In this second part of our interview with Professor Roberto De Mattei, we discuss the impact of the Second Vatican Council on the Catholic Church, and the impact it had on the world at large. We also discuss Pope John XXIII's Apostolic Exhortation Apostolic Dei, and his role as a papal adviser to the Italian government.
00:02:18.900So, in your book, you outline sort of the difficulties that we are experiencing today in the Church,
00:02:26.640but having arisen or being evident even at the time of the Second Vatican Council.
00:02:32.080Yes, I think that it is important to understand that the roots of the current crisis are in the 60s and above all during the Second Vatican Council.
00:02:53.920My judgment on this Council is, above all, the judgment of an historian, rather than a theological judgment.
00:03:06.840And from an historical point of view, I think that this Council was a really revolutionary turning point in the history of the Church.
00:03:20.860And so, it is very important today to study this Council and to understand how deep were the consequences of this event in the history of the Church.
00:03:46.380Now, you mentioned, too, about the different allocutions that the Popes gave to start and end the Council.
00:03:55.320What were those, and what were the significance they have in terms of the outcome, or the outcome of the Council in the way it came out,
00:04:04.220not only in its theological writings, but also how it was perceived?
00:04:06.960Vatican II. Vatican II. Vatican II. Vatican II. Vatican II. Vatican II. Vatican II. Vatican II promulgated 16th among constitutions and declarations.
00:04:16.900These are doctrinal documents of a different level and degree, but I think that from an historical point of view, more important than this document,
00:04:30.460it is perhaps the opening of the opening allocution of Gaudet Mater Ecclesia is the name of this allocution.
00:04:39.460John XXIII, the 11th of October 1962, opened the Vatican II with this allocution, and it is very important that this document
00:04:59.460because it is not a doctrinal, but a psychological turning point, because of all the atmosphere of this document,
00:05:14.460it is an optimistic atmosphere. We have to remember that this year was the year of Kennedy, of Khrushchev,
00:05:25.460it seemed that a new era for the world opened, and Pope John XXIII believed in this happy future for the Church,
00:05:41.460and he criticized what he called the prophets of gloom, the considered fathers who were skeptical about this optimism.
00:05:59.460But history, 50 years ago, now, today, gives a reason to these prophets who were criticized by John XXIII,
00:06:14.460because, unfortunately, what happened was a period of really unhappy for the Church and for all the humanity.
00:06:33.460We live now in a terrible religious, moral, political, and social crisis, and I think that men like Cardinal Ottaviani,
00:06:51.460or the same Monsignor Lefebvre, Monsignor Casomayre, other fathers who criticized the deprogressism in the epoch of Cardinal II,
00:07:04.460who were best prophets than Cardinal Sünens, Frings, Alfrings, who announced a new era of happiness for the Church.
00:07:20.460I would think, because it was around 1960, the Holy Father might also have been referring to the children of Fatima.
00:07:30.460The message wasn't supposed to be revealed in 1960.
00:07:34.460Yes. John XXIII and Paul XXVI, they opened, they read the message of Fatima, but for them it was a too pessimistic message,
00:07:52.460and they decided not to reveal. We know that Our Lady called for the diffusion of this message,
00:08:01.460because the right moment was exactly this moment, the 60s. Unfortunately, what happened was that on this message, there was a very heavy silence of the Church,
00:08:20.460and in 1967, Paul VI went to Fatima. He met Sir Lucia. It was a really excellent opportunity for disvealing the
00:08:38.460secret of the First Secret of Fatima for the consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, but nothing happened. This was really a failure.
00:09:00.460Now, how does this all then play into the crisis that we're experiencing now, particularly the crisis around Pope Francis himself?
00:09:12.460I think that Pope Francis is a concrete realization. His pontificate, the pontificate of Pope Francis, is an application of the spirit of the Vatican II.
00:09:34.460Because the idea of the Vatican II was more important than a doctrinal revolution,
00:09:44.460a revolution realized in the practice, a concrete revolution. It was the Marxist idea that the philosophers
00:09:58.460first have the duty not to know the world, but to change it, to transform it. So, who transformed the reality is the revolutionary.
00:10:12.460And from this point of view, the true revolutionary is not Marx, but Lenin, because Lenin made the French revolution.
00:10:22.460If we wanted to apply this to the history of the Church, we can say that in the history of the Church, the true revolutionary is not the theologian,
00:10:38.460the theologian, but he is the pastoral man who, in the daily practice, changes the reality. And from this point of view,
00:10:54.460Pope Francis is the true revolutionary in the Church, not for his idea, but because he is transforming concretely, daily,
00:11:07.460the spirit, the mentality. So, it is a psychological revolution more important than a theological revolution. It is the new paradigm of Pope Francis.
00:11:24.460What would be, in your mind, some of the primary examples of that kind of change in paradigm, that kind of change in psychology that Pope Francis is manifesting in the Church?
00:11:36.460Yes. I can give not one of the first examples, but one of the last examples. For the fact, when Pope Francis kisses the feet of some political leaders of Sudan,
00:12:05.460this is a gesture, this is a gesture, more important than the Abu Dhabi declaration, which is a very bad declaration, but perhaps few people understand what the Abu Dhabi declaration means.
00:12:25.460Many people understand what this act, the fact of Pope Francis kissing the feet of a political leader means, and it means the submission of the Church to the political power. It is exactly the contrary of the tradition, of the
00:12:55.440the Church. The Church to the Church to the Kingdom of Christ, the reign of Christ, the primacy of the Church over the politics. And from this point of view, let me quote, as an Italian, a recent episode.
00:13:23.440A recent episode. Some days ago, a political leader, the Italian, Salvini, has been criticized from Carolina Parolin and from other Catholic media in Italy, because in his political campaign, he kissed publicly the rosary.
00:13:50.440And this has been considered as an instrumental gesture. He has been criticized for kissing the rosary. So it is really very strange that you can kiss the feet of political people, but a politician cannot kiss the rosary.
00:14:16.440It is a paradox of the rosary. It is really a paradox of the current situation.
00:14:23.440Well, we've seen this before with Pope Francis doing these gestures. We don't have the changing of the Church's teaching on abortion, let's say, but he meets with and praises Emma Bonino, the chief abortionist in Italy.
00:14:40.740You don't have a change supposedly in reverence for the Mass, yet we watch him on television putting a beach ball beside the Blessed Sacrament on the altar.
00:14:52.540So there are these strange gestures which really do shift the psychology in the Church.
00:14:59.540Yes, yes, I agree completely. And I can add this. In these days in Rome, there was an extraordinary week for life with, for example, the March for Life, an international March for Life with thousands of participants of everywhere.
00:15:21.540And the silence of Pope Francis of the Church. But there is something worse than this. In these days, there was the sentence of death for Vincent Lambert.
00:15:42.540And we waited for Vincent Lambert and we waited for a public, strong appeal of Pope Francis and of all the universal Church for asking the right of Vincent Lambert to live.
00:16:04.540But what we are seeing is that the decision for life or death of Vincent Lambert has been given to the United Nations.
00:16:19.540So the United Nations today is the more important moral authority. It is the new Church.
00:16:27.540The United Nations has the right of death of life on the innocent human being. And the Catholic Church is silent. I find it scandalous.