The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast - July 25, 2022


273. Conservative Resistance in Canada | Roman Baber


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 5 minutes

Words per Minute

162.67802

Word Count

10,688

Sentence Count

509

Misogynist Sentences

4

Hate Speech Sentences

23


Summary

In this episode of Daily Wire Plus, host Jordan Peterson sits down with Canadian Conservative Party Leadership Candidate Roman Baber to discuss his campaign and his vision for the future of the Conservative Party of Canada. Dr. Jordan Peterson has created a new series that could be a lifeline for those battling depression and anxiety. With decades of experience helping patients, Dr. Peterson offers a unique understanding of why you might be feeling this way, and offers a roadmap towards healing. In his new series, "Dr. Jordan B. Peterson on Depression and Anxiety," Dr. B Peterson provides a roadmap toward healing, showing that while the journey isn't easy, it's absolutely possible to find your way forward. If you're suffering, please know you are not alone. There's hope, and there's a path to feeling better. Go to Dailywireplus.ca/Dailywireplus to join our FB group and become a supporter of the show. Subscribe today using our podcast s promo code POWER10 for 10% off your first pack! Subscribe to our newest podcast, POWER10, wherever you get your stuff, and help us spread the word about our new podcast! Subscribe, rate, and review the show! Thank you for listening and share the podcast with your fellow podcast go to: Anchor.fm/DailyWireplus and share it with your friends and family! Support us! Timestamps: 0:00:00 - What does it mean to you? 1:30 - How do you feel about the podcast? 5:00 | What are you struggling? 6:15 - What do you think about it? 7:00 8: What is the most important thing you're worried about? 9:40 - How does it matter? 10: What makes it matter to you deserve to be heard? 11:30 | What makes you feel the most? 12:40 | What is it possible? 13:30 14:40 15:10 - What is your opinion of Canada's democracy? 16:30 + 13: Is it possible to be better than someone else s role? 17:30 Is it better than you deserve a better than it s better than that? 15, what do you need to be more than it can be better? 18:00 + 11:10 19:40 + 17:10? 21:30 & 16:10 ?


Transcript

00:00:00.960 Hey everyone, real quick before you skip, I want to talk to you about something serious and important.
00:00:06.480 Dr. Jordan Peterson has created a new series that could be a lifeline for those battling depression and anxiety.
00:00:12.740 We know how isolating and overwhelming these conditions can be, and we wanted to take a moment to reach out to those listening who may be struggling.
00:00:20.100 With decades of experience helping patients, Dr. Peterson offers a unique understanding of why you might be feeling this way in his new series.
00:00:27.420 He provides a roadmap towards healing, showing that while the journey isn't easy, it's absolutely possible to find your way forward.
00:00:35.360 If you're suffering, please know you are not alone. There's hope, and there's a path to feeling better.
00:00:41.780 Go to Daily Wire Plus now and start watching Dr. Jordan B. Peterson on depression and anxiety.
00:00:47.460 Let this be the first step towards the brighter future you deserve.
00:00:57.420 Hello everyone.
00:01:10.220 As you may or may not know, and probably don't, Canada is in the midst of a leadership race for its Federal Conservative Party.
00:01:20.260 The Federal Conservatives in Canada are generally the second most likely political party in Canada to govern at the Federal and the Provincial levels.
00:01:31.800 Recently, as a consequence of the aftermath of the truckers' convoy, the Conservative Party blew up in some sense in Canada.
00:01:43.040 The leader resigned, and a new slate of contenders is now vying for leadership position.
00:01:50.720 I spoke with one of them recently, Pierre Polyev, who's currently the frontrunner, and I extended an invitation to the other candidates to speak with me.
00:02:01.560 Mr. Roman Babber took me up on that.
00:02:04.520 He's currently, as I said, a candidate for leadership of Canada's Federal Conservative Party.
00:02:09.380 He's a former member of Ontario's Provincial Parliament.
00:02:12.600 He was removed, most infamously, by Ontario Premier Doug Ford from that Provincial Government Caucus after calling out the collateral harm of lockdowns in January 2021.
00:02:28.140 Since then, Mr. Babber has been a staunch advocate in favour of a balanced COVID response and such emergency responses,
00:02:36.360 and in particular, against lockdowns due to their toll on the health and mental health of Canadians.
00:02:44.000 Roman also brought legislation to cut MPP, Member of Provincial Parliament, pay to Canadian emergency response benefit levels while emergency orders are in place,
00:02:55.060 commenced, and is in litigation against the Attorney General of Ontario over Canadians' right to protest and worship outdoors,
00:03:02.060 and recently put forward a bill to outlaw workplace mandates.
00:03:07.960 He is running for leader of the Conservative Party of Canada because he does not wish to, quote,
00:03:13.580 sit back while Canadians are losing faith in Canada's democracy and Canadian opportunity.
00:03:20.900 Thank you very much, Mr. Babber, for coming to talk to me today, and I'm looking forward to a provocative discussion.
00:03:28.540 Good to be with you, Jordan.
00:03:29.420 So, let's start with a question that I thought was handled very badly by the Conservatives during the last federal debate.
00:03:42.520 The debate was, during the election that Trudeau precipitously called,
00:03:46.860 the debate was framed around five issues, and one of the things I thought the Conservatives did extraordinarily badly
00:03:52.060 was to allow the progressives, essentially, to dictate the terms of the debate, to dictate the topics.
00:03:58.780 And so, one of the things I wanted to ask you, you're contending for leadership of the Conservative Party
00:04:03.880 and, hypothetically, for Prime Ministership of Canada.
00:04:07.660 What do you think the most crucial issues facing Canadians today are?
00:04:13.200 I think, like, in much of the Western world, it's the erosion of Canada's democracy that I fear very much
00:04:21.280 and that propelled me to enter into this race.
00:04:24.240 I'm seeing unprecedented erosion, whether it's by way of censorship.
00:04:28.380 We have two or three pieces of legislation in Canada seeking to abridge freedom of speech.
00:04:33.600 We have regulators coming down on membership.
00:04:38.500 We have, obviously, social media giants also censoring speech.
00:04:42.400 Then, as many of you know, I have been very saddened by the fact that close to 20% of Canadians
00:04:48.940 are treated as effectively second-class citizens.
00:04:51.380 I made the choice that most Canadians have made, but that doesn't mean that we should impose our choice on others.
00:04:57.860 In fact, we've never done that as Western civilization.
00:05:01.540 We're seeing an unlawful invocation of the Emergencies Act that was predicated in false propositions,
00:05:07.640 voted on after the alleged emergency was over, clearly without meeting the matter of the law,
00:05:13.220 which suggests that you don't need it if you have other legislation to deal with.
00:05:16.640 So, Jordan, I think that if you don't have democracy, you don't have anything.
00:05:22.240 And I'm very, very concerned about where we're headed.
00:05:26.200 So, what makes you think that this concern is warranted?
00:05:29.760 I mean, you're from the former Soviet Union, so you have experience with such things.
00:05:34.180 Your family does, certainly.
00:05:36.800 You talked about censorship.
00:05:39.020 We could go into that with Bill C-11 in particular,
00:05:41.500 which is a stunningly overreaching piece of legislation, no matter how you slice it.
00:05:46.200 And will be absolutely impossible to impose.
00:05:49.360 What makes you think that we're actually facing something serious in Canada
00:05:55.080 in relationship to our democratic freedoms?
00:05:57.400 And why should people assume that this isn't just a, you know,
00:06:01.680 what a scandalous talking point that the Conservatives are using
00:06:04.860 to drum up interest in the leadership race?
00:06:07.580 What do you see happening?
00:06:09.480 Well, as they would say in Latin,
00:06:12.680 it speaks for itself.
00:06:14.920 You see it before your very eyes.
00:06:16.980 Government is passing legislation which would dictate,
00:06:19.680 which would manipulate what Canadians see online,
00:06:23.760 giving the CRTC, which is our broadcast regulator,
00:06:26.940 even more power to determine what we may and may not see.
00:06:31.120 We see government also picking winners and losers in the media,
00:06:34.740 in that we know that we do not have effectively free and independent media in Canada
00:06:42.320 because it's heavily subsidized.
00:06:44.240 The government bailed out the media a couple of years ago
00:06:46.740 and continues with annual subsidies.
00:06:49.220 How can you have free and independent media
00:06:50.960 when the government signs its paycheck?
00:06:54.920 Yeah, well, let's drill down into that a little bit.
00:06:58.200 So the Canadian federal government subsidizes the CBC
00:07:02.220 to the tune of between $1.2 and $1.5 billion a year
00:07:06.400 for a shrinking market of virtually no viewers
00:07:10.200 and then seems to also, in some sense,
00:07:13.880 collude with the CBC to produce news pieces
00:07:16.640 that are in keeping with government legislation
00:07:18.720 and then to refer to those pieces of legislation
00:07:22.560 for proof that the legislation being covered
00:07:25.200 was actually necessary to begin with.
00:07:27.060 And then there's this broader pattern of subsidizing media in general.
00:07:31.400 And to me, this is reminiscent of what's technically termed fascism
00:07:36.000 because fascism comes from fascists to bind together.
00:07:40.580 And fascism is collusion of elites, right?
00:07:43.460 So government, media, corporation colluding together
00:07:47.600 to produce a kind of monolith.
00:07:49.380 What would Pierre Polyev on my podcast when I interviewed him famously
00:07:56.540 or infamously said that he would defund the CBC?
00:08:00.240 And so what's your take on that from a policy perspective?
00:08:04.860 So it's important for you, as you mentioned, to understand
00:08:07.440 I was born in the former Soviet Union
00:08:09.080 and we didn't leave until I was almost nine.
00:08:11.060 I still have a very good recollection about that communist regime.
00:08:17.280 Specifically, there was a newspaper called Pravda.
00:08:20.440 Pravda means truth in the Russian language.
00:08:23.660 And so Pravda would be plastered all over walls
00:08:26.380 and buildings and subway stations.
00:08:28.820 And it would essentially be government talking points.
00:08:31.520 And what we've seen, particularly in the last two or three years,
00:08:34.320 is that government was effectively repeating,
00:08:36.060 sorry, media was effectively repeating government talking points,
00:08:39.480 particularly as it came to the public health exercise.
00:08:44.160 But I would say beyond that,
00:08:46.120 so we don't only have this funding of the CBC,
00:08:49.560 which will end before lunchtime.
00:08:51.980 We also have bailouts and subsidies
00:08:54.620 of a number of other stakeholders in the media.
00:08:58.860 And on top of that, we're now seeing an unprecedented move
00:09:03.140 for media buys.
00:09:04.460 Government has become one of the biggest advertisers
00:09:07.200 on all news and media platforms.
00:09:11.520 And there's an old rule in the ad game.
00:09:14.600 He or she who pays for the ad gets their narrative across.
00:09:19.260 And so I would not just defund the CBC.
00:09:21.600 I will also end the bailouts and the subsidies.
00:09:24.460 And I will limit the way that government
00:09:26.560 is able to advertise on all platforms.
00:09:31.100 I'm sure your viewers fully agree and understand
00:09:34.140 that free and independent media
00:09:35.660 is one of the most important checks and balances
00:09:38.220 we have in our democracy
00:09:39.180 because it is in fact vested with the responsibility
00:09:41.740 to put a check on government,
00:09:43.140 something we're simply not seeing in Canada,
00:09:45.700 which I think in large part resulted
00:09:48.200 in the catastrophe that I've alleged has transpired
00:09:50.660 over the last two years.
00:09:51.880 Yeah, well, you know, we have the continual suspension
00:09:58.260 of parliament in Canada, which is a catastrophe
00:10:00.920 that's now being extended essentially another year
00:10:03.400 in an absolutely unprecedented and unwarranted move.
00:10:07.320 And so the possibility for genuine opposition
00:10:10.680 to the Trudeau government's policies
00:10:13.380 has been dramatically reduced on the parliamentary front.
00:10:16.620 And now we have this situation where the press,
00:10:19.400 which and even the CBC in years past
00:10:21.700 was at least under some circumstances
00:10:24.520 and what would you say an effective critic
00:10:28.080 of governmental policies, both federal and provincial,
00:10:32.980 and also saw that as their sacred duty, let's say.
00:10:36.060 That seems to have gone entirely by the wayside.
00:10:39.240 And so that means Canadians are in a position.
00:10:41.240 I saw this with the truckers convoy.
00:10:42.980 You know, when Trudeau called them misogynists and bigots
00:10:46.660 and that they were attempting in some sense
00:10:50.220 to foment a coup, my sense that was that Canadians
00:10:53.460 had a really hard option in front of them,
00:10:55.440 which was to either decide that their prime minister
00:10:58.060 was a complete liar and that the federal government
00:11:00.360 had become untrustworthy as an institution,
00:11:02.880 along with all the legacy media outlets,
00:11:05.620 or that the truckers were reprehensible misogynists
00:11:08.800 and bigots.
00:11:09.400 And many Canadians decided to take the latter stance.
00:11:14.900 But it's not surprising to me because our institutions
00:11:17.580 had been pretty sound for about 150 years.
00:11:20.360 And it's a bitter pill for Canadians to swallow
00:11:22.660 to understand that that, in some real sense,
00:11:25.080 may no longer be the case.
00:11:27.080 You cannot underestimate the role that the media plays
00:11:29.460 in everyday Canadian discourse.
00:11:31.520 You said yourself at the commencement of this interview
00:11:33.260 that conservatives have difficulty reframing the debate.
00:11:37.720 In fact, liberals frame the debate very, very well.
00:11:40.880 And so it seems like we're fighting every election
00:11:43.320 on their ground instead of talking about issues
00:11:45.540 that may be important to us.
00:11:47.300 And so there's no question that media has a large part
00:11:52.580 in how the daily conversation goes on,
00:11:54.740 which is why it's so important that we keep it independent
00:11:57.220 and objective by ending all financial relationship
00:12:00.040 between government and the media.
00:12:01.520 But back to the truckers.
00:12:03.600 Jordan, everything the Trudeau government said
00:12:06.740 about the Ottawa convoy turned out to be false.
00:12:10.620 The arson was not connected.
00:12:13.880 There were no weapons.
00:12:14.520 Yeah, that was a huge lie, man.
00:12:15.880 There was no weapons found anywhere near the site.
00:12:19.040 There was very little foreign funding,
00:12:21.500 about 10 to 12 percent,
00:12:22.780 and all of it was small donations.
00:12:24.860 And there was no foreign collusion.
00:12:26.320 And it's on the strength of those misrepresentations
00:12:31.120 that a lot of Canadians formed public opinion,
00:12:33.820 and on the strength of those misrepresentations
00:12:36.320 that the government tried to justify
00:12:37.920 the invocation of the Emergencies Act,
00:12:40.440 which is the successor of the War Measures Act
00:12:42.660 that hasn't been invoked since the 70s.
00:12:47.660 And so this particular piece of legislation
00:12:49.660 was invoked for the first time.
00:12:51.240 This is, of course, an affront to democracy,
00:12:56.000 but it's important in how you stated
00:12:57.900 that it was, in fact, the CBC
00:13:00.020 that raised the prospect of foreign collusion.
00:13:04.200 And one or two cabinet ministers
00:13:06.440 pointed to evidence in the media
00:13:08.940 in support of their suggestion
00:13:11.340 that there was foreign collusion.
00:13:12.680 So the government is funding the media.
00:13:15.840 The media is speculating and is often wrong.
00:13:19.080 The government is predicating action
00:13:20.860 on the basis of such media speculation
00:13:23.460 and then justifies its invasive
00:13:26.420 and very undemocratic action.
00:13:28.440 So I think we're in real trouble here,
00:13:31.200 and we've got to rethink all of this.
00:13:33.800 Well, Trudeau, it seems to me
00:13:35.320 that Trudeau believes his own press releases
00:13:37.760 in some real sense.
00:13:39.020 And I'm not actually quite as cynical about that
00:13:42.280 as I might be,
00:13:43.180 because I don't think it's possible
00:13:45.860 to generate a web of deception around you,
00:13:50.520 a web of instrumental deception around you,
00:13:53.700 and simultaneously maintain your distance from that.
00:13:57.640 And so I think when he feeds stories to the CBC
00:14:00.700 and then the CBC feeds them back,
00:14:03.460 he believes it.
00:14:04.620 It's not merely cynical.
00:14:06.240 It's that he's trapped up
00:14:07.320 in his own web of deception.
00:14:08.760 I think we've been seeing
00:14:11.480 last in the last couple of years,
00:14:12.900 one of the hallmarks of authoritarian regimes
00:14:17.020 is that they peddle half-truths
00:14:20.260 or things that often are not true.
00:14:24.540 But quite often,
00:14:26.180 they tend to believe in the system
00:14:28.420 that the people around them
00:14:29.700 are made to buy into those half-truths
00:14:34.680 because that essentially strengthens the system.
00:14:37.100 And we've seen that largely
00:14:39.320 in our public health exercise.
00:14:41.640 We've seen, for instance,
00:14:42.680 that the...
00:14:43.700 And even I'm talking about objective facts,
00:14:46.720 facts that we understood pretty well.
00:14:48.620 For instance,
00:14:49.140 we knew that the modeling was not reliable.
00:14:51.720 The modeling was consistently overly aggressive.
00:14:55.040 They would meet some of the metrics,
00:14:56.860 like cases,
00:14:57.780 but we understood very early
00:14:59.120 that the factor by which
00:15:01.300 you have to multiply
00:15:02.680 all the categories we're interested in,
00:15:04.920 like hospitalizations or deaths,
00:15:06.200 was constantly overstated.
00:15:09.300 But despite that,
00:15:11.460 even though time and time again
00:15:13.260 the modelers were wrong,
00:15:15.000 the government continued to...
00:15:18.200 This pervasive fear,
00:15:20.220 this belief that we have to continue
00:15:23.500 down this very aggressive path of mitigation
00:15:26.000 that, of course, resulted in a catastrophe.
00:15:29.160 Well, in a catastrophe that hasn't ended yet
00:15:31.680 because the fact that we disrupted supply chains,
00:15:34.720 we're still going to pay for that.
00:15:36.060 And I was thinking the other day too,
00:15:37.880 you know,
00:15:38.760 because we locked everything down
00:15:41.800 around the whole world,
00:15:42.960 that also meant that political leaders
00:15:44.740 didn't get to meet face-to-face.
00:15:47.000 And so in some real sense,
00:15:49.220 Putin, for example,
00:15:50.320 was taken out of the face-to-face discussions
00:15:53.100 that might have also otherwise occurred
00:15:55.140 for a period of a couple of years.
00:15:56.740 And God only knows what that did
00:15:58.840 to savage Russia-Western relationships.
00:16:01.900 So the consequences of this lockdown
00:16:03.880 have not by any stretch of the imagination
00:16:05.980 come to an end yet.
00:16:07.700 Now, you got tossed out
00:16:10.500 of the Doug Ford Conservative Provincial Caucus
00:16:14.960 because of your vociferous objection
00:16:18.060 to the lockdown.
00:16:19.160 So let's go into that for a bit.
00:16:22.580 What happened there
00:16:23.520 and why did it come to blows,
00:16:27.640 so to speak?
00:16:28.600 And what's been the consequence
00:16:31.620 of that for you?
00:16:33.100 And what should Canadians think about that?
00:16:37.560 I started feeling a lot more optimistic
00:16:39.720 about the risk of COVID early in May 2020.
00:16:45.200 Public health came in and said,
00:16:46.480 look, first of all,
00:16:47.340 80%, almost 80% of everyone
00:16:48.940 that regretfully passed away
00:16:50.180 were in long-term care homes
00:16:51.400 in congregate settings.
00:16:52.740 I said, OK, that's, of course, tragic.
00:16:54.960 So let's focus our resources
00:16:56.520 on long-term care
00:16:57.400 into infection protocol and control
00:16:59.240 instead of locking down healthy people
00:17:01.420 and making them sick.
00:17:03.040 The second element we learned very early
00:17:05.260 is that the virus was considerably
00:17:07.860 more transmissible than we thought.
00:17:10.220 And that was actually good news
00:17:11.700 because that meant that there was,
00:17:14.020 the infection rate was considerably higher
00:17:15.720 than previously thought.
00:17:17.220 And that means that the metrics
00:17:18.500 that we're worried about,
00:17:19.880 like hospitalizations,
00:17:21.240 like deaths, like mortality,
00:17:22.840 is significantly lower.
00:17:25.040 And, of course, I thought that we're going
00:17:27.840 to potentially pivot our response
00:17:29.940 because there's no question
00:17:31.080 that locking down healthy people,
00:17:33.240 delaying their surgeries,
00:17:34.840 canceling cancer screenings,
00:17:37.040 and, of course, locking down the economy
00:17:38.660 is probably not going to be good
00:17:39.780 for our health and mental health.
00:17:41.500 And as time went on in 2020,
00:17:43.320 I started hearing more and more
00:17:46.040 of some of those unintended consequences
00:17:48.500 of lockdown.
00:17:49.700 And so I had difficulty
00:17:51.580 towards the end of 2020
00:17:53.740 to continue to not be able
00:17:57.680 to speak out on something
00:17:59.040 that I felt defined our generation.
00:18:01.840 It is well known
00:18:03.380 that I worked very hard
00:18:04.960 within my government
00:18:06.180 to try and steer them
00:18:07.720 into a different course.
00:18:09.100 But in early January,
00:18:10.620 I realized that we're probably
00:18:12.660 not going to turn.
00:18:13.600 And all I wanted to do, Jordan,
00:18:14.940 is to start a conversation
00:18:15.900 because there was no conversation.
00:18:18.520 People were afraid
00:18:19.540 to tell their best friend
00:18:20.800 that their kid is depressed
00:18:22.680 because that would render you
00:18:24.260 a grandma killer of some sort.
00:18:26.180 And I was hoping that
00:18:27.620 by issuing this public letter,
00:18:29.520 a conversation would start,
00:18:31.180 would ensue.
00:18:31.660 And in fact, thankfully,
00:18:32.820 it started.
00:18:33.960 What I was also hoping for
00:18:35.160 is that a lot more leaders
00:18:37.020 would follow,
00:18:37.920 a lot more business leaders,
00:18:39.200 political leaders,
00:18:40.100 union leaders,
00:18:40.980 trade leaders, whoever,
00:18:42.300 academic leaders.
00:18:43.560 But unfortunately,
00:18:44.240 that did not happen much
00:18:45.220 because of this culture of fear
00:18:46.920 that has gagged everyone
00:18:48.660 into silence.
00:18:50.600 And so since then,
00:18:51.940 I've been asked to leave caucus.
00:18:54.160 I lost my chairmanship
00:18:55.000 of the Justice Committee,
00:18:56.380 but I'm at peace
00:18:58.500 with my decision.
00:18:59.960 And I'm grateful
00:19:01.200 that I've been able
00:19:01.800 to give a voice
00:19:02.360 to many Canadians.
00:19:04.600 Yeah, well, I mean,
00:19:05.940 Ford obviously piloted Ontario
00:19:09.440 well enough to,
00:19:11.400 in the minds of the constituents,
00:19:12.780 to win an overwhelming majority
00:19:16.040 in the last election.
00:19:17.760 And so he steered a course
00:19:21.300 that seemed to be in accord
00:19:23.100 with the desires of the people.
00:19:25.040 Were you surprised?
00:19:27.700 Now, I have been personally unhappy,
00:19:30.600 at least to some degree,
00:19:32.180 with the degree to which Mr. Ford
00:19:34.480 has cozied up to the federal liberals
00:19:37.320 and also appalled
00:19:39.120 at some of the legislation,
00:19:40.760 for example,
00:19:41.300 that his Minister of Education
00:19:42.640 has proposed.
00:19:43.900 I think that was Bill C-67,
00:19:45.660 which is an absolutely appalling
00:19:47.180 piece of legislation,
00:19:48.420 likely to die in ignominy
00:19:50.940 in any case.
00:19:51.940 But that's not precisely the point.
00:19:54.380 Were you,
00:19:55.340 what was your personal experience like
00:19:57.560 trying to make the case
00:19:59.980 that you made
00:20:00.700 and then running into opposition
00:20:02.420 from your former compatriots?
00:20:05.440 It's interesting to note that,
00:20:07.420 and I, of course,
00:20:08.200 will not reveal any names
00:20:09.940 or details,
00:20:11.040 and I will not breach confidentiality
00:20:13.360 of my former caucus,
00:20:14.220 but I will say that
00:20:15.600 it's well known
00:20:16.200 that many have,
00:20:17.740 in fact,
00:20:18.280 shared my view,
00:20:20.080 including,
00:20:21.200 at times,
00:20:22.520 even the Premier himself.
00:20:24.360 And it's regretful.
00:20:26.000 And it's,
00:20:26.520 I found it incredibly regretful
00:20:28.000 that we didn't have the courage,
00:20:30.280 we didn't have the political courage
00:20:31.960 to say,
00:20:33.340 enough,
00:20:34.320 we have to reassess our response
00:20:36.320 because we're clearly harming people.
00:20:38.400 Right?
00:20:38.740 If this was tax policy
00:20:40.480 or if we were dealing with,
00:20:42.900 you know,
00:20:43.340 highway construction
00:20:44.240 and fine,
00:20:46.380 I understand why
00:20:47.600 some people might be
00:20:48.700 more inclined to do politics
00:20:50.000 than others.
00:20:50.960 But when it comes to human life,
00:20:53.220 and that's what I try to stress
00:20:54.840 in this exercise,
00:20:56.260 subsequent to my expulsion
00:20:58.940 from the Conservative caucus,
00:21:00.740 I've been subjected to
00:21:02.620 a lot of criticism,
00:21:06.220 I would say,
00:21:07.020 pointed lightly,
00:21:08.400 by our opposition,
00:21:09.920 by media and others.
00:21:12.300 But,
00:21:13.380 and somehow,
00:21:14.340 there is this dispersion
00:21:16.040 where people try to suggest
00:21:17.380 that you don't care about life
00:21:18.660 or you want to compromise life.
00:21:20.800 But I think it's precisely the opposite.
00:21:23.480 It was an intent to save lives.
00:21:25.280 And in fact,
00:21:25.600 I think that this entire exercise
00:21:27.140 of the last couple of years
00:21:28.200 dehumanized
00:21:29.660 so many people around the world.
00:21:32.780 In fact,
00:21:33.820 as we try to convey
00:21:35.340 this collective sense,
00:21:37.580 goal of safetyism,
00:21:39.040 what we've in fact done
00:21:40.580 is the opposite,
00:21:41.600 is we've compromised human life,
00:21:43.560 we've compromised human ingenuity,
00:21:45.540 we've compromised,
00:21:46.620 we've regressed our children considerably.
00:21:49.560 And so the goal was
00:21:51.460 to take a holistic view.
00:21:54.260 And so that's what I'm upset
00:21:55.740 by my friends.
00:21:57.700 Given recent SCOTUS wins,
00:21:59.480 it feels like the pendulum
00:22:00.460 may be swinging back
00:22:01.540 to a time
00:22:02.020 when the nuclear family
00:22:03.060 was situated
00:22:03.740 at the center of American life,
00:22:05.480 where real conversation,
00:22:06.820 learning,
00:22:07.160 and growth
00:22:07.500 began at home.
00:22:08.620 President Ronald Reagan
00:22:09.500 said in his farewell address
00:22:10.680 that all great change in America
00:22:12.320 begins around the dinner table.
00:22:14.240 Well,
00:22:14.620 all great meals in America
00:22:15.960 begin with Good Ranchers.
00:22:17.980 Good Ranchers cares deeply
00:22:19.300 about providing families
00:22:20.400 with steakhouse-quality beef,
00:22:22.160 chicken,
00:22:22.380 and seafood meat
00:22:23.260 at a reasonable price.
00:22:24.720 Their mission
00:22:25.120 is to bring people to the table,
00:22:26.780 making those shared moments
00:22:27.840 with your loved ones
00:22:28.580 easy,
00:22:29.240 accessible,
00:22:29.940 and delicious.
00:22:31.220 Good Ranchers ships
00:22:31.960 100% American meat,
00:22:33.640 born,
00:22:34.100 raised,
00:22:34.380 and harvested in the U.S.,
00:22:35.700 right to your door.
00:22:36.940 Plus,
00:22:37.300 when you subscribe,
00:22:38.200 your price is locked in
00:22:39.260 for the life of your subscription.
00:22:41.020 Great food creates
00:22:41.980 great conversation,
00:22:43.200 and great conversation
00:22:44.140 makes great change.
00:22:45.380 So start bringing people
00:22:46.440 back to the table
00:22:47.240 with high-quality
00:22:48.120 American meat.
00:22:49.400 Go to
00:22:49.660 GoodRanchers.com
00:22:50.640 slash Peterson
00:22:51.320 to get $30 off
00:22:52.540 your first order
00:22:53.200 plus free shipping.
00:22:54.360 That's
00:22:54.540 GoodRanchers.com
00:22:55.620 slash Peterson.
00:22:57.520 So I have it on good authority
00:22:59.520 that a lot of the decision-making
00:23:01.720 around COVID policy,
00:23:04.020 specifically in Ontario,
00:23:05.280 but also at the federal level,
00:23:06.700 was not based on
00:23:07.980 so-called following the science,
00:23:10.120 which is not an easy thing
00:23:11.220 to do in any case,
00:23:12.140 but on
00:23:12.720 continually conducted
00:23:14.680 opinion polls.
00:23:16.080 And that's problematic
00:23:17.220 to me for two reasons.
00:23:18.660 Number one,
00:23:19.940 as a psychologist
00:23:20.900 and a research psychologist,
00:23:23.440 I know perfectly well
00:23:24.980 that asking people questions
00:23:27.140 to find out
00:23:28.080 what they really think
00:23:29.380 is unbelievably difficult.
00:23:31.680 And so
00:23:32.020 the way you
00:23:33.760 formulate the question
00:23:35.400 to a large part
00:23:36.320 determines the response
00:23:38.140 you're going to get.
00:23:38.920 So for example,
00:23:40.000 when Trudeau,
00:23:40.540 here's a good indication,
00:23:42.820 when Trudeau
00:23:43.520 clamped down
00:23:44.400 on the truckers,
00:23:46.180 the polls indicated
00:23:47.100 that most Canadians
00:23:48.160 supported his decision.
00:23:50.160 But at the same time,
00:23:51.140 the polls indicated
00:23:51.920 that his popularity
00:23:52.940 had plummeted.
00:23:54.620 And so what in the world
00:23:55.460 are you supposed to make of that
00:23:56.540 if you're polling?
00:23:57.340 And so
00:23:57.560 if you're a political leader
00:23:59.000 and your guidance
00:24:01.140 is polls,
00:24:02.320 first of all,
00:24:02.880 you're relying on something
00:24:04.120 that's unbelievably unreliable.
00:24:06.780 Short-term sampling
00:24:08.120 of public whim
00:24:09.320 done badly
00:24:10.200 by people
00:24:10.820 who don't have
00:24:11.420 the psychological credibility
00:24:12.800 to answer the questions properly.
00:24:14.360 And then as you said,
00:24:15.840 you have a proclivity
00:24:16.740 to forego your principles.
00:24:18.100 Now,
00:24:18.400 I know that
00:24:19.200 the Doug Ford government
00:24:20.320 as well as
00:24:20.880 the federal liberals
00:24:21.620 was relying on poll data
00:24:23.240 to make their decisions.
00:24:25.220 And so
00:24:25.560 you said
00:24:26.220 even the Premier
00:24:26.900 agreed with you
00:24:27.740 at least in private
00:24:28.980 in relationship
00:24:29.880 to the appalling consequences
00:24:31.860 of the lockdowns
00:24:32.900 and the abdication
00:24:33.880 of political responsibility
00:24:35.100 to health care experts.
00:24:37.200 So
00:24:37.500 why didn't they have
00:24:39.000 the courage
00:24:39.460 of their convictions?
00:24:41.980 Politics.
00:24:43.000 Politics is
00:24:43.760 as I often say.
00:24:45.000 Yeah,
00:24:45.100 but it's stupid.
00:24:46.040 It's stupid politics,
00:24:47.980 right?
00:24:48.240 Because there's no indication
00:24:49.480 that following the polls
00:24:50.660 in that manner
00:24:51.360 actually constitutes
00:24:52.340 a reasonable way forward.
00:24:54.120 So
00:24:54.280 politics is the rot
00:24:55.580 on government.
00:24:57.060 It's the cause
00:24:57.880 of
00:24:58.240 almost everything
00:24:59.680 that's bad with government
00:25:00.520 and I hope that we get
00:25:01.380 to get into that
00:25:02.060 in a moment.
00:25:03.060 But
00:25:03.260 back to opinion polling
00:25:04.700 for a moment.
00:25:05.640 What's important to appreciate
00:25:06.540 is that a lot of that
00:25:07.520 opinion
00:25:08.480 is also shaped
00:25:09.380 by government itself
00:25:10.540 and media.
00:25:11.660 Well,
00:25:11.980 of course.
00:25:12.360 And what we saw
00:25:13.680 during the COVID pandemic
00:25:14.720 was a vicious cycle
00:25:15.760 in that
00:25:16.820 you had public health
00:25:18.260 come out.
00:25:19.000 Of course,
00:25:19.320 the media would
00:25:19.960 pick up on that
00:25:20.800 and would spread fear.
00:25:22.520 The public would react
00:25:24.020 with fear.
00:25:25.240 The government
00:25:25.660 would feel that
00:25:26.920 intuitively
00:25:27.440 and would act
00:25:28.800 in response
00:25:29.420 to that fear
00:25:30.000 even when it was
00:25:31.240 completely unwarranted
00:25:32.520 and it was
00:25:34.260 objectively unwarranted.
00:25:36.140 And then
00:25:36.500 in order to justify
00:25:37.740 its own decisions
00:25:38.680 subsequent to the fact,
00:25:40.140 the government
00:25:40.640 would add more fear
00:25:41.940 to justify its action.
00:25:45.100 And so
00:25:45.340 on it went.
00:25:46.600 You know,
00:25:46.900 this is exactly
00:25:48.080 why we don't have
00:25:49.420 a direct democracy.
00:25:51.120 We have a parliamentary democracy
00:25:52.500 so there's a bit
00:25:53.440 of a space
00:25:54.800 put in
00:25:55.340 between government policy
00:25:56.600 and public feedback
00:25:57.940 and response
00:25:58.680 because
00:25:58.980 I think
00:25:59.820 the reliance
00:26:01.700 on opinion polls
00:26:02.720 as a replacement
00:26:03.540 for parliament
00:26:04.260 does inevitably,
00:26:05.680 especially in social media
00:26:07.040 mediated times
00:26:08.080 with the acceleration
00:26:08.880 of communication.
00:26:09.800 It does inevitably
00:26:11.180 produce these kinds
00:26:12.400 of vicious circle,
00:26:14.080 vicious cycle
00:26:14.780 feedback loops
00:26:15.600 that you just described.
00:26:17.360 When you don't have
00:26:18.980 objective media
00:26:20.180 questioning
00:26:21.440 the government,
00:26:22.960 right,
00:26:23.540 because the only thing
00:26:24.440 we've heard
00:26:24.980 over the course
00:26:25.860 of this pandemic
00:26:26.520 is
00:26:26.920 are you doing enough?
00:26:28.700 Are you doing it
00:26:29.460 fast enough?
00:26:30.140 Are you saving enough lines?
00:26:31.780 Why haven't you acted
00:26:32.720 sooner?
00:26:33.180 And so on and so forth.
00:26:34.120 Instead of asking
00:26:35.140 is any of this effective?
00:26:37.240 Is any of this
00:26:38.100 making sense?
00:26:39.340 Are you factoring in
00:26:40.560 the collateral harm
00:26:41.920 of what you're doing?
00:26:42.960 That was never asked.
00:26:44.520 Which is the job.
00:26:45.660 That's the fundamental job
00:26:46.980 of politicians
00:26:47.680 right there
00:26:48.380 because they abdicated
00:26:49.840 their responsibility
00:26:50.760 to these public health experts
00:26:52.500 and decided that
00:26:53.980 this narrow target,
00:26:56.160 the narrow targets
00:26:56.940 that you described
00:26:57.860 trumped every other
00:26:59.720 political and economic
00:27:01.040 consideration
00:27:01.660 in the short,
00:27:02.840 medium and long term.
00:27:04.020 There's an absolute
00:27:05.000 abdication of political
00:27:06.300 and legislative responsibility
00:27:07.800 in the face of this,
00:27:09.860 well,
00:27:10.240 what turned out to be
00:27:11.080 not so overwhelming threat
00:27:12.600 and a collapse
00:27:13.440 of our institutions
00:27:14.300 as a consequence.
00:27:15.740 The abdication
00:27:17.140 of responsibility
00:27:17.820 was to their constituents,
00:27:19.460 was to the people
00:27:20.100 that put them in office
00:27:21.620 and I've said before,
00:27:23.580 anyone with a working cell phone
00:27:25.000 would have understood
00:27:26.620 the mental health catastrophe,
00:27:29.300 of course,
00:27:29.600 the economic catastrophe,
00:27:31.060 the collapse of healthcare.
00:27:32.060 I think one of the greatest
00:27:33.660 legacies of our pandemic response
00:27:35.860 is going to be
00:27:36.780 the collapse of healthcare
00:27:38.160 in Canada
00:27:38.480 and we're seeing that
00:27:39.500 to some extent
00:27:40.040 around the world.
00:27:41.480 We have a trauma,
00:27:43.240 we have a post-trauma
00:27:44.160 in the workforce
00:27:44.880 and that includes healthcare.
00:27:47.280 We see that
00:27:48.720 we have a lot of conditions
00:27:50.260 that went undiagnosed
00:27:51.520 that are now catching up with us.
00:27:53.600 We're diagnosing cancer
00:27:54.760 a lot later
00:27:55.320 than we should be.
00:27:56.100 And so what they have done,
00:28:00.540 what the political class
00:28:01.940 has done effectively
00:28:02.540 is they've abdicated
00:28:03.740 their responsibility
00:28:04.340 to their constituents
00:28:05.220 and why did they do that?
00:28:06.580 For politics.
00:28:07.500 They were afraid
00:28:08.440 that they're going
00:28:09.420 to be cancelled
00:28:10.220 by the radical COVID,
00:28:13.540 I call it the COVID mob,
00:28:15.400 that would cancel them
00:28:17.400 on Twitter,
00:28:18.460 that would dehumanize them
00:28:20.480 or say that they don't care
00:28:22.040 about lives.
00:28:22.580 And that's what effectively
00:28:24.360 they try to do to me
00:28:25.360 is a lot of politicians
00:28:27.720 figure that they may be asked
00:28:30.160 to leave their own
00:28:30.720 government caucuses
00:28:31.560 or caucuses
00:28:32.220 if they went against the grain.
00:28:34.180 And therein lies
00:28:34.980 the classical agency conflict
00:28:36.920 of politics
00:28:38.100 in that it's inevitable,
00:28:40.840 regretfully,
00:28:41.720 that politicians continue
00:28:42.860 to put themselves
00:28:44.460 and their offices
00:28:45.800 and their careers
00:28:46.740 and their aspirations
00:28:47.760 ahead of what's right
00:28:49.220 for their constituents
00:28:50.840 and nowhere,
00:28:52.580 it has been true
00:28:53.420 before, I think,
00:28:54.320 to the extent
00:28:54.760 that it has been
00:28:55.320 with our COVID response.
00:28:59.260 So did this,
00:29:00.680 the fact that you did
00:29:01.780 get mobbed
00:29:02.680 and excluded,
00:29:04.160 let's say,
00:29:05.300 did that shake your faith
00:29:06.700 in, well,
00:29:08.380 you said it didn't shake
00:29:10.360 your faith
00:29:10.840 in what you had to say.
00:29:12.580 What did it do
00:29:13.500 to your opinions
00:29:14.440 of your political colleagues
00:29:16.180 and to your sense
00:29:17.940 of the functionality
00:29:18.900 of the political process
00:29:20.240 in general in Canada?
00:29:21.360 Look,
00:29:22.780 thankfully,
00:29:23.220 I've been able
00:29:23.760 to survive,
00:29:24.820 as I call it,
00:29:26.000 the COVID mob
00:29:26.700 and I've continued
00:29:27.760 to work ever since
00:29:29.160 articulating sensible,
00:29:31.580 moderate propositions
00:29:32.500 that if people want
00:29:33.940 to, for instance,
00:29:34.480 avail themselves
00:29:35.040 of the benefit
00:29:36.140 that the vaccine offers,
00:29:37.300 then they're certainly
00:29:38.280 welcome to do so.
00:29:39.560 But that doesn't mean
00:29:40.620 that they should force
00:29:41.680 anyone else
00:29:42.360 to do anything
00:29:43.120 that they don't want to do.
00:29:44.600 We've just never done that
00:29:45.480 before as Western civilization.
00:29:46.540 You can acknowledge
00:29:47.880 that the virus
00:29:48.680 can be very,
00:29:50.140 very risky
00:29:50.540 to certain demographics,
00:29:51.540 but you can also
00:29:52.740 be reasonable and say,
00:29:53.760 look, it's not about
00:29:54.400 how many people get COVID,
00:29:55.700 it's about who gets COVID
00:29:56.860 because we all have
00:29:58.220 different risk predispositions.
00:29:59.960 And so that's what's missing
00:30:01.520 is that we could have
00:30:03.240 overcome this
00:30:04.300 public health emergency
00:30:05.340 probably in a much better way
00:30:07.100 if we just allowed
00:30:08.040 for some sensible conversation,
00:30:10.020 which we haven't.
00:30:11.260 And so I'm grateful
00:30:12.080 for the fact
00:30:12.520 that I've been able
00:30:13.020 to continue to speak
00:30:13.900 on behalf of millions
00:30:14.720 of Canadians
00:30:15.220 and that I think
00:30:16.940 in part has brought me
00:30:18.000 to today
00:30:18.940 in that I feel
00:30:20.580 that we need
00:30:21.500 to have the courage
00:30:22.480 as a Conservative Party
00:30:23.580 to say what we believe
00:30:26.700 and do what we believe
00:30:27.820 is right.
00:30:29.040 And that...
00:30:29.780 How do you think...
00:30:30.760 How do you think...
00:30:31.760 Okay, so the Conservatives
00:30:33.000 I've talked to in Canada
00:30:34.160 over the last 10 years,
00:30:35.780 they do have this
00:30:37.180 terror of the mob.
00:30:39.580 You know, each of them
00:30:40.520 privately is afraid
00:30:42.980 that they'll be targeted
00:30:45.560 as you were
00:30:46.580 by the woke mob
00:30:48.700 and taken out
00:30:49.800 and that they'll be abandoned
00:30:51.140 by their colleagues
00:30:51.940 in doing so.
00:30:52.880 And that has put Conservatives...
00:30:54.660 To say it's put them
00:30:55.460 on the defensive
00:30:56.140 is to say almost nothing.
00:30:57.840 It's put them unbelievably
00:30:59.100 on the defensive.
00:31:00.480 Why in the world
00:31:01.380 did they decide...
00:31:02.580 First of all,
00:31:03.680 how do you think
00:31:04.460 Conservatives might be able
00:31:05.660 to protect themselves
00:31:06.500 against that?
00:31:07.260 And second,
00:31:08.360 why in the world
00:31:09.460 did Ford and his people
00:31:10.780 think that the right approach
00:31:11.920 to you was to
00:31:13.820 dispense with you
00:31:15.320 in some sense?
00:31:16.080 Why couldn't
00:31:16.700 your conversation...
00:31:18.820 Your objections
00:31:19.600 be part of the
00:31:20.400 ongoing conversation?
00:31:21.460 Why did they have to
00:31:22.180 take such a drastic move?
00:31:25.220 Look, to Conservatives
00:31:26.680 that fear
00:31:27.600 speaking their minds,
00:31:28.680 they need to do
00:31:29.260 some self-reflection
00:31:30.060 and determine
00:31:31.260 why they got
00:31:32.040 into this business.
00:31:33.600 Right?
00:31:33.840 And what is it
00:31:34.860 that differentiated us
00:31:35.960 traditionally
00:31:36.480 from the Liberal Party
00:31:37.640 is that we stuck
00:31:38.920 to the principle
00:31:39.540 of principles.
00:31:40.220 We never sought
00:31:42.000 popularity.
00:31:43.080 We never sought
00:31:44.020 to be populist
00:31:46.020 and appeal
00:31:47.060 to the most
00:31:47.540 common denominator.
00:31:49.000 Instead,
00:31:49.580 we sought
00:31:50.020 to implement
00:31:50.820 sensible policy.
00:31:52.320 And so,
00:31:52.820 if the goal
00:31:53.420 is to
00:31:54.000 say what's popular
00:31:55.100 and win elections,
00:31:57.040 then we lost
00:31:58.820 the heart
00:31:59.160 and soul
00:31:59.480 of the Conservative Party.
00:32:00.300 We do not deserve...
00:32:01.540 We have not earned
00:32:02.980 the vote of Canadians.
00:32:05.040 So,
00:32:05.180 they need to think
00:32:06.040 about why they got
00:32:06.740 into this business
00:32:07.480 and do some
00:32:08.860 self-reflection.
00:32:09.680 And the second
00:32:10.100 element of that
00:32:10.740 is that those
00:32:11.760 that are determined
00:32:13.300 to do right
00:32:14.500 by their constituents
00:32:15.280 and to do right
00:32:16.280 by Canadians,
00:32:17.520 leadership needs
00:32:18.260 to give them cover.
00:32:19.840 They need to know
00:32:20.740 that they
00:32:22.140 are free
00:32:23.980 to speak their mind
00:32:25.340 and do the right thing
00:32:26.620 without suffering
00:32:28.500 reprisal.
00:32:30.420 And so,
00:32:31.080 you can't restore
00:32:31.900 democracy in our country
00:32:32.960 without restoring
00:32:33.660 parliamentary democracy
00:32:34.660 as well.
00:32:35.400 It's something
00:32:35.800 that I'm very
00:32:36.260 passionate about.
00:32:38.120 Like I often say,
00:32:39.080 look,
00:32:39.260 I don't work
00:32:39.980 for the boss.
00:32:40.520 I work for constituents
00:32:41.220 and that's what I'll expect
00:32:42.380 should I win
00:32:43.840 the leadership
00:32:44.240 of my caucus as well.
00:32:45.860 I'm not going
00:32:46.620 to penalize an MP
00:32:47.580 for introducing legislation.
00:32:48.820 That's their
00:32:49.100 parliamentary right
00:32:49.900 even if I'll vote
00:32:50.860 against it.
00:32:51.820 I'm not going to
00:32:52.820 punish them
00:32:54.140 for disagreeing
00:32:54.860 with me
00:32:55.160 because they're
00:32:56.480 not expected
00:32:57.220 to parody me.
00:32:58.100 They're expected
00:32:58.540 to serve the people
00:32:59.260 that elected them.
00:33:01.060 Otherwise,
00:33:01.460 what do you even
00:33:01.980 need parliament for?
00:33:03.040 They could just vote
00:33:03.580 by proxy
00:33:04.180 or just
00:33:05.120 all you as a leader.
00:33:06.040 Interestingly,
00:33:06.460 we don't need
00:33:07.080 parliament,
00:33:07.780 right?
00:33:08.060 I mean,
00:33:08.380 our federal government
00:33:09.600 is doing everything
00:33:10.360 it possibly can
00:33:11.240 to make parliament
00:33:12.200 merely an unnecessary
00:33:14.920 impediment
00:33:15.920 to their woke
00:33:17.560 utopian future.
00:33:19.420 And we're headed
00:33:20.280 down that road
00:33:20.900 very rapidly.
00:33:21.980 Well,
00:33:22.160 that is a disaster.
00:33:23.800 And so
00:33:25.180 parliamentary democracy,
00:33:26.640 it's important
00:33:27.520 to understand
00:33:28.220 that it spills
00:33:28.760 to other institutions,
00:33:30.500 right?
00:33:30.740 You have a lot
00:33:31.340 of close cooperation
00:33:32.000 with industry
00:33:32.840 and you have
00:33:33.760 close corporations
00:33:34.960 with regulators.
00:33:36.320 And so
00:33:36.620 if the people
00:33:38.000 around start
00:33:39.040 sensing
00:33:39.900 that there is
00:33:40.800 no more dissent
00:33:41.820 that is allowed,
00:33:43.300 and that's in fact
00:33:44.000 what in part
00:33:44.480 I think contributed
00:33:45.120 very much
00:33:45.660 to the prevailing
00:33:47.440 COVID response
00:33:48.640 in that
00:33:49.120 people in positions
00:33:50.480 to disagree
00:33:51.220 and in fact
00:33:52.760 affect
00:33:53.340 a different outcome
00:33:54.620 like the colleges
00:33:55.680 of physicians,
00:33:56.480 like the colleges
00:33:57.040 of nurses,
00:33:57.580 like the teachers
00:33:59.060 just decided
00:33:59.760 that no,
00:34:00.440 we're going
00:34:01.160 to stick
00:34:02.200 to the messaging
00:34:03.220 and we're not
00:34:04.400 going to allow
00:34:05.160 for any dissent.
00:34:06.160 I'm of the view
00:34:06.860 that if regulated
00:34:08.320 health professionals
00:34:09.260 were able
00:34:10.300 to freely articulate
00:34:11.760 their view
00:34:12.460 and concerns
00:34:12.960 over the last
00:34:13.380 couple of years,
00:34:14.180 we would have been
00:34:14.940 out of this mess
00:34:15.580 a while ago.
00:34:16.280 That's gone
00:34:16.940 completely out
00:34:18.680 the window.
00:34:19.820 So what's happened
00:34:20.600 among the,
00:34:21.620 for healthcare
00:34:22.500 professionals,
00:34:23.540 speaking as one,
00:34:25.020 is that the colleges
00:34:26.560 have become weaponized
00:34:28.040 and so that anyone
00:34:28.880 who has a dissenting
00:34:30.040 voice of any sort
00:34:31.560 medically,
00:34:32.600 on the nursing front,
00:34:33.860 social workers,
00:34:34.720 psychologists,
00:34:35.820 if they dare voice
00:34:37.120 a dissenting opinion,
00:34:38.200 the college will come
00:34:38.880 down on them hard
00:34:39.740 with at,
00:34:40.920 so the college
00:34:41.540 is the professional
00:34:42.280 body that regulates
00:34:43.360 independently in some
00:34:45.120 sense of the government,
00:34:46.060 regulates these professions.
00:34:47.840 Anyone in the world
00:34:48.960 can take out a complaint
00:34:50.100 against me,
00:34:50.980 for example,
00:34:51.600 as a psychologist
00:34:52.380 for any reason
00:34:53.320 whatsoever
00:34:54.060 because of something
00:34:54.860 I said
00:34:55.420 and the college
00:34:56.300 will launch
00:34:56.800 an investigation
00:34:57.420 that tangles me up
00:34:58.640 in six months worth
00:34:59.620 of legal trouble
00:35:00.360 and substantive expense.
00:35:02.620 We have.
00:35:03.160 And I've talked
00:35:03.900 to many physicians
00:35:04.880 who are absolutely
00:35:06.340 unwilling to say
00:35:07.240 what they think
00:35:07.880 about health,
00:35:08.800 the health of their
00:35:09.460 patients and about
00:35:10.380 public health in general
00:35:11.320 because they are
00:35:12.340 petrified that the college
00:35:13.700 will make their life
00:35:14.940 a living hell
00:35:15.640 and destroy their
00:35:16.760 enterprise.
00:35:18.080 I've had multiple
00:35:19.660 conversations with
00:35:20.440 regulated health
00:35:21.060 professionals that
00:35:21.920 wanted to speak out
00:35:23.580 but did not have
00:35:24.540 courage to do so
00:35:26.000 because they faced
00:35:26.920 those professional
00:35:28.120 repercussions.
00:35:28.740 But it's important
00:35:29.620 in this discussion
00:35:30.340 not to lose sight
00:35:31.160 of the fact that
00:35:31.880 discussion and
00:35:33.720 expression is not
00:35:35.580 just important
00:35:36.160 for democracy.
00:35:37.180 It's also very
00:35:37.920 important for public
00:35:38.700 policy, right?
00:35:40.100 How can we make
00:35:41.420 informed decisions
00:35:43.640 when our field
00:35:45.920 of opinions
00:35:46.920 is limited?
00:35:48.080 Don't you want
00:35:48.980 a greater baseline
00:35:50.600 of opinions
00:35:51.640 so you can
00:35:52.520 consider,
00:35:53.660 so you can
00:35:54.100 weigh your
00:35:54.680 options,
00:35:55.880 informed options
00:35:56.940 and then come
00:35:57.940 to some sort
00:35:58.480 of consensus
00:35:59.320 as to what's
00:35:59.920 reasonable.
00:36:00.400 But when you
00:36:00.760 have silence,
00:36:03.020 when you don't
00:36:03.920 have opinion,
00:36:04.860 you inevitably
00:36:05.680 have blind spots
00:36:07.040 intentionally or
00:36:08.160 unintentionally.
00:36:09.380 And so it's not
00:36:10.220 just back for
00:36:10.700 democracy,
00:36:11.320 it's terrible
00:36:12.100 for public policy.
00:36:13.800 Right, right.
00:36:14.300 Well, that was
00:36:14.760 also,
00:36:16.020 we need to be
00:36:17.880 reminded,
00:36:18.540 one of the major
00:36:19.700 points of parliament
00:36:20.520 was to flesh
00:36:21.820 out the ideas
00:36:22.980 on a broad,
00:36:25.140 across the broad
00:36:26.020 range of political
00:36:26.840 ideas in as
00:36:28.040 broad a manner
00:36:28.600 as possible
00:36:29.300 to make policy
00:36:30.480 more subtle
00:36:31.200 and nuanced
00:36:31.880 and targeted
00:36:32.600 and appropriate.
00:36:33.860 It's part of
00:36:34.780 the process
00:36:35.300 of thinking.
00:36:36.740 And it's true
00:36:37.300 not just for
00:36:37.880 politics,
00:36:38.680 it's true for
00:36:39.800 business,
00:36:41.140 if you're coaching
00:36:42.060 a sports team,
00:36:43.080 it's true for
00:36:43.620 academia,
00:36:45.700 right,
00:36:46.760 and any good
00:36:47.320 manager will tell
00:36:48.120 you that the
00:36:49.300 best thing they
00:36:49.800 can do for
00:36:50.180 their business
00:36:50.540 is probably
00:36:51.000 to surround
00:36:51.640 themselves with
00:36:52.460 folks that
00:36:52.960 might disagree
00:36:53.460 with them
00:36:53.900 from time
00:36:54.640 to time.
00:36:56.000 And so I
00:36:56.620 don't know why
00:36:57.080 we resent that
00:36:57.880 in government,
00:36:59.320 this uniformity
00:37:00.520 of message.
00:37:02.240 Well,
00:37:02.600 Trudeau told us
00:37:03.960 why when he
00:37:04.560 told us that
00:37:05.120 he admired the
00:37:05.760 Chinese Communist
00:37:06.540 Party for their
00:37:07.320 efficiency and
00:37:08.100 decision-making
00:37:08.780 capacity in
00:37:09.980 relationship to
00:37:10.820 such things as
00:37:11.520 environmental policy.
00:37:13.160 Why bother with
00:37:14.120 all that messy
00:37:15.100 process of
00:37:16.080 consultation and
00:37:17.040 thought when
00:37:17.900 you already
00:37:18.380 have the
00:37:18.900 answers handed
00:37:19.620 down on high
00:37:20.600 and all you
00:37:21.320 need to do is
00:37:21.900 implement them as
00:37:22.680 quickly as
00:37:23.260 possible.
00:37:24.640 It's interesting
00:37:25.140 because that
00:37:26.120 moment, I think,
00:37:27.460 defined him very
00:37:28.320 much and we're
00:37:29.560 seeing that
00:37:30.160 hubris, that
00:37:31.900 arrogance, almost
00:37:34.360 dare I say,
00:37:36.400 thuggish approach
00:37:37.700 to others that
00:37:40.380 we're seeing
00:37:40.780 displayed from
00:37:41.320 the Prime
00:37:42.220 Minister, which
00:37:43.160 is why he's
00:37:43.880 now...
00:37:44.200 I don't know
00:37:45.900 if Canadians
00:37:46.460 have any idea
00:37:47.440 at all what
00:37:48.680 a devastating
00:37:49.540 hit the
00:37:50.620 international
00:37:51.160 reputation of
00:37:52.060 our country
00:37:52.540 has taken.
00:37:53.860 And so all
00:37:54.580 of the Eastern
00:37:55.180 Europeans, I
00:37:55.840 met a lot of
00:37:56.400 Eastern European
00:37:57.040 politicians in
00:37:57.980 my last tour
00:37:58.540 through Eastern
00:37:59.140 Europe, and
00:38:00.020 they are utterly
00:38:01.080 appalled by what's
00:38:02.200 happened in
00:38:02.680 Canada.
00:38:03.400 And then in
00:38:04.460 the United
00:38:04.800 States, even
00:38:06.560 among the
00:38:07.040 Democrats in
00:38:07.900 the United
00:38:08.200 States, the
00:38:09.440 fact that
00:38:09.960 Trudeau dared
00:38:10.820 to suggest
00:38:11.820 that American
00:38:13.320 Republicans
00:38:14.280 financed what
00:38:15.980 was essentially
00:38:16.780 an insurrection
00:38:17.560 attempt on
00:38:18.360 Canada's capital
00:38:19.320 is something so
00:38:20.860 jaw-dropping,
00:38:21.860 like I said,
00:38:22.440 even to the
00:38:22.920 leftists in the
00:38:23.800 US, the liberals
00:38:24.580 and the leftists,
00:38:25.520 that its
00:38:27.220 appalling and
00:38:28.600 absurd nature
00:38:29.280 can hardly be
00:38:30.100 overstated.
00:38:31.260 And then I'm
00:38:31.700 thinking too,
00:38:32.560 from a strategic
00:38:33.520 perspective,
00:38:34.220 although I don't
00:38:34.760 think he ever
00:38:35.260 does think
00:38:35.760 strategically,
00:38:36.960 it's obvious
00:38:37.720 to anyone with
00:38:38.800 eyes, that the
00:38:39.880 Democrats are
00:38:40.520 going to get
00:38:40.980 absolutely
00:38:41.720 lambasted in
00:38:42.880 November.
00:38:44.120 And that means
00:38:44.700 that, and then
00:38:45.800 probably in the
00:38:47.180 next presidential
00:38:47.860 election as well.
00:38:48.960 And so, in all
00:38:49.800 likelihood, Canada
00:38:50.700 is facing a
00:38:52.200 conservative-slash-
00:38:53.460 Republican-dominated
00:38:54.720 monolith in the
00:38:56.740 United States on
00:38:57.580 the governmental
00:38:58.020 front for the
00:38:58.800 next four or five
00:38:59.800 years after Biden
00:39:01.140 departs.
00:39:02.480 And that means
00:39:03.240 that Trudeau
00:39:03.900 essentially alienated
00:39:05.460 the biggest ally
00:39:07.040 that Canada has
00:39:08.000 by accusing
00:39:08.760 those very
00:39:09.480 same people
00:39:10.320 of fomenting
00:39:11.500 of all the
00:39:12.200 absurd things
00:39:12.920 anti-democratic
00:39:14.060 insurrection in
00:39:14.920 Canada.
00:39:15.760 It just boggles
00:39:16.920 the mind.
00:39:17.460 And then for him
00:39:18.080 to have frozen
00:39:18.820 bank accounts
00:39:19.520 as part of
00:39:20.020 the Emergency
00:39:20.460 Act, that
00:39:21.640 there isn't,
00:39:22.740 I don't think
00:39:23.240 I talked to
00:39:23.760 anyone in the
00:39:24.580 entire world
00:39:25.360 over the last
00:39:26.140 four months
00:39:26.920 who thought
00:39:27.740 that that was
00:39:28.460 anything
00:39:29.800 approximating,
00:39:30.880 a justifiable,
00:39:32.100 no, let's
00:39:32.660 not say
00:39:32.980 justifiable,
00:39:33.760 anything other
00:39:34.420 than an
00:39:34.860 absolutely
00:39:35.360 catastrophic
00:39:35.960 decision.
00:39:36.500 It shook
00:39:37.260 everyone's
00:39:38.120 faith in
00:39:38.540 the foundations
00:39:39.120 of both
00:39:39.960 Canadian
00:39:40.300 democracy
00:39:40.800 and the
00:39:41.200 Canadian
00:39:41.480 financial
00:39:41.960 system.
00:39:43.120 My first,
00:39:44.460 when I first
00:39:45.040 started practicing
00:39:45.620 law at a law
00:39:46.200 school, I
00:39:46.640 practiced commercial
00:39:47.680 litigation primarily.
00:39:49.200 And so I was
00:39:49.900 on the receiving
00:39:50.420 end of a bank
00:39:51.880 account frozen
00:39:52.420 and I froze a
00:39:53.180 number of
00:39:53.520 accounts.
00:39:54.320 And it's so
00:39:54.940 difficult to do
00:39:55.880 so in Canada
00:39:57.120 or the United
00:39:57.600 States.
00:39:57.980 You have to
00:39:58.420 meet a very
00:39:59.380 high evidentiary
00:40:00.380 threshold to
00:40:01.880 ask the court
00:40:02.800 to freeze a
00:40:03.320 bank account.
00:40:03.760 And here
00:40:04.560 essentially bank
00:40:06.220 accounts of
00:40:06.780 Canadians were
00:40:07.500 frozen on a
00:40:09.040 phone call,
00:40:09.720 right?
00:40:11.520 With no trial,
00:40:13.020 with no trial,
00:40:14.040 no hearing.
00:40:15.040 For something
00:40:15.560 that was made
00:40:16.480 retroactively,
00:40:17.940 arguably unlawful,
00:40:19.000 right?
00:40:19.180 It was
00:40:19.420 retroactively
00:40:20.220 unlawful.
00:40:21.440 And it wasn't
00:40:22.200 just bad for
00:40:23.160 our democracy.
00:40:24.020 It was terrible
00:40:24.660 for investor
00:40:25.980 confidence.
00:40:27.060 We know that
00:40:27.680 there was a
00:40:28.620 very material
00:40:29.260 risk of a run
00:40:30.160 on the bank.
00:40:30.860 And it's
00:40:32.240 not clear
00:40:33.120 that any
00:40:33.820 of that
00:40:34.260 in any
00:40:35.620 circumstance
00:40:36.860 was warranted.
00:40:37.760 But I want
00:40:38.220 to make an
00:40:38.560 interesting point
00:40:39.360 further to
00:40:40.720 you suggesting
00:40:41.680 that there are
00:40:42.080 Eastern European
00:40:42.760 parliamentarians
00:40:43.980 that doubt
00:40:45.460 whether Canada
00:40:46.020 is a democracy
00:40:46.600 anymore.
00:40:47.700 So you're
00:40:48.360 correct.
00:40:49.180 Generally,
00:40:49.840 I think that
00:40:50.500 our reputation
00:40:51.260 around the world
00:40:51.920 has suffered
00:40:52.340 immensely.
00:40:53.440 And so my
00:40:54.040 view on
00:40:54.500 foreign affairs
00:40:55.320 is we don't
00:40:56.680 have the
00:40:57.060 credibility
00:40:57.520 to opine
00:40:58.960 on world
00:40:59.520 events anymore
00:41:00.480 until we
00:41:02.140 fix our
00:41:03.220 democracy at
00:41:03.920 home,
00:41:04.180 which is
00:41:04.500 what my
00:41:05.200 run for
00:41:05.720 the conservative
00:41:06.140 leadership is
00:41:06.740 predicated on.
00:41:07.840 But it's
00:41:08.320 also Eastern
00:41:08.880 European
00:41:09.280 Canadians.
00:41:10.860 Not just
00:41:12.680 them, but
00:41:13.140 I like to
00:41:14.340 joke that if
00:41:14.800 you're from
00:41:15.140 an Eastern
00:41:15.460 European bloc
00:41:16.300 and myself
00:41:17.220 included,
00:41:18.120 you have been
00:41:18.780 very nervous
00:41:19.660 about what
00:41:20.640 you've been
00:41:20.960 seeing for
00:41:21.420 the last
00:41:21.740 couple of
00:41:22.140 years.
00:41:23.740 And that
00:41:24.420 is what
00:41:25.520 really scares
00:41:26.060 me.
00:41:26.600 And I'm
00:41:27.020 often asked,
00:41:28.000 do I see
00:41:28.400 any similarities
00:41:29.100 between what
00:41:30.240 I'm seeing
00:41:30.620 in Canada
00:41:31.100 today and
00:41:32.320 what I saw
00:41:33.060 in the
00:41:33.240 Soviet Union
00:41:33.720 as a kid?
00:41:34.900 And I'd
00:41:35.200 say, you
00:41:36.000 know, jokingly
00:41:36.580 sure, I mean,
00:41:36.940 the lineups to
00:41:37.520 the liquor
00:41:37.800 store, that's
00:41:38.660 always a
00:41:39.560 classic.
00:41:41.360 But beyond
00:41:42.400 that, it's
00:41:42.880 when government
00:41:43.520 engages in
00:41:44.740 remarkable
00:41:45.280 activity that
00:41:46.200 is predicated
00:41:46.880 on a false
00:41:47.560 narrative, when
00:41:49.300 it does
00:41:49.940 extraordinary
00:41:51.460 things, very
00:41:52.280 onerous, high
00:41:53.860 handed, running
00:41:54.520 rough shot over
00:41:55.500 people, knowing
00:41:56.600 that the
00:41:57.780 pretense for
00:41:58.620 such action,
00:41:59.760 the narrative
00:42:00.260 for such
00:42:00.740 is false.
00:42:02.200 That's
00:42:02.640 indicative of
00:42:04.040 those authoritarian
00:42:04.680 regimes.
00:42:05.360 And as I
00:42:05.660 said to you,
00:42:06.120 we knew, we
00:42:07.140 kept treating
00:42:07.840 the virus as
00:42:08.720 if this was
00:42:09.100 still March
00:42:09.660 or April
00:42:10.200 2020, as
00:42:11.240 if we
00:42:11.500 didn't learn
00:42:11.880 anything, we
00:42:12.780 continue this
00:42:13.440 onerous
00:42:13.920 response on
00:42:15.180 a false
00:42:15.800 narrative.
00:42:17.100 And that's
00:42:18.060 what probably
00:42:18.800 scares me most.
00:42:19.580 Because, Jordan,
00:42:20.060 if you can
00:42:20.840 engage in,
00:42:22.000 if government
00:42:22.380 can engage in
00:42:23.000 remarkable action
00:42:23.780 on false
00:42:24.280 narrative, then
00:42:25.500 it can do
00:42:26.440 essentially whatever
00:42:27.180 it wants for
00:42:28.020 as long as
00:42:28.600 it wants.
00:42:29.700 Yeah, well,
00:42:30.000 it's going to
00:42:30.440 do, the
00:42:30.780 Trudeau government
00:42:31.400 is going to
00:42:31.780 do exactly
00:42:32.380 the same
00:42:32.860 thing on
00:42:33.400 the environmental
00:42:33.960 front.
00:42:35.120 And there's
00:42:35.600 absolutely no
00:42:36.340 doubt about
00:42:36.820 that.
00:42:37.220 And they're
00:42:37.800 going to
00:42:38.200 ride this
00:42:38.880 idiot,
00:42:41.000 quasi-communist,
00:42:42.420 anti-capitalist
00:42:43.340 ethos that
00:42:44.020 they're pushing
00:42:44.520 like mad to
00:42:45.720 the ultimate
00:42:46.920 degree.
00:42:47.820 We've already
00:42:48.200 seen, most
00:42:49.440 recently this
00:42:50.180 week, some
00:42:50.880 of the
00:42:51.080 consequences of
00:42:51.860 that unfolding,
00:42:52.660 similar actions,
00:42:53.820 let's say,
00:42:54.180 unfolding in
00:42:54.800 Holland, where
00:42:55.360 the farmers,
00:42:56.440 although they
00:42:57.260 haven't got
00:42:57.780 much media
00:42:59.180 coverage,
00:42:59.880 surprise,
00:43:00.400 surprise, are
00:43:01.240 doing in
00:43:02.220 Holland something
00:43:03.160 or in the
00:43:03.540 Netherlands
00:43:03.820 something very
00:43:04.500 similar to
00:43:05.260 what the
00:43:05.560 truckers did
00:43:06.140 in Canada.
00:43:07.520 So the
00:43:08.140 Dutch government
00:43:08.760 has made it
00:43:09.320 very difficult
00:43:09.780 for farmers
00:43:10.380 to ply their
00:43:11.100 trade because
00:43:11.700 all they're
00:43:12.080 doing after
00:43:12.660 all is growing
00:43:13.360 food and
00:43:13.940 who's going
00:43:14.320 to need
00:43:14.620 that, let's
00:43:15.240 say, come
00:43:15.700 fall when
00:43:16.320 there's a
00:43:16.680 terrible
00:43:16.920 shortage.
00:43:18.680 And so we're
00:43:19.200 seeing the
00:43:19.820 consequences of
00:43:21.380 this top-down
00:43:22.160 heavy authoritarian
00:43:23.440 governance style in
00:43:25.140 Western countries
00:43:25.840 all over the
00:43:26.380 world.
00:43:27.680 You probably
00:43:28.500 already know that
00:43:29.320 there are data
00:43:29.840 brokers out there
00:43:30.620 selling your
00:43:31.300 internet data off
00:43:32.220 to companies who
00:43:32.920 want to serve you
00:43:33.720 a targeted ad.
00:43:34.880 But you might be
00:43:35.580 surprised to learn
00:43:36.280 that they're also
00:43:36.920 selling your
00:43:37.400 information to the
00:43:38.200 Department of
00:43:38.860 Homeland Security
00:43:39.660 and the IRS.
00:43:41.420 Mask your digital
00:43:42.180 footprint and
00:43:42.800 protect yourself
00:43:43.700 with ExpressVPN.
00:43:45.220 One of the
00:43:45.780 easiest ways for
00:43:46.660 brokers to
00:43:47.140 aggregate data and
00:43:48.080 tie it back to
00:43:48.680 you is through
00:43:49.600 your device's
00:43:50.320 unique IP address.
00:43:51.740 But when you're
00:43:52.180 connected to
00:43:52.780 ExpressVPN, your
00:43:54.140 IP address is
00:43:54.980 hidden, making it
00:43:55.800 much more difficult
00:43:56.780 for data brokers to
00:43:57.780 identify you.
00:43:59.160 ExpressVPN also
00:44:00.180 encrypts 100% of
00:44:01.740 network traffic to
00:44:02.740 keep your data safe
00:44:03.820 from hackers on
00:44:04.560 public Wi-Fi.
00:44:05.620 You can download
00:44:06.260 ExpressVPN on all
00:44:07.780 your devices, your
00:44:08.840 phone, your
00:44:09.400 computer, even your
00:44:10.640 home Wi-Fi router.
00:44:12.080 Just tap one
00:44:12.840 button and you're
00:44:13.680 protected.
00:44:14.460 Make sure your
00:44:15.060 online activity and
00:44:16.160 data is protected
00:44:17.100 with the best VPN
00:44:18.320 money can buy.
00:44:19.480 Visit expressvpn.com
00:44:21.260 slash Jordan right
00:44:22.440 now and get
00:44:23.220 three extra months
00:44:24.320 free.
00:44:25.080 That's expressvpn.com
00:44:26.880 slash Jordan.
00:44:28.420 Look, I think to
00:44:30.440 some extent now is
00:44:32.020 an opportunity to
00:44:33.160 have a conversation
00:44:34.100 with Canadians,
00:44:36.120 with I think
00:44:37.380 throughout the
00:44:37.900 world about where
00:44:39.240 the radical left
00:44:40.080 and radical left
00:44:40.960 wing ideology has
00:44:41.860 gotten us over the
00:44:42.580 last couple of
00:44:43.020 years.
00:44:43.880 I am seeing a
00:44:45.060 sense of optimism
00:44:45.840 because I think the
00:44:47.240 media is actually
00:44:47.860 churning on Justin
00:44:48.720 Trudeau.
00:44:49.600 We certainly see a
00:44:50.620 different conversation
00:44:51.280 in the United
00:44:51.740 States and so I
00:44:54.220 have a cause for
00:44:56.320 optimism that we
00:44:57.620 can get around
00:44:59.080 this.
00:44:59.600 But it's important
00:45:01.200 to note as we
00:45:02.520 talk about the
00:45:03.040 environment that I
00:45:04.500 think that what
00:45:05.520 transpired over the
00:45:06.700 last couple of
00:45:07.260 years has actually
00:45:08.880 resulted in
00:45:10.180 opportunity for
00:45:12.160 classical liberals,
00:45:13.560 for traditional
00:45:14.420 small d
00:45:15.440 Democrats to have
00:45:16.640 a conversation about
00:45:17.940 issues that we
00:45:18.580 couldn't speak about
00:45:19.300 before, right?
00:45:20.980 I think the
00:45:22.320 left has
00:45:22.860 overplayed its
00:45:23.840 hand with
00:45:24.700 COVID.
00:45:25.420 They overplayed
00:45:26.200 its hand.
00:45:27.480 And so now I
00:45:29.520 think Canadian
00:45:30.060 conservatives should
00:45:30.900 feel a lot more
00:45:31.720 comfortable to say
00:45:33.200 things that we
00:45:33.960 otherwise would not
00:45:34.980 have dreamt of
00:45:35.540 saying.
00:45:36.580 For instance, we
00:45:37.720 shouldn't be afraid
00:45:38.240 regardless.
00:45:39.120 But look, I think
00:45:40.740 that we should
00:45:41.180 comfortably say that
00:45:42.280 taxing Sally $10
00:45:44.160 at the gas pump
00:45:45.480 whenever she fills
00:45:46.280 up is probably
00:45:47.540 not going to
00:45:48.480 affect climate
00:45:49.200 change, right?
00:45:50.540 It's probably not
00:45:51.520 going to factor
00:45:52.440 into global
00:45:53.000 temperatures.
00:45:54.760 Canada produces
00:45:55.740 less than a
00:45:56.180 percent and a
00:45:56.660 half of all
00:45:57.520 global emissions
00:45:58.200 and it's not
00:45:58.740 clear that even
00:45:59.260 if we were to
00:45:59.860 cut all of
00:46:00.480 them, that it
00:46:01.280 would make a
00:46:01.900 material difference.
00:46:02.900 And so instead
00:46:03.340 we're just punishing
00:46:04.640 Canadians with
00:46:05.820 our environmental
00:46:06.580 policy.
00:46:07.680 That is something
00:46:08.300 that the
00:46:08.560 Conservative Party
00:46:09.160 had difficulty
00:46:09.960 articulating over
00:46:11.700 the last couple
00:46:12.080 of elections.
00:46:12.360 Well, and also
00:46:13.000 Canada could be
00:46:14.020 supplying cheap
00:46:15.720 and reliable
00:46:16.380 energy to the
00:46:17.260 U.S.
00:46:18.380 We could be
00:46:18.840 doing the same
00:46:19.480 for Europe.
00:46:20.160 We could be
00:46:20.520 doing the same
00:46:21.120 for China.
00:46:22.640 And we could
00:46:23.000 be, so we
00:46:23.740 could have our
00:46:24.320 cake on the
00:46:25.120 energy front
00:46:25.720 and eat it
00:46:26.200 too.
00:46:26.500 We could
00:46:26.760 provide clean
00:46:27.620 and carefully
00:46:29.300 regulated fossil
00:46:30.860 fuel energy
00:46:31.700 supplies on a
00:46:33.420 global scale.
00:46:34.480 We could make
00:46:35.160 ourselves much
00:46:35.800 more prosperous
00:46:36.480 than we already
00:46:37.340 are by using
00:46:38.180 our natural
00:46:38.700 resources properly
00:46:39.740 and we could
00:46:40.600 make advances on
00:46:41.560 the environmental
00:46:42.060 front.
00:46:42.500 We know, for
00:46:43.020 example, with
00:46:43.720 the Americans
00:46:44.300 that they cut
00:46:45.500 their carbon
00:46:46.000 output, for
00:46:46.960 those who are
00:46:47.480 concerned about
00:46:48.080 such things,
00:46:48.720 and I don't
00:46:49.180 happen to be
00:46:49.660 one of them
00:46:50.100 particularly,
00:46:50.740 but they cut
00:46:51.240 their carbon
00:46:51.840 output substantially
00:46:52.900 by turning to
00:46:54.020 fracking and
00:46:54.620 natural gas
00:46:55.260 utilization, and
00:46:56.140 no environmentalist
00:46:57.640 preacher saw
00:46:58.360 that coming.
00:46:59.900 I think Canada's
00:47:00.820 natural resources
00:47:01.540 are a blessing
00:47:02.200 and we should
00:47:03.360 not let, and I
00:47:04.200 certainly will
00:47:04.720 not let, oil
00:47:05.860 and gas be
00:47:06.520 cancelled.
00:47:06.980 And it's
00:47:07.200 important not
00:47:07.700 just for our
00:47:08.940 strategic and
00:47:09.900 national interest
00:47:10.420 and our economic
00:47:11.040 bottom line,
00:47:11.480 because that's
00:47:11.800 the only way
00:47:12.200 we're going
00:47:12.500 to get out
00:47:13.180 of our
00:47:13.600 economic hole.
00:47:14.500 But it's also
00:47:15.420 good for the
00:47:15.820 planet because
00:47:16.420 Canadians can
00:47:17.260 produce and
00:47:18.140 derive energy
00:47:18.880 cleaner and
00:47:19.960 safer than any
00:47:21.120 other nation
00:47:22.120 on earth.
00:47:23.600 And so I'm
00:47:24.360 very interested
00:47:24.840 not in just
00:47:25.940 oil and gas,
00:47:26.740 but mining.
00:47:27.660 We have an
00:47:28.280 insatiable
00:47:28.940 appetite around
00:47:29.720 the world for
00:47:30.920 precious metals
00:47:32.140 and minerals.
00:47:33.660 I'd like to
00:47:34.600 look into
00:47:35.420 natural gas as
00:47:36.760 well.
00:47:37.000 I think if
00:47:38.420 you're concerned
00:47:39.380 about the
00:47:39.800 environment,
00:47:40.380 then you
00:47:40.580 should certainly
00:47:41.220 be more
00:47:41.660 interested in
00:47:42.520 transporting oil
00:47:43.500 and gas by
00:47:44.080 pipeline instead
00:47:45.120 of transporting
00:47:45.620 oil by train,
00:47:46.640 which is very,
00:47:47.320 very risky.
00:47:49.000 I think, you
00:47:50.020 know, as we
00:47:50.800 come to think,
00:47:53.720 as we look at
00:47:54.660 this conversation,
00:47:55.900 I think that we
00:47:56.500 can solve almost
00:47:57.660 everything that
00:47:58.380 ails Canada right
00:47:59.380 now with
00:48:00.460 democracy and
00:48:01.600 natural resources.
00:48:03.260 If we just...
00:48:04.020 Yeah, well, you
00:48:04.480 know, it's
00:48:05.540 definitely the
00:48:06.160 case that the
00:48:06.800 conservatives on
00:48:07.640 the environmental
00:48:08.240 front could be
00:48:10.040 taking the moral
00:48:11.340 high ground back
00:48:12.120 from the idiot
00:48:12.760 environmentalists,
00:48:14.180 because these are
00:48:15.080 problems that we
00:48:15.960 can solve, and
00:48:17.180 the pathway to
00:48:17.960 solving them is
00:48:18.560 actually laid
00:48:19.120 forward quite
00:48:19.760 clearly, not
00:48:20.420 least by people
00:48:21.240 like Bjorn
00:48:21.800 Lomborg, who've
00:48:22.760 produced an
00:48:23.680 extremely detailed
00:48:24.780 roadmap, I would
00:48:25.740 say, of how to
00:48:26.360 move forward in
00:48:27.040 the face of the
00:48:27.980 climate changes that
00:48:28.920 we may perhaps be
00:48:30.020 contributing to.
00:48:31.080 We're obviously
00:48:31.780 going to be able to
00:48:32.480 adapt to them, and
00:48:33.200 they're nowhere near
00:48:33.820 as cataclysmic as
00:48:34.900 the doomsayers have
00:48:35.800 prognosticated
00:48:36.960 constantly from
00:48:38.160 Al Gore onward.
00:48:39.700 So we can do this,
00:48:40.960 and we could do it
00:48:41.740 while ensuring that
00:48:43.240 everyone had
00:48:44.140 abundant resources,
00:48:45.660 that the poor
00:48:46.180 didn't have to
00:48:46.920 freeze in the dark,
00:48:48.000 which seems to be
00:48:48.840 the leftist
00:48:49.820 environmental approach
00:48:50.880 to the problem.
00:48:52.040 It's like, who cares
00:48:52.740 about today's poor
00:48:53.740 when we have poor
00:48:55.200 in a hundred years
00:48:55.960 to worry about?
00:48:57.180 You know, a pretty
00:48:57.940 sad bit of
00:48:59.160 moralizing, and
00:49:00.200 obviously, one,
00:49:01.220 this war in Russia
00:49:03.200 with the Ukraine
00:49:04.600 and with the West
00:49:05.480 in general has
00:49:06.220 certainly brought
00:49:06.760 home one of the
00:49:07.920 consequences of
00:49:08.880 what foolish
00:49:10.740 environmentally
00:49:11.640 predicated energy
00:49:12.680 policy.
00:49:13.600 That's another thing
00:49:14.400 that Canada can play
00:49:15.220 a role in
00:49:15.700 ameliorating.
00:49:16.900 We don't just
00:49:17.740 can't do this,
00:49:18.900 we must do this.
00:49:20.700 Yes.
00:49:21.160 You know, half of
00:49:22.240 Canadians, there are a
00:49:23.500 lot of estimates,
00:49:24.320 even before the most
00:49:25.880 recent inflationary
00:49:26.760 crisis, is that almost
00:49:27.620 half of Canadians
00:49:28.620 were $200 away
00:49:30.320 from not being able
00:49:31.800 to meet their
00:49:32.300 monthly obligations.
00:49:33.780 And so now, with
00:49:34.600 the price of gas
00:49:35.520 effectively doubling
00:49:36.420 and the price of
00:49:37.840 everything, and most
00:49:39.340 notably food,
00:49:40.640 significantly increasing,
00:49:42.380 Canadian, many
00:49:43.100 Canadian families
00:49:43.840 are vulnerable.
00:49:45.460 And we cannot
00:49:46.320 continue to have
00:49:48.120 this conversation
00:49:48.740 over and over.
00:49:49.480 We need to get
00:49:49.900 serious and at least
00:49:50.940 telegraph to the
00:49:51.740 market that we're
00:49:52.740 willing to start,
00:49:54.500 and we're determined
00:49:55.400 to develop Canada's
00:49:56.860 natural resources
00:49:57.580 that will immediately
00:49:58.380 give people some
00:50:00.240 relief.
00:50:01.020 And which is why I'm
00:50:02.280 really worried also,
00:50:03.560 Jordan, if I may,
00:50:04.180 very quickly, I'm
00:50:05.400 nervous about what's
00:50:07.420 happening by way of
00:50:09.160 our monetary policy.
00:50:10.700 So much of this
00:50:11.480 inflation is driven
00:50:12.820 by food and energy
00:50:14.540 that I'm not sure
00:50:15.780 that aggressive
00:50:16.920 tightening of our
00:50:18.160 monetary policy is
00:50:19.580 going to make the
00:50:20.500 traditional difference
00:50:21.760 that tightening
00:50:22.540 would.
00:50:23.660 And instead, what
00:50:24.380 we're doing is we're
00:50:25.240 significantly increasing
00:50:26.640 the cost of borrowing,
00:50:28.560 which means we're
00:50:29.060 increasing the cost
00:50:29.840 of living on many
00:50:31.660 Canadians.
00:50:33.060 Yeah, that's exactly
00:50:34.420 right.
00:50:34.820 Well, there are
00:50:35.620 actually food shortages
00:50:37.240 and they're going to
00:50:38.060 get a lot worse,
00:50:38.880 especially with the
00:50:39.640 fertilizer crisis.
00:50:41.160 And so this
00:50:41.960 inflation isn't
00:50:43.640 merely a consequence
00:50:44.760 of runaway
00:50:45.400 monetary policy.
00:50:46.840 Precisely.
00:50:47.460 Yeah, it is quite
00:50:48.760 the situation.
00:50:49.860 You know, you could
00:50:50.360 have hardly hoped
00:50:51.380 for a worse outcome
00:50:52.360 to entice Canadians
00:50:53.640 into over-investing
00:50:55.020 on margin
00:50:55.560 in real estate
00:50:56.360 and then cranking
00:50:57.480 up the interest
00:50:58.020 rates to cut
00:50:59.340 them off at the
00:50:59.960 knees, which is
00:51:00.800 exactly what's
00:51:01.520 happening at the
00:51:02.160 moment.
00:51:02.580 It's important to
00:51:03.180 appreciate that our
00:51:03.880 housing industry
00:51:04.820 accounts for about
00:51:05.500 a third of our
00:51:06.140 economy.
00:51:07.240 And for many
00:51:07.780 people, it's
00:51:08.960 their life
00:51:09.580 investment, right?
00:51:10.680 Their principal
00:51:11.360 residence can be
00:51:12.580 their way to save
00:51:13.280 for retirement.
00:51:14.040 And the fact that
00:51:14.700 we continue to
00:51:16.180 try and undermine
00:51:17.660 the market, even
00:51:19.120 though we have to
00:51:19.700 focus on affordability
00:51:20.540 for sure, but we
00:51:21.620 also want to
00:51:22.220 preserve value for
00:51:23.300 people that work
00:51:24.180 hard for it.
00:51:25.060 But beyond that,
00:51:25.780 yes, the main
00:51:26.600 cause, in my
00:51:27.500 view, for what's
00:51:28.380 transpiring is not
00:51:29.780 just the printing.
00:51:30.920 We printed half a
00:51:31.960 trillion dollars in
00:51:32.800 Canada with nothing
00:51:34.140 to show for it.
00:51:35.400 But beyond that, it's
00:51:36.640 the lockdowns, in my
00:51:38.000 view, that are
00:51:38.960 responsible for this
00:51:39.800 runaway inflation.
00:51:41.000 We essentially, we
00:51:42.220 stopped the supply
00:51:43.080 chain at its tracks
00:51:43.960 a number of times.
00:51:44.980 We reopened the
00:51:45.920 economy, so there's
00:51:46.700 obviously a spike in
00:51:47.920 demand, and supply is
00:51:49.280 simply not catching up
00:51:50.360 to demand.
00:51:51.020 The market is out of
00:51:52.280 equilibrium.
00:51:52.380 You just can't get
00:51:53.020 anything.
00:51:54.040 You know, Penguin
00:51:54.820 Random House informed
00:51:56.000 me that they couldn't
00:51:56.820 put out a double
00:51:57.500 edition of my book in
00:51:58.960 any reasonable amount
00:51:59.920 of time, my two
00:52:00.640 books, because they
00:52:01.480 can't get cardboard or
00:52:02.440 paper.
00:52:03.380 That's Penguin Random
00:52:04.300 House.
00:52:04.940 A sheet of plywood in
00:52:05.860 British Columbia is now
00:52:06.800 $100.
00:52:07.680 You can't buy a vehicle
00:52:09.040 for love nor money.
00:52:10.780 Most large-scale
00:52:12.180 appliances and that
00:52:14.040 sort of thing,
00:52:14.600 especially those that
00:52:15.380 depend on chips, are
00:52:16.340 in unbelievably scarce
00:52:17.460 supply.
00:52:18.540 And one in five
00:52:19.640 container ships right
00:52:21.260 now across the world
00:52:22.340 is locked in a port
00:52:23.960 somewhere, unable to
00:52:25.480 move because of
00:52:26.540 backups.
00:52:27.580 Like, we have no idea
00:52:28.580 how much damage we did
00:52:29.640 to the supply chain, and
00:52:30.920 we are by no means done
00:52:32.480 with that catastrophe.
00:52:34.240 No.
00:52:35.200 I like to joke, my Jeep
00:52:37.000 started misfiring, and I
00:52:38.280 gave it to the
00:52:39.240 dealership, and they
00:52:40.280 told me it's going to
00:52:40.920 take three weeks because
00:52:41.760 there are no car parts.
00:52:43.300 So there's no car parts,
00:52:44.920 not because we printed
00:52:48.100 so much money, but
00:52:49.160 because we simply
00:52:50.160 stopped the supply
00:52:51.560 chain in its tracks.
00:52:52.360 But there's another
00:52:52.920 reason for all of
00:52:53.960 this, and I think that
00:52:54.640 that's the tragedy of
00:52:56.180 the labor market, that
00:52:57.240 is the remarkable,
00:52:58.760 unprecedented
00:52:59.220 catastrophe in our
00:53:01.120 labor market.
00:53:02.620 Canadians have
00:53:03.740 already suffered from
00:53:05.520 low productivity before
00:53:06.660 the pandemic, but what
00:53:08.140 I'm seeing right now
00:53:08.840 in speaking to many
00:53:09.600 Canadians and small
00:53:11.100 businesses and medium
00:53:12.140 businesses, businesses
00:53:12.860 of all sizes, is
00:53:14.520 that there's a
00:53:14.960 remarkable shortage of
00:53:16.240 labor, and even
00:53:17.600 though it appears as
00:53:18.680 if we're back to
00:53:20.040 almost full employment,
00:53:21.140 we're just north of
00:53:21.900 5% unemployment, which
00:53:23.320 seems good, but
00:53:23.940 productivity has not
00:53:25.000 come back.
00:53:25.820 People are working
00:53:26.540 less, people are not,
00:53:28.660 those, some continue
00:53:29.860 to work remotely, so
00:53:30.800 productivity is down.
00:53:32.740 And you know,
00:53:33.580 primarily what I'm
00:53:34.500 noticing, and that's
00:53:35.480 something that I talk
00:53:36.100 about a lot, is that
00:53:37.480 the labor force has
00:53:38.780 suffered a post-trauma
00:53:40.800 from COVID.
00:53:41.600 A lot of, I think,
00:53:44.040 Canadians and others
00:53:45.580 around the world feel
00:53:47.260 that something was
00:53:48.620 materially lost in the
00:53:49.680 last couple of years.
00:53:50.700 They're losing faith in
00:53:51.580 institutions, they're
00:53:52.840 estranged from their
00:53:53.520 family, they're seeing
00:53:55.180 erosion of their
00:53:55.820 democracy, nothing's
00:53:57.560 fun anymore, and so
00:53:59.000 that, of course,
00:54:00.080 translates itself into
00:54:01.040 productivity, and until
00:54:02.780 we restore productivity,
00:54:04.360 we will not catch up on
00:54:05.500 supply, and we will not
00:54:07.080 be able to catch up
00:54:07.920 with inflation.
00:54:08.060 That's a consequence
00:54:08.260 of demoralization.
00:54:09.440 Yeah, well, Canadians,
00:54:11.440 what, we're 35% now
00:54:13.420 behind the Americans in
00:54:14.840 terms of comparative
00:54:15.620 productivity, and the
00:54:16.940 OECD has prognosticated
00:54:18.700 that we'll be the worst
00:54:19.800 performing industrial
00:54:20.860 economy in the world for
00:54:22.800 the next 40 years.
00:54:24.600 It's a disaster.
00:54:25.200 That's what Canadians are
00:54:26.140 facing.
00:54:26.540 So that means, in all
00:54:27.680 likelihood, we'll be half
00:54:29.560 as wealthy as the
00:54:30.440 Americans in 10 years.
00:54:32.240 That's what it looks
00:54:33.100 like now.
00:54:33.900 When we could be more
00:54:35.020 wealth, we could be
00:54:35.840 wealthier and more
00:54:36.500 prosperous than any
00:54:37.360 nation on earth with
00:54:38.280 reasonable policy.
00:54:40.200 I'm not sure how we
00:54:42.220 get out of this in the
00:54:43.240 short term, but I know
00:54:44.380 the following for a fact
00:54:46.160 is that as soon as
00:54:47.700 Canadians start feeling
00:54:49.000 that this public health
00:54:50.840 episode is behind us,
00:54:53.000 when we feel that we no
00:54:54.860 longer need government
00:54:55.900 intervention, those that
00:54:56.920 perceive risk should
00:54:59.220 certainly are welcome to
00:55:01.280 take mitigation steps,
00:55:03.120 but for many Canadians to
00:55:05.680 continue to worry, are
00:55:06.940 they going to lose their
00:55:07.720 job if they don't take
00:55:08.960 a booster?
00:55:09.940 Are they going to have
00:55:10.720 to work a minimum wage
00:55:14.080 job again if they have
00:55:15.620 to wear a mask for eight
00:55:16.760 hours?
00:55:17.720 Are they going to be told
00:55:19.860 that they might not be
00:55:21.700 able to go to school
00:55:22.540 again next year?
00:55:24.380 While government still
00:55:26.180 remains in our faces, so
00:55:28.020 to speak, the labor force
00:55:30.000 has a difficulty recovering.
00:55:31.660 We need to give people a
00:55:32.920 relief by extricating
00:55:35.020 government out of our
00:55:36.000 lives as quickly as
00:55:36.820 possible.
00:55:38.660 Yeah, well, God only
00:55:39.420 knows what's going to
00:55:40.200 happen when we face the
00:55:41.340 next serious flu, because
00:55:43.800 the mortality rate for
00:55:45.560 COVID wasn't that high, and
00:55:47.040 as you pointed out, most
00:55:48.680 of the people who died
00:55:49.700 were very elderly, often
00:55:52.280 already passed their
00:55:53.740 stated life expectancy in
00:55:55.620 the vast majority of
00:55:56.580 cases, and also suffered
00:55:58.280 from a number of
00:55:59.320 comorbidities.
00:56:00.940 And so, and there's going
00:56:02.480 to be a serious flu
00:56:03.400 epidemic in the near
00:56:04.800 future, because we
00:56:05.580 haven't had a serious
00:56:06.520 flu for a number of
00:56:07.520 years.
00:56:07.960 And so, it's an open
00:56:09.140 question now, what
00:56:10.660 mortality rate will be
00:56:12.060 deemed acceptable by the
00:56:13.440 public health mavens and
00:56:14.860 authoritarians who've now
00:56:16.040 come to run the
00:56:16.740 government, and to
00:56:18.260 provide us with the
00:56:19.200 excuse to lock down yet
00:56:20.420 again.
00:56:21.140 Like, what if the next
00:56:22.020 flu is half as deadly as
00:56:23.580 we thought COVID was
00:56:24.620 going to be?
00:56:25.180 Are we going to lock
00:56:25.900 everyone down again?
00:56:27.380 And if not, why not?
00:56:28.740 Where's the line?
00:56:29.440 Now that we've
00:56:30.040 established the
00:56:31.160 precedent following in
00:56:32.640 the aftermath of the
00:56:33.640 bloody CCP
00:56:34.940 authoritarians, what,
00:56:37.560 what, what, it's no
00:56:38.800 wonder that people feel
00:56:39.660 that something has been
00:56:40.500 lost, because something
00:56:42.120 was lost.
00:56:43.220 So, this is why it's so
00:56:44.180 important that history
00:56:45.140 reflects on what
00:56:45.960 happened fairly, right?
00:56:47.500 I never sought to
00:56:48.620 minimize the risk of
00:56:50.240 COVID.
00:56:50.680 It can be a very serious
00:56:51.880 infection for certain
00:56:53.360 folks, and it can
00:56:54.520 regretfully be deadly
00:56:55.580 for some.
00:56:56.580 But that doesn't mean
00:56:57.700 that we don't need to
00:56:58.940 be forefront about
00:57:01.080 objective metrics.
00:57:02.540 It doesn't mean that
00:57:03.300 we don't need to factor
00:57:04.280 the collateral harm and
00:57:05.880 potentially rethink our
00:57:07.120 response.
00:57:07.880 But beyond that, I
00:57:09.340 think it's very
00:57:09.920 important that history
00:57:11.420 regards this episode
00:57:13.340 fairly, because
00:57:14.700 Canadians, Americans,
00:57:16.520 people all over the
00:57:17.120 world, in the free
00:57:18.400 world, have been
00:57:19.160 subjected to
00:57:20.480 unprecedented government
00:57:22.300 tactics, right?
00:57:24.200 The censorship, the
00:57:25.420 segregation, the
00:57:26.640 psychological
00:57:27.140 manipulation, and
00:57:28.780 if that narrative
00:57:29.860 somehow prevails, and
00:57:31.920 it suggests that it
00:57:32.580 saved lives, then
00:57:34.480 we will never fully
00:57:36.040 get our democracy
00:57:37.380 back, and we will
00:57:38.220 never fully go back
00:57:39.240 to normal.
00:57:39.880 And those are two
00:57:40.580 propositions that I
00:57:41.400 find unacceptable.
00:57:42.340 We have to get our
00:57:43.180 democracy back, we
00:57:44.200 have to go back to
00:57:45.060 normal.
00:57:46.080 And that will also
00:57:47.240 help us deal with
00:57:48.300 potentially the next
00:57:49.120 public health crisis,
00:57:50.200 because we should
00:57:51.540 have the courage to
00:57:53.020 address it professionally
00:57:54.160 and objectively.
00:57:55.360 So let's turn a bit
00:58:00.380 now to the actual
00:58:01.580 Conservative Party
00:58:02.600 race.
00:58:03.800 And I just looked at
00:58:06.160 some stats this
00:58:07.420 morning about
00:58:08.260 popularity polling
00:58:10.120 within the
00:58:10.660 Conservative Party
00:58:11.460 itself.
00:58:12.660 And there were six
00:58:14.780 candidates, although
00:58:15.640 my understanding is
00:58:16.840 that Patrick Brown
00:58:17.720 has now withdrawn
00:58:20.300 from the leadership
00:58:21.080 race.
00:58:21.560 So there are five
00:58:23.660 remaining, if I have
00:58:25.120 that right.
00:58:26.680 And Pierre Poliev
00:58:28.740 clearly has the lead,
00:58:30.800 and Jean Charest is
00:58:32.360 clearly in second
00:58:33.340 place.
00:58:34.340 I asked Charest's
00:58:35.700 people, by the way,
00:58:36.800 if he wanted to
00:58:39.360 speak with me on
00:58:40.760 this podcast.
00:58:41.540 As I said, I've
00:58:43.320 extended an opportunity
00:58:44.280 to all of the
00:58:45.420 leaders.
00:58:46.460 And the response I
00:58:48.580 received, as far as I
00:58:49.680 can tell, although it
00:58:50.580 wasn't exactly that
00:58:51.480 clear, was that the
00:58:53.200 Charest people decided I
00:58:54.360 was too toxic to
00:58:55.440 associate with the
00:58:56.580 aftermath of the tweet
00:58:57.700 I put out about a
00:58:58.640 swimsuit illustrated
00:58:59.560 model.
00:58:59.960 And I guess they
00:59:00.920 thought that was a
00:59:01.880 scandal, which was
00:59:03.220 quite surprising to me
00:59:04.300 because it was a
00:59:05.020 tempest in a teapot.
00:59:06.300 But in any case,
00:59:07.860 Poliev seems to have
00:59:08.880 about 45% of the
00:59:11.120 popular support among
00:59:12.960 those who are going to
00:59:13.780 vote in the
00:59:14.720 Conservative
00:59:15.120 Leadership race,
00:59:16.220 and Charest about
00:59:16.860 14.
00:59:17.520 And then you and
00:59:18.900 Leslyn Lewis and
00:59:19.940 Scott Aitchison are
00:59:20.960 bringing up the
00:59:22.080 rear.
00:59:22.800 What do you expect
00:59:24.020 and hope to, what
00:59:25.240 do you hope to
00:59:25.800 accomplish by your
00:59:26.920 leadership race?
00:59:27.860 And what do you
00:59:29.220 see as the future
00:59:30.140 for the Conservative
00:59:30.980 Party as the vote
00:59:33.320 occurs and there's a
00:59:34.420 new leader?
00:59:36.500 And how do you hope
00:59:38.320 to play a role in
00:59:39.160 that?
00:59:40.520 So, look, of course,
00:59:41.640 we still see a path
00:59:42.560 to winning, although
00:59:43.800 I'm not under any
00:59:45.420 illusion that we are
00:59:47.560 not in first or
00:59:49.320 second place.
00:59:50.120 I will not comment on
00:59:51.820 my friends and how
00:59:52.880 they perceive or choose
00:59:54.020 to conduct the race.
00:59:54.960 I think it's important
00:59:56.300 for the electorate
00:59:57.700 itself to evaluate
00:59:59.220 our respective
01:00:01.060 positions and
01:00:02.040 approach to the race
01:00:03.020 because this is really
01:00:04.500 an audition for the
01:00:05.260 general election.
01:00:06.520 But what I think is
01:00:08.380 important that I've
01:00:10.000 been blessed to
01:00:10.560 contribute to the
01:00:11.240 conversation, I'm
01:00:12.480 glad that many of
01:00:13.840 the Conservative
01:00:14.960 candidates are coming
01:00:16.060 around on this
01:00:16.920 question of
01:00:17.680 democracy.
01:00:18.940 Initially, a lot of
01:00:19.900 the media speculated
01:00:20.600 that Roman's just
01:00:21.220 going to talk about
01:00:21.760 COVID and lockdown
01:00:22.420 and that's behind
01:00:23.080 us.
01:00:23.620 Well, first of all,
01:00:24.140 20%, almost 20% of
01:00:25.480 Canadians are still
01:00:26.240 treated differentially,
01:00:27.040 so it's certainly
01:00:27.920 not behind us.
01:00:29.120 But beyond that,
01:00:30.300 now we're seeing all
01:00:32.540 the other camps coming
01:00:33.900 around to our
01:00:34.540 democracy message and
01:00:35.900 so that is certainly
01:00:37.580 something that I was
01:00:38.260 very much hopeful for
01:00:39.620 and grateful for that
01:00:40.700 we get to push.
01:00:41.960 And second of all,
01:00:42.860 I think that insisting
01:00:44.720 that our party is not
01:00:45.880 afraid to stand for
01:00:47.560 what it believes and
01:00:48.580 that we speak with
01:00:49.240 clarity, something that
01:00:50.120 I've tried to do
01:00:51.060 throughout my career in
01:00:51.800 the last couple of
01:00:52.340 years, is something
01:00:53.840 that I will demand
01:00:54.760 and expect from the
01:00:57.220 leadership of this
01:00:57.920 party, the future
01:00:58.440 leadership of this
01:00:59.100 party, as the voters
01:01:00.220 expect it from us.
01:01:01.180 And that's the only
01:01:01.880 way we're going to
01:01:03.240 prevail with Canadians
01:01:05.060 is when they believe
01:01:06.640 what we say and when
01:01:08.780 we speak clearly and
01:01:09.860 we're not afraid to
01:01:11.700 stand up for all
01:01:12.520 Canadians, unlike in
01:01:13.620 the last couple of
01:01:14.200 years.
01:01:15.540 Is there, I think we
01:01:17.200 should switch over to
01:01:18.300 the other portion of
01:01:20.280 this conversation.
01:01:21.080 For those of you who
01:01:22.400 are listening, I'm
01:01:23.400 going to talk to Mr.
01:01:24.640 Babers some more
01:01:25.380 behind the, on the
01:01:27.420 Daily Wire Plus
01:01:28.180 website.
01:01:29.200 We're going to talk a
01:01:29.920 little bit more
01:01:30.580 personally, I would say.
01:01:31.900 Is there anything else,
01:01:33.800 Roman, that you would
01:01:34.540 like to bring to the
01:01:35.520 attention of Canadians?
01:01:36.560 You sort of summed up
01:01:37.820 there by pointing out
01:01:38.840 that, you know, you
01:01:40.020 got pilloried pretty hard
01:01:41.100 for speaking your mind
01:01:42.220 and the leadership
01:01:43.520 convention and race
01:01:45.560 offers you, or the
01:01:46.760 leadership race offers
01:01:47.640 you an opportunity to
01:01:48.540 speak your mind again
01:01:49.360 and show that that is
01:01:50.240 possible and to
01:01:51.060 bring these attention,
01:01:52.180 these issues to the
01:01:53.820 attention of Canadians,
01:01:55.280 which seems to me to
01:01:56.040 be a very valid
01:01:57.300 ambition.
01:01:58.640 Is there anything else
01:01:59.500 that you'd like to say
01:02:00.400 to people before we
01:02:01.480 move to the second
01:02:03.040 part of this
01:02:03.540 conversation?
01:02:04.760 I don't see myself as
01:02:06.400 a victim of the
01:02:07.320 cancel culture mob.
01:02:08.480 On the contrary, I
01:02:09.560 saw what transpired
01:02:11.480 as a remarkable
01:02:12.460 blessing.
01:02:13.920 I came to Canada
01:02:14.940 when I was 15.
01:02:15.920 We didn't have a
01:02:16.500 cent to our name
01:02:17.400 and I've had every
01:02:18.640 blessing this country
01:02:19.700 had to offer.
01:02:20.440 And I would encourage
01:02:21.700 Canadians not to give
01:02:22.860 up on Canada.
01:02:23.660 I've always felt that
01:02:24.540 this is the best country
01:02:25.920 in the world because all
01:02:26.620 you need to do to succeed
01:02:27.440 in Canada is work hard and
01:02:28.560 be nice to people.
01:02:29.680 And if you just do those
01:02:30.600 two things, then everything
01:02:31.400 will be okay and we get to
01:02:32.400 do that and still keep our
01:02:33.920 religious and cultural
01:02:34.660 values and we get to be
01:02:35.680 ourselves.
01:02:36.740 And I have a sense of
01:02:38.740 optimism, as I said to you
01:02:40.180 in the beginning of this
01:02:40.780 interview, that even the
01:02:42.360 media is turning on
01:02:43.100 Justin Trudeau.
01:02:44.380 And so many things that
01:02:46.340 we're concerned about that
01:02:47.180 ail us right now, we can
01:02:48.280 solve them.
01:02:48.720 As I said, we just need
01:02:49.940 democracy and natural
01:02:51.140 resources that would
01:02:52.080 alleviate a lot of the
01:02:53.380 concern we have right now.
01:02:54.820 As soon as government
01:02:55.640 extricates itself out of
01:02:56.840 our lives, we're going to
01:02:57.640 breathe a sigh of relief.
01:03:00.000 We know what to do to
01:03:02.000 solve this and I'm
01:03:04.360 incredibly grateful to
01:03:06.300 so many Canadians coast to
01:03:07.560 coast with whom my
01:03:08.980 message of democracy has
01:03:10.260 resonated.
01:03:11.280 And I'm also thankful to
01:03:13.600 all of my friends in this
01:03:14.460 race.
01:03:14.780 We have record membership
01:03:15.800 leadership of 675,000
01:03:17.620 members.
01:03:18.420 It's something to the
01:03:19.860 credit of all of them and
01:03:21.280 it's something to be proud
01:03:22.160 of because that means we're
01:03:23.500 bringing a large motivated
01:03:24.880 base into our next election.
01:03:26.980 We have to emerge out of
01:03:28.240 this united and firm.
01:03:30.680 We cannot give up on our
01:03:31.860 country, nor do we need to.
01:03:33.480 We are a wonderful country
01:03:35.000 and I'm optimistic about the
01:03:36.120 future.
01:03:37.840 Great.
01:03:38.340 Well, that's a lovely place
01:03:39.300 to end.
01:03:39.840 And so thank you very much.
01:03:41.660 I've been speaking today
01:03:42.540 with Mr. Roman Baber who
01:03:44.020 is running for the
01:03:45.420 leadership of the Federal
01:03:46.420 Conservative Party in
01:03:47.580 Canada, hoping to lead
01:03:49.520 that party and then to
01:03:50.580 challenge the
01:03:51.600 reprehensible, shall we
01:03:53.040 say, Justin Trudeau for
01:03:54.880 the position of Prime
01:03:55.960 Minister of Canada in the
01:03:57.360 next election, which
01:03:58.360 can't come too soon in my
01:04:00.240 humble estimation.
01:04:01.620 Thank you very much for
01:04:03.080 speaking with me today.
01:04:04.740 Thank you so much,
01:04:05.420 Jordan.
01:04:06.800 Going online without
01:04:08.020 ExpressVPN is like not
01:04:09.580 paying attention to the
01:04:10.460 safety demonstration on a
01:04:11.580 flight.
01:04:12.340 Most of the time you'll
01:04:13.220 probably be fine, but what
01:04:14.980 if one day that weird
01:04:16.160 yellow mask drops down from
01:04:17.500 overhead and you have no
01:04:18.980 idea what to do?
01:04:20.080 In our hyper-connected
01:04:21.120 world, your digital privacy
01:04:22.500 isn't just a luxury, it's a
01:04:24.260 fundamental right.
01:04:25.180 Every time you connect to
01:04:26.120 an unsecured network in a
01:04:27.480 cafe, hotel, or airport,
01:04:29.480 you're essentially
01:04:30.020 broadcasting your personal
01:04:31.200 information to anyone with
01:04:32.700 a technical know-how to
01:04:33.800 intercept it.
01:04:34.520 And let's be clear, it
01:04:35.540 doesn't take a genius
01:04:36.480 hacker to do this.
01:04:37.720 With some off-the-shelf
01:04:38.700 hardware, even a tech-savvy
01:04:40.220 teenager could potentially
01:04:41.420 access your passwords, bank
01:04:43.080 logins, and credit card
01:04:44.340 details.
01:04:45.100 Now, you might think, what's
01:04:46.620 the big deal?
01:04:47.220 Who'd want my data anyway?
01:04:48.760 Well, on the dark web, your
01:04:50.140 personal information could
01:04:51.320 fetch up to $1,000.
01:04:53.180 That's right, there's a whole
01:04:54.540 underground economy built on
01:04:56.080 stolen identities.
01:04:57.440 Enter ExpressVPN.
01:04:59.180 It's like a digital fortress,
01:05:00.660 creating an encrypted tunnel
01:05:01.840 between your device and the
01:05:03.200 internet.
01:05:03.840 Their encryption is so robust
01:05:05.480 that it would take a hacker
01:05:06.500 with a supercomputer over a
01:05:08.100 billion years to crack it.
01:05:09.540 But don't let its power
01:05:10.500 fool you.
01:05:11.420 ExpressVPN is incredibly
01:05:12.680 user-friendly.
01:05:13.700 With just one click, you're
01:05:14.800 protected across all your
01:05:16.000 devices.
01:05:16.720 Phones, laptops, tablets,
01:05:18.320 you name it.
01:05:18.900 That's why I use ExpressVPN
01:05:20.280 whenever I'm traveling or
01:05:21.780 working from a coffee shop.
01:05:23.020 It gives me peace of mind
01:05:24.080 knowing that my research,
01:05:25.420 communications, and personal
01:05:26.860 data are shielded from
01:05:28.040 prying eyes.
01:05:29.020 Secure your online data
01:05:30.140 today by visiting
01:05:31.200 expressvpn.com
01:05:32.640 slash jordan.
01:05:33.360 That's E-X-P-R-E-S-S
01:05:35.800 vpn.com slash jordan
01:05:37.540 and you can get an extra
01:05:38.560 three months free.
01:05:40.220 Expressvpn.com slash jordan.