The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast - December 20, 2020


148. Nietzsche, Dostoevsky, Kierkegaard (Existentialism)


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 49 minutes

Words per Minute

170.46965

Word Count

18,600

Sentence Count

1,246

Misogynist Sentences

16

Hate Speech Sentences

25


Summary

In this lecture, Dr. Jordan Peterson discusses the giants of existentialism: Nietzsche, Dostoevsky, and Kierkegaard. He discusses existentialism as a philosophically grounded psychological position positing that psychopathology, or mental illness, is built into being itself, and that the adoption of responsibility through action is the appropriate response. Dr. Peterson provides a roadmap towards healing, showing that while the journey isn t easy, it s absolutely possible to find your way forward. If you're suffering, please know you are not alone. There's hope, and there's a path to feeling better. This episode is brought to you by Thinker.org, which summarizes key ideas from new and noteworthy nonfiction, giving you access to an entire library of great books in bite-sized form. Books from old classics like Dale Carnegie's How to Win Friends and Influence People to recent bestsellers like "How To Win Friends And Influence People" by Chris Voss, which is out in a couple of weeks. Go to thinker.org/Thinker to start a free trial today! To start a FREE trial today, you can use code MP for 15% off that's great for New Year's resolutions too! That's code MP! And his Understand Myself.com personality test is also 15% OFF right now with code MP. Let this be the first step towards the brighter future you deserve. Thanks to Thinker, which gives you the gist of it in a matter of minutes! This is a great gift to start thinking about this episode of Season 3 of The Jordan Peterson Podcast. I hope you enjoy this episode is a little bit more than you can be a little more than halfway through Season 3. Happy Holidays! xoxo, Michaela Peterson . Thank you, x XOXO, Michaela - The Jordan B Peterson Podcast (The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast - Season 3 Episode 37: Existentialism - Episode 37, Ep 37, Season 3, Episode 37 of The Mythology of the Mythology Podcast - Part 1, Episode 1, Season 2, Episode 2, Season 1, Ep 1, "Existentialistism, Nietzsche and the Greatness of the Mind" Season 2: "The Mythology Of The Mind" - Season 2 - "The Great Idea?" - Season 1 Episode 3, Season 4, Episode 4, "The Big Idea?"


Transcript

00:00:00.960 Hey everyone, real quick before you skip, I want to talk to you about something serious and important.
00:00:06.480 Dr. Jordan Peterson has created a new series that could be a lifeline for those battling depression and anxiety.
00:00:12.740 We know how isolating and overwhelming these conditions can be, and we wanted to take a moment to reach out to those listening who may be struggling.
00:00:20.100 With decades of experience helping patients, Dr. Peterson offers a unique understanding of why you might be feeling this way in his new series.
00:00:27.420 He provides a roadmap towards healing, showing that while the journey isn't easy, it's absolutely possible to find your way forward.
00:00:35.360 If you're suffering, please know you are not alone. There's hope, and there's a path to feeling better.
00:00:41.800 Go to Daily Wire Plus now and start watching Dr. Jordan B. Peterson on depression and anxiety.
00:00:47.460 Let this be the first step towards the brighter future you deserve.
00:00:53.920 Welcome to the Jordan B. Peterson podcast.
00:00:56.160 I'm Michaela Peterson.
00:00:58.500 This is episode 37 of season 3, titled Existentialism, Nietzsche, Dostoevsky, and Kierkegaard.
00:01:05.820 In this lecture, 11th in the 2017 series, Dad discusses the giants of existentialism, a philosophically grounded psychological position positing,
00:01:15.140 one, that psychopathology or mental illness slash distress is built into being itself.
00:01:20.580 That would come from somebody in my family.
00:01:24.640 And two, that the adoption of responsibility through action is the appropriate response.
00:01:30.260 I shouldn't make bad jokes on this, but I do.
00:01:33.800 Happy early Merry Christmas, everyone.
00:01:35.820 A couple of updates.
00:01:36.680 If you'd like to check out the self-authoring program Dad has, you can use code MP for 15% off that.
00:01:44.240 That's great for New Year's resolutions, too.
00:01:47.160 And his understandmyself.com personality test is also 15% off right now with code MP.
00:01:52.680 The second update, if you have purchased or pre-ordered his book, Beyond Order, you can go to his website, jordanbpeterson.com,
00:02:02.640 and there's a printable PDF to put under the tree because the book isn't shipping out until March.
00:02:09.120 This episode is brought to you by Thinker.
00:02:12.380 I actually used Thinker recently to read a book, Never Split the Difference, by Chris Voss in preparation for a podcast Dad and I did with him.
00:02:19.740 That'll be out in a couple of weeks.
00:02:21.100 Thinker.org summarizes key ideas from new and noteworthy nonfiction, giving you access to an entire library of great books in bite-sized form.
00:02:31.220 Read or listen to hundreds of titles in a matter of minutes.
00:02:34.280 They really give you the gist of it in about six minutes.
00:02:37.380 Books from old classics like Dale Carnegie's How to Win Friends and Influence People to recent bestsellers.
00:02:42.840 If you want to challenge your preconceptions, expand your horizons, and become a better thinker,
00:02:46.840 Go to thinker.org, that's T-H-I-N-K-R dot org, to start a free trial today.
00:02:54.060 Again, that's T-H-I-N-K-R dot org.
00:02:57.720 I hope you enjoy this episode.
00:02:58.960 So we started to talk a little bit about phenomenology last time and about Carl Rogers.
00:03:20.180 And I mentioned that the phenomenologists were interested in experience in some sense as the ultimate reality.
00:03:30.700 And that's a very complicated concept to grasp.
00:03:37.860 The existentialists also adopted that viewpoint.
00:03:42.980 They were concerned with the quality of subjective experience.
00:03:47.060 Not that they were ignoring the reality of objective experience, but they were concerned with the reality of subjective experience.
00:03:53.760 And they're also more focused on action than on statement or belief.
00:03:59.300 Because here's something to think about.
00:04:01.540 You can think about this for a very long time.
00:04:03.720 If you're trying to understand what someone believes, even if you're trying to analyze their representations of the world,
00:04:11.920 should you pay attention to how they act or what they say?
00:04:16.600 And that's a profound question, even from a neurological perspective or a neuropsychological perspective.
00:04:23.500 Because the memory system that you use to represent what you say that you believe is not the same memory system that you use to embody.
00:04:33.720 Your knowledge about action.
00:04:37.700 So, it's akin, I would say, to the distinction between telling someone how to ride a bike and knowing how to ride a bike.
00:04:44.760 Those are not the same things.
00:04:46.780 The descriptions don't even really lay very well on top of one another because you don't actually know how you ride a bike.
00:04:52.420 You just know how to do it.
00:04:53.600 It's built into your physiology, right?
00:04:55.740 It's a skill.
00:04:57.440 And that's called procedural memory.
00:04:59.580 And procedural memory is the same kind of memory that basically structures your perceptions.
00:05:07.360 It's not that you can't orient your perceptions consciously, because you can.
00:05:12.360 But once you've oriented them consciously, say, towards some goal, it's automatic procedures that take over.
00:05:18.040 Because you really don't know how it is that you organize your senses so that you can pay attention.
00:05:23.340 You just know how to do it.
00:05:24.700 Now, the existentialists believe that action spoke louder than words.
00:05:32.420 And that if you were interested in belief, and even if you were interested in analyzing belief, that it was better for you to look at how someone acted than what they said.
00:05:43.300 Now, one of the things that you might think with regards to Rogers is that his psychotherapeutic practice would be predicated on the idea that you should bring how you act into alignment with what you say you believe.
00:06:00.780 So that there's no discontinuity in your, between your body, that's one way of thinking about it, and your mind.
00:06:08.220 And so that there are fewer paradoxes in your mind.
00:06:13.300 In the way that you manifest yourself in the world.
00:06:17.960 So the concentration on action is one of the fundamental characteristics of existentialism.
00:06:25.420 Another one is.
00:06:31.140 The insistence upon trouble and suffering as an intrinsic element of human experience.
00:06:37.960 So you could say, we could concentrate on subjective experience.
00:06:40.820 What's your life like to you?
00:06:42.300 How do you experience it?
00:06:44.040 And we could say, well, built into that is trouble.
00:06:46.920 Built into that is chaos.
00:06:48.480 Built into that is anxiety and pain and disease.
00:06:52.340 And that you can fall prey to those things without there being something wrong with you.
00:06:58.560 Now, you know, if you pin down a psychoanalyst like Jung or Freud, they would, of course, admit that human misery is endemic to human experience.
00:07:08.420 But Freud, in particular, tended to look for adult psychopathology in childhood misadventure.
00:07:17.820 In childhood, in pathological childhood experience.
00:07:20.820 And he, at least implicitly, claimed that if you hadn't experienced childhood trauma and you had developed properly, that what would happen is that you would end up healthy.
00:07:33.700 Roughly speaking, certainly mentally sound.
00:07:37.340 But the existentialists, they don't really buy that perspective right from the beginning.
00:07:40.860 They basically make a different claim, which is that life is so full of intrinsic misery, let's say, but suffering is a better way of thinking about it.
00:07:50.520 Suffering that manifests itself as a consequence of your intrinsic vulnerability.
00:07:55.860 That psychopathology is built into the human experience.
00:08:00.480 There's no real way of avoiding it.
00:08:02.600 Or at least, there's no reason to look for extra causes.
00:08:08.320 That might be a better way of thinking about it.
00:08:10.860 And you'd be surprised how often that sort of observation is useful for clinical clients, for example.
00:08:18.380 Because one of the things that's quite characteristic about people, especially if they're introverted and they don't have very many friends, they don't have people to talk to.
00:08:25.540 If they're suffering, maybe they're depressed or anxious or they have some sets of strange symptoms like agoraphobia or obsessive compulsive disorder.
00:08:33.280 One of the things they always presume that is that the fact that they're suffering in that manner means that there's something, not only something wrong with them, but something uniquely wrong with them.
00:08:45.540 So that it's their fault and no one else is like them.
00:08:49.320 And one of the things you do as a diagnostician, you know, you'll hear...
00:08:53.320 Welcome to the Jordan B. Peterson podcast.
00:08:55.920 I'm Michaela Peterson.
00:08:57.520 This is episode 37 of season three, titled Existentialism, Nietzsche, Dostoyevsky, and Kierkegaard.
00:09:03.940 In this lecture, 11th in the 2017 series, Dad discusses the giants of existentialism, a philosophically grounded psychological position positing, one, that psychopathology or mental illness slash distress is built into being itself.
00:09:20.380 That would come from somebody in my family.
00:09:23.380 And two, that the adoption of responsibility through action is the appropriate response.
00:09:29.220 I shouldn't make bad jokes on this, but I do.
00:09:32.020 So happy early Merry Christmas, everyone.
00:09:34.920 A couple of updates.
00:09:36.080 If you'd like to check out the self-authoring program Dad has, you can use code MP for 15% off that.
00:09:43.300 That's great for New Year's resolutions, too.
00:09:46.140 And his understandmyself.com personality test is also 15% off right now with code MP.
00:09:51.760 The second update, if you have purchased or pre-ordered his book, Beyond Order, you can go to his website, jordanbpeterson.com,
00:10:01.600 and there's a printable PDF to put under the tree because the book isn't shipping out until March.
00:10:08.280 This episode is brought to you by Thinker.
00:10:11.160 I actually used Thinker recently to read a book, Never Split the Difference by Chris Voss, in preparation for a podcast Dad and I did with him.
00:10:18.820 That'll be out in a couple of weeks.
00:10:20.180 Thinker.org summarizes key ideas from new and noteworthy nonfiction, giving you access to an entire library of great books in bite-sized form.
00:10:30.300 Read or listen to hundreds of titles in a matter of minutes.
00:10:33.360 They really give you the gist of it in about six minutes.
00:10:36.460 Books from old classics like Dale Carnegie's How to Win Friends and Influence People to recent bestsellers.
00:10:41.400 If you want to challenge your preconceptions, expand your horizons, and become a better thinker, go to thinker.org.
00:10:47.880 That's T-H-I-N-K-R dot org to start a free trial today.
00:10:53.220 Again, that's T-H-I-N-K-R dot org.
00:10:56.800 I hope you enjoy this episode.
00:10:59.960 Going online without ExpressVPN is like not paying attention to the safety demonstration on a flight.
00:11:04.980 Most of the time, you'll probably be fine, but what if one day that weird yellow mask drops down from overhead and you have no idea what to do?
00:11:13.220 In our hyper-connected world, your digital privacy isn't just a luxury.
00:11:17.060 It's a fundamental right.
00:11:18.360 Every time you connect to an unsecured network in a cafe, hotel, or airport, you're essentially broadcasting your personal information to anyone with a technical know-how to intercept it.
00:11:27.660 And let's be clear, it doesn't take a genius hacker to do this.
00:11:30.540 With some off-the-shelf hardware, even a tech-savvy teenager could potentially access your passwords, bank logins, and credit card details.
00:11:38.300 Now, you might think, what's the big deal? Who'd want my data anyway?
00:11:41.920 Well, on the dark web, your personal information could fetch up to $1,000.
00:11:46.520 That's right, there's a whole underground economy built on stolen identities.
00:11:50.580 Enter ExpressVPN.
00:11:52.340 It's like a digital fortress, creating an encrypted tunnel between your device and the internet.
00:11:56.600 Their encryption is so robust that it would take a hacker with a supercomputer over a billion years to crack it.
00:12:02.680 But don't let its power fool you.
00:12:04.480 ExpressVPN is incredibly user-friendly.
00:12:06.840 With just one click, you're protected across all your devices.
00:12:09.860 Phones, laptops, tablets, you name it.
00:12:12.040 That's why I use ExpressVPN whenever I'm traveling or working from a coffee shop.
00:12:16.180 It gives me peace of mind knowing that my research, communications, and personal data are shielded from prying eyes.
00:12:21.900 Secure your online data today by visiting expressvpn.com slash jordan.
00:12:26.900 That's E-X-P-R-E-S-S-V-P-N dot com slash jordan, and you can get an extra three months free.
00:12:33.280 Expressvpn.com slash jordan.
00:12:38.940 Starting a business can be tough, but thanks to Shopify, running your online storefront is easier than ever.
00:12:44.980 Shopify is the global commerce platform that helps you sell at every stage of your business,
00:12:49.060 From the launch your online shop stage, all the way to the did we just hit a million orders stage,
00:12:54.220 Shopify is here to help you grow.
00:12:56.400 Our marketing team uses Shopify every day to sell our merchandise,
00:12:59.540 and we love how easy it is to add more items, ship products, and track conversions.
00:13:04.340 With Shopify, customize your online store to your style with flexible templates and powerful tools,
00:13:09.600 alongside an endless list of integrations and third-party apps like on-demand printing, accounting, and chatbots.
00:13:15.400 Shopify helps you turn browsers into buyers with the internet's best converting checkout,
00:13:20.140 up to 36% better compared to other leading e-commerce platforms.
00:13:24.260 No matter how big you want to grow, Shopify gives you everything you need to take control
00:13:28.080 and take your business to the next level.
00:13:30.640 Sign up for a $1 per month trial period at shopify.com slash jbp, all lowercase.
00:13:36.680 Go to shopify.com slash jbp now to grow your business, no matter what stage you're in.
00:13:41.600 That's shopify.com slash jbp.
00:13:45.400 So we started to talk a little bit about phenomenology last time and about Carl Rogers.
00:14:06.740 And I mentioned that the phenomenologists were interested in experience in some sense as the ultimate reality.
00:14:17.340 And that's a very complicated concept to grasp.
00:14:24.480 The existentialists also adopted that viewpoint.
00:14:29.520 They were concerned with the quality of subjective experience, not that they were ignoring the reality of objective experience,
00:14:37.540 but they were concerned with the reality of subjective experience.
00:14:40.280 And they're also more focused on action than on statement or belief.
00:14:45.820 Because here's something to think about.
00:14:48.080 You can think about this for a very long time.
00:14:50.240 If you're trying to understand what someone believes, even if you're trying to analyze their representations of the world,
00:14:58.440 should you pay attention to how they act or what they say?
00:15:01.720 And that's a profound question, even from a neurological perspective or a neuropsychological perspective,
00:15:10.020 because the memory system that you use to represent what you say that you believe is not the same memory system that you use to embody your knowledge about action.
00:15:22.960 So it's akin, I would say, to the distinction between telling someone how to ride a bike and knowing how to ride a bike.
00:15:31.260 Those are not the same things.
00:15:33.300 The descriptions don't even really lay very well on top of one another because you don't actually know how you ride a bike.
00:15:38.940 You just know how to do it.
00:15:40.120 It's built into your physiology, right?
00:15:42.260 It's a skill.
00:15:43.980 And that's called procedural memory.
00:15:46.240 And procedural memory is the same kind of memory that basically structures your perceptions.
00:15:50.700 Um, not, it's not that you can't orient your perceptions consciously because you can, but once you've oriented them consciously, say towards some goal,
00:16:02.220 it's automatic procedures that take over because you really don't know how it is that you organize your senses so that you can pay attention.
00:16:09.640 You just know how to do it.
00:16:12.060 Now, the existentialists believe that actions spoke louder than words.
00:16:18.100 And that if you were interested in belief, and even if you were interested in analyzing belief, that it was better for you to look at how someone acted than what they said.
00:16:29.820 Now, one of the things that you might think with regards to Rogers is that his psychotherapeutic practice would be predicated on the idea that you should bring how you act into alignment with what you say you believe so that there's no discontinuity in your, between your body.
00:16:52.360 That's one way of thinking about it and your mind.
00:16:54.720 And so that there are fewer paradoxes in your mind.
00:16:59.820 In the way that you manifest yourself in the world.
00:17:04.460 So the concentration on action is one of the fundamental characteristics of existentialism.
00:17:11.920 Another one is.
00:17:13.080 The insistence upon trouble and suffering as an intrinsic element of human experience.
00:17:24.460 So you could say, we could concentrate on subjective experience.
00:17:27.340 What's your life like to you?
00:17:28.820 How do you experience it?
00:17:30.540 And we could say, well, built into that is trouble.
00:17:33.400 Built into that is chaos.
00:17:34.840 Built into that is anxiety and pain and disease.
00:17:38.700 And that you can fall prey to those things without there being something wrong with you.
00:17:45.060 Now, you know, if you pin down a psychoanalyst like Jung or Freud, they would, of course, admit that human misery is endemic to human experience.
00:17:54.740 But Freud, in particular, tended to look, tended to look for adult psychopathology in childhood misadventure and childhood and pathological childhood experience.
00:18:06.740 And he, at least implicitly claimed that if you hadn't experienced childhood trauma and you had developed properly, that what would happen is that you would end up healthy, roughly speaking, certainly mentally sound.
00:18:23.440 But the existentialists, they don't really buy that perspective right from the beginning.
00:18:27.580 They basically make a different claim, which is that life is so full of intrinsic misery, let's say, but suffering is a better way of thinking about it.
00:18:37.000 Suffering that manifests itself as a consequence of your intrinsic vulnerability.
00:18:42.380 That psychopathology is built into the human experience.
00:18:46.100 There's no real way of avoiding it, or at least there's no reason to look for extra causes.
00:18:54.820 That might be a better way of thinking about it.
00:18:58.840 And you'd be surprised how often that sort of observation is useful for clinical clients, for example, because one of the things that's quite characteristic about people, especially if they're introverted and they don't have very many friends, they don't have people to talk to.
00:19:11.720 If they're suffering, maybe they're depressed or anxious, or they have some sets of strange symptoms like agoraphobia or obsessive compulsive disorder.
00:19:20.280 One of the things they always presume that is that the fact that they're suffering in that manner means that there's something, not only something wrong with them, but something uniquely wrong with them.
00:19:32.060 So that it's their fault and no one else is like them.
00:19:36.160 And one of the things you do as a diagnostician, you know, you'll hear a lot of rattling about how labeling is bad for people and certainly mislabeling is bad for people.
00:19:48.280 And even an accurate label can be a box that you can't get out of, but it's very, very frequently the case that if you diagnose someone, it's a relief to them.
00:19:57.240 Like you can't believe because they come in to see you knowing that something isn't going properly, but they think, well, they're the only person facing it.
00:20:06.600 And that means they're idiosyncratically strange in some incomprehensible way that no one else could possibly understand.
00:20:12.760 And there's no way they could ever get better.
00:20:15.060 And one of the things you do is point out to them is like, yeah, depression and anxiety doesn't really require any explanation.
00:20:22.560 Right.
00:20:22.960 There's plenty of reason.
00:20:24.000 I don't remember who said it.
00:20:26.020 Everyone has sufficient justification for suicide.
00:20:29.340 I think that was the claim.
00:20:30.400 Well, but the point is, is that if you look through the experiences of the typical person, unless they're very, very fortunate and they won't be that way forever, that's certainly the case that they can point to traumatic experiences in their life, death and loss and illness and, and humiliation and all those sorts of things that are sufficient to account for existence in a state of quasi permanent negative emotion.
00:20:54.880 Now, often, if you see, as I said, if you see people who are depressed and anxious by nature, they assume that everyone else is the smiling face that you see on Facebook.
00:21:04.540 And so that that alienates them from other people and themselves even more than, than, than, than certainly far more than necessary.
00:21:12.300 And part of the psychoeducation that glows along with therapy is merely educating people to understand that a fair bit of misery is the norm and that there's plenty of genuine reason for it.
00:21:26.060 And so the existentialists basically start from that stance.
00:21:31.500 It's like a fall of man stance in some sense, you know, because deeply rooted in, in, in, in the Western tradition, roughly speaking, is the idea that people are divorced from some early paradisal state and that it was the emergence of something like self-consciousness that produced that demolition of humanity and left us in a damaged state.
00:21:54.420 And, um, I mean, I mean, people think they don't believe that, but they believe it all the time.
00:22:00.360 Um, and it's frequently how people experience themselves, you know, as, as if there's something wrong that needs to be rectified.
00:22:09.160 And it seems unique in some sense to human beings.
00:22:12.620 It doesn't seem all that obvious that animals think that way, but people definitely think that way.
00:22:19.020 And so, well, the existentialists basically take that as a given.
00:22:24.600 And then they, they, they, they offer another question, which is, well, given that that's your lot and that there's ample reason for misery, how is it that you should conduct yourself?
00:22:36.120 Because merely say giving into that misery or multiplying it doesn't seem to be, it doesn't seem to do anything but multiply it.
00:22:45.140 It doesn't seem to do anything but increase it.
00:22:47.020 And it was, if it's bad to begin with, you might say, well, increasing it is definitely going to be increasing.
00:22:51.860 It is something that you have to regard as worse.
00:22:53.920 So how do you conduct yourself in the face of misery?
00:22:56.520 Okay.
00:22:56.800 So how do they, how do they present that to begin with?
00:22:59.260 Well, this is from Pascal.
00:23:01.420 And, and this is an existential statement that describes the position of the individual in the universe.
00:23:08.960 You might say, or, or, or you could say that it, it explains the individual, the deep, a deep characteristic of individual experience or existence.
00:23:17.300 Hence existentialism.
00:23:19.580 When I consider the brief span of my life, swallowed up in the eternity before and behind it, the small space that I fill or, or even see engulfed in the infinite immensity of spaces, which I know not and which know not me.
00:23:36.720 I am afraid and wonder to see myself here rather than there, for there's no reason why I should be here rather than there or now rather than then.
00:23:46.320 And so that's an element of existential thinking that is shared with a phenomenologists called thrownness.
00:23:55.100 And that's a term that Heidegger originated, if I remember correctly.
00:24:00.500 And what it means is, is it's an analysis of a certain characteristic of human experience, which is that, well, there was an immense span of time in which you could have been born, but you weren't born then.
00:24:10.660 You were born 20 years ago.
00:24:12.480 And there was an immense span of time in the future that you could have been born and you weren't born then either.
00:24:17.600 You were born when you were born and you're who you are and you have exactly the characteristics that you have.
00:24:22.860 And there's something tremendously arbitrary about that.
00:24:25.620 It's as if you were thrown into experience.
00:24:28.060 And that's what thrownness means.
00:24:29.320 It means that you were randomly placed in a place in time.
00:24:32.820 And there's something fundamentally irrational about that, meaning that there's no real way of understanding it.
00:24:38.820 It's something you have to deal with.
00:24:40.500 And you might say, well, why was I born poor?
00:24:42.520 Or why was I born less attractive than I might be?
00:24:46.840 Or why was I born less intelligent than I might be?
00:24:50.020 Or maybe why I was born, why was I born to these terrible parents at this particular horrible moment in time?
00:24:55.640 And in some sense, there's no answer to questions like that.
00:24:58.620 It's just how it is.
00:25:00.400 And you have to deal with it.
00:25:03.180 So the question is for the existentialists, how do you deal with that?
00:25:07.800 This is Walter Kaufman, if I remember Rollo May.
00:25:13.040 Rarely has the existential question been put more simply or beautifully.
00:25:16.420 In this passage, we see first, the profound realization of the contingency of human life with the, which the existentialists call thrownness.
00:25:25.500 Second, we see Pascal flinch, facing unflinchingly, unflinchingly the question of being there or more accurately being where.
00:25:33.680 Third, we see the realization that you cannot take refuge in some superficial explanation of time and space, which Pascal, a scientist that he was, could well know.
00:25:45.140 And lastly, the deep shaking anxiety arising from this stark awareness of existence in such a universe.
00:25:50.720 There's a fairly well-developed line of social psychological theorizing known as terror management theory.
00:26:02.280 And the basic premise of terror management theory is that human beings have belief systems.
00:26:08.380 And what the belief systems do is serve to protect them against death anxiety.
00:26:14.640 And that now I have that that's derived from the work of Ernest Becker, by the way, who wrote a great book called The Denial of Death.
00:26:22.120 And his theories in the denial of death have been put to the test by the terror management theorists with, I would say, some success.
00:26:28.960 But I think the theory is flawed because I don't believe that Becker phrased the issue properly.
00:26:43.040 I think it's deeper than a fear of death.
00:26:45.080 And that's what the existentialists are attempting to communicate.
00:26:50.980 It's more like, it's more like terror at ice.
00:26:55.320 It's more like terror of isolated being.
00:26:58.660 You know, it's not only that you're pro that you're mortal, you know, that you have a border.
00:27:05.620 A temporal border, you're born and you die.
00:27:08.160 But also that during that time, you're vulnerable to all sorts of things and all sorts of contingencies.
00:27:13.600 One of which, of course, is death, but it's by no means the only one that is horrifying.
00:27:17.700 I think you can certainly make a case like the existentialists do that the mere fact that you're, you're limited in the face of infinite complexity is also a primary existential problem.
00:27:34.940 It's a problem that human beings have been dealing with ever since they started to understand.
00:27:40.920 They started to make sense of concepts that were beyond their immediate experience.
00:27:44.700 Now, millions of years ago or tens of millions of years ago, when our ancestors lived in trees, you could be sure that they were frightened of what surrounded them.
00:27:58.800 They were frightened of when they were little, they were frightened of birds that might pick them out of a tree or they were afraid of cats that might climb a tree and eat them.
00:28:06.080 And they were afraid of snakes that would come slithering along and bite them.
00:28:10.500 And they were, they existed in a space that was safe, surrounded by a space that wasn't safe, that was full of predatory, predatory entities.
00:28:21.920 And those were primarily birds of prey and cats and, and snakes or other reptiles.
00:28:28.800 And then what seemed to have happened as we evolved was that the way we construed the world, you can think of the world as a safe place surrounded by the possibility of predation.
00:28:37.840 But you can also think of the world as the known, but you can also think of the world as the known surrounded by the unknown.
00:28:41.660 It's the same idea, except put up one level of abstraction and the unknown has the same relationship to us in some sense that the territory of predators has relationship to us.
00:28:53.060 And we use the same circuitry to represent the absolute unknown that, that we used so many millions of years ago to represent predators.
00:29:01.260 Now it's more complicated for human beings because first of all, we're not just prey animals.
00:29:06.980 We're also predators.
00:29:08.220 And so we're not only targets, but we're the thing that makes other thing targets.
00:29:12.840 And we're also something that isn't only shaking in the face of the unknown because of its predatory element, maybe like a rabbit, but something that can explore the unknown and garner something of value as a consequence.
00:29:25.220 And so we have this very paradoxical wiring, you might say, the unknown is partly terror and that's the prepotent element of the unknown.
00:29:35.060 So negative emotion for human beings is more powerful than positive emotion is sort of dose for dose.
00:29:41.220 And that's, I think that's because you can be completely and utterly dead, but you can only be so much happier.
00:29:48.260 And so it makes much more sense to be tilted to some degree towards sensitivity to negative emotion than it does to be tilted towards sensitivity for positive emotion.
00:29:57.940 But it's also another one of those things that makes life rather intrinsically difficult because negative emotions are commonplace and they're powerful and they need to be because otherwise you'd wander stupidly into something that would kill you.
00:30:13.280 And it's better to be anxious than to be in pain or dead, even though it's not so good to be anxious.
00:30:22.500 So for the existentialist that the fundamental, the fundamental quality of human existence is limitation in the face of incomprehensible complexity.
00:30:34.660 And all of the things that stem from that existentialism is not a comprehensive philosophy or a way of life, but an endeavor to grasp reality.
00:30:49.100 Existentialism is immersed in and arises directly out of man's anxiety, estrangement and conflicts.
00:30:53.780 This was written 60 years ago and it was written.
00:30:57.360 So it was, it was aimed at Western audiences at that point.
00:31:02.020 If you go back a hundred years, you could make the case or, or, or perhaps a little longer than that.
00:31:07.380 You could make the case that the parts of the world that weren't Western were still reasonably well ensconced in traditional belief systems.
00:31:14.520 And so those traditional belief systems provided an overarching canopy of meaning.
00:31:20.560 That's one way of thinking about it that was designed exactly to, you could say, rationalize, or you could say, cope with or deal with, depending on your perspective, that existential anxiety.
00:31:33.260 It gave, it gave significance to everything.
00:31:35.740 It gave meaning to everything.
00:31:36.720 And those are religious systems, let's say, but they came crashing down in the West in the late 1800s and then increasingly everywhere else in the world.
00:31:45.100 So the point at which we are now in time, it isn't reasonable to only consider this a pathology of the Western individual.
00:31:54.740 It might even be the prime conflict that exists in the world right now between comprehensive and traditional religious systems.
00:32:06.280 And a modern viewpoint that has this existential angst built into it as part of its, as part of its nature.
00:32:13.040 Maybe it's the price you pay for increased technological mastery and awareness, but it's a big price to pay.
00:32:19.340 And the existentialists were concerned about that because they also believed that although the scientific method had given us immense technological power, the worldview that came along with it, which you could say in some sense is incidental to the method, but it doesn't matter.
00:32:34.740 The worldview that came along with it was sufficiently powerful and objective and reductive to blow gaping holes in the meaning systems that protected us from our existential anxiety and to open us up to the possibility.
00:32:52.320 The proclivity, number one of nihilism, which is really belief in nothing, and we'll talk about that more as we progress or a proclivity towards rational totalitarianism, which would be, you might say, the, the extreme reaction to the threat of nihilism and the abandonment of classic belief systems.
00:33:10.900 I, I think you still, I think you still, I think you still see that playing out everywhere.
00:33:14.900 You certainly see it playing out in the universities right now because the, there's huge ideological conflicts at, at the, in the substructure of, of Western intellectual thinking.
00:33:23.460 And people are, and this is very hard on young people.
00:33:28.280 They're caught in part be, be between an emergent nihilism that seems to be implicit in a materialist worldview and the temptation of radical ideologies.
00:33:37.220 And neither of those options I would say is tenable.
00:33:41.460 I mean, the nihilistic option leaves you with nothing and that's not good.
00:33:45.380 And that's an existential realization in some sense too, because if your life is fundamentally problematic without you being pathological, just as the essence of your life, then you need something to defend your, to defend against that.
00:33:59.060 You can't just have nothing because all it does is leave you with the suffering that's implicit in your experience.
00:34:06.280 And then to swing to a totalitarianism, totalitarian system means that you don't even exist.
00:34:12.220 Once you've done that, everything you say can be predicted.
00:34:15.400 You're just the puppet of a, of a rational scheme that has an explanation for everything, but that's really good for nothing except destruction because it's too vague and, and abstracted to be used to actually solve any concrete problems.
00:34:29.960 So this is a, this is the situation of modern people as far as the existentialists were concerned and the people that I'm talking to you about specifically, I'm going to talk to you about Nietzsche and Dostoevsky and Kierkegaard.
00:34:42.460 And I picked those people who aren't psychologists, except in the broader sense, because I don't think there is anybody who there were and are existential psychotherapists, but I don't think that any of them do as good a job of explaining the problem as those people do.
00:34:56.760 So you might as well get right.
00:34:58.520 You might as well get the information right from the source.
00:35:05.020 Like psychoanalysis, existentialism seeks to utilize these very conflicts as avenues to the more profound self-understanding.
00:35:12.460 Of man.
00:35:13.320 Well, so what does that mean?
00:35:14.260 Well, it means, at least in part, that the theorists that we're going to talk about had an idea that was akin to the psychoanalytic idea of facing what you're afraid of.
00:35:24.300 And that's a key concept in psychotherapy.
00:35:26.480 There's, there's not that many key concepts in psychotherapy.
00:35:29.380 One might be that you enter into an honest relationship with your client.
00:35:34.540 The second is that exposure to the things that you don't want to be exposed to is curative.
00:35:41.800 If it's voluntary, that's a big deal.
00:35:44.840 And it has to be voluntary.
00:35:46.060 It can't be involuntary because that'll just make it worse.
00:35:48.280 Because you might ask, well, you know, if a kid has a fear of rats or mice, they got that fear because often they were exposed to rats or mice.
00:35:57.420 And then you use exposure to rats and mice to cure them.
00:36:00.400 Well, that makes the precipitator of the illness, the cure, which makes no sense.
00:36:06.900 Well, what's the distinction?
00:36:08.440 Well, it's, it's one thing to have something pop up at you when you're not expecting it.
00:36:12.660 That puts you in a state of, of apprehension and preparation for action in a state of even a state of terror, a state of reflex of shock.
00:36:21.800 And then perhaps terror and maybe something you don't recover from.
00:36:25.100 That's completely different than facing something voluntarily.
00:36:28.940 The psychophysiology isn't even the same.
00:36:31.200 So if you're faced with a stressor of a certain magnitude and it's involuntary, your body produces a lot of the stress hormone cortisol.
00:36:37.580 And in large doses, cortisol is toxic, especially if it's produced over long periods of time.
00:36:44.100 But if you face it voluntarily, then that doesn't happen.
00:36:46.960 You use a completely different set of circuits to do something voluntarily.
00:36:50.000 And it's the utilization of the voluntary circuits that indicates your mastery over the thing that you're afraid of.
00:36:56.940 And that mastery over the thing that you're afraid of and can't cope with, that actually constitutes your adaptive personality.
00:37:03.320 And so part of what the existentialists were suggesting is that precisely, and you see this, you see this in Freud with his insistence that you go into your messy past and, and dig up the corpses and the skeletons and sort them out.
00:37:16.680 And Jung's insistence that what you want is most is to be found where you least want to look.
00:37:22.540 And Roger's insistence that people communicate honestly about difficult things.
00:37:26.220 It's all predicated on the same idea in some sense that voluntary exposure is one of the prime things that cures people.
00:37:32.900 And one of the things that you should think about, you think, well, is that a valid claim?
00:37:36.480 Well, you have the psychophysiological evidence, but it's also the case that that is how people learn, right?
00:37:42.320 If you're a child and you're learning to master the world, you actually exist in a state of existential anxiety unless you're near someone that will take care of you.
00:37:52.080 So for example, if you take the typical child and you go to a mall, say a three-year-old, and then you have the three-year-old stand and you leave,
00:38:01.960 it isn't going to be very long until you're far enough away so that most of most children in that situation will immediately start to cry.
00:38:09.980 They'll get worried and they'll start to cry and then they'll break down because, well, because that's the existential anxiety.
00:38:16.180 Like you think, well, a normal child is calm.
00:38:19.560 It's like wrong.
00:38:21.140 A normal child close to someone who will take care of them is calm, but that is by no means the same thing.
00:38:26.900 It's not even close to the same thing.
00:38:28.840 And so you get backwards in your psychological thinking if you don't notice that because you think, well, the normal human being is calm and well put together.
00:38:36.660 It's like, no, wrong.
00:38:38.320 The normal human being in a place of safety is calm and well put together.
00:38:42.800 But why you would ever think that a normal place is a place of safety?
00:38:47.580 You know, assuming that that's the standard or the norm, there's absolutely no reason for that.
00:38:52.540 You see this with rats too, because the behaviorists, for example, made the presumption that you had to teach rats to be afraid.
00:38:59.800 But let me tell you how that actually worked.
00:39:01.820 It's really interesting, and it shows you how carefully you have to analyze, say, psychological experiments to understand what's going on.
00:39:08.800 So let's say you take a lab rat, okay?
00:39:11.920 And let's say it's a lab rat like a rat that Skinner used, B.F. Skinner, who was the most famous of the behaviorists, and he could get rats to do anything.
00:39:19.100 He taught pigeons to play ping pong.
00:39:21.640 He taught pigeons to guide guided missiles by photographs, and he did that with behavioral training.
00:39:27.120 They were never used for guided missiles because they got the electronics working before the program was set into operation.
00:39:33.580 But he could get them to peck at photos to guide something that was flying accurately, and he did that with behavioral training.
00:39:40.540 So Skinner, I mean, he was no joke.
00:39:42.680 He really knew how to train animals, and it's very useful material to know.
00:39:46.920 We'll talk about it to some degree if you want to train children, for example, or pets.
00:39:50.820 So, because the learning mechanisms are very similar, which is why, of course, we can get along with pets, right?
00:39:56.580 We understand them like we understand children, roughly speaking.
00:39:59.920 So, anyways, so let's say you've got your rat, and he's sitting there, and he's pretty calm, and he's in his cage.
00:40:07.260 And so he's already a weird rat because he's been genetically altered.
00:40:11.320 He's not a wild Norway rat.
00:40:13.080 So he's a little tamer than a normal rat.
00:40:15.040 Maybe he's a little more fearful, although perhaps not.
00:40:17.200 And he's also a solitary rat in his cage, and there's no such thing as a solitary rat.
00:40:22.300 It's like a solitary zebra or a solitary carp, or not carp, cod.
00:40:28.860 Cod exists in huge schools.
00:40:30.840 There's no such thing as a cod, which is why they will never come back, as far as I can tell,
00:40:35.420 because once you wipe out the school, it's like you wipe out a beehive, and you're going to have six bees.
00:40:40.680 What the hell are you going to do with six bees?
00:40:42.400 What are they going to do?
00:40:43.200 They don't exist on their own, and herd animals are like that, too, and cod are like that.
00:40:49.380 So they organize their mating behavior in their huge schools.
00:40:52.640 So without the schools, it's like, what the hell is a cod going to do?
00:40:55.980 Nothing.
00:40:56.580 And that is what they're doing.
00:40:57.700 But anyways, back to the rat.
00:41:00.140 So you've got this rat.
00:41:01.160 He's in a cage.
00:41:02.280 He's alone, and he's hungry, because one of the things that Skinner did was starve his rats down to 75% of their normal body weight,
00:41:09.720 so that they would respond a lot more to food.
00:41:11.940 So that's the model, and you've got to keep in mind the nature of the model,
00:41:17.080 because the model is like, the way the model is constituted is equivalent to your implicit assumptions about your experiment,
00:41:25.360 and people don't take that into consideration.
00:41:27.700 Okay, so the rat's calm.
00:41:28.840 So then what you do is you take the rat out of his cage, and you put him in the testing chamber,
00:41:32.700 and so maybe what you're going to do is you're going to set the rat up so that a light goes on,
00:41:37.440 and then he gets a little electric shock, okay?
00:41:39.880 But, and that you're going to teach him to be afraid of the light.
00:41:42.920 So after you pair the light with the shock six or seven times, when the light comes on, the rat's going to freeze.
00:41:47.980 So, and he freezes because he's using predator avoidance strategy basically to deal with the threat.
00:41:54.000 But, but, and so you think, well, calm rat learns to be afraid.
00:41:57.440 But no, because when you put the rat in the cage, the new cage, what does it do?
00:42:04.160 Well, it doesn't just, you know, find the sofa and have a nap.
00:42:07.280 It's terrified when you put it in the new situation.
00:42:10.140 That's the normal rat.
00:42:12.080 It's the one that's like this.
00:42:13.620 It doesn't move, because if it moved, maybe a predator would pick it out, like a cat,
00:42:17.160 because cats can see lateral movement.
00:42:18.940 That's why they have slit eyes, by the way, so they can detect lateral movement.
00:42:22.620 And you know that, because if you play with your cat like this, it'll chase your hand.
00:42:26.040 But if you do this, it won't.
00:42:27.740 It's because it doesn't chase things that do this.
00:42:30.780 It doesn't chase kangaroos, you know.
00:42:32.560 It chases things that move like this, so it has eyes for that.
00:42:36.180 Anyways, the rat's frozen, and then it starts to sniff, because a rat is all smell.
00:42:43.280 Most animals, the brains of most animals are organized around smell.
00:42:47.760 Human beings are very weird, because our brains are organized around vision.
00:42:50.940 But that's just not the case for most, well, you know, dogs.
00:42:54.060 They're the weirdest things, eh?
00:42:55.440 Because they can smell, like, way better than you.
00:42:59.340 They can detect odors way better than you.
00:43:01.040 Probably most of you smell better than a dog.
00:43:02.720 But they can detect odors better than you.
00:43:06.400 But everything seems to smell good to a dog, which is the strangest damn thing, you know.
00:43:11.180 With a nose like that, you'd think they'd never even want to go outside.
00:43:14.200 But anyways.
00:43:16.840 Uh-oh.
00:43:17.660 Now I probably lost my place.
00:43:19.880 Ha ha ha.
00:43:20.700 All right.
00:43:21.260 Dogs smell.
00:43:23.060 Where were we going with that?
00:43:25.280 Rats.
00:43:26.660 Yes.
00:43:27.220 And what's that?
00:43:29.560 Frozen.
00:43:30.120 Yes, okay.
00:43:30.720 So the rat, that's the one.
00:43:32.240 That's the one.
00:43:33.020 So the rat is in its cage, and it's frozen so that nothing can see it and eat it.
00:43:37.260 And so it starts to sniff, because it uses smell to see what's going on.
00:43:42.200 And so if you take rats that have never been exposed to a cat, and you, like, blow cat odor over them,
00:43:49.440 they do not like that at all.
00:43:50.760 They do not like cat odor.
00:43:52.300 So it's built right into, it's an archetype.
00:43:54.040 So the predator cat is an archetype for the rat, and it doesn't need any pre-training to respond to it.
00:44:00.660 And it's probably also the case with human beings and things like snakes and looming objects.
00:44:04.780 We've got some archetypal predators as well.
00:44:07.320 But, all right, so the rat sniffs, and then if nothing happens, it thinks, okay, a rat can sniff here without dying.
00:44:15.580 And so then it starts to relax a little bit, and maybe it starts to move around a bit, and then it thinks, okay,
00:44:19.980 a sniffing rat that's moving a little bit can live here without dying.
00:44:23.420 And then nothing else happens, and so it relaxes a bit more.
00:44:26.320 And then it starts to sniff its way around, and it'll sniff all around the cage, and check out all the corners,
00:44:31.720 and make sure that there isn't anything there that can eat it, because the rat actually cares about that.
00:44:36.200 And then when it's completely explored the cage and decided that it's safe,
00:44:41.600 then it turns into a normal calm rat.
00:44:43.920 But that's post-exploration.
00:44:46.200 So you have to say, well, a rat that has thoroughly explored its territory is a calm rat.
00:44:51.220 That's a whole different way of looking about fear.
00:44:53.660 Then you turn the light on and shock it, and the rat thinks, ugh, wrong.
00:44:58.240 It's not safe here, and that light indicates that it's not safe.
00:45:02.200 So basically what you've done is remind the rat that life is dangerous.
00:45:06.440 You have not taught it fear.
00:45:08.920 It's not the same thing.
00:45:10.320 The rat knows everything about fear.
00:45:12.280 It learned that it was safe, and it was wrong.
00:45:16.300 And that's a really, a really important thing to understand also about what you're like.
00:45:22.140 Because you know, like anxiety, that needs no explanation.
00:45:27.140 Depression, that needs no explanation.
00:45:29.700 What needs explanation is how the hell do you ever feel secure and together ever?
00:45:35.200 Because that's the mystery.
00:45:37.820 And partly the way you do that is by never going anywhere where you're upset.
00:45:41.880 You stay in your territory.
00:45:44.000 And so, like, this is your territory.
00:45:45.840 And everyone knows how to act here, right?
00:45:48.220 So you look around, and everyone's sitting and doing exactly the same thing.
00:45:51.940 So you can ignore them.
00:45:53.380 You can pretend that they're not dangerous.
00:45:55.200 And most of the time, that will be correct.
00:45:59.520 And some of the time, it won't be.
00:46:02.440 And so, you maintain your emotional stability by staying where you belong.
00:46:09.580 And that's quite different than the psychoanalytic view.
00:46:11.760 Psychoanalytic view, you know, that you're calm and well put together if your psyche is properly organized.
00:46:18.380 It's like, this is partly why I introduced you guys to Piaget.
00:46:21.940 Because Piaget adds this other element, you know.
00:46:24.040 He says something like, yeah, well, your psyche has to be organized properly.
00:46:27.960 So you have to turn, you have to have turned everything that is a constituent element of you into a functional being.
00:46:33.760 But that being has to be integrated in a functional game-like landscape.
00:46:39.380 Made of other people who are doing the same thing.
00:46:41.340 And then it's the concordance between your structure and that landscape that makes you emotionally regulated.
00:46:47.900 That's a way different theory.
00:46:49.520 It's a much more sophisticated theory.
00:46:51.280 So you could say, in some sense, the psychoanalysts had it half right.
00:46:54.480 You know, and also, you can be individually pathological in a way that doesn't let you fit into society.
00:47:00.180 But you have to understand the concordance between the social organization and the individual organization to get the picture right.
00:47:07.400 Well, so what do the existentialists say?
00:47:11.960 Well, it's something like, in the depths of your existential terror, the wisdom to cope with that terror will be found.
00:47:21.820 So that's the fundamental idea.
00:47:24.080 And then there's a more profound idea in that, which I would also say is implicit in psychotherapy.
00:47:30.740 The more behavioral the psychotherapy, the more implicit it is.
00:47:34.820 But the idea is that, despite the fact that you are mismatched, that you're outmatched by, let's call it existential complexity.
00:47:44.840 There's something in you that's far more complex than you know.
00:47:49.420 And if you challenge it, it will respond by growing and developing.
00:47:53.020 And that will not protect you against the existential anxiety.
00:47:57.340 It's not like a shield or a guard that you're hiding behind.
00:48:01.060 It's not a defense.
00:48:02.620 What happens instead is that you actually learn how to deal with it.
00:48:05.720 You know, so you think about it this way.
00:48:07.120 One of the things that human beings are archetypally related to is fire.
00:48:14.080 And, of course, fire is something to be afraid of because it will burn you and it will burn everything down.
00:48:19.280 But by the same token, when we mastered fire, which may have been two million years ago, something like that, because it looks like it was about then that we learned how to cook, which made a big difference.
00:48:29.660 So, you know how chimps, I haven't told you the chimp story, I don't think.
00:48:32.900 You know how chimps are sort of shaped like this?
00:48:34.600 They've got this huge barrel-shaped body.
00:48:37.700 Well, they spend like 12 hours a day chewing leaves.
00:48:41.100 And why is that?
00:48:42.460 Because you go out in the forest and eat leaves and see how much you have to chew so you don't starve to death.
00:48:47.860 It's like leaves aren't edible.
00:48:49.480 They hardly have any nourishment at all.
00:48:51.460 And so if you're a chimp, all you do is sit around and chew leaves.
00:48:54.680 And then you need to have an intestinal tract that could wrap two or three times around this room so that you can digest the damn things, right?
00:49:02.060 So that's chimp life.
00:49:03.200 Well, human beings, we decided to trade intestinal length for brain.
00:49:08.320 And the way we did that was by learning how to cook.
00:49:10.780 And we mastered fire.
00:49:12.620 And so you might say, well, is fire dangerous?
00:49:14.560 And the answer to that is, well, it depends on how you react to it.
00:49:18.120 It's exactly that, right?
00:49:19.300 You say, well, fire is intrinsically dangerous.
00:49:21.660 It's like, no, fire is multivalent.
00:49:24.200 It has all sorts of possibilities.
00:49:26.460 And some of them are extraordinarily destructive.
00:49:28.920 But if you match your behavior properly to the phenomena, then you can master something like fire.
00:49:34.320 Well, so the idea is that there's a potential inside you.
00:49:38.760 Whatever inside means, there's a potential that's part of you.
00:49:41.700 Some of it's genetic potential.
00:49:43.720 And we know that because if we move you into a new environment, new genes will turn on inside of you and manufacture new parts of you.
00:49:50.480 So if you stress yourself optimally, if you push yourself out into the world, you can incorporate information from that journey, the exploration.
00:50:01.040 That's a Piagetian idea, right?
00:50:02.560 You go out and you learn something new and you adjust your behavior to it.
00:50:05.760 You adjust your concepts to it and then you can master it.
00:50:08.620 But what Piaget didn't realize was that it also transforms your biological structure at a microscopic level merely as a consequence of being put in the new situation.
00:50:17.800 So the idea is that there's more to you than you know.
00:50:21.180 And the way you call it out is by challenging yourself voluntarily in as many directions as you can manage.
00:50:27.440 And that's a real thing.
00:50:28.640 It isn't the construction of defenses.
00:50:30.880 It's not something artificial like defense against death anxiety.
00:50:34.460 It's actually how you learn to cope in the world.
00:50:37.600 And the existentialists, I would say, despite their exceptional pessimism, were in some sense unbelievably optimistic.
00:50:44.700 Because what they would say, it's the opposite of a straw man argument.
00:50:48.000 They would say, well, how weak are human beings?
00:50:50.920 Ultimately weak.
00:50:52.360 We're up against an opponent, so to speak.
00:50:55.620 A social opponent, say, which would be the crushing weight of society.
00:50:58.620 And a natural opponent that is nature, which overwhelms you.
00:51:02.580 We're up against the ultimate opponent.
00:51:04.340 But, and so in that sense, we're extraordinarily weak.
00:51:08.060 But it turns out that if we face that opponent or that series of opponents, then all sorts of possibilities manifest themselves inside of us.
00:51:15.940 And it isn't clear what the upper limits are to that.
00:51:18.560 So, it's so interesting that it's a good example of how if you face what you're afraid of, you can find what you need.
00:51:25.640 You say, well, the existentialists make the strongest case possible for the vulnerability of human beings.
00:51:31.300 And out of that, they extract out the strongest case possible why human beings are strong and powerful.
00:51:37.780 It's a very interesting paradox.
00:51:39.820 And again, I would say that that's central to psychotherapy.
00:51:42.380 One of the things that's been learned about agoraphobics, for example, agoraphobics, they're usually women.
00:51:50.060 They're usually in their 40s.
00:51:51.180 They've usually been dependent.
00:51:52.880 Often someone close to them has divorced or died or they're having heart palpitations or something like that.
00:51:58.420 Sometimes as a consequence of menopause.
00:52:00.720 And they've accustomed themselves to seeking authority when challenged.
00:52:05.380 But the problem with having heart palpitations is like, who's going to help you with that?
00:52:09.860 Well, maybe you go to the emergency room.
00:52:11.520 And that is what agoraphobics do.
00:52:13.820 Most agoraphobics have been to the emergency room like a dozen times because they have heart palpitations.
00:52:18.240 And then they feel them.
00:52:19.500 Then they get afraid and panic.
00:52:21.140 Then their heart rate goes way up.
00:52:22.640 And then they think, oh my God, I'm going to die.
00:52:25.380 And while I die, I'm going to make an absolute fool of myself and everyone's going to laugh at me.
00:52:30.120 So that's social rejection and biological mortality staring them right in the face.
00:52:35.860 Well, so then you take an agoraphobic and you find out her background, because as I said, it's usually women.
00:52:43.760 And then you start to expose that person to the things that she's afraid of.
00:52:48.140 Elevators, maybe subways, taxis.
00:52:50.860 Because actually agoraphobics, really, what happens is they're not really so much afraid of places or things.
00:52:57.340 What they're afraid of is being trapped in a place or a situation where they can't get away.
00:53:04.640 And then if they had a heart attack, they wouldn't be able to get to an emergency ward.
00:53:07.660 So that's really at the basis of the fear.
00:53:10.300 And so, and the emergency ward thing only helps to a limited degree.
00:53:14.420 Because if you're having a heart attack and it's a really good one, you're dead.
00:53:19.240 And so that's a place where recourse to authority is only going to take you so far.
00:53:24.040 Right?
00:53:24.480 So it's not a good solution to the problem.
00:53:27.900 Well, so what do you do?
00:53:29.540 Well, you expose the person maybe to an elevator.
00:53:32.600 And, you know, maybe the elevator is there.
00:53:35.540 And you tell them, well, can you get on an elevator?
00:53:39.840 And they say, no.
00:53:40.600 So, well, can you look at an elevator?
00:53:42.100 Well, I don't think so.
00:53:43.040 Well, how about some pictures of an elevator?
00:53:44.780 So you show them some pictures of an elevator on Google.
00:53:47.780 And maybe one with closed doors and one with open doors.
00:53:50.680 And you have them look at the damn thing.
00:53:52.700 Because they won't want to look.
00:53:54.720 They'll want to look away.
00:53:56.640 But you can't look away.
00:53:58.100 You have to investigate it.
00:53:59.460 And then what your brain learns is that you're afraid of that thing.
00:54:02.500 But you can scan it with your eyes.
00:54:04.360 And nothing happens.
00:54:05.540 It's like the rat in the cage sniffing and realizing, well, he can sniff and he doesn't die.
00:54:10.940 It's like you can look at the picture of an elevator and you don't die.
00:54:13.900 Well, you do that until you're bored.
00:54:16.120 And then you've learned that you can look at that elevator without dying.
00:54:21.760 It's built right into you.
00:54:22.880 Well, then maybe I can take you out and we'll look at a real elevator.
00:54:26.020 And so I say, well, let's walk as close to that elevator as you can manage.
00:54:30.940 I want you right on the edge between order and chaos, let's say.
00:54:34.280 I want you to find that edge.
00:54:35.900 Can you stand here?
00:54:37.400 Yes.
00:54:37.880 How about here?
00:54:38.960 Yes.
00:54:39.560 How about that's good enough?
00:54:40.840 Okay.
00:54:41.740 You're standing here.
00:54:42.740 Order, order, chaos.
00:54:45.400 That's where you're at.
00:54:46.900 So what happens?
00:54:47.900 You stand there and you notice you don't die and you do that long enough.
00:54:52.460 So you're bored with it.
00:54:53.540 And then you think, well, can you step three feet closer?
00:54:57.180 Yes, you can.
00:54:58.080 Well, and maybe after three weeks you say, well, we're by the door.
00:55:01.740 So here's the deal.
00:55:02.960 I'm going to open that door and I'm going to hold it open and I'm not going to play a
00:55:06.900 trick on you.
00:55:08.260 And so what you're going to do is just poke your head in and take a look around.
00:55:12.020 And so imagine doing that.
00:55:13.860 Okay.
00:55:14.200 So you imagine it.
00:55:15.060 Okay.
00:55:15.240 Now actually do it.
00:55:16.560 Then I let, no, I don't let go of the door.
00:55:19.700 That's what evil psychotherapists do.
00:55:22.140 Anyways, then you get the person inside and what you see is they're looking at their
00:55:25.600 shoes.
00:55:26.520 They're in there, but they're not really in there.
00:55:28.200 You say, no, no, no.
00:55:28.900 You got to look.
00:55:29.560 You got to look in the corners.
00:55:30.520 You got to look at the numbers.
00:55:32.320 You got to see that you're in this thing that you're afraid of.
00:55:35.420 And so you have them look around and look around and look around.
00:55:38.360 They're like the rat coming, relaxing and starting to move.
00:55:41.980 And you say, well, that's good enough.
00:55:43.340 You can get out of the elevator slowly.
00:55:45.480 Don't, don't rush out.
00:55:46.620 Just go out calmly.
00:55:48.000 Good enough.
00:55:49.180 Go home, sleep for a week and then come back and we'll do it again.
00:55:52.440 And then if you do that for, it depends on how fast the person is capable of, of
00:55:57.620 advancing, but you can move people through phobias pretty fast.
00:56:00.520 If they trust you and they have to trust you and you have to be careful.
00:56:03.900 You say, you say to them, look, we will stop doing this whenever you want, as soon as you
00:56:08.760 say so.
00:56:09.720 So this is, this is completely up to you.
00:56:12.120 I'm not pushing you.
00:56:13.200 I've got no demands on you.
00:56:15.640 You want to be able to go outside again.
00:56:17.580 We're going to walk through that, but you're not performing for me.
00:56:21.260 This isn't a test.
00:56:22.420 This isn't a contest.
00:56:23.240 It's none of that.
00:56:24.240 And when you're done, we're done.
00:56:26.420 And you know, you can also have help people like step through that.
00:56:30.920 So I was treating someone who had a needle phobia recently.
00:56:33.020 And this person really felt trapped by authority figures that were medical.
00:56:38.600 And this person had their reasons for it.
00:56:41.400 And so the first thing I did, because we were working with this needle was say, you're
00:56:45.900 going to practice getting the hell out of here.
00:56:47.780 So I'll come at you.
00:56:49.920 I'll come at you with this needle.
00:56:51.580 You know, I don't have a needle, but we'll pretend I do.
00:56:53.980 Okay.
00:56:54.140 So I'm going to move it towards you.
00:56:55.440 And you're going to tell me to stop.
00:56:56.880 And you're going to leave the room because you want to see that you can, you know, and
00:57:00.860 the person will think, well, I know I can.
00:57:02.300 It's like, no, you don't know.
00:57:03.560 You don't know.
00:57:05.120 And so we're going to practice it just like a kid pretending.
00:57:08.680 And so I move forward with the non-existent needle and they say, stop.
00:57:12.880 And I stop.
00:57:13.480 And they say, I'm leaving.
00:57:14.500 And they leave and they come back and they're smiling because they didn't know they could
00:57:18.520 do that.
00:57:19.340 You know, and part of them is still thinking, well, I'm a four-year-old kid and there's
00:57:22.500 no way I can get out of here.
00:57:23.580 No one's going to listen to me.
00:57:24.760 It's built right into them.
00:57:26.060 That's like Freudian regression or fixation at an earlier developmental stage.
00:57:30.600 And if you watch that, if you watch for that in people, sometimes you can see how old they
00:57:35.220 are.
00:57:35.560 You know, if you, if you tap into something that they were afraid of very young, their
00:57:39.460 whole facial expression will turn into that person, their body language and everything.
00:57:43.140 It's very interesting.
00:57:44.180 You have to watch very carefully to see it, but you can definitely see it.
00:57:47.780 So, okay.
00:57:49.440 So with the agoraphobic, you think, well, you treat the agoraphobic, you know, and then
00:57:53.820 she can go take taxis and she can go on the subway.
00:57:56.520 And then she goes and has a big fight with her husband because she should have had one 20
00:58:00.440 years ago, but she was dependent and authority seeking.
00:58:04.160 So she never would risk it because if she upset the relationship with authority, then
00:58:08.620 it would expose her to the world.
00:58:10.000 And so she was always in a subordinate and inferior position and a bit of a slave.
00:58:14.520 And one of the things that often happens when you treat someone with agoraphobia is they
00:58:18.400 get a lot more assertive and you think, well, one of the things the psychoanalysts objected
00:58:24.440 to when the behaviorists started to use exposure therapy as a treatment was the idea that there
00:58:29.440 would be substitution because the psychoanalysts would say, you're not really afraid of an
00:58:33.420 elevator.
00:58:34.440 So if I just treat your elevator fear, because that's really not what you're afraid of, the
00:58:38.980 fear is just going to pop up somewhere else.
00:58:40.840 That'd be symbolic substitution.
00:58:42.580 But that isn't what happened.
00:58:44.000 What happened was, is that if they learn to get on the elevator, they're much more likely
00:58:47.740 to take a taxi.
00:58:49.240 You think, well, why is that?
00:58:50.740 It's because they weren't learning that things were less frightening.
00:58:54.520 That was the original idea.
00:58:55.880 The original idea was counter conditioning that basically the person had been conditioned
00:59:00.420 to be afraid of whatever it was.
00:59:02.820 And then what you did was you put them in, in a encounter with that and you let them breathe
00:59:08.880 and relax.
00:59:09.660 And then the relaxation they learned would counteract the panic.
00:59:12.740 And that's why exposure therapy worked.
00:59:14.360 But it turned out you didn't need to do any of that.
00:59:16.620 It wasn't counter conditioning at all.
00:59:18.460 And so then you think, well, it's fear reduction or habituation.
00:59:21.740 That was the next theory.
00:59:22.700 Habituation is just, if you take a snail, he comes out of his shell, you poke him, he
00:59:27.940 goes into his shell, then he comes out again, poke him.
00:59:30.600 It's how you tease a snail, if you, if you, you know, if you ever need to know that.
00:59:34.180 So he comes out and you tap him and you do that 10 or 15 times, the snail gets bored
00:59:39.020 and you tap him.
00:59:39.640 He just sits there.
00:59:40.420 Now he doesn't get bored because snails are probably always, always bored.
00:59:43.560 But what's happened is that you've, in some sense, you've exhausted the nervous system
00:59:49.040 representation.
00:59:50.260 That's one way of thinking about it.
00:59:51.720 Or you can think about it as a very simple form of learning.
00:59:54.080 That's habituation.
00:59:55.360 It's learn.
00:59:56.280 You learn to ignore.
00:59:58.560 And the idea then for a while was that you were teaching people to habituate to these things
01:00:02.840 they were afraid of.
01:00:03.800 But that also turned out not to be true.
01:00:05.960 What you're actually doing is teaching the person to be brave.
01:00:08.680 And that generalizes.
01:00:11.100 So what happens is they think they're all pathetic and, and, and, and fear ridden and,
01:00:16.240 and tiny and vulnerable and useless.
01:00:19.620 And, and so they're acting like that.
01:00:21.440 And then you say, well, look, this is a horrible thing you've got here.
01:00:24.940 Why don't we see if you can manage it?
01:00:26.360 And so they go through it and they think, wow, I could do that.
01:00:29.180 Ha!
01:00:29.560 I'm not as useless as I thought.
01:00:31.240 And then maybe they try 20 things like that and they think, wow, I'm a lot tougher than
01:00:34.500 I knew I was.
01:00:35.420 Maybe they stand up a little bit straighter because they're a little more dominant.
01:00:38.680 And their serotonin systems start to work again, and then they're ready to take on the
01:00:42.460 world more.
01:00:43.080 And so maybe that's why they go home and have a fight with their stupid husband.
01:00:46.240 And that doesn't necessarily make him very happy either.
01:00:48.680 And that would be a, an example of psychotherapeutic resistance from a family member.
01:00:54.420 Do you really want your person to be better?
01:00:57.160 Right?
01:00:57.400 If they're a little more assertive and a little less fearful, you might not be able to
01:01:00.360 tyrannize over them so easily.
01:01:01.960 And so it's not necessarily the case at all that you would be happy about that.
01:01:05.260 So you got to watch that sort of thing too.
01:01:07.320 And maybe the person wouldn't even be that happy about it because they're getting all
01:01:10.480 sort of secondary benefits from being, you know, neurotic and martyred because that's
01:01:15.360 a vicious weapon to be weak and useless.
01:01:17.920 If you can wield that as a weapon, it's extraordinarily effective.
01:01:21.800 So you got to watch for that sort of thing to be working against your psychotherapeutic aims
01:01:25.740 as well.
01:01:26.260 Like psychoanalysis, existentialism seeks to utilize these very conflicts as avenues to
01:01:33.620 the more profound self-understanding of man.
01:01:36.500 In many ways, existentialism is the unique and specific portrayal of the psychological
01:01:42.120 predicament of contemporary man.
01:01:43.920 Okay, so that relates back to the idea that modern people have been stripped of their archaic
01:01:52.020 belief systems and are exposed more completely to the possibility of a meaningless and painful
01:02:01.420 existence with no superordinate meaning.
01:02:07.240 Existentialism is not a school of thought nor reducible to any set of tenets.
01:02:10.760 The three writers who appear invariably on every list of existentialists, Jaspers, Heidegger,
01:02:16.080 and Sartre, are not in agreement on essentials.
01:02:19.020 Such alleged precursors as Pascal and Kierkegaard differed from all three men by being dedicated
01:02:23.740 Christians, and Pascal was a Catholic of sorts, while Kierkegaard was a Protestant's Protestant.
01:02:29.640 If, as often done, Nietzsche and Dostoevsky are included in the fold, then we must make
01:02:34.280 room for an impassioned anti-Christian, Nietzsche, and an even more fanatical Greek-Orthodox-Russian
01:02:40.480 imperialist.
01:02:41.700 That's a little hard on Dostoevsky, I would say, but by the time we consider adding
01:02:45.600 Rilke, Kafka, Ortega, and Camus, it became plain that one essential feature shared by all
01:02:50.620 these men is their perfervid individualism.
01:02:53.320 Well, so that's another element of existentialism.
01:02:56.100 The locale of action is in the individual.
01:02:58.660 And the idea is that, well, you're fated in some sense to suffer and to be vulnerable
01:03:05.760 as an individual.
01:03:06.700 And so the right unit of analysis for people is as individuals.
01:03:11.620 And again, I would say that's a primary tenet of psychotherapy.
01:03:14.680 There are family psychotherapy schools, for example, but individual psychotherapy is predicated
01:03:20.040 on the idea that the individual is the right level of analysis, the correct level of analysis.
01:03:27.500 Intense.
01:03:28.560 Intense.
01:03:29.320 Committed.
01:03:29.680 I can give you an interesting example of this.
01:03:34.020 One of the things that you guys are going to do is the, you're going to do the personality
01:03:37.680 analysis, which is part of this self-authoring suite that my colleagues and I have developed.
01:03:43.260 If you take Maps of Meaning, you would also do the future authoring exercise.
01:03:46.740 Um, and we've done that for people, mostly university students, mostly in Europe.
01:03:52.920 So I want to tell you an interesting story, and this has been replicated a couple of times.
01:03:56.700 So in the business school at, at the Rotterdam School of Management, we've tested, we put
01:04:02.180 about 4,000 students through this future authoring program that helps you make a plan for three
01:04:07.020 to five years into the future, a plan and a counter plan.
01:04:09.620 The plan is what you want to have happen.
01:04:11.380 And the counter plan is what you really do not want to have happen.
01:04:14.660 And then you make a plan to avoid the latter and to move towards the former.
01:04:19.020 And, uh, we compared their performance, three years per student's performance to the performance
01:04:24.520 of students three years before that.
01:04:26.200 So it wasn't a perfect design, although we also did a controlled study that, that had
01:04:29.560 the same results.
01:04:31.480 So when, when we started, before we started having people do this plan, here was the ranking
01:04:37.440 of performance.
01:04:38.340 So we looked at ethnicity, ethnicity and gender.
01:04:41.120 So the top performing people were Dutch national women, and they were a minority among the
01:04:47.320 business students and probably a fairly selected minority.
01:04:50.060 So maybe that's what accounted for their higher performance.
01:04:52.160 Although women tend to be outperforming men in academic institutions, pretty much all the
01:04:56.800 way from elementary school through university.
01:04:58.520 Now, which is an absolute catastrophe, but we won't talk about that now.
01:05:02.220 So, and then the next highest performing group were Dutch nationals.
01:05:06.880 And then the next highest performing group were non-Western ethnic minority women.
01:05:11.300 And the lowest performing group were West, non-Western West, non-Western ethnic minority
01:05:15.920 men.
01:05:16.400 And there were quite a few people in all those categories.
01:05:18.360 So it wasn't just even a couple dozen.
01:05:20.120 It was a couple hundred solid study.
01:05:22.480 And within two years after doing the future authoring program, the non-Western ethnic minority
01:05:27.420 men were outperforming the Dutch women.
01:05:29.580 Their academic performance went up 70% and their dropout rate plummeted.
01:05:34.720 And it really looks good for decreasing dropout rate.
01:05:37.240 And the reason I'm telling you about that is because people make the automatic assumption
01:05:41.420 that ethnic disparities in ethnic performance are necessarily a consequence of sociological
01:05:47.040 inequality, let's say, or sociological or political or economic disparity, let's say.
01:05:53.320 This was a pure psychological intervention.
01:05:55.560 It wiped out the difference completely.
01:05:56.840 And the Dutch women had actually improved slightly over that two-year period as a consequence
01:06:01.480 of doing the program as well.
01:06:03.000 So the men not only caught up to the women the way they were performing, but the way they
01:06:07.860 were performing even better in the aftermath of having a plan.
01:06:13.100 So our provisional theory, we've replicated that at a couple of places.
01:06:16.480 It works better for men.
01:06:17.780 Now that's partly because women are already doing well.
01:06:19.900 But we have a hypothesis that men are ornery enough so that unless they have their own plan,
01:06:24.040 they just won't perform.
01:06:26.420 I think it's associated with disagreeableness.
01:06:28.680 Now, we don't know that for sure because we haven't been able to disentangle that.
01:06:31.800 But it's been a very striking finding.
01:06:34.160 So anyway, so you can say, well, what's the right level of analysis when you're trying
01:06:38.540 to improve human adaptation?
01:06:42.460 It's a terrible word, but it'll do for now because I can't think of another one.
01:06:50.560 So the refusal to belong to any school of thought, the repudiation of the adequacy of
01:06:56.160 any body of beliefs, whatever, and especially of systems, and a marked dissatisfaction with
01:07:01.700 traditional philosophy as superficial, academic, and remote from life.
01:07:05.100 That's the heart of existentialism.
01:07:07.240 And I think that if you're a good psychotherapist, you take an existential approach to your clients.
01:07:14.740 And that's why listening is so important as well, because it's really useful to have a
01:07:19.200 body of theories about what might be up with a person and how you might approach the problem.
01:07:25.060 And to have a whole array of psychotherapeutic tools, so those would be the theories that
01:07:32.580 we've been discussing, opens up your, it makes you more skilled.
01:07:37.680 It gives you more to offer.
01:07:39.380 But you've got to be careful not to hammer the person into one of those schools.
01:07:43.060 Now, sometimes that's useful because if someone comes to you and they're just chaotic, they've
01:07:47.460 got no structure at all.
01:07:48.520 If you approach them as if their problems were Freudian, at least it's systematic, and they
01:07:53.820 can come out with a systematic understanding of their problem.
01:07:56.680 And it might match to some degree.
01:07:58.360 Like, you know, if you're having all sorts of anxiety and depression problems, we could
01:08:02.240 probably look into your family history and identify reasons why that might be at least
01:08:06.360 partly the case.
01:08:07.600 And so that's at least a reasonable, maybe there's multiple reasons, but at least nailing
01:08:12.220 one of them would be useful, more useful than nailing none of them.
01:08:15.960 So, but what's better is to treat the person as someone you don't know.
01:08:20.360 You have no idea what's up with this person, but you have a bunch of.
01:08:23.820 Potential tools to use.
01:08:24.900 And then you talk to them and you treat them as if they're unique.
01:08:29.140 And you figure out what is up with them specifically.
01:08:31.860 And they tell you what's up with them.
01:08:33.540 You know, they've got all sorts of cockeyed theories about who they are and what they're
01:08:36.560 doing.
01:08:36.840 And it's scattered and paradoxical and it doesn't make much sense.
01:08:40.660 And it's like a bad undergraduate essay, roughly speaking.
01:08:44.120 It's full.
01:08:44.740 Well, really, it's full of internal contradictions and it's incoherent.
01:08:48.120 But if you listen long enough, that stops being the case.
01:08:51.040 The person starts to pull themselves together with their representation and they start to
01:08:55.720 act that out properly.
01:08:56.720 And that's great.
01:08:57.940 So that's, that's, that's, you could consider that applied existentialism.
01:09:02.700 Now, the other thing, the existentialists, they're kind of romantic, I would say, but the romantics
01:09:11.300 are, are thinkers who, who deny the overarching supremacy of rationality and the intellect.
01:09:19.160 They would say that to think about life as a problem that is to be solved rationally is
01:09:24.240 insufficient because you're not a rational being or you're only partly a rational being.
01:09:28.480 You're also an emotional being and you're a motivated being and you're an embodied being.
01:09:32.860 And that's a lot different than being purely rational.
01:09:35.160 And I would say there's actually not even debate about that anymore because it's pretty
01:09:40.680 damn clear that rationality cannot really operate unless it's embodied.
01:09:46.260 So it has a, it has a set of operations that it can undertake, that it's motivated so that
01:09:52.960 there's certain things it's doing and other things that it aren't, that it isn't, that
01:09:56.420 it's emotional because emotions are low resolution, quick solutions to problems that can't be
01:10:04.120 computed.
01:10:04.940 So for example, we get in an argument and we just can't go anywhere.
01:10:08.420 And at some point you say, well, to hell with you.
01:10:10.380 I'm going home.
01:10:11.040 You're angry.
01:10:11.740 That's right.
01:10:12.320 Do you win?
01:10:12.920 Well, no, but you don't have to have the stupid argument anymore.
01:10:15.600 So the anger is actually, it's a way of popping you out of a rational framework that there's
01:10:21.100 no escaping from.
01:10:22.100 You just say, well, this is stupid and you leave.
01:10:24.620 It's like, there's nothing rational about that, except that you don't want to stand there
01:10:28.840 and argue until you starve to death.
01:10:30.960 So, so you need the emotions to give you guides in situations that you can't really compute
01:10:38.080 your way through.
01:10:39.580 So, and only inside of that does rationality operate with all of those underlying predicates
01:10:44.920 and the rationality has to be informed by the body and by the motivations and by the
01:10:49.260 emotions for it to even operate.
01:10:51.300 So the existentialists are correct about that to, to deny rationality as the fundamental
01:10:57.380 principle of orientation.
01:10:58.660 That doesn't mean that irrationality is the right approach.
01:11:01.520 It means that rationality has to be augmented by other elements of being elements of subjective
01:11:07.620 being.
01:11:07.980 And that's akin to the psychoanalytic viewpoint too, that you have to integrate your drives
01:11:13.200 and emotions, especially anger and sexuality into your personality.
01:11:16.500 And also akin to Piaget's idea that the sub-personalities, the reflexes and so forth have to be, you know,
01:11:24.080 have to be organized into a playable game so that everything is working in harmony.
01:11:28.460 So, it's a similar idea.
01:11:30.940 Now, the existentialists regard the division between object and subject as part of what's
01:11:37.020 specifically torturing people who are outside of, say, traditional systems of belief.
01:11:42.340 Because, and this is a tricky one, you know, scientists might claim that, well, the world
01:11:48.000 is material and matter is essentially dead and without spirit or, or, or psyche.
01:11:53.900 But, and it's easy as a consequence of adopting that viewpoint to think the same thing about
01:12:00.180 you, that, you know, you're ultimately a short-lived material entity in a meaningless material world.
01:12:06.140 But the weird thing about that, and this is worth thinking about, is that if you're a
01:12:10.180 scientist, you throw away this objective as soon as you start operating the science.
01:12:16.200 Because the idea is, well, you'll watch something according to a procedure and you'll watch it
01:12:20.960 and you'll watch it and you'll watch it, and we're only going to allow what all of you
01:12:25.340 experience the same way to be real.
01:12:28.600 Well, you throw out the subjective right at the beginning.
01:12:31.120 And then you, so you can't say, well, there's no subject left in what results.
01:12:36.040 It's, it's the reason there's nothing left in what results is because you threw it out to
01:12:39.480 begin with.
01:12:40.340 Now, the question is, what should you do with it?
01:12:42.680 When the existentialists say, well, you're alive.
01:12:45.280 You can't just dispense with it.
01:12:47.280 The fact that you're alive is the critical issue.
01:12:49.860 And so you can use science as a tool, which is proper, but if you use it as a way of describing
01:12:57.140 being, well, then you fall into this subject object dichotomy.
01:13:00.540 And underneath that is nihilism or the proclivity for totalitarianism.
01:13:04.540 So they don't like that idea.
01:13:07.340 They don't like the idea of compartmentalization for people either, but we won't go into that
01:13:12.920 to any great degree.
01:13:13.880 Okay, now I'm going to read you some things from some of the people that I described and
01:13:22.780 we'll take them apart a little bit.
01:13:24.740 Things I've been collecting for a long period of time.
01:13:27.680 So this is Nietzsche, Dostoevsky and Kierkegaard.
01:13:32.080 And I called them prophets of the dawning age.
01:13:34.420 And Kierkegaard, the Danish philosopher and writer, was really the first person who wrote
01:13:40.620 about phenomena like anxiety, dread, more particularly.
01:13:46.460 So he was the first person who sort of conceptualized it as a, even as something akin to a scientific
01:13:52.400 phenomena, something that had existence.
01:13:54.220 And he wrote very much about that.
01:13:55.760 Nietzsche, of course, was the great prophet of the death of God and, and a prognosticator
01:14:04.080 of what the psychological consequences of the demise of this classic meaning structure
01:14:10.640 that was unbelievably ancient.
01:14:12.920 What, what the collapse of that actually meant to make you, you can think about Christianity
01:14:17.060 and then maybe you could think about the Judaism that was embedded in as even an older system.
01:14:21.580 But that Judaism emerged out of the Middle East, partly out of Egypt, which was enmeshed
01:14:27.300 in even an older belief system.
01:14:29.260 And that was enmeshed in something absolutely prehistoric that, and so it was a continuum
01:14:35.620 in some sense of adaptive structures that, that reigned supreme essentially right until,
01:14:42.800 well, right until the scientific revolution.
01:14:44.560 And so we're outside of that now we're in a different paradigm and there are consequences
01:14:48.680 to that.
01:14:49.160 And that was the sort of thing that Nietzsche was concentrating on.
01:14:52.520 And he actually, in some ways made it worse because Nietzsche was an incredible critic
01:14:56.560 of Christianity.
01:14:57.240 I mean, he wrote a book called the Antichrist and all he did in that book brilliantly was
01:15:02.500 take dogmatic Christianity to task.
01:15:05.660 Now, one of the things he did say, which is very interesting was that Christianity died
01:15:10.120 at its own hand.
01:15:11.080 So his notion was that because Christianity, say Judeo-Christianity had elevated truth to
01:15:18.080 the highest virtue, that that search for truth then ended up undermining the axioms of Christianity
01:15:24.800 itself.
01:15:25.360 So it developed a tool, an unbelievably powerful analytic tool, and then used it to, well, it's
01:15:32.800 like we were sitting on a branch and sawed it off with the saw that we had invented.
01:15:36.440 And then everyone fell and Dostoevsky, well, Dostoevsky was a Orthodox Christian and, and, but
01:15:43.680 an also an extraordinarily brilliant man.
01:15:45.580 And he was absolutely terrified at a, at what the consequences of the dissolution of that
01:15:50.860 belief system was going to mean for Russia in particular.
01:15:54.000 And Dostoevsky explored nihilism great, you know, to great degree in notes from underground
01:15:59.720 and in crime and punishment, because the murderer in crime and punishment is essentially nihilistic.
01:16:04.560 He's a nihilistic narcissist, roughly speaking.
01:16:07.620 And that's what compels him to commit murder.
01:16:10.360 But Dostoevsky also wrote a book called the devils, which is an amazing book where he predicted
01:16:15.580 that the death of Chris, the sudden death of Christianity in the Soviet, in Russia was going
01:16:21.240 to produce the catastrophic totalitarian horrors of the Soviet Union.
01:16:25.080 And he predicted that in like 1880, 1890, which was 30 years before the revolution.
01:16:30.300 Absolutely remarkable.
01:16:33.220 Nietzsche, a genius.
01:16:35.940 Nietzsche was a full professor when that was impossible.
01:16:38.140 I think when he was 24 and that just never happened.
01:16:41.560 And, and so his, his extraordinary genius was recognized very early.
01:16:46.540 Uh, and, uh, but he was also extraordinarily ill, sick physically.
01:16:51.460 His dad died at about 40 of something they called softening of the brain, which was actually
01:16:57.220 a fairly common diagnostic category back then.
01:16:59.900 No one really knows what it was.
01:17:01.580 Some people have suggested that he had syphilis from one sexual encounter or that it was hereditary,
01:17:08.180 but nobody really knows.
01:17:09.580 But anyways, his father died young and Nietzsche died very young as well.
01:17:13.040 He went, he was very, he was mentally incapacitated for the last few years of his life and, and
01:17:19.100 died and died after that.
01:17:22.440 And so he could only serve as a professor for a while because he couldn't see very well.
01:17:26.820 And he was always sick.
01:17:27.860 And he ended up living in this little village, I believe in Switzerland, where he wrote his
01:17:32.360 books and he could only write a paragraph or two at a time without, before he became very
01:17:37.000 ill.
01:17:39.000 And so his writing is extraordinarily condensed and dense and brilliant, brilliant.
01:17:42.160 And he's, I think he gave away, I think beyond good and evil, which is his masterpiece.
01:17:47.680 Although he had many, I think it only sold 500 copies in his lifetime.
01:17:51.960 So he, he also believed that he was only writing for himself.
01:17:54.940 He didn't really know if, if anybody was ever going to pay any attention to what he said,
01:17:58.300 but they certainly did.
01:17:59.240 So I would say he was, he ended up being certainly one of the 10 most influential people of the
01:18:05.600 late 19th and early 20th century.
01:18:11.100 This is an example of his writing of what is great.
01:18:13.980 One must either be silent or speak with greatness.
01:18:18.300 With greatness.
01:18:19.120 That means cynically and with innocence.
01:18:21.720 What I relate is the history of the next two centuries.
01:18:24.940 I describe what is coming, what can no longer come differently.
01:18:29.980 The advent of nihilism, our whole European culture is moving from some time now, moving
01:18:37.660 for some time now with a tortured tension that is growing from decade to decade as towards
01:18:43.120 a catastrophe, restlessly, violently, headlong, like a river that wants to reach the end that
01:18:49.220 no longer reflects.
01:18:50.160 That's afraid to reflect he that speaks here has conversely done nothing so far, but to reflect
01:18:56.960 as a philosopher and solitary by instinct, who has found his advantage in standing aside
01:19:02.980 outside.
01:19:06.740 Why has the advent of nihilism become necessary?
01:19:11.400 Sorry about that.
01:19:12.580 Because the values we have had hitherto, thus draw their final consequence.
01:19:17.360 Because nihilism represents the ultimate logical conclusion of our great values and ideals.
01:19:26.160 Because we must experience nihilism before we can find out what value those values really
01:19:32.300 had.
01:19:33.360 We require at some time new values.
01:19:35.840 Nihilism stands at the door.
01:19:38.740 Whence comes this uncanniest of all guests?
01:19:42.260 Point of departure.
01:19:43.380 This is a good example of how Nietzsche, he, Nietzsche said he philosophized with a hammer
01:19:49.180 and, and it's, it's, it means that he spent hours, days, weeks, months, concentrating on
01:19:58.180 how to make a single sentence as packed with significance as he could possibly manage.
01:20:03.460 And so Nietzsche said, it's the best arrogant statement I've ever read.
01:20:07.160 He said, I can say in a sentence, what it takes other people, a whole book to say.
01:20:16.660 And then he said, what, what they can't say in a whole book.
01:20:20.260 That's pretty good.
01:20:21.200 Eh?
01:20:21.520 It's like the first one's a real like blow to the solar plexus.
01:20:26.060 And the second one is like, I can top that with no problem.
01:20:29.120 Point of departure.
01:20:30.600 It is an error to consider social distress or physiological degeneration or the corruption
01:20:35.240 of all things as the cause of nihilism.
01:20:38.780 That's a critique of the later Freudian ideas right there.
01:20:41.720 And then, because what Nietzsche says would look, if things are going wrong for you, or
01:20:45.660 if they're going wrong in general, it's really straightforward to say that, well, there's
01:20:50.020 something wrong with society.
01:20:51.100 That would be social distress, or there's some physiological degeneration.
01:20:55.040 There's something wrong with you physically, or everything is just corrupted.
01:21:00.000 Being itself is corrupt, which is a classic explanation, right?
01:21:04.200 You hear that all the time.
01:21:05.220 You think, well, people are suffering for one reason or another.
01:21:07.680 Well, why?
01:21:08.480 Well, there's something wrong biologically, or society is corrupted and everything is
01:21:12.500 unfair.
01:21:13.280 Nietzsche says, no, no, you're not going to get away with that.
01:21:15.820 First, he says, ours is the most honest and compassionate age comparing modern civilization,
01:21:21.540 let's say, to everything that has come before it.
01:21:23.860 So speaking of corruption is not something you can do lightly.
01:21:27.180 And then he says, and this is remarkable, distress, whether psychic, physical, or intellectual,
01:21:32.600 need not at all produce nihilism.
01:21:35.000 That is the radical rejection of value, meaning, and desirability.
01:21:38.100 Such distress always permits a variety of interpretations.
01:21:42.620 Well, that's a rough one.
01:21:44.280 It's like, well, you had a rough childhood.
01:21:46.860 Well, someone else who had your childhood might not have drawn those conclusions.
01:21:50.560 So here's an example.
01:21:51.500 You know that most people who abuse children were abused by children, as children, right?
01:21:57.560 But most people who were abused as children do not grow up to abuse children.
01:22:03.300 And you can figure that out arithmetically.
01:22:05.560 Because if it was, if it was the case that everyone abused, grew up to abuse in about
01:22:10.520 four generations, everyone would be being beat to death in childhood as a matter of course,
01:22:14.780 because it would spread exponentially.
01:22:16.360 That isn't what happens.
01:22:17.580 It dampens.
01:22:18.340 And why is that?
01:22:19.680 Well, if you're bullied as a child, we could say, well, you could draw two conclusions,
01:22:23.280 causal conclusions.
01:22:24.800 Being bullied caused me to be a bully.
01:22:26.700 Fair enough, man.
01:22:27.640 That's an understandable story.
01:22:29.180 How about being bullied caused me not ever to be a bully?
01:22:33.280 Well, why is that any less reasonable a conclusion?
01:22:36.720 It's frequently one that people draw.
01:22:38.460 And since the two opposite conclusions can be drawn from the same set of experiences,
01:22:42.500 you cannot say that the experiences caused the conclusions.
01:22:46.400 And that's Nietzsche's critique of, say, sociological or psychological determinism with regards to
01:22:51.820 the optimism or pessimism, pessimism of your worldview.
01:22:56.460 Such distress always permits a variety of interpretations.
01:23:00.640 Right.
01:23:01.700 Rather, it is in one particular interpretation, the Christian moral one, that nihilism is rooted.
01:23:06.660 The end of Christianity at the hands of its own morality.
01:23:10.200 That was the development of the sense of truth, which cannot be replaced, which turns against
01:23:14.800 the Christian God.
01:23:15.860 The sense of truthfulness, highly developed by Christianity, is nauseated by the falseness
01:23:21.120 and mendaciousness of all Christian interpretations of the world and of history.
01:23:25.760 A remarkable claim.
01:23:27.420 And then this one's even worse.
01:23:28.780 It's absolutely brilliant, I think.
01:23:30.960 Rebound from God is truth to the fanatical faith.
01:23:34.980 All is false.
01:23:36.080 That's nihilism.
01:23:36.920 An act of Buddhism.
01:23:38.400 And Nietzsche, Nietzsche explains that.
01:23:41.220 And this is, you know, I talked to you guys a little bit about the idea of the game and
01:23:45.380 the metagame, you know, the metagame being the set of all games.
01:23:49.060 Nietzsche draws on a conception like that for this criticism, because he says, when you lose
01:23:53.820 faith in something, and that happens to people very frequently.
01:23:57.620 When you lose faith in something, because you're human and because you can abstract, it's
01:24:02.200 not only that you lose faith in that thing, that person, that system, the fact that you've
01:24:07.940 lost faith in that indicates to you that it's possible to lose faith in anything, in
01:24:13.100 every system, in every person, once burnt, forever shy.
01:24:18.680 And that's nihilism.
01:24:20.180 The fact that one thing can collapse on you can make you completely unwilling to manifest
01:24:25.420 any faith in anything whatsoever.
01:24:27.280 And that's the emergence of nihilism.
01:24:30.920 The end of the moral interpretation of the world, which no longer has any sanction after
01:24:35.400 it has tried to escape into beyond, leads to nihilism.
01:24:39.180 Another critique of Christianity embedded in that sentence, he said, well, Christianity needed
01:24:44.120 to be destroyed even by itself, because it puts so much emphasis on the afterworld, on
01:24:49.540 heaven, that it forgot completely about life now and here.
01:24:53.100 And because of that needed to be destroyed because life here is sufficiently rife with
01:24:58.680 suffering.
01:24:59.060 So it needs to be addressed and people, it's wrong, it's incorrect to inform people that
01:25:06.400 they should wait for some hereafter and justify their suffering in that manner.
01:25:10.960 And so he would say in some sense that even the idea of compassion, which is central to
01:25:15.820 Christianity is also one of the reasons why Christianity collapsed under its own weight.
01:25:20.700 The untenability of one interpretation of the world upon which a tremendous amount of energy
01:25:25.920 has been lavished, awakens the suspicion that all interpretations of the world are false.
01:25:32.600 Well, so what?
01:25:33.260 You might say, well, so what if you don't believe in anything?
01:25:35.840 Well, I would take a neuropsychological approach to that.
01:25:41.060 Most of the positive emotion, positive emotions, dopaminergic.
01:25:44.640 It's a consequence of the manifestation of the exploratory system that has its roots in the
01:25:48.780 hypothalamus, a very ancient part of the brain.
01:25:51.040 It's the same part of the brain that cocaine and heroin, all the drugs that people like
01:25:55.020 to abuse, the drugs that are exciting, not the drugs that are calming.
01:25:59.660 It activates that system.
01:26:01.340 It's the system that's activated when something exciting happens to you or when something novel
01:26:05.240 happens to you.
01:26:05.960 But more importantly, it's the system that's activated when you're pursuing a goal and you
01:26:12.060 see that you're moving towards the goal.
01:26:13.980 So what does that mean?
01:26:15.940 No goal, no positive emotion.
01:26:20.020 So you say, well, if you have nothing to believe in, if you have no value structure left, because
01:26:23.820 the value structure says this is better than this, no value structure, no positive emotion.
01:26:30.980 Well, and so what's the problem with that?
01:26:33.280 It's easy to get rid of your positive emotion.
01:26:35.540 That's not a problem because it's rather fragile and tenuous.
01:26:38.520 Try getting rid of your negative emotion.
01:26:40.980 Good luck.
01:26:41.680 That is not going to happen.
01:26:43.020 So what happens is that if your value system collapses, then all you're left with is negative
01:26:48.140 emotion.
01:26:49.400 And that is not a good thing.
01:26:50.620 Well, so Nietzsche would say, well, why do people flee into the arms of totalitarians
01:26:54.280 from the specter of nihilism?
01:26:56.300 It's because totalitarian certainty, even though it involves slavery and the sacrifice of reason
01:27:02.240 and intellect, totalitarian certainty might be preferable to nihilistic chaos.
01:27:08.680 Well, it's a big problem.
01:27:10.480 It's a, it's a, and he said, well, I'm telling the story of the next 200 years.
01:27:14.440 It's like, well, ever since then, for the entire 20th century, we bounced between nihilism
01:27:20.940 and totalitarianism with deaths on both sides, constant.
01:27:24.260 And we're still doing exactly the same thing.
01:27:28.320 Dostoevsky.
01:27:28.720 Dostoevsky was a big influence on Nietzsche.
01:27:31.900 And it's very interesting to read them in parallel because Nietzsche, Dostoevsky is, of course,
01:27:36.860 a dramatist and Nietzsche is a philosopher.
01:27:38.640 And it's almost as if Dostoevsky wrote the drama and Nietzsche provided the philosophical
01:27:43.980 commentary.
01:27:45.000 They're very, very powerful to read together.
01:27:47.180 This is from Notes from Underground.
01:27:50.840 It's a very short book about this character who is a bureaucrat, nasty sort of bureaucrat.
01:27:56.040 He knows he's a nasty sort of bureaucrat.
01:27:58.020 All he does, he spends his whole life trying to make life more miserable for people because
01:28:02.000 he's so resentful and, and crushed and weak.
01:28:05.380 And so he, he just not did nothing but abuse his bureaucratic position and used his trivial
01:28:10.580 bit of power to lord it over people.
01:28:12.360 He gets a little bit of an inheritance and, and quits.
01:28:15.260 And this is his confession notes from underground.
01:28:17.600 He's the underground man.
01:28:19.020 It's a brilliant book.
01:28:20.280 It's viciously funny.
01:28:21.280 And it's so psychologically alive.
01:28:23.500 If you're, if you're interested in psychology, it's a spectacular book and it's only about a
01:28:28.220 hundred pages long.
01:28:29.400 Anyways, he's arrogant and nihilistic and resentful.
01:28:32.360 And what he does is he tries to justify his life to himself and does a very poor job of
01:28:37.140 it, even though he's trying to be honest, there's a lot of honesty in it.
01:28:40.160 At one point he meets a woman who's been forced out onto the streets because there weren't very
01:28:45.020 many options for women in the Victorian period who, who had fallen afoul of economic necessity.
01:28:51.440 And he basically, in a fit of false messianism offers to save her, which he can't because
01:28:57.860 he's completely useless.
01:28:58.940 He can't save himself even, but he offers to save her.
01:29:01.780 And she more or less accepts.
01:29:03.520 And then when she shows up having sacrificed a tremendous amount to do so, he basically
01:29:08.780 tells her that he was toying with her and joking and, and, and, and makes her situation
01:29:15.500 far worse than it was to begin with.
01:29:17.240 It's a brilliant book because you see, he repents.
01:29:20.880 He says what he's like.
01:29:21.880 He's this horrible person.
01:29:23.120 He knows it.
01:29:24.080 Weak and resentful.
01:29:25.140 And then he confesses.
01:29:26.400 And then he says, well, now I've confessed.
01:29:27.980 I'm a better person.
01:29:29.120 And then he tries to do something good, but he hasn't changed a bloody bit, not a bit.
01:29:32.900 The confession was just to make himself feel better.
01:29:35.760 And so he offers to help someone and pulls them right into the right under the water where
01:29:40.500 they drown.
01:29:41.280 It's an amazing book.
01:29:42.420 And this is from notes from underground.
01:29:44.880 In short, one may say anything about the history of the world, anything that might enter the
01:29:50.240 most disordered imagination.
01:29:52.540 The only thing one can't say is that it's rational.
01:29:55.200 The very word sticks in one's throat.
01:29:57.340 This is a good example of the existential criticism of the idea of rationality.
01:30:01.440 Dostoevsky says, well, lots of things operate according to rational principles.
01:30:05.260 But let's think about history for a minute, especially from, from the perspective of a
01:30:10.280 thinking and feeling being history is a, is a slaughterhouse.
01:30:14.920 It's a catastrophe.
01:30:16.520 And, and how would you ever consider that something rational?
01:30:20.140 Dostoevsky's point is rationality fails in its analysis of something as complex and terrible
01:30:25.660 as history.
01:30:28.040 The only thing one can't say is that it's rational.
01:30:30.680 The very word sticks in one's throat.
01:30:32.180 In short, one may, sorry.
01:30:36.700 And indeed, this is the odd thing that is continually happening.
01:30:42.100 There are continually turning up in life, moral and rational persons, sages and lovers
01:30:47.380 of humanity who make it their object to live all their lives as morally and rationally as
01:30:52.080 possible.
01:30:53.940 So to be, to be, so to speak, a light to their neighbors, simply in order to show them that
01:30:58.720 it is possible to live morally and rationally in this world.
01:31:02.980 And yet we all know that those very people sooner or later have been false to themselves,
01:31:07.480 playing some queer trick, often a most unseemly one.
01:31:11.820 Now I ask you, what can be expected of man since he is a being endowed with such strange
01:31:18.760 qualities?
01:31:19.300 This is a criticism of utopianism.
01:31:24.160 That's what he's trying to do, right?
01:31:25.600 Because the utopian ideas were starting to emerge in Russia at about this point in the
01:31:29.020 1880s.
01:31:29.720 The idea that you could reorganize society so that material privation would disappear and
01:31:34.900 that as a consequence, the, the paradise would be ushered in.
01:31:38.640 Well, Dostoevsky was no fool.
01:31:40.380 He knew perfectly well, a, that that was never going to happen.
01:31:42.900 But even more importantly, that if you gave people exactly what they wanted, even what
01:31:48.720 they needed, there's no reason whatsoever to presume that that would make them any more
01:31:54.700 sane than, than they already are now.
01:31:58.480 And then he takes that further because he says, well, you can give people cake and, and
01:32:03.500 material goods until they're satiated and they'll still be ungrateful and insane.
01:32:08.380 And you might think, well, that's pessimistic.
01:32:10.200 But then he says, well, wait a minute, what makes you think that that insanity isn't exactly
01:32:14.720 what's valuable about people?
01:32:16.280 What makes you think you would ever want to take that away?
01:32:18.440 And that's the case that he makes shower upon him.
01:32:21.520 Every earthly blessing, drown him in a sea of happiness so that nothing but bubbles of
01:32:26.840 bliss can be seen on the surface.
01:32:28.680 Give him economic prosperity such that he should have nothing else to do, but sleep, eat cakes
01:32:35.180 and busy himself with the continuation of his species.
01:32:38.480 And even then, out of sheer ingratitude, man would play you some nasty trick.
01:32:46.260 He would even risk his cakes and would deliberately desire the most fatal rubbish, the most
01:32:51.200 uneconomical absurdity, simply to introduce into all this positive, good sense, his fatal,
01:32:57.820 fantastic element.
01:32:58.480 It is just his fantastic dreams, his vulgar folly that he will desire to retain, simply
01:33:05.400 in order to prove to himself, as though that were so necessary, that men are still men and
01:33:11.060 not the keys of a piano, which the laws of nature threaten to control so completely that soon
01:33:16.820 one will be able to desire nothing but by the calendar.
01:33:19.860 And that is not all.
01:33:23.140 If even if man really were nothing but a piano key, even if this was proved to him by natural
01:33:28.080 science and mathematics, even then he would not become reasonable, but would purposely do
01:33:32.480 something perverse out of simple ingratitude, simply to gain his point.
01:33:38.280 And if he does not find means, he will contrive destruction and chaos, will contrive suffering of
01:33:43.920 all sorts, just to gain his point.
01:33:47.080 He will launch a curse upon the world.
01:33:49.340 And as as man is the only animal that can curse, it's his privilege, the primary distinction
01:33:54.840 between him and other animals.
01:33:56.580 Maybe by his curse alone, he will attain his object.
01:34:00.040 That is to convince himself that he's a man and not a piano key.
01:34:04.180 And if you say that all of this too can be calculated and tabulated chaos and darkness and
01:34:09.680 curses so that the mere possibility of calculating it all beforehand would stop it all and reason
01:34:15.800 would reassert itself, then man would purposely go bad in order to be rid of reason and gain
01:34:20.600 his point.
01:34:21.740 I believe in it.
01:34:22.660 I answer for it.
01:34:24.360 For the whole work of man really seems to consist in nothing but proving to himself every minute
01:34:28.720 that he's a man and not a piano key.
01:34:30.320 It might be at the cost of his skin.
01:34:32.980 It might be by cannibalism.
01:34:34.340 And this being so, can one help being tempted to rejoice that it has not yet come off and that
01:34:41.120 desire still depends on something we don't know?
01:34:44.300 You will scream at me, that is, if you condescend to do so, that no one is touching my free will,
01:34:50.120 that all they're concerned with is that my will should of itself, of its own free will,
01:34:54.340 coincide with my own normal interests, with the laws of nature and arithmetic.
01:34:59.860 Good heavens, gentlemen, what sort of free will is left?
01:35:03.100 When we come to tabulation and arithmetic, when it will all be a matter of twice two
01:35:08.340 makes four, twice two makes four without my will, as if free will meant that.
01:35:16.960 It's brilliant, I think.
01:35:18.380 It's one of the most remarkable criticisms of utopianism I've ever read.
01:35:23.280 It's like, and it's so, it's so intelligent.
01:35:25.660 It's like, what makes you think that if you had everything you asked for, that that would
01:35:28.780 satisfy you?
01:35:30.280 What, what if being dissatisfied is part of what satisfies you?
01:35:34.780 What if the fact that you have to have limits and need them and that there's an element of
01:35:38.540 insanity in the world and that there's an element of insecurity and vulnerability?
01:35:42.640 What if that's what you need?
01:35:44.120 What if it's what you want?
01:35:45.520 It's what, what if that's what gives your life meaning?
01:35:48.440 You're going to be like a lion after it's eaten a zebra and do nothing but sleep.
01:35:51.620 It hardly constitutes the appropriate human paradise.
01:35:54.660 What makes people think that merely providing economic security would be sufficient?
01:36:00.240 Who wants that?
01:36:01.640 It's what you, it's what you offer a cow in its pen so that it remains calm and fat.
01:36:08.200 It's not something for human beings.
01:36:10.100 And that's Nietzsche's fundamental point.
01:36:12.280 And he formulated that, what, 40 years before the damn Soviet revolution, when that sort of
01:36:17.140 utopianism was put into practice with absolutely catastrophic consequences.
01:36:21.860 Kierkegaard.
01:36:26.220 It is now about four years ago that I got the notion of wanting to try my luck as an author.
01:36:33.240 I remember it quite clearly.
01:36:36.200 It was on a Sunday.
01:36:37.960 Yeah, that's it.
01:36:38.640 A Sunday afternoon.
01:36:39.520 I was seated at usual out of doors at the cafe in the Fredericksburg garden.
01:36:43.920 I had been a student for half a score of years.
01:36:47.300 Although never lazy, all my activity, nevertheless, was like a curse.
01:36:51.860 A glittering inactivity.
01:36:53.440 A kind of occupation for which I still have a great partiality.
01:36:56.800 And for which perhaps I even have a little genius.
01:37:00.060 I read much.
01:37:01.820 Spending the remainder of the day idling and thinking.
01:37:06.620 Or thinking and idling.
01:37:08.240 But that was all it came to.
01:37:09.720 So I sat there and smoked my cigar until I lapsed into thought.
01:37:13.700 Among other thoughts, I remember these.
01:37:15.400 You were going on, I said to myself, to become an old man without being anything.
01:37:20.340 And without really undertaking to do anything.
01:37:23.560 On the other hand, wherever you look about you in literature and in life, you see the celebrated names and figures.
01:37:29.740 The precious and much heralded men who are coming into prominence and are much talked about.
01:37:34.080 The many benefactors of the age.
01:37:35.960 Who know how to benefit mankind by making life easier and easier.
01:37:40.820 Some by railways.
01:37:42.180 Some by omnibuses and steamboats.
01:37:44.300 Others by the telegraph.
01:37:45.800 Others by easily apprehended compendiums and short recitals of everything worth knowing.
01:37:50.480 And finally, the true benefactors of the age.
01:37:53.040 Who make spiritual existence in virtue of thought easier and easier.
01:37:57.180 Yet more and more significant.
01:37:59.600 And what are you doing?
01:38:00.660 Here, my soliloquy was interrupted because my cigarette was smoked out and a new one had to be lit.
01:38:06.180 So I smoked again and then suddenly this thought flashed through my mind.
01:38:09.940 You must do something.
01:38:12.100 But in as much as with your limited capacities, it will be impossible to make anything easier than it has already become.
01:38:19.780 You must, with the same humanitarian enthusiasm as the others, undertake to make something harder.
01:38:26.760 This notion pleased me immensely.
01:38:28.460 And at the same time, it flattered me to think that I, like the rest of them, would be loved and esteemed by the whole community.
01:38:34.500 For when all combine in every way, to make everything easier, there remains only one possible danger.
01:38:41.780 Namely, that the ease becomes so great that it becomes altogether too great.
01:38:47.680 Then there's only one want left.
01:38:49.660 Though it is not yet a felt want.
01:38:51.580 When people will want difficulty.
01:38:53.320 Out of love for mankind and out of despair at my embarrassing situation, seeing that I had accomplished nothing and was unable to make anything easier than it had already been made.
01:39:04.760 And moved by a genuine interest in those who make everything easy, I conceived it as my task to create difficulties everywhere.
01:39:12.320 Everywhere.
01:39:17.160 Kierkegaard again.
01:39:17.920 There's a view of life which conceives that where the crowd is, there's also the truth.
01:39:27.120 And that in truth itself, there is need of having the crowd on its side.
01:39:32.060 There's another view of life which conceives that wherever there is a crowd, there is immediately untruth.
01:39:38.040 So that to consider for a moment, the extreme example, even if every individual, each for himself in private, were to be in possession of the truth.
01:39:48.760 Yet in the case, they were all to get together in a crowd, a crowd to which any sort of decisive significance is attributed to voting, noisy, audible crowd.
01:39:56.840 Untruth would at once be in evidence for a crowd is the untruth in a godly sense.
01:40:06.320 It is true.
01:40:06.940 Eternally, Christianly, as St. Paul says that only one attains the goal, which is not meant in a comparative sense because a comparison takes others into account.
01:40:17.120 It means that every man can be that one God helping him therein, but only one attains the goal.
01:40:22.240 And again, this means that every man should be careful about having to do with the others and essentially should talk only with God and with himself for only one attains the goal.
01:40:34.080 And again, this means that man or to be a man is akin to deity.
01:40:39.200 In a world, in a worldly and temporal sense, it will be said by the man of bustle, sociability and amicableness, how unreasonable that only one attains the goal.
01:40:50.360 For it is far more likely that many, by the strength of united effort, should attain the goal.
01:40:55.160 And when we are many, success is more certain and it is easier for each man severally.
01:41:01.280 True enough.
01:41:02.920 It is far more likely.
01:41:05.720 And it is true also with respect to all earthly and material goods.
01:41:09.420 If it is allowed to have its way, this becomes the only true point of view.
01:41:13.060 And it does away with God in eternity and with man's kinship with deity.
01:41:16.660 It does away with it or it transforms it into a fable and puts in its place the modern, or we might rather say the old pagan notion that to be a man is to belong to a race endowed with reason, to belong to it as a specimen.
01:41:31.800 So that the race or species is higher than the individual, which is to say that there are no individuals, but only specimens.
01:41:39.800 But eternity, which arches over and high above the temporal, tranquil as the starry vault at night and God in heaven, who in the bliss of that sublime tranquility holds in survey without the least sense of dizziness at such a height, those countless multitudes of men and knows each single individual by name.
01:42:00.300 He, the great examiner, says that only one attains the goal.
01:42:04.580 Nietzsche, a similar comment, the traveler.
01:42:13.160 A traveler who had seen many countries and peoples and several continents was asked what human traits he had found everywhere.
01:42:20.220 And he answered, men are inclined to laziness.
01:42:24.360 Some will feel, he might have said with greater justice, they're all timid.
01:42:29.360 They hide behind customs and opinions.
01:42:31.920 At bottom, every human being knows very well that he is in this world just once as something unique.
01:42:40.100 And that no accident, however strange, will throw together a second time into a unity, such a curious and diffuse plurality.
01:42:49.220 He knows it.
01:42:50.820 But he hides it like a bad conscience.
01:42:53.700 Why?
01:42:53.940 From fear of his neighbor, who insists on convention and veils himself with it.
01:43:00.500 But what is it that compels the individual human being to fear his neighbor, to think and act, heard fashion, and not to be glad of himself?
01:43:09.720 A sense of shame, perhaps, in a few rare cases.
01:43:13.760 In the vast majority, it is the desire for comfort.
01:43:17.620 Inertia, in short, that inclination to laziness of which the traveler spoke.
01:43:21.240 He is right.
01:43:22.720 Men are even lazier than they are timid.
01:43:25.340 And what they fear most is the troubles with which any unconditional honesty and nudity with burden.
01:43:35.340 Only artists hate this slovenly life and borrowed manners and loosely fitting opinions and unveil the secret.
01:43:41.560 Everyone's bad conscience.
01:43:44.140 The principle that every human being is a unique wonder.
01:43:46.440 They dare to show us the human being as he is, down to the last muscle, himself and himself alone.
01:43:54.900 Even more, that in this rigorous consistency of his uniqueness, he is beautiful and worth contemplating,
01:44:01.000 as novel and incredible as every work of nature, and by no means dull.
01:44:05.540 When a great thinker despises men, it's their laziness that he despises.
01:44:12.900 For it is on account of this that they have the appearance of factory products and seem indifferent and unworthy of companionship or instruction.
01:44:21.760 The human being, who does not wish to belong to the mass, must merely cease being comfortable with himself.
01:44:28.020 Let him follow his conscience, which shouts at him,
01:44:31.340 Be yourself.
01:44:35.180 What you are at present doing, opining, and desiring,
01:44:40.380 that's not really you.
01:44:45.400 And why are you so firmly and triumphantly convinced that only the normal and the positive,
01:44:51.480 in other words, only what is conducive to welfare,
01:44:54.800 is for the advantage of man?
01:44:56.540 Is not reason and error as regards advantage?
01:44:58.980 Does not man perhaps love something besides well-being?
01:45:05.080 Perhaps he is just as fond of suffering.
01:45:08.200 Perhaps suffering is just as great a benefit to him as well-being.
01:45:11.900 Man is sometimes extraordinarily, passionately in love with suffering.
01:45:16.520 And that is a fact.
01:45:17.980 There's no need to appeal to universal history to prove that.
01:45:20.800 Ask yourself if you're a man and have lived it all.
01:45:23.460 As far as my personal opinion is concerned,
01:45:26.320 to care only for well-being seems to me positively ill-bred.
01:45:32.220 Whether it's good or bad,
01:45:34.520 it's sometimes very pleasant, too, to smash things.
01:45:37.460 I hold no brook, brief, for suffering, nor for well-being either.
01:45:41.940 I'm standing for my caprice,
01:45:44.360 and for its being guaranteed to me when necessary.
01:45:47.220 Suffering would be out of place at amusement parks.
01:45:50.160 For instance, I know that.
01:45:51.540 In the Palace of Crystal, it is unthinkable.
01:45:57.640 Now, in the late 1800s, there was a world exhibition in London.
01:46:02.840 And they erected a Palace of Crystal at the World Exhibition.
01:46:06.400 And it was the first building made out of glass and steel.
01:46:09.440 And so it was a representation of the dawning materialist utopia.
01:46:13.360 And that's the Palace of Crystal that Dostoevsky is referring to.
01:46:16.480 In the Palace of Crystal, suffering is unthinkable.
01:46:19.620 Suffering means doubt, negation.
01:46:21.840 And what would be the good of a Palace of Crystal if there could be any doubt about it?
01:46:26.400 And yet, I think man will never renounce real suffering.
01:46:29.320 That is, destruction and chaos.
01:46:32.320 Why?
01:46:33.620 Suffering is the sole origin of consciousness.
01:46:36.100 Though I did lay it down at the beginning that consciousness is the greatest misfortune for man.
01:46:43.560 Yet, I know man prizes it and would not give it up for any satisfaction.
01:46:47.920 We are now in a position to see the crucial significance of the existential psychotherapy movement.
01:46:55.620 It is precisely the movement that protests against the tendency to identify psychotherapy with technical reason.
01:47:02.140 We have seen that Kierkegaard and Nietzsche, as well as the representatives of the existential cultural movement following them, we have seen that, yes, not only contributed far-reaching and penetrating psychological insights, which in themselves form a significant contribution to anyone seeking scientifically to understand modern psychological problems, but also did something else.
01:47:22.880 They placed these insights on an ontological basis, namely, the study of the individual as the being who has these particular problems.
01:47:34.080 They believed that it was absolutely necessary that this be done, and that they feared that the subordination of reason to technical problems would ultimately mean the making of man over in the image of the machine.
01:47:48.540 That's it.
01:47:51.140 We'll see you on Thursday.
01:47:52.880 You're going to have to stop doing that.
01:48:00.740 Someone accused me on YouTube of dubbing in applause at the end of my lectures.
01:48:07.040 Bye.
01:48:07.860 Bye.
01:48:12.860 Bye.
01:48:13.460 Bye.
01:48:14.900 Bye.
01:48:15.140 Bye.
01:48:16.960 Bye.
01:48:17.400 Bye.
01:48:18.700 Bye.
01:48:18.980 Bye.
01:48:19.120 Bye.
01:48:19.340 Bye.
01:48:20.820 Bye.
01:48:23.260 Bye.
01:48:24.800 Bye.
01:48:25.900 Bye.
01:48:26.940 Bye.
01:48:27.000 Bye.
01:48:27.340 Bye.
01:48:29.040 Bye.
01:48:29.140 Bye.
01:48:30.200 Bye.
01:48:30.580 Bye.
01:48:31.020 Bye.
01:48:31.420 Bye.
01:48:31.520 Bye.
01:48:31.680 Bye.
01:48:32.840 Bye.
01:48:32.960 Bye.
01:48:33.100 Bye.
01:48:33.520 Bye.
01:48:34.220 Bye.
01:48:35.080 Bye.
01:48:35.560 Bye.
01:48:36.160 Bye.
01:48:36.640 Thank you.