134. Maps of Meaning 06: Story and Metastory (Part 2)
Summary
In this episode, I talk about a lecture I gave on the nature of complexity and how it relates to our understanding of the world. I also talk about the role of social networks in understanding the world around us, and the role they play in shaping our perception of it, and how they affect our ability to understand it. I hope you enjoy this episode of Maps of Meaning: 6: Story and Metastory, Part 2. I'm Mikayla Peterson, the daughter of Jordan B. Peterson, and I'm very excited to be sharing this episode with you. Thanks to our sponsor, Viking, for sponsoring this episode. Viking is committed to exploring the world in comfort, a journey through the heart of Europe on an elegant Viking longship. With thoughtful service, cultural enrichment, and all inclusive fairs, Viking is dedicated to providing thoughtful service and all-inclusive fairs. Viking Viking Viking is a Viking Viking Longship. The options are endless. Viking Viking, Viking Viking. Use promo code DAILYWIRE to get a 50% bonus of up to $250. Betonline.ag to place your bets on your favorite sports team or event! BetOnline.ag is betting on the upcoming presidential election, and you can increase your wager on real-world events outside of the realm of sports outside of sports or you can spice things up with a friendly wager at BetOnline . Go to BetOnline or if you're a diehard sports fan, why not spice it up with BetOnline? go to Betonlineag to place a friendly bet on your bets at Betonline and you ll get a $250 bonus of $250, $250 that you can win $250 of up-to-start your bet on the future of the upcoming election. You can t miss out on $250 in the next episode of the next season of the season of The Jordan B Peterson Podcast with me and much more! I ll be back next week! of the Jordan Peterson Podcast, Episode 21, Season 3: Episode 21 of the . I'll be back in Season 3, coming up next week with a new episode of Season 3 of the show! - Jordan B.'s Podcast, coming soon! Subscribe to my insta-series, Jordan B., Episode 21: "Mikayla, I m Mentioned in the new season of Mapping Meaning."
Transcript
00:00:00.000
BetOnline has one of the largest offerings and betting odds in the world.
00:00:03.420
Beyond traditional sports, BetOnline gives you the option to bet on political events
00:00:06.700
like the outcome of the presidential election, whether Hunter Biden serves jail time before 2025,
00:00:11.460
or who's going to be the next Republican speaker.
00:00:14.080
Political betting allows you to wager on real-world events outside the realm of sports.
00:00:18.140
Or if you're a diehard sports fan, BetOnline makes sports betting more accessible and convenient than ever before.
00:00:23.660
With just a few clicks, you can place bets on your favorite teams or events from the comfort of your own home.
00:00:27.540
BetOnline prides themselves with their higher-than-average betting limits of up to $25,000,
00:00:32.220
and you can increase your wagering amount by contacting their player services desk by phone or email.
00:00:37.460
So whether you're watching your favorite team or the news surrounding the upcoming election,
00:00:41.020
why not spice things up with a friendly wager at BetOnline?
00:00:46.320
Use promo code DAILYWIRE to get a 50% sign-up bonus of up to $250.
00:00:55.720
Viking. Committed to exploring the world in comfort.
00:01:00.160
Journey through the heart of Europe on an elegant Viking longship.
00:01:04.180
With thoughtful service, cultural enrichment, and all-inclusive fairs.
00:01:11.260
Welcome to Season 3, Episode 21 of the Jordan B. Peterson Podcast.
00:01:17.820
I hope you enjoy this episode of Maps of Meaning 6, Story and Metastory, Part 2.
00:01:23.400
If you guys haven't checked it out, I watched Jocko Willing's podcast with dad recently.
00:01:29.320
It wasn't a recent podcast. I think it was from 2018? 26?
00:01:37.880
It had some nice stories my dad shared about working on the railway that I think you might enjoy.
00:01:43.380
Also, if you haven't heard of Nicole Arbor and you're in need of some laughs, I would recommend watching some of her videos.
00:01:53.800
Season 3, Episode 21, Maps of Meaning, Part 6, Story and Metastory, Part 2.
00:02:00.860
So, I guess the case that I was making last time, at least in part, was that
00:02:16.420
one way of conceptualizing the fundamental problem
00:02:22.820
that human beings face is to conceptualize it as an ongoing struggle with complexity.
00:02:39.820
the sort of finite boundedness of individual consciousness
00:02:46.600
and the incredible excess of the unbounded everywhere else,
00:02:57.980
because, of course, your individual consciousness depends on the function
00:03:01.600
or is related to the function of things that are so complex you can't even understand it.
00:03:06.280
So, there you are, surrounded by some things that you understand
00:03:11.000
in an ocean of things that you don't understand at all,
00:03:17.640
And it's not obvious at all how people solve that problem,
00:03:24.260
the fact that you don't have the cognitive resources
00:03:26.840
or the conceptual resources to understand everything that you need to understand
00:03:31.180
in order to properly orient yourself in the world.
00:03:33.400
Now, obviously, partly the way we deal with that is that we cooperate with other people,
00:03:38.680
and so that radically multiplies our resources, incredibly multiplies our resources.
00:03:44.020
So, and it's something to consider always when, you know,
00:03:49.260
so much of the political dialogue that surrounds us now
00:03:52.380
consists of a critique of cooperative societies
00:04:00.720
And, of course, that's true, because any cooperative system
00:04:04.100
that specifies a certain endpoint and produces a value hierarchy of some sort
00:04:10.540
also simultaneously forces things into that value system
00:04:15.380
and then rank orders people according to the value structure.
00:04:21.240
But compared to being naked in chaos, generally, it's better.
00:04:29.860
Now, it doesn't always have to be, because it can get murderous.
00:04:32.500
But generally speaking, well, look, we're social animals.
00:04:36.060
Our evolutionary pathway has already taken us here.
00:04:38.680
And so we're individuals, but we're unbelievably social.
00:04:44.660
So as far as I can tell, we'd have to be completely different creatures
00:04:47.480
not to fall, not to take advantage of and fall prey to the problems with social being.
00:04:55.520
So I think the way that the problem of complexity has been solved,
00:05:04.840
and this is the best argument I know of for the truth of the Darwinian notion of evolution.
00:05:10.760
Now, I don't think that our models of evolution are complete by any stretch of the imagination.
00:05:16.800
I know they're not, partly because of recent work done on epigenetics,
00:05:21.800
which suggests that you can inherit acquired traits, right?
00:05:27.120
And when I went to university, when I started going to university in the 1980s,
00:05:32.920
Like, no, you cannot inherit acquired traits, but actually you can inherit acquired traits.
00:05:45.880
because we also don't know exactly what that means across any length of time.
00:05:49.180
And when you're thinking about evolutionary lengths of time,
00:05:51.640
you're thinking about three and a half billion years,
00:05:53.780
because that's the span of time over which life evolved.
00:05:56.240
And so even things that don't have an overwhelmingly marked potency for one generation
00:06:07.340
And then there's also the issue of sexual selection,
00:06:10.300
because, you know, you'll hear Darwinists continually describe the world
00:06:15.120
and the evolutionary world as a place of randomness.
00:06:26.200
because we don't understand mutations that well yet either.
00:06:31.700
There's a set of them that are harmful but not deadly.
00:06:35.940
that could, in principle, produce some benefit to the next generation,
00:06:41.560
assuming environmental shifts, say, in the direction of the mutation.
00:06:45.960
So, and that's, there's a randomness element to that.
00:06:50.400
I mean, part of the reason that you mutate, or your cells mutate,
00:06:54.520
your DNA mutates, is because of background levels of radioactivity.
00:06:59.020
And a lot of that's a consequence of solar activity, right?
00:07:02.140
So cosmic rays come zipping through the atmosphere,
00:07:04.300
and they nail your DNA and produce minor alterations,
00:07:08.580
And if you crank up the background radiation rate,
00:07:11.280
like, say, around Chernobyl, then the mutation rate rises.
00:07:14.420
And there's definitely a random element to that.
00:07:16.920
And it's necessary for there to be a random element,
00:07:32.380
that's selecting for higher and higher levels of fitness
00:07:38.280
it's certainly not doing that in any static way.
00:07:43.560
And then, you know, you have a structure that's been,
00:07:47.980
that's a consequence of this immense evolutionary journey,
00:07:50.700
and it's moderating itself randomly within certain parameters.
00:07:54.620
The parameters being that most mutations will kill you,
00:08:05.060
they match the randomness in the environmental shift,
00:08:10.040
But then there's additional complicating factors,
00:08:39.460
The dominance hierarchy is 300 million years old,
00:08:42.100
because it emerged pretty much whenever there was,
00:08:47.580
and whenever animals had to occupy the same territory,
00:08:51.780
into something approximating a dominance hierarchy.
00:08:53.820
So it's a very, very, very, very old structure.
00:09:02.040
And as far as real goes from a Darwinian sense,
00:09:10.700
our burial ancestors adapted themselves to trees,
00:09:26.580
because you'd kind of think about the dominance hierarchy
00:09:34.840
And so the dominance hierarchy is part of the environment.
00:09:51.220
and those successful males have preferential access
00:10:07.040
so that even if the females don't exercise choice,
00:10:29.400
I'm not talking about female dominance hierarchies
00:10:39.480
for their ability to move up dominance hierarchies,
00:10:58.060
the dominance hierarchy happens to be arranged.
00:56:48.200
Well, I would say to quite an incredible degree.
00:57:25.860
That is the interesting idea as far as I'm concerned.
00:57:28.460
Okay, so then we can make this a little bit more...
00:57:31.640
Interesting, I think is the right way of thinking about it.
00:57:55.760
And you could say the world is made out of matter,
00:58:03.520
you act like the world is made out of things that matter.
00:58:37.760
and it takes the glory and the glamour out of the world.
00:59:05.760
Well, then you have this small subset of things
00:59:31.180
I'm going to get a little burst of negative emotion.
00:59:35.020
And the reason for that is that is not a recycling bin then.
01:01:17.320
And so he, imagine the visual cliff experiment.
01:02:29.280
it's really interesting to notice your perception,
01:48:08.180
some sense that's an ultimate level of abstraction okay so you could what do you do someone comes up
01:48:14.740
to you and you're tickling the baby and you say well i'm being a good person they ask what are
01:48:18.360
you doing i'm being a good person it's like it's a bit dis disjointed it isn't what the person
01:48:23.980
would expect as an answer they'd expect something more local but it's still true and so what's
01:48:29.400
interesting is that when you're doing something that's well well i would say worthwhile that's
01:48:39.760
probably the right way of thinking about it you're doing a whole bunch of things simultaneously
01:48:43.360
and you're not really aware of all those things but you are in some sense you know because if the
01:48:48.580
person someone might come along and say well what kind of idiot tickles a baby like that it's like
01:48:54.080
well what have they said well they've kind of nailed you here down on the micro tickle level
01:48:59.400
but they're sort of also taking a pretty good crack at this high level system as well now and that's a
01:49:06.740
problem so let's say well good parent is a subset of being a good person but there's all sorts of
01:49:12.120
other maybe you have to be a good partner maybe you have to be a good daughter maybe you have to be a
01:49:17.320
good niece you know they're your your your ability to function as a good person is composed of a very
01:49:27.180
large number of hierarchically nested subsystems and so when the person goes only an idiot would
01:49:32.820
tickle the baby like that and they go after that you might think well how upset you should should you
01:49:38.100
get and the answer is well how valid do you think their complaint is so let's say maybe only an idiot
01:49:43.780
would tickle a baby like that and you happen to be that idiot and so well maybe you're not a good
01:49:47.960
person and so what does that mean it means that the map that consists of all these nested subsistence
01:49:53.280
has now become unreliable and so how upset are you going to get about that well you know maybe you had
01:49:59.640
a bad day at work and you're kind of hypoglycemic and you had too much to drink the night before and
01:50:03.320
so someone says you know that's not how you tickle a baby you idiot and you cry well why well it's a
01:50:10.580
pretty high level blow and so it's the sort of thing you want to do if you want to do if you
01:50:15.400
want to hurt someone it's not a good way to teach someone because you teach them down at the smallest
01:50:20.280
possible level the micro no no you don't tickle a baby like that you tickle a baby like this and
01:50:25.800
you're doing a good job on everything else but if you're going to tickle a baby this is how you go
01:50:30.060
about it and the person thinks well you know i'm doing a fairly good job but i've got this little
01:50:34.240
thing i have to work on and maybe i can manage it and so that works and that works and you can have
01:50:40.220
some sympathy for the person at the same time because you might say well i used to tickle babies
01:50:44.120
like an idiot too but you know it's it's fixable and most of you is okay and that's a nice thing to
01:50:49.560
do when you're arguing with someone you say look here's a bunch of things you're doing right that
01:50:56.580
are related to this that are important here's a small thing that maybe you could alter slightly and
01:51:01.380
it would make me happy and maybe i'll return the favor at some point and they think oh well
01:51:05.460
uh oh maybe oh maybe i'll do that maybe and then they practice doing it and you can give them a pat
01:51:11.180
on the head and then you're both happy about that that really works with people it really works so
01:51:17.520
okay so what you see is that these high level abstractions let's call them ethical abstractions
01:51:26.480
are related to actions they're related and so you can see that relationship from the good person to
01:51:33.560
doing something like tickle the baby properly and then you can you can conceptualize it this way
01:51:38.820
that you have this massive overarching map which is something like the story of your life
01:51:43.580
this including its extension into the future and then it consists of these subordinate maps which can
01:51:49.940
be broken down all the way down to the level of actions and so then that explains to you to some
01:51:55.640
degree how you can do the impossible job of calibrating your emotional response because roughly
01:52:01.440
speaking your emotional response should be proportionate to the level that's being assaulted
01:52:06.460
by the anomaly right if it's way up here you you wrote your mcat because you want to go to medical
01:52:12.360
school right and so now the envelope comes and you're shaking away and you open and it's like you got
01:52:17.040
25th percentile just like a quarter of the people who take the test well what what does that mean
01:52:23.040
well this is sir all blown to hell that's for sure and so god only knows how many of these things are
01:52:29.920
going to go to maybe your study habits really need to be you know you have to reconstitute yourself
01:52:35.780
all the way down to the level of your habits it can be devastating news now one of the ways to
01:52:41.140
protect yourself against something like that is like don't have one plan right if you're going to
01:52:46.820
stake yourself on something you should throw a couple of alternative scaffolds up beside you
01:52:51.380
so that you have somewhere to go you want to be a doctor okay well you could be a nurse it's like
01:52:57.000
it's not a doctor but it means cutting your throat you're still doing 80 percent of what you wanted
01:53:02.440
to do so you want to and you want to think about this during your whole life man if you're going to
01:53:06.720
take a high risk you want to scaffold yourself in other areas so that if it fails you don't the bottom
01:53:13.060
doesn't drop out and you die and it's also very much worth thinking about with regards to setting up
01:53:18.380
your life in general it's like if you concentrate solely on your career you can get a long way in
01:53:26.920
your career and i would say that that's a strategy that a minority of men preferentially do that that's
01:53:33.880
all they do they work like 70 80 hours a week they go flat out on their career they're staking everything
01:53:39.700
on the small probability of exceptional status in a narrow domain but it's it's hard on them they don't
01:53:46.420
have a life it's very difficult for them to have a family they don't know how to take any leisure
01:53:50.620
activity like they get very one-dimensional now it may be that that unidimensionality is the price
01:53:55.600
you have to pay to be exceptional at one thing right because if you're going to be something like a genius
01:54:00.740
level mathematician and you want to do that for or a scientist say it's like you're in your lab
01:54:06.640
you're in your lab all the time you're working 70 hours a week or 80 hours a week you're smart
01:54:11.180
you're dedicated you're unidimensional and that's how you get to beat all the other people who are
01:54:16.280
doing that it's the only way but the problem is you don't get a life now if you love being a scientist
01:54:22.340
and you have that kind of focus of mind well first of all you're a rare person and second you're going
01:54:28.900
to pay for it but fine more power to you but but it's a it's a risky business to do that you sacrifice
01:54:38.260
a lot for it you know and i would say most often if you're speaking about having a healthy life
01:54:44.760
that isn't what you do you spread yourself out more so you know you have a family you have some
01:54:50.180
things that you do outside of work that are meaningful to you and useful you you have a network
01:54:54.980
of friends um that that those three things alone are four things alone are plenty to keep you well
01:55:01.980
oriented and then if one of those things collapses you know everything doesn't go now the price you
01:55:09.040
pay for that is the more you strive to optimize that balance the less likely you are to be fantastically
01:55:15.420
successful at any single one of them but you might have a very you know if you consider your life as
01:55:21.120
a whole that might be a winning strategy one of the things carl jung said i really like this
01:55:26.940
he thought that men went after perfection and when women went after wholeness so they're different
01:55:34.780
they're different value they're different there's something different at the top of the value hierarchy
01:55:40.680
so perfection would be stake it all on one thing and look for radical success not all not that all men
01:55:47.340
do that because they don't but we're talking about extremes at least with regards to the men that do
01:55:52.880
that the wholeness idea is more like well i want i want it's like i want one thing in my life to be 150
01:55:59.780
percent or i want five things in my life to be 80 percent well there's a lot more richness in a life
01:56:09.640
where you have five things operating at 80 percent but you're not operating in any of at any of them at
01:56:14.300
150 so and i really believe this because i've watched men and women go through their careers
01:56:19.960
now for a long period of time and one of the things that there's lots of things that produce this
01:56:25.800
but one of the things that i've noticed is that mostly women in their 30s bail out of
01:56:31.620
unidimensional careers they won't do them they won't they won't put in the 80 hours a week that
01:56:37.680
they would have to put in in order to dominate that particular area and it isn't the reason that they
01:56:43.660
won't do it is because they decide it's not worth it and no wonder because why would that be worth
01:56:49.500
it you have to ask yourself that it's like well you want to be an outstanding scientist it's like
01:56:54.420
okay really really that's what you want because that means that's what you do because you're
01:57:01.440
competing with other people you know they're smart they're hard-working and if you want to be at the
01:57:05.760
top you have to be smarter and work harder than any of them and working hard means working long
01:57:10.660
hours i mean it also means working diligently but in in the final analysis it's all also an
01:57:16.580
additive issue if i'm smart and hard-working and i can crank out for 70 hours a week and you do it
01:57:22.340
for 30 it's like in two years i'm so far ahead of you you will never ever catch up so anyways and i
01:57:30.760
think partly maybe part of the reason too that women are oriented that way more than men i think
01:57:34.660
there's two reasons is one is socioeconomic status does not make women more attractive on the
01:57:39.300
mating market but it does make men more attractive and the second is women's time frame is compressed
01:57:44.100
right because guys can always say well i'll have kids later and they can say that till they're like
01:57:48.700
80 whereas women it's like no way man you got to get it you got to get it together by the time you're
01:57:53.540
let's say 40 but really probably by 35 but definitely by 40 because otherwise it ain't happening
01:57:59.060
and that's bloody dreadful like the most unhappy people you ever see no
01:58:04.980
no one of the common routes to extreme unhappiness is to want children and not have them i wouldn't
01:58:12.820
recommend that you know you see couples who are in their 30s one couple in three over the age of 30
01:58:18.140
has fertility problems that's defined as inability to conceive after one year of trying one in three
01:58:24.180
that's worth thinking about because people are very very unhappy if they want to have kids and then
01:58:29.220
they can't man you're in the medical mill for 10 years if that's if that's what happens to you so
01:58:36.340
i think what i'll do what time is it is it because i'd have to open up a whole new can of worms so to
01:58:47.320
speak to do the next part so i think actually what i'm going to do is just recap what we did and then
01:58:52.140
stop or maybe we can have some questions or maybe we can call it an early day okay so what what is the
01:58:58.340
fundamental issue here what did we discuss today all right so you're in a frame and we've laid out
01:59:06.280
its characteristics it has a goal in it it has a current position in it it has rules for operating
01:59:11.020
within it it governs your perceptions which is really critical thing to understand and well
01:59:17.600
governing your perceptions it's it tells you what's useful to you and what gets in your way but most
01:59:21.880
importantly it tells you what you don't have to pay attention to it so as long as your damn frame
01:59:25.460
is functional you can ignore most of the world and that means your stress level is way lower than
01:59:30.440
it would normally be okay so perception motivation all of that's integrated into those frames and then
01:59:36.800
the emotional element comes out in that with when you're within a frame things that move you forward
01:59:42.420
and validate the frame are positive and things that get in your way and invalidate the frame are
01:59:46.720
negative and then the next issue is well if your frame is invalidated exactly what does that mean
01:59:53.300
and you can't answer that without thinking about the hierarchy of frames because if you're lucky it
01:59:57.640
just means your frame needs a minor alteration that would be equivalent to piagetian assimilation in
02:00:04.160
some sense right you can stay in the frame you just make a small adjustment i think the piagetian
02:00:10.380
distinction between assimilation and accommodation is technically inaccurate because it's a continuum
02:00:16.500
right i mean if i if i want to grab your pen i have a little frame that will enable me to do that
02:00:24.340
you say well i'm staying within the frame to move that out of the way but actually i'm not what i'm
02:00:29.000
doing is doing a very i'm doing a small micro revolution in the frame moving that to pick that up
02:00:35.360
and so it's i think accommodation there's no hard distinction between assimilation and accommodation
02:00:43.480
it's a continuum so you'd say well if if the top end of your map gets blown out that requires
02:00:48.720
accommodation and if it's just a little micro change at the bottom that's assimilation but there's no
02:00:54.020
there's no real difference between this except for scale and there's kind of a continual scale not an
02:00:59.560
absolute dichotomy so okay so anyways back to the back to the emotion something happens and it isn't
02:01:08.480
what you wanted what does that mean well it could mean anything what you do is you start trying to
02:01:15.160
micro adjust the frame at the highest level of resolution but then you might find that you can't
02:01:20.560
do that so you have to jump up to the next one you have to jump up to the next one you have to jump up
02:01:24.600
to the next one and each time you do that the psychophysiological cost increases so
02:01:30.320
okay so so we talked about the cost end of the spectrum and then we also talked about the
02:01:42.200
engagement end of the spectrum and so the idea would be well if you're if you're very much engaged
02:01:48.860
say in let's go to that again if you find it very engaging to play with your baby
02:01:58.600
then you might be doing it in a way that's indicating that you're taking good care of your
02:02:03.900
family that you're being a good parent and that you're being a good person all simultaneously
02:02:08.080
and there's rich meaning in that and you're the systems that orient you with regards to meaning are
02:02:13.120
saying look you're doing this micro action in a way that benefits the maintenance and maybe even
02:02:18.300
the expansion of all the frames that exist above it and that's that's that's exactly what you want
02:02:23.480
you want to be doing that all the time if you can and so that implies that you want to delineate out
02:02:28.340
a pretty well developed value system so that you're not acting at odds with yourself and you also want
02:02:35.700
to have that integrated within the broader society so that society isn't existing towards you as
02:02:41.820
a continual obstacle in making your life miserable so okay
02:02:49.600
any of that not make sense or do you have any objections to it
02:02:58.280
it's funny we it's funny i mentioned the word matter you know because things are made out of matter or
02:03:08.900
maybe they're made out of what matters but the word object is the same thing you could say that the
02:03:13.580
world is made out of objects or you could say that the world is made out of what objects and both of
02:03:19.220
those both of those weirdly enough are equally true in some sets question
02:03:23.860
um no it's the serotonin system in all likelihood so serotonin seems so the question was um positive
02:03:44.780
emotions mediated by dopamine um when you're advancing towards something say or when you have a cue that
02:03:50.320
something good is about to happen what is the system that mediates positive emotion at the
02:03:55.340
satiation level and if i can add the negative aspect one yeah as well what is the circuit for that
02:04:02.040
yep okay okay well let's start with the satiation issue that seems mostly regulated by serotonin
02:04:09.540
the opiate issue is there are other forms of specific reward that don't seem to be merely
02:04:16.360
motivated or merely underpinned by dopamine and the opiate system would be one of those there's an
02:04:22.140
oxytocin system as well so there are other biochemical systems that are involved in more specific forms of
02:04:33.200
instances that make it appear that you're moving forward is the dopaminergic element
02:04:39.960
roughly speaking and then one of the things that happens if you're higher in serotonin because you're
02:04:47.060
more dominant is that you're more satiated all the time that's why people who are low in the dominance
02:04:52.000
hierarchy with decreased levels of serotonin are more impulsive and also more emotionally
02:04:58.540
dysregulated they're more impulsive because hey you take your positive thing when you can get it
02:05:03.500
and so they're they're more dissatisfied they're more looking for anything that will produce a positive
02:05:09.620
outcome and then they're also more likely to experience diffuse negative emotion partly because
02:05:18.080
their serotonin systems are lower indicating their tenuous status in the dominance hierarchy
02:05:23.880
meaning that everything they do that's uncertain is far more dangerous
02:05:28.580
so this is also why it's very difficult often when you're trying to treat someone who's depressed because you could say
02:05:36.000
there's not much difference between being depressed
02:05:37.900
and existing in the biochemical state that being at the bottom of the dominance hierarchy would produce
02:05:46.280
well then the question is are you depressed or are you just at the bottom of a dominance hierarchy
02:05:52.220
because those are not like the the symptomatology is
02:05:56.000
very very similar but the cause and the cure are not the same
02:06:02.000
you know because you might be at the bottom of a dominance hierarchy because you're just
02:06:07.780
so and of course you're suffering are you depressed
02:06:22.400
I was wondering why people pursue motivations that don't produce this resonance of meaning in this hierarchy
02:06:30.560
okay so the question is why don't why do people pursue rewards that don't produce this resonance
02:07:06.160
you're only considering the immediate time frame
02:07:08.980
and the problem is is that things propagate across all the time frames
02:07:13.640
and so just because something works really well this second
02:07:18.480
doesn't mean that it's a tenable solution to the class of all problems
02:07:23.060
so usually often people pursue local pleasure because that's the best they can imagine
02:07:35.720
it can be they don't want to adopt the responsibility
02:07:39.940
working at every level of the hierarchy simultaneously
02:07:50.900
paying attention to a very large number of things simultaneously
02:08:09.380
you hear people drink because they have problems
02:08:19.200
but young people drink because they're sick and tired of being responsible
02:08:26.060
I won't care about the medium to long term consequences
02:08:30.980
it doesn't make you ignorant of the medium to long term consequences
02:08:41.200
it leaves your positive emotion circuits intact
02:08:43.080
so then you can go out there and do stupid fun things
02:09:17.600
that's why conservatives and liberals don't get along
02:09:20.020
because conservatives do bind themselves to a particular frame
02:09:29.340
doesn't that just bind you to a particular frame
02:32:59.440
Jordan B Peterson podcast see jordanbpeterson.com
02:33:26.520
exploring the world and comfort journey through