The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast - December 13, 2021


209. Islam and the Possibilities of Peace | Mohammed Hijab


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 37 minutes

Words per Minute

155.87575

Word Count

15,124

Sentence Count

432

Misogynist Sentences

2

Hate Speech Sentences

52


Summary

In this episode, Dr. Jordan B. Peterson sits down with author and philosopher Muhammad Hijab to discuss how Islam is seen in the West, its metanarrative, the life of the prophet Muhammad, and the traditionalist take on the Quran in Islam itself. Dr. Peterson has created a new series that could be a lifeline for those battling depression and anxiety. We know how isolating and overwhelming these conditions can be, and we wanted to take a moment to reach out to those listening who may be struggling. With decades of experience helping patients with depression, and a unique understanding of why you might be feeling this way in his new series on Depression and Anxiety: The Journey to Finding Your Way Forward. He provides a roadmap towards healing, showing that while the journey isn t easy, it s absolutely possible to find your way forward. If you re suffering, please know you are not alone. There s hope and there s a path to feeling better. Go to Dailywire Plus now and start watching Dr. B.P. Peterson s new series, "Depression and Anxiety" on DailywirePlus now. Subscribe to Daily Wire Plus to get 20% off your entire purchase, plus up to 30% off the entire purchase at Leaffilters. That s a 20% discount plus a 10% Senior or Military discount. You get a free inspection and up to a 30% discount, plus an additional 20% warranty plus a $10 discount when you sign up for warranty details. You get up to $100 in the Daily WirePlus membership when you use the discount code: DEALFLOWER. at checkout. Get 20% OFF plus a discount code at checkout, plus a FREE inspection and an additional 10% discount at checkout when you place an order of $50 or $99.00 plus a total of $99 + a maximum of $25.00 at checkout at the Leaffilter. This offer valid through Dec 31st and $50, plus $99, plus the discount gets you an additional $10% discount. I hope you enjoy this offer! I m looking forward to hearing from you! Thank you so much for listening to Season 4 Episode 66 of the Jordan B Peterson Podcast. The podcast is produced by my podcast, Dailywire plus $5,000 in total! I ll be back in Season 4, Episode 66, Subscribe to my podcasting Subscribe on Audible.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 As a homeowner, some of the most tedious and easily forgotten maintenance tasks are often
00:00:04.340 the most important. Take gutter cleaning. It's one of those out-of-sight, out-of-mind chores
00:00:08.940 that can lead to serious issues if neglected. LeafFilter offers an investment engineered to
00:00:14.440 protect your whole home. Clogged gutters aren't just a nuisance. They can cause extensive repairs
00:00:19.580 costing thousands of dollars and causing major headaches. LeafFilter's patented technology is
00:00:25.120 designed to take care of everything from start to finish, making the process hassle-free for
00:00:29.360 homeowners. Their professionals will clean out, realign, and seal your existing gutters before
00:00:34.600 installing the LeafFilter system, ensuring optimal performance from day one. Plus, every installation
00:00:40.120 comes with a free inspection, estimate, and lifetime guarantee. By choosing LeafFilter, you're not just
00:00:45.740 solving a maintenance problem. You're investing in your home's long-term health and your own peace of
00:00:49.980 mind. Protect your home and never clean out your gutters again with LeafFilter, America's number
00:00:55.140 one protection system. Schedule your free inspection and get up to 30% off your entire purchase at
00:01:00.580 LeafFilter.com slash build. That's a free inspection and up to 30% off at LeafFilter.com slash build.
00:01:08.540 See representative for warranty details. Promotion is 20% off plus a 10% senior or military discount.
00:01:13.960 One discount per household. Hey everyone, real quick before you skip, I want to talk to you about
00:01:20.080 something serious and important. Dr. Jordan Peterson has created a new series that could
00:01:25.020 be a lifeline for those battling depression and anxiety. We know how isolating and overwhelming
00:01:30.420 these conditions can be, and we wanted to take a moment to reach out to those listening who may be
00:01:34.840 struggling. With decades of experience helping patients, Dr. Peterson offers a unique understanding
00:01:40.500 of why you might be feeling this way in his new series. He provides a roadmap towards healing,
00:01:45.620 showing that while the journey isn't easy, it's absolutely possible to find your way forward.
00:01:50.960 If you're suffering, please know you are not alone. There's hope and there's a path to feeling better.
00:01:57.460 Go to Daily Wire Plus now and start watching Dr. Jordan B. Peterson on depression and anxiety.
00:02:03.120 Let this be the first step towards the brighter future you deserve.
00:02:06.620 Welcome to Season 4, Episode 66 of the Jordan B. Peterson Podcast. In this episode,
00:02:16.120 Dad met with author and philosopher Muhammad Hijab, whose areas of expertise are political philosophy,
00:02:22.320 philosophy of religion, and comparative religion. They had a very engaging conversation and covered
00:02:28.160 a lot. Too much to try and recap here, but some highlights were how Islam is seen in the West,
00:02:34.020 its metanarrative, the life of the prophet Muhammad, and the traditionalist take on the Quran in Islam
00:02:40.300 itself. If you enjoy this episode, please be sure to subscribe.
00:02:45.440 I understand that, and I'm not even saying that there's something exceptional in that regard about
00:02:49.880 Islam, although the rate at which it happened was quite remarkable. But it still, it presents us with
00:02:54.600 a problem, doesn't it? I mean, everyone. It presents everyone with a problem. And the problem is,
00:03:00.020 well, for example, the problem is reconciling the idea of turning the other cheek with the idea of
00:03:04.780 a just war, a defensive war, or an expansive war, for that matter. And of course, that issue is
00:03:09.780 relevant to Islam, because Islam exploded outward and produced the biggest empire the world had ever
00:03:15.220 seen in the space of a few short centuries. So then you ask, well, what's the spirit? What is the
00:03:24.220 spirit that animated that? And is that attributable to the Islamic doctrines themselves? I don't know
00:03:30.740 the answer to that.
00:03:31.540 Now, let me tell you the answer to that, okay? And this is what I want to tell you conclusively,
00:03:35.860 and this will help build bridges, honestly, because we can maintain the warlord thesis,
00:03:39.480 we can maintain the expansionist thesis. But here's what I'll tell you. Islam has a capability to
00:03:45.720 be expansive, and it also has a capability of making peace treaties. And it does, and it should do,
00:03:53.060 wherever it's in its best interest, just like every country should do, wherever it's in its best interest.
00:04:15.740 Hello, everyone. I'm pleased today to have as my guest discussant, Mohamed Hijab.
00:04:22.420 And this discussion has been postponed a number of times because of illness, and I'm very glad that
00:04:28.120 we're able to do it today. And I thank him for his patience in continuing to pursue this and being
00:04:32.800 willing to talk to me, despite, I think, being delayed three times, which is one more time than
00:04:37.420 is unforgivable. But in any case, Mohamed Hijab is an author, a student of comparative religion,
00:04:43.600 and a philosopher of religion. He's the co-founder of Sapiens Institute, and is a researcher and
00:04:48.480 instructor for that organization. He has a BA in politics and a master's degree in history.
00:04:53.540 He's acquired a second master's in Islamic studies from the School of Oriental and African Studies.
00:04:59.140 Hijab has also completed a third master's degree in applied theology from the University of Oxford,
00:05:03.640 where he focused on the philosophy of religion in applied settings. He's now doing his PhD in the
00:05:08.840 philosophy of religion on the contingency argument for God's existence. And many people,
00:05:14.060 I was looking a while back for people to talk about Islam with, and many people recommended
00:05:21.020 that I talk to Mohamed Hijab. And so I talked to Mustafa Akil a couple of weeks ago. He's known
00:05:26.120 more, I would say, on the liberal front. And so I'm very pleased to be able to talk to Mohamed Hijab
00:05:32.680 today. Thank you very much for joining me today. It's very good of you to put up with the delays.
00:05:37.360 No, no, no, no. Thank you for having me, honestly. It's always a pleasure.
00:05:41.900 Well, so I'm going to ask some really basic questions, because it's very difficult to
00:05:47.160 understand another culture from the outside. And you also have, as an outsider, you have no idea
00:05:53.500 how much you don't know about what you don't know, even. You're blind to your own ignorance. And so
00:05:58.440 I'm going to start with basic questions. I wouldn't say that I have a tangible understanding of Islam.
00:06:04.780 I mean, I have some understanding of Christianity. I've been able to get the sense of Christianity
00:06:09.600 at a reasonably deep level, I would say, at least compared to other things I know. And I've kind of
00:06:15.680 felt the same way about certain aspects of Buddhism and Taoism. But as a religious system, a system of
00:06:21.920 thought, Islam has remained relatively opaque to me, despite the fact that I've done a reasonable amount
00:06:26.420 of historical reading. And so what is it in terms of practice and belief that are absolutely core,
00:06:33.780 as far as you're concerned, to practicing the Islamic faith?
00:06:37.920 Well, the first thing is, I think we should start with the bare bones basics. And the bare bones
00:06:42.660 basics is first to say that we believe in God. And the kind of God we believe in is one God,
00:06:48.640 worthy of worship. In fact, the Quran makes a series of arguments, rational arguments for why we
00:06:55.560 believe in the type of God that we believe in. For example, in chapter 52, verse 35 of the Quran,
00:07:00.200 it says,
00:07:01.060 were they created from nothing or by nothing? Or were they themselves the creators of themselves?
00:07:12.580 Did they create the heavens and the earth? They have no certainty. In other words, the Quran is
00:07:17.760 hinting here at the fact that it's impossible for something to come from nothing. And it's impossible
00:07:23.720 also for something to give rise to itself. And so the universe, for example, if we take this as an
00:07:28.820 example, couldn't have come from nothing. And it couldn't have created itself. It couldn't be
00:07:32.700 self-generating and or self-maintaining. And there can't be a world, in fact, the Quran would indicate,
00:07:40.400 there cannot be a world with only dependent things, things that require other things in order to exist
00:07:46.920 at infinitum. And so what is required outside of the series of dependent things is something which
00:07:53.160 is independent, which all things depend upon, and which itself depends upon nothing. And this is
00:07:59.480 what the Quran refers to as as-samad, or the idea of God being self-sufficient and independent.
00:08:06.460 So the idea of God is-
00:08:08.740 So it's a prime mover argument, and you think-
00:08:11.400 It's a kind of prime mover argument.
00:08:13.480 A lot of-
00:08:14.200 Why do you think that the same argument that you put forward in relationship to the generation of
00:08:20.260 the universe can't be put forward as an objection in relationship to God? You know, because you make
00:08:26.660 a logical case that something can't come from nothing and something can't create itself. But you move,
00:08:31.700 from a philosophical perspective, this isn't a religious critique, from a philosophical
00:08:35.420 critical perspective. You just move the problem back one step. What advantages do you think there
00:08:40.640 are to moving the problem back one step? Or am I mischaracterizing it?
00:08:44.200 Well, I'll tell you what, Dr. Jordan Peterson, what you've said is very similar to what Richard
00:08:48.460 Dawkins said in a debate with the Archbishop of the then Archbishop of Canterbury. And he said that,
00:08:54.760 well, if you have, and he said this debate, he made this argument in Oxford. And he said that if you
00:09:00.240 look at the universe, well, if you're saying that God has made the universe in this way,
00:09:06.460 then your God who's more complicated, and he would add this layer of complexity,
00:09:11.240 your God who's more complicated would require an even greater,
00:09:15.640 he would require an even greater explanation.
00:09:17.460 You're a greater God.
00:09:18.900 Yeah, yeah. So really interestingly, Anthony Kenny, who's an agnostic himself, he's a philosopher
00:09:25.240 and agnostic, he came in and he said, well, actually, take a look at this, you've got an
00:09:29.780 electric razor, which is made up of many different component parts. And you have a cutthroat razor,
00:09:35.300 which is made up of one part. And he said, although the electric razor is more complicated,
00:09:41.960 it serves less functions than the cutthroat razor, because the cutthroat razor can cut your throat,
00:09:47.660 and it can also cut an apple, for example. And so it's a fallacy to assume that just because
00:09:53.960 something is complicated, or that something has many features and attributes, that thing itself
00:10:00.280 requires an explanation. And in fact, if we had an infinite regress of such explanations,
00:10:05.520 then obviously, that would lead to a kind of absurdity. So even, you know, well-meaning atheists
00:10:10.660 and agnostics in the field realize the redundancy and the fallacity, and the argument that is put
00:10:16.580 forward by the likes of Richard Dawkins, who said that kind of thing. And I would also add
00:10:21.700 to that one point, the argument from composition, which is usually a corollary to the contingency
00:10:28.760 argument, usually, is made in the following way, that everything that is made of parts
00:10:33.420 is contingent, that the universe, or say, a multiverse is made of parts, therefore,
00:10:39.120 a universe, or the universe, and or the multiverse is contingent. The parts that we are talking
00:10:45.160 about, meteorologically, are things that can be attached and detached. So that doesn't apply to
00:10:50.140 God. Classical theism doesn't say that God is made of parts the same way as human beings are,
00:10:54.960 or as universes are, or multiverses are. And so, and in fact, the Quran hints at this itself.
00:10:59.500 It says, that the one who created you and composed you and configured you in any form that he wished,
00:11:09.540 he put you together. And so the fact that you have such configuration in the universe,
00:11:14.760 indicates that the fact that you have an external sorting agent that has particularized the universe
00:11:22.160 in a certain way, and that has composed the universe in a certain way. So the argument really
00:11:27.060 is that things which are made of attachable and detachable parts, that those things are
00:11:32.980 contingent, that doesn't apply to God on any theistic paradigm. Now, what we would say,
00:11:37.620 though, sorry to kind of drag this on a little bit, is that this would disqualify something like
00:11:42.120 the Trinity from being true. And in fact, the Quran, this is the Islamic position, is vehement in its
00:11:48.480 opposition towards a triune God. So for example, in chapter 23, verse 91, it says,
00:11:54.700 That God hasn't taken a son, and he doesn't have any gods with him. If that had been the case,
00:12:06.420 each God would have taken what he has created, and they would have tried to dominate one another.
00:12:11.500 The idea, therefore, that there can be more than one all-powerful entity, is an inconceivable and
00:12:17.420 unintelligible idea from the Islamic paradigm. So it's seen as problematic, to say the least,
00:12:23.780 or conceptually impossible, to say even more, to suggest that something like a Trinity can be
00:12:29.140 true. When it's talking about, for example, Mary and Jesus, it says something very simple,
00:12:35.940 that both of them used to eat food. So in other words, the impossibility of something limited, like
00:12:42.260 Jesus, a man, being God at the same time, being unlimited. Because the definition of God is
00:12:48.620 that he's unlimited, is all-powerful. Do you think that there's a divine spark in human beings?
00:12:54.960 No, we don't think there's any kind of divinity at all. Islam is categorical about this,
00:13:00.500 because the way we define divinity is extremely strict. We say that the divine attributes of God
00:13:06.280 are specific only to God. So what's the characteristic element of the human relationship
00:13:12.900 with God? So what's the central, what's the central, what's the central, you say, structure of value
00:13:20.480 within a human being that makes them worthy of respect, say, in the sight of God, or worthy of
00:13:25.560 value in the sight of God? The Quran states,
00:13:27.840 لَقَدْ كَرَّمْنَا بَنِي أَدَمْ
00:13:29.280 We have, we have dignified the child of Adam. So that we do believe in something called human
00:13:35.300 exceptionalism. We do believe that human being has been specialized or specified, among all other
00:13:41.160 things in creation, to be, to have free will, for example, to have a personal relationship with God,
00:13:47.920 to have a loving relationship with God. People don't realize this, especially in the Christian
00:13:51.120 tradition, but one of the names of God from the Islamic tradition is that he's the loving one,
00:13:55.900 Al-Wadud in Arabic, in the Quran as well. So we believe that the relationship that human being
00:14:00.940 should have with God is a loving relationship, but it's, it's one of submission. This is the
00:14:06.460 main thing. Islam doesn't mean peace. Islam actually means submission. Islam comes from the
00:14:11.340 root Arabic called istislam. And what it means is submission. And really what the picture is in the
00:14:16.660 Islamic cosmology is that everything in the universe is submitting to God. Everything, the laws of nature
00:14:23.280 have been placed there by the lawmaker, which is God. And so we as human beings are volitional.
00:14:30.500 We have free, we do believe in free will, but we also believe in a theological compatibilism.
00:14:34.880 And so that kind of predetermination is actually one of our pillars of faith to believe in that.
00:14:40.340 So in that sense, we have to voluntarily submit to God in the same way that everything else in
00:14:47.440 creation is submitted to God. And what does, what does that submission mean?
00:14:50.120 What that means is that all the prophets and messengers came a full time. So this is the
00:14:55.120 meta-narrative of Islam. Abraham came, Moses came, Jesus came, and all of them came with exactly the
00:15:00.700 same message. And that message is to worship, to believe in one God and to worship in only one God.
00:15:06.580 And to do that, you have to follow a guidance. So each and every single one of those messengers,
00:15:11.180 they came with, we believe in our narrative, they came with two things effectively. They came with a
00:15:16.360 message, which is to worship God, meaning to submit to his laws. And also with, with some kind of
00:15:22.520 evidence base to suggest that they are prophets. So some of these stories would have been known,
00:15:28.000 obviously to you, you've done a biblical series. So I know you're very aware of those stories. We
00:15:31.580 have very similar stories, like in Moses, Abraham, Jesus, but they are slightly different.
00:15:36.360 Those stories are slightly different. In fact, sometimes radically different,
00:15:39.760 especially considering some new Testament kind of narratives. And so what the, the, the thread
00:15:46.280 that joins or the flesh that joins all of these kinds of messengers and prophets is that they all
00:15:53.420 came with one fundamental message, which is to believe in one God, worship one God. We believe
00:15:57.480 that the prophet. Hang on. I'm still not understanding this exactly. Okay. I'm not sure what you mean by
00:16:03.600 believe, like the way you laid that out was in some sense, propositional, right? You made it,
00:16:09.100 you made a logical argument for the existence of God, but you, you, you take the existence of God
00:16:14.540 as, as given in some sense to begin with because of your faith. And then you provide your belief
00:16:20.680 with a rational argument, but it wasn't derived from a rational argument. And so I don't, so does it,
00:16:28.520 when you talk about belief, do you mean belief in a set of propositions about the nature of God? And,
00:16:33.300 and if you do or don't, what, what do you believe and how would you separate out that
00:16:38.960 belief from what you term as worship? Right. So actually there's, there's one thing that
00:16:44.400 ought to be known that in Islamic theology, we believe in something called the fitrah,
00:16:48.900 which is an innate instinct to believing in God. And now I'm not sure if you're aware of the,
00:16:53.860 the work on it. So why bother, why bother with the propositional arguments then?
00:16:57.980 It's, to me, they just seem like a side, a side venture, you know, to argue with scientists.
00:17:02.160 Some scholars have said that in Islam, sorry, I apologize. Yeah. Okay. No, no.
00:17:06.380 Yeah. In fact, some modern day philosophers of religion have that kind of a stance, like
00:17:11.740 Alvin Plantinga, he seems quite, you know, agnostic about the old thing. I mean, we can,
00:17:16.260 the thing is, what we're saying is it would be committing something like the naturalistic fallacy
00:17:20.520 to suggest that just because something is the case, or there is a fallacy, maybe it's just because
00:17:26.100 something is the case that it ought to be the case. So in order to prove the, or it's a demonstrative
00:17:32.580 proof for those who are in what we call shack or doubt. And this, but the truth is, as, as you've
00:17:40.020 mentioned, and as, as in the literature, like for example, Justin Barrett has this in his cognitive
00:17:45.880 psychological or cognitive science literature. I'm not sure if you've come across his stuff,
00:17:51.860 but basically, yeah, basically what he says is that we have an innate,
00:17:56.100 his words exactly, receptivity to believing in God. In 2011, the, the Oxford Anthropological
00:18:02.260 Society, they'd done a huge study of 32,000 children. And what they found is that children
00:18:08.340 innately and intuitively, instinctively have a belief of a higher power of some sorts.
00:18:15.280 Now they're born with that belief. And in fact, in one of the papers in, in Justin Barrett's book,
00:18:22.380 he literally mentions the fitrah or the Islamic theological concept of an instinct in believing
00:18:27.780 in God. What's his last name? Barrett. How do you spell that? I think double R double T, I believe.
00:18:35.820 Justin Barrett. Okay, that's useful. Yeah. Well, it just strikes me that in, you see, the problem with
00:18:41.020 debating people like Richard Dawkins about the existence of God is that he will formulate the
00:18:49.040 argument in propositional terms, and then force the person, so to speak. I don't imply any malice on
00:18:56.400 his part. But as soon as you accept that the, the battle is to be won on propositional grounds,
00:19:02.340 you've already accepted a certain definition of God. And I think you lose the argument instantly.
00:19:07.420 I think the, the argument for instinct, something like that is, is much more powerful. Because one
00:19:14.100 of the things I'm led to, to wonder when you laid out your argument is, well, what, what purpose does
00:19:20.660 belief in God serve? Or your faith in God, let's say. And I think belief, see, it's also really
00:19:25.900 interesting to try to distinguish between belief in something and faith in something. Like if you have,
00:19:30.860 imagine you have faith in the good. And so how do you demonstrate that? Well, you believe that good is
00:19:36.420 more powerful than evil. You believe that you should act in a manner that's, that's, that's appropriate
00:19:43.820 to the good. And so then you act that way. And that's the faith. The faith is demonstrated in the
00:19:50.020 actions. Yes. But it's not exactly, it's not exactly propositional. And, you know, partly because I would
00:19:55.680 say, if you look at good and evil, for example, it's not that easy to make the case that good is more
00:20:02.200 dominant or more powerful than evil, all things considered in human affairs. Now, I think it is.
00:20:07.300 But you know what I mean? You can't make a compelling propositional case that that's absolutely true.
00:20:13.200 But you can reflect your faith in your actions.
00:20:16.200 The thing is, you mentioned Richard Dawkins, I wrote, as part of the Sapiens Institute, we wrote a
00:20:20.520 small booklet called The Scientific Delusions of the New Atheists. And we refuted him on the, on these
00:20:26.360 kind of things. If you read The God Delusion, he literally spends five pages of hundreds talking
00:20:31.840 about the cosmological argument. And I think, too, talking about the teleological argument or the
00:20:36.160 fine-tuning argument. I do think that not much work has been done by new atheists in, new atheists,
00:20:45.000 meaning like, you know, the four horsemen or whatever, in trying to actually tackle these arguments.
00:20:49.120 And sometimes when they're on debates with other philosophers of religion, I don't think they,
00:20:52.760 from my perspective, at least, they don't actually provide a satisfactory defense.
00:20:57.400 Yeah, well, the instinct argument is an interesting one, because it seems to me that part of the,
00:21:03.000 and this is why I was pressing you to some degree on the issue of the definition of worship, is that
00:21:08.200 I don't see much difference between the instinct to worship and the instinct to imitate. And I do
00:21:15.000 believe that there's compelling evidence, psychological and biological, that we human beings have a remarkably
00:21:21.180 strong instinct to imitate. And the question is, well, what is it that we're oriented to imitate?
00:21:28.140 And I think we're, like, if you look at the developmental psychology literature, for example,
00:21:33.700 it seems quite, it seems to be the case that if a child has an intact nervous system, and they have
00:21:39.200 one or two good models around them, that they'll be drawn towards those good models and imitate them,
00:21:44.980 and develop quite healthily, even under rather stressful circumstances. And, you know, that instinct
00:21:52.040 to imitate also underlies phenomena, like the experience of awe, and the experience of charisma.
00:22:01.360 And that charisma, you know, has an effect on attentional function and on the proclivity to behave.
00:22:07.840 And so I think the propositionalized arguments deliver the religious ideas over to the propositional
00:22:14.880 camp. And that's dominated already by scientists in many ways. It's a losing battle. I don't think
00:22:20.600 it's the right one. So worship, you just, so, okay, so one thing the West and Islam agree on,
00:22:27.180 although I think Islam is part of the West, by the way, because we're all people of the book.
00:22:30.660 I mean, the triune God in the Christian sense is still subordinate to a higher order unity. And so
00:22:37.380 there is a powerful movement towards monotheism in Judaism and Christianity and Islam. And that seems
00:22:44.560 to be a point of some agreement. We're also, all three societies are also people who've made a decision
00:22:51.880 collectively in some mysterious manner, that a book should sit at the basis of culture,
00:22:57.540 a specific book that's been aggregated in a strange way, in a mysterious way. And so we also
00:23:03.580 agree on that. And so that's, you know, that's a starting place, at least. And obviously, there's
00:23:08.460 been a lot of interpenetration of ideas between Islam and Judaism and Christianity. I mean, the
00:23:13.720 prophets in Islam are the same prophets that go through the three major Western monotheistic
00:23:19.360 religions. And so that's a fair bit of commonality. And so that's a good place to start building
00:23:25.080 bridges. And so, okay, so Islam is stringently monotheistic. And then the submission idea,
00:23:32.160 what exactly, I mean, God is ineffable in a sense. And so what does submission mean exactly?
00:23:39.960 Right.
00:23:40.400 And how is that related to worship? And how is that related to the good, let's say,
00:23:44.360 on a practical level?
00:23:46.120 Right. So I think what you said before, there was a point you made about defining faith through action.
00:23:50.820 And I think that we would strongly agree with that. And that's, that's what we believe.
00:23:55.640 Our definition of faith is what you, what you basically believe in the heart, say on the tongue
00:24:01.700 and do with your, with your actions. That's, that's like a definition of faith, faith for us or
00:24:06.920 Iman, the idea of Iman. In terms of, in terms of the good, now there are different conceptions in
00:24:12.980 Islam of the good. But the main thing is we believe that God is good, quite similar to what
00:24:17.540 Christians believe. And therefore he wants good for human beings. And that the injunctions of God
00:24:24.540 are also good in terms of submission. And this is extremely important here. Submission can only be
00:24:30.640 done through revelation. That, that is our position. The position is that submission is actually
00:24:36.220 impossible without a guidance. And the guidance we believe obviously is the Quran. But we also
00:24:43.160 acknowledge the, we also acknowledge the Torah, the original Torah that was sent to Moses and the
00:24:50.060 original Injil or the gospel that was sent to Jesus. But what we have is, you can call it a doctrine
00:24:56.400 of Tahrif, which means corruption. So what we believe is that what happens is with these books, you've had
00:25:02.460 basically corruption happen to them. So we don't know what is, what is part of that book and what is not
00:25:08.980 part of that book. We don't know exactly what Jesus said and what isn't. Because there is no clear chain
00:25:14.000 of narration back to Jesus Christ. But going back to the point of submission, submission is to follow
00:25:21.420 the prophets, all of them, because a Muslim cannot be a Muslim unless they believe in, revere, love and
00:25:27.600 respect all of the prophets, including Jesus, Moses, Abraham, and all of them, follow all of them and in
00:25:34.760 their way. And once again, we believe that they were divinely inspired. So, and there is evidence that all of
00:25:40.080 these prophets come with. And I think I was on that point where I was telling you that the differentiating
00:25:46.000 factor between the prophet Muhammad and the rest of the prophets is we believe, whereas all of the other
00:25:50.920 prophets came for their people in their time, we believe that Muhammad came for all people and all times.
00:25:56.360 That's certainly what Christians say about Christ. Yes, but in the Bible, you'll find, you know, some verses
00:26:04.720 that are saying I've only been sent for the lost sheep of Israel. And so there's some tension, you know, you see
00:26:10.560 this, you see something like the rise of a universalism, a spirit of universalism, that surpasses fundamental
00:26:17.280 tribalism, even of a religious sort. But and it seems there seems to be a struggle that takes place in the gospel in some
00:26:23.420 sense conceptually, between this reversion to something that's more tribal and something that's
00:26:28.980 genuinely universal. But I think the universalist spirit wins out quite clearly. In other ways,
00:26:34.300 Christianity wouldn't be an evangelizing religion. It's designed to try to bring everyone under the
00:26:39.660 fold, let's say. It's largely because of the tension between Paul and James. And a lot of, well, modern day
00:26:46.140 Christianity is based on Pauline kind of interpretations, rather than kind of, James was very much a man of
00:26:52.040 the law himself. He was, you know, he didn't believe that the law was abrogated. He didn't
00:26:56.640 believe that. In fact, there's huge tension, obviously, in the Bible between both those two
00:27:01.720 men. And obviously, there's historical reasons for that as well. But what we will say is, we would say
00:27:08.840 that there are clear verses in the Bible, like, for example, we point to Isaiah 42, 11, where that
00:27:15.700 indicates a new prophet that's going to come. And in fact, Isaiah 42, 11, in particular, is extremely
00:27:21.320 important, because it even specifies the region. It says it will be sent to the people of Kedar. And the
00:27:27.480 people of Kedar, as in Genesis, Kedar was the son of Ishmael. And basically, from him is the lineage of
00:27:34.940 Muhammad, or the Arabs, if you like. And so, it is a whole discussion in the whole of Isaiah 42, about a new
00:27:42.120 prophet going to come. And he is going to come to the people of Kedar, and the people will be rejoicing on the
00:27:48.060 mountaintops. And in fact, the name of a mountain in Medina, which is present-day Saudi Arabia, is
00:27:53.740 mentioned, which is the Mount of Selah. And, and so we would say that actually, Muhammad was a
00:27:58.880 continuation of Jesus Christ, and that Jesus Christ, as a prophet, also in the Bible, doesn't
00:28:05.860 say that there's not going to be another prophet after me. And so that there's no reasonable reason
00:28:11.220 for us to think it will end with Jesus. I think Christ actually said that, that believers would
00:28:16.680 be able to do the things he did, and more. So there's actually a prophecy of, of a multitude
00:28:22.320 of prophets, in some sense, which would perhaps be a consequence of taking the fundamental doctrine,
00:28:28.200 the spiritual doctrine of Christianity, seriously. Yes, I mean, as we said, interpretation. In many
00:28:34.040 ways, we are all followers of Christ. And that's another point of commonality. Like, we, we, we see
00:28:39.580 the Messiah, Jesus Christ, as a man who had done wonders and miracles and signs, as the Bible states.
00:28:45.880 We believe that he was immaculately conceived. We believe that he cured the blind. He raised the
00:28:51.360 dead with God's permission. We believe all, like most of the things that you'll find, we actually
00:28:55.760 believe in those things. There's huge commonalities between Islam and Christianity from that
00:28:59.920 perspective. The, the major difference is we would say that it's not intelligible or conceivable
00:29:04.340 or pardonable to believe any human being with a date of birth could never be called God.
00:29:09.840 And, and this is where, where we kind of diverge from the Christian mainstream.
00:29:14.680 This episode is brought to you by Elysium Health. I want to tell you why their products are the perfect
00:29:19.600 gift that keeps on giving for the holidays. Elysium works with leading institutions like Oxford and Yale
00:29:25.420 to make the benefits of aging research accessible to everyone. They collaborate with many of the
00:29:30.560 world's best researchers to make innovative health products that let customers lead healthy lives for
00:29:35.620 longer. Not only do they have dozens of the world's best scientists working with them, eight of them are
00:29:41.060 Nobel prize winners, but some of them are pioneers in aging science with three decades in the field.
00:29:46.820 You might've heard me talk about their supplements basis for cellular aging format for immune aging and
00:29:52.820 matter for brain aging. That last one matter is a brain health supplement that slows the natural brain
00:29:58.820 loss that occurs with age in important brain areas like the hippocampus, the brain's memory centers.
00:30:05.120 In fact, a clinical trial at Oxford showed matter can slow the loss in those areas by a whopping 86%.
00:30:11.820 Either way, people don't usually pay attention to these things until the damage is done. And then it's too late,
00:30:18.540 which makes these supplements an extra thoughtful gift. Nothing's more important than health and family and
00:30:24.280 these holidays, you can cover both and save big on Elysium health supplements with their exclusive offer for
00:30:29.760 JVP listeners. Go to Elysium health.com slash Jordan. That's spelled E L Y S I U M and enter code
00:30:38.620 JVP one zero at checkout to save 10% off Elysium health prepaid plans as well as other Elysium health supplements.
00:30:45.900 Again, that's Elysium health.com slash Jordan with code JVP one zero for 10% off.
00:30:52.320 This episode was brought to you by Canva. Making content is an essential part of what I do to keep this show
00:30:58.360 going, but it hasn't always been a seamless creative process. Ever since I found Canva pro, I can design
00:31:04.660 anything like a pro on any device while I've outsourced that now, but it used to be me making the graphics and so on.
00:31:10.660 But Canva pro makes the whole process seamless. If you don't know them, Canva is a great design
00:31:16.160 platform where you can create and share content very easily. You have thousands of customizable
00:31:20.280 templates to choose from, or just start your project from scratch. Canva pro is Canva's premium
00:31:26.640 version, and it has an absurd amount of variety. You get tons of premium fonts, photos, videos,
00:31:32.620 and extensive tool catalog. So the possibilities are pretty much endless. For example, there's a great
00:31:38.320 tool for scheduling social media posts, and I love the background remover. Super straightforward, and I
00:31:43.940 constantly need it for thumbnails. If you're part of a team, Canva pro's content planner helps you stay
00:31:49.100 organized and streamline planning, creating, and posting by having it all in one place. You and four
00:31:54.060 teammates can unlock everything Canva pro has to offer for just $12.99 a month. Start designing like a pro
00:32:00.480 with Canva pro. Right now you can get a free 45 day extended trial when you use my promo code. Just go to
00:32:07.140 canva.me slash Peterson to get your free 45 day extended trial. That's C-A-N-V-A dot M-E slash
00:32:16.200 Peterson. Canva dot me slash Peterson. I hope you enjoy the rest of this episode.
00:32:20.860 Going online without ExpressVPN is like not paying attention to the safety demonstration on a flight.
00:32:26.100 Most of the time you'll probably be fine, but what if one day that weird yellow mask drops down from
00:32:31.500 overhead and you have no idea what to do? In our hyper-connected world, your digital privacy isn't
00:32:36.860 just a luxury. It's a fundamental right. Every time you connect to an unsecured network in a cafe,
00:32:42.120 hotel, or airport, you're essentially broadcasting your personal information to anyone with a technical
00:32:47.160 know-how to intercept it. And let's be clear, it doesn't take a genius hacker to do this.
00:32:51.720 With some off-the-shelf hardware, even a tech-savvy teenager could potentially access your passwords,
00:32:56.860 bank logins, and credit card details. Now, you might think, what's the big deal? Who'd want my data
00:33:02.140 anyway? Well, on the dark web, your personal information could fetch up to $1,000. That's
00:33:07.700 right, there's a whole underground economy built on stolen identities. Enter ExpressVPN. It's like a
00:33:13.660 digital fortress, creating an encrypted tunnel between your device and the internet. Their
00:33:18.040 encryption is so robust that it would take a hacker with a supercomputer over a billion years
00:33:22.760 to crack it. But don't let its power fool you. ExpressVPN is incredibly user-friendly. With just one
00:33:28.340 click, you're protected across all your devices. Phones, laptops, tablets, you name it. That's why
00:33:33.260 I use ExpressVPN whenever I'm traveling or working from a coffee shop. It gives me peace of mind
00:33:38.080 knowing that my research, communications, and personal data are shielded from prying eyes.
00:33:43.020 Secure your online data today by visiting expressvpn.com slash jordan. That's e-x-p-r-e-s-s-v-p-n.com
00:33:50.880 slash jordan, and you can get an extra three months free. ExpressVPN.com slash jordan.
00:33:58.340 Starting a business can be tough, but thanks to Shopify, running your online storefront is
00:34:04.460 easier than ever. Shopify is the global commerce platform that helps you sell at every stage of
00:34:09.500 your business. From the launch your online shop stage, all the way to the did we just hit a
00:34:13.680 million orders stage, Shopify is here to help you grow. Our marketing team uses Shopify every day to
00:34:19.400 sell our merchandise, and we love how easy it is to add more items, ship products, and track
00:34:23.980 conversions. With Shopify, customize your online store to your style with flexible templates and
00:34:29.460 powerful tools, alongside an endless list of integrations and third-party apps like on-demand
00:34:34.360 printing, accounting, and chatbots. Shopify helps you turn browsers into buyers with the internet's
00:34:39.600 best converting checkout, up to 36% better compared to other leading e-commerce platforms.
00:34:45.060 No matter how big you want to grow, Shopify gives you everything you need to take control
00:34:48.940 and take your business to the next level. Sign up for a $1 per month trial period at
00:34:53.780 shopify.com slash jbp, all lowercase. Go to shopify.com slash jbp now to grow your business
00:35:00.860 no matter what stage you're in. That's shopify.com slash jbp.
00:35:09.100 When a woman experiences an unplanned pregnancy, she often feels alone and afraid. Too often, her first
00:35:15.440 response is to seek out an abortion, because that's what left-leaning institutions have conditioned
00:35:20.220 her to do. But because of the generosity of listeners like you, that search may lead her to a
00:35:25.500 pre-born network clinic, where, by the grace of God, she'll choose life, not just for her baby, but for
00:35:31.140 herself. Pre-born offers God's love and compassion to hurting women and provides a free ultrasound to
00:35:36.620 introduce them to the life growing inside them. This combination helps women to choose life, and it's
00:35:42.360 how pre-born saves 200 babies every single day. Thanks to the Daily Wire's partnership with
00:35:47.480 pre-born, we're able to make our powerful documentary, Choosing Life, available to all on
00:35:52.500 Daily Wire Plus. Join us in thanking pre-born for bringing this important work out from behind our
00:35:57.860 paywall, and consider making a donation today to support their life-saving work. You can sponsor one
00:36:03.420 ultrasound for just $28. If you have the means, you can sponsor pre-born's entire network for a day for
00:36:09.100 $5,000. Make a donation today. Just dial pound 250 and say the keyword baby. That's pound 250 baby.
00:36:16.740 Or go to pre-born.com slash Jordan. That's pre-born.com slash Jordan.
00:36:25.180 Yeah, so, so, okay, so let me, let me tell you about some things I've been thinking about
00:36:30.320 in relationship to that. Well, you know that Nietzsche announced the death of God in the
00:36:37.340 late 1800s, and you know what the consequences of that have been, at least to some degree, and of
00:36:44.160 course, Dostoevsky was talking about exactly the same things at pretty much exactly the same time, but
00:36:48.560 the philosopher of religion, Mircea Eliad, in his historical investigations, indicated that
00:36:55.980 the death of God is something that has happened to many cultures in many places over many times. It's not
00:37:02.620 a unique event in, let's say, Western history. And his explanation for that, at least in part, was that
00:37:09.740 as there's a movement towards unification under a monotheistic umbrella, let's say, which is perhaps
00:37:17.880 a precondition for the union of diverse people, one of the consequences of that is that that central
00:37:26.340 unifying value becomes so abstracted, because it has to cover such a multiplicity, it becomes so
00:37:32.420 abstracted that it becomes sufficiently, it flies away in something. He called that deus abscondes,
00:37:38.540 if I remember correctly, is that the idea of the spirit just flies away, because it no longer has an
00:37:43.840 attachment to the world. And one of the ways that Christianity solved that, if you think about it
00:37:49.300 from a psychological perspective, was by insisting upon the presence of God in a canonic form, right,
00:37:59.100 in an emptied form, in a partially emptied form, in the person of Christ, in a particular place,
00:38:04.500 in a particular time. And it's a variant of the prophetic idea, although taken to its absolute
00:38:10.640 extreme. The prophetic idea is that there are people who are marked out in history, marked out by God,
00:38:16.600 by their relationship with what's highest, in some spectacular manner. And so, I guess one of the
00:38:23.280 things I would say about the Islamic resistance to the idea of the divinity of Christ is that
00:38:29.620 there is an emphasis on Islam on the special status of prophets, of certain prophets, and their
00:38:36.800 particular special relationship with God, which seems to elevate them above other men, in some important
00:38:43.280 sense. And so, and drawing a line precisely between that claim and the claim of divinity incarnate is
00:38:49.080 not an easy matter. So, well, I would actually disagree with that. I think there's a clear
00:38:54.640 distinction in the Quran between the prophets and ordinary men. This is actually one of the clearest
00:39:00.000 distinctions. Yes, but is there a clear distinction between the prophets and some spark of divinity
00:39:06.180 inside those men? Yeah. So, what do we define as a spark of divinity?
00:39:12.960 Well, I would say it's what, it's partly what gives people charisma, although it's not always that.
00:39:19.840 It's also partly what marked these men out as being prophets. I mean, it's what we look at when we say
00:39:25.200 that man is great. That's a great man. That's a great person. That was a great deed. Well, yes, yes, fair enough.
00:39:32.080 But I would say also embodied virtue. And it's embodied virtue that is, in some sense, reflective
00:39:37.300 of the action of the highest value operating at a local scale.
00:39:42.600 Yeah. So, that's exactly what we believe. We believe in the doctrine of infallibility,
00:39:47.720 or ismah. And so, we believe that all prophets basically did the best thing possible for human
00:39:53.920 beings. And this is narrated about the Prophet Muhammad. In fact,
00:39:57.640 the Quran in chapter 68, verse 2, that, and you have impeccable virtue, basically the highest level
00:40:06.100 virtue. And this is something about all the prophets. And obviously, if that wasn't the case,
00:40:10.940 we wouldn't, there wouldn't be sufficient guides for us in terms of humanity. So, if that's what you
00:40:15.400 mean by a spark of divinity, then I don't think there's a point of resistance.
00:40:18.860 Yeah. Well, these things are hard to sort out, right? The terminology. And that's part of the complexity
00:40:22.460 of these sorts of discussions. Yeah. For us, divinity is basically having the attributes of
00:40:29.240 God. So, once again, since we know God through his attributes, from that perspective, that human
00:40:37.440 beings cannot possess the fullness of the attributes of God. If you want, I can recite.
00:40:42.120 That seems like a perfectly reasonable perspective. I mean, you know, we're all limited, infallible
00:40:46.600 creatures. And we'd be fools not to see that. The attributes of God, how are they knowable?
00:40:55.200 Is that only through relationship with the book? Or does that also have an experiential element as
00:41:02.020 far as you're concerned? So, what I can do, in fact, is I can recite for you a couple of verses
00:41:06.520 from the Quran. Because what we believe is they are known through the revelation. And I can recite for
00:41:12.740 you maybe 10-20 second verses and translate for you and show you what, I think it will
00:41:17.360 give you more of a flavor of what you believe. Sure. Do what you will. So, the Quran states
00:41:22.700 in the end of chapter 59.
00:41:24.240 part in chapter 59.
00:41:36.720 Surah Al-Fatihah
00:42:06.720 Surah Al-Fatihah
00:42:36.720 Surah Al-Fatihah
00:43:06.720 Surah Al-Fatihah
00:43:36.700 Surah Al-Fatihah
00:44:06.680 Surah Al-Fatihah
00:44:36.660 Surah Al-Fatihah
00:45:06.640 Surah Al-Fatihah
00:45:36.620 Surah Al-Fatihah
00:46:06.600 Surah Al-Fatihah
00:46:36.580 Surah Al-Fatihah
00:47:06.560 Surah Al-Fatihah
00:47:36.560 Surah Al-Fatihah
00:48:06.560 Surah Al-Fatihah
00:48:36.540 Surah Al-Fatihah
00:49:06.520 What would you say?
00:49:36.500 Surah Al-Fatihah
00:50:06.480 Surah Al-Fatihah
00:50:36.480 Surah Al-Fatihah
00:51:06.440 Surah Al-Fatihah
00:51:36.420 Surah Al-Fatihah
00:52:06.400 Surah Al-Fatihah
00:52:36.380 Surah Al-Fatihah
00:53:06.360 Surah Al-Fatihah
00:53:36.360 Surah Al-Fatihah
00:54:06.340 I would say
00:54:36.340 In Islam
00:55:06.300 I would say
00:55:36.280 The biggest
00:56:06.260 The war in the war in
00:56:36.240 death that this fracturing took place among the people that were closely allied with him and it
00:56:40.080 was a bloody fracturing and it isn't obvious that it's been how bloody was it how how bloody was it
00:56:45.380 well how bloody does it have to be you know it doesn't take much okay well let's be honest let's
00:56:50.780 be fair yeah yeah okay let's be fair right with with with with the wars that took place 30 to 40
00:56:56.520 years and it wasn't immediately after because you said that in the video the day he died that's
00:56:59.880 wrong he it didn't happen the day he died it happened 30 to 40 years after it happened 30 to
00:57:04.800 40 years after and how long how how many people how many members of muhammad's immediate family
00:57:09.680 survived during that 30 years my understanding was that most of his immediate family died in
00:57:15.320 armed conflict most of his immediate family died in his own lifetime yes well i'm not speaking of them
00:57:21.200 but i'm speaking of what happened after he died facts right because yeah okay look first first fact
00:57:26.940 muhammad uh salasalam we say salasalam meaning peace and blessing be upon him um all of his
00:57:34.020 children died in his life okay except for one so most of the members of his immediate family and
00:57:40.720 his wife died khadijah died his uncle abu talib died his other uncle hamza died they all died within
00:57:46.820 his lifetime either due to illness or due to uh some other some other cause war for example like one of
00:57:53.800 the defensive wars hamza died and by the way muhammad forgave his killer and that's something which
00:57:58.480 which goes against the warlord thesis because when he then conquered mecca when he conquered mecca he
00:58:04.600 was actually no fighting i'm not sure if you know this it's called fatah mecca when he went into and
00:58:09.640 conquered mecca he didn't fight anybody it was no fighting there were a few people that that were
00:58:15.400 exempted but he actually quoted what joseph quoted to his brothers in the quran in the quran which is
00:58:22.120 that no blame is on you today and so and this by the way is a bedrock example of forgiveness in islam
00:58:29.240 because these were people that were persecuting him for 13 years these are people that were that
00:58:34.440 killed his uncle like i said there's one person called washi who um who literally killed his uncle
00:58:39.620 and uh and mutilated his body and he said to washi i forgive you but i can't i can't see your face
00:58:47.200 because of how how he said he said can you keep your face away from me because i can't psychologically
00:58:57.440 i can't believe my face but i do forgive you he said so he forgave people that killed his own family
00:59:01.720 members and this was after he he himself attempted a treaty with the pagans called hudaibiya and so they
00:59:10.040 broke the treaty and that's what initiated the conquest of mecca which was not a conquest that was
00:59:15.460 fighting now if you compare this because i think the comparison if there's any comparison that can
00:59:20.280 be or should be made it's the it's jesus's second coming with muhammad in the medinian period not in
00:59:26.860 the meccan period in the meccan period both were being persecuted jesus in his life and muhammad in his
00:59:32.200 in the meccan period but jesus when he comes back he will then get authority and he will be i uh he will
00:59:38.600 be ruling with the iron scepter according to the bible he will be crushing his uh he will be crushing his
00:59:44.920 enemies uh as it says in corinthians under his foot humbling his enemies other's foot uh and
00:59:49.900 killing and violent stuff so in fact what the the i will actually argue today that the new testament
00:59:56.480 representation of jesus christ in his second coming is way more violent than muhammad's conquests in uh
01:00:04.520 the medinan okay well look like i said i wasn't i wasn't trying to make the case i wasn't trying to
01:00:09.260 make the case that what happened in mecca or medina was wrong like so let me explain that a little bit
01:00:16.440 so christian europe fought a defensive war against the nazis it isn't obvious that that was wrong i
01:00:24.600 don't think that was i wouldn't say that's defensive well okay fine but but i understand the concept of
01:00:30.720 defensive war and america america when america got involved in world war ii it was not under
01:00:37.820 immediate threat by germany and they colonized it and here's the thing it it overtook western germany
01:00:44.600 you see and well here's the thing the term warlord that you use with the prophet you've never used
01:00:50.300 with harry truman you've never used with uh with uh roosevelt you've never used with winston
01:00:55.880 church here all of which conquered countries literally in wars because i feel like there is
01:01:01.340 there is a bias there and you've actually never used it with anybody else aside from the prophet
01:01:05.880 muhammad in your public output and i think that's unjustifiable i think that you have biblical prophets
01:01:10.200 like moses you have biblical prophets like um joshua you have you have the jesus and his second coming
01:01:17.820 all of which were warrior prophets and and and and you've only used the term uh war uh warlord with
01:01:25.240 the prophet muhammad and i think that is unjustifiable i think if we're what is it that
01:01:29.040 what makes someone a warlord in your in then if if it's if it's conquering lands then harry truman
01:01:35.600 is a warlord then uh you know and so on and so forth in fact the problem well i guess that's a real
01:01:41.320 that's a real tough question isn't it what makes a warlord and what makes a just war it's not like any
01:01:45.860 of us have the precise answers to that i think that's what partly what we're trying to hash out
01:01:49.800 definitions of the word warlords the definition of the word warlord according to collins is that
01:01:53.880 someone who acquires force by aggressivity and violence well okay so you pushed back on me so
01:02:00.560 i'll push back on you to some degree okay well it's certainly the case that the expansion of the
01:02:05.600 islamic empire was accomplished by a tremendous amount of warlike activity and that wasn't defensive
01:02:11.440 now look i understand that monotheism is a difficult state to attain yeah and that monotheistic
01:02:18.320 societies have emerged in the midst of conflict throughout human society i understand that and
01:02:22.940 i'm not even saying that there's something exceptional in that regard about islam although
01:02:27.080 the rate at which it happened was quite remarkable but it still it presents us with a problem doesn't
01:02:32.060 it i mean everyone it presents everyone with a problem and the problem is well for example the
01:02:37.800 problem is reconciling the idea of turning the other cheek with the idea of a just war a defensive
01:02:42.440 war or an expansive war for that matter and of course that issue is relevant to islam because islam
01:02:47.780 exploded outward and produced the biggest empire the world had ever seen in in the in the space of
01:02:53.380 a few short centuries yeah but dr jordan and so that yeah so then well so then you ask well what's
01:02:59.340 the spirit what is the spirit that animated that and is that attributable to the islamic doctrines
01:03:05.660 themselves i don't know the answer to that no let me tell you the answer to that okay and this is
01:03:10.840 what i want to tell you conclusively and this will help build bridges honestly because we can maintain
01:03:15.100 the warlord thesis we can maintain the expansionist thesis but here's what i'll tell you islam has a
01:03:20.780 has a capability to be expansive and it also has a capability of making peace treaties and it does and
01:03:28.880 it should do whatever's in its best interest just like every country should do whatever's in its best
01:03:33.320 interest in the pre-modern world we did not i think this is highly anachronistic in the pre-modern
01:03:39.120 world there was no such thing as the un it was a realist international relations framework whereby
01:03:44.460 everybody was fighting everyone the roman empire didn't care about what it didn't care about you
01:03:51.300 quite frankly it was expanding itself the persian empire was expanding itself and the arabian peninsula
01:03:56.880 was in between both and so it could have either been swallowed by those two other empires or it could
01:04:02.560 decide to in fact we will impose our government on them before they impose it on us and it decided the
01:04:08.060 former rather than the latter it decided to expand and in fact the prophet in his weakest of times
01:04:13.020 he predicted that that would happen you know there was one war in particular where they were
01:04:17.980 they were starving and it's called khandaq and he hit a rock and he said
01:04:22.180 the roman empire has been conquered he hit another a rock again he said
01:04:27.980 that the persian empire has been conquered and then he knocked the rock again he said
01:04:32.580 he said this in his weakest moment he said that the yemen has been conquered
01:04:35.820 i see that the expansion of the islamic empire is a proof of islam and you know it's not just me
01:04:41.000 even historians say this how barnaby rogersson he said the fact that islam spread to the roman
01:04:47.400 empire and the persian empire is equivalent to the the is equivalent to eskimos taken over russia
01:04:53.600 and america i believe it's miraculous if anything that this happened i don't think it's unjustifiable i
01:04:58.580 think actually jordan pearson then why did it stop it why did it stop at europe's borders
01:05:03.360 so to speak if it was a miraculous expansion yeah it stopped because of uh it wasn't successful there
01:05:10.060 it wasn't it stopped where it couldn't go further but the point is is that it's not like the christians
01:05:16.540 at that time in uh rome cared i mean they did the same thing for years they were expanding themselves
01:05:22.020 well that's why i said that's why i said i wasn't making a prima facie case that this was wrong i'm
01:05:26.840 trying to understand it and so and you objected to my use of the term warlord and perhaps rightly so
01:05:32.200 you know perhaps that was an injudicious comment i was rather shocked when i was reading islamic history
01:05:38.100 when i encountered the degree of violence that surrounded these events and so you know maybe i was
01:05:44.680 i appreciate what you said there i think this that shows real sincerity and it's it's it's one step
01:05:50.820 closer to creating real uh meaningful relationships between uh well i think and i think your you know
01:05:57.540 your defense that well the world was a battleground of empires and you know if it's if it's push out
01:06:03.280 from our territory or be encroached upon and dominated then it isn't obvious that being encroached
01:06:08.460 upon and dominated is the right approach the correct approach the most moral approach let's say
01:06:13.860 especially because there'd be no shortage of bloodshed that would also accompany that
01:06:18.120 so sometimes you're in a bad place and but you know it's not an easy thing for any of us to
01:06:23.400 what would you say mediate between doctrines like turn the other cheek and love your enemy
01:06:28.280 and also at the same time discuss the necessity of both defensive and sometimes expansive expansionist
01:06:34.360 wars right we all have to contend with that and and and and it's very difficult to contend with it
01:06:40.100 the arguments are extremely complicated you're absolutely right and i think what's really important
01:06:43.960 here because i think this is a huge misconception is to to outline because i know you're against
01:06:49.060 totalitarianism you're very uh you know vocal about that and i want to tell you that we are
01:06:54.300 this is a point of commonality we are also against totalitarianism if we if we define totalitarianism
01:06:59.620 as um a central government trying to encroach every private and public matter uh of of the citizens
01:07:07.260 lives and this is something we don't believe in in fact this is very important islam does not
01:07:12.140 say you have to force people either to become muslim or that they can or they have to live
01:07:17.500 an islamic lifestyle within an islamic governance and i'm not sure if you know this but at the time
01:07:22.640 of the prophet he made a constitution okay with jewish people with other people who are not muslim at
01:07:28.180 the time protecting their rights protecting their rights to worship whoever they wanted to worship
01:07:31.900 and actually even guaranteeing that if there were intruder forces that they would be protected like
01:07:36.720 that as well is that the is that the arrangement made with like fellow people of the book
01:07:41.520 essentially yes it was arrangement yeah i'm aware of that yes and so not only this but this was
01:07:47.720 implemented at the time of the caliphs so omar or abu bakr saddiq and so on this is we believe in a
01:07:55.620 kind of pluralism in this sense and the fact is i would argue that it was more legally efficacious than
01:08:01.500 what we have in the west do you know why because permission you think that's true now yes even i'm
01:08:07.900 tell you why because christians were given courts that they could rule in and that the law would be
01:08:15.960 efficacious would be a parallel dissenting law system which would have effect so they would so they would
01:08:21.580 effectively be able to go and judge their affairs outside of the the general framework of islam
01:08:27.360 and in fact this is in the quran and they took this even though we believe that the torah
01:08:36.080 has been corrupted to some extent uh the the remnants of they can use the torah whatever
01:08:42.620 corrupted version they have to rule their affairs and this is something that was was was done at the
01:08:48.500 time of the prophet done done at the time of the caliphs and so even now we would say and i'm not saying
01:08:53.280 that the whole of islamic history has presented this convivencia that we saw in spain between
01:08:58.020 muslims christians and jews a good time and and uh or other times in india by all yeah yeah i'm not
01:09:04.220 saying that of course i'm not but what i'm saying is that i think it is disingenuous to to to paint a
01:09:10.340 point at islam as if it's been the most intolerant of all of these religions look at the alhambra
01:09:14.520 look at the spanish inquisition look at the crusades look at look at the colonialism that has happened
01:09:20.020 in the name if not even not in the name of religion there's no disputing with me the fact that in some
01:09:26.460 sense we all have the blood of history on our hands yes i'm firmly aware of that and it's an
01:09:32.880 existential burden for everyone and i'm not i'm not trying to make the case that this is particularly
01:09:38.060 or uniquely true of islam i certainly know that that's not the case what i'm saying instead is that
01:09:43.940 these are things that we have to contend with and we don't exactly know how i still have the
01:09:49.800 problem of these two evangelizing religions right that they're going head to head in some sense
01:09:54.340 yes it's true evangelizing doesn't mean that it's compelling and and this is very clear okay okay now
01:10:00.860 that that's now there's an interesting point not that the points you made before aren't you know
01:10:05.360 because i kind of think well let he who can tell the best story win and then that story also has the
01:10:11.780 best actors so to speak right and so i would say the proper mode to conversion is something like
01:10:17.040 shining example and then if you're governed by a doctrine that is in fact divine and you're managing
01:10:22.960 to embody that in the sense that gives you the glow the charismatic glow of embodied divinity
01:10:29.840 two steps removed let's say and people are willing to abide by your words as a consequence well
01:10:35.700 more power to you and that's a lot more efficient and effective than compulsory war armed conflict or
01:10:41.680 any of those things and i mean this is a constant problem and i would also say that given our
01:10:46.100 technological mastery now we really can't afford this anymore we have to solve this problem of
01:10:51.700 defensive war expansive war evangelical religion you know how to go about you not how to go about
01:10:59.080 uniting us under some umbrella that isn't so vague that it means nothing how to preserve our traditions
01:11:05.280 from the past and i can't see any better way than each of us trying to be shining exemplars of our
01:11:10.580 tradition and then letting that goodness shine forth in a way that people you may you may it may be the
01:11:16.040 case that we'll find that the better we are the more we're like each other i mean wouldn't that be a
01:11:20.360 kind of union under something approximating god that all good men could see in each other a reflection
01:11:25.620 of something that was the highest and that that should be compelling in and of itself absolutely but
01:11:31.580 i think in terms of the jurisprudence in terms of what islam is capable of people in the west must
01:11:39.380 realize that islam is fully capable of peace this is what must be realized how do we how do we know
01:11:45.520 that it's not despite the quran and the sunnah or the sayings of the prophet and actions but it's
01:11:50.940 because of them if you if you look at the quran and you look at for example chapter 4 verse 90 or if
01:11:57.560 you look at for example chapter 1 verse 90 chapter 2 verse 190 you'll see that the the um the islamic
01:12:06.000 commandments are clearly sometimes about defensiveness but sometimes also clearly about
01:12:11.380 um about creating peace treaties and this treaty of hudabia is a bedrock example we are so long as
01:12:19.560 there's peace treaties there is peace and so in terms of muslim countries they can perpetually create
01:12:24.860 peace treaties with other people muslim people uh even more so because we believe we're fully under
01:12:31.260 contract and and therefore you're willing to abide by a contract this is the thing let me tell you
01:12:38.780 something jordan peterson okay the thing one of the clearest for me and i've done a lot of work
01:12:43.840 studying liberalism studying christianity and studying islam okay this the clearest commonality
01:12:50.860 between liberal theory and islam is contractarianism and contracts consent that is a clearest thing because
01:12:57.620 in in liberal theory you have the theory of consent and in islam you have the same thing
01:13:02.840 contracts are binding the quran says yeah even with people outside the faith yes especially with
01:13:09.320 people outside the faith why especially why especially is that part of the tradition of
01:13:13.560 hospitality in some sense because if if you break a contract with a non-muslim then you're driving
01:13:19.380 them away from islam okay so yes that's definitely true that's absolutely and so remember islam is
01:13:25.640 islam is attempts to attract people to its own religion one of the categories of zakat was
01:13:32.380 money that you pay to non-muslims so that they can feel comfortable and they can feel as if
01:13:39.880 you're doing them a favor and there's relationships going on it's a category it is a category of zakat which
01:13:46.160 is one of the five pillars of islam to to give such money so the fact that islam states uh in chapter
01:13:54.080 five verse verse one yeah oh you who believe fulfill your contracts that is generic and that means to
01:14:05.280 abide by your word so you have to stick by your words no matter for us if you don't stick to your words
01:14:11.000 then this shows a lack of character it shows that you in fact one of the signs one of the signs of
01:14:17.460 a hypocrite is that he goes against a religious hypocrite is that he is that if he if he makes
01:14:25.580 a contract he goes against it it seems one of the most despicable things do you think that there are
01:14:30.460 other things that i've said about islam that we could talk about right now that i could clear up and
01:14:37.140 you know because i don't want elephants under the carpet i don't like elephants under the carpet
01:14:41.740 or snakes under the carpet so are there other things that i've said that you that that people
01:14:46.780 on the islamic side who would maybe like to not be my enemy let's say um because who needs enemies
01:14:54.140 after all unless you want them um are there other things that you think places that i've misstepped in
01:15:00.840 a serious manner that should be rectified as far as you're concerned in a serious matter i will confine
01:15:05.780 it to the warlord comment because i think that's the one that most muslims well you know people in
01:15:11.360 the west are afraid of islamic expansionism and they're okay so let's let's go after that again
01:15:15.920 so the other thing that i find upsetting let's say is the civil war in islam yeah well yeah so if it
01:15:25.320 didn't tell people to fight each other i mean that fair enough doesn't say it doesn't say that
01:15:31.260 islam doesn't say there should be a civil war it's in fact it was predicted but it was never
01:15:36.420 encouraged in fact the quran clearly encourages against civil war yeah and i would say the same
01:15:41.940 thing about christianity and it gives us by the way protestant and catholic wars sorry just to
01:15:48.100 interrupt it gives us a remedy in fact the quran is the only religious book i know that tells you how
01:15:53.880 to deal with the civil war it says that if two groups of muslims fight then create peace between
01:16:04.380 them it says that if and if one of the groups rebels against the other group then fight the one
01:16:17.100 that is rebellious until it wakes up to the command of god so islam is categorically against civil war
01:16:24.340 islam is islam is clearly for pluralism it's not for compulsion these misnomers and misconceptions
01:16:32.040 must okay so okay so fair fair enough and as i said i know that the protestants and the catholics were
01:16:38.800 at each other's throats for years and despite the fact that of there being no justification for that
01:16:43.740 let's say or quite the contrary in the gospels so this isn't a problem that's unique to islam but
01:16:49.060 it is an ongoing problem in islam and it's not like there isn't sectarian strife in the west i also
01:16:54.620 understand that and so that that makes people watching the the religious community say wary
01:17:00.720 because well for obvious reasons and so why do you i know you can't answer this question in totality but
01:17:06.520 islam hasn't been able to bring its own house into unified order and so what why why do you think that
01:17:13.000 is and how is that related to islam itself if it is at all there's nothing exceptional about islam in
01:17:19.280 that regard and this once again is you made this point many times i'll tell you something again
01:17:24.120 just because there's multiple interpretations of something it doesn't mean that that thing
01:17:29.320 is false like there may be multiple interpretations of the killing of jfk it doesn't mean that
01:17:33.940 jfk didn't get killed people differ on things which especially if there's a lot of those people
01:17:41.500 which there can be more than one interpretation about now in terms of body count there was actually
01:17:46.100 a book that was written um and with there was a chapter of the book by i think his name is nazir
01:17:52.520 sheikh and he he done a study looking at the numbers of people that have been killed in all the major world
01:17:59.780 religions and he puts christianity firmly at the top i mean this doesn't require too much historical
01:18:04.960 research anyway look at the 30-year war compare that with okay look okay okay so so the point
01:18:12.620 you're making the point you're making is twofold is it's not the necessity for civil war isn't embedded
01:18:20.420 in the doctrine yes there's no reason to throw stones at the muslim world when we could perfectly
01:18:25.360 well look to our own history and i do think what we should do is look to our own history i really
01:18:31.160 believe that and i believe that we all carry historical guilt for the bloodshed that's
01:18:36.400 preceded the the structure of all of our societies but we in the west we look at the muslim world and
01:18:42.120 we see that it's it's it's riven apart and we wonder well i i know i know there's a hypocritical
01:18:49.200 element to that i'm not claiming that there isn't it's not like we have our own house in order but you
01:18:53.900 have to remember something else you have to remember there was a colonial reality that existed
01:18:58.280 where britain france and many of the european countries and uh the western european extensions
01:19:06.040 they dominated the muslim world for the last two three hundred years and so yeah but i i think i
01:19:11.740 don't think that's particularly good argument no it's very good well hang on hang on a second
01:19:16.420 i'm not i don't want it i don't want to knock it away completely the rift that i'm talking about
01:19:21.860 though was was evident far before that now the fact of that colonial complication that that could
01:19:27.040 well be the fact of that colonial complication could could well be a contributor i know the
01:19:31.820 the nation state lines first of all were imposed they were imposed quickly they were imposed
01:19:36.760 arbitrarily and without and partly partly that was a consequence of what would you say having to do a
01:19:43.160 lot of things very quickly in the aftermath of a terrible war i'm not trying to excuse it but it was
01:19:47.900 complicated and i know that that's left the middle east in this you know uh uh group of nation states
01:19:54.960 that now comprise the world in a very complicated situation so it's a reasonable point but the rift
01:20:00.460 was there before and so okay here's what i'll say to that yeah it's you you're right to say that there
01:20:06.820 was arbitrary lines that were drawn but it's not just that there were arbitrary lines that were drawn
01:20:10.540 you mentioned the middle east syria for example which is where most of the problems are happening
01:20:15.100 now in terms of the middle eastern countries it's probably number one maybe maybe libya number two
01:20:18.900 but say syria for example they put three four five ten different factions all of which have
01:20:24.520 differing understandings of of of religion of ideology of whatever it may be together that
01:20:31.560 produced wars you know you had christians in lebanon fighting sunnis shias fighting sunnis
01:20:37.140 and this happened especially after the revolution a lot of it is so it was the imposition of a false
01:20:42.860 unity that's really what happened yeah if you look at how what they're doing now like look at
01:20:47.400 lebanon as an example you could you have to have a christian president and a sunni prime minister
01:20:52.420 and a shia i don't know what it is first minister or something i don't i mean they have systems that
01:20:56.760 try and mitigate these issues but it's a mess because you're putting people that have different
01:21:01.060 visions of how to run a country together and they have their similar demographics it's like 30 40
01:21:07.420 20 and so that creates more wars but they put them together almost on i would argue on purpose to be
01:21:13.140 honest it's divide and conquer if you look at countries like denmark and sweden and norway which
01:21:18.480 are very peaceful and very prosperous they're also very homogenous and so and they're relatively small
01:21:23.760 so the problem of governance over diversity is much reduced in countries like that it's simpler for
01:21:29.600 them to be at peace because the culture is relatively homogenous and so i take your point
01:21:34.180 it's not easy to bring a true diversity into something approximating a unity especially when that unity
01:21:40.460 has been in some sense arbitrarily opposed imposed and also rapidly and arbitrarily imposed so that's
01:21:46.740 a reasonable point yeah um but i think what it is is and i've seen this in your reading list it's
01:21:51.500 like when you when you follow kind of bernard lewis's uh or samuel huntington's kind of clash of
01:21:57.620 civilization narratives sometimes you miss the nuances and these are the nuances yeah well that's for
01:22:02.120 sure there are myriad contributory factors to why and it's i don't i still don't see how islamic
01:22:08.080 countries there's like almost 50 muslim majority countries uh in like in general like you made a
01:22:14.560 point about economic uh potential one time you said yeah yeah i wanted to ask you about that because
01:22:19.120 well that's another thing that's quite a mystery is that the comparatively speaking per capita the
01:22:25.380 muslim countries are not that productive economically there's a there's four muslim majority in what sense
01:22:31.340 there's four muslim there are four out of ten muslim majority countries in the gdp per capita top 10
01:22:38.080 brunei qatar kuwait and saudi arabia well yeah well i'm not sure that i'm willing to grant the fact
01:22:45.200 that most of that wealth is generated by oil as a as a indicator of productivity the point stands is
01:22:50.700 you said per capita gdp yeah but that i'm sorry yes fair enough and you were right to call me on that
01:22:55.460 that isn't what that isn't what i meant i'm sorry because i don't think i well no i do i we got to get
01:23:01.540 the words right here we got to get them exactly right because these things matter um i don't the
01:23:06.720 well all you know that oil wealth is often a curse as well as a blessing
01:23:11.100 so outside of oil wealth you have brunei brunei is another country that's in the top 10
01:23:16.660 okay so let's talk about brunei what have they done right in your estimation i don't know much
01:23:22.160 about brunei but i know they're in the top 10 i have to be honest with you you know but yeah well
01:23:25.520 that's part of this low resolution knowledge that we all have a problem with right i mean it's
01:23:29.600 yes talking about these things is very difficult because you have to know everything to do it right
01:23:33.400 it's not that easy to know everything i know that they were trying to implement sharia to a very high
01:23:37.880 level and uh whatever they're doing is it's not because it's not despite the sharia and but i also
01:23:44.360 know is that the methodology is flawed when you look at uh muslim majority countries and say well
01:23:50.220 they're not doing well as uh non-muslim majority because the ottoman empire 400 years ago was doing
01:23:55.540 better than most countries yes yes yes yes absolutely and i know i know and historical
01:24:01.440 time frame matters you know because it's definitely so so that's a perfectly valid point let me tell you
01:24:06.920 something uh john pearson uh you are an epistemological pragmatist from my understanding
01:24:11.640 you've said before in an interview that anything which serves life is is true that's what you said
01:24:17.100 i think with sam harris if this is the case and you said it's nested in bionism if this is your
01:24:22.740 position then the truth of the matter it's nested complicated it's nested in a very complex manner
01:24:27.960 in darwin yeah but if it's i mean i think that highest truth is something like love and i think
01:24:32.380 it's very much associated with the notions of love that are central to religious traditions and so
01:24:37.560 i'm with you but you still believe that truth is utility and you still believe because that's the
01:24:41.400 pragmatist position and so truth is relative what i'm saying yeah but i also believe that the basis of
01:24:46.860 utility is love that's why i'm not so sure that i'm not so sure that you and i differ so much on
01:24:52.780 that particular no but john pearson what i want to say to you is this right pragm first of all
01:24:58.480 pragmatically islam is doing the best because if you're talking about evolution then we're talking
01:25:02.120 about reproduction and survivability and islam has got the highest birth rates in the world today
01:25:07.160 it's the fastest growing religion by a mile by by 2100 it will be number one so in your definition it
01:25:12.740 should be the most true by the way number one number two is this is that well that's a lot of
01:25:17.220 love all that reproduction they're trying to change the subject now look so number number number two is
01:25:24.860 this look dr john pearson is i'll tell you that i think i've seen your struggle against post-modernism
01:25:30.600 i've seen your struggle against nihilism and i don't think you will be successful and i'm sorry to
01:25:35.220 say it like this and the reason why i don't think you'll be successful is because your framework is
01:25:38.920 self-relativistic if if it's utility and epistemologically pragmatic then truth is
01:25:44.380 relative and if truth is relative what are you going to say to you you actually agree with the
01:25:48.460 post-modernist in that sense you i think you're closer to post-modernist than you think in fact the
01:25:53.100 pragmatist position is not it's a secret love it's not inconsistent jordan pearson with the pragmatic
01:26:00.020 position that you hold what we are offering you well i'm going to detail out that in in much more
01:26:05.240 detail when i go to cambridge and oxford so okay i don't know you should come why don't you come to
01:26:09.820 one of the talks i'll i'll come okay just send me do you want me to get do you want an invitation
01:26:14.240 i'll get you an invitation well let's why don't you come because i'm going to talk about one of the
01:26:18.380 things in islam is to always accept invitations as well and gifts and i'm going to send you some
01:26:22.660 gifts as well my friend yeah all right we need to get you some gifts all right so look i'm going to
01:26:27.120 ask you one more i gotta stop because i'm getting burned out i i want to ask you one more question
01:26:31.100 okay and and we i would like to talk to you again and i do hope you come in and and join me in
01:26:35.800 cambridge or at oxford for one of these talks that would be real good i'll get i'll get the person
01:26:40.040 organizing the the the the trip to to extend you an invitation and so thank you now you described
01:26:47.380 yourself as a traditionalist as opposed to a liberal muzzle and and we were talking a little bit
01:26:53.380 about mustafa akul and so why for you is the traditionalism particularly important and why
01:27:01.140 why should that carry more weight than let's say attempts to hypothetically liberalize islam what is
01:27:07.220 it doing for you look we have and this goes back to the pragmatism point and the post-modernism point
01:27:13.440 islam gives you moral anchorage in and of itself we believe islam itself has an inbuilt
01:27:20.820 flexibility but objectively it's an from a correspondence theory perspective it's an
01:27:25.120 outside truth which is which is hard which is strong and which can oppose and destroy post-modernism
01:27:32.160 and nihilism and and that's what i think a lot of your followers want so you think that a
01:27:36.440 traditionalist grounding is is a more it's a firmer foundation as far as you're concerned when a liberal
01:27:41.700 decides that they want to fuse islamic ideas with uh islamic ideas with liberal ideas
01:27:50.560 they're assumed they're almost um they're almost okay fair enough i can understand that and it's
01:27:55.940 partly why i have some sympathy for conservative for the conservative perspective just one point
01:28:00.600 okay yes yes so they're they're admitting that there's it's almost an admission that islam is
01:28:06.440 not complete and it's not perfect we believe islam is complete and it's perfect and it's guidance
01:28:10.680 and we believe we have evidence for that whether it's the prophets yeah well okay but there's two
01:28:15.280 there's two problems i have with that i would say i mean look and i i'm taking your point
01:28:19.480 seriously and i understand the utility of firm foundations as a bulwark against chaos okay yes
01:28:24.900 of course so but but here's here's two problems i have with that it's not easy to protect yourself
01:28:30.720 if you're a traditionalist against the temptation towards an authoritarian interpretation
01:28:35.320 and flawed as we all are you know when we approach let's say sacred texts we also have to
01:28:41.440 remember that it's us who are reading them and divine though they may be that doesn't mean we're
01:28:47.280 perfect in our receipt receipt of their message and so it's hard what the the danger on the on the
01:28:52.700 more traditionalist side is the slide into authoritarian authoritarian certainty as opposed
01:28:58.520 to the slide into chaos on the more liberal side so how do you how do you how do you personally defend
01:29:04.760 yourself against that well first of all um authoritarianism on pragmatism is and pragmatism
01:29:12.140 are not uh inconsistent because an authoritarian leader i'm not saying i have the answer to that
01:29:18.080 problem okay fine fine making that that's the first thing number two is i would say do you know
01:29:21.920 you've said one time i think in a lecture that that one of the miracles of christianity is uh render
01:29:26.580 on to caesar first you know render on to caesar what belongs to caesar render on to god what belongs to
01:29:30.340 god what if caesar is hitler then you've got authoritarianism all over again so i think yes
01:29:37.180 definitely yeah so you didn't answer my question though it was a technical question it's a technical
01:29:43.000 question look and maybe i'm wrong in the formulation and you can tell me if you think i am
01:29:47.280 what i see as a danger on the liberal side is the possibility of a descent into something like chaos
01:29:54.560 that's hopelessness and despair but what i see on the more traditionalist side let's say the
01:29:59.840 conservative side is a retreat into a a kind of authoritarian certainty and that's those are
01:30:05.660 twin temptations that might be what would you say specific to given temperaments and i was asking you
01:30:10.740 personally like you're a you're a uh uh traditionalist believer yeah how do you protect yourself
01:30:17.800 you know your soul against the temptations of overweening certainty all right i got you i got you okay
01:30:24.900 yeah okay yeah no no i don't in terms of certainty i i strive for it in fact we we want it we don't
01:30:32.220 we don't want to the the problem is not how do you rectify error like you know you're not perfect
01:30:38.040 obviously no no me personally of course i'm not perfect but we believe we follow a perfect guidance
01:30:43.680 right but you follow it imperfectly yes there's the rub right so so that's my point is that given
01:30:51.040 that you have to follow it imperfectly given that you're imperfect how do you defend yourself against
01:30:56.680 inappropriate certainty because look if you're imperfect it means you think you're right about
01:31:01.340 things you're not right about that's the definition of it's compounded ignorance right yes yeah yeah so
01:31:06.600 there are things that i you know in terms of my own personal you're talking about my own personal
01:31:11.280 face yeah i'm talking you bet you bet okay i got you there are certain things which i'll agree i will
01:31:16.100 believe in 100 and there are certain things i will suspend judgment on so the things which for me
01:31:22.760 constitute the anchor i believe the moment i take the anchor away i plunge into chaos and anarchy
01:31:28.840 and depression and that's not something i'm willing to do for myself so the certainty i have is that
01:31:35.360 there's one god worthy of worship that god's wisdom and guidance is the truth that whatever god says is
01:31:42.180 true that the prophets are true that heaven is true that hell is true all that stuff the things i will
01:31:47.460 suspend judgment on is how to deal with situations because that i do believe by the way in a kind of
01:31:53.060 sharia consequentialism and i do believe that within the islamic framework is something called
01:31:58.860 which is basically the principles of jurisprudence that that rules are not always going to work in all cases
01:32:07.340 we do believe that by the way so so for example i'm not allowed to drink alcohol but in certain
01:32:12.380 cases if it's the last thing uh that one can do if if they're not going to die if they're going to die
01:32:18.140 if they don't do it then you can do it and this is just one like extreme example we're not allowed
01:32:22.500 alcohol in islam obviously uh this is one of the injunctions but there are things we do believe in a
01:32:27.740 consequence and inbuilt flexibility with that we have to communicate we have to discuss we have to speak
01:32:32.840 to muslims and non-muslims alike you're so okay okay so i'm still not getting at what i want i want
01:32:39.180 to hear from you specifically go on you know that well all of us struggle with the desire to have what
01:32:46.680 we believe be right at all costs right because it's it well it is satisfying and and it's difficult to be
01:32:53.780 wrong because it means you have to improve you have to look at your errors i'm asking you personally
01:32:58.200 like when you're dealing with your wife when you're dealing with your kids you know how do you know
01:33:02.880 when how is it that you can protect yourself against being over weaning
01:33:07.640 this is a good question you're gonna get me in trouble with this kind of thing right now you know
01:33:13.040 this is a good question what it is is that you know i've been married for like nine years now
01:33:18.000 you know and i've had to learn that the hard way you know i've had to learn that the hard way that
01:33:22.900 i protect myself by realizing or know my own vulnerability my own fallibility
01:33:27.800 my own weakness the fact that i don't get everything right um the fact that there's
01:33:32.860 another perspective that there's something outside of myself which is greater than me
01:33:36.680 yeah well that's okay so that's that's something like you know because a serious discussion can be
01:33:42.340 had about the relationship between humility and love right i mean i think a certain degree of
01:33:46.820 humility is a precondition for love because otherwise you can't take the perspective of the other person
01:33:51.100 like how can you if you don't if you don't think you're wrong and i like i for me and and it's
01:33:58.000 certainly been the case this was useful in my clinical practice and certainly in my marriage is
01:34:02.020 i'm trying to be as attentive as i can to when i'm wrong and that seems to be a reasonable yeah that
01:34:08.080 comes out and i think that's really good that's a good part of your person i think that's why a lot
01:34:12.440 of people actually love your work and love you as a person because you come across as extremely
01:34:16.760 authentic and sincere that we don't find that kind of thing in kind of a lot it's not like it's it's
01:34:23.280 not like it's obvious to me that the christians have it right and the jews and the muslims have it
01:34:28.100 wrong and so that's certainly not the case at an individual level no it's way more complicated than
01:34:34.680 that way more and so we're just not going to go for answers if we go for answers like that we're
01:34:39.340 going to be at each other's throats and how about we aren't how about we're not how about we make
01:34:44.740 peace hey and so you and i we had a peaceful conversation so good for us and hooray and
01:34:51.400 hopefully we'll have some more and i would be very much like to see you in in cambridge or oxford and
01:34:56.200 you can listen to my arguments in a more detailed manner that way and that might address some of the
01:35:00.820 philosophical concerns that you were raising yeah so so i'll get an invitation out to you well likely
01:35:06.760 today so and hopefully we'll be able to talk again and thank you very much for agreeing to speak
01:35:12.100 with me i appreciate it and for correcting me on my misapprehensions thank you dr jordan and you're
01:35:17.060 most welcome to come and speak on my podcast as well and as i said a lot of traditionalist muslims
01:35:22.860 really look up to you and i think we've actually come quite a long way in being able to build bridges
01:35:28.040 to summarize really from my side so long as today we have realized that okay islam is a religion not
01:35:34.140 too dissimilar okay from the other previous dispensations as we would we would see it and that
01:35:40.100 there are things there's a flesh that joins these religions and also that peace is possible
01:35:47.040 peace is possible well then let's let's see if we can be good enough people to actually want peace
01:35:53.760 let's try and see what we can do all right man we'll see you i hope we see each other in the uk and
01:36:00.280 and i'd like to say hello to all the listeners and watchers of this from the islamic community and
01:36:05.060 like let's see what we can do together man yeah and you're you're invited to anything any mosque i
01:36:11.700 think in the uk will have you because you've already got the presence there just name the mosque and i'll
01:36:18.120 i'll get you an invitation send me a send me a suggestion uh when i can send you this invitation
01:36:23.760 send me a suggestion i don't know if i can do it on this visit but i'm coming back in i think march
01:36:28.620 and i'd certainly i'm certainly willing to do it at not only willing eager and i mean that i mean
01:36:34.460 eager i would love to be welcomed in that manner that would be a tremendous privilege as far as i'm
01:36:39.380 concerned so no i think you will be surprised as to the amount of acceptability that you have in
01:36:46.000 particular the muslim community well hooray for that so let's try not to muck it up with foolish words
01:36:52.060 all right all right man good talking to you thanks again thanks so much man
01:36:57.180 you