The John-Henry Westen Show - February 01, 2022


Military lawyer says genetic changes from COVID vaccines are creating a new human 'species' under the law


Episode Stats


Length

29 minutes

Words per minute

163.46869

Word count

4,839

Sentence count

332

Harmful content

Misogyny

2

sentences flagged

Toxicity

2

sentences flagged

Hate speech

1

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Todd Collender is a lawyer representing thousands of service members of the U.S. military who object to being injected with contaminated vaccines. He argues that the government should not be able to force them to participate in a mass vaccination program.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 If you're like me, you might have heard it before that people are talking about the COVID
00:00:07.220 vaccines as gene therapy, they're really gene editing.
00:00:11.520 And, you know, it's really creating then a different kind of a human being for the purposes
00:00:17.040 of a law.
00:00:18.400 It starts to sound really far-fetched, except that there's the evidence for it.
00:00:25.120 I'm going to bring on today a lawyer, a lawyer who's involved in defending many of, in fact,
00:00:32.500 thousands and thousands of military men and women in the United States who object to taking
00:00:39.400 a vaccine that's abortion tainted, that's under emergency youth authorization.
00:00:45.380 How can they be forced to?
00:00:46.620 They're being forced to under various penalties and pains, and it's unbelievable, and they've
00:00:51.000 denied every religious exemption ever applied for.
00:00:54.900 So what's going on?
00:00:57.000 Well, this lawyer for this case looked into it, and it's unbelievable.
00:01:01.960 And we're going to show you the actual evidence of all those horrific things we heard about
00:01:07.360 and thought, nah, that can't be true.
00:01:10.420 Unfortunately, it is.
00:01:12.100 This is John Henry Weston's show.
00:01:13.960 Stay tuned.
00:01:21.000 Todd Collender, welcome to the program.
00:01:34.920 Thank you for having me.
00:01:36.260 Let's begin, as you always do, at the sign of the cross.
00:01:38.780 In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.
00:01:43.080 Amen.
00:01:43.340 So, Todd, just an absolutely unbelievable thing is happening.
00:01:51.140 If you could explain to our viewers what, first of all, tell us about your case.
00:01:56.020 I guess maybe we can frame everything about your case.
00:01:57.960 Tell us about your case and what you're doing in it, and we'll move forward from there.
00:02:01.640 In August of last year, 2021, the military mandates came down.
00:02:08.680 The Secretary of Defense issued an order that all military whatsoever, Active Reserves, National Guard, all had to become vaccinated.
00:02:18.100 I use the term vaccinated only because it's simple and everybody knows what we're talking about.
00:02:22.140 That mandate actually can't exist in the law because the Secretary of Defense is the one who made it.
00:02:27.120 This has all been done before.
00:02:29.460 In the anthrax scenario, about 20 years prior, where they tried something very similar, my co-counsel in the case actually prevailed.
00:02:37.580 And as a result of that came some new law.
00:02:41.300 In particular, at issue is the informed consent rise.
00:02:45.380 So here we have a phase three clinical trial, to be very clear about this.
00:02:50.160 None of these mRNA adenovirus vaccines, again, are FDA approved.
00:02:57.420 They are emergency use authorization, which means that informed consent requirements come into play.
00:03:03.520 In other words, nobody can force you to become a lab rat.
00:03:06.500 So here comes this order from the Secretary of Defense requiring everybody to enjoin into this experiment, 1.8 million people, to be exact.
00:03:17.420 At the same time, a lot of service members were complaining that I've already had the bug.
00:03:22.360 In fact, 200,000 or so military had expected to make that defense, which is actually part of military regulations as to why not to get this.
00:03:32.040 So we filed suit on a number of grounds, number one of which is that this has already been addressed in 10 U.S.C. 1107 coming out of the anthrax case, which says only the president of the United States has the ability to waive service members' rights to informed consent.
00:03:48.760 Not the Secretary of Defense, not anybody else.
00:03:51.320 So the order itself is illegal.
00:03:53.040 On top of that, there are specific exemptions entered into Army regulations, some of which go back to 1908 that talk about prior immunity.
00:04:01.340 That one goes back to 1908.
00:04:04.080 Disability, religious beliefs, and finally, administrative.
00:04:08.800 If you're not going to stay in the military, then what's the point of doing this?
00:04:12.940 All of those were disregarded, all of them.
00:04:15.060 So then we looked at, you know, how did we get here and why are we here?
00:04:18.960 What is the emergency, first and foremost, because this has got an tremendously high survivability rate, even today.
00:04:26.020 And back then it was 99.98% or something along that line.
00:04:30.800 Not even taking into consideration, we're talking about military people who are fit as a function of their job, go through annual physicals, you know, aren't allowed to be unhealthy effectively, suffer diseases.
00:04:42.960 So there was really no reason that we could quantify as to why this would take place in the first place.
00:04:47.500 We filed a lawsuit against the Department of Defense, Health and Human Services, and the FDA in an attempt to, number one, stop this, getting an injunction or asking for one.
00:04:58.500 And number two, calling into question the reasoning behind bringing a mass experiment to the market when there were already efficacious drugs.
00:05:06.500 37 of them we came to find that could treat the malady.
00:05:10.020 At this point now, your clientele is huge.
00:05:12.800 You're representing how many people in the Army and military, in the military?
00:05:18.460 So the entirety of the military, it appears it's somewhere around 400,000 people.
00:05:22.320 Our case was dismissed on procedural grounds on the 18th.
00:05:26.040 We're filing a notice of appeal.
00:05:27.580 We haven't had our day in court.
00:05:28.880 And by the way, all we were asking for in this anyway was a declaratory judgment.
00:05:33.520 We wanted the judge to tell the military to follow their own laws, but 400,000 people or so.
00:05:38.740 This is a huge case.
00:05:40.400 But what it led you to find is, I could say, even more stupendous.
00:05:46.140 It's more mind-blowing than just the, they're not following their own rules.
00:05:52.240 The president has to do a waiver.
00:05:54.520 They're just doing it anyway.
00:05:55.660 We've interviewed all sorts of military men and women.
00:05:59.680 I just had on a Navy commander, Rob Green, who was telling me that, you know, despite his filing for religious exemption, they were denying everything. 0.82
00:06:07.120 They're doing a pro forma thing, which is ridiculous.
00:06:09.360 A whistleblower has shown that they're not taking anything seriously.
00:06:12.840 And these are good, faithful men who are giving for their country, offering their lives for their country.
00:06:18.080 And they're forcing them to take this experimental jab, which for many of them is abhorrent because it's abortion tainted.
00:06:24.280 And we've done shows on that as well.
00:06:27.960 But what did it lead you to find that is so hair-raising about gene therapy and what this really is?
00:06:37.520 In all cases, you're always trying to figure out what the defense is going to be so you can get ahead of it.
00:06:41.820 We did quite a bit of research in so much that we were largely ignored by the DAP for a long time.
00:06:47.080 And so we started looking around, is there any other way that they could defend this?
00:06:52.820 Because very clearly, they were not getting anybody's consent.
00:06:55.720 They were coercing, threatening, taking punitive actions towards the service members, all in violation of the law.
00:07:02.160 The Nuremberg Code was brought into the Uniform Code of Military Justice in 1957.
00:07:06.460 Very clearly, the DOD is violating all those rules.
00:07:08.900 So it made us think what possibly could be there.
00:07:11.840 And it turns out that circa 2001, the DOD, NASA, other agencies started down this road of genetic modification.
00:07:20.280 We also came to find that the informed consent requirements are significantly less.
00:07:24.960 And so that made us think maybe that's the defense, is that this is experimental.
00:07:30.240 It is gene modification therapy, otherwise known as gene therapy.
00:07:34.100 So maybe we're just off on our legal analysis, and that's what this is really about.
00:07:38.340 And I think that it is.
00:07:39.440 Let's stop there for a second, because I want to right away dispel the charges of falsehood, because there are charges of falsehood.
00:07:50.620 Everybody's saying, oh, they're calling it gene therapy, give me a break.
00:07:52.760 So let's just go to this clip of the head of Bayer telling Bill Gates and all sorts of high-profile leaders, world leaders, that this indeed is gene therapy, and that nobody would have accepted it before COVID, but now they all have.
00:08:12.200 Take a look.
00:08:12.580 The mRNA vaccines are an example for that cell and gene therapy.
00:08:18.500 I always like to say, if we had surveyed two years ago in the public, would you be willing to take gene or cell therapy and inject it into your body, we would have probably had a 95% refusal rate.
00:08:31.580 I think this pandemic has opened many people's eyes to innovation in a way that was maybe not possible before.
00:08:40.180 So, Todd, tell us, in addition to this being mentioned on display, you have documents that show that Pfizer or Moderna, they're admitting themselves that this is gene therapy.
00:08:54.780 Is that not correct?
00:08:55.400 Yes, they've never hidden it.
00:08:57.140 From the very beginning, they said that they were going to use lipid nanoparticles to deliver RNA or messenger RNA or even synthetic DNA fragments to the user for the purpose of making that user's body create spike proteins.
00:09:12.660 That by itself is gene therapy.
00:09:15.600 So now that we've dispelled that this is just some kind of imaginary thing, let's return to that NASA document.
00:09:22.040 First of all, what year is that NASA document from?
00:09:24.200 2001, Future Strategic Issues, Future Warfare, Circa 2025.
00:09:30.360 This is from 2001.
00:09:31.880 So in 2001, they're projecting to 2025, which we're coming up to now, about these kinds of things.
00:09:41.240 Give us, if you will, their sort of, their mindset from 2001 when the U.S. military, excuse me, NASA is looking at this.
00:09:50.240 And it is.
00:09:51.060 It's a combination of NASA and other agencies, including DARPA and, well, for instance, the NASA Langley Research Center.
00:09:57.420 That's part of it.
00:09:58.140 The CIA, this is a combined effort.
00:10:00.860 There's a few things that I take away from reading this, aside from the fact that it goes on for 113 pages.
00:10:06.800 And that's just a PowerPoint.
00:10:08.320 It's actually not written text in the traditional sense.
00:10:12.300 It's all about threat assessment.
00:10:14.020 It's all about how is somebody else going to kill us and how are we going to kill them?
00:10:18.120 And you take away from this thing, there is no survivability.
00:10:22.740 The technology is such that both sides, every side, is going to end up killing everybody.
00:10:30.860 The part that disturbs me most about it is that the author uses a whole lot of exclamation marks.
00:10:36.180 So, yay, we have directed energy weapons, exclamation mark.
00:10:40.860 We have nanotechnologies.
00:10:42.800 Next generation by 2020, nobody will be able to escape it. 1.00
00:10:47.400 It talks about all of those things, including, you know, effectively the bio net of things, harnessing people's humanity, harvesting their being into beyond what they call beyond artificial intelligence.
00:11:01.060 I think that's where we're going right now.
00:11:03.640 And then they compare the whole thing to our planet being a spaceship.
00:11:07.820 This is its own microcosm, and we're stuck here.
00:11:12.560 And by the way, we'd better do something about the population because there's too many of us, not enough resources.
00:11:18.560 All of this is predicated on really one thing.
00:11:21.340 And that, to me, is the absence of spirituality, the absence of God.
00:11:27.620 This is all about man's creations. 0.97
00:11:29.460 This is about men killing men.
00:11:32.180 And you walk away from it, at least I did, fairly depressed to think that somebody put this time, energy, and effort into trying to figure out how to kill as many people as they could.
00:11:42.360 It is truly unreal.
00:11:43.380 The analogy to the spaceship, and then they've said how they're adding too many people to the spaceship, and we need to do something about that.
00:11:51.920 So population control is built right into the system, and it really does show the mindset.
00:12:00.640 But where did you go from there, knowing their mindset, knowing that this is a sort of outlook from the U.S. militarily, but different government organs in the U.S.?
00:12:12.020 Where did you go from there in your research?
00:12:13.560 The predicate to this whole thing is that nowhere in here really does it talk about peace.
00:12:19.940 Instead of threatening each other, the presumption is that there's going to be a war and massive casualties in here that talks about, you know, why don't we try something else, like, you know, getting along or something along those lines.
00:12:32.940 So we ended up looking at a variety of other things, including what is the law around this, being lawyers, and there actually isn't hardly any.
00:12:44.860 Along comes a case in 2013, however, that relates to intellectual property rights as it relates to synthetic DNA.
00:12:52.680 In particular, it's the Myriad Genetics case, and I don't know if you've seen it, but I can cite it exactly if you prefer.
00:13:00.420 And it is called the Association for Molecular Pathology versus Myriad Genetics.
00:13:05.620 So what's it about?
00:13:07.140 So this is about the intellectual property rights developed by the use of mRNA in particular, and what happens to the synthetic genome as a result of that.
00:13:16.760 This is an argument over intellectual property rights in the new genome that they create from genetic therapy, genetic modification.
00:13:23.660 Right. And presumably they're talking about lab animals that they're going to modify their genes.
00:13:27.980 That's right. In this particular case, mice.
00:13:31.000 It wanders into a variety of things, and I guess that's the point.
00:13:35.180 They look at this as whether it's a human or mice or anything else, it's almost irrelevant.
00:13:40.700 There are humanized mice, right?
00:13:42.920 They use them in labs all the time to test new drugs.
00:13:46.820 So chimeras already exist, and they don't differentiate a genome to them as a genome. 0.91
00:13:54.600 What did the courts rule?
00:13:56.040 And this is a U.S. Supreme Court decision already.
00:13:59.980 That's right. This is what we call good law, meaning it's already happened.
00:14:03.740 There is no higher court.
00:14:05.460 This is the decision of the court.
00:14:06.880 The only thing that can happen as a result of this is people follow it as law, or if the legislature doesn't like it, then the legislature theoretically has the power to change it, and they do on occasion.
00:14:16.980 So in this particular case, the holding is what really bothers me.
00:14:20.220 It's on page six, about halfway down, and the sentence begins with, it is also.
00:14:24.140 So it states, it is also possible to create DNA synthetically through the process similarly well-known in the field of genetics.
00:14:31.620 One such method begins with an mRNA molecule and uses the natural bonding properties of nucleotides to create a new synthetic DNA molecule.
00:14:41.320 And that's it.
00:14:42.080 So you can't, in the world of intellectual property, you cannot patent something that already exists in nature.
00:14:49.360 If you change that, however, into something synthetic, that new genome is, in fact, patentable.
00:14:56.700 You are creating chattel property, intellectual property rights in that new genome, and that's what this case holds.
00:15:02.120 Now, this is the same kind of thing we're doing with the vaccines, because they are mRNA vaccines, both with Pfizer and Moderna.
00:15:09.920 And so if you can explain, what is that, and is that actually creating sort of a new genome within us, within people who take the vaccine?
00:15:18.420 So not sort of.
00:15:19.560 It does.
00:15:20.660 So the Supreme Court case says it.
00:15:22.840 If you use messenger RNA to create a synthetic genome, that new genome is your intellectual property rights.
00:15:30.280 That's the holding of the case.
00:15:34.040 I've heard people say, well, maybe it's just the synthetic DNA in that new genome.
00:15:39.920 That is, you know, the intellectual property rights.
00:15:43.020 How does one separate that?
00:15:45.000 If these shots, which we now know, go throughout your entire body, they're not stuck in your own.
00:15:50.140 They go everywhere.
00:15:51.080 And if they're genetically modifying billions of your cells, that's the plan.
00:15:55.420 Well, then how does one separate billions of cells from the other billions of cells?
00:15:59.580 The simple reality is those that took these shots, messenger RNA ones, for sure, according to this document, are now the chattel property of the patent holders.
00:16:08.560 This is totally not come up for discussion right now.
00:16:12.620 But actually, in documents you sent me, it has come up for discussion before.
00:16:18.720 That's what I found so fascinating.
00:16:21.240 A document that you sent over that is from the UK Ministry of Defense, along with the German Ministry of Defense, actually takes this up.
00:16:31.700 And I'm going to read a rather lengthy quote from it and then get your reaction to it.
00:16:35.800 Because I found this just incredible that, I think it was from 2011, they did envision this very thing and what to do about it.
00:16:44.540 This is, of course, in defense, talking about defense and therefore soldiers and so on.
00:16:49.900 And that, of course, your case is taking up the soldiers' cases.
00:16:53.200 But here's what they said.
00:16:55.840 So the document explains, by the way, this is a document put out by the UK Ministry of Defense in partnership with Germany's Bundeswehr Office for Defense Planning.
00:17:05.620 It actually says,
00:17:07.060 Human rights and property law are examples of legal fields, which may need to adapt as technologies become integrated with rather than merely used by people.
00:17:18.600 People have legal rights and machines do not.
00:17:21.420 But human augmentation will make it increasingly difficult to adopt this binary approach as machines are integrated with our bodies, potentially at a molecular level.
00:17:32.960 Which is exactly what we're talking about.
00:17:34.540 As an example they give is the discussion about possibilities that humans may become cyborgs in the future.
00:17:42.060 The term has many mythical, metaphorical, and technical connotations, but it reflects the idea that humans no longer merely used machines.
00:17:49.820 We increasingly depend on them for our most human-like activities.
00:17:55.780 Then it goes on and says,
00:17:57.080 Because ownership of human augmentation technologies and the data they use and collect will need to be carefully considered.
00:18:04.860 If implants become integral parts of our bodies, for example, people who wear pacemakers, often they do not have any rights to access data gathered and transmitted by these devices.
00:18:17.100 Within the European Union, this problem is in part managed by the privacy law, General Data Protection Regulation, GDPR, which regulates access to personal data.
00:18:29.980 It's incredible that they envisioned this back then because they knew that they're going to get into this kind of gene therapy, gene modification, that it's going toward super soldiers or augmenting their military and then finding out what that will mean.
00:18:48.500 And yet here we've done it on a global scale without this discussion really taking place.
00:18:53.620 Yeah, a global scale, still phase three clinical trials.
00:18:57.680 So the entirety of the user populations, billions of people are effectively lab rats.
00:19:04.360 I'm unaware of any of them getting proper informed consent for the law.
00:19:09.800 And I don't even know if anybody cares.
00:19:12.360 It's really quite remarkable.
00:19:13.660 In what you referenced, I think, in part three of that particular document, it asks questions about ethics.
00:19:20.700 You know, should we be considering these things?
00:19:23.620 The horse is already out of the barn.
00:19:25.760 It already happened.
00:19:27.420 And so you can tell, going back to the NASA document, the 2001 document, this was a plan.
00:19:34.440 This didn't just happen.
00:19:36.360 They've been planning it for a long time.
00:19:37.840 And the military seemingly has been doing genetic modification experiments since 2005 on their soldiers with very limited informed consent requirements.
00:19:46.120 There are a separate set of informed consent requirements.
00:19:48.020 The only thing that's come out of U.S. law that I think has any bearing whatsoever on this, I take that back, too.
00:19:55.640 Number one is the Genetic Information Non-Discrimination Act that came out a few years ago.
00:20:00.520 And that's great.
00:20:01.600 You can't discriminate against somebody based on their genetic information.
00:20:04.960 It doesn't talk at all about how about not genetically modifying people and giving them a choice in the matter.
00:20:09.340 Secondarily, when you look at the law and the totality of it around the planet, it all seems to be based on environmental protection.
00:20:15.660 The focus, Australia is a good example, focuses on if there's an inadvertent spill.
00:20:22.120 And we did an intent to genetically modify some cows over in this field or whatever the case may be.
00:20:27.760 So that's their concern, not whether or not somebody has a voice in this or an interest in doing it to themselves.
00:20:34.280 It's a foregone conclusion.
00:20:35.980 And you find that in a 2001 document from NASA.
00:20:38.860 All of this is happening irrespective of our desires.
00:20:43.040 Here we have the documents.
00:20:44.700 How did this figure into your case with them not caring?
00:20:47.700 You had mentioned earlier about how, why were they not paying attention, not even concerned about it?
00:20:52.640 How did that figure into your case?
00:20:54.360 It hasn't at all.
00:20:55.220 The response we got out of the Department of Defense, the Department of Justice, who actually defends them, was a straightforward denial.
00:21:04.380 You know, the law actually can't be more clear on this particular subject.
00:21:07.940 And they kept kind of referencing things that weren't even salient.
00:21:12.680 And nowhere did they enter in the genetic modification part of this.
00:21:17.720 It really didn't even address informed consent.
00:21:20.020 Even though this is an investigational new drug, investigational new device, it really wasn't addressed.
00:21:25.660 They've just ignored it, just like they did their own regulation, AR40562.
00:21:32.120 It's in their own rules, and they just ignore it.
00:21:34.500 It's absolutely unbelievable.
00:21:36.160 One of the, I guess you could say, things get really strange when we go down this path.
00:21:41.820 And people don't know what to believe anymore.
00:21:43.460 And that's why I wanted to bring you on to get the evidence out there so people could say, wait a minute, there's actually something to this.
00:21:51.220 Because it seems so far-fetched.
00:21:53.440 It seems impossible.
00:21:54.560 For one thing, the military has kept a lot of what it's doing behind the scenes anyway.
00:21:58.340 But for another, it just, it sounds so much beyond our realm of possibility.
00:22:06.420 One of the things you mentioned is the liquid nanoparticles that are used here.
00:22:12.180 The documentation is there for its use.
00:22:15.480 What do they do?
00:22:16.920 So the liquid nanoparticles, yes, they're throughout the documentation.
00:22:20.500 They're in all the protocols.
00:22:21.440 They're in all the patents.
00:22:22.300 This is one of six that I see delivery devices.
00:22:25.800 And what they're delivering are payloads.
00:22:27.920 And those payloads are fragments of messenger RNA, RNA, and DNA.
00:22:33.100 Some of them, the other shots will use adenovirus vectors to deliver the very same kinds of payloads.
00:22:39.520 The point of those payloads, and in my understanding in the Pfizer shots, there are eight different types of fragments that they're delivering.
00:22:49.300 Eight different types of genetic modification that they're creating, at least.
00:22:52.560 Is they have to slip past your body's immune system.
00:22:58.040 So historically, apparently, the nanoparticles, the nanoparticles have been in our food.
00:23:02.580 I think there's 3,300 products or so on the market today that have them.
00:23:06.940 Our bodies do a fairly good job of defending against it.
00:23:09.520 So they've actually included other proteins taken from the HIV studies, again, back in the 2020s,
00:23:15.480 to disarm our autoimmune system, to slip the lipid nanoparticles, their molecular size, frankly, into the user cells.
00:23:26.220 And in this particular case, it's the cardiovascular cells for the purpose of reprogramming those cells to produce these S proteins, the spike proteins.
00:23:34.620 What do you see as the grave danger there with regard to the use of the liquid nanoparticles and the payloads?
00:23:41.300 Because there's no end to it.
00:23:42.820 So we did mass spectrometry studies on both the Moderna and the Pfizer shots.
00:23:48.740 And what we found is that the ingredients are effectively the same.
00:23:52.280 A huge amount of polyethylene glycol.
00:23:54.320 They mentioned lipid nanoparticles and adjuvants.
00:23:58.600 The point of it is that nowhere in those documents do they actually talk about what the payload is.
00:24:05.040 What messenger RNA are they delivering?
00:24:07.080 What DNA fragments?
00:24:09.160 So we don't know what's in these because it's not disclosed in the filings with the FDA.
00:24:15.060 It's in the patents.
00:24:16.080 You can see that.
00:24:16.920 And if you read through the patents, you look up what all these different things are.
00:24:20.220 One of them will probably turn you into a flying monkey. 0.94
00:24:22.100 I really don't know.
00:24:24.320 Some of them seem to utilize, for instance, E. coli chimerically blended, I guess for lack of a better word, with Marburg.
00:24:34.760 You know, elements of Ebola, all these other pathogens seem to be actually included in these payloads.
00:24:42.180 We're really in the midst of quite the experiment.
00:24:45.340 More experimental than people perhaps even know.
00:24:48.340 Because it's not only, yeah, we couldn't have the time to develop this properly,
00:24:52.320 so we developed a quick vaccine sort of that we think will work.
00:24:56.100 Hopefully it will.
00:24:56.820 We'll just go for it anyway.
00:24:58.840 It's much deeper.
00:24:59.860 It's much beyond that.
00:25:01.340 It's a totally novel technology that's never been used really on humans before
00:25:05.220 and given and foisted upon you without consent of any kind.
00:25:11.440 So what is your conclusion from this?
00:25:15.320 What's your takeaway?
00:25:16.360 We're going to bring you back on to get more into this.
00:25:19.540 But what's your takeaway right now?
00:25:21.780 And really, what's your takeaway for the people out there?
00:25:24.520 What should they be doing?
00:25:25.660 The takeaway is this.
00:25:26.760 And funny enough, I think it was in Jurassic Park where the scientist, the mathematician,
00:25:33.440 says you stood on the shoulders of giants and never stopped to ask whether or not this should be done,
00:25:38.400 just whether or not it could be done.
00:25:40.200 And that's exactly what's happened.
00:25:41.660 We're transforming the entirety of the world's population,
00:25:45.460 or at least those that took these shots for now, into a new species.
00:25:50.760 They're no longer humans for purposes of law, according to the Myriad Genetics case.
00:25:57.080 So what are they?
00:25:59.180 They're people, you and I, from perspective of definition in the law.
00:26:04.660 What are they, and what rights do they enjoy?
00:26:06.920 And it just strikes me that these people could do this.
00:26:11.700 They did do this without ever stopping to ask why.
00:26:14.760 And it strikes me that they view themselves as gods, right?
00:26:18.600 We are creatures of God.
00:26:20.760 We're in the image of God.
00:26:22.600 And it seems to me that they decided that wasn't good enough,
00:26:25.700 and they should make a whole lot of people creatures of their own imaginations.
00:26:31.000 It's blinding to me how arrogant this is.
00:26:34.660 Unbelievable stuff.
00:26:35.520 Todd Collender, thank you so much for being with us.
00:26:38.380 Tell us, how can people find out what you're up to?
00:26:42.380 Where can they get in touch?
00:26:44.880 The name of our law firm is Disabled Rights Advocates.
00:26:48.400 It's on the web.
00:26:49.480 It's easy to find.
00:26:50.260 We have a good and close association with a website called VaxChoice, V-A-X-Choice.com,
00:26:57.000 where there's constant updates and information for people to be aware of.
00:27:01.360 Some blogs have been created as a result of it.
00:27:03.780 It's really a large community of people around the planet that are looking for legal self-help that we provide there.
00:27:09.780 And, of course, we have lots of people coming to our firm,
00:27:12.540 and we try our very best to work with them and Truth For Health Foundation in particular to help people as best as we can.
00:27:19.040 Thank you so much for what you're doing for life, for faith, for family, and for freedom.
00:27:24.780 May God bless you.
00:27:25.620 Thank you.
00:27:26.900 And God bless all of you.
00:27:28.200 We'll see you next time.
00:27:29.080 We have been warning everyone who would listen and attempting to build up alternative platforms to continue to reach you.
00:27:39.080 We have established ourselves on all sorts of platforms I'm going to explain in a minute,
00:27:43.300 but the most important thing to do is come direct to LifeSiteNews.com, because there we will always be.
00:27:50.340 But we've also established ourselves on platforms like Parler and MeWe, and our videos can be found on Rumble as well.
00:27:58.180 We would love to see each of you on those platforms too,
00:28:01.700 as they are not censoring or suppressing the truth that we are sharing every single day.
00:28:06.640 More than these alternative social media platforms, we highly encourage you to subscribe to our email newsletter.
00:28:14.080 We have really built up a large list of loyal readers on our email marketing platform,
00:28:19.160 and we have prepared several backup plans for, well, I want to say if, but it's really when,
00:28:26.180 we are removed from our current platform as well.
00:28:28.900 Additionally, I really encourage you, as I said before, to make it a regular habit to go directly to LifeSiteNews.com.
00:28:37.160 Make it your homepage.
00:28:39.200 While all of these different platforms are an excellent way to curate your news,
00:28:44.380 going directly to our website means that you will never encounter any censorship or sudden loss of LifeSiteNews reporting.
00:28:51.780 Here's the thing.
00:28:53.220 We will never stop sharing the truth.
00:28:56.100 We founded this organization with the mission to be the life, family, and culture source for men and women who seek to know the truth.
00:29:04.960 We have established a track record of honest reports, and this will never stop,
00:29:10.660 even with censorship happening around the globe.
00:29:14.540 Again, I'm encouraging you to join us on Parler, MeWe, Rumble, and on our email list.
00:29:20.920 You can find all the direct links in the description of this video.
00:29:25.220 May God bless you and keep you, and we are so thankful that you've chosen to follow and support LifeSiteNews.
00:29:32.500 I'm John Henry Weston, co-founder and editor-in-chief of LifeSiteNews.