The John-Henry Westen Show - February 01, 2023


Battle of the Bishops: Latin Mass Wars Have Now Intensified

Topics
Hosted by
Mentioned
Brave Priest Exposes Heretical "Shadow Church," Ready to Die Watch the Shocking Globalist Plans Ignored by the Mainstream Media

Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 1 minute

Words per minute

164.53

Word count

10,073

Sentence count

607

Harmful content

Misogyny

3

sentences flagged

Toxicity

5

sentences flagged

Hate speech

27

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Why is there such a strong push to get rid of the old rite of the Mass, the Latin Mass? Why is Pope Francis and many of the high-ranking churchmen he has surrounded himself with bent on stopping out a flourishing community of young people seeking to deepen their faith life with a Mass that s the same one attended by the greatest saints the Church has ever known for over a thousand years?

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.180 Why is there such a strong push to get rid of the old rite of the Mass, the old Latin Mass?
00:00:06.180 Why is Pope Francis and many of the high-ranking churchmen he has surrounded himself with
00:00:11.680 bent on stopping out a flourishing community of young people seeking to deepen their faith life
00:00:18.040 with a Mass that's the same one attended by the greatest saints the Church has ever known
00:00:23.540 for over a thousand years?
00:00:25.300 What is this hatred for a form of liturgy or worship that, from an outside perspective,
00:00:33.440 can only be seen as a, perhaps even a neat gimmick to revitalize a failing institution?
00:00:40.320 It's like the return of old Coke since new Coke was a sales disaster.
00:00:46.540 Well, the answer to this central question is contained in a Latin phrase,
00:00:53.640 Lex Arundi, Lex Credendi.
00:00:57.120 The law of prayer is the law of faith, or more loosely translated, how we pray is how we believe.
00:01:03.440 And that is the key to understanding the battle surrounding the Latin Mass.
00:01:09.720 Why are all the liberal prelates stacked up on one side of this debate?
00:01:14.020 Why the Pope, Cardinal Cupich, Cardinal Gregory, Cardinal Roach, Cardinal Farrell, Bishop John Stowe, and more?
00:01:22.540 Why are all the faithful Catholic prelates on the other side fighting for the retention of the traditional Latin Mass?
00:01:29.000 Cardinal Burke, Cardinal Serra, Cardinal Zen, Archbishop Vigano, Bishop Schneider, and more?
00:01:34.540 Well, there are all sorts of reasons, for sure.
00:01:38.640 But I wanted to highlight one reason that perhaps few think about.
00:01:43.700 It's at the heart of all the culture war.
00:01:48.240 All those liberal prelates that I mentioned would all be regarded as heretics in more Catholic times.
00:01:55.680 They opposed the Church's perennial teaching on homosexuality, for starters.
00:02:00.060 They also oppose the teaching against contraception.
00:02:04.420 They fight the Church's encouragement for large families.
00:02:07.580 They waver on the pro-life teachings, for instance, in their glorification of pro-abortion politicians
00:02:13.580 and the insistence on giving them Holy Communion.
00:02:16.780 They are the opposite in these respects from their faithful counterparts, also mentioned previously.
00:02:24.800 So, how does this play out, then, in terms of the traditional Latin Mass?
00:02:28.880 Well, you will find that attendees of the old Latin Mass reject all the new-fangled anti-Catholic
00:02:37.780 nouveau theology that these liberal prelates promote.
00:02:42.140 Check out this survey of Latin Mass Catholics compared to mainstream Catholics of the Novus Ordo
00:02:48.180 that we reported on at LifeSite in 2019.
00:02:51.980 The traditional Latin Mass national survey carried out by Father Donald Closter, who celebrated both the Novus Ordo Mass
00:03:00.720 and the traditional Mass for 20 years, he noticed big differences between the people attending the two different types of Masses.
00:03:09.040 So, he decided to do a survey of Latin Mass Catholics to see where they stood on key issues which were common to the surveys of
00:03:17.940 Catholics in the general public, carried out by major pollsters. 0.53
00:03:22.860 So, here are a few of the issues he looked at.
00:03:26.000 The approval of contraception.
00:03:28.440 The approval of abortion. 0.69
00:03:30.620 The approval of same-sex marriage.
00:03:34.900 And the results of this survey were astounding.
00:03:39.900 Pew, the big national pollster, found that 89% of nominal Catholics or of Novus Ordo Catholics approve contraception.
00:03:50.120 That's 89%.
00:03:51.420 You know what the number was among traditional Latin Mass Catholics surveyed?
00:03:56.400 2%.
00:03:57.080 89% of Novus Ordo Catholics approve of contraception.
00:04:02.120 2% among traditional Latin Mass Catholics.
00:04:05.620 That's an unreal difference.
00:04:08.240 Well, let's look at the next category.
00:04:10.640 Pew, again, Pew Research, found that 51% of Novus Ordo Catholics approve abortion.
00:04:17.120 Among traditional Latin Mass Catholics, it was 1%.
00:04:21.820 Also, Daily Wire found, in a massive survey that they did, they found that 67% of Novus Ordo Catholics approve of gay marriage.
00:04:32.700 And among traditional Latin Mass Catholics, it was 2%.
00:04:36.660 Those differences are astounding.
00:04:40.820 It is unreal.
00:04:42.160 Go check it out at LifeSite News for the full story.
00:04:44.380 Check out the research, how they did it, everything else.
00:04:46.320 But to me, it is no wonder that liberal prelates in the Church want to stomp out the traditional Latin Mass.
00:04:55.140 And I'm not the only one who sees this.
00:04:58.220 You don't even have to be Catholic at all to see this.
00:05:01.440 Perhaps an outside view is actually better to be able to see what's happening within.
00:05:06.440 Take, for instance, this piece from the New York Times, of all places, from last November.
00:05:12.240 Ruth Graham, who covers religion for the Times, wrote a piece called, and I quote,
00:05:17.580 Old Latin Mass, finds new American audience despite Pope's disapproval.
00:05:23.900 And here's what she said.
00:05:25.180 She said,
00:05:25.560 The Mass has sparked a sprawling proxy battle in the American Church over not just the songs and prayers,
00:05:33.300 but also the future of Catholicism and its role in culture and politics.
00:05:39.820 She added this, and I quote,
00:05:41.740 On one level, the split over the Old Mass represents a clash of priorities and power struggles in Church leadership.
00:05:50.960 In the pews and parishes, it is more complicated.
00:05:54.880 Many Catholics say they are attracted to the Mass for spiritual reasons,
00:05:59.200 bolstered by aesthetic and liturgical preferences, rather than by partisanship.
00:06:04.060 So, isn't that interesting?
00:06:08.280 Isn't it interesting that really the lineup of the battle for the Latin Mass between the old traditional Latin Mass,
00:06:16.640 at least allowance for it, and those wanting to stomp it out,
00:06:22.260 fall exactly along the same lines of the moral battle going on in the Church.
00:06:27.840 Of course, there's no real battle.
00:06:29.900 The Church's moral teachings are unchangeable.
00:06:32.600 Nonetheless, the battle in the Church follows exactly that same one.
00:06:39.560 Now, the faithful are fighting for the Latin Mass.
00:06:45.080 And there's lots of fighting going on.
00:06:46.820 We saw beautiful processions all over the world to ask the bishops to retain the Latin Mass.
00:06:54.600 We saw when they had, in Rome, a celebration of the Latin Mass,
00:06:58.120 a huge number, over a thousand Catholics were there to support the traditional Latin Mass.
00:07:03.600 But I want you to just check out this one thing.
00:07:06.480 When Traditiones Custodis was released, restricting the Latin Mass,
00:07:10.360 there were young people who spoke up.
00:07:13.360 There was this particular young woman who released this heartfelt plea to the bishops
00:07:20.760 to please not stomp out the Latin Mass.
00:07:23.340 You know what? Rather than me talking about it, you have a listen to her.
00:07:25.540 Being able to adore our Lord in the Blessed Sacrament,
00:07:31.100 to love Him, and to grow deeper in my faith because of the reverence shown to Him
00:07:36.000 was truly, like, life-changing for me.
00:07:38.680 When Traditiones Custodis was implemented in my diocese,
00:07:42.000 honestly, it was heartbreaking for me,
00:07:44.840 and it was devastating to my home parish.
00:07:46.680 Truly, from the bottom of my heart, I beg,
00:07:50.020 beg any bishop that is watching this,
00:07:52.820 recognize the suffering that Traditiones Custodis has caused.
00:07:57.280 God bless, and I really hope that it can be restored.
00:08:04.100 So, when these old men in mitres are crushing young people like that,
00:08:10.300 without the slightest remorse,
00:08:12.040 that is when you know God will act and it is the firm sentiment
00:08:18.480 of all the best priests, all the best bishops and cardinals that I know
00:08:22.300 that the Latin Mass will be restored.
00:08:25.940 And that's also the take of my next guest.
00:08:29.540 Dr. Peter Kwasniewski is a specialist in liturgy
00:08:33.420 who has written 20 books,
00:08:35.260 including his latest, The Once and Future Roman Rite.
00:08:39.540 This is The John Henry Weston Show.
00:08:41.540 Stay tuned.
00:08:42.040 Hello, LifeSite friends.
00:08:50.640 To celebrate the momentous overturning of Roe v. Wade,
00:08:53.960 we at LifeSite have minted just under 10,000
00:08:57.000 brand-new, limited-edition, pro-life silver rounds.
00:09:00.500 Each round is stamped on the back
00:09:02.280 with an image of the Supreme Court of the United States
00:09:04.720 featuring the date that the High Court
00:09:06.700 delivered this historic victory.
00:09:08.720 And on the front of our pure silver rounds,
00:09:10.700 we feature LifeSite's logo,
00:09:12.800 surrounded by brilliant sunbursts and draped with olive branches.
00:09:15.780 And each round commemorates LifeSite's 25 years of pro-life,
00:09:19.540 pro-family reporting in America, Canada, and beyond.
00:09:22.480 These one-troy ounce rounds are 0.999 pure silver,
00:09:27.000 and LifeSite has just under 10,000 in stock.
00:09:29.660 They're beautiful, historic,
00:09:30.940 and forever enshrining the most important American pro-life victory of a generation.
00:09:36.220 This first edition LifeSite silver round
00:09:38.660 is the perfect gift for yourself or anyone you love
00:09:42.220 that collects precious metals and is passionately pro-life.
00:09:45.800 And each purchase helps directly fund LifeSite's pro-life and pro-family mission.
00:09:51.840 This is the first precious metals collectible of its kind
00:09:54.820 that is directly supporting LifeSite's worldwide mission
00:09:57.540 that you know, love, and trust.
00:10:00.040 And now it can be yours while limited supplies last.
00:10:03.500 Get your one-troy ounce rounds of 99% pure silver today
00:10:08.060 by clicking the first link below
00:10:10.160 and celebrate life with all of us at LifeSite News.
00:10:13.380 Dr. Peter Kwasniewski, welcome back to the program.
00:10:19.860 Thank you, John Henry. It's always good to see you.
00:10:23.200 Let's begin, as we always do, with the sign of the cross.
00:10:25.800 In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Amen.
00:10:32.540 So, Peter, your brand new book out,
00:10:35.280 The Once and Future Roman Rite, is very timely.
00:10:39.840 Let me start with just what's going on in the news right now,
00:10:44.220 because all over Rome, we're hearing these rumors.
00:10:48.000 And at first, it was just rumors on blogs, and we thought,
00:10:50.440 but then Robert Moynihan came out with a letter
00:10:53.840 that apparently spoke with one of the brothers or fathers
00:10:58.920 in one of these traditional orders,
00:11:00.540 who sort of seems to suggest, yes, it's true,
00:11:03.520 it's coming out April or May,
00:11:05.620 there will be a massive restriction on the Latin mass, 0.68
00:11:08.120 it's in the form of an apostolic constitution
00:11:10.940 that will basically bar the Latin mass 1.00
00:11:15.000 from all, you know, regular churches, from all parishes.
00:11:19.040 And sort of basically taking Traditiones Custodes,
00:11:24.340 the document, the moda proprio by Pope Francis,
00:11:27.220 to its sort of full extension,
00:11:29.880 or perhaps just another step along the way.
00:11:32.700 Love to get your opinion on that to start.
00:11:34.420 Sure. I do think that it's entirely possible
00:11:38.400 that such a document is in the works.
00:11:40.780 There are enough converging rumors to suggest
00:11:43.240 that it's at least on somebody's desk or on multiple desks.
00:11:46.900 We definitely know that there is a powerful
00:11:49.520 anti-Latin mass faction working in the Vatican.
00:11:53.780 Cardinal Roach is the main figure there,
00:11:58.300 but there's a whole host of St. Anselmians
00:12:01.000 who are kind of pushing this line
00:12:03.380 that the liturgical reform is a necessity,
00:12:06.460 is irreversible, is the best fruit of Vatican II, 0.91
00:12:09.680 et cetera, et cetera.
00:12:10.960 They've kind of pinned everything
00:12:12.900 onto the liturgical reform
00:12:14.420 in a way that's very strange.
00:12:16.340 It's ideological.
00:12:18.120 Because in fact, liturgical changes happen
00:12:20.800 throughout history.
00:12:21.560 There's nothing irreversible in that sense about it.
00:12:24.900 In fact, if anything's irreversible,
00:12:26.980 it would be the normative nature
00:12:29.640 of the tradition that we've received.
00:12:31.560 But we can get into that.
00:12:32.580 That's what my whole book is about.
00:12:34.120 So I do think this document could be in the works.
00:12:36.120 If it comes to pass,
00:12:37.380 if there really is some kind of megaton bomb
00:12:40.180 that's dropped on the Latin mass communities
00:12:42.860 throughout the world,
00:12:44.000 I think it's just going to be
00:12:45.140 another one of these occasions
00:12:46.880 where they are going to need to organize better
00:12:49.820 and resist it,
00:12:51.060 just as we've had to do in the past.
00:12:53.300 The traditional movement in the 1970s
00:12:55.320 was under a cloud of suspicion.
00:12:58.100 It had no backing whatsoever from the Vatican.
00:13:01.520 And yet people persevered
00:13:03.180 and eventually they got the support
00:13:04.800 they needed from John Paul II
00:13:06.560 and then more fully from Benedict XVI.
00:13:08.640 So yes, we have a bad Pope right now,
00:13:10.480 but we could have a decent Pope
00:13:11.920 or even a good Pope in the future
00:13:13.820 who will reverse these not irreversible decisions.
00:13:18.340 So let's talk a little bit
00:13:22.140 about another recent revelation.
00:13:24.540 Archbishop Genswein,
00:13:25.900 upon the death of Pope Benedict,
00:13:27.680 released his book.
00:13:29.020 A couple of very interesting things in there.
00:13:31.880 And one is this quote.
00:13:33.720 This was from the book of Archbishop Genswein
00:13:37.120 and talked about the Pope's reaction
00:13:41.040 to Traditiones Custodis.
00:13:43.400 So when Traditiones Custodis is released,
00:13:46.740 Pope Benedict has a reaction.
00:13:50.200 He then he was flipping through, he says,
00:13:54.400 and he furrowed his brow
00:13:56.100 when it was talked about in Traditiones,
00:14:00.640 or at least in the notes from Pope Francis,
00:14:03.300 that this was the real intention
00:14:05.440 of Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict.
00:14:09.280 Can you speak to that?
00:14:10.860 Yes, yes.
00:14:11.900 In fact, those four pages
00:14:13.660 of Archbishop Genswein's book
00:14:15.580 are fascinating
00:14:16.560 because what they suggest
00:14:19.140 is a chink in the armor 1.00
00:14:21.320 of this curated image
00:14:24.240 that Pope Benedict was perfectly
00:14:25.860 in accord with Pope Francis.
00:14:27.480 I mean, we know that's not true.
00:14:28.480 We know that wasn't true
00:14:29.240 even with the release of the book
00:14:31.000 about celibacy
00:14:32.080 in connection with the Amazon Synod
00:14:34.660 and so forth.
00:14:35.760 But no, I mean, it's just false.
00:14:39.100 I mean, I have to read this passage
00:14:40.620 to you from the interview
00:14:43.040 that Pope Benedict did
00:14:44.260 with Petrus Sevald in 2016.
00:14:47.380 It was called Last Testament
00:14:49.860 is what it was called.
00:14:52.100 And Benedict said,
00:14:53.280 I have always said
00:14:54.260 and even still say
00:14:55.300 that it was important
00:14:56.380 that something which was previously
00:14:57.840 the most sacred thing
00:14:58.920 in the church to people
00:15:00.060 should not suddenly
00:15:01.320 be completely forbidden.
00:15:02.960 A society that considers
00:15:04.160 now to be forbidden
00:15:05.580 what it once perceived
00:15:06.480 as the central core,
00:15:07.780 that cannot be.
00:15:09.800 The inner identity
00:15:10.860 it has with the other,
00:15:12.560 the past,
00:15:13.160 must remain visible.
00:15:14.540 So for me,
00:15:15.100 it was not about tactical matters
00:15:16.840 and God knows what,
00:15:18.120 but about the inward reconciliation
00:15:19.720 of the church with itself.
00:15:22.240 And then Sevald says,
00:15:24.420 the reauthorization
00:15:25.260 of the Tridentine Mass
00:15:26.240 is often interpreted
00:15:27.160 primarily as a concession
00:15:28.400 to the Society of St. Pius X,
00:15:30.240 which is what Pope Francis asserts.
00:15:33.160 And Benedict responds,
00:15:34.160 this is just absolutely false.
00:15:38.040 That's his direct words.
00:15:39.340 It was important for me
00:15:40.660 that the church
00:15:41.680 is one with herself
00:15:42.800 inwardly with her own past.
00:15:44.940 That what was previously
00:15:47.340 holy to her
00:15:48.340 is not somehow wrong now.
00:15:51.900 Those quotations
00:15:52.700 are from pages 201 to 202
00:15:54.640 of the Last Testament.
00:15:56.940 With John Paul II too,
00:15:58.400 he talked about
00:15:59.000 legitimate aspirations
00:16:00.360 of the faithful
00:16:01.800 who loved the former liturgical books
00:16:04.880 and rites.
00:16:07.760 Legitimate aspirations
00:16:08.900 are not just
00:16:09.880 what the Lefebvreists had.
00:16:11.200 It's what any Catholic had 1.00
00:16:12.700 who missed the old rites
00:16:15.040 or who fell in love
00:16:16.100 with them afterwards.
00:16:19.220 There's another interesting passage
00:16:21.000 in the new book
00:16:22.060 and it goes this way.
00:16:24.060 This is, again,
00:16:24.640 the book by Archbishop Genswein
00:16:26.380 released right at the death
00:16:28.880 of Pope Benedict.
00:16:29.980 And this passage
00:16:31.820 also made a big splash.
00:16:33.780 He says,
00:16:35.220 Benedict in particular
00:16:37.360 felt it was wrong
00:16:38.560 to prohibit
00:16:39.260 the celebration of the Mass
00:16:40.260 in the ancient rite
00:16:41.120 in parochial churches.
00:16:42.900 In other words,
00:16:43.320 in parish churches.
00:16:44.480 As it is always dangerous
00:16:46.520 to corner a group of faithful
00:16:48.640 so as to make them
00:16:49.540 feel persecuted
00:16:50.480 and to inspire in them
00:16:52.320 a sense of having
00:16:53.300 to safeguard their identity
00:16:54.900 at all costs
00:16:55.820 in the face of the enemy.
00:16:58.600 If you can speak to that.
00:17:00.360 Yes, of course.
00:17:01.340 Well, there's an organization
00:17:03.380 in France called
00:17:04.560 Pei Liturgique,
00:17:05.820 Liturgical Peace,
00:17:07.660 or Pax Liturgica.
00:17:09.020 They sometimes use
00:17:09.740 the Latin version of that.
00:17:11.220 And their thesis is
00:17:12.900 Pope Benedict is the Pope
00:17:14.620 of Liturgical Peace
00:17:15.740 because he wanted to allow
00:17:18.480 groups of Catholics
00:17:20.180 with legitimate aspirations
00:17:21.620 to worship
00:17:22.620 in the traditional manner
00:17:24.160 if that's what nourishes
00:17:25.360 their faith,
00:17:25.980 as it indeed does,
00:17:27.880 as we can see
00:17:28.540 in many communities
00:17:29.660 around the world.
00:17:31.740 And, you know,
00:17:32.320 it was a similar motivation
00:17:33.680 with the Anglican ordinariate,
00:17:35.140 right?
00:17:35.360 These former Anglicans,
00:17:36.800 they love their own
00:17:37.700 Anglican tradition.
00:17:38.980 If we can purge it
00:17:40.040 of what's erroneous in it,
00:17:41.640 but let them keep
00:17:42.580 what's beautiful and worthy,
00:17:44.080 then let them have it, right?
00:17:45.740 So Benedict is truly
00:17:47.440 a Pope of pluralism
00:17:49.220 in a good sense.
00:17:50.940 And he also was a Pope
00:17:52.320 who understood that
00:17:53.580 if mistakes were made
00:17:56.020 in the Liturgical Reform,
00:17:57.080 and there were big mistakes made,
00:17:58.700 he admits that
00:17:59.680 over the course of 40 years,
00:18:01.600 and many other people
00:18:02.440 who look into it
00:18:03.440 admit the same thing.
00:18:04.700 He believed that
00:18:05.760 the best approach
00:18:06.860 was to kind of
00:18:08.240 let people work it out
00:18:09.620 on the ground level.
00:18:11.120 Let priests celebrate
00:18:12.560 the old rites.
00:18:13.580 Let that influence
00:18:14.480 how they celebrate
00:18:15.220 the new rites.
00:18:16.380 Let the faithful,
00:18:17.520 in a sense,
00:18:18.080 vote with their feet.
00:18:18.940 You know, it's kind of
00:18:20.620 the principle of
00:18:21.340 if God is for it,
00:18:23.020 who are we to be against it, right?
00:18:25.480 And so there is this idea
00:18:27.960 very much of fraternal
00:18:30.640 and charitable coexistence
00:18:32.540 that Benedict was aspiring to
00:18:34.540 in order to depolarize
00:18:37.500 and, let's say,
00:18:39.740 remove some of the rancor
00:18:41.040 from the whole question
00:18:42.840 of the liturgical debates
00:18:45.520 or war some people refer them to.
00:18:47.680 And so I, you know,
00:18:48.800 I edited a collection
00:18:49.800 of about 70 pieces
00:18:51.860 from cardinals
00:18:52.660 all the way down
00:18:53.340 to lay people
00:18:54.060 called
00:18:54.860 From Benedict's Peace
00:18:56.540 to Francis' War, right?
00:18:59.400 And the reason I called it that
00:19:01.040 is that that's exactly
00:19:01.940 what we're seeing.
00:19:02.600 He is the one
00:19:03.520 in the name of unity
00:19:04.580 who is antagonizing
00:19:06.960 these,
00:19:07.880 a whole group of Catholics,
00:19:09.360 a significant minority
00:19:10.700 of Catholics.
00:19:11.760 It's not,
00:19:12.260 that's not going to end well.
00:19:13.860 I mean, history shows that.
00:19:15.040 When you antagonize minorities,
00:19:16.220 it does not end well.
00:19:17.400 Hmm.
00:19:18.720 So there's an interesting
00:19:20.220 thing there
00:19:20.800 because
00:19:21.820 in a way
00:19:23.860 you could say
00:19:24.600 both JP II
00:19:25.620 and Benedict
00:19:26.280 tried to do a feint
00:19:28.360 to both sides.
00:19:29.660 It was like,
00:19:30.580 yeah, there's so many people,
00:19:32.380 particularly old people,
00:19:33.400 who are kind of
00:19:33.920 attached to this.
00:19:35.520 And perhaps
00:19:37.120 he had some of these
00:19:38.400 warring cardinals
00:19:39.860 who really had a problem
00:19:41.080 with the Latin mass
00:19:41.760 say,
00:19:42.700 okay, fine,
00:19:44.300 we'll give it to them. 1.00
00:19:45.060 Hopefully they'll die off 1.00
00:19:46.080 sooner than later.
00:19:48.020 But what seems
00:19:49.680 to have
00:19:50.280 gotten them crazy
00:19:53.420 is that it caught on.
00:19:55.440 It caught on
00:19:56.020 among the young people.
00:19:57.200 And all of a sudden
00:19:58.020 there was a massive resurgence
00:19:59.600 and it seems like
00:20:01.520 they went crazy.
00:20:02.400 It was like,
00:20:02.840 oh my gosh,
00:20:03.220 they're not just dying off.
00:20:04.580 Exactly.
00:20:05.400 Now,
00:20:05.940 now let's,
00:20:06.600 I mean,
00:20:06.780 let's,
00:20:07.040 it's interesting,
00:20:07.700 you know,
00:20:07.820 there was a piece
00:20:08.380 written recently,
00:20:09.740 a really puerile piece
00:20:11.260 that appeared
00:20:13.400 at a website
00:20:14.660 called Where Peter Is
00:20:15.960 in which the author,
00:20:18.260 he was,
00:20:18.520 he was arguing
00:20:19.120 essentially that the liturgy
00:20:20.140 is the Pope's toy
00:20:21.060 so he can do
00:20:21.680 whatever he wants
00:20:22.360 with it.
00:20:22.660 He can break it, 0.98
00:20:23.420 smash it,
00:20:24.060 replace it,
00:20:24.800 ad libito,
00:20:25.380 it doesn't matter,
00:20:26.280 which of course
00:20:26.760 is a profoundly
00:20:27.440 false view
00:20:28.300 and can be shown
00:20:29.000 to be false
00:20:29.540 from church history
00:20:30.320 and from theology.
00:20:31.960 But he,
00:20:32.860 he made the claim
00:20:33.840 that Benedict's gamble
00:20:35.660 or assumption
00:20:36.480 in Sumorum Pontificum
00:20:37.660 is that only
00:20:39.080 a tiny minority
00:20:40.300 of people
00:20:40.920 would ever go
00:20:41.800 to the Latin Mass
00:20:42.680 and therefore
00:20:43.660 it would never
00:20:44.260 become popular.
00:20:45.540 And,
00:20:46.080 and he draws
00:20:46.620 the conclusion
00:20:47.160 that if it became popular
00:20:48.460 then it would have
00:20:48.980 to be stopped,
00:20:49.920 which is the most
00:20:50.880 absurd conclusion
00:20:51.700 to think of,
00:20:52.260 right?
00:20:52.520 It's like,
00:20:53.160 if people,
00:20:54.020 you know,
00:20:54.760 eagerly and fervently
00:20:56.600 go to Mass,
00:20:57.920 there,
00:20:58.360 there must be
00:20:58.780 something wrong.
00:20:59.240 We better stop that,
00:21:00.100 right?
00:21:01.280 So,
00:21:01.940 but,
00:21:02.140 but this is false.
00:21:03.260 This is a false claim
00:21:04.140 because,
00:21:05.560 well,
00:21:05.860 actually Benedict,
00:21:07.200 the problem,
00:21:07.700 one of the problems
00:21:08.420 with Pope Benedict XVI
00:21:09.700 is that he
00:21:10.760 isn't always
00:21:11.860 100% consistent
00:21:13.080 in his thinking
00:21:14.020 about things.
00:21:15.040 So he does say
00:21:16.040 two things
00:21:16.580 that are kind of intention.
00:21:18.240 One of them
00:21:18.980 is,
00:21:19.520 he says,
00:21:20.220 I forget if this is,
00:21:21.460 I think this is in the letter
00:21:22.300 to the bishops
00:21:22.840 that accompanied
00:21:23.480 Sumorum Pontificum.
00:21:24.700 He says
00:21:25.180 that,
00:21:25.920 that,
00:21:26.520 that,
00:21:27.040 that,
00:21:27.300 attending the old right
00:21:28.800 presupposes
00:21:29.680 a liturgical formation
00:21:31.040 and a knowledge
00:21:31.800 of Latin
00:21:32.320 that is not
00:21:33.300 frequently to be met with.
00:21:35.540 And that's kind of
00:21:36.720 implying that,
00:21:37.540 okay,
00:21:37.660 this is a very minority
00:21:38.980 affair.
00:21:39.980 But,
00:21:40.420 he says in the same letter
00:21:41.760 that young people,
00:21:43.440 too,
00:21:43.600 are discovering this form
00:21:44.900 and finding in it
00:21:46.160 an encounter
00:21:46.760 with the mystery
00:21:47.440 of the Holy Eucharist
00:21:48.420 particularly suited to them.
00:21:50.320 Young people,
00:21:51.180 he says,
00:21:51.700 right?
00:21:52.260 Well,
00:21:52.660 if you see young people
00:21:53.820 being attracted to that,
00:21:55.500 and perhaps
00:21:56.340 they're not
00:21:56.760 classical Latin scholars
00:21:57.960 or whatever,
00:21:58.880 right?
00:21:59.140 Then it shows
00:21:59.860 that there's
00:22:00.240 an attractive force
00:22:01.580 in the traditional
00:22:02.420 right itself.
00:22:03.860 That is drawing people.
00:22:05.380 And if it draws young people,
00:22:06.520 it's drawing the future.
00:22:07.980 If it's drawing young people,
00:22:08.980 it's drawing families
00:22:09.880 with children,
00:22:10.900 right?
00:22:11.180 Which we see happening.
00:22:12.880 So,
00:22:13.500 I think that Benedict,
00:22:14.940 surely Benedict was
00:22:15.740 in a perfect position
00:22:16.560 to know,
00:22:17.060 especially as in Rome
00:22:18.260 for so many decades,
00:22:19.300 he met with Michael Davies,
00:22:20.540 he met with,
00:22:21.420 with all kinds of groups
00:22:23.320 of pilgrims coming to Rome
00:22:24.840 because of the Latin Mass.
00:22:27.260 He knew that it was attractive.
00:22:29.400 He knew that it was growing,
00:22:30.860 right?
00:22:31.100 And he still released
00:22:32.240 Sumorum Pontificum.
00:22:34.120 Mm-hmm.
00:22:35.480 Okay.
00:22:36.120 So,
00:22:36.560 now that we've dealt with
00:22:37.820 the sort of newsy aspects,
00:22:39.920 let's go back to some basics.
00:22:41.900 First of all,
00:22:42.800 in your book,
00:22:43.720 you say,
00:22:44.740 tradition is the ultimate norm.
00:22:48.200 What does that mean?
00:22:49.520 And,
00:22:50.340 just if you,
00:22:50.880 even if you can bring it back
00:22:51.740 even a little bit more,
00:22:53.320 for people who are
00:22:54.640 new to this,
00:22:57.200 what even is
00:22:58.500 the Latin Mass?
00:23:00.580 Why are people
00:23:01.320 attached to it?
00:23:02.560 What does it have to do
00:23:03.640 with tradition?
00:23:04.580 Isn't the Mass the Mass?
00:23:05.560 Yes.
00:23:06.100 Yes.
00:23:06.920 Right.
00:23:07.680 There's a lot built
00:23:08.380 into those questions.
00:23:09.720 But,
00:23:10.440 I mean,
00:23:11.060 basically,
00:23:11.560 Catholicism is a religion
00:23:12.640 of tradition.
00:23:13.500 I mean,
00:23:13.600 we just have to start
00:23:14.400 with that.
00:23:15.380 What is tradition?
00:23:16.160 What is,
00:23:16.920 in Greek,
00:23:17.460 paradosis,
00:23:18.200 is the word,
00:23:19.080 traditio in Latin.
00:23:20.200 It means that which is
00:23:21.320 handed down
00:23:22.180 from age to age,
00:23:23.680 from the apostles
00:23:24.500 to their successors,
00:23:26.260 from the church of one century
00:23:27.780 to the church of the next century.
00:23:30.460 So,
00:23:30.840 and of course,
00:23:32.520 at the heart of that tradition
00:23:33.840 is tradition with a capital T.
00:23:36.080 That is,
00:23:36.740 what God revealed
00:23:37.940 through Christ
00:23:39.060 to the apostles,
00:23:40.220 but was not written down
00:23:41.820 in the form of scripture.
00:23:43.220 Right?
00:23:43.280 That's what we,
00:23:43.900 we refer to this as oral tradition.
00:23:45.520 It's part of divine revelation.
00:23:46.680 But then there's a whole
00:23:48.680 sort of accumulation
00:23:49.640 of traditions,
00:23:51.000 ecclesiastical traditions,
00:23:52.380 we call them,
00:23:53.240 around that core,
00:23:54.700 that divine
00:23:55.260 and apostolic core.
00:23:57.320 And these ecclesiastical traditions
00:23:59.180 include
00:23:59.860 many,
00:24:01.100 many things.
00:24:01.720 They include
00:24:02.200 liturgical chant,
00:24:04.160 like Gregorian
00:24:04.740 or Byzantine chant.
00:24:06.060 They include
00:24:06.600 church architecture,
00:24:07.760 how we build our churches.
00:24:09.520 You know,
00:24:09.740 that we have tabernacles
00:24:10.820 and altars in churches.
00:24:12.440 You know,
00:24:12.820 these are,
00:24:13.600 these are things
00:24:14.140 that are modeled
00:24:14.780 after divine revelation,
00:24:15.920 but how we do them
00:24:17.220 and how we practice them
00:24:18.700 from century to century
00:24:19.680 is,
00:24:20.160 is built up
00:24:21.140 as a matter of customs.
00:24:22.360 Right?
00:24:23.100 I mean,
00:24:23.380 there are multiple ways
00:24:24.300 of doing things,
00:24:25.100 but you have to do it
00:24:26.020 one way.
00:24:27.000 And that what you see
00:24:28.260 when you study history
00:24:28.980 is that
00:24:29.360 as the church,
00:24:31.000 you might say,
00:24:32.120 learns to celebrate
00:24:33.180 the mass
00:24:33.620 with certain customs,
00:24:35.080 these customs
00:24:35.780 are taken very seriously
00:24:37.880 by all who come afterwards.
00:24:39.620 And,
00:24:40.180 and the ones
00:24:40.880 who come afterwards
00:24:41.400 cling to those customs.
00:24:42.480 They,
00:24:42.820 they hold onto them
00:24:43.700 as precious heirlooms,
00:24:44.960 as an inheritance.
00:24:46.260 Right?
00:24:46.540 Why?
00:24:47.340 Because it might have been
00:24:48.920 a saintly bishop
00:24:49.920 who gave you
00:24:51.060 part of the Eucharistic prayer.
00:24:52.760 You know,
00:24:53.080 perhaps it wasn't,
00:24:53.920 you know,
00:24:54.120 it wasn't fully written out
00:24:55.140 to begin with,
00:24:55.820 but some saintly bishop
00:24:57.100 added a certain section to it.
00:24:59.620 And,
00:25:00.120 you know,
00:25:00.400 and,
00:25:00.720 and then people said,
00:25:01.540 well,
00:25:01.600 we're not going to drop this.
00:25:03.240 Saint so-and-so
00:25:03.900 added this part.
00:25:04.780 Right?
00:25:05.340 And so in a way,
00:25:07.100 the liturgy grows up
00:25:08.440 slowly,
00:25:09.660 gradually,
00:25:10.260 like an organic process.
00:25:11.800 It's not,
00:25:12.280 it's a human process.
00:25:13.420 It's an artistic process,
00:25:14.600 but it is like
00:25:15.480 the slow growth
00:25:16.780 of a forest,
00:25:17.840 right?
00:25:18.480 Where there's seeds
00:25:19.460 or seeds are planted
00:25:20.480 and they grow up to maturity,
00:25:21.900 to fruition.
00:25:23.020 And then people
00:25:23.980 treasure that
00:25:25.220 and they take pride in it
00:25:26.500 and they don't want to
00:25:27.460 deviate from it.
00:25:28.840 This is just the,
00:25:29.720 the Catholic attitude.
00:25:31.640 Right?
00:25:32.620 And so,
00:25:33.340 in fact,
00:25:34.140 in the history of liturgy,
00:25:35.660 there is no
00:25:37.240 decisive break.
00:25:38.880 There's no point
00:25:40.000 at which
00:25:41.100 a Pope
00:25:42.560 says,
00:25:44.320 okay,
00:25:44.800 we need to
00:25:45.660 appoint a committee
00:25:46.740 and the committee
00:25:48.040 is going to evaluate
00:25:48.940 everything that we've done
00:25:50.480 before
00:25:51.020 and it's going to sift
00:25:52.360 between the things
00:25:53.140 they want to keep
00:25:53.780 and the things
00:25:54.180 they don't want to keep
00:25:55.060 and basically redesign
00:25:56.700 the whole thing
00:25:57.360 from the ground up.
00:25:58.520 That's,
00:25:58.960 that's never happened before.
00:26:00.780 In,
00:26:01.120 in some sense,
00:26:01.840 you might even say
00:26:02.260 that couldn't happen
00:26:03.280 prior to modern times.
00:26:04.820 It's just,
00:26:05.480 the modern mentality
00:26:06.660 is very kind of
00:26:08.480 technological
00:26:09.080 and constructivist
00:26:10.380 and,
00:26:10.900 you know,
00:26:11.320 people think
00:26:11.760 we can build
00:26:12.320 a better mousetrap
00:26:13.240 and,
00:26:13.480 you know,
00:26:13.540 we can build
00:26:14.000 a better liturgy
00:26:14.720 just like we can
00:26:15.320 build a better world,
00:26:16.300 you know?
00:26:16.840 So I think this,
00:26:18.500 you know,
00:26:18.660 the importance of tradition
00:26:19.780 is that it shows us
00:26:21.560 the norm to follow.
00:26:22.880 It shows us
00:26:23.480 the footsteps
00:26:24.420 that we should follow in
00:26:25.960 that God has
00:26:26.860 in his providence
00:26:28.040 appointed for us,
00:26:30.140 right?
00:26:30.780 It's part really
00:26:31.680 of the Holy Spirit's
00:26:32.860 guidance of the church,
00:26:34.060 I think we should say.
00:26:34.960 And so there is
00:26:36.580 something very disturbing
00:26:37.720 about a wholesale
00:26:39.780 revolution
00:26:41.520 in the forms of worship,
00:26:43.300 which is exactly
00:26:44.100 what happened
00:26:44.600 in the 1960s and 70s.
00:26:46.420 You know,
00:26:46.760 you ask,
00:26:47.200 well,
00:26:47.300 why are people
00:26:47.840 attached to the
00:26:48.600 traditional Latin mass?
00:26:49.520 I mean,
00:26:49.660 I think the simplest,
00:26:50.920 there are multiple reasons
00:26:52.180 people are attached to it,
00:26:53.560 but when they go to it,
00:26:55.720 I think they recognize,
00:26:57.080 even if they're not academics,
00:26:58.380 even if they haven't read
00:26:59.240 about the subject,
00:27:00.540 they recognize
00:27:01.360 a sort of awesomeness
00:27:03.100 that comes with
00:27:04.740 authentic grandeur,
00:27:07.160 that comes with
00:27:07.860 something that has
00:27:09.380 developed over 2,000 years,
00:27:11.700 right?
00:27:12.420 It's,
00:27:13.160 it comes,
00:27:13.760 you know,
00:27:13.960 the traditional Latin liturgy
00:27:15.140 is somehow monumental.
00:27:17.080 It's,
00:27:17.800 it forces
00:27:18.920 its objective reality
00:27:20.700 upon you,
00:27:21.980 and there are things
00:27:22.720 of it that you
00:27:23.200 immediately understand,
00:27:24.560 some of the symbolism,
00:27:25.960 the beauty of it,
00:27:26.880 the so-called smells
00:27:27.900 and bells,
00:27:28.740 but other things
00:27:29.580 are mystifying
00:27:30.440 and completely daunting
00:27:32.040 and they make you feel
00:27:33.120 small and humble,
00:27:34.820 right?
00:27:35.120 And I think that's the way
00:27:36.160 we should feel
00:27:36.860 when we go into
00:27:37.720 divine worship,
00:27:38.560 right?
00:27:39.520 So I,
00:27:40.160 I think what we experience
00:27:41.220 there is,
00:27:41.880 is I like to use this word
00:27:42.880 authenticity,
00:27:44.120 right?
00:27:45.640 And I think that when you,
00:27:47.940 when you get deeply
00:27:48.940 into the traditional rites,
00:27:50.740 all of them,
00:27:51.340 not just the mass,
00:27:52.120 but baptism
00:27:52.760 and confirmation
00:27:53.440 and marriage
00:27:54.340 and all of these
00:27:55.140 different rites,
00:27:56.360 and then you can,
00:27:57.040 and then you contrast them
00:27:58.100 with the Novus Ordo
00:27:59.000 versions of those things,
00:28:00.100 Paul VI's version,
00:28:01.740 versions of those things,
00:28:03.400 you,
00:28:03.680 you start to get the sense
00:28:04.940 of really like some committee
00:28:06.820 wrote this new version.
00:28:08.760 It,
00:28:08.780 it,
00:28:09.020 it's kind of clunky
00:28:09.960 and it seems to be
00:28:11.120 agenda-driven
00:28:11.900 and it's,
00:28:12.800 it's,
00:28:13.220 it's just,
00:28:13.880 it's awkward
00:28:14.780 and it seems to be
00:28:16.240 created to prompt people
00:28:17.920 to a certain kind
00:28:18.860 of participation,
00:28:19.480 which,
00:28:20.900 you know,
00:28:21.320 is not as deep
00:28:22.480 a kind of participation
00:28:23.680 as you get
00:28:24.440 with the old rites.
00:28:26.200 So then,
00:28:28.040 they,
00:28:28.660 they do a lot of talk
00:28:29.820 about a continuity.
00:28:31.180 Is there a continuity
00:28:32.280 between the old
00:28:33.740 rite of the mass
00:28:34.320 and the new rite?
00:28:35.960 No,
00:28:36.540 no,
00:28:36.940 there's not.
00:28:37.440 I mean,
00:28:37.580 there's,
00:28:38.000 there is what I would call
00:28:39.260 super,
00:28:39.780 there's some superficial
00:28:40.880 continuity
00:28:41.540 that is possible
00:28:44.180 and actual.
00:28:45.780 What I mean is,
00:28:46.780 if,
00:28:47.080 if you take a 30,000
00:28:48.420 foot view
00:28:49.120 of the old Roman rite
00:28:51.120 and the rite
00:28:52.160 of,
00:28:52.420 of Paul VI,
00:28:53.540 you can see
00:28:54.220 certain continuities,
00:28:55.160 right?
00:28:55.560 It begins with,
00:28:57.140 or it has the sign
00:28:57.860 of the cross
00:28:58.400 somewhere near
00:28:58.900 the beginning
00:28:59.360 and there's
00:28:59.880 a penitential rite
00:29:00.920 and there are
00:29:01.600 some readings
00:29:02.280 and a psalm
00:29:03.340 and then you have
00:29:04.300 an offertory
00:29:05.000 and then you have
00:29:05.700 the Eucharistic prayer,
00:29:07.180 right?
00:29:07.540 So,
00:29:07.800 and communion.
00:29:08.740 So,
00:29:09.100 if you take
00:29:09.680 a 30,000 foot view,
00:29:10.880 of course,
00:29:11.340 there are parallels.
00:29:11.980 But then again,
00:29:12.980 those things exist
00:29:13.780 in every liturgical rite
00:29:14.940 across the face
00:29:15.580 of the earth.
00:29:16.080 All the,
00:29:16.520 you know,
00:29:16.760 the dozens
00:29:17.180 of Eastern rites
00:29:18.500 and so forth,
00:29:19.000 they all follow
00:29:19.660 basically that pattern.
00:29:21.620 So,
00:29:22.140 really,
00:29:22.440 it's when you dive
00:29:23.220 into the details
00:29:24.080 that you see
00:29:24.840 the lack
00:29:25.600 of continuity,
00:29:26.620 the real rupture.
00:29:27.640 So,
00:29:27.820 for instance,
00:29:29.020 that there's only
00:29:30.380 ever been one
00:29:31.240 Eucharistic prayer
00:29:32.180 or anaphora,
00:29:33.220 namely the Roman canon
00:29:34.280 in the Western tradition
00:29:36.400 and then suddenly
00:29:38.180 there are many
00:29:39.860 Eucharistic prayers
00:29:40.820 that the priest
00:29:41.380 can choose
00:29:41.820 from ad libitum,
00:29:43.340 including some
00:29:44.280 that were put together
00:29:45.100 under very suspicious
00:29:46.200 circumstances
00:29:47.020 and with
00:29:47.920 faulty scholarship
00:29:49.260 behind them.
00:29:50.280 If you don't mind
00:29:51.840 delving into that
00:29:53.260 a little bit,
00:29:53.800 what do you mean
00:29:54.400 by that?
00:29:55.740 Well,
00:29:56.080 so,
00:29:56.300 in the West
00:29:58.160 from the 4th century,
00:29:59.800 the 4th century
00:30:00.580 is when the liturgy
00:30:01.660 shifted seemingly
00:30:02.860 from Greek to Latin.
00:30:04.800 So,
00:30:05.060 there was a big shift
00:30:06.020 in language.
00:30:08.920 It wasn't so much
00:30:10.100 though because
00:30:10.880 Latin was the vernacular 1.00
00:30:12.300 and they wanted to put
00:30:13.080 something in the vernacular
00:30:13.920 because the Latin
00:30:14.620 of the liturgy
00:30:15.160 is actually a rather
00:30:15.900 sophisticated,
00:30:17.220 culturally elevated,
00:30:19.060 artistically refined,
00:30:20.280 and rather archaic
00:30:21.900 and difficult Latin.
00:30:23.340 In fact,
00:30:23.660 it's not the Latin
00:30:24.380 that was spoken
00:30:24.960 in the marketplace.
00:30:27.240 And the reason for that
00:30:28.040 is that by the 4th century,
00:30:29.600 the aristocracy
00:30:30.520 and the clergy,
00:30:32.200 they were Latin speaking
00:30:33.300 rather than Greek speaking.
00:30:34.860 And so,
00:30:35.360 and Latin had finally become,
00:30:37.100 had developed
00:30:37.940 a sort of sacral vocabulary
00:30:39.500 thanks to translations
00:30:41.160 of scripture
00:30:41.720 into Latin
00:30:42.420 that made it possible
00:30:44.000 to have an elevated
00:30:45.240 and dignified liturgy
00:30:46.400 in Latin.
00:30:47.200 That wasn't possible prior.
00:30:48.880 So,
00:30:49.000 in a sort of ironic way,
00:30:51.220 it wasn't that
00:30:51.840 it was Latin
00:30:52.520 spoken commonly
00:30:53.480 that turned the liturgy
00:30:54.380 into Latin.
00:30:54.960 It's that Latin 1.00
00:30:55.480 had developed sufficiently
00:30:56.800 in refinement,
00:30:58.220 Christian Latin,
00:30:59.040 that the liturgy
00:30:59.900 could be put
00:31:00.480 into an appropriate
00:31:01.300 high register
00:31:02.280 of Latin,
00:31:03.680 right?
00:31:03.960 So,
00:31:04.200 it's almost the contrary
00:31:05.180 of the way people
00:31:06.240 talk about
00:31:06.860 the Latinization
00:31:07.960 of the liturgy.
00:31:09.060 But from that point,
00:31:10.420 all the way
00:31:11.000 to the 1960s,
00:31:12.640 the liturgy
00:31:13.120 of the Catholic Church
00:31:13.980 in all of its forms
00:31:15.720 in the West
00:31:16.220 was conducted
00:31:17.020 in Latin.
00:31:18.040 In the Ambrosian Rite,
00:31:19.920 the Mozarabic Rite,
00:31:21.240 in the Gallican Rites,
00:31:22.500 in the Roman Rite itself,
00:31:23.640 all over the place.
00:31:24.680 In the West,
00:31:25.900 it was in Latin.
00:31:27.480 So,
00:31:27.940 right there,
00:31:28.540 there's a huge rupture,
00:31:29.620 right?
00:31:29.860 From going from Latin, 0.58
00:31:31.400 exclusively in Latin,
00:31:32.780 to a sort of babel
00:31:35.020 of vernacular languages
00:31:36.360 with all the problems
00:31:37.540 that the translations
00:31:38.360 have brought in,
00:31:39.000 mistranslations,
00:31:40.160 translating pro multis
00:31:41.380 as for all
00:31:42.260 rather than for many,
00:31:43.200 you know,
00:31:43.720 my blood shed for you
00:31:44.760 and for many.
00:31:46.160 So,
00:31:46.720 that's one big rupture
00:31:48.340 right there.
00:31:49.500 But the other point
00:31:50.260 I was making is
00:31:50.900 during all of those
00:31:51.900 centuries of Latin liturgy,
00:31:53.280 there was one
00:31:53.980 Eucharistic prayer,
00:31:55.200 the Roman canon.
00:31:56.560 That's it.
00:31:58.140 And that prayer
00:31:59.680 is as ancient
00:32:00.180 as it gets.
00:32:00.680 I mean,
00:32:00.780 it was already traditional
00:32:01.760 by the time
00:32:02.220 Pope St. Gregory the Great
00:32:03.360 was reigning
00:32:04.020 in the end
00:32:04.440 of the 6th century.
00:32:06.780 And there was never
00:32:07.660 any other one
00:32:08.380 until the late 1960s
00:32:11.080 when several new
00:32:12.120 Eucharistic prayers
00:32:12.760 were created
00:32:13.320 for the sake of variety.
00:32:14.680 That's what the reformers said.
00:32:15.880 We need more variety,
00:32:17.440 you know.
00:32:18.340 And then they added
00:32:19.760 still more after that,
00:32:21.000 you know,
00:32:21.240 prayers for children,
00:32:22.240 prayers for reconciliation,
00:32:24.120 whatever it might be.
00:32:25.540 And so now
00:32:26.160 when you get
00:32:26.680 the Novus Ordo Altar Missal,
00:32:28.180 it's got a whole bunch
00:32:28.960 of Eucharistic prayers
00:32:29.660 and that is utterly,
00:32:30.840 utterly foreign 1.00
00:32:31.580 to the entire
00:32:32.280 Western tradition.
00:32:34.880 Just a quick note
00:32:35.860 before we return.
00:32:36.980 If you would like
00:32:37.720 to stay up to date
00:32:38.460 on LifeSite's coverage
00:32:39.420 of the latest
00:32:40.080 life, family,
00:32:40.940 and culture news,
00:32:41.900 subscribe to
00:32:42.600 one of our many
00:32:43.340 newsletters
00:32:43.820 by going to
00:32:44.560 LifeSiteNews.com
00:32:45.800 slash subscribe.
00:32:47.200 And if you'd like
00:32:47.960 to help us
00:32:48.640 bring our truth-telling
00:32:49.820 coverage to millions
00:32:50.960 around the world,
00:32:51.840 please consider
00:32:52.500 making a one-time
00:32:53.440 or monthly donation
00:32:54.420 at give.lifesitenews.com.
00:32:57.320 And now,
00:32:58.120 back to the video.
00:33:01.280 So,
00:33:01.920 what are the problems
00:33:03.320 then with the
00:33:04.160 new Eucharistic prayers?
00:33:05.420 Do you see any
00:33:05.840 actual problems
00:33:06.580 with them?
00:33:07.660 Yes, well,
00:33:08.660 let's put it this way.
00:33:10.320 Anabali Bunyini,
00:33:11.400 who was the architect
00:33:12.060 of the liturgical reform,
00:33:13.820 the main secretary,
00:33:15.200 the kind of,
00:33:15.680 the one who was,
00:33:16.460 who operated the clearinghouse
00:33:17.740 for all of the different
00:33:18.700 ideas and papers
00:33:19.700 and votes
00:33:20.960 and so forth.
00:33:21.980 He said,
00:33:23.480 he wrote a giant book,
00:33:24.700 huge book,
00:33:25.700 all about the liturgical reform.
00:33:27.100 It's an incredible resource.
00:33:28.440 And you know what?
00:33:29.620 The publisher,
00:33:30.420 Liturgical Press,
00:33:31.620 has allowed it
00:33:32.500 to stay out of print
00:33:33.920 because it's too dangerous.
00:33:35.540 They don't want people
00:33:36.480 to get hold of this book.
00:33:38.180 You know,
00:33:38.500 if you go on the used book market,
00:33:39.820 it costs hundreds of dollars
00:33:40.880 because it's,
00:33:41.400 it's,
00:33:41.620 it's now become a rare book.
00:33:43.040 It needs to be republished somehow,
00:33:44.980 but I'm,
00:33:45.340 I'm sure they'll never do that
00:33:46.320 because it's so damning.
00:33:48.020 But anyway,
00:33:48.600 he documents in detail
00:33:49.800 what they did
00:33:50.440 and what their ideas were.
00:33:52.000 And,
00:33:52.460 and he says,
00:33:53.560 we need more variety
00:33:55.580 in,
00:33:57.140 in Eucharistic prayers.
00:33:58.160 And so when we write
00:33:59.160 the new ones,
00:33:59.780 they ought to be
00:34:00.680 different from the old one.
00:34:03.000 In other words,
00:34:03.780 not just,
00:34:04.760 not just a new way
00:34:06.260 of saying the same thing,
00:34:07.500 but saying different things
00:34:08.780 or having different emphases
00:34:10.060 is what he wanted.
00:34:12.460 And,
00:34:13.040 and one of those key shifts
00:34:15.260 is in the language
00:34:16.640 of sacrifice,
00:34:17.880 right?
00:34:18.920 The language,
00:34:19.580 the,
00:34:19.720 the mass,
00:34:20.600 the Holy Mass
00:34:21.300 as the sacrifice
00:34:22.580 of Jesus Christ
00:34:23.400 on the cross,
00:34:24.060 as representing that
00:34:26.100 and renewing it for us
00:34:27.320 and giving us access
00:34:28.160 to the grace
00:34:28.740 of that sacrifice,
00:34:29.840 that once for all sacrifice.
00:34:31.260 that language
00:34:32.560 is very strong
00:34:33.940 in the Roman canon.
00:34:35.120 It,
00:34:35.200 it's,
00:34:35.500 it permeates it,
00:34:37.100 right?
00:34:38.300 It's,
00:34:38.920 it's muted
00:34:39.680 in the new Eucharistic prayers.
00:34:41.460 It's not absent completely.
00:34:42.880 That would be false to say.
00:34:44.060 Sometimes people say
00:34:44.840 that it's gone.
00:34:45.660 No,
00:34:45.820 it's not gone,
00:34:46.420 but it's very minimal.
00:34:48.280 You know,
00:34:48.580 it's,
00:34:48.780 it's in passing,
00:34:49.820 you might say,
00:34:50.900 maybe once mentioned,
00:34:52.340 right?
00:34:52.940 And so it's definitely
00:34:54.120 not going to leave
00:34:55.040 the same impression
00:34:55.820 on the priest
00:34:56.820 or on the people
00:34:57.500 as they hear
00:34:58.240 these Eucharistic prayers.
00:34:59.300 And the new ones
00:35:00.060 have become by far
00:35:01.660 more popular
00:35:02.400 because they're shorter.
00:35:04.100 You know,
00:35:04.340 the Roman canon
00:35:04.920 is quite long.
00:35:05.920 It was,
00:35:06.600 it was,
00:35:07.360 although it might have been
00:35:08.340 said aloud
00:35:09.140 at a certain point,
00:35:10.200 very quickly,
00:35:10.880 it came to be said quietly,
00:35:12.600 sotto voce,
00:35:13.460 as when you go
00:35:14.220 to a Latin mass,
00:35:15.100 you don't hear the priest
00:35:16.220 saying the canon,
00:35:17.240 although you can follow
00:35:18.040 along with it
00:35:18.660 in a hand missile.
00:35:20.780 And so,
00:35:21.200 in fact,
00:35:21.620 when it's said out loud,
00:35:23.380 it's,
00:35:23.560 it's,
00:35:23.860 it's a long thing
00:35:24.820 to read out loud.
00:35:26.000 And most priests think,
00:35:27.160 well,
00:35:27.280 this is,
00:35:27.780 you know,
00:35:28.160 this is kind of tedious.
00:35:29.340 So,
00:35:29.420 so let's just do
00:35:30.080 the short one,
00:35:30.880 you know,
00:35:31.200 or the shorter one.
00:35:32.760 So yeah,
00:35:33.200 the language of sacrifice,
00:35:34.380 the language of typology
00:35:35.680 is very much lacking
00:35:37.560 in the new prayers.
00:35:38.480 What I mean is
00:35:38.980 in the Roman canon,
00:35:40.360 the priest mentions
00:35:41.400 Abel and Abraham
00:35:43.080 and Melchizedek
00:35:44.260 and all these sacrifices
00:35:45.660 in the history
00:35:47.040 of salvation
00:35:47.600 that paved the way
00:35:48.700 for the one supreme
00:35:49.580 sacrifice of Christ.
00:35:50.920 So it's,
00:35:51.340 it's also kind of
00:35:52.520 permeated with a Jewish 0.99
00:35:53.720 temple sacrificial feel
00:35:56.160 as well,
00:35:56.540 which really emphasizes
00:35:57.460 the unity
00:35:57.980 of salvation history
00:35:58.980 and the fact that
00:35:59.740 Christ is the redeemer
00:36:01.160 of all,
00:36:01.800 including the Jews
00:36:02.680 and all men,
00:36:03.700 all pagans too,
00:36:05.140 right?
00:36:05.560 That's,
00:36:06.020 that's nowhere
00:36:06.640 in the new Eucharistic prayers.
00:36:08.640 So there are,
00:36:09.860 there are so many,
00:36:10.680 I mean,
00:36:10.860 in one of the chapters
00:36:11.740 of my book,
00:36:12.760 the ones of future Roman,
00:36:13.540 right,
00:36:13.660 is all about the Roman canon
00:36:15.160 and all of these
00:36:15.920 wonderful features
00:36:16.740 that it has.
00:36:17.360 One of the things
00:36:20.740 that I've noticed
00:36:21.500 that's quite different
00:36:23.860 is where in the
00:36:26.300 Novus Ordo,
00:36:27.320 right,
00:36:27.620 the modern rite
00:36:28.800 of the mass,
00:36:29.520 we talk about
00:36:30.460 the priest proclaims,
00:36:32.700 not as a mystery
00:36:33.200 of faith,
00:36:34.140 and then they say
00:36:35.120 this little prayer,
00:36:36.060 but that's very different
00:36:38.120 from the old rite,
00:36:39.360 if you can explain that.
00:36:40.600 Exactly.
00:36:41.140 And there's a chapter
00:36:41.820 in my book
00:36:42.220 just on this question
00:36:43.220 on what happened
00:36:44.040 to the mystery
00:36:44.540 of faith.
00:36:46.280 So this phrase,
00:36:47.660 Mysterium Fidei,
00:36:49.660 is,
00:36:50.280 it's a very mysterious phrase.
00:36:52.180 None of the liturgical historians 0.52
00:36:53.460 know where it came from.
00:36:54.900 It's not in any
00:36:55.740 of the New Testament
00:36:56.640 narratives
00:36:57.240 of the Last Supper,
00:36:59.580 but it's there
00:37:00.300 in every manuscript
00:37:01.480 we have of the Roman canon.
00:37:03.080 And where is it?
00:37:04.160 It's located
00:37:04.900 in the middle
00:37:06.040 of the prayer
00:37:07.240 by which the priest
00:37:08.420 consecrates,
00:37:09.340 or the words
00:37:09.860 by which the priest
00:37:10.460 consecrates
00:37:10.900 the precious blood.
00:37:12.400 So he says,
00:37:14.320 And then he goes on,
00:37:23.620 right?
00:37:23.900 So it's planted
00:37:25.060 mysteriously
00:37:25.780 in the middle
00:37:26.320 of this prayer
00:37:26.940 of consecration
00:37:27.740 as if to draw
00:37:29.760 attention
00:37:30.660 to the fact
00:37:31.660 that this
00:37:32.320 is the awesome
00:37:33.280 mystery of salvation,
00:37:34.820 that what we're doing
00:37:35.700 here is
00:37:36.920 at the core
00:37:37.860 of our Catholic faith,
00:37:39.980 right?
00:37:40.160 And, you know,
00:37:43.340 what Bunini said
00:37:44.340 and the other
00:37:45.060 liturgical reformers
00:37:46.520 on the concilium,
00:37:47.680 the committee
00:37:48.100 for reform,
00:37:49.460 they said,
00:37:50.240 this is a strange thing.
00:37:52.080 It's not found
00:37:52.940 in any of the
00:37:53.520 New Testament
00:37:54.040 accounts.
00:37:55.500 They were kind of
00:37:56.020 thinking like Protestants, 0.80
00:37:57.060 like it has to be found
00:37:58.180 in the scriptures
00:37:59.120 or else we shouldn't do it.
00:38:01.020 And so we should
00:38:01.800 remove this phrase.
00:38:03.780 But then Paul VI
00:38:05.300 objected.
00:38:05.960 He said,
00:38:06.240 no, no, no,
00:38:06.640 we don't want
00:38:07.380 to remove this phrase
00:38:08.180 altogether.
00:38:09.140 So then the solution,
00:38:10.120 the compromise,
00:38:11.220 was to turn it
00:38:12.040 into the occasion
00:38:13.060 for an acclamation
00:38:13.980 from the congregation,
00:38:15.440 right?
00:38:15.740 So they said,
00:38:16.460 well,
00:38:16.900 if we say it
00:38:17.580 after the consecration,
00:38:19.280 then it can be
00:38:19.980 like an invitation
00:38:21.240 for the people
00:38:22.100 to make
00:38:22.560 a certain act
00:38:23.820 of faith.
00:38:25.160 So already
00:38:26.080 right there,
00:38:26.500 they're just kind
00:38:26.960 of playing around
00:38:27.760 with these elements.
00:38:29.080 I mean,
00:38:29.280 they're just ripping
00:38:30.260 something from
00:38:30.980 its historic context
00:38:32.100 and repurposing it,
00:38:34.560 as we would say.
00:38:35.940 And then,
00:38:36.740 as Baccia and Ottaviani
00:38:38.480 objected all the way
00:38:39.660 back in 1969,
00:38:41.940 the memorial acclamation
00:38:43.380 introduces a kind
00:38:45.780 of confusion
00:38:46.580 because what the people
00:38:48.380 say in response
00:38:49.220 to Mysterio Fidei
00:38:50.460 is,
00:38:51.060 you know,
00:38:52.700 Christ has died,
00:38:53.840 Christ has risen,
00:38:54.640 Christ will come again.
00:38:55.920 Yes,
00:38:56.280 exactly.
00:38:57.020 In other words,
00:38:57.740 they're not so much
00:38:59.180 acknowledging the real
00:39:00.220 presence of Christ
00:39:01.060 in the Eucharist
00:39:01.720 as Christ came
00:39:03.740 and he will come again.
00:39:05.480 And so,
00:39:05.920 there's a sort of
00:39:06.560 confusion of different
00:39:07.420 levels of presence.
00:39:08.660 What are we talking
00:39:09.300 about here?
00:39:10.240 That's not,
00:39:10.800 that wasn't the original
00:39:11.600 meaning of Mysterio Fidei
00:39:13.520 at all.
00:39:14.480 So,
00:39:14.800 I mean,
00:39:15.060 to go into more detail
00:39:16.340 would be getting
00:39:16.860 too deep in the weeds,
00:39:17.820 but the interested reader
00:39:18.860 can find it
00:39:20.040 in my chapter.
00:39:21.780 Absolutely.
00:39:22.160 I think it's
00:39:23.200 very significant
00:39:24.060 to switch
00:39:25.020 the meaning
00:39:26.020 from what
00:39:27.340 I think
00:39:28.840 for most Catholics
00:39:29.900 who have even
00:39:30.620 basic understandings
00:39:31.520 of the faith.
00:39:33.000 The mystery of faith,
00:39:34.780 this central belief
00:39:36.180 that I think
00:39:37.280 tons of,
00:39:39.060 even followers
00:39:40.020 of Jesus
00:39:40.420 walked away
00:39:41.000 for the very reason,
00:39:42.360 you know,
00:39:42.620 that he said,
00:39:43.380 this is my body,
00:39:44.280 this is my blood,
00:39:45.020 and they walked away.
00:39:46.400 Believers in him,
00:39:47.360 they walked away
00:39:48.380 saying,
00:39:49.380 hey,
00:39:49.560 this is too weird.
00:39:50.780 How can this guy
00:39:51.380 give us his flesh to eat?
00:39:52.880 That,
00:39:53.600 for everybody,
00:39:54.480 is the mystery of faith.
00:39:55.340 I mean,
00:39:55.540 from any kind
00:39:56.580 of normal understanding,
00:39:57.440 the mystery of faith
00:39:57.980 is consubstantiation,
00:39:59.620 the changing
00:40:00.200 of this bread and water
00:40:01.380 into Jesus' own body
00:40:03.220 and blood,
00:40:03.780 really living.
00:40:05.320 Yes,
00:40:05.680 I think you meant
00:40:07.040 to say transubstantiation.
00:40:08.460 Oh,
00:40:08.760 excuse me.
00:40:09.380 Sorry.
00:40:10.260 Transubstantiation,
00:40:10.780 absolutely.
00:40:11.600 Yes,
00:40:12.000 of the bread and wine,
00:40:14.020 exactly.
00:40:15.500 Yeah,
00:40:15.900 I mean,
00:40:16.140 in fact,
00:40:16.700 we could think of it
00:40:17.320 this way,
00:40:17.840 right?
00:40:18.540 The central mysteries
00:40:19.520 of the Christian faith
00:40:20.520 are the blessed trinity,
00:40:22.720 which we can only know
00:40:23.560 by divine revelation,
00:40:24.460 and the incarnation
00:40:27.000 of the word,
00:40:28.060 which,
00:40:28.340 again,
00:40:28.560 we can only know
00:40:29.080 by divine revelation.
00:40:29.900 We can make arguments
00:40:30.760 of fittingness
00:40:31.520 or we can make
00:40:32.320 certain analogies,
00:40:33.460 but we can only know
00:40:34.660 these things for sure
00:40:35.580 because God tells them
00:40:36.760 to us.
00:40:38.320 And then,
00:40:39.380 following from that
00:40:40.880 is the mystery
00:40:41.980 of the church
00:40:42.560 as the mystical body
00:40:43.420 of Christ
00:40:43.780 and the mystery
00:40:44.380 of the Holy Eucharist
00:40:45.360 as the real body
00:40:47.160 of Christ
00:40:47.700 that causes 0.52
00:40:48.320 the mystical body
00:40:49.320 of Christ.
00:40:50.140 And all of those things
00:40:51.080 are linked together.
00:40:52.220 And in fact,
00:40:55.060 it just is a fact
00:40:56.840 that the traditional mass
00:40:59.460 emphasizes all of those mysteries
00:41:01.240 much,
00:41:01.960 much more.
00:41:03.240 I didn't talk about this
00:41:04.380 so much in this particular book,
00:41:05.980 but in an earlier book
00:41:07.060 called Resurgent
00:41:08.840 in the Mist of Crisis,
00:41:10.340 I talked about
00:41:11.060 how much the trinity
00:41:12.920 has been removed
00:41:14.040 from the Novus Ordo.
00:41:15.300 I mean,
00:41:15.460 that sounds shocking.
00:41:16.240 Like,
00:41:16.400 how can that possibly be true?
00:41:17.500 Well,
00:41:17.780 I document it in detail.
00:41:19.680 It's the Holy Trinity
00:41:20.860 is mentioned
00:41:21.460 much,
00:41:22.120 much more
00:41:22.580 and doxologized,
00:41:23.800 praised much,
00:41:24.620 much more
00:41:25.000 in the old right
00:41:26.140 than in the new right.
00:41:27.640 And yet,
00:41:28.140 some people have the temerity
00:41:29.320 to say,
00:41:30.340 oh,
00:41:30.660 you know,
00:41:31.380 the faith,
00:41:32.360 the Catholic faith
00:41:34.340 in the Trinity
00:41:34.800 was revitalized
00:41:35.900 by the Novus Ordo.
00:41:36.680 Well,
00:41:36.860 I mean,
00:41:37.100 they don't know
00:41:38.140 what they're talking about.
00:41:39.360 They haven't even looked
00:41:40.180 at the evidence,
00:41:41.060 right?
00:41:41.540 And so,
00:41:42.140 now we see the results,
00:41:43.740 right?
00:41:44.440 What,
00:41:45.700 how much do Catholics 0.85
00:41:46.740 know about the Trinity?
00:41:48.480 If they go to the Latin Mass 1.00
00:41:50.100 for most of the Sundays
00:41:51.860 of the year,
00:41:52.660 they get this Trinitarian preface
00:41:54.740 that lays out
00:41:56.400 the whole Catholic doctrine
00:41:57.760 of the Trinity.
00:41:59.400 I mean,
00:41:59.620 even if you're only half awake,
00:42:00.940 you're going to get something
00:42:01.640 from that
00:42:02.000 by hearing it Sunday
00:42:02.800 after Sunday
00:42:03.260 after Sunday.
00:42:04.020 That's,
00:42:04.440 that's used only once a year
00:42:05.900 in the Novus Ordo.
00:42:06.780 It's used dozens of times a year
00:42:08.580 in the traditional Mass,
00:42:09.880 right?
00:42:10.620 And then similarly,
00:42:11.740 Catholics,
00:42:12.400 the surveys show
00:42:13.320 that even Catholics 0.66
00:42:14.260 who go to Mass regularly,
00:42:15.380 the Novus Ordo,
00:42:16.160 don't believe
00:42:16.620 in the real presence.
00:42:18.040 Well,
00:42:18.220 why did that happen?
00:42:19.480 It happened both
00:42:20.480 because the liturgy
00:42:21.480 doesn't talk about it as much
00:42:22.680 and because the priests
00:42:24.080 and the people
00:42:24.900 don't behave
00:42:25.720 towards the Eucharist
00:42:26.620 as if they believed
00:42:27.640 that it was really
00:42:28.460 the body and blood of Christ,
00:42:29.880 right?
00:42:30.500 And so,
00:42:31.020 this is also part
00:42:32.120 of my argument
00:42:33.600 about rupture
00:42:34.500 is that,
00:42:35.480 you know,
00:42:36.360 ways that we paid reference
00:42:38.480 to the Eucharist
00:42:40.160 throughout the whole
00:42:41.200 of church history
00:42:41.940 and we still do
00:42:43.020 in the traditional rite
00:42:43.920 were stripped away
00:42:45.380 from the Novus Ordo.
00:42:47.140 Well,
00:42:47.280 should we be surprised
00:42:48.280 at the results
00:42:49.180 that we're seeing?
00:42:51.300 Yeah.
00:42:52.480 If anything,
00:42:54.260 that is one of the
00:42:55.640 most startling changes.
00:42:58.500 The change to
00:43:01.060 not face our Lord,
00:43:03.920 the priest not facing our Lord,
00:43:06.100 in fact,
00:43:06.760 the priest with his back
00:43:08.280 to the tabernacle,
00:43:09.440 if the tabernacle
00:43:10.320 is still front and center
00:43:11.280 or in the church at all,
00:43:12.680 but then the reception
00:43:14.940 of Holy Communion
00:43:15.760 standing on the hand
00:43:18.040 or just taken
00:43:18.820 out of the hand
00:43:20.260 of the priest,
00:43:22.340 it's funny to hear
00:43:24.280 from non-Catholics
00:43:25.600 testify to say,
00:43:28.020 if I really believed
00:43:29.740 that that was Jesus,
00:43:30.780 I would come up
00:43:31.820 crawling on my hands
00:43:33.560 and knees 0.98
00:43:33.900 and my forehead
00:43:34.720 to the ground.
00:43:36.500 So,
00:43:37.160 that really is
00:43:38.560 a startling change
00:43:40.600 and something that,
00:43:43.600 actually,
00:43:45.020 can you tell us
00:43:45.900 something about
00:43:46.440 the change there
00:43:48.080 and why that got made?
00:43:49.420 But also,
00:43:50.460 notice that
00:43:51.240 just this week
00:43:53.040 in the
00:43:54.020 catechists
00:43:56.580 and women lectors 1.00
00:43:57.820 installation
00:43:58.540 in the Vatican,
00:44:00.320 you see every single
00:44:01.660 one of them
00:44:02.180 receiving standing
00:44:03.040 and on the hand.
00:44:04.360 Yes.
00:44:04.920 Yeah,
00:44:05.500 if you could tell us that.
00:44:06.180 Well, look,
00:44:06.580 I mean,
00:44:06.820 this pontificate,
00:44:07.840 Pope Francis
00:44:08.360 is the Pope of rupture,
00:44:09.640 right?
00:44:10.460 I mean,
00:44:10.720 he wants to drive
00:44:12.040 the wedge
00:44:12.720 as deeply as possible
00:44:14.460 between pre-conciliar
00:44:15.620 and post-conciliar.
00:44:17.060 I mean,
00:44:17.320 he's the anti-Benedict.
00:44:18.720 He does everything
00:44:19.520 that Benedict wanted.
00:44:20.860 Francis wants to do
00:44:21.560 the opposite.
00:44:23.080 I mean,
00:44:23.360 once you see that,
00:44:24.200 it's actually really easy
00:44:25.060 to understand
00:44:25.600 everything he says
00:44:26.360 and everything he does.
00:44:27.760 So,
00:44:28.380 what did Benedict XVI do?
00:44:29.640 He insisted
00:44:30.360 at the Vatican
00:44:32.000 that at papal masses
00:44:34.020 that people should kneel
00:44:35.300 to receive communion
00:44:36.540 on the tongue.
00:44:37.680 He didn't,
00:44:38.080 he was,
00:44:39.780 this perhaps is a weakness.
00:44:41.220 I think in many ways
00:44:42.160 it is a weakness.
00:44:42.760 He didn't want to impose rules
00:44:44.540 on the whole church
00:44:45.380 and say,
00:44:46.140 okay,
00:44:46.360 everybody,
00:44:47.040 people now should kneel
00:44:48.500 and receive on the tongue.
00:44:49.460 But he wanted to lead
00:44:50.160 by example.
00:44:51.260 Here's what the Pope does
00:44:52.660 at his own liturgy
00:44:53.720 and therefore it's a model,
00:44:55.340 like a shining model
00:44:56.220 that you should imitate.
00:44:57.560 Well,
00:44:58.520 you know,
00:44:59.240 the regime at the Vatican
00:45:00.600 now disagrees
00:45:01.340 with that model
00:45:02.100 and they want to have it,
00:45:02.960 they want to go back
00:45:03.520 to the 60s
00:45:04.260 or the 70s.
00:45:05.140 You know,
00:45:05.240 that's their slogan,
00:45:05.980 back to the 70s,
00:45:06.840 it seems to me.
00:45:08.920 So,
00:45:09.440 I mean,
00:45:09.800 getting to your question
00:45:10.560 about how all this happened,
00:45:12.580 this is what we have
00:45:13.640 to understand,
00:45:14.540 that in the period
00:45:16.380 right before
00:45:17.360 and during
00:45:18.100 and right after
00:45:18.860 the Second Vatican Council,
00:45:20.020 the theologians
00:45:24.940 in Europe,
00:45:25.740 the European theologians,
00:45:26.940 especially from Central
00:45:27.700 and Northern Europe,
00:45:29.040 had very progressive ideas,
00:45:31.760 some of which
00:45:32.640 they got
00:45:34.120 from twisting passages
00:45:35.920 from church fathers,
00:45:37.340 some of it was modernism,
00:45:39.120 you know,
00:45:39.700 revived,
00:45:40.380 warmed over,
00:45:41.400 but wherever they got
00:45:42.460 their ideas from,
00:45:44.040 they wanted to
00:45:45.020 de-emphasize
00:45:46.360 what the church
00:45:47.080 had been doing
00:45:47.800 for a thousand years
00:45:49.260 or more
00:45:49.680 and create
00:45:51.260 new points
00:45:52.200 of emphasis.
00:45:52.860 So one of their
00:45:53.360 new points
00:45:54.000 of emphasis
00:45:54.360 was to say
00:45:55.060 that the body
00:45:56.920 of Christ
00:45:57.620 is primarily
00:45:58.880 the people
00:45:59.740 who are gathered together.
00:46:00.980 We are the body
00:46:01.780 of Christ,
00:46:02.380 as St. Paul says.
00:46:03.920 And so,
00:46:04.440 we don't want to put
00:46:05.140 too much emphasis
00:46:06.120 on the Eucharist
00:46:06.820 as the body of Christ
00:46:07.500 because it'll make people
00:46:08.300 neglect the fact
00:46:09.980 that they are members
00:46:10.680 of the body of Christ.
00:46:11.960 Well,
00:46:13.020 that's a half truth.
00:46:14.740 I mean,
00:46:14.920 it is true,
00:46:15.420 we are members
00:46:15.860 of the body of Christ,
00:46:16.640 but we are made
00:46:17.780 to be members
00:46:18.300 of the body of Christ
00:46:18.840 by Christ himself.
00:46:20.020 And it's because
00:46:20.440 he's really present
00:46:21.060 in the Eucharist
00:46:21.500 that we get to be
00:46:22.140 his members,
00:46:22.740 right?
00:46:23.420 There's a priority here.
00:46:25.060 And even Paul VI
00:46:25.840 said that very clearly
00:46:26.940 in his encyclical
00:46:27.620 Mysterium Fidei,
00:46:28.500 who said that Christ
00:46:29.980 is present in many ways,
00:46:31.300 but he is present
00:46:32.180 in a singularly real
00:46:33.720 and profound way
00:46:35.560 in the Eucharist.
00:46:36.500 That has primacy,
00:46:38.420 right?
00:46:38.560 That's the traditional
00:46:39.320 Catholic way
00:46:39.940 of looking at it.
00:46:41.160 So modern theologians,
00:46:42.920 it's not that they have
00:46:43.940 simply erroneous ideas,
00:46:45.680 although sometimes they do,
00:46:47.240 but they want to take
00:46:48.920 a truth,
00:46:49.800 a partial truth,
00:46:51.560 and magnify it
00:46:52.700 to such an extent
00:46:53.540 that it elbows out
00:46:54.800 all kinds of other truths.
00:46:57.160 And so on the basis
00:46:57.860 of this idea
00:46:58.460 that we are
00:46:58.920 the body of Christ,
00:47:00.120 then they wanted
00:47:00.760 to sort of
00:47:01.680 de-emphasize
00:47:02.700 some of what
00:47:03.760 they considered
00:47:04.280 excessive signs
00:47:05.420 of reverence
00:47:06.140 and humility
00:47:06.820 and submission
00:47:07.600 towards the Eucharist,
00:47:09.140 right?
00:47:09.560 Because that's not really
00:47:10.560 in accord with
00:47:11.300 our Christian dignity.
00:47:12.320 That's what they argued.
00:47:13.040 It's absurd.
00:47:13.780 It's an absurd argument,
00:47:14.840 but that's what they
00:47:15.440 were saying
00:47:15.820 in the 60s.
00:47:17.920 So even though
00:47:18.680 Paul VI
00:47:19.200 asked the bishops
00:47:19.980 of the world,
00:47:20.560 as you know,
00:47:21.680 should we keep
00:47:22.320 the custom
00:47:22.820 of receiving
00:47:23.440 on the tongue?
00:47:24.120 And nearly all
00:47:24.980 of them said yes.
00:47:26.680 Nevertheless,
00:47:27.220 he caved
00:47:27.760 into the pressure
00:47:28.500 and allowed
00:47:29.160 a loophole.
00:47:30.340 If Episcopal conferences
00:47:31.360 wanted to ask
00:47:32.160 for permission
00:47:32.800 for communion
00:47:33.720 in the hand
00:47:34.280 or for a rescript
00:47:35.860 for the Vatican
00:47:36.460 basically to give
00:47:37.380 an exception
00:47:37.920 to the norm,
00:47:39.260 which is to receive
00:47:39.960 on the tongue,
00:47:40.620 then the conferences
00:47:42.020 could do so.
00:47:42.700 And of course,
00:47:43.120 one conference
00:47:43.780 after another
00:47:44.480 asked for that
00:47:45.620 because they were
00:47:46.720 all driven
00:47:47.100 by people
00:47:47.540 like Rembert
00:47:48.140 Weakland.
00:47:49.920 And that's how
00:47:51.640 we ended up
00:47:52.140 with the situation
00:47:52.920 that we have
00:47:54.460 today.
00:47:55.640 Whereas when you
00:47:56.220 go to a Latin Mass,
00:47:57.220 people still preserve
00:47:58.660 these beautiful
00:48:00.160 age-old customs,
00:48:02.100 kneeling before
00:48:02.900 our Lord and Savior
00:48:03.880 and receiving
00:48:04.620 him on the tongue
00:48:05.340 from the anointed
00:48:07.740 hand of the priest
00:48:08.740 as is right
00:48:09.820 and fitting.
00:48:11.520 Yeah,
00:48:11.720 it's a beautiful
00:48:13.580 act that
00:48:14.760 even that alone,
00:48:17.140 even for those
00:48:17.980 folks who really
00:48:18.900 understand no Latin,
00:48:20.340 they know they go
00:48:21.020 to a Latin Mass,
00:48:22.360 a traditional Mass,
00:48:23.460 and they know
00:48:24.320 they're at the
00:48:24.760 crucifixion.
00:48:25.980 At the crucifixion,
00:48:26.740 you wouldn't also
00:48:27.760 understand what
00:48:28.660 went on,
00:48:28.980 but you'd know
00:48:29.440 our Lord is there
00:48:30.160 and he's being
00:48:30.580 crucified for me.
00:48:32.020 When they go up
00:48:32.960 and receive our Lord,
00:48:34.380 it's just stunning
00:48:37.480 because you have
00:48:39.260 a real presentation
00:48:40.900 of you're receiving
00:48:43.100 God and worthy
00:48:44.260 as you are.
00:48:46.900 It is,
00:48:47.660 it's the most
00:48:48.220 touching thing
00:48:48.700 and to watch
00:48:49.420 people receiving
00:48:51.420 so worthily,
00:48:53.360 it's,
00:48:53.660 it's funny,
00:48:54.940 it does a lot of
00:48:55.660 things on a
00:48:56.080 psychological level
00:48:56.840 that assist in
00:48:58.400 the belief
00:48:59.380 in the true
00:49:00.180 presence.
00:49:01.360 No,
00:49:01.560 I agree.
00:49:02.200 It's one of the
00:49:03.080 most beautiful
00:49:03.660 aspects of
00:49:04.780 the traditional
00:49:05.260 Mass,
00:49:05.760 and it's not,
00:49:06.840 and of course,
00:49:07.380 I just want to say
00:49:07.960 this for fairness
00:49:08.600 because people
00:49:09.300 are always looking
00:49:10.000 for ways to attack
00:49:11.000 us,
00:49:12.040 you know,
00:49:12.240 oh,
00:49:12.460 there's a loop,
00:49:13.060 there's a,
00:49:13.520 there's a,
00:49:13.860 there's a gap
00:49:14.360 in your argument.
00:49:15.340 So,
00:49:15.740 yes,
00:49:16.020 it is possible
00:49:16.900 to,
00:49:17.740 for everyone
00:49:18.140 to receive
00:49:18.660 kneeling at a
00:49:19.440 communion rail
00:49:19.960 and on the tongue
00:49:20.580 at the Novus Ordo
00:49:21.360 Mass.
00:49:22.140 That is not
00:49:23.000 forbidden,
00:49:23.620 it's never been
00:49:24.280 forbidden,
00:49:25.220 nobody ever said
00:49:26.020 you had to tear
00:49:26.540 out the communion
00:49:27.020 rails,
00:49:27.880 or that you,
00:49:28.540 but it's harder
00:49:30.040 to do that
00:49:30.540 at the Novus Ordo
00:49:31.140 because there is
00:49:31.920 this contrary
00:49:33.660 of,
00:49:34.440 there's a kind
00:49:34.880 of peer pressure
00:49:35.680 that comes from
00:49:36.780 most people
00:49:37.440 doing things
00:49:37.940 differently,
00:49:38.520 and especially
00:49:38.960 from the USCCB
00:49:40.080 saying the normal
00:49:41.260 way to receive
00:49:42.020 is standing,
00:49:43.280 but they don't
00:49:44.120 say in your hand,
00:49:45.140 but standing
00:49:45.820 is the norm
00:49:46.520 in the United States.
00:49:49.240 And so already
00:49:49.880 for a priest
00:49:50.500 to recommend
00:49:51.120 that people kneel
00:49:52.040 and for people
00:49:52.620 to kneel
00:49:53.000 is a kind
00:49:53.660 of awkward
00:49:54.060 situation
00:49:54.580 because now
00:49:54.940 you're going
00:49:55.320 against what
00:49:55.900 the USCCB
00:49:56.740 has said.
00:49:57.800 So it's difficult
00:49:58.860 to get the right
00:49:59.880 things to happen
00:50:00.780 in the Novus Ordo.
00:50:01.860 That's one of the,
00:50:02.580 one of the great
00:50:03.460 problems with the
00:50:04.200 so-called reform
00:50:04.960 of the reform.
00:50:06.260 You know,
00:50:06.500 lots of good ideas,
00:50:08.420 but,
00:50:09.160 but extreme
00:50:10.480 difficulties
00:50:11.160 in implementing
00:50:12.240 them.
00:50:13.580 Now,
00:50:14.320 one of the things
00:50:15.560 with this
00:50:16.320 upcoming,
00:50:17.480 or perhaps
00:50:18.480 upcoming,
00:50:20.020 apostolic
00:50:21.680 constitution,
00:50:23.100 they seem
00:50:24.460 to be taking
00:50:25.020 sort of steps
00:50:26.120 towards
00:50:27.500 really outlawing
00:50:29.400 the traditional
00:50:31.000 mass.
00:50:33.140 Can that be
00:50:33.960 done?
00:50:35.120 And
00:50:35.500 if it is
00:50:37.500 said,
00:50:38.140 what does
00:50:39.060 that mean?
00:50:39.560 And what
00:50:39.840 should
00:50:40.120 traditional
00:50:41.140 priests do
00:50:41.740 and the
00:50:42.420 faithful do?
00:50:43.460 Yes.
00:50:44.320 Yes.
00:50:44.680 So my simple
00:50:45.480 answer to that
00:50:45.880 is absolutely
00:50:46.720 not.
00:50:47.800 It is not
00:50:48.380 possible
00:50:48.920 for a pope
00:50:50.220 to outlaw
00:50:52.140 a traditional
00:50:53.120 liturgical
00:50:53.560 right of the
00:50:54.200 church,
00:50:54.620 one that was
00:50:55.340 received and
00:50:56.240 approved by the
00:50:57.140 church of every
00:50:57.780 age prior to
00:50:58.880 him.
00:50:59.380 That's not
00:50:59.780 possible.
00:51:00.780 Why?
00:51:01.500 Because that is
00:51:02.400 like blowing up
00:51:03.340 the bridge that
00:51:04.580 connects us to
00:51:05.300 our entire
00:51:05.880 heritage and
00:51:06.640 tradition.
00:51:07.340 That is not a
00:51:08.060 Catholic mentality.
00:51:08.880 That cannot be a
00:51:09.520 Catholic mentality.
00:51:10.380 And moreover,
00:51:11.820 and this is
00:51:12.280 perhaps the
00:51:12.800 most powerful
00:51:15.360 argument,
00:51:16.640 authority exists
00:51:18.000 for the sake of
00:51:18.680 the common
00:51:19.060 good.
00:51:19.740 That is the only
00:51:20.400 justification for
00:51:21.380 the existence of
00:51:22.040 an authority.
00:51:22.780 When you have a
00:51:23.260 community of
00:51:23.640 people, they
00:51:24.260 have a certain
00:51:24.640 good or they
00:51:25.100 enjoy certain
00:51:25.680 goods together
00:51:26.200 and the
00:51:26.500 authority is
00:51:26.900 placed over
00:51:27.300 them to
00:51:27.540 ensure that
00:51:28.400 they have
00:51:28.640 access to
00:51:29.120 those goods
00:51:29.600 and that
00:51:30.560 they're
00:51:30.700 protected from
00:51:31.260 those who
00:51:31.500 are trying
00:51:31.740 to undermine
00:51:32.460 those goods.
00:51:33.780 Well, the
00:51:34.820 spiritual good
00:51:35.360 of the
00:51:35.560 faithful is
00:51:36.060 very much
00:51:36.480 wrapped up
00:51:37.020 in the
00:51:37.940 liturgical
00:51:38.280 rites, the
00:51:39.700 frequenting of
00:51:40.660 the sacraments,
00:51:41.700 and adherence
00:51:42.420 to tradition.
00:51:43.240 These things
00:51:43.640 are part of
00:51:44.360 the church's
00:51:44.920 common good.
00:51:46.020 And it's a
00:51:46.500 fact that there
00:51:47.440 are many
00:51:47.760 Catholics today 0.99
00:51:48.580 who are
00:51:49.500 nourished in
00:51:50.660 a particularly
00:51:51.340 deep way by
00:51:52.460 the traditional
00:51:53.100 rites
00:51:53.500 themselves.
00:51:54.360 In other
00:51:54.660 words, it's
00:51:55.280 not indifferent
00:51:56.020 whether you
00:51:56.820 go to this
00:51:57.360 rite or that
00:51:57.940 rite or the
00:51:58.380 other rite.
00:51:59.180 Otherwise, we
00:51:59.660 could just
00:51:59.980 send everybody
00:52:00.600 to the
00:52:00.900 Byzantine
00:52:01.260 rite or
00:52:01.640 tell all the
00:52:02.100 Byzantine
00:52:02.420 Catholics that
00:52:03.000 they should
00:52:03.260 go to the
00:52:03.540 Roman rite.
00:52:04.220 No, the
00:52:05.920 church recognizes
00:52:06.660 that people
00:52:07.120 are fed in
00:52:08.780 different ways.
00:52:10.020 And so there
00:52:11.180 are converts,
00:52:12.380 there are
00:52:12.680 reverts, there
00:52:13.800 are large
00:52:14.260 families, all
00:52:15.240 of whom are
00:52:15.900 deeply attached
00:52:16.720 to the
00:52:16.960 traditional
00:52:17.240 rites that
00:52:18.040 feed them in
00:52:18.660 a way that
00:52:19.060 the Novus
00:52:19.420 Order does
00:52:19.800 not do.
00:52:20.680 Therefore, to
00:52:21.060 attack those
00:52:21.780 traditional
00:52:22.080 rites is
00:52:22.460 directly to
00:52:23.280 attack the
00:52:23.740 common good of
00:52:24.260 the church.
00:52:25.120 And no
00:52:25.640 authority can do
00:52:26.360 that.
00:52:27.160 So we
00:52:28.360 have to be
00:52:28.640 very clear
00:52:29.100 about these
00:52:29.480 principles.
00:52:30.380 As for
00:52:30.880 priests, priests
00:52:31.940 are in a very
00:52:32.420 difficult situation
00:52:33.280 because they
00:52:34.220 owe a certain
00:52:34.920 obedience to
00:52:35.460 their bishops,
00:52:35.920 they made a
00:52:36.280 promise to
00:52:37.060 that effect,
00:52:37.980 but it's not
00:52:38.880 the vow of
00:52:40.060 obedience that's
00:52:40.700 made by a
00:52:41.220 religious.
00:52:42.300 When a
00:52:42.700 religious makes 0.96
00:52:43.160 a vow of
00:52:43.480 obedience, he 0.94
00:52:43.960 says to his
00:52:44.660 superior, you
00:52:45.880 tell me to do
00:52:46.560 anything and as
00:52:47.240 long as it's not
00:52:47.840 sinful, I will
00:52:48.660 do it.
00:52:49.280 Or you tell me
00:52:49.960 not to do
00:52:50.380 something and as
00:52:50.900 long as it's
00:52:51.200 not sinful, I
00:52:51.840 will not do
00:52:52.380 it.
00:52:52.580 But the
00:52:54.660 priest isn't in
00:52:55.560 the same
00:52:56.020 situation.
00:52:56.960 If a bishop
00:52:57.340 says to the
00:52:57.860 priest, I want
00:52:58.480 you to go to
00:52:58.920 Rome and study
00:52:59.500 canon law, the
00:53:00.480 priest can
00:53:00.780 actually say, no
00:53:01.500 thanks, I don't
00:53:02.000 want to do
00:53:02.320 that.
00:53:02.740 He's not under
00:53:03.400 a vow of
00:53:03.860 obedience in
00:53:04.380 the same way.
00:53:05.200 He's a
00:53:05.540 collaborator with
00:53:06.680 the bishop.
00:53:07.600 So the priest
00:53:08.240 has rights and
00:53:09.200 he has duties.
00:53:10.580 And he's not
00:53:11.180 just a sort of
00:53:11.780 pawn that the
00:53:12.860 bishop can move
00:53:13.460 around however
00:53:14.000 he wants to.
00:53:16.240 And so sometimes
00:53:17.260 people conflate
00:53:18.360 religious obedience
00:53:19.420 with priestly
00:53:20.140 obedience, and
00:53:20.680 that's a big
00:53:21.100 mistake.
00:53:21.380 They say, look
00:53:22.280 at what Padre
00:53:22.840 Pio did.
00:53:23.580 Okay, well,
00:53:23.980 Padre Pio was
00:53:24.560 a Capuchin.
00:53:25.280 He had a
00:53:25.560 religious vow
00:53:26.000 of obedience.
00:53:26.620 It's a
00:53:26.820 different thing.
00:53:28.780 But what
00:53:29.860 should priests
00:53:30.340 do?
00:53:30.600 Well, they
00:53:31.040 need to
00:53:31.520 recognize that
00:53:32.200 if they give
00:53:32.960 in to this
00:53:33.660 tyranny, this
00:53:34.920 tyranny against
00:53:35.940 the common
00:53:36.340 good, against
00:53:36.960 the rights of
00:53:37.460 the faithful,
00:53:38.100 even against
00:53:38.640 the good of
00:53:39.220 their own
00:53:39.500 priesthood, they
00:53:41.160 will be
00:53:41.660 actually supporting
00:53:42.880 an evil in
00:53:44.140 the church.
00:53:44.640 They will be
00:53:45.020 part of the
00:53:46.120 abusive system
00:53:47.060 and not part
00:53:47.700 of the solution
00:53:48.240 to it.
00:53:49.260 And so I
00:53:49.720 think it's, I
00:53:50.200 mean, I'm
00:53:50.680 very, very
00:53:51.240 strong about
00:53:52.200 this point when
00:53:52.940 I speak to
00:53:53.780 priests, either
00:53:54.260 personally or
00:53:54.900 through correspondence.
00:53:56.400 Don't be
00:53:57.120 another wolf
00:53:58.040 among the
00:53:58.660 shepherds.
00:53:59.880 You need to
00:54:00.440 be a shepherd.
00:54:01.180 You need to
00:54:01.540 keep shepherding
00:54:02.260 your people,
00:54:02.840 even if that
00:54:03.360 means going
00:54:03.880 underground,
00:54:04.920 it means, you
00:54:05.780 know, having
00:54:06.340 mass in a
00:54:06.900 barn the way
00:54:07.700 that the
00:54:07.980 priest had to
00:54:08.460 do after the
00:54:09.020 French Revolution.
00:54:10.180 Whatever it
00:54:10.700 takes, keep
00:54:11.660 the tradition
00:54:12.200 going, right?
00:54:13.320 There is no
00:54:13.920 one on earth
00:54:14.460 who can stop
00:54:15.000 you from doing
00:54:15.460 that.
00:54:15.780 And I
00:54:17.140 talk about
00:54:17.500 this a little
00:54:17.840 bit more, by
00:54:18.260 the way, in
00:54:18.600 my book, my
00:54:19.420 booklet, True
00:54:19.940 Obedience.
00:54:20.600 I give lots
00:54:21.480 more arguments
00:54:22.540 and references
00:54:23.200 there.
00:54:25.040 So I have
00:54:26.040 one sort of
00:54:26.680 insider baseball
00:54:27.720 question, and
00:54:28.440 it's very
00:54:29.000 strange to me,
00:54:29.620 it always has
00:54:30.020 been.
00:54:31.520 There was a
00:54:32.400 bull called
00:54:32.860 Quote Primum
00:54:33.560 that was very
00:54:35.200 straightforward about
00:54:37.100 the traditional
00:54:38.180 Latin mass, how
00:54:39.340 it could be
00:54:40.000 said for all
00:54:41.440 eternity, but
00:54:41.940 no one could
00:54:42.760 abrogate it at
00:54:43.740 all.
00:54:44.980 But it was
00:54:46.520 then changed
00:54:47.220 in 1962, and
00:54:48.460 now the whole
00:54:48.960 conversation is
00:54:49.560 about the
00:54:49.900 1962 mass, not
00:54:51.900 the one that
00:54:52.980 was with Quote
00:54:54.440 Primum.
00:54:55.160 Can you unpack
00:54:55.960 that for us?
00:54:56.660 I've always been
00:54:57.500 confused by that.
00:54:58.740 Sure.
00:54:59.340 So I think
00:55:00.160 people make,
00:55:02.280 there are
00:55:02.960 mistakes that
00:55:03.740 are easy to
00:55:04.300 make when
00:55:04.660 you're dealing
00:55:05.040 with legal
00:55:06.000 documents in
00:55:07.760 the church's
00:55:08.660 legal tradition.
00:55:10.020 So there are
00:55:10.640 aspects of
00:55:11.560 Quote Primum
00:55:12.300 which are
00:55:13.560 which are
00:55:14.800 you might
00:55:15.720 say, what's
00:55:17.940 the word I
00:55:18.260 want, there
00:55:18.920 are timeless
00:55:19.500 aspects to
00:55:20.280 it, and
00:55:20.940 there are
00:55:21.260 time-bound or
00:55:22.580 changeable
00:55:23.020 aspects to
00:55:23.660 it.
00:55:24.260 In as much
00:55:24.900 as you're
00:55:25.680 talking about
00:55:26.100 the details
00:55:26.720 of the
00:55:27.040 liturgy, like
00:55:27.760 having a
00:55:29.320 feast, adding
00:55:30.140 a feast for
00:55:30.720 a new saint
00:55:31.400 who is canonized
00:55:32.840 after 1570, or
00:55:34.600 adding a new
00:55:35.180 preface as the
00:55:36.200 Vatican did just
00:55:36.980 a few years
00:55:37.560 ago, they 1.00
00:55:37.940 added to the
00:55:38.820 Missal, you 1.00
00:55:39.840 know, a special
00:55:40.320 preface, for
00:55:41.020 example, for
00:55:41.500 Corpus
00:55:41.800 Christi, or
00:55:42.500 for Mass
00:55:43.220 Honor of the
00:55:43.600 Eucharist.
00:55:45.340 When it comes
00:55:46.140 to small
00:55:46.620 changes like
00:55:47.220 that, obviously
00:55:48.400 Pius V wasn't
00:55:49.400 saying you can
00:55:50.360 never add a
00:55:51.140 new feast or
00:55:51.740 you can never
00:55:52.180 add a new
00:55:52.700 preface.
00:55:54.580 So the
00:55:55.320 subsequent
00:55:55.800 editions of
00:55:56.880 his own
00:55:57.500 Missal that 0.91
00:55:58.480 came out
00:55:59.000 made small
00:55:59.660 changes like
00:56:00.340 that.
00:56:01.120 However, they
00:56:02.320 did not make
00:56:02.920 a revolutionary
00:56:03.620 change.
00:56:04.320 They didn't
00:56:04.740 rupture the
00:56:05.900 Missal of
00:56:06.320 Pius V,
00:56:07.640 rupture from
00:56:09.140 it.
00:56:09.940 And that's
00:56:10.280 important because
00:56:10.800 Pius V didn't
00:56:11.560 create a Missal,
00:56:12.340 as some
00:56:12.680 people say
00:56:13.240 ignorantly, but
00:56:14.400 he simply 0.96
00:56:14.980 codified and
00:56:16.100 as it were
00:56:16.520 canonized the
00:56:17.800 pre-existing
00:56:18.360 Missal of the
00:56:19.480 Church of
00:56:19.840 Rome that
00:56:20.440 went back
00:56:20.880 centuries before
00:56:21.760 that.
00:56:22.140 You can find a
00:56:22.900 Missal almost 0.57
00:56:23.800 identical to
00:56:24.680 Pius V's 0.84
00:56:25.300 Missal in the 0.81
00:56:26.820 time of
00:56:27.140 Innocent III,
00:56:28.400 who was
00:56:28.760 Pope centuries
00:56:29.640 before Pius V.
00:56:31.260 So Pius V was
00:56:32.680 simply codifying
00:56:33.900 the Roman
00:56:34.720 tradition, having
00:56:35.800 purged it of
00:56:36.580 certain errors
00:56:37.800 that had
00:56:38.220 crept in, as
00:56:39.680 they do.
00:56:40.160 I mean, especially
00:56:40.620 when you're
00:56:41.360 copying manuscripts
00:56:42.180 or when you
00:56:43.180 have typography
00:56:44.440 in its early
00:56:45.120 phases, there
00:56:45.820 are going to
00:56:46.260 be mistakes
00:56:46.800 that creep
00:56:47.200 in.
00:56:47.440 So there
00:56:47.920 were some
00:56:48.220 corrections
00:56:48.660 made, but
00:56:49.160 they were
00:56:49.420 very minor
00:56:50.200 compared to
00:56:50.940 what was
00:56:51.560 done under
00:56:52.840 Paul VI.
00:56:53.620 Really
00:56:53.900 insignificant
00:56:55.000 compared to
00:56:55.640 that.
00:56:57.380 So what
00:56:58.140 Quo Primum is
00:56:59.240 really enshrining
00:57:00.200 and recognizing
00:57:00.900 is not Pius V's
00:57:02.080 product, but the
00:57:03.320 tradition of the
00:57:04.040 Church of Rome
00:57:04.680 as a gold
00:57:05.540 standard.
00:57:06.860 And this is
00:57:07.320 where you get
00:57:07.760 to a key
00:57:08.220 point.
00:57:09.380 Inasmuch as
00:57:10.060 the liturgy
00:57:10.480 is a confession
00:57:11.100 of faith,
00:57:11.940 it's the
00:57:12.260 Lex Orandi
00:57:13.140 that corresponds
00:57:14.140 to and
00:57:15.100 expresses the
00:57:15.700 Lex Credendi,
00:57:16.540 so the law
00:57:16.980 of praying
00:57:17.400 that tells
00:57:17.900 us what
00:57:18.580 we believe
00:57:19.200 as Catholics.
00:57:20.840 To that
00:57:21.200 extent, the
00:57:21.940 Missal of
00:57:22.420 Pius V is
00:57:23.160 a dogmatic
00:57:24.880 confession of
00:57:25.520 the Catholic
00:57:25.900 faith against
00:57:26.540 the errors of
00:57:27.160 the Protestants
00:57:27.740 who were
00:57:28.000 condemned at
00:57:29.720 the Council
00:57:30.120 of Trent.
00:57:31.360 And so the
00:57:32.160 Missal of
00:57:32.540 Pius V isn't
00:57:33.300 just a
00:57:34.240 set of
00:57:36.840 ceremonies or
00:57:37.600 rituals that
00:57:38.180 has no
00:57:38.780 dogmatic
00:57:39.660 implications.
00:57:40.540 No, it's a
00:57:41.200 form of the
00:57:41.940 profession of
00:57:42.660 the Catholic
00:57:43.080 faith, especially
00:57:44.040 against the
00:57:44.600 errors of the
00:57:45.120 Protestants.
00:57:46.600 And so to
00:57:47.060 that extent, to
00:57:48.580 cancel out the
00:57:49.620 Missal of
00:57:50.060 Pius V is
00:57:50.980 actually an
00:57:51.640 anti-dogmatic
00:57:52.540 statement.
00:57:53.380 It's a
00:57:53.980 statement against
00:57:54.780 the faith.
00:57:55.880 You can't do
00:57:56.620 that.
00:57:56.820 That's part of
00:57:57.240 the reason
00:57:57.520 why Pius V
00:57:59.120 is right to
00:57:59.740 say this
00:58:00.320 mass can
00:58:01.440 always be
00:58:02.160 used, just
00:58:03.100 like the
00:58:03.420 Catholic faith
00:58:03.940 can always
00:58:04.540 be professed
00:58:05.380 through it.
00:58:07.560 So I guess
00:58:08.900 what I'm
00:58:09.080 saying is
00:58:09.400 in as much
00:58:09.960 as the
00:58:10.680 Tridentine
00:58:11.220 mass
00:58:11.580 encapsulates
00:58:13.220 the tradition
00:58:13.780 of Rome
00:58:14.260 and encapsulates
00:58:15.500 the Catholic
00:58:15.980 faith, to
00:58:17.040 that extent
00:58:17.640 it is not
00:58:18.520 changeable and
00:58:19.540 it is not
00:58:20.620 abrogatable.
00:58:23.380 And this is
00:58:24.140 in fact what
00:58:24.640 Benedict XVI
00:58:25.340 said.
00:58:25.900 I mean, I
00:58:26.180 know this is a
00:58:26.680 famous quote,
00:58:27.300 but I just
00:58:27.620 have to share
00:58:28.200 it with you
00:58:28.620 because he
00:58:29.140 says it so
00:58:29.800 explicitly.
00:58:30.320 He says
00:58:31.720 what earlier
00:58:33.580 generations held
00:58:34.780 as sacred
00:58:35.540 remains sacred
00:58:37.220 and great
00:58:37.680 for us
00:58:38.280 too, and
00:58:39.360 it cannot,
00:58:40.300 cannot be
00:58:41.740 all of a
00:58:42.260 sudden entirely
00:58:43.100 forbidden or
00:58:43.960 even considered
00:58:44.840 harmful.
00:58:46.700 So Benedict's
00:58:47.820 claim is not
00:58:48.700 well, as a
00:58:51.280 disciplinary measure
00:58:52.140 I'm letting
00:58:52.580 people have
00:58:53.040 access to
00:58:53.500 this missile,
00:58:54.000 but we could
00:58:54.360 abolish it if
00:58:54.940 we wanted 0.89
00:58:55.240 to.
00:58:55.960 It's a
00:58:56.380 theological
00:58:56.860 claim that
00:58:57.540 it cannot
00:58:58.160 be abolished.
00:58:59.620 That's what
00:59:02.700 Cool Premium is
00:59:03.400 talking about.
00:59:05.720 Fascinating.
00:59:06.980 Peter, where
00:59:07.760 can people get
00:59:08.440 your book?
00:59:10.060 And then I'd
00:59:11.680 love to hear
00:59:12.020 your closing
00:59:12.400 thoughts.
00:59:13.600 Sure.
00:59:14.240 Yes.
00:59:14.580 Well, here's
00:59:14.920 what the cover
00:59:16.040 looks like.
00:59:17.420 You can see
00:59:18.000 it there.
00:59:19.100 This book
00:59:19.860 was published
00:59:20.580 by Tan
00:59:21.220 Publishers.
00:59:23.100 I'm very proud
00:59:24.560 to have a book
00:59:25.080 with Tan,
00:59:25.760 the good old
00:59:26.560 publisher of
00:59:27.120 Michael Davies
00:59:27.780 back in the
00:59:28.300 day.
00:59:29.620 who's a
00:59:30.460 hero of
00:59:30.860 mine and
00:59:31.420 an inspiration.
00:59:33.100 But anyway,
00:59:33.400 you can get
00:59:33.760 it directly
00:59:34.240 from Tan
00:59:34.880 if you want
00:59:35.980 to avoid
00:59:36.520 Amazon,
00:59:37.400 but you can
00:59:37.700 also get
00:59:38.000 it from
00:59:38.180 Amazon and
00:59:38.660 the other
00:59:38.940 online
00:59:39.440 distributors.
00:59:42.340 And as
00:59:42.740 far as
00:59:43.440 closing
00:59:43.780 thoughts are
00:59:44.340 concerned,
00:59:46.500 I think
00:59:47.180 that the
00:59:47.540 tradition of
00:59:48.120 the church
00:59:48.520 is so
00:59:49.000 powerful,
00:59:49.720 so beautiful,
00:59:50.580 so true,
00:59:51.780 so holy,
00:59:53.580 that it
00:59:54.700 cannot be
00:59:56.100 extinguished.
00:59:57.020 The Vatican
00:59:57.540 can fulminate,
00:59:59.280 they can
00:59:59.620 condemn,
01:00:00.380 they can
01:00:00.580 abolish, 0.80
01:00:01.100 they can
01:00:01.300 do whatever
01:00:01.660 they want,
01:00:02.240 but they
01:00:02.720 can't
01:00:03.240 actually
01:00:03.880 quench
01:00:04.420 a movement
01:00:05.360 that involves
01:00:06.200 millions of
01:00:07.020 faithful Catholics,
01:00:08.240 thousands of
01:00:08.760 priests and
01:00:09.180 religious.
01:00:09.920 They will
01:00:10.400 fail.
01:00:11.260 This unjust
01:00:12.000 attack will
01:00:12.980 fail.
01:00:14.040 And thanks be
01:00:14.660 to God for
01:00:15.120 that.
01:00:16.840 Amen to
01:00:17.480 that.
01:00:18.760 Dr. Peter
01:00:19.520 Kwasniewski,
01:00:20.140 thank you so
01:00:20.620 much for
01:00:20.900 joining us.
01:00:22.080 Thank you,
01:00:22.380 John Henry.
01:00:23.500 God bless you,
01:00:24.620 and God bless
01:00:25.560 all of you,
01:00:26.620 and we'll
01:00:26.900 see you next
01:00:27.240 time.
01:00:30.040 Hi, everyone,
01:00:30.820 this is John
01:00:31.240 Henry Weston.
01:00:31.960 We hope you
01:00:32.380 enjoyed this
01:00:32.860 program.
01:00:33.560 To see more
01:00:34.020 like it,
01:00:34.480 be sure to
01:00:35.000 hit the
01:00:35.260 subscribe button
01:00:35.940 below to get
01:00:36.560 all the latest
01:00:37.320 content from
01:00:38.240 LifeSite News.
01:00:39.120 Check the
01:00:39.580 links in the
01:00:40.020 description to
01:00:40.640 read more and
01:00:41.320 connect with us
01:00:41.940 on social media
01:00:42.680 so that you
01:00:43.340 can stay up to
01:00:44.160 date with all
01:00:44.960 the latest
01:00:45.420 life, family,
01:00:46.360 faith, and
01:00:46.680 freedom news.
01:00:47.500 Thanks for
01:00:47.840 watching, and
01:00:48.580 may God bless
01:00:49.000 you.
01:00:55.560 Peace.
01:00:56.380 Bye.
01:00:56.880 Bye.
01:00:58.860 Bye.
01:01:01.320 Bye.
01:01:01.820 Bye.
01:01:12.100 Bye.
01:01:12.180 Bye.
01:01:12.240 Bye.
01:01:13.360 Bye.