The John-Henry Westen Show - NEW： Dark Origin and Agenda of Klaus Schwab's World Economic Forum

00:00:00.000 What if I told you that the key to understanding what is going on with the World Economic Forum,

00:00:06.180 which we're hearing about in the news today, is really revealed in its origins? Do you even know

00:00:13.020 what the origins are of the World Economic Forum? Have a listen to this briefly.

00:00:20.400 They've been around since about 1971. They were first founded as what was then called the European

00:00:26.320 Community Forum, which was an initiative that was started, oddly enough, by Henry Kissinger,

00:00:32.560 who first introduced Klaus Schwab to the economist John Kenneth Galbraith, and a man called Herman

00:00:39.120 Kahn. He used to run a think tank for the technocratic future managerial model of society

00:00:44.900 called the Hudson Institute. These men were put together in order to create what was thought

00:00:50.000 then to be an extension of the United States' interest in global governance, in a model for

00:00:56.220 how to best efficiently manage human populations. And Europe was seen as a problem that they

00:01:02.000 hadn't yet tried to solve. So in 1971, in 1970, they accompanied Schwab to attract people to

00:01:08.620 the first meeting, which took place in 1971. Several years later, it became the World Economic

00:01:13.640 Forum. Kissinger himself addressed the World Economic Forum in 1980. So he carried on in an

00:01:19.620 association, which I think will continue to this day, even though it's probably less gifted

00:01:24.100 in the limelight now. In addition to knowing where the World Economic Forum came from, they

00:01:32.320 have plans, plans for the future that they are rolling out in front of us right now. Listen

00:01:38.300 to some of that. The World Economic Forum is part of a much broader attempt to refigure human

00:01:46.600 behavior and indeed to institute a global management system that is more efficient from the point of view

00:01:53.620 of management, of global management, precisely because it patterns human behavior upon technology

00:01:59.960 that was initially invented to spy on everyone. In order to sustain what they're doing, because

00:02:06.880 it seems so impossible when they tell us at the same time, you're going to own nothing and yet be

00:02:11.080 happy. How are they going to do that? There's one key element that you've got to understand in how

00:02:16.960 they foist all of this. Have a listen.

00:02:20.300 Why is the WEF so visible today? It's because of their ability, their habit of leveraging a sense

00:02:28.000 of permanent alarm. And the great success of fomenting a sense of crisis over the environment

00:02:33.240 has allowed them to open the door to their own profit solutions. The more popular that this mistaken,

00:02:39.900 and I think it is mistaken, belief that mankind is destroying the planet and is doing so in an

00:02:45.760 accelerating destructive fashion, it simply helps these people to advance their agenda. Without a

00:02:52.420 sense of emergency, no one would even consider the expedience that they're offering. But what is

00:02:57.820 offering is security in a time of ongoing crisis. Crisis is their best friend.

00:03:05.100 There is a solution to all of this. I know it seems completely overwhelming, like these guys own the

00:03:11.000 universe, and are coming after us, and there's nothing we can do. Actually, there is something we

00:03:15.720 can do. Listen to this.

00:03:19.340 The best antidote to what you might call the massification of everything, or, you know,

00:03:23.880 scale, which is, you know, the scale complexity, atomization, liberalism, and elitism that typifies

00:03:31.900 this kind of technological managerialism, is by strong and meaningful human scale bonds,

00:03:38.360 community bonds, by the belief in God, by genuine, durable human relations, which begins with the

00:03:45.760 family, but doesn't end there, but the extension of the family into a meaningful community,

00:03:50.580 a helpful mutualist community where people have shared and stable values. Human scale relations is

00:03:57.080 the answer.

00:03:59.500 And let me introduce this fellow to you. This is Frank Wright. Frank Wright is a writer for LifeSite

00:04:04.980 News. Thanks be to God. And we are so pleased to bring you his insights on the World Economic Forum,

00:04:10.380 which he has been studying for years and years, and which he is following for LifeSite News right

00:04:15.200 now. This is the John Henry Weston Show. Stay tuned.

00:04:25.500 Frank Wright, welcome to the program.

00:04:27.300 Thank you. Thank you. It's good to be here.

00:04:28.800 Let's begin, as we always do, with the sign of the cross.

00:04:30.440 In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Amen.

00:04:35.680 A lot of people are right now focused on the World Economic Forum because a lot of the world

00:04:41.240 leaders are there. It's going on. There's already a lot of controversy in that people are being

00:04:45.900 barred from seeing what's actually going on. Tell us, if you can, what is the World Economic Forum?

00:04:53.540 Where does it come from? And why the big splash about it now?

00:04:56.440 Well, the big splash about it now is obviously because it is a rather secretive and somewhat

00:05:00.600 influential organization that's mainly composed of, well, business leaders. They're very, very

00:05:06.980 interested in attracting global business leaders, like leaders of international corporations and so

00:05:12.020 on, digital media companies, leaders of industry. And this will help them in their stated aims,

00:05:17.980 which is they are really a managerial organization that seeks to shape the future experience of humanity

00:05:23.100 and global governance. So they invite world leaders as well.

00:05:26.440 And they've been around since about 1971. They were first founded as what was then called the

00:05:32.600 European Community Forum, which was an initiative that was started, oddly enough, by Henry Kissinger,

00:05:39.680 who first introduced Klaus Schwab to the, well, the economist John Kenneth Galbraith, and a man called

00:05:45.480 Herman Kahn. He used to run a think tank for the kind of technocratic future managerial model of society

00:05:51.620 called the Hudson Institute. So these men were put together in order to create what was thought then

00:05:56.960 to be an extension of the United States interest in global governance, in a model for how to best

00:06:03.740 efficiently manage human populations. And Europe was seen as a problem that they hadn't yet tried to solve.

00:06:10.000 So in 1971, in 1970, they accompanied Schwab to attract people to the first meeting, which took place

00:06:17.240 in 1971. Several years later, it became the World Economic Forum. Kissinger himself addressed the World

00:06:22.680 Economic Forum in 1980. So he carried on an association, which I think will continue to this day, even though

00:06:29.160 it's probably less gifted than limelight now. What the World Economic Forum wishes to do is it wishes to attract

00:06:35.120 influential people in order to promote a managerial program that is largely infused by technology.

00:06:42.040 Since about 1941, the idea that you can see humanity as a managerial problem, as a problem to be managed,

00:06:50.760 has been around since the publication of a book called The Managerial Revolution by James P. Burnham,

00:06:56.400 which was first reviewed famously by George Orwell. In this book is a blueprint for modern society.

00:07:03.040 You would recognize much of the processes and even some of the language today, such as the manager's

00:07:07.540 right to manage. But what it presages is the supplanting of state and institutional power with

00:07:14.520 that of an international managerial class, one which we have today. And what has changed since the 1940s

00:07:21.280 is technology. We have the technology, or rather they do that, to advance an idea of a future humanity,

00:07:28.340 which I would argue is the deletion of everything valuable about the human experience in order to

00:07:35.160 make human beings globally more manageable. If anybody's wondering who Henry Kissinger is,

00:07:40.020 he is the same one who, involved with the U.S. government, actually drafted NSSM 200, which was the

00:07:47.120 National Security Study Memorandum 200, which outlined the need for population control to be imposed by

00:07:54.440 the United States to maintain supremacy around the world. And that then got put into U.S. foreign policy,

00:08:01.320 which is why you see, even to this day, the massive push on birth control and population control around

00:08:09.260 the globe coming from the United States, because it's actually part of their international policy as

00:08:14.840 developed by Henry Kissinger. But please go on. You were mentioning to me before that these folks,

00:08:21.220 even in the 60s, could envision a time when they would be able to do this kind of mass population

00:08:29.800 control. Yes. Whenever they talk about it, whether it's in 1941 or 1969 or 1970 or yesterday at the

00:08:37.640 Crystal Awards by Schwab himself, they always frame this technological transformation into a mass surveillance

00:08:43.320 state in talk of security or safety or a more stable way of life for everyone. So what was going on

00:08:50.680 with the Hudson Institute with Herman Kahn? Herman Kahn invited the BBC into his institute in, I think,

00:08:56.780 in 1969 to, as it were, open the door on his work there, which was very well funded and did do much to

00:09:03.200 inform the posture and policy of the developing United States national security state under Nixon.

00:09:08.840 What he was talking about in this interview is remarkable. He speaks about a future managerial

00:09:14.400 utopia, a utopia from the manager's point of view, of course, wherewith they encounter social problems.

00:09:20.360 He describes the emergence of violent protest movements as throwing sand in the gears. They

00:09:25.680 always use mechanical metaphors. But tellingly, in the case of a scenario that they imagine where an

00:09:32.240 entire city is revolting, is in some state of civil unrest, they casually discuss the option of

00:09:38.160 neutralizing this problem. Again, you know, in very delicate language, by adding tranquilizers to

00:09:44.000 the water supply. And Herman Kahn's on video saying this, just to prove that let's let's show a clip of

00:09:50.400 that if we could. You could imagine temporarily tranquilizing the whole city. You know, it's been

00:09:57.680 upset, the riots, you know, let's put trans guards either in the air or in the water, you know, just 1.00

00:10:04.400 get people settled down a bit. Well, I mean, this is it sounds unbelievable. But what was he actually

00:10:10.560 saying there? And the tie in again, from Herman Kahn to where we are today with the World Economic Forum?

00:10:19.040 The tie in from Herman Kahn to where we are today in the World Economic Forum is that he was

00:10:23.600 introduced along with John Kenneth Galbraith to Klaus Schwab by Henry Kissinger in order to form the

00:10:28.720 World Economic Forum. This is the origins of the WF, which is rather lesser known, but which is

00:10:33.920 documented in publications such as the New York Times. In a New York Times interview in the 90s,

00:10:38.880 I think in 1997, Schwab himself mentions the meeting which they arranged in Europe between himself and

00:10:46.400 Khan Khan and Galbraith to attract world leaders and influential members of the business community

00:10:51.600 and people that they called opinion formers to come to the World Economic Forum. I mean,

00:10:56.160 tellingly, the World Economic Forum, I think to this day does not pay what they call honorariums.

00:11:02.080 They may pay for your hotel room, but they make money. They don't pay people to appear there.

00:11:07.440 The idea is that you join an increasingly influential forum, which includes people who

00:11:15.120 have the power to make hidden decisions throughout the world. The hidden decision dimension comes from

00:11:20.640 the United States national security state. There is one aspect of this game that really ought to be

00:11:26.800 common knowledge, but isn't. The Total Information Awareness Program is a very good example for many

00:11:33.520 reasons. It came around in around 2002, after the September 11th attacks, which conveniently gave

00:11:40.080 the neoconservatives the shot in the arm that they needed to prevent them from extinction. It opened the

00:11:46.800 door to these ideas of global mass surveillance, which are necessary for this kind of technocratic

00:11:52.960 management. It was met with absolute outcry, because what it was, was an attempt to institute the

00:12:00.320 very suggestions that Herman Kahn made in the Hudson Institute 22 years earlier. It said,

00:12:06.880 we can now, we now have the technology to institute a total information awareness program. That is to

00:12:13.680 say, to execute a mass surveillance program on the United States population. In 1969, in this interview

00:12:19.680 that we've just seen, Herman Kahn's protégé talks about future technology in which it will be possible to

00:12:24.800 do just this. He speaks of phone calls quite nostalgically, saying that we'll be able to monitor every

00:12:30.080 single phone call, and then have a computer scan these phone calls worldwide, every single worldwide

00:12:35.760 phone call, for keywords to see if we need to look at it more closely.

00:12:41.840 One could, with a computer capacity that will be available in the next couple of decades,

00:12:46.240 one could easily record every phone conversation made. And then one could easily scan mechanically,

00:12:54.240 no human being could spend the centuries that would be required. One could scan every conversation

00:13:00.400 looking for keywords that would identify the conversation as worth looking into a little further.

00:13:06.080 So that, for example, one could begin with a naive set of words, kill, rob, murder, assassinate, plot.

00:13:16.080 What the United States security state wanted to do in 2003 was to execute this program. It was met with

00:13:25.440 outlaw, uplaw, sorry, and outrage. And their expedient was to change it to the terrorist information

00:13:34.000 awareness initiative, which, of course, then was evocative of images of safety and Big Brother looking

00:13:40.160 after you rather than prying into your every movement to create, as they said, a limitless array

00:13:46.400 of data points of human behavior. This is where the story gets interesting because this program did,

00:13:53.520 in fact, attempt to change its branding by moving from a more traditional CIA-style presentation to

00:14:02.480 cutesy cartoon-like imagery to soften its image. It didn't work. It was ordered by the United States

00:14:09.840 Senate to shut down. But it was continued. And it was continued by the admission of DARPA itself,

00:14:17.360 in documents that can still be seen on the Wayback Machine on their own website,

00:14:21.360 into a program called LifeLog. Now, LifeLog was an attempt to extend data capture from mere telephone

00:14:27.840 calls to everything humans did. It was a prototype for Facebook, and it was closed on the very same day

00:14:34.960 that Facebook was launched. In later statements made by former DARPA employees, they admit openly

00:14:41.520 that Facebook is nothing more than a continuation of the United States' security state attempt to

00:14:46.880 capture trillions of data points from people voluntarily, thereby obviating objection to a mass

00:14:53.200 surveillance state. And they're doing this in order to build what DARPA called in 2004

00:14:58.480 cognitive computing. That's to say, the modern algorithms that we have today. Now, these algorithms

00:15:04.720 are important because what they are is a machine-based model of human nature, which is largely based on the

00:15:12.160 behavior of people who have enthusiastically adopted social media. So the model of human behavior that

00:15:18.000 they're capturing is of people who are quite comfortable to upload their personalities to the machine and

00:15:24.400 to live this synergistic life, this cybernetic existence that practically removes or displaces

00:15:30.560 the human dimension with that of the virtual. People who are happy to pixelate themselves have become

00:15:35.920 the future model of humanity for the managerial society, for the utopia that they imagine for us

00:15:41.280 all to inhabit in future. It is a model of human behavior in nature that eliminates God and the best of

00:15:47.840 human nature itself. All the dissidents, the independence of mind, the strength of character

00:15:53.200 that allows you to resist the mass formation psychosis, will not feature in these algorithms.

00:15:59.200 And these tendencies will and are isolated and neutralized by these very algorithms that run most

00:16:05.280 of the social media companies. Now, if you mention this to people, they would think it sounds quite

00:16:10.320 far-fetched. But if you care to look it up, and I have written an article that references these links

00:16:15.440 for life site, which was published on Monday, you can see that the United States government's own

00:16:20.960 archives demonstrate the veracity of all these claims. So the World Economic Forum is part of a

00:16:27.520 much broader attempt to refigure human behavior and indeed to institute a global management system that

00:16:35.840 is more efficient from the point of view of global management, precisely because it patterns human

00:16:42.320 behavior upon technology that was initially invented to spy on everyone.

00:16:46.800 Unbelievable. If you can just define one term, DARPA you mentioned a couple of times, what's DARPA?

00:16:51.120 It's the Defense and Armaments Research Project Agency, which is the kind of acronym that you might

00:16:58.320 think just features in shady video games. But really, it's a defense research agency that's been around

00:17:05.520 since I think the 1950s. Advanced technologies, especially things like intelligence techniques,

00:17:13.360 data capture, but also things like experimental military technology and strategy. It's a think tank for,

00:17:22.320 if you like, defense, which now in the United States security state also adembrates national security.

00:17:28.720 So it would be, if you like, it's where a lot of the military spooks hang out. It's a function of

00:17:37.600 the intelligence state. What's truly remarkable is that most of the world has heard about this.

00:17:43.600 They've heard about this in China. They've heard about it as the system in China where every movement

00:17:51.120 you make, every phone call, every click on your computer and your handheld device are all registered.

00:17:57.760 You're given a social credit score that then can even interact with your bank account

00:18:03.440 if you're allowed out, and so on. It's everything controlled. What you're saying is

00:18:09.280 the evidence is there that this is being foisted upon the US population and the population of the

00:18:15.360 globe at large. How does China even figure into that? Are they like the test run or what?

00:18:20.480 That's a viable hypothesis. I think it is. China now has a biometric system where you can pay with

00:18:25.680 your face. So your face is already linked to your social credit account, and you don't need to show

00:18:31.360 any chip or any kind of implant or your phone. As soon as you show your face to the camera, it knows who

00:18:36.720 you are, and it subtracts the concomitant amount from your bank account. So you could say that China is,

00:18:43.360 if you like, the testing ground for these technologies. Whether or not that's the case,

00:18:48.080 and I think there's a compelling case to be made there, it is certainly the case that these are

00:18:52.080 ideas that came out of the United States, and they came out of the national security state.

00:18:56.960 That was a state that was heavily expanded, aggressively expanded under Nixon's two terms,

00:19:02.800 under the direction of Henry Kissinger. It's important to understand that these people are

00:19:07.920 technocrats. That's to say that they are an elite. They are an elite who believe that they

00:19:12.800 uniquely deserve power. There was a video today of John Kerry speaking in favor of the World Economic

00:19:20.480 Forum, saying that these people have a messianic quality because they believe themselves to have

00:19:25.040 been touched by a sense of mission to, as it were, serve humanity by leading them.

00:19:31.280 And when you stop and think about it, it's pretty extraordinary

00:19:34.080 that we, a select group of human beings, because of whatever touched us at some point in our lives,

00:19:44.480 are able to sit in a room and come together and actually talk about saving the planet.

00:19:50.720 I mean, it's so almost extraterrestrial to think about, quote, saving the planet. If you said that to

00:19:57.520 most people, most people, they think you're just a crazy, tree-hugging, lefty, liberal, you know, 0.95

00:20:02.880 do-gooder, whatever, and there's no relationship. But really, that's where we are. 0.92

00:20:10.560 People such as Tony Blair were often described as being possessed of a kind of messianic kind

00:20:15.840 of mentality. And the broader picture of the technocratic future that the World Economic Forum

00:20:22.240 paints for us does have a political, ethical, and economic dimension. In every action that they take,

00:20:28.880 it is a neoliberal economic dimension that they take, where you will find that corporations can

00:20:36.000 act without consequence. And so can state-level actors, that large-scale bureaucracies never face

00:20:42.480 the consequences of their disastrous decisions, no matter how bad it is. They may pay token fines,

00:20:48.240 they will continue to operate. But it is notable that you as an individual can have your life ruined

00:20:54.240 for saying the wrong pronoun. So for extremely negligible transgressions, which some self-appointed

00:21:01.200 commissars have now dedicated their lives to detecting in you, even in the way that you look at people,

00:21:06.800 this can be termed a microaggression. We've all heard about the terminology. The point that I'm making

00:21:11.520 here is the scale of consequence. The bigger you are, the tinier or in fact non-existent consequences

00:21:19.600 that are attended upon large-scale disasters resulting from your decisions. Whereas if you are

00:21:24.480 an individual person, your life can and may very well will be ruined by simply saying the wrong word.

00:21:31.040 This is the reality that we inhabit. Another political dimension that we have is the loss of moral authority

00:21:37.280 in the West. I mean, there was a thinker in Britain in the 1960s who was writing and speaking at the

00:21:43.440 same time that the Hudson Institute was taking off. He was called Sir Isaiah Berlin. And he was probably

00:21:48.880 the best defender of the liberal idea with the capital L, the John Stuart Mill classical liberalism,

00:21:55.120 who lived in the 20th century. He said that the reason why we are better than the Soviet Union, 0.96

00:22:00.880 the reason why we in the West are better than the dictatorships is because we have the moral

00:22:06.400 authority that comes from pluralism. We have the only society that tolerates opposing points of view

00:22:12.160 where you were free to disagree. Well, this is no longer the case. The last three years have

00:22:16.880 demonstrated that our so-called inalienable rights can be suspended at the whim of large-scale

00:22:22.160 bureaucracies, which means they are not rights at all. When they're inconvenient to the management,

00:22:28.960 they are simply dismissed. We do not any longer tolerate opposing points of view. You are free to agree.

00:22:36.560 Or you are free to carry the extremely severe penalties for noticing things, noticing basic

00:22:43.520 facts about reality out loud, or if you like, speaking your mind as a normal person in the 1990s.

00:22:51.040 The pace of change has been alarming. Opinions that were normal even 15 years ago, even 10 years ago,

00:22:58.320 are now hugely controversial and can cost you your livelihood. This is not a pluralistic society.

00:23:05.600 People joke about work and they joke about polarization. But the aim of cancel culture is to cancel culture

00:23:12.080 and replace it with a one-dimensional existence for us all. The one-dimensionality of life, the fact that

00:23:18.080 you're only free to agree, is also a function of what I would call the post-human future, which is

00:23:23.840 represented by the technocrats at the World Economic Forum. They're not the only ones, but it is the major

00:23:29.120 meeting place for people who are minded to see humanity as a problem to be managed. And the way

00:23:35.280 they intend to manage that problem is by dehumanizing people. It sounds sensationalist, but if you look

00:23:42.080 into what's happening with public morality, with the massification of human behavior, where everything

00:23:48.960 becomes a function of mass media society, there are mass crazes, suddenly, I don't know if I'm permitted

00:23:55.440 to say this, but the sudden obligatory worship of a criminal becomes not just an epidemic, but something

00:24:05.040 which you are expected to applaud or face consequences for. Issues such as the usage of masks, issues such

00:24:12.400 as the obligation to have injections whose safety is yet to be proven, issues such as the Nature published

00:24:19.920 a study showing the rising levels of global hatred of the unvaccinated, the extreme polarization of

00:24:27.520 society, the promotion of extreme individualism, the delimiting of desire, and the ethical system that

00:24:35.760 says that the greatest good is the pursuit of personal satisfaction, that it's simply hedonic utilitarianism.

00:24:44.720 Do what you like, seek pleasure, and there's no higher spiritual or moral purpose to life.

00:24:50.080 This leads to a vacuum in human nature. It subtracts from human life the greatest

00:24:56.880 possible meaning that there can be, which is the moral order that comes from God.

00:25:01.680 Notably, in the constitution of the European Union, there was no mention of Christianity.

00:25:07.280 This is because the European Union itself is very much the type of technocratic managerial

00:25:12.560 bureaucracy that envisages for its citizens a global trans-human or post-human identity,

00:25:21.440 where with everything that is meaningful in the human dimension is subtracted

00:25:26.320 in order to promote some idea of utopian equality. It is a society in which no one will have anything

00:25:33.040 to envy because there will be no difference, because we are viewed by these people as ideally fungible,

00:25:40.560 as if we're all just little yellow Lego men with replaceable heads and everybody with perpetually

00:25:47.280 smiling faces. This is genuinely the vision that the technocrats have for everyone, not for themselves,

00:25:55.200 because notably in his address to the Crystal Awards yesterday, Klaus Schwab said that he mentioned

00:26:03.360 the crises facing the world and that there could hardly be a worse time to be speaking, he said.

00:26:08.720 But then he says it begs the question, how are we to master the future? It does not take Sherlock Holmes

00:26:14.720 to ask or to answer who is to be the master and who is to be the mastered. The hubris of these people

00:26:22.080 is astonishing. It's remarkable that people who sit in these bureaucratic removes assign to themselves

00:26:31.280 and reserve exclusively to themselves the power to decide what is good for humanity. But not only that,

00:26:36.320 that they think that they have within their grasp the remedy. When he was asked years ago, decades ago,

00:26:43.360 why he decided to stage the economic forum, the World Economic Forum, on a mountain in Davos in

00:26:48.960 Switzerland, he referenced a book by Thomas Mann called The Magic Mountain. He said that because there's

00:26:54.560 something in German and Austrian imagination that's magical about mountains, and I wanted it to be that

00:27:01.600 kind of place a magical remove from the real world. If you read The Magic Mountain, I don't suggest you do

00:27:07.440 because I find Thomas Mann's books insufferably tedious. But nonetheless, he does have his fans.

00:27:15.520 It's about a sanitarium, which does exist. It's about a real place. So it's about a kind of asylum on top of

00:27:22.560 of a Swiss mountain, where people go to recover from society, and in which various occult and

00:27:30.320 mythological themes take place in the book. It isn't an innocent book. And the fantasies it has about

00:27:36.480 humanity are wicked, and they are depraved. And it is this that is the subtext of The Magic Mountain,

00:27:43.520 is that you have a cult-like mentality of people who are, in some sense, refugees,

00:27:49.680 but also seeking some kind of asylum from the world, who see themselves as separate from others,

00:27:55.280 and who can symbolize reality in a way that's meaningful only to them. These are people who

00:28:00.880 speak a hieratic language between themselves. These are people whose stated aims is to create

00:28:07.280 a global surveillance state for the betterment of mankind. These are people whose solutions, as it were,

00:28:13.520 are worse than the disease, and who never own up to the fact that most of these crises to which they

00:28:19.280 speak, they indicate crises constantly as an argument for their own solutions. But they never admit that

00:28:25.680 they themselves are the cause of these crises. The enormous crippling debt burden in the West was

00:28:31.760 caused by the very technocratic managerialists who are currently in charge of our system. They have

00:28:37.600 burdened everyone with a potential earthquake of debt, which may yet see the end of the dollar-based

00:28:45.840 system. It could be epochal in its disastrous consequences. Nonetheless, the latest round of

00:28:53.040 borrowing under Covid to finance these ruinous lockdowns has resulted in soar-away inflation

00:28:59.360 that has simply been fueled by nine rounds of sanctions against the Russians, that has seen

00:29:05.280 Europe gradually and then rapidly de-industrialize and enter a state of permanent stagflation with no

00:29:11.680 possible exit. These leaders, to whom we are to trust the future of humanity, have created the very

00:29:18.000 problems in almost every case of which they complain. The crises in the dissolution of society, the fact that

00:29:25.120 that they mention an epidemic of mental illness, and then they have the goal to tell you that this

00:29:30.640 is due to people's interactions with mass media, the very mass media that they're using to reshape you

00:29:37.040 into a broken human subject, a dehumanized broken subject who is more likely to be happy with a few

00:29:43.920 meager consumer consolations than the genuine consolations that make life truly meaningful,

00:29:50.240 which they can never offer. So they use the sense of permanent emergency as an invitation into their

00:29:58.400 dystopia. It's only by this means that it could make this hellish vision that they present to us

00:30:03.520 in any way appealing. No one would choose to take the emergency exit under normal circumstances.

00:30:11.760 Just a quick note before we return. If you would like to stay up to date on LifeSite's coverage of

00:30:16.720 the latest life, family, and culture news, subscribe to one of our many newsletters by

00:30:21.120 going to lifesitenews.com slash subscribe. And if you'd like to help us bring our truth-telling

00:30:26.960 coverage to millions around the world, please consider making a one-time or monthly donation

00:30:31.760 at give.lifesitenews.com. And now back to the video.

00:30:37.840 I want to get to in a moment what's going on at the World Economic Forum right now, but

00:30:43.040 one thing that is very noticeable because this started already, as you said, in the 60s and 70s,

00:30:50.000 but they've become much more visible of late. This used to run sort of behind the scenes. You would

00:30:56.960 hear it. I remember writing about this kind of thing in the early 1990s, but it was not popular.

00:31:04.000 It was not in the mainstream media where you would find it, you know, a new American magazine and things

00:31:08.640 like that. But very little reported on, very few reporters going there. Much of their goals,

00:31:15.600 you wouldn't know what's exactly happening. Today, they seem to be out in force that they're talking

00:31:22.640 about this. I'm amazed, for instance, that Yuval Noah Harari is able to speak publicly because he says the

00:31:30.720 most unbelievable things. He talks openly about useless people. What are we going to do with all 0.97

00:31:38.080 these useless people? And offering his suggestion, he says, the thing that I can think of most is 0.97

00:31:44.720 drugs and video games. 0.70

00:31:45.720 It's spoken like a true degenerate. I mean, if you indicate the man's private life, I think that's a case

00:31:52.680 of ipsa locata. You know, the thing speaks for itself. But as for why is the WEF so visible today, it's

00:31:59.720 because of their ability, their habit of leveraging a sense of permanent alarm. And the great success of

00:32:05.720 fomenting a sense of crisis over the environment has allowed them to open the door to their own profit solutions.

00:32:11.720 The more popular that this mistaken, and I think it is mistaken belief that mankind is destroying the

00:32:18.120 planet and is doing so in an accelerating, destructive fashion, is it simply helps these

00:32:24.200 people to advance their agenda. Without a sense of emergency, no one would even consider the

00:32:30.440 expedience that they're offering. But what he's offering is security in a time of ongoing crisis.

00:32:36.760 Crisis is their best friend. This is the reason why many people believe that they themselves have

00:32:41.400 deliberately fermented these crises. Personally, I had reservations about this, because having met

00:32:47.640 people who work in the institutions at a state level, I think most of them lack the competence.

00:32:53.560 They are certainly, seriously, I do not deny that there are plans, and I do not deny that there are

00:32:59.720 schemes, and that most of them are indeed wicked. They smell of sulphur. As soon as you open the door,

00:33:06.280 there is the echo of mythic laughter. It's unmistakable. But nonetheless, if there's one saving

00:33:12.520 grace to these people, it's their incompetence. And I think that it's difficult to argue from many

00:33:17.960 ends. If you look at certain global crises taking place right now, it's hard to see how these things

00:33:24.360 square away with the grand plan. The war plans haven't gone well. I mean, the United States

00:33:30.520 hasn't won a war since it bombed Japan, if you just count Grenada. The results of the neoconservative

00:33:38.520 expeditions abroad have been disastrous. So the idea that the wars feature in this seems preposterous to

00:33:46.040 me. The United States appears to be gearing up for the big one, which is a war against China. There's 0.61

00:33:52.360 been a recent slew of articles suggesting that, well, rehabilitating the debacle of Afghanistan

00:33:57.800 as some kind of sandbox experiment to prepare for a major war. That one. So I would say that

00:34:05.080 the thing about the World Economic Forum is that people forget that there are other factions

00:34:09.320 that play at state level in the world's most powerful nation, which is the United States. And

00:34:14.600 one of those factions is the neoconservatives. And they are a different branch of the same kind

00:34:20.600 of tree. They themselves received funding from the National Endowment for Democracy,

00:34:25.800 which was a similarly shady, initially CIA set up organization that was set up in the 1960s in

00:34:33.080 order to undermine communist states. It ended up funding think tanks, which support neoconservative

00:34:39.160 ideology. And even today continues to fund people who otherwise couldn't justify a career in journalism,

00:34:45.960 because they have the ideas of a shoe. But the thing is, when you find people who are famous

00:34:53.160 and in that sphere, and you wonder why, how on earth they got there? If you have a look into how

00:34:57.800 much money these people have, and what kind of ideology they're purporting to believe in,

00:35:04.040 it's simply parrot fashion. What they're doing is that they're being paid to repeat a lie,

00:35:08.440 and to rebroadcast it. Because the best thing, the most powerful thing that the West still does,

00:35:13.560 is the control of mass media, is propaganda. What's happening right now at the World Economic

00:35:18.200 Forum? I hear there's been some kind of restriction on journalists, or what's going on from what you've

00:35:22.920 been seeing? The thing about the 5,000 Swiss troops is true. There's always a heavy security presence

00:35:29.480 there. There was some brouhaha last year about a police badge. There is a police badge that they wear,

00:35:35.720 but these are local police, and they have a kind of novelty badge, because it's a kind of novel event.

00:35:43.080 But what that is, is there are also distasteful stories, one which comes out of the Daily Mail that

00:35:49.240 says about the amount of prostitutes that have flown into Davos, which gives you an idea of the

00:35:55.960 interests of the people attending it. It should come as no surprise that the kind of people who reach

00:36:01.400 these positions aren't people of the highest moral property. And what's going on this year,

00:36:06.040 specifically, is it is a year that is very much angled towards leveraging a sense of global crisis

00:36:13.080 to accelerate the appeal of the World Economic Forum's agenda. And what that agenda means is it is an

00:36:20.760 offer, as it were, and it's best understood as one, of global security and stability and a certain type

00:36:30.120 of citizenship as against a rising background of social collapse, societal collapse, and environmental

00:36:39.320 catastrophe. The global risk analysis that they publish every year, every year the WF publishes

00:36:46.120 an analysis of global risks. In almost every recent year, they've published a two-year, five- and ten-year

00:36:52.360 forecast. This year, it's just two and ten years. They've missed the medium term out. But they place an

00:36:58.520 enormous emphasis on environmental catastrophe. I have never been able to identify who it is they

00:37:04.440 interview to speak about these global concerns. There are no sources given, and there's no way of

00:37:10.040 finding out. And I suspect that if I did, I'd probably disappear. But the thing is, is that they make these

00:37:18.280 claims. And it's very, it's telling that the claims of the risk assessments that they offer

00:37:24.760 to tessellate very closely with the aims of the WF. Now, I honestly cannot see how you can overlook the

00:37:33.560 nuclear brinkmanship that we've all been treated to in the last year. That doesn't feature whatsoever,

00:37:42.040 nor does the impact of the disastrous sanctions, or what I would say is the large-scale failure of

00:37:49.000 diplomacy at the highest levels in the West. We should never be in this position. And it is a

00:37:55.320 genuine tragedy that it is, in fact, only Henry Kissinger himself who has suggested that we take the

00:38:01.320 off-ramp from Ukraine, that we avoid escalation. Henry Kissinger, for his many sins, we haven't got time for

00:38:08.760 that. I haven't got time for that in terms of the rest of my lifetime, never alone tonight. But Henry Kissinger is

00:38:15.000 is the man who helped to keep the West out of a nuclear exchange over cities like Donetsk.

00:38:22.120 Now, why does it matter so much now? Why are we supposed to throw our lives away for a borderland

00:38:28.920 that NATO would not fight a war over throughout the entirety of the Cold War? It is a shame that he's

00:38:36.200 the last realist of any influence whatsoever. He's completely surrounded by neoconservatives who are

00:38:43.480 constantly pushing for escalation. This is a reckless, ruinous policy. And every single war

00:38:49.320 that they've entered the United States into has been a catastrophic loss for the people of the 1.00

00:38:54.360 nations that they've destroyed, for the United States, who's lost its young men and women in those

00:38:59.080 wars, and of course, for the enormous costs. No one ever seems to count. Where does the money go?

00:39:04.680 He does countermand the other great faction against the technocrats, which is the neoconservatives,

00:39:12.680 that somehow see war as an instrument of civilization. Oddly enough, there's no mention of

00:39:20.040 that in any of the global risk analysis of the World Economic Forum. It's always an emphasis on

00:39:26.440 environmental doom. It says that people are frightened of the weather. Personally, I find the weather

00:39:31.400 inconvenient. It's very icy today, to be honest. My fingers got a bit cold. When it rains, sometimes

00:39:40.120 people feel a bit gloomy. But as for major concerns for the next 10 years, no. I don't believe the

00:39:46.440 weather forecast anyway, as I kind of darted the wool sceptic. I think that's a conspiracy to depress me,

00:39:52.280 because I live on a foggy island. It's never good news. But the thing about that is that the WF's

00:39:59.160 forecast deliberately excludes meaningful information that people would probably relay you in their own

00:40:05.800 lives. For example, there was a kind of national survey done by the Hungarian government several

00:40:11.880 days ago, the only one in Europe. And it found that 97% of Hungarians opposed the sanctions on Russia,

00:40:19.880 and thought they should immediately resile the position of hostility and escalation.

00:40:25.160 There's a growing sense in places like Hungary that the United States war faction is going to retire

00:40:32.840 from Ukraine, potentially hang it around the neck of Biden. And that will leave Europe in a seriously

00:40:39.320 diminished and exposed position. There are people already calling for, in France, in Hungary and

00:40:44.680 elsewhere, for a de-escalation, to try and draw some of the poison from the shattered relationship with

00:40:52.680 Russia. Because you simply have to find some way to accommodate yourself to your neighbours. 0.89

00:40:58.840 So people do not get asked about these things. The thing about the WF and its global risk analysis

00:41:04.680 is it doesn't take account of the concerns of ordinary people. And in that, it does reflect the

00:41:10.520 Western-style managerial democracies that we have, that are largely ignorant, willfully ignorant, 0.99

00:41:16.120 of the wishes of its population. It's my belief that the systems of the West are no longer truly democratic.

00:41:22.920 Because they do not function to reflect the general will of the people in any way. In fact,

00:41:28.200 you will find that on a large scale, the majority of public opinion is permanently excluded from the

00:41:34.440 political process. And in almost every Western country, people of genuine political conviction,

00:41:39.800 whether they be communists or from the right, are largely excluded from the party political process

00:41:46.200 for this reason. There is not just a tendency, it is a pattern. That is the nature of our governance.

00:41:51.960 We are governed by managerialists, by blank faces in times, people with monotone voices and

00:41:58.680 uninspiring characters, who pursue policies that are largely identical to the preceding party's policies,

00:42:05.160 against the wishes of the people, who constantly vote on a platform that's very attractive. It goes up like

00:42:10.760 a kind of Chinese lantern around the election cycle, only to disappear into the upper atmosphere and be

00:42:16.840 forgotten. It's like a firework. It burns brightly in the mind, all these promises. Then they vanish.

00:42:22.520 And it's business as usual. And you find that that business is angled more towards the kind of global

00:42:28.440 business that the World Economic Forum supports, and has absolutely nothing to do with the wishes

00:42:33.160 of its own electorate. This is another dimension in which the West has lost its legitimacy.

00:42:37.720 Now, you've been following this scenario for many years now. How far along in their plans do you think

00:42:44.440 they are? When do you think some of these global surveillance systems and total control, if you

00:42:52.440 will, might be put into place? You can see from the policies of the lockdowns, and you can see from the,

00:42:58.200 I mean, it's very, it's impossible to understand how many people actually took the vaccines in any

00:43:03.080 country because the data is just unreliable. Or perhaps in some cases, people haven't wanted to find out.

00:43:08.760 But from the acceptance of lockdowns, you can see that there's been a certain compliance with authority,

00:43:14.680 there are two arguments about this. The one argument is, you can do what you like to people

00:43:19.000 now. They'll never stand up to any form of tyranny. The other argument is, is that it may not be so

00:43:24.680 easy for them to do it next time. I think the second argument compelling myself, because from my own

00:43:30.040 experience, anecdotally, even from people who've taken two, maybe even three injections, most people

00:43:35.880 will never take another one. They feel tremendously let down. And there is a sense, a palpable sense,

00:43:41.320 that the truth has not been told to them. Of course, this is the case. But people who were trying to make

00:43:48.200 that point at the time were, of course, derided and isolated and neutralized as the kind of 0.76

00:43:55.880 lunatics, well, like me. So this is like anyone, like anyone who had an independence of mind,

00:44:03.000 regardless of your qualifications or expertise, was simply sidelined as a crank. This has been a

00:44:08.520 narrative that is gradually breaking down in the public imagination. And there's a sense of,

00:44:14.360 if you like, incredulity towards what people are told now. I mean, the United States suffered from

00:44:19.560 a credibility gap around the later stages of the Vietnam War, when it emerged that they simply

00:44:24.200 weren't winning, as against the broadcast that had been subjected to. The public knew they'd been lied

00:44:29.640 to. And they've been lied to here, globally. So it may be difficult to implement these procedures,

00:44:36.040 if you like, these transformations of human life, with a degree of cooperation that was expected from

00:44:43.000 the lockdowns. I don't think that the lockdowns show us that you can expect this kind of conformity and

00:44:48.360 compliance, maybe in a certain section of the population, but certainly not as much as a half

00:44:53.240 or 40% of people. I think people would be much more sceptical towards the aims and practices of

00:44:59.320 government, as well as when it sinks in, that the emergency was generally overstated, that the origins of

00:45:05.720 the virus itself were obscured, and that what was once a conspiracy theory has turned out to be true.

00:45:13.000 I mean, there's a great meme about that. It says that the conspiracy theorists are running out of them

00:45:18.040 because they've all turned out to be true. What this does is it makes people more sceptical,

00:45:22.760 more dubious of what they're told. Unfortunately, it then predisposes them to believe in things that

00:45:28.120 are equally spurious at times. But there's an incredulity towards power, which I think is

00:45:35.480 difficult for the World Economic Forum and the technocrats that support them. This is the reason why

00:45:40.600 they want to constantly sound the alarm bell. If your arguments are compelling, if you think you're

00:45:46.840 going to carry the people with you, then you will carry them with you anyway. If you really are

00:45:52.360 inviting them into a future that resembles some kind of appealing VIP experience, then surely they

00:45:58.280 need no persuasion. But if you're constantly having to bang the gong of alarm, if you're going to have

00:46:03.160 to sound the emergency every single time you want to persuade them, you're to point at crisis and even

00:46:08.920 create them to compel people to your arguments, it shows that your arguments aren't winning. I do not

00:46:14.280 think that there's the competence in the institutions to provide for a full authoritarian

00:46:20.200 crackdown either. I don't think we have them in the West anymore. One way to encapsulate that thought

00:46:27.720 is it's not the 90s anymore. When we think of the army, when we think of the state and the law,

00:46:33.800 when we think of the university system or medicine, we think of a vestige. We are attached to vestiges.

00:46:41.880 These are images of past deficiencies and past honours that have simply vanished. All they've

00:46:50.040 left are ghosts. We are attached to ghosts. Those things don't exist anymore. We don't have that kind

00:46:55.480 of efficiency. We don't have that kind of probity or strength of character or sense of civic duty that

00:47:01.080 inspired the excellence, which we thought was routine and would last forever. It turned out not to be

00:47:05.800 durable. There's a crisis of competence, which is due to this managerialism because it does select

00:47:12.200 for people for reasons other than their competence. It selects for them for being fungible parts of a

00:47:17.960 machine. It actually selects against talent and against merit and certainly against people of

00:47:24.280 principle. Even someone like Secretary of State James Baker, who worked for Walker Bush,

00:47:30.200 not a man who was universally liked, but this was a man who was a diplomat in the traditional sense,

00:47:36.840 who knew how to speak to people from foreign cultures without offending them, who took pains

00:47:42.120 to understand people's traditions. This is a man who was probably not seen as the most sympathetic to

00:47:48.280 them, but nonetheless, a man in the mold of, if not anywhere near the equal, of a Talleyrand.

00:47:54.120 But we don't have these kinds of people in the West anymore. We don't have the kind of diplomatic

00:47:59.480 engagement or even the will to find them because our managerial system throughout all of our

00:48:04.280 institutions, civil, scientific, military, and in public administration and in politics, selects

00:48:11.320 against talent. It selects against character. What it wants is conformity. It wants willing,

00:48:17.160 fungible parts in the broader managerial machine, and that's what it gets.

00:48:21.160 Where do you think this is going in the short term? How best could we work against this machine?

00:48:29.320 And what's your best bet on the outcome of this year and next?

00:48:33.400 The best antidote to what you might call the massification of everything or scale, which is

00:48:40.520 the scale complexity, atomization, liberalism, and elitism that typifies this kind of technological

00:48:47.640 managerialism, is by strong and meaningful human scale bonds, community bonds, by the belief in God,

00:48:55.480 by genuine, durable human relations, which begins with the family but doesn't end there,

00:49:01.560 but the extension of the family into a meaningful community, a helpful mutualist community where

00:49:06.600 people have shared and stable values. Human scale relations is the answer. There is a political

00:49:12.840 movement, which I wrote about for LifeSite the other day, based around the objection to the

00:49:17.560 abolition of farming in Holland. And these people have won. They've won. They succeeded in gaining the

00:49:24.680 resignation of the Minister for Agriculture, and they're now one of the leading parties in the

00:49:28.840 country, maybe the foremost party in the country by April. They're rising rapidly in the polls. This is

00:49:34.840 a movement that's based upon what they call neighbourly values. Because their community has not yet been

00:49:40.040 destroyed by the kind of large-scale managerial bureaucratization of everything, there still

00:49:45.880 exist strong community bonds of loyalty and kinship and meaning, which has snowballed into an enormous

00:49:52.760 political movement. It's called the farmer-citizen movement. Social bonds, genuine human interaction,

00:49:59.560 people who still retain the meaningful, human face-to-face relations that make life worth living.

00:50:06.360 These are the people who are going to win. These systems, one of the things that people overlook

00:50:11.720 when they begin to think about the enormous, complex, powerful, media-infused and propagandized

00:50:19.560 bureaucracies which are bearing down upon us, they forget the inherent instability of an ever-more

00:50:27.960 complex system. It is unstable, and it is tending towards more instability. It isn't working, which is

00:50:36.440 the reason why the promotion of crisis has become a central plank of the WF's annual agenda. It used to

00:50:44.920 be about creating a better future through business, prosperity and cooperation, and more of an upbeat tone.

00:50:52.760 But now it's an attempting to compel its own arguments by pointing to global crises, which all tend somehow

00:51:00.360 to trace back to the very people in the room at the time. It's a very difficult argument to make when

00:51:05.800 people begin to look and say, well, you know, why was there an economic crisis after lockdown and all

00:51:11.320 that money? Where did all that money go? Oh, they're all sitting in this room. There they are. It was you.

00:51:17.480 And furthermore, right, anyone who's going to put Bono on the screen, I mean, really, you know, I think

00:51:24.680 not only have you lost all legitimacy, I mean, that's basically an argument for giving Putin the

00:51:29.640 nuclear coordinates. You don't have to say anything more than Bono. Just the last syllable, no, will do.

00:51:38.840 Yeah, I think he should change his name to that. But that's the thing is that human scale relations

00:51:44.520 are possible. A human scale society is possible. The antidote to this is what is meaningful. This is

00:51:52.200 the reason why these technocrats hate the family. This is the reason why you have so many anti-family

00:51:57.560 policies. Yuval Noah Harari will never have a family, or if he will, it will be a weird approximation of

00:52:03.640 one because he's an aggressive homosexualist. And he doesn't see anything wrong with that. And this 0.75

00:52:08.840 is the reason why he sees nothing when we're taking a wrecking ball to human nature and to the natural

00:52:14.520 order. These people have their own agendas privately, but you will find that they feed into an idea of

00:52:22.440 humanity that rejects the human scale in everything. Everything that is meaningful, from genuine affection,

00:52:30.040 for their disgusting conflation of the idea of love with unbridled sexual depravity. The moral inversion

00:52:39.720 that results from the massification of society is another thing that is producing inherent instability

00:52:46.840 in this attempt at a global managerial bureaucracy. The moral inversion is not just the inversion of

00:52:53.880 vice and virtue. You can see from Nike advertisements that champion the obese, from stunning and brave,

00:53:02.280 being applied to Bruce Jenner. I refuse to call him by any other name. Stunning and brave. Whenever

00:53:08.280 people mention that, I simply see his face. And I'm determined to get myself sent to the gulags. I will

00:53:14.840 go to the gulag for misgendering Jenner. The moral inversion that results from this 0.92

00:53:19.080 extremely distorted vision of humanity. It comes from the massification of human experience. It's a

00:53:27.160 pathologizing tendency. Moral inversion isn't just about turning the values upside down, about presenting

00:53:33.400 vice as virtue. It's also typified by an intense but nihilistic fervor. It's because when people's

00:53:44.040 genuine, genuine anchorage of meaning in God, in the family, in durable human-scale relations,

00:53:51.880 in their own communities, when their nation is dissolved, when their custom and culture and

00:53:56.920 tradition is reviled and dragged through the mud and dismantled aggressively, when there's nothing left

00:54:03.240 but the self, then there is an enormous nihilistic void within people that screams to be filled. It is

00:54:10.840 this howl that you hear when people tear down statues or when they commit arson and riots in

00:54:16.840 the name of social justice. In every furore that seems to take place first through social media and

00:54:23.880 then in the streets, you can see this intense moral fervor of people who have no wider moral framework

00:54:29.480 than themselves and whose actions, in a broader sense, simply don't make sense. It is a meaningless but

00:54:36.920 intense sense of self-importance. And that's the desperation of people who are completely deprived

00:54:44.120 from the correct or natural human dimension. It is a mass psychosis. And this is useful too. If you're

00:54:53.800 a technocratic managerialist, the sicker people are, the better, because they're more easily manipulated.

00:55:00.680 And also they buy more things, like Funko Pops.

00:55:05.400 I want to ask you for concluding thoughts, and I want to get your, uh, you're okay to come back

00:55:10.360 on the program. It's been a fascinating ride with you. I am so glad we got to this. Uh,

00:55:15.880 give us your final thoughts, if you will.

00:55:17.880 I would say nil desperando. Despair is, is a sin. And it's a sin for a reason. Because you give up on

00:55:24.200 the hope of the salvation of the Lord. Well, these people fear if, and they do fear a lot of things.

00:55:30.120 They fear happy, well-ordered, stable, functioning people. And these are people whose lives are anchored

00:55:37.160 in God and the family. And if you, if you ever wanted something to live by, other than your faith,

00:55:43.000 if you want a motto that you can live by, why, to resist the large scale mental illness factory 0.83

00:55:50.520 that is being promoted as the future normality, you could just think of yourself as a radical normal.

00:55:56.280 Because to be normal is really to be radical nowadays. Be proud. We should start a march,

00:56:01.960 actually. Maybe I'll lead it. Normal pride. You can turn up as yourself. Bring your own flag. It's

00:56:09.800 probably a flag that you recognized from your childhood. But yes, that's what I would say,

00:56:15.400 is that, is that we are the kind of people that will be, that will be there to pick up the pieces.

00:56:21.160 I want to say this in all seriousness, because I've been joking. The epidemic mental illness is,

00:56:25.240 is a fact of society. The fact that screen-based socialization, that people are increasingly

00:56:30.680 patterned on things that make them mentally ill, is, is a fact. The epidemic use of antidepressants

00:56:36.360 is a fact. The large scale immiseration of people is a fact. Do not go among these people

00:56:42.040 and sneer. Don't, don't go up to your broken, screaming, blue-haired compatriots and despise

00:56:48.520 them. Think of yourself, even if you can't say anything nice about them, try and think of yourself

00:56:53.480 as a missionary in your own society. This is the best way that I've ever heard. It wasn't my idea.

00:56:59.720 It was someone that told me this. This is the best way that I've ever heard of how to function

00:57:05.400 in the madhouse. Don't let yourself become poisoned by hate. Think of yourself as a missionary in your

00:57:11.560 own culture, in your own community, in your own life, in your own, in your own nation, because that's

00:57:17.320 what it needs to heal it. Indeed. Frank Wright, thank you so much for being with us. And we hope that you're

00:57:23.960 back very soon for more details on what's going on with the World Economic Forum and everything else.

00:57:29.240 May God bless you. Thank you. Thank you, John. God bless you, too. Bye-bye for now.

00:57:33.080 Bye-bye for now, and God bless all of you. And we'll see you next time.

00:57:53.960 the latest life, family, faith, and freedom news. Thanks for watching, and may God bless you.

The John-Henry Westen Show - January 20, 2023

NEW： Dark Origin and Agenda of Klaus Schwab's World Economic Forum

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript