The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast


331. The Case Against the Sexual Revolution | Louise Perry


Summary

Louise Perry is a UK-based journalist, author, and columnist writing on the topics of sexual freedom and the current state of feminism and the feminine. Her recent book The Case Against the Sexual Revolution, published in 2022, notes the emergence of a widespread disillusionment with sex, particularly among the young, male and female alike, and discusses the long-term psychological and social era of a life of hedonistic urges in the midst of the upheaval of traditional marital concepts. She is also the Director of The Other Half, a new non-partisan feminist think tank, and the host of Maiden Mother Matriarch, a podcast about sexual politics. In this episode, Louise talks about her new book, and her relationship with Marilyn Monroe and Hugh Hefner, the two most influential men in American history who helped define the sexual revolution of the 60s and 70s. She also explains why she chose to write about them, and why she thinks they were not born in exactly the same year as her great-great-grandmother. This message comes from Viking, committed to exploring the world in comfort, a journey through the heart of Europe on an elegant Viking longship with thoughtful service, destination-focused dining, and cultural enrichment on board and on shore. Discover more at Viking.me/VikingLongship and every Viking voyage is all-inclusive with no children, no casinos, and no casinos. Viking is all inclusive, with no kids? Discover more on Viking, a Viking voyage, all inclusive with no casinos! This message from Viking is committed to exploration, all inclusivity, and a voyage to explore the world, in comfort and a place of cultural enrichment . by Viking, the Viking Voyages and a message about sex and the female experience in this episode is by Viking s mission to help you become a better version of yourself, the good old days. by The Good Lady . by viking, the Good Lady, the Bad Lady, The Bad Lady by the Good Lord, The Good Feminist, the Queen, The Queen, and The Bad Lord, the Lady of the Good God, The Lady of Good Vibes, the Great Old Lady, and so you can be a better woman The Queen of Good Luck, the One and the Queen of the Bad Girl, The Real Good Lady. By Viking, Viking, Inc., and The Good Girl, the Righteous Lady, by Viking.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 This message comes from Viking, committed to exploring the world in comfort.
00:00:06.060 Journey through the heart of Europe on an elegant Viking longship with thoughtful service,
00:00:11.900 destination-focused dining, and cultural enrichment on board and on shore.
00:00:17.460 And every Viking voyage is all-inclusive with no children and no casinos.
00:00:23.780 Discover more at Viking.com.
00:00:30.000 Hello, everyone.
00:00:42.100 I'm happy today to be able to talk to Louise Perry.
00:00:46.560 We'll have an interesting conversation about sexual dynamics and the relative role of women and men.
00:00:53.100 Louise Perry, my guest today, is a UK-based journalist, author, and columnist,
00:00:58.040 writing on the topics of sexual freedom and the current state of feminism and the feminine.
00:01:05.380 Her recent book is The Case Against the Sexual Revolution, published in 2022, so a new book.
00:01:13.980 It notes the emergence of a widespread disillusionment with sex, particularly among the young, male and female alike,
00:01:21.900 and discusses the long-term psychological and social era of a life of hedonistic urges
00:01:29.980 in the midst of the upheaval of traditional marital concepts.
00:01:35.340 Louise is also the director of The Other Half, a new non-partisan feminist think tank,
00:01:41.200 and the host of Maiden Mother Matriarch, a developmental progression, a podcast about sexual politics.
00:01:52.460 Hello, Louise.
00:01:53.180 Thank you very much for agreeing to talk to me today.
00:01:55.960 You wrote a rather controversial book recently.
00:02:01.840 Let's talk about the book.
00:02:03.040 I'm just going to walk through the chapters and give everybody a preview of where we're heading.
00:02:08.360 So, chapter one, sex must be taken seriously.
00:02:13.600 That doesn't sound like much fun.
00:02:16.400 Number two, men and women are different.
00:02:19.700 Well, that'll get you in trouble.
00:02:21.120 That's for sure, too.
00:02:22.920 So, some desires are bad.
00:02:26.980 Loveless sex is not empowering.
00:02:29.500 Consent is not enough, and people are not products.
00:02:35.600 Well, if you were trying to pick a fight in today's society,
00:02:40.260 particularly with those on the left, I would say,
00:02:43.040 you couldn't have picked six more contentious titles for chapters,
00:02:48.680 with the possible exception of people are not products.
00:02:51.580 I suppose most people on the left, even the radicals, would agree with that statement.
00:02:56.880 But the rest of it pretty much runs counter to, I would say,
00:03:03.720 the juvenile delusions of our present culture.
00:03:07.220 I was interested today, I was going through your book again,
00:03:12.080 and I noticed once again that you started with the story of Marilyn Monroe and Hugh Hefner.
00:03:18.820 And I was just talking to my wife about that the other day.
00:03:22.320 I think it was probably in a conversation motivated by the fact that this podcast was coming up,
00:03:28.380 and we talked about the emergence of pornography during our lifetime, you know,
00:03:34.800 and when both of us are around 60, and when we were young,
00:03:39.800 the standard pornographic recourse, you might say, was Playboy.
00:03:45.580 But that soon multiplied like a hydra, and first of all, there was Playboy.
00:03:51.760 And it had some pretensions to something like culture,
00:03:56.080 and there was a certain style associated with it,
00:04:00.040 and a certain, what would you call it, veneer of sophistication.
00:04:06.220 You know, it was all jazz and penthouses and New York and freedom and youth and, you know,
00:04:13.860 sexual activity between consenting adults, all free of other entanglements,
00:04:19.480 but completely conscious of what they were doing.
00:04:21.520 And there were highbrow interviews and, you know, sort of in-jokes.
00:04:25.820 And so Playboy was quite effective at generating a kind of late rat pack cool around itself.
00:04:37.060 But then the next iteration of the pornographic ascent was Penthouse,
00:04:45.360 and it was the harder core version of Playboy.
00:04:50.040 It got a lot more gynecological, let's say.
00:04:52.660 And then Hustler hit after that, and everybody knew at that point,
00:04:57.140 no matter what their attitude was toward Playboy,
00:05:00.920 that we'd stepped into a new sort of swamp of monstrosity.
00:05:08.720 And then, of course, it wasn't long after that, 15 years maybe, something like that,
00:05:14.940 that porn hit the internet, and then away we went.
00:05:18.720 So let's start talking about Marilyn Monroe and her.
00:05:22.920 I mean, she embodied this feminine archetype of the sex kitten, I guess,
00:05:32.520 the femme fatale tube, but she's more on the sex kitten end of things.
00:05:36.260 And she's still an icon.
00:05:38.800 And she's an icon that even gave rise to figures such as Madonna, I would say,
00:05:43.540 because Madonna played with the Marilyn Monroe image a lot and with a fair bit of success.
00:05:47.980 But it's not like Marilyn exactly had a good time with it.
00:05:51.100 So she died very young, by her own hand.
00:05:55.080 Why don't you tell a little bit more of her story?
00:05:58.280 Yeah, she had a fairly miserable life from start to finish.
00:06:02.340 One of the reasons I decided to open the book by talking about Marilyn Monroe and Hugh Hefner
00:06:08.080 is partly because, just through good luck from my perspective as a writer,
00:06:12.780 they were born in exactly the same year, even though, of course, yeah, Monroe died young
00:06:17.900 and Hefner lived well into his 90s.
00:06:20.400 And they were both these incredible icons of the sexual revolution.
00:06:25.940 Marilyn for her beauty and Hefner for his success for Playboy magazine.
00:06:29.920 But they lived extraordinarily different lives.
00:06:32.900 And they experienced sexual liberation, so-called, in completely different ways.
00:06:37.700 You know, Marilyn Monroe grew up in foster homes, was a victim of child sexual abuse
00:06:44.200 and of domestic violence as an adult, and, as you say, died by her own hand,
00:06:49.140 long-standing substance abuse issues, etc.
00:06:52.700 Hefner didn't suffer in that way.
00:06:54.960 I mean, I do think that, actually, by the time Hefner grew old,
00:06:59.700 he had lost the glamour that he had as a younger man.
00:07:03.320 I think that he is evidence of the fact that even the most successful playboy
00:07:08.620 has a shelf life, not as short a shelf life as the sexually liberated woman does.
00:07:15.860 I mean, really, in reality, with a modern Western lifespan,
00:07:20.040 you're talking maybe a quarter of that.
00:07:22.720 You might be really sexually desirable,
00:07:24.780 which is why I think it's risky to place all of your self-esteem on that value
00:07:31.180 or, indeed, to best your career, best your life around being sexually desirable,
00:07:37.560 because it's really not very long.
00:07:38.600 Well, you know, that's a good place to take a slight detour.
00:07:47.860 You know, a lot of your book makes a moral case,
00:07:52.660 and moral cases aren't particularly popular now,
00:07:55.920 but there are some interesting ways of discussing morality technically
00:08:03.700 that I think might be worth delving into.
00:08:06.300 So, one of the things that people who are watching and listening
00:08:10.280 might be interested in knowing is that
00:08:12.040 people pursue different mating strategies, so to speak.
00:08:15.820 That's how evolutionary psychologists or biologists describe it,
00:08:19.500 and you can make the same case in the animal kingdom to some degree.
00:08:23.060 And there are short-term mating strategies,
00:08:27.640 and that would be associated with an ethos of the glorification, let's say,
00:08:32.620 or the practice of casual sex, so sex without relationship.
00:08:36.740 And one of the questions that you might ask is,
00:08:40.900 are there pronounced differences between people
00:08:44.920 who tend to pursue short-term mating strategies
00:08:49.720 versus long-term mating strategies?
00:08:52.480 Now, a long-term mating strategy would be accompanied
00:08:54.700 by the formulation of a relationship of mutual support.
00:09:00.200 That's what makes it sustainable.
00:09:02.460 And the answer is, well, yeah, there are marked differences.
00:09:07.820 One of the hallmarks of antisocial personality,
00:09:10.700 and so that's the personality characteristic set
00:09:14.420 that is associated with criminality,
00:09:16.940 is a proclivity towards short-term mating strategies,
00:09:19.480 and that is associated with early onset of sexual activity
00:09:24.320 and multiple sexual partners,
00:09:26.400 and then in its more pathological form,
00:09:29.040 a predatory or parasitical lifestyle in relationship to sex.
00:09:37.540 And so that has been elaborated more recently into the analysis
00:09:42.700 of so-called dark tetrad personality characteristics.
00:09:46.400 That's an emerging model of the malevolent and pathological personality,
00:09:51.540 and that involves Machiavellianism,
00:09:53.760 which is manipulative,
00:09:54.820 narcissistic,
00:09:58.940 which is virtue-free attention-seeking.
00:10:03.360 It's a good way of thinking about it.
00:10:05.980 Psychopathy, which is predatory parasitism,
00:10:08.580 and sadism,
00:10:09.420 which is positive delight in harm to other people.
00:10:12.200 And all of those delightful characteristics
00:10:15.660 are associated with a striking proclivity
00:10:19.260 for short-term mating,
00:10:20.980 and that brings up the stark realization
00:10:24.900 that it's a form of exploitation.
00:10:29.300 That's a good way of thinking about it.
00:10:30.980 And it's fundamentally the exploitation of women,
00:10:34.260 because here's a good way of defining women,
00:10:36.340 since we don't know how to do that in our society anymore.
00:10:38.980 We might as well start with basics.
00:10:40.840 And throughout the animal kingdom,
00:10:42.740 and this is true all the way from sperm and egg
00:10:45.420 up to fully embodied being,
00:10:48.780 the female is almost inevitably the sex
00:10:52.440 that pours more resources into reproduction.
00:10:56.920 So that means that women have a higher,
00:10:59.940 bear a higher cost for sexual reproduction
00:11:02.020 in case anyone's still too stupid to actually understand that.
00:11:06.080 Might as well make it explicit.
00:11:08.100 And what that also means is that
00:11:09.980 if there's exploitation going on in a sexual relationship,
00:11:16.280 it's most often, although not always,
00:11:20.100 the male who has less at stake exploiting the female,
00:11:23.560 who has far more at stake.
00:11:25.600 And it's enticing for young women to believe,
00:11:30.500 I suppose, if they want to pursue hedonic pleasure,
00:11:33.420 that they can escape from that reality.
00:11:35.620 But it's very difficult to.
00:11:37.720 So that's one element.
00:11:38.640 Then the next element with regard to morality is
00:11:41.260 if you're playing a game that only works in the short term
00:11:46.200 for others, but also for yourself,
00:11:50.140 then that's not a very good game.
00:11:51.900 And, you know, the point you were making was that
00:11:54.040 Marilyn was playing a particularly short game.
00:11:57.560 And even Hugh, who had less to lose,
00:12:01.060 and arguably on some dimensions more to gain,
00:12:04.860 he was still pretty damn pathetic by the time he hit.
00:12:08.640 I would say, what, mid-50s?
00:12:12.260 I watched one of his late TV shows
00:12:14.400 where he was touring Europe
00:12:16.200 with his three blonde bimbos
00:12:17.980 who were not the world's...
00:12:20.420 They weren't the sharpest knives in the drawer,
00:12:22.440 let's put it that way.
00:12:23.520 And it was Hugh and his three blonde clones
00:12:27.180 who was traipsing painfully from faux glamorous restaurant
00:12:33.820 to faux glamorous restaurant through Europe,
00:12:36.680 engaging in conversations so puerile and painful
00:12:39.580 that anyone with any sense would have run away from the table
00:12:43.200 screaming after five minutes.
00:12:45.220 So he turned into his own parody.
00:12:47.940 And that was quite clear.
00:12:49.220 I mean, anybody with any sense at all,
00:12:50.960 no matter how much they might have been enamored
00:12:53.080 by his young and hypothetically glamorous self,
00:12:57.220 if you had looked at that with a cold eye
00:13:00.220 a few decades later,
00:13:01.680 it was looking pretty oldest boy at the frat party.
00:13:07.460 It had that whole stench about it, I would say.
00:13:10.800 All right, so back to Marilyn.
00:13:12.820 You said that she had a pretty brutal upbringing
00:13:15.280 and was exploited pretty early on.
00:13:19.120 You might as well tell the story
00:13:20.320 about the famous photographs that launched Playboy.
00:13:24.860 Yeah, so Marilyn was both the first cover star
00:13:28.480 and also the first naked centrefold
00:13:30.500 in the first issue of Playboy.
00:13:32.720 But the naked photos were acquired without her consent.
00:13:36.880 She'd taken them,
00:13:38.100 or she'd had them taken many years before
00:13:39.860 when she was much younger for very little money
00:13:41.820 just because she was desperate.
00:13:42.740 She'd signed the release with a false name,
00:13:46.040 but somehow Hefner got a hold of them
00:13:47.560 and paid the photographer rather than her
00:13:49.580 in order to publish them in Playboy.
00:13:52.240 And she wasn't even sent a free copy
00:13:53.740 and was apparently very upset about it.
00:13:56.460 Hefner ended up buying the crypt next to hers
00:13:59.780 at the cemetery in Los Angeles
00:14:02.720 where they're both buried,
00:14:03.900 obviously buried many decades after she was.
00:14:06.360 But they never actually met in real life.
00:14:08.660 So this whole kind of relationship
00:14:11.200 between the two of them
00:14:12.160 was very much initiated by him.
00:14:15.420 And, I mean, this is the point that I want to make
00:14:17.920 with talking about Marilyn Monroe.
00:14:19.700 She is very typical of female sex icons
00:14:23.160 in having this kind of tragic backstory,
00:14:27.920 multiple forms of exploitation
00:14:29.700 by lots of people, most of them men.
00:14:31.900 And yet she is held up as this iconic figure
00:14:37.380 of the sexual revolution,
00:14:38.580 which we're supposed to believe was a good thing.
00:14:41.200 Right.
00:14:41.640 And my argument in the book,
00:14:42.660 it is, of course, the case against the sexual revolution.
00:14:45.700 My argument is not that it was entirely bad.
00:14:48.320 I don't think you can paint any huge historical event
00:14:51.660 as entirely bad or entirely good.
00:14:54.120 But I think that it has been falsely presented mostly
00:14:58.060 by progressives through rose-tinted spectacles.
00:15:01.580 And this is my attempt to counter that.
00:15:03.920 Yeah, well, there's no doubt she was an iconic figure
00:15:06.600 and still is.
00:15:07.840 And part of the reason,
00:15:09.800 it's hard to say exactly why.
00:15:11.600 I mean, there's something.
00:15:13.780 Going online without ExpressVPN
00:15:15.680 is like not paying attention
00:15:17.100 to the safety demonstration on a flight.
00:15:19.220 Most of the time, you'll probably be fine.
00:15:21.360 But what if one day that weird yellow mask
00:15:23.740 drops down from overhead
00:15:24.760 and you have no idea what to do?
00:15:27.060 In our hyper-connected world,
00:15:28.520 your digital privacy isn't just a luxury.
00:15:30.820 It's a fundamental right.
00:15:32.160 Every time you connect to an unsecured network
00:15:34.140 in a cafe, hotel, or airport,
00:15:36.420 you're essentially broadcasting your personal information
00:15:38.700 to anyone with a technical know-how to intercept it.
00:15:41.480 And let's be clear,
00:15:42.360 it doesn't take a genius hacker to do this.
00:15:44.700 With some off-the-shelf hardware,
00:15:46.260 even a tech-savvy teenager
00:15:47.660 could potentially access your passwords,
00:15:49.820 bank logins, and credit card details.
00:15:52.080 Now, you might think,
00:15:53.320 what's the big deal?
00:15:54.200 Who'd want my data anyway?
00:15:55.740 Well, on the dark web,
00:15:56.900 your personal information could fetch up to $1,000.
00:16:00.140 That's right,
00:16:00.900 there's a whole underground economy
00:16:02.440 built on stolen identities.
00:16:04.420 Enter ExpressVPN.
00:16:06.160 It's like a digital fortress,
00:16:07.640 creating an encrypted tunnel
00:16:08.820 between your device and the internet.
00:16:10.440 Their encryption is so robust
00:16:12.440 that it would take a hacker with a supercomputer
00:16:14.320 over a billion years to crack it.
00:16:16.520 But don't let its power fool you.
00:16:18.320 ExpressVPN is incredibly user-friendly.
00:16:20.680 With just one click,
00:16:21.660 you're protected across all your devices.
00:16:23.700 Phones, laptops, tablets, you name it.
00:16:25.880 That's why I use ExpressVPN
00:16:27.240 whenever I'm traveling
00:16:28.380 or working from a coffee shop.
00:16:30.000 It gives me peace of mind
00:16:31.060 knowing that my research,
00:16:32.380 communications,
00:16:33.180 and personal data
00:16:34.140 are shielded from prying eyes.
00:16:35.740 Secure your online data today
00:16:37.540 by visiting expressvpn.com
00:16:39.620 slash jordan.
00:16:40.740 That's E-X-P-R-E-S-S
00:16:42.780 vpn.com
00:16:43.840 slash jordan
00:16:44.500 and you can get an extra
00:16:45.540 three months free.
00:16:47.120 Expressvpn.com
00:16:48.280 slash jordan.
00:16:49.000 Obviously hyper-attractive about her
00:16:54.720 and I heard her interviewed once
00:16:57.140 in a radio station
00:16:57.980 where she said
00:16:58.640 she could walk down the street.
00:17:00.700 I believe her genuine name
00:17:03.100 was Norma Ray.
00:17:04.220 Is that right?
00:17:04.940 Norma Ray?
00:17:06.200 And she said
00:17:07.400 she could walk down the street
00:17:08.540 as Norma Ray
00:17:09.260 and no one would look at her
00:17:10.420 or she could walk down the street
00:17:12.040 as Marilyn
00:17:12.540 and then people would just be
00:17:13.880 attracted to her like mad.
00:17:15.240 And so I want to run
00:17:16.320 a hypothesis by you.
00:17:17.700 You know, given that
00:17:19.380 that backstory
00:17:21.260 for female sexual icons
00:17:23.620 and this is often the case
00:17:24.820 for girls who get dragged
00:17:26.880 or who agree to participate
00:17:29.640 in the pornography industry
00:17:30.920 that, you know,
00:17:32.280 they're often abandoned girls
00:17:33.800 who have a history
00:17:35.380 of fractured relationships
00:17:37.340 and abuse.
00:17:38.800 Now, so here's
00:17:39.800 here's a hypothesis.
00:17:41.260 You know that
00:17:41.700 girls without fathers
00:17:43.240 hit puberty
00:17:44.140 one year earlier, eh?
00:17:46.060 That's a real biological mystery
00:17:47.680 but here's a hypothesis.
00:17:49.900 So imagine that you're
00:17:51.460 bereft of male companionship
00:17:55.420 and productivity
00:17:57.380 and protection
00:17:58.300 and maybe that's because
00:18:00.520 your culture
00:18:02.440 doesn't have enough men.
00:18:04.240 Sometimes that happens
00:18:05.100 after wars, for example.
00:18:06.460 Or maybe you're just
00:18:08.000 in an economic niche
00:18:10.100 or social niche
00:18:11.300 where you're unfortunate,
00:18:13.900 you know.
00:18:14.120 So, now why would you
00:18:16.020 develop a year early
00:18:18.100 from a puberty perspective?
00:18:19.900 Well, the answer is
00:18:20.660 one of the ways
00:18:21.920 that women can attract
00:18:23.440 male attention
00:18:24.200 obviously
00:18:25.060 and therefore
00:18:25.760 in principle
00:18:26.980 companionship,
00:18:28.100 protection,
00:18:28.740 productivity,
00:18:29.440 all of that
00:18:30.020 that might come along
00:18:32.280 with a real relationship
00:18:33.280 is by being
00:18:34.180 sexually attractive
00:18:36.000 and available.
00:18:36.740 And so, if there's
00:18:38.420 a dearth of males
00:18:39.440 in the local environment
00:18:40.720 then early puberty
00:18:41.860 could easily be a way
00:18:43.360 of increasing
00:18:45.520 the probability
00:18:46.420 of catching a mate
00:18:47.540 early enough
00:18:48.220 so you don't starve
00:18:49.280 to death,
00:18:50.400 let's say.
00:18:51.480 Okay, so
00:18:52.000 then imagine that
00:18:53.220 there's a psychological
00:18:53.980 equivalent to that
00:18:55.580 and this is where
00:18:56.700 that waif-like
00:18:57.740 femme fatale
00:18:58.920 archetype
00:19:00.100 might kick in
00:19:00.920 and so
00:19:01.380 if you're
00:19:03.000 appealingly,
00:19:04.680 vulnerably
00:19:05.340 beautiful
00:19:06.100 and available
00:19:06.900 and then you have
00:19:08.360 that magic
00:19:10.140 that goes
00:19:10.780 that can go along
00:19:11.860 with that
00:19:12.320 when it's
00:19:13.860 transformed
00:19:14.460 into something
00:19:15.560 truly archetypal
00:19:17.360 which Marilyn
00:19:17.960 did extraordinarily well
00:19:19.280 you know
00:19:20.300 there's a bit
00:19:20.760 of a little girl
00:19:21.540 about her
00:19:22.160 she had a very
00:19:22.940 girly voice
00:19:24.340 and that's how
00:19:24.960 she sang
00:19:25.620 and she had
00:19:26.700 a kind of
00:19:27.880 innocent,
00:19:28.700 naive provocativeness
00:19:29.940 that was
00:19:30.580 amplified
00:19:32.340 paradoxically
00:19:33.460 by her
00:19:34.120 overt sexuality
00:19:35.440 and so
00:19:37.260 she had some
00:19:38.100 of the appeal
00:19:38.760 of a helpless child
00:19:39.960 and some of the appeal
00:19:40.980 of a truly
00:19:42.180 mature woman
00:19:43.040 and that's a pretty
00:19:44.440 that can be a very
00:19:45.300 deadly combination
00:19:46.360 and I think
00:19:47.320 the fact that
00:19:47.980 it's a deadly combination
00:19:48.960 is also a kind
00:19:50.040 of adaptation
00:19:50.640 so you can imagine
00:19:52.240 that girls
00:19:53.160 who are abused
00:19:53.980 might turn
00:19:54.700 to that
00:19:55.360 that pattern
00:19:57.500 of seductive
00:19:59.000 behavior
00:20:00.320 because it's
00:20:02.180 if they turn
00:20:03.200 on the charm
00:20:03.980 full throttle
00:20:05.280 in that manner
00:20:06.120 it increases
00:20:07.240 the probability
00:20:08.060 that even
00:20:08.560 in their
00:20:08.960 desperate
00:20:09.540 economic straits
00:20:10.720 they might be able
00:20:11.400 to attract a male
00:20:12.340 and of course
00:20:13.360 with Marilyn
00:20:13.900 that was elevated
00:20:14.900 right to the point
00:20:15.680 where she became
00:20:16.420 literally the poster girl
00:20:17.780 for that approach
00:20:18.700 you know
00:20:19.500 and then
00:20:19.840 I mentioned Madonna
00:20:21.560 a little earlier
00:20:22.320 and when Madonna
00:20:23.920 first came on the scene
00:20:25.000 I thought
00:20:25.380 she's kind of interesting
00:20:26.400 she seems to be
00:20:27.220 taking this
00:20:27.920 Marilyn-like archetype
00:20:30.340 but toying with it
00:20:31.700 consciously
00:20:32.320 you know
00:20:33.220 she was
00:20:33.760 a businesswoman
00:20:35.280 pretty canny
00:20:36.380 she seemed to be
00:20:37.620 in charge
00:20:38.160 of her own image
00:20:39.220 you know
00:20:40.320 and I thought
00:20:41.180 maybe she had a grip
00:20:42.260 on the archetype
00:20:43.380 but
00:20:44.000 it isn't obvious
00:20:45.960 to me at all
00:20:46.600 that she did
00:20:47.300 you know
00:20:47.720 Madonna's life
00:20:49.020 has been characterized
00:20:49.800 by a continual pattern
00:20:51.560 of sexual
00:20:52.920 attention seeking
00:20:53.880 and she's also
00:20:55.840 I would say
00:20:57.360 turned into
00:20:57.920 her own parody
00:20:58.780 even in her
00:21:00.400 I think she's
00:21:01.540 in her late 60s
00:21:02.600 now
00:21:02.900 if I remember
00:21:04.060 correctly
00:21:04.560 she's still doing
00:21:05.960 essentially
00:21:06.940 she's still doing
00:21:08.700 photo shoots
00:21:09.380 that are
00:21:09.860 leveraging
00:21:10.820 pornographic
00:21:11.860 attractiveness
00:21:12.640 and I mean
00:21:13.980 that requires
00:21:14.620 a lot of
00:21:15.220 maintenance
00:21:16.240 and makeup
00:21:16.840 by the time
00:21:17.960 you're at
00:21:18.280 her stage
00:21:18.780 of life
00:21:19.180 but it doesn't
00:21:19.880 really look
00:21:20.340 to me
00:21:20.720 like it's
00:21:21.980 aged
00:21:22.300 particularly
00:21:22.860 well
00:21:23.400 and that's
00:21:24.780 the problem
00:21:25.220 with short-term
00:21:26.000 mating strategy
00:21:26.840 is that it's
00:21:27.580 not a good
00:21:28.100 iterating game
00:21:29.100 you can't play
00:21:30.040 it with other
00:21:30.600 people
00:21:31.020 continually
00:21:31.840 you have to
00:21:32.580 have multiple
00:21:33.040 partners
00:21:33.460 and it's
00:21:34.380 not a good
00:21:34.960 pattern
00:21:35.380 for your
00:21:35.800 whole life
00:21:36.340 course
00:21:36.780 that's partly
00:21:38.100 what makes
00:21:38.580 it both
00:21:38.960 immoral
00:21:39.380 and unwise
00:21:40.300 is it just
00:21:41.160 doesn't work
00:21:41.960 across the
00:21:43.080 decades
00:21:43.580 that you're
00:21:44.020 going to be
00:21:44.460 alive
00:21:44.920 so
00:21:45.900 yes
00:21:46.300 all right
00:21:47.300 so back
00:21:47.740 to Marilyn
00:21:48.720 and Hugh
00:21:49.800 on that
00:21:50.360 point
00:21:51.000 I decided
00:21:52.080 to call
00:21:52.340 my podcast
00:21:52.900 Maiden Mother
00:21:53.440 Matriarch
00:21:54.120 because it's
00:21:54.960 my hypothesis
00:21:55.980 that one of
00:21:57.280 the features
00:21:57.820 of late
00:21:59.640 20th early
00:22:00.220 21st century
00:22:01.120 culture
00:22:01.680 is that the
00:22:03.020 normal life
00:22:03.920 progression
00:22:04.380 that women
00:22:04.860 are supposed
00:22:05.300 to pass
00:22:06.180 through from
00:22:06.700 maiden to
00:22:07.280 mother to
00:22:07.720 matriarch
00:22:08.260 has been
00:22:09.480 interrupted
00:22:11.200 and we now
00:22:12.340 have a very
00:22:12.680 widespread problem
00:22:13.440 of women
00:22:13.860 desperate to
00:22:14.420 remain in
00:22:15.080 maiden mode
00:22:15.760 permanently
00:22:16.340 and Madonna
00:22:17.780 is a beautiful
00:22:18.340 example of
00:22:18.840 that
00:22:18.960 she can't
00:22:20.020 find it
00:22:22.020 within herself
00:22:22.500 to accept
00:22:23.040 progressing
00:22:23.520 from maiden
00:22:24.380 to matriarch
00:22:25.060 and I think
00:22:25.540 that's a lot
00:22:26.040 of
00:22:26.220 I think
00:22:27.180 the key
00:22:27.760 cause of
00:22:28.260 that is
00:22:28.520 the fact
00:22:28.780 that we
00:22:29.040 don't attach
00:22:29.720 status to
00:22:30.500 mothers and
00:22:31.840 to matriarchs
00:22:32.360 in the way
00:22:32.820 that we
00:22:34.300 once did
00:22:35.120 I think
00:22:35.740 that all
00:22:36.240 of the status
00:22:36.740 is loaded
00:22:37.180 onto the
00:22:38.100 maiden role
00:22:38.800 but it's
00:22:40.640 necessarily
00:22:41.280 as you say
00:22:41.920 a role
00:22:42.240 that you
00:22:42.520 can't spend
00:22:43.060 your entire
00:22:43.600 life in
00:22:44.220 and I think
00:22:44.680 that explains
00:22:45.440 a lot of
00:22:45.820 the psychological
00:22:46.300 dysfunction
00:22:47.640 that women
00:22:48.040 suffer from
00:22:48.660 yeah
00:22:49.720 yeah
00:22:50.160 yeah
00:22:50.460 well I
00:22:50.740 think
00:22:50.920 that's
00:22:51.700 right
00:22:52.660 so what
00:22:53.300 we have
00:22:53.800 is the
00:22:54.560 domination
00:22:55.500 you basically
00:22:56.980 laid out a
00:22:57.740 three part
00:22:58.440 archetype
00:22:59.660 and it's
00:23:00.980 an archetype
00:23:01.800 of transformation
00:23:02.760 you know
00:23:03.760 and I've
00:23:04.380 talked to
00:23:04.840 some pretty
00:23:05.680 bright women
00:23:06.300 on my podcast
00:23:07.180 and a number
00:23:08.420 of them
00:23:08.720 have commented
00:23:09.340 that as
00:23:10.480 they progress
00:23:11.200 along their
00:23:11.700 careers
00:23:12.220 and their
00:23:13.240 as they
00:23:14.160 accrue
00:23:14.860 productive
00:23:16.000 status
00:23:16.760 so let's
00:23:17.620 say as
00:23:17.960 mothers and
00:23:18.520 matriarchs
00:23:19.220 they don't
00:23:20.360 necessarily
00:23:21.000 attain a
00:23:23.080 commensurate
00:23:23.620 status
00:23:24.220 particularly
00:23:24.720 among young
00:23:25.500 women
00:23:25.860 interestingly
00:23:26.940 enough
00:23:27.440 and maybe
00:23:28.220 that's because
00:23:28.720 the women
00:23:29.120 are competing
00:23:29.720 you know
00:23:30.040 I suppose
00:23:30.600 a woman
00:23:31.640 can be
00:23:32.000 attractive
00:23:32.420 as a
00:23:32.800 mother
00:23:32.980 and a
00:23:33.260 matriarch
00:23:33.760 and so
00:23:35.120 the maidens
00:23:35.640 might take
00:23:36.080 exception to
00:23:36.680 that
00:23:36.900 because it
00:23:37.380 it's a
00:23:38.060 form of
00:23:38.400 competition
00:23:38.940 but I
00:23:39.860 do think
00:23:40.280 too
00:23:40.580 that our
00:23:41.680 culture
00:23:42.160 hyper values
00:23:43.660 the maiden
00:23:45.360 image
00:23:45.900 especially when
00:23:46.760 that's allied
00:23:47.440 with
00:23:47.840 it's not
00:23:50.840 virginal maiden
00:23:51.700 that's exactly
00:23:52.440 held up
00:23:54.960 as an icon
00:23:56.040 you know
00:23:56.760 even though
00:23:57.180 people like
00:23:58.060 Madonna
00:23:59.180 will play
00:23:59.920 with the
00:24:00.360 idea of
00:24:00.920 virginity
00:24:01.540 as something
00:24:02.480 attractive
00:24:03.060 it's only
00:24:03.920 there as
00:24:04.620 a
00:24:05.020 sexual
00:24:06.260 magnet
00:24:07.060 and
00:24:07.800 it's
00:24:08.340 only
00:24:08.620 there
00:24:08.860 tongue
00:24:09.160 in cheek
00:24:09.680 in some
00:24:10.980 real sense
00:24:12.060 and then
00:24:13.260 our culture
00:24:13.840 because it's a
00:24:14.460 consumer culture
00:24:15.200 and also
00:24:15.680 because
00:24:16.080 you know
00:24:17.240 it concentrates
00:24:17.960 on teenagers
00:24:18.620 a lot
00:24:19.200 because they
00:24:19.920 have
00:24:20.040 disposable income
00:24:21.500 and it's
00:24:22.340 really the
00:24:22.720 case that our
00:24:23.220 culture became
00:24:23.780 consumerist
00:24:24.580 oriented
00:24:25.040 when teenagers
00:24:26.520 started to develop
00:24:27.460 disposable income
00:24:28.500 it's not
00:24:29.360 surprising at
00:24:30.000 all that
00:24:30.500 the consumer
00:24:32.180 market
00:24:33.360 tilts towards
00:24:34.420 the maiden
00:24:34.860 archetype
00:24:35.440 because that's
00:24:36.040 where there's
00:24:36.420 spare money
00:24:36.880 to be
00:24:37.200 vacuumed up
00:24:37.880 so that's
00:24:38.600 sort of a
00:24:38.980 perfect storm
00:24:39.640 in some
00:24:40.060 sense
00:24:40.460 and so
00:24:40.920 but yeah
00:24:42.280 so our
00:24:42.720 developing
00:24:44.060 hypothesis
00:24:44.680 here in the
00:24:45.340 podcast
00:24:45.680 and obviously
00:24:46.360 you've thought
00:24:46.840 this through
00:24:47.180 to a great
00:24:47.580 degree
00:24:47.880 is that
00:24:48.300 part of
00:24:49.140 the reason
00:24:49.560 that
00:24:49.900 the sexual
00:24:51.000 revolution
00:24:51.700 claiming
00:24:52.580 absolute
00:24:53.240 sexual
00:24:53.760 freedom
00:24:54.160 is pathological
00:24:55.560 is because
00:24:56.160 well it enables
00:24:56.940 the male
00:24:57.520 exploiters
00:24:58.480 but
00:24:59.200 and that's
00:24:59.840 not good
00:25:00.220 at all
00:25:00.500 but it also
00:25:01.100 isn't a good
00:25:02.200 medium to
00:25:02.860 long-term
00:25:03.400 game
00:25:03.820 well I would
00:25:04.580 say either
00:25:04.980 for women
00:25:05.440 or men
00:25:06.000 I mean
00:25:06.560 if you develop
00:25:07.700 a long-term
00:25:08.300 partner
00:25:08.760 in a woman
00:25:09.820 and you're
00:25:10.860 a man
00:25:11.180 you might
00:25:11.620 want a woman
00:25:12.180 who has
00:25:12.660 enough sense
00:25:13.260 to move
00:25:13.800 from maiden
00:25:14.400 to mother
00:25:14.920 to matriarch
00:25:15.960 and to do
00:25:17.280 that in a
00:25:18.000 manner that
00:25:19.020 facilitates
00:25:20.300 the
00:25:20.720 you know
00:25:22.660 the development
00:25:23.200 of the relationship
00:25:24.080 across time
00:25:25.000 you know
00:25:25.920 and maybe
00:25:26.340 I wonder
00:25:26.960 too if
00:25:27.440 a woman
00:25:27.760 who does
00:25:28.180 that really
00:25:28.660 well
00:25:29.100 is as
00:25:30.200 she progresses
00:25:30.960 across that
00:25:31.900 three-part
00:25:32.760 track
00:25:33.900 also to some
00:25:35.220 degree
00:25:35.540 integrates
00:25:36.340 the previous
00:25:36.960 stages as
00:25:37.720 she moves
00:25:38.160 forward
00:25:38.600 you know
00:25:39.700 because it
00:25:40.120 might be
00:25:40.460 the case
00:25:40.900 that if
00:25:41.980 you're
00:25:42.360 a successful
00:25:43.580 matriarch
00:25:44.380 maybe that's
00:25:45.360 at the point
00:25:45.880 where you
00:25:46.240 become a
00:25:46.740 grandmother
00:25:47.160 something like
00:25:48.320 that
00:25:48.620 that you've
00:25:49.600 also
00:25:50.080 integrated
00:25:51.200 mother
00:25:51.620 and even
00:25:52.260 maiden
00:25:52.720 and are
00:25:53.280 still capable
00:25:54.040 of playing
00:25:54.580 those roles
00:25:55.220 when that's
00:25:55.720 appropriate
00:25:56.200 but are
00:25:56.700 no longer
00:25:57.260 only limited
00:25:58.660 to them
00:25:59.200 and I'm
00:25:59.940 not saying
00:26:00.280 that's an
00:26:00.660 easy thing
00:26:01.020 to pull
00:26:01.320 off
00:26:01.600 because
00:26:01.920 you know
00:26:02.520 it's not
00:26:02.840 that hard
00:26:03.320 to be
00:26:03.700 it's not
00:26:04.380 that easy
00:26:04.880 to be
00:26:05.380 you know
00:26:06.300 outstandingly
00:26:07.320 sexually
00:26:07.780 attractive
00:26:08.380 male or
00:26:09.440 female
00:26:09.780 by the time
00:26:10.440 you're in
00:26:10.760 your 60s
00:26:11.560 let's say
00:26:12.100 it gets
00:26:12.740 to be
00:26:13.160 you know
00:26:13.640 old age
00:26:14.180 is fighting
00:26:14.580 against that
00:26:15.120 pretty hard
00:26:15.640 but
00:26:15.900 that doesn't
00:26:17.520 mean that
00:26:18.000 that can't
00:26:19.260 be held
00:26:20.060 forward
00:26:20.500 as
00:26:20.940 you know
00:26:22.220 an unattainable
00:26:23.020 ideal
00:26:23.460 to which
00:26:23.920 we all
00:26:24.300 might strive
00:26:25.100 or at least
00:26:25.600 hope might
00:26:26.140 make itself
00:26:26.700 manifest
00:26:27.140 and I think
00:26:27.760 that's actually
00:26:28.480 I think that's
00:26:29.800 actually a
00:26:30.260 possibility
00:26:30.820 you know
00:26:31.820 that
00:26:32.060 you can
00:26:33.600 move towards
00:26:34.600 something like
00:26:35.120 a full
00:26:35.420 integration
00:26:36.060 like Russian
00:26:37.600 dolls
00:26:38.000 I think
00:26:38.620 is the
00:26:38.960 perfect
00:26:39.240 image
00:26:39.620 for it
00:26:40.080 you know
00:26:40.400 the Russian
00:26:40.740 dolls
00:26:40.920 that contains
00:26:41.760 the younger
00:26:43.000 the smaller
00:26:43.580 counterparts
00:26:44.980 in the whole
00:26:46.480 that's the
00:26:47.240 aspiration
00:26:47.840 I mean
00:26:48.200 I think
00:26:48.780 part of the
00:26:49.360 reason
00:26:49.600 that we're
00:26:49.840 so focused
00:26:50.280 on the
00:26:51.000 maiden role
00:26:51.560 is partly
00:26:51.960 as you say
00:26:52.380 because it's
00:26:52.780 a very
00:26:53.020 consumerist
00:26:53.960 kind of
00:26:54.740 product
00:26:55.200 I mean
00:26:56.060 this strange
00:26:56.480 paradox
00:26:56.960 where on
00:26:57.220 the one
00:26:57.580 hand
00:26:57.900 I'd say
00:26:58.240 Western
00:26:58.560 society
00:26:59.240 is increasingly
00:27:00.260 gerontocratic
00:27:02.300 in that
00:27:02.940 power
00:27:03.340 and
00:27:04.080 assets
00:27:05.200 primarily
00:27:05.660 are
00:27:06.400 disproportionately
00:27:07.100 held by
00:27:07.560 the old
00:27:08.020 but it's
00:27:08.780 also still
00:27:09.260 a very
00:27:09.620 youth
00:27:10.140 orientated
00:27:10.660 culture
00:27:11.020 in terms
00:27:11.400 of
00:27:11.540 politics
00:27:12.020 in terms
00:27:12.500 of
00:27:12.920 fashion
00:27:13.600 beauty
00:27:14.680 all of
00:27:14.960 this
00:27:15.100 kind
00:27:15.280 of
00:27:35.660 reproductive
00:27:36.020 stage
00:27:36.580 in a
00:27:37.540 way
00:27:37.680 that
00:27:37.820 maybe
00:27:38.020 men
00:27:38.260 are
00:27:38.400 less
00:27:38.620 so
00:27:38.840 I
00:27:39.100 think
00:27:39.260 that
00:27:39.400 men's
00:27:39.660 lives
00:27:39.920 change
00:27:40.420 a bit
00:27:40.780 less
00:27:41.100 when they
00:27:41.420 become
00:27:41.640 fathers
00:27:41.960 when they
00:27:42.240 become
00:27:42.480 grandfathers
00:27:43.020 and I
00:27:44.080 think
00:27:44.280 that part
00:27:44.720 of the
00:27:45.220 resistance
00:27:45.960 to this
00:27:46.800 natural
00:27:47.340 progression
00:27:47.840 among women
00:27:49.640 comes from
00:27:50.120 the fact
00:27:50.480 that so much
00:27:51.360 of feminism
00:27:51.860 of the
00:27:52.240 second wave
00:27:52.800 has been
00:27:53.480 about trying
00:27:54.100 to be more
00:27:54.660 masculine
00:27:55.200 in every
00:27:56.720 way
00:27:57.060 in a way
00:27:58.080 that I
00:27:58.340 think is
00:27:58.600 ultimately
00:27:58.940 detrimental
00:27:59.320 to women
00:27:59.860 that's why
00:28:00.320 I called
00:28:00.640 chapter two
00:28:01.100 men and women
00:28:01.500 are different
00:28:01.900 because I
00:28:02.580 think we
00:28:02.820 have to
00:28:03.100 just start
00:28:03.820 from the
00:28:04.180 premise
00:28:04.460 that men
00:28:04.780 and women
00:28:05.000 are fundamentally
00:28:05.600 different
00:28:05.960 there is a
00:28:06.340 sexual asymmetry
00:28:07.160 that is never
00:28:07.720 going away
00:28:08.280 there are
00:28:08.960 psychological
00:28:09.500 average
00:28:09.940 psychological
00:28:10.460 but you
00:28:11.040 know
00:28:11.120 nevertheless
00:28:11.460 at the
00:28:11.720 population
00:28:12.040 level
00:28:12.260 they matter
00:28:12.740 there are
00:28:13.620 these
00:28:13.760 differences
00:28:14.060 between
00:28:14.400 men and
00:28:14.680 women
00:28:14.900 and actually
00:28:16.040 I think
00:28:16.400 that any
00:28:16.820 kind of
00:28:17.280 productive
00:28:17.620 form of
00:28:18.060 feminism
00:28:18.380 has to
00:28:18.880 start
00:28:19.420 from that
00:28:20.000 recognition
00:28:21.160 that those
00:28:22.500 fundamental
00:28:22.880 differences
00:28:23.280 aren't going
00:28:23.820 anywhere
00:28:24.260 yeah
00:28:26.620 okay
00:28:27.380 so let's
00:28:28.600 focus on
00:28:30.300 that
00:28:30.580 now
00:28:31.600 so now
00:28:32.380 we're off
00:28:32.760 to chapter
00:28:33.240 two
00:28:33.640 I'm going
00:28:35.560 to make
00:28:35.760 a counter
00:28:36.160 case
00:28:36.540 for a
00:28:36.900 minute
00:28:37.060 and then
00:28:37.600 let's
00:28:38.260 hash
00:28:38.480 that out
00:28:39.020 all right
00:28:40.240 so
00:28:40.520 we mentioned
00:28:42.940 at the
00:28:43.260 beginning
00:28:43.500 of this
00:28:43.860 podcast
00:28:44.220 that
00:28:44.680 the
00:28:46.240 fundamental
00:28:47.040 biological
00:28:47.700 differentiator
00:28:48.940 or one
00:28:49.560 of them
00:28:49.860 because there's
00:28:50.320 a number
00:28:50.700 is that
00:28:51.960 what makes
00:28:53.240 a creature
00:28:54.020 female
00:28:54.540 rather than
00:28:55.120 male
00:28:55.400 is
00:28:55.880 disproportionate
00:28:58.380 contribution
00:28:59.000 to reproduction
00:28:59.920 and so you
00:29:00.500 even see
00:29:00.880 that with
00:29:01.260 the sperm
00:29:01.700 and the
00:29:02.000 egg
00:29:02.280 the egg
00:29:03.780 is way
00:29:04.220 way bigger
00:29:04.820 across
00:29:07.040 the biological
00:29:08.200 universe
00:29:08.800 than the
00:29:09.280 sperm
00:29:09.580 and that
00:29:10.120 means
00:29:10.400 the egg
00:29:11.660 has more
00:29:12.220 resources
00:29:12.700 than the
00:29:13.440 sperm
00:29:13.700 and that
00:29:14.540 is echoed
00:29:15.220 at every
00:29:15.800 stage of
00:29:16.520 sexual
00:29:17.160 interaction
00:29:17.780 in animals
00:29:18.720 and human
00:29:19.260 beings
00:29:19.520 there's a few
00:29:20.360 exceptions
00:29:20.860 in some
00:29:22.440 regards
00:29:22.880 like I
00:29:23.460 think
00:29:23.680 male
00:29:24.520 seahorses
00:29:26.580 care for
00:29:27.480 the young
00:29:27.900 for example
00:29:28.520 they basically
00:29:29.300 have something
00:29:30.380 approximating a
00:29:31.300 pregnancy
00:29:31.740 but that's
00:29:33.660 enough of an
00:29:35.020 exception so
00:29:35.760 that you
00:29:36.620 know most
00:29:37.080 people who
00:29:37.540 are biologically
00:29:38.300 informed know
00:29:40.060 about it
00:29:40.540 it's extraordinarily
00:29:41.300 rare for a
00:29:42.420 male for the
00:29:43.480 male to take
00:29:44.180 on that role
00:29:44.900 and so
00:29:46.080 women are
00:29:49.020 the half of
00:29:50.800 the human race
00:29:51.440 that bears
00:29:52.220 disproportionate
00:29:53.220 responsibility
00:29:53.960 for sexual
00:29:56.960 reproduction
00:29:57.540 pays a higher
00:29:58.940 cost for it
00:29:59.920 and that seems
00:30:00.620 to shape
00:30:01.080 everything
00:30:01.560 including mating
00:30:02.340 strategies
00:30:02.920 but
00:30:03.300 but
00:30:03.840 but
00:30:04.340 here's the
00:30:05.040 here's the
00:30:06.040 killer
00:30:06.300 and so
00:30:08.360 we could also
00:30:08.860 say that's
00:30:09.400 been true
00:30:09.820 for the entire
00:30:10.440 course of
00:30:11.080 reproductive
00:30:12.180 history
00:30:12.720 after the
00:30:13.580 emergence of
00:30:14.200 sex
00:30:14.520 which emerged
00:30:15.480 a very long
00:30:16.480 time ago
00:30:16.960 biologically
00:30:17.640 speaking
00:30:18.180 but
00:30:19.300 the pill
00:30:20.880 hit
00:30:21.260 you know
00:30:22.620 50 years
00:30:23.380 ago
00:30:23.700 and was
00:30:24.440 was made
00:30:26.120 widespread
00:30:26.500 very rapidly
00:30:27.260 and what
00:30:27.940 that did
00:30:28.460 in principle
00:30:29.220 and to
00:30:29.920 some degree
00:30:30.480 in reality
00:30:31.060 was give
00:30:32.340 females
00:30:33.420 voluntary
00:30:36.000 control of
00:30:36.760 their reproductive
00:30:37.400 function
00:30:38.020 really for the
00:30:39.560 first time in
00:30:40.340 biological history
00:30:41.600 and so that
00:30:42.260 opened up a
00:30:43.100 new question
00:30:43.700 and this is a
00:30:44.660 question
00:30:45.040 if a woman
00:30:47.560 has full
00:30:48.360 voluntary
00:30:48.840 control over
00:30:50.360 her
00:30:50.840 reproductive
00:30:51.600 function
00:30:52.300 why isn't
00:30:54.800 she now
00:30:55.380 just a
00:30:56.760 man
00:30:57.060 that's one
00:30:58.320 question
00:30:58.740 or what
00:30:59.520 exactly
00:31:00.040 distinguishes
00:31:00.900 her from
00:31:01.500 a man
00:31:01.960 because one
00:31:02.600 thing that
00:31:03.060 distinguished her
00:31:03.900 was her
00:31:04.900 differential
00:31:05.460 role in
00:31:06.120 reproductive
00:31:06.620 burden
00:31:07.240 and now
00:31:08.080 that's been
00:31:08.800 ameliorated
00:31:10.300 arguably to
00:31:11.680 some degree
00:31:12.240 and then
00:31:13.160 also
00:31:13.760 if
00:31:14.960 reproductive
00:31:16.080 function is
00:31:16.800 now a
00:31:17.220 matter of
00:31:17.680 voluntary
00:31:18.080 choice
00:31:18.620 why can't
00:31:19.700 sex
00:31:20.080 just be
00:31:21.240 fun
00:31:22.380 and free
00:31:23.140 and I
00:31:24.040 would say
00:31:24.560 we've been
00:31:25.600 wrestling with
00:31:26.260 those two
00:31:26.700 questions for
00:31:27.460 50 years
00:31:28.180 and longer
00:31:28.660 than that
00:31:29.140 insofar as
00:31:30.160 there's been
00:31:30.560 some form of
00:31:31.440 reliable
00:31:31.860 contraception
00:31:32.620 but it
00:31:32.840 wasn't very
00:31:33.280 damn reliable
00:31:34.100 till the
00:31:35.180 birth control
00:31:35.720 pill
00:31:36.080 kicked in
00:31:37.300 and so I
00:31:38.120 think it
00:31:38.440 is an
00:31:38.800 open
00:31:39.040 question
00:31:39.600 to what
00:31:41.700 degree
00:31:41.980 can sex
00:31:42.540 just be
00:31:43.140 you know
00:31:44.140 fun
00:31:45.160 and fancy
00:31:45.760 free
00:31:46.120 and also
00:31:47.100 it's an
00:31:47.560 open
00:31:47.800 question
00:31:48.360 to what
00:31:49.880 degree
00:31:50.220 aren't
00:31:50.780 women
00:31:51.320 just
00:31:52.700 now
00:31:53.220 the same
00:31:53.740 as men
00:31:54.240 and so
00:31:56.200 well
00:31:58.400 any comments
00:31:59.460 on that
00:31:59.920 whole line
00:32:00.920 of inquiry
00:32:01.400 are more
00:32:01.840 than welcome
00:32:02.460 well that's
00:32:03.120 the promise
00:32:03.760 right of
00:32:04.580 the sexual
00:32:04.860 revolution
00:32:05.360 that by
00:32:06.700 introducing
00:32:07.420 this new
00:32:08.160 technology
00:32:09.200 shock
00:32:09.680 we do
00:32:11.020 erase the
00:32:11.500 differences
00:32:11.820 between the
00:32:12.340 sexes
00:32:12.780 and I
00:32:13.080 think that
00:32:13.420 to some
00:32:13.740 extent
00:32:14.180 if you
00:32:15.240 live a
00:32:15.700 very modern
00:32:16.240 life
00:32:17.340 you know
00:32:17.560 it's not
00:32:17.900 just the
00:32:18.300 pill
00:32:18.480 obviously
00:32:18.880 it's changed
00:32:19.440 in the last
00:32:19.880 60 years
00:32:20.440 we also have
00:32:21.020 very different
00:32:21.440 ways of
00:32:22.020 working
00:32:23.200 people are
00:32:23.860 much less
00:32:24.220 likely to do
00:32:24.840 manual work
00:32:25.580 at least in
00:32:26.120 the west
00:32:26.480 than they
00:32:26.800 used to be
00:32:27.340 we live
00:32:28.860 much more
00:32:29.800 mixed
00:32:31.660 lives
00:32:32.800 there's much
00:32:33.440 less homosexuality
00:32:34.440 than there
00:32:34.860 used to be
00:32:35.340 and so people
00:32:36.260 are interacting
00:32:36.720 in the workplace
00:32:37.240 or whatever
00:32:37.600 basically in
00:32:38.880 an egalitarian
00:32:39.760 fashion between
00:32:40.480 men and women
00:32:41.000 if you live
00:32:42.420 that kind of
00:32:42.960 life
00:32:43.600 where you're
00:32:44.160 not really
00:32:44.700 using your
00:32:45.360 sexed body
00:32:46.160 for anything
00:32:46.920 you're just
00:32:47.380 living the
00:32:48.200 life of the
00:32:48.580 mind really
00:32:49.100 you could
00:32:50.080 believe that
00:32:50.560 those differences
00:32:51.020 are trivial
00:32:51.480 and I think
00:32:52.240 that's where
00:32:52.780 we've had
00:32:53.940 some very
00:32:54.560 strange political
00:32:55.160 ideas around
00:32:55.740 for instance
00:32:56.340 having biological
00:32:59.880 males competing
00:33:00.540 in women's
00:33:01.000 sports
00:33:01.380 is seen to
00:33:02.880 be a
00:33:04.040 completely
00:33:04.320 logical thing
00:33:05.160 from people
00:33:05.900 who do
00:33:06.220 have
00:33:06.360 essentially
00:33:06.780 those lives
00:33:07.360 who probably
00:33:07.780 haven't actually
00:33:08.340 competed in
00:33:08.880 sports
00:33:09.120 I mean
00:33:09.340 you'll notice
00:33:09.760 that female
00:33:10.700 athletes tend
00:33:11.320 to be opposed
00:33:11.920 to this
00:33:12.800 because they
00:33:13.180 tend to be
00:33:13.580 completely aware
00:33:14.320 of the fact
00:33:14.740 that there
00:33:15.040 are huge
00:33:16.120 differences in
00:33:16.780 performance
00:33:17.120 between male
00:33:17.580 and female
00:33:17.900 athletes
00:33:18.400 but for people
00:33:19.320 you can usually
00:33:20.000 mob them
00:33:20.700 into silence
00:33:21.520 though
00:33:21.800 yeah
00:33:22.340 some of
00:33:22.800 them are
00:33:23.020 brave enough
00:33:23.380 to say so
00:33:23.820 many of
00:33:24.160 them
00:33:24.300 yeah
00:33:24.580 as you say
00:33:25.140 but many
00:33:26.180 people who
00:33:26.800 don't really
00:33:28.160 do sports
00:33:29.140 who don't
00:33:29.520 live very
00:33:30.220 physical lives
00:33:30.980 may be
00:33:31.680 genuinely
00:33:32.040 quite oblivious
00:33:32.980 to this
00:33:33.960 fact
00:33:34.480 because that
00:33:34.880 seems to be
00:33:35.560 the promise
00:33:36.360 of technology
00:33:36.860 that it
00:33:37.180 erases this
00:33:37.680 difference
00:33:38.000 I don't think
00:33:39.000 that it does
00:33:39.740 I mean not
00:33:40.300 only because
00:33:40.900 we don't yet
00:33:41.660 have artificial
00:33:42.900 wombs
00:33:43.380 we still
00:33:43.900 reproduce
00:33:44.280 the old
00:33:44.680 fashioned
00:33:44.980 way
00:33:45.280 and I
00:33:45.700 think are
00:33:46.000 likely to
00:33:46.500 for the
00:33:46.780 foreseeable
00:33:47.240 I don't
00:33:47.860 think artificial
00:33:48.400 wombs are
00:33:48.780 just around
00:33:49.080 the corner
00:33:49.400 I think
00:33:49.700 actually
00:33:49.960 they're a
00:33:50.300 spectacularly
00:33:50.820 difficult
00:33:51.120 technology
00:33:51.560 to develop
00:33:52.060 and also
00:33:53.300 because we
00:33:53.660 still have
00:33:54.240 the same
00:33:54.940 brains
00:33:55.520 essentially
00:33:56.180 that our
00:33:56.700 stone age
00:33:57.040 ancestors
00:33:57.440 did
00:33:57.980 we spent
00:33:58.420 95%
00:33:59.100 of our
00:33:59.600 species
00:33:59.800 history
00:34:00.120 as
00:34:00.260 hunter-gatherers
00:34:00.900 is
00:34:01.560 humanity's
00:34:02.240 first
00:34:02.540 and most
00:34:02.900 successful
00:34:03.260 adaptation
00:34:03.820 and I
00:34:05.140 think that
00:34:05.520 we can't
00:34:06.360 no matter
00:34:06.880 how
00:34:07.340 intelligent
00:34:09.000 we are
00:34:09.540 no matter
00:34:09.860 how desperately
00:34:10.320 we try
00:34:11.000 I think
00:34:11.700 it's very
00:34:12.060 very hard
00:34:12.840 to erase
00:34:13.660 those
00:34:13.900 differences
00:34:14.240 at the
00:34:14.500 psychological
00:34:14.860 level
00:34:15.340 and the
00:34:16.740 response
00:34:17.360 interestingly
00:34:17.860 that I've
00:34:18.200 had to
00:34:18.680 this book
00:34:19.020 since it
00:34:19.300 was published
00:34:19.700 is obviously
00:34:20.280 hugely
00:34:20.700 controversial
00:34:21.120 title
00:34:21.540 the whole
00:34:21.840 premise
00:34:22.100 is hugely
00:34:22.400 controversial
00:34:22.860 but interestingly
00:34:24.520 I haven't
00:34:25.100 had nearly
00:34:26.020 as much
00:34:26.740 criticism
00:34:27.780 as I
00:34:28.180 thought I
00:34:28.820 would
00:34:29.080 and I've
00:34:29.540 actually had
00:34:29.980 positive
00:34:30.320 reviews
00:34:30.920 even from
00:34:31.640 left-leaning
00:34:32.000 outlets
00:34:32.360 and so on
00:34:32.800 I got an
00:34:33.500 amazing review
00:34:34.000 in The
00:34:34.180 Observer
00:34:34.520 I think
00:34:35.740 it's because
00:34:36.420 actually an
00:34:38.060 enormous number
00:34:38.900 of women
00:34:39.220 across the
00:34:39.700 political
00:34:39.900 spectrum
00:34:40.320 who have
00:34:41.280 been
00:34:41.940 offered
00:34:42.800 this promise
00:34:43.620 of you
00:34:44.600 can live
00:34:44.920 just like
00:34:45.280 a man
00:34:45.560 you can
00:34:45.820 have sex
00:34:46.200 just like
00:34:46.580 a man
00:34:46.980 they're
00:34:47.700 profoundly
00:34:48.540 miserable
00:34:49.000 and they
00:34:50.300 do
00:34:50.580 recognise
00:34:51.040 that actually
00:34:51.680 deep down
00:34:52.300 that promise
00:34:53.400 is an
00:34:53.640 empty one
00:34:54.180 and I
00:34:55.200 think
00:34:55.500 there's
00:34:56.240 the emotion
00:34:57.820 that I've
00:34:58.160 had most
00:34:58.520 often
00:34:58.860 from readers
00:34:59.540 is just
00:35:00.120 a sense
00:35:00.540 of relief
00:35:01.160 that someone
00:35:02.340 is saying
00:35:02.880 it
00:35:03.220 and that it
00:35:03.740 seems as if
00:35:04.540 there's now
00:35:04.900 permission
00:35:05.300 to say it
00:35:06.900 because I
00:35:07.440 think that
00:35:08.100 the effort
00:35:09.160 of trying to
00:35:10.120 pretend that
00:35:10.700 men and
00:35:10.940 women are
00:35:11.200 the same
00:35:11.620 is ultimately
00:35:12.500 ruinous
00:35:13.140 to both
00:35:13.640 sexes
00:35:14.120 yeah well
00:35:15.340 you see
00:35:15.740 this weird
00:35:16.560 phenomenon
00:35:17.460 emerging on
00:35:19.380 the left
00:35:20.340 in particular
00:35:20.980 and I think
00:35:21.560 it's particularly
00:35:22.340 rife in
00:35:23.300 university
00:35:23.800 campuses
00:35:24.340 where you
00:35:25.780 get a
00:35:26.560 combination
00:35:27.540 of compassion
00:35:29.760 and low
00:35:30.620 conscientiousness
00:35:31.660 and high
00:35:32.120 openness
00:35:32.600 driving a
00:35:34.480 particular
00:35:34.800 political
00:35:35.280 mindset
00:35:35.800 and so
00:35:36.420 the compassion
00:35:37.160 means
00:35:37.620 well we're
00:35:38.480 going to
00:35:38.840 accept
00:35:39.260 everyone
00:35:39.740 and the
00:35:40.040 low
00:35:40.240 conscientiousness
00:35:41.160 means
00:35:41.540 well we're
00:35:42.400 not bound
00:35:43.480 by anything
00:35:44.080 approximating
00:35:44.820 duty
00:35:45.200 and the
00:35:45.580 high
00:35:45.780 openness
00:35:46.140 means
00:35:46.680 you know
00:35:47.580 we're
00:35:47.820 creative
00:35:49.080 and curious
00:35:49.760 about every
00:35:50.540 form of
00:35:51.180 potential
00:35:52.160 self-expression
00:35:53.560 and then
00:35:54.880 that produces
00:35:56.140 this idea
00:35:56.980 that all
00:35:57.760 sexual
00:35:58.440 drive
00:35:59.840 you have a
00:36:00.700 chapter in
00:36:01.200 your book
00:36:01.560 called
00:36:02.000 something like
00:36:03.720 not all
00:36:04.120 desire is
00:36:04.780 good
00:36:05.080 and so
00:36:06.160 we'll talk
00:36:07.420 about that
00:36:07.840 a little
00:36:08.060 bit
00:36:08.300 we have
00:36:09.100 this
00:36:09.420 there's
00:36:09.920 this
00:36:10.120 absolute
00:36:10.920 clamoring
00:36:13.720 insistence
00:36:14.560 that every
00:36:15.700 form of
00:36:16.300 sexual
00:36:16.780 desire
00:36:17.400 and
00:36:18.020 behavior
00:36:18.580 is to
00:36:19.360 be
00:36:19.680 valued
00:36:20.300 celebrated
00:36:21.640 and promoted
00:36:22.840 and that if
00:36:23.480 you dare
00:36:24.140 oppose that
00:36:24.960 you are
00:36:25.640 there's
00:36:28.560 something
00:36:28.860 immoral
00:36:29.260 about the
00:36:29.720 opposition
00:36:30.160 so that's
00:36:30.880 merely a
00:36:31.500 consequence
00:36:31.920 let's say
00:36:32.520 of your
00:36:32.820 bigotry
00:36:33.400 but
00:36:34.180 and so
00:36:34.960 you know
00:36:35.820 and you
00:36:37.080 pointed out
00:36:37.800 in your
00:36:38.020 book that
00:36:38.460 you often
00:36:39.600 get artistic
00:36:40.580 types like
00:36:41.240 andre
00:36:41.620 guide let's
00:36:42.300 say and
00:36:42.640 left-wing
00:36:43.040 intellectuals
00:36:43.760 pushing for
00:36:44.860 full sexual
00:36:45.680 freedom and
00:36:47.220 some of that's
00:36:47.760 high openness
00:36:48.340 and some of
00:36:48.820 that's low
00:36:49.280 conscientiousness
00:36:50.300 that's for
00:36:51.160 sure but
00:36:52.280 then there's a
00:36:53.000 kickback that's
00:36:53.880 really interesting
00:36:54.640 to me because
00:36:55.980 it's the same
00:36:57.020 radicals possessed
00:36:58.480 by exactly the
00:36:59.700 same set of
00:37:00.340 ideas who
00:37:01.620 make a very
00:37:02.840 radical
00:37:03.440 counterclaim
00:37:04.400 and the
00:37:05.400 counterclaim
00:37:06.080 is something
00:37:06.600 like well
00:37:07.740 every form of
00:37:08.800 sexual behavior
00:37:09.640 is must be
00:37:11.380 celebrated and
00:37:12.160 is nothing but
00:37:13.020 a testament to
00:37:13.900 the you know
00:37:14.380 ever blossoming
00:37:15.240 range of human
00:37:16.080 freedom but
00:37:17.740 every form of
00:37:19.420 sexual interaction
00:37:20.440 between particularly
00:37:21.760 a young man and
00:37:22.760 a young woman
00:37:23.360 is so dangerous
00:37:25.080 right to its
00:37:25.980 core that
00:37:27.160 there's nothing
00:37:28.600 more important
00:37:29.700 than full
00:37:30.840 consent and
00:37:32.440 that consent
00:37:32.980 has to be
00:37:33.660 documented
00:37:34.220 verbally and
00:37:35.220 maybe even
00:37:36.160 beyond verbally
00:37:36.980 formally for
00:37:38.180 even interactions
00:37:39.200 as that were
00:37:40.900 once as
00:37:41.660 casual let's
00:37:42.760 say as
00:37:43.740 dancing and
00:37:45.700 so at
00:37:46.080 Princeton
00:37:46.480 University for
00:37:47.360 example there
00:37:48.100 was a push
00:37:49.660 to make men
00:37:51.800 ensure that
00:37:52.440 even when
00:37:53.640 they're dancing
00:37:54.620 with a girl
00:37:55.440 who agreed to
00:37:56.900 dance that it
00:37:58.140 was incumbent
00:37:58.840 upon them
00:37:59.640 multiple times
00:38:01.120 during the
00:38:01.800 dance to
00:38:02.840 ask verbally
00:38:03.900 to ensure
00:38:04.580 that that
00:38:05.080 once established
00:38:06.040 consent was
00:38:07.540 still continuing
00:38:08.480 now you know
00:38:09.560 if you weren't
00:38:10.340 being cynical
00:38:10.920 about that
00:38:11.600 you might say
00:38:12.240 well that's
00:38:13.220 a stumbling
00:38:13.840 attempt to
00:38:14.540 something
00:38:15.000 approximating
00:38:16.460 awake
00:38:17.440 politeness
00:38:18.320 because if you
00:38:18.980 have any sense
00:38:19.880 when you're
00:38:21.060 dancing with
00:38:21.660 someone one of
00:38:22.280 the things you
00:38:22.820 actually want to
00:38:23.620 know is do
00:38:24.720 they really want
00:38:25.600 to be doing
00:38:26.200 it but it's
00:38:27.720 very peculiar
00:38:28.460 to me and
00:38:29.180 illuminating
00:38:30.020 that this
00:38:31.440 insistence on
00:38:33.360 negotiated
00:38:34.700 contract for
00:38:35.940 every step
00:38:36.860 of a
00:38:37.400 potentially
00:38:38.480 sexual
00:38:39.020 interaction
00:38:39.620 is being
00:38:40.300 insisted upon
00:38:41.500 not by
00:38:42.460 Christian
00:38:43.020 apologists for
00:38:44.040 traditional
00:38:44.520 morality but
00:38:45.320 by the same
00:38:45.960 radicals who
00:38:46.760 are out there
00:38:47.980 dancing three
00:38:49.420 quarters naked
00:38:50.180 in the street
00:38:50.820 in their dog
00:38:51.520 costumes and
00:38:52.880 insisting that
00:38:53.740 you know every
00:38:54.480 bit of sexual
00:38:55.260 expression is to
00:38:56.780 be lauded
00:38:57.440 my suspicion
00:38:58.860 with what's
00:38:59.720 going on there
00:39:00.720 with this rise
00:39:02.120 of sort of
00:39:02.700 starting a
00:39:05.060 business can be
00:39:05.700 tough but thanks
00:39:06.640 to Shopify running
00:39:07.660 your online
00:39:08.200 storefront is
00:39:09.000 easier than
00:39:09.620 ever Shopify is
00:39:10.960 the global
00:39:11.620 commerce platform
00:39:12.420 that helps you
00:39:12.980 sell at every
00:39:13.640 stage of your
00:39:14.140 business from
00:39:15.000 the launch your
00:39:15.600 online shop stage
00:39:16.580 all the way to
00:39:17.140 the did we just
00:39:17.900 hit a million
00:39:18.380 orders stage
00:39:19.240 Shopify is here
00:39:20.380 to help you
00:39:20.940 grow our
00:39:21.900 marketing team
00:39:22.520 uses Shopify
00:39:23.120 every day to
00:39:23.940 sell our
00:39:24.260 merchandise and
00:39:25.020 we love how
00:39:25.720 easy it is to
00:39:26.320 add more
00:39:26.680 items ship
00:39:27.620 products and
00:39:28.260 track conversions
00:39:29.040 with Shopify
00:39:30.220 customize your
00:39:31.080 online store to
00:39:31.880 your style with
00:39:32.880 flexible templates
00:39:33.680 and powerful
00:39:34.300 tools alongside an
00:39:35.720 endless list of
00:39:36.580 integrations and
00:39:37.360 third-party apps
00:39:38.120 like on-demand
00:39:38.880 printing accounting
00:39:39.860 and chatbots
00:39:40.820 Shopify helps you
00:39:42.020 turn browsers into
00:39:43.100 buyers with the
00:39:43.740 internet's best
00:39:44.440 converting checkout
00:39:45.240 up to 36% better
00:39:46.940 compared to other
00:39:47.660 leading e-commerce
00:39:48.460 platforms no matter
00:39:49.940 how big you want
00:39:50.620 to grow Shopify
00:39:51.500 gives you everything
00:39:52.300 you need to take
00:39:53.080 control and take
00:39:54.040 your business to
00:39:54.700 the next level
00:39:55.400 sign up for a
00:39:56.680 one dollar per
00:39:57.280 month trial period
00:39:58.060 at shopify.com
00:39:59.380 slash jbp all
00:40:00.940 lowercase go to
00:40:02.320 shopify.com slash
00:40:03.520 jbp now to grow
00:40:04.820 your business no
00:40:05.820 matter what stage
00:40:06.620 you're in that's
00:40:07.660 shopify.com slash
00:40:09.020 jbp a very a
00:40:14.140 bureaucratic attitude
00:40:15.480 to sex shall we
00:40:16.340 say this idea of
00:40:17.560 asking for consent
00:40:19.200 at every stage and
00:40:20.040 so on I mean the
00:40:20.620 funniest example
00:40:21.220 which I mentioned
00:40:22.100 briefly in the
00:40:22.600 book is an idea
00:40:24.500 cooked up Western
00:40:25.140 University students
00:40:25.940 that you would
00:40:26.380 have a sign a
00:40:27.040 contract before you
00:40:27.920 had casual sex and
00:40:29.520 you'd take a photo
00:40:30.300 of the pair of you
00:40:32.600 with your contracts
00:40:33.320 and so on and the
00:40:34.540 joke obviously is
00:40:35.520 why not get dressed
00:40:37.020 up in a big white
00:40:37.620 dress why not invite
00:40:38.500 all your friends you
00:40:39.200 know it's this sort
00:40:40.120 of reinvention of
00:40:40.900 marriage I think
00:40:42.220 right I think that
00:40:43.400 that's basically what
00:40:44.220 is going on we're
00:40:45.300 married for the day
00:40:46.360 that's I think what's
00:40:48.600 going on with this
00:40:49.420 reintroduction of
00:40:50.400 these new rules
00:40:51.660 post me too is
00:40:53.600 that complete
00:40:55.880 sexual freedom is
00:40:56.740 not actually a
00:40:57.460 sustainable system
00:40:58.400 and what we've
00:40:59.920 had for many
00:41:02.960 centuries millennia
00:41:03.900 up until the
00:41:04.520 1960s really is a
00:41:06.260 very complicated
00:41:08.400 tapestry of laws
00:41:09.980 and norms which
00:41:11.420 regulate sexuality
00:41:13.280 and which
00:41:13.820 particularly regulate
00:41:14.820 heterosexuality because
00:41:16.280 what you're dealing
00:41:17.200 with when it comes
00:41:18.420 to heterosexuality is
00:41:20.140 great imbalances of
00:41:21.940 physical strength the
00:41:23.060 fundamental imbalance
00:41:23.980 of reproductive roles
00:41:25.700 and also personality
00:41:27.260 differences and you
00:41:28.480 know all of this which
00:41:29.160 make it very it's just
00:41:30.120 inherently very very
00:41:30.820 difficult to deal with
00:41:32.600 mating smoothly there
00:41:34.300 is a lot of heartache
00:41:35.060 there is a lot of
00:41:35.580 risk and what we have
00:41:37.620 in most societies is
00:41:39.620 this complex dance of
00:41:41.880 marriage customs and
00:41:44.420 you know thinking more
00:41:45.580 recently in the west
00:41:46.480 chaperones and asking
00:41:48.680 the father's hand and
00:41:50.660 all of these things
00:41:51.440 which which are
00:41:52.060 supposed to basically
00:41:52.920 control sexuality I
00:41:56.280 mean the progressive
00:41:58.400 account of this is that
00:41:59.460 they repress people's
00:42:00.460 sexuality to which I
00:42:01.740 say yes they do but
00:42:02.960 they but they do that
00:42:03.740 because they have to
00:42:04.440 because that is it
00:42:06.000 completely untrammeled
00:42:07.540 sexual freedom is not
00:42:09.140 possible because of
00:42:10.560 what you can't run a
00:42:11.560 society like that and
00:42:12.960 because you will
00:42:13.500 inevitably have people
00:42:14.640 coming into conflict
00:42:15.380 with one another if
00:42:16.020 that's permitted so
00:42:16.660 you need people to be
00:42:18.040 men and women to be
00:42:19.460 repressed I think
00:42:20.040 that's what marriage
00:42:20.600 does but in a good
00:42:22.740 way you know as a
00:42:24.440 necessary step towards
00:42:25.560 having productive
00:42:26.080 relationships and I
00:42:27.180 think there's an
00:42:27.680 attempt to kind of
00:42:28.480 reinvent that with this
00:42:29.900 new bureaucracy but
00:42:31.160 it's not nearly as
00:42:31.840 good yeah yeah well
00:42:34.240 okay so here's the
00:42:35.680 rule is that
00:42:36.280 responsibility
00:42:37.020 abdicated is
00:42:38.200 vacuumed up by
00:42:39.220 tyrants and so if
00:42:40.800 young men and young
00:42:42.040 women aren't
00:42:42.540 regulating their own
00:42:43.340 sexual behavior then
00:42:44.400 tyrannical bureaucrats
00:42:45.600 will definitely step
00:42:46.800 in to have fun on
00:42:48.020 that front so but
00:42:49.640 you brought up two
00:42:51.700 points that we could
00:42:52.800 pursue and one is
00:42:54.120 an analysis of what
00:42:56.020 actually constitutes
00:42:57.060 consent and then
00:42:59.780 we could start with
00:43:02.040 that and then the
00:43:02.700 other one was let me
00:43:04.440 see if I've exactly
00:43:05.760 got this
00:43:06.460 oh yes
00:43:08.580 inhibition and
00:43:10.740 oppression let's say
00:43:12.000 of sexual desire
00:43:13.900 see this this is
00:43:16.520 something that has
00:43:17.620 to be handled
00:43:18.500 conceptually very
00:43:20.140 carefully so there's
00:43:21.940 different models of
00:43:23.340 socialization that
00:43:25.860 permeate the let's
00:43:27.320 say the psychological
00:43:28.080 community and one of
00:43:30.720 them is an ethos of
00:43:31.980 something like
00:43:32.740 inhibition and
00:43:34.500 repression and so
00:43:36.020 the Freudians sort of
00:43:37.480 fall into that camp
00:43:38.400 that the superego
00:43:39.760 inhibits the id
00:43:41.380 and and squashes it
00:43:44.100 down I'd say and
00:43:45.300 that part of what
00:43:46.620 makes you a social
00:43:47.980 being is your
00:43:48.960 ability to
00:43:50.140 suppress and
00:43:51.600 inhibit
00:43:52.140 desires like
00:43:54.720 aggression and sex
00:43:55.800 and I don't think
00:43:58.200 that's true
00:43:58.900 I only think that's
00:44:01.340 true when it's gone
00:44:02.280 wrong so here's an
00:44:04.200 alternative viewpoint
00:44:05.100 this is the viewpoint
00:44:06.400 of people like
00:44:07.740 Jean Piaget who's
00:44:09.320 great developmental
00:44:10.240 psychologist he
00:44:12.180 thought of the
00:44:13.080 developmental process
00:44:14.880 as one of
00:44:15.520 integration now you
00:44:16.700 know you already put
00:44:17.420 forth a three-stage
00:44:18.500 model of female
00:44:19.320 development and you
00:44:20.220 could think about
00:44:20.800 that as a continuing
00:44:22.480 model of complex
00:44:23.980 integration and so
00:44:25.480 the reason that sex
00:44:26.580 becomes regulated
00:44:28.520 isn't because it's
00:44:29.920 now being inhibited
00:44:31.000 it's being regulated
00:44:33.020 because it's being
00:44:33.780 integrated into higher
00:44:35.100 order games and so
00:44:36.900 it's being integrated
00:44:38.180 for example and
00:44:40.200 maybe can even be
00:44:41.220 celebrated within this
00:44:42.500 confined area of
00:44:44.800 or regulated area of
00:44:46.120 integration it's
00:44:47.500 becoming integrated
00:44:48.240 with the more mature
00:44:49.620 realization that sex
00:44:51.560 outside of an
00:44:52.740 iterated relationship
00:44:54.000 is actually a net
00:44:55.580 negative even for the
00:44:57.360 parties involved even
00:44:58.600 if they're primarily
00:44:59.440 motivated by their own
00:45:01.540 hedonism and then
00:45:03.300 hypothetically their
00:45:04.140 own will and so it
00:45:05.480 isn't inhibition that's
00:45:06.740 regulating sex and it
00:45:08.620 isn't top-down social
00:45:09.980 control it's the
00:45:11.480 necessity of
00:45:12.340 integrating sex which
00:45:14.180 can be just a
00:45:14.860 unimensional desire into
00:45:16.220 a much more sophisticated
00:45:17.380 symphony of social
00:45:18.720 interactions now when
00:45:20.800 that fails inhibition is
00:45:23.980 necessary right so if
00:45:25.880 you have someone who's
00:45:26.860 acting in an anti-social
00:45:28.060 manner parading their
00:45:29.760 sexuality insisting upon
00:45:32.080 short-term gratification at
00:45:33.680 their own expense and
00:45:34.700 that of others then
00:45:36.060 compulsion might have to
00:45:38.020 be brought to bear but
00:45:39.840 that indicates a failure
00:45:41.120 of the proper
00:45:41.840 developmental pathway
00:45:42.840 rather than a
00:45:43.540 manifestation of a
00:45:44.720 necessarily oppressive
00:45:46.200 patriarchy and that's a
00:45:48.440 much more positive
00:45:49.180 vision of the
00:45:50.920 regulation of sexual
00:45:52.820 behavior it's more like
00:45:53.880 ordered freedom rather
00:45:55.240 than inhibition and that
00:45:57.960 also opens up the other
00:45:59.240 another positive idea
00:46:01.660 which is that you know
00:46:03.600 we've thought toyed with
00:46:05.640 the idea that the birth
00:46:07.240 control pill meant that
00:46:08.800 impulsive hedonism could
00:46:10.060 now rule and that that
00:46:11.920 would be the highest form of
00:46:13.240 sexual expression and the
00:46:14.500 idiot artists who jumped on
00:46:15.940 that bandwagon were
00:46:16.960 certainly of that mind but
00:46:18.960 what we're seeing instead is
00:46:20.900 that young men and women
00:46:22.480 are turning in all ever
00:46:25.060 greater numbers to a very
00:46:27.260 casual pornography especially
00:46:29.040 with regards to the boys
00:46:30.300 to the abandonment of any
00:46:32.020 relationships whatsoever
00:46:33.160 and then interestingly
00:46:34.660 enough it seems to much
00:46:38.020 less sexual activity in
00:46:39.700 general I think it's 30%
00:46:42.100 now of Japanese I think
00:46:44.360 it's 30% of Japanese
00:46:46.020 young people under 30 are
00:46:48.620 still virgins 30% and
00:46:51.160 similar figures in South
00:46:52.520 Korea and you can see the
00:46:53.980 same proclivity emerging in
00:46:55.360 the West so what's happening
00:46:57.020 paradoxically is that by
00:46:59.160 removing all the principles
00:47:01.080 from sexual interaction not
00:47:04.060 the inhibitions but the
00:47:05.240 principles we're actually
00:47:06.720 dooming the sexual
00:47:07.920 enterprise rather than
00:47:09.140 facilitating it even for the
00:47:11.180 hedonists so anyways it's
00:47:14.040 very useful to know that
00:47:15.340 there's an integration model
00:47:16.520 rather than an inhibition
00:47:17.660 model right because it also
00:47:19.480 stops those who might oppose
00:47:22.800 the sexual revolution from
00:47:25.960 just being finger wagging
00:47:27.560 conservative moralists
00:47:29.020 because you can say no no
00:47:30.160 you're going to have a way
00:47:31.520 better sex life in every
00:47:34.640 possible way if you actually
00:47:36.040 like fall in love with
00:47:37.320 someone and have a long
00:47:39.580 term relationship and I
00:47:40.960 think the psychological the
00:47:42.740 statistical data on that are
00:47:44.100 pretty clear too most single
00:47:46.380 people don't have a lot of
00:47:47.460 sex the phrase that I use in
00:47:48.680 the book to describe this
00:47:49.540 exact phenomenon where you on
00:47:50.600 the one hand have hyper sexual
00:47:52.840 public life you can walk down
00:47:55.480 any street and see women in
00:47:57.440 lingerie on posters or watch
00:47:59.740 TV and there's very explicit
00:48:01.640 sex scenes etc so on the one
00:48:02.940 hand we've had this amazing
00:48:03.820 ramping up of sexuality in
00:48:06.520 public life but on the other
00:48:08.000 hand exactly as you say we have
00:48:09.400 what's sometimes called the sex
00:48:11.140 recession the fact that people
00:48:12.180 are having sex later less
00:48:14.200 frequently I think what's
00:48:15.740 happening generally is people
00:48:16.880 are having probably more casual
00:48:18.560 sex but but they're having sex
00:48:20.520 less frequently so when they are
00:48:22.360 having sex it's more likely to
00:48:23.480 be casual but they're not
00:48:24.480 forming these long long
00:48:25.560 standing relationships and the
00:48:27.200 term that I use in the book is
00:48:28.720 cultural death grip syndrome
00:48:30.440 taken from the quasi medical
00:48:33.340 term death grip syndrome which is
00:48:35.520 used by compulsive porn users to
00:48:38.400 describe the physical experience
00:48:40.460 of impotence when you use too much
00:48:42.260 porn you get to the point where
00:48:43.800 you actually can't be aroused
00:48:44.780 either physically or
00:48:45.540 psychologically in real life
00:48:47.760 because you use so much porn and
00:48:49.080 I think cultural death grip
00:48:50.340 syndrome is is the counterpart to
00:48:52.940 that where on the one hand we
00:48:55.700 have this astounding availability
00:48:57.120 of sexual stimuli at the click of a
00:48:59.380 button at any moment anything that
00:49:00.760 you can imagine is available on the
00:49:01.900 internet immediately and that seems
00:49:04.400 to be demotivating people to
00:49:07.600 actually seek out meaningful sexual
00:49:09.040 relationships which in the long
00:49:10.540 term are vastly better for us in
00:49:13.360 every possible way but we have a
00:49:16.180 culture enabled by technology which
00:49:18.100 is very very short term in every
00:49:19.980 way so people are channeled towards
00:49:22.060 that kind of immediate relief that
00:49:24.280 that disincentivizes proper yeah
00:49:26.900 it's I think the rule is something
00:49:29.480 like unearned surfeit turns into
00:49:32.440 revulsion right right it's it's too
00:49:36.700 too much of a good thing means that
00:49:39.080 it's no longer a good thing and that
00:49:42.100 you know and that goes along with an
00:49:44.260 idea too that there's something like
00:49:45.760 optimal deprivation right I mean
00:49:47.760 look let's say you've just had a big
00:49:50.100 banquet and someone sits you down
00:49:51.800 and says well now you have to eat
00:49:53.080 five pounds of dessert it's like the
00:49:55.720 first of all that's not going to be a
00:49:57.480 very attractive proposition and
00:49:59.020 second of all it might actually make
00:50:00.440 you ill is that everything has to be
00:50:02.620 in proper proportion and one of the
00:50:04.540 things we really haven't contended
00:50:06.080 with at all in our society is how much
00:50:09.340 desperation is necessary on the sexual
00:50:11.980 front to drive young men and young
00:50:13.740 women together and the answer is not
00:50:16.400 zero and the problem with pornography
00:50:18.880 one of many problems is that drives
00:50:21.400 desperation on the male front down to
00:50:23.700 zero now I know perfectly well from my
00:50:26.800 clinical experience that the standard
00:50:29.500 state of most young men especially under
00:50:33.100 20 let's say is pretty much terror in
00:50:37.600 the face of a woman who they're very
00:50:39.380 attracted to and the reason for that is
00:50:42.240 that well there's all sorts of reasons
00:50:44.700 but the primary reason is the
00:50:46.380 probability that any given male even
00:50:49.160 one who's very attractive let's say in
00:50:51.720 multiple ways is going to be rejected
00:50:54.180 by any given female especially a high
00:50:56.720 value female who has a lot of people
00:50:59.080 attracted to her is extremely high so
00:51:01.920 there are classic psychological experiments
00:51:04.160 showing this you know if you if you send
00:51:06.360 attractive undergraduates out to talk to
00:51:09.320 other undergraduates to offer sexual
00:51:12.300 access say well you know would you be
00:51:14.920 willing to have coffee with me would you
00:51:16.500 be willing to give me your phone number
00:51:18.040 would you be willing to come back to my
00:51:19.620 apartment if the girls offer that then
00:51:23.360 whoever they're offering that to on the
00:51:25.900 male front will take them up on their
00:51:28.160 offer but if the boys offer that even
00:51:32.380 when they're attractive the probability that
00:51:34.980 their advances will be rejected is
00:51:37.400 extremely high and so young men face the
00:51:40.080 uncomfortable situation where even if
00:51:42.520 they're competent and will turn eventually
00:51:44.640 into useful men which isn't the status of
00:51:48.580 most very young men the probability that
00:51:51.660 they'll be rejected is extremely high and
00:51:54.100 then it's also the case that there's little
00:51:57.060 that's more psychologically impactful than
00:52:00.400 such rejection especially if it's
00:52:03.240 undertaken by someone to whom there's a
00:52:05.060 genuine attraction so that means that
00:52:07.140 boys are paralyzed into terror I think
00:52:12.460 that's not too exaggerated a term by the
00:52:16.180 mere fact of attractive women and so you
00:52:18.700 know they slough that off and they make
00:52:21.600 derogating jokes and so forth try to get
00:52:23.720 over that but doesn't change the basic
00:52:26.500 reality that also means that a certain
00:52:28.760 percentage of males and it's not low
00:52:31.060 really it could easily be like 30% are
00:52:36.140 just paralyzed into utter stasis by the
00:52:40.360 possibility of rejection especially
00:52:42.380 because they haven't been fortified
00:52:44.040 against it with their dependency
00:52:46.480 inducing upbringing unless they're
00:52:48.640 driven forward by a certain amount of
00:52:50.500 desperation some of which needs to be
00:52:52.740 sexual there's actually they're never
00:52:55.100 going to go they're never going to break
00:52:56.660 through that barrier and so then they can
00:53:00.480 satisfy themselves momentarily with
00:53:03.100 pornography and then that turns into that
00:53:05.240 host of problems you already described is
00:53:07.060 now they're training themselves maybe right
00:53:09.640 from puberty to be impotent
00:53:12.620 cuckold voyeurs essentially so that's not
00:53:17.580 good training then they're training
00:53:19.600 themselves to view women as targets of
00:53:23.580 short-term gratification so that's like
00:53:25.800 training in psychopathy and then they're
00:53:28.260 also interfering with their ability to
00:53:30.580 establish a relationship and also to
00:53:33.200 perform sexually in a real environment
00:53:35.460 so all that seems like you know like a
00:53:38.460 five-dimensional catastrophe and that's
00:53:40.740 going to get a lot worse in the next year by
00:53:43.420 the way because we haven't seen anything on
00:53:46.460 the pornography front compared to what's
00:53:48.880 going to be coming down with the advent of
00:53:50.760 AI because now what's going to happen real
00:53:53.840 soon is that this is already underway so
00:53:57.740 imagine a sign-up service where you can
00:54:00.660 talk to a very attractive young woman so
00:54:03.960 and she's a AI right so she can be as
00:54:08.200 attractive as you want her to be and
00:54:09.940 tuned exactly to your preferences okay so
00:54:12.980 now there's already a service offering this
00:54:16.360 by the way so now you have a friend and
00:54:18.900 that friend can keep track of your
00:54:20.620 conversations and especially if you're
00:54:23.000 lonesome and isolated that might be the
00:54:24.680 best friend you've ever had and certainly
00:54:27.080 the most attractive person you've ever
00:54:28.660 talked to now it's not real but you know
00:54:31.680 men are pretty damn visual so it's got a
00:54:35.120 long ways towards real and then you know
00:54:37.000 for your subscription fee you can talk to
00:54:42.040 the woman nude and then the whole avenue of
00:54:45.120 sexual display is open to you and so god only
00:54:48.380 knows what that's going to do yes as sex
00:54:51.480 robots are the next step where you have a
00:54:54.420 yeah yeah well and then the integration of
00:54:56.720 those two things yeah yeah that'll be and
00:54:59.520 that that'll be and then that'll really get
00:55:01.920 us going up in a situation where men young
00:55:04.300 men can feel as if they are winning at life
00:55:09.140 right with their sex robot who's giving them
00:55:12.180 all the cues that suggest fitness but in
00:55:14.560 fact you know they don't need to wash they
00:55:16.600 don't need to have a job they don't need to
00:55:18.180 do anything productive with their lives
00:55:19.580 because the sex robot doesn't care only fans
00:55:22.900 i think is a step along this path because
00:55:25.180 what only fans offer definitely it's not
00:55:27.360 just pornography it offers a parasocial
00:55:30.020 relationship it gives the impression to
00:55:32.580 customers that this woman cares about them
00:55:35.760 remembers his birthday remembers his
00:55:38.120 children's names all of this stuff and but
00:55:41.460 it's all obviously a mirage and it's one
00:55:42.940 that's purchased
00:55:43.840 and it it's completely the wrong
00:55:48.040 structure and that's
00:55:49.420 right well and that that's narcissistic
00:55:53.160 exploitation on the part of the females
00:55:55.420 with anti-social personality traits and
00:55:58.640 often what would you say aided and
00:56:00.820 embedded by quasi-psychopathic pimps
00:56:03.300 electronic pimps and you know those only
00:56:05.600 fan women that you made a very good
00:56:07.400 point there
00:56:07.900 those are actually androids right because
00:56:11.120 they're not women
00:56:11.820 now you might say what the hell are you
00:56:13.900 talking about dr peterson obviously
00:56:15.640 they're women it's like no they're not
00:56:17.220 they're machine women hybrids and the
00:56:19.840 machine is the technology that can
00:56:22.040 broadcast their image to millions of
00:56:23.660 people
00:56:23.960 so you're not a woman anymore if you're
00:56:26.500 in a million men's bedrooms at the
00:56:28.700 same time
00:56:29.400 you're a woman machine hybrid now it's
00:56:32.800 virtualized obviously because it's
00:56:35.320 two-dimensional and it's not embodied
00:56:37.500 in the form of a robot but the idea
00:56:39.760 that that's not an android means that
00:56:42.000 you're an idiot that's what it means
00:56:43.420 it's obviously an android and there there
00:56:46.240 is definitely that form of parasitism on
00:56:49.260 the female part you know these women have
00:56:51.340 embodied capital that's a good way of
00:56:53.100 thinking about it so they're young they
00:56:55.160 don't have economic resources but
00:56:56.700 they're young and beautiful and that's
00:56:58.560 an economic resource make no mistake
00:57:00.960 about it in fact it's the most well it's
00:57:04.900 the highest possible form of wealth this
00:57:08.100 is another thing that the marxist types
00:57:10.060 get real wrong with their economic
00:57:11.500 analysis because if you took let's say a
00:57:14.720 hyper rich 80 year old woman and you said
00:57:18.420 well you give away 99% of your fortune and
00:57:22.000 now you inhabit the body that you had when
00:57:24.560 you were 20 and then we could add to that
00:57:27.360 the possibility of being stellarly beautiful
00:57:29.560 the probability that that woman would
00:57:31.360 trade everything she has for that
00:57:33.660 opportunity you know assuming she hasn't
00:57:36.420 become disenamored of life is extraordinarily
00:57:40.020 high and so that also means that on the
00:57:42.380 female side and this is happening
00:57:43.860 continually female exploitation can take
00:57:49.400 place with regard to men just like male
00:57:52.800 exploitation takes place with regard to
00:57:55.840 women and those women are not doing other
00:57:58.300 women a favor either by monopolizing the
00:58:01.000 marketplace let's say no I think that one
00:58:04.740 of the ways in which women are hurt by the
00:58:07.960 pretense that is what widely practiced that
00:58:12.840 men and women are psychologically the same and
00:58:15.120 that male and female sexuality is the same is
00:58:17.940 that it's very easy for a young beautiful woman
00:58:20.840 to mistake male sexual desire for high
00:58:25.060 regard and to and to I think that really there
00:58:29.900 are two parallel tracks when it comes to male
00:58:34.240 sexual desire for women there is the short
00:58:36.200 term and the long term and they are not at all
00:58:38.560 the same and that being very highly desired on
00:58:42.460 the short term track does not necessarily
00:58:44.200 translate into being very high highly desired on
00:58:46.760 the long term track in fact sometimes quite the
00:58:48.580 opposite and I think that the main error that
00:58:51.440 women are making with thinking that only fans
00:58:54.100 is a is a quick buck not only is the fact that
00:58:57.000 only fans is enormously unequal and actually
00:58:59.420 there are very few people on it who are making
00:59:00.880 any real money and generally the ones who are
00:59:02.380 making lots of money of course were already
00:59:04.300 famous before they joined the platform and so
00:59:05.880 on it's also the fact that there is the internet
00:59:08.620 is forever and these images are out there and
00:59:11.040 it damages your long term mating prospects to
00:59:13.760 to have been on only fans and actually I mean it is
00:59:17.520 clearly the case that female beauty is incredibly
00:59:19.520 valuable resource but I think maybe the way in which
00:59:22.800 it needs to be understood distinctly from economic
00:59:25.500 power is it is to some extent vicarious you can acquire
00:59:29.660 enormous power as a beautiful woman through access to
00:59:34.060 typically male political and economic power but it
00:59:38.900 doesn't last forever if you're able to secure a very
00:59:41.700 high status husband for instance and he commits to
00:59:43.860 you for life you've translated your beauty into real
00:59:47.260 and lasting power if you're not able to do that then
00:59:50.380 you will very quickly you know age 35 age 40 age out of
00:59:54.380 having any access to that kind of power and then you
00:59:56.340 will potentially be paying the cost later down the line so
00:59:59.060 there are some women who've become very wealthy and
01:00:01.500 only fans but in general I would say that it's very very
01:00:04.680 poor strategy and you know as ever it is presented as a
01:00:08.220 kind of short-term boon yeah well it suffers from the same
01:00:12.840 Pareto distribution problem as any productive enterprise
01:00:15.740 creative enterprise which is a small minority of people will
01:00:18.600 rake in all the money like a tiny tiny proportion it'll be a
01:00:22.240 tenth of one percent they'll make a spectacular amount of
01:00:25.720 money and everyone else will strive away in the dirt
01:00:28.880 scrabbling way for virtually nothing and then as you said even
01:00:32.700 those women who have managed to make that successful are
01:00:36.320 dooming themselves in all likelihood to remaining only
01:00:40.440 attractive to psychopathic and exploitive males because the
01:00:44.320 rest of them won't be particularly happy with that
01:00:47.000 background so yeah it's not a good iterating medium to long-term
01:00:51.100 strategy let's talk about consent a little bit because that's a
01:00:55.040 tricky issue and it ties back to this notion we were discussing
01:00:58.640 earlier about the proclivity of the radical left to ensure to
01:01:02.120 insist upon something approximating a contract which I do think is
01:01:06.300 very comical that you know that's the same as well maybe
01:01:10.140 consent means getting married and and actually I think you can make
01:01:15.220 a case for that so you know when you see that happening on
01:01:18.000 campuses very frequently and we should delve into the details of
01:01:22.040 this is that a young man and a young woman will sleep
01:01:25.460 together it's usually at a party and it's usually a drunken party and
01:01:30.400 so one of the things that people don't know
01:01:33.220 maybe because they don't want to is that almost all criminal behavior that
01:01:38.320 involves coercion is facilitated by alcohol so half of
01:01:44.580 people who are murdered are drunk half of the murderers are drunk there
01:01:48.920 would be almost no domestic abuse violent abuse without alcohol it's an
01:01:54.100 unbelievable facilitator this is why this is why the temperance movement was in
01:01:58.820 many ways a feminist movement I would argue that that's not how it was
01:02:02.360 normally expressed but the temperance movement was very much about domestic
01:02:05.600 violence this message comes from viking committed to exploring the world and
01:02:12.260 comfort journey through the heart of europe on an elegant viking long ship with
01:02:17.580 thoughtful service destination focused dining and cultural enrichment on board and on shore and
01:02:25.260 every viking voyage is all-inclusive with no children and no casinos discover more at viking.com
01:02:33.260 right right right well and on campuses date rape etc and unwanted social uh sexual advance and alcohol
01:02:43.740 go hand in hand but of course you have the libertine culture on campuses sexually and also behaviorally and
01:02:50.620 so many campuses are simultaneously hotbeds of you know sexual investigation and trouble and drunken
01:02:59.580 dionysian partying and you know i think there's a time and a place for that and that's probably when
01:03:04.860 you're young and you know hopefully you manage to wend your way through it but as a basis for a stable
01:03:10.300 society it falls uh short but here's here's one of the problems it really brings up so now you have
01:03:17.260 women and hypothetically they have control of the reproductive function and uh they can go out and drink and then
01:03:25.100 they can find themselves waking up in the morning and not even remembering because alcohol really
01:03:32.620 interferes with memory consolidation not even at relatively minor doses not even really remembering
01:03:38.140 how the hell they got there now especially if they're women who've been mistreated in the past and
01:03:44.540 that's not uncommon there is a real question that emerges about whether or not they consented and
01:03:51.500 it's very complicated because it's certainly one of the strategies that desperate young men
01:03:56.780 use to entice uh foolish young women into their beds is to get them drunk and anybody who doesn't know
01:04:04.220 that is a blind fool and so now and so if you have a party and you're a college student and you're male and
01:04:12.380 you invite some women over including the ones that you might be attracted to and you serve copious amounts of alcohol and
01:04:19.500 you know perfectly well that if you get a young woman drunk you're more likely to get her into bed
01:04:24.300 are you manipulating her or is she an autonomous entity fully capable of making her own sovereign
01:04:31.580 decisions who knows the ground rules of the game when she enters the door and is their response for
01:04:37.420 responsible for her own actions and the answer is a little of column a and a little of column b and that makes the whole issue of
01:04:44.860 consent extraordinarily complex you know if you consent well drunk and you regret it the next day
01:04:52.700 is that true consent and of course that's being fought out in legal minefields all across north
01:04:58.540 america and i think the reason it's being thought out fought out is because it's actually a complicated
01:05:03.740 question what does it mean to give consent how old do you have to be like if you have three drinks can you give
01:05:12.460 informed consent or maybe you couldn't for a medical procedure could you if you had one drink well
01:05:21.820 i studied the effects of alcohol for years on cognitive ability and function and it's a highly
01:05:29.420 disinhibiting drug which is why people like it because it it removes the regulatory constraint from
01:05:36.940 hedonic behavior including aggressive behavior it's lots of fun and it it uh amplifies sociability
01:05:45.340 for many people it's got an opiate effect that's pain killing and a stimulant effect that's like cocaine
01:05:51.260 and it's an anxiety reducer so it's a killer party drug and so you add some alcohol into the mix and you think well
01:05:59.500 did the young woman give consent and the answer to that is well what the hell is consent and then one
01:06:08.540 answer is well you have to have a legal document and then you think well you might as well just get
01:06:12.380 married then because that's the whole point and but here here's an open question like i really wonder
01:06:18.380 i really think this might be true marriage is consent
01:06:23.260 that's what marriage means marriage is full informed consent and it's the only form of full
01:06:30.940 informed consent all things being equal given how dangerous sex is in the most fundamental sense
01:06:38.060 given how socially destabilizing it is given how difficult it is to integrate into a full personality
01:06:44.380 across time given how much is at risk for children and women in particular that the the issue of consent
01:06:52.380 is so important that it basically devolves into something approximating marriage by necessity
01:06:58.540 the i agree the only proviso i would place on that is that one of the i would say one of the really
01:07:04.140 profound successes of 20th century feminism was in reconceptualizing rape which in most traditional
01:07:11.020 legal systems is understood as a crime against a woman's male kin reconceptualizing it as a crime
01:07:18.780 against the woman herself which therefore makes it marriage or rape um uh explicable in a way that it
01:07:26.540 isn't in the old model it clearly is the case that it is possible to to be to be raped within marriage
01:07:31.100 i think it's also absolutely the case that any we are forced to draw bright lines when it comes to the
01:07:38.860 law we're forced to say that you know the age of consent is 16 that x the amount of alcohol in the
01:07:45.180 bloodstream constitutes you know above the legal driving limit etc etc we're forced to draw bright
01:07:50.060 lines we have to also recognize and we all know intuitively that those bright lines are fallible
01:07:54.700 and that there is a huge amount of gray space between what is legally permissible and what is good
01:08:01.740 and i think that the problem with basing any kind of system of sexual ethics on consent as a bare minimum
01:08:09.340 is it becomes impossible to talk about that gray space and what you often find actually is women
01:08:13.420 particularly during me too women who would talk about distressing sexual experiences which actually
01:08:21.500 normally didn't meet the legal threshold for being criminal but which they nevertheless experienced as
01:08:27.420 upsetting as as disturbing as whatever often involving alcohol as you say briefly on that point one of the
01:08:34.620 things a lot of people don't know is that there's a cognitive bias in men where they tend to
01:08:39.340 overestimate a woman's sexual interest in them and that it and it's not the other way around and that
01:08:44.860 bias is is exaggerated by alcohol so you have men who are very drunk and who really do read signs of
01:08:51.740 sexual interest from women who are in fact not sexually interested in them and who are incapacitated by
01:08:55.500 alcohol and it all ends up being and a rough you know we're talking about teenagers who have who are
01:08:59.180 raised on porn and have you know it's a complete disaster like the whole cauldron mix is basically
01:09:04.060 perfectly designed to produce these scenarios and often you have women who are coming out of these
01:09:08.140 scenarios feeling really distressed but they they don't have the moral language to talk about it
01:09:13.580 because they don't want to talk about they don't want to use terms like chivalrous they don't want
01:09:16.700 to talk about gentlemen they don't want to talk even about morality and good and bad what they have in
01:09:21.660 their vocabulary toolkit is consent and so you will say that the xyz encounter wasn't consensual whereas
01:09:28.140 actually that's not the best way of describing what went wrong and trying to just further embed the
01:09:33.820 consent model which often just what consent workshops are really is just they're sort of
01:09:39.180 they're attempts at ideological interventions the idea is that we you know we sit kids down
01:09:43.420 we tell them in words of one syllable don't rape each other but of course we know that's not how
01:09:47.740 social interactions work that's not actually a kind of intervention that's really going to make
01:09:50.780 a difference because the would-be rapists aren't listening for one thing and also because that's
01:09:55.500 you know the complexity of sexual relationships is just so so too difficult to sum up in that kind of
01:10:01.020 simple message but that's all we've got and so and so this emphasis is just on reiterating and
01:10:08.060 reiterating if you start talking about unwanted sexual advance as a failure of something like
01:10:14.620 chivalry you sound like a transplant from the 13th century but it's it's definitely the case it's also
01:10:21.100 definitely the case that unsophisticated males are not very good at reading what would you say
01:10:28.860 anything but explicit signals of no right sophisticated people can tell
01:10:36.940 by a polite glance let's say whether or not interest is being
01:10:42.220 manifested and then they play a very slow incremental game which is romance by the way checking each other
01:10:49.740 out for consent at every stage and you cannot replace that with a rule-governed system the attempt
01:10:56.700 to do that is first of all going to be intrusive and tyrannical and awkward and second it's putting
01:11:01.500 the cart before the horse the the unsophisticated people aren't going to be able to use that system
01:11:07.260 anyways and then you have like three people you have a crowd in the bedroom you have the young man and you
01:11:13.900 have the young woman and you have the whole idiot uh phalanx of dei bureaucrats they're trying to
01:11:20.060 mediate the social relationship and that's just not going to work at all and here's another thing
01:11:25.340 i've been thinking about i talked to my wife who i know you talk to on her podcast about this quite a
01:11:30.300 bit so here's an interesting idea so um males compete for status and the essential dimension
01:11:39.020 of competition that differentiates them from uh women i would say is something like productive
01:11:46.380 economic generosity it's something like that now it's not like women aren't productive and it's not
01:11:51.660 like they're not generous but the ground rules are different women are looking to equalize the
01:11:56.060 economic disparity that's attendant upon differential uh uh cost for reproduction and so men are
01:12:03.740 evaluated on the basis of their potential for economic reciprocity reciprocity and generosity
01:12:12.300 and that gives them status males and so women peel from the top of that hierarchy basically they
01:12:19.020 let males competed out on the economic front and then women select from the top down
01:12:25.260 and the higher the status a woman has the higher the man the status of the mate that she can obtain
01:12:33.260 now that brings up a question which is what gives women status and that's a really hard question
01:12:39.980 because first of all we know that economic viability is not one of those things so male economic viability
01:12:47.020 and sexual success are correlated insanely highly it's like 0.6 0.7 crazily high one of the most
01:12:54.300 powerful single variable relationships that you can find in all of the social sciences far higher than
01:13:00.780 the relationship between intelligence and life success for example but the correlation between
01:13:06.300 female economic viability and sexual attractiveness is lower than zero so it's actually slightly negative
01:13:13.980 so it's a massive sexual dimorphism so then you ask well what gives female status and well one of the
01:13:20.140 the answers is obviously uh associated with beauty and reproductive capacity and and sexual attractiveness
01:13:28.620 those things all tangled together extraordinarily tightly but that's not the only thing i don't think
01:13:33.500 and so this i think is really worth thinking about so imagine that you have an attractive girl and a
01:13:40.940 variety of relatively high status men are chasing her now you might ask well how do they evaluate her
01:13:48.380 status and i think they evaluate her status by her ability to say no
01:13:56.140 no so imagine you know a high status person offers himself or herself to you and of you if you're of
01:14:05.500 lower status you're going to say yes right away but one marker of higher status is well no i don't need
01:14:12.700 what you're selling yeah but what i'm selling is great yeah but i have so many offers that i'm not inclined to
01:14:18.860 take your offer because i have options and it's no on the part of women that signal i really believe
01:14:26.300 this is the case it's voluntary no on the part of women that signals their status and so i don't think
01:14:33.820 young women know this at all because they want to know how to compete with men let's say in the power
01:14:38.620 game and uh that's a tough question because women are smaller and they're not as physically powerful
01:14:44.700 and economic uh prowess isn't as attractive to them and it doesn't make them more viable on the
01:14:50.940 marketing on the mating market so the whole game that women are playing is way different than the
01:14:56.060 game men is playing so you might say well how do women equalize the battle and i think a huge part of
01:15:00.780 that is by reserving to themselves the right to say no and you see this people are stumbling towards
01:15:08.540 this realization even on the radical leftist front because they keep saying no means no and it's like
01:15:15.580 well yeah i wish it was that clear but at a drunken frat party what constitutes no is not self-evident
01:15:21.660 but a clear no on the part of a woman and i also think that there's every reason to think and plenty
01:15:28.540 of evidence that that's also one of the things that makes men desirable in the face that makes women
01:15:34.780 desirable in the eyes of men especially if the men might be enticed into pursuing a long-term mating
01:15:41.740 strategy you know they'll push on women and see but will you say yes right away and if the answer is
01:15:49.260 yes especially true for high status men if the answer is immediately yes then the guy assumes well
01:15:54.700 you're not your status really isn't that high you can't say no to me but if the woman says no even to
01:16:02.300 you the guy thinks oh well you know look at that oh you can imagine there's some narcissism not even
01:16:10.060 though i have everything to offer that i have to offer she's just not falling over you know maybe
01:16:16.700 there's something there that requires further exploration you know and you even see this in
01:16:22.060 female pornography it's so interesting because the classic female pornographic story is uh you know
01:16:28.860 there's this extremely attractive highly productive man who's got a real capacity for aggression he's
01:16:34.620 a pirate or a surgeon or a werewolf or a vampire or a billionaire those are the fundamental female
01:16:42.380 pornographic tropes and he has women at his disposal but this woman is shielded off from him and they dance
01:16:51.580 around each other for a long time which essentially means that she's saying no and he's finally enticed into a
01:16:57.580 relationship with her where he sacrifices all you know his access to all other women and then they
01:17:03.100 have hot steamy sex and so you know most of female pornography is extended foreplay and that's this romantic
01:17:10.700 dance of no followed by you know a very spectacular consummation and that certainly mirrors the
01:17:18.860 well it mirrors the optimal female reproductive pathway obviously because otherwise it wouldn't be the hottest
01:17:25.980 pornographic fantasy but it's based in i really think it's based in reality and so i don't know how
01:17:31.100 it is that you communicate to young women that especially if they are of high female status but
01:17:36.940 even if they're not that the most potent art tool they have in their armament with regard to status with
01:17:44.540 regard to being taken seriously is their ability and willingness to say no
01:17:50.300 um a question um that i've had a lot since the book was published is um is there a sexual counter
01:17:59.820 revolution underway my answer to that is a guarded yes a bit i think what's happened is that we've
01:18:09.420 ended up in this very historically unusual situation where female virginity is not prized basically every
01:18:16.620 society hugely praises female virginity and female sexual um restraint the ability to say no for
01:18:23.500 obvious reasons because um illegitimate child is a disaster not only for the woman but for her
01:18:28.620 family for the community there's a you know there's a need to be um to be gatekeeping young women
01:18:34.460 the pill does away the pill the pill does away with that and the pill also occurs at exactly the same
01:18:38.780 time as this huge political shift and technological shift and and we we now have attempted to
01:18:45.340 um reconceptualize women as being sort of like slightly smaller men who basically have the same
01:18:52.380 sexual drives and preferences and so on we know that this isn't true but we've given a good go
01:18:56.540 and many of the young women who um who've read my book have been raised with this expectation and have
01:19:03.820 attempted to have sex like men and have invariably found that it actually makes them miserable
01:19:07.740 but we also get trapped in this painful strategic impasse where when the expectation is that you will have
01:19:14.620 sex very early on in a relationship and that withholding sex is not socially permissible
01:19:21.420 it's a it's a it's a weird sign it's a sign that you're unusual that you're not playing by the normal
01:19:26.860 rules it puts you at a disadvantage you know if you are a young woman who doesn't want to be putting
01:19:30.940 out on a first second third date you're already disadvantaged in the dating market released up until
01:19:35.100 recently but one of the things that i've noticed going and giving um talks all over the country is
01:19:41.500 i have often had women come up to me afterwards and say that they they they like my message they
01:19:47.020 agree that they are that they have implementing this in their own lives that they are not having casual
01:19:51.980 sex that they are not giving into this social pressure and one of the things i've noticed about these
01:19:55.900 women is they tend to be very beautiful and i think that that's not coincidental i think it's because
01:20:01.740 they are the women who have the greatest power within this system and are therefore the ones who
01:20:07.980 can most easily opt out of the current set of expectations and can say no without suffering a
01:20:15.260 penalty for it so i think those women many of them are already do are already doing that because they've
01:20:19.980 gotten on to the fact that this is actually a miserable system which causes them harm
01:20:23.260 and my hope is that that will accelerate as other women imitate them well you know if if it's the
01:20:34.300 beautiful high status women who begin that trend the rest of the women will follow because trends always
01:20:40.380 start in the aristocracy and trend downwards now okay so here's another thought um and this has to do with
01:20:47.340 the built-in antagonism let's say and hopefully eventual cooperation of the sexes on the sexual
01:20:55.100 front so women are checking out men all the time and women have all sorts of tricks for doing that
01:21:02.540 they might be provocative for example because they want to test a man to see if he can control his temper
01:21:07.900 and no one likes to talk about that but any smart woman is going to do that because she wants to
01:21:12.540 find out if her partner she wants someone who has the capacity for aggression but she wants someone
01:21:18.060 who can control it because a man will be provoked by children and if he can't control his temper then
01:21:24.060 he's going to be aggressive and so she has to check that out and you don't check that out by having a
01:21:28.860 formal conversation you check that out the same way children check out their parents which is by harassing
01:21:34.860 them and seeing what happens and so and then men check women out so maybe one of the things a man wants
01:21:42.780 to do if he's going to commit to a long-term relationship is he wants to find out well does
01:21:47.340 this woman have what it takes to actually commit to a long-term relationship and what that means in
01:21:54.300 part is that he has to know that she's capable of controlling her impulsive desires right because
01:22:00.380 otherwise she's going to stray and that's actually a worse problem for men than it is for women and
01:22:07.340 and we should return to this idea that rape is a violation of male property rights in a moment
01:22:12.700 because i want to explore that a bit so you can tell a woman has control over her impulses if she can
01:22:18.860 say no this message comes from viking committed to exploring the world in comfort journey through the
01:22:26.140 heart of europe on an elegant viking longship with thoughtful service destination focused dining
01:22:33.340 and cultural enrichment on board and on shore and every viking voyage is all-inclusive with no children
01:22:41.740 and no casinos discover more at viking.com right i mean it's a way of testing so imagine that you're
01:22:51.580 you're a young guy with plenty to offer and you're a hot young woman and you meet and you're
01:22:55.740 you're pretty attracted to each other now both of you are going to fall under the sway of short-term
01:23:03.020 temptation obviously now the question is are both of you or either of you capable of being mature
01:23:13.020 in your regard for your iterated future self and the potential of a long-term relationship and the way
01:23:19.500 the man checks that out is by seeing if the girl will say no and maybe he checks that even harder because
01:23:25.580 he does everything he can to seduce her and she still says no you know and it works and he knows
01:23:31.900 she's interested and she still says no well then he can conclude that she's capable of keeping her pants
01:23:38.620 on let's say and that's actually something that you need to conclude if you're going to commit to a
01:23:44.220 long-term partnership obviously on the male front because you want to be assured of paternity
01:23:51.900 and so you know these are very intense games that men and women play with each other and they're
01:23:56.540 no holds barred games because everything's at stake but again it devolves down to this issue of
01:24:03.180 being able to say no even under intense temptation and provocation so i don't know how it is that we
01:24:10.620 start teaching young women well we can just stop start by not lying to them about absolutely everything
01:24:16.540 which is what we do now but i don't know how it is that young women can be taught that the most potent
01:24:24.620 weapon they have is their ability to say no you know and that that's actually a
01:24:30.300 a weapon of formidable force and that it does nothing but confer status upon them you know and
01:24:36.940 the fact that you said already that what you see is that it's the obviously high status high
01:24:42.780 desirable women who are figuring this out first is an indication of that because obviously they're
01:24:48.300 the ones that that are going to be able to wield that power in the most effective possible manner
01:24:54.940 but that doesn't mean that it's not useful for women farther down the hierarchy and you know you
01:24:59.660 also said something about women are enjoined to believe they have to be sexually accessible to
01:25:06.860 make themselves successful on the dating market but i don't believe that's true at all i think
01:25:12.300 i think that's a myth i think that you know if you have nothing else to offer at all but immediate
01:25:18.780 sexual access that might be your only game but if you have anything at all to offer and that is what
01:25:24.540 you offer you're actually going to be thrown out of the mating game really quickly because the guys
01:25:28.540 will just be they'll just be turned off and they won't call you back you'll get what do they call
01:25:32.700 that ghosted like a no time flat you know and the girls might ask well you know i gave the guy what
01:25:38.540 he wanted why didn't he call me and the answer is no you gave his impulsive libido what it wanted
01:25:46.860 and that's what you established a relationship with but you completely sacrificed any possibility
01:25:52.220 at all of being attracted of you being attractive to his more mature and potentially you know long-term
01:26:01.260 productive and sophisticated self you make yourself attractive to that by saying not on your life
01:26:06.620 joker you know i'm taking myself too seriously for that and my future and my future children and even
01:26:13.100 our future relationship and all that signaled by no and then it's it's complicated too a because
01:26:19.980 you get the prude problem and nietzsche observed century and a half ago that a lot of what
01:26:28.700 passed for morality was nothing but cowardice you know people are afraid to do something afraid to
01:26:33.740 be aggressive afraid to be sexual and they passed their fear off as morality and prudes are sort of like
01:26:40.540 that is they they don't want to have anything to do with sex but it's not because they've made a moral
01:26:44.460 decision or because they have strength of character it's just because they're afraid and because that's
01:26:49.260 true it's easy to parody women who say no or men for that matter uh as prudes you know as old-fashioned
01:26:57.820 conservative prudes who are just terrified of sex and you know sometimes that is true but but you can
01:27:03.980 be sophisticated as hell instead and say no and i don't think there's anything more attractive to a man
01:27:10.540 than a sophisticated woman who knows how to say no like that's that's top of the stack as far as men are
01:27:16.860 concerned and they'll do any they'll do everything to test the the what would you call the thickness of
01:27:24.780 that boundary so i don't know how you tell that to young women i don't even think men can probably
01:27:33.180 it's because the pill disrupts it all right because the pill it doesn't reduce to zero but it does
01:27:38.540 massively reduce the risks associated with sex the physical risks not the psychological risks
01:27:43.500 risks and so with those physical risks removed i mean i have a fascinating quote from a woman who was
01:27:50.700 who was um in her 20s in the 1960s when the pill arrived and she said that the the advent of the pill
01:27:57.740 meant that it suddenly became so much more difficult to say no to men because what you used to be able to
01:28:02.380 say was no no no we can't because of because i might get pregnant with that no longer available and
01:28:09.260 what we're dealing with here of course is the agreeability gap between men and women women find
01:28:13.500 it difficult to be assertive and if they can't call on that kind of very clear risk as an as an appeal
01:28:21.100 then what are they left with no i just don't want to have sex with you and so and that's a really
01:28:25.260 painful thing to say that it wouldn't hurt feelings there's also i think an element of women being
01:28:28.860 slightly physically frightened right well it boils down to personal rejection then hey yeah yeah which is
01:28:34.940 which is a painful thing because that's the only excuse you have left yeah absolutely well here's
01:28:40.540 something else that's that's worth pondering you know you talked about one of the advantages of the
01:28:45.900 sexual revolution was the transformation of the idea that rape was a property crime let's say into
01:28:52.460 a crime against the woman herself and i would say look i have plenty of sympathy for that perspective
01:28:59.820 and i think it's fundamentally true but but i'm going to push back because
01:29:03.980 you know all this is all very complicated you know it isn't obvious to me that that offers women
01:29:10.860 enough defense you know and so the counter argument might be if untrammeled sexual access to a young
01:29:20.140 woman is a crime in order for that to be recognized as a crime properly it has to be viewed as
01:29:31.340 something that will bring the males on her side to her defense in principle
01:29:37.660 now maybe not right because you could say well maybe we could set up a society where
01:29:42.060 merely quote transgressing the rights of a woman to say no is sufficient but it's not obvious to me
01:29:48.540 that that's sufficient like maybe sufficient means not only do you violate the integrity of the woman
01:29:55.900 in a fundamental sense but you enrage all of her male protectors
01:30:02.220 and then that's enough of a barrier because god only knows how much barrier we need and obviously
01:30:09.340 while you just laid out a bunch of problems especially now that the pill introduces and we
01:30:13.900 should stress that the problem that women have in saying no once they're on the pill is that it's
01:30:18.220 instantly personal and that means the woman has to deliver a pretty hard blow and that's especially
01:30:24.540 problematic if she's somewhat potentially interested in the guy right how do i say no without hurting his
01:30:31.660 feelings alienating him making him into an enemy looking like a prude and i mean when you're 16 how
01:30:38.220 you don't know the answer to any of those questions like you're not sophisticated enough to
01:30:41.820 and i saw this in my clinical practice all the time you know i had lots of women in my clinical
01:30:47.580 practice who were abused serially and you know they were generally stunningly unsophisticated in
01:30:54.940 their conduct and i'm not trying to blame the victim i'm just saying that sophisticated women
01:31:00.940 and those are often those who've been they've had a lot of good relationships with men brothers and
01:31:06.780 fathers in particular sophisticated women signal to men who are getting a little pushy in no uncertain
01:31:14.620 terms very early in the pushing game that no is the answer right and they do that if you do that really
01:31:22.620 early on in the investigation you don't have to use much force but unsophisticated women they can't do
01:31:30.220 that at all they don't know how and then what happens is they they run into an unsophisticated guy
01:31:35.500 he's too dumb to pick up any clues and then by the time she really wants to say no she's already on
01:31:40.940 the bed i'll give you an example of this you know i had one client who uh was coerced in her account
01:31:49.420 into a sexual encounter by a door-to-door salesman you know typical pornographic fantasy setup so this
01:31:57.420 young guy is going around door-to-door selling whatever he's selling so he's not one of the world's
01:32:02.060 high status males let's put it that way and uh you know and i suppose he's probably got all
01:32:08.700 sorts of fantasies running through his pornography pornography addled brain and so he comes to the
01:32:15.180 door and she's in the house and she's a reasonably attractive young woman and he's friendly and well
01:32:20.780 the first thing she does is invite him in now that's stupid she's alone she doesn't know who he is at all
01:32:28.060 and she invites him in well he thinks oh my god what is she you know maybe she really likes me and
01:32:34.780 you already said that men and this is especially true if they're narcissistic and immature radically
01:32:39.980 overestimate the degree to which a woman's attention is signaling sexual availability for obvious
01:32:45.900 reasons and so he's thinking oh my god this is my big chance and so then he starts to press her and
01:32:51.660 she has no tools at her disposal at all because she has no idea how to signal no and let's say
01:32:57.580 she's agreeable and neurotic with a bit of a history of abuse and the next thing she knows she finds
01:33:03.420 herself on the couch you know three quarters undressed and then the question is well is that rape and
01:33:10.460 well then that's the question that's when the police come in and the lawyers come in and you know you
01:33:14.460 spend the next three years trying to figure out whether or not that's rape but it's a so so my
01:33:21.340 point with all that is that it's an open question how much protection women need from the males around
01:33:27.420 them and then it's an open question exactly how to construe the crime of irresponsible access to a
01:33:36.220 young woman woman from a psychological and legal and social perspective like maybe it's not just
01:33:41.420 maybe it's not just a crime against the woman you know maybe it's a crime against the broader
01:33:46.300 community and i don't like i it's not like i'm saying i know how to adjudicate that because i don't but
01:33:53.660 it's hard to get all the necessary barriers in place and if that wasn't true we wouldn't have
01:33:59.100 this huge debate about consent on campuses um i have a slightly um unusual view of the relationship
01:34:08.060 between christianity and feminism in general um feminists modern feminists set themselves up in
01:34:15.180 opposition to christianity particularly on the issue of abortion the handmaid's tale kind of
01:34:20.300 neo-puritan outfit being the the the uniform now of of american feminists and so on i am of the view
01:34:27.340 though that actually feminism is an outgrowth of christianity and that the fundamental idea in
01:34:34.540 christianity which is so different from other religious traditions that weakness is strength
01:34:39.660 that the first shall be last that there is something valuable about being small and vulnerable
01:34:45.180 rather than something um despicable about it i think that feminism completely relies on that idea
01:34:51.740 which is by no means shared by all cultures and certainly wasn't shared by the ancient roman
01:34:55.500 culture that that from which christianity sprung and so if you're operating in say an ancient roman
01:35:02.140 culture which which doesn't see women as inherently vulnerable which actually sees female um vulnerability
01:35:09.500 as uh something to be despised potentially and which sees prostituted slave women as entirely
01:35:16.460 available for male sexual consumption that cannot really conceptualize the idea of a slave woman having
01:35:22.220 being able to be sexually violated you know it's just not kind of within the moral system it's not it's not
01:35:26.460 understandable into that comes the christian idea of sexual equality at least at the spiritual level
01:35:35.020 and the idea therefore that actually even a woman who doesn't have male kin available to defend her
01:35:40.540 against sexual violation which of course a slave doesn't she is nevertheless worthy of that protection it
01:35:46.380 kind of socializes this may be the wrong word but it it shares that duty of protection
01:35:52.140 among the community and among women i think that's basically what feminism is
01:35:58.460 and says that actually we should we should be bestowing on these friendless women the same
01:36:04.140 protection that a woman with high connected male kin has it's a very difficult system to enforce to some
01:36:10.380 extent we we try and use police criminal justice system whatever to do that job it's a hard job to do
01:36:15.020 but that is basically the modern project and i think it is born out of christian morality
01:36:18.220 right right well yeah yeah i mean i think i think that's right is that what what you're attempting
01:36:23.900 to do is to replicate the protection that a very well-constituted family and community system would
01:36:31.660 have for a woman who's highly functioning you're trying to replicate that in abstraction in the entire
01:36:38.300 social structure and so that's why you have a legal structure that says well women have the right to
01:36:43.020 bodily integrity you're really trying to replace that protective structure with
01:36:48.140 the force of law yeah and i think that's an entirely laudable exercise the question that we have to
01:36:53.580 wrestle with is the question that you brought up at the end of that which is that if a woman is
01:36:57.980 unfortunate enough not to have you know let's say close male associates brothers friends fathers
01:37:07.820 available to her to what degree is it even possible for the more abstract state and the body
01:37:14.380 of laws to replace that might be a goal but it's very difficult to realize in practical terms is there
01:37:22.140 anything else that that's rattling around in the back of your mind that you think might be worth making
01:37:28.940 a case for at the moment i suppose that the um if there's one unifying idea um within the book it's
01:37:38.780 probably summed up in the um in the epilogue which i called listen to your mother i didn't crucially
01:37:43.980 call it obey your mother i called it listen to your mother i you know give your mother the opportunity
01:37:48.140 to present her her view of things because i think that basically everything that's in the book
01:37:53.420 actually is incredibly obvious and ought to be incredibly obvious and it only isn't because we we
01:37:59.500 live in a very strange time which has constructed some very strange ideas about sexual politics
01:38:05.020 and actually in order to i think to navigate these waters effectively this message comes from viking
01:38:11.420 committed to exploring the world in comfort journey through the heart of europe on an elegant viking
01:38:17.740 longship with thoughtful service destination focused dining and cultural enrichment on board and on
01:38:25.580 shore and every viking voyage is all-inclusive with no children and no casinos discover more at viking.com
01:38:35.020 simply listening to women who've lived it already and who have your best interests at heart if
01:38:41.180 there's anyone in the world who's likely to have your best interests at heart it is probably your
01:38:44.540 mother simply listening to that woman is really the only piece of advice that ought to be needed
01:38:54.620 um because all of this is really just about rediscovering some of the i would say eternal truths
01:39:02.540 about men and women which we've yeah well i'm kind of i'm kind of hoping that um the women that you
01:39:07.900 describe as post maidens so let's say mothers and matriarchs could seize the reins on the social media
01:39:16.620 front and start educating young women who are both motherless and fatherless in the most fundamental
01:39:23.020 sense about some of these truths you know my wife has been tammy has been starting to do that with her
01:39:27.660 podcast inquiring into the nature of the divine feminine let's say and speaking to people like
01:39:33.660 janice fiamengo who's a real scholar of bitter and resentful feminism let's say but also trying to have
01:39:40.860 an intelligent discussion among older women who have a bit of wisdom often hard-won about what a viable
01:39:49.180 long-term life path might look like like you sketched it out a bit you know this transition in terms of
01:39:55.340 narrative role let's say from maiden to mother to matriarch but that's you know that's a very vague
01:40:02.940 this is not a criticism but a three-word description is very vague and it isn't obvious at all that our
01:40:09.020 culture is good at providing an image of like what does it mean to be a mother in the highest sense and
01:40:16.940 it's really complicated you know because one of the problems a lot of my female clients had was they were
01:40:22.380 very productive economically and very brilliant and it's clearly the case that cultures get much richer
01:40:28.940 and children are much more well educated if women have access to educational resources and if society
01:40:36.860 can tap into their broad economic productivity that seems like a net good right but then it puts women
01:40:43.340 in the uncomfortable situation of well how do you devote enough attention to your husband and your
01:40:48.540 children probably in the reverse order and how do you handle your career and that needs a lot of
01:40:55.820 discussion the answer seems to be that most of the women that i've seen who've had viable lives is that
01:41:02.460 they don't make career advancement their number one goal and one of the things you see emerging as a
01:41:08.220 consequence of that is that women are pretty likely to start small businesses but they generally do them part-time
01:41:14.540 and they're generally not as hyper successful as a minority of men but the reason they're doing
01:41:20.060 that is because they're trying to balance marriage and children with economic productivity and that's
01:41:26.220 that's challenging and presents lots of opportunity but it's not straightforward to conceptualize
01:41:34.380 and women have only been able to do that in some real sense for about 60 years right since we had
01:41:39.900 reliable birth control so it's not surprising that there has to be a discussion and then so that's
01:41:44.700 on the mother front and then on the matriarch front well i think the problem's even worse is like
01:41:49.980 well what's it like to be a grandmother who's had a life you know a family a relationship a career
01:41:56.140 who's been productive at that who's now entering into the you know final third of life let's say
01:42:02.620 what does that look like if it's rich and fulfilling in terms of social role and and personal relationship
01:42:11.020 and sexual behavior and like there's an absolute dearth of conversation on those fronts and you know
01:42:18.860 you're obviously spearheading uh what the rectification of that in some real sense but it would be lovely to
01:42:27.340 see a lot more of that anyways people who are listening louise perry's book is the case against
01:42:33.020 the sexual revolution uh very you know punchy title and one of the things louise said today that was
01:42:40.140 interesting is that her books actually uh being met with a lot of positive responses you know and so
01:42:46.460 that's it's pretty interesting you know i feel the tide is turning in many ways this might be a
01:42:52.620 a cardinal pivoting year 2023 because a lot of these things you say your books about the painfully
01:42:58.460 obvious in some sense it's like well you know society is pretty unstable when the painfully obvious
01:43:03.420 is now both debatable and even um objected to but your book is definitely shot in the opposite
01:43:11.900 direction so thank you very much for talking to me today thank you so much and uh to all of you bet
01:43:18.620 you bet you bet and uh hopefully we can meet when i come to the uk that would be good that'd be
01:43:23.100 fantastic and uh to all those who are listening and watching thank you very much for your time and
01:43:27.580 attention to the dailywire plus crew for facilitating this and the camera people who are here in austin
01:43:33.660 texas is where i am today thank you for helping us do this and uh and well we'll we'll continue this
01:43:41.740 conversation on the dailywire plus platform thanks again louise hello everyone i would encourage you
01:43:49.180 to continue listening to my conversation with my guest on dailywireplus.com
01:43:58.300 this message comes from viking committed to exploring the world in comfort journey through the heart of
01:44:05.260 europe on an elegant viking longship with thoughtful service destination focused dining and cultural
01:44:12.860 enrichment on board and on shore and every viking voyage is all-inclusive with no children and no casinos
01:44:21.820 discover more at viking.com