000 Sure.
01:19:17.000 And I think that it's a perfect place to start because it is a sport that...
01:19:22.000 You're going to get in the ring, you better be a man.
01:19:25.000 I mean, you better be tough.
01:19:26.000 Or a woman.
01:19:26.000 Or a tough, tough woman.
01:19:28.000 You better be, yeah, you can't be a wimp getting in that ring.
01:19:35.000 So I think that it's a great place to think about this.
01:19:38.000 But the notion that somebody would be able to administer more punishment because they're on Star Wars...
01:19:44.000 I don't know if I accept that.
01:19:46.000 I don't know if I accept.
01:19:47.000 I need some evidence before I come to that conclusion.
01:19:53.000 I understand your position.
01:19:54.000 I'm pretty sure that's a correct position, though, that you would be able to administer more.
01:20:00.000 I think if you take very talented athletes that already have all those attributes, discipline, hard work, and then you add steroids, you're going to get a more efficient body.
01:20:09.000 You're going to get a body that functions more.
01:20:11.000 Yeah.
01:20:12.000 Yeah, that's right.
01:20:14.000 But we're talking about delivering blows.
01:20:16.000 You think that people will be able to deliver blows in ways that...
01:20:20.000 Yeah, I do.
01:20:21.000 And on top of that, I think also with fighting, a big one is confidence.
01:20:25.000 And there's something about those guys that are juiced to the tits.
01:20:28.000 They're confident as fuck because they're Barely human.
01:20:32.000 I mean, when you hit these super high, hyperhuman levels of testosterone, you get these incredibly aggressive, confident men that can do things that they might.
01:20:43.000 And then subsequently, when they get off that stuff, boy, their confidence erodes radically.
01:20:48.000 Right on.
01:20:49.000 And their Instagram pages start looking like suicidal strippers.
01:20:52.000 It's all like motivational quotes and shit, and like, you know, they get real weird.
01:20:57.000 Josie, the ultimate experiment that we have to tell people they're on these things.
01:21:02.000 And let's see if their confidence is increased, right?
01:21:05.000 And we can see whether or not it's a placebo effect, this sort of confident thing.
01:21:10.000 I mean, but I know that they have real physical effects, so I'm not denying that at all.
01:21:15.000 But the confidence piece will be interesting to see.
01:21:18.000 Whether or not somebody will still have this confidence if we give them placebo and telling them this is what they are.
01:21:25.000 But isn't it fascinating also that we're still talking about drugs?
01:21:29.000 Like that term drugs is just such a weighted and loaded term.
01:21:33.000 The fact that that term could be used for a steroid as well as for aspirin or coffee.
01:21:40.000 It's really kind of unfortunate that we have this one blanket term that applies to psychedelics and as well it applies to testosterone and it applies to heroin.
01:21:52.000 I mean, there's too many things.
01:21:54.000 I actually like that.
01:21:56.000 Do you?
01:21:57.000 Do you?
01:21:57.000 Yeah.
01:21:58.000 Why don't you like it?
01:22:00.000 I mean, because when we think about...
01:22:02.000 One of the things that bothers me about the psychedelic kind of movement, and God bless them, people who enjoy this thing, but, you know, people separate their drug use, like the psychedelic use, like, I'm using this to go on a higher plane or for some other reason,
01:22:20.000 as opposed to the person on the corner who's getting high.
01:22:23.000 It's like...
01:22:24.000 You can rationalize your drug use however you want, but you're using drugs, and it's all the same thing.
01:22:31.000 It's a beautiful thing.
01:22:33.000 We're all together in this.
01:22:36.000 I'm not better than you with my drug use, and you're not better than me with your drugs.
01:22:40.000 Oh, I see.
01:22:41.000 I love that.
01:22:42.000 It's the elitism of the psychedelic community that annoys you.
01:22:45.000 Exactly.
01:22:46.000 Or other people.
01:22:48.000 I mean, this notion like even the marijuana smokers, when they talk about marijuana and not talk about crack and not talk about heroin, what the fuck is that?
01:22:57.000 I mean, come on.
01:22:58.000 You're doing a drug just like I'm doing this drug.
01:23:02.000 And so it's hypocrisy.
01:23:04.000 It's the same elitism that is pervasive throughout our society.
01:23:09.000 Well, I think the idea is that when they're doing marijuana or something like that, they're being responsible.
01:23:16.000 They're taking something that makes you more socially aware and casual, whereas when you're doing some speed or some meth or something like that, you're stealing cars and fucking driving into pedestrians.
01:23:29.000 That's how people look at it.
01:23:31.000 You're laughing hard, man.
01:23:34.000 Because, you know, I hear these things, right?
01:23:37.000 Like, I have done all of these things.
01:23:40.000 Right.
01:23:40.000 And it's not like I am stealing cars or doing any of these.
01:23:44.000 You don't get wacky when you get on the meth?
01:23:46.000 No, I mean, what?
01:23:47.000 You know, look at me.
01:23:49.000 LAUGHTER I mean, my life revolves around my work.
01:23:56.000 And, you know, my idea of a good time is being able to write a new paper, to write a book.
01:24:02.000 But that doesn't mean that I don't appreciate drugs and drug use.
01:24:08.000 And I think this is the majority of drug users.
01:24:12.000 In the world of academia, does your stance cause controversy?
01:24:16.000 Because, you know, you're obviously a very educated guy, very well respected.
01:24:20.000 But yet you say this so openly that you enjoy drugs.
01:24:25.000 Like, whereas a lot of people would shy away from that, even if they do research on the drugs themselves.
01:24:31.000 I've had people that, you know, even guys that work trying to legalize drugs that are very hesitant to admit their fault.
01:24:39.000 Like Rick Doblin, I had him on the podcast.
01:24:41.000 He didn't want to admit that he had taken ProVigil before the show.
01:24:46.000 He did, but he was hesitant to it.
01:24:48.000 I'm not slamming him at all, because I love that guy.
01:24:51.000 Yeah, me too.
01:24:51.000 He's a great guy.
01:24:52.000 But I found it fascinating that there was this hesitancy to admit that he took something that is so mild.
01:25:00.000 Pro Vigil gives you a little bit of energy.
01:25:02.000 It doesn't alter your heart rate.
01:25:04.000 It certainly doesn't alter critical thinking processes.
01:25:07.000 But he was hesitant, and he's the head of MAPS. Yeah.
01:25:12.000 See, not to talk about Rick's situation specifically, but just in general, when people are reluctant to say these things, that's part of the problem.
01:25:24.000 Because we need to have people get out of the closet.
01:25:27.000 There are so many people who go to jail, who get in trouble, who lose their job for doing a behavior that well-respected people in our society engage in.
01:25:38.000 I've been all over the world, and I've been hanging out with some of the movers and shakers in a variety of society.
01:25:46.000 And I have seen them get high, and they are responsible people, and they are people who I would want my children to be like, in many cases, some of these folks.
01:25:56.000 Now, many of those people are closeted.
01:26:00.000 But them being in the closet allows this hypocrisy to go on, allows us to go at the poor people for doing a behavior, engaging in behavior in which many of us engage in.
01:26:13.000 Something's very wrong with that.
01:26:15.000 And that's very, for me, very hypocritical.
01:26:19.000 And I like to look in the mirror as a man, as an adult, and to say that I live my life as honestly as I can in that regard.
01:26:30.000 And so what kind of man would I be if I wasn't honest about this?
01:26:35.000 I mean, I'm the person who has given thousands of doses of these drugs to people and carefully studied their effects, written books on this stuff.
01:26:44.000 If I can't say this, Why are you here?
01:26:49.000 Why am I here?
01:26:50.000 I would be embarrassed as a person, and I would deserve to be embarrassed as a person, because I didn't take the opportunity to help my fellow citizens who are catching hell for doing the same thing that I and others do.
01:27:08.000 That would be wrong.
01:27:09.000 Well, kudos to you for taking that stance, but I think that's a brave stance.
01:27:13.000 And in the world of academia, how is that accepted?
01:27:20.000 I don't know.
01:27:21.000 I haven't thought about it.
01:27:22.000 All I know is that I have to do my job.
01:27:24.000 So I do my job and, you know, I try to do my job as well or better than my colleagues.
01:27:30.000 That's all I can do in those spaces.
01:27:32.000 But, you know, those are not the spaces in which I live.
01:27:37.000 I mean, I work there.
01:27:39.000 I'm trying to be a citizen of the world, and so that's just a narrow aspect of my life.
01:27:45.000 That's very admirable, and I'm glad you're alive.
01:27:48.000 Thank you, man.
01:27:49.000 I'm glad there's people like you out there.
01:27:50.000 It's so important, I think.
01:27:52.000 I really do.
01:27:53.000 I think these conversations where a guy like you, who is so educated in the subject, can expand people's minds and say things in such an honest way, I think it's very critical because we are so hesitant to admit these things.
01:28:08.000 I run into situations with parents all the time.
01:28:12.000 I go to school, their kids go to school, and then they'll Google me.
01:28:16.000 They'll find out who you are.
01:28:18.000 All the fucking drug talk is the one that freaks them out the most.
01:28:22.000 Not the fact that I'm involved in cage fighting.
01:28:24.000 That seems fine.
01:28:26.000 They want to get tickets.
01:28:28.000 The drug stuff is the weird part, especially the psychedelics ones.
01:28:33.000 Psychedelics are the ones that seem to freak them out the most, more so even in the pot.
01:28:37.000 Like DMT. I've had more parents ask me about DMT. You know, with this curious, cross-armed, so what is this DMT stuff?
01:28:46.000 Well, see, I have children, too, so you know I get similar sorts of things.
01:28:51.000 I'm sure, yeah.
01:28:52.000 And you, like me, are an odd-looking fella, you know, with your crazy dreadlocks, your long fingernails.
01:28:59.000 Like, who's this motherfucker?
01:29:00.000 This guy's a doctor?
01:29:02.000 Yeah.
01:29:04.000 Yeah, you just hit it on the head.
01:29:09.000 But, you know, that's the sort of thing that drives me, right?
01:29:13.000 That's why when people are sleeping, I'm working.
01:29:16.000 I mean, I'm working around the clock, you know, but I pretend that I'm not.
01:29:21.000 You know, I pretend like I'm just chilling.
01:29:23.000 And, you know, I'm one of the most sort of uptight people you want to meet when it comes to work.
01:29:29.000 You know, I am a difficult person to work for.
01:29:34.000 Because you're a workaholic.
01:29:36.000 Absolutely.
01:29:36.000 Well, your work is very, very important to you, obviously.
01:29:40.000 Yeah, absolutely.
01:29:41.000 You know, it's like if you're going to be in the game, you got to be in the game to win it.
01:29:45.000 Yeah.
01:29:46.000 Well, it's also what you're doing is so critical at this juncture because I think we're in a transitionary stage in our culture.
01:29:53.000 I think our culture is opening its mind, and I think, as we said before, because of the internet, because we can have conversations like this where no one can step in and stop us.
01:30:02.000 It's already too late.
01:30:03.000 Everything you've said, it's all streamed.
01:30:05.000 People have recorded it.
01:30:07.000 People are listening to it right now.
01:30:09.000 There's no way around that.
01:30:10.000 People are getting it.
01:30:11.000 They're playing it in their car.
01:30:12.000 No one can stop it.
01:30:13.000 And once that information gets out, then they'll Google it.
01:30:16.000 A vast majority of the people that are curious about this will start looking into some of the things that you've said and go, wow, that's fucking true.
01:30:23.000 Wow, this is crazy.
01:30:24.000 And then they'll talk to people at work, they'll talk to people at the gym, they'll talk to people that they're friends with, and then it'll expand further and further and further.
01:30:31.000 So I think what you're doing is critical.
01:30:33.000 It's critical at this juncture.
01:30:35.000 So the fact that you approach it like it's so critical is why you're so important.
01:30:41.000 Well, thank you, man, because, you know, that's how I try and see it.
01:30:44.000 You know, it's like I think about, like, I don't want to let people down by me not working as hard as I can, particularly when it's so important, as you point out, for so many people, you know, because young people, older people, people are always going to get high.
01:31:00.000 They're always going to get high.
01:31:01.000 So one of the things we can do is we can help them do it more safely and more effectively.
01:31:06.000 We can actually do that, as opposed to saying, don't do that.
01:31:11.000 Come on.
01:31:12.000 If you're a thinking person, you want to know why.
01:31:16.000 It's more important that kids and people challenge me, challenge everyone.
01:31:20.000 And when they challenge us, they might actually go and engage in this behavior.
01:31:25.000 Okay, I have my own kids.
01:31:27.000 So that means my kids hear me talking about this, so my kids might think, well, drugs aren't that bad, because I heard what my dad said.
01:31:34.000 So I have to understand that there's a potential that my kids will use drugs, too.
01:31:42.000 Yeah, I know that.
01:31:43.000 But the thing that I try to do is make sure they're safe and they know what they're doing.
01:31:48.000 And also that they understand their role about educating their friends and keeping their friends safe and even educating their teachers.
01:31:55.000 Like I get my kids say, Dad, I had the drug talk in class and this is what this person said, this teacher said or this person said.
01:32:04.000 Said that the majority of people who use marijuana go on to use other drugs and become addicted to marijuana or some other drug.
01:32:13.000 So my kid, my young kid, has to raise his hand and be like, Mr. X. It's exactly the opposite of what you just said.
01:32:24.000 And then the teacher says, you know, like, what evidence do you have for this sort of thing?
01:32:29.000 Of course, my kids, they do.
01:32:32.000 And he's like, well, look at the last three presidents of the United States, you know.
01:32:36.000 And so he goes on and he educates the teachers in that sort of way.
01:32:42.000 But you know, that's a hard thing for a kid to do.
01:32:46.000 It is.
01:32:47.000 But he feels compelled to do it because he understands that that's part of his responsibility too.
01:32:53.000 There was a great lecture by Terence McKenna once where he was talking about his kid being in class.
01:33:00.000 And Terence McKenna is sort of a legendary figure in the psychedelic community.
01:33:05.000 And his child was in class and the teacher was telling his child that LSD causes brain damage.
01:33:12.000 And he said, you know, no, it doesn't cause brain damage.
01:33:16.000 And the teacher said, well, who told you that?
01:33:17.000 And he said, Albert Hoffman.
01:33:21.000 It's When you've had a conversation with Albert Hoffman and you're dealing with some fucking high school teacher in Podunk, Colorado...
01:33:28.000 Well, it'd be interesting if the teacher knew who Albert Hoffman was.
01:33:33.000 He probably did.
01:33:34.000 Yeah, I hope so.
01:33:34.000 I would hope so, yeah.
01:33:36.000 But it's the narrative that...
01:33:39.000 The brain damage narrative is a big one.
01:33:42.000 Yeah.
01:33:42.000 And, you know, like, boy, there's a lot of things that could potentially cause your brain to not function at its best, and some abuse of drugs is certainly on that list.
01:33:52.000 But there's a lot of things that we do on a daily basis that are not good for you, like poor diet, like a lack of exercise, like being stuck in polluted cities, like breathing in brake dust and fucking exhaust fumes all day.
01:34:07.000 All these things are terrible for you.
01:34:08.000 Yeah, but we really have to challenge the brain damage narrative.
01:34:12.000 I mean, one of the things that we do is that we don't challenge it.
01:34:17.000 I mean, one of the things, when we think about the brain damage narrative, it has gained more energy in recent years, in part because we have this technology of neural imaging, of brain imaging.
01:34:29.000 But what, in fact, what has happened with brain imaging is that brain imaging has become a projection test, basically.
01:34:36.000 You know what I mean when I say projection test?
01:34:39.000 No, I don't.
01:34:40.000 You know, inkblot tests?
01:34:41.000 Okay.
01:34:43.000 Or workshop, these sort of psychological tests where you throw up some image and you ask the person, what do they see?
01:34:50.000 And then, you know, you get this sort of, they'll tell you their interpretation and then the psychologist has his or her subjective interpretation of what that means.
01:34:59.000 That's what brain imaging in drugs in the sort of drug field has become.
01:35:04.000 It's become a projection test.
01:35:06.000 So that means that the sort of what the examiner sees is what the test or the information becomes.
01:35:17.000 So it's a subjective sort of view, a subjective view of what the examiner thinks.
01:35:23.000 And so you can take brain imaging For example, you can take the data and give it to two different labs.
01:35:30.000 Just give the data to two different labs and you don't tell them who the participants are.
01:35:36.000 I would bet you, any amount of money, that the two labs would not come up with the same interpretation.
01:35:45.000 You know, so people think of this as like being hard science.
01:35:49.000 It's there and this is what we see and we know it.
01:35:53.000 It's not that way.
01:35:54.000 It's really, there's a lot of subjective...
01:35:57.000 It's the subjectivity that goes into these sorts of tests.
01:36:01.000 And so one of the things we have to do is just push back and ask people when they talk about these drugs causing brain damage, where?
01:36:09.000 What's the evidence?
01:36:10.000 These are the questions that people have to ask.
01:36:13.000 Please show me the evidence of the brain damage that you're talking about.
01:36:16.000 Because it's true.
01:36:19.000 Amphetamines can cause brain damage.
01:36:21.000 Nicotine is a lot more dangerous than amphetamine, heroin, and all the rest of these things in terms of potency and that sort of thing.
01:36:29.000 But we take nicotine in doses that we avoid any sort of damage or most of the damage associated with it.
01:36:35.000 We take all of these drugs in doses that causes euphoria, which is way below The doses that causes toxicity.
01:36:44.000 So when we start talking about brain damage, humans don't usually take drugs in the doses that will cause brain damage because if they did, the drug effects become unpleasant and humans won't take it because it's so unpleasant.
01:36:58.000 So the notion that these things cause brain damage, you need to really ask people to show you the evidence.
01:37:04.000 I have not seen the evidence in humans that any of these recreational drugs is causing some brain damage.
01:37:12.000 So when they have those scans, and they show the brain, and they show the effects, like when someone's on X amount of, you know, milligrams of this or of that, I always wondered that.
01:37:24.000 Like, what are you seeing when you see, like, highlighted portions of the brain?
01:37:27.000 Like, what, is it just activity in that area?
01:37:30.000 So if we're talking, most of the studies have been done when people are not on drugs.
01:37:34.000 I mean, we can talk about when people are on drugs would do that.
01:37:37.000 And so what you do, you typically do, you have like a group of methamphetamine users in one group, and then you have people who've never used methamphetamine in another group.
01:37:46.000 And you image their brain.
01:37:47.000 You might do what this thing we call a pet image.
01:37:50.000 That was popular where you inject a radioactive compound in somebody's body, and this compound selectively binds to, let's say, dopamine cells in the brain.
01:38:01.000 And when it binds to the dopamine cells, since it's radioactive, it lights up.
01:38:06.000 And so you can see how many dopamine cells are in a person's brain or region, or you can get an idea of the dopamine cells and how many are there.
01:38:18.000 One of the things that has done, sort of a popular way that it's done, is that they say the methamphetamine users have less dopamine receptors than the non-methamphetamine users.
01:38:30.000 And so, that's interpreted as saying methamphetamine caused the methamphetamine users to lose dopamine cells, kill cells, basically.
01:38:40.000 Now, we don't know what was in the brains of the methamphetamine users before they used methamphetamine.
01:38:47.000 We only know from this one scan.
01:38:50.000 That's one problem.
01:38:51.000 Another problem is that we don't know what the normal range of dopamine receptors are in a person's brain.
01:39:01.000 So if you look at your brain versus my brain, we'll see differences.
01:39:05.000 What does that mean?
01:39:06.000 Or if you look at the brains of people who never use drugs or anything, you'll see differences.
01:39:11.000 What does it mean?
01:39:12.000 And so we have a wide range, just as humans, we have a wide range of dopamine cells in each person's brains versus somebody else.
01:39:21.000 So you can't say that methamphetamine caused these people to lose dopamine cells because we don't know if they lost dopamine cells in the first place.
01:39:32.000 And another thing is that you have this tremendous amount of overlap of dopamine cells in this case in the methamphetamine users compared to the controls.
01:39:41.000 So that means that some people in the methamphetamine group has more dopamine cells than people in the control and vice versa.
01:39:48.000 So what does it all mean?
01:39:51.000 It doesn't mean, what it typically means is, we don't know, but what we know it doesn't typically mean is that it caused some brain damage.
01:39:59.000 Because when you look at these people's functioning, cognitive functioning, other functioning, they look just like anybody else who didn't use methamphetamine.
01:40:08.000 That's fascinating.
01:40:12.000 That's really interesting.
01:40:13.000 So the only way to tell would be to take someone who is healthy and doesn't have a history of drug use and monitor them, get them hooked on methamphetamine, and then see what's happening to their dopamine receptors then?
01:40:25.000 Certainly, that could be a way of doing that, but that would be really expensive, and I don't know if it's justified.
01:40:32.000 I mean, we have these natural experiments already.
01:40:35.000 So we think about amphetamine use became big in the 30s.
01:40:40.000 And we have this sort of history in the military.
01:40:42.000 We still use amphetamines.
01:40:44.000 Pilots use amphetamines.
01:40:45.000 Yeah, pilots are always on that stuff when they fly missions, right?
01:40:48.000 To make sure they're sharp.
01:40:49.000 Right.
01:40:50.000 So you have this history.
01:40:51.000 So you just look in the general population and you say, all right, what is a dopamine-related illness?
01:40:58.000 You look at a dopamine-related illness.
01:41:00.000 One of them is Parkinson's disease.
01:41:02.000 You lose dopamine cells, you get Parkinson's disease.
01:41:05.000 Do you have higher rates of Parkinson's disease in methamphetamine users?
01:41:10.000 And, you know, the bottom line is that you don't generally see this.
01:41:14.000 You don't see higher rates of Parkinson's disease in methamphetamine use.
01:41:20.000 I mean, that's just one thing.
01:41:21.000 But you can just look throughout the society and you can see various illnesses, particularly neurological illnesses, and see, do you have greater rates of this illness in people who reported this type of drug use?
01:41:36.000 And you don't really see that.
01:41:38.000 And so, when I hear people talk about the brain damage thing, particularly when they show brain imaging, that's not evidence of brain damage.
01:41:48.000 You know, when you have animal studies, you can give animals amphetamines for every day for their life, and then you kill them at some point, and then you look at dopamine damage, for example.
01:41:59.000 You certainly can see damage.
01:42:01.000 When you give Amphetamine at doses 30, 40 times what humans take.
01:42:08.000 Yeah, you can see some toxicity.
01:42:09.000 It's clear.
01:42:10.000 But now when you give the doses that are comparable to what humans take over that same period of time, you don't see this.
01:42:17.000 Really?
01:42:18.000 Yes.
01:42:18.000 So the stimulants and the effect of the stimulants don't result in brain damage unless you're at just ridiculous levels.
01:42:27.000 Absolutely.
01:42:27.000 This is the same thing that I worry about with steroid use.
01:42:32.000 This is why I want to make sure that we...
01:42:35.000 Actually regulate it, because we want to make sure people are not taking doses that are so large that they might actually be causing some damage.
01:42:43.000 And when you don't regulate it, yeah, you run that risk.
01:42:46.000 And so regulate it.
01:42:48.000 And if you really care about people, that's what you would do.
01:42:51.000 And then you make sure that you monitor them regularly to make sure that they don't exceed those levels, and you educate them about the potential consequences.
01:42:59.000 Well, a good example of that is probably the bodybuilding community, because if anybody takes steroids at hyperhuman and preposterous levels, it's bodybuilders.
01:43:10.000 And yet, very few of them wind up dying from it.
01:43:13.000 There are a few cases of guys that were really big in the 80s and 90s that are now Dead from heart attack.
01:43:20.000 But if you ever see what those fucking guys look like, you realize, like, these are not people that are taking normal levels.
01:43:27.000 These are not people that are even taking commensurate levels to their peers.
01:43:32.000 Like, a lot of them are taking just these insane, insane...
01:43:35.000 And some of them have come clean about their routines and what they would use.
01:43:39.000 I mean, they were just redlining.
01:43:41.000 They were just redlining their system on a regular basis.
01:43:44.000 They were trying to win, and they were trying to...
01:43:47.000 That's a sport where you have to take steroids.
01:43:51.000 You're not going to compete with a Lee Haney or a Dorian Yates.
01:43:55.000 You're not going to compete with them if you don't take steroids.
01:43:57.000 It's a sport that is really...
01:43:59.000 It's the only way it works.
01:44:02.000 Your human body is not supposed to be that big.
01:44:06.000 Yeah, well, yeah, my concern is that we should make sure we keep them safe by making sure that they understand what they're doing and how to do it.
01:44:15.000 But that is a crazy sport when you think about it.
01:44:19.000 I mean, some people don't even consider it a sport, whatever, an activity, whatever you want to call it, you know, because it's not like you're doing anything other than standing there looking big.
01:44:26.000 It's weird, right?
01:44:28.000 Because you're not, you know what I mean?
01:44:29.000 It's like you're not trying to run faster.
01:44:32.000 You're just standing there.
01:44:34.000 Is that a sport?
01:44:37.000 Well, you know, if they think it is, they're competing, right?
01:44:40.000 It's an activity, certainly a legit activity.
01:44:43.000 And they're competing, right?
01:44:44.000 Yes, I guess, but the competition's so subjective.
01:44:47.000 It's like, you know, you look at one guy, I mean, I don't get it.
01:44:50.000 I look at the, like, if I look at Mr. Olympia, and there's, like, the top five guys, like, they're indistinguishable to me.
01:44:55.000 They're all just giant, huge dudes.
01:44:57.000 I don't know, how the fuck does one person win and one person not win?
01:45:00.000 I don't get it.
01:45:01.000 Yeah, but you know, our ignorance shouldn't prevent them from having a sport.
01:45:05.000 No, no, no.
01:45:05.000 I'm not saying prevent them from having a sport.
01:45:07.000 I'm saying, is it a sport?
01:45:08.000 It's an activity.
01:45:09.000 But that's my thing.
01:45:10.000 Our ignorance should prevent them from calling it a sport.
01:45:14.000 I mean, you know, there are some sports that I just don't get.
01:45:18.000 I mean, golf is clearly a sport, but...
01:45:20.000 Right.
01:45:21.000 Is it, though?
01:45:23.000 My wrestling coach in high school wouldn't even say baseball is a sport.
01:45:27.000 He's like, it's a skill game.
01:45:28.000 Coach Murphy, it's a skill game.
01:45:30.000 It's not a sport.
01:45:31.000 You get tired?
01:45:32.000 You get tired when you gotta push through it when you're playing baseball?
01:45:34.000 Get the fuck out of here.
01:45:36.000 That's not a sport.
01:45:37.000 He'd make us run hills if we said it was a sport.
01:45:39.000 Okay.
01:45:40.000 Well, you know, that's how I feel, too.
01:45:43.000 But, you know, the thing is, is that my view on this certainly should not be considered.
01:45:49.000 You know, even though that's because of my own ignorance.
01:45:53.000 I shouldn't have much of a say-so there because of my ignorance.
01:45:57.000 I understand.
01:45:58.000 Even though I have my view, but my view is less important.
01:46:01.000 Well, in bodybuilding, if there is consequences to taking the level of steroids that you need to take in order to get that big...
01:46:07.000 Didn't Arnold have open-heart surgery?
01:46:09.000 I think Arnold had heart surgery, I'm pretty sure.
01:46:12.000 So I think for a lot of those guys...
01:46:14.000 But Arnold has had a fun...
01:46:16.000 I mean, his life has been, you know, I don't know why he had open heart surgery.
01:46:20.000 But I mean, clearly he used steroids.
01:46:22.000 He said this, but I don't know if that's the reason.
01:46:25.000 I mean, you know, the number one sort of reason that people die in the United States is heart disease.
01:46:30.000 And they get that for a variety of reasons.
01:46:33.000 Many of them have never taken steroids.
01:46:35.000 Most of it, it's obesity, right?
01:46:37.000 It's obesity, poor eating habits, a wide range of things.
01:46:41.000 Genetics, lack of exercise, a lot of different factors.
01:46:43.000 Not enough alcohol, no alcohol.
01:46:45.000 No alcohol?
01:46:46.000 I mean, moderate alcohol use is associated with lower levels of heart disease and stroke and all the rest of these things.
01:46:53.000 Why do you think that is?
01:46:54.000 It just relaxes people, takes a little bit of the edge off and less stress on the body maybe?
01:46:58.000 There is a component that has been identified in alcohol that they think is helpful at getting rid of plaques and that sort of thing.
01:47:08.000 But it's not definitive.
01:47:09.000 I don't know.
01:47:11.000 Is that one of those things where you'd have to take a healthy person and expose them to alcohol and monitor as well?
01:47:17.000 Same thing as methamphetamine, maybe?
01:47:19.000 Well, you know, it's like if you do a wide range of different types of studies, you know, because there's no perfect studies.
01:47:25.000 But if you have all of these different types of studies and then you have the evidence coming, pointing to the same way, the same direction, it increases your confidence that this is real.
01:47:35.000 And that's kind of what happened with alcohol.
01:47:37.000 There have been dozens of large studies with thousands of people that have looked at folks who don't drink alcohol, those people who drink moderate doses and those who drink excessive or larger doses.
01:47:50.000 And the moderate drinkers, time at the time, They are associated with all of these positive outcomes.
01:47:57.000 And so it's certainly starting to increase my confidence that it's something real going on where people should drink moderately.
01:48:06.000 Should drink moderately?
01:48:07.000 Yeah.
01:48:09.000 Wow, that's controversial, right?
01:48:11.000 It's pretty controversial, isn't it?
01:48:13.000 People should take a little heroin, they should drink moderately, should do some steroids.
01:48:21.000 I'm obviously not really stating your position, but there's a thing in red wine, there's an antioxidant called resveratrol, isn't that something that they've associated with health as well?
01:48:32.000 Yeah, they were thinking about it was specific to red wine, but now they think it's just alcohol in general.
01:48:38.000 In a perfect world, Dr. Karl Hart, if you were the drug czar...
01:48:42.000 First of all, why the fuck do we have a...
01:48:44.000 czars?
01:48:44.000 Aren't they, like, evil?
01:48:45.000 Isn't that, like, a fucking dictator?
01:48:47.000 Well, they are.
01:48:49.000 Yeah, in a way, right?
01:48:50.000 Yeah, if you know anything about what happens with U.S. drug policy, you can't help but think that they are evil.
01:48:55.000 It's kind of ironic then that we call them the drug czar instead of the drug chairman or the drug overseer or policy coordinator.
01:49:04.000 Well, you have to understand the first drug czar was William Bennett.
01:49:07.000 And I think he took that title and that's where it's been.
01:49:11.000 He ran with it.
01:49:12.000 He's like, well, I'm a fucking czar.
01:49:14.000 I'm going to act like one.
01:49:15.000 If you were, I mean, say if President Obama or President Trump, when he gets into office, is that scared the shit out of you or what?
01:49:23.000 Not really, man, because I live in this country.
01:49:26.000 Look at all of these people who run this country.
01:49:28.000 I mean, it doesn't care.
01:49:30.000 They're all not that different.
01:49:33.000 Well, I think if anybody would be different, it might be Trump.
01:49:35.000 I mean, he's the only one that's financially independent.
01:49:38.000 Yep.
01:49:40.000 Yep, and that's probably why he's so—well, and he also has a personality, and the other folks who are running for the Republicans don't have personalities.
01:49:49.000 That is true, yeah.
01:49:50.000 But this is not an endorsement by no means, but this is just a state of fact.
01:49:55.000 He has a personality.
01:49:56.000 And personality means a lot in this goofy country.
01:50:00.000 Anyway, if someone came along and said, listen, Dr. Hart, you're obviously very educated in this subject, much more so than the average person, what do you recommend we do in this country to handle drugs?
01:50:15.000 Yeah, so the first thing I do, you know, you'd be really hard-pressed to have me work in government, for once.
01:50:24.000 I just want to state that, because the thing that I love about being an academic is that I'm a free man.
01:50:30.000 And in government, these people talk about what they can't do because of some whatever reason.
01:50:36.000 I don't understand how you look in the mirror when you say you can't do things.
01:50:39.000 But If I had some influence on drug policy in this country, the first thing I would do was decriminalize all drugs.
01:50:47.000 That would be the first thing that would happen immediately.
01:50:51.000 Then I would change our educational sort of programming in this country surrounding drugs.
01:50:57.000 All of these things that vilify the drug and say that it's the drug that causes that that would be out.
01:51:04.000 People who are doing the sort of things that the government is paying for, their money would dry up if they didn't change the way that they're educating.
01:51:11.000 That's another thing.
01:51:13.000 Another thing I would do with police forces that I had control over, they would, when they confiscate drugs, their main mission is not to arrest people.
01:51:25.000 The main mission is to keep people safe.
01:51:27.000 Whenever they confiscated drugs, they would test them for adulterants and see what else is in that cocaine, what else is in that heroin.
01:51:35.000 And it would be published in the local papers.
01:51:37.000 It would be published in some local sort of form where everyone would know Avoid this type of drug or this packaging because it has this adulterant and that's not safe.
01:51:49.000 Whereas something else doesn't have that adulterant.
01:51:52.000 So the people would be informed immediately.
01:51:55.000 Then another thing I would do, I would work on legalizing or regulating all of these drugs.
01:52:03.000 Figuring out what would be the best regulated market for marijuana?
01:52:07.000 What would be the best regulated market for cocaine?
01:52:11.000 What would be the best regulated market for heroin?
01:52:14.000 How do we best regulate ecstasy?
01:52:17.000 How do we do this?
01:52:18.000 And that's where I would go.
01:52:20.000 And we would get rid of the people in jail who are there because of drug violation.
01:52:29.000 Obama's done a little bit of that.
01:52:31.000 He's kind of scratched the surface getting people out of jail that are in for nonviolent drug offenses.
01:52:36.000 But it was a very small amount of people, and there was a big ado about it.
01:52:40.000 And I couldn't help but be...
01:52:44.000 Underwhelmed, because I think it was only like 65 people or something like that.
01:52:47.000 I don't remember what the- I think the total now has gone up to like 80-something.
01:52:52.000 Jesus Christ, there's fucking million people in jail.
01:52:54.000 We have- 2.3 million.
01:52:56.000 Yeah, but how many of them are in there for nonviolent drugs?
01:52:59.000 No, you're right, you're right, you're right.
01:53:00.000 It's insane.
01:53:01.000 It's probably half the population, right?
01:53:02.000 Yeah, no, I'm with you, man.
01:53:05.000 You've been overwhelmed.
01:53:07.000 I mean, underwhelmed.
01:53:08.000 I have been disappointed.
01:53:10.000 I mean, I voted for Obama, and I was hoping that we get a lot more relief on these things.
01:53:15.000 I mean, crack cocaine was originally punished 100 times more harshly than powder cocaine at the federal level.
01:53:21.000 It's now punished 18 times more harshly than powder cocaine.
01:53:25.000 That doesn't make any sense.
01:53:26.000 They're the same drug.
01:53:27.000 Right.
01:53:27.000 That's just racism.
01:53:29.000 Right?
01:53:29.000 Well, you know, that's...
01:53:31.000 Or at the very least, targeting economic disparity.
01:53:36.000 I mean, you're targeting people in poor communities.
01:53:39.000 Yeah, yeah.
01:53:40.000 Our enforcement of drug laws has been racially discriminatory.
01:53:45.000 That's a fact.
01:53:45.000 But we certainly can come back to the racism piece.
01:53:49.000 But, I mean, so that sort of thing, we were expecting Obama to, his administration, to push for a one-to-one equating with crackwood powder.
01:53:57.000 It didn't happen.
01:53:58.000 And by the way, it's 18 to 1 now, and then when you look at the arrests of people who are being arrested, it's still 80% black.
01:54:05.000 It's still this racially discriminatory sort of effect.
01:54:09.000 So changing that law didn't have any impact on that.
01:54:12.000 That's one thing.
01:54:13.000 And then when we think about the people who are being, the sentences have been commuted.
01:54:17.000 You know, he has become the president who has commuted more sentences than any other president.
01:54:22.000 I think Johnson was ahead of him at one point, but now he's surpassed Johnson.
01:54:28.000 But we have to think about when Johnson was president, we might have had 200,000 people in jail.
01:54:34.000 You know, now we got 2.3 million or so.
01:54:37.000 So really, this is a drop in the bucket.
01:54:40.000 And this is disappointing to me.
01:54:43.000 I am so discouraged and...
01:54:50.000 It's heartbreaking, actually, because we thought we would see this president be more bold about these things, raise these issues.
01:55:00.000 And some of these sort of arrests are related to race, and racial discrimination is important.
01:55:09.000 But one of the things that happens in our country when we start having this discussion or these discussions about racial discrimination It's that we're in this frame where poor black people, poor other people, white people,
01:55:25.000 all these other people in the country who are catching the same hell are not working together as a result of keeping this conversation tied to the racial discrimination.
01:55:37.000 Although racial discrimination is important in a lot of domains and we should not forget that.
01:55:43.000 But there are people, there are white poor people catching the same hell for the same or similar reasons.
01:55:51.000 The reason might not be conspicuously race, but it might be for other reasons.
01:55:57.000 Like I said, I've been traveling all over the world and I went to Belfast, Northern Ireland, and you got a lot of fans there.
01:56:07.000 Like the Catholics, although they're not really Catholics, many of these people are not really Catholics, but they're catching hell For similar reasons.
01:56:17.000 You know, they're being dominated by a British sort of occupation, if you will.
01:56:23.000 And they have similar problems as poor people have in this country.
01:56:27.000 And so one of the things I'm struggling with is that I'm trying to get people to see how poor black people's struggles in the U.S. is connected with poor white people's struggle in Belfast.
01:56:42.000 Their struggles are connected with poor peoples in Brazil.
01:56:47.000 All around the globe, these people have more things in common.
01:56:52.000 And then sometimes the conspicuous characteristic of race Kind of blinds us from our connection with other folks.
01:57:01.000 And so I'm struggling with how to communicate this in a way that everybody can see, hey, we're in this shit together.
01:57:10.000 And there are a few elitist sort of people who are benefiting from us going at each other's throat and not understanding.
01:57:19.000 And then us also just playing right into it.
01:57:24.000 One of the things about cocaine and heroin and ecstasy as opposed to marijuana is that marijuana obviously is really easy to make.
01:57:33.000 You just put it in the ground, you water it, it grows, harvest it, it's simple.
01:57:39.000 It's like you see it as a leaf.
01:57:40.000 You don't have to worry about there being a bunch of stuff in it.
01:57:44.000 When you talked about, what's the word you used?
01:57:46.000 Adulterance?
01:57:46.000 Adulterance, yeah.
01:57:47.000 When someone's taking cocaine and cutting it with something else, that becomes, when you look at it, it still looks like white powder.
01:57:58.000 Legalization, if we legalized it as opposed to decriminalizing it.
01:58:02.000 If you're decriminalizing it, what you're doing is you're not prosecuting people that are using it.
01:58:07.000 But what do you do with the people that are selling it?
01:58:09.000 And how do you move to an ethical, responsible, open market for something like this?
01:58:18.000 So when you say, what do you do with the people who are selling it, what do you mean?
01:58:22.000 The people who are currently selling it or the people who will be selling it?
01:58:24.000 No, no, no.
01:58:24.000 The people that will be.
01:58:25.000 See, like, if we go to decriminalizing...
01:58:29.000 Obviously, that means that you're not going to prosecute the people that are using it, but how do they get it?
01:58:34.000 And do we change that?
01:58:36.000 So decriminalization, thinking about Portugal and the Czech Republic, you still have the illicit markets in those places.
01:58:43.000 And so people have to understand that decriminalization is not to go at the illicit markets.
01:58:50.000 Decriminalization, the major reason that you decriminalize is that you don't want to put your citizens in jail and you want to encourage them to get help if they need help.
01:58:59.000 So it's about the sort of user.
01:59:01.000 That's kind of what you're doing.
01:59:03.000 But if you're worried about illicit drug markets and you want to get rid of illicit drug markets, then regulation is a way to go, legal regulation.
01:59:14.000 And if you're worried about adulterants, legal regulation is a way to go because you get rid of the black market and you get rid of The potential dangerous compounds that people cut these drugs with.
01:59:27.000 That's my major concern.
01:59:29.000 That's why I kind of push for now regulating these markets because I'm more afraid of the adulterants.
01:59:34.000 I'm not afraid of heroin.
01:59:36.000 I know how to keep people safe with heroin.
01:59:38.000 I know how to keep people safe with cocaine.
01:59:40.000 But I don't know how to keep people safe with some of the cuts because I don't know what they are.
01:59:44.000 Right.
01:59:45.000 And no one knows until you test it.
01:59:47.000 And it just seems to me that if we accept the fact that people are doing drugs in this country, and we kind of have, right?
01:59:55.000 I mean, it's not like there's ever been a time in our country that people stopped doing drugs, even for a month.
02:00:03.000 There's never been like a month of no one doing drugs in this country.
02:00:06.000 So the entire time...
02:00:08.000 Our president wouldn't function.
02:00:09.000 Right.
02:00:10.000 I mean, those guys take sleeping pills and stimulants to get going.
02:00:14.000 I mean, they have to.
02:00:16.000 Do they really?
02:00:16.000 They have to.
02:00:18.000 Like, you think Obama takes sleeping pills?
02:00:20.000 All right.
02:00:21.000 I can't say for sure that he does, but if we had a bet...
02:00:26.000 I would bet you a lot of money that he does.
02:00:29.000 Just because he's so tired, because he works so crazy hours?
02:00:32.000 He would be, I would say, irresponsible if he didn't take sleeping pills.
02:00:36.000 Really?
02:00:37.000 Of course.
02:00:38.000 Sleep is one of the most important human functions.
02:00:41.000 And I want my president to be getting sleep.
02:00:44.000 But when you take sleeping pills, doesn't it alter your REM sleep and fuck with your cycles?
02:00:49.000 Some of them certainly can.
02:00:53.000 Opiates are outstanding for sleep.
02:00:56.000 You're a big fan of the opiates, aren't you?
02:01:00.000 Are you working for the opiate industry?
02:01:01.000 Are you involved somehow?
02:01:03.000 But there are others that will work, and I'm sure he has some good physicians.
02:01:09.000 I mean, look through our history.
02:01:12.000 The presidents have taken stimulants and sedatives, as well they should, because they have to be on these different coasts, and the time change, and they have to.
02:01:22.000 It just doesn't make...
02:01:24.000 I mean, people who have to be in the public eye, I assure you, They are taking drugs to enhance their human experience and function.
02:01:34.000 So, to go back to that, there's never been a time, it's not like an achievable goal, there's never been a time where we've gone a month, a week, a year, whatever, without anyone in this country doing drugs.
02:01:45.000 So we know that the drugs are always going to exist.
02:01:47.000 It would seem to me that this country that's obsessed with making money to the point where we have privatized prisons and we allow people to profit off of people being in jail, wouldn't it be a better source of income to instead tax legal sales of drugs?
02:02:03.000 To make everything legal, tax it, and then you get the benefit like you got in Colorado.
02:02:09.000 Colorado is the first state ever to get more taxes from marijuana than they do from alcohol, which is incredible.
02:02:16.000 They made more money this year from marijuana than they have from alcohol.
02:02:20.000 And alcohol's been around forever.
02:02:22.000 If we did that with cocaine and with heroin and with ecstasy and all these other drugs that we know people are already using, and we also know people are selling illegally and not paying taxes on it.
02:02:35.000 It's not only people are selling coke and going, you know what, I'm a coke dealer, but I'm a responsible American, so I like to pay taxes.
02:02:41.000 I made $100 million this year.
02:02:43.000 How'd you make that money?
02:02:44.000 Ah, fuckin' hustle.
02:02:45.000 You know, hustle and flow.
02:02:46.000 You know how I do.
02:02:48.000 No one's going to do that, so we're missing out on all that tax revenue as a country.
02:02:53.000 I mean, it's economically unsound to not legalize it and tax it.
02:02:58.000 If you know for a fact that people are going to do it, it seems economically irresponsible.
02:03:05.000 And then the idea of these public or private prisons.
02:03:08.000 Private prisons are a giant issue in this country because they also lobby.
02:03:13.000 And the prison unions, the prison guard unions, and police officers unions lobby to make sure the drug laws stay in place to make sure that they have work.
02:03:22.000 It's insidious.
02:03:23.000 It's creepy, and it's scary.
02:03:26.000 Yeah, private prisons now, the thing is that they're all those things you said.
02:03:31.000 But understand, they only make up 11% of all prison beds in the United States, right?
02:03:38.000 They're going to Brazil now and they're going to some other places.
02:03:41.000 And it's important that we are aware of what you just said.
02:03:45.000 But we also need to be aware of places like Louisiana.
02:03:48.000 I think they have the largest number of prisoners in the country.
02:03:52.000 They have local sheriffs who kind of operate like private prisons.
02:03:56.000 So they bid or they get these state prisoners to be housed in their jail and they receive a certain amount of money for having those prisoners in their local jail.
02:04:10.000 So this is a way for the local sheriffs to generate Income, revenue, by taking the prisoners from state prisoners into their local jails.
02:04:21.000 And so this technically is not private prison, but this is certainly unscrupulous.
02:04:27.000 And people should be aware of this going on throughout the country as well.
02:04:31.000 So private prisons are a concern, but also these local jails and local sheriffs, they're doing similar things.
02:04:38.000 But legalizing drugs, though, would be financially a huge boon to our economy.
02:04:45.000 Yeah, I think so.
02:04:48.000 Yeah, I think so.
02:04:50.000 But people will...
02:04:52.000 I don't know if that argument alone is going to be compelling.
02:04:59.000 I mean, I certainly think it's an important argument.
02:05:01.000 Not alone, but it's something that should be considered, especially in the wake of what's going on in Colorado.
02:05:06.000 Yeah, yeah.
02:05:08.000 Yeah, and there are people who are saying in terms of Colorado, they're saying that, yeah, Colorado is generating all of this tax revenue, but they're having to pay out a lot of it, too, because they have to enforce this new law.
02:05:21.000 And so people are kind of distorting this sort of story.
02:05:26.000 But I think over time, Colorado and other places is going to show that This is a huge benefit, and the benefits far outweigh the risk, I think.
02:05:38.000 And similar to what's going on in Portugal, where you see the decrease in violent crime, the decrease in addiction, the decrease in all sorts of different problems.
02:05:47.000 Decrease in revenues to their prisons and all those things, yeah.
02:05:51.000 All the negative aspects that we associate with drugs.
02:05:54.000 A lot of it is negative aspects of crime.
02:05:58.000 Yeah, see the thing about Portugal too, you have to understand, in places like Portugal, Switzerland, those kind of places where they kind of take care of their people, they are more of a homogenous society than we are.
02:06:14.000 And when you have a place like the United States where we're not as homogenous, like LA, you guys have every nationality, ethnic group, race, they're all here.
02:06:24.000 Not homogenous at all.
02:06:26.000 And so one of the things that the drug laws has done, it has allowed us to separate out those people we don't like and go after them.
02:06:35.000 So if we decriminalize, it makes it more difficult.
02:06:38.000 So you're taking away that tool.
02:06:40.000 Whereas Portugal, the Swiss, and those folks, they're such homogenous societies.
02:06:46.000 They kind of care about the people in their society because the people who are in power, they see that many of the people who might be subjected to these laws, they look like them.
02:06:58.000 They are them.
02:07:00.000 In our society, since it's not as homogenous, It's easy for us to think about these drug laws being used to go after those people who don't share our value.
02:07:11.000 That's what we say, but they really don't look like us, and they're really not us.
02:07:15.000 So this can't really happen to us, because we know that there are a number of people who look like folks who are in Washington, and they're using drugs.
02:07:25.000 They're using a lot of drugs, but they're not subjected to drug policy.
02:07:29.000 I see what you're saying.
02:07:30.000 And so it's like we have to be honest about why we have these policies in place in the first place.
02:07:36.000 They allow us to go after the people we don't like without explicitly saying so.
02:07:40.000 So I think overall, like as an overview, what we're looking at is we have a society that has a lot of ignorance when it comes to both the prevalence of drugs, the use of drugs, and the effect of drugs.
02:07:57.000 And that ignorance is part of the problem and it's shaped not just public opinion but also shaped policy, shaped how politicians address these issues like a guy like Chris Christie that is allowed to say ignorant stuff.
02:08:12.000 The reason why he's not booed off stage when he does it is for a lot of the people in the audience, they don't know that what he's saying is unbelievably ignorant.
02:08:20.000 Yeah, and he kind of provides the cover for them.
02:08:23.000 You know, they kind of support these things because they're not happening to them.
02:08:28.000 And it's those other people who don't share their values is what they say.
02:08:33.000 But they really don't look like them.
02:08:35.000 They don't...
02:08:36.000 They don't dress like them.
02:08:37.000 They don't go to the same schools.
02:08:39.000 They don't do any of these things.
02:08:40.000 So Christie, when he says that, he's saying this because he's representing what many Americans think, and he's providing cover for that bigoted ignorance or that uninformed perspective.
02:08:55.000 So what you're doing now with this touring all around the world, are you speaking in all these places?
02:09:02.000 What are you doing?
02:09:03.000 Yeah, you know, I spoke at the World Health Organization this past summer, universities in Belfast and London, Geneva, of course, Brazil, just down there speaking.
02:09:18.000 I'll be in Canada next month.
02:09:21.000 So just doing all of these talks, I'm trying to Have these kind of conversations, trying to inform people, trying to let people know that they've been hoodwinked all around the world, and they've been hoodwinked, particularly countries that follow the U.S. drug policy,
02:09:37.000 and try and expose why the countries are following this policy that is having detrimental impact on their citizens.
02:09:47.000 How is this received?
02:09:48.000 Is it universally received or is it there's different places that are more open to it?
02:09:53.000 Yeah, you know, in Brazil, for example, they have followed the U.S. wholeheartedly and Brazil has 50 percent of their population is black, right?
02:10:02.000 Fifty percent.
02:10:03.000 They have like the greatest African population outside of Africa.
02:10:08.000 They, in their prisons, their jails are filled with black people.
02:10:13.000 And the poor people in the country are black.
02:10:16.000 And their drug policy is being used as a tool to further marginalize this group, basically.
02:10:24.000 And so when I go down there and speak, and I'm brought there by their government oftentimes, it's well received, even from the ruling class and the government.
02:10:32.000 And so it's a conundrum to me, quite frankly, that I'm so well received there by the ruling class.
02:10:41.000 But there are some people who are very interested in changing policy.
02:10:47.000 Geneva and those places, what I'm saying to them, those folks there, they're like, no shit.
02:10:53.000 We know that.
02:10:53.000 And their drug policy is reflected, or it's more rational.
02:11:00.000 Go to France, they're equally as ignorant as we are, and they use their drug policy just like we do, and they're equally arrogant as we are.
02:11:11.000 Belfast, they're trying.
02:11:15.000 I mean, their Catholic population, you know, they're on the siege, basically.
02:11:22.000 Vancouver, they feel the message, of course.
02:11:28.000 Norway, all of these people, they are responding because they know.
02:11:32.000 This is not...
02:11:33.000 I'm not...
02:11:34.000 I wish I was brilliant and bright and all those things.
02:11:38.000 I'm not.
02:11:38.000 You know, this is not anything that's earth-shattering.
02:11:41.000 These people know.
02:11:43.000 Many of the people around the world, Colombia, was in Colombia, those people, they're politicians, they know.
02:11:51.000 But they're getting a lot of money from the U.S. to continue this sort of war on drugs.
02:11:56.000 Mexico, they know.
02:11:58.000 But they're getting a lot of money from the U.S. to continue this war on drugs.
02:12:02.000 Hasn't Mexico decriminalized a lot of things?
02:12:04.000 They decriminalize everything, but nobody talks about it.
02:12:08.000 Because, as I pointed out earlier, in Portugal, a person is allowed to have a 10-day supply of drugs before that triggers some sort of criminal prosecution.
02:12:21.000 So you can have a 10-day supply of methamphetamine, heroin, whatever.
02:12:25.000 In Mexico, you trigger a criminal offense when you have just a small amount of something.
02:12:33.000 So it's like, it's really not decriminalization.
02:12:35.000 You know, it's just they lowered the thresholds that trigger a criminal prosecution.
02:12:43.000 It doesn't really play out in the spirit of decriminalization.
02:12:48.000 So they probably did it to appeal to the United States laws or to abide by what the United States is looking for them to do?
02:12:58.000 Yeah, I don't know exactly why they did it, but I know they're continuing their war on drugs in part because of us.
02:13:07.000 A war on drugs is really a war on people, and particularly a war on poor people, as we know.
02:13:13.000 And I'm against wars, and I'm an ex-military person.
02:13:18.000 Now, if people want to see you talk, are you still traveling?
02:13:21.000 Yeah, yeah.
02:13:22.000 Where can they find out about you?
02:13:24.000 My website, drcarlhart.com.
02:13:27.000 And when is the new book coming out?
02:13:29.000 New book won't be out until after the presidential election.
02:13:33.000 Okay.
02:13:34.000 All right, man.
02:13:34.000 Well, thank you very much.
02:13:36.000 You're always awesome.
02:13:37.000 I really appreciate you coming on here.
02:13:38.000 Good to be here, man.
02:13:38.000 I really dig what you do, and thank you for having me.
02:13:41.000 Thank you, sir.
02:13:42.000 I appreciate that very much.
02:13:43.000 And follow him on Twitter, Dr. Carl Hart on Twitter.
02:13:46.000 Is it drcarlhart.com is your website?
02:13:48.000 Yeah.
02:13:49.000 Okay.
02:13:49.000 Thank you, brother.
02:13:50.000 Appreciate it, man.
02:13:51.000 Thank you.
02:13:51.000 Good night, everybody.