The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast


247. The War On The West | Douglas Murray


Summary

In this episode, Dr. Jordan Peterson speaks to one of the world s foremost political writers, Douglas Murray, about Great Paintings, Oppression, and The War on the West, which happens to be the title of Murray s latest book. He believes we re facing an all-out assault from within, where anything s praised so long as it wasn t produced by the west, where history is reappraised as driven by slavery, and where unreason is one of many weapons mobilized against democracy, science, and progress. Also mentioned in this episode: bullies with a victim complex, white supremacist mathematics, and the power of truth. Dr. Peterson has created a new series that could be a lifeline for those battling depression and anxiety. We know how isolating and overwhelming these conditions can be, and we wanted to take a moment to reach out to those listening who may be struggling. With decades of experience helping patients with Depression and Anxious Disorder (D.I.Y.D.) in his new series on his new podcast, Dr. Peterson offers a unique understanding of why you might be feeling this way, and provides a roadmap towards healing, showing that while the journey isn t easy, it s absolutely possible to find your way forward. Subscribe today using our podcast s promo code POWER10 for 10% off your first pack! Tim s Classic Breakfast Sandwiches are just $3 when you buy any size coffee, your mornings will never be the same. Plus Tax Canada only, limited time only, offer, only, terms apply. See app for details. Tims Classic Breakfast sandwiches are Just $3, $3? I want to talk to you about something serious and important, I ve been going through a bit by the war on the west. Well, I ll do that next for sure, I mean a bit on the Western culture, a bit of a war on Westernism, I ve come to do that in the past, I m in the history of the past by the past? I d like to help you do that, I d come to talk about that in a bit, so I hope you re not alone, so let me do that for me in the other sorts of anti-Westernism, I think I think that s good, I do that... - DOUG MEYER, - THE WORD ON THE WEST? - SONGS OF THE WATER ON THE WHORE ON THE SWORE?


Transcript

00:00:00.000 We interrupt your playlist to bring you breaking news.
00:00:02.500 Tim's Classic Breakfast Sandwiches are just $3 when you buy any size coffee.
00:00:06.520 You heard that right, $3.
00:00:08.200 Your mornings will never be the same.
00:00:10.180 Plus Tax Canada only, limited time only, terms apply.
00:00:12.400 See app for details.
00:00:15.500 Hey everyone, real quick before you skip,
00:00:19.960 I want to talk to you about something serious and important.
00:00:22.940 Dr. Jordan Peterson has created a new series
00:00:25.360 that could be a lifeline for those battling depression and anxiety.
00:00:28.700 We know how isolating and overwhelming these conditions can be
00:00:32.380 and we wanted to take a moment to reach out to those listening who may be struggling.
00:00:36.640 With decades of experience helping patients,
00:00:39.080 Dr. Peterson offers a unique understanding of why you might be feeling this way in his new series.
00:00:44.400 He provides a roadmap towards healing,
00:00:46.440 showing that while the journey isn't easy,
00:00:48.620 it's absolutely possible to find your way forward.
00:00:51.800 If you're suffering, please know you are not alone.
00:00:54.960 There's hope and there's a path to feeling better.
00:00:57.640 Go to Daily Wire Plus now and start watching Dr. Jordan B. Peterson on depression and anxiety.
00:01:03.920 Let this be the first step towards the brighter future you deserve.
00:01:10.320 Welcome to episode 247 of the JBP podcast.
00:01:14.820 I'm Michaela Peterson.
00:01:16.400 In this episode, Dad spoke to one of the world's foremost political writers,
00:01:20.800 Douglas Murray, about great paintings, oppression,
00:01:23.580 Dostoevsky, and the War on the West,
00:01:26.700 which happens to be the title of Murray's latest book.
00:01:30.320 He believes we're facing an all-out assault from within,
00:01:33.720 where anything's praised so long as it wasn't produced by the West,
00:01:38.180 where history is reappraised as driven by slavery,
00:01:41.320 and where unreason is one of many weapons mobilized against democracy, science, and progress.
00:01:46.780 Also mentioned in this episode,
00:01:49.360 bullies with a victim complex,
00:01:51.260 white supremacist mathematics,
00:01:53.080 and the power of truth.
00:01:55.120 Before we start, I wanted to quickly remind you that Dad's now on Parler,
00:01:59.080 the world's premier free speech platform.
00:02:01.800 You can find more personal posts there,
00:02:03.620 like pictures with Roger Penrose or Kermit the Frog.
00:02:06.600 Be sure to follow him on their app,
00:02:08.560 or just Google Jordan Peterson Parler.
00:02:10.800 You get the idea.
00:02:12.020 I hope you enjoy this episode.
00:02:13.380 Hello, everyone.
00:02:33.620 I'm pleased to be talking today to Mr. Douglas Murray,
00:02:38.060 who is associate editor of The Spectator,
00:02:41.260 and is now based in New York.
00:02:43.380 His latest publication,
00:02:44.740 The Madness of Crowds, was a bestseller.
00:02:47.220 His last publication,
00:02:48.380 The Madness of Crowds, was a bestseller,
00:02:50.140 and book of the year for the Times and the Sunday Times.
00:02:53.540 The book before that,
00:02:54.820 The Strange Death of Europe, Immigration, Identity, Islam,
00:02:58.340 was published by Bloomsbury in May 2017.
00:03:02.140 It spent almost 20 weeks on the Sunday Times bestseller list,
00:03:05.760 and was the number one bestseller in nonfiction.
00:03:08.260 Douglas and I have spoken several times before publicly on my podcast and for Unheard,
00:03:16.240 and he also moderated a discussion I had with Sam Harris.
00:03:21.080 I've just finished his latest book, which is not out yet,
00:03:25.200 The War on the West.
00:03:27.240 When is it out, Douglas?
00:03:28.980 It's out on the 26th of April,
00:03:30.920 so hopefully by the time people see this,
00:03:33.300 it will be out.
00:03:34.920 Yeah.
00:03:35.700 So that's what we're going to talk about today,
00:03:38.580 your new book.
00:03:39.180 I read it yesterday.
00:03:40.120 A very pessimistic read, I might note,
00:03:44.140 and I thought I might start with something technical in some sense,
00:03:49.820 terminological.
00:03:52.220 It might be regarded as a pretty inflammatory title,
00:03:55.240 The War on the West,
00:03:56.380 and maybe we'll start with that.
00:03:58.680 What do you mean by war,
00:04:00.580 and why use that term?
00:04:03.560 Essentially,
00:04:04.340 that's interesting,
00:04:04.880 I thought you were going to start with the West,
00:04:07.100 which is not really...
00:04:07.580 Well, we'll do that next.
00:04:08.680 A really knotty one to untangle.
00:04:11.760 Well, we'll do that next for sure.
00:04:14.680 War,
00:04:15.320 because what I say in the book is that
00:04:18.460 this is what we've been going through.
00:04:20.420 We've been going through a war
00:04:21.400 on everything to do with the foundations of the West,
00:04:24.820 everything to do with the results
00:04:26.620 of the Western inheritance.
00:04:29.640 And when I say that, of course,
00:04:31.460 I mean the war,
00:04:34.220 as I do it bit by bit on Western history,
00:04:37.320 a war on Western peoples,
00:04:40.020 a war on Western culture,
00:04:42.600 a war on Western religion and philosophy.
00:04:45.900 This is a position that I argue that we've come to in the present age,
00:04:49.200 where everything is bad if it came from us,
00:04:53.120 let me say,
00:04:54.620 us in the West.
00:04:55.880 And everything is good so long as it hasn't come from us.
00:04:59.000 Now, I should stress, by the way,
00:05:00.340 that what I'm describing here is Western anti-Westernism.
00:05:04.360 There are plenty of other forms of anti-Westernism.
00:05:07.800 There's Russian anti-Westernism,
00:05:10.300 there's Chinese anti-Westernism,
00:05:12.340 all sorts of other kinds.
00:05:13.460 But the one that I think is most interesting,
00:05:15.220 partly because it's so pathological,
00:05:17.340 is what I'm really writing about here,
00:05:18.780 which is Western anti-Westernism.
00:05:20.540 Why we in the West have arrived at this strange place
00:05:24.180 where we venerate everything so long as it's not our own.
00:05:28.340 We respect things so long as it hasn't been produced
00:05:31.040 by the society that also produced us.
00:05:33.920 And I do think this is a fundamental assault.
00:05:36.500 I think it's a fundamental assault,
00:05:38.160 as I try to demonstrate in the book,
00:05:39.580 on all of the foundations,
00:05:41.500 the principles,
00:05:42.420 the foundational figures,
00:05:44.100 the heroes,
00:05:45.340 the great stories,
00:05:46.540 the great themes of the West even.
00:05:50.100 have all come in recent decades
00:05:52.320 under this just relentless assault.
00:05:56.400 And I try to explain why,
00:05:57.940 why I think that's happened.
00:05:58.960 It's not an entirely new phenomenon,
00:06:00.440 as you know.
00:06:01.140 I mean, it's been a strain of Western thought,
00:06:03.700 arguably for some centuries,
00:06:05.980 if not longer.
00:06:07.640 But that in recent decades,
00:06:09.100 it's picked up a pace.
00:06:10.680 And it's picked up a pace
00:06:11.560 for some very obvious reasons.
00:06:13.760 After the colonial era,
00:06:15.480 it was inevitable that there was going to be
00:06:17.240 an anti-colonial backlash,
00:06:19.120 a post-colonial movement.
00:06:21.560 But that's lingered and turned
00:06:23.120 into something else,
00:06:24.860 as have all of the other backlashes
00:06:26.780 that I lay out.
00:06:28.220 So I do think it's a,
00:06:29.000 I think it's a,
00:06:29.700 I think it's a,
00:06:30.720 it's a complete and fundamental assault
00:06:32.800 on everything
00:06:33.560 that the West has produced.
00:06:35.840 And I think that's why
00:06:37.200 it's deserving of the term.
00:06:39.460 So to,
00:06:41.120 to what end?
00:06:44.220 Well,
00:06:44.860 that's a very interesting question,
00:06:46.280 because of course,
00:06:47.420 it's a different aim
00:06:48.600 for different people.
00:06:50.080 I mean,
00:06:50.360 one of the people I write about
00:06:51.600 at one point in the book
00:06:52.560 is Fanon,
00:06:54.240 Franz Fanon,
00:06:55.240 the distinguished
00:06:56.820 and highly cited
00:06:57.920 post-colonial author
00:06:59.120 who,
00:06:59.960 like Edward Said,
00:07:00.880 had a profound influence
00:07:02.320 in the academy.
00:07:04.560 The foreword to his last book
00:07:06.280 was written by Sartre.
00:07:09.080 He was a very,
00:07:11.480 very impressive
00:07:13.320 in many ways figure.
00:07:15.440 But his,
00:07:16.060 his version of
00:07:17.120 what should happen
00:07:18.080 in the post-colonial era
00:07:19.620 was,
00:07:20.460 for instance,
00:07:20.860 I mean,
00:07:21.400 basically entirely Marxist.
00:07:22.960 And it's one of the,
00:07:23.680 it's one of the ironies
00:07:24.940 I try to tease out about this,
00:07:26.540 that for instance,
00:07:27.660 if in the post-colonial era,
00:07:30.320 people had argued that
00:07:31.560 societies that have been
00:07:33.300 colonized
00:07:34.060 should be returned
00:07:35.420 to a pre-colonial condition
00:07:37.920 with a return to,
00:07:41.140 let's say,
00:07:42.060 more of the native
00:07:43.220 political
00:07:45.100 and other habits.
00:07:47.000 And that would have been
00:07:47.840 one thing.
00:07:48.720 But writers like Fanon
00:07:50.020 were not doing that.
00:07:50.860 They were arguing that
00:07:52.500 the answer to the colonial era
00:07:54.520 was Marxism.
00:07:56.920 And of course,
00:07:57.440 that has this tremendous irony,
00:07:59.320 doesn't it?
00:07:59.680 Which is that
00:08:00.180 they say,
00:08:01.100 well,
00:08:01.200 this one form of Westernism,
00:08:03.920 Western colonialism,
00:08:05.260 must be replaced
00:08:06.400 because it's Western.
00:08:07.660 And what we'll replace it with
00:08:08.980 is Western Marxism.
00:08:12.420 And so that's just
00:08:13.680 one of the motivations.
00:08:14.820 I think it was
00:08:15.160 a very strong motivation,
00:08:16.400 certainly in the immediate period
00:08:17.520 of the post-colonial era.
00:08:19.420 There are different versions
00:08:20.620 of it now,
00:08:21.320 of course.
00:08:22.160 There's the,
00:08:23.160 let's say,
00:08:23.620 the social one,
00:08:25.240 the one where
00:08:26.160 it's just rather gauche.
00:08:27.960 I mean,
00:08:28.860 of course,
00:08:29.260 famously,
00:08:29.780 writers like Orwell
00:08:30.600 pointed this out
00:08:31.380 many decades ago.
00:08:32.660 Rather gauche
00:08:33.740 to celebrate
00:08:34.440 anything about
00:08:35.320 your own society
00:08:36.080 and indeed regarded
00:08:37.140 as being slightly backward,
00:08:39.320 a sign of a sort of
00:08:40.440 low resolution figure
00:08:42.540 that you would do
00:08:43.340 such a thing.
00:08:44.040 Whereas the veneration
00:08:45.200 of other cultures
00:08:46.220 was a demonstration
00:08:48.180 of sophistication.
00:08:49.980 A sophisticate
00:08:50.720 would do that.
00:08:51.380 But we do end up
00:08:53.520 in this position
00:08:54.300 today,
00:08:55.900 which is much
00:08:57.260 more dangerous
00:08:57.880 than that.
00:08:59.080 One of the reasons
00:08:59.800 I do the assault
00:09:00.640 on Western history
00:09:01.700 and do it also
00:09:02.660 by individuals,
00:09:04.940 the figures
00:09:05.900 that used to be
00:09:06.680 and certainly
00:09:07.540 in my own lifetime,
00:09:08.540 I'm sure in yours,
00:09:09.400 Jordan,
00:09:10.020 some of the
00:09:10.960 absolutely foundational
00:09:11.980 heroes of Western history
00:09:13.660 have come in
00:09:14.260 for specific assault.
00:09:16.240 And you could ask yourself,
00:09:17.480 well,
00:09:17.980 maybe that's because
00:09:19.340 they're overdue
00:09:20.100 some reckoning
00:09:21.040 and I think
00:09:22.740 it's far more than that
00:09:23.780 and I try to show that.
00:09:25.040 I try to show,
00:09:25.680 for instance,
00:09:26.200 that the interpretation
00:09:28.160 of, say,
00:09:29.740 Thomas Jefferson
00:09:30.600 or Winston Churchill
00:09:32.900 or Abraham Lincoln
00:09:34.240 has actually become
00:09:35.780 an assault
00:09:37.700 based on the
00:09:38.600 following premise
00:09:39.360 that if we can
00:09:40.040 take down Churchill,
00:09:41.280 we sort of can get
00:09:42.240 to the roots
00:09:42.800 of taking down
00:09:43.580 British patriotism.
00:09:45.520 If we get,
00:09:46.400 if we assault
00:09:47.020 Abraham Lincoln,
00:09:48.300 we've essentially
00:09:49.220 not done Thomas Jefferson,
00:09:50.640 we've not just
00:09:51.400 assaulted them,
00:09:53.260 we've actually
00:09:53.900 assaulted something
00:09:54.720 that is the absolute
00:09:55.680 root of the American
00:09:56.700 ideal,
00:09:58.100 the heroic story,
00:09:59.700 the heroic figure.
00:10:01.640 And then there's
00:10:02.280 this further layer
00:10:03.460 of that,
00:10:03.760 which is not just
00:10:04.440 with individuals,
00:10:06.020 but with whole societies.
00:10:07.380 So that,
00:10:07.880 for instance,
00:10:08.840 instead of understanding
00:10:10.060 the history of racism
00:10:11.160 as,
00:10:11.840 well,
00:10:12.480 racism is a highly
00:10:13.600 regrettable
00:10:14.200 and ugly human trait,
00:10:15.480 which is consistent
00:10:16.320 across all human societies
00:10:18.180 that we know about
00:10:19.120 and it is a part
00:10:21.520 of Western history,
00:10:23.400 instead the whole
00:10:24.560 of Western history
00:10:25.440 is made into
00:10:26.660 a history of racism
00:10:28.140 in which racism
00:10:29.240 was the guiding force
00:10:30.720 when,
00:10:32.000 as I explain in the book,
00:10:33.660 or any fair estimate
00:10:35.080 would see it as being
00:10:36.060 an element
00:10:36.820 within Western history,
00:10:38.000 but by no means
00:10:40.080 the thing that drove
00:10:41.280 Western history.
00:10:42.740 So it's this sort of thing.
00:10:44.140 Okay,
00:10:44.920 so let's concentrate
00:10:46.300 on that then,
00:10:47.660 in terms of the values
00:10:49.020 that you regard
00:10:50.360 as being under assault
00:10:52.860 in this war.
00:10:55.520 What do you think
00:10:56.600 the canonical values are
00:10:58.120 that are the subject
00:10:59.280 of this intense criticism?
00:11:00.900 Now,
00:11:01.120 you described Marxism itself,
00:11:03.140 which is also a branch
00:11:04.100 of Western thought,
00:11:05.000 interestingly enough,
00:11:05.980 as fundamental
00:11:07.220 to this criticism.
00:11:09.360 So,
00:11:10.140 if it isn't,
00:11:12.280 the Marxists basically
00:11:13.380 make the claim that
00:11:14.600 something like
00:11:16.020 the claim that
00:11:17.400 history and human institutions
00:11:20.180 and perhaps individuals
00:11:21.360 as well are to be
00:11:22.380 understood as manifestations
00:11:24.080 of their class identity,
00:11:26.460 so as some form
00:11:27.300 of group identity.
00:11:28.320 For the classical Marxists,
00:11:30.540 it was class identity.
00:11:32.480 And then history
00:11:33.140 is to be viewed
00:11:33.920 as the battle
00:11:35.720 between an oppressor class
00:11:38.140 and an oppressed class.
00:11:39.640 And the oppressor class
00:11:40.840 is motivated
00:11:41.880 by the desire
00:11:42.640 to exploit
00:11:43.540 the victimized class.
00:11:46.840 And that's been,
00:11:47.360 and then that's been transferred,
00:11:49.180 I would say,
00:11:49.720 to some degree
00:11:50.260 in recent years
00:11:51.020 to terminology
00:11:52.700 that replaces
00:11:53.960 economic class
00:11:54.820 with race,
00:11:55.420 but basically makes
00:11:56.320 the same arguments.
00:11:57.600 Does that seem,
00:11:58.460 okay,
00:11:58.760 so if,
00:12:00.540 so the claim then
00:12:02.360 is that
00:12:02.820 the central motivation
00:12:04.120 is something like
00:12:05.080 the will to
00:12:06.240 use compulsion
00:12:07.720 in the service
00:12:08.980 of group-centered goals,
00:12:11.500 I guess?
00:12:12.780 What's the Western
00:12:13.820 counterclaim?
00:12:14.900 And why,
00:12:16.380 so that's one question,
00:12:17.600 is there a Western
00:12:18.280 counterclaim?
00:12:19.060 And why should we reject
00:12:20.240 that analysis of history
00:12:21.500 given that things do
00:12:22.880 get corrupted by power?
00:12:25.880 Well,
00:12:26.600 I quote in the opening
00:12:28.240 and later on in the book,
00:12:29.920 as you know,
00:12:30.720 a phrase of Nietzsche,
00:12:32.520 which I sort of add to
00:12:34.080 from the genealogy
00:12:35.380 of morals.
00:12:36.520 When Nietzsche refers
00:12:37.360 in passing,
00:12:39.580 but I think it's such
00:12:40.260 a remarkable phrase,
00:12:41.240 I wanted to bring it out
00:12:43.240 and throw it to the forefront.
00:12:44.900 He talks in the genealogy
00:12:46.160 of morals
00:12:46.620 of people
00:12:47.860 who talk about justice
00:12:49.420 but mean revenge.
00:12:52.060 Now,
00:12:52.700 this seems to me
00:12:53.820 to be an extraordinarily
00:12:54.960 pertinent insight
00:12:56.520 to our era.
00:12:57.900 When you actually,
00:12:59.360 when you talk about
00:13:01.040 some of the scholars
00:13:01.860 and writers
00:13:02.560 that I try to tear into
00:13:04.820 in this book,
00:13:06.620 they have,
00:13:07.600 I'm thinking of figures
00:13:08.580 like Ibram X. Kendi,
00:13:10.200 Robin DiAngelo,
00:13:12.780 quite a number of others
00:13:14.440 you could go on listing,
00:13:16.240 but these are some
00:13:17.080 of the main ones.
00:13:18.660 They're simply not interested,
00:13:20.540 it's clear,
00:13:21.280 in a sort of fair analysis
00:13:22.820 of the West
00:13:24.400 or its history
00:13:25.620 or its traditions
00:13:26.540 or its claims.
00:13:28.040 They're interested
00:13:28.960 in a form of revenge
00:13:30.100 and some of them
00:13:31.500 are perfectly open
00:13:32.340 about that.
00:13:33.420 I mean, Kendi
00:13:34.080 is perfectly open
00:13:34.980 about the fact
00:13:35.440 that in response
00:13:36.760 to one thing
00:13:37.620 it might be necessary
00:13:38.620 to punish another group.
00:13:40.820 He says it completely,
00:13:42.700 frankly,
00:13:43.800 in his most famous book
00:13:45.760 how to be ironically titled,
00:13:48.260 inappropriately titled,
00:13:50.020 how to be an anti-racist.
00:13:52.880 And it's extremely clear
00:13:55.600 from the work
00:13:56.840 of other people
00:13:57.980 in this movement,
00:13:58.740 people like Hannah Nicole Jones
00:14:01.360 of the 1619 Project.
00:14:03.680 What you're really talking about,
00:14:05.020 you're certainly talking about
00:14:06.160 with the people
00:14:06.600 tearing down
00:14:07.240 the heroes of the West
00:14:08.420 is people are saying,
00:14:10.440 okay,
00:14:11.400 you had your go
00:14:12.980 and now we're going
00:14:15.060 to have ours
00:14:15.880 and we're going to see
00:14:16.780 how you like it,
00:14:18.360 how you like being talked about
00:14:20.140 in extraordinarily racist terms,
00:14:22.880 how you like being lumped in
00:14:24.500 and homogenized as a group,
00:14:26.100 for instance,
00:14:26.700 white people,
00:14:27.940 Western people,
00:14:28.900 Western traditions.
00:14:29.720 And again,
00:14:30.780 this isn't an entirely new thing.
00:14:32.360 I point out again
00:14:33.140 with one of the most prominent
00:14:34.140 post-colonial writers,
00:14:35.580 Edward Said,
00:14:36.560 who every benighted student
00:14:39.340 who's had to study
00:14:40.300 at almost any university
00:14:42.060 has come across Orientalism
00:14:43.720 at some point.
00:14:44.580 And one of Said's
00:14:45.380 fundamental critiques
00:14:46.480 of the West
00:14:47.020 is that it sort of,
00:14:47.980 it essentializes people
00:14:49.680 in the East.
00:14:51.020 And, you know,
00:14:51.800 there's quite a lot of points
00:14:52.800 to make about that,
00:14:53.520 but one of them is
00:14:54.180 he's extremely good
00:14:55.740 at essentializing people
00:14:57.000 in the West.
00:14:57.740 You know,
00:14:58.020 he'll refer in passing,
00:15:00.040 Said,
00:15:00.500 to, for instance,
00:15:01.340 your average 19th century European.
00:15:04.820 Right?
00:15:05.820 What the hell
00:15:06.840 was an average 19th century European
00:15:08.940 any more than
00:15:10.340 an average 19th century
00:15:13.180 person in Africa
00:15:15.020 or the Arabian Peninsula?
00:15:18.400 You know,
00:15:18.560 people of this revenge kind
00:15:22.600 were extraordinarily keen
00:15:24.460 to use tools
00:15:25.360 which they claimed
00:15:26.220 to deprecate
00:15:27.200 so long as that
00:15:28.240 they furthered
00:15:29.340 their particular
00:15:30.020 political goals.
00:15:31.940 And I think that
00:15:32.600 they exposed themselves
00:15:33.680 again and again.
00:15:34.620 And the problem
00:15:35.380 in recent years,
00:15:36.500 as I see it,
00:15:37.200 in the West
00:15:37.740 is that this process
00:15:39.540 of revenge
00:15:40.240 has taken on
00:15:40.980 this exceptionally
00:15:41.740 gleeful attitude.
00:15:44.660 People like D'Angelo
00:15:45.920 visibly,
00:15:47.980 audibly,
00:15:48.660 cannot believe
00:15:49.580 the luck they have
00:15:51.060 that they can get away
00:15:52.280 with saying
00:15:52.900 the things that they do.
00:15:54.440 And the fact
00:15:55.820 that when asked
00:15:56.460 to provide evidence,
00:15:57.620 they say things
00:15:58.420 like D'Angelo did
00:15:59.640 recently in an interview.
00:16:01.900 There's a collective
00:16:03.020 glee in the white body
00:16:04.520 when black bodies
00:16:05.460 are punished.
00:16:07.300 And her interviewer,
00:16:08.240 who happens to be black,
00:16:09.000 asks her for evidence
00:16:09.940 that she has none.
00:16:11.040 So she just makes
00:16:11.740 another outrageous claim.
00:16:13.760 And this has become
00:16:15.060 part of it.
00:16:16.480 Okay, so let's go
00:16:18.700 into this as deeply
00:16:19.640 as we can.
00:16:20.400 So I was thinking
00:16:21.100 when reading your book
00:16:22.080 about,
00:16:22.900 let's start with
00:16:24.160 the issue of slavery.
00:16:25.980 And it's certainly
00:16:27.280 the case that
00:16:28.060 the people
00:16:29.320 that you're describing
00:16:30.700 and the intellectual
00:16:33.040 and Marxist influence
00:16:35.100 types
00:16:35.580 who criticize
00:16:37.080 the more traditional
00:16:39.160 institutions of the West
00:16:40.500 accept it as a given
00:16:42.580 that slavery is wrong.
00:16:44.260 And so you could imagine
00:16:46.480 there might be
00:16:46.980 two reasons for that.
00:16:48.000 One reason would be
00:16:48.880 one group should not
00:16:50.120 have the upper hand
00:16:51.060 over another.
00:16:52.760 Or at least if you're
00:16:54.280 the group that's
00:16:54.980 in the oppressed class,
00:16:57.040 you might not want
00:16:58.820 that to be the case.
00:17:00.020 And the other argument
00:17:01.500 is there's something
00:17:02.440 intrinsically wrong
00:17:03.660 with slavery as such,
00:17:07.180 but at the individual level.
00:17:11.080 And so I guess
00:17:11.900 one of the things
00:17:12.740 that struck me
00:17:14.580 is that
00:17:15.040 unless you believe
00:17:17.080 the second,
00:17:18.600 you're just trying
00:17:19.480 to swap one form
00:17:20.460 of slavery for another
00:17:21.440 and it isn't also clear
00:17:22.860 why it's wrong.
00:17:25.280 Slavery is wrong
00:17:26.440 if you believe
00:17:27.400 that the individual
00:17:28.200 should be sovereign,
00:17:29.680 able to make choices,
00:17:31.060 able to make free
00:17:31.760 and unconstrained choices
00:17:33.020 that aren't subject
00:17:33.880 to the arbitrary will
00:17:35.040 of another.
00:17:35.980 But to believe that,
00:17:37.400 you have to believe
00:17:38.220 that there is
00:17:39.360 such a thing
00:17:39.980 as the individual.
00:17:41.080 That's the right
00:17:41.640 unit of analysis.
00:17:42.740 And that the idea
00:17:43.700 that that individual
00:17:44.760 is valuable
00:17:45.520 and sovereign
00:17:46.200 in some fundamental sense
00:17:47.620 is true.
00:17:48.560 And then when I think that,
00:17:50.540 I think there isn't
00:17:52.480 anywhere in the world
00:17:53.580 where that idea
00:17:54.360 has been expressed
00:17:55.280 more clearly
00:17:55.960 than in the West.
00:17:57.400 And so it's so interesting
00:17:59.840 to see people
00:18:00.800 object to slavery
00:18:02.260 and object to the use
00:18:04.040 of arbitrary power
00:18:04.900 by one group
00:18:06.220 over another,
00:18:06.960 but also to reject
00:18:09.220 wholesale,
00:18:11.040 the individualism,
00:18:12.640 the notion
00:18:13.060 of individual value
00:18:14.000 that's at the heart
00:18:14.680 of the Western enterprise
00:18:16.160 that seems to be
00:18:17.600 the basis
00:18:18.100 for the rejection
00:18:19.000 of slavery per se.
00:18:20.520 You do point out,
00:18:21.500 for example,
00:18:21.900 that it wasn't obvious
00:18:22.940 that Karl Marx
00:18:23.940 objected to slavery
00:18:25.500 on moral grounds.
00:18:26.600 So it seems
00:18:29.000 too obvious
00:18:30.060 to even be asked,
00:18:31.000 why is slavery wrong?
00:18:32.620 But when everything
00:18:33.900 obvious is up for grabs,
00:18:35.240 then it's perfectly
00:18:35.980 reasonable to ask that.
00:18:37.260 And so part of the problem
00:18:44.120 with setting the group
00:18:46.020 against the individual
00:18:46.960 is that you see
00:18:47.740 that the people
00:18:48.480 who do that
00:18:48.940 seem to invalidate
00:18:49.880 their own moral claim
00:18:51.000 that what they're opposing
00:18:51.960 is wrong.
00:18:52.860 Like, on what basis
00:18:53.720 is it wrong?
00:18:55.160 And does that seem
00:18:55.820 like a reasonable
00:18:56.500 position to you?
00:18:58.560 Yes.
00:18:58.880 I mean,
00:18:59.640 one of the most
00:19:01.100 fascinating things
00:19:01.940 about this,
00:19:02.380 I go into in the section
00:19:03.540 on slavery in the book
00:19:04.560 is that, of course,
00:19:05.620 historically speaking,
00:19:08.160 it would have been
00:19:08.780 highly unusual
00:19:09.720 to be opposed
00:19:10.740 to slavery
00:19:11.420 in almost any era.
00:19:13.420 And there were
00:19:13.920 lots of reasons
00:19:14.540 for that.
00:19:15.700 I mean,
00:19:15.940 you first of all
00:19:16.700 have the,
00:19:17.160 one of the questions
00:19:18.020 as you know
00:19:18.460 that I delve into
00:19:19.380 at one point
00:19:19.820 in the book
00:19:20.160 is why are
00:19:20.860 the Enlightenment
00:19:21.460 philosophers
00:19:21.960 under particular
00:19:22.700 attack at the moment?
00:19:24.060 And there are
00:19:24.520 various explanations
00:19:25.480 you could give
00:19:26.280 for that.
00:19:26.820 One is that
00:19:27.880 there is a genuine
00:19:28.840 overdue reckoning,
00:19:30.360 that there is a form
00:19:31.200 of Enlightenment,
00:19:32.240 let's say,
00:19:32.640 fundamentalism at the
00:19:33.700 moment that views
00:19:34.580 figures of the
00:19:36.480 Enlightenment
00:19:37.040 as particularly
00:19:38.260 needing this
00:19:39.200 sort of scouring
00:19:40.340 and re-approach.
00:19:41.980 Another is that
00:19:42.700 they happened to have
00:19:43.620 the misfortune
00:19:44.500 to live in an era
00:19:45.520 in which both
00:19:46.260 the slave trade
00:19:47.320 and colonialism,
00:19:48.700 currently seen as
00:19:49.380 the two great
00:19:50.020 wrongs of history
00:19:51.080 of the West,
00:19:52.620 were going on
00:19:53.700 and that they
00:19:55.320 didn't spend enough
00:19:56.200 of their time
00:19:56.860 countering them
00:19:57.780 and that Immanuel Kant
00:19:58.880 should have spent
00:19:59.920 more time addressing
00:20:00.820 slavery and less time
00:20:02.120 addressing all of the
00:20:03.880 questions that he
00:20:04.520 addressed and that
00:20:05.160 rather than talking
00:20:05.800 about superstition
00:20:06.600 and trying to pull
00:20:07.260 that apart,
00:20:08.120 David Hume should
00:20:08.820 have been interested
00:20:09.380 in colonialism
00:20:10.140 and on and on.
00:20:11.100 So that's another
00:20:11.660 explanation.
00:20:12.460 And a third
00:20:12.900 explanation,
00:20:13.520 which I think is
00:20:14.100 perhaps more persuasive,
00:20:15.500 is that actually
00:20:16.120 if you go for the
00:20:17.060 Enlightenment philosophers,
00:20:18.140 you get to one of
00:20:19.060 the absolutely key
00:20:19.840 things to assault
00:20:20.620 if you're going
00:20:21.080 to assault the West,
00:20:22.140 which are the ideas
00:20:22.980 of rationalism and
00:20:24.080 reason and the
00:20:24.740 application of the
00:20:25.660 scientific method
00:20:26.500 and much more.
00:20:27.820 But the reason I
00:20:29.160 mention this is
00:20:29.880 because, of course,
00:20:31.800 what's so fascinating
00:20:33.080 is that there are
00:20:34.380 two aspects of the
00:20:36.260 slavery thing in
00:20:36.960 particular that need
00:20:37.560 to be delved into.
00:20:38.320 One is that thing of,
00:20:39.560 well, everybody did it
00:20:40.560 throughout history.
00:20:42.720 And there's a counter
00:20:43.820 which Kendi,
00:20:44.720 among others,
00:20:45.360 do, which is,
00:20:46.060 well, Western slavery
00:20:47.200 was worse because it
00:20:48.320 was race-based.
00:20:49.280 And by the way,
00:20:49.680 that's absolute nonsense.
00:20:50.960 I mean, countless
00:20:52.440 societies had effectively
00:20:53.560 race-based slavery
00:20:54.980 and indeed it's going
00:20:55.820 on today in the
00:20:57.020 Middle East and in
00:20:57.820 Africa.
00:20:58.280 But there was a
00:21:01.260 specific reason,
00:21:02.260 actually, why during
00:21:03.280 the Enlightenment
00:21:03.880 period, and I cite
00:21:04.960 Thomas Jefferson on
00:21:06.080 this because he's a
00:21:06.820 very interesting figure
00:21:07.520 trying to think this
00:21:08.700 through as they were
00:21:09.300 going through it.
00:21:09.960 One of the reasons
00:21:10.500 why Thomas Jefferson
00:21:11.220 is so interesting is
00:21:11.920 because he is one of
00:21:12.840 the most thoughtful
00:21:13.460 people of his era,
00:21:15.460 was still not aware
00:21:17.520 of whether or not
00:21:18.620 there was an answer
00:21:19.500 or which way the
00:21:20.340 answer went to what
00:21:21.240 was still a live
00:21:21.940 conversation then,
00:21:22.880 which was the
00:21:23.420 monogenesis and
00:21:26.280 polygenesis argument.
00:21:28.280 That was the
00:21:29.140 argument over whether
00:21:29.940 or not all the human
00:21:31.260 races were from the
00:21:32.340 same stock as it
00:21:33.980 were, or whether we
00:21:35.760 were all from
00:21:36.300 different lines.
00:21:38.380 That debate seems
00:21:39.500 obvious to us now
00:21:40.460 because it got
00:21:41.020 answered later in the
00:21:42.100 19th century.
00:21:43.780 It wasn't obvious at
00:21:45.080 that time and people
00:21:46.060 like Jefferson were
00:21:46.780 trying to do what
00:21:47.440 they could with it.
00:21:48.080 So there was a sort
00:21:49.100 of, there was one
00:21:50.120 version of the
00:21:50.740 defense of slavery
00:21:51.480 which was, well,
00:21:53.160 these are all totally
00:21:53.980 different people, but
00:21:55.160 then of course you
00:21:55.900 have to counter that
00:21:56.900 with the fact that,
00:21:57.920 and again, Voltaire
00:21:59.060 made this point, what
00:22:00.620 is the greater evil?
00:22:02.600 To sell somebody and
00:22:03.880 buy somebody of a
00:22:05.880 different country, a
00:22:08.200 different race and so
00:22:09.600 on, or to sell your
00:22:11.540 neighbor or your
00:22:12.700 brother or the member
00:22:14.380 of your community?
00:22:15.700 Now, of course, this is
00:22:17.100 a, just as it is, just
00:22:19.480 as it was when Voltaire
00:22:20.380 asked the question, it's
00:22:21.720 an exceedingly
00:22:22.480 uncomfortable question to
00:22:23.700 ask today.
00:22:24.340 And I don't ask it in
00:22:25.640 order to say, well,
00:22:27.220 there's an obvious
00:22:27.800 answer, but as
00:22:29.360 everybody knows, the
00:22:30.460 slave trade only
00:22:31.300 existed because people
00:22:33.000 in Africa were selling
00:22:34.080 their brothers and
00:22:35.000 their neighbors and
00:22:36.200 raiding neighboring
00:22:37.060 towns of people who
00:22:38.100 looked exactly like
00:22:39.460 them and selling them
00:22:40.840 to other black people
00:22:42.040 in Africa, some of
00:22:43.540 whom ended up in the
00:22:44.960 slave trade going
00:22:45.900 across the Atlantic,
00:22:47.180 many more of whom
00:22:48.300 went through the slave
00:22:49.460 trade that went to
00:22:50.500 Arabia.
00:22:50.900 So, it took an
00:22:53.580 awfully long time for
00:22:54.820 our species to even
00:22:55.840 begin and we're not
00:22:56.720 there yet by any
00:22:57.940 means.
00:22:58.360 I've met people in my
00:22:59.900 own life who were
00:23:00.640 slaves, were born
00:23:01.700 slaves in Africa and
00:23:04.240 elsewhere.
00:23:05.660 This is by no means
00:23:06.860 solved by our species,
00:23:09.060 but we look back at it
00:23:10.260 now as if it was
00:23:11.580 perfectly obvious.
00:23:13.320 Well, look, okay, so
00:23:14.680 my understanding of
00:23:16.420 the history of ideas in
00:23:19.140 the deepest sense is
00:23:20.360 that it's very
00:23:22.420 difficult for people,
00:23:24.300 first of all, to
00:23:24.980 understand that there
00:23:26.500 is a universally valid
00:23:28.960 human essence across
00:23:31.320 cultures, right?
00:23:32.880 And so, most isolated
00:23:36.080 peoples have regarded
00:23:37.300 their own citizens as
00:23:38.780 human and everyone
00:23:39.820 else who isn't part of
00:23:42.440 that group as not fully
00:23:44.380 human.
00:23:44.820 and to develop a
00:23:48.920 universal system of
00:23:50.700 value despite that
00:23:52.160 proclivity has been
00:23:54.140 extraordinarily difficult.
00:23:55.180 And then to further
00:23:56.600 make the case that
00:23:58.440 each person, regardless
00:23:59.960 of their social status
00:24:01.500 and power and all of
00:24:03.140 that, is also
00:24:04.640 characterized by
00:24:05.920 something that is best
00:24:07.980 termed intrinsic worth
00:24:09.540 that's associated with
00:24:10.880 their personal sovereignty
00:24:11.820 or their individual
00:24:13.760 sovereignty is also an
00:24:14.900 extraordinarily difficult
00:24:16.100 idea to conceptualize.
00:24:18.940 And then, but, so
00:24:21.980 first of all, we
00:24:22.680 shouldn't be lulled into
00:24:23.720 thinking that, as you
00:24:24.960 pointed out, that those
00:24:25.820 are human norms in some
00:24:27.140 sense.
00:24:28.260 They're not quite the
00:24:30.060 contrary.
00:24:30.700 And then, I do believe
00:24:32.960 it is the case that,
00:24:34.340 first of all, perhaps in
00:24:35.420 the religious domain, and
00:24:36.380 we can talk about that
00:24:37.180 later, and then later in
00:24:38.560 the political domain, that
00:24:40.760 notion of divine
00:24:42.580 individual worth was
00:24:44.400 developed and instituted
00:24:46.120 in social institutions
00:24:47.340 most effectively and in
00:24:48.880 some sense solely in the
00:24:51.440 West.
00:24:52.340 Yes.
00:24:52.800 And we could get into
00:24:54.220 that in one angle.
00:24:55.580 You talk about the
00:24:56.560 British Empire's attempt
00:24:58.640 to eradicate slavery
00:25:00.400 worldwide.
00:25:02.100 And also that that was
00:25:03.560 driven by Christian
00:25:05.300 notions and by
00:25:07.020 Christians specifically,
00:25:08.320 and that it also
00:25:09.440 occurred at great
00:25:10.620 expense in relationship
00:25:12.060 to the British Empire's
00:25:13.580 function.
00:25:14.840 Yes.
00:25:14.980 So maybe you could just
00:25:16.140 walk through that a bit
00:25:17.180 and we could delve into
00:25:17.980 that.
00:25:18.700 Yes.
00:25:19.360 This is a particularly
00:25:21.360 important one because,
00:25:23.000 yes, first of all, as you
00:25:24.420 well know, many of the
00:25:25.780 people, like William
00:25:26.680 Wilberforce, who were
00:25:27.520 most prominent in arguing
00:25:29.360 the case for the
00:25:30.160 abolition of slavery, were
00:25:32.660 driven comprehensively by
00:25:35.780 their Christian faith.
00:25:37.020 And so, you know, as my
00:25:39.060 late friend Rabbi Jonathan
00:25:40.600 Sachs used to say, the
00:25:41.940 claim that morality is
00:25:44.780 self-evident is self-evidently
00:25:46.600 untrue.
00:25:49.140 These people were driven by
00:25:51.560 a specific idea of
00:25:53.160 morality and a specific set
00:25:54.760 of values and indeed
00:25:56.460 virtues.
00:25:57.680 And it's a modern myth that
00:26:01.600 we would have got there
00:26:02.980 anyway.
00:26:03.480 But the sanctity of the
00:26:05.000 individual, the sanctity of
00:26:06.280 the individual life and the
00:26:07.500 autonomy of every
00:26:08.320 individual, the necessity of
00:26:09.900 every individual having
00:26:11.240 autonomy, was at the
00:26:12.680 absolute base of the
00:26:14.560 desire, first of all, to
00:26:17.040 ban slavery in the British
00:26:20.280 Empire.
00:26:21.520 And then, and it was a,
00:26:23.920 maybe people would say,
00:26:25.520 well, you would say that,
00:26:26.560 wouldn't you, Douglas, having
00:26:27.940 been born and brought up in
00:26:28.860 the UK, but a pretty
00:26:30.700 remarkable thing that the
00:26:32.320 British Empire then decided
00:26:33.640 to spend a considerable
00:26:34.920 amount of blood and
00:26:36.240 treasure policing the high
00:26:38.100 seas in order to stop
00:26:40.140 slavery elsewhere.
00:26:42.560 British sailors losing their
00:26:44.060 lives, boarding ships
00:26:46.120 without sails that they
00:26:47.660 would search the cargo
00:26:49.400 holds for and discover were,
00:26:51.460 for instance, a brilliant,
00:26:52.720 a Brazilian slave trading
00:26:54.460 ship trying to sneak through
00:26:56.320 in disguise because, of
00:26:57.520 course, Brazil didn't get
00:26:58.440 rid of slavery until the
00:26:59.520 1880s, formally.
00:27:02.560 And Britain policed the
00:27:04.580 seas for this for many
00:27:05.520 years.
00:27:06.520 Thousands of sailors lost
00:27:07.620 their lives.
00:27:08.880 And in the end, as I cite in
00:27:10.580 the book, the actual cost of
00:27:13.400 eradicating the slave trade
00:27:15.260 has been shown by a number of
00:27:17.540 modern historians to have
00:27:18.820 actually cost Britain more,
00:27:20.620 first of all, in the actual
00:27:21.680 endeavour.
00:27:23.560 Secondly, most importantly, in
00:27:25.140 the paying out, the buying
00:27:28.700 out effect for your companies
00:27:29.740 engaged in the slave trade in
00:27:31.480 order to make sure that they
00:27:32.620 didn't continue their trade.
00:27:35.300 And thirdly, in the increased
00:27:36.640 prices that everybody in
00:27:37.960 Britain had to pay throughout
00:27:38.980 the 19th century because of
00:27:40.740 the need to pay for goods that
00:27:42.800 were coming from non-slave
00:27:44.060 trading places.
00:27:45.240 These ended up being an exercise
00:27:48.360 more costly than the benefits
00:27:51.620 accrued during the period of
00:27:53.900 slavery.
00:27:54.220 So the reason why I mention
00:27:55.960 this isn't actually just
00:27:57.020 because of the way I speak or
00:27:58.200 the fact that I happen to come
00:27:59.240 from the UK.
00:28:00.460 It's because it then gets us
00:28:02.960 to this very interesting
00:28:03.940 question, which is what would
00:28:05.520 restitution ever look like?
00:28:08.140 And what I'm what I notice and
00:28:10.500 what I, as you know, Jordan, in
00:28:11.960 a number of times in the book go
00:28:13.240 into is this question of
00:28:14.640 reparations, as it's currently
00:28:16.620 called.
00:28:17.400 What we might also call a sort of
00:28:18.960 what would restitution look like
00:28:21.180 on a number of historic wrongs.
00:28:22.960 And I've been very struck in the
00:28:24.960 last two decades in particular
00:28:26.820 by the fact that we have people
00:28:28.900 and again, Nietzsche puts his
00:28:30.700 finger on it with uncanny
00:28:32.320 precision.
00:28:33.540 I'm struck by the number of
00:28:35.240 people who who who rip at long
00:28:38.900 closed wounds, rip them open and
00:28:42.520 then scream at everyone about how
00:28:45.120 hurt they are.
00:28:46.180 Because in actual fact, on a whole
00:28:50.000 range of issues of what we're now
00:28:51.840 reminded are historic wrongs,
00:28:54.680 something like considerable
00:28:56.440 restitution happened an awfully long
00:28:59.080 time ago.
00:29:00.540 I mean, you still hear people saying
00:29:02.060 it's extremely popular in American
00:29:03.760 discourse, but America never
00:29:05.840 addressed the issue of slavery.
00:29:08.220 And, you know, you think, well,
00:29:09.840 fighting a long and bloody civil war
00:29:12.560 about it would have been one obvious
00:29:14.420 way that they clearly tried to
00:29:16.360 address it.
00:29:17.400 And even that today is is poo pooed.
00:29:20.100 A number of contemporary historians
00:29:21.640 say, oh, it wasn't really about
00:29:23.140 slavery.
00:29:23.580 It was a different power struggle.
00:29:25.920 It never is about the thing that
00:29:27.320 the thing was about.
00:29:28.840 But but I'm very keen to address
00:29:30.740 these ugly, difficult corners of
00:29:33.420 it.
00:29:33.600 So I say if you are interested in
00:29:35.420 restitution of making making
00:29:37.420 atonement for any any wrongs in the
00:29:39.320 past, you have to look at what
00:29:41.000 actually has already happened in the
00:29:42.620 past by way of atonement.
00:29:44.920 Well, there's also a Christian
00:29:47.800 slash Western or Judeo-Christian
00:29:49.900 slash Western philosophy of
00:29:53.300 atonement.
00:29:54.520 And that is that you atone for
00:29:57.780 your shortcomings and perhaps for
00:30:00.160 the unequal distribution of talents
00:30:01.780 by trying to live a responsible,
00:30:04.160 generous, productive and honest
00:30:05.860 life.
00:30:06.520 And that it's actually a matter of
00:30:08.160 individual moral striving,
00:30:10.720 rather than something that should be
00:30:12.300 conceptualized at the group level.
00:30:14.580 And so I'm struck again and still
00:30:16.380 in it.
00:30:17.720 I cannot understand if you accept
00:30:20.840 the notion that.
00:30:23.760 The willingness of one group to
00:30:25.900 oppress another is in some
00:30:28.100 measure a human universal.
00:30:30.060 It's deeply characteristic of our
00:30:31.740 history and that the reason that
00:30:34.720 that's wrong is that individuals
00:30:36.720 shouldn't be subject to arbitrary
00:30:39.480 compulsion, partly because it deprives
00:30:42.080 the rest of us of their potential
00:30:44.560 value as free agents and partly
00:30:46.820 because it's that and partly because
00:30:49.760 it's it transgresses against part of
00:30:52.860 their essential nature that's
00:30:55.500 intrinsically valuable.
00:30:56.780 You can't oppose slavery on moral
00:31:00.620 grounds, as far as I can tell,
00:31:01.940 without implicitly accepting those
00:31:03.720 axioms.
00:31:04.860 And so then it's so striking to me that
00:31:06.540 the people who are simultaneously
00:31:08.580 accusing the West of these uniquely
00:31:11.160 awful predilections accept one of the
00:31:15.100 great propositions of the West as
00:31:18.680 central to their entire moral
00:31:20.680 doctrine.
00:31:21.160 And then they accept it so centrally,
00:31:23.420 they don't even notice that it's true.
00:31:25.200 They just think it's self-evident.
00:31:27.200 Yes.
00:31:27.300 Well, it's not so self-evident.
00:31:28.820 Why? Why shouldn't I oppress someone
00:31:31.140 if I can get away with it?
00:31:32.960 Yes.
00:31:33.240 And why shouldn't my group?
00:31:35.340 Right.
00:31:35.920 And then and then we have the one now,
00:31:38.780 which is the form of oppression that
00:31:40.180 presents itself in the guise of the
00:31:42.000 victim.
00:31:43.380 I constantly come back in this book to
00:31:46.620 the people who present themselves as
00:31:48.380 victims and are clearly the bullies,
00:31:51.360 people who claim to be suffering
00:31:54.760 from historic wrongs because it gives
00:31:57.840 them a dominance that they would not
00:31:59.260 otherwise have.
00:32:00.860 I mean, let me give you two quick,
00:32:03.260 but quite significant examples of this.
00:32:06.280 Two of the most celebrated writers of
00:32:08.180 the last generation in America are
00:32:10.600 Tanehese Coates and Ibrahim X.
00:32:12.320 Kendi.
00:32:12.760 Both of them have been recipients of
00:32:14.860 MacArthur Genius Awards.
00:32:18.340 Kendi is now the only holder, apart from
00:32:20.940 the late Elie Wiesel, the late Nobel Prize
00:32:24.080 winner and Holocaust survivor of one of
00:32:26.020 the most prestigious chairs in an American
00:32:27.760 Ivy League university.
00:32:31.320 Both of them have written memoirs that
00:32:33.380 have been bestsellers and are highly
00:32:35.140 fated and cited everywhere.
00:32:36.700 And both of them have an origin story of
00:32:40.280 racism that is absolutely risible.
00:32:43.840 In the case of Coates, he describes a
00:32:46.440 moment in one of his memoirs of getting
00:32:49.200 into an elevator with his young child and a
00:32:51.520 white woman gets into the elevator and he
00:32:53.980 says behaves dismissively towards the
00:32:56.320 child.
00:32:57.920 And Coates describes how he wants to sort of
00:33:00.080 fling this woman against the wall and sort of
00:33:02.000 throttle her for this act of racism.
00:33:04.520 And at no point suggests that actually it's
00:33:06.840 possible that the woman was having a bad
00:33:10.140 day and it didn't matter who the child
00:33:12.080 was or or that she was partially sighted
00:33:16.080 or anything.
00:33:16.580 It is sort of the immediate assumption.
00:33:18.960 This is racism.
00:33:20.100 We suffered it and we suffered it so
00:33:21.540 appallingly.
00:33:22.120 I'm going to get a chapter of my book out
00:33:23.780 of it.
00:33:24.720 And Ibrahim X.
00:33:25.440 Kendi's origin story of racism is equally
00:33:27.840 risible.
00:33:28.360 And it's that when he was at primary school
00:33:30.200 in the US as a child, on one occasion,
00:33:34.300 a teacher in the classroom called on a white
00:33:37.660 girl when a quiet black girl in the class
00:33:39.920 also had her hand up and wasn't called
00:33:42.160 upon.
00:33:43.160 And Kendi gets an entire chapter out of
00:33:44.880 this.
00:33:45.840 And my suggestion on these cases is these
00:33:49.560 people are presenting extremely minimal
00:33:53.200 stories, risibly small stories of, I don't
00:33:57.560 by the way, and I don't deny that racism
00:33:58.920 exists in some forms today in America as in
00:34:01.740 all societies, but they present these
00:34:03.420 reasonably small examples of racism in
00:34:06.220 order to present themselves as a victim
00:34:07.880 and then present themselves also as the
00:34:09.800 judge and jury over everybody else
00:34:12.040 currently alive.
00:34:14.360 It's also very different to say that
00:34:19.940 institutions are corrupted or tempted by
00:34:24.320 the willingness to use power or the
00:34:28.400 motivation to use power and that one of
00:34:30.280 the manifestations of that is various form
00:34:32.720 of arbitrary oppression and to claim that
00:34:36.900 that's the central guiding principle of the
00:34:40.540 institutions and the societies.
00:34:42.380 And then, and that, that also begs the
00:34:45.480 question, well, if you criticize the West,
00:34:50.240 let's say, for its grounding in willingness
00:34:54.300 to use arbitrary power and compulsion, what
00:34:58.140 do you propose as an alternative and why do you
00:35:00.860 believe that alternative exists?
00:35:03.120 I mean, does the alternative only exist outside of
00:35:05.280 the Western structure somehow?
00:35:07.380 What's there except power?
00:35:14.060 It's only power.
00:35:15.900 It's only power and power in this era, as you
00:35:18.860 know, Jordan, comes through the claim of
00:35:20.940 oppression.
00:35:22.540 That power is best exerted in our era, first
00:35:26.780 of all, by claiming that the person has been a
00:35:29.040 victim of oppression.
00:35:30.600 And secondly, by wielding that alleged
00:35:32.700 oppression, sometimes true oppression, but by
00:35:35.220 wielding it as a tool to beat others.
00:35:39.220 So that, for instance, it's also interesting that
00:35:41.580 the only reason that works, let's say I claim
00:35:44.380 moral virtue because I'm an anti-racist rather
00:35:46.740 than a non-racist.
00:35:48.320 Well, why does that, why does that work for
00:35:50.800 me?
00:35:51.000 Why do I have a platform?
00:35:52.400 Why do I have authority?
00:35:54.660 Because, yes, because our era cares about
00:35:57.500 racism, only because our era doesn't like
00:36:00.560 racism, you know, which belies the central
00:36:03.120 proposition, right?
00:36:04.600 I mean, if no one cared, if people were
00:36:07.200 psychopathic expressors of power, and that
00:36:10.560 was particularly true of Western people, they
00:36:12.520 just say something like, well, yeah, what's
00:36:15.840 your point?
00:36:16.380 Try to do something about it.
00:36:17.760 And you think that's wrong.
00:36:19.100 It's just because you're weak and I've got the
00:36:21.180 power and I've got you under my thumb and to
00:36:24.320 hell with you and your stupid ideas.
00:36:26.040 But that isn't what people do.
00:36:27.880 And when they're accused of being racist in
00:36:30.720 the West, they're struck to the heart, generally
00:36:34.200 speaking.
00:36:34.700 They're ashamed of themselves.
00:36:36.400 They'll bend over backwards to apologize.
00:36:40.500 They scour their conscience to see if they can
00:36:44.220 find any example of where they might not have
00:36:47.040 abided by the principle of divine sovereignty
00:36:50.340 somehow and make obeisances in every possible
00:36:53.840 direction.
00:36:54.920 And so that in itself seems to indicate that the
00:36:58.520 primary claim is fundamentally untrue.
00:37:01.680 Which, as you know, I write a chapter in the
00:37:04.080 book, as you know, on what everyone else in the
00:37:07.140 world is doing whilst we're doing this to
00:37:09.140 ourselves.
00:37:10.620 And, you know, one of my favorite examples, I
00:37:13.640 quote a lay colleague of mine's work on this, is
00:37:16.720 racism within China and racism from China about
00:37:21.140 the rest of the world.
00:37:22.140 Well, there's a term that the Chinese use of white
00:37:25.640 people that roughly translates as ghosts.
00:37:31.800 The idea being that I think it's Hui.
00:37:36.300 And the idea is, of course, is that white people
00:37:40.760 aren't really human.
00:37:42.960 Like the simulacrum of a human being, but not the
00:37:46.840 real thing.
00:37:47.400 Only the Chinese people are the real thing.
00:37:48.980 Well, well, that's really racism for sure.
00:37:53.000 And from the most heavily populated country on
00:37:57.480 earth.
00:37:57.920 And there's no.
00:37:59.520 And one's certainly willing to use power.
00:38:02.280 So.
00:38:02.780 And one's certainly willing to use power.
00:38:04.360 So this is a little oddity.
00:38:05.640 So it looks to me, for example, I've tried to make
00:38:09.480 this case that the central animating spirit of the
00:38:15.080 West is something like the spirit of voluntary
00:38:19.700 association, the spirit of voluntary cooperation,
00:38:24.460 uncompelled choice, recognition of universal human
00:38:27.980 dignity.
00:38:28.380 Now, we all fall short of acting that out and instilling
00:38:32.440 it in our institutions.
00:38:33.440 But and I see that as a reflection of a deeper that
00:38:37.420 deeper theological claim that we discussed earlier, that
00:38:40.540 each individual is in some sense of divine worth
00:38:44.060 intrinsically and and and should be treated as
00:38:48.880 intrinsically worthwhile as a consequence.
00:38:52.240 And and that out of that, as far as I'm concerned, emerges
00:38:57.420 the entire tradition of natural rights.
00:39:00.800 And there are a delineation of the notion of that intrinsic
00:39:04.780 worth.
00:39:07.900 That's not the expression of the will to power.
00:39:10.660 It's the precise opposite of that.
00:39:12.640 And so.
00:39:13.440 Yes.
00:39:13.760 Why are we so loath to give ourselves credit for the
00:39:21.620 emergence of that idea and our attempts to abide by
00:39:24.200 it?
00:39:24.780 Why are we so prone to guilt in this regard?
00:39:28.960 Firstly, because firstly, we would go about that thing that
00:39:31.800 it's regarded as being somewhat somewhat gauche and
00:39:35.580 backward and unsophisticated to take such an attitude.
00:39:39.520 And the second is that we is a second and there are many
00:39:44.620 other reasons, but a second is the completely misinformed
00:39:48.120 idea.
00:39:48.840 And this comes from America in particular, I'm afraid.
00:39:51.200 It's what America has been pumping around the world in
00:39:53.420 recent decades.
00:39:54.860 The idea that what is what is bad in the West is uniquely bad.
00:39:59.480 And that comes from a complete and wholesale ignorance, not
00:40:03.380 just of history in the rest of the world, but the rest of the
00:40:06.780 world now.
00:40:07.480 I mean, a total startling lack of context.
00:40:11.580 I mean, if anything ever suffered from context collapse in
00:40:14.740 our era, it is everything to do with the West.
00:40:18.840 So that so that it is seen as there's another element that
00:40:22.840 there's another element that seems to be me to be worthy of
00:40:28.860 note, too.
00:40:29.440 We're tortured for our moral insufficiency because of the
00:40:35.240 existence of demonstrable inequality.
00:40:38.100 And the call for equity is part of the clarion call for the people who
00:40:43.540 are conducting, let's call it the war on the West.
00:40:46.260 And the proposition there is essentially Marxist, that wealth tends to
00:40:52.180 accumulate in the hands of fewer and fewer people, which happens to be true.
00:40:56.200 Although those people differ, the proportion is small, but the people change.
00:41:01.240 But what's so faulty about that, in my estimation, isn't the claim that that
00:41:07.820 inequality exists or even the claim that there are negative aspects of that that
00:41:14.000 might need to be addressed.
00:41:15.040 But the notion that that is somehow unique to the social institutions and the
00:41:21.220 economic institutions of the West.
00:41:22.920 I hate that most particularly because I think it underestimates the problem.
00:41:27.760 You cannot blame inequality on capitalism.
00:41:31.320 No, I mean, it's foolish.
00:41:32.740 Absolutely.
00:41:33.280 I mean, let's take the other options on the table.
00:41:36.480 The remaining flotsam and jetsam of the Cold War.
00:41:40.340 Let's say you can say maybe you can say Putin's Russia.
00:41:43.500 You can certainly say Cuba and a few other places.
00:41:48.140 What do we reckon is the inequality of wealth in these countries?
00:41:52.920 Between, let's say, the oligarchs and the average Russian.
00:41:58.840 There was a documentary Alexander Navalny bravely made before going back to Russia and
00:42:04.440 being imprisoned.
00:42:05.060 And he had it released after he got back to Russia the other month and was
00:42:09.380 promptly imprisoned.
00:42:10.560 He had the release of this documentary called Putin's Palace.
00:42:13.600 And one of the extraordinary things which did a lot of harm for Putin at home, because
00:42:17.140 people were genuinely shocked and upset about this, was that Putin's Palace on the Black
00:42:21.980 Sea, which he's been building for years at the cost of hundreds and hundreds of millions
00:42:25.980 of dollars, has, among other things, a vineyard attached to it.
00:42:29.720 And there's a guest area, a guest room near the vineyard.
00:42:33.060 And there's a guest lavatory in the guest room, the vineyard.
00:42:36.400 And there's a lavatory brush there made of gold that costs the same as the average Russian
00:42:41.220 makes in a year.
00:42:42.220 So, there's just one example of inequality in Russia.
00:42:48.100 We could do the same thing for Cuba.
00:42:51.640 Let's look at all of the other examples.
00:42:53.700 Look at North Korea.
00:42:54.960 Look at North Korea.
00:42:58.460 I've seen myself in a country, which I visited many years ago, but in a country where the
00:43:04.280 general population starved by the millions in the 1990s, and the military elites were
00:43:10.540 able to get hold on the black market of blue-label Johnny Walker, one of the most expensive
00:43:15.980 whiskeys on the planet.
00:43:17.020 Take any of the...
00:43:18.860 Because everyone talks about the post-colonial...
00:43:20.860 I mean, of course, there's post-colonial societies that haven't gone well.
00:43:23.840 There have been post-colonial societies that have gone very well, like Singapore, in terms
00:43:27.660 of productivity.
00:43:29.240 You could say that Hong Kong, until very recently, the same thing.
00:43:32.740 But let's talk about the post-colonial societies that didn't go well.
00:43:36.680 Zimbabwe, for instance.
00:43:37.720 What was the wealth inequality in Zimbabwe between the wealth of Mrs. Mugabe, say, and the average
00:43:45.460 Zimbabwean?
00:43:46.400 The average life expectancy in Zimbabwe during Robert Mugabe's reign halved.
00:43:54.300 He's one of the very few leaders in the world where life expectancy actually declined faster
00:44:00.000 than people were living.
00:44:03.580 People were on a treadmill that was getting shorter and shorter with every step.
00:44:08.900 Well, what was wealth inequality like there?
00:44:11.080 What's wealth inequality like in Angola these days?
00:44:14.700 I mean, go anywhere.
00:44:15.560 It is so obscene to present this as, as you say, as some kind of phenomenon of Western
00:44:22.520 capitalism, and as though any other system around could be better.
00:44:29.120 And to present it as some sort of rigorous theory.
00:44:32.220 So, all economic systems produce inequality, it seems to be the reflection of a deep underlying
00:44:39.740 law that we don't understand that well about how advantage tends to accrue as you accrue
00:44:50.180 advantage.
00:44:51.180 And disadvantage tends to accrue as you accrue disadvantage.
00:44:54.860 Positive feedback loops of some sort.
00:44:56.920 Yes.
00:44:57.480 All economic systems result in inequality and different societies have evolved different
00:45:03.880 mechanisms to deal with that.
00:45:05.680 But the only system that we know of that's also produced inequality, but also produced the
00:45:13.700 cessation of absolute privation are free market systems.
00:45:18.300 And China didn't manage that till they instituted instituted free market systems and free market
00:45:24.260 systems work because sovereign individuals exercise choice over not only purchase, but also
00:45:30.260 employment.
00:45:30.900 And so people in the West are guilty about inequality and liable to rape themselves over the coals when
00:45:39.980 its existence is pointed out.
00:45:41.520 But it's partly because they don't understand how pernicious the problem really is.
00:45:45.220 And they don't take credit for the fact that free markets have stopped people from starving.
00:45:49.840 You know, it's only 8% of people now live below the UN line for absolute poverty compared to 40% in
00:45:57.020 Ronald Reagan's time.
00:45:58.020 That's only 40 years, 40 years.
00:46:01.100 And you go back to that phenomenon that, again, I don't think there's any evidence that in modern
00:46:07.340 China, the people involved with the Politburo and the people who've done terribly well out of the
00:46:13.020 last 20 years, particularly since China entered the WTO, I don't think there's any evidence of
00:46:19.180 significant fears about inequality between the Chinese elite and the average person.
00:46:24.940 There is something very specific about the Western worry about inequality, which again,
00:46:30.460 like the worry about slavery, like the worry about guilt and historical guilt,
00:46:35.060 is a product of a thing that ought to be recognized as being a good part of the machine.
00:46:41.920 If the machine was so pernicious, we wouldn't care about inequality.
00:46:47.440 We would simply say, as I'm afraid...
00:46:49.700 Or we'd celebrate it even more, which is a perfectly easy thing to do, which is,
00:46:54.160 well, if I have more, it's because I'm better.
00:46:56.300 And the evidence that I'm better is clearly that I have more.
00:47:01.220 And what's your evidence for the contrary claim?
00:47:03.600 Well, people have intrinsic worth.
00:47:05.460 It's like, yeah.
00:47:07.100 And you go to another of the world's biggest economies, India.
00:47:12.300 I don't know if you've ever been there.
00:47:13.380 It's an extraordinary culture, very, very rich, a wonderful culture, just the most extraordinary
00:47:18.540 place to visit, but it also has a form of inequality, which is grotesque to any Western visitor.
00:47:27.360 I'm talking, of course, about the caste system, which exists to this day, which is a form of
00:47:32.480 slavery as well, and which regards people, if they're born into the wrong class, as being
00:47:36.560 literally untouchable.
00:47:38.760 The untouchable class in India is something you're born into, and you will be in for your
00:47:44.540 whole life.
00:47:45.860 Now, is that inequality?
00:47:47.920 Oh, yes.
00:47:48.800 Is it systemic?
00:47:50.780 Hell, yes.
00:47:52.540 Is much being done about it?
00:47:54.560 Not really.
00:47:55.900 People take a sort of view that, well, there's an old joke about Princess Margaret once being
00:48:01.480 asked, once hearing somebody refer to an extraordinarily grand English country house, and the person
00:48:07.200 says, imagine this coming as just an accident of birth, and Princess Margaret saying, birth is no accident.
00:48:16.080 Now, but actually, that view, whether it was correctly attributed or not, is regarded by us as being
00:48:22.800 laughable and risible.
00:48:24.220 It's not being regarded as being laughable or at all risible in one of the most important societies in the
00:48:30.000 world today, India.
00:48:30.900 And historically, that certainly wasn't regarded as laughable in any sense.
00:48:35.980 The notion that you didn't have divine value in some sense, or ultimate value as a consequence
00:48:43.520 of your birth, that was an extraordinarily difficult idea to supplant, uproot, and transform, because
00:48:51.280 that also seemed, in some real sense, self-evident.
00:48:55.320 Yes.
00:48:55.600 And the evidence was your success.
00:48:58.360 And I'm afraid, here, we also get to what I regard as being one of the hardest to discuss,
00:49:05.400 but most necessary to identify aspects of what I'm trying to tackle in this book, which is
00:49:09.720 what I go straight on to in the first chapter, which is what I regard as being, and describe
00:49:14.000 as, a now outright war on white people.
00:49:17.540 Now, of course, this is very difficult to talk about, because people say, first of all, you're
00:49:21.120 guilty of self-pity of some kind, or, you know, boo-hoo, poor you.
00:49:27.700 But as I show, I think in some remorseless detail in that chapter, if you wanted for some
00:49:34.700 reason to attack Africa, or everyone from North Africa downwards, you would at some point,
00:49:45.960 if you were to be driven by such an animus, you would be attacking black people.
00:49:52.300 If you decided to turn on everything to do with Chinese culture, at some point, you would
00:49:58.880 be attacking Chinese people.
00:50:01.220 And so it is in the case of the West, that since historically, the West has been predominantly
00:50:06.400 populated, not entirely, but predominantly populated by white people.
00:50:10.280 The assault on the West has to include, and now does include, an extraordinarily ugly and
00:50:16.080 increasingly ugly assault on white people, whereby in societies which quite rightly abhor
00:50:23.260 racism, the only group of people against whom racism is completely acceptable has become white
00:50:29.240 people.
00:50:30.160 And this is, to my mind, one of the great unsayables, but necessary to address issues of our time,
00:50:36.280 because it seems to me that this can't go on much longer.
00:50:40.760 It's an extraordinarily dangerous game that's being played, and one with such negative consequences,
00:50:50.280 not least the consequences of likely backlash, that it has to be had out in the open.
00:50:55.460 At the point at which you are deciding people's futures in the workplace based on whether they're
00:51:02.060 white or not, and that being white means you're marked down, that application to schools and
00:51:09.040 universities involves you being marked down if you're white, that access to medical care,
00:51:16.580 as I give examples of in the book, that you will be deprived of it if you happen to be white
00:51:22.180 in certain jurisdictions.
00:51:23.240 And this, and very much more, is absolute poison in our societies, and I think is one of the
00:51:32.640 things that has to be addressed.
00:51:35.080 If we really don't like racism, we have to tackle the rise of this new racism, which has become
00:51:43.040 totally acceptable and everyday.
00:51:45.020 Well, to also to identify Western ideas, let's say, as somehow white means that you, to the
00:51:56.240 degree that those ideas have a universal value, which might even be the universal value, say,
00:52:03.580 of making the case that slavery is wrong, you have to deny them to other people who aren't
00:52:10.400 of that race, right?
00:52:12.600 You, you, you, you, you, you contaminate them irretrievably.
00:52:17.740 I've seen attempts, for example, to make the case that the emphasis on logic and excellence
00:52:23.780 is somehow white, and that to accept those values as paramount means that you've just fallen
00:52:35.580 under the sway of a certain kind of racism.
00:52:38.240 Mm-hmm.
00:52:40.400 To the degree that that's faulty in its essence, I mean, if the thing is worth doing, then by
00:52:47.340 definition, it's worth doing well.
00:52:49.060 And if nothing is worth doing, then we don't do anything, and there's nothing to talk about.
00:52:53.020 And so the notion that excellence is somehow associated with a given race or a racial view
00:52:58.600 is preposterous and demoralizing.
00:53:01.360 And also something that's greatly detrimental, at least in principle, to the very people that
00:53:11.280 are supposed to be helped by such doctrines.
00:53:14.460 Well, yes, it's possible that the assault on white people, as it were, has become tied up
00:53:24.880 as part of the assault on the Western, let's say, the Western legacy.
00:53:30.640 And that what is happening is a desire to enact that revenge I referred to earlier, and a desire
00:53:40.240 to take apart what some of us thought was actually an ideal, which is the ideal that the Western
00:53:48.080 tradition is not actually the preserve of white people, but is a universal inheritance.
00:53:54.000 And I say this repeatedly in the book, this is one way of looking at it, is to say, one
00:53:59.580 of the interesting things about so-called, a phrase I don't like to use, but let's say
00:54:04.760 white culture, Western culture, one of the remarkable things about it has been, yes, in
00:54:11.020 its negative forms, it has attempted to force itself upon people.
00:54:16.340 In its positive forms, it invites anyone who wants to be part of it to share in it, which
00:54:22.260 is, again, not the case with other cultures.
00:54:25.060 There is no way, even in, let's say, in the political systems of any other country, outside
00:54:30.120 of the West, if you were to migrate there from a Western country, you would not be able to
00:54:35.400 work your way up to the prime ministership, presidency, or even the cabinet of most other
00:54:41.700 countries in the world, if you were an outsider.
00:54:44.320 The West is, specifically in our era, exceptionally open and believes that its own inheritance, its own
00:54:51.340 traditions, its own political order, its institutions, not just should be open, but have to be open
00:54:57.280 to anybody who wants to be a part of them.
00:55:00.080 So that's, and that ideal is one of the ones that in the name of anti-racism is being taken
00:55:06.980 apart in our time.
00:55:08.360 She's saying, no, no, no, these things only belong to the white people.
00:55:12.680 And as I say, toward the end of the war on the West, wow are the conclusions that you get
00:55:19.860 to from there negative.
00:55:21.580 I mean, wow are the consequences of that down the road negative, because, and as I lay out,
00:55:28.320 as you know, in quite a lengthy passage, there is a response to that just waiting to be said.
00:55:34.980 So, do you think, do you think that the core values of the West are tenable and maintainable
00:55:47.440 in the absence of the underlying religious substrate?
00:55:51.940 So I'm thinking about Chuck Derrida, for example, and Derek, Derrida criticized what he called
00:55:58.900 the logocentrism of the West, and its emphasis, for example, on binary oppositions.
00:56:06.540 And binary oppositions are the foundation of computation.
00:56:11.080 So maybe criticizing that too deeply is unwise.
00:56:15.480 But in any case, it seems to me that the notion of individual sovereignty is, in some sense,
00:56:22.820 a religious claim, and this gets, you can think about the West, one stream of Western
00:56:29.580 thought is the Enlightenment, and there's a secular element to that, but it emerged out
00:56:33.600 of a deeper religious tradition that has this universalizing tendency, and this universalizing
00:56:38.880 claim.
00:56:42.400 Is it possible for the, then I would say, to what degree is the assault on values that you
00:56:48.920 see and diagnose an assault on religious values, and is it possible to formulate a defense without
00:56:57.320 simultaneously defending some of these underlying religious presumptions?
00:57:02.220 No, this is the German jurist Bockenforder's dilemma, isn't it?
00:57:06.180 The, can you sustain a system that isn't willing to nurture the roots that gave birth to the
00:57:12.140 system?
00:57:14.380 And it's probably the biggest underlying question of our era.
00:57:20.440 The claim has been sometimes, yes, of course.
00:57:25.320 And I think that that, yes, of course, has been coming under significant strain in recent
00:57:30.440 years.
00:57:31.640 As I said, I mean, it's not clear that the sanctity of the individual is something that
00:57:36.900 is enforceable purely through human rights doctrine and the court and the international
00:57:41.640 court system.
00:57:43.540 Yeah, well, it's not self-evident that it's fundamentally a rational claim.
00:57:48.680 It might be instead something more like the precondition for all claims that we regard as rational,
00:57:55.600 which is a whole, an axiom rather than a conclusion.
00:57:59.580 And axioms have to be accepted on faith by definition, right?
00:58:06.820 If you define faith as operation within the system that the axioms give rise to.
00:58:13.640 And I've been trying to puzzle this out deeply.
00:58:16.900 There's the idea of the divine individual in the West is associated with the idea of logos.
00:58:23.980 And it's associated with the notion as well that there's something about speech, in particular,
00:58:30.320 truthful speech, that is fundamentally redemptive.
00:58:34.880 And it's recognition of that, I think, that gives rise to our notion that freedom of speech
00:58:39.720 is a cardinal value, not because it gives you the freedom to speak exactly, but because
00:58:44.420 without that freedom, we can't think.
00:58:47.780 We can't improve our institutions.
00:58:50.120 And we can't get to truth, that it isn't a merely theoretical exercise.
00:58:58.680 The point of freedom of speech, freedom of inquiry, and all these things, was to get to
00:59:04.060 a truth.
00:59:05.240 It wasn't a game in itself.
00:59:07.660 Right.
00:59:08.260 It was a belief that there was something to uncover at the end of that process that was
00:59:12.300 more than worth discovering.
00:59:15.220 Right.
00:59:15.660 Well, when I talked to Richard Dawkins recently about such things, and of course, he's arguably
00:59:22.140 the world's most famous atheist, but I like talking to him.
00:59:26.880 And I think Dawkins is possessed by the spirit of the truth to a marked degree.
00:59:32.920 And so then one of the things I wonder is, is science itself possible in the absence of
00:59:39.740 the proposition that the truth will set you free?
00:59:42.580 I don't think that's a scientific proposition.
00:59:45.740 I think it's a philosophical or a theological proposition.
00:59:50.120 I mean, this comes to one of the great jokes against conservatives in recent years.
00:59:58.480 I think I've said this to you in private before, Jordan, but not publicly.
01:00:01.360 But one of the great jokes against conservatives was that they tended to think that the deconstructionists,
01:00:08.800 for instance, would inevitably stop at the borders of STEM.
01:00:12.660 Remember, for years, people sort of had risks on the fact that, well, you know, your degree
01:00:18.280 in lesbian dance theory, you know, you just wait till you have to go out into the market
01:00:23.300 and find a job with that useless degree.
01:00:27.200 But these people, actually, the joke was on the conservatives saying that they did all
01:00:30.420 find degree jobs.
01:00:32.260 They found them in HR departments and they told everyone else how to behave for the next
01:00:36.460 generation.
01:00:37.420 So, and then there was the sort of joke that the conservatives again had of sort of, you
01:00:42.580 know, it'll stop at the borders of STEM because at some point the bridges need to stay up.
01:00:47.520 No, no.
01:00:48.780 Turns out that if you've got a more overriding theory and claim and ambition and drive in
01:00:56.080 your era, if the bridges do fall down, it'll be because of institutional racism and constructional
01:01:01.780 racism and much more.
01:01:03.040 And it'll be because you didn't do it hard enough.
01:01:05.600 It'll be just like the nonsense that everyone said in communism.
01:01:09.300 Look at the stuff of different ways of knowing.
01:01:11.740 I mean, this goes back, you know, I have a deep, deep contempt for Derrida, as I do for
01:01:18.020 all of the deconstructionists, not just because it's so easy to deconstruct and so hard to
01:01:22.700 construct, but because, of course, the deconstructionists always try to deconstruct everything apart from
01:01:28.000 their own university positions and Derrida and Co definitely started some of this.
01:01:34.800 And it's led to this thing we now have, one of the things I describe in the book, of the equitable
01:01:39.840 maths nonsense, where we come once again to the anti-white, anti, I would say also anti-black, actually,
01:01:48.640 but certainly anti-Western idea that mathematics is a Western construct and that there are other
01:01:57.660 ways of knowing that exist and which must be brought forth.
01:02:02.600 And you don't just get this in maths.
01:02:04.240 And by the way, I mean, as I, again, as I lay out in remorseless detail in the book, this is
01:02:08.020 being taught in American schools.
01:02:10.400 This is being rolled out in school district after school district in the US.
01:02:16.460 The idea that in maths, in STEM in general, there are other ways of knowing other than the
01:02:23.160 scientific method, accurate mathematics, things like showing your workings is an example of
01:02:29.940 white supremacy and on and on and on.
01:02:33.320 And this is completely mainstream today to an extent that I think will shock many readers.
01:02:38.900 These things are effectively in the realm of voodoo, because nobody ever explains what the
01:02:46.540 other ways of knowing are.
01:02:50.380 Let me give you an example.
01:02:52.980 If you don't believe in the mathematical method that actually happens to have been refined in
01:02:57.740 the West, but owes some of its ancestry to a considerable, indeed bewildering array of cultures
01:03:04.220 around the world.
01:03:05.100 Why?
01:03:05.380 You can't say, oh, that's interesting.
01:03:06.600 The West may have refined it, but it's got its heritage elsewhere.
01:03:10.420 Hurrah.
01:03:10.900 We're all able to own it.
01:03:12.600 Why instead of that, you have to say, no, this is a white supremacist thing.
01:03:16.480 So we're going to come up with other ways of knowing instead of addition and subtraction
01:03:21.200 in the normal way of things.
01:03:23.120 What are the other ways of knowing?
01:03:25.900 What is this voodoo we're being told?
01:03:27.960 Never explained.
01:03:29.200 Never explained.
01:03:30.040 Other than you get this little hint sometimes that it has something to do with better intuitiveness
01:03:38.520 about the concerns of others.
01:03:42.040 And I give examples of this.
01:03:44.020 And basically, you could also argue it's a sort of feminization of certain things, of
01:03:48.580 certain realms of study, but essentially that the white supremacist male patriarchal thing
01:03:55.500 is all about the answers and about accuracy and about being on time, even.
01:04:00.620 I mean, all of these, to say that they're racist, hardly needs saying.
01:04:03.960 But all of these things are white.
01:04:07.180 And therefore, we need to look at these other ways of knowing, which are never explained,
01:04:10.740 but as something which we're all meant to go along with.
01:04:15.980 I mean, to say that this doesn't bear examination is to vastly understate the matter.
01:04:27.580 Going online without ExpressVPN is like not paying attention to the safety demonstration
01:04:31.980 on a flight.
01:04:33.100 Most of the time, you'll probably be fine.
01:04:35.140 But what if one day that weird yellow mask drops down from overhead and you have no idea
01:04:40.040 what to do?
01:04:40.900 In our hyper-connected world, your digital privacy isn't just a luxury.
01:04:44.700 It's a fundamental right.
01:04:45.980 Every time you connect to an unsecured network in a cafe, hotel, or airport, you're essentially
01:04:50.780 broadcasting your personal information to anyone with the technical know-how to intercept
01:04:54.960 it.
01:04:55.300 And let's be clear, it doesn't take a genius hacker to do this.
01:04:58.500 With some off-the-shelf hardware, even a tech-savvy teenager could potentially access your passwords,
01:05:03.620 bank logins, and credit card details.
01:05:05.880 Now, you might think, what's the big deal?
01:05:08.000 Who'd want my data anyway?
01:05:09.240 Well, on the dark web, your personal information could fetch up to $1,000.
01:05:14.160 That's right, there's a whole underground economy built on stolen identities.
01:05:18.220 Enter ExpressVPN.
01:05:19.980 It's like a digital fortress, creating an encrypted tunnel between your device and the
01:05:23.960 internet.
01:05:24.660 Their encryption is so robust that it would take a hacker with a supercomputer over a billion
01:05:29.120 years to crack it.
01:05:30.120 But don't let its power fool you, ExpressVPN is incredibly user-friendly.
01:05:34.460 With just one click, you're protected across all your devices.
01:05:37.500 Phones, laptops, tablets, you name it.
01:05:39.680 That's why I use ExpressVPN whenever I'm traveling or working from a coffee shop.
01:05:43.800 It gives me peace of mind knowing that my research, communications, and personal data
01:05:47.940 are shielded from prying eyes.
01:05:49.780 Secure your online data today by visiting expressvpn.com slash Jordan.
01:05:54.520 That's E-X-P-R-E-S-S-V-P-N dot com slash Jordan, and you can get an extra three months free.
01:06:00.780 Expressvpn.com slash Jordan.
01:06:02.800 Starting a business can be tough, but thanks to Shopify, running your online storefront
01:06:10.940 is easier than ever.
01:06:12.620 Shopify is the global commerce platform that helps you sell at every stage of your business.
01:06:16.900 From the launch your online shop stage, all the way to the did we just hit a million
01:06:20.600 orders stage, Shopify is here to help you grow.
01:06:23.940 Our marketing team uses Shopify every day to sell our merchandise, and we love how easy
01:06:28.180 it is to add more items, ship products, and track conversions.
01:06:31.260 With Shopify, customize your online store to your style with flexible templates and powerful
01:06:36.540 tools, alongside an endless list of integrations and third-party apps like on-demand printing,
01:06:41.780 accounting, and chatbots.
01:06:43.480 Shopify helps you turn browsers into buyers with the internet's best converting checkout,
01:06:47.800 up to 36% better compared to other leading e-commerce platforms.
01:06:51.860 No matter how big you want to grow, Shopify gives you everything you need to take control
01:06:55.700 and take your business to the next level.
01:06:57.620 Sign up for a $1 per month trial period at shopify.com slash jbp, all lowercase.
01:07:04.220 Go to shopify.com slash jbp now to grow your business, no matter what stage you're in.
01:07:09.540 That's shopify.com slash jbp.
01:07:11.900 We interrupt your playlist to bring you breaking news.
01:07:16.880 Tim's classic breakfast sandwiches are just $3 when you buy any size coffee.
01:07:20.900 You heard that right, $3.
01:07:22.600 Your mornings will never be the same.
01:07:24.580 Plus tax, Canada only, limited time only, terms apply, see app for details.
01:07:27.780 It's time for Tim's.
01:07:29.980 Yeah, well, I think the STEM types are completely defenseless against all of this.
01:07:38.980 They tend to be apolitical in their machinations.
01:07:43.260 If they're credible scientists and credible researchers, almost by definition,
01:07:48.360 because they're busy obsessively detailing out their specialized concerns and not paying attention
01:07:58.180 to the broader context, which works fine if the broader context is one in which their narrow
01:08:04.800 and specialized productive pursuits are valued, but fatal when that isn't the case.
01:08:11.920 And so one of the questions that we're facing now is, what are the invisible ethical preconditions
01:08:19.900 for the successful practice of science itself?
01:08:23.700 And weirdly enough, that's kind of a postmodern question, you know, because the postmodernists
01:08:28.860 did insist to some degree that we exist within stories, although they don't believe in grand
01:08:36.820 unifying narratives, which begs the question for me, then what unites us internally, psychologically
01:08:44.660 or socially, if there's no unifying narrative, if narrative is the fundamental answer.
01:08:51.560 The narrative in which science operates is something like, well, the pursuit of truth is valuable
01:08:59.460 in and of itself, and it's valuable because it's a benefit to people at the individual level.
01:09:08.720 And as long as that's in place, it can all be ignored, and science can act as if it's something
01:09:15.680 unto itself.
01:09:17.960 And I know that's a tricky argument, because it does veer in somewhat into the postmodern direction.
01:09:25.320 But we wouldn't pursue science if we didn't think the pursuit was valuable and redemptive.
01:09:33.840 Yes.
01:09:35.180 Right.
01:09:36.000 And was heading towards something.
01:09:38.440 Yes, yes.
01:09:40.080 That could be attained by...
01:09:42.700 Go ahead.
01:09:43.220 Can you say the same thing about the humanities?
01:09:46.340 Can you say the same thing about art?
01:09:47.900 Can you say the same thing about metaphysics?
01:09:50.360 Can you say the same thing about politics or economics or anything else?
01:09:56.520 And I think the answer on all of these things is that the priority of the era is representation,
01:10:03.880 not attainment of a goal that is worth attaining other than representation.
01:10:08.760 And this is where we get to this, what I say in the War on the West is one of the deep underlying
01:10:17.140 just questions we have to address, which is, is the game that our societies have decided
01:10:24.640 to play worth playing?
01:10:27.500 And does it mean that we effectively win out in the end or not?
01:10:31.620 And let me flesh that out by saying, what I mean is, let's say that across America and
01:10:39.080 all other Western societies, we managed to completely nix the representation game and the diversity,
01:10:48.240 inclusion, equity game was just solved.
01:10:51.340 And that every board in America and every other Western country, Canada, Britain, you
01:10:58.380 name it, every board had exactly the right representation or over-representation of minority
01:11:05.080 groups so that there was more trans people on every board, more black people, more minority
01:11:11.600 ethnic people on every board, or exactly the percentage that replicated the percentage in
01:11:16.700 the country, and that every board and every workforce across every imaginable discipline
01:11:22.420 and every industry exactly replicated, of course, as I don't need to tell you the absurdity of
01:11:28.700 this, but that, you know, you had exactly 50% female firefighters and exactly 50% of the
01:11:36.120 police were women.
01:11:37.100 And if in America, 13% of the population are black, then 13% of the police are black and
01:11:42.200 on and on and on.
01:11:43.860 And the same with engineers and the same with electricians and the same with absolutely everybody,
01:11:47.980 computer programmers and a lot.
01:11:49.960 Let's say you get to there.
01:11:53.100 Do you beat China?
01:11:59.860 I don't know that the questions are all clear.
01:12:02.860 The answers are all clear to that question.
01:12:06.380 My own suspicion is actually it's a game that we're playing for politeness reasons and for
01:12:11.280 some justifiable reasons in certain areas, and I give the example in the book saying actually
01:12:16.800 it makes sense to have a, for instance, a police force that represents the community pretty
01:12:22.740 accurately.
01:12:25.680 But do you actually need your, for instance, your basketball teams or your computer programmers
01:12:35.020 all to also completely accurately represent the population and to have complete representation?
01:12:41.700 It doesn't seem to me that you win any particular game from doing so other than satisfying the
01:12:47.920 game that the West has decided to play for the time being.
01:12:50.740 But at the end of that game, well, you win if you win, if you, you win, if you regard holding
01:12:57.160 those positions as a reward that's equivalent to privilege rather than as the opportunity
01:13:06.620 to do something productive in and of itself.
01:13:10.080 Right.
01:13:10.860 And so because that seems to be part of the conceptualization is while your job is a reward
01:13:16.260 to be doled out rather than something that's productive in relationship to valuable ends.
01:13:22.460 And you mentioned the humanities earlier, too.
01:13:25.260 I don't think there is humanities outside of the canon.
01:13:29.460 So science is nested inside an underlying ethic that presumes that, let's say, the universe is
01:13:35.440 understandable, that there's some association between that and logic, that pursuing the
01:13:40.060 truth in relationship to knowledge of the world has this redemptive quality and that there
01:13:45.200 are very careful ways of doing that.
01:13:47.140 But the humanities is also nested, but even in some sense, more self-evidently inside the
01:13:54.460 idea of a canon.
01:13:56.200 And that canon is traditional.
01:13:58.420 And if you throw out the traditional canon, I think by definition, you throw out the humanities.
01:14:04.240 And well, as you know, in the chapter on culture, I go into this.
01:14:09.200 Because I think by this stage, it is clear that there is not an aspect of Western culture
01:14:16.020 that has not been assaulted at such a fundamental and dishonest level that if you were to continue
01:14:22.780 this game, there's just nothing left.
01:14:25.540 Nothing.
01:14:25.820 The British Library in 2020 announced that they were going to create a list of authors whose work was in the
01:14:38.480 British Library, including manuscripts and important documents by these authors who had some connection to the
01:14:44.900 slave trade or colonialism.
01:14:47.720 And they produced this sort of blacklist of authors, including the late poet laureate Ted Hughes, who died in 1998, who was born in considerable
01:14:59.680 poverty in Yorkshire in the 1930s, who had nothing to do with the British Empire.
01:15:04.200 And the British Library claimed that one of his ancestors in the 17th century had benefited from the slave trade.
01:15:11.020 I mean, this isn't even the sins of the father debate anymore.
01:15:13.900 This is the sins of the ancestor four centuries earlier debate.
01:15:18.820 And by the way, it turned out, among other things, that the British Library can't even get researchers these days,
01:15:23.240 because the researchers turned out to have selected a person called Nicholas Ferrer, who actually was opposed to the slave trade and wasn't an ancestor of Ted Hughes.
01:15:33.500 So they they weirdly just decided to posthumously defame somebody.
01:15:38.780 And this isn't at all uncommon.
01:15:40.860 The Tate Gallery in London.
01:15:44.000 I give an example, one that I might come on to is particularly painful to me.
01:15:48.020 But there's an example of one of the masterpieces they have in there.
01:15:51.560 I don't know if you know the work, but it's a beautiful painting called The Resurrection Cookham by Stanley Spencer,
01:15:58.100 one of the great mid-century British artists.
01:16:00.120 And it's a huge, vast canvas, which the Tate is exceptionally lucky to have.
01:16:05.800 Painted in the 1930s.
01:16:07.460 And it is a depiction of the of the physical resurrection of the dead at the Day of Judgment.
01:16:13.500 And they're all coming out of their tombs in the graveyard of his local church in the village of Cookham.
01:16:18.920 And it's a profoundly moving painting to me.
01:16:23.200 I've always been I used to occasionally my lunchtime just go to sit in front of this canvas.
01:16:28.980 Some of the dead coming out of the tombs are recognizably, apparently, neighbors of Spencer's from his village.
01:16:35.720 But he wanted to show the resurrection of all humanity.
01:16:38.700 So he also includes, you know, there are black men and women coming out of some of the graves as well.
01:16:42.600 He didn't have to do that, but he wanted to show the literal representation of the actual physical resurrection.
01:16:48.920 Well, the Tate now has a descriptor beside this sublime painting, saying that it is a racist painting.
01:16:56.700 Because whereas Stanley Spencer accurately depicts his neighbors from his village in England,
01:17:02.880 the black people in the painting are generic black people copied from National Geographic magazine of the time.
01:17:09.400 Well, Stanley Spencer didn't have any black neighbors, you know, so what?
01:17:17.000 So what?
01:17:17.640 There weren't any black people in his village in the 1930s in England.
01:17:21.720 And how dare these people?
01:17:24.000 But they've done it now on everything.
01:17:26.780 Well, they get to be morally superior.
01:17:29.620 Yes.
01:17:30.100 To be morally superior to a genius.
01:17:31.960 They get to be morally superior to a genius.
01:17:34.580 But what concerns me is that they pull down a sublime thing into their banal, monotone, utterly monomaniacal view of the world,
01:17:48.900 which is that race is the only thing that matters.
01:17:50.800 Let me give you one other example, if I may, because it's particularly painful to me.
01:17:54.400 There's a wonderful painter, an artist I'm very fond of, called Rex Whistler, English artist from the early 20th century.
01:18:04.380 Everybody adored him.
01:18:05.760 He was clearly an exceptionally lovable human being and an exceptionally talented artist.
01:18:10.780 And his first artwork was a mural for the Tate that he did in his early 20s.
01:18:15.200 And he worked all around the clock for months and months on end to complete this mural called In Pursuit of Rare Meats.
01:18:21.660 It's a fantasy, a beautiful fantasy landscape and an arcadian landscape that goes around all four walls of the gallery.
01:18:30.560 And a couple of years ago, a group whose name was White Pube, only consisting of a couple of people, decided that this mural was racist.
01:18:40.920 And they decided it because of two figures, one of whom was a Chinese figure they said was generic.
01:18:46.620 And the other was because in one corner of the forest, in one of the bits of the rest of a tiny figure, about two inches high,
01:18:54.100 is a young black boy, clearly in distress, being pulled on a chain by a woman in a white fully frock.
01:19:01.040 Now, clearly, Rex Whistler, he always included sort of ugly things like this.
01:19:06.060 There's a drowning child, a drowning white child elsewhere in it.
01:19:09.340 It's clearly Et in Arcadia Ego, you know, that's clearly what he's saying.
01:19:14.300 He was always saying this. All of his work always included this.
01:19:18.120 You know, there'd be a tomb or he even painted himself in things as a lowly street sweeper, you know.
01:19:23.860 And he had a wonderful sense of humor and a wonderful and dark sense of the macabre nature of all things, even in Arcadia.
01:19:32.100 This was decided two years ago by the Tate to be a racist painting.
01:19:37.220 And they have closed the room until further notice.
01:19:41.020 They looked into whether or not they could actually remove, after 100 years, actually remove this from the walls of the gallery.
01:19:48.200 And it seems that they can't because part of it's on plaster.
01:19:51.680 So they've locked the room.
01:19:53.000 And the reason I mind this, among many other reasons, is because they have posthumously declared Rex Whistler to be a racist.
01:20:03.660 They said that he reflected the racist attitudes of his time.
01:20:08.580 Rex Whistler died on his first day in action in Normandy in 1944.
01:20:16.240 How dare these people do this?
01:20:19.140 How dare they do it to everybody in our past, to all of our heroes, to all of our artistic heroes?
01:20:29.580 How dare they say that the story of the West is purely a story of racism and xenophobia and colonialism and slavery?
01:20:40.200 How dare they not even bother to weigh that up, as I say in one point in the book, weigh it up against just, let's name a few cities.
01:20:50.400 Paris, Florence, Rome, Venice, just for starters.
01:20:56.080 How dare they not be able to even weigh up the achievements that have come from this allegedly unremittingly terrible past?
01:21:03.240 But worse than that, and the point I really wanted to make, Jordan, is what they are driving us to, and I feel it very, very strongly myself, is how dare you do this to our ancestors?
01:21:16.580 How dare you do this to all of our heroes?
01:21:19.320 And then the follow-on thought is this.
01:21:22.940 If you have no respect for my ancestors, I see no reason why I should have respect for yours.
01:21:30.580 If you have no respect for my past and my culture, I don't see why I should continue to say that I have respect for yours.
01:21:43.460 If you have nothing good to say about me, why should I have anything good to say about you?
01:21:52.120 And what I suggest is that in the West at the moment, we are in a potentially short holding pattern.
01:21:59.620 A holding pattern based on politeness.
01:22:03.540 Or, as Kenneth Clark, Lord Clark of Civilization, put it, that fundamental aspect of Western culture, courtesy.
01:22:12.020 We are in a period of courtesy where we have been willing to say,
01:22:16.980 Okay, you can keep rampaging through the past of the West and assaulting my ancestors and insulting my predecessors and saying all of these negative things about my past,
01:22:29.100 and I am pretending for the time being or saying out of courtesy that you can do this, and I will put up with it for a time.
01:22:38.040 And I will even say, and there are these other ways of knowing and so on.
01:22:44.140 But there is a moment there where that absolutely stops.
01:22:48.320 And as I say at the end of the book, as you know, Jordan, I say there is a very clear place where you can do that.
01:22:54.320 The courtesy stops at a certain point.
01:22:56.600 And it stops when you say, You know what?
01:22:58.580 Well, this politeness seems not to be working for us.
01:23:02.460 So let's go for the impolite things.
01:23:05.220 And the impolite things that can be said are legion.
01:23:08.620 And nobody should want to go there.
01:23:10.920 But that's where we're being led.
01:23:12.300 So these great cities that you point to and the great achievements that went along with them, to me, they're the consequence of the manifestation of the best of the human spirit, universally speaking,
01:23:29.020 that was made possible by societies that recognize the existence of such of the best.
01:23:36.480 And so that was a precondition.
01:23:37.940 Yes.
01:23:38.200 And to and to associate them in some sense with Western culture, with white culture, and then to associate them with nothing but the spirit of oppression is to simultaneously deny that that spirit exists and can produce things of universal transcendent value.
01:24:01.060 And I can't see that that's going to be good for anyone except for people who can make moral hay of that in the short term to ratchet themselves up.
01:24:11.140 What to produce for themselves positions of authority that would not be available to them if they weren't able to weaponize guilt and claim the moral upper hand.
01:24:23.300 Yes.
01:24:24.440 So let me ask you another question.
01:24:27.280 One of the accusations that's levied at me from fairly frequently is that my concern about such things, which I would say in many ways is similar to yours, is evidence of my...
01:24:45.280 I'm exaggerating.
01:24:46.860 This is illusory.
01:24:48.500 None of this is actually happening.
01:24:49.920 Point to the evidence exactly.
01:24:54.100 And I think, well, I see it in the spread of such ideas in the universities and then downstream into culture.
01:24:59.840 But people aren't particularly awake to that fact.
01:25:03.900 I mean, in my home province in Ontario, there's a bill that purports to be anti-racists that's going to transform the entire education system by fiat into a system that is part of the war on the West, let's say.
01:25:23.000 And people who conduct that war will be rewarded for that.
01:25:28.480 How do you know that?
01:25:30.060 Why do you believe that this is a serious concern?
01:25:34.780 Well, because, as I say, they've decided to come for absolutely everything.
01:25:40.320 Because it's not just a Judeo-Christian tradition of the West, but the Enlightenment tradition of the West, too.
01:25:45.860 It's the religious tradition and the secular tradition.
01:25:50.220 It's the American politicians and leaders and presidents who were on the side of the South in the Civil War and the ones who are on the side of the North.
01:26:04.220 It comes for people who owned slaves and those who were opposed to slavery.
01:26:10.020 It comes for people who were in favor of empire and those who were against empire.
01:26:15.860 It comes for those who lived in the era of empire and everyone who lived before it and everyone who lived after it.
01:26:22.640 The people who lived in the era of slavery and all of the people who live after it.
01:26:27.020 It's so comprehensive.
01:26:28.640 And, I mean, you mentioned Canada just now.
01:26:32.680 There's a highly pertinent example, which is that insane spate of church burning that went on in your native country a year ago.
01:26:45.080 So, just to remind people, there was a claim that graves of indigenous children were found beside what had been a school and it had been run by the Catholic Church.
01:26:59.160 And that these were graves of children, therefore murdered by the Catholic Church.
01:27:04.600 And in no time, prominent figures in Canada, I list some of them in the book and you know some of them as well, Jordan, start to tweet out things like burn it all down.
01:27:13.140 And churches, including indigenous built churches in Canada, go up in flames across parts of the country.
01:27:21.280 Well, in what other situation would that have been regarded as being something you just shrug off?
01:27:29.280 And by the way, to date, no evidence has been produced of these alleged mass graves.
01:27:35.040 It happened on the basis of an investigation using ultrasound that turns out not to have yet produced one grave.
01:27:43.100 So, we are so primed.
01:27:46.420 We are so primed at this idea that, for instance, the Catholic Church, of which I am not a defender to the death or anything,
01:27:55.460 but that institutions like that are so evil that they deliberately killed children in countries like Canada, hid them in mass graves,
01:28:06.820 and now you can burn down the churches if you want.
01:28:09.380 What other religious tradition in Canada would be allowed to be treated like that in the present?
01:28:14.400 Or would it be just sort of brushed off that it happened?
01:28:18.240 It happens all around us.
01:28:19.480 And it's not just in the academies, as you know.
01:28:21.620 It's spilt out many years ago.
01:28:23.920 It's everywhere.
01:28:25.680 And it now has this completely physical manifestation on the streets.
01:28:32.360 When the so-called 1619 riots kicked off, and just a reminder, this is the 1619 project,
01:28:38.780 which tries to completely reframe all of American history to say that the heroic story of America is not a story of heroism.
01:28:45.140 It's one of slavery and subjugation, which is why they started in 1619.
01:28:48.820 When the riots after the death of George Floyd began, the murder of George Floyd began in 2020,
01:28:54.440 somebody says they should be called the 1619 riots.
01:28:57.380 And the woman who fronted the 1619 project at the New York Times,
01:29:01.460 so we're not talking about some kooky, far-out, fringe publication,
01:29:06.120 says the 1619 riots, I'd be honoured.
01:29:10.120 And these are the riots where, sure, they start to pull down statues of General Lee.
01:29:16.940 OK.
01:29:19.120 Wouldn't go to the wall for that one at all.
01:29:23.220 But then it's Jefferson.
01:29:25.260 And then it's Lincoln.
01:29:26.960 And then it's absolutely every damn figure in American history who ends up getting assailed.
01:29:31.580 Well, that's no longer a theoretical thing.
01:29:38.300 That's not just students reading Derrida.
01:29:41.360 That's not just papers on Foucault.
01:29:46.060 This is a manifestation of some of their thought, often by people who've never read them.
01:29:51.020 But this is long ago the spilling out even of their own thought,
01:29:55.020 simply into this thing where the era decides everything in our own past must be scoured.
01:30:01.600 What's to come after?
01:30:03.580 They don't tell us any more than they tell us what the other ways of knowing might be.
01:30:15.340 What are you trying to accomplish with the book, Douglas, do you think,
01:30:18.920 apart from clarifying your own thoughts?
01:30:24.420 Quite a number of things.
01:30:26.360 One is to alert people to the scale of what is being attempted against.
01:30:30.660 Another is to point to the unfairness of it, the simple unfairness of it, the unjustness of it.
01:30:40.760 Another is to arm people with the, I think, reasonable and correct rebuttals to it.
01:30:46.840 To remind people of the context of history and the context of the rest of the world so that we get ourselves and our own past in a proper light.
01:30:58.520 And get the rest of the world in a proper light.
01:31:02.520 You have an interesting interlude in there.
01:31:06.740 So there's four chapters, race, history, religion, and culture.
01:31:10.000 And there's three interludes, China, reparations.
01:31:13.240 And maybe the most interesting or one, the one that struck me most particularly was an interlude on gratitude.
01:31:21.200 And so you elevate that as a moral virtue.
01:31:26.120 And it's the antithesis, in some sense, of a resentment for history.
01:31:33.380 Gratitude, talk about that for a bit.
01:31:36.100 Why that value particularly?
01:31:38.200 Well, as you know, it's one you've thought about a lot and spoken and written about a lot.
01:31:44.260 It's one that a number of my friends have.
01:31:47.940 And I just, it's been one of the underlying things in my life.
01:31:52.200 And whenever I'm asked to sort of explain, as it were, why I come to some of the conclusions I come to on things,
01:31:58.540 I come back to this term.
01:32:01.120 Our late friend Roger Scruton, actually the last thing he wrote, I quote in the book,
01:32:08.480 was a diary for The Spectator where he reflected on the last year of his life.
01:32:12.500 And Roger said to approach death is to approach what life really means.
01:32:18.300 And what it means is gratitude.
01:32:22.160 Now, that was the last thing he wrote.
01:32:25.280 I thought about it a lot.
01:32:26.420 I quote Dostoevsky, as you know, from The Brothers Karamazov, where the devil,
01:32:31.220 the devil is incapable of gratitude, which I would think is deeply telling and brilliant.
01:32:40.080 Only Dostoevsky would dismiss it.
01:32:42.340 Well, it's so interesting that that, right, exactly.
01:32:45.980 Well, that was also penned at about the same time that Nietzsche was pointing to resentment
01:32:50.740 as the driving force behind movements, for example, that later became revolutionary Marxism.
01:32:58.180 Yes.
01:32:59.140 And outlining the moral hazard associated with that.
01:33:04.740 Exactly.
01:33:05.800 And Nietzsche and some other writers who come after him on resentment,
01:33:09.660 I spent a lot of time reading in recent years.
01:33:12.660 I think that resentment is, along with that desire for revenge in the name of justice,
01:33:20.000 one of the absolutely underlying drivers of our time.
01:33:24.480 Many of the great philosophers realize this.
01:33:26.880 Resentment is a terrifically strong driver.
01:33:29.100 And, again, as Nietzsche and others said, it's a terrific way to avoid any culpability.
01:33:40.000 Because the only way, as you well know, the only way to turn around resentment,
01:33:46.100 apart from gratitude, would be for the person of resentment to recognize that there is a reason
01:33:53.100 why they feel resentment, and that there is a person who is responsible for the things
01:33:57.860 that they are angry about, but that the person is themselves.
01:34:03.960 This is, of course, such a profoundly disturbing, life-disturbing thing to acknowledge
01:34:12.120 that almost nobody deeply embedded in resentment can.
01:34:15.660 That's why we always look for excuses.
01:34:19.420 We always put it on other people.
01:34:21.320 It's so hard to take responsibility ourselves for what has not gone wrong in our own life.
01:34:26.300 So much harder compared to putting it on any other group of people or another individual,
01:34:32.760 a person we believe has done us wrong, or a group we believe have done us wrong.
01:34:37.060 It's so easy to manipulate our species against other groups of people.
01:34:42.040 My God, what's the history of the Jews, but a history of people pouring their resentments
01:34:46.500 onto this tiny group of people for daring to continue to exist and thrive across societies.
01:34:54.620 You know, the history of anti-Semitism is that, as it is in our own days,
01:34:58.420 the great explanation for where some people can pour their resentment.
01:35:03.100 But the main thing that you have to count, and I've long said this to conservatives in my own country
01:35:09.940 and elsewhere, is that you have to address things at an equally deep level.
01:35:16.240 And when people say, I can't remember if we've talked about this before,
01:35:20.060 but when people say, for instance, how will the right respond to the left on this issue?
01:35:27.500 You very often see things like, you know, well, we'll need to do more house building
01:35:31.300 on brownfield sites or something like this. And I say, you're mad. I mean, you're countering
01:35:38.540 resentment. You can't do that with a bit of bureaucraties. Now, how can you counter resentment?
01:35:47.920 It is only, I believe, by gratitude. It is only by completely inverting that sentiment. And I think
01:35:55.100 that in our own lives, as well as in societies, this is eminently possible. You and I both know
01:36:01.080 this. You can stand in front of a painting and you could endlessly work out the cost that that
01:36:11.560 painting had, what the cost of it had been. What the cost of it had been, for instance,
01:36:17.980 were the people who worked in the workshop of this master adequately paid? Where there were
01:36:25.160 paints that were sourced from specific minerals, were those minerals justly acquired? And were
01:36:32.920 people along every stage of the process justly rewarded for providing the material? You could
01:36:39.260 break that down endlessly, or you could stand back and marvel at the Madonna of the Rocks.
01:36:44.480 You know, you could stand in front of Michelangelo's Pieter and you could think about what the workmen
01:36:54.000 who got the piece of marble out of the quarry went through and whether they were adequately paid
01:37:01.420 and whether they had all of the life choices necessary for them to be able to decide whether
01:37:08.600 they wanted to be quarriers in marble. Or you can stand back and marvel at Michelangelo's Pieter.
01:37:18.200 You can do this in every city in Europe. You can look at Venice and say this was a trading city where
01:37:25.400 not everyone was always adequately rewarded for their labor. Or you can marvel at Venice. You can
01:37:32.120 do this on absolutely everything. Everything can be deconstructed to this utmost point at which you
01:37:38.680 cannot see the value in anything because you claim to be looking for basically for the checks and the
01:37:47.560 bills, historically speaking, and in the present day. And it is such a reductive, mean-minded,
01:37:56.280 obsessive way that our era actually is looking at things. It actually is tearing everything apart in
01:38:03.240 this way. It actually is looking for racism everywhere. It is looking for colonialism and
01:38:09.080 slavery and blame and guilt. And I just say, how about turning that around and saying, just have some
01:38:16.600 damn gratitude for what you found yourself living among. And as I say, all I can suggest is that our
01:38:26.760 age in the West has gone through a vast context collapse. And I am very struck by the fact that
01:38:33.480 many, many people, if not a majority, who come to the West from outside of the West do not share this
01:38:41.080 ravenous hatred. I have a friend who's a school teacher in a school in London who has said before
01:38:49.800 that one of the best ways to make sure that a pupil who is misbehaving, as it were, playing up
01:38:58.600 in a very dominantly immigrant background school, one of the best ways to make sure that
01:39:06.840 they change their life attitude is if they are taken back to the country of origin at some
01:39:12.760 point in a school holiday by their parents. Because they may be told in their school in New
01:39:20.680 York or in London or Ontario that they are living in a patriarchal, racist society. But wow, when they
01:39:28.920 go back and see their first and second cousins in Bangladesh, they come back with a different view.
01:39:36.120 My view in general is that we in the West have undergone a massive context collapse about the
01:39:43.720 nature of our own past, our own societies. I think we have to turn it around. I don't think it's
01:39:50.120 sustainable to continue to war on ourselves and on every part of our own history, not least also because
01:39:57.800 we deserve the right to have heroes and heroic narratives and things of which we're proud. We absolutely
01:40:05.480 have that right as every other society in the world does. So I'm trying to do a more reasonable audit
01:40:15.080 on an era which I think has been deeply unreasonable to itself. As I say, this is a Western on Western
01:40:25.480 crime that is being committed. It is completely possible to mend it. And that's why this very,
01:40:31.880 very depressing subject matter in some ways. I try, as you know, by the end of the book to show people,
01:40:37.160 actually, this is positive. This is a way out. And these are the ways out. These are the ways in
01:40:42.680 which you can try to turn the era of resentment into a personal and wider appreciation of gratitude
01:40:51.720 and of getting things into a proper order and of getting things into a proper sense of themselves,
01:40:57.080 because, my God, we need it.
01:41:01.640 I've been trying to conceptualize gratitude as a form of courage.
01:41:05.480 No. Well, because there's, there's evidence for tragedy and atrocity, obviously, and
01:41:13.720 everywhere, and that can make you despair. That gratitude is also part of separating the wheat from
01:41:20.840 the chaff, right? Is that you want to, you want to appreciate the things that are of high value.
01:41:27.240 And so I wanted to ask, maybe close with one more question. It's a complicated question. Maybe I'll put
01:41:35.640 it in two parts. You know, in the biblical narrative, the first two human beings that emerge in any real
01:41:45.960 sense are Cain and Abel. They're the first who are born rather than directly created. And it's a rather
01:41:53.960 depressing beginning point because they're, they're fratricidal brothers. And Cain is bitter and resentful
01:42:05.160 and Abel makes the sacrifices that are acceptable to God and flourishes. And it's because of that
01:42:11.800 flourishing that Cain decides to destroy him. And the depth psychology that I've read and the literary
01:42:21.000 criticism tradition that's emerged from that suggests in some sense that those are the earliest
01:42:28.360 manifestations of two patterns of deeply rooted patterns of behavior. One you might regard as the
01:42:35.320 spirit of Abel and the other, the spirit of Cain. And our error is characterized by this tremendous
01:42:42.600 increase in the speed of communication.
01:42:45.800 And it seems to me that that's produced an exaggeration of this battle. And it seems also
01:42:53.640 to me in some sense that it is a theological battle. It's, it's, it's the anti logos aspect of it is a
01:43:02.360 theological battle and that it has to be addressed in some sense at that level. And so I guess what I'm
01:43:10.040 asking you is, well, first of all, what you think of those ideas. And second, if this is how this may
01:43:16.760 have changed your views on what would you say the necessary truth of the religious suppositions that
01:43:26.040 underlie that notion of the sovereignty of the individual, I guess that's
01:43:30.280 We interrupt your playlist to bring you breaking news. Tim's classic breakfast sandwiches are just
01:43:37.640 three dollars when you buy any size coffee. You heard that right. Three dollars. Your mornings will
01:43:42.280 never be the same. Plus tax Canada only limited time only terms apply. See app for details.
01:43:50.200 Yes, I mean, I, uh, I laid out in the strange death of Europe, what I think of as being not just
01:43:55.960 my own, but certainly modern Europe's current malaise in regards to the Christian tradition,
01:44:03.720 uh, the difficulty of it. I think as you've also said in the past, I've, I've often tried to live
01:44:11.800 with what Cardinal Ratzinger when he was still Cardinal Ratzinger, uh, it said as the invitation
01:44:16.520 to live as though God exists, which I thought was a deeply brilliant, um, invitation and a very
01:44:23.000 generous invitation actually from a soon to be Pope. Um, and, uh, I, I think as I've, I've expressed a
01:44:33.160 number of times recently that, that in any case, uh, you, you need a tradition to come from in order
01:44:42.520 to know what the others are and that the, the, the modern idea that is where you can splash around
01:44:49.080 among all of the faith traditions of the world as a child and come out more roundly formed seems to me
01:44:57.720 to be doing everything exactly in reverse. And that, that really the way in which a child to be read
01:45:05.160 is in one tradition so that they can then go out having been versed in one tradition and know the
01:45:10.440 others, discover the others as they go along. But the, the complexity of that is something that only
01:45:15.960 an adult can go through, you know, you can, you can only understand the things that the traditions
01:45:21.400 have in common. If you know, the one that you've come from and you can only actually admire them,
01:45:26.680 other traditions on their own terms, really, if you know, and, and, and, and have some reverence
01:45:31.640 for the one that you've come from. Otherwise it's all just a sort of mishmash of yoga like banalities.
01:45:38.600 I, I'm not, so I'm, I'm, I certainly know how much I owe personally to this tradition and I know my
01:45:46.040 deeply, um, complex, conflicted and inadequate, uh, answers to it. I, um, it's, you know, I, I often have
01:46:00.120 to fall back on quotes, but, um, I, I was, uh, I'm not, I'm not Jewish. I'm, I'm Christian by upbringing,
01:46:07.400 but, um, I remember something I mentioned earlier, late friend, Rabbi Sachs, he once said to me, he
01:46:12.760 said that Isaiah Berlin friend was once asked, uh, what it meant to be a Jew. And he said to be a Jew
01:46:20.200 is to have a sense of, of history. And, uh, um, and Jonathan Sachs said Isaiah was almost right.
01:46:29.080 And he said, and I said, what do you mean? He said, I corrected him. He said to be Jewish
01:46:32.520 is to have a sense of memory. Um, it's a, it's a pretty good clarification. Um, I think one has a
01:46:42.480 role in society to have a sense of memory. And in that case, if you're from a society like
01:46:50.200 I am, like you are, that memory is absolutely God haunted and Christ haunted, biblically,
01:46:57.880 biblically haunted. And there's no way around that. I don't resist it. I don't, I said, and I,
01:47:03.000 I also, I long ago came to the same conclusion that Roger Scruton did. And he encouraged me to,
01:47:07.640 which was at least don't war on it, you know? Um, and there's many other things that are worth
01:47:15.400 worrying on, but unless, unless, and until the Christian religion was to return to the stage of
01:47:23.080 that, it was out in parts of Europe in the 15th and 16th centuries, there's no, no need to, I don't
01:47:27.880 see the, the Episcopalian church in America, for instance, as particularly requiring my, um,
01:47:34.520 my, uh, critique. Um, so I do have a, um, uh, I have a complex attitude towards it, but I, um,
01:47:44.680 I try to remain, I try to remain in dialogue with the religion is the way I would, I would put it,
01:47:50.120 and not to close the door. I think that's, uh, uh, so one of the, I think I told you when we met
01:47:57.160 possibly that the, the word Israel means those who wrestle with God. Yes. Yes. And that's, that's
01:48:07.240 very interesting as far as I'm concerned. Yes. That's the nature of belief in some sense,
01:48:14.440 is to wrestle with the notion of what constitutes the highest virtues.
01:48:19.880 Well, the, the, the former Bishop of Edinburgh was a sort of secularist himself by the end of his
01:48:24.920 career, but a deeply distinguished and humanist figure, um, called Richard Holloway, who once
01:48:30.200 rather beautifully said that the, everyone assumes that the opposite of, um, of, of, uh, faith is,
01:48:36.920 is doubt, but the opposite of, no, sorry, but the opposite of doubt is faith, but it isn't, it's
01:48:41.640 certainty. Um, the, uh, certainty is, is the, um, is the problem in that, in that, in that mix of
01:48:51.240 perhaps, perhaps having conflicted views is inevitable if, if not necessary. Um, as for Cain
01:48:58.840 and Abel, um, is it, isn't one of the many things in that story, the fact that as so often in the,
01:49:05.400 the early books of the Bible, the Torah, that you're being reminded that you're both people. I mean,
01:49:11.640 that, that, that, that everyone has both of these things in their hearts and that just as we,
01:49:19.080 the, the, the, the path, both these, both these paths are always, both these paths are always open
01:49:25.480 to all of us. Isn't that what we're, one of the things that we're being told?
01:49:30.920 Well, we're, we're always tempted by the desire to get away with insufficient sacrifices,
01:49:39.640 you know, to cut corners and to not do things as well and at as much cost as we might. We're all
01:49:49.080 tempted by, what would you say, the spirit of revenge that we might allow to inhabit us if we
01:49:56.520 became sufficiently bitter. We're all tempted to tear down our ideals because they also
01:50:03.080 simultaneously judge us. We're all tempted to shake our fist at God. But if that spirit gets up,
01:50:11.080 gets the upper hand, well, the consequence for Cain is that his sin is so much that he cannot bear it.
01:50:18.120 And it, I believe that if we in the West tear down everything of value because we've given
01:50:25.320 too much sway to the spirit of resentment and revenge, the consequences us for us all will be
01:50:32.520 something so cataclysmic that we won't be able to bear it.
01:50:35.800 Well, I couldn't agree more. And we come back to this thing that we don't know what it would be
01:50:43.160 if the men of resentment had their way in what they're doing and pulled everything down as they
01:50:51.000 are trying, pulled down all of our stories, all of our heroes, all of our history, all of our culture,
01:50:55.800 read our culture as a story, not of admiration for the world and learning from the world, but actually
01:51:01.160 theft from the world. If they did this on everything and succeeded as they're doing at the moment,
01:51:05.960 what is it exactly at the end of this other than the, again, the other ways of knowing? What is it that
01:51:11.400 lies there? And the one answer you can get for people is essentially a version of that thing that
01:51:16.760 Tom Wolfe described in Radical Chic, you know, the essay on the party at the Bernstein's apartment
01:51:26.440 in New York in the early 70s that Leonard Bernstein and his wife threw for the Black
01:51:31.320 Panthers. And of course, Tom Wolfe fantastically destroys this obscene, obscene event where the
01:51:41.720 liberal elite of New York are having canapes listening to these revolutionaries describing
01:51:46.920 how they want to destroy and pull down the society they're in. And there's a wonderful moment in it
01:51:51.960 where I think Otto Preminger, one of Bernstein's friends, is sitting in his chair and he says to
01:51:57.400 one of the panthers, but what are you going to do once you have pulled down all of the existing
01:52:02.840 structures? But what are you going to do? And he keeps pushing this panther on it, on this, until this
01:52:09.000 Black Panther says, you can't put a blueprint on the future, man. And Leonard Bernstein leans forward
01:52:17.480 in his chair and says, you mean you're just going to wing it? And that's really what we're dealing
01:52:25.480 with. We're dealing with people who don't know what they're going to do. They're going to pull
01:52:29.720 everything down and then wing it. Well, if we undermine that which unites us,
01:52:39.000 right, and if we're united around something like recognition of the value of the individual,
01:52:44.600 the divine sovereignty of the individual, let's say, if we pull that down and destroy it, then it's the
01:52:51.720 group. It's the war of every conceivable group against every other conceivable group. That's the
01:52:58.920 only alternative that I can see because there's an infinite number of arbitrarily oppressed groups.
01:53:05.400 Absolutely. And I would just add a coda to that, which is, you know, I think people should be very
01:53:12.760 careful of what they wish for in this. You know, as you know, at the end of the war in the West, I say,
01:53:18.200 you know, of all of the unpalatable answers, the one coming the way of the people who want to make
01:53:23.720 this racial is worse than any. You know, it would consist of saying, this thing that you believe
01:53:31.800 is so appalling, right, we've been courteous enough. End of courtesy. Why don't we go to the
01:53:39.160 Aboriginal peoples or the First Nations peoples for any vaccines? Why don't we find other ways of knowing?
01:53:48.440 For cancer cures. Why are all of these things products of the thing that you say you hate
01:53:57.960 and the people that for politeness's sake everyone says can also contribute and do in certain ways,
01:54:04.440 but are not better than this? That the other ways of knowing are actually worse.
01:54:10.840 And then if you say, oh, and by the way, that's not universal after all, because you've told us it
01:54:16.040 isn't. It's just ours. Wow is the 21st century hell.
01:54:26.200 Well, as far as I can tell from delving into it, that the end goal of the spirit of Cain is hell.
01:54:33.960 Yes. Right. Yes. And we've been warned about that for a very long time.
01:54:40.040 And still have to learn that. In the background.
01:54:42.040 Yes. Well, you, the 20th century might not have been enough.
01:54:47.480 I hope it was.
01:54:48.360 That's, that's a horrible, horrible thought, but I agree. I agree.
01:54:56.200 So, to
01:54:56.920 this book is coming out April, you said 26th. 26th.
01:55:04.760 So, it describes the battle of ideas that currently
01:55:12.360 is tearing our culture apart. And I would say, in some real sense, destabilizing the entire world.
01:55:18.200 And so, people can read it and they can draw their own conclusions and see their own way forward.
01:55:26.440 But it's an alarm bell and it should be ringing loud.
01:55:34.200 Anything else, Mr. Murray?
01:55:36.920 No, just, I just, just, I would just add, since you did say at the beginning that it was very depressing,
01:55:42.360 it's also quite amusing, if I say so myself. And I have to put in, I have to put in that plug.
01:55:51.400 I agree that what I describe is highly depressing, but it is, it is, as I say, I try to show a way out.
01:55:57.640 And I do actually try to give readers some fun along the way. And you can't not, because some of
01:56:02.840 what I'm attacking is so risible that once again, when I was doing the audio book, as I was for the
01:56:09.480 Mans of Crowds, there were points I had to say to the sound engineer, I'm sorry, I've just,
01:56:13.880 the reason I'm laughing so much, I promise, it's not my own jokes. It's the things I'm reading,
01:56:19.640 when you read them out loud, are so even more ridiculous than they are on the page.
01:56:25.800 But yeah, it may be gloomy in places, but there is fun along the way.
01:56:34.360 Good to talk to you again.
01:56:35.640 Always great to see you, Jordan. Thank you.
01:56:39.480 We interrupt your playlist to bring you breaking news. Tim's classic breakfast sandwiches are just
01:57:03.400 three dollars when you buy any size coffee. You heard that right, three dollars. Your mornings will
01:57:08.040 never be the same. Plus tax. Canada only. Limited time only. Terms apply. See app for details.