NEW： Dark Origin and Agenda of Klaus Schwab's World Economic Forum
Summary
The key to understanding the World Economic Forum, which we re hearing about in the news today, is really revealed in its origins. Do you even know what the origins are of the WEF? Have a listen to this briefly to find out.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
What if I told you that the key to understanding what is going on with the World Economic Forum,
00:00:06.180
which we're hearing about in the news today, is really revealed in its origins? Do you even know
00:00:13.020
what the origins are of the World Economic Forum? Have a listen to this briefly.
00:00:20.400
They've been around since about 1971. They were first founded as what was then called the European
00:00:26.320
Community Forum, which was an initiative that was started, oddly enough, by Henry Kissinger,
00:00:32.560
who first introduced Klaus Schwab to the economist John Kenneth Galbraith, and a man called Herman
00:00:39.120
Kahn. He used to run a think tank for the technocratic future managerial model of society
00:00:44.900
called the Hudson Institute. These men were put together in order to create what was thought
00:00:50.000
then to be an extension of the United States' interest in global governance, in a model for
00:00:56.220
how to best efficiently manage human populations. And Europe was seen as a problem that they
00:01:02.000
hadn't yet tried to solve. So in 1971, in 1970, they accompanied Schwab to attract people to
00:01:08.620
the first meeting, which took place in 1971. Several years later, it became the World Economic
00:01:13.640
Forum. Kissinger himself addressed the World Economic Forum in 1980. So he carried on in an
00:01:19.620
association, which I think will continue to this day, even though it's probably less gifted
00:01:24.100
in the limelight now. In addition to knowing where the World Economic Forum came from, they
00:01:32.320
have plans, plans for the future that they are rolling out in front of us right now. Listen
00:01:38.300
to some of that. The World Economic Forum is part of a much broader attempt to refigure human
00:01:46.600
behavior and indeed to institute a global management system that is more efficient from the point of view
00:01:53.620
of management, of global management, precisely because it patterns human behavior upon technology
00:01:59.960
that was initially invented to spy on everyone. In order to sustain what they're doing, because
00:02:06.880
it seems so impossible when they tell us at the same time, you're going to own nothing and yet be
00:02:11.080
happy. How are they going to do that? There's one key element that you've got to understand in how
00:02:20.300
Why is the WEF so visible today? It's because of their ability, their habit of leveraging a sense
00:02:28.000
of permanent alarm. And the great success of fomenting a sense of crisis over the environment
00:02:33.240
has allowed them to open the door to their own profit solutions. The more popular that this mistaken,
00:02:39.900
and I think it is mistaken, belief that mankind is destroying the planet and is doing so in an
00:02:45.760
accelerating destructive fashion, it simply helps these people to advance their agenda. Without a
00:02:52.420
sense of emergency, no one would even consider the expedience that they're offering. But what is
00:02:57.820
offering is security in a time of ongoing crisis. Crisis is their best friend.
00:03:05.100
There is a solution to all of this. I know it seems completely overwhelming, like these guys own the
00:03:11.000
universe, and are coming after us, and there's nothing we can do. Actually, there is something we
00:03:19.340
The best antidote to what you might call the massification of everything, or, you know,
00:03:23.880
scale, which is, you know, the scale complexity, atomization, liberalism, and elitism that typifies
00:03:31.900
this kind of technological managerialism, is by strong and meaningful human scale bonds,
00:03:38.360
community bonds, by the belief in God, by genuine, durable human relations, which begins with the
00:03:45.760
family, but doesn't end there, but the extension of the family into a meaningful community,
00:03:50.580
a helpful mutualist community where people have shared and stable values. Human scale relations is
00:03:59.500
And let me introduce this fellow to you. This is Frank Wright. Frank Wright is a writer for LifeSite
00:04:04.980
News. Thanks be to God. And we are so pleased to bring you his insights on the World Economic Forum,
00:04:10.380
which he has been studying for years and years, and which he is following for LifeSite News right
00:04:15.200
now. This is the John Henry Weston Show. Stay tuned.
00:04:28.800
Let's begin, as we always do, with the sign of the cross.
00:04:30.440
In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Amen.
00:04:35.680
A lot of people are right now focused on the World Economic Forum because a lot of the world
00:04:41.240
leaders are there. It's going on. There's already a lot of controversy in that people are being
00:04:45.900
barred from seeing what's actually going on. Tell us, if you can, what is the World Economic Forum?
00:04:53.540
Where does it come from? And why the big splash about it now?
00:04:56.440
Well, the big splash about it now is obviously because it is a rather secretive and somewhat
00:05:00.600
influential organization that's mainly composed of, well, business leaders. They're very, very
00:05:06.980
interested in attracting global business leaders, like leaders of international corporations and so
00:05:12.020
on, digital media companies, leaders of industry. And this will help them in their stated aims,
00:05:17.980
which is they are really a managerial organization that seeks to shape the future experience of humanity
00:05:23.100
and global governance. So they invite world leaders as well.
00:05:26.440
And they've been around since about 1971. They were first founded as what was then called the
00:05:32.600
European Community Forum, which was an initiative that was started, oddly enough, by Henry Kissinger,
00:05:39.680
who first introduced Klaus Schwab to the, well, the economist John Kenneth Galbraith, and a man called
00:05:45.480
Herman Kahn. He used to run a think tank for the kind of technocratic future managerial model of society
00:05:51.620
called the Hudson Institute. So these men were put together in order to create what was thought then
00:05:56.960
to be an extension of the United States interest in global governance, in a model for how to best
00:06:03.740
efficiently manage human populations. And Europe was seen as a problem that they hadn't yet tried to solve.
00:06:10.000
So in 1971, in 1970, they accompanied Schwab to attract people to the first meeting, which took place
00:06:17.240
in 1971. Several years later, it became the World Economic Forum. Kissinger himself addressed the World
00:06:22.680
Economic Forum in 1980. So he carried on an association, which I think will continue to this day, even though
00:06:29.160
it's probably less gifted than limelight now. What the World Economic Forum wishes to do is it wishes to attract
00:06:35.120
influential people in order to promote a managerial program that is largely infused by technology.
00:06:42.040
Since about 1941, the idea that you can see humanity as a managerial problem, as a problem to be managed,
00:06:50.760
has been around since the publication of a book called The Managerial Revolution by James P. Burnham,
00:06:56.400
which was first reviewed famously by George Orwell. In this book is a blueprint for modern society.
00:07:03.040
You would recognize much of the processes and even some of the language today, such as the manager's
00:07:07.540
right to manage. But what it presages is the supplanting of state and institutional power with
00:07:14.520
that of an international managerial class, one which we have today. And what has changed since the 1940s
00:07:21.280
is technology. We have the technology, or rather they do that, to advance an idea of a future humanity,
00:07:28.340
which I would argue is the deletion of everything valuable about the human experience in order to
00:07:35.160
make human beings globally more manageable. If anybody's wondering who Henry Kissinger is,
00:07:40.020
he is the same one who, involved with the U.S. government, actually drafted NSSM 200, which was the
00:07:47.120
National Security Study Memorandum 200, which outlined the need for population control to be imposed by
00:07:54.440
the United States to maintain supremacy around the world. And that then got put into U.S. foreign policy,
00:08:01.320
which is why you see, even to this day, the massive push on birth control and population control around
00:08:09.260
the globe coming from the United States, because it's actually part of their international policy as
00:08:14.840
developed by Henry Kissinger. But please go on. You were mentioning to me before that these folks,
00:08:21.220
even in the 60s, could envision a time when they would be able to do this kind of mass population
00:08:29.800
control. Yes. Whenever they talk about it, whether it's in 1941 or 1969 or 1970 or yesterday at the
00:08:37.640
Crystal Awards by Schwab himself, they always frame this technological transformation into a mass surveillance
00:08:43.320
state in talk of security or safety or a more stable way of life for everyone. So what was going on
00:08:50.680
with the Hudson Institute with Herman Kahn? Herman Kahn invited the BBC into his institute in, I think,
00:08:56.780
in 1969 to, as it were, open the door on his work there, which was very well funded and did do much to
00:09:03.200
inform the posture and policy of the developing United States national security state under Nixon.
00:09:08.840
What he was talking about in this interview is remarkable. He speaks about a future managerial
00:09:14.400
utopia, a utopia from the manager's point of view, of course, wherewith they encounter social problems.
00:09:20.360
He describes the emergence of violent protest movements as throwing sand in the gears. They
00:09:25.680
always use mechanical metaphors. But tellingly, in the case of a scenario that they imagine where an
00:09:32.240
entire city is revolting, is in some state of civil unrest, they casually discuss the option of
00:09:38.160
neutralizing this problem. Again, you know, in very delicate language, by adding tranquilizers to
00:09:44.000
the water supply. And Herman Kahn's on video saying this, just to prove that let's let's show a clip of
00:09:50.400
that if we could. You could imagine temporarily tranquilizing the whole city. You know, it's been
00:09:57.680
upset, the riots, you know, let's put trans guards either in the air or in the water, you know, just
00:10:04.400
get people settled down a bit. Well, I mean, this is it sounds unbelievable. But what was he actually
00:10:10.560
saying there? And the tie in again, from Herman Kahn to where we are today with the World Economic Forum?
00:10:19.040
The tie in from Herman Kahn to where we are today in the World Economic Forum is that he was
00:10:23.600
introduced along with John Kenneth Galbraith to Klaus Schwab by Henry Kissinger in order to form the
00:10:28.720
World Economic Forum. This is the origins of the WF, which is rather lesser known, but which is
00:10:33.920
documented in publications such as the New York Times. In a New York Times interview in the 90s,
00:10:38.880
I think in 1997, Schwab himself mentions the meeting which they arranged in Europe between himself and
00:10:46.400
Khan Khan and Galbraith to attract world leaders and influential members of the business community
00:10:51.600
and people that they called opinion formers to come to the World Economic Forum. I mean,
00:10:56.160
tellingly, the World Economic Forum, I think to this day does not pay what they call honorariums.
00:11:02.080
They may pay for your hotel room, but they make money. They don't pay people to appear there.
00:11:07.440
The idea is that you join an increasingly influential forum, which includes people who
00:11:15.120
have the power to make hidden decisions throughout the world. The hidden decision dimension comes from
00:11:20.640
the United States national security state. There is one aspect of this game that really ought to be
00:11:26.800
common knowledge, but isn't. The Total Information Awareness Program is a very good example for many
00:11:33.520
reasons. It came around in around 2002, after the September 11th attacks, which conveniently gave
00:11:40.080
the neoconservatives the shot in the arm that they needed to prevent them from extinction. It opened the
00:11:46.800
door to these ideas of global mass surveillance, which are necessary for this kind of technocratic
00:11:52.960
management. It was met with absolute outcry, because what it was, was an attempt to institute the
00:12:00.320
very suggestions that Herman Kahn made in the Hudson Institute 22 years earlier. It said,
00:12:06.880
we can now, we now have the technology to institute a total information awareness program. That is to
00:12:13.680
say, to execute a mass surveillance program on the United States population. In 1969, in this interview
00:12:19.680
that we've just seen, Herman Kahn's protégé talks about future technology in which it will be possible to
00:12:24.800
do just this. He speaks of phone calls quite nostalgically, saying that we'll be able to monitor every
00:12:30.080
single phone call, and then have a computer scan these phone calls worldwide, every single worldwide
00:12:35.760
phone call, for keywords to see if we need to look at it more closely.
00:12:41.840
One could, with a computer capacity that will be available in the next couple of decades,
00:12:46.240
one could easily record every phone conversation made. And then one could easily scan mechanically,
00:12:54.240
no human being could spend the centuries that would be required. One could scan every conversation
00:13:00.400
looking for keywords that would identify the conversation as worth looking into a little further.
00:13:06.080
So that, for example, one could begin with a naive set of words, kill, rob, murder, assassinate, plot.
00:13:16.080
What the United States security state wanted to do in 2003 was to execute this program. It was met with
00:13:25.440
outlaw, uplaw, sorry, and outrage. And their expedient was to change it to the terrorist information
00:13:34.000
awareness initiative, which, of course, then was evocative of images of safety and Big Brother looking
00:13:40.160
after you rather than prying into your every movement to create, as they said, a limitless array
00:13:46.400
of data points of human behavior. This is where the story gets interesting because this program did,
00:13:53.520
in fact, attempt to change its branding by moving from a more traditional CIA-style presentation to
00:14:02.480
cutesy cartoon-like imagery to soften its image. It didn't work. It was ordered by the United States
00:14:09.840
Senate to shut down. But it was continued. And it was continued by the admission of DARPA itself,
00:14:17.360
in documents that can still be seen on the Wayback Machine on their own website,
00:14:21.360
into a program called LifeLog. Now, LifeLog was an attempt to extend data capture from mere telephone
00:14:27.840
calls to everything humans did. It was a prototype for Facebook, and it was closed on the very same day
00:14:34.960
that Facebook was launched. In later statements made by former DARPA employees, they admit openly
00:14:41.520
that Facebook is nothing more than a continuation of the United States' security state attempt to
00:14:46.880
capture trillions of data points from people voluntarily, thereby obviating objection to a mass
00:14:53.200
surveillance state. And they're doing this in order to build what DARPA called in 2004
00:14:58.480
cognitive computing. That's to say, the modern algorithms that we have today. Now, these algorithms
00:15:04.720
are important because what they are is a machine-based model of human nature, which is largely based on the
00:15:12.160
behavior of people who have enthusiastically adopted social media. So the model of human behavior that
00:15:18.000
they're capturing is of people who are quite comfortable to upload their personalities to the machine and
00:15:24.400
to live this synergistic life, this cybernetic existence that practically removes or displaces
00:15:30.560
the human dimension with that of the virtual. People who are happy to pixelate themselves have become
00:15:35.920
the future model of humanity for the managerial society, for the utopia that they imagine for us
00:15:41.280
all to inhabit in future. It is a model of human behavior in nature that eliminates God and the best of
00:15:47.840
human nature itself. All the dissidents, the independence of mind, the strength of character
00:15:53.200
that allows you to resist the mass formation psychosis, will not feature in these algorithms.
00:15:59.200
And these tendencies will and are isolated and neutralized by these very algorithms that run most
00:16:05.280
of the social media companies. Now, if you mention this to people, they would think it sounds quite
00:16:10.320
far-fetched. But if you care to look it up, and I have written an article that references these links
00:16:15.440
for life site, which was published on Monday, you can see that the United States government's own
00:16:20.960
archives demonstrate the veracity of all these claims. So the World Economic Forum is part of a
00:16:27.520
much broader attempt to refigure human behavior and indeed to institute a global management system that
00:16:35.840
is more efficient from the point of view of global management, precisely because it patterns human
00:16:42.320
behavior upon technology that was initially invented to spy on everyone.
00:16:46.800
Unbelievable. If you can just define one term, DARPA you mentioned a couple of times, what's DARPA?
00:16:51.120
It's the Defense and Armaments Research Project Agency, which is the kind of acronym that you might
00:16:58.320
think just features in shady video games. But really, it's a defense research agency that's been around
00:17:05.520
since I think the 1950s. Advanced technologies, especially things like intelligence techniques,
00:17:13.360
data capture, but also things like experimental military technology and strategy. It's a think tank for,
00:17:22.320
if you like, defense, which now in the United States security state also adembrates national security.
00:17:28.720
So it would be, if you like, it's where a lot of the military spooks hang out. It's a function of
00:17:37.600
the intelligence state. What's truly remarkable is that most of the world has heard about this.
00:17:43.600
They've heard about this in China. They've heard about it as the system in China where every movement
00:17:51.120
you make, every phone call, every click on your computer and your handheld device are all registered.
00:17:57.760
You're given a social credit score that then can even interact with your bank account
00:18:03.440
if you're allowed out, and so on. It's everything controlled. What you're saying is
00:18:09.280
the evidence is there that this is being foisted upon the US population and the population of the
00:18:15.360
globe at large. How does China even figure into that? Are they like the test run or what?
00:18:20.480
That's a viable hypothesis. I think it is. China now has a biometric system where you can pay with
00:18:25.680
your face. So your face is already linked to your social credit account, and you don't need to show
00:18:31.360
any chip or any kind of implant or your phone. As soon as you show your face to the camera, it knows who
00:18:36.720
you are, and it subtracts the concomitant amount from your bank account. So you could say that China is,
00:18:43.360
if you like, the testing ground for these technologies. Whether or not that's the case,
00:18:48.080
and I think there's a compelling case to be made there, it is certainly the case that these are
00:18:52.080
ideas that came out of the United States, and they came out of the national security state.
00:18:56.960
That was a state that was heavily expanded, aggressively expanded under Nixon's two terms,
00:19:02.800
under the direction of Henry Kissinger. It's important to understand that these people are
00:19:07.920
technocrats. That's to say that they are an elite. They are an elite who believe that they
00:19:12.800
uniquely deserve power. There was a video today of John Kerry speaking in favor of the World Economic
00:19:20.480
Forum, saying that these people have a messianic quality because they believe themselves to have
00:19:25.040
been touched by a sense of mission to, as it were, serve humanity by leading them.
00:19:31.280
And when you stop and think about it, it's pretty extraordinary
00:19:34.080
that we, a select group of human beings, because of whatever touched us at some point in our lives,
00:19:44.480
are able to sit in a room and come together and actually talk about saving the planet.
00:19:50.720
I mean, it's so almost extraterrestrial to think about, quote, saving the planet. If you said that to
00:19:57.520
most people, most people, they think you're just a crazy, tree-hugging, lefty, liberal, you know,
00:20:02.880
do-gooder, whatever, and there's no relationship. But really, that's where we are.
00:20:10.560
People such as Tony Blair were often described as being possessed of a kind of messianic kind
00:20:15.840
of mentality. And the broader picture of the technocratic future that the World Economic Forum
00:20:22.240
paints for us does have a political, ethical, and economic dimension. In every action that they take,
00:20:28.880
it is a neoliberal economic dimension that they take, where you will find that corporations can
00:20:36.000
act without consequence. And so can state-level actors, that large-scale bureaucracies never face
00:20:42.480
the consequences of their disastrous decisions, no matter how bad it is. They may pay token fines,
00:20:48.240
they will continue to operate. But it is notable that you as an individual can have your life ruined
00:20:54.240
for saying the wrong pronoun. So for extremely negligible transgressions, which some self-appointed
00:21:01.200
commissars have now dedicated their lives to detecting in you, even in the way that you look at people,
00:21:06.800
this can be termed a microaggression. We've all heard about the terminology. The point that I'm making
00:21:11.520
here is the scale of consequence. The bigger you are, the tinier or in fact non-existent consequences
00:21:19.600
that are attended upon large-scale disasters resulting from your decisions. Whereas if you are
00:21:24.480
an individual person, your life can and may very well will be ruined by simply saying the wrong word.
00:21:31.040
This is the reality that we inhabit. Another political dimension that we have is the loss of moral authority
00:21:37.280
in the West. I mean, there was a thinker in Britain in the 1960s who was writing and speaking at the
00:21:43.440
same time that the Hudson Institute was taking off. He was called Sir Isaiah Berlin. And he was probably
00:21:48.880
the best defender of the liberal idea with the capital L, the John Stuart Mill classical liberalism,
00:21:55.120
who lived in the 20th century. He said that the reason why we are better than the Soviet Union,
00:22:00.880
the reason why we in the West are better than the dictatorships is because we have the moral
00:22:06.400
authority that comes from pluralism. We have the only society that tolerates opposing points of view
00:22:12.160
where you were free to disagree. Well, this is no longer the case. The last three years have
00:22:16.880
demonstrated that our so-called inalienable rights can be suspended at the whim of large-scale
00:22:22.160
bureaucracies, which means they are not rights at all. When they're inconvenient to the management,
00:22:28.960
they are simply dismissed. We do not any longer tolerate opposing points of view. You are free to agree.
00:22:36.560
Or you are free to carry the extremely severe penalties for noticing things, noticing basic
00:22:43.520
facts about reality out loud, or if you like, speaking your mind as a normal person in the 1990s.
00:22:51.040
The pace of change has been alarming. Opinions that were normal even 15 years ago, even 10 years ago,
00:22:58.320
are now hugely controversial and can cost you your livelihood. This is not a pluralistic society.
00:23:05.600
People joke about work and they joke about polarization. But the aim of cancel culture is to cancel culture
00:23:12.080
and replace it with a one-dimensional existence for us all. The one-dimensionality of life, the fact that
00:23:18.080
you're only free to agree, is also a function of what I would call the post-human future, which is
00:23:23.840
represented by the technocrats at the World Economic Forum. They're not the only ones, but it is the major
00:23:29.120
meeting place for people who are minded to see humanity as a problem to be managed. And the way
00:23:35.280
they intend to manage that problem is by dehumanizing people. It sounds sensationalist, but if you look
00:23:42.080
into what's happening with public morality, with the massification of human behavior, where everything
00:23:48.960
becomes a function of mass media society, there are mass crazes, suddenly, I don't know if I'm permitted
00:23:55.440
to say this, but the sudden obligatory worship of a criminal becomes not just an epidemic, but something
00:24:05.040
which you are expected to applaud or face consequences for. Issues such as the usage of masks, issues such
00:24:12.400
as the obligation to have injections whose safety is yet to be proven, issues such as the Nature published
00:24:19.920
a study showing the rising levels of global hatred of the unvaccinated, the extreme polarization of
00:24:27.520
society, the promotion of extreme individualism, the delimiting of desire, and the ethical system that
00:24:35.760
says that the greatest good is the pursuit of personal satisfaction, that it's simply hedonic utilitarianism.
00:24:44.720
Do what you like, seek pleasure, and there's no higher spiritual or moral purpose to life.
00:24:50.080
This leads to a vacuum in human nature. It subtracts from human life the greatest
00:24:56.880
possible meaning that there can be, which is the moral order that comes from God.
00:25:01.680
Notably, in the constitution of the European Union, there was no mention of Christianity.
00:25:07.280
This is because the European Union itself is very much the type of technocratic managerial
00:25:12.560
bureaucracy that envisages for its citizens a global trans-human or post-human identity,
00:25:21.440
where with everything that is meaningful in the human dimension is subtracted
00:25:26.320
in order to promote some idea of utopian equality. It is a society in which no one will have anything
00:25:33.040
to envy because there will be no difference, because we are viewed by these people as ideally fungible,
00:25:40.560
as if we're all just little yellow Lego men with replaceable heads and everybody with perpetually
00:25:47.280
smiling faces. This is genuinely the vision that the technocrats have for everyone, not for themselves,
00:25:55.200
because notably in his address to the Crystal Awards yesterday, Klaus Schwab said that he mentioned
00:26:03.360
the crises facing the world and that there could hardly be a worse time to be speaking, he said.
00:26:08.720
But then he says it begs the question, how are we to master the future? It does not take Sherlock Holmes
00:26:14.720
to ask or to answer who is to be the master and who is to be the mastered. The hubris of these people
00:26:22.080
is astonishing. It's remarkable that people who sit in these bureaucratic removes assign to themselves
00:26:31.280
and reserve exclusively to themselves the power to decide what is good for humanity. But not only that,
00:26:36.320
that they think that they have within their grasp the remedy. When he was asked years ago, decades ago,
00:26:43.360
why he decided to stage the economic forum, the World Economic Forum, on a mountain in Davos in
00:26:48.960
Switzerland, he referenced a book by Thomas Mann called The Magic Mountain. He said that because there's
00:26:54.560
something in German and Austrian imagination that's magical about mountains, and I wanted it to be that
00:27:01.600
kind of place a magical remove from the real world. If you read The Magic Mountain, I don't suggest you do
00:27:07.440
because I find Thomas Mann's books insufferably tedious. But nonetheless, he does have his fans.
00:27:15.520
It's about a sanitarium, which does exist. It's about a real place. So it's about a kind of asylum on top of
00:27:22.560
of a Swiss mountain, where people go to recover from society, and in which various occult and
00:27:30.320
mythological themes take place in the book. It isn't an innocent book. And the fantasies it has about
00:27:36.480
humanity are wicked, and they are depraved. And it is this that is the subtext of The Magic Mountain,
00:27:43.520
is that you have a cult-like mentality of people who are, in some sense, refugees,
00:27:49.680
but also seeking some kind of asylum from the world, who see themselves as separate from others,
00:27:55.280
and who can symbolize reality in a way that's meaningful only to them. These are people who
00:28:00.880
speak a hieratic language between themselves. These are people whose stated aims is to create
00:28:07.280
a global surveillance state for the betterment of mankind. These are people whose solutions, as it were,
00:28:13.520
are worse than the disease, and who never own up to the fact that most of these crises to which they
00:28:19.280
speak, they indicate crises constantly as an argument for their own solutions. But they never admit that
00:28:25.680
they themselves are the cause of these crises. The enormous crippling debt burden in the West was
00:28:31.760
caused by the very technocratic managerialists who are currently in charge of our system. They have
00:28:37.600
burdened everyone with a potential earthquake of debt, which may yet see the end of the dollar-based
00:28:45.840
system. It could be epochal in its disastrous consequences. Nonetheless, the latest round of
00:28:53.040
borrowing under Covid to finance these ruinous lockdowns has resulted in soar-away inflation
00:28:59.360
that has simply been fueled by nine rounds of sanctions against the Russians, that has seen
00:29:05.280
Europe gradually and then rapidly de-industrialize and enter a state of permanent stagflation with no
00:29:11.680
possible exit. These leaders, to whom we are to trust the future of humanity, have created the very
00:29:18.000
problems in almost every case of which they complain. The crises in the dissolution of society, the fact that
00:29:25.120
that they mention an epidemic of mental illness, and then they have the goal to tell you that this
00:29:30.640
is due to people's interactions with mass media, the very mass media that they're using to reshape you
00:29:37.040
into a broken human subject, a dehumanized broken subject who is more likely to be happy with a few
00:29:43.920
meager consumer consolations than the genuine consolations that make life truly meaningful,
00:29:50.240
which they can never offer. So they use the sense of permanent emergency as an invitation into their
00:29:58.400
dystopia. It's only by this means that it could make this hellish vision that they present to us
00:30:03.520
in any way appealing. No one would choose to take the emergency exit under normal circumstances.
00:30:11.760
Just a quick note before we return. If you would like to stay up to date on LifeSite's coverage of
00:30:16.720
the latest life, family, and culture news, subscribe to one of our many newsletters by
00:30:21.120
going to lifesitenews.com slash subscribe. And if you'd like to help us bring our truth-telling
00:30:26.960
coverage to millions around the world, please consider making a one-time or monthly donation
00:30:31.760
at give.lifesitenews.com. And now back to the video.
00:30:37.840
I want to get to in a moment what's going on at the World Economic Forum right now, but
00:30:43.040
one thing that is very noticeable because this started already, as you said, in the 60s and 70s,
00:30:50.000
but they've become much more visible of late. This used to run sort of behind the scenes. You would
00:30:56.960
hear it. I remember writing about this kind of thing in the early 1990s, but it was not popular.
00:31:04.000
It was not in the mainstream media where you would find it, you know, a new American magazine and things
00:31:08.640
like that. But very little reported on, very few reporters going there. Much of their goals,
00:31:15.600
you wouldn't know what's exactly happening. Today, they seem to be out in force that they're talking
00:31:22.640
about this. I'm amazed, for instance, that Yuval Noah Harari is able to speak publicly because he says the
00:31:30.720
most unbelievable things. He talks openly about useless people. What are we going to do with all
00:31:38.080
these useless people? And offering his suggestion, he says, the thing that I can think of most is
00:31:45.720
It's spoken like a true degenerate. I mean, if you indicate the man's private life, I think that's a case
00:31:52.680
of ipsa locata. You know, the thing speaks for itself. But as for why is the WEF so visible today, it's
00:31:59.720
because of their ability, their habit of leveraging a sense of permanent alarm. And the great success of
00:32:05.720
fomenting a sense of crisis over the environment has allowed them to open the door to their own profit solutions.
00:32:11.720
The more popular that this mistaken, and I think it is mistaken belief that mankind is destroying the
00:32:18.120
planet and is doing so in an accelerating, destructive fashion, is it simply helps these
00:32:24.200
people to advance their agenda. Without a sense of emergency, no one would even consider the
00:32:30.440
expedience that they're offering. But what he's offering is security in a time of ongoing crisis.
00:32:36.760
Crisis is their best friend. This is the reason why many people believe that they themselves have
00:32:41.400
deliberately fermented these crises. Personally, I had reservations about this, because having met
00:32:47.640
people who work in the institutions at a state level, I think most of them lack the competence.
00:32:53.560
They are certainly, seriously, I do not deny that there are plans, and I do not deny that there are
00:32:59.720
schemes, and that most of them are indeed wicked. They smell of sulphur. As soon as you open the door,
00:33:06.280
there is the echo of mythic laughter. It's unmistakable. But nonetheless, if there's one saving
00:33:12.520
grace to these people, it's their incompetence. And I think that it's difficult to argue from many
00:33:17.960
ends. If you look at certain global crises taking place right now, it's hard to see how these things
00:33:24.360
square away with the grand plan. The war plans haven't gone well. I mean, the United States
00:33:30.520
hasn't won a war since it bombed Japan, if you just count Grenada. The results of the neoconservative
00:33:38.520
expeditions abroad have been disastrous. So the idea that the wars feature in this seems preposterous to
00:33:46.040
me. The United States appears to be gearing up for the big one, which is a war against China. There's
00:33:52.360
been a recent slew of articles suggesting that, well, rehabilitating the debacle of Afghanistan
00:33:57.800
as some kind of sandbox experiment to prepare for a major war. That one. So I would say that
00:34:05.080
the thing about the World Economic Forum is that people forget that there are other factions
00:34:09.320
that play at state level in the world's most powerful nation, which is the United States. And
00:34:14.600
one of those factions is the neoconservatives. And they are a different branch of the same kind
00:34:20.600
of tree. They themselves received funding from the National Endowment for Democracy,
00:34:25.800
which was a similarly shady, initially CIA set up organization that was set up in the 1960s in
00:34:33.080
order to undermine communist states. It ended up funding think tanks, which support neoconservative
00:34:39.160
ideology. And even today continues to fund people who otherwise couldn't justify a career in journalism,
00:34:45.960
because they have the ideas of a shoe. But the thing is, when you find people who are famous
00:34:53.160
and in that sphere, and you wonder why, how on earth they got there? If you have a look into how
00:34:57.800
much money these people have, and what kind of ideology they're purporting to believe in,
00:35:04.040
it's simply parrot fashion. What they're doing is that they're being paid to repeat a lie,
00:35:08.440
and to rebroadcast it. Because the best thing, the most powerful thing that the West still does,
00:35:13.560
is the control of mass media, is propaganda. What's happening right now at the World Economic
00:35:18.200
Forum? I hear there's been some kind of restriction on journalists, or what's going on from what you've
00:35:22.920
been seeing? The thing about the 5,000 Swiss troops is true. There's always a heavy security presence
00:35:29.480
there. There was some brouhaha last year about a police badge. There is a police badge that they wear,
00:35:35.720
but these are local police, and they have a kind of novelty badge, because it's a kind of novel event.
00:35:43.080
But what that is, is there are also distasteful stories, one which comes out of the Daily Mail that
00:35:49.240
says about the amount of prostitutes that have flown into Davos, which gives you an idea of the
00:35:55.960
interests of the people attending it. It should come as no surprise that the kind of people who reach
00:36:01.400
these positions aren't people of the highest moral property. And what's going on this year,
00:36:06.040
specifically, is it is a year that is very much angled towards leveraging a sense of global crisis
00:36:13.080
to accelerate the appeal of the World Economic Forum's agenda. And what that agenda means is it is an
00:36:20.760
offer, as it were, and it's best understood as one, of global security and stability and a certain type
00:36:30.120
of citizenship as against a rising background of social collapse, societal collapse, and environmental
00:36:39.320
catastrophe. The global risk analysis that they publish every year, every year the WF publishes
00:36:46.120
an analysis of global risks. In almost every recent year, they've published a two-year, five- and ten-year
00:36:52.360
forecast. This year, it's just two and ten years. They've missed the medium term out. But they place an
00:36:58.520
enormous emphasis on environmental catastrophe. I have never been able to identify who it is they
00:37:04.440
interview to speak about these global concerns. There are no sources given, and there's no way of
00:37:10.040
finding out. And I suspect that if I did, I'd probably disappear. But the thing is, is that they make these
00:37:18.280
claims. And it's very, it's telling that the claims of the risk assessments that they offer
00:37:24.760
to tessellate very closely with the aims of the WF. Now, I honestly cannot see how you can overlook the
00:37:33.560
nuclear brinkmanship that we've all been treated to in the last year. That doesn't feature whatsoever,
00:37:42.040
nor does the impact of the disastrous sanctions, or what I would say is the large-scale failure of
00:37:49.000
diplomacy at the highest levels in the West. We should never be in this position. And it is a
00:37:55.320
genuine tragedy that it is, in fact, only Henry Kissinger himself who has suggested that we take the
00:38:01.320
off-ramp from Ukraine, that we avoid escalation. Henry Kissinger, for his many sins, we haven't got time for
00:38:08.760
that. I haven't got time for that in terms of the rest of my lifetime, never alone tonight. But Henry Kissinger is
00:38:15.000
is the man who helped to keep the West out of a nuclear exchange over cities like Donetsk.
00:38:22.120
Now, why does it matter so much now? Why are we supposed to throw our lives away for a borderland
00:38:28.920
that NATO would not fight a war over throughout the entirety of the Cold War? It is a shame that he's
00:38:36.200
the last realist of any influence whatsoever. He's completely surrounded by neoconservatives who are
00:38:43.480
constantly pushing for escalation. This is a reckless, ruinous policy. And every single war
00:38:49.320
that they've entered the United States into has been a catastrophic loss for the people of the
00:38:54.360
nations that they've destroyed, for the United States, who's lost its young men and women in those
00:38:59.080
wars, and of course, for the enormous costs. No one ever seems to count. Where does the money go?
00:39:04.680
He does countermand the other great faction against the technocrats, which is the neoconservatives,
00:39:12.680
that somehow see war as an instrument of civilization. Oddly enough, there's no mention of
00:39:20.040
that in any of the global risk analysis of the World Economic Forum. It's always an emphasis on
00:39:26.440
environmental doom. It says that people are frightened of the weather. Personally, I find the weather
00:39:31.400
inconvenient. It's very icy today, to be honest. My fingers got a bit cold. When it rains, sometimes
00:39:40.120
people feel a bit gloomy. But as for major concerns for the next 10 years, no. I don't believe the
00:39:46.440
weather forecast anyway, as I kind of darted the wool sceptic. I think that's a conspiracy to depress me,
00:39:52.280
because I live on a foggy island. It's never good news. But the thing about that is that the WF's
00:39:59.160
forecast deliberately excludes meaningful information that people would probably relay you in their own
00:40:05.800
lives. For example, there was a kind of national survey done by the Hungarian government several
00:40:11.880
days ago, the only one in Europe. And it found that 97% of Hungarians opposed the sanctions on Russia,
00:40:19.880
and thought they should immediately resile the position of hostility and escalation.
00:40:25.160
There's a growing sense in places like Hungary that the United States war faction is going to retire
00:40:32.840
from Ukraine, potentially hang it around the neck of Biden. And that will leave Europe in a seriously
00:40:39.320
diminished and exposed position. There are people already calling for, in France, in Hungary and
00:40:44.680
elsewhere, for a de-escalation, to try and draw some of the poison from the shattered relationship with
00:40:52.680
Russia. Because you simply have to find some way to accommodate yourself to your neighbours.
00:40:58.840
So people do not get asked about these things. The thing about the WF and its global risk analysis
00:41:04.680
is it doesn't take account of the concerns of ordinary people. And in that, it does reflect the
00:41:10.520
Western-style managerial democracies that we have, that are largely ignorant, willfully ignorant,
00:41:16.120
of the wishes of its population. It's my belief that the systems of the West are no longer truly democratic.
00:41:22.920
Because they do not function to reflect the general will of the people in any way. In fact,
00:41:28.200
you will find that on a large scale, the majority of public opinion is permanently excluded from the
00:41:34.440
political process. And in almost every Western country, people of genuine political conviction,
00:41:39.800
whether they be communists or from the right, are largely excluded from the party political process
00:41:46.200
for this reason. There is not just a tendency, it is a pattern. That is the nature of our governance.
00:41:51.960
We are governed by managerialists, by blank faces in times, people with monotone voices and
00:41:58.680
uninspiring characters, who pursue policies that are largely identical to the preceding party's policies,
00:42:05.160
against the wishes of the people, who constantly vote on a platform that's very attractive. It goes up like
00:42:10.760
a kind of Chinese lantern around the election cycle, only to disappear into the upper atmosphere and be
00:42:16.840
forgotten. It's like a firework. It burns brightly in the mind, all these promises. Then they vanish.
00:42:22.520
And it's business as usual. And you find that that business is angled more towards the kind of global
00:42:28.440
business that the World Economic Forum supports, and has absolutely nothing to do with the wishes
00:42:33.160
of its own electorate. This is another dimension in which the West has lost its legitimacy.
00:42:37.720
Now, you've been following this scenario for many years now. How far along in their plans do you think
00:42:44.440
they are? When do you think some of these global surveillance systems and total control, if you
00:42:52.440
will, might be put into place? You can see from the policies of the lockdowns, and you can see from the,
00:42:58.200
I mean, it's very, it's impossible to understand how many people actually took the vaccines in any
00:43:03.080
country because the data is just unreliable. Or perhaps in some cases, people haven't wanted to find out.
00:43:08.760
But from the acceptance of lockdowns, you can see that there's been a certain compliance with authority,
00:43:14.680
there are two arguments about this. The one argument is, you can do what you like to people
00:43:19.000
now. They'll never stand up to any form of tyranny. The other argument is, is that it may not be so
00:43:24.680
easy for them to do it next time. I think the second argument compelling myself, because from my own
00:43:30.040
experience, anecdotally, even from people who've taken two, maybe even three injections, most people
00:43:35.880
will never take another one. They feel tremendously let down. And there is a sense, a palpable sense,
00:43:41.320
that the truth has not been told to them. Of course, this is the case. But people who were trying to make
00:43:48.200
that point at the time were, of course, derided and isolated and neutralized as the kind of
00:43:55.880
lunatics, well, like me. So this is like anyone, like anyone who had an independence of mind,
00:44:03.000
regardless of your qualifications or expertise, was simply sidelined as a crank. This has been a
00:44:08.520
narrative that is gradually breaking down in the public imagination. And there's a sense of,
00:44:14.360
if you like, incredulity towards what people are told now. I mean, the United States suffered from
00:44:19.560
a credibility gap around the later stages of the Vietnam War, when it emerged that they simply
00:44:24.200
weren't winning, as against the broadcast that had been subjected to. The public knew they'd been lied
00:44:29.640
to. And they've been lied to here, globally. So it may be difficult to implement these procedures,
00:44:36.040
if you like, these transformations of human life, with a degree of cooperation that was expected from
00:44:43.000
the lockdowns. I don't think that the lockdowns show us that you can expect this kind of conformity and
00:44:48.360
compliance, maybe in a certain section of the population, but certainly not as much as a half
00:44:53.240
or 40% of people. I think people would be much more sceptical towards the aims and practices of
00:44:59.320
government, as well as when it sinks in, that the emergency was generally overstated, that the origins of
00:45:05.720
the virus itself were obscured, and that what was once a conspiracy theory has turned out to be true.
00:45:13.000
I mean, there's a great meme about that. It says that the conspiracy theorists are running out of them
00:45:18.040
because they've all turned out to be true. What this does is it makes people more sceptical,
00:45:22.760
more dubious of what they're told. Unfortunately, it then predisposes them to believe in things that
00:45:28.120
are equally spurious at times. But there's an incredulity towards power, which I think is
00:45:35.480
difficult for the World Economic Forum and the technocrats that support them. This is the reason why
00:45:40.600
they want to constantly sound the alarm bell. If your arguments are compelling, if you think you're
00:45:46.840
going to carry the people with you, then you will carry them with you anyway. If you really are
00:45:52.360
inviting them into a future that resembles some kind of appealing VIP experience, then surely they
00:45:58.280
need no persuasion. But if you're constantly having to bang the gong of alarm, if you're going to have
00:46:03.160
to sound the emergency every single time you want to persuade them, you're to point at crisis and even
00:46:08.920
create them to compel people to your arguments, it shows that your arguments aren't winning. I do not
00:46:14.280
think that there's the competence in the institutions to provide for a full authoritarian
00:46:20.200
crackdown either. I don't think we have them in the West anymore. One way to encapsulate that thought
00:46:27.720
is it's not the 90s anymore. When we think of the army, when we think of the state and the law,
00:46:33.800
when we think of the university system or medicine, we think of a vestige. We are attached to vestiges.
00:46:41.880
These are images of past deficiencies and past honours that have simply vanished. All they've
00:46:50.040
left are ghosts. We are attached to ghosts. Those things don't exist anymore. We don't have that kind
00:46:55.480
of efficiency. We don't have that kind of probity or strength of character or sense of civic duty that
00:47:01.080
inspired the excellence, which we thought was routine and would last forever. It turned out not to be
00:47:05.800
durable. There's a crisis of competence, which is due to this managerialism because it does select
00:47:12.200
for people for reasons other than their competence. It selects for them for being fungible parts of a
00:47:17.960
machine. It actually selects against talent and against merit and certainly against people of
00:47:24.280
principle. Even someone like Secretary of State James Baker, who worked for Walker Bush,
00:47:30.200
not a man who was universally liked, but this was a man who was a diplomat in the traditional sense,
00:47:36.840
who knew how to speak to people from foreign cultures without offending them, who took pains
00:47:42.120
to understand people's traditions. This is a man who was probably not seen as the most sympathetic to
00:47:48.280
them, but nonetheless, a man in the mold of, if not anywhere near the equal, of a Talleyrand.
00:47:54.120
But we don't have these kinds of people in the West anymore. We don't have the kind of diplomatic
00:47:59.480
engagement or even the will to find them because our managerial system throughout all of our
00:48:04.280
institutions, civil, scientific, military, and in public administration and in politics, selects
00:48:11.320
against talent. It selects against character. What it wants is conformity. It wants willing,
00:48:17.160
fungible parts in the broader managerial machine, and that's what it gets.
00:48:21.160
Where do you think this is going in the short term? How best could we work against this machine?
00:48:29.320
And what's your best bet on the outcome of this year and next?
00:48:33.400
The best antidote to what you might call the massification of everything or scale, which is
00:48:40.520
the scale complexity, atomization, liberalism, and elitism that typifies this kind of technological
00:48:47.640
managerialism, is by strong and meaningful human scale bonds, community bonds, by the belief in God,
00:48:55.480
by genuine, durable human relations, which begins with the family but doesn't end there,
00:49:01.560
but the extension of the family into a meaningful community, a helpful mutualist community where
00:49:06.600
people have shared and stable values. Human scale relations is the answer. There is a political
00:49:12.840
movement, which I wrote about for LifeSite the other day, based around the objection to the
00:49:17.560
abolition of farming in Holland. And these people have won. They've won. They succeeded in gaining the
00:49:24.680
resignation of the Minister for Agriculture, and they're now one of the leading parties in the
00:49:28.840
country, maybe the foremost party in the country by April. They're rising rapidly in the polls. This is
00:49:34.840
a movement that's based upon what they call neighbourly values. Because their community has not yet been
00:49:40.040
destroyed by the kind of large-scale managerial bureaucratization of everything, there still
00:49:45.880
exist strong community bonds of loyalty and kinship and meaning, which has snowballed into an enormous
00:49:52.760
political movement. It's called the farmer-citizen movement. Social bonds, genuine human interaction,
00:49:59.560
people who still retain the meaningful, human face-to-face relations that make life worth living.
00:50:06.360
These are the people who are going to win. These systems, one of the things that people overlook
00:50:11.720
when they begin to think about the enormous, complex, powerful, media-infused and propagandized
00:50:19.560
bureaucracies which are bearing down upon us, they forget the inherent instability of an ever-more
00:50:27.960
complex system. It is unstable, and it is tending towards more instability. It isn't working, which is
00:50:36.440
the reason why the promotion of crisis has become a central plank of the WF's annual agenda. It used to
00:50:44.920
be about creating a better future through business, prosperity and cooperation, and more of an upbeat tone.
00:50:52.760
But now it's an attempting to compel its own arguments by pointing to global crises, which all tend somehow
00:51:00.360
to trace back to the very people in the room at the time. It's a very difficult argument to make when
00:51:05.800
people begin to look and say, well, you know, why was there an economic crisis after lockdown and all
00:51:11.320
that money? Where did all that money go? Oh, they're all sitting in this room. There they are. It was you.
00:51:17.480
And furthermore, right, anyone who's going to put Bono on the screen, I mean, really, you know, I think
00:51:24.680
not only have you lost all legitimacy, I mean, that's basically an argument for giving Putin the
00:51:29.640
nuclear coordinates. You don't have to say anything more than Bono. Just the last syllable, no, will do.
00:51:38.840
Yeah, I think he should change his name to that. But that's the thing is that human scale relations
00:51:44.520
are possible. A human scale society is possible. The antidote to this is what is meaningful. This is
00:51:52.200
the reason why these technocrats hate the family. This is the reason why you have so many anti-family
00:51:57.560
policies. Yuval Noah Harari will never have a family, or if he will, it will be a weird approximation of
00:52:03.640
one because he's an aggressive homosexualist. And he doesn't see anything wrong with that. And this
00:52:08.840
is the reason why he sees nothing when we're taking a wrecking ball to human nature and to the natural
00:52:14.520
order. These people have their own agendas privately, but you will find that they feed into an idea of
00:52:22.440
humanity that rejects the human scale in everything. Everything that is meaningful, from genuine affection,
00:52:30.040
for their disgusting conflation of the idea of love with unbridled sexual depravity. The moral inversion
00:52:39.720
that results from the massification of society is another thing that is producing inherent instability
00:52:46.840
in this attempt at a global managerial bureaucracy. The moral inversion is not just the inversion of
00:52:53.880
vice and virtue. You can see from Nike advertisements that champion the obese, from stunning and brave,
00:53:02.280
being applied to Bruce Jenner. I refuse to call him by any other name. Stunning and brave. Whenever
00:53:08.280
people mention that, I simply see his face. And I'm determined to get myself sent to the gulags. I will
00:53:14.840
go to the gulag for misgendering Jenner. The moral inversion that results from this
00:53:19.080
extremely distorted vision of humanity. It comes from the massification of human experience. It's a
00:53:27.160
pathologizing tendency. Moral inversion isn't just about turning the values upside down, about presenting
00:53:33.400
vice as virtue. It's also typified by an intense but nihilistic fervor. It's because when people's
00:53:44.040
genuine, genuine anchorage of meaning in God, in the family, in durable human-scale relations,
00:53:51.880
in their own communities, when their nation is dissolved, when their custom and culture and
00:53:56.920
tradition is reviled and dragged through the mud and dismantled aggressively, when there's nothing left
00:54:03.240
but the self, then there is an enormous nihilistic void within people that screams to be filled. It is
00:54:10.840
this howl that you hear when people tear down statues or when they commit arson and riots in
00:54:16.840
the name of social justice. In every furore that seems to take place first through social media and
00:54:23.880
then in the streets, you can see this intense moral fervor of people who have no wider moral framework
00:54:29.480
than themselves and whose actions, in a broader sense, simply don't make sense. It is a meaningless but
00:54:36.920
intense sense of self-importance. And that's the desperation of people who are completely deprived
00:54:44.120
from the correct or natural human dimension. It is a mass psychosis. And this is useful too. If you're
00:54:53.800
a technocratic managerialist, the sicker people are, the better, because they're more easily manipulated.
00:55:00.680
And also they buy more things, like Funko Pops.
00:55:05.400
I want to ask you for concluding thoughts, and I want to get your, uh, you're okay to come back
00:55:10.360
on the program. It's been a fascinating ride with you. I am so glad we got to this. Uh,
00:55:17.880
I would say nil desperando. Despair is, is a sin. And it's a sin for a reason. Because you give up on
00:55:24.200
the hope of the salvation of the Lord. Well, these people fear if, and they do fear a lot of things.
00:55:30.120
They fear happy, well-ordered, stable, functioning people. And these are people whose lives are anchored
00:55:37.160
in God and the family. And if you, if you ever wanted something to live by, other than your faith,
00:55:43.000
if you want a motto that you can live by, why, to resist the large scale mental illness factory
00:55:50.520
that is being promoted as the future normality, you could just think of yourself as a radical normal.
00:55:56.280
Because to be normal is really to be radical nowadays. Be proud. We should start a march,
00:56:01.960
actually. Maybe I'll lead it. Normal pride. You can turn up as yourself. Bring your own flag. It's
00:56:09.800
probably a flag that you recognized from your childhood. But yes, that's what I would say,
00:56:15.400
is that, is that we are the kind of people that will be, that will be there to pick up the pieces.
00:56:21.160
I want to say this in all seriousness, because I've been joking. The epidemic mental illness is,
00:56:25.240
is a fact of society. The fact that screen-based socialization, that people are increasingly
00:56:30.680
patterned on things that make them mentally ill, is, is a fact. The epidemic use of antidepressants
00:56:36.360
is a fact. The large scale immiseration of people is a fact. Do not go among these people
00:56:42.040
and sneer. Don't, don't go up to your broken, screaming, blue-haired compatriots and despise
00:56:48.520
them. Think of yourself, even if you can't say anything nice about them, try and think of yourself
00:56:53.480
as a missionary in your own society. This is the best way that I've ever heard. It wasn't my idea.
00:56:59.720
It was someone that told me this. This is the best way that I've ever heard of how to function
00:57:05.400
in the madhouse. Don't let yourself become poisoned by hate. Think of yourself as a missionary in your
00:57:11.560
own culture, in your own community, in your own life, in your own, in your own nation, because that's
00:57:17.320
what it needs to heal it. Indeed. Frank Wright, thank you so much for being with us. And we hope that you're
00:57:23.960
back very soon for more details on what's going on with the World Economic Forum and everything else.
00:57:29.240
May God bless you. Thank you. Thank you, John. God bless you, too. Bye-bye for now.
00:57:33.080
Bye-bye for now, and God bless all of you. And we'll see you next time.
00:57:53.960
the latest life, family, faith, and freedom news. Thanks for watching, and may God bless you.