The John-Henry Westen Show - January 31, 2024


SPECIAL: Thomas More Society, John-Henry Westen On Winning For Life


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 3 minutes

Words per Minute

149.88878

Word Count

9,568

Sentence Count

643

Misogynist Sentences

14

Hate Speech Sentences

12


Summary

Join us as we celebrate the 25th anniversary of The Thomas Moore Society, a pro-life organization that has been at the forefront of the pro-choice movement for over 30 years. In this episode of the John Henry Weston Show, we have a special edition of the show featuring a panel of four of the organization's most distinguished lawyers.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 We can't save people from just abortion
00:00:03.800 and then still they're lost eternally.
00:00:09.440 That's ridiculous.
00:00:11.280 We're saving their lives for eternal life.
00:00:15.160 So if you want a good clue as to how to find a media organization
00:00:18.580 that you can trust, trust Jesus Christ.
00:00:30.000 Hey my friends, as many of you know, a couple of weeks ago now
00:00:33.320 we were at March for Life and at March for Life every year
00:00:36.140 there is something called the Law of Life Summit.
00:00:38.060 You know, very often you don't get good news in the pro-life movement.
00:00:41.940 There is actually a lot of good news coming out of the legal challenges
00:00:45.220 and no team is better at doing legal challenges on pro-life issues
00:00:49.780 than is Thomas More Society.
00:00:52.100 They are absolutely fabulous.
00:00:55.820 Peter Breen, Tom Brescia, their group has been
00:00:59.680 absolutely stellar in supporting every pro-life group out there
00:01:03.280 that's worthy of the name and the victories are stellar.
00:01:06.120 So we wanted to show you this roundup from the lawyers
00:01:10.680 at Law of Life Summit.
00:01:13.320 Also, as a snippet, I was asked to give a reason
00:01:15.960 why people should trust LifeSite News
00:01:19.260 and how they can know what media to trust.
00:01:22.880 And that's there for you as well on this special episode
00:01:25.600 of the John Henry Weston Show.
00:01:27.240 May God bless you.
00:01:29.680 Welcome to LifeSite League.
00:01:31.860 What are we?
00:01:33.500 We are change.
00:01:39.560 We are relentless.
00:01:45.280 We are a voice for the voiceless.
00:01:51.400 We are prayer warriors.
00:01:53.140 We are journalists.
00:02:03.500 We are activists.
00:02:07.840 As citizen journalists, we, members of LifeSite League,
00:02:12.340 contribute stories to LifeSite News from across the world.
00:02:16.080 Christ is calling you.
00:02:19.100 He is calling every single one of us to fight,
00:02:23.400 to fight for truth and stand on the front lines
00:02:26.360 with our greatest weapon in our hand, the rosary.
00:02:29.220 The world we are living in is encompassed by evil.
00:02:33.540 It is mocking God, killing babies in the womb, and burning down our churches.
00:02:39.480 And what are so many of us doing?
00:02:42.020 We are standing by in silence.
00:02:44.900 Or worse, we are compromising and joining the devil's army out of convenience.
00:02:49.920 But not anymore.
00:02:52.760 LifeSite News brings to you the League.
00:02:55.520 We stand on the side of Christ.
00:02:57.920 We stand for truth and are ready to transform the culture we are living in.
00:03:02.960 There is no time to waste.
00:03:05.240 There is no time for weakness.
00:03:07.840 Join the fight for truth now.
00:03:09.660 Join LifeSite League.
00:03:10.820 And let's begin, as we always do, with the sign of the cross.
00:03:23.760 In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.
00:03:27.540 Amen.
00:03:30.540 So it is my honor to welcome and introduce
00:03:33.300 the panel of Thomas More Society Attorneys.
00:03:36.080 Please give them a huge round of applause.
00:03:40.820 Thank you, David.
00:03:45.700 Great to see all of you here.
00:03:46.880 Thank you for being here.
00:03:48.100 Thanks for being interested in our work.
00:03:50.580 I'm going to start off by delivering a message.
00:03:52.320 Then I have a big announcement.
00:03:53.360 And then I get to introduce a panel of superstar lawyers
00:03:55.980 that I'm honored to be up here on stage with.
00:03:58.240 First, a message from our founder, Tom Brekka.
00:04:01.020 He gives his regards.
00:04:02.220 He would like to be here himself if he could,
00:04:04.080 but he can't be here this year.
00:04:06.340 Why don't we, he may be watching.
00:04:08.900 Why don't we give him a round of applause?
00:04:10.820 Well, as you know, back in 1986,
00:04:18.900 the National Organization for Women sued Joe Scheidler
00:04:22.160 and a bunch of pro-life activists all across the country,
00:04:25.500 alleging that they had engaged in racketeering
00:04:28.880 in violation of federal law.
00:04:30.840 And Thomas was retained.
00:04:32.560 He was in private practice at the time.
00:04:34.380 He took on that case,
00:04:35.680 eventually transitioned out of private practice,
00:04:38.020 founding the Thomas Moore Society.
00:04:39.940 And over the course of 28 years,
00:04:41.840 that case went to the Supreme Court three times,
00:04:44.180 ultimately resulting in a unanimous victory
00:04:46.240 for the Thomas Moore Society
00:04:47.360 and for the pro-life movement.
00:04:48.840 Now, the thing that I'm happy to be able to stand here
00:04:56.860 and announce tonight is that this is our 25th anniversary.
00:05:00.460 It was 25 years ago that Tom incorporated
00:05:02.820 the Thomas Moore Society and we got off the ground.
00:05:05.800 At the beginning, it was one lawyer and one case.
00:05:08.180 And now we have still headquartered in Chicago.
00:05:10.580 We have offices all across the country
00:05:11.940 and lawyers spread across the country.
00:05:13.220 And we have cases pending in courtrooms
00:05:15.020 literally from coast to coast
00:05:16.880 that we're handling all at the same time.
00:05:18.980 And we owe that to Tom Brekka.
00:05:26.420 Now, one of the very satisfying aspects of this job
00:05:29.560 is that we get to sue states like New York
00:05:32.560 and Illinois and California
00:05:34.080 and do it over and over and over again.
00:05:36.820 And that's some of the work
00:05:38.060 that we're going to describe to you here.
00:05:39.460 You're used to seeing four Thomas Moore Society lawyers
00:05:43.920 on this panel.
00:05:45.340 And we have some special guests today.
00:05:47.460 We have some distinguished lawyers
00:05:50.320 who are helping us with a particularly interesting case
00:05:53.580 that you're going to hear about tonight.
00:05:56.060 I think we have, since we have so much fun doing it,
00:05:58.740 I'd like to introduce my colleague, Tom Olk,
00:06:01.980 who is handling two of our really important cases
00:06:04.560 challenging state overreach
00:06:07.280 and abuse of government power.
00:06:08.900 Tom, come on.
00:06:09.460 Thank you very much.
00:06:15.580 I kind of think that my claim to fame
00:06:18.700 is I'm involved with cases that, like, never end.
00:06:21.820 So I came to Thomas Moore Society in 2015.
00:06:25.520 And in 2016, the great state of Illinois,
00:06:29.120 you know, a deep blue state,
00:06:30.680 passed a law that says that pregnancy centers
00:06:33.600 have to give the benefits of abortion
00:06:36.220 to the women they counsel.
00:06:38.580 How about that for a law, you know,
00:06:43.600 bringing into conflict the First Amendment?
00:06:47.260 So in 2016, we sued to stop that law.
00:06:54.280 And a preliminary injunction was entered in 2017.
00:06:58.560 And then the law, the case began to be litigated.
00:07:04.020 We waited for a decision in Nifla v. Becerra,
00:07:09.040 went round and round, filed for summary judgment.
00:07:11.720 It was denied by the chief judge in the Northern District of Illinois.
00:07:17.340 And then finally, this fall, we finally had a trial
00:07:21.120 before the judge, Ian Johnston, out in Rockford, Illinois.
00:07:24.920 So we finally finished our briefing and we're waiting for a decision on this case.
00:07:30.200 We hired some good experts and we're hopeful that we're going to win this case.
00:07:35.140 Seems to be an obvious violation of the First Amendment.
00:07:38.620 But this is what we're facing here in Illinois.
00:07:41.340 In New York, a similar kind of situation where we had to wait three years
00:07:48.040 for a decision from the Second Circuit on the case that we were litigating there.
00:07:56.020 It involved the scope of an injunction.
00:08:00.040 And way back in the Operation Rescue days,
00:08:03.600 that would be the late 1980s and early 1990s,
00:08:07.900 there were activities that were conducted in Rochester, New York,
00:08:12.840 and Buffalo, New York, that led to an injunction that was finalized in 2005.
00:08:18.040 And our client came in 2017, Jim Havens, and his group.
00:08:24.720 And they had no involvement with the named parties of that injunction.
00:08:29.960 And yet the police and Planned Parenthood there at that location in Rochester told them,
00:08:36.400 you can't cross the buffer line that the injunction imposed.
00:08:41.360 It's a global injunction.
00:08:43.360 They contacted the Thomas More Society and we looked up the law,
00:08:47.100 went back to a case in 1930 called Alamite and decided by an eminent jurist learned hand
00:08:58.280 that said, you're only liable, if you're not a named party in an injunction,
00:09:04.100 you're only liable and bound by it if you aid and abet a named party to violate the injunction.
00:09:10.140 We told the city of Rochester this.
00:09:14.000 They said, okay, we'll let you guys alone.
00:09:17.240 And then the state of New York got involved, Letitia James' people.
00:09:22.520 They reversed that decision and said, we think you're in bed with the bad guys.
00:09:28.800 And they said, we're going to arrest you guys if you cross that buffer line.
00:09:33.400 We filed a lawsuit and it was denied.
00:09:38.180 Our case was dismissed with prejudice.
00:09:41.380 And we said, this is crazy.
00:09:43.360 So we appealed to the Second Circuit.
00:09:45.580 And as I just said, we had to wait three years for a decision.
00:09:50.120 That decision came down last August.
00:09:52.800 We won.
00:09:53.420 The dismissal was reversed.
00:10:00.320 And now we're finally sitting down with the state and the city to try and work out our differences
00:10:06.420 and have a modus vivendi at that abortion clinic there, Planned Parenthood in Rochester.
00:10:14.820 So our sidewalk counselors will be able to do their job effectively.
00:10:18.680 So the theme of my few words here today is justice takes a long time to work out.
00:10:29.160 And I have to say that if you're careful and you hang in and persevere, then you're liable to win out.
00:10:38.880 The kind of primary example of that is the Nau v. Scheidler case that our founder, Tom Brackett, was involved in.
00:10:46.580 Guess how long it took.
00:10:48.680 28 years and three times to the Supreme Court.
00:10:53.320 So we here at Thomas More, we're here for the long term.
00:11:00.660 We're going to work hard to win these cases because, you know, there's a stiff wind, as you know, against the pro-life movement.
00:11:09.820 So we're well aware of that and proceeding knowing that.
00:11:14.980 So anyway, that's enough of my for me.
00:11:18.260 I turn it over to Peter Breen, who's a colleague and has similar stories, I think.
00:11:24.640 Thank you, Tom.
00:11:29.920 And my name is Peter Breen.
00:11:31.760 I'm your executive vice president, head of litigation for Thomas More Society.
00:11:35.400 You know, last year at this time, we were frantically preparing to defend Mark Houck in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in downtown Philadelphia.
00:11:46.260 And praise God, we were able to get a not guilty verdict in that case and absolutely lay one on the Biden Department of Justice.
00:11:54.260 But I will tell you, you know, we have, you know, the stakes are only higher with each passing month.
00:12:02.620 You know, and David B. Wright referred to the fact that, you know, abortion, we had, you know, we had hoped the abortion rates would continue to go down.
00:12:09.500 They've kind of bottomed out, and we were seeing a little bit of an upswing.
00:12:13.460 And I'll tell you, you know, you're hearing a lot tonight about California, Illinois, and New York.
00:12:21.660 And maybe California and New York are obvious to you because they're big abortion states, have been since pre-Roe, and they're just large states generally.
00:12:29.820 The reason you're also going to hear about Illinois, not just because we happen to be headquartered there in the middle of the country, which gives us easy access to both ends of the country, but it's because the abortion rate in Illinois has absolutely skyrocketed.
00:12:44.500 And if you look at the month-by-month data that is coming out lately, Illinois is on track to double its abortion rate from before Dobbs.
00:12:55.360 So you're looking at Illinois, possibly, maybe even getting into the number three slot in the country, even though Illinois is, what, a quarter of the size of California, a third of the size of California, half the size of New York and Florida, probably going to be right up there at 100,000 abortions a year, possibly, from a traditional rate of about 40.
00:13:15.400 And so you're seeing this, though, this is this divide in the country, the red state versus blue state.
00:13:20.760 And I don't mean to use those politically, I mean to use them in the pro-life terminology, maybe.
00:13:25.360 And so for us at Thomas More Society, you know, the idea of representing sidewalk counselors and helping pregnancy centers and the movement to fight states where abortion is legal, you know, that's kind of the thing we were doing before Dobbs.
00:13:40.440 But the vigor with which these states, these blue states are coming after our people, has intensified times 10.
00:13:50.920 I mean, and you see, we had already seen under the Obama administration, you know, there's somewhat of a disregard for the rule of law, a disregard for proper process and principles.
00:14:01.800 And so that they would think, well, you know, we don't want to do it to you because then it'll be done back to us.
00:14:05.760 Now they just don't care in these states for the most part.
00:14:09.780 And so you see that in the blue states, you know, the red states, the pro-life states, we're having wonderful success.
00:14:16.080 You know, we'd like to do a little more.
00:14:17.800 We're helping people with drafting legislation, but we're doing offensive work.
00:14:20.940 But it's really those blue states right now where we are focusing our efforts because they are undertaking in particular, so not just, say, the face case violations, which you're going to hear about as well from my colleague Martin Cannon.
00:14:36.820 We've got to face act prosecutions, both civil and criminal, that we are defending across the country, both against the Department of Justice and against state attorneys general.
00:14:45.500 But they're coming after pregnancy centers.
00:14:48.120 And really, when you think about it, it makes a lot of sense.
00:14:52.680 And as part of the effort, say, I want to give you a case study in Illinois because it's a wonderful victory that was just won.
00:15:01.680 But it's against the most recent brand of anti-pregnancy center legislation that is going through the states.
00:15:08.520 They're trying to stop the pregnancy centers from doing their work generally.
00:15:13.580 You know, and these are small nonprofits.
00:15:14.700 So if you impose a lot of legal restrictions and the threats of fines or even jail time or what have you, folks just recede.
00:15:24.080 You know, they're volunteers for the most part.
00:15:25.540 They might not have enough money or legal resources to combat, you know, the entire weight of the sovereign state of California or New York or Illinois.
00:15:32.480 But they are doing this work, really attacking pregnancy centers in a couple of ways.
00:15:39.700 And the newest way that this is being framed as is they are that pregnancy centers are violating your state deceptive practices act.
00:15:49.540 So, in other words, it's this whole business.
00:15:51.220 The other side doesn't want to engage on the issues.
00:15:53.460 They just say, oh, you're lying.
00:15:54.840 You're lying.
00:15:55.300 And in particular, they're challenging things like our characterization of abortion.
00:16:02.140 In the state of Illinois, we had a bill this past year called Senate Bill 1909.
00:16:07.420 It was enacted at the behest of Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raul, who was a liberal Democrat and proudly signed by Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker, a name you may know because he is on the short list of Democratic presidential candidates, multi-billionaire, you know, heir to the Hyatt family fortune.
00:16:27.060 And so that law declared that pregnancy centers were overstating the risks of abortion and using misinformation.
00:16:38.320 Gosh, where have we heard that lately?
00:16:40.740 You know, but putting it into state statute and even saying, well, the pregnancy centers are saying falsely that abortion could lead to infertility.
00:16:52.000 Now, ladies and gentlemen, this is a pretty well-educated pro-life room.
00:16:55.840 I mean, if you botch an abortion, oftentimes it could lead to infertility.
00:17:00.440 But they didn't even care.
00:17:01.640 And you were sitting there, you're just looking at them going, what are you people thinking?
00:17:06.160 And then, you know, they were trying to, you know, peddle lies like, oh, well, you know, childbirth is much more dangerous than a surgical abortion, which is outlandish.
00:17:17.280 And most of us, you know, we've seen the studies, we've debunked them, what have you.
00:17:21.120 But they enacted this into law.
00:17:23.680 So they essentially put into law saying what we know to be false is true and you must adhere to it.
00:17:30.820 And if you don't, we're going to subject you to $50,000 fines, ruinous investigations.
00:17:36.300 We're going to issue subpoenas on you and what have you.
00:17:38.840 And this was looking like an existential threat to the pregnancy center movement in Illinois in particular.
00:17:44.720 But it's a similar law has been enacted in states like Connecticut and Vermont and other places like that.
00:17:52.320 So we desperately fought when we were thinking we've got to beat this in Illinois because it's probably the worst of its kind in the country in hopes of stopping it in other states.
00:18:01.180 It's also being considered in certain other state legislatures.
00:18:04.080 Well, we were able and showed what the pro-life movement can do, even in a blue state, even when you're down two to one in your legislature.
00:18:10.500 Our activists on the ground were working the phones.
00:18:14.820 Folks put lots of witness slips in.
00:18:17.060 We had 17,000 witness slips against this bill, 3,000 in favor.
00:18:20.780 And we had the right people testifying.
00:18:22.900 We had the right record come in.
00:18:24.700 The legislators, the good pro-life core there in the Illinois General Assembly, were asking the right questions.
00:18:30.800 They did the good floor debate.
00:18:32.020 And then we, as the lawyers, were able to look and go, hey, let's get this evidence in.
00:18:36.480 We filed, you know, with our friends at the Pro-Life Action League, who became our clients in this case, because the law also impacted sidewalk counselors.
00:18:43.080 We filed FOIA requests and got documents to help make our case.
00:18:47.500 At the end of the day, as against the attorney general who had claimed, we've had scores of reports and complaints about your deceptive practices, you pregnancy centers.
00:18:57.080 Our evidence, FOIA request results, showed there had actually been no complaints, not a single one in 10 years.
00:19:04.840 And so we took all of this to the federal district court in the Northern District of Illinois.
00:19:08.800 So the bill was signed on July 27th at noon.
00:19:13.880 We filed our lawsuit and sought a preliminary and permanent injunction at 1 p.m.
00:19:18.680 And at 2 p.m., the attorney general got up to talk about his wonderful bill.
00:19:21.820 And, ladies and gentlemen, I put this to you because it's important to see us actually score points in a blue state.
00:19:29.080 The AG got one softball question at his press conference, and every other question was about our lawsuit, about what the pro-life movement was doing.
00:19:36.280 And we were able to reframe that debate and really reshape the way this thing was being covered in a hard blue state like Illinois.
00:19:43.900 Yeah, and that is something to be proud of.
00:19:46.240 Sorry.
00:19:48.720 I'm not leaving you time to applaud.
00:19:50.700 I'm sorry.
00:19:51.740 I'm a politician, too, or a reformed politician.
00:19:55.020 But I'll tell you, a week later, we get a hearing, and we're there in the district court, six-hour hearing.
00:20:02.560 We had our friends from NIFLA were one of the parties there and flew in from New Jersey.
00:20:08.720 We had the folks from the Pro-Life Action League there, local pro-life sidewalk counseling group, another local pregnancy center.
00:20:15.860 Had them up on the stand.
00:20:17.000 We asked a lot of questions.
00:20:18.320 The judge was asking a lot of questions.
00:20:19.600 He was very engaged.
00:20:21.380 And at the end of the hearing, Thursday night, 6 o'clock, he gives us a preliminary injunction against that law.
00:20:27.960 And it was a wonderful victory.
00:20:31.020 And he then issued his written decision the next day, and he said, you know, sometimes there are laws where Justice Scalia had said, you know, I wish I had a stamp that said, this law is stupid, but it's constitutional.
00:20:41.820 And the judge said, well, this one's stupid, and it's unconstitutional.
00:20:45.740 And so that was a wonderful victory for us.
00:20:48.540 And wouldn't you know it, the state of Illinois came back, said, we're going to take 25 depositions, four expert witnesses.
00:20:53.780 We're going to put you through the wringer.
00:20:55.700 Well, a few weeks later, and a little more, you know, we kind of fought back on them on a lot of these things.
00:21:02.980 They have now since agreed to drop the law, agree to a permanent injunction, and pay us our attorney's fees for the trouble.
00:21:11.980 So, yeah, I give you that look.
00:21:16.320 I mean, that one, this was a good win.
00:21:18.520 It was a good, hard win.
00:21:19.660 And frankly, you know, we started the year with Mark Houck winning, you know, when we got the right jury seated, it was an hour, not guilty, up against the DOJ that has a 98, 99% win rate.
00:21:29.200 And we're kind of closing the year with this incredible win in Illinois, where we just absolutely, you know, cleaned their clocks, got them to admit it, and stopped one of the worst laws against pregnancy centers in the country.
00:21:39.000 I do that to show you we can win these fights, and we take the opportunities and absolutely drive it home.
00:21:46.380 I'll tell you, you know, every time Merrick Garland gets in front of Congress, they ask him about Mark Houck, still.
00:21:52.140 And they're going to keep asking him about it.
00:21:53.880 And in Illinois, it's an absolute black eye.
00:21:56.760 So every time the parole boards get up there and want to run another bill, you know, the legislators are kind of privately grumbling on, are you going to get us sued again?
00:22:03.260 Are we going to get embarrassed again?
00:22:04.460 And so this is the sort of thing that we're glad and, you know, honored to be able to do for you and pleased to be able to do.
00:22:10.760 We're going to keep doing it in the year to come.
00:22:12.580 You know, we've got challenges in California, state of California.
00:22:15.760 The California Attorney General has sued Heartbeat International.
00:22:19.040 I mean, the mega pregnancy center network of 3,000 centers, which does wonderful work, they want to shut down abortion pill reversal,
00:22:26.900 saying it's, again, a deceptive practice to help people try to save their babies when they decide that they don't want to have an abortion anymore.
00:22:34.720 So we are working very hard in that.
00:22:36.620 You're going to hear more about that in the months to come.
00:22:39.480 But, again, I just thank you so much.
00:22:41.100 Please keep the faith.
00:22:42.140 And, again, think of these great victories, and let's hope we get a few more in this year to come.
00:22:46.160 Thank you.
00:22:46.480 Thank you, Peter.
00:22:53.500 It's great to have big wins to crow about.
00:22:56.160 We're proud of our victories, and we are in the process of filing more lawsuits to deliver more victories.
00:23:04.100 Several years ago, New York passed its awful RHA, and our phones exploded.
00:23:10.160 We got calls from New York asking us to do something.
00:23:13.760 Other law firms were engaged, and everybody said there was nothing that lawyers could do about this.
00:23:21.060 Well, we thought long and hard and decided we're going to be creative,
00:23:24.020 and that's why we have two esteemed guest lawyers up here to tell you about what we ended up doing in New York and what we're doing now.
00:23:33.800 Michelle Sturlus-Acorsi is the executive director of Feminist Choosing Life of New York.
00:23:39.220 They weren't satisfied passing the awful RHA bill through the legislature.
00:23:46.120 Now they have a ballot initiative to enshrine abortion in their constitution.
00:23:49.640 Michelle is a campaign consultant to the Coalition to Protect Kids New York,
00:23:54.940 which was commissioned to defeat the New York Equal Rights Amendment,
00:24:00.080 which is their pro-abortion ballot initiative.
00:24:02.440 Michelle is a lawyer herself, a mom, and a very effective pro-life activist.
00:24:08.900 Michelle, come on up.
00:24:19.840 Thank you, Andy.
00:24:21.920 I'm going to read my brief comments here quickly.
00:24:24.700 On January 22nd, 2019, the New York State Legislature enacted the Reproductive Health Act, or the RHA,
00:24:34.460 an abortion expansion policy that for years had been held at bay by only a few votes in the New York State Senate.
00:24:44.320 Former New York State Governor Andrew Cuomo, in office at the time,
00:24:48.380 lit up the World Trade Center in pink to celebrate the passage of the RHA,
00:24:55.320 an historical achievement according to pro-abortion special interests,
00:25:00.500 but a move towards death and danger for unborn children and pregnant women.
00:25:06.240 The RHA in New York dehumanizes unborn children and jeopardizes the health and well-being of women.
00:25:13.960 Among other things, the RHA repealed New York's long-standing fetal homicide law
00:25:22.300 and created a new definition of person under New York criminal law,
00:25:27.640 which excludes all unborn children, including viable unborn children,
00:25:33.700 from the legal definition of persons who can be victims of homicide.
00:25:39.100 The change altered nearly 200 years of New York law.
00:25:43.100 The RHA permits killing children capable of surviving outside of the wombs of their mothers
00:25:50.980 with or without medical intervention for reasons wholly unrelated to any threat
00:25:58.220 to their mother's physical life or health.
00:26:02.080 Essentially, the RHA permits on-demand abortion throughout all nine months of pregnancy.
00:26:07.680 The RHA repealed New York's long-standing requirement that only duly licensed physicians perform abortions
00:26:17.160 and permits a largely undefined category of health care professionals
00:26:23.640 to perform any and all abortions, including later second- and third-trimester abortions,
00:26:30.940 nearly 2,000 of which occur in New York on average annually.
00:26:38.620 Shortly after the passage of the RHA, Feminists Choosing Life of New York
00:26:42.800 organized a legal team to explore the legality of this law.
00:26:48.560 The legal team, led by the most brilliant attorney, Theresa Collette, here today,
00:26:53.320 who will speak to you all after me, discovered several areas to attack the RHA
00:26:59.920 that would protect children and women.
00:27:03.480 Our incredible, incredible friends at the Thomas More Society took on the matter
00:27:08.600 and shortly thereafter filed a class-action lawsuit against the RHA
00:27:15.020 on behalf of vulnerable victim plaintiffs.
00:27:19.640 The class-action lawsuit, titled Smith v. Hochul,
00:27:23.740 filed on several U.S. constitutional grounds,
00:27:27.560 represented the first time a New York abortion law was challenged
00:27:32.760 for violating both women's rights and the rights of unborn children.
00:27:38.000 Among other things, the lawsuit claims the RHA deprives viable unborn children
00:27:44.920 of their right to live free from lethal violence
00:27:49.220 and incentivizes domestic and intimate partner violence against pregnant women.
00:27:56.800 Plaintiffs challenged two portions of the RHA,
00:28:00.640 claiming these two provisions violated three constitutional protections,
00:28:05.760 substantive due process, equal protection, and the right to legal red dress.
00:28:12.780 As expected, the case was dismissed by the lower court,
00:28:16.520 as are the majority of challenges to abortion laws in the United States.
00:28:22.180 Most notable, however, the federal district court where the case was filed
00:28:27.600 agreed with plaintiffs that there is a substantial likelihood
00:28:32.960 that by eliminating the fetal homicide law,
00:28:37.320 the RHA reduced disincentives for violence against pregnant women,
00:28:43.560 making it more likely that third parties will inflict violence against pregnant women.
00:28:50.020 Further, the lower court declined to rule
00:28:52.580 on whether viable unborn children can be represented,
00:28:57.340 holding instead that neither the proposed representatives in the complaint
00:29:03.120 nor the attorneys for the children could speak on their behalf.
00:29:08.100 On April 21st, 2023, the matter was taken up on appeal
00:29:12.980 before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals,
00:29:17.020 where oral argument is expected to occur in February of this year.
00:29:21.860 The appeal involved is ultimately asking the court,
00:29:26.340 and Teresa will go into further detail,
00:29:29.220 to recognize the right to life for viable unborn children
00:29:33.860 under the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution,
00:29:38.260 a right for these children to live free from violent destruction
00:29:42.340 at the hands of criminals attacking pregnant women
00:29:45.880 and from those who would kill them at the request of their mothers,
00:29:49.820 and to identify who can speak on behalf of viable unborn children
00:29:55.560 in a court of law,
00:29:57.260 exactly who can present their claim to live free from violent destruction.
00:30:03.520 This case is a fight for the voiceless,
00:30:06.540 a chance to rehumanize unborn children,
00:30:10.440 an opportunity to protect more kids from death,
00:30:14.500 a chance to protect pregnant women from violence.
00:30:17.680 Smith v. Hochul is potentially one step closer to the U.S. Supreme Court,
00:30:23.420 and please pray that we will prevail.
00:30:25.780 Thank you.
00:30:26.300 Thank you, Michelle.
00:30:34.760 Thank you.
00:30:35.200 Thank you.
00:30:36.760 It was very frustrating that within days of the passage of the RHA in New York,
00:30:41.040 a number of law firms announced that there was nothing lawyers could do about it,
00:30:44.540 and we knew it was going to be quite a challenge,
00:30:47.060 and we realized that we were different than those other law firms in many ways,
00:30:54.600 one of which is we have Teresa Collette in our corner.
00:30:57.760 And we turned to Professor Collette, and she has come through.
00:31:01.980 Now, we're going to get into some detailed law talk here
00:31:05.620 so that we can understand just what a steep climb we took on,
00:31:13.160 and we're real proud that we are the one prosecuting this lawsuit.
00:31:19.340 Now, Teresa is a professor of law at the University of St. Thomas,
00:31:23.580 where she directs the Pro-Life Law Center there.
00:31:26.660 She teaches constitutional law and bioethics.
00:31:29.120 She served as assistant attorney general for the states of Oklahoma and Kansas,
00:31:32.400 and she frequently represents states who are defending their pro-life laws.
00:31:37.060 Teresa, come on up here.
00:31:43.900 I wasn't aware that my mother had called everybody on the panel.
00:31:48.580 That very generous introduction overstates the case
00:31:52.500 because working with both Michelle and with the Thomas Moore lawyers
00:31:56.520 has just been a delight, and I've learned a lot from them,
00:31:59.240 so I'm very fortunate to be working as a part of their team on this matter.
00:32:04.680 But I am going to sort of geek out on the law,
00:32:07.880 so for those of you who are not lawyers in the room
00:32:10.640 or don't aspire to be lawyers, forgive me.
00:32:12.960 I'll try to keep it reasonably understandable,
00:32:15.680 but for the law students, pay attention.
00:32:19.440 Let's start with a recent debate that occurred in National Review
00:32:24.240 between Clark Forsythe and, not Josh Blackman, but Craddock, Josh Craddock.
00:32:32.440 And the question was,
00:32:34.420 is personhood the right next battle for the pro-life movement?
00:32:39.500 When we took this case up on appeal,
00:32:42.900 the trial court, as Michelle said,
00:32:45.140 had declined to answer whether or not unborn children
00:32:48.380 could ever have a guardian ad litem or a legal representative,
00:32:52.160 and there's a good reason for that,
00:32:54.420 because there's a long, multi-century history
00:32:57.980 of unborn children having guardian ad litems or next friends,
00:33:02.600 particularly in probate and trust.
00:33:05.100 And so to say that unborn children
00:33:06.600 can never have legal representatives
00:33:08.160 would simply be to defy two centuries of law.
00:33:12.400 Instead, the judge said,
00:33:14.800 I am reserving that question,
00:33:16.160 but the person that you have nominated
00:33:19.800 to be that legal representative
00:33:21.840 doesn't have a sufficient relationship
00:33:25.180 with the unborn children
00:33:27.380 who are members of this class,
00:33:29.760 so she can't be appointed.
00:33:33.160 We argued that, Your Honor,
00:33:35.480 the fact that she counsels women
00:33:37.260 who are in violent relationships,
00:33:39.160 women who are being coerced
00:33:41.760 regarding continuation of their pregnancy,
00:33:44.040 gives her a sufficient relationship.
00:33:47.260 And the judge said,
00:33:48.200 no, I don't believe that's so.
00:33:50.220 I said, well, in the event that's not true, Your Honor,
00:33:52.600 there is multiple precedent
00:33:55.320 for the lawyers in the case
00:33:58.520 to represent those individuals.
00:34:01.020 So consider us the legal representatives.
00:34:04.300 Now, the reason this is important
00:34:05.520 is because you have to have someone
00:34:07.700 legally competent to speak in court.
00:34:11.620 and unborn children can't speak on their own behalf.
00:34:15.120 By avoiding appointing anyone,
00:34:18.080 what the court essentially did is say
00:34:20.040 that children,
00:34:22.280 their right to plead for their lives
00:34:24.460 before the court
00:34:25.340 is conditioned upon the court
00:34:28.420 being willing to grant them a representative.
00:34:32.380 This cannot be the law.
00:34:35.380 Every American has a right
00:34:37.400 to appear in court and plead their case.
00:34:39.940 So we took it up on appeal
00:34:42.600 on that specific issue.
00:34:45.140 Was a special relationship
00:34:46.900 under these circumstances required?
00:34:50.100 And if so,
00:34:50.740 had we adequately established it?
00:34:53.640 The New York Attorney General
00:34:55.160 changed the question,
00:34:56.700 which was a very interesting move on their part.
00:35:01.480 He changed the question in that
00:35:03.880 he came back and said,
00:35:06.540 she came back,
00:35:07.360 I'm sorry,
00:35:07.720 Letitia James came back and said,
00:35:09.400 whether there's enough of a relationship or not
00:35:12.620 is irrelevant
00:35:13.260 because they're not constitutional persons.
00:35:17.760 So they can't make constitutional claims.
00:35:21.320 Now, the law students in the room
00:35:22.960 will remember that one of the holdings
00:35:25.180 in Roe versus Wade
00:35:26.200 was in fact,
00:35:28.340 can unborn children
00:35:29.940 be considered constitutional persons
00:35:32.380 for purposes of the 14th Amendment?
00:35:34.320 And so the entire defense of the appeal
00:35:38.060 on the part of New York
00:35:40.120 was that Roe said
00:35:42.340 they're not constitutional persons
00:35:44.220 and therefore you're not obligated
00:35:46.260 to appoint a representative.
00:35:47.780 They can't make these claims.
00:35:49.580 And so we're done.
00:35:52.740 What's interesting is
00:35:54.140 that of course,
00:35:55.440 Dobbs overruled Roe in toto.
00:35:59.140 The concurring opinion
00:36:02.120 by Chief Justice Roberts
00:36:03.520 basically pleaded with the majority.
00:36:05.900 Please don't do that.
00:36:06.980 Just overrule it partially.
00:36:08.320 Let's do this gradually.
00:36:09.500 Let's be very careful.
00:36:11.400 And Justice Alito said,
00:36:12.620 no,
00:36:13.160 no,
00:36:14.360 it's gone in toto,
00:36:17.000 which is our reply brief.
00:36:19.420 That in fact,
00:36:20.820 the question
00:36:21.800 of the personhood
00:36:23.420 of the unborn
00:36:24.480 as of Dobbs
00:36:26.640 is now an open question again
00:36:28.820 in federal courts.
00:36:31.080 And we learned
00:36:32.860 from the abortion industry.
00:36:34.860 Our complaint ran 120 pages
00:36:37.300 and had expert declarations
00:36:40.140 that were attached
00:36:41.640 that established
00:36:42.620 the biological identity
00:36:44.540 of these unborn children
00:36:47.280 as human beings
00:36:48.640 and in being,
00:36:51.740 which were the requirements
00:36:52.920 of a U.S. Supreme Court
00:36:55.100 just five years
00:36:56.360 before Roe v. Wade
00:36:57.640 when the question
00:36:58.740 was whether or not
00:36:59.420 illegitimate children
00:37:00.400 in Virginia
00:37:01.160 had a right to inherit.
00:37:03.100 And the court said,
00:37:04.520 Virginia said
00:37:05.440 they're non-persons
00:37:06.420 because they're not legitimate.
00:37:07.800 And the court said,
00:37:09.200 no,
00:37:10.040 they are not non-persons
00:37:11.540 because
00:37:11.900 they're human beings
00:37:13.900 and they're in being.
00:37:15.860 We meet that qualification.
00:37:18.980 Is the court ready
00:37:20.460 in the Second Circuit
00:37:21.680 to give us a ruling
00:37:23.380 that our tiny,
00:37:25.520 tiny clients
00:37:26.320 are in fact
00:37:28.240 constitutional persons
00:37:30.560 for the 14th Amendment?
00:37:32.620 We pray they are.
00:37:35.640 But if the court isn't ready,
00:37:37.780 we've at least begun
00:37:39.120 to lay the groundwork
00:37:40.860 because any law student
00:37:42.620 can tell you
00:37:43.360 the main way
00:37:44.680 you get to the U.S. Supreme Court
00:37:46.040 is where you have
00:37:46.940 a split of authority
00:37:48.040 in various circuit courts.
00:37:51.500 And I think
00:37:52.280 the Fifth Circuit
00:37:53.020 is our next stop
00:37:54.080 if we need to get
00:37:55.220 that split of authority.
00:37:56.600 Thank you.
00:37:57.060 Thank you, Teresa.
00:38:05.020 We need your prayer support
00:38:06.140 for that lawsuit
00:38:07.320 and for all of the others
00:38:09.800 for that matter.
00:38:13.020 Back in the 80s,
00:38:15.380 there was a practice
00:38:17.880 that spread nationwide
00:38:18.740 of doing sit-ins
00:38:19.700 at abortion clinics
00:38:20.440 and shutting them down.
00:38:21.400 You physically obstruct
00:38:22.180 the entrance
00:38:22.580 so they can't get in,
00:38:23.340 they can't do business.
00:38:24.080 That the magnitude
00:38:27.340 of those sit-ins grew
00:38:28.360 so that by 1991
00:38:30.160 we had the Summer of Mercy
00:38:31.300 at George Tiller's Clinic
00:38:32.340 in Wichita, Kansas.
00:38:33.520 92 we had
00:38:34.440 where then
00:38:35.800 hundreds of people showed up
00:38:37.140 and dozens were arrested
00:38:38.140 every day.
00:38:39.480 The next summer
00:38:40.400 it spread to Milwaukee
00:38:41.640 and other cities
00:38:42.200 where thousands would show up
00:38:44.040 and hundreds would be arrested
00:38:44.920 in a day
00:38:46.040 and then they'd be processed,
00:38:47.340 charged with trespassing
00:38:49.040 or disturbing the peace
00:38:49.920 and processed
00:38:50.740 and come back the next day
00:38:51.940 and do it again.
00:38:52.920 And they were very public
00:38:54.140 about what their intent was
00:38:55.160 and what they were doing.
00:38:56.700 Then in 1993,
00:39:00.620 Dr. Tiller was shot
00:39:02.860 in the arm in Wichita
00:39:03.640 and Dr. David Gunn
00:39:04.760 was shot to death
00:39:05.380 in Pensacola
00:39:06.000 and Teddy Kennedy
00:39:07.380 introduced the FACE Act
00:39:08.380 in the Senate
00:39:09.380 and Chuck Schumer
00:39:10.360 introduced it in the House
00:39:11.380 and it was assigned
00:39:12.980 into law in 1994.
00:39:15.040 So who here,
00:39:16.260 let's see a show of hands,
00:39:17.180 has heard of this obscure
00:39:18.260 federal law
00:39:19.060 called the FACE Act?
00:39:21.340 Yes, pretty much everybody.
00:39:22.920 Now, under our scheme
00:39:24.340 of separation of powers,
00:39:26.500 those powers,
00:39:27.200 known as the police powers,
00:39:28.480 are generally reserved
00:39:29.980 to the states.
00:39:31.040 So if you are tried
00:39:31.980 for murder,
00:39:33.260 rape,
00:39:34.080 robbery,
00:39:34.660 assault and battery,
00:39:35.600 you're probably going
00:39:36.260 to be tried
00:39:36.640 in a state court
00:39:37.380 under state law.
00:39:38.940 Now there are exceptions
00:39:39.720 if you commit your crime
00:39:40.920 on federal property
00:39:41.740 than you might be
00:39:42.480 in federal court.
00:39:43.420 But generally,
00:39:43.980 that's how things work.
00:39:45.140 Now they pass the FACE Act
00:39:46.340 and of course,
00:39:47.140 I'm asking the question,
00:39:48.420 where do they get off
00:39:49.180 thinking they have the power
00:39:50.060 to do that?
00:39:51.480 And so we're going
00:39:51.920 to tell you about
00:39:52.320 how our efforts
00:39:53.320 to have the FACE Act
00:39:54.220 declared unconstitutional.
00:39:56.100 Now at the same time,
00:39:57.380 there's been a bill
00:39:58.120 introduced in Congress
00:39:59.140 to repeal the FACE Act
00:40:01.360 and there's been
00:40:02.140 an appropriations amendment
00:40:03.380 introduced
00:40:03.840 to defund the FACE Act.
00:40:05.820 So I'm not sure
00:40:07.880 if we can get that
00:40:08.420 through Congress
00:40:08.920 as it currently stands,
00:40:10.760 but it's good
00:40:11.640 that it's there.
00:40:12.700 Congress itself
00:40:13.500 is questioning
00:40:14.200 the constitutionality
00:40:15.300 of the FACE Act.
00:40:15.920 that's the justification,
00:40:17.020 the motivation
00:40:18.080 for filing this bill.
00:40:20.200 We have a number
00:40:21.560 of FACE Act cases
00:40:22.520 that we are defending
00:40:23.500 and they came in a wave
00:40:26.020 after the Dobbs decision
00:40:27.200 was rendered
00:40:27.700 when people were urging
00:40:30.440 the administration
00:40:31.420 to do something.
00:40:33.040 And so we've suffered
00:40:34.580 what I think
00:40:34.960 has had an egregious
00:40:36.560 abuse of government power
00:40:37.780 over this law
00:40:38.380 which is in constitution
00:40:39.280 in the first place
00:40:40.020 is being misused
00:40:40.860 against a lot of people
00:40:41.720 and we have a great number
00:40:46.800 of really skilled lawyers
00:40:48.260 that are pushing back
00:40:49.380 on this,
00:40:49.920 representing people
00:40:50.540 in courts
00:40:50.860 all across the country
00:40:51.660 and we have
00:40:52.860 our next speaker
00:40:54.160 is the guy
00:40:55.260 I call the king
00:40:56.280 of the sidewalks,
00:40:57.180 Martin Cannon.
00:40:58.020 Come on up here
00:40:58.540 and tell us
00:40:58.880 about the FACE Act.
00:41:09.060 Whenever you speak
00:41:09.980 after Andy Bath,
00:41:10.820 you've got to pull
00:41:11.280 the microphone back down.
00:41:14.200 I'm going to brag
00:41:15.260 for just a minute
00:41:15.800 about the Thomas More Society.
00:41:17.220 A few years ago,
00:41:18.140 there was actually
00:41:18.960 a pretty well-researched,
00:41:20.480 very pro-abortion article
00:41:23.240 put out by an outfit
00:41:24.300 I can't remember
00:41:25.060 but it was rather significant
00:41:26.300 and they researched
00:41:27.660 all the FACE cases
00:41:28.920 everywhere in the country
00:41:30.200 that had been prosecuted
00:41:31.640 since the FACE Act
00:41:33.000 was passed.
00:41:34.640 And at the time,
00:41:35.180 this is a couple years ago,
00:41:36.660 the government
00:41:37.280 or some government,
00:41:39.320 I think it included
00:41:40.100 state attorneys general
00:41:41.520 had prosecuted
00:41:43.160 right at 100
00:41:44.880 FACE cases
00:41:46.260 and they had won
00:41:47.840 95 of them.
00:41:49.960 The takeaway from that is
00:41:51.700 government doesn't lose
00:41:54.140 FACE cases.
00:41:55.300 Of the five
00:41:56.620 that the government
00:41:57.460 had lost,
00:41:58.560 three of them
00:41:59.440 were Thomas More cases.
00:42:00.660 And these aren't
00:42:06.400 small cases.
00:42:07.220 These aren't
00:42:07.660 something where
00:42:08.200 you go down the sidewalk
00:42:09.060 and you step into
00:42:09.880 the courtroom
00:42:10.300 and try your case
00:42:11.040 for half an hour
00:42:11.820 or an afternoon
00:42:12.560 and you get a verdict
00:42:13.760 and go home.
00:42:14.820 These take
00:42:15.620 months and months
00:42:16.840 of preparation,
00:42:17.700 hundreds of thousands
00:42:18.480 of dollars of expense,
00:42:20.160 not attorney fees,
00:42:21.400 maybe expense
00:42:22.040 paying local counsel
00:42:23.520 to be around.
00:42:25.340 Weeks and weeks
00:42:26.280 in hotel rooms
00:42:27.220 and taxis
00:42:27.900 and airfare
00:42:28.460 and stuff.
00:42:28.920 It's a big deal
00:42:29.980 when the U.S.
00:42:31.040 government
00:42:31.400 or any government
00:42:32.400 prosecutes a client
00:42:34.220 with something
00:42:34.740 that risks
00:42:35.320 10 years in prison.
00:42:37.540 So it's a big deal.
00:42:39.520 Since Dobbs,
00:42:41.180 and actually since
00:42:42.020 it became apparent
00:42:42.880 a little bit ahead of time
00:42:43.960 that Roe was going away,
00:42:45.980 the DOJ prosecution
00:42:47.400 of FACE cases
00:42:48.080 has exploded.
00:42:49.840 They created their own
00:42:51.220 separate FACE department
00:42:53.800 and they've got
00:42:54.680 their own FACE people
00:42:56.160 that are running
00:42:56.680 around the country
00:42:57.280 charging people
00:42:59.100 with the FACE Act
00:42:59.960 and trying those cases.
00:43:01.720 Now, since then,
00:43:02.920 we've won another one,
00:43:04.100 the Hout case
00:43:04.740 that you all know about.
00:43:06.360 I want to go quickly
00:43:07.440 to kind of go through
00:43:08.580 a rundown
00:43:09.060 of the TMS FACE cases
00:43:10.220 because it really creates
00:43:11.420 a big picture
00:43:11.980 that you have to see.
00:43:14.220 Father Westland,
00:43:15.140 this goes back
00:43:15.720 10 or 15 years,
00:43:16.840 Father Westland
00:43:17.520 was a Catholic priest
00:43:18.380 charged with FACE
00:43:19.360 because he went
00:43:19.940 into a clinic in Omaha
00:43:21.440 and kneeled down to pray.
00:43:23.820 You know,
00:43:23.980 terrible, violent crime.
00:43:26.980 The BS in the allegations
00:43:29.700 against him,
00:43:30.720 somewhat uniquely,
00:43:31.600 actually came in that case
00:43:32.720 from clinic escorts.
00:43:35.900 We won that case.
00:43:37.480 Tried it to a federal jury
00:43:38.860 over the course
00:43:39.420 of a week or so.
00:43:40.800 We won it.
00:43:42.440 The next one
00:43:43.220 was the Ken Scott case
00:43:44.660 in Colorado.
00:43:45.880 Interestingly,
00:43:46.440 this was under the Obama
00:43:47.400 administration
00:43:48.240 and the Obama administration
00:43:49.820 pretty much sent out
00:43:52.120 a memo to all their
00:43:53.200 local state U.S.
00:43:54.280 attorneys saying
00:43:55.320 when people
00:43:56.420 offer a pamphlet
00:43:58.360 to a car
00:43:59.120 going into a driveway
00:44:00.360 and that car stops,
00:44:02.840 that's blockage.
00:44:04.020 That's a FACE violation.
00:44:06.480 So we're going to
00:44:07.520 take this approach.
00:44:08.780 One of their first cases
00:44:09.720 on that was the
00:44:10.320 Ken Scott case
00:44:11.160 charging him with FACE
00:44:12.260 because he
00:44:12.900 was handing pamphlets
00:44:14.720 out to people
00:44:15.300 who voluntarily
00:44:16.220 stopped their cars.
00:44:17.160 When he didn't step
00:44:17.900 in front of the car
00:44:18.520 to force it to stop.
00:44:21.000 We won that case
00:44:22.420 and the tactic
00:44:24.000 kind of faded.
00:44:25.420 We still hear the argument
00:44:26.180 once in a while,
00:44:26.940 but it's not one
00:44:28.040 that the DOJ
00:44:28.720 is advancing anymore.
00:44:31.200 Our next case
00:44:32.180 was the Greep case
00:44:33.220 in New York.
00:44:33.900 It wasn't a DOJ case.
00:44:35.380 It was the New York
00:44:36.660 Attorney General,
00:44:38.000 probably the most powerful
00:44:39.660 Attorney General
00:44:40.340 in the country.
00:44:41.860 Their approach
00:44:42.900 was our clients
00:44:44.340 on a 16-foot-wide sidewalk
00:44:46.140 standing at the edges
00:44:47.560 of the sidewalk
00:44:48.660 leaving about 15 feet
00:44:51.060 available for people
00:44:52.280 to walk into the clinic.
00:44:53.380 Just their being there,
00:44:54.900 holding signs,
00:44:57.080 preaching a little bit
00:44:58.200 from the edge
00:44:59.440 of the sidewalk,
00:45:00.200 just their being there
00:45:01.200 was intimidation
00:45:02.160 and therefore
00:45:03.300 had to be
00:45:03.760 a FACE violation.
00:45:04.700 That Attorney General,
00:45:07.940 Ken,
00:45:08.440 or Schneiderman,
00:45:10.800 on the day
00:45:11.820 he filed that lawsuit,
00:45:12.780 he held a press conference
00:45:13.960 with all the abortionists
00:45:15.700 and escorts
00:45:16.520 and everybody
00:45:17.060 from the clinic
00:45:17.660 behind him
00:45:18.300 on that very sidewalk.
00:45:20.400 And he said,
00:45:21.140 this is a quote,
00:45:22.500 we do not live
00:45:23.320 in a country
00:45:23.900 where you can choose
00:45:25.220 your point of view.
00:45:28.160 And they held,
00:45:29.960 they acted like
00:45:30.920 the mere filing
00:45:31.900 of that lawsuit
00:45:32.620 was the victory.
00:45:35.080 And of course,
00:45:35.420 they had another thing
00:45:36.140 coming about a year
00:45:37.500 and a half later
00:45:38.160 when we won that case.
00:45:41.580 And
00:45:41.660 and interesting,
00:45:46.560 interestingly,
00:45:47.640 we're all looking
00:45:50.260 at the same videos.
00:45:51.680 The DOJ,
00:45:52.700 or in that case,
00:45:53.520 the Attorney General's office,
00:45:55.920 literally misrepresented facts
00:45:58.480 that were right there
00:45:59.560 on video.
00:46:00.660 It's like they live
00:46:01.720 in a different reality.
00:46:02.660 And and our trial judge
00:46:04.840 said at the end
00:46:05.880 of a long case,
00:46:06.920 she rendered
00:46:07.220 a hundred page opinion
00:46:08.620 saying your witnesses
00:46:11.140 aren't believable.
00:46:12.480 You're misrepresenting
00:46:13.660 what's going on here
00:46:14.800 and you're not going
00:46:15.340 to get your injunction.
00:46:16.300 But it took a lot
00:46:17.320 of work to do that.
00:46:18.860 The next one
00:46:19.920 after that
00:46:20.540 was the Hout case.
00:46:21.480 Of course,
00:46:21.680 you all know
00:46:22.060 what the Hout case is.
00:46:23.580 The the commonality
00:46:25.080 here is continued.
00:46:26.780 The the prosecution
00:46:28.380 as a face case
00:46:30.120 was an egregious
00:46:32.160 reach.
00:46:33.240 It was an egregious
00:46:34.160 abuse of the law
00:46:35.380 trying to make it
00:46:36.440 fit facts
00:46:37.200 that are not intended
00:46:38.080 to be included
00:46:39.580 in the face case.
00:46:41.020 The next one
00:46:41.780 is that fairly recently
00:46:42.900 we tried
00:46:43.380 the Lauren Handy case.
00:46:45.760 In that case,
00:46:47.220 again,
00:46:47.620 DOJ.
00:46:48.540 From this point forward,
00:46:49.360 it's all DOJ.
00:46:50.280 After after grief,
00:46:51.540 as soon as Dobbs
00:46:52.660 started looking
00:46:53.660 like it was going
00:46:54.260 to happen,
00:46:55.000 the DOJ exploded
00:46:55.960 and these are
00:46:56.480 all DOJ cases.
00:46:58.800 So Hout was DOJ.
00:47:00.380 Handy was DOJ also.
00:47:02.280 And Handy
00:47:02.820 and people
00:47:03.980 that were charged
00:47:04.660 with her
00:47:05.300 went into the clinic
00:47:06.700 and they sat down.
00:47:08.320 Interestingly enough,
00:47:10.700 two,
00:47:11.640 maybe,
00:47:12.420 allegedly
00:47:12.860 actually blocked
00:47:13.860 something.
00:47:14.880 But rather inarguably,
00:47:16.680 the other eight
00:47:17.320 did not.
00:47:18.900 Now,
00:47:19.440 a prosecutor
00:47:20.680 has a duty
00:47:21.820 to the prospective
00:47:23.180 defendants,
00:47:24.040 just as he has
00:47:24.660 a duty
00:47:25.160 to the community
00:47:27.280 at large,
00:47:28.080 not to over-prosecute.
00:47:30.920 He's got
00:47:31.420 prosecutorial discretion.
00:47:32.980 He's supposed to
00:47:34.420 employ it
00:47:35.420 temperately.
00:47:36.560 But we don't see that
00:47:37.780 in these cases.
00:47:39.520 Where he's got
00:47:40.400 two people
00:47:41.000 he may be able
00:47:41.820 to charge with face
00:47:42.720 and eight
00:47:43.240 that he really
00:47:43.760 ought to push off
00:47:44.620 to the state
00:47:45.160 and charge them
00:47:45.620 with trespass
00:47:46.300 if they want.
00:47:46.840 He doesn't do that.
00:47:48.280 Without the facts
00:47:49.080 to support the face
00:47:50.000 conviction itself,
00:47:51.440 what they do instead
00:47:52.420 is charge them
00:47:52.960 with conspiracy.
00:47:54.020 Anybody who was
00:47:54.680 anywhere around
00:47:56.160 the thing
00:47:56.560 gets charged
00:47:57.400 with conspiracy
00:47:58.180 and that's the same
00:47:59.400 as being charged
00:48:00.040 with face
00:48:00.460 even though there
00:48:01.020 was no conspiracy.
00:48:02.760 In that case,
00:48:03.600 there was no agreement.
00:48:05.360 The evidence
00:48:05.760 didn't support
00:48:06.460 anything but
00:48:07.180 an agreement
00:48:07.940 that whatever we do,
00:48:09.740 10 people,
00:48:10.600 we're all going
00:48:10.960 to do our own thing,
00:48:11.800 whatever you want
00:48:12.160 to do,
00:48:12.720 the only real agreement
00:48:13.920 was to be peaceful.
00:48:15.080 But it doesn't matter.
00:48:17.840 We're going
00:48:18.080 to rope them all in.
00:48:19.740 The next case
00:48:20.900 is a face case
00:48:22.200 we're actually
00:48:22.700 getting ready
00:48:23.140 to try starting
00:48:24.200 next Monday
00:48:25.220 in a couple of days.
00:48:26.040 That's in Tennessee.
00:48:27.200 Almost exactly
00:48:28.140 the same facts.
00:48:29.500 Two people
00:48:30.100 allegedly
00:48:30.740 did some blocking,
00:48:33.100 the others weren't.
00:48:34.100 And they didn't even
00:48:34.600 go into the clinic.
00:48:35.720 You know,
00:48:35.940 this is out
00:48:36.980 in public areas.
00:48:38.640 So that's a big deal.
00:48:41.080 It's a stretch
00:48:42.180 on the facts.
00:48:43.160 And how's the DOJ
00:48:44.440 handling it?
00:48:46.640 Conspiracy again.
00:48:48.660 We have an Ohio
00:48:49.860 civil case coming up.
00:48:52.020 It's just a civil case.
00:48:53.260 But the DOJ
00:48:54.040 is pushing it,
00:48:54.740 of course.
00:48:55.060 They've sent letters
00:48:55.680 to our clients
00:48:56.320 saying we're going
00:48:57.500 to sue you
00:48:57.880 for a face violation.
00:48:59.240 And what that means
00:48:59.960 since it's a civil case,
00:49:01.100 it could become
00:49:01.620 a criminal case later.
00:49:02.960 But in the civil realm,
00:49:05.240 what it means is
00:49:06.240 they're going to be
00:49:06.760 seeking an injunction
00:49:07.740 and they're going
00:49:08.620 to be seeking
00:49:09.300 a judgment
00:49:10.200 for a bunch of money.
00:49:12.300 Now,
00:49:12.920 the big picture here
00:49:15.140 is abuse
00:49:17.580 of the process.
00:49:19.420 Abuse of people
00:49:20.400 who are as entitled
00:49:21.300 to the protections
00:49:22.000 from government
00:49:23.400 as the people
00:49:24.600 the government
00:49:25.140 is fixated
00:49:26.640 on protecting
00:49:27.460 one-sidedly.
00:49:28.800 It is abuse.
00:49:30.380 It is egregious.
00:49:31.400 It is not good faith.
00:49:33.040 Now,
00:49:33.380 a few of these cases,
00:49:34.460 I've heard people say
00:49:35.380 in the Handy case
00:49:36.300 or maybe the Tennessee case,
00:49:37.640 well, good grief.
00:49:38.760 If people are going
00:49:39.720 into the clinics,
00:49:41.320 why are you defending them?
00:49:43.800 They go in there.
00:49:44.900 They know that
00:49:45.520 it's probably illegal.
00:49:46.880 They're going in there
00:49:47.660 to make trouble.
00:49:49.100 Aren't they willingly
00:49:49.900 breaking the law?
00:49:51.600 Aren't they making
00:49:52.400 pro-lifers look like radicals?
00:49:54.900 Shouldn't they rely
00:49:55.840 on lawful means?
00:49:58.380 The answer to that question
00:49:59.920 affects everyone
00:50:00.740 in this room.
00:50:02.280 And it's multi-parted.
00:50:03.680 I'm going to try
00:50:04.120 and go quickly.
00:50:04.820 First of all,
00:50:05.900 the people watching
00:50:06.900 a pregnant woman
00:50:07.580 walk into a clinic
00:50:08.540 are looking at
00:50:09.660 an actual baby,
00:50:10.980 not a hypothetical baby.
00:50:13.060 The defense of others' idea,
00:50:15.800 which is born in natural law,
00:50:18.160 is real.
00:50:19.000 It's compelling.
00:50:20.260 And it's what they act upon.
00:50:22.740 When you're watching
00:50:23.800 a real baby
00:50:24.660 about to be killed,
00:50:25.880 you don't go outside
00:50:26.880 and call your congressman
00:50:28.180 or write a letter
00:50:28.840 to the editor.
00:50:30.100 You act.
00:50:31.320 Now,
00:50:31.900 in most cases,
00:50:34.180 we confront a problem there.
00:50:35.400 It's a barrier
00:50:36.040 to using that defense.
00:50:37.420 And that is
00:50:37.900 that killing that baby
00:50:38.760 is legal.
00:50:40.000 If it's legal,
00:50:41.260 you don't really
00:50:42.000 get the defense
00:50:43.520 of others' argument.
00:50:45.420 And, you know,
00:50:46.440 there are ways
00:50:46.880 you might be able to,
00:50:47.760 but pretty much
00:50:48.340 it's a loser.
00:50:49.560 The second answer
00:50:50.600 to why we defend them,
00:50:51.640 though,
00:50:52.060 is that if the killing
00:50:53.720 of that baby
00:50:54.300 is actually illegal,
00:50:56.340 then the law provides
00:50:58.600 and your duty says
00:51:01.740 you intervene.
00:51:04.620 You intervene.
00:51:06.080 Where the evidence is
00:51:07.340 that babies are
00:51:08.340 not being killed legally,
00:51:09.860 but being killed illegally,
00:51:11.280 born alive
00:51:11.920 and left to die.
00:51:13.300 And the evidence
00:51:13.880 of that is very strong.
00:51:14.940 It was very strong
00:51:15.700 in the Handy case.
00:51:17.760 Face doesn't even apply.
00:51:19.340 There's no argument
00:51:20.380 that that is
00:51:21.760 reproductive health care.
00:51:24.220 Face defines
00:51:24.920 reproductive health services
00:51:26.020 as dealing with a pregnancy.
00:51:27.220 But a baby outside the womb
00:51:28.960 living at any stage
00:51:30.180 and even for 30 seconds
00:51:31.700 is not a pregnancy.
00:51:33.200 This is a human being
00:51:34.320 who has all the rights
00:51:35.640 to protection
00:51:36.280 that anyone in this room has.
00:51:38.440 So you can do your blocking.
00:51:40.500 You can do your trespassing.
00:51:42.480 You can chain yourself to doors.
00:51:44.120 That is not unlawful.
00:51:47.000 So in those situations,
00:51:49.160 the people that we would represent there
00:51:51.400 are not using unlawful means.
00:51:54.260 They are using lawful means.
00:51:57.220 But they are charged with a crime.
00:52:00.120 Third part of that answer
00:52:01.540 is that if only some people block,
00:52:04.240 but all are charged,
00:52:06.400 don't these people deserve defense?
00:52:10.460 Fourth answer to that,
00:52:11.980 no rule says that all pro-lifers
00:52:14.680 have to do things
00:52:15.720 exactly the same way.
00:52:18.120 People speak the language they heard.
00:52:22.520 People get into the pro-life business
00:52:24.220 because something affected them.
00:52:26.880 A sign of an aborted baby.
00:52:28.580 A picture of a non-aborted baby.
00:52:30.700 Some argument that somebody made.
00:52:32.240 A printed sign.
00:52:33.380 Whatever it is doesn't really matter.
00:52:34.840 But people will tend to go
00:52:36.020 into the pro-life movement
00:52:37.140 doing things in the way
00:52:39.320 that they got brought into by.
00:52:42.160 So that's pretty important.
00:52:44.680 And the variety of approaches
00:52:45.960 to the thing
00:52:46.720 really reflects the depth
00:52:48.900 and complexity
00:52:49.720 and fundamental nature
00:52:51.400 of the pro-life view.
00:52:55.300 When we come at it
00:52:56.700 from a hundred different directions,
00:52:58.480 it's harder for the other side
00:52:59.920 to just dismiss it
00:53:01.080 or ignore it
00:53:02.000 as the unilateral ravings
00:53:04.000 of kind of a one-sided group.
00:53:08.340 Fifth answer,
00:53:09.360 and there's only one more after this.
00:53:11.440 Defending people works.
00:53:13.960 When Father Wesselin
00:53:15.980 was first charged,
00:53:17.240 he was charged by the state
00:53:18.940 with trespass.
00:53:20.380 But the federal government
00:53:21.940 came down with all their power
00:53:24.120 and they took it away from the state
00:53:26.000 and they charged him
00:53:27.300 with his face sack.
00:53:29.060 Created a much bigger,
00:53:30.300 much more complex trial.
00:53:31.840 But we won it.
00:53:33.000 A year later,
00:53:34.820 Father Wesselin
00:53:35.740 went in to the same clinic
00:53:38.160 and did exactly the same thing.
00:53:40.780 He was one of these wonderful,
00:53:42.060 indefatigable guys
00:53:43.420 that was just going to do this.
00:53:45.180 He did the exact same thing.
00:53:47.820 The feds wouldn't touch it.
00:53:51.260 We went in and pled him guilty
00:53:52.820 to trespass
00:53:53.700 and a nice judge
00:53:54.720 fined him 25 bucks
00:53:55.820 and it was done.
00:53:57.860 Trying cases,
00:53:59.100 winning cases especially,
00:54:00.860 keeps the other side
00:54:01.940 a little more honest.
00:54:03.320 They don't want to waste
00:54:04.120 their resources.
00:54:05.520 They don't want to work hard.
00:54:06.580 They don't want to get embarrassed.
00:54:09.940 Finally,
00:54:11.240 and this applies,
00:54:12.740 kind of wraps up
00:54:13.460 the whole idea
00:54:14.300 that everybody in this room
00:54:16.400 ought to care about.
00:54:18.800 If we didn't defend
00:54:20.160 people out on the edges,
00:54:21.860 people I like to call
00:54:22.640 the rascals,
00:54:23.920 and if we didn't have
00:54:25.540 the victories,
00:54:27.340 the government
00:54:27.980 that spends all its time
00:54:29.180 coming after them
00:54:30.160 would be coming after you.
00:54:31.900 I'm not doing
00:54:35.060 anything illegal
00:54:35.880 so I have nothing
00:54:37.180 to worry about
00:54:38.100 is not
00:54:39.560 a realistic approach
00:54:41.380 in the face
00:54:42.780 of a lawless
00:54:43.880 and abusive
00:54:44.640 government.
00:54:45.940 This is why
00:54:47.240 we need
00:54:48.180 the Thomas More Society
00:54:49.480 and this is why
00:54:50.940 finally,
00:54:58.100 with Dobbs,
00:54:59.260 the federal underpinnings
00:55:00.600 for the FACE Act
00:55:01.560 itself
00:55:01.980 have gone away.
00:55:03.040 That is not a strained argument.
00:55:04.400 It's a decent argument
00:55:05.380 and we're taking that up.
00:55:07.260 So,
00:55:07.580 stay tuned on that one.
00:55:09.140 Thank you.
00:55:09.460 Thank you,
00:55:15.800 Martin.
00:55:16.140 Good stuff.
00:55:16.860 Good stuff.
00:55:17.420 Well delivered.
00:55:18.520 You can see why I'm
00:55:19.680 honored to work
00:55:20.920 alongside these people.
00:55:22.860 We've come to the end
00:55:23.700 of our time here.
00:55:24.540 I want to urge you
00:55:25.260 to go to our website,
00:55:26.620 www.thomasmoresociety.org.
00:55:29.960 More has one O
00:55:31.000 and it's .org,
00:55:31.920 not .com.
00:55:33.000 You can sign up
00:55:33.660 for our emails,
00:55:34.460 follow our work.
00:55:35.800 You can support us
00:55:36.640 by,
00:55:37.520 there's a tab
00:55:38.320 that will allow you
00:55:39.440 to donate
00:55:39.800 in a variety
00:55:40.720 of different ways.
00:55:41.880 You can support us
00:55:42.640 financially also.
00:55:44.180 You hear me say this
00:55:44.980 every year,
00:55:45.860 we're really proud
00:55:46.840 of all these victories,
00:55:48.440 proud of our lawsuits,
00:55:50.000 proud of our wins,
00:55:50.700 proud of our clients
00:55:51.440 that are out there
00:55:51.960 putting it on the line.
00:55:53.340 But we realize
00:55:54.140 that even our biggest
00:55:55.160 courtroom victories
00:55:56.180 are just minor skirmishes
00:55:57.400 in what is really
00:55:58.380 a much larger
00:55:59.060 spiritual battle.
00:55:59.940 So please support us
00:56:00.840 with your prayers.
00:56:01.500 Thank you.
00:56:05.780 I've known John Henry
00:56:06.840 for a long, long time.
00:56:08.160 He is one of the founders
00:56:09.420 and editors
00:56:10.340 at LifeSite News.
00:56:12.340 And so, John,
00:56:12.920 what we want to know
00:56:13.500 about,
00:56:14.480 the media is so slanted,
00:56:15.920 it's so corrupt.
00:56:16.760 I look at the headlines,
00:56:17.580 I see the AP,
00:56:18.820 the talking points
00:56:19.660 from the Associated Press.
00:56:20.760 If you guys don't know,
00:56:21.440 they actually published
00:56:22.100 a topical guide
00:56:23.100 instructing their reporters
00:56:25.940 not to use the phrase
00:56:27.880 pro-life.
00:56:28.960 You are to refer
00:56:30.360 to pro-lifers
00:56:31.300 as anti-abortion.
00:56:33.140 And so you can see
00:56:33.900 the articles.
00:56:34.740 Jeanne Mancini
00:56:35.320 was in an article
00:56:36.020 earlier today.
00:56:36.860 Anti-abortion,
00:56:37.600 Jeanne Mancini,
00:56:39.160 right?
00:56:39.980 They can't say
00:56:40.900 anything positive
00:56:41.880 about the pro-life movement
00:56:43.260 because that would
00:56:43.820 destroy their narrative.
00:56:45.880 So I want to ask
00:56:46.800 John Henry Weston,
00:56:48.220 what can we do?
00:56:50.440 What are you doing
00:56:51.480 to address this gaping
00:56:53.240 gap of ethics
00:56:55.020 in the media?
00:56:56.340 Thank you, Royce,
00:57:00.260 and thank you
00:57:00.760 to all of you
00:57:01.560 who have for so many years
00:57:03.480 already defended life
00:57:04.660 in America.
00:57:06.680 As your third Canadian
00:57:08.000 mentioned in like
00:57:08.920 the last five minutes,
00:57:10.220 I think this is really cool.
00:57:11.680 Great opportunity
00:57:12.380 to follow Abby Johnson.
00:57:13.640 Always a hard act
00:57:14.320 to follow,
00:57:14.700 but someone great
00:57:15.320 and inspirational
00:57:16.020 to follow.
00:57:17.720 See, Abby talked
00:57:18.420 about something
00:57:18.940 right off the bat
00:57:19.940 which is absolutely
00:57:21.520 central
00:57:22.560 to how to discern
00:57:24.960 what is proper
00:57:26.960 when it comes to media.
00:57:28.660 And it's not going
00:57:29.420 to be popular to say.
00:57:32.240 The answer is
00:57:33.360 Jesus Christ.
00:57:39.060 It is the only way.
00:57:40.340 You know,
00:57:40.860 in the pro-life movement
00:57:41.720 in Canada,
00:57:42.280 we tried.
00:57:43.380 We tried
00:57:44.340 because our pro-life march
00:57:46.400 started in 1997.
00:57:48.260 We tried
00:57:48.840 to do it
00:57:49.660 without Jesus.
00:57:50.320 We tried
00:57:51.960 to say
00:57:52.360 to those people
00:57:52.980 coming with posters
00:57:54.020 of Our Lady
00:57:55.280 or a statue
00:57:56.480 or a crucifix.
00:57:58.580 Don't do that.
00:57:59.760 Keep that away.
00:58:01.600 Take this pro-life sign
00:58:02.700 instead.
00:58:04.880 A lot of them
00:58:05.700 stayed home
00:58:06.120 because of that.
00:58:07.460 God bless them
00:58:07.960 because it taught us
00:58:08.560 a lesson.
00:58:10.280 Here in America,
00:58:11.740 where everything
00:58:12.220 was free,
00:58:13.300 everybody came
00:58:14.160 with everything.
00:58:15.560 There's a huge
00:58:16.300 statue being carried
00:58:18.660 by guys.
00:58:19.500 I don't know
00:58:19.820 how they do that
00:58:20.380 by the way
00:58:20.720 for the whole march
00:58:21.220 but it's amazing.
00:58:22.580 When I go to Italy
00:58:23.540 at the March for Life,
00:58:24.480 they do that too
00:58:25.180 but they dance
00:58:25.880 the whole way
00:58:26.480 and carry a big
00:58:27.460 statue of Our Lady.
00:58:28.420 Those guys are heroes.
00:58:30.640 But it is actually
00:58:32.560 the answer.
00:58:33.520 If you want to know
00:58:34.500 what we're doing
00:58:36.300 in the pro-life movement,
00:58:39.260 we're evangelizing.
00:58:41.800 That is what we're doing.
00:58:44.820 What did Bernard Nathanson,
00:58:46.460 what did Abby Johnson
00:58:47.580 come to
00:58:48.320 they came to faith?
00:58:51.980 They came because
00:58:53.580 of faith.
00:58:55.940 We can't save
00:58:57.700 people from
00:58:59.200 just abortion
00:59:00.020 and then still
00:59:03.040 they're lost
00:59:04.260 eternally.
00:59:05.700 That's ridiculous.
00:59:07.700 We're saving their lives
00:59:09.380 for eternal life.
00:59:11.400 So if you want
00:59:12.060 a good clue
00:59:12.760 as to how to find
00:59:13.960 a media organization
00:59:14.820 that you can trust,
00:59:16.380 trust Jesus Christ.
00:59:20.540 At LifeSite News,
00:59:21.960 our mission
00:59:22.500 is evangelization.
00:59:24.740 News is actually there
00:59:25.820 as a hook
00:59:27.120 to evangelize.
00:59:29.380 And when you start
00:59:30.740 with Jesus,
00:59:31.620 you bring the truth
00:59:33.120 because you can't
00:59:34.060 do anything else
00:59:34.540 because you offend
00:59:35.240 the truth himself.
00:59:36.940 and so that's
00:59:38.600 our mission.
00:59:40.100 And obviously
00:59:41.000 we go to defend
00:59:42.220 the greatest
00:59:42.920 attacks on truth
00:59:44.360 with a capital T,
00:59:45.200 the greatest
00:59:45.720 attacks on Jesus Christ.
00:59:47.620 And
00:59:47.880 what is a little
00:59:49.500 known,
00:59:50.120 perhaps,
00:59:51.500 vision
00:59:53.920 given to
00:59:54.760 three children
00:59:55.300 in Fatima
00:59:55.720 in 1917,
00:59:56.420 the mother
00:59:59.100 of God
00:59:59.360 from heaven
00:59:59.660 came to tell
01:00:00.440 these little
01:00:02.240 children
01:00:02.620 the greatest
01:00:03.860 or the final
01:00:04.940 battle between
01:00:05.560 our Lord
01:00:05.900 and the reign
01:00:06.200 of Satan
01:00:06.520 will be over
01:00:07.140 marriage and
01:00:08.320 the family.
01:00:09.780 The very issues
01:00:11.180 that you fight
01:00:11.960 every day
01:00:12.740 are the very
01:00:13.940 issues
01:00:14.580 that are
01:00:15.640 the decisive
01:00:17.120 final battle.
01:00:19.260 And that's
01:00:20.460 why
01:00:20.900 it's so
01:00:21.860 demonic.
01:00:23.720 You ever
01:00:24.040 wonder
01:00:24.320 why
01:00:25.040 this
01:00:26.060 insane
01:00:27.020 ferocity?
01:00:29.480 Why?
01:00:31.040 And you will
01:00:31.560 have seen
01:00:32.000 the
01:00:32.360 abortionists
01:00:34.240 or
01:00:35.440 sidewalk
01:00:37.480 counselors,
01:00:38.140 whatever they
01:00:38.440 are.
01:00:39.600 They're nearly
01:00:40.520 foaming at the
01:00:41.260 mouth.
01:00:42.200 They're saying
01:00:42.820 the most
01:00:43.220 obscene
01:00:43.700 things.
01:00:45.320 Why?
01:00:47.980 You've
01:00:48.560 watched this.
01:00:50.560 Whether they
01:00:51.400 know it or not,
01:00:52.140 as we already
01:00:52.600 heard up here,
01:00:53.040 it's not
01:00:54.520 about
01:00:55.220 knowing
01:00:56.000 that you're
01:00:57.000 working with
01:00:58.180 the evil
01:00:58.660 one.
01:00:59.480 He doesn't
01:01:00.060 care.
01:01:00.380 In fact,
01:01:00.620 he enjoys
01:01:01.160 it more
01:01:01.700 when he's
01:01:02.760 thought not
01:01:03.180 to exist.
01:01:05.200 This whole
01:01:06.080 battle
01:01:06.480 is about
01:01:07.680 one thing.
01:01:09.000 We need
01:01:09.780 to be
01:01:10.780 about
01:01:11.260 Jesus Christ,
01:01:12.220 about evangelization,
01:01:13.700 and that's
01:01:14.840 why
01:01:15.240 the most
01:01:16.440 powerful thing
01:01:17.340 in the pro-life
01:01:17.800 movement
01:01:18.180 works.
01:01:20.200 It's the
01:01:20.880 same thing
01:01:21.280 Jesus did.
01:01:23.260 Telling
01:01:23.820 stories.
01:01:26.760 The stories
01:01:27.960 and the
01:01:29.260 images.
01:01:30.920 You know
01:01:31.620 that the
01:01:32.360 church is
01:01:32.620 all about
01:01:32.920 images.
01:01:34.300 You know
01:01:34.660 that in
01:01:34.960 every church
01:01:35.520 there's a
01:01:35.900 crucifix,
01:01:36.800 the most
01:01:37.380 horrific
01:01:37.840 scene of
01:01:38.660 death you
01:01:38.980 can ever
01:01:39.220 see.
01:01:40.860 That's why
01:01:41.520 in the
01:01:41.680 pro-life
01:01:41.940 movement we
01:01:42.580 have the
01:01:43.420 signs that
01:01:44.520 have converted
01:01:45.080 so many
01:01:45.660 people.
01:01:45.960 They're able
01:01:46.180 to see
01:01:46.780 what it
01:01:48.460 is that
01:01:49.300 we're doing
01:01:49.820 a million
01:01:51.160 times a
01:01:52.500 year,
01:01:53.220 every year,
01:01:54.800 to children
01:01:55.740 in this
01:01:56.420 country
01:01:56.940 alone.
01:01:59.340 So media
01:02:00.480 is there
01:02:01.280 to serve
01:02:02.240 as a tool
01:02:03.620 for bringing
01:02:04.100 the truth.
01:02:05.320 The only
01:02:06.000 trustworthy
01:02:06.440 media
01:02:06.980 is the
01:02:08.880 media that
01:02:09.460 serves to
01:02:10.400 bring you
01:02:10.820 to the
01:02:11.240 ultimate
01:02:11.660 truth.
01:02:13.440 And
01:02:13.540 outside of
01:02:14.460 that there
01:02:16.080 will always
01:02:16.460 be lies.
01:02:18.220 We started
01:02:18.920 LifeSite News
01:02:19.400 in 1997.
01:02:21.560 The whole
01:02:22.140 reason why we
01:02:22.660 started is
01:02:23.120 because the
01:02:23.500 same year
01:02:23.820 we started
01:02:24.200 the March
01:02:24.600 for Life
01:02:24.960 in Canada,
01:02:25.580 a copycat
01:02:26.180 of what
01:02:26.620 you guys
01:02:26.920 are doing
01:02:27.160 right here.
01:02:29.440 And they
01:02:30.000 lie consistently
01:02:31.360 in our
01:02:31.760 media that
01:02:32.660 it didn't
01:02:32.940 happen.
01:02:34.040 That if it
01:02:34.620 did happen,
01:02:35.080 it was like
01:02:35.460 five people.
01:02:37.140 The news
01:02:37.900 cameras that
01:02:38.520 came,
01:02:39.280 they would
01:02:39.600 focus on
01:02:40.160 the corner
01:02:40.580 where there
01:02:41.020 is probably
01:02:41.640 five people
01:02:42.360 having a
01:02:42.960 smoke,
01:02:43.260 likely.
01:02:43.520 and not
01:02:44.840 behind them.
01:02:45.560 And they
01:02:45.780 literally do
01:02:46.440 this stuff
01:02:46.920 because that's
01:02:48.280 what they're
01:02:48.500 about.
01:02:49.540 We've
01:02:49.980 watched,
01:02:50.780 especially
01:02:51.360 over the
01:02:51.940 past three
01:02:52.460 or four
01:02:52.760 years,
01:02:53.840 the media
01:02:54.340 lies in
01:02:55.000 ways you
01:02:56.600 never thought
01:02:57.060 possible.
01:02:58.240 No,
01:02:58.860 they wouldn't.
01:02:59.480 They didn't.
01:03:00.480 They did.
01:03:01.720 They did with
01:03:02.620 the absolute
01:03:03.360 utter collusion
01:03:04.400 of the media
01:03:06.160 owners.
01:03:06.860 You've watched,
01:03:07.440 how many of you
01:03:07.900 have seen these
01:03:08.400 videos where
01:03:09.100 all the news
01:03:10.060 media are
01:03:10.720 parroting the
01:03:11.380 same line?
01:03:12.040 Have you
01:03:13.400 guys seen
01:03:13.680 that?
01:03:14.440 Hands up if
01:03:14.860 you're
01:03:14.940 not.
01:03:15.600 A lot of
01:03:16.040 you have
01:03:16.160 seen it.
01:03:16.320 If you
01:03:16.460 haven't seen
01:03:16.780 it yet,
01:03:17.400 boy,
01:03:17.760 oh boy.
01:03:19.180 Every news
01:03:20.020 anchor parroting
01:03:20.860 the same
01:03:21.220 line.
01:03:21.900 And the
01:03:22.340 line is a
01:03:23.620 lie.
01:03:25.700 Because they're
01:03:26.420 trying purposefully
01:03:27.840 to give you
01:03:28.760 misinformation,
01:03:29.960 disinformation.
01:03:31.440 Media is about
01:03:32.240 trust.
01:03:34.100 LifeSite News
01:03:34.540 has been there
01:03:34.980 now for 26
01:03:36.640 years,
01:03:37.600 trying to
01:03:38.500 provide the
01:03:39.080 truth,
01:03:39.400 especially to
01:03:40.980 those whom
01:03:41.460 we serve.
01:03:42.540 And that
01:03:42.780 is first
01:03:43.160 and foremost
01:03:43.720 those in
01:03:44.540 the movement
01:03:44.840 for life
01:03:45.360 and family.
01:03:47.280 For LifeSite
01:03:47.820 News,
01:03:48.160 I'm John
01:03:48.420 Henry Weston.
01:03:49.360 And may
01:03:49.560 God bless
01:03:49.900 you.