In this episode, Dr. Jordan B. Peterson talks to his daughter and collaborator, Michaela Peterson, about her father's new book, Rules 21, 22, and 23. She also talks to Ignat Solzhenitsyn, the author of The Gulag Archipelago, about the impact of living in the shadow of his father, and the consequences of writing a book about his father's life. Dr. Peterson also discusses the importance of keeping up with the trouble from your past, and how to deal with it in order to maintain a healthy, long-lasting relationship with someone you care deeply for. And, of course, he reads from a new chapter from his new book. Rules 21 and 22 are the first in a series of 12 rules that will be published in the next book, which will be called Rules 22 and 23, which is due out later this year. If you're struggling, please know that you are not alone. There's hope, and there's a path to feeling better. Let this be the first step towards the brighter future you deserve. -Let this be a step towards a brighter, happier, more productive, more fulfilling life you deserve, and a life you can live in which you can be grateful in spite of the suffering of your past. Subscribe to Daily Wire Plus to get immediate access to all the tools, tips, and resources you need to get you on the path to a healthier, happier and more fulfilled in your life! Subscribe and share the podcast with your friends, family, colleagues, and partners to help keep you on track toward a brighter and more productive future you are worthy of a brighter future. Thank you for listening to the podcast, and keep sharing it with the world you deserve a brighter you deserve to be a brighter brighter future! -Dr. Jordan Peterson and thank you for supporting the podcast. To learn more about his new series, go to DailyWire Plus.org/thejordanbpeterson to become a supporter of his new podcast, Dailywire Plus. Thank you, Jordan B Peterson. The podcast is a new series that could be a lifeline for those battling Depression and Anxiety, and we wanted to take a moment to reach out to those listening who may be struggling with depression and PTSD, and help them find a way to feel better, too. Thanks for listening and learn how to be kinder, not less lonely, and more uplifting.
00:00:00.940Hey everyone, real quick before you skip, I want to talk to you about something serious and important.
00:00:06.480Dr. Jordan Peterson has created a new series that could be a lifeline for those battling depression and anxiety.
00:00:12.740We know how isolating and overwhelming these conditions can be, and we wanted to take a moment to reach out to those listening who may be struggling.
00:00:20.100With decades of experience helping patients, Dr. Peterson offers a unique understanding of why you might be feeling this way in his new series.
00:00:27.420He provides a roadmap towards healing, showing that while the journey isn't easy, it's absolutely possible to find your way forward.
00:00:35.360If you're suffering, please know you are not alone. There's hope, and there's a path to feeling better.
00:00:41.780Go to Daily Wire Plus now and start watching Dr. Jordan B. Peterson on depression and anxiety.
00:00:47.460Let this be the first step towards the brighter future you deserve.
00:00:57.420Welcome to Season 2, Episode 6 of the Jordan B. Peterson Podcast.
00:01:03.060I'm Michaela Peterson, Dr. Peterson's daughter and collaborator.
00:01:06.840Today we're presenting Dad's lecture at the Civic Arts Plaza in Thousand Oaks, California, recorded on June 30th, 2018.
00:01:14.700He discussed thinking as simulation of action, thinking as the ability to produce new avatars of the many possible sub-personalities that you could act out in the world,
00:01:23.960so that you can embody those which might be useful and productive, and let the ones that come to a dismal end in imagination fade away, never to appear in the real world.
00:01:33.720He talked about thinking as tool production and use, making the case that clarity of thought, equivalent to the creation of well-honed tools,
00:01:42.100prepares people for a less sorrow-ridden and more meaningful and productive life.
00:01:46.740So, Dad, what's been going on with you this week?
00:01:49.440Well, I was in New York earlier, and I had a chance to talk to Ignat Solzhenitsyn, who's Alexander Solzhenitsyn's son.
00:01:58.680And Solzhenitsyn, of course, is the author of the famous book, The Gulag Archipelago.
00:02:03.080I wrote a foreword to that book, the abridged version, the 50th anniversary of the abridged version,
00:02:09.640and the 100th anniversary of the centenary of Solzhenitsyn's birth.
00:02:13.200And I recorded the audio version of that foreword for the audiobook in New York.
00:02:20.160But I also had a chance to talk to Ignat about his experiences with his father, his experiences working on his books,
00:02:27.200the effect that living in the shadow of his father and that book has had on his life,
00:02:32.980and on some of the historical consequences of the publication of The Gulag Archipelago.
00:02:38.200That'll all be additional material associated with the audio version of the abridged version of The Gulag Archipelago.
00:02:47.540So, I'm hoping that that's all very useful.
00:02:50.280I also spent a lot of time this week really doing the second edit,
00:08:34.280If they're rustling around and coughing and making noise, then you're not where you should be because everyone should be sitting silent and immersed in what's going on.
00:08:42.720And you can tell when you're dealing with, wrestling with ideas.
00:08:46.560If you're watching people, you can see if they're on board with the ideas.
00:08:49.860And so, like, it really, if it's a good talk, it's a dialogue.
00:08:54.460And so, and every time I have the chance to talk, I try to talk about, I wouldn't say different things exactly because it's variations on a theme, you know.
00:09:02.900And there's only so much you can know, so you can't talk about something different every night.
00:09:07.220But I use these lectures as an opportunity to hone my thinking.
00:09:12.740And the reason that I do that is because, well, most fundamentally, because you should hone your thinking.
00:12:53.940And for students to go to a university and then think that that's what the university is demanding of them is an absolute, it's an, it's a, I don't even know what the right word is.
00:13:38.200If you could just avoid undue harm, that would be something.
00:13:40.540But maybe if you got your words together properly, you could go out and do some positive good for you and for your family and for your community.
00:13:47.980And that's all dependent on the integrity of your word.
00:13:51.240And so every chance you have to hone the integrity of your word, you should cling to like your life depends on it.
00:14:48.500And so then you get the best of both worlds.
00:14:50.400You can think through your thoughts and you can hone them.
00:14:52.840And then you can provisionally test them out there in the world where you're going to have to act anyways.
00:14:56.560And if they meet a receptive audience, and especially if they meet an audience that is also willingly engaged in the process of making the ideas better, then you can have some assurance, not complete, but some assurance that you're in the right place at the right time doing the right thing.
00:16:03.460It's the deepest instinct that you have in some sense manifesting itself saying you're doing everything you possibly can to put the structures around you into the proper musical-like balance.
00:16:15.860And that's facilitating your movement through the world.
00:16:19.020And that's something I've come to realize ever more clearly, I would say, over the last 30 years.
00:16:23.120And I certainly would think of it as one of the most important things that I've come to realize is that that sense of meaning is not only a real thing,
00:16:31.320but the most real thing, it's actually genuine, solid, it orients you in the world.
00:16:39.180And rule seven is do what is meaningful and not what is expedient.
00:16:44.240And it's a riff on that theme, essentially, that you have an instinct for meaning.
00:16:49.960And it's not an epiphenomenon of something more real.
00:19:07.700Because when you do what you can to set the suffering right, then you've accomplished something that you can take, I wouldn't say pride in, you can take solace in.
00:19:18.240You know, that despite the conditions of your miserable existence and all of your insufficiencies, that you are still able to stumble forward with some degree of nobility and make things less terrible than they might have been.
00:19:29.580That's something, and that does, well, look, look, man, if you're a flawed creature with a proclivity towards malevolence, you should aim low.
00:19:43.180And not making anything any worse than you could have, that's a good start.
00:19:51.760So, so, so, so, so, um, I, I, so, why you're here in the more proximal sense, the question that I've been trying to figure out, because I've been trying to make sense of what's been happening around me, because, you know, I've spoken, as I said, the total number of cities now is about 52, I think.
00:20:09.740And the average audience size has been approximately this, and this is 2,500 to 3,000 people.
00:20:15.100And so, I'm thinking, what the hell's going on here?
00:20:18.000Why are you people all coming out to hear a psychology professor talk about, really, intellectual ideas?
00:20:25.880And I would say, in some sense, obscure intellectual ideas.
00:20:28.820It's like, what, why, no one was doing this five years ago, or ever.
00:20:34.800And so, something, something's changed.
00:20:40.420And then I saw that even a more, what would you say, curious example of this, when I was in Vancouver on the 24th and 25th of this month, I was there talking to Sam Harris about the distinction between facts and values, or the relationship between science and religion, or the relationship between facts and stories, depends on how you carve it up.
00:20:59.820And it was a pretty intense discussion, and I would say it had approximately the same level of intellectual complexity as a pretty decent PhD thesis defense in the field of psychology, when the PhD candidate is actually really capable of defending their thesis.
00:21:18.680And so, it was a little different than a PhD defense, because Sam was defending his position, and I was defending my position, and so, there was a dual element to it, both D-U-A-L and D-U-E-L, and I suppose that heightened the tension to some degree.
00:21:33.640But what was so interesting, well, there were three things that were interesting.
00:21:36.740The first was, that the event ever happened.
00:21:40.980Just the mere fact that the event happened was really quite unfathomable.
00:21:45.580The second was, we were only supposed to speak to each other for an hour, and then we were supposed to go to Q&A for an hour, and when we got into the conversation an hour in, we were right in the thick of it, let's say, and we asked the audience if they wanted to go to Q&A, or if they wanted us to continue the discussion, and the overwhelming response was, continue the discussion, and we talked for two and a half hours, and so that was night one, and then we did the same thing in night two, and I thought, wow, this is really weird.
00:22:13.840It's like there's 3,000 people out here, and they're participating in a high-level intellectual discussion, focusing on the fundamental nature of morality, and it's a back and forth.
00:22:24.240There's no cheap victory at hand for either of us, because we were trying to extend our knowledge substantively.
00:22:30.320The audience was dead on board for that, and we went overtime, and it worked spectacularly well.
00:22:35.480And then it worked, I mean, as an event, you know, I'm not commenting on necessarily the quality of the discussion, although I certainly believe that I honed my arguments as a consequence of the discussion, and I think Sam felt the same way, so that was a great success from an intellectual and, let's say, moral perspective.
00:22:53.540But I was thinking, well, what in the world's going on? Why are people coming out to these events?
00:22:58.800And I've really been thinking about that, because something strange is happening.
00:23:04.040First of all, the space for public intellectual engagement seems to be opening up.
00:23:08.160Harris is obviously capitalizing on that, so to speak, and so am I, and I've talked to about 150,000 people now, which is a lot of people.
00:23:15.640And I'd like to, you know, maybe the narrowly egotistical part of myself, which isn't a part that I'm particularly thrilled about, and I don't think has a tremendous amount of sway over me, would like to say, well, there must be something remarkable about you.
00:23:30.040And, well, I mean, it's tempting to think that, right?
00:23:35.040And, I mean, I'm a reasonably engaging lecturer, and I've thought about a lot of things, but you have to, if you have any sense, and this is actually one thing you learn as an experimental psychologist, is you never attribute to a personality what you can attribute to a situation.
00:23:47.840You start with a situational analysis first.
00:23:50.320It's the proper, it's the proper, well, analytic approach.
00:23:54.560And so I say, well, I'm not going to attribute this to me, and I'm not going to attribute it to Sam, because something similar is happening to him.
00:24:00.860And there's a handful of other people, including the people on the so-called intellectual dark web, like Joe Rogan, who's pulling in.
00:24:07.880I've got to tell you, yeah, yeah, well, so that's it, exactly.
00:24:12.680Rogan, so I just want to throw out some numbers here, because it's quite staggering and incomprehensible, really.
00:24:18.540The last time I saw Rogan, I asked him, so, how many downloads do you get in a month, Joe?
00:24:24.440Podcast downloads, because that's about ten times the market of YouTube, hey?
00:24:28.020So there's YouTube, which is big, but there's podcasts, and that's, like, immense and invisible in some sense.
00:24:34.320150 million podcast downloads a month.
00:24:38.180Right, so it's one point, it's more than 1.5 billion a year, you think.
00:24:42.660I think Joe Rogan is the most powerful interviewer who's ever lived.
00:24:46.080And he might be the most powerful interviewer who's ever lived by an order of magnitude.
00:24:50.680And so I asked him, well, what do you think about being the most powerful interviewer that ever lived?
00:24:55.520And he said, I try not to think about it.
00:24:58.340And, which, because how do you make sense out of that?
00:25:01.400And so he has the same problem in some sense, perhaps on a larger scale, than I do.
00:25:06.260It's like, well, what the hell's going on here?
00:25:08.380And so I've really been trying to think that through, because I think it's important.
00:30:56.980And you might think, we're smarter than our technology had heretofore revealed to us.
00:31:02.640And we're hungrier for high-level discourse than we knew.
00:31:05.920And thank God for that, because we need some high-level discourse, because we've got some bad political polarization problems besetting us at the moment that need to be dealt with.
00:31:16.000But even more, crucially, in some sense, things are changing really, really fast.
00:31:21.040And the rate at which they're changing is increasing.
00:31:23.540And so, we're going to have to stay on top of that.
00:31:27.200And maybe, because we can now engage in long-form, complex discourse, we have a better chance of staying on top of the technological transformations.
00:31:36.380So, this has made me feel, laying this all out, has made me feel a lot more optimistic.
00:31:41.140First of all, it's put what's been happening to me in a context.
00:32:36.920And then, I would say, when you're trying to see if a proposition is true, one of the things you do is you look for additional, well, often, counter-examples.
00:32:44.640But, in this case, I'm going to use additional evidence from a different domain.
00:32:48.820So, think about what happened when Netflix blew the bandwidth limitations off drama.
00:32:54.120It's like, everybody thought, oh, man, you're lucky if you can get that audience of dimwits out there to concentrate for 20 minutes on a light-hearted sitcom.
00:33:03.160And you better provide them with a laugh track so they have enough sense to know when something's funny.
00:33:07.160You know, and maybe you can really push your damn limit and you can get them to sit and watch an hour-and-a-half movie if the plot isn't too complex.
00:33:15.280You know, which is kind of the standard routine for television movies.
00:33:19.280And then, we blew the bandwidth limitations off on-demand drama.
00:33:31.440Like, there have been plots that have been derived since the 1960s in the radical increase in narrative complexity as television has developed.
00:33:39.160And it's, well, especially in the last five or six years that, you know, I would say that there has been a series of shows
00:33:44.880whose narrative complexity starts to approach that of great literature.
00:33:49.200You know, and people are dead, starving for that.
00:33:52.140And they'll binge on it for, like, you know, you'll sit there for, like, three days and just watch it like mad.
00:33:57.920It's like, not only do you have an attention span, it's way longer than anybody would have possibly imagined.
00:34:05.080And it's so powerful that you can actually monetize it.
00:34:25.720Because the other thing that's happening, and you see this, this is another thing that characterizes these IDW types, as far as I can tell.
00:39:28.880Just as complicated as trying to make sense out of a book.
00:39:31.620Of course, then the meaning is also in your relationship with the book.
00:39:35.640Because you're going to bring an a priori framework to the book.
00:39:38.940And the meaning is actually a consequence of the framework that you believe interacting with all those levels of meaning in the book.
00:39:45.340So when I grade students' essays, generally what I do is I say, well, you know, your essay succeeded as a whole in that I got the idea.
00:39:53.720But, like, the paragraph level sequencing was dreadful.
00:39:57.080You know, you can't string sentences together coherently in a paragraph.
00:40:02.120Your phrasing is awkward and unpoetic.
00:40:04.280And you use words that you don't understand to look smarter than you are, which might work for people who are stupider than you, but doesn't work very well for people who can see what you're doing.
00:40:14.400And so the point is that you can do a critical analysis at all of those levels, right?
00:40:19.380And also the point is that when you write and when you speak, all of those levels of analysis simultaneously are of equal importance.
00:40:28.380And it's very hard to get that whole structure right, right?
00:40:32.580Right from the word up to the gist of the entire conversation itself.
00:40:37.660I would say, here's an interesting thing.
00:40:39.820It's another thing I tell students when they're trying to write.
00:40:42.360How can you tell if you've got that right?
00:40:45.260Or even more importantly, because you'll never get it perfectly right.
00:40:49.040How can you tell if you're on the pathway to get that right?
00:40:51.980And I would say, you're compelled and engaged by what you're writing.
00:40:56.720And that's another indication of the manifestation of that instinct for meaning.
00:41:00.420I told my students over and over, if your essay bores you, just imagine what it's doing to me.
00:42:40.240So, you know, a motif that runs through Maps of Meaning and also Twelve Rules for Life is a description of the fundamental realities of existence, let's say.
00:42:50.260And that isn't a theory about the materialist substrate of the world.
00:42:54.020That's a different domain as far as I'm concerned.
00:42:56.140It's a, this is a more existential idea or a more phenomenological idea.
00:43:00.700It's an analysis of life as it's experienced.
00:43:05.300What's the fundamental reality of life as experienced or one of the fundamental realities?
00:43:09.680And the reality is the reality of suffering.
00:43:12.980That's a classic religious proclamation.
00:44:42.720And you know their insufficiencies and all of that.
00:44:45.980And yet, you're still, you still grieve when they die.
00:44:50.200And you think, well, what does that mean?
00:44:51.500It means that, well, you've made a judgment at the deep level of your being that despite the insufficiency of their existence, it was better that they existed than that they didn't exist.
00:45:00.980Because otherwise, you wouldn't grieve, you'd have a party that they weren't, it's thank God he finally died.
00:45:06.500Better for him and better for everyone else, you know.
00:45:11.120And, you know, and even if it's a person that you've had a contentious relationship with in your family, you'll see that when they die, some of the things that you thought of as faults, and maybe that even were faults, are part and parcel of that thing that you loved.
00:45:25.080And so that is a deep judgment about the validity of being.
00:45:28.380And so that's a meaningful act of engagement.
00:45:30.940And you know that, because the close relationships that you make in life, the intimate relationships genuinely sustain you.
00:45:38.180If you talk to people who are terribly nihilistic and depressed, they're often also extremely isolated, right?
00:45:44.240It's not only that they're hopeless, it's that they don't have anyone.
00:46:00.400It's very difficult to orient yourself in the world without those fundamental connections.
00:46:04.880And so you value them, and you find them intrinsically meaningful.
00:46:08.240And that's despite the catastrophe of life.
00:46:10.600And then, so that's a good, that's an interesting thing, because it shows you that there are spontaneous, there are spontaneous involvements in life that lift you out of the malaise.
00:46:22.540And certainly, the love that you have for the people that you love is one of those things.
00:47:09.500And so, what that means is that you can find yourself in situations where you observe something as of transcendent value despite its subjugation to tragedy and malevolence.
00:47:23.140Because if you start with the a priori assumption that life is suffering, tainted by malevolence, that can be very pessimistic.
00:47:30.020And that can take you down a very nihilistic road.
00:47:32.600And it's incontrovertibly true at some level.
00:47:35.040And so, then you think, that's why we never talk about it.
00:47:37.440But then you think, well, wait a second.
00:47:39.400If there are things that lift you out of that, and not because you're rationalizing them, but because when you experience them, they lift you out of that.
00:47:48.420That means that there are things that are more powerful, that manifest themselves in the confines of your life, more powerful than death and suffering and evil.
00:47:56.480And so, I've taken a very close look at all of the things I didn't want to take a close look at.
00:48:01.260And based on the alchemical dictum of Jung, in Sturquilinus Invinitur, which is, what you most need will be found where you least want to look.
00:48:12.040It's like, so you look at the darkest possible place, and the strange thing is, is that's where you discover the light.
00:48:19.000You contend with how terrible the world is.
00:48:21.160You find out what is exactly that terrible, but there's something in you that beckons to you to adopt a mode of being that transcends that.
00:48:31.680And what that means is that no matter, regardless of how terrible the reality is, the thing that allows you to transcend it is more powerful than that.
00:48:39.520And that's an unbelievably optimistic vision.
00:48:42.760And I do believe that, I do believe not only that it's true, I also believe that we actually know it's true.
00:48:48.120And so, the first bit of evidence for that would be the reaction that you have to the people that you love.
00:50:47.300And if the how is, how are you going to trudge through the catastrophe of life, let's say, with head held high, so that you can stand up straight with your shoulders back, how are you going to do that?
00:50:57.760And the answer has to be, well, you have to find something worthwhile to do in the face of that.
00:56:23.740And then you see the universities, they say, well, we're going to protect students from their fear by isolating them from anything that might upset them.
00:56:30.080It's like, there isn't anything you could do to them, psychologically, that would be, arguably, that would be more damaging than that.
00:56:38.020If you set out to design a process that would make students worse.
00:56:42.520And what's so interesting about this is that we debate this.
00:56:50.700It's like, if you took a thousand qualified psychologists and psychiatrists, and you said,
00:57:00.020does graduated exposure to what makes you afraid cure people, if they said no, all that would mean was they weren't qualified.
00:57:14.880It's that, it's one of the, you know, we've been doing psychotherapy for a hundred years and studying how it works across all sorts of different approaches, right?
00:57:22.580Medical and psychological and so forth.
00:57:25.160And from all sorts of different schools of psychology.
00:57:27.540And everyone's converged on those two things.
00:57:30.040Get your story straight and expose yourself voluntarily and gradually to things that are impediments to your development that you're afraid of.
00:57:41.400And, of course, if you think about it, A, that's how you learn to do everything, right?
00:57:46.800Because, so it's the learning mechanism itself here.
00:57:49.700Because what you do when you learn something is you take on something that's a little more difficult than you could do before with some trepidation.
00:58:34.360And that's not, and that is exactly what I see happening in the university campuses.
00:58:38.180It's a manifestation of that pathological attempt to cripple the spirit of adventure that drives people out into the world.
00:58:46.400And I see that, I see that as a boneheaded reflection of the notion.
00:58:50.800I see that as a pathological reflection of the proposition that to take your place in the world is to attempt to participate in the patriarchal tyranny.
00:59:10.480And so any way that you manifest yourself bravely in the world is actually indistinguishable from your participation in that tyranny and should be crippled.
00:59:19.560And that's what people are learning in the universities.
00:59:58.160Every time you connect to an unsecured network in a cafe, hotel, or airport, you're essentially broadcasting your personal information to anyone with a technical know-how to intercept it.
01:00:07.640And let's be clear, it doesn't take a genius hacker to do this.
01:00:10.840With some off-the-shelf hardware, even a tech-savvy teenager could potentially access your passwords, bank logins, and credit card details.
01:00:18.220Now, you might think, what's the big deal?
01:02:44.520You know, well, I watch the kids outside the St. George, I have this building, perversely enough, on St. George Street, which I think is really funny.
01:02:51.920That's where I work at the University of Toronto.
01:02:53.660I think it's funny because of St. George and the Dragon.
01:02:55.620And that's, I guess, my joke because you don't think it's very funny, but I think it's funny.
01:03:02.020Well, St. George and the Dragon is a very old story.
01:03:04.440It's the oldest story of humanity, not in that form, but it's a variant of the oldest story of humanity.
01:03:09.860And the oldest story of humanity is go out and confront the eternal enemy and the knight.
01:03:15.480Go out forthrightly and confront it, and you'll gain what you need as a consequence.
01:06:01.720And I've seen people on YouTube jump down what looks like three stories and not die.
01:06:09.160It's like, I don't know how they do it, and I'm sure many of them have died doing it.
01:06:13.500But it's, they do this high-speed running across obstacles and cities, and it looks superhuman.
01:06:20.120You know, and it is in some sense superhuman, because no one was doing it 30 years ago.
01:06:23.660And now all sorts of people can do it, and they can do it spectacularly.
01:06:27.300And you see these people on YouTube, too, doing crane climbing, which is also a form of absolute insanity.
01:06:32.360You know, they go into buildings that are under construction, and climb up the buildings, and then they climb up the crane, and then they take a video of themselves on top of it.
01:14:32.640And so, what happens is, if you decide that you value something, then the world organizes itself into those things that will move you along on the pathway towards that value.
01:14:41.840And you actually, literally, and I really want to emphasize this, literally, that determines what you see.
01:14:50.120Now, it's not the only determinant, because the world's there too, right?
01:14:53.760So, it can get in the way, and it can interfere, and it can screw up your perceptions, or your perceptions can fail.
01:14:58.700But the world's very complicated, and lots of things are happening, and at least you filter all that through your value structure, and what gets through the filter is what you see.
01:15:08.460So, what you value determines what you see.
01:26:23.640It's like, you know, so, so, well, so the point, the point of that with regards to these lectures is that I want to keep them vibrant and alive.
01:26:31.200I want to keep the living spirit in them, let's say.
01:26:34.680And the way to do that is to speak on the edge, right?
01:26:39.840And you can tell when that's happening because that engages everybody.
01:26:45.220You have to be stretching your ideas outward.
01:26:47.820You have to be doing what a novelist does, in some sense, in real time.
01:26:51.760It has to be a creative act because otherwise it's not engaging.
01:26:55.020And with any creative act comes the spectacular risk of constant failure, which is partly what it makes it engaging because you don't know, right?
01:27:03.280Well, if I go way out on a limb, you know, verbally, am I going to be able to get back to the main track?