Exposing the liberal activist quietly driving US environmental policy
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
153.01219
Summary
Bill McKibben is one of the most influential environmental activists in the world. He is a writer, a thinker, a philosopher, and an environmentalist. And yet, he has no qualifications to be a climate scientist or a scientist at all. In this episode of the John Henry Wesson Show, I discuss his views on climate change, and why he should be taken seriously.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hello, and welcome to this episode of the John Henry Wesson Show, where we will be airing
00:00:07.680
And this time, he's talking about the leftist climate guru who's really behind much of the
00:00:18.560
And I know who you're thinking, but it's not Bill Gates.
00:00:43.320
I don't know if this is your area of expertise, but with the proposal for the Paris climate
00:00:49.740
change that this is signed, Biden signed back into, and his climate policies, what do you
00:00:56.860
think is going to happen with that over the next four years?
00:00:58.940
This is something I do have a fair amount of knowledge about.
00:01:01.920
So this is a, what's going to happen is that the United States is most likely going to follow
00:01:08.980
along by, you know, playing along in the Paris climate accord game.
00:01:17.160
In my view, it's a game, again, because there's a lot of contradictions if you look into this.
00:01:23.800
If, for example, if everything was so desperate, particularly they're saying that the
00:01:28.800
world's going to end by 2030 or some time of that nature, yet the number one emitter of
00:01:36.280
CO2 here, China, doesn't have any obligation to do anything after 2030.
00:01:45.540
It's just completely nonsensical that people can say, this is what we need to do, but yes,
00:01:52.440
we're going to let off the people who are causing the most problems.
00:01:59.260
In my view, this is all really about bringing America down.
00:02:04.580
In my view, the person who's behind all this, that's the most important person that you ought
00:02:11.060
Bill McKibben is generally considered to be the leader of the worldwide environmental movement.
00:02:18.800
So when Bernie Sanders, when Hillary Clinton, when Joe Biden sit down to make up policies about
00:02:26.980
such things, the person who's sitting there at the table with them is Bill McKibben.
00:02:32.300
When the Sierra Club, when the Greenpeace, all these other organizations on the left decide
00:02:38.760
what their messaging and policy is going to be, they call up Bill McKibben.
00:02:45.640
And that's, to me, one of the surprising things is how few people are even aware of that position
00:02:54.040
The second part is that once you understand that this is the guy that's one of, if not
00:02:59.700
the most influential in the world, you ought to be known what his thinking is.
00:03:05.420
Now, the good thing is he's given a lot of talks.
00:03:13.420
But if you read some of his books here, you find some very interesting perspectives.
00:03:27.500
He graduated from Harvard, so I'd say he's a smart guy, but his degree, but I'm going
00:03:37.760
He was, I don't know, editor of the Harvard Crimson or whatever, but his degree is in journalism.
00:03:43.620
So my first point is that he has zero, none, nada credentials in science.
00:03:56.160
And yet he is the person telling everybody what to do about this scientific matter, quote
00:04:05.020
How does a journalist dictate world policy on a technical matter?
00:04:11.240
Well, that's the type of absurdity we're living in.
00:04:13.320
Well, what his answer is, his answer is, well, I have consulted with multiple experts.
00:04:21.840
But how did you choose those experts to consult with?
00:04:26.120
Well, the fact is, the only people he's really consulted with are people that have alarmist
00:04:33.620
Well, in my opinion, this is an opinion, one of the most influential or indicative, I should
00:04:40.960
say, things that he said in one of his writings was, he asked a question, are American citizens
00:04:50.820
But my response would be, number one, happiness is not something we can quantify.
00:04:58.240
So I don't know how you can say, this person's happier than another person.
00:05:04.840
But second of all, we have no data to say what the degree of happiness was in 1900.
00:05:11.900
How can we go back and say, here's the level of happiness those people in 1900?
00:05:18.240
And yet he makes a conclusion, he goes on to answer his own question, and he says, well,
00:05:29.200
So that's his premise of a lot of his arguments here.
00:05:33.300
Well, from that, he then says, okay, well, why were they happier then than they are today?
00:05:45.460
Even if you assume he's right, I don't think he's right.
00:05:48.260
But even if you assume he's right, he then goes on to say that the reason that we're less
00:05:55.700
happy today, he doesn't use the word materialism, but probably to most people, that's what he
00:06:10.820
That isn't the exact word he used, but I'm just saying, that would be the layperson's
00:06:14.540
translation, that this materialism we have, all these things we have don't cause us happiness,
00:06:25.860
Now, from a Christian perspective, there's probably some truth to that, right?
00:06:30.460
Which materialism doesn't correspond with being a better person, holier person, happier person.
00:06:37.820
No, like materialism is an illusion in a lot of ways.
00:06:41.980
But that isn't really his, he's not talking about it from a religious point of view.
00:06:46.680
His perspective is to say, well, okay, what's behind all these materialistic things?
00:06:55.380
In other words, you wouldn't have a nice car or two cars, or you wouldn't have a nice
00:07:01.580
house, or you wouldn't have all these types of things here that we have.
00:07:05.320
95 plus percent of everything we have that's considered a modern benefit, whatever, is based
00:07:16.460
It's like pulling it out of a hat, you know, because thinking about that, there's so many
00:07:27.980
Now we have, you know, one or maybe two children.
00:07:36.360
Well, he's talking about materialistic things here is the difference.
00:07:39.660
He's blaming materialism to, for, the word he uses is modernity.
00:07:48.020
So he says the fault of why we're less happy today is due to modernity.
00:07:53.540
Now, the problem is most people will say, well, what the hell is modernity?
00:08:01.820
Having more stuff, more things is not making you happier.
00:08:08.540
But then to say most of these things we've gotten here, whether it's phones or other kind
00:08:17.700
So he's saying if we hadn't had these fossil fuels here, we wouldn't be swamped in all
00:08:24.000
of this materialistic modernity stuff here that's really making us less happy.
00:08:28.060
I was actually surprised to hear you say it was McKibben, because when you were leading
00:08:32.160
up to that, I thought you might be talking about Bill Gates, who is quite the guru as
00:08:38.120
Also on climate change, he wrote a climate change book saying, you know, we have to come
00:08:48.900
Bill Gates isn't some genius like he's made out to be.
00:08:51.900
He was effectively in the right place at the right time.
00:08:54.180
He did some good things here, but most of it sort of fell into his lap.
00:09:00.740
But of the two, I would say, in my opinion, that Bill McKibben actually has probably more
00:09:07.100
influence over our climate change environmental policies than Bill Gates does, because he's
00:09:13.560
Bill Gates isn't perceived as the person who's in head of the environmental movement.
00:09:17.120
He's sort of a techie guy that's, you know, I don't know.
00:09:28.120
But similarly, no background in it scientifically anyway.
00:09:33.620
Well, he has more science background than Bill McKibben does, certainly.
00:09:36.660
But as I say, if you really understood how Bill McKibben made his money, two things.
00:09:43.800
And the second thing was he stole a lot of stuff.
00:09:46.240
I mean, he publicly acknowledged it in the court case that he stole stuff.
00:09:51.620
So, for instance, he stole the Macintosh interface from Steve Jobs and company to do Windows.
00:10:04.000
And under court cross-cut across the examination here at trial, he admitted under oath that he
00:10:16.840
So the question came down to in the court case, OK, you stole all the stuff that Apple
00:10:25.120
So he and his attorney, Boyle, another high-end attorney here, their argument was, since there
00:10:34.080
was no debating that they stole it, their argument was that Apple shouldn't have ever been given
00:10:42.920
Well, it was a pretty desperate strategy, but actually, it worked.
00:10:51.080
The judge sided with him and said, well, yes, Apple, you have like 50 patents that have been
00:11:06.620
You're talking about some of the influence of judges and stuff here?
00:11:08.800
Well, just in closing, John, if you could tell us, what would you suggest people, lawmakers
00:11:15.040
perhaps, can do about all of this, all these things that are going on right now?
00:11:19.760
Because they're threatening our election integrity.
00:11:22.620
They're threatening our livelihood even, because with the whole paying attention to the climate
00:11:29.120
change theory or whatever, we're just damaging our own economies left, right, and center.
00:11:41.280
We need to see the big picture of what's going on here.
00:11:43.460
And until we see the big picture, unfortunately, we're all involved in day-to-day stuff here.
00:11:48.820
We need to stand back and say, what is the big picture?
00:11:51.420
And once you understand that the big picture is really to push us back to be an agrarian society,
00:11:57.720
a communist agrarian society, that'll answer effectively anything else you're going to see.
00:12:05.020
A lot of stuff will all of a sudden start making sense.
00:12:07.440
The best film I've seen on this, I'm sort of a film buff, but is called Grinding America Down.
00:12:17.100
It's amazingly spot on about what's going on here.
00:12:22.460
And it's disturbing, but, you know, you said, what do we need to do?
00:12:29.320
What we need to do is understand what we're up against here.
00:12:32.360
If we're distracted or if we believe that all these people are being honest about election malfeasance being zero,
00:12:42.700
if we believe that's honestly true, well, we're just buying a pig and a poke here.
00:12:47.440
If we believe all their claims about climate change are honestly true,
00:12:52.120
we're just not going to be able to effectively respond to it.
00:12:57.420
So understanding what the big picture is, then the other things I said here,
00:13:03.080
that people on our side here, the allies, need to work better together and they need to have better messaging.
00:13:10.620
So all three of those things are sort of tied together.
00:13:13.020
But the working together and the better messaging would help in educating people as to the big picture of what's going on here.
00:13:21.400
John Drost, thank you so much for being with us on this episode of the John Henry Weston Show.
00:13:32.880
Hi, this is John Henry Weston, the co-founder and editor-in-chief of LifeSite News.
00:13:37.380
I'm coming to you today because we want to be sure that we're communicating clearly with you, our loyal followers.
00:13:45.100
Things are really heating up, as I'm sure you can see.
00:13:48.460
Christians, conservative truth-tellers are being targeted, are being banned from social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram at an alarmingly fast rate.
00:14:00.620
They are attempting to suppress any narrative that does not fit that of the mainstream media.
00:14:09.040
We have been warning everyone who would listen and attempting to build up alternative platforms to continue to reach you.
00:14:16.480
We have established ourselves on all sorts of platforms I'm going to explain in a minute, but the most important thing to do is come direct to LifeSiteNews.com because there we will always be.
00:14:28.260
But we've also established ourselves on platforms like Parler and MeWe, and our videos can be found on Rumble as well.
00:14:36.180
We would love to see each of you on those platforms too, as they are not censoring or suppressing the truth that we are sharing every single day.
00:14:45.100
More than these alternative social media platforms, we highly encourage you to subscribe to our email newsletter.
00:14:52.000
We have really built up a large list of loyal readers on our email marketing platform.
00:14:56.980
And we have prepared several backup plans for, well, I want to say if, but it's really when, we are removed from our current platform as well.
00:15:07.640
Additionally, I really encourage you, as I said before, to make it a regular habit to go directly to LifeSiteNews.com.
00:15:17.120
While all of these different platforms are an excellent way to curate your news,
00:15:22.000
going directly to our website means that you will never encounter any censorship or sudden loss of LifeSiteNews reporting.
00:15:34.460
We founded this organization with the mission to be the life, family, and culture source for men and women who seek to know the truth.
00:15:42.660
We have established a track record of honest reports, and this will never stop, even with censorship happening around the globe.
00:15:52.540
Again, I'm encouraging you to join us on Parler, MeWe, Rumble, and on our email list.
00:15:58.840
You can find all the direct links in the description of this video.
00:16:03.140
May God bless you and keep you, and we are so thankful that you've chosen to follow and support LifeSiteNews.
00:16:10.420
I'm John Henry Weston, co-founder and editor-in-chief of LifeSiteNews.