The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast - August 23, 2021


188. Saving The Humanities | Stephen Blackwood


Episode Stats

Length

2 hours and 7 minutes

Words per Minute

160.27808

Word Count

20,419

Sentence Count

912

Misogynist Sentences

2

Hate Speech Sentences

17


Summary

Dr. Stephen Blackwood is the founding president of Ralston College in Savannah, Georgia, and author of The Consolation of Boethius as Poetic Liturgy. With a main focus in the history of philosophy, Dr. Blackwood also founded the Inner City Youth Program in Nova Scotia, Canada, and hosted and moderated further soul-feeding conversations with my dad, Sir Roger Scruton, and Slavoj Zizek in the past couple of years. He also hosts and moderates lectures and specializes in the History of Philosophy, especially the Stoic philosophy of Julius Caesar. He is a regular guest host on the RALTON College podcast, which has featured guests including Douglas Murray, the physicist Freeman Dyson, Andrew Doyle, the online satirist and author, and Theodore Dalrymple, who wrote Our Culture, What's Left of It? Among many other books, he is author of Our Culture? and Our Culture: What's left of It, among other books. He is also the founder of St. George's Youth Net, an educational mentoring program for inner-city youth in the North End District of Halifax, Nova Scotia and was subsequently a teaching fellow in the Foundation Year Program at the University of King s College, which is one of Canada s finest undergraduate institutions. He's also the host and moderator of The Happiness, Capitalism vs. Marxism Debate, hosted by the Cambridge University, which moderated the debate with Slavoj Zakizek and I at Cambridge University in 2018, and is the debate between Slavoj and I, and I. . Dr. Jordan B. Peterson is a professor of philosophy at RALston College, a newly founded university in Georgia, which was founded in the early 2000s. and hosted a conversation between me and Dr. Slavoj in November 2018. I hope you enjoy this episode, and that it s a good listen! and that you ll enjoy it. Jordan - Dr. B. Peterson is a wonderful humanist, philosopher, writer, thinker, and philosopher, and writer, who is a friend of mine, and a great humanist and philosopher of all things good. - and I hope that you enjoy it Thank you for listening to this episode of The Jordan B Peterson Podcast, my dear friend! - Mikayla ( ) Jordan B Peterson ( . ( ) ( ).


Transcript

00:00:00.960 Hey everyone, real quick before you skip, I want to talk to you about something serious and important.
00:00:06.480 Dr. Jordan Peterson has created a new series that could be a lifeline for those battling depression and anxiety.
00:00:12.740 We know how isolating and overwhelming these conditions can be,
00:00:16.120 and we wanted to take a moment to reach out to those listening who may be struggling.
00:00:20.100 With decades of experience helping patients,
00:00:22.620 Dr. Peterson offers a unique understanding of why you might be feeling this way in his new series.
00:00:27.400 He provides a roadmap towards healing, showing that while the journey isn't easy,
00:00:32.160 it's absolutely possible to find your way forward.
00:00:35.360 If you're suffering, please know you are not alone.
00:00:38.520 There's hope, and there's a path to feeling better.
00:00:41.800 Go to Daily Wire Plus now and start watching Dr. Jordan B. Peterson on depression and anxiety.
00:00:47.460 Let this be the first step towards the brighter future you deserve.
00:00:51.040 Welcome to the Jordan B. Peterson podcast, season four, episode 42, recorded on May 18th, 2021.
00:01:00.460 I'm Mikayla Peterson.
00:01:01.600 Quick update.
00:01:02.640 My dad is feeling better.
00:01:04.120 Not fully good, but better.
00:01:06.140 Thank goodness.
00:01:07.560 On this episode, my dad discussed philosophy from a historical perspective with his guest, Dr. Stephen Blackwood.
00:01:14.120 Dr. Blackwood is the founding president of Ralston College in Savannah, Georgia,
00:01:17.920 and author of The Consolation of Boethius as Poetic Liturgy.
00:01:23.520 With a main focus in the history of philosophy, Dr. Blackwood also founded the Inner City Youth Program in Nova Scotia.
00:01:30.140 He hosted and moderated further soul-feeding conversations with my dad, Sir Roger Scruton,
00:01:35.640 and Slavoj Zizek in the past couple of years.
00:01:38.180 I hope you enjoy this episode.
00:01:39.360 Hello, everyone.
00:01:59.540 I'm pleased to have with me today Dr. Stephen Blackwood,
00:02:02.900 who's the founding president of Ralston College,
00:02:05.540 a newly founded university in Savannah, Georgia.
00:02:09.300 Dr. Blackwood was one of the founders of St. George's Youth Net,
00:02:13.920 an educational mentoring program for inner-city youth in the North End District of Halifax, Nova Scotia,
00:02:20.520 and was subsequently a teaching fellow in the Foundation Year Program at the University of King's College,
00:02:25.600 which is one of Canada's finest undergraduate institutions.
00:02:28.900 Blackwood hosted and moderated a conversation between Sir Roger Scruton and I at Cambridge University in November of 2018
00:02:38.280 and moderated the debate Happiness, Capitalism vs. Marxism between Slavoj Zizek and I on April 19th, 2019.
00:02:47.940 Dr. Blackwood lectures and specializes in the history of philosophy, especially Boethius.
00:02:53.520 He also hosts the Ralston College podcast, which has featured guests including Douglas Murray,
00:03:01.240 the physicist Freeman Dyson, Andrew Doyle, the online satirist and author,
00:03:06.880 and Theodore Dalrymple, who wrote Our Culture, What's Left of It, among many other books.
00:03:12.060 Oxford University Press published his book, The Consolation of Boethius as Poetic Liturgy, in 2015.
00:03:21.140 Welcome, Dr. Blackwood. Stephen, it's really good to see you. Thanks for agreeing to talk to me today.
00:03:29.360 Thanks for having me in, Jordan. It's great to see you again.
00:03:32.160 I think the last time we actually saw each other, I believe, was during the debate with Slavoj Zizek.
00:03:41.180 Is that correct?
00:03:42.060 That is right. I think that is right. Yeah.
00:03:44.340 So it's two years ago. So maybe I could ask you, first of all, about the inner city youth program in North End of Halifax.
00:03:52.940 I don't know that story, so that might be a nice place to start.
00:03:55.660 Well, I grew up in eastern Canada and a place that you would know, but perhaps not all of your listeners know,
00:04:05.380 in Prince Edward Island, in a sort of pastoral, quiet, sleepy, very rural place on a small family farm.
00:04:14.660 In a huge, well, comparatively by historic standards, by contemporary standards, rather,
00:04:20.080 a huge family of seven younger brothers and two younger sisters, my parents, a milk cow.
00:04:27.800 I don't want to paint too idyllic a picture.
00:04:30.300 Everyone knows family life and farm life is all kinds of ups and downs.
00:04:35.620 But the point I'm trying to make is that I had a very kind of intensely wonderful and rich and very actively busy childhood.
00:04:50.240 And it set me up in many respects for the discovery of philosophy when I went to college
00:04:56.740 and I had the immeasurable gift of meeting some teachers who just opened worlds to me.
00:05:04.360 I mean, you know what a teacher can do and be, having had them yourself and having been one for so many people.
00:05:12.560 And I really fell in love with trying to think deeply about, you know, fundamental matters.
00:05:21.780 And not that I was particularly good at it by any means, but just that it was eye-opening for me to see
00:05:28.720 that things I had perhaps intuited in my childhood about the nature of things in some deep sense.
00:05:34.660 We all have these intuitions, whether through nature or music or love or family life or whatever,
00:05:43.140 that there were ways of thinking about those things.
00:05:45.800 And I spent quite a long time with some wonderful teachers, particularly in the ancient Greek and Latin and then medieval tradition,
00:05:54.820 thinking about things and particularly about the nature of the human individual, what it is really, what its realization is.
00:06:04.860 Anyway, I mention all that because when I came to the end of my master's degree, I'd gone straight through, you know, doing a lot of, you know, thinking work
00:06:13.620 in a wonderful community, it needs to be said.
00:06:16.320 And I just, I had kind of, in a way, had my fill of ideas and I had kind of tapped out.
00:06:25.360 I'd gone as far as I could in the theoretical at that point.
00:06:29.360 And I needed to re-engage in the, not, I wouldn't say the real world, but in the more, you know, the world of activity and action.
00:06:40.060 And I had a dear friend and mentor of mine named Gary Thorne, who was the priest at an inner city parish called St. George's Church in Halifax, Nova Scotia.
00:06:52.900 And he had been with others, including one of my sisters, had been working in the inner city thinking about, which was, I should say, a very rough and highly dysfunctional place at North End of Halifax is, that is, or was, and in some respects still is, not least because of a absolutely catastrophic civic decision.
00:07:17.920 There was a place in Halifax called Africville, a Black community that, though perhaps was not entirely up to contemporary standards in terms of technology and things, was a vibrant place.
00:07:31.320 Duke Ellington had played there.
00:07:32.840 It was a flourishing community.
00:07:35.280 Anyway, the city wanted to build a new bridge and part of the foundations of the bridge, they wanted to put in Africville.
00:07:43.280 So at least it's the story I've understood from my own reading about it.
00:07:47.100 And they uprooted this entire very vibrant community out of the place that had been called Africville and resettled them in pretty dismal inner city housing in the North End.
00:07:59.240 And that was not by any means, I think, the only factor, but a very significant moment in the devastation of a community.
00:08:08.340 And when I was there in the early 2000s, mid-90s to early 2000s, there were very many pretty serious problems from drug and alcohol abuse to prostitution, devastatedly broken families.
00:08:33.740 And my friend Gary Thorne and others had been thinking about what modest, you know, one doesn't think one can solve these really very serious problems, you know, simply walk out and solve them.
00:08:47.500 They're really hard.
00:08:49.020 But what could the parish, let us say, this community do that might be meaningful?
00:08:54.720 And so I was with a group of people involved in setting up a small, very small, this is a small community, but small youth mentoring and life skills program called St. George's Youth Net.
00:09:07.420 And the idea was to be a kind of network that would help pick these children up when they fell and to give them, well, our observation, Father Thorne's observation had been over many years that if you wait until someone has already fallen through the cracks, it's in many respects, and this is a terrible thing to say, I know, but in many respects too late.
00:09:30.520 It is very hard to reach people, not that it's impossible, I believe in redemption, I believe in the whole possibility of things being turned around, right down to the most, you know, tiniest fibers of my being.
00:09:44.200 But the point is, is that it is very, very hard to do that with someone who's 16 or 17 or 18, already fallen out of, you know, dropped out of school, you know, had a baby, whatever.
00:09:56.460 So we thought about ways of.
00:10:00.520 We thought about what we could do to, to expand the horizons of these children and youth of all ages, you know, really, but starting with them as young as, as, as school age and working with them and I won't go on at length about this, but what I.
00:10:17.820 Learned was a couple of things that are still really, really with me today.
00:10:21.160 The first is that human, the realization of the individual has to come down at a very fundamental level to the individual, like no one else can live your life for you.
00:10:35.380 You know, no one else can kind of come in and just do it for you that that would, that would, that would, that would, that would deny all of the agency that is at the heart of human, you know, fulfillment.
00:10:43.840 And, and, and, and, and, and the driving force of this is me, this meanness of life has to come from me.
00:10:50.660 Um, and in a way, I think that's a standpoint that, that at some loose level, you know, people would call the political right seems to understand that, you know, there has to be agency is fundamental.
00:11:02.340 And yet that is a totally incomplete standpoint at the same time, uh, because, uh, you know, we don't simply throw children out into the woods and say, you know, all right, come back when you're fully formed, you know, you know, writing books and playing the, playing the flute and, and, and, and, and, and fully able to take on the complexities of life.
00:11:20.380 One of the things that's so striking to me is that it, as people have ability, one of the things they will throw all of themselves into is the raising of their children.
00:11:36.560 And so damn well, they should, uh, my wife and I have not been blessed with children, unfortunately, but I, I, as the eldest of, of a big family and having observed in my friends and many others, you know, they will just give everything they can to carefully.
00:11:50.380 Tend to this, to the development of each individual.
00:11:53.580 And they're not all the same, even in a single family, you can only have two children or three, and they can be very different as day and night.
00:11:59.460 And yet they will give everything they can to these.
00:12:01.460 And so well, they should, but what this points to, I think is a really fundamental question, which is, you know, what are the conditions, the external conditions for human realization?
00:12:10.580 And what we found with these beautiful, often, you know, children in very, very, very broken circumstances is that on the one hand, we had to have high expectations for them and their agency.
00:12:25.740 We had to insist that they'd be there on time, that they, that they, that they treat others with respect, that they be attentive and to anything less was to betray their own dignity and potential, what they could become.
00:12:39.200 And yet, on the other hand, we found that we had to move heaven and earth to make those opportunities possible for them.
00:12:45.220 We would go around in the, in the mornings and pick them up at their home, because they didn't have people who would get them there on time.
00:12:52.580 And we would make various other kinds of, let's say, accommodations to make things accessible for them.
00:12:59.900 And, and, and, and, and, and lastly, I will simply say that, you know, it's not enough just to keep people busy, you have to give them ways that open up their own understanding of themselves.
00:13:11.740 And so we, we took them wilderness camping.
00:13:14.580 Many of these were kids who'd never been outside of inner city Halifax.
00:13:17.660 We took them to, to, to Cape Shed Necto, a beautiful park on the Bay of Fundy.
00:13:22.880 And it was three days, you know, hiking through unbelievably beautiful terrain.
00:13:29.160 And, and, and we, we, we'd had music programs and, and art, fine art programs.
00:13:37.520 And, and later on, they, they were teaching them Latin after I left.
00:13:41.100 And the point is, is that I don't overestimate what good we did for anyone, but insofar as we did any good for them.
00:13:50.720 I think it was in, in, it was in believing that, helping them believe that they mattered, that they mattered at the highest plane of existence, that they were, that they belonged to that highest plane of existence.
00:14:15.120 It wasn't just enough to, you know, learn technical skills, or it as important as those are, or to know that you needed to come on time to have a chance in life.
00:14:24.500 But that you were made, the highest and best things there are, were made for you.
00:14:31.660 So anyway, I've gone on rather long, but that's a, it was an important part of life.
00:14:35.620 And I came to see things that are still groundingly important.
00:14:39.340 It's an interesting conclusion to draw from that kind of work, because the latter part of that in particular was spoken like a true believer in the humanities.
00:14:49.900 And I suppose we can transition our conversation to that.
00:14:54.400 I mean, the first thing I'd like to ask you, though, before we do that is, you grew up in this rural community, you went off to college, what sparked your interest in philosophy?
00:15:03.500 Were your parents educated?
00:15:04.880 I mean, how did you come by the interests that you have?
00:15:07.040 Well, I think it would be so interesting when you think about childhood and what really is formative.
00:15:19.540 You know, you don't make a kid a philosopher by reading him Aristotle at six.
00:15:22.900 My upbringing in my parents and my siblings were unbelievably important to my sense of the world, to my sense of what a human individual is, to my sense of what's good, to my sense of the possibilities of redemption, and so on and so forth.
00:15:41.980 So I would say in a very deep way, my earlier childhood opened me up to be able to then later think about things in a more abstract or philosophical register.
00:15:58.700 But, you know, philosophy doesn't exist in a vacuum.
00:16:00.520 I mean, it's not for no reason that, you know, Plato and Aristotle are after Homer, and the things that you can only really think about things that you already, in some sense, intuit.
00:16:14.940 You don't just sort of abstractly go off and, you know, discover things that the deepest thinking is about.
00:16:26.920 You have to already have them in some form.
00:16:30.520 You know, you have a sense of, well, you can take anything.
00:16:34.300 You can take the difficulty of life or the beauty of a sonnet or the beauty of nature or the horribleness of suffering.
00:16:48.460 And it's very hard to think about these things in the abstract.
00:16:51.840 If you've never suffered and never seen suffering, of course, most human beings at some point do in pretty serious ways.
00:16:57.500 But the point is, is that one of the things I think we absolutely need to think about very seriously as a society and as parents and as educators and so on and so forth are what are the deep forms, the deep things that form, that shape an individual in such a way as to open up that horizon later in life.
00:17:20.320 And, you know, I know you've done a lot of work on early childhood development and reflected at length on things like a play in Piaget and others.
00:17:28.280 You know, everything in its own time in a way that is right for the stage of development.
00:17:34.920 But what I'm saying is that I had some very deeply formative encounters with things that I think are of a very, and I think these are not exclusive to me, they're universal human realities.
00:17:50.820 But I had the privilege of encountering some of them in my youth, in a way that then when I went to college, I went to this place called King's College, founded in 1789 by loyalists who went north from New York at the time of the American Revolution, from an earlier university in New York called King's College, which at the time of the Revolution was renamed, or just after then, renamed Columbia.
00:18:17.060 But the Loyalists went to a more northern colony at that time, of course, this is all pre-Canada, and they set up King's College.
00:18:25.180 And King's had been failing after it relocated to Halifax in the early 70s, and teachers of mine founded a place called the, or a program called the Foundation Year Program.
00:18:36.080 And it was really-
00:18:36.760 My son took that as well.
00:18:38.520 Oh, that's right.
00:18:39.380 It's a great program.
00:18:40.080 Yeah.
00:18:40.340 So tell us about that.
00:18:41.680 Well, it is really just a crash course introduction to principally Western, the history of Western culture, not exclusively Western, but going back to, in fact, to very, very back from Mesopotamia up through the ancient Greeks, the medievals, the Renaissance, the Age of Enlightenment, and the contemporary world.
00:19:04.620 And you'd simply read, and think, and hear lectures about, and discuss books.
00:19:10.300 And that was a kind of introduction to those things.
00:19:12.760 And then I realized that the teachers who'd set up that program were in the classics department at Dalhousie University, some magnificent teachers.
00:19:22.100 And I then spent the next three years doing a bachelor's in classics, and then a master's there.
00:19:28.600 But that classics department, I should add, was particularly strong in the philosophical, let's say, the big ideas that were moving in that period.
00:19:39.580 Not that learning languages and things didn't matter, but they were particularly strong in those careful readings of texts that really can change your life if you attend to them.
00:19:51.780 So I, in my early days of my undergraduate degree, I encountered people who were reading these texts and saying things about them that enabled me to understand the things that I had perhaps intuited when I was younger, in a more self-conscious, rationally universal frame, which is, of course, what philosophy is.
00:20:18.380 This week's episode is brought to you by BioOptimizers.
00:20:21.600 If you struggle with falling asleep or staying asleep throughout the night, one of the best things you could do for yourself is to start getting enough magnesium in your system.
00:20:30.300 I recommend you guys try out Magnesium Breakthrough by BioOptimizers, the only organic full-spectrum magnesium supplement that includes seven different forms of magnesium.
00:20:40.160 Getting all of them in means that you'll get to experience calming, stress-reducing, sleep-enhancing effects.
00:20:44.880 I like it because there are no synthetic additives or preservatives, not like those other not-so-great products you probably find in your drugstore.
00:20:54.280 So if you're taking magnesium, try this one.
00:20:57.620 A lot of people are low in magnesium, and this is a high-quality product.
00:21:02.020 For an exclusive offer for our listeners, go to www.magbreakthrough.com slash jbp and use code jbp10 to save 10% when you try Magnesium Breakthrough.
00:21:13.320 For a limited time, BioOptimizers is also giving away free bottles of their best-selling products P3OM and Masszymes with select purchases.
00:21:26.000 So go to magbreakthrough.com slash jbp now to get your exclusive 10% discount plus the chance to get more than $50 worth of supplements for free.
00:21:35.200 Going online without ExpressVPN is like not paying attention to the safety demonstration on a flight.
00:21:41.780 Most of the time, you'll probably be fine, but what if one day that weird yellow mask drops down from overhead and you have no idea what to do?
00:21:49.540 In our hyper-connected world, your digital privacy isn't just a luxury.
00:21:53.360 It's a fundamental right.
00:21:54.660 Every time you connect to an unsecured network in a cafe, hotel, or airport,
00:21:58.600 you're essentially broadcasting your personal information to anyone with a technical know-how to intercept it.
00:22:04.000 And let's be clear, it doesn't take a genius hacker to do this.
00:22:07.180 With some off-the-shelf hardware, even a tech-savvy teenager could potentially access your passwords, bank logins, and credit card details.
00:22:14.560 Now, you might think, what's the big deal?
00:22:16.680 Who'd want my data anyway?
00:22:18.220 Well, on the dark web, your personal information could fetch up to $1,000.
00:22:22.640 That's right, there's a whole underground economy built on stolen identities.
00:22:26.900 Enter ExpressVPN.
00:22:28.660 It's like a digital fortress, creating an encrypted tunnel between your device and the internet.
00:22:33.340 Their encryption is so robust that it would take a hacker with a supercomputer over a billion years to crack it.
00:22:38.940 But don't let its power fool you.
00:22:40.820 ExpressVPN is incredibly user-friendly.
00:22:43.140 With just one click, you're protected across all your devices.
00:22:46.180 Phones, laptops, tablets, you name it.
00:22:48.260 That's why I use ExpressVPN whenever I'm traveling or working from a coffee shop.
00:22:52.360 It gives me peace of mind knowing that my research, communications, and personal data are shielded from prying eyes.
00:22:58.480 Secure your online data today by visiting expressvpn.com slash jordan.
00:23:03.220 That's E-X-P-R-E-S-S-V-P-N dot com slash jordan, and you can get an extra three months free.
00:23:09.580 ExpressVPN dot com slash jordan.
00:23:11.480 Starting a business can be tough, but thanks to Shopify, running your online storefront is easier than ever.
00:23:21.320 Shopify is the global commerce platform that helps you sell at every stage of your business.
00:23:25.580 From the launch your online shop stage all the way to the did we just hit a million orders stage, Shopify is here to help you grow.
00:23:32.340 Our marketing team uses Shopify every day to sell our merchandise, and we love how easy it is to add more items, ship products, and track conversions.
00:23:39.940 With Shopify, customize your online store to your style with flexible templates and powerful tools,
00:23:45.900 alongside an endless list of integrations and third-party apps like on-demand printing, accounting, and chatbots.
00:23:52.180 Shopify helps you turn browsers into buyers with the internet's best converting checkout, up to 36% better compared to other leading e-commerce platforms.
00:24:00.540 No matter how big you want to grow, Shopify gives you everything you need to take control and take your business to the next level.
00:24:06.300 Sign up for a $1 per month trial period at shopify.com slash jbp, all lowercase.
00:24:12.920 Go to shopify.com slash jbp now to grow your business, no matter what stage you're in.
00:24:18.240 That's shopify.com slash jbp.
00:24:20.600 In today's chaotic world, many of us are searching for a way to aim higher and find spiritual peace.
00:24:29.880 But here's the thing.
00:24:31.080 Prayer, the most common tool we have, isn't just about saying whatever comes to mind.
00:24:35.240 It's a skill that needs to be developed.
00:24:37.640 That's where Hallow comes in.
00:24:39.300 As the number one prayer and meditation app, Hallow is launching an exceptional new series called How to Pray.
00:24:44.720 Imagine learning how to use scripture as a launchpad for profound conversations with God, how to properly enter into imaginative prayer, and how to incorporate prayers reaching far back in church history.
00:24:56.880 This isn't your average guided meditation.
00:24:59.400 It's a comprehensive two-week journey into the heart of prayer, led by some of the most respected spiritual leaders of our time.
00:25:05.920 From guests including Bishop Robert Barron, Father Mike Schmitz, and Jonathan Rumi, known for his role as Jesus in the hit series The Chosen,
00:25:13.980 you'll discover prayer techniques that have stood the test of time, while equipping yourself with the tools needed to face life's challenges with renewed strength.
00:25:21.940 Ready to revolutionize your prayer life?
00:25:24.220 You can check out the new series, as well as an extensive catalog of guided prayers, when you download the Hallow app.
00:25:30.000 Just go to hallow.com slash jordan and download the Hallow app today for an exclusive three-month trial.
00:25:35.920 That's hallow.com slash jordan.
00:25:38.420 Elevate your prayer life today.
00:25:42.280 So, I've been thinking while you've been talking about something that I've been writing about, and I've been working on this for a long time.
00:25:49.040 So, I'm a behavioral psychologist, and so behavioral psychologists are eminently practical.
00:25:56.060 We tend to break things down to the smallest applicable unit of action, right?
00:26:01.760 So, if you're trying to help someone move somewhere better, well, you want to figure out what better is.
00:26:07.980 But then you want to decompose that into actions that are likely to be undertaken, and those might be very, very small actions.
00:26:16.080 And I've been thinking about the question of the meaning of life, and the first objection, I suppose, that arose in my mind was an objection to the question itself, because there might not be a meaning in life.
00:26:29.800 There are places where people derive meaning.
00:26:32.540 And you can list them, and it's useful practically if people are thinking about how to organize their life if they're unhappy, and they want to know how things might be better.
00:26:44.500 I mean, my observation, and obviously not only mine, is that people generally need to have a career or a job to keep the wolf from the door, but also to engage them productively with others, which is a primary source of meaning for conscientious people and for creative people alike.
00:27:00.540 You need to pursue your education to flesh out your intellectual capacity.
00:27:08.300 You have to take care of your health, physical and mental.
00:27:10.740 You need an intimate relationship.
00:27:13.000 You need a family.
00:27:14.400 You need friends.
00:27:15.280 You need intelligent use of your leisure time.
00:27:17.900 You have to regulate your susceptibility to the temptations that might lead you astray, drugs and alcohol and perhaps pornography and those sorts of things.
00:27:27.680 But then there is a core to all of that around which these more practical endeavors arrange themselves, and that's something like attention to the spiritual or the philosophical domain or the religious domain.
00:27:42.080 I think you can, in some sense, put all those together.
00:27:44.880 And that might be, well, it might be the attempt to answer explicitly or at least to address the question of, well, what is all of that practical life in service of?
00:27:56.720 And you said, for example, that when you were working with the inner city kids in Halifax, you were trying to help them realize that they were meant for the higher things and vice versa.
00:28:10.780 And someone might ask, well, why bother with that when you can just bother with the skills?
00:28:17.720 And it seems to me that the answer is something like, well, we all have to make decisions about how we're going to behave in life and how we're going to act ethically.
00:28:26.040 And if you help people understand their relationship to what's ultimately noble, then you can help them fortify their resolution to do good in the world instead of to do harm.
00:28:41.240 It seems to me to be, I mean, I think we're always deciding with every decision that we make whether we're going to do good or do harm by action or by inaction.
00:28:51.980 And whether we should do good or harm or nothing at all, I think depends to some degree on who we think we are and what we're capable of.
00:29:00.380 And it seems to me that the humanities, when they're properly taught, are the study of who we could be, each of us as individuals.
00:29:08.900 And we need to know that because otherwise we'll be much less than we are.
00:29:12.100 And that's not a trivial problem.
00:29:14.580 It's a cataclysmic problem.
00:29:15.940 And I also think that people pine away in the absence of that.
00:29:21.000 I mean, you sent some questions that we could cover.
00:29:24.720 And one of them was, well, you said topics that might be relevant include our historic, cultural, spiritual, civilizational crisis.
00:29:34.100 What is at its root?
00:29:35.200 For example, their idea that there's no truth, but only power and the vast longing slash hunger of our moment.
00:29:42.700 You said, I think the woke phenomenon is, at least in many cases, an index of that hunger,
00:29:47.800 although it miserably fails to satisfy this intrinsically human desire for transcendent purpose.
00:29:53.620 And so, to me, the universities are a key element in the conversation across the generations about just exactly what a human being is.
00:30:04.880 And that's something that it's not some abstract philosophical, it's not merely some abstract philosophical concern.
00:30:12.060 It's the central issue that determines how you make all the decisions in your life.
00:30:19.540 So, I just think that's completely right.
00:30:23.180 I'll say two things just quickly.
00:30:26.960 The first is that my father's a medical doctor, and he worked in the ER for many, many years, and has seen many people die.
00:30:35.580 And he has remarked to me that no one on their deathbed looks back and says, gosh, I wish I'd spent more time at the office, or I wish I'd accumulated more riches for myself.
00:30:52.840 And so, I really do think you're right to say that there is nothing more important than how we understand ourselves.
00:31:03.940 I mean, human life can't be lived for some other end.
00:31:08.760 I mean, you can do all kinds of things for certain ends.
00:31:11.460 I mean, you might work hard to get a qualification in order to get a job, in order to make money, in order to provide a home for your family.
00:31:20.780 But at a certain point, it stops.
00:31:23.380 And it stops.
00:31:24.520 It's not for something else.
00:31:26.400 It's for the lives of these people that I am living, my life, and for the lives of the people that I am seeking to live in relation to.
00:31:35.740 Those are then not for something else.
00:31:37.600 And so, the point is that our self-understanding, I mean, you can regardless even, you can even look at this, I think, Jordan, from an evolutionary standpoint.
00:31:51.540 I mean, human beings are evolved as creatures that are self-conscious.
00:31:58.300 They are self-understanding.
00:32:00.040 They have self-regard.
00:32:02.880 And you may think that all of the ways in which they regard themselves or the things in relation to which they understand themselves, whether it's truth or beauty or purpose, you may say all those things are just constructs of the will to power, which, of course, is what the dominant nihilism would have us believe, and which I do not accept and which I think we can show to be wrong, very clearly, rationally, philosophically.
00:32:24.540 However, even if you think they are constructs, you still do not escape the fact that human beings are evolved in this way, such that how they understand themselves is absolutely fundamental to their nature.
00:32:43.000 Like, that is what we are, as an evolved species.
00:32:48.560 And so, any culture that does not enable human beings to understand themselves in a way that they find to be richly meaningful, and I'm not saying meaning is just a construct, but if it does not do that at the end of the day, it has failed.
00:33:08.700 It's fundamental test.
00:33:10.540 Yes.
00:33:10.860 Yeah, okay.
00:33:13.260 So, now, let's go after this power idea.
00:33:16.960 Okay, so you seem to agree with something that I've also concluded, that what's at the root of our current cultural malaise is this idea that human social institutions, and then also by implication, primary individual motivation, that human institutions are predicated on power.
00:33:41.180 And so, the more I've thought about that, the more wrong it seems to me to be.
00:33:46.720 And I've also been thinking about truth and lies some more.
00:33:50.860 And, you know, there are those lies that you tell when you just skirt the truth a bit.
00:33:55.760 So, they're maybe the ones that are most easy to get away with, and often most effective, but not always, but often most effective, because maybe they work the best.
00:34:05.660 You take a truth and you bend it a little bit, and that's still a lie.
00:34:09.740 But then there are statements that are antithetical to the truth.
00:34:15.920 They're anti-truth lies.
00:34:17.980 And I think that the idea that human social institutions, especially the functional social institutions of the West, that they're predicated on the drive to power, I think that's an antithruth.
00:34:30.940 I don't, and so, so let's see if we can take that apart a little bit.
00:34:35.460 I mean, the first question might be, well, what exactly is the definition of power?
00:34:43.220 Who's making these claims, and what's the definition of power, and why are they making the claims?
00:34:49.260 So, let's start with who's making the claim that our social institutions are predicated on power.
00:34:57.740 Well, it does seem to me to be a claim that comes pretty fundamentally out of the academy.
00:35:01.820 I mean, one of my constant refrains is that the academy, the university, that is, is upstream of absolutely everything else.
00:35:10.200 You know, culture, policy, politics, art and architecture, family life, you know, media, just go down on through the list.
00:35:19.140 And I think that these narratives or frameworks are proceeding fundamentally out of certain forms of really 19th and 20th century philosophical critiques,
00:35:34.080 many of which were important and even necessary and illuminating in their, their, in their original form,
00:35:43.920 but which have been made into very reductive, totalizing forms of seeing the world.
00:35:52.400 And so is it reasonable, do you think, to, I mean, I've talked about postmodern neo-Marxism,
00:35:58.440 and, of course, people who are critical of the way I think point out that, well, postmodernism hypothetically is predicated on the idea that all grand narratives are to be questioned,
00:36:09.220 which you would assume would include the grand Marxist narrative,
00:36:13.720 which presumes that the most appropriate way to view human history and human social institutions is
00:36:20.980 by positing the existence of an oppressor class economically and a subordinate class economically,
00:36:28.740 the bourgeoisie and the proletariat.
00:36:30.700 And so that's the fundamental analytic lens through which Marxists approach the world,
00:36:36.540 that those who have have because they've taken from those who have not.
00:36:40.960 And that the implication there is the fundamental animating principle of our social structures is exploitation for the benefit of the few.
00:36:51.240 And then, of course, this is my view anyways, when Marxism became untenable ethically as an explicit philosophy in the late 1960s,
00:36:59.960 as a consequence of the revelation of the absolute catastrophe that the Maoists and the Stalinists had made of the,
00:37:05.940 of China and the Soviet Union, respectively, that postmodernism transformed Marxism into something that was more palatable on the surface,
00:37:18.000 but that proclaimed that, well, it wasn't exactly economics that was exploitation that was at the root of things.
00:37:24.020 It was just exploitation in general.
00:37:25.840 It was the manifestation of the power drive, let's say,
00:37:30.240 that keeps people who are in positions of power above the rest and who have at their disposal the means of compelling those people to do what they would not do otherwise against their will.
00:37:44.300 That's an expression of power as well.
00:37:46.540 I mean, do you think, do you think there's something, am I wrong in that formulation?
00:37:51.200 I mean, I've tried to understand this.
00:37:52.580 I'm not trying to be, what would you say, biased or blinkered about it.
00:37:58.080 It's just, that's the way it looks like that to me.
00:38:01.280 I mean, people like Derrida and Foucault, they were Marxists to begin with.
00:38:06.680 And so, and isn't it the case that the notion that our social relations are structured as a consequence of the expression of arbitrary power,
00:38:16.300 isn't that merely a transformation of that initial Marxist presumption?
00:38:20.120 Or am I, am I barking up the wrong tree here?
00:38:22.480 Well, I would say a few things.
00:38:25.080 The first is that I'm very far from a scholar of these, you know, complicated intellectual movements from the late 18th century through to the present.
00:38:33.900 But in my reading, certainly in the main, there's, in the main, I think you are right about Marx.
00:38:46.600 And again, I'm not a philosopher of Marx, but if you read, for example, the introduction to his critique of Hegel's philosophy of right,
00:38:57.140 you know, he outlines very, very clearly this, this dynamic of focusing all of the force of one part of society against another as an essential kind of material dialectic.
00:39:11.300 And that does seem to me to be fundamentally what is, you know, that is the, that is the logic of the power alone revolution.
00:39:18.800 I think that is fundamentally what we're facing in the, well, that leads to a war of all against all, of course,
00:39:25.740 but it certainly leads to, to identity politics warfare and the reductions of, of an individual to wherever they can be usefully mobilized in a battle of one part of, against another.
00:39:40.140 But I would also say about, about Marx, and again, I, just to think of, as you know, when you get into, to studying complicated things,
00:39:49.460 you always feel you must endlessly qualify what you don't know.
00:39:53.020 There's a huge amount I don't know about Marx, but I also know that he says that religion does not make man, man makes religion.
00:40:01.700 And at some very fundamental level, there appears to be, whether in Marx or proceeding out of his interpreters,
00:40:09.200 a wholesale negation or rejection of the idea that there is any abiding metaphysical or transcendent reality.
00:40:18.040 Well, and Marx also points out very clearly that, and this is a key element of Marxist thought,
00:40:23.820 that social structures structure individuals, individual consciousness, and it's not that individual consciousness structures social structures.
00:40:32.880 So it's the group imposing its nature on the individual rather than the group being led by the individual.
00:40:41.820 And that's a profoundly anti-Enlightenment, and I would say anti-Judeo-Christian proposition.
00:40:46.720 And so, and that's certainly something, and then you said something else that was interesting, you know,
00:40:52.760 you said you're not a scholar of these movements, and neither am I.
00:40:56.000 And that's actually a problem, right, because we're trying to address this appearance of a culture war
00:41:02.240 that seems to be manifesting itself first in the universities and then everywhere else,
00:41:06.380 and it's an amorphous thing, it's hard to get a grip on, and it's easy to be wrong,
00:41:10.460 but we're forced to contend with it regardless and to sketch out its outlines,
00:41:15.740 and I've been trying to do that as fairly as I possibly can.
00:41:18.840 I mean, part of this proposition seems to be the insistence, the radical insistence,
00:41:25.720 that the Enlightenment insistence on the individual as the primary unit of analysis
00:41:33.040 is to be discarded in favor of a group-centered analysis,
00:41:37.360 and that the only reason that that individual, the idea of the transcendent individual manifest itself
00:41:43.320 was because it served the interests of those who have arbitrary power to maintain it,
00:41:48.680 although the logical connection there isn't clear because it isn't obvious to me
00:41:51.940 how it served the particular power interests of that group
00:41:55.480 and how it wouldn't serve the power interests of other groups equally as well.
00:41:58.900 It seems to be a fundamental flaw in the logic.
00:42:01.220 I've been thinking about my own experience with social institutions
00:42:14.000 and my knowledge of how people develop as well as how children develop,
00:42:19.860 and the first thing or part of that is that all the developmental literature suggests that
00:42:26.320 the use of aggression, which is what you'd expect to be developed
00:42:31.360 if power was the fundamental organizing principle of social institutions,
00:42:36.260 you'd expect that aggressive children would do better than non-aggressive children,
00:42:41.360 and you'd expect that children would be socialized by their superordinates,
00:42:47.740 their adults, their teachers, their parents,
00:42:49.660 to manifest aggression in the service of power,
00:42:52.620 and that doesn't seem to be the case developmentally.
00:42:56.560 The children who preferentially use aggression, self-centered aggression in particular,
00:43:01.680 tend to be alienated and unhappy and in a dismal minority and friendless,
00:43:07.700 and then they don't do well in life at all,
00:43:09.940 and the developmental course is from more aggression at the very early stages of life
00:43:15.200 to less aggression as adulthood inculcates itself,
00:43:19.080 and so we actually become more civilized as we become more integrated in our social institutions
00:43:24.300 rather than less.
00:43:26.200 And so, why do you think the...
00:43:29.500 And then, I think about my relationships with...
00:43:33.620 No, I think about two things.
00:43:35.020 People I have admired who have been successful in social institutions,
00:43:39.320 and then my experience as an apprentice, let's say, within social institutions,
00:43:44.040 and, first of all, the people I admire and who've been successful
00:43:48.800 are not, by any stretch of the imagination, notable for their manipulation of arbitrary power.
00:43:57.760 Quite the contrary, the people that I've met who are particularly admirable
00:44:01.820 have done everything they possibly can in their positions of authority and competence
00:44:06.260 to open the door to advancement to people around them,
00:44:11.060 to facilitate their cooperation, to work with them genuinely
00:44:15.220 in a manner that increases the probability that both of them will succeed,
00:44:22.400 and they've also taken extreme pleasure in the development of their subordinates, so to speak.
00:44:30.360 And then I thought, well, doesn't...
00:44:32.580 How is it that our culture has got so bloody warped that we don't notice that...
00:44:37.120 You know, you talked about the importance of family in your upbringing,
00:44:40.920 and you speak of your family with great affection.
00:44:45.580 I mean, why don't we believe that the central patriarchal spirit
00:44:50.280 is properly constituted as benevolent father
00:44:54.780 rather than as tyrannical, power-mad, you know, exploiter?
00:44:59.120 Because I don't see that people who are tyrannical, power-mad exploiters
00:45:04.940 actually do that well in our social institutions.
00:45:08.300 And it also seems to me that it's a primary pleasure
00:45:10.820 to open the door to people who have ability but less opportunity.
00:45:17.800 Like, it's really...
00:45:18.680 It's a fundamental motivational pleasure for that to occur,
00:45:21.800 and I think it's integrally related with the pleasure that people take in fatherhood.
00:45:25.900 Yeah, and I think...
00:45:29.280 Well, I think that's completely right, and it needs to...
00:45:31.720 I think it needs to be said, well, a couple of things.
00:45:33.560 The first is that this rich view of the individual as having...
00:45:38.800 As really mattering, as being connected intrinsically to reality itself.
00:45:47.000 You know, facon, facet de Dieu is one phrase that the French give us,
00:45:50.820 you know, face-to-face with God.
00:45:52.320 But you see this in the ancient Greeks.
00:45:53.960 You see this all throughout the...
00:45:57.400 Well, you see this developing in all sorts of ways
00:45:59.180 throughout the institutions and philosophical, artistic movements
00:46:02.640 of Western culture.
00:46:04.380 I'm not saying...
00:46:04.980 Not in other cultures, it's just that this is where...
00:46:07.040 This is the tradition I know and to some level of a scholar of.
00:46:13.880 But the point I want to make twofold.
00:46:16.920 First, that these ideas of the individual way predate the Enlightenment.
00:46:21.260 And in many respects, the Enlightenment itself is, though responsible
00:46:26.220 for many of our clarifications around these things,
00:46:29.200 has also left us with many problems
00:46:30.960 that we're, I think, going to have to face.
00:46:38.180 Or we're finished, really, fundamentally.
00:46:41.260 But the second thing I want to say is that, you know,
00:46:44.980 it's not that thinking about power is not important.
00:46:47.280 I mean, there are very few things in the entire record of human beings
00:46:52.280 thinking about what it means to be a human being,
00:46:53.860 which is essentially what the humanities are, right?
00:46:55.540 I mean, it's just the record of other people thinking about human experience
00:46:59.360 throughout time, whether it's art or philosophy or theology or logic or architecture.
00:47:06.540 I mean, these are the record of the ways in which people have grappled
00:47:09.520 with what the human being is.
00:47:11.200 That's all the humanities are, fundamentally.
00:47:13.180 But at the heart of that, there are few things that occupy more bandwidth
00:47:21.960 in that whole long arc of reflection than how one restrains the individual's own solipsism.
00:47:35.840 It's the individual's own will to power, the individual's own closed loop of the self
00:47:41.220 against everything else, which it turns out, in this rich tradition of reflection,
00:47:46.920 is an extremely bad thing for the individual to do.
00:47:49.080 Well, it's partly because it's short-sighted and it actually runs...
00:47:55.840 See, this is the problem with positing that the drive to power
00:47:59.140 is the central animating principle and to make a fundamental critique
00:48:04.480 that might be expressed in such terms as systemic racism, let's say.
00:48:09.260 I mean, that the drive to power and deceit, perhaps, in the service of power
00:48:15.440 is best viewed as an aberration to the central tendency.
00:48:19.720 A powerful aberration and certainly the source of all the fundamental corruption
00:48:24.160 of the central tendency, but it's not to be confused with the central tendency itself,
00:48:29.080 which is more like properly construed, and I think that this is perhaps the central message
00:48:34.440 of the Old Testament, properly construed as something like a benevolent father.
00:48:39.080 I mean, the Greeks had their metaphysical reality, too.
00:48:44.220 I spoke with an author this week and a professor of classics at Boston University.
00:48:49.580 The author, Brian Morescu, wrote a book called The Immortality Key,
00:48:52.560 and he was talking about the Eleusinian mysteries and the saturation of Greek culture
00:49:00.180 in this underlying metaphysical religious reality that was manifested in the Eleusinian mysteries
00:49:07.780 and in the Dionysian tradition as well.
00:49:12.360 We talked a little bit about the transformation of the Dionysian into the Christian
00:49:16.560 as a consequence of the union of Greek society and Jewish society.
00:49:22.240 Out of that comes Christianity and this new conception of man
00:49:25.740 as akin to divinity in some sense, or a recreation of that idea.
00:49:34.340 I'm fumbling for words here, but I'm trying to get a picture of the central animating spirit
00:49:39.320 because what we're pushing out of the universities is the idea that
00:49:42.900 we're fundamentally motivated by group-centered tyranny.
00:49:46.420 And I don't believe that to be the case.
00:49:48.320 I don't think that that's what good people are motivated by,
00:49:51.560 and I don't think that bad people are particularly successful in our social institutions.
00:49:57.580 I think that's an unbelievably cynical and dangerous way of looking at history.
00:50:04.000 And it's also a way of looking at history that demolishes your own motivation
00:50:07.820 because if the central animating tendency of our social institutions
00:50:11.780 is the expression of tyrannical power,
00:50:14.160 then that's the defining characteristic of your own ambition.
00:50:17.140 But if your own ambition is to develop yourself as a noble being
00:50:21.820 who has a broad purview and who finds fundamental pleasure in serving the higher good,
00:50:27.500 well, that's a whole different story.
00:50:29.360 And the story is the critical thing here.
00:50:31.860 And that's what the universities are supposed to be transmitting,
00:50:34.360 is that central story.
00:50:36.640 And if we're wrong about this, we're going to tear things down.
00:50:39.740 Yeah.
00:50:40.080 Well, I don't think we need to say we're going to.
00:50:43.140 I think in many respects, we have already very-
00:50:47.420 And you were going to critique the Enlightenment.
00:50:49.760 Well, I think we have already very deeply deconstructed many of the forms of life and
00:50:54.380 culture that actually mediate the individual's agency and deeper realization.
00:51:01.040 And we were saying a minute ago that if you look at things simply from the standpoint of
00:51:05.160 power and you analyze individuals by that, I mean, the paradox is that if you tend only to
00:51:09.720 your own power, you are a disaster.
00:51:12.420 You are a disaster as a human being.
00:51:13.980 You are a disaster in relation to others.
00:51:17.080 You end up wildly unhappy and unfulfilled.
00:51:21.840 I mean, that is simply a fact.
00:51:24.220 Right, right.
00:51:24.240 It's the path downward on every level.
00:51:26.880 It's not like you can be an individually successful psychopath exploiting everyone
00:51:30.800 and end up hedonically advantaged without suffering.
00:51:35.180 That isn't how it works.
00:51:36.520 I've never seen that happen.
00:51:38.580 I don't believe it's possible.
00:51:41.440 And so I can't understand why we've bought the idea that power is the central animating
00:51:48.240 principle.
00:51:48.960 Like, what the hell?
00:51:50.700 And why have it- there's an envy in it.
00:51:53.600 There's an envy in it that I can't quite put my finger on.
00:51:56.180 It's related in some sense to this, you know, I've noticed that in the universities, whenever
00:52:01.160 I worked with business people, for example, a lot of my peers would become upset with me.
00:52:06.660 And I always wondered why that was, because my sense was, well, there was just as many
00:52:10.880 good people and bad people in business, let's say, as there were good people and bad people
00:52:15.020 in academia.
00:52:15.540 And it was just completely foolish to draw an arbitrary line.
00:52:20.020 But it had something to do with envy.
00:52:22.180 And I was talking to Paul Rossi, you know, the New York teacher who got nailed for standing
00:52:30.400 up against the importation of critical race theory, let's say, into the private schools
00:52:34.640 in New York.
00:52:36.180 And he talked about the attraction that the postmodern theory had for him when he was
00:52:40.620 an undergraduate.
00:52:41.380 He wanted to be a writer, but he didn't really have the talent as far as he was concerned.
00:52:45.600 And along came the postmodern critics who were tearing literature apart.
00:52:49.840 And they appealed to his resentment and his envy because they were tearing apart, you
00:52:55.640 know, an ideal he couldn't reach.
00:52:57.360 And so it was very much reminiscence to me, for me, of the story of Cain, you know, who
00:53:01.800 became resentful and bitter because his sacrifices weren't accepted by God.
00:53:06.740 It's a fundamental story of human beings, really.
00:53:10.320 And so there's this envy that's driving us to misinterpret our institutions and to be
00:53:17.460 careless with them.
00:53:18.480 And the universities seem to be leading the pack.
00:53:22.380 I would say more than leading.
00:53:24.520 Yeah, certainly.
00:53:25.180 Yes, certainly leading, racing onwards.
00:53:29.320 I think that, you know, one of the terrible ironies of this standpoint is that it becomes
00:53:36.980 guilty of the very things that it accuses in others.
00:53:41.660 And so it violates our institutional life.
00:53:46.700 It violates our whole relation to the past.
00:53:48.680 It violates the individual.
00:53:50.120 That is to say, when you drink the Kool-Aid of there being only power all the way down,
00:53:54.600 you are in a grim world.
00:53:57.500 And what is, I think, so tragically perverse about the dismissal of our whole inherited past
00:54:04.060 with all of its complexity and beauty and difficulty is that the tradition itself of all of humanistic
00:54:11.580 learning has many of the very tools we need to confront the problems that the, those concerned
00:54:20.800 with the, those, those who are concerned with the abuse of power are concerned about.
00:54:24.900 And so the, the, and I think revolutions often work, work in this way is that the first thing
00:54:30.400 they need to do is alienate the entire record of the past from the present, because that's
00:54:35.840 the basis upon which you bring in the brave new world, you know, through your own manipulation
00:54:39.900 of, of power and system and so on and so forth.
00:54:42.680 So I don't, I mean, I think there are a number of things going on.
00:54:45.780 It's always very tempting.
00:54:47.740 I mean, the, the siren song of power is, is, is, is, is, there's a kind of, uh, uh, drug
00:54:55.180 like character to, uh, uh, to that, but I think Jordan, we need to ask, you know, why is it
00:55:04.140 that these, um, reductive, inadequate, manifestly ahistorical, irrational, um, utterly, you know,
00:55:15.080 low-grade, uh, uh, kinds of analysis have become so dominant.
00:55:20.140 And I think if we can't answer that question, it is difficult to transcend their hold on, uh,
00:55:29.940 those who, uh, ascribe to them.
00:55:33.020 Well, you said that, um, the woke phenomena is an index of the vast longing slash hunger
00:55:40.800 of our moment.
00:55:41.540 I mean, the, the other thing, one of the other things that Rossi said that was quite
00:55:45.240 interesting was that when the, the new doctrines entered the private school that he was teaching,
00:55:54.020 he was initially highly supportive of them because they came in flying, let's say the anti-racist
00:56:00.080 flag and like, who isn't happy about anti-racism?
00:56:05.720 And so, if you take it at face value, well, then you get to put yourself on the side of the heroes
00:56:11.420 that are fighting against those who oppress people on the basis of arbitrary characteristics like their race.
00:56:17.660 And so, that certainly accounts for some of the attraction on the positive side.
00:56:23.420 I mean, the negative side is, well, the, the opportunity to tear things down
00:56:27.220 for the sake of tearing them down in the name of some higher moral virtue that just covers the real
00:56:34.080 motivation, which is to tear things down because you're envious.
00:56:37.640 But, you know, to give the devil his due, well, there's something to be said for
00:56:41.700 working, identifying with a movement that purports to be serving the interests of the poor
00:56:48.600 and the dispossessed and, and those who are, um, prejudiced against and, and to take to task
00:56:55.560 those who are perpetrators of such things.
00:56:58.200 And so, I see that as part of a religious impulse to do the good, but it's so incomplete and it's so,
00:57:06.460 um, it's so dangerous in its incompleteness because, well, partly because it provides a,
00:57:12.380 say, a too convenient enemy and partly because it does dispense with the richness of the past.
00:57:17.300 And, well, and then it brings with it in its, in its, in its wake, let's say, all sorts of ideas
00:57:24.340 that are entirely counterproductive.
00:57:26.680 Um, I mean, it contains within it a fundamental critique of the idea of free market economies,
00:57:32.320 for example, which to me is just a disaster.
00:57:35.700 It just, from a computational perspective, we can't do with central planning what the market
00:57:41.540 can do with computation because it's distributed and it relies on the choices of everyone.
00:57:45.820 It's a much more effective computational system, but we seem to have done a pretty bad job
00:57:51.500 of defending it.
00:57:53.460 Well, I think it's, it's, it, that's a very, very good statement of the problem.
00:57:59.760 Why is that so?
00:58:01.080 I mean, it's, it, well, let's say a few things.
00:58:05.940 The first is that I do think the whole woke thing, which, you know, for whatever, I mean,
00:58:12.380 it's for whatever, uh, whether that, what that even, what that word even means is, I
00:58:18.300 think it is a, is a, is a good question to dig into fairly carefully.
00:58:22.220 But, um, I think it is an index of a search for meaning in a, in a deep sense, at least
00:58:29.240 for many, because there are many people who are just cynically take things up.
00:58:31.880 They know it's a power move.
00:58:33.040 It's a power political move.
00:58:34.440 They know what they're doing full well.
00:58:36.000 It's, it's, it's wrong.
00:58:37.460 It's reductive.
00:58:38.500 It destroys people's lives.
00:58:40.200 We know that's what's at work.
00:58:41.320 There are always people who will do this, but in, in a much larger sense, I don't think
00:58:45.840 that's an adequate analysis.
00:58:47.120 I think that at a larger level, it is an index for a search for meaning.
00:58:51.220 Um, and we, I think need to, to remember Aristotle's, uh, fundamental insight into the human psyche,
00:58:58.400 which is that, you know, one is only ever moved by some kind of a perceived good.
00:59:03.380 And you, you, that's why for Dante, you know, to go down to the bottom of, of, of hell, which
00:59:07.780 is just an allegory for him about this life, not a vision of the afterlife, you know, things
00:59:12.440 are frozen.
00:59:13.000 There's no movement at all because the good of intellect or even any perceived good, however,
00:59:20.140 limitedly or obscurely perceived is gone.
00:59:22.580 It's just frozen.
00:59:24.140 And so whenever there's any action at all, it's because there's some kind of a perceived
00:59:28.080 good at work, even if that is completely misperceived.
00:59:31.760 I'm saying it's a perceived good.
00:59:33.040 We never do anything at all.
00:59:34.400 You don't go up to make yourself a sandwich or go get the mail or say hello to anyone without
00:59:38.680 some kind of a perceived good.
00:59:40.100 And, and the, so the second thing I would say is that I think we need to think of times
00:59:47.120 when there is a significant, therefore we need to think about times when there is a significant
00:59:50.780 amount of momentum behind something.
00:59:53.100 It could be national socialism in the, in the twenties and thirties in, in Germany.
00:59:57.140 It could be the, the movement to, uh, uh, Scottish independence in our own day.
01:00:01.900 It could be the, the, the so-called woke movement, black lives matter, whatever, whatever,
01:00:06.980 whatever lens we want to look at this from.
01:00:08.960 We need to really honestly ask ourselves the question, what is moving in this?
01:00:14.620 And I think it's clearly the case that, uh, uh, from the, the, the, from what I understand
01:00:20.940 about the, the formation of, uh, the, the, the complicated historical movements that led
01:00:26.520 to the second world war, that, um, there was in Germany, at least I would be very surprised
01:00:31.840 to learn this is not the case, a, a vulnerability to the.
01:00:38.960 And an, a, an ideological standpoint that gave a defining collective purpose.
01:00:48.240 And that seems to me to indicate a lack of that not being done in a better way.
01:00:54.620 Uh, you could say the same thing I suspect about Scottish independence.
01:00:57.600 Is it really that Scottish independence or is it that, well, you know, if you were in
01:01:01.360 Canada, in Quebec and you were a lapsed Catholic, a French lapsed Catholic, you were four times
01:01:07.720 as likely to be a separatist during the separatist, you know, uprising, say in the 1980s and 1990s
01:01:13.200 in Canada or 1960s through the 1990s.
01:01:15.540 Uh, the Gallup, Gallup poll indicated that.
01:01:19.020 And, and so, you know, Quebec was the last place in Western Europe in some sense that,
01:01:24.820 so to speak, where Catholicism dissolved.
01:01:28.700 And that didn't happen until the late 1950s.
01:01:30.780 And it was instantly replaced by a radical nationalism, which really, I mean, I watched it from the
01:01:36.480 outside.
01:01:36.960 I was in Quebec for much of that.
01:01:38.420 But it was impenetrable.
01:01:40.720 You could see that it was a displaced religious doctrine.
01:01:43.800 The state had taken the place of Christ.
01:01:46.780 That's the simplest way of putting it.
01:01:48.500 Well, that's a great, I think that's a great, that's a great historical example.
01:01:52.920 I mean, I think that at a minimum, what many people perceive in these, these, these sort
01:01:57.520 of so-called woke movements is at least some incipient or inchoate vision of justice that,
01:02:05.360 you know, the least of these among us matters.
01:02:07.360 The different among us matters.
01:02:09.640 Now, of course, I think that the standpoint that is through which these things are viewed
01:02:13.400 is completely tragic and unfulfillable, unable to fulfill the very ends that it seeks to
01:02:18.040 bring about.
01:02:19.140 But what, but, you know, the, the, the, you know, conservatives and, you know, free market
01:02:22.920 lovers and all these people are very often lament the fact they say, why is it that, you
01:02:26.860 know, this, you call it the left, call it whatever you want, seems to beat us on the moral
01:02:30.780 argument every time, despite the fact that we know that, that, that our systems and the
01:02:35.740 ideas that we espouse historically have been shown to be superior to the very values that
01:02:42.260 the so-called left is beating us at.
01:02:45.420 And I think that this does raise the fact that it, you know, I've been reading, uh, uh,
01:02:55.940 Tupi's wonderful coffee table book.
01:02:57.580 I know you had a wonderful conversation with him recently about, you know, how much better
01:03:01.040 everything is, is, is, is getting in absolute terms.
01:03:04.320 Yeah.
01:03:04.700 In absolute terms.
01:03:05.680 And, you know, these are, these are, this is a wonderful, it's a very important book.
01:03:08.900 These are wonderful achievements.
01:03:10.780 Uh, we should all rejoice and, and absolutely, you know, face, face them and be glad for them
01:03:15.880 and the things that they will make possible.
01:03:17.700 But it is also very interesting to note, um, you know, what is not in Tupi.
01:03:23.740 I mean, there, uh, there is, uh, uh, there's no talk about beauty.
01:03:28.600 There's no talk about architecture.
01:03:30.200 There's no talk about cultural achievement.
01:03:32.080 There's no talk about, let's put it this way.
01:03:34.240 There is no talk about many of the things that are most fundamental to the meaning in
01:03:38.580 human life.
01:03:39.180 And that's not to degrade or denigrate the achievements that are being spoken about there,
01:03:43.280 but it is rather to say that, that, that if your metric for human flourishing is, do we
01:03:50.820 have enough to eat?
01:03:52.100 And are we not getting rained on?
01:03:54.600 And, you know, you go through these lists of kind of fundamentally material things, all of
01:03:58.360 which are fundamentally important.
01:03:59.340 And not only because they're, they're material, because there's also a spiritual dimension
01:04:02.840 to those things for human beings.
01:04:04.060 But the point I'm making is that you see the same thing in Steven Pinker's work, like
01:04:08.400 the blank slate.
01:04:09.720 If I'm sorry, I hope I've got this right.
01:04:11.440 Cause I've read a couple of Pinker's books, but one of the things, so he thinks very much
01:04:15.620 like Tupi thinks, and he wrote the better, um, angels of our nature, if I remember correctly
01:04:21.280 as well, showing that human aggression has decreased substantially over the last number of
01:04:26.440 centuries.
01:04:26.760 But the, all of the, um, qualities of humanity that you describe are sort of, they're parsed
01:04:35.280 off near the end of the book into a single chapter as if they're just secondary side effects
01:04:40.080 of some more profound rationality, let's say.
01:04:43.500 And it's the rationality that's concentrating on material wellbeing.
01:04:47.540 And I don't have anything against material wellbeing and the elimination of privation, but there
01:04:53.000 is, and it's interesting that you make that comment about Tupi's work is that that the
01:04:57.640 spiritual dimension, it's like the list of, of, of, of, of what should be attended to,
01:05:04.000 to have a meaningful life that I listed at the beginning of our talk.
01:05:07.720 At the end, I capped that off with some attention to be paid for the spiritual or moral or religious
01:05:13.200 element of life to bring everything together.
01:05:15.120 And that narrow focus on material wellbeing necessary, though it is, does seem to lack
01:05:23.440 to, it, there's something in it that's missing.
01:05:26.060 That's absolutely fundamental that if it's missing undermines the whole project or appears
01:05:31.100 to.
01:05:32.680 Well, I think the bottom line is that there, there, there is no deep human realization for
01:05:38.340 any individual outside of understanding her or himself in relation to higher order principles,
01:05:44.560 truths, realities.
01:05:45.980 I mean, that's just what human being, that's what human beings are.
01:05:47.840 So that is not to denigrate the necessity of improvement in all of these areas that Tupi
01:05:52.960 so brilliantly chronicles.
01:05:54.920 I don't portray myself as somehow anti-Tupi.
01:05:57.520 I'm a huge fan of, of, of this.
01:05:59.740 I'm a huge fan of the inclusive institutions that they describe as necessary to human, human
01:06:04.820 flourishing.
01:06:05.320 But I think it needs to be said that in the most developed places, so-called developed
01:06:09.340 places of the world, skepticism about those inclusive institutions is higher than anywhere
01:06:14.220 else, or at least arguably so.
01:06:16.680 I think it needs to be said that there's, there's, there's nothing in the book about the very
01:06:23.460 disturbing trends of, of rising suicide, of, of rising, of dopamine addiction, of porn addiction
01:06:30.460 in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in young and young men, of course, especially these are
01:06:34.500 and I think it needs to be said that many of these things that appear to be a very fundamental
01:06:40.840 malaise of contemporary life are also related to technology.
01:06:45.220 And one of the paradoxes, I think that I love to ask you about Jordan relative to your own
01:06:50.300 work on the individual and human individual realization is that if on the one hand, human
01:06:56.640 beings are becoming increasingly liberated from, you know, the demands of material necessity,
01:07:01.920 I mean, the amount of time it took to, they, you know, they, they bring up brilliantly to
01:07:05.680 create light, for example, was an immense amount of work or create, to, to save up enough calories
01:07:11.440 to make it through a winter.
01:07:12.440 All of these, just this, this, this, the bone grindingly hard aspect of, of human existence
01:07:18.460 for, for millennia, then we are very rapidly in the last two centuries, uh, you know, now
01:07:25.540 almost every human being in the planet, not everyone, but the vast majority are living at
01:07:30.160 standards of living that were inconceivable by anyone just a few centuries ago.
01:07:33.980 So these are, these are, these are, these are amazing, uh, uh, uh, achievements, but it
01:07:40.220 also needs to be said that insofar as if on the one hand, the individual is being liberated
01:07:44.300 from these, uh, uh, those bone crushing realities at the same time, it does appear to be a key
01:07:54.080 aspect of modern life that individuals are finding themselves less connected, more alienated,
01:08:00.420 and that the very technology in some respects that liberates them also appears to homogenize
01:08:07.760 in a kind of globally reductive way such that, you know, as human life is lived on the ground,
01:08:14.360 the frame in which it's actually lived and we're in which meaning is derived, that that
01:08:18.720 has become more distant, uh, uh, harder to access and that we have far fewer of the tools
01:08:25.820 we might have once had to make sense of that all important sphere.
01:08:30.420 I've talked to Bjorn Lomberg and to Matt Ridley and to Marion Toopey and to other people who
01:08:38.140 are deeply concerned about continuing to make absolute privation, let's say a thing of the
01:08:44.380 past and, and to many people as well who are hoping to ameliorate relative privation, which
01:08:50.360 is more the concern of the left, as you already pointed out.
01:08:53.680 And all of these people are also aware, and Stephen Fry, for that matter, you know, Stephen
01:08:59.460 has allied himself to some degree with the four horsemen of the atheist world and is a dramatist
01:09:05.900 and so understands, at least in his bones, the necessity of this underlying poetic, dramatic,
01:09:13.580 religious, humanistic matrix out of which rationality has emerged and in which rationality must remain
01:09:21.260 embedded. I mean, what it looks like to me is that, and, and I see this dawning realization
01:09:27.140 among people like Richard Dawkins as well, at least by proxy, um, talking to people who
01:09:33.700 know him and watching what's happened to him with the humanists, for example, who attacked
01:09:38.080 him, is that this insistence on pure rationality and pure enlightenment rationality doesn't address
01:09:46.200 the fundamental religious impulse. And the hope was, among the four horsemen of the atheist
01:09:52.300 world, let's say, that once we dispensed with this irrational superstition, we'd all become
01:09:57.760 materialist rationalists, you know, of the intellectual caliber of Stephen Pinker. But that isn't what's
01:10:03.980 happening. I don't believe that that can be the case. What happens instead is that all sorts of
01:10:09.740 things that religion should be separated from, the higher life, the spiritual life, the religious
01:10:17.060 life, all of that falls down a level or two, and, and, and pure politics becomes contaminated with the
01:10:25.220 religious impulse. And then it becomes totalizing. And that looks like a catastrophe. And so it seems to me
01:10:32.280 that we need to pull up the spiritual domain again, to parse it off as a separate field of, of what,
01:10:42.580 endeavor, study, hope, to give the, to give it its due. And that the, that's the role, at least in part,
01:10:50.380 that the university should be playing. Instead, they're tearing things down.
01:10:56.100 Yeah. And I mean, I think it needs to be said, I mean, these, these, these, these, these,
01:10:58.880 you know, technology is an amazing tool. That's what it is. It is a tool. It does not have a moral
01:11:03.540 value in itself. You know, it's, it's, it's, it's, and it's, and it's, it, there's no question that it
01:11:08.500 largely, well, it is, it is morally in, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, what is the word I'm looking for? It doesn't
01:11:18.360 have a moral determination intrinsic to itself. Uh, uh, but, but, so that is to say, even from the
01:11:25.100 standpoint of the, this, the kind of narrow instrumental rationalism, you still are putting
01:11:31.840 this in service of something that you think is, that you think is good. You know, it's good to
01:11:37.420 feed people, but you know, you have to ask, you have to ask yourself, you know, why do we think
01:11:41.340 peace is better than war? Or why is it that, that, you know, forgiveness is better than vengeance or
01:11:46.720 that, um, that unity is better than disunity or that beauty is better than ugliness. And this is a
01:11:52.140 point that I know we ought, we, we both are very keen about. Maybe we can talk about beauty in a
01:11:56.560 minute, but the, the, the point I'm making is that, uh, it is twofold. First, so that's, that's
01:12:02.180 relevant to that central animating spirit of, of, of mankind, let's say, because that central
01:12:08.700 animating spirit accepts all those propositions that you just laid out as givens, that beauty is
01:12:14.500 preferable to ugliness, that unity is preferable to disunity, that, that, um, life more abundant is
01:12:20.660 preferable to privation. And that's all part of our, our central ethic. And that's part of the
01:12:26.880 central ethic of our properly functioning institutions as well. And it's part of the
01:12:31.780 central ethic that enables us to communicate about what's good and what's evil. And it's part of the
01:12:36.200 central ethic that allows our consciences to torment us when we deviate from that path. And that's not
01:12:42.500 merely a matter of aberration from a central power drive. Yeah. I mean, I think there's a real
01:12:49.060 question, you know, the, the, you know, the West, the world at large could very easily become a
01:12:56.440 technological order set over a moral vacuum. And this is not to denigrate the technology, but actually
01:13:02.300 it'll destroy itself, right? That's well, look, I mean, it's very easy to point that out. I mean,
01:13:07.240 you know, we can, you know, the, the, the, the, the national socialist was, it was a very largely
01:13:10.740 technological regime, you know, nuclear war is the creation of technology, you know, the gene
01:13:16.120 modifying technology, bio-warfare. These are all things that are either there or almost there
01:13:21.900 with the capacity to, to wreak unimaginable suffering on the entire planet because of the
01:13:28.620 technology. That's not to say the technology is bad. It is to say rather that it must take its place
01:13:34.560 relative to a higher order series of conversations. And what I absolutely want to insist on is that
01:13:40.020 those higher order conversations, they're not mere intuitions. They're not mere, you know, you know,
01:13:44.940 speculative, oh, we can just kind of, you know, consult the, the, the, the entrails of a goose
01:13:49.840 or something. They're also not mere expressions of the arbitrary desire for power because that's
01:13:55.020 not the central animating spirit. That isn't why you built Ross, that isn't why you're trying to
01:14:00.000 build Ralston College. It isn't to fulfill your own desire for power. That's not a good motivation.
01:14:05.860 It's not pleasing. It doesn't last. It's not enriching. It's what people turn to when they're
01:14:11.660 bitter and cynical and, and feel that there's nothing left, but the exploitation of others for
01:14:17.040 momentary pleasure. It can't, you can't be more cynical than that. And so we also have to ask
01:14:23.100 ourselves, why the hell did we get so cynical about ourselves? It doesn't, I mean, gosh, that is
01:14:29.780 such a good question. Do you remember, do you remember in that, in that debate with Zizek,
01:14:34.140 um, there was a, a piece that we're going to clip out and, but it's part of something I already clipped
01:14:41.140 out of a 15 minute piece of that debate. I talked about the communist manifesto as a call to bloody
01:14:48.540 violent revolution and a significant proportion of the audience who were obviously pro-Marxist and had
01:14:55.680 come to hear Zizek hopefully defend their hero, um, cheered and laughed when I talked about bloody
01:15:02.360 violent revolution. And, you know, it, it's also the case that once you make the prop, look, I've,
01:15:13.280 I've been trying to understand, for example, when the left goes too far, you know, where's the cutoff
01:15:18.840 line? It's very difficult to draw, but the problem with the insistence that power structures, everything
01:15:26.580 is that as soon as you insist upon that, you justify, you can't help but justify your own use
01:15:34.100 of power. And then that for me, as a psychoanalytic thinker, let's say, then that makes me suspicious
01:15:40.400 that perhaps that's the motivation for the entire bloody argument. It's like, well, everything's about
01:15:46.760 power, so it's perfectly fine for me to express power in whatever way I see fit, especially if I'm
01:15:52.920 serving the oppressed or I'm serving some higher moral order. But really what I'm trying to do is
01:15:58.900 to find a justification for my expression of naked power. And you can see the enjoyment in the crowd
01:16:04.540 when that phrase about bloody violent revolution popped out. It's like, yes, yes, it's really, that's
01:16:10.720 what you want. And who is it exactly here that's animated by the desire for power? And so, I mean, is the,
01:16:17.620 is the driving force behind the insistence that all our social institutions are based on power,
01:16:23.120 the desire to justify power as a political weapon? That is indubitably a significant part of the
01:16:32.240 attraction, though I think it takes its strength fundamentally morally from the perception that
01:16:42.180 this mode of analysis can help us redress suffering.
01:16:48.360 Well, you insisted, yeah, you insisted earlier, and I've, I was speaking with someone else who made
01:16:54.320 the same case very recently. I can't remember who it was, but it'll come to me. You know, that there's
01:17:01.800 no impulse to action without a drive toward the good, but I'm not so sure about that. I think that people
01:17:08.320 can become hurt enough and bitter enough and resentful enough so that they are driven by the
01:17:16.140 desire to make things worse, that there isn't a good in mind. Oh, certainly, but that's, I mean,
01:17:22.180 I know, absolutely, but I mean, there is, there's a, there's a, however misperceived, there's some
01:17:27.120 end in the activity. I'm not saying it's a good move. Why couldn't the end just be, like, because I've
01:17:32.060 thought about Hitler in this regard, too. It's like, there's this old psychoanalytic dictum that Jung,
01:17:37.160 I believe, formulated. I haven't been able to find exactly where he, he stated it, unfortunately,
01:17:43.000 but the gist of it is that if you don't understand the motivation for something, you look at the
01:17:48.980 outcome, and you infer the motivation. And so then I look at Hitler, and he committed suicide in a
01:17:56.600 bunker after berating Germany for failing to live up to his noble ideal, left the entire country in
01:18:03.180 flames, left the entire continent in ruins, in this massive conflagration. He was always interested
01:18:09.860 in the worship of fire. I mean, and so, you know, one interpretation would be that Hitler was attempting
01:18:15.560 to produce, you know, a new world order. Another would be that he was aiming at committing suicide
01:18:21.660 in the midst of Europe in flames. And that was the outcome, and I'm kind of likely to attribute that
01:18:30.260 motivation. You know, you can think about it as a warped attempt to pursue the good, you know, in
01:18:38.240 the form of, let's say, an extreme nationalism, and the binding of a tribe. But to me, it's more
01:18:44.620 shaking his fist at God in the sky and saying, you know, here's my revenge on the world you created.
01:18:52.940 And I don't see a good, I don't see any drive to good in that, except peripherally.
01:18:58.480 Oh, sure. Sure. I'm not, I'm not saying, I'm certainly not saying that these things are actually
01:19:03.240 good. What I'm saying is that- I know, I know, you're not. Yeah, yeah. That the action, that the action,
01:19:07.960 however perverse, perceives, even if it's just the perception of the furtherance of the self-sown will
01:19:16.080 to power. You know, there's a, what I'm saying is it's moved by a perception of an end, and that end
01:19:21.880 may be completely cataclysmic. I'm not, I'm not, not, and frankly, that's why the whole work of
01:19:28.240 education, the whole work of education, of parenting, of our social institutions, aims at,
01:19:37.140 we hope, enlightening or helping the individual to better perceive what is really good. Good, yes.
01:19:48.380 And, and so, you know, let me ask you about that. So I've been thinking psychologically, again, about
01:19:53.880 Christianity. And I know that Christianity is an extension of other metaphysical forms of thought,
01:20:02.620 but, that predated. But it looked to me like, and, and some of those were derived from Mesopotamia,
01:20:10.680 and some of them were derived from Greece, and some of them were derived from Judaism, and other
01:20:14.480 sources. But they all seem to me to be part of the conversation that human beings have been having
01:20:21.180 amongst themselves for thousands of years about what the nature of the ideal human being is.
01:20:26.960 And now I see these cathedrals, these works of art in architecture that took a tremendous amount of
01:20:33.840 labor, produce a dome-like structure that represents the sky, and you see Christ as logos spread out on
01:20:41.360 the sky as a transcendent force. And you ask yourself, well, what exactly is that signifying? And the answer
01:20:49.640 is at least the proposition of a kind of ideal that's associated with, let's say, universal love and
01:20:57.820 truth in speech. That's the logos summed up in two phrases. And if there's no metaphysical reality there
01:21:06.920 at all, there's still this imaginative enterprise that characterizes the entire human, what, imaginative
01:21:15.900 effort, cultural effort, to posit a transcendent ideal that we would live in relationship to.
01:21:23.860 And I just don't see that case being made very strongly, and I can't really understand why, because
01:21:28.820 isn't it rather obvious that at least part of what Christianity has been is the attempt by thousands
01:21:35.400 of people over thousands of years to specify the nature of an ideal?
01:21:38.980 Certainly, I would say so. And I would say that the fact that these principles actually work is
01:21:48.140 proof of their being true accounts of what the nature of the real is. Well, let's approach this
01:22:01.520 from a couple of different angles, Jordan. The first is, one of the things that I profoundly believe
01:22:06.780 is that, you know, these young people seeking deeper answers, and, you know, however much they
01:22:15.620 may be flailing about, you know, it's not their fault that many, perhaps most of the institutions
01:22:23.380 they will encounter will betray that which is deepest in them, will denigrate, will tell them,
01:22:30.860 no, none of these things that you're seeking are really real. I mean, I think, you know, I've been
01:22:35.720 talking, thinking a lot over the years about architecture, and what is going on in brutalist
01:22:42.060 architecture. And it really does seem to me that in brutalist architecture, I mean, to live in
01:22:46.780 relation to brutalist architecture, it is as if you had a parent that said, you know, you're nothing.
01:22:52.480 You're nothing, you'll never amount to any, I mean, of course, there are terrible people, terrible to say
01:22:57.440 people actually, there are people in these situations who live with such dysfunctional
01:23:02.940 lack of love and antagonism. This is the way that the home life that they, that some people
01:23:09.280 terribly have. But I'm using this as an example, because I think what brutalist architecture does
01:23:15.080 is it declares to the whole world and to you that you are, there is no truth, there is no beauty,
01:23:20.280 you are nothing, accept it. It's just a concrete, annihilating force. And, and, and, and, and you
01:23:30.960 see this culture of repudiation, I mean, here in, in, in, not here, you're in Canada, I'm in the States
01:23:35.540 in Savannah now. But you know, the Chateau Laurier, I think I misspoke recently called it the Frontenac,
01:23:40.940 which is in Quebec. But in Ottawa, you know, the Chateau Laurier, there's been a desire to expand
01:23:46.360 this sort of beautiful sort of neo gothic building. And it went through six rounds of
01:23:51.940 approval to finally be to make a set of plans that would meet the local architectural
01:23:58.580 or review board, whatever it was. And I thought, well, it can't be that bad. You know, it's gone
01:24:04.780 through that. And I mean, this structure is abhorrent, it looks like a cross between a Verizon
01:24:12.040 server farm and an American penitentiary. I mean, it is just a, it is a declaration that there,
01:24:18.840 that there is no higher order. You know, in Edinburgh, they're tearing all those out, eh?
01:24:24.040 There is, Edinburgh is an unbelievable, beautiful, beautiful city. The whole central mile of it,
01:24:30.520 square mile essentially, is a UNESCO World Heritage Site. And it's marred by random placements
01:24:36.920 of 1970s brutalist architecture. And they're just horrible. It's complete lack of regard for the
01:24:43.760 architectural context. And they're all being torn out and replaced, thank God. So, well,
01:24:50.400 this architectural idea, so back to the cathedral, you know, what's really interesting about
01:24:54.840 a cathedral with, let's say, Christ as Pantocrator on the ceiling is spread against the ceiling is
01:25:01.080 that it's not the state that's portrayed up there, right? It's not a map of the country. It's
01:25:07.720 not even a map of the world. It's not a geographical locale or a political institution. It's the
01:25:12.840 transcendent individual. And, you know, it's just not obvious to me. It seems obvious to me that that's
01:25:20.400 correct. And that if it isn't the transcendent individual, then it becomes the state. And as soon
01:25:26.980 as the transcendent becomes the state, then we have a catastrophe. And I don't see any difference
01:25:33.320 between the insistence that our identity is predicated on our group membership. I don't
01:25:38.720 see any real difference between that and the insistence that we're just handmaidens of the
01:25:42.480 state. It's a totalitarian insistence. And I think part of that too is maybe, you know, I learned from
01:25:48.220 Jung that as soon as you posit an ideal, you also specify a judge. And the more, the higher the ideal,
01:25:55.520 the more severe the judgment because of your distance from the ideal. And so part of what
01:26:01.700 we're seeing too might be a rebellion against the awful requirements of that ideal. But that
01:26:09.620 doesn't justify, that doesn't justify the rebellion. Because if it's really the ideal, then if you don't
01:26:15.740 act it out, you fail to act it out at your peril. And then we need to have a serious conversation about
01:26:21.580 the metaphysical, about the practical implications of the idea of this ideal. I mean, if we've had
01:26:29.680 this conversation about the transcendent individual as the ideal against which we should all be judged
01:26:35.500 and to which we should strive to emulate, is there any relationship between that ideal and the structure
01:26:44.320 of reality itself? Because that's the hundred dollar question, so to speak. You know, we have a human
01:26:52.260 ideal, and you could say merely psychologically, maybe even merely biologically, that that's something
01:26:57.880 we originated, that's part of our biological nature, that's expressed in this ideal, and it's nothing
01:27:03.800 more than that. But you could also say, well, perhaps it is something more than that. Perhaps it's
01:27:08.440 reflective of the structure of being itself. I mean, it depends on our position in the cosmos.
01:27:14.500 You know, we are self-conscious. We are that which reflects being itself, or perhaps even makes it
01:27:19.980 possible. It's not that obvious what our role is. It might not be so trivial, despite our mortality.
01:27:28.440 Well, I would say that not only it is as you say, but we can know it to be as you say. I mean,
01:27:34.920 this is what the whole history, in some sense, of literature and philosophy and theology
01:27:42.380 is about, and I want to insist on this. It is a rational grappling with these questions, realities,
01:27:53.040 and indeed truths. I want to come back to something in a minute, but just on this topic,
01:28:00.600 one way into this is to reflect on the fact that reality is not zero sum. Of course, we know this
01:28:11.180 economically. You were talking, Jordan, a minute ago about the voluntary exchange of regulated,
01:28:18.080 that is to say, a contractually governed marketplace, that in this exchange, it's not
01:28:26.500 zero sum. We all end up over time better. But you also see this naturally in the evolution
01:28:33.180 of the diversity of species, of languages, of cultures. You've written beautifully about play
01:28:39.980 as orienting the child in relation to a deepening reciprocity with others. We know this in terms of
01:28:48.560 knowledge. I mean, how can it be that in a conversation, I can be wrong and be shown to be
01:28:55.560 wrong? And that'd be a net gain for me. I mean, the whole point of free dialogue is that we can learn
01:29:06.240 in our not knowing, that the conversation is not zero sum, that even in our, we know this
01:29:15.300 in terms of forgiveness, that even our betrayals of beautiful things can become deepening
01:29:20.480 engagements with what we have betrayed, if we have the humility to see it. And so then, you know,
01:29:28.040 I think, you know, that leads one to, you know, what, geez, you can go back, you can go at the level
01:29:34.660 of subatomic particles in physics. I had the pleasure of talking with Freeman Dyson before he died. And,
01:29:41.080 you know, Dyson will say very clearly that against the determinists, you know, some of the rational
01:29:46.020 optimists are pretty religiously determinist in their worldview, you know, and they want to marshal
01:29:52.500 modern science as saying that their determinism is what science teaches. But that, you know, Dyson,
01:29:58.920 who was a subatomic physicist at the highest level, you know, expressly said the opposite. He said that
01:30:06.000 the electron, that, you know, essentially, he says that the electron is free, that consciousness is not
01:30:13.080 an epiphenomenon, that at the very most detailed level of subatomic particles, things are not
01:30:20.180 determinist. And the reason I want to go all the way down to that level is because you can go down to
01:30:25.340 the lowest level of resolution, then you can back up to the higher level, and see that there is a non-zero-sum
01:30:34.520 nature to what is real. And then you have to ask yourself, is it good to live in relation to
01:30:43.080 what is true, or should I live in a delusion? And we say, well, it's better to live in relation to
01:30:50.260 what's true than to live in relation to a delusion. And then you say, well, what would it mean then
01:30:55.800 for me to live in relation to this positive sum, this essential reciprocity, which I think is really
01:31:03.900 what the Christian view of the Trinity is about, this essential reciprocity, which is the bedrock of
01:31:09.380 all reality? What would it mean to live in relation to that? What would it mean to remember that?
01:31:14.620 And, you know, one can approach that in any number of different ways, but certainly that is what prayer
01:31:20.480 is. That is what all spiritual exercises are. That's what perhaps walking in nature can be. That's what
01:31:26.240 any kind of meditative activity, intellectual or physical, is a recollecting of the self in the deepest
01:31:34.760 way to what is most real. And I know you've written, for example, about gratitude. And I love your words
01:31:42.760 about gratitude, because it's an inversion of the burden. It's not that it all comes down to us, but
01:31:49.620 actually just the opposite, that we place ourselves in the hands of the eternal
01:31:58.160 reciprocity that gathers us up and puts us back together. And I think that this, frankly, is a
01:32:10.460 deeply rational standpoint that can be shown to be, despite my not making it very articulately here
01:32:18.520 today, shown to be true in economics, in physics, in biology, in sociology, and certainly in all of the
01:32:25.960 higher order spheres of human knowing. This is the nature of what we are and what the world is. And
01:32:35.640 this is where, you know, your image of the pantocrator, you know, I think this comes back to
01:32:40.740 this, because what fundamentally is going on there is that, you know, the logos is in us. You know,
01:32:48.240 it's actually in us. That's why when you talk about the divine significance of truth and speech,
01:32:53.340 that, you know, we are made to understand ourselves in relation to the whole. That is an intrinsic
01:33:00.680 human need and an intrinsic human ability. And I think that, you know, this is where, you know,
01:33:08.040 you know, my life is about trying to, in whatever small way I can, you know, open, if the nihilists
01:33:14.500 darken the horizon and close off in the way that brutalist architecture does, close off what we're
01:33:19.700 allowed to become and understand ourselves as. Then I think the work of our time is to open it
01:33:24.880 back up. And, and, and, and that is really what the humanities are fundamentally about. You can go
01:33:30.720 back to, you know, one of the things I despise about the current structure of the academy is it
01:33:35.240 acts as though, you know, these things are just for the few. But, you know, you think about, you know,
01:33:40.000 Homer. I mean, Homer was the mode of educating the Greeks for, you know, a thousand years. The pantheon was
01:33:45.420 right there on the highest hill where everyone could see it. Same with Gothic architecture. You
01:33:50.600 know, J.S. Bach, perhaps the greatest musician who ever lived, was a parish church musician. Anyone,
01:33:56.380 I presume, could walk in the doors and listen to his, to his, to his, to his cantatas. I mean,
01:34:00.820 Dickens, when Dickens wrote, I've heard recently people would line the docks to wait, to see what,
01:34:07.340 what was the next, you know, what was the next installment of Dickens. And so what, what I think,
01:34:11.960 you know, most fundamentally is that the, the antidote to the spiritual crisis, civilizational
01:34:16.620 cultural crisis we're living in is, is, is, is, is really fundamentally simple in it, at least it's
01:34:24.400 what we can state it as. And that is to, to, to open the horizon again, to turn the lights back on.
01:34:30.480 And what that means is to turn them on so that individuals can better come to understand themselves
01:34:35.920 in relation to these higher order realities in the image of which they are made. And in relation to
01:34:41.480 which their fundamental realization essentially depends.
01:34:46.220 So we have, so there's critiques of, let's say, thought in relationship to the ideal,
01:34:55.040 that Freudian critique of religious structure, that
01:34:57.320 it's infantile. And, and perhaps that's a consequence of the hypothesis of the divine
01:35:06.300 afterlife that awaits us all. Freud regarded that as an infantile response to the reality of
01:35:11.460 death. And, and there's the Marxist criticism that religion only serves power and it's the opiate of
01:35:17.000 the masses. But there's, I, I, it's striking to me how poorly the alternative position has been
01:35:23.420 defended given its unbelievable power. I mean, look, we all seem to recognize within ourselves that we
01:35:30.740 have moral culpability, as far as I can tell, because I've never met anyone who hasn't tortured
01:35:36.240 themselves to a tremendous degree as a consequence of their own perceived inadequacies in relationship
01:35:43.200 to the ideal. I see that people take the deepest pleasure that's possible in life in the facilitation
01:35:50.380 of the development of others. I don't believe that, I believe that's wisdom to notice that,
01:35:56.660 to say, well, it isn't the, the service to my momentary desires for pleasure or even comfort for
01:36:06.320 that matter, where I'm going to find the deepest significance, life sustaining significance that
01:36:12.220 keeps me away from nihilistic hell and, and the desire to destroy and hurt. It's, it's going to be
01:36:19.040 something like service to the greater good and primarily in the form of, well, other people in
01:36:26.140 their longest possible term interests and that we have not only a divine responsibility to do that,
01:36:32.420 but a divine capacity to do that, that if not manifested, cripples us spiritually and, and physically
01:36:40.780 for that matter. And I mean, the ultimate significance of that remains unknowable, but
01:36:47.980 I don't see any logical flaws in the, in the, in the proposition. I mean, I looked at the manner in
01:36:55.260 which the Mesopotamians built their savior, Marduk. Marduk has eyes all the way around his head and he
01:37:01.200 speaks magic words. The, the cosmos comes into being and disappears as a consequence of his utterances.
01:37:06.420 And like, there's this sense emerging in Mesopotamia as the consequence of the aggregation
01:37:12.440 of all these cultures, that the highest order being is extraordinarily attentive, hence the
01:37:18.020 all encircling eyes, and is capable of the deepest and most profound speech. And that's not a realization
01:37:25.180 that's in any means trivial, that the Mesopotamians had wars between all of their representations of
01:37:31.400 their gods. And what they elevated to the highest position was this all seeing, truth speaking
01:37:37.660 capacity that also went forward and confronted chaos and built the world as a consequence.
01:37:43.760 And the influence of that set of ideas, or the derivation from the set, same set of ideas for the
01:37:50.000 Jewish conception of Yahweh is quite clear. And you see the same thing emerging in Greece with,
01:37:55.800 with the building of a pantheon of gods and the proposition that something occupies the apex,
01:38:00.980 something Apollonian or something of that nature. And then you see that revolution take place
01:38:07.900 with the dawn of Christianity and the insistence that there's something fundamental about
01:38:13.660 consciousness and spoken, and what's, and the spoken truth that is constitutive of reality. And
01:38:23.400 you ask yourself, well, do you believe that? And the answer is, well, you treat people like you
01:38:28.540 believe that, because you hold them responsible for the consequences of their utterances, and you
01:38:32.680 judge their character on the basis of what they say, and you, and on whether or not they act out what
01:38:38.220 they say. And so we hold each other to these standards with everything that we do, and we
01:38:42.960 berate ourselves when we don't live up to them. And I don't understand how it is that we can be said
01:38:47.440 not to believe it. Now, you know, there's the dogmatic element, the hypothesis, for example,
01:38:53.440 that Christ is literally the son of God. And I mean, my knowledge runs out very, very rapidly when
01:38:59.100 speculating about such things. But I'm certainly, certainly seems to me that Christianity has at
01:39:04.340 least been a very long conversation about what the nature of the good is, and that that's spilled out
01:39:09.640 into the humanities and, and underlies our culture. And that, that, that, that has very little to do with
01:39:17.120 the expression of power. It's, it's the, it's not the right lens through which to view things. It's
01:39:22.540 devastating. It's wrong. It's cynical. And I think it appeals to envy and the desire to tear down.
01:39:31.920 Well, well, I, I, I, I think, think that the, well, two things I would say just quite quickly,
01:39:40.940 Jordan. The first is that, you know, uh, we have immense resources in the, uh, in our own past and
01:39:47.960 in the past of every culture. I mean, one of the things I love about your work is how syncretistic
01:39:51.380 is, you know, here you've moved in the last five minutes and you moved from Marduk to, you know,
01:39:57.020 the Pantocrater to, uh, uh, to, uh, the Greeks and, and good on you for doing it. I mean, that's,
01:40:03.680 that's, uh, I think, uh, I want to say that, uh, you say people have not been good at making
01:40:10.920 the counter-argument, uh, well, um, uh, you've been very, very good at making the counter-argument
01:40:19.180 and, uh, the millions of people who've had their lives, uh, touched and ennobled and deepened,
01:40:25.880 uh, by, uh, by, um, taking seriously the things you point towards, uh, are proof of that. Um, I,
01:40:35.320 you know, I think relative to our spiritual cultural, uh, crisis, uh, we should not pretend
01:40:42.980 that we don't have resources. I mean, it's as if, uh, uh, it's as if, you know, the situation is,
01:40:49.820 is if you were to give young people, uh, uh, the challenge of building something beautiful. And if
01:40:57.060 you were to, if you were to say, well, you're absolutely not allowed to look at or have any
01:41:02.740 knowledge of any previous building, well, the results are not going to be very good,
01:41:06.260 but as soon as you say, and you can go back to Palladio and Vitruvius and look at all these models
01:41:11.460 and discover all of the things that they give you, I mean, the results will be amazing. And so I,
01:41:18.680 what I want to, I want to drive towards a kind of, uh, optimism, not rooted in, in kind of, uh,
01:41:27.460 silly blindness about the depth of our problems, but rather, uh, in, in the, the, the nature of what
01:41:35.420 is most real and the whole treasure house of, of tools. It's like, we have these spotlights
01:41:43.180 from the, from the past to help us understand ourselves and the, the, the, the, the, the world
01:41:49.080 around us in philosophy and religion and literature and architecture and art and, in, in art and painting
01:41:54.980 and music. I mean, for God's sakes, I mean, we, we've got, we've got an unspeakable treasure house
01:42:01.700 here and, and the, it may be that as we dig into that, we see that we uncover ourselves more
01:42:12.100 and understand ourselves more, uh, adequately. You know, I want to, one example, you know, for example,
01:42:19.180 I think, uh, one thing that is, is, uh, uh, I live in the, in, in beautiful city, in a very beautiful
01:42:24.660 city and in historic Savannah, and I'm live on the edge of a, just absolutely a stunning civic space,
01:42:32.440 a park called Forsyth park. I hope you can come and see it someday. There's a beautiful fountain in
01:42:38.120 the middle of it. And it has these, these, these oak trees, these live oaks that were planted by
01:42:43.580 people long dead. Now these oaks of, you know, one to two to even 300 years, uh, old. And
01:42:52.040 I not infrequently see, uh, young couples coming to stand in front of one of the biggest,
01:43:00.180 the biggest oak inside the park proper to, uh, to get married. You know, they stand there with the
01:43:07.040 justice of the peace and, uh, exchange simple vows. And I think we have to ask ourselves what in the
01:43:15.200 hell is going on there? And it seems to me, you know, very beautiful and in a way, very simple.
01:43:22.160 It's that they wish that their vows, they're aspiring to be to each other in some way as the
01:43:29.980 oak tree, as able to live up to the, um, the love that they are called to. And they want to
01:43:43.820 instantiate that, uh, by, uh, by... Well, that's why they turn to the garden and the tree and the
01:43:50.040 scent. Yes. Yes. And act out Adam and Eve. Yes. Reborn. Yes. Yes. But there's a related point I would make,
01:43:58.540 and that is that, that, you know, we're not, we are not starting fatherless in the regeneration.
01:44:05.560 I mean, I, I absolutely, you know, I'm the president of Austin College.
01:44:08.080 Well, we have to, if the father's nothing but a tyrant.
01:44:12.160 Yes. Well, that's the thing. We can't, we've got to stop thinking that way.
01:44:15.920 The father isn't a tyrant. Yes. Yes. You know, this is what's so sad. I mean, you, you, you,
01:44:22.960 I've been in enough cities with you to be, have been very touched at the people coming
01:44:28.060 up to you. And I know you all almost invariably get emotional when you discuss what it means to
01:44:34.180 you to have people come and thank you for your work. Um, and, um, what I am so struck by in,
01:44:43.100 in those experiences and in the people who come increasingly to us at Ralston college is,
01:44:49.400 uh, I mean, we had a young man drive all the way from Utah, uh, without telling us, uh, in the hope of
01:44:55.280 just, um, meeting someone here, uh, had someone moved to Savannah, a former military, uh, young
01:45:01.920 man, uh, with all, again, without telling us. And the question is what is going on there? Um,
01:45:07.460 you know, these young people who turn to us are not, they are not animated by the culture wars
01:45:12.680 fundamentally. They are already seeking out higher order realities. Uh, they want to give themselves
01:45:20.400 to rebuilding things in a, uh, beautiful and fundamental, uh, way. And I think we need to
01:45:31.700 remember, we see, we must absolutely not buy the line that the revolutionaries want to force down
01:45:38.740 our throats, which is that, you know, the whole past is wicked and terrible, and there's nothing,
01:45:42.960 there's nothing of value there at all. Because once we do that, we have cut ourselves off from the very
01:45:48.500 sources of the regeneration. It's not that we'd return to the past. You can't return to the past,
01:45:52.960 but it's like my image of trying to build beautiful buildings without any access to anything that's
01:45:56.820 ever been, been, been, been, been, been, been built before. And so what I, what I, what I really
01:46:04.180 think is a big problem is, and, and this is in so-called conservatism is I think, you know,
01:46:09.880 deeply fraught with this problem is that we subordinate ourselves to the current narratives,
01:46:16.940 to the idea that there is no truth, but only power, you know, to the evisceration of our
01:46:22.320 institutional life, rather than take a contradistinctively positive standpoint, which, you know,
01:46:29.660 if I can say to you, you know, this is what I think fundamentally is at work in your work,
01:46:35.660 is, is, is, is opening up a way for individuals to more deeply understand themselves and the world
01:46:43.040 around them, um, in, in, in transformatively beautiful and difficult ways. Why do you stress,
01:46:52.320 why do you stress architecture? That, that seems to have a particular meaning for you.
01:46:58.240 Well, for me, it's, it's, it's, uh, for a couple of reasons, but fundamentally it's,
01:47:03.340 is I choose architecture as the example, because I think it's the most visible, um, uh, it's the most
01:47:09.800 visible represent, representation of what the ideas are. And I think the idea is behind nihilism.
01:47:16.520 You see in university campuses, like at the University of Toronto, one side of it is cathedral
01:47:20.980 and the other side is brutalist factory. And that's, it's like the university has transformed
01:47:26.820 itself from cathedral of knowledge to brutalist factory of, of, of classroom inculcation. And that's,
01:47:33.280 that's maybe not even so much reflected in the architecture as led by the architecture.
01:47:39.040 Yes. It's not that I think architecture is alone enough. I, I choose to drill the door in for two
01:47:43.020 reasons. The first is that I think it's the clearest way into what the worldview is. I mean,
01:47:46.460 I'm a philosopher and we can talk about nihilism and, and the, the negation of, of, of higher order
01:47:51.740 goods and what those goods are, but you know, that's not the language that, that most immediately
01:47:55.860 rings with people. But if you show them a brutalist building, they get it. That's what that,
01:48:00.880 those, where those ideas lead. Whereas when you look at the great cathedrals or even just a well
01:48:05.900 balanced, simple town hall, I mean, my, my ancestors, like I grew up in Alberta as, and grew up there
01:48:12.140 until I was eight years old as you did in Alberta. And you know, my, my Ukrainian ancestors, I mean,
01:48:19.540 they lived in very, very humble homes in I mean, many of them lived in essentially dirt shacks until
01:48:27.800 they could build the next generation, the next year. And they were extremely simple homes. And
01:48:32.460 you can see recreations of, of these, these elementary forms of, of architecture, but they
01:48:38.420 are beautiful. I mean, the idea that somehow, you know, that, you know, beauty is a rarefied thing
01:48:45.560 that only those who are wealthy have access to. And that's just completely wrong. The most, one of the
01:48:49.540 most beautiful buildings I ever saw was a day laborers cottage from the, I think the 17th century
01:48:54.280 in, in the Netherlands. And so the, the point I'm, I'm making is that, is that architecture matters
01:49:02.420 both because it's a symbol of what the closing down of the horizon is, and conversely a symbol of
01:49:09.500 what opening up of the horizon looks like. I mean, you know, if you, if you live in a place with a
01:49:14.680 beautiful building, that building becomes a means of understanding yourself. In some sense, that building is
01:49:21.940 yours and it elevates and opens you up, you know, the proportions of the building, the symmetry that
01:49:28.260 becomes a way of your becoming proportioned or understanding yourself as within those. Now, I don't
01:49:34.940 think by any means architecture is sufficient. I think in fact, it's, it's even a subsidiary to
01:49:41.200 higher order things, whether it's educational, religious, civic, political, familial. I mean, the turning
01:49:49.680 on of the lights again, the opening up of the horizon needs to happen in my view, at every level
01:49:54.200 in every domain of our, of our, of our culture and architecture is just one example to help us
01:50:00.600 understand both what the closed or open horizon is and, uh, uh, uh, an instance of a domain that is
01:50:09.460 urgently in need, given our epidemic of ugliness, urgently in need of, um, uh, of being real, reopened again.
01:50:17.680 What's your vision for Ralston College, architecturally speaking?
01:50:23.460 Well, we, we are, um, uh, we're living in one, Ralston College in, in Savannah and so far as we, we, we have
01:50:30.660 and will have, uh, in-person programs here. Our endeavor is to, uh, to repurpose historic buildings in the
01:50:38.900 historic core in order to make the, this sublimely beautiful, uh, uh, historic downtown. The campus
01:50:47.640 rather than to, uh, to, uh, to build a new. Now, if we, for example, were to have a hundred million
01:50:54.000 dollars and build a new campus in some beautiful, uh, place, we would really simply, I think, want for
01:51:02.200 that to be in coherent conversation with the history of collegiate architecture. Um, uh, but, uh, as I say,
01:51:09.460 fundamentally, we, we, we chose Savannah actually, because it is a sublimely beautiful place. And because the,
01:51:17.420 the natural and architectural beauty, uh, we think, uh, is a, uh, powerful analog to the discovery of
01:51:29.520 the, uh, uh, intellectual riches of the classroom. Can I ask you where the project is, uh, in its
01:51:36.760 current state of development? Uh, certainly, um, you know, I would perhaps say just by introduction
01:51:43.380 that, you know, our analysis and the need for founding new institutions is directly related
01:51:48.020 to the things we've just been speaking about the, the cultural spiritual crisis, the upstream
01:51:52.320 influence of the university over everything else. The fact that it is the epicenter of
01:51:57.780 at very best unhelpful, at worst, uh, downright toxic forms of ideology that spread through anything
01:52:06.200 and everything, uh, uh, that is, uh, uh, is catastrophically beset with, uh, high costs,
01:52:13.000 low value, and so on and so forth. But our analysis is simply that, um, the, uh, there is huge demand
01:52:21.060 in young people for alternatives, people who are seeking alternatives to the indoctrination and
01:52:26.960 activism and fraudulent low value of the academy. I mean, I think your own work has shown this, uh,
01:52:32.800 about as clearly as anything else historically ever has, that it's a mistake to concede the,
01:52:40.660 to be, you know, your new book, you write about the need for creative dynamism in relation to our
01:52:44.640 institutions. And it seems to me we're in, in a, in a moment, not only in which that is urgently
01:52:49.700 necessary, but also eminently possible if we have only the courage to, uh, to, to do it. Um,
01:52:57.320 so, uh, what I would say is, uh, a few things. The first is that Ralston College has, has really
01:53:04.500 four fundamental commitments. First, to seek the truth with courage. Second, to apprehend beauty
01:53:14.500 in all of its forms. Third, to the freedom of speech and thought that are the conditions of those
01:53:24.280 pursuits. And finally, to the, the friendship or even fellowship that is the context for all of these
01:53:33.300 pursuits. And, you know, what's become clear to us, Jordan, over the, uh, the years is, uh, of, it's,
01:53:41.120 it's been a long, uh, runway. Uh, it's not easy getting a college going, uh, you know, anyone who thinks
01:53:47.100 that you need to go off and fight in a war in order to undertake something really hard of value.
01:53:53.560 Um, uh, uh, can call me up and we'll have a talk about other things, other projects that may be
01:53:58.920 very, very difficult to bring into the world, but, uh, uh, necessary and beautiful. Um, what's
01:54:04.140 become clear to us in these, uh, these years of development, uh, uh, which we're sort of at the
01:54:10.660 end of as we, we now are launching our first programs and, and first degree is that Ralston
01:54:16.120 College has a double vocation, both on the one hand to be a reinvention of the academy,
01:54:23.300 a place for in-person degrees, uh, uh, uh, a new model for the university that can, we hope, be
01:54:30.860 pretty radically disruptive, not just because we're going to change everything, but we hope that it
01:54:35.700 will lead to many other people doing new and different and more beautiful and more adequate
01:54:40.100 and perhaps cheaper and faster, but above all, just more important and higher value, uh, things in the
01:54:45.480 space of higher education. So on the one hand, to be a reinvention of the, uh, the, the academy,
01:54:50.780 a reinvention and a revival of the academy. Uh, but, uh, and on that side, we've, we've received
01:54:56.260 our degree granting powers from the state of Georgia. We expect to launch our first degree
01:55:00.320 this autumn. In what, in what? This first degree will be a master's in the humanities. So it will be a
01:55:06.760 pretty intensive bootcamp in thinking about the big ideas, tracing them and their development
01:55:12.320 through history, uh, which we think is important, both as a revival of those forms of, of life and
01:55:18.580 thought and culture, but also because we think they are the, as it were, the key to opening up
01:55:24.620 the depths of the self for the students themselves. Um, you know, it's not that every human, if I can't
01:55:32.400 play the piano, it's not that every, um, you talk about resentment earlier, you know, it's not that
01:55:37.100 every, uh, human being should have to play the piano like Martha Argerich or Glenn Gould, uh, from
01:55:43.540 your, your, your, your current town of Toronto. Um, uh, 99.999% of human individuals couldn't play
01:55:50.720 the piano that way, but because Glenn Gould could and did, we can all hear the music. And in some
01:55:57.640 level, I think what the, the, the, the, the high end of the academy is about is about playing the
01:56:06.080 music so we can all hear it. And, uh, and, and so on the one hand, it's the reinvention of the academy,
01:56:13.020 um, in, in, in a, in a degree form. But on the other hand, the second side of this double vocation
01:56:19.480 is to be a kind of platform of humanistic inquiry for anyone, anywhere, who wishes, wishes to engage
01:56:26.780 with the, the riches of the humanistic tradition, who wishes to seek the truth with courage, who,
01:56:31.800 who is, who is, who wishes to ask the fundamental human questions that, that, that, that every human
01:56:38.000 being must face about truth and beauty and forgiveness and love and suffering.
01:56:44.240 It, I put a reading list online of a hundred books. It's, it's at jordanbpeterson.com under books
01:56:51.140 for those who might be interested in people are buying those books like mad and reading them. And
01:56:56.000 it, it does really seem to me that, you know, if you can open up access to people, to these great
01:57:02.700 ideas and provide them with a pathway, that there's all sorts of people who are more than willing to
01:57:08.080 tread down that pathway as rapidly as possible. And so, you know, I'm, I'd be interested at,
01:57:15.720 as we progress in this conversation at some other point to know in more detail what it is that you're
01:57:21.320 planning. I mean, but I would like to ask right now, I mean, how do you envision opening up the
01:57:26.100 humanities to a broader range of people? What are you going to do that's different? Or what are you
01:57:30.680 hoping to do that's different? Well, well, it, you know, there's an, in one sense it's, it's gosh,
01:57:38.060 you know, we have to confront the fact that the universities have in many respects, I'm not a
01:57:43.200 catastrophist. I mean, you know, and there are many wonderful people teaching in many, you know,
01:57:47.520 institutions around the world. It's not like it's just all bad all the time everywhere.
01:57:51.860 But I think, and I clarify things because I don't want to be perceived as a catastrophist.
01:57:55.720 While I say that, the universities have by and large fundamentally forgotten, if not betrayed,
01:58:02.080 their fundamental value proposition. Well, what's happened to enrollment in the humanities over the
01:58:06.720 last 20 years? My understanding is that it's plummeted. Yes, of course, it's dropping from
01:58:11.440 everything I, I, I read. But, you know, I think we can look at this at a, at a higher level of
01:58:16.280 resolution or a higher level of, if we zoom out a bit, I think we can say that when people,
01:58:24.340 the average person anywhere in the world, when they are looking to make sense of their lives,
01:58:29.740 whether it's suffering or loss or cancer or, or, or, or joy or sorrow or, or, or whatever, that
01:58:38.040 the place they do not look for answers to those questions is to the university by and large. And I
01:58:46.200 think this tells us we're living in a, in a historic moment in which the institutions that are meant to
01:58:50.980 have those questions at their heart are no longer tending to them in any, uh, uh, fundamentally
01:58:57.400 visible way. And so the, the, the, the, do you think that's true of the church as well?
01:59:02.880 Definitely. I mean, again, with exceptions here and there and so forth, but I think
01:59:06.420 the, at least in my experience, I can't speak for other religious traditions. I think that, uh,
01:59:12.820 in many respects, not again, not as a catastrophist, but in many respects, the, uh, uh, the various
01:59:20.980 denominations of the Christian religion have, uh, lost their way in a way that is similar to the
01:59:27.380 humanities having lost their way. And what I want to, you know, just really insist upon is that,
01:59:32.920 you know, of course, Jordan, you know, that there are certain kinds of, um, intellectual activity
01:59:38.900 or, or intellectual domains, let's say, you know, string theory, or, um, you know, the, the, the,
01:59:46.080 highest and hardest questions in philosophy that are not fundamentally very easily accessible,
01:59:51.380 uh, to, to anyone, unless they have gone through years of apprenticeship to be able to encounter those
01:59:56.900 questions. However, the vast amount of humanistic inquiry of art and music and literature and
02:00:06.560 architecture and so on and so forth throughout virtually every humanistic domain are not only
02:00:16.300 accessible to, but are made for the enjoyment and illumination of, uh, human beings everywhere and
02:00:27.120 anywhere. And, you know, I, I had a very moving experience with someone who's quite close to me in my,
02:00:32.880 um, extended family who never really finished high school and who is very, uh, intelligent,
02:00:39.460 uh, person, uh, I hasten to, to add, not that intelligence should be any kind of marker of
02:00:45.700 value as a human being. It is not. Um, but, uh, we were in London and, uh, we were, my wife and I
02:00:53.040 were suggesting we should go to Shakespeare's globe and, uh, spend some, you know, go watch a Shakespearean
02:00:57.800 play. And this person in my extended family was, uh, who's very, very dear to me was quite insecure
02:01:03.940 about, about going. And she really sort of said, you know, no, you know, I won't understand anything.
02:01:10.440 You know, I'll go off and, you know, walk around and you all go in and enjoy, you know, Shakespeare's,
02:01:15.100 you know, her view was Shakespeare's not for me, but we insisted and she came along and it was a play I
02:01:23.780 had never had seen before. And here I had my, you know, PhD and whatever. Um, and by the intermission,
02:01:29.920 uh, I am not exaggerating to say she knew far more about what was happening in the play than I did.
02:01:35.780 And what I want to insist Jordan is that, you know, the great high watermarks of the humanities,
02:01:43.220 whether it's Bach or Matisse or the Gothic cathedrals, uh, or, or, or Homer, or just go on
02:01:51.560 and down through the list of, of all of it, they are made for everyone. And the, so the, the, the
02:01:58.660 question is, you know, how do you open them up? Well, I mean, dammit, we're going to do everything
02:02:02.160 we can to open them up. However we can. I mean, you're one of our great examples of how you open
02:02:06.140 things up. I mean, you, you, you, you, you think about them, you try and share them in a, in a medium
02:02:11.600 that seems right for a certain audience. And you, you know, you can't, you can't do everything to
02:02:15.860 everyone all the time. I mean, there are some things that you can do in the internet and some
02:02:18.800 things you can't do in the internet, some things you can do in person in a weekend, some things
02:02:22.740 take a whole year. Um, but the point is, is that by and large, the internet gives us the opportunity
02:02:31.040 and modern travel gives us the opportunity of gathering people either virtually or in person,
02:02:39.060 totally extraterritorially to the, to the university. Why should the university have to be the place
02:02:44.480 that these things are, these things are that are encountered. I mean, most of your work, though you,
02:02:48.140 I know you were formed and shaped in the university, the vast amount of your work that has reached
02:02:51.940 large audiences is not taking place in the university. And so I think that, or that's
02:02:55.740 where the university has moved. Yes, truly conceived. The university is, um, as a community of those who
02:03:04.640 pursue the truth. Yes. It's like Israel is those who struggle with God and the university is those
02:03:11.220 who struggle with the truth. Yes, exactly. So, you know, I would say that we think that there is
02:03:19.220 enormous opportunity. We have a partnership now with a global online learning platform called
02:03:24.040 FutureLearn, which grew out of the open university in the United Kingdom with, I think it's 15 million
02:03:28.900 users in 200 countries. Uh, our first courses will go up on FutureLearn, open access available to anyone,
02:03:34.540 anywhere with an internet connection. There's no credit. There's no, uh, you're not getting a, uh,
02:03:39.260 a degree. We're just trying to share these things as widely as we can. The first course will be Tony
02:03:45.420 Daniels, AKA Theodore Dalrymple, who's, I know some of whose books are on your, your, uh, reading list
02:03:52.140 on, uh, uh, Johnson's Rassilis, uh, uh, which is going to be a wonderful course. Andrew Doyle
02:03:58.140 is doing a course on, uh, Shakespeare's Titus Andronicus and so on and so forth. We'd love to
02:04:02.760 have, have, uh, uh, uh, have you join this initiative at some point if you're able, um,
02:04:07.760 and interested. The point is, is that we, we live in actually very exciting times from the standpoint
02:04:15.520 of the sharing of information, uh, freely at low cost, uh, uh, through the internet. And that's not
02:04:22.140 that, you know, which would be internet ideologues as if everything meaningful in life can be done
02:04:26.760 on the internet. It cannot be, but we should, at the same time, as you have very beautifully and
02:04:31.680 courageously shown, embrace the possibilities that it does in fact offer us. And, you know, our
02:04:38.480 deepest hope is that we can, if I can use a scriptural metaphor, you know, break the alabaster
02:04:45.600 box and take the greatest, most beautiful minds we can find and to have them share the things that
02:04:53.080 they know and understand, uh, for, uh, anyone who is seeking, uh, uh, to ask those questions,
02:05:00.340 to encounter those truths, to look at those beautiful things and to understand, um, uh,
02:05:07.020 understand themselves more truly and love others more fully. I mean, it's in a way, a very simple
02:05:13.180 endeavor, but we, I think have to insist that, that we ought not to be captive to the closed horizon
02:05:19.900 that would tell us, you know, it's too late. It's not possible. The very hunger,
02:05:27.620 the deafening hunger around us is a sign that, that at a minimum, we can try to give what we can
02:05:34.860 to those who seek it.
02:05:39.160 That's a really good place to stop.
02:05:40.880 Thanks very much for talking with me today, Stephen, and best of luck with your initiative.
02:05:48.060 And thank you very much for the conversation.
02:05:50.880 Thank you, Jordan, for having me.
02:05:52.820 Thank you.
02:05:53.820 Thank you.
02:06:10.880 When a woman experiences an unplanned pregnancy, she often feels alone and afraid. Too often,
02:06:17.180 her first response is to seek out an abortion, because that's what left-leaning institutions
02:06:21.560 have conditioned her to do. But because of the generosity of listeners like you, that search
02:06:26.680 may lead her to a pre-born network clinic, where, by the grace of God, she'll choose life,
02:06:31.520 not just for her baby, but for herself. Pre-born offers God's love and compassion to hurting women
02:06:37.040 and provides a free ultrasound to introduce them to the life growing inside them.
02:06:41.440 This combination helps women to choose life, and it's how Pre-born saves 200 babies every single
02:06:46.940 day. Thanks to the Daily Wire's partnership with Pre-born, we're able to make our powerful
02:06:51.480 documentary, Choosing Life, available to all on Daily Wire+. Join us in thanking Pre-born for bringing
02:06:58.060 this important work out from behind our paywall, and consider making a donation today to support
02:07:02.920 their life-saving work. You can sponsor one ultrasound for just $28.
02:07:07.040 If you have the means, you can sponsor Pre-born's entire network for a day for $5,000.
02:07:12.640 Make a donation today. Just dial pound 250 and say the keyword baby. That's pound 250 baby.
02:07:18.880 Or go to preborn.com slash Jordan. That's preborn.com slash Jordan.