The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast - March 09, 2023


338. The Epidemic That Dare Not Speak Its Name | Stephen J Shaw


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 44 minutes

Words per Minute

166.5538

Word Count

17,462

Sentence Count

766

Misogynist Sentences

52

Hate Speech Sentences

40


Summary

Dr. Jordan Peterson has created a new series that could be a lifeline for those battling depression and anxiety. With decades of experience helping patients, Dr. Peterson offers a unique understanding of why you might be feeling this way. In his new series, he provides a roadmap towards healing, showing that while the journey isn t easy, it s absolutely possible to find your way forward. If you re suffering, please know you are not alone. There s hope, and there s a path to feeling better. Go to Daily Wire Plus now and start watching Dr. Jordan B. Peterson on Depression and Anxiety. Let s take a first step towards the brighter future you deserve. Today s guest is Stephen J. Shaw, a British national who has studied and lived on three continents. He trained as a computer engineer and then as a data scientist before starting his first film project, Birth Gap, at age 49. At age 49, he maintains the position of President of the data analytics company he co-founded, Autometrics Analytics LLC. Stephen holds an MBA graduate business degree from ISG in Paris, France and is continuing his studies at the Harvard Extension School. He s looking very much forward to delving into the issue of declining birth rates and population collapse, something that s not particularly on everyone s radar, and is looking to delve into the invisible epidemic of unplanned childlessness. In this episode, we talk to Stephen about his background and how he got started in the field of data analytics and what he s been up to date with the world s largest corporations for the last 20 years. We could walk you through his background in data science, and what it s like to be a data analyst. And how he s involved in forecasting, and why he s got into the field in the first place and why it s so important to be an expert at predicting the future of the world's fastest-growing economy. . What s up with data analytics? Why you should use Express VPN? Why I use ExpressVPN? What are you using it? And why you should be using Express VPNs to keep your personal data secure? How to protect your data in the best way possible? Can you trust your data between the dark web and the dark side of the internet and the lightest possible access point? and much more! Subscribe to our newest episode of Daily Wire plus? Subscribe and subscribe to our new podcast?


Transcript

00:00:00.960 Hey everyone, real quick before you skip, I want to talk to you about something serious and important.
00:00:06.480 Dr. Jordan Peterson has created a new series that could be a lifeline for those battling depression and anxiety.
00:00:12.740 We know how isolating and overwhelming these conditions can be, and we wanted to take a moment to reach out to those listening who may be struggling.
00:00:20.100 With decades of experience helping patients, Dr. Peterson offers a unique understanding of why you might be feeling this way in his new series.
00:00:27.420 He provides a roadmap towards healing, showing that while the journey isn't easy, it's absolutely possible to find your way forward.
00:00:35.360 If you're suffering, please know you are not alone. There's hope, and there's a path to feeling better.
00:00:41.780 Go to Daily Wire Plus now and start watching Dr. Jordan B. Peterson on depression and anxiety.
00:00:47.460 Let this be the first step towards the brighter future you deserve.
00:00:57.420 Hello everyone. I'm here today talking to Mr. Stephen J. Shaw.
00:01:13.900 Stephen is a British national who has studied and lived on three continents.
00:01:17.860 He trained as a computer engineer and then as a data scientist before starting his first film project, Birth Gap, at age 49.
00:01:28.580 He maintains the position of president of the data analytics company he co-founded, Autometrics Analytics LLC.
00:01:37.760 Stephen holds an MBA graduate business degree from ISG in Paris, France,
00:01:43.280 and is continuing his studies at the Harvard Extension School, looking very much forward today to delving into the issue of declining birth rates and population collapse,
00:01:56.220 something that's not particularly on everyone's radar, and the issue of the invisible epidemic of unplanned childlessness.
00:02:06.660 Good to see you.
00:02:07.820 Thank you for inviting me.
00:02:09.280 Hey, thanks for agreeing to talk. So, let's start with your background.
00:02:14.460 We could walk through what you've been up to biographically, first of all, to situate it,
00:02:19.840 and then you can expand on that to the degree that you're willing and able.
00:02:26.800 Historically, for the last 20 years, I've been involved in data analytics, what we now call data science.
00:02:32.860 I'm a part statistician, part coder.
00:02:35.420 I've worked with some great academics and PhDs that we have on staff and coming up with academic models,
00:02:41.840 forecasting models for industries, mainly in the automotive sector.
00:02:46.480 We try and do short-term forecasting.
00:02:48.840 What might people purchase?
00:02:51.200 What should car companies build?
00:02:53.300 What should they market?
00:02:54.760 What should they give for incentives?
00:02:56.940 Down to a very minute level.
00:02:58.440 This is a private venture?
00:02:59.680 It is.
00:03:00.160 And so, it's a corporation that offers these services?
00:03:03.100 Yeah, it's a small niche corporation that's been offering services to the world's largest corporations for 20 years.
00:03:08.800 And how did you get involved in that?
00:03:10.540 It was a startup in London 20 years ago.
00:03:12.940 I personally moved to the U.S.
00:03:14.840 We got a contract with Nissan North America.
00:03:17.680 It took me to L.A.
00:03:18.600 And following that, yeah, I spent like 15 years following that company hands-on until around 2015.
00:03:28.560 Bizarrely, and I should explain that my lifelong learner, I'd gone, I'd got accepted into Harvard Extension School
00:03:34.800 to become a degree candidate to keep my data science skills up to date.
00:03:41.020 And I was presented with some data that I just couldn't believe on falling birth rates.
00:03:46.740 So, as someone who is involved in forecasting, albeit short-term forecasting.
00:03:53.080 Going online without ExpressVPN is like not paying attention to the safety demonstration on a flight.
00:03:58.560 Most of the time, you'll probably be fine.
00:04:00.620 But what if one day that weird yellow mask drops down from overhead and you have no idea what to do?
00:04:06.320 In our hyper-connected world, your digital privacy isn't just a luxury.
00:04:10.100 It's a fundamental right.
00:04:11.280 Every time you connect to an unsecured network in a cafe, hotel, or airport,
00:04:15.760 you're essentially broadcasting your personal information to anyone with the technical know-how to intercept it.
00:04:20.780 And let's be clear, it doesn't take a genius hacker to do this.
00:04:23.980 With some off-the-shelf hardware, even a tech-savvy teenager could potentially access your passwords, bank logins, and credit card details.
00:04:31.400 Now, you might think, what's the big deal?
00:04:33.480 Who'd want my data anyway?
00:04:35.020 Well, on the dark web, your personal information could fetch up to $1,000.
00:04:38.880 That's right, there's a whole underground economy built on stolen identities.
00:04:43.700 Enter ExpressVPN.
00:04:45.440 It's like a digital fortress, creating an encrypted tunnel between your device and the internet.
00:04:50.140 Their encryption is so robust that it would take a hacker with a supercomputer over a billion years to crack it.
00:04:55.780 But don't let its power fool you.
00:04:57.500 ExpressVPN is incredibly user-friendly.
00:04:59.940 With just one click, you're protected across all your devices.
00:05:02.960 Phones, laptops, tablets, you name it.
00:05:05.060 That's why I use ExpressVPN whenever I'm traveling or working from a coffee shop.
00:05:09.160 It gives me peace of mind knowing that my research, communications, and personal data are shielded from prying eyes.
00:05:15.280 Secure your online data today by visiting expressvpn.com slash jordan.
00:05:20.020 That's E-X-P-R-E-S-S-V-P-N dot com slash jordan.
00:05:23.920 And you can get an extra three months free.
00:05:26.400 ExpressVPN dot com slash jordan.
00:05:28.280 Realizing that we've got this fundamental problem with birth rates that's ultimately going to affect, well, not just the number of potential car buyers.
00:05:42.000 I mean, that's the smallest problem in this overall.
00:05:43.940 But that was, you know, something I felt almost ashamed of.
00:05:46.820 Why do I know this?
00:05:48.220 And then you expand that to what is this going to mean for the planet?
00:05:52.620 And as a father of three, my three children were just about still teenagers then.
00:05:58.280 I felt a sense of failure that I hadn't been preparing my children for the world they were about to enter into.
00:06:06.620 You know, we all, I think, are led into the belief that, sure, that the world's population is growing perhaps exponentially still.
00:06:15.600 That's what I would have said at that time based on what I was learning.
00:06:18.980 And I had no idea that the actual dynamics of everything from how work is going to be like to how society is going to be like to how pension systems are going to be like is fundamentally flawed.
00:06:35.800 And at that moment, I realized something's wrong because, you know what, the same trend was showing up for Germany and Italy and Japan.
00:06:47.520 South Korea.
00:06:48.420 Yeah.
00:06:49.000 Well, South Korea was just a little bit later, just a little bit later, which is interesting.
00:06:53.240 But something triggered in the early 1970s in Japan, Germany, Italy, and you can add Spain, Portugal, Switzerland, Austria, to cause a series of parallel trends.
00:07:06.560 And yet, what I was reading from experts was that these are localized problems, but Japan, it's work-life balance.
00:07:14.840 That in Germany, it's something called Rebenmutter, which is the idea that in parts of Germany, even today, for a woman to have a child and go straight back to work is really something that culturally shouldn't be done.
00:07:28.240 So that might cause some people to delay parenthood.
00:07:32.280 In Spain and Italy, it was down to high unemployment among the youth.
00:07:38.460 Other areas, it was gender balance, et cetera.
00:07:40.900 So all these localized reasons were being proposed.
00:07:45.520 For me, as a data scientist, you could see clearly, and if I can give you an analogy, it's one of your own.
00:07:52.640 You were talking to Lex Friedman.
00:07:54.840 You talked about the dragon, I think, in terms of the environment context.
00:07:58.120 Someone finds a dragon, and they scream, there's a dragon.
00:08:01.480 And I love the analogy, and I since saw that you use dragons quite a lot, so I thought I might too.
00:08:06.700 And it's like you found this little dragon in Japan, and the same kind of dragon in Germany and Italy at the same time, and they're starting to get bigger.
00:08:16.640 So they're lizards to begin with.
00:08:18.540 Right.
00:08:19.200 I mean, they're tiny.
00:08:20.040 They're the size of a kitten, I think, is the analogy I saw.
00:08:23.260 And they're getting bigger, and then suddenly they're appearing in other neighboring countries, and it's growing, growing, growing from there.
00:08:30.280 So the idea that these are localized issues, to me, just did not make sense.
00:08:35.040 So why do you think you were struck to begin with by the fact that birth rates were plateauing or declining?
00:08:42.220 I mean, because the typical response to that would be either, so what?
00:08:47.340 There's too many people on the planet anyways, or actually it's a net good.
00:08:51.460 So now you said you're in a private company.
00:08:54.280 Now, I should let everybody watching and listening know that one of the markers for the trustworthiness of a data analytic company is that people will actually pay for their information.
00:09:05.160 And so, you know, it doesn't necessarily mean that a private data analytic company is credible, but it does mean at least that they've been able to demonstrate their credibility enough so that they have paying customers.
00:09:17.340 And that's not an easy thing to manage, and so you were doing short-term forecasting that was integrated into the capitalist economy, let's say, to help people plan their product development and so forth.
00:09:28.160 But you came across this data at a much broader level indicating a plateauing birth rate or population growth.
00:09:35.380 Why did that disturb you?
00:09:36.800 Why did you think that was a problem?
00:09:39.480 Because birth rates less than replacement level spiral downwards.
00:09:44.600 They never stall.
00:09:45.280 Well, if you have fewer children that are required to replace a parent's generation, once that generation grows up, they will, unless birth rates change, which they don't historically, they stay low once they're low, you're going to have fewer people again.
00:10:03.040 So you see it as a positive feedback loop.
00:10:05.520 It is.
00:10:06.000 And when you then look up, well, you want to find examples of societies coming from low birth rates going back to replacement level, and you realize there are no examples.
00:10:17.120 In fact, there's no non-historical examples anywhere.
00:10:21.780 Do we have enough of a historical track to consider that a concern?
00:10:26.460 In modern times, if you look at the number of countries who've fallen to birth rates of 1.7, 1.6, 1.5, when you have no single example of a country going back to a replacement level, we should be concerned.
00:10:41.300 In fact, we should be very concerned.
00:10:42.700 I know places like Quebec, for example, in Canada, with very, very low birth rate, have tried to institute government policies that, for example, make daycare in principle more accessible to young women and young families, although that's had pretty much zero impact on the outcome.
00:10:59.820 I know that Hungary has put forward a series of policy transformations on the family support front, and my belief is, from what I've read, is that they've at least stopped the birth rate decrease and increased it slightly.
00:11:16.360 So that's the only—I mean, Quebec didn't work at all.
00:11:18.940 Hungary, it looks like there's some minor—they're still way below replacement, so it hasn't rectified the problem in any sense.
00:11:25.560 What's fascinating about Hungary is what I wanted to do was look at something much deeper than the typical birth rate numbers that we see today, and I'm trying to change that.
00:11:40.140 If you look deeper, you can find data that, if you merge together, which I don't believe anyone had ever done before, that gives you two measures.
00:11:48.620 One is of societal childlessness, and the other is family structure.
00:11:55.560 So the traditional way to measure childlessness is to wait until women are 45, usually, and have some surveys, maybe a census.
00:12:05.560 So you're waiting to the end of the fertility window and counting them then.
00:12:09.820 What I wanted to see was, what is societal childlessness today if there's a reduction in the number of women starting to have families compared to what you would expect?
00:12:19.020 We should be able to track that now.
00:12:21.200 So looking at Hungary, which I've just been doing recently, was fascinating.
00:12:25.520 I mean, they're giving huge incentives for people to have three and four children.
00:12:29.380 But the family structure in Hungary is not changing at all.
00:12:33.580 At all.
00:12:34.320 What is changing, which may or may not be linked, it's associative in some way, but causal, we don't know, is the childlessness rate in Hungary does seem to be going down.
00:12:45.220 And more people look like they're starting to have families.
00:12:49.540 And what happens then is, when people start to have families, they go on, because family structure is locked in globally.
00:12:54.800 That's another finding.
00:12:56.480 And so what do you mean?
00:12:58.120 So we'll go in two directions.
00:12:59.260 What do you mean, what are you speaking about when you're talking, when you're expressing your concerns about family structure?
00:13:05.120 Well, family structure basically is the percentage of women.
00:13:08.500 We say women because we've got so much data on women, but really we should think of men and women.
00:13:15.000 The proportion of women, couples, who have one child, or two, or three, or four, or five, or more.
00:13:24.200 And if you take data for Japan, and you look at 1973, right before the fall in birth rates,
00:13:32.620 the percentages of women having one, two, three, or four are identical today as they were then.
00:13:38.780 Six percent of women in 1973 were having four or more children.
00:13:42.460 Today, it's the exact same number, six percent.
00:13:46.060 So our focus has been completely, we've been in a fog looking at overall birth rates.
00:13:53.420 What you find is in Japan in 1974, interesting year, an explosion in childlessness,
00:14:01.960 which went from three percent to six percent to 15 to 21 to 30 plus percent in a space of about four years.
00:14:09.600 The same in Italy, the same in Germany.
00:14:11.900 In four years.
00:14:12.560 In four years.
00:14:13.520 It's a shock.
00:14:14.700 It was what I call a baby shock.
00:14:16.320 And then if you look at Korea, South Korea, which you mentioned earlier, if we take South Korea,
00:14:22.240 mid-90s, right in the midst of a currency shock, you see childless rates were already maybe 15 percent there.
00:14:29.860 Suddenly, it goes up to, I believe, 30 percent, and now it's over 40 percent.
00:14:33.680 And this is childless at what age?
00:14:35.060 Well, when I estimate childlessness, I'm taking for the given population of women the number of births you'd expect to have at any age
00:14:46.780 and say, how many first-time mothers were there?
00:14:50.200 And when you count up the number of first-time mothers of any age group and look at the overall population structure,
00:14:56.380 you can see, well, wait a minute, there's a gap opening up here compared to the number you would expect.
00:15:01.900 So this is like age agnostic in a sense.
00:15:04.340 And as a measure, people may say, well, some of those women might, you know, there might be a boom in the future.
00:15:11.320 People might be just delaying.
00:15:12.880 But that doesn't happen.
00:15:13.980 There's no example of those booms ever happening.
00:15:17.220 So it seems to be we've got this cycle going on that people are pulled quite quickly into this what I call world of unplanned childlessness,
00:15:31.360 if I can, I've had to coin quite a few phrases here.
00:15:34.340 And I should explain what it might mean by unplanned childlessness.
00:15:39.540 If you look at surveys, look at research, the vast majority of people want children.
00:15:48.500 It's an aid.
00:15:50.500 And some don't.
00:15:52.400 That's clear.
00:15:53.380 What percentage do, approximately?
00:15:56.060 I'm estimating around 5% don't.
00:15:58.480 There have been Gallup polls in the U.S. done.
00:16:00.400 Does that differ between men and women?
00:16:03.080 I don't have that data.
00:16:04.200 Okay, okay.
00:16:04.860 So 5%, you figure, are out of the game?
00:16:07.840 Yes.
00:16:08.140 By voluntary choice?
00:16:09.440 Yes.
00:16:10.000 Right.
00:16:10.320 And what percentage are childless?
00:16:13.020 Well, right now we're looking at 30% to 40% in most developed nations.
00:16:16.760 So the vast majority, 80% is estimated in studies.
00:16:21.760 And I think this...
00:16:22.460 So that's that involuntary childlessness.
00:16:26.120 I've been thinking about that lately.
00:16:27.460 We have this notion for men of involuntary celibacy in cells.
00:16:31.960 We don't have a term that's as at hand for involuntary childlessness among women.
00:16:38.820 And it hasn't been recognized as a, like, what would you call it?
00:16:42.500 A universal social problem.
00:16:45.620 But you just said 5% of women don't want children, but 30% don't have them.
00:16:51.400 And so there's a huge gap there between desire and reality.
00:16:54.240 So I think, frankly, I believe it's the biggest societal problem that we have.
00:17:01.200 And it's hiding because we haven't recognized it.
00:17:04.500 And if you find people, as I did make in a documentary, people who are struggling, 30s, late 30s, women particularly, but men too, who have given up in their 40s.
00:17:17.740 And they're opening their heart to you with a level of what they call grief.
00:17:21.560 Yeah.
00:17:21.780 And in English language, grief is used for one particular context.
00:17:27.060 It's not necessarily used normally for something you never had.
00:17:30.420 Yeah.
00:17:30.580 I think in other languages, there are terms that encompass that.
00:17:35.300 But it's the same emotion.
00:17:37.220 And I have been pulled into conversations where I have, frankly, been brought myself to the depths of understanding the suffering from these people who thought they were going through life, getting the education, probably.
00:17:51.200 Yeah.
00:17:51.940 Starting the career path, probably.
00:17:54.480 Thinking that, well, you know what, I'm not 30 yet.
00:17:57.800 I've got time to meet a partner.
00:17:59.680 Yeah.
00:17:59.920 And then getting to the point of, well, often there is no partner.
00:18:03.860 Yeah.
00:18:04.420 Or that biology gets in the way.
00:18:06.880 Yeah.
00:18:07.100 Well, it turns out that life is shorter than people think.
00:18:09.500 You know, I've had clinical clients who.
00:18:14.160 Starting a business can be tough, but thanks to Shopify, running your online storefront is easier than ever.
00:18:20.080 Shopify is the global commerce platform that helps you sell at every stage of your business.
00:18:24.200 From the launch your online shop stage, all the way to the did we just hit a million orders stage, Shopify is here to help you grow.
00:18:31.460 Our marketing team uses Shopify every day to sell our merchandise, and we love how easy it is to add more items, ship products, and track conversions.
00:18:39.400 With Shopify, customize your online store to your style with flexible templates and powerful tools, alongside an endless list of integrations and third-party apps like on-demand printing, accounting, and chatbots.
00:18:50.460 Shopify helps you turn browsers into buyers with the internet's best converting checkout, up to 36% better compared to other leading e-commerce platforms.
00:18:59.320 No matter how big you want to grow, Shopify gives you everything you need to take control and take your business to the next level.
00:19:05.720 Sign up for a $1 per month trial period at shopify.com slash jbp, all lowercase.
00:19:11.760 Go to shopify.com slash jbp now to grow your business no matter what stage you're in.
00:19:17.000 That's shopify.com slash jbp.
00:19:20.460 Followed that path, and some of them were women who had initially decided that they didn't want to have children,
00:19:29.320 and then changed their minds quite dramatically in their late 20s, which is a very common pattern,
00:19:34.640 and then couldn't have children, and it was just absolutely disastrous for them.
00:19:38.560 They were often on the artificial fertility route for 10 years with multiple miscarriages and failures on that front,
00:19:45.860 and it's a bloody dismal outcome.
00:19:47.600 Okay, so you're making a case here, you're making a psychological case in some sense at the moment in that this is a phenomenon worth attending to,
00:19:57.140 because the vast majority of people who end up childless, which is a more serious immediate problem for women because of the biological restrictions on their reproductive capacity,
00:20:08.520 the reason that's a problem is because so many women end up in that situation despite wanting children.
00:20:14.740 So that's a real psychological problem, but you could take a sociological stance and say,
00:20:19.380 well, as has been insisted upon for 60 years, there's too many people on the planet,
00:20:26.600 and it's just not a bad thing at all if we stop reproducing in this manner,
00:20:30.460 and if the price we have to pay for reduction in the number of excess mouths to feed is that there are some unhappy women,
00:20:38.160 and so be it, what do you think about this at a sociological or political or economic level?
00:20:43.880 Well, first of all, I think that's a terribly sad thing to contemplate,
00:20:48.280 that we have to somehow enforce perhaps lifelong grief and sadness on a subset of society
00:20:57.800 who were mostly unlucky enough not to have the children they wanted to have for the sake of the planet when there are other people.
00:21:06.960 For the hypothetical sake.
00:21:07.980 Hypothetical planet at some future time.
00:21:11.560 At some future time.
00:21:13.240 And to me, the first thing, my reaction, strong reaction, isn't there another way, if that's right?
00:21:20.400 And then you look at data, as it reported in Nature last year, on the overall footprint by age group.
00:21:28.580 Quite a number of scientists put their name to it, and it says very clearly that 8% of our footprint occurs when we're aged under 30.
00:21:39.580 Then it rises quite significantly between 30 and around 65, I believe, and then it falls off sharply.
00:21:46.320 Well, that means that if the world's births were to magically, well, it wouldn't be magically, drop by, say, half.
00:21:54.840 I love taking extreme situations.
00:21:56.620 So let's imagine that from tomorrow, only half of the births happen for some crazy reason.
00:22:02.280 That 8% of total emissions or footprint would go down to 4% in 30 years' time.
00:22:08.120 This is going to have almost no impact for decades at a time when I think we have to find other solutions as much as they're needed to solve problems that are out there.
00:22:19.720 So the idea that we're going to inflict this pain, deep personal suffering, pain in people, and perhaps be pleased about it, as I know some people are, I think is terribly sad.
00:22:33.360 I think it might be that, to come back, I would like to clarify that for those people who don't have the desire, I consider myself a pan-natalist.
00:22:43.800 If you don't want to have children, I will be your biggest supporter to say that's fine.
00:22:47.520 And I think there might be a misunderstanding in society for some people who perhaps don't share that desire, who perhaps can't quite understand how fundamental this desire is.
00:22:58.760 Yeah, well, most people who are in that boat are being willfully blind, in my experience.
00:23:03.640 And so the idea that there are reasons to not want to have children, one reason is an overwhelming self-centered narcissism.
00:23:13.380 That's not the only reason, but it's definitely one reason.
00:23:17.020 And people talk about, you know, the interference with their personal freedom and their desire to pursue their career.
00:23:22.700 And in that, I read something like the absolute inability to ever sacrifice your own narrow self-interest.
00:23:28.720 And I do mean narrow to the, what would you say, concerns and needs of other people.
00:23:35.160 And so, you know, it's interesting to me that it's 5% that don't want children and that the rate of that kind of self-centered narcissism is about 4% to 5% too.
00:23:46.420 Now, I am not saying that everyone who decides not to have children falls into that category.
00:23:51.620 But I am saying that a fair number of people who don't want children fall into that category.
00:23:56.200 I mean, if you think about it biologically, every single one of your maternal ancestors for three and a half billion years reproduce successfully.
00:24:05.560 And it might be that you're the exception to that rule.
00:24:08.180 But, you know, if you are, you should think long and hard about why.
00:24:11.640 You also might want to think long and hard about why, given that it's likely to have a pretty damn detrimental effect on your life.
00:24:18.760 You know, it's all fine to be fancy, free and footloose when you're 30 and 35, but it's a lot less amusing when you're 50.
00:24:26.100 And it might be downright dreadful by the time you're, let's say, 65.
00:24:30.800 So, all right.
00:24:32.440 So, on the population front now, we talked a little bit about the psychological catastrophe of involuntary childlessness.
00:24:40.060 I'm curious, too, about the social and economic consequences.
00:24:45.340 So, as you get a demographic bulge, more and more older people and fewer and fewer younger people, obviously, you have fewer people to take care of the older people.
00:24:54.360 But I also have never really read anything pertaining to models of, like, real estate value collapse, because it doesn't take very long if there are more houses than there are people for the value of real estate to fall to, well, to what?
00:25:12.480 To nothing?
00:25:13.540 I mean, that's what happened in Detroit.
00:25:15.500 It basically fell to nothing.
00:25:16.940 I mean, Detroit has recovered to some degree, but we don't know at all what the world would look like if real estate values fell to virtually nothing, especially because that's where most people put their retirement value.
00:25:30.760 So, what do you foresee happening on the political and economic front, given the shift towards the elderly demographically?
00:25:42.820 We're going to see it in China first, right?
00:25:44.640 Clearly.
00:25:45.620 Clearly.
00:25:46.840 Well, Japan, too.
00:25:47.780 Japan, too.
00:25:48.320 One of the reasons I moved to live in Japan is to be close to, I wanted to feel this problem.
00:25:53.620 Yeah, yeah.
00:25:54.020 I wanted to be able to see it and almost touch it, and you can there.
00:25:57.620 But you mentioned Detroit.
00:25:59.160 I spent many, many years living in the suburbs of Detroit.
00:26:03.020 And right around the time I was looking to start this project, you know, that I was able to drive around the streets of Detroit and see street after street after street of tens and tens of thousands
00:26:14.780 thousands of, you know, decaying houses.
00:26:18.000 Yeah.
00:26:18.220 Yeah.
00:26:18.400 Yeah.
00:26:18.660 I remember one day driving along and there was a house.
00:26:22.260 And these were nice houses back in the day.
00:26:25.480 Right.
00:26:25.740 Right.
00:26:25.780 And there was a young family having a picnic outside one of these houses.
00:26:31.360 And it was the perfect setting, you might say, in every context, except every other house in this street looked like they were completely vacant, dilapidated.
00:26:42.200 And around that time, listening to local Detroit news every night, it was crime.
00:26:49.160 It was street lights that weren't functioning.
00:26:51.340 It was lack of safety.
00:26:52.580 It was lack of functioning of basic utilities.
00:26:54.680 It was infrastructure and bridges that the city couldn't afford.
00:26:57.820 And of course, in 2013, it went bankrupt.
00:27:00.160 So I had this backdrop to knowing what was happening to Detroit as a city.
00:27:06.000 And you're right about property value.
00:27:07.380 Around that time, you could buy a significant property in Detroit for $10,000.
00:27:10.740 Yeah.
00:27:10.880 You probably couldn't go there to ever see it because it wasn't safe at that time.
00:27:14.380 Right, right, right.
00:27:14.940 And you're right.
00:27:15.580 Detroit has come back.
00:27:16.560 So in some ways, it is a town.
00:27:17.620 Well, they demolished huge tracts of houses.
00:27:19.940 But how do you do that when half the houses are still occupied?
00:27:23.600 You go through this period of time.
00:27:25.740 Unless you're going to say to people, everybody move three streets over now, and you do that every few years,
00:27:32.040 you can't easily go into neighborhoods and start moving things back to nature, which is what Detroit's doing.
00:27:38.940 You can individual houses, but you still have these scars of the empty spaces that were there.
00:27:45.480 And I show some of this in the documentary.
00:27:47.960 So the idea, I mean, people, I was on a podcast with Chris Williamson's recently.
00:27:54.280 It was the first time I got a sense of the comments that people make.
00:27:59.580 And many people were sharing these deep personal stories about their life to do with unplanned chalices.
00:28:05.800 Yeah.
00:28:05.980 Others were sharing concerns about whether they'd ever become grandparents, right?
00:28:12.380 So, but a lot of people were saying, well, this is just about economics.
00:28:18.840 You know, who cares?
00:28:19.460 This is just about big corporations suffering.
00:28:21.360 Who cares?
00:28:22.620 I think people need to understand this is going to impact everybody, everybody's life.
00:28:26.720 If you're living in an area where there's literally decay, dilapidation all around you,
00:28:31.800 and the taxes that you're paying to your city or your municipality aren't covering the basic infrastructure,
00:28:38.140 no one's going to escape from this.
00:28:39.860 And I think people don't understand that.
00:28:41.280 So in my case, understanding life in Detroit, and again, I really love the city, and it's great.
00:28:49.060 You know, I love the people.
00:28:50.940 I love the way it is starting to come back.
00:28:54.320 But that experience, I think, really spoke to me that we really need to think about what this means.
00:29:01.480 And you talk about the socioeconomic.
00:29:03.100 I mean, the economics, you know, go beyond the city and the property values.
00:29:06.540 It's the pension funds.
00:29:08.540 It's the social welfare funds that, you know, people think, I think I did too at the time,
00:29:13.520 that, you know, the retirement, the cost to maintain each of us in a retirement
00:29:19.620 is basically what the government or someone's been saving for when we get to that age.
00:29:24.400 Yeah, right.
00:29:24.740 It's not.
00:29:25.740 What we're paying right now—
00:29:26.960 That's a bargain with the future.
00:29:28.360 That's a bargain.
00:29:29.200 You know, you're covering the people who are retired now.
00:29:31.660 What the government has put away for us is debt.
00:29:34.420 Debt.
00:29:34.840 Yeah, yeah.
00:29:35.160 There's no savings.
00:29:36.820 And then you look at—
00:29:37.180 There's a promise.
00:29:38.300 Right.
00:29:38.900 And then the debt's a problem because—
00:29:40.720 Yes, that's for sure.
00:29:41.700 If you have a shrinking number of taxpayers, the debt's not shrinking.
00:29:45.660 So the repayment on the debt actually becomes worse and worse and worse.
00:29:50.480 Yeah, well, and hypothetically, you can remediate that with immigration,
00:29:53.580 but then that opens up another can of worms, which is no one really knows
00:29:58.660 what the maximal rate of incorporation a society can manage without imploding, right?
00:30:06.420 I mean, obviously, Canada, the U.S., the U.S. in particular is an immigrant society,
00:30:10.940 and that's worked out extremely well for the immigrants and for the society.
00:30:15.460 But the idea that there's no upper limit to our capacity to digest and integrate,
00:30:21.780 let's say, is absolutely preposterous.
00:30:24.280 So—and we don't know, but the notion that we can replenish at the rate that we're losing
00:30:30.600 on the birth rate front strikes me as—it's at least a debatable claim.
00:30:36.300 Immigration is a subject that, you know, I think we actually only look at one side of it,
00:30:42.160 and I certainly did, until I went to Nepal.
00:30:45.260 And I went and I sat down with a professor, the head of the department of population,
00:30:49.940 Professor Patak, in one of the largest universities in Asia.
00:30:53.200 And I wanted to talk about falling birth rates in Nepal,
00:30:57.420 which were just about replacement level at that time.
00:31:00.260 And all he seemed to want to talk about was the pains of migration on Nepal,
00:31:06.460 the people, the communities that are left behind.
00:31:10.040 I never for one second had thought about this dark side of immigration.
00:31:14.440 Oh, your brain drain, for example.
00:31:17.080 Community drain.
00:31:18.040 Yeah, yeah.
00:31:18.440 You're actually taking away—you're leaving the old parents there,
00:31:20.740 and you're sending, you know, remittances back, and that's seen as positive.
00:31:25.120 But those parents aren't really looking for remittances.
00:31:27.820 They're looking for people, community, their children to be there into their older age.
00:31:34.080 And, you know, we went to film some of these older people,
00:31:37.020 and, you know, the looks on their—forlorn looks on their face.
00:31:40.220 No one thinks about that.
00:31:41.460 And then you have another situation, which is often it's men who are the immigrants,
00:31:46.080 at least first.
00:31:47.500 Yeah.
00:31:47.600 And, well, okay, so maybe that seems to some a good way for it to start.
00:31:55.200 But there's another dark side to that is the woman behind are either not married yet,
00:32:01.220 or they are married, and their men have gone off elsewhere,
00:32:05.320 and they're not having children.
00:32:06.660 Right.
00:32:07.800 Or their husband's coming back for three weeks a year,
00:32:11.020 and you've got three weeks a year to try and get pregnant.
00:32:13.960 And, of course, most are not.
00:32:16.920 So you actually are propelling countries into low birth rates,
00:32:21.660 the same factor that the rest of us are going through right now.
00:32:25.400 So the immigration debate—and I'm an immigrant myself.
00:32:29.780 You know, I've been an immigrant to the U.S., to Japan now.
00:32:33.600 So I'm absolutely not against immigration at all.
00:32:37.740 As you say, it's done great service to U.S., Canada, and many other countries, too.
00:32:43.500 But the idea that—
00:32:44.780 Yeah, but that doesn't mean it's a solution to population flight replacement.
00:32:48.420 Right, right, right.
00:32:49.420 Now, you talked about Japan.
00:32:50.880 Let's talk about Japan a little bit.
00:32:52.320 How long did you live in Japan?
00:32:53.480 I still do, so I've been there for five years.
00:32:56.420 Uh-huh.
00:32:57.020 And you said you can—well, so what do you experience there
00:33:00.580 in relationship to your concerns about population decline?
00:33:04.080 Let me tell you about a community in rural Tokyo.
00:33:09.260 So this is the world's biggest city, based on some measures.
00:33:13.180 You go to the northwestern part of Tokyo,
00:33:17.200 and there's an area called Takashima Daira,
00:33:19.560 and it's featured in the documentary.
00:33:22.240 1973, the 10,000 homes in this apartment were filled with young families.
00:33:27.960 And there's old footage where you see, you know, just children everywhere.
00:33:31.720 I went back with someone who was a child in those days.
00:33:35.020 And, you know, you can hear the voices of the past.
00:33:39.280 And today, it's a ghost town, but it's not unoccupied.
00:33:44.560 In fact, 98% of the apartments are still occupied, but they're old people.
00:33:49.700 And they're mostly old women living alone.
00:33:52.580 Yes, and they're old women because men die early.
00:33:54.820 Men die early.
00:33:55.400 Right, so this is another—that's exactly right.
00:33:57.500 So one of the things that you see as young people disappear
00:34:02.340 and as the population ages is that the landscape is made up of isolated old women
00:34:08.800 who no one cares about.
00:34:12.280 Right.
00:34:12.500 A dismal destiny for all concerned.
00:34:17.700 You know, I'd love people, frankly, to watch the documentary to really sense this
00:34:21.880 because, you know, there's one scene there, and it is harrowing,
00:34:26.360 but to put it in simple terms, there's an 80-year-old woman who has no family,
00:34:32.640 who's contemplating suicide because she's nothing to live for,
00:34:38.160 no one to live for, and no one to communicate.
00:34:40.260 No, she should move to Canada.
00:34:41.660 We have a nice medically-assisted death program here that's, I think,
00:34:45.960 accounting for something like 3% to 5% of all deaths now.
00:34:49.100 So, you know, there's a solution for everyone to contemplate.
00:34:53.220 Yeah, well, I just worry—
00:34:54.420 In fact, there was a Japanese professor who came out the other day, a week ago,
00:34:57.900 suggesting that it would be morally appropriate for the older people in Japan to consider suicide as a route out
00:35:04.300 because they're a burden to society.
00:35:08.480 And now he's backtracking, saying he didn't really mean that.
00:35:11.160 But it's dangerous once you start to put that out there because there are people.
00:35:16.380 You know, I remember a conversation with a young woman in Japan and talking about her future,
00:35:23.220 and I did that with a lot of people, over 230 people I interviewed in 24 countries.
00:35:28.740 And she mentioned that her grandmother was living with her family.
00:35:33.320 But she mentioned the burden of her grandmother to the family.
00:35:38.540 And she came out with a point that I guess many might be thinking when you're that age,
00:35:43.340 why is she still here?
00:35:45.600 And when you hear that, you know, and then you meet people who are that age
00:35:52.480 who I think have still so much to give to society, they're just excluded from it.
00:35:56.920 They're not.
00:35:57.700 Well, it's hard if they're not integrated in—
00:36:00.020 well, sometimes it's hard if they are integrated into a family,
00:36:02.740 but it's definitely harder if they're not.
00:36:04.440 It's also the case that a lot of people who contemplate suicide
00:36:08.160 do that not so much because they're specifically suffering,
00:36:12.940 although that can certainly be a contributing factor,
00:36:15.100 but because they do believe that they are fundamentally best construed as a burden
00:36:20.620 and that the world, including the people around them,
00:36:23.300 would be better off if they disappeared.
00:36:24.840 So that's a very sad, what would you say, realm to inhabit in your misery and isolation.
00:36:33.240 So can we walk through the structure of the documentary?
00:36:37.600 Yes, of course.
00:36:38.160 Yeah, so it's just so everyone listening is reminded,
00:36:41.700 it's called—the name of the documentary is Birth Gap.
00:36:44.800 And so let's walk through the structure of it.
00:36:48.880 First of all, the title, Birth Gap,
00:36:50.700 if I could just explain why it's called Birth Gap.
00:36:52.620 What is a birth gap?
00:36:54.660 To me, it's what I defined as the gap between the number of old people to support in society and births.
00:37:01.000 So it's an indication of, frankly, a measure that we're not taking account of today.
00:37:06.780 What is that ratio?
00:37:08.920 So to me, to be very honest with you,
00:37:12.440 whether we hit 9 billion or maybe 10, it's trivial.
00:37:18.800 It's going to happen.
00:37:19.780 It's going to be in that ballpark.
00:37:21.760 Whether we like it or not, that's going to happen.
00:37:25.400 And what actually matters is the age structure.
00:37:29.260 So Birth Gap, the title of the movie, that's where it comes from.
00:37:32.900 Before I went on this journey, chapter one is me literally going with an iPad,
00:37:39.960 showing people data.
00:37:41.660 We started in Italy, Switzerland.
00:37:44.100 We went to Japan and just started to talk to people about what's happening in their own societies.
00:37:49.140 So how did you move into the realm of documentary filmmaking?
00:37:53.020 Well, I have to thank my second son, Adam, for that.
00:37:57.820 Because my idea at this point, I mean, I'm not a filmmaker.
00:38:02.020 It certainly wasn't then.
00:38:03.320 My thought was, this is a big problem.
00:38:07.780 I can write a book about this.
00:38:09.160 I thought just about I have the ability to write, to explain this.
00:38:13.620 And what I wanted to do, because there's other books out there,
00:38:16.160 is come up with a new way to help visualize this problem
00:38:19.700 and to use the book to kind of communicate.
00:38:22.760 And I felt, well, maps, no one's really come up with the structure of a map.
00:38:27.060 And in doing this, I was explaining to my son, Adam,
00:38:31.320 and he said, Dad, no one our age, his age, reads books anymore.
00:38:36.220 We all watch documentaries.
00:38:37.620 Right, right.
00:38:38.460 Or listen to them.
00:38:39.780 Or listen to them.
00:38:40.800 Yeah.
00:38:41.520 And for me, well, that's not me.
00:38:43.700 There's no way I could possibly do that.
00:38:45.580 And then by chance, a friend of a friend was a former videographer,
00:38:50.240 news anchor for a Washington, D.C. news network,
00:38:55.640 but was going out on her own.
00:38:57.760 And long story short, we thought, well, okay,
00:39:00.200 let's see if we can make this work.
00:39:02.160 And I brought her along for two weeks to film the first interviews,
00:39:05.800 thinking, if nothing else, this is going to be an archive for my own research.
00:39:09.440 Right, right, right.
00:39:10.100 And sent me note-taking while I'm listening to all of these people.
00:39:14.840 And as we got into it, the personal stories opened up of people
00:39:19.400 who you could see them contemplating the future of their lives.
00:39:23.580 Like one springs to mind a young elementary school teacher in Switzerland,
00:39:28.620 30 years old, a young man.
00:39:31.040 And when we walked through with him the future of elementary schools in Switzerland,
00:39:37.260 you could see the process in his mind,
00:39:39.380 realizing we're not going to need anywhere near the number of elementary school teachers
00:39:44.120 that we have now and what that might mean for him.
00:39:47.020 So the documentary starts literally with me asking people in countries,
00:39:52.660 why is this happening?
00:39:54.640 And frankly, you know, I was hoping, you know, in this entire project,
00:40:02.440 I was expecting at some point to sit down and do some form of regressive model,
00:40:06.760 you know, to find a correlation between something that would link these small dragons,
00:40:12.180 these, you know, falling birth rates in Japan, Germany, and Italy,
00:40:18.040 because they were happening at the same time and they were spreading.
00:40:21.580 I never got to that point, and I'm very grateful I didn't,
00:40:24.220 because I probably would have found something like, you know,
00:40:27.220 ice cream seals, you know, happened at the same time.
00:40:29.620 Some scurious thing would have come up.
00:40:32.000 It's very hard to identify.
00:40:34.300 Well, it seems obvious that, I mean, one of the causes, the distal causes,
00:40:39.840 I would say clearly, is the promotion of the birth control pill.
00:40:44.720 But even that is a somewhat shallow answer because there's a very specific set of social
00:40:52.520 and economic realities, zeitgeist, that even made the invention and distribution
00:40:59.520 and acceptance of the birth control possible, right?
00:41:02.660 You had to have the psychological stage set for the acceptance of that technology,
00:41:09.000 the demand for that technology before it could be developed or implemented.
00:41:12.100 And so, well, so, okay, so you started the documentary, you're in chapter one,
00:41:18.060 you're starting to ask people what's going on.
00:41:20.180 What are they telling you?
00:41:21.940 Yeah, well, no one had a clear answer.
00:41:23.700 And that, you know, maybe that was overly simplistic,
00:41:25.600 but what I was trying to do is find some common thread.
00:41:30.500 But let me just, if I can, talk about contraceptives,
00:41:34.620 because there's a wonderful counterexample.
00:41:38.260 The contraceptive pill was not legalized in Japan until 1990.
00:41:43.100 Hmm.
00:41:44.540 And it was only legalized because Viagra was legalized.
00:41:49.880 And at that point, women said, wait, you've been blocking the contraceptive pill
00:41:53.820 and now you're allowing Viagra.
00:41:55.060 And at that point, it was made accessible.
00:41:56.240 So you had the precipitous decline in birth rate.
00:41:58.820 From 73.
00:41:59.840 You had an increase in mass abortions.
00:42:03.600 So this was a societal issue with that.
00:42:06.920 So, okay, so that shows that it's something deeper than the year.
00:42:09.100 It's something deeper.
00:42:10.180 And also, if you look at other countries, particularly UK at the time, France to the US,
00:42:16.540 where you also had access to the contraceptive pill, you were not seeing falling birth rates.
00:42:21.380 And a lot of people would say, well, it's obvious it was industrialization.
00:42:26.440 It was something to do with urbanization.
00:42:30.060 But the correlations aren't there if you look at, well, why did this only happen in those three countries?
00:42:36.280 And the answer comes back to, I'd love people to see it unfold in the documentary,
00:42:40.140 but it's a sudden increase in this unplanned, involuntary childlessness happened in Germany, Italy,
00:42:48.220 those countries at the same time.
00:42:49.540 Well, it's definitely the case that as women become more educated, they have fewer children.
00:42:55.560 And that's now the precise causal pathway there isn't obvious.
00:43:02.940 One simple suggestion would be that it is a matter of accidental delay.
00:43:10.160 I mean, I've seen this in my daughter, you know, my daughter, although she had terrible health problems
00:43:15.340 and that complicated her life a lot.
00:43:17.400 She had initially thought that she might want to go be a physician, but that's like 12 years.
00:43:23.360 And she was also very oriented towards having children.
00:43:27.260 And she's managed to have one child, despite her health problems.
00:43:32.180 But that desire to pursue an intense educational pathway does exist in conflict,
00:43:39.360 certainly with an early start to family development.
00:43:44.300 If you presume that that doesn't matter because you've got time,
00:43:47.660 you're not going to find out that isn't true for 10 years in your own life.
00:43:51.640 And maybe the culture won't find out that's true for like 30 years.
00:43:54.760 You know, I mean, we still tell young women who are 19.
00:43:58.960 I made a comment that was clipped on an Instagram reel by someone
00:44:04.400 about the fact that we always lie to young women about what's going to be important in their lives.
00:44:09.120 We tell them it's going to be all career.
00:44:11.400 I said, you know, I've worked in female-dominated industries my whole life.
00:44:15.820 And what I've observed is among men and women alike that it's a very rare person
00:44:22.020 for whom career is the most important thing in their life, even if they're men.
00:44:26.800 Although it's true for more men, it's true for virtually no women by the time they hit 30.
00:44:32.680 And the amount of vitriol that comment generated was unparalleled.
00:44:36.900 And that's something because I've had plenty of vitriol generated from things I said.
00:44:41.220 And it was all young women, you know, talking about how some old white guy like me
00:44:46.540 had no right to tell young women what to do with their bodies, which I most certainly was not.
00:44:52.200 But it is, you can see a simple pathway there, right?
00:44:57.640 It's like, well, we have this avenue where we can pursue our career and our education
00:45:02.660 and everything else we want.
00:45:04.360 And then we'll be able to solve the problem of having a family.
00:45:07.300 The problem with that is, well, it's hard enough to find a mate when you're 23, 24.
00:45:13.880 By the time you're 30, it's even more difficult.
00:45:16.180 And by the time you're 35, it's starting to become well-nigh impossible to find a mate
00:45:20.020 and get pregnant and have a family, especially if you're going to have more than one kid.
00:45:24.200 And so, well, so there's a direct conflict there between the avenues that are open to women
00:45:32.480 and the need to strike while the iron's hot on the reproductive front.
00:45:39.060 Nobody really knows how to reconcile that.
00:45:41.240 I mean, it's odd, because women will live about seven years longer than men.
00:45:45.420 So it could be the case that the societal norm could be that women have their children
00:45:50.820 when they're quite young and then go back to school in their 30s.
00:45:53.280 That would actually work out.
00:45:54.920 In principle, that could work out quite nicely.
00:45:57.200 But we don't have the norms in place to make that a possibility.
00:46:00.100 But we have to start addressing exactly this, because if we don't, you know, to me, I mean,
00:46:07.380 there's so many ideas today about reproductive technology that are overstated.
00:46:13.160 Oh, yes.
00:46:13.880 Terribly.
00:46:14.760 Freeze your eggs.
00:46:15.660 Yeah, right.
00:46:16.160 At age 40, you know, if you have a partner and if you still have energy, you might then.
00:46:20.920 Yes, and everything goes well.
00:46:22.360 Yeah, if everything goes well.
00:46:23.000 And you have the money.
00:46:23.860 Yeah.
00:46:24.460 And the emotional stamina.
00:46:25.780 All of that.
00:46:26.200 So part of what I'm hoping to do through the documentary and my work after this
00:46:32.960 is to just increase awareness, particularly to women, but you need a man as well.
00:46:38.320 So it's both.
00:46:39.440 That the fertility window is much shorter, and the ability of children gets harder and harder and harder.
00:46:46.620 It's not just about getting pregnant.
00:46:47.880 It's about being able to deliver, you know, being able to see the pregnancy through, which gets exponentially harder very, very quickly.
00:46:56.340 I should mention, I interviewed five fertility doctors for the documentary itself.
00:47:01.680 And, you know, each one of them wanted to open up about the challenges, because normally they have to sell their services.
00:47:08.720 Right.
00:47:08.920 Normally you have to tell people, think positively, here's what we've done for other people.
00:47:14.480 Here's what we think we can do for you.
00:47:16.120 Yeah.
00:47:16.340 What they were telling to me openly, I'm frankly getting quite emotional about it on a couple of occasions, was it's terrible because so often it doesn't work out.
00:47:26.340 Well, one in three couples by the age of 30 have pronounced fertility problems defined as inability to conceive within a year of embarking on the endeavor consciously.
00:47:38.340 Right.
00:47:38.860 So that's one in three.
00:47:39.800 And, of course, it just gets worse and worse as age creeps up.
00:47:44.580 And 30 is not that old.
00:47:46.000 And it does mean that women have a damn tight window.
00:47:49.560 It's 13 years, let's say, by the time you're 17.
00:47:53.520 By some standards, you're mature enough to consider reproduction, 17 or 18, on the extreme end.
00:48:01.660 And then, well, 35 is the other end of that distribution.
00:48:07.360 And you're playing with fire by the time you're delaying, especially if you don't have a partner, by the time you're delaying until 35.
00:48:15.880 And if you want three children, you know.
00:48:17.540 Yeah, well, right.
00:48:18.340 I'm thinking just one, you know.
00:48:19.920 And it's also the case, I think, if you're a reasonable observer of human nature, you see that people have three sources of fundamental gratification in their lives.
00:48:31.260 One is the pursuit of their own interests, including career and job.
00:48:36.360 One is their intimate relationship, and the other is their family.
00:48:40.080 And, obviously, the intimate relationship and the family are very integrally associated.
00:48:45.580 And if you miss out on one of those, you may be able to fill it by exceptional ability in the remaining domains.
00:48:55.280 But for most people, not only is that highly unlikely, it's also highly undesirable.
00:48:59.880 So, to take the point as well, here am I, you know, an older male talking about things that are very sensitive to women.
00:49:10.580 But there are a lot of women out there saying the exact same thing.
00:49:14.940 And, you know, there was one this morning I got an email from Melanie Notkin, who's written a book called Otherhood, who herself has no children.
00:49:23.240 And she put it succinctly that, in her words, women are going through the education path, the career path, to try to ultimately fall in love and have a family.
00:49:32.660 Yeah, right.
00:49:33.480 It's all linked.
00:49:34.660 Yeah, well, I think it's the same for men.
00:49:36.640 I think so, too.
00:49:37.120 You know, well, half the reason, half, it's more than that, half the reason that men strive for career success is to impress women and attract them.
00:49:45.480 In fact, it's higher than that.
00:49:46.760 So, but maybe that point is the heart of the problem we have today, because today, if you look at who's at college and who's actually earning more right now, I read this morning, women in cities in the U.S. are earning more than men.
00:50:00.700 I don't know if that's right or wrong, but you have this situation.
00:50:03.420 Yeah, it's right under 30.
00:50:04.820 Yeah.
00:50:05.180 So, in U.S. colleges right now, there are, I believe it's 9.5 million women and around 6.5, 7 million men.
00:50:12.400 Oh, and the women start dropping out of college, by the way, when they start to outnumber the men two to one, right?
00:50:19.300 Because a lot of the reason people go to college, you know, you've got to ask yourself, what's college for?
00:50:23.700 It's like, well, it's to get educated, to go to lectures, to be accredited.
00:50:26.900 It's like, no, probably not.
00:50:29.280 Probably the reason people go to college is to find a mate.
00:50:31.720 And there's a selected pool there, and you have a decent chance of finding someone, you know, of approximately your ability and forward-looking vision, let's say.
00:50:42.720 And the reason people are willing to shell out between $150,000 and $250,000 for four years is in no small part so that they can find a mate.
00:50:51.420 Well, and if you demolish that by, well, radically decreasing the number of available men, for example,
00:50:57.000 you're just going to blow the whole enterprise out of the water, which is already what's happening.
00:51:00.300 Absolutely.
00:51:03.400 And this is perhaps my greatest concern, because I think if we make young people more aware of fertility, the fertility window, they might want to have children earlier.
00:51:13.780 If we link that to, in some way, enabling careers later in life, which has to fundamentally happen for this to work,
00:51:20.260 we might still be left with a situation where women who, the term is hypergony,
00:51:25.860 where women tend to want to marry someone at least as educated, at least as successful, taller than they are.
00:51:32.240 But if we're in a situation where there's so few men getting the same level of education, we might be left with this imbalance.
00:51:38.800 Oh, yeah, that's already happening, clearly.
00:51:41.400 It's very difficult for women to overcome the hypergamous instinct, because they're trying to redress the imbalance in terms of reproductive responsibility.
00:51:49.260 There's no evidence at all. You get a little bit of flattening of hypergamy in extremely egalitarian societies like Scandinavia,
00:51:56.420 but it certainly doesn't disappear. And so that's built in at a very fundamental biological level.
00:52:03.360 And I don't think any casual tinkering on the anthropological or sociological front is going to shift that a bit.
00:52:08.400 So that's a big problem.
00:52:10.820 It's a big problem.
00:52:11.600 It's also the case, too, that if marriages where the wife out-earns or out-statuses the husband tend to be comparatively unstable and violent.
00:52:23.140 So, you know, now you can lay that at the feet of the men if you're inclined to, but in some sense it doesn't really matter,
00:52:29.800 because that's the way it is.
00:52:31.180 And so the women are unhappy and the men are threatened, and that's just not a good recipe for marital stability.
00:52:40.120 So everyone loses in this situation.
00:52:42.520 So let's talk about another country, Thailand.
00:52:45.840 So you would think, if you'd asked me how many women are in college in Thailand, I might have said 15%.
00:52:52.200 I have no idea, but it's 55%.
00:52:55.100 40% of men are in college in Thailand.
00:52:58.520 So you have a similar shift even there.
00:53:00.580 And what's happening to the men, the documentary, we went to a temple where monks are trying to rehabilitate young men who fell out of college or didn't go to college, moreover.
00:53:11.120 What they did, age 16, 18, was turned to alcohol, was turned to substances, to drive taxis because they could get some cash,
00:53:19.520 because there was no point trying to compete with a woman.
00:53:21.920 So you have these deep societal problems, but yet I want to be really clear that the answer to this is not, in some way, preventing women from getting an education.
00:53:33.680 That's just not going to function.
00:53:35.500 How are you going to do that?
00:53:37.540 Well, you also lose access to half the world's brain power.
00:53:40.080 Of course, of course.
00:53:41.520 There are people who think that, and there are people who I think want to use this conversation to promote that, because I've seen comments along those lines too often.
00:53:51.960 This has to be, therefore, partly about men in some way, asking why are men excluded from society?
00:53:59.460 Why are they becoming incels?
00:54:00.640 Or in Japan, they call them otakus, you know, the young man who stays home playing his gaming systems.
00:54:07.340 See, I don't think that's the right question.
00:54:10.000 I think we almost always ask questions backwards.
00:54:13.300 Why people become useless, that's not a mystery.
00:54:18.020 It's easy to be useless.
00:54:20.120 The mystery is why that doesn't happen to everyone all the time.
00:54:23.000 And the answer is because we build up extremely careful structures of societal discipline to encourage people to adopt mature, long-term responsibility and to reward them judiciously for doing so.
00:54:38.380 And when you allow those structures to collapse or work consciously to undermine them, then you get default to the default.
00:54:46.860 And the default is useless.
00:54:48.560 It's short-term gratification.
00:54:50.000 And so you'd never need an explanation for that.
00:54:53.080 It's like, well, why do people turn to short-term gratification?
00:54:55.980 Because it's gratifying in the short term.
00:54:58.840 It's easy.
00:55:00.120 Now, you know, getting men, encouraging men to shed their Peter Pan persona, juvenile Peter Pan persona, and to adopt mature responsibility, that's a real challenge for every society.
00:55:14.940 And we are increasingly not only failing at doing that, but punishing young men for developing, say, the virtues of ambition and, well, and even sexual desire for that matter.
00:55:30.180 So, all right.
00:55:32.020 So, chapter one, you went and interviewed a variety of people and just started to flesh out the territory.
00:55:38.220 How does it unfold after that?
00:55:39.740 Well, it comes to the point where I realize there's a moment I realize there is a connection across all these countries.
00:55:47.500 And it's to do with this structure of the family.
00:55:52.540 You know, you would expect, if you're having fewer children, you know, and some of these organizations encourage people to have fewer children, have fewer, smaller families, you would expect if they had had any success or if people were doing it, you would have a lot of families with only one child.
00:56:08.520 But actually, singletons are actually really quite rare in life.
00:56:13.420 And they're no more common today than they were 30, 40 years ago.
00:56:17.860 So, I started to discover…
00:56:20.660 So, you see people with zero children.
00:56:23.000 Right.
00:56:23.620 That's the only…
00:56:24.220 How do you get a fertility rate of less than replacement level?
00:56:27.240 It's either the number of people having one child or none.
00:56:30.380 So, connecting that allowed me to start to ask more questions about childlessness and about aspirations in life.
00:56:36.480 And that really…
00:56:37.300 I see.
00:56:37.760 So, it's not a matter of small families.
00:56:39.940 No.
00:56:40.100 It's a matter of no family.
00:56:41.480 That's right.
00:56:41.880 And then it's a matter of involuntary no family.
00:56:44.380 That's right.
00:56:44.740 Okay, got it.
00:56:45.580 And that's why I didn't end up doing any regressive analysis because it's a counting problem.
00:56:50.980 You know, we were counting this the wrong way.
00:56:52.540 You just simply need to look at the number of people having one child, two, three, four, and you find this gap.
00:56:58.400 And you find that gap getting wider and wider.
00:57:00.240 And it effectively explains the entire fall below replacement level.
00:57:07.240 But there's really good news here, too.
00:57:10.920 The best news in all of this is that if the majority or significant number of those people who are involuntarily, unplanned childlessness, as I call it, if they were having a family, they're not going to have one.
00:57:24.700 They're going to have, in the same proportions, one, two, three, four, five plus.
00:57:28.020 It's all about having that first child.
00:57:30.800 So, the documentary...
00:57:32.340 Right, well, look, the second child is pretty straightforward after the first.
00:57:36.120 And once you've got two, you're already completely screwed.
00:57:38.960 So, you might as well have three.
00:57:40.660 Well, that's...
00:57:41.620 Then the kids start to take care of each other, by the way, too, which is something that parents don't understand.
00:57:46.260 Is that, you know, you don't...
00:57:47.720 If you have eight kids, it's not like you're taking care of eight kids.
00:57:51.360 The kids start to form their own society and take care of each other.
00:57:54.720 Yeah, and there's great examples of that in the documentary.
00:57:56.780 Or, at least on my journey, you saw in Italy this mother of four children saying she educated her eldest daughter, taught her how to read, and she taught the next daughter, and she taught the next one, and the next one.
00:58:07.820 So, that's certainly true.
00:58:09.460 But the good news is here, because family structure is really locked in, once, of course, you know, if you go to some countries, as I did in Africa, you've got high birth rates because of poverty.
00:58:20.020 Somewhat access to reproductive services, but mostly that's covered now.
00:58:25.660 Mostly it is.
00:58:26.860 So, we've got poverty that people in Africa need children to go and get the water.
00:58:31.340 But a lot of good things are being done on that.
00:58:34.060 That poverty level is coming way down, and we're seeing in Africa, on average in sub-Saharan Africa, just to cover that briefly,
00:58:41.300 the average woman is having one less child every 15 years.
00:58:46.500 It's around four now.
00:58:47.860 So, in around 30 years' time, we're looking at Africa starting to get down towards replacement level.
00:58:52.380 It's on the same path.
00:58:53.320 Yeah, yeah, yeah.
00:58:54.040 That's the reasonable assumption based on the data right now.
00:58:57.020 So, once you get to that point, and this is what I think the world of demography really skipped over,
00:59:04.700 is that it's not the same form.
00:59:11.020 It's not like you look at, you know, families going from four to two and then down to 1.5 and set this is the same trend.
00:59:16.900 It's not.
00:59:17.600 When you get to replacement level, when women are having pretty much the family size that they actually want,
00:59:23.840 childlessness kicks in, and it's that that pulls it down a different level.
00:59:27.900 So, the next part of the documentary is then going to people, finding out what their young people,
00:59:32.240 what their aspirations for the future was,
00:59:34.500 but then also talking to men and women who hadn't had children, why they didn't, and what it meant to their lives.
00:59:42.740 And that gets quite...
00:59:43.800 So, what do you find on the aspirational front?
00:59:45.760 Oh, you know, the majority, the significant majority of people, young people, expect or want to have children someday.
00:59:53.960 Right, right.
00:59:54.600 Now, I do have some concerns, but I have no evidence for it,
00:59:57.360 but it's just a natural concern that what we're seeing in the world today,
01:00:01.180 perhaps this over-focus on the environment is through fear.
01:00:05.380 Yeah.
01:00:05.900 Persuading people more than you would normally expect to not think of children,
01:00:10.520 but I have hope around that because it's this internal desire really does seem to kick in.
01:00:14.800 I think it's not so much fear that's interfering on that front.
01:00:17.600 I think it's actually demoralization, right?
01:00:21.000 Because this is especially true for, let's say, decent young men who would like to be moral actors.
01:00:28.880 If they're told continually which they are, that all of their male pattern behaviors, for example, in school, are disruptive,
01:00:37.780 and that their male ambition is nothing but a reflection of the tyrannical patriarchy,
01:00:43.080 and that any interest they might evoke, they might evince towards women is part of the predatory pattern of male behavior,
01:00:52.260 then it demoralizes them.
01:00:55.100 Literally, it makes them feel like their natural proclivity for ambitious striving, let's say,
01:01:01.460 and sexual desire is immoral.
01:01:04.880 And the people you hurt the most by doing that are the people who have a moral heart
01:01:11.640 because the ones who don't, don't care, and the ones who do.
01:01:15.580 I had a friend, his name was Rob Durnan,
01:01:18.900 and he was an early, he fell prey to this anti-male narrative very early in his life.
01:01:25.920 This is like 40 years ago, 50 years ago,
01:01:28.700 and he was definitely guilty about his role as a patriarchal male, let's say,
01:01:34.920 and he did everything he could to adopt a kind of nihilistic Buddhism
01:01:38.340 and just take himself out of life.
01:01:41.780 You know, he thought everything he did was,
01:01:43.580 and everything that men did in general,
01:01:45.100 was just part of the destructive force that was ravaging the world,
01:01:49.020 and he eventually committed suicide.
01:01:51.140 It was awful.
01:01:52.420 I watched that unfold for 50 years.
01:01:55.360 You know, and I would say,
01:01:57.300 you know, he had his flaws like everyone does,
01:02:00.040 and in that self-destructive pathway,
01:02:03.420 there can be a fair bit of, let's say, unconscious self-serving,
01:02:07.820 but fundamentally, he was overwhelmed by existential guilt
01:02:14.580 in relationship to being male,
01:02:16.520 and that eventually convinced him to do himself in.
01:02:20.820 It was quite the catastrophic voyage, all things considered,
01:02:25.360 and I know perfectly well that that's not rare
01:02:29.260 because I've talked to thousands of young men
01:02:32.060 who have been demoralized to the point of suicide,
01:02:34.300 and that story is, I'd say that's the archetypal story.
01:02:41.200 So, it's not fear exactly.
01:02:43.900 It's an assault.
01:02:46.460 It's a moral assault,
01:02:48.320 and it's unconscionable.
01:02:52.120 It's an unconscionable moral assault.
01:02:54.060 If your solution to saving the planet
01:02:57.340 is that you have to demoralize young people so badly
01:03:00.280 that they even abstain from sex,
01:03:03.200 then there's seriously something wrong with your worldview,
01:03:07.300 and maybe we could call out Paul Ehrlich on that front,
01:03:10.340 for example.
01:03:12.020 So, all right.
01:03:13.440 So, now you're starting to talk to people
01:03:15.580 about their aspirations.
01:03:16.620 You're finding out that young people
01:03:17.660 do want to have a family,
01:03:19.340 and that doesn't mean one child.
01:03:21.240 It means a family,
01:03:22.780 but they're not prioritizing that properly,
01:03:25.420 or they're...
01:03:27.260 What happens to the people who end up without children?
01:03:29.740 Well, there's no path to it.
01:03:32.060 Right.
01:03:32.560 The path is education, education, education, usually.
01:03:37.340 Not for everyone, but...
01:03:38.660 And then debt.
01:03:40.040 Sure, debt.
01:03:42.060 But debt's not the driver,
01:03:43.480 because education in some countries
01:03:45.200 is much lower than the U.S.
01:03:47.320 So, some people will say,
01:03:48.700 oh, debt's the problem.
01:03:49.760 Yeah.
01:03:50.000 It's not a good thing.
01:03:51.040 It can't help.
01:03:51.920 Yeah.
01:03:52.920 And that's career, career, career.
01:03:54.800 And no one is guiding people to say,
01:03:57.620 actually, there is a moment in time
01:03:59.680 when you really need to prioritize this.
01:04:02.660 So, we've left young people
01:04:05.400 to find a path on their own,
01:04:08.600 having sent them off as parents,
01:04:11.520 as societies,
01:04:15.360 to find a path in life
01:04:17.480 that will get them to where they want to be,
01:04:19.900 which everyone, I think, implicitly assumes,
01:04:22.640 for most people, not all,
01:04:24.040 will involve love
01:04:25.820 and will involve children.
01:04:27.600 Yeah.
01:04:28.800 But actually, what's happening
01:04:30.380 is when young people are getting to that point,
01:04:32.980 they're often in their 30s
01:04:34.400 because no one really is thinking
01:04:37.240 that 30 is too late at all.
01:04:41.280 Yeah.
01:04:42.080 But, I mean, just another statistic,
01:04:45.080 if you look across every country
01:04:47.240 we had data on,
01:04:48.420 the probability of becoming a parent,
01:04:52.240 a mother, rather,
01:04:53.320 it's on women again,
01:04:54.380 the probability of someone without children
01:04:57.940 at age 30 ever becoming a parent
01:04:59.560 at most, at most, is 50%.
01:05:02.700 Really?
01:05:04.000 That's just the outcome.
01:05:06.020 So, by 30?
01:05:07.320 By 30.
01:05:08.120 If you haven't had your first child by 30,
01:05:10.380 in most countries,
01:05:11.780 it's lower than that.
01:05:14.180 And why is that?
01:05:15.800 Do you know?
01:05:16.920 I mean, there must be multiple causes.
01:05:19.500 Part of that would be partnerlessness.
01:05:21.560 Part of that would be fertility difficulties.
01:05:24.680 What are the major contributors to that?
01:05:26.660 The major contributor is
01:05:28.340 not finding a partner at the right time.
01:05:30.920 Yeah, right.
01:05:31.540 Or when you do find a partner,
01:05:33.240 you have challenges.
01:05:35.220 Yeah, well, the other thing
01:05:36.040 that is painful to point out to women
01:05:38.700 is that 30-year-old women
01:05:41.040 aren't competing with
01:05:42.440 other 30-year-old women for partners.
01:05:45.220 They're competing with
01:05:46.660 18- to 35-year-old women for partners.
01:05:50.040 And so, all things considered,
01:05:53.080 if you're 30
01:05:53.920 and you're looking for a mate
01:05:55.700 and you want children,
01:05:57.200 you're putting an awful lot of pressure
01:05:59.080 one way or another
01:06:00.520 on your 30-year-old male target.
01:06:03.860 Because his option is to find
01:06:05.720 a 25-year-old woman
01:06:07.200 who, all things being equal,
01:06:11.080 is of the same value as you are,
01:06:13.440 except that you're 30.
01:06:14.900 And that means his time frame
01:06:16.380 is now shortened
01:06:17.420 in a manner that wouldn't be the case
01:06:19.040 if he married someone younger.
01:06:20.560 Plus, women tend to prefer men
01:06:24.240 who are slightly older than them.
01:06:26.000 Well, not exactly slightly.
01:06:27.260 It's actually four years
01:06:28.320 is the average internationally.
01:06:30.180 And so, the optimal target
01:06:33.000 for a 25-year-old woman
01:06:34.320 is a 29-year-old man.
01:06:35.780 And so, and it's rude
01:06:39.880 to point such things out,
01:06:42.060 but mate selection
01:06:43.500 is a very difficult problem.
01:06:45.800 And it's also exacerbated
01:06:48.220 by the fact that
01:06:49.140 this is also a terrible thing
01:06:50.480 is that because of this
01:06:51.420 hypergamous tendency of women,
01:06:53.560 as women are,
01:06:54.680 I knew a lot of very successful
01:06:57.660 young women
01:06:58.720 who worked in the legal field
01:07:00.960 and they were often
01:07:02.820 stars in their firms,
01:07:06.040 extremely able people.
01:07:07.920 And generally,
01:07:08.740 they were very vivacious,
01:07:11.780 attractive,
01:07:13.420 intelligent, educated,
01:07:15.880 and intimidating as hell
01:07:18.440 to men.
01:07:20.200 And not that interested
01:07:22.140 in someone who didn't have
01:07:23.460 the same ability
01:07:24.380 and status they did,
01:07:25.620 which was almost no one.
01:07:27.120 So then they're 30,
01:07:28.560 they're extremely choosy,
01:07:29.900 and you could say
01:07:30.680 they have a right to be.
01:07:32.000 But the problem is,
01:07:33.080 well, yeah,
01:07:33.940 you're 30
01:07:34.680 and you're extremely choosy
01:07:36.820 and your pool
01:07:37.980 of available candidates
01:07:39.180 has basically shrunk to none.
01:07:41.280 Because first of all,
01:07:42.280 a lot of men
01:07:43.000 are already snapped up
01:07:44.020 by the time they're 30.
01:07:45.160 So there's that reduction
01:07:46.440 right off the bat.
01:07:47.380 And then if you're going to reject,
01:07:49.080 women rate 80% of men
01:07:51.720 on dating sites
01:07:52.480 as below average
01:07:53.280 in attractiveness.
01:07:54.120 And that's just the baseline,
01:07:55.740 right?
01:07:56.200 For the women who are
01:07:57.420 high status
01:07:58.400 and high attractiveness,
01:07:59.900 let's say,
01:08:00.940 very able
01:08:01.980 on the career front
01:08:03.340 and the men
01:08:06.260 they're going to regard
01:08:07.040 as acceptable,
01:08:08.500 that's a vanishingly
01:08:09.760 small proportion of men.
01:08:11.400 So that's part
01:08:12.060 of the reason
01:08:12.480 why they,
01:08:14.320 what would you say,
01:08:15.740 select themselves
01:08:16.560 out of the mating market.
01:08:18.280 That's brutal, man.
01:08:19.640 It's brutal.
01:08:20.240 And I watched women
01:08:21.080 struggle with that
01:08:21.840 like mad
01:08:22.420 and certainly had
01:08:23.400 no shortage
01:08:23.880 of sympathy for them.
01:08:24.820 but
01:08:25.040 the mere fact
01:08:29.660 that you're sympathetic
01:08:30.380 to someone
01:08:30.960 doesn't mean
01:08:31.480 that the brute reality
01:08:32.560 that confronts them
01:08:33.440 has been altered
01:08:34.220 in any manner whatsoever.
01:08:35.920 A couple of points
01:08:36.700 on that.
01:08:37.260 So I agree
01:08:38.160 with all of that.
01:08:39.940 What I see
01:08:41.020 and I get to
01:08:43.100 often once or twice
01:08:45.100 a week
01:08:45.520 have a coffee
01:08:46.340 with a young person
01:08:48.220 who has reached out
01:08:49.400 and you know
01:08:51.060 when you talk
01:08:51.560 about the documentary
01:08:52.320 or friends
01:08:52.800 or friends
01:08:53.140 or friends
01:08:53.380 someone wants
01:08:53.820 to talk to you
01:08:54.320 about something personal.
01:08:56.220 A common
01:08:57.200 conversation
01:08:59.220 would be
01:09:00.560 women more than men
01:09:03.420 that have been
01:09:04.720 dating someone
01:09:05.200 for five years.
01:09:05.940 Yeah.
01:09:07.120 They think
01:09:07.860 they might want to
01:09:09.040 well different scenarios
01:09:10.300 they think
01:09:10.960 they might want
01:09:11.460 to settle down
01:09:11.880 and have a child
01:09:12.400 with them
01:09:12.620 but they've never
01:09:13.080 talked about it.
01:09:14.300 Well it's only been
01:09:15.180 five years.
01:09:16.220 Right.
01:09:17.000 Or
01:09:17.440 they've already
01:09:18.880 figured out
01:09:19.420 they probably
01:09:20.100 don't want a child
01:09:20.960 with this person.
01:09:21.940 What should they do?
01:09:23.680 Or
01:09:24.080 worst of all
01:09:25.420 they've just
01:09:25.800 broken up
01:09:26.380 because they've been
01:09:27.000 dating this guy
01:09:27.920 for seven years
01:09:28.780 and he's not got
01:09:29.660 another girlfriend
01:09:30.260 who's 25
01:09:30.980 and she's pregnant.
01:09:33.940 Yeah.
01:09:34.620 Oh my God.
01:09:35.480 Yeah.
01:09:35.640 That's a brutal situation.
01:09:37.100 Brutal.
01:09:37.900 But those are
01:09:38.720 real life stories.
01:09:39.700 Oh yeah.
01:09:40.100 That's very
01:09:40.560 all that's very common.
01:09:42.840 So the idea
01:09:43.740 of dating someone
01:09:44.560 for an extended period
01:09:45.400 my children are now
01:09:47.040 you know
01:09:47.720 27 to 20
01:09:49.580 they're getting
01:09:50.140 to that point
01:09:50.700 where
01:09:51.080 you know
01:09:52.320 to me
01:09:52.900 I'm thinking
01:09:53.220 of my own children
01:09:54.120 when I think
01:09:54.960 of these young people
01:09:55.940 and the advice
01:09:57.200 I would give them
01:09:58.340 and frankly
01:09:59.440 the advice
01:10:00.140 I usually give
01:10:01.080 and I'm not
01:10:01.780 a clinical psychologist
01:10:02.800 but you know
01:10:04.160 people are asking
01:10:04.760 for advice
01:10:05.340 and I've talked
01:10:05.800 to a lot of people
01:10:06.620 is if you're unsure
01:10:08.020 break up
01:10:09.680 because you know what
01:10:10.660 if it feels wrong
01:10:11.760 after you've broken up
01:10:12.760 you'll get back
01:10:13.860 together quickly
01:10:14.580 and I'd say
01:10:16.680 more of
01:10:17.020 The other advice too
01:10:17.780 is get the hell at it
01:10:18.920 you think you have
01:10:19.680 a long time to decide
01:10:20.760 well here's
01:10:21.500 here's a way
01:10:22.040 of thinking about it
01:10:22.940 if you're reasonably
01:10:24.820 attractive
01:10:25.500 you'll be able
01:10:28.160 to try out
01:10:29.320 five people
01:10:30.120 that's it
01:10:31.680 that's what
01:10:33.020 you've got
01:10:33.620 you know
01:10:34.400 because it takes
01:10:34.940 a while to find someone
01:10:36.140 and then it takes
01:10:37.120 a while to get
01:10:37.660 to know them
01:10:38.180 and
01:10:38.980 finding them
01:10:40.640 and getting to know
01:10:41.300 them
01:10:41.520 that's probably
01:10:42.320 something
01:10:43.540 approximating
01:10:44.300 one to two years
01:10:45.200 and if you do that
01:10:46.380 five times
01:10:47.020 that's ten years
01:10:47.800 and that's your
01:10:48.520 fertility window
01:10:49.340 and so
01:10:50.220 you think you have time
01:10:52.100 but that's a delusion
01:10:53.780 and you think
01:10:54.860 the right person
01:10:55.660 will come around
01:10:56.360 well first of all
01:10:57.040 that's a delusion
01:10:57.760 to begin with
01:10:58.340 because
01:10:58.680 you build a relationship
01:11:01.640 you don't find one
01:11:02.680 now you should have
01:11:03.540 some sense
01:11:04.060 when you pick
01:11:04.600 your partner
01:11:05.100 to the degree
01:11:06.380 that you have
01:11:06.880 the luxury
01:11:07.380 to have some sense
01:11:08.440 but
01:11:09.340 the notion that
01:11:10.680 the person
01:11:11.960 right for you
01:11:12.800 will come along
01:11:13.640 at the right time
01:11:14.520 that's just
01:11:15.340 that's just not the case
01:11:16.640 that isn't how things
01:11:17.540 work at all
01:11:18.100 and if you know
01:11:19.020 that even if you're
01:11:19.960 very attractive
01:11:21.140 that
01:11:21.980 the list of
01:11:23.180 true candidates
01:11:24.120 is probably five
01:11:25.580 and for some people
01:11:26.960 it's one
01:11:28.520 or zero
01:11:29.760 and so that's
01:11:31.580 it's hard eh
01:11:33.980 because when you're
01:11:34.520 17 or 16
01:11:35.660 especially if you're
01:11:36.600 attractive
01:11:37.020 and I would say
01:11:37.560 this is especially true
01:11:38.620 if you're an attractive
01:11:39.340 young woman
01:11:39.920 you have no shortage
01:11:41.440 generally speaking
01:11:42.600 of people who are
01:11:43.540 interested in you
01:11:44.340 and it looks like
01:11:45.500 that's sort of
01:11:46.020 a landscape of plenty
01:11:47.080 but that doesn't
01:11:48.800 mitigate
01:11:49.240 against the fact
01:11:50.400 that it still takes
01:11:51.280 a long time
01:11:51.740 to get to know people
01:11:52.620 and to find
01:11:53.540 the right person
01:11:54.280 now men have it
01:11:56.000 a bit easier
01:11:56.520 on that front
01:11:57.160 I would say
01:11:57.640 because
01:11:58.060 like I had one friend
01:11:59.860 who didn't have a child
01:12:01.040 until he was 55
01:12:01.880 you know
01:12:03.020 that can always
01:12:04.060 be the case for men
01:12:05.300 and so the pressure
01:12:06.360 isn't on in the same way
01:12:07.560 but even with men
01:12:09.020 like had I married
01:12:11.540 my wife earlier
01:12:12.220 we would have had
01:12:12.740 more kids
01:12:13.300 you know
01:12:14.480 and that didn't happen
01:12:15.620 so and we got married
01:12:17.440 comparatively early
01:12:18.380 for our
01:12:19.440 social class
01:12:20.860 say an educational
01:12:21.600 background
01:12:22.160 okay so now
01:12:24.160 you're talking to people
01:12:25.040 and you're finding out
01:12:25.660 they want to have kids
01:12:26.500 and then they find out
01:12:27.360 that they don't get to
01:12:28.340 right a little bit
01:12:29.380 too late
01:12:29.840 and so where does
01:12:30.560 the documentary
01:12:31.060 go from there
01:12:31.860 so from there
01:12:33.440 we take it
01:12:33.960 into the consequences
01:12:34.800 the consequences
01:12:36.660 well they're
01:12:39.160 partly personal
01:12:39.940 but partly economic
01:12:42.140 but everything
01:12:43.240 ultimately is personal
01:12:44.200 because everything
01:12:44.980 ultimately comes back
01:12:46.060 to you know
01:12:47.060 whether it's
01:12:48.320 you and your life
01:12:49.440 and how you live
01:12:50.200 and whether you're
01:12:50.740 lonely or not
01:12:51.660 yeah
01:12:52.160 or how much
01:12:54.080 the state can help you
01:12:55.520 particularly in your
01:12:56.400 later years
01:12:57.120 through health care
01:12:57.920 through pensions
01:12:58.840 through your city
01:13:00.120 providing basic services
01:13:01.300 like water
01:13:01.980 it all comes back
01:13:03.720 together
01:13:04.140 so we explore
01:13:05.380 a lot of those
01:13:06.040 and by the way
01:13:07.240 I sat down with
01:13:08.180 I believe about
01:13:08.680 a dozen experts
01:13:09.820 many professors
01:13:10.660 many you know
01:13:11.800 a priest
01:13:13.840 a monk
01:13:15.060 people involved
01:13:16.500 working with
01:13:16.980 government health care
01:13:17.740 programs around the world
01:13:19.100 so we hear these voices
01:13:20.260 and other than
01:13:22.120 one organization
01:13:24.000 which happens to be
01:13:25.380 the successor
01:13:26.500 to what Paul Ehrlich
01:13:27.780 set up
01:13:28.680 they were the only
01:13:30.620 organization
01:13:31.140 who took an optimistic
01:13:32.220 view
01:13:32.620 of course
01:13:33.100 they would do that
01:13:34.140 everybody else
01:13:35.280 is negative
01:13:35.820 everybody else
01:13:36.660 is worried
01:13:37.080 about the future
01:13:37.740 consequences of this
01:13:39.140 and just by the way
01:13:41.260 I should call this out
01:13:42.660 Ehrlich set up
01:13:43.680 an organization
01:13:44.620 author of the
01:13:45.940 population bomb
01:13:46.680 of course
01:13:47.160 called ZPG
01:13:48.460 which evolved
01:13:49.220 zero population growth
01:13:50.620 it evolved
01:13:51.920 into another
01:13:52.520 organization
01:13:53.280 that still
01:13:53.980 has something
01:13:54.660 like 30,000
01:13:56.000 teachers
01:13:57.120 who train
01:13:58.300 other teachers
01:13:59.120 who educate
01:14:00.300 4 million
01:14:01.040 US high school
01:14:02.400 kids
01:14:03.380 every year
01:14:04.400 and
01:14:05.860 they explain
01:14:07.140 the population
01:14:07.820 problems
01:14:08.300 usually in Africa
01:14:09.080 and their message is
01:14:10.820 please think about this
01:14:12.740 yeah well
01:14:13.460 there's nothing
01:14:13.980 there's nothing
01:14:14.640 racist about
01:14:15.420 the too many
01:14:16.020 African narrative
01:14:17.020 yeah
01:14:17.600 and when you teach
01:14:19.080 someone like
01:14:19.680 2 and 2 is 4
01:14:21.240 you don't say
01:14:21.760 think about that
01:14:22.680 but when you say
01:14:23.800 here's the problem
01:14:24.840 in Africa
01:14:25.280 and you say
01:14:25.920 to a
01:14:26.300 think about that
01:14:27.620 you're not really
01:14:28.520 saying think about
01:14:29.280 Africa
01:14:29.660 you're thinking
01:14:30.240 about you know
01:14:31.240 do you want
01:14:32.060 to have kids
01:14:32.460 or not
01:14:32.780 so
01:14:32.980 that's covered
01:14:34.580 in the documentary
01:14:35.180 as well
01:14:35.580 as part of the
01:14:36.400 narrative
01:14:36.740 as to why
01:14:37.660 we still have
01:14:38.600 this viewpoint
01:14:39.180 when frankly
01:14:39.760 we should have
01:14:40.260 known about this
01:14:41.020 decades ago
01:14:42.000 well we can also
01:14:42.780 look at the
01:14:43.620 self-evident
01:14:45.560 economic statistics
01:14:46.720 demonstrating that
01:14:47.720 since Paul Ehrlich
01:14:48.540 and his
01:14:50.440 population bomb
01:14:51.800 and the Club of Rome
01:14:52.640 etc
01:14:53.000 these anti-population
01:14:54.820 zealots
01:14:55.400 started beating
01:14:56.300 the drum back
01:14:56.920 in 1965
01:14:57.680 saying that
01:14:59.480 we're all going to
01:15:00.080 starve to death
01:15:00.620 by the year 2000
01:15:01.600 when we'll have
01:15:02.220 4 billion people
01:15:03.280 God help us
01:15:04.640 and now we have
01:15:05.760 8
01:15:06.200 and the relationship
01:15:07.920 between wealth growth
01:15:09.100 and population
01:15:10.120 has been
01:15:10.600 extremely
01:15:11.680 positive
01:15:12.300 not negative
01:15:13.120 or flat
01:15:13.740 and everyone
01:15:15.100 on the planet
01:15:15.660 virtually is richer
01:15:16.640 than well
01:15:17.500 that anyone
01:15:18.000 had ever conceived
01:15:18.920 of
01:15:19.160 and it's clearly
01:15:19.760 the case
01:15:20.160 that we could
01:15:20.640 manage this
01:15:21.200 if we had
01:15:21.720 half the will
01:15:22.620 to do it
01:15:23.160 and so
01:15:24.200 the data
01:15:25.200 are in
01:15:25.780 one of the things
01:15:27.440 I've really learned
01:15:28.160 is that
01:15:28.620 I believe the whole
01:15:30.400 idea of natural
01:15:31.120 resource
01:15:31.580 almost the whole
01:15:32.520 idea of natural
01:15:33.140 resource
01:15:33.560 is specious
01:15:34.280 in that
01:15:35.600 human beings
01:15:37.260 the wealth
01:15:38.360 of the planet
01:15:38.980 is dependent
01:15:41.040 on
01:15:41.480 the psychological
01:15:43.160 health
01:15:43.680 and the structures
01:15:44.700 of governance
01:15:45.420 that are put in
01:15:46.020 place by people
01:15:46.840 of good will
01:15:47.480 and that if we
01:15:48.180 organize ourselves
01:15:49.000 properly
01:15:49.520 and aim up
01:15:50.740 there's no
01:15:51.900 real limit
01:15:52.880 to abundance
01:15:53.920 and it's certainly
01:15:55.600 not population
01:15:56.340 dependent
01:15:56.680 we're not in a
01:15:57.720 zero-sum game
01:15:58.520 we are not yeast
01:15:59.980 in a Petri dish
01:16:01.240 we're not doomed
01:16:02.880 to a Malthusian
01:16:03.820 outcome
01:16:04.300 and the biologists
01:16:05.600 who make that claim
01:16:06.600 and say it's
01:16:07.560 scientific
01:16:07.940 are assuming
01:16:09.340 that the yeast
01:16:10.220 in the Petri dish
01:16:11.220 model of human
01:16:12.600 function
01:16:13.360 is the appropriate
01:16:14.180 biological model
01:16:15.060 and it's not
01:16:16.720 and the reason
01:16:17.880 for that is
01:16:18.420 because we can
01:16:19.000 let our ideas
01:16:19.660 die instead of us
01:16:20.700 and we can learn
01:16:21.420 and we can transform
01:16:22.500 and we're very good
01:16:23.700 at that
01:16:24.160 and
01:16:25.080 there's no
01:16:26.780 justification
01:16:28.320 whatsoever
01:16:29.080 for stating
01:16:30.660 that
01:16:30.940 it's a scientific
01:16:31.840 fact
01:16:32.520 that population
01:16:34.040 increase is going
01:16:34.740 to produce
01:16:35.080 a Malthusian
01:16:35.720 catastrophe
01:16:36.240 now it can
01:16:37.040 in limited
01:16:37.500 circumstances
01:16:38.160 but we are not
01:16:39.360 yeast in a Petri dish
01:16:40.400 that's the wrong
01:16:41.420 model
01:16:41.780 so
01:16:42.960 and I can't
01:16:44.320 disagree
01:16:44.680 I'm a data
01:16:46.020 analyst
01:16:46.540 I'm only prepared
01:16:47.960 to comment
01:16:48.460 when I've done
01:16:49.360 my own work
01:16:50.080 or I've seen
01:16:51.020 detailed work
01:16:52.060 of others
01:16:52.480 I can't imagine
01:16:53.500 how complicated
01:16:54.320 it must be
01:16:56.440 to model the
01:16:57.320 planet
01:16:57.580 I mean that's
01:16:58.240 on a level
01:16:58.780 beyond anything
01:17:00.120 any
01:17:00.860 rational statistician
01:17:03.160 could do
01:17:03.520 alone
01:17:03.960 it's models
01:17:04.720 on top of
01:17:05.200 models
01:17:05.540 on top of
01:17:06.040 models
01:17:06.540 so where I
01:17:07.920 come from
01:17:10.360 is to be honest
01:17:11.160 with you
01:17:11.520 I don't know
01:17:12.480 but I do know
01:17:13.960 that we are
01:17:14.680 adaptive
01:17:15.080 I do know
01:17:15.960 that we should
01:17:16.420 prepare
01:17:16.960 because to be
01:17:18.080 honest with you
01:17:18.760 you know
01:17:19.460 green technology
01:17:20.580 sound like
01:17:21.200 pretty cool things
01:17:22.200 when you look at
01:17:22.740 Teslas out there
01:17:23.480 they're not perfect
01:17:24.220 but they're
01:17:25.340 remember I work
01:17:26.920 with a lot of
01:17:27.420 automotive clients
01:17:28.540 but what Elon
01:17:29.140 has done
01:17:29.660 for the industry
01:17:30.420 you know
01:17:31.000 is phenomenal
01:17:31.600 and if we
01:17:33.700 come at this
01:17:34.280 from a point
01:17:34.960 of view of
01:17:35.300 positivity
01:17:35.820 what can we
01:17:36.820 do
01:17:37.100 and I look
01:17:37.680 at my own
01:17:38.140 kids
01:17:38.460 and well
01:17:39.280 their generation
01:17:40.000 and the malaise
01:17:40.680 the belief
01:17:41.800 that the world
01:17:42.280 is coming to
01:17:42.820 an end
01:17:43.180 the world
01:17:43.620 is not coming
01:17:44.340 to an end
01:17:44.960 anytime soon
01:17:46.180 because of this
01:17:46.820 we precipitated
01:17:47.760 in that direction
01:17:48.640 which we seem
01:17:49.240 to be striving
01:17:49.960 to do
01:17:50.480 with all
01:17:51.000 diligence
01:17:51.440 at the moment
01:17:52.260 well then
01:17:53.120 to bring it
01:17:53.520 back to the
01:17:54.100 documentary
01:17:55.100 at this point
01:17:55.820 we come back
01:17:57.660 to this point
01:17:58.260 of loneliness
01:17:58.680 and meet people
01:17:59.620 I mean
01:18:00.840 there's a scene
01:18:01.600 where I go
01:18:02.120 to a crematorium
01:18:02.900 in Germany
01:18:03.480 and I'm hoping
01:18:05.420 to find out
01:18:06.460 something about
01:18:07.740 what it's like
01:18:09.020 to bury
01:18:11.840 people who
01:18:12.520 have no family
01:18:13.060 I nearly got
01:18:14.800 an interview
01:18:15.240 directly with
01:18:16.640 the director
01:18:17.140 but he refused
01:18:17.760 to meet me
01:18:18.280 and an intermediary
01:18:19.460 kind of sat down
01:18:20.300 to explain why
01:18:21.220 and it's horrendous
01:18:22.880 and so this is
01:18:25.300 off camera
01:18:25.820 but I got
01:18:27.460 a long note
01:18:28.840 recently
01:18:29.320 with more information
01:18:30.360 as to what's
01:18:31.120 happening
01:18:31.500 people with no
01:18:32.720 family and care
01:18:33.740 homes
01:18:34.120 are being
01:18:35.020 effectively
01:18:35.640 mistreated
01:18:36.180 malnourished
01:18:36.920 tied to their
01:18:38.060 beds
01:18:38.380 for long
01:18:39.360 periods of time
01:18:40.040 and
01:18:41.080 we know this
01:18:42.560 or it's known
01:18:43.180 in this
01:18:43.520 crematorium
01:18:44.060 because
01:18:44.840 the bodies
01:18:46.240 that come
01:18:46.600 are I guess
01:18:47.460 white
01:18:47.900 and marked
01:18:49.020 and they
01:18:51.260 weren't prepared
01:18:51.740 to say it
01:18:52.220 because they're
01:18:52.700 fearful of the
01:18:53.360 system
01:18:53.680 so you know
01:18:54.840 someone should
01:18:55.660 make a documentary
01:18:56.300 about that
01:18:56.880 alone
01:18:57.380 but it tells
01:18:58.440 you that the
01:18:58.920 life of these
01:18:59.900 people
01:19:00.320 without family
01:19:02.360 you know
01:19:03.380 and we can't
01:19:04.540 see it because
01:19:05.160 these people
01:19:05.820 whether it be
01:19:06.300 in a suburban
01:19:06.940 Japan or
01:19:07.760 in Germany
01:19:08.160 or anywhere else
01:19:08.820 these people
01:19:09.900 are spending
01:19:10.300 their lives
01:19:10.720 in their homes
01:19:11.400 alone
01:19:11.880 hidden from
01:19:12.940 the world
01:19:13.580 so
01:19:13.840 well the thing
01:19:14.520 is in our
01:19:15.240 culture we only
01:19:16.040 seem to be able
01:19:16.720 to apprehend
01:19:17.600 life until
01:19:19.420 about 30
01:19:20.140 like that's
01:19:20.920 our vision
01:19:21.440 you know the
01:19:22.480 vision is
01:19:22.960 you're young
01:19:23.420 you're full
01:19:23.740 of promise
01:19:24.220 you get educated
01:19:25.180 you have your
01:19:25.680 career and then
01:19:26.540 you're 30
01:19:27.900 and what's
01:19:29.120 happening
01:19:29.380 well now you're
01:19:29.860 successful
01:19:30.300 it's like okay
01:19:30.980 but you got
01:19:31.620 60 years left
01:19:33.080 there
01:19:33.420 what are you
01:19:34.440 going to do
01:19:34.760 with that
01:19:35.420 well how long
01:19:37.540 is your career
01:19:38.460 going to run
01:19:39.040 you
01:19:39.180 well you
01:19:40.080 know lots
01:19:41.140 of people
01:19:41.420 think about
01:19:41.920 early retirement
01:19:42.620 and that's
01:19:43.140 particularly
01:19:43.640 perhaps the
01:19:44.380 case if
01:19:44.820 you're
01:19:45.180 successful
01:19:46.100 economically
01:19:46.700 so let's
01:19:47.280 say you
01:19:47.500 retired 50
01:19:48.220 okay fair
01:19:50.220 enough
01:19:50.560 you got 45
01:19:52.280 years left
01:19:53.040 what's your
01:19:53.440 vision for
01:19:53.880 that
01:19:54.220 well now
01:19:55.200 you're alone
01:19:55.820 you don't
01:19:56.400 have a family
01:19:56.940 you don't
01:19:57.180 have a partner
01:19:57.820 you don't
01:19:58.540 have a career
01:19:59.020 either
01:19:59.400 so what
01:20:01.440 are you planning
01:20:01.840 to do
01:20:02.360 exactly
01:20:03.200 what's your
01:20:03.980 vision
01:20:04.380 and the answer
01:20:05.240 is we don't
01:20:05.700 have a vision
01:20:06.220 for that
01:20:06.860 we don't
01:20:07.360 have a vision
01:20:07.840 for the
01:20:08.180 expanse of
01:20:08.760 our life
01:20:09.160 and so
01:20:10.300 and that's
01:20:11.300 an interesting
01:20:11.760 thing in and
01:20:12.320 of itself
01:20:12.800 I mean
01:20:13.160 you know
01:20:14.400 for a long
01:20:14.920 time
01:20:15.260 back in the
01:20:16.660 1860s
01:20:17.600 people even
01:20:18.740 in the west
01:20:19.220 were struggling
01:20:20.320 along on
01:20:21.060 less than
01:20:21.900 a dollar
01:20:22.260 fifty a day
01:20:23.040 in today's
01:20:23.600 money
01:20:23.860 and it's
01:20:24.520 not like
01:20:24.940 people had
01:20:25.980 the luxury
01:20:26.740 of developing
01:20:27.460 a lifetime
01:20:27.980 vision
01:20:28.520 they were
01:20:29.240 sort of
01:20:29.600 fending off
01:20:30.540 one disaster
01:20:31.580 after another
01:20:32.820 like people
01:20:33.440 do now
01:20:34.320 who live
01:20:34.740 in absolute
01:20:35.160 privation
01:20:35.720 there's about
01:20:36.180 800 million
01:20:37.100 people like
01:20:37.600 that still
01:20:38.060 on the
01:20:38.340 planet
01:20:38.600 and then
01:20:39.940 once you
01:20:41.080 get a little
01:20:41.380 wealthier
01:20:42.340 a little
01:20:42.740 more secure
01:20:43.300 you can start
01:20:43.880 thinking about
01:20:44.340 the future
01:20:44.820 and that's
01:20:46.260 very very
01:20:46.640 complicated
01:20:47.200 and this
01:20:48.540 luxurious wealth
01:20:49.940 we have is
01:20:50.460 new enough
01:20:50.920 so that our
01:20:51.800 capacity to
01:20:52.820 develop a
01:20:53.320 lifetime vision
01:20:53.920 hasn't developed
01:20:54.600 to a degree
01:20:56.380 that's sophisticated
01:20:56.980 enough to take
01:20:57.780 that whole
01:20:58.500 time span
01:20:58.980 into account
01:20:59.580 but this
01:21:00.600 vision of
01:21:01.740 isolated death
01:21:03.880 with no one
01:21:04.600 around you
01:21:05.040 that cares
01:21:05.560 I wouldn't
01:21:06.940 recommend that
01:21:07.880 as your
01:21:09.340 life from
01:21:09.980 70 to
01:21:10.720 95
01:21:11.200 it's pretty
01:21:13.240 damn dismal
01:21:14.020 so
01:21:14.900 Jordan
01:21:16.480 it's going
01:21:16.960 to be worse
01:21:17.660 in less
01:21:19.140 industrialized
01:21:20.060 nations
01:21:20.440 because you
01:21:21.040 go to
01:21:21.300 Brazil
01:21:21.700 and as
01:21:22.840 professors
01:21:23.300 there
01:21:23.660 I met
01:21:23.940 three of
01:21:24.340 them
01:21:24.520 the phrase
01:21:25.780 they used
01:21:26.520 was
01:21:27.220 we're getting
01:21:28.160 old before
01:21:28.840 we got rich
01:21:29.580 in Brazil
01:21:30.200 so they
01:21:31.160 can't provide
01:21:31.820 the infrastructure
01:21:32.380 resources to
01:21:33.400 the elderly
01:21:33.880 on a level
01:21:34.640 comparable
01:21:35.100 to what
01:21:35.520 we can
01:21:36.020 so the
01:21:37.100 life of
01:21:37.620 elderly
01:21:38.020 people
01:21:38.500 so I
01:21:39.380 look at
01:21:39.740 when I
01:21:40.480 look at
01:21:40.720 India
01:21:41.080 with the
01:21:41.980 birth rate
01:21:42.360 now
01:21:42.640 below
01:21:43.180 replacement
01:21:43.600 level
01:21:43.960 growing
01:21:44.780 population
01:21:45.460 because it's
01:21:45.980 so young
01:21:46.420 people are
01:21:46.860 living longer
01:21:47.340 which is a
01:21:47.800 good thing
01:21:48.340 but I'm
01:21:49.640 looking at
01:21:50.020 a future
01:21:50.340 for India
01:21:50.880 30 years
01:21:51.560 from now
01:21:51.980 where you're
01:21:52.660 going to have
01:21:53.060 so many
01:21:53.940 old people
01:21:54.600 and so few
01:21:55.760 people to
01:21:56.200 take care of
01:21:56.800 them
01:21:56.940 so this
01:21:59.040 is a
01:21:59.360 problem
01:21:59.720 that we
01:22:00.420 focus too
01:22:01.620 much on
01:22:02.200 in our
01:22:02.820 own
01:22:03.180 societies
01:22:03.720 this is a
01:22:05.100 global
01:22:05.400 humanitarian
01:22:05.900 crisis
01:22:06.440 of old
01:22:07.020 people
01:22:07.320 who are
01:22:07.780 going to
01:22:08.200 be left
01:22:08.680 by and
01:22:09.360 large
01:22:09.740 to some
01:22:10.700 extent
01:22:11.020 to fend
01:22:11.300 for themselves
01:22:11.900 and when
01:22:12.360 they're not
01:22:12.600 fending for
01:22:13.000 themselves
01:22:13.460 they're going
01:22:15.100 to be mostly
01:22:15.600 in their
01:22:15.900 homes
01:22:16.380 or alone
01:22:17.360 I find
01:22:19.080 the psychological
01:22:20.200 argument
01:22:20.880 I would say
01:22:21.560 probably
01:22:22.120 more compelling
01:22:23.340 I think
01:22:24.080 not because
01:22:25.060 I take any
01:22:25.960 issue to
01:22:26.940 your forward
01:22:27.500 looking
01:22:27.820 projections
01:22:28.360 but because
01:22:29.060 things are
01:22:30.520 so unstable
01:22:31.540 on the
01:22:32.180 technological
01:22:32.680 and economic
01:22:33.660 and political
01:22:34.160 front that
01:22:34.860 projecting
01:22:35.900 even a
01:22:36.740 decade
01:22:37.020 into the
01:22:37.480 future
01:22:37.740 seems in
01:22:38.300 some ways
01:22:38.680 like a
01:22:39.000 fool's errand
01:22:39.540 right
01:22:39.860 because
01:22:40.200 God only
01:22:41.700 knows what's
01:22:42.240 coming down
01:22:42.620 the pipelines
01:22:43.240 with regards
01:22:44.000 to new
01:22:45.260 technology
01:22:45.840 but I think
01:22:47.000 you can make
01:22:47.440 an extraordinarily
01:22:48.160 strong case
01:22:48.980 that one
01:22:50.420 of the things
01:22:50.980 you don't want
01:22:51.620 to end up
01:22:52.200 happening to
01:22:53.060 you in your
01:22:53.560 own life
01:22:54.100 is to be
01:22:55.040 involuntarily
01:22:56.580 childless
01:22:57.300 and isolated
01:22:58.100 starting at
01:22:58.940 the age of
01:22:59.460 30 going
01:23:00.180 forward
01:23:00.780 right
01:23:01.820 and so
01:23:02.320 I do
01:23:03.120 you know
01:23:04.020 I've looked
01:23:05.180 at the
01:23:05.800 situation in
01:23:06.480 China
01:23:06.760 and in
01:23:07.340 Japan
01:23:07.660 with this
01:23:09.100 what do they
01:23:09.620 call that
01:23:10.040 the inverted
01:23:10.640 pyramidal
01:23:11.260 distribution
01:23:12.120 where there's
01:23:12.860 way more
01:23:13.520 old people
01:23:13.960 than young
01:23:14.340 people
01:23:14.620 and obviously
01:23:15.460 that seems
01:23:16.020 untenable
01:23:16.480 on the
01:23:16.800 technological
01:23:17.220 or on
01:23:17.960 the economic
01:23:18.500 front
01:23:18.860 but I do
01:23:20.700 think the
01:23:21.260 psychological
01:23:22.320 issue is
01:23:23.760 much more
01:23:25.500 present
01:23:26.680 should be
01:23:27.300 much more
01:23:27.700 present for
01:23:28.180 young people
01:23:28.740 and the
01:23:29.020 warning is
01:23:29.520 don't be
01:23:30.220 thinking you've
01:23:30.660 got a lot
01:23:31.000 of time to
01:23:31.520 get your act
01:23:31.960 together because
01:23:32.440 you don't have
01:23:32.860 as much time
01:23:33.360 as you think
01:23:33.860 and you want
01:23:34.860 to get things
01:23:35.300 going sooner
01:23:37.060 than you
01:23:37.700 might find it
01:23:39.300 convenient
01:23:39.700 there's never a
01:23:40.740 convenient time
01:23:41.300 to have a
01:23:41.600 child
01:23:41.920 there's stupid
01:23:43.100 times to have
01:23:43.700 a child
01:23:44.080 for sure
01:23:44.560 but there's
01:23:45.200 never a
01:23:45.580 convenient time
01:23:46.260 and that's the
01:23:46.680 other thing
01:23:47.000 people do too
01:23:47.700 when my wife
01:23:50.080 and I
01:23:50.420 finally got
01:23:51.140 together
01:23:51.460 she was
01:23:51.840 about 28
01:23:52.420 or so
01:23:52.760 she wanted
01:23:53.100 to have
01:23:53.260 a kid
01:23:53.480 pretty much
01:23:55.720 right away
01:23:56.160 and I was
01:23:58.560 finishing off
01:23:59.020 my postdoc
01:23:59.760 and I hadn't
01:24:00.260 got a permanent
01:24:01.000 job yet
01:24:01.540 and my
01:24:01.940 sense was
01:24:03.120 well you know
01:24:04.180 everything's not
01:24:04.800 in place
01:24:05.260 and we talked
01:24:06.320 that out for
01:24:06.780 quite a while
01:24:07.240 and decided to
01:24:07.920 proceed
01:24:08.380 regardless
01:24:09.160 because
01:24:09.620 there was no
01:24:11.920 real reason
01:24:12.540 for me to be
01:24:13.220 concerned
01:24:13.600 the probability
01:24:14.320 that I was
01:24:14.780 going to be
01:24:15.140 jobless
01:24:15.580 was
01:24:15.900 barring
01:24:16.840 catastrophe
01:24:17.360 zero
01:24:17.900 and
01:24:18.840 you jump
01:24:19.900 into the
01:24:20.340 abyss
01:24:20.720 holding hands
01:24:22.260 with your
01:24:22.660 wife
01:24:23.000 you know
01:24:23.360 there's no
01:24:24.160 right time
01:24:25.000 and the
01:24:26.660 reason that's
01:24:27.260 so important
01:24:27.680 to know
01:24:28.000 is because
01:24:28.460 the clock
01:24:29.020 ticks while
01:24:29.740 you're waiting
01:24:30.300 and that's
01:24:31.160 also a
01:24:31.640 catastrophe
01:24:32.120 and then it
01:24:33.020 sneaks up
01:24:33.440 on people
01:24:33.820 unawares
01:24:34.300 as you just
01:24:34.880 described
01:24:35.440 and takes
01:24:36.360 them out
01:24:36.820 not good
01:24:37.860 okay so
01:24:38.840 now you're
01:24:39.240 talking
01:24:39.560 now you're
01:24:40.160 investigating
01:24:40.640 in the
01:24:40.980 documentary
01:24:41.440 the consequences
01:24:42.340 of this
01:24:42.920 involuntary
01:24:43.780 childlessness
01:24:44.300 and do
01:24:45.160 you progress
01:24:46.060 past that
01:24:46.780 yeah well
01:24:47.580 so the
01:24:48.140 consequences
01:24:48.680 go into
01:24:49.240 both
01:24:49.640 the economy
01:24:50.680 we go to
01:24:51.140 Detroit
01:24:51.740 we look at
01:24:52.560 what might
01:24:52.960 happen to
01:24:53.540 the future
01:24:54.160 of the world
01:24:54.840 based on
01:24:55.240 what's happened
01:24:55.640 to Detroit
01:24:56.100 yeah
01:24:56.440 we look at
01:24:58.200 briefly
01:24:59.300 future pension
01:25:01.440 systems
01:25:02.100 we look at
01:25:02.960 AI technology
01:25:04.680 but only very
01:25:05.300 briefly
01:25:05.800 it's an area
01:25:06.580 that I'm sure
01:25:07.000 many people
01:25:07.560 you mentioned
01:25:08.180 technology
01:25:08.700 just now
01:25:09.560 a comment
01:25:11.600 for me
01:25:11.960 is that
01:25:12.240 robots
01:25:12.520 don't pay
01:25:13.300 taxes
01:25:13.680 so simply
01:25:14.720 saying
01:25:15.020 they also
01:25:15.620 don't
01:25:15.920 necessarily
01:25:16.460 want to
01:25:16.900 take care
01:25:17.340 of you
01:25:17.680 so we'll
01:25:19.040 just see
01:25:19.380 how that
01:25:19.740 works out
01:25:20.340 and I think
01:25:21.280 they're going
01:25:21.500 to be
01:25:21.640 expensive
01:25:22.000 so the
01:25:22.720 idea that
01:25:23.360 AI is a
01:25:24.120 solution
01:25:24.520 just like
01:25:25.100 this
01:25:25.300 is
01:25:26.280 probably
01:25:27.940 oversimplified
01:25:28.920 possibly very
01:25:29.700 oversimplified
01:25:30.420 but of course
01:25:30.940 it has a role
01:25:31.520 technology
01:25:32.000 definitely has
01:25:32.700 a role
01:25:33.060 in this
01:25:33.400 but we can't
01:25:34.340 just turn
01:25:34.660 away from
01:25:35.040 this subject
01:25:35.460 and say
01:25:35.900 let's not
01:25:36.540 worry about
01:25:37.040 it for that
01:25:37.360 reason
01:25:37.640 the final
01:25:38.960 part of the
01:25:39.320 documentary
01:25:39.820 and I have
01:25:41.440 to credit
01:25:41.760 a friend
01:25:42.120 I thought
01:25:42.420 I was
01:25:42.700 done
01:25:43.080 after
01:25:43.420 filming
01:25:43.820 in probably
01:25:44.300 18 countries
01:25:45.220 I thought
01:25:45.600 well this is
01:25:46.040 enough now
01:25:46.600 I can see
01:25:47.400 the global
01:25:48.060 pattern
01:25:48.600 and this
01:25:50.900 friend in LA
01:25:51.600 said no you
01:25:52.120 haven't finished
01:25:52.580 you have to
01:25:53.060 go to Africa
01:25:53.600 and you have to
01:25:54.460 go to other
01:25:54.900 countries like
01:25:55.380 Bangladesh
01:25:56.040 and India
01:25:58.140 I'd already
01:25:58.460 been to but I
01:25:59.140 wanted more
01:25:59.760 filming
01:26:00.120 I wanted to
01:26:00.520 go into
01:26:00.820 we went to
01:26:01.560 slums in
01:26:02.600 Mumbai
01:26:02.860 we went to
01:26:03.520 slums in
01:26:04.900 Rio
01:26:05.600 I think
01:26:06.600 five in
01:26:07.580 Johannesburg
01:26:08.320 and I
01:26:09.840 wanted to
01:26:10.260 see what's
01:26:10.640 happening
01:26:11.080 in the
01:26:11.780 parts of
01:26:12.140 the world
01:26:12.480 that I
01:26:13.000 think to
01:26:13.520 some extent
01:26:14.020 we might
01:26:14.460 fear are
01:26:15.640 exploding
01:26:16.340 and you
01:26:18.500 have the
01:26:19.940 same fundamental
01:26:20.880 story happening
01:26:21.960 everywhere
01:26:23.020 even Nigeria
01:26:24.240 and so
01:26:26.580 Nigeria is a
01:26:28.180 good example
01:26:28.880 of a country
01:26:29.480 that's moving
01:26:31.080 towards lower
01:26:32.020 birth rates
01:26:33.160 at a much
01:26:33.660 slower pace
01:26:34.400 there'll be
01:26:34.940 more people
01:26:35.480 by the way
01:26:36.020 in Nigeria
01:26:36.600 by the year
01:26:37.760 2100 than
01:26:38.560 there are in
01:26:38.980 China for
01:26:39.540 everyone watching
01:26:40.420 and listening
01:26:40.780 that's quite the
01:26:42.020 shocking bit of
01:26:42.680 information
01:26:43.220 yeah and you
01:26:44.400 know you look
01:26:44.740 at Nigeria
01:26:45.140 and you still
01:26:45.580 have a culture
01:26:46.220 there where
01:26:47.280 the more male
01:26:48.560 children you
01:26:49.100 have it's part
01:26:49.920 of the what
01:26:50.660 you might say
01:26:51.120 that the bravado
01:26:51.940 that you have
01:26:52.540 it's like
01:26:53.100 that's that
01:26:53.660 status reward
01:26:54.580 status
01:26:54.960 yeah but you
01:26:55.820 go to Ethiopia
01:26:56.480 and you meet
01:26:57.640 people there
01:26:58.160 and you talk
01:26:58.500 to professors
01:26:58.960 there and
01:26:59.520 Ethiopia used
01:27:00.260 to be like
01:27:00.660 that but the
01:27:01.240 birth rate right
01:27:01.940 now in Ethiopia
01:27:02.560 is four it
01:27:03.320 used to be seven
01:27:03.980 or eight not
01:27:04.560 that long ago
01:27:05.200 and there's
01:27:06.100 transformation
01:27:06.740 happening
01:27:07.440 so you can
01:27:08.180 see and feel
01:27:09.300 the transformation
01:27:09.880 happening in
01:27:10.700 Africa just
01:27:11.620 like everywhere
01:27:12.240 else so I
01:27:13.000 like to think
01:27:13.500 of the analogy
01:27:14.080 that the world
01:27:14.920 is on a
01:27:15.360 roller coaster
01:27:15.940 and countries
01:27:18.100 like Japan
01:27:19.040 and Germany
01:27:19.640 and Italy
01:27:20.100 and now
01:27:21.060 South Korea
01:27:21.640 are in the
01:27:22.360 front car
01:27:22.860 you know
01:27:23.100 they're over
01:27:23.500 in terms of
01:27:24.200 the peak
01:27:24.600 population
01:27:25.340 and sure
01:27:26.500 they're aging
01:27:27.160 and people
01:27:27.640 are going to
01:27:27.940 live longer
01:27:28.460 and longer
01:27:28.760 so we're not
01:27:29.120 going to really
01:27:29.500 see the drop
01:27:31.680 for a little
01:27:32.360 while but we
01:27:33.080 know what's
01:27:33.500 coming
01:27:33.820 Africa
01:27:34.780 is in the
01:27:35.740 rear car
01:27:36.200 you know
01:27:36.600 they're still
01:27:36.980 on the way
01:27:37.340 up
01:27:37.640 but the path
01:27:38.720 is the same
01:27:39.280 here
01:27:39.600 yeah
01:27:39.940 but perhaps
01:27:41.080 the thing
01:27:41.440 that struck
01:27:42.100 me about
01:27:42.860 Africa
01:27:44.040 where I'm
01:27:44.880 planning to go
01:27:45.500 back and spend
01:27:46.040 a significant
01:27:46.520 amount of time
01:27:47.200 for my own
01:27:48.120 purposes
01:27:48.800 as much as
01:27:49.900 anything
01:27:50.220 when you go
01:27:51.160 to Africa
01:27:51.780 you go to
01:27:52.420 Malawi
01:27:52.940 which is I
01:27:54.160 believe
01:27:54.560 World Bank
01:27:55.240 dated the
01:27:55.780 12th poorest
01:27:56.600 country in the
01:27:57.640 world by GDP
01:27:58.560 per person
01:27:59.160 and you go
01:28:01.380 to a community
01:28:02.060 and people
01:28:02.900 are laughing
01:28:03.440 smiling
01:28:04.520 and you go
01:28:05.700 to kind of
01:28:06.160 an area
01:28:07.540 it's not even
01:28:08.120 a soccer pitch
01:28:08.760 it's nothing
01:28:09.120 like a soccer
01:28:09.660 pitch
01:28:09.920 but there's
01:28:10.220 a soccer
01:28:10.540 bowl there
01:28:10.960 there's no
01:28:11.540 rules
01:28:11.820 but you've
01:28:12.100 got 30
01:28:12.440 kids
01:28:12.860 running
01:28:13.560 and screaming
01:28:14.000 and laughing
01:28:14.520 and we're
01:28:15.600 there
01:28:15.960 and they
01:28:17.120 come and say
01:28:17.600 hi for a
01:28:18.080 moment
01:28:18.220 but they
01:28:18.520 want to get
01:28:18.820 back and play
01:28:19.340 soccer with
01:28:19.800 each other
01:28:20.200 and to see
01:28:21.960 that sense
01:28:22.620 of community
01:28:23.500 and that
01:28:24.660 intergenerational
01:28:25.860 community
01:28:26.560 maybe in some
01:28:28.220 ways part of
01:28:28.780 solution here
01:28:29.520 that we've
01:28:30.020 you know
01:28:30.600 I think an
01:28:31.020 argument for me
01:28:31.520 is that we've
01:28:32.200 lost a sense
01:28:32.780 of community
01:28:33.280 for one reason
01:28:34.120 or another
01:28:34.620 and so
01:28:36.920 you know
01:28:37.740 that's
01:28:38.380 you know
01:28:38.980 something that
01:28:39.920 surprised me
01:28:41.040 actually
01:28:41.360 how similar
01:28:42.700 really we
01:28:44.060 all are
01:28:45.140 and we're just
01:28:45.840 at different
01:28:46.300 parts of
01:28:47.320 that cycle
01:28:48.780 so
01:28:50.420 you've
01:28:51.540 laid out
01:28:52.700 this documentary
01:28:53.480 and you've
01:28:54.540 documented
01:28:55.060 a problem
01:28:56.300 that is not
01:28:57.200 being attended
01:28:58.120 to
01:28:58.460 much
01:28:59.220 that's a
01:29:00.580 very
01:29:00.760 pervasive
01:29:01.260 problem
01:29:01.820 and that's
01:29:02.840 going to
01:29:03.160 affect
01:29:03.560 virtually
01:29:04.940 everyone
01:29:05.560 personally
01:29:06.160 and
01:29:06.680 sociologically
01:29:07.780 we talked
01:29:09.040 a little
01:29:09.320 bit
01:29:09.620 about
01:29:10.420 pathways
01:29:11.300 you know
01:29:12.460 I mean
01:29:12.960 it's one
01:29:13.360 thing obviously
01:29:13.940 to diagnose
01:29:14.560 a problem
01:29:15.060 and that's
01:29:15.760 not a
01:29:16.060 straightforward
01:29:16.340 thing to
01:29:16.900 do
01:29:17.100 to see
01:29:17.620 the problem
01:29:18.040 and then
01:29:18.280 to diagnose
01:29:18.840 it
01:29:19.040 it's a
01:29:20.240 completely
01:29:20.640 different
01:29:21.000 order of
01:29:21.460 things
01:29:21.700 to start
01:29:22.260 thinking
01:29:22.580 about
01:29:22.940 what might
01:29:23.920 constitute
01:29:24.460 an
01:29:24.700 acceptable
01:29:25.120 alternative
01:29:25.620 so in
01:29:26.100 Hungary
01:29:26.440 what they've
01:29:27.120 done
01:29:27.320 you probably
01:29:27.920 know this
01:29:28.400 is that
01:29:28.820 if you're
01:29:30.300 a mother
01:29:30.840 in Hungary
01:29:31.400 and you have
01:29:32.340 one child
01:29:32.900 you're now
01:29:34.220 exempt from
01:29:34.880 income tax
01:29:35.400 at the federal
01:29:35.900 level for the
01:29:36.540 rest of your
01:29:36.860 life
01:29:37.080 25%
01:29:38.240 and then
01:29:39.080 that scales
01:29:39.580 up to
01:29:39.940 100%
01:29:40.780 for four
01:29:41.700 children
01:29:42.000 and the idea
01:29:43.000 there was
01:29:43.480 both practical
01:29:44.360 and cultural
01:29:45.240 so the cultural
01:29:46.120 idea was
01:29:46.820 we need to
01:29:48.480 signal that we
01:29:49.440 value motherhood
01:29:50.500 and children
01:29:50.960 and one
01:29:52.460 of the
01:29:52.680 more powerful
01:29:53.300 signals
01:29:53.780 that
01:29:54.560 society
01:29:56.140 has access
01:29:56.660 to is
01:29:57.020 economic
01:29:58.440 signals
01:29:59.020 and the
01:29:59.700 Hungarians
01:30:00.040 have stopped
01:30:00.820 the decline
01:30:01.440 in their birth
01:30:01.960 rate and
01:30:02.280 tapped it up
01:30:02.740 slightly
01:30:03.060 they've
01:30:03.640 increased
01:30:03.960 female
01:30:04.320 participation
01:30:04.960 in the
01:30:05.240 workforce
01:30:05.520 by the
01:30:05.980 way
01:30:06.200 13%
01:30:07.400 so the
01:30:08.620 feminists
01:30:09.080 had objected
01:30:09.720 or some
01:30:10.060 of them
01:30:10.280 that the
01:30:11.520 Hungarian
01:30:11.860 government
01:30:12.220 was just
01:30:12.660 turning women
01:30:13.140 into baby
01:30:13.660 making factories
01:30:14.440 which is
01:30:14.920 a hell of
01:30:15.660 a nasty
01:30:17.560 epithet
01:30:18.080 I might
01:30:18.460 add
01:30:18.820 but
01:30:19.560 what's
01:30:20.780 happened
01:30:21.000 is the
01:30:21.260 reverse
01:30:21.620 is more
01:30:22.060 women
01:30:22.340 are working
01:30:22.820 now than
01:30:23.200 before
01:30:23.560 and I
01:30:23.880 suppose
01:30:24.100 that's
01:30:24.380 because
01:30:24.560 they get
01:30:24.860 to keep
01:30:25.140 more of
01:30:25.460 their money
01:30:25.840 and they
01:30:27.720 can make
01:30:28.000 child care
01:30:28.400 arrangements
01:30:28.800 more
01:30:29.220 straightforwardly
01:30:29.900 and all
01:30:30.120 of that
01:30:30.440 they've
01:30:31.040 knocked
01:30:31.280 the divorce
01:30:31.780 rate
01:30:32.080 down
01:30:32.520 substantially
01:30:33.300 they've
01:30:34.080 increased
01:30:34.380 the marriage
01:30:34.820 rate
01:30:35.160 they've
01:30:35.720 knocked
01:30:35.900 the abortion
01:30:36.460 rate
01:30:36.840 down
01:30:37.140 40%
01:30:37.960 38%
01:30:38.820 with no
01:30:39.420 compulsion
01:30:39.920 it's not
01:30:41.000 as easy
01:30:41.760 to get
01:30:42.060 an abortion
01:30:42.600 in Hungary
01:30:43.100 as it is
01:30:43.580 in the US
01:30:44.100 or Canada
01:30:44.660 and the
01:30:46.620 legal limits
01:30:47.520 there is
01:30:47.880 12 weeks
01:30:48.580 instead of
01:30:49.720 the 16
01:30:50.260 weeks
01:30:50.580 which is
01:30:51.040 about
01:30:51.300 what
01:30:51.620 Americans
01:30:52.060 think
01:30:52.360 it should
01:30:52.680 be
01:30:52.940 but
01:30:53.580 the point
01:30:54.560 is
01:30:54.740 these
01:30:54.960 alterations
01:30:55.560 in policy
01:30:56.140 have
01:30:56.560 produced
01:30:58.060 increases
01:30:59.560 in
01:31:00.020 fertility
01:31:01.280 increases
01:31:01.940 in the
01:31:02.260 marital
01:31:02.520 rate
01:31:02.840 decreases
01:31:03.280 in the
01:31:03.560 divorce
01:31:03.860 rate
01:31:04.180 decreases
01:31:04.860 in the
01:31:05.120 abortion
01:31:05.400 rate
01:31:05.700 and those
01:31:06.040 look
01:31:06.400 arguably
01:31:07.420 like
01:31:07.740 desirable
01:31:08.160 things
01:31:08.620 do you
01:31:09.560 see
01:31:09.920 and we
01:31:10.640 talked a
01:31:11.000 little bit
01:31:11.240 about the
01:31:11.540 fact that
01:31:11.900 women
01:31:12.120 live
01:31:12.620 seven
01:31:12.940 years
01:31:13.240 longer
01:31:13.620 and so
01:31:14.120 in principle
01:31:14.900 have a
01:31:15.440 time
01:31:15.860 let's say
01:31:16.740 eight years
01:31:17.500 where they
01:31:18.300 could have
01:31:18.660 children
01:31:19.000 without really
01:31:19.740 being at a
01:31:20.880 competitive
01:31:21.240 disadvantage
01:31:21.920 on the
01:31:22.340 economic
01:31:22.700 front
01:31:23.020 with men
01:31:23.540 assuming
01:31:24.060 that it
01:31:24.700 is a
01:31:25.160 competitive
01:31:25.580 landscape
01:31:26.100 and that's
01:31:26.640 also not
01:31:27.180 particularly
01:31:27.580 obvious to
01:31:28.240 me
01:31:28.460 I mean
01:31:29.220 what
01:31:30.700 have
01:31:31.320 your thoughts
01:31:32.940 turned to
01:31:33.600 what might
01:31:34.200 constitute
01:31:34.920 an appropriate
01:31:35.900 pathway
01:31:36.300 forward
01:31:36.720 for young
01:31:37.140 people
01:31:37.500 I certainly
01:31:38.820 would
01:31:40.440 quite boldly
01:31:43.260 say
01:31:43.660 what will
01:31:44.660 not work
01:31:45.140 because there's
01:31:45.620 so many
01:31:45.960 examples of
01:31:46.640 things that
01:31:46.960 have been
01:31:47.100 tried and
01:31:47.660 tried and
01:31:48.200 tried and
01:31:48.600 tried and
01:31:48.880 tried and
01:31:48.900 we'll come
01:31:49.160 back to
01:31:49.460 Hungary in
01:31:49.820 a moment
01:31:50.040 because it
01:31:50.420 is very
01:31:50.760 interesting
01:31:51.120 but if
01:31:53.680 you look
01:31:54.040 at baby
01:31:54.640 bonus
01:31:55.020 programs
01:31:55.540 globally
01:31:56.320 at best
01:31:57.800 what they
01:31:58.200 do is
01:31:58.920 temporarily
01:31:59.600 increase the
01:32:00.540 birth rate
01:32:01.000 and then
01:32:02.600 you see
01:32:03.300 a dip
01:32:03.780 and the dip
01:32:04.160 usually goes
01:32:04.600 below where
01:32:05.080 it was
01:32:05.360 before
01:32:05.660 all you've
01:32:06.140 done is
01:32:06.680 bring
01:32:06.940 forward
01:32:07.560 the
01:32:08.500 people who
01:32:09.880 would have
01:32:10.160 had kids
01:32:10.540 anyway
01:32:11.200 yeah
01:32:11.600 right
01:32:12.200 so
01:32:13.600 and you
01:32:14.700 look at
01:32:14.960 the amount
01:32:15.280 of money
01:32:15.580 in certain
01:32:16.080 Japan
01:32:16.560 certainly
01:32:16.940 South Korea
01:32:17.540 are spending
01:32:18.180 on kindergarten
01:32:19.320 yeah
01:32:19.700 that doesn't
01:32:20.380 seem to help
01:32:20.840 Quebec
01:32:21.180 it didn't
01:32:21.560 make a bit
01:32:21.900 of difference
01:32:22.400 no it isn't
01:32:23.580 it isn't
01:32:24.080 lack of
01:32:24.520 child care
01:32:25.040 that's causing
01:32:25.600 this problem
01:32:26.180 yeah
01:32:26.500 and it's
01:32:26.960 not income
01:32:27.500 either
01:32:27.780 no right
01:32:28.580 a lot of
01:32:29.420 people think
01:32:29.840 it is income
01:32:30.460 it's a natural
01:32:31.340 thing I think
01:32:31.960 for people
01:32:32.360 thinking well
01:32:32.840 if I had a
01:32:33.280 little bit
01:32:33.580 more money
01:32:34.000 at the right
01:32:34.860 time
01:32:35.280 or my
01:32:36.340 apartment's
01:32:36.860 too small
01:32:37.420 but actually
01:32:38.320 what you
01:32:39.080 find is that
01:32:39.880 when people
01:32:40.300 have more
01:32:40.560 money in
01:32:40.860 their pocket
01:32:41.340 birth rates
01:32:42.100 go down
01:32:42.560 they do
01:32:43.100 other things
01:32:43.620 it's like
01:32:44.340 not yet
01:32:44.720 we can take
01:32:45.560 this vacation
01:32:46.120 well I think
01:32:46.660 also
01:32:47.020 well I also
01:32:47.860 think that
01:32:48.340 their expectations
01:32:49.580 for what constitutes
01:32:51.100 sufficiently prepared
01:32:52.380 for children
01:32:52.940 also change
01:32:53.920 you know
01:32:55.020 like I said
01:32:55.540 when I was in
01:32:56.100 Montreal
01:32:56.420 well you know
01:32:57.160 I was already
01:32:57.700 educated
01:32:58.180 I had a job
01:32:58.980 it was clear
01:32:59.540 I was going
01:32:59.960 to get a job
01:33:00.520 but my
01:33:01.380 standard for
01:33:02.480 what was
01:33:02.900 sufficient security
01:33:03.920 and opportunity
01:33:04.560 for my
01:33:05.060 children
01:33:05.360 rose along
01:33:06.260 with my
01:33:06.780 horizon of
01:33:07.740 vision on
01:33:08.180 the economic
01:33:08.680 front
01:33:09.020 and it's
01:33:09.900 also not
01:33:10.340 the case
01:33:10.720 that more
01:33:11.260 security
01:33:11.800 makes you
01:33:12.600 liable to
01:33:13.940 take more
01:33:14.460 risks
01:33:14.920 that isn't
01:33:15.500 how life
01:33:15.940 works
01:33:16.300 you have to
01:33:16.880 jump into
01:33:17.420 children
01:33:17.800 just like
01:33:18.260 you jump
01:33:18.640 into a
01:33:19.440 marriage
01:33:19.780 or into
01:33:20.580 your life
01:33:21.620 for that
01:33:21.960 matter
01:33:22.300 I think
01:33:22.900 that's the
01:33:23.220 key point
01:33:23.680 you know
01:33:23.940 so ultimately
01:33:24.760 Hungary
01:33:26.380 aside for a
01:33:26.960 moment
01:33:27.100 and also
01:33:27.640 Russia
01:33:27.980 in the past
01:33:28.480 has had
01:33:29.040 similar
01:33:29.540 programs
01:33:30.080 where they
01:33:30.440 have put
01:33:30.820 significant
01:33:32.020 benefits
01:33:32.520 in place
01:33:32.940 that seem
01:33:33.360 to work
01:33:33.860 for a
01:33:34.240 time
01:33:34.700 but
01:33:36.100 vast
01:33:37.240 majority
01:33:37.860 of
01:33:38.580 financial
01:33:39.040 incentives
01:33:39.560 or even
01:33:40.560 societal
01:33:41.120 changes
01:33:43.080 such as
01:33:43.660 kindergartens
01:33:44.420 have very
01:33:45.520 limited
01:33:46.020 effects
01:33:46.680 very limited
01:33:47.700 indeed
01:33:48.160 if we come
01:33:49.400 back to
01:33:49.780 understand
01:33:50.260 the fundamentals
01:33:51.000 of the
01:33:51.240 problem
01:33:51.500 is this
01:33:52.040 unplanned
01:33:53.460 childlessness
01:33:54.000 issue
01:33:54.760 perhaps
01:33:56.060 what Hungary
01:33:57.420 might have
01:33:58.600 got right
01:33:59.040 and I
01:34:01.020 will never
01:34:03.100 frankly
01:34:03.740 tell someone
01:34:04.800 you should
01:34:05.300 or should
01:34:05.520 not have
01:34:05.960 an abortion
01:34:06.360 that's your
01:34:06.840 choice
01:34:07.180 that's not
01:34:07.900 something
01:34:08.120 I want
01:34:08.580 to have
01:34:08.840 any
01:34:09.180 I don't
01:34:09.600 believe
01:34:09.940 it's my
01:34:10.540 right
01:34:10.960 to say
01:34:11.500 that
01:34:11.680 that's
01:34:11.940 just my
01:34:12.520 personal
01:34:12.820 position
01:34:13.200 on it
01:34:13.560 but
01:34:14.080 what
01:34:14.940 Hungary
01:34:16.920 might have
01:34:17.500 done
01:34:17.740 and you
01:34:18.600 stated a
01:34:19.460 moment ago
01:34:19.860 is just
01:34:20.120 make it
01:34:20.560 more
01:34:21.080 positive
01:34:23.140 the idea
01:34:23.620 of parenting
01:34:24.220 something
01:34:24.680 that's
01:34:25.340 what they're
01:34:26.300 aiming at
01:34:26.960 the Hungarians
01:34:28.420 do understand
01:34:29.640 so their
01:34:30.380 president
01:34:30.820 Catalina
01:34:31.340 Novak
01:34:31.880 a young
01:34:32.780 dynamic
01:34:33.300 woman
01:34:33.640 who
01:34:34.000 is their
01:34:35.160 symbolic
01:34:35.600 head of
01:34:35.980 state
01:34:36.180 was very
01:34:36.640 much
01:34:36.900 involved
01:34:37.680 in the
01:34:38.320 formulation
01:34:38.660 of these
01:34:39.260 family
01:34:39.660 policies
01:34:40.060 and she
01:34:40.900 knew
01:34:41.080 perfectly
01:34:41.500 well
01:34:41.800 that part
01:34:42.360 of what
01:34:42.780 the goal
01:34:43.560 was
01:34:43.940 was to
01:34:44.600 culturally
01:34:46.180 elevate
01:34:46.920 the let's
01:34:47.940 call it
01:34:48.280 the sacred
01:34:48.760 significance
01:34:49.460 of motherhood
01:34:50.080 something like
01:34:50.640 that
01:34:50.840 to put
01:34:51.740 the mother
01:34:52.240 again
01:34:52.760 on something
01:34:54.540 on something
01:34:55.200 approximating the
01:34:56.120 necessary
01:34:56.760 pedestal
01:34:57.360 you see this
01:34:58.460 in Catholic
01:34:58.980 imagery
01:34:59.380 all the
01:34:59.760 time
01:35:00.040 is that
01:35:00.400 of course
01:35:01.040 in the
01:35:01.540 Christian
01:35:01.800 tradition
01:35:02.260 Christ
01:35:03.120 is obviously
01:35:03.900 the central
01:35:04.420 figure of
01:35:04.980 redemption
01:35:05.480 and divinity
01:35:06.160 but there's
01:35:07.240 strong competition
01:35:08.460 symbolically
01:35:09.380 on the part
01:35:10.380 of Mary
01:35:10.840 because it's
01:35:11.660 Mary and
01:35:12.060 the infant
01:35:12.420 and I
01:35:13.320 would say
01:35:13.660 any society
01:35:14.400 that doesn't
01:35:14.920 hold the
01:35:15.300 mother and
01:35:15.640 infant as
01:35:16.140 sacred
01:35:16.460 is doomed
01:35:17.080 for obvious
01:35:19.100 reasons
01:35:19.580 since we
01:35:20.140 all had
01:35:20.700 mothers
01:35:21.000 and we're
01:35:21.420 all infants
01:35:22.060 if you
01:35:22.380 don't value
01:35:22.940 that
01:35:23.320 whatever that
01:35:24.420 value means
01:35:25.320 and when
01:35:25.960 my wife
01:35:26.540 had little
01:35:26.940 kids
01:35:27.280 she was
01:35:28.340 treated
01:35:28.600 pretty damn
01:35:29.200 dismally
01:35:29.980 I would
01:35:30.420 say
01:35:30.640 you know
01:35:30.900 I used
01:35:31.260 to go
01:35:31.560 out to
01:35:31.980 restaurants
01:35:32.420 with her
01:35:33.100 and just
01:35:33.420 watch when
01:35:34.020 she entered
01:35:34.500 in with
01:35:34.880 the kids
01:35:35.240 and there
01:35:36.020 was a lot
01:35:36.460 of sneers
01:35:36.980 and a lot
01:35:37.540 of you
01:35:38.320 know
01:35:38.940 casual
01:35:40.260 mistreatment
01:35:41.260 there was
01:35:42.040 no
01:35:42.480 they were
01:35:43.460 a nuisance
01:35:44.020 you know
01:35:44.480 and that
01:35:44.780 was extremely
01:35:45.520 annoying
01:35:45.920 to me
01:35:46.380 to watch
01:35:46.800 because I
01:35:47.240 don't think
01:35:47.600 of kids
01:35:47.980 as kids
01:35:48.640 can be
01:35:48.980 nuisances
01:35:49.400 if they're
01:35:49.820 not well
01:35:50.200 behaved
01:35:50.560 but you
01:35:51.660 there's
01:35:52.240 something wrong
01:35:52.700 with you
01:35:53.060 if you think
01:35:53.620 children are
01:35:54.380 fundamentally
01:35:54.900 a nuisance
01:35:55.540 and it's
01:35:56.840 definitely
01:35:57.120 the case
01:35:57.600 that we
01:35:59.780 don't value
01:36:00.560 the contribution
01:36:02.480 of young
01:36:03.960 mothers in
01:36:05.240 our culture
01:36:05.840 the way
01:36:06.420 that we
01:36:06.840 would if
01:36:07.320 we were
01:36:08.060 wise
01:36:08.520 and that's
01:36:09.320 a very
01:36:09.540 difficult
01:36:09.820 problem to
01:36:10.460 solve
01:36:10.940 right
01:36:11.220 all this
01:36:12.020 emphasis
01:36:12.420 on you
01:36:13.300 know
01:36:13.420 the kind
01:36:13.840 of hedonic
01:36:14.340 freedom
01:36:14.740 that's
01:36:15.060 associated
01:36:15.600 with you
01:36:16.060 with being
01:36:16.620 a youthful
01:36:17.140 teenager
01:36:17.580 and then
01:36:18.340 that equally
01:36:19.060 sex in the
01:36:19.860 city
01:36:20.080 nonsense
01:36:20.600 about you
01:36:21.840 know
01:36:21.980 your freedom
01:36:23.440 on the
01:36:23.840 sexual front
01:36:24.420 while you're
01:36:24.860 pursuing your
01:36:25.420 career
01:36:25.640 it's a bloody
01:36:26.120 juvenile
01:36:26.540 that it's
01:36:27.020 almost
01:36:27.260 incomprehensible
01:36:28.160 but it's
01:36:28.860 not an easy
01:36:29.380 thing to
01:36:29.780 reverse
01:36:30.080 and it
01:36:30.860 isn't even
01:36:31.300 obvious that
01:36:31.900 it's the
01:36:32.280 government's
01:36:32.920 role to
01:36:33.320 reverse that
01:36:34.520 but
01:36:34.820 and the
01:36:35.700 outcomes
01:36:36.120 are
01:36:36.580 unplanned
01:36:37.480 childlessness
01:36:37.920 time and
01:36:39.220 time again
01:36:39.680 I think
01:36:40.100 it's just
01:36:42.120 clear that
01:36:42.780 people who
01:36:43.460 could
01:36:43.620 down that
01:36:44.020 path
01:36:44.400 are thinking
01:36:44.960 of what
01:36:45.320 society
01:36:45.800 tells them
01:36:46.320 they can
01:36:46.600 do in the
01:36:47.040 short term
01:36:47.520 only
01:36:47.880 that'd be a
01:36:48.460 good title
01:36:49.000 for this
01:36:49.500 this
01:36:50.120 interview
01:36:51.900 really
01:36:52.500 we should
01:36:52.820 probably call
01:36:53.320 it unplanned
01:36:53.920 childlessness
01:36:54.560 I love that
01:36:55.240 well because
01:36:55.900 that's
01:36:56.320 that is
01:36:57.160 so
01:36:57.700 it's so
01:36:58.960 interesting
01:36:59.500 that that
01:36:59.960 exists
01:37:00.440 as such
01:37:00.960 a plague
01:37:01.780 and yet
01:37:02.600 it isn't
01:37:03.020 identified
01:37:03.500 and it
01:37:03.880 doesn't
01:37:04.120 have a
01:37:04.440 name
01:37:04.880 and that's
01:37:05.680 a real
01:37:06.040 that's
01:37:06.500 a real
01:37:06.740 catastrophe
01:37:07.360 I
01:37:08.080 you know
01:37:09.360 one of the
01:37:09.680 earliest
01:37:09.960 greetings
01:37:10.300 I did
01:37:10.700 there was
01:37:11.100 a young
01:37:11.780 man
01:37:12.080 it was
01:37:12.360 in Japan
01:37:12.780 but he's
01:37:13.240 from the
01:37:13.760 US
01:37:14.160 and he
01:37:15.680 just stood
01:37:16.140 there afterwards
01:37:16.640 gazing at
01:37:17.180 the ceiling
01:37:17.520 and he's
01:37:17.840 probably
01:37:18.280 30
01:37:19.060 early
01:37:19.480 30
01:37:19.860 35
01:37:20.260 and he
01:37:21.580 said
01:37:21.740 unplanned
01:37:22.440 childlessness
01:37:23.040 and he
01:37:23.700 looked at
01:37:24.060 me
01:37:24.260 and said
01:37:24.740 that's
01:37:25.540 me
01:37:25.920 that's
01:37:28.020 me
01:37:28.340 and you
01:37:29.380 could see
01:37:29.740 it wasn't
01:37:30.480 just the
01:37:30.820 term
01:37:31.120 it was
01:37:31.460 talking
01:37:32.080 yeah right
01:37:32.680 he was
01:37:32.980 talking
01:37:33.160 the
01:37:33.320 realization
01:37:33.960 realization
01:37:34.440 you actually
01:37:35.220 have to
01:37:35.760 in some
01:37:36.200 way
01:37:36.520 have a
01:37:37.680 plan
01:37:38.080 even if
01:37:38.600 the plan
01:37:39.000 is to
01:37:39.400 do
01:37:39.640 something
01:37:40.340 not
01:37:41.240 rational
01:37:41.760 but to
01:37:42.280 take a
01:37:42.700 leap
01:37:42.980 of faith
01:37:43.780 and to
01:37:45.520 come back
01:37:45.860 to men
01:37:46.200 as well
01:37:46.620 men can
01:37:48.900 have children
01:37:49.380 age 55
01:37:50.240 you know
01:37:52.160 I divorced
01:37:53.200 sadly
01:37:53.920 you know
01:37:55.140 at around
01:37:56.700 40 I guess
01:37:57.420 and I thought
01:37:57.780 there'd be a
01:37:58.380 time where I
01:37:59.040 would meet
01:37:59.600 someone again
01:38:00.180 and have more
01:38:00.620 children
01:38:00.880 that's something
01:38:01.300 I would have
01:38:01.680 desired frankly
01:38:02.600 not to get
01:38:04.520 too personal
01:38:05.080 but it wasn't
01:38:06.160 my plan for life
01:38:07.080 to be a
01:38:07.640 divorced dad
01:38:08.640 right
01:38:08.920 and what
01:38:11.080 you find
01:38:11.960 is
01:38:12.440 that you're
01:38:13.820 competing
01:38:14.140 with younger
01:38:14.620 men
01:38:14.920 for the
01:38:15.780 same
01:38:16.020 younger
01:38:16.300 woman
01:38:16.600 easier said
01:38:16.820 than done
01:38:17.320 the fact
01:38:19.060 that you
01:38:19.320 can technically
01:38:20.180 have a child
01:38:20.880 at almost
01:38:21.440 any age
01:38:21.940 as a man
01:38:22.380 doesn't mean
01:38:23.600 that you're
01:38:23.980 going to
01:38:24.540 so the
01:38:25.100 outcome
01:38:25.680 is
01:38:25.860 what makes
01:38:26.940 you think
01:38:27.360 you're going
01:38:27.640 to be more
01:38:28.020 successful
01:38:28.520 old and
01:38:29.140 ugly
01:38:29.460 than you
01:38:29.940 had been
01:38:30.400 young and
01:38:30.840 ugly
01:38:31.180 and every
01:38:33.300 year you're
01:38:33.900 on the path
01:38:34.440 to get
01:38:34.660 older and
01:38:35.260 uglier
01:38:35.580 so
01:38:37.040 you know
01:38:38.260 it's
01:38:39.260 men and
01:38:40.120 women
01:38:40.440 in this
01:38:41.040 situation
01:38:41.560 I think
01:38:42.000 that society
01:38:42.720 needs to
01:38:43.300 make parenting
01:38:44.260 something more
01:38:45.840 valuable
01:38:46.360 but to come
01:38:47.220 back to your
01:38:47.680 point
01:38:47.880 that cannot
01:38:48.620 be the
01:38:49.560 sacrifice of
01:38:50.300 career education
01:38:51.100 options
01:38:51.500 we have to
01:38:52.620 make it
01:38:53.000 more
01:38:53.560 almost the
01:38:55.440 default option
01:38:56.420 that you
01:38:57.700 can continue
01:38:58.640 your education
01:38:59.600 I love the
01:39:00.320 idea of
01:39:00.660 lifelong learning
01:39:01.460 which is what
01:39:01.980 I'm doing
01:39:02.340 yeah
01:39:02.540 well it's
01:39:04.140 very odd
01:39:04.600 that we
01:39:04.980 orient our
01:39:05.860 educational
01:39:06.920 establishments
01:39:07.640 to people
01:39:08.040 between 18
01:39:08.680 and 22
01:39:09.180 I just
01:39:09.840 can't figure
01:39:10.240 that out
01:39:10.460 at all
01:39:10.760 I taught
01:39:11.100 at the
01:39:11.320 Harvard
01:39:11.500 Extension
01:39:11.880 School
01:39:12.200 by the
01:39:12.500 way
01:39:12.660 I had a
01:39:13.120 lot of
01:39:13.320 adult
01:39:13.620 students
01:39:14.280 and I
01:39:14.640 enjoyed
01:39:14.900 teaching
01:39:15.200 them
01:39:15.360 a lot
01:39:15.660 there's
01:39:16.300 absolutely
01:39:17.100 no reason
01:39:17.800 whatsoever
01:39:18.600 that the
01:39:19.100 university
01:39:19.520 should
01:39:19.880 specialize
01:39:20.460 in 18
01:39:21.020 to 22
01:39:21.520 year olds
01:39:21.920 that's a
01:39:23.320 hangover
01:39:24.200 from
01:39:24.620 I don't
01:39:25.780 know
01:39:25.940 God
01:39:26.240 I don't
01:39:26.680 even know
01:39:27.100 when that
01:39:27.460 was useful
01:39:28.300 and relevant
01:39:28.800 it's just
01:39:29.380 not a
01:39:29.880 smart
01:39:30.180 idea
01:39:30.600 and it's
01:39:31.420 in the
01:39:31.620 college's
01:39:32.000 interest
01:39:32.420 because
01:39:32.780 there's a
01:39:33.240 shrinking
01:39:33.520 number of
01:39:34.220 children
01:39:35.120 come through
01:39:35.780 these systems
01:39:36.420 universities
01:39:37.340 are going
01:39:37.960 to need
01:39:38.400 to diversify
01:39:39.160 and lifelong
01:39:39.700 learning is
01:39:40.320 the answer
01:39:40.700 to that
01:39:41.120 so why
01:39:42.060 it's also
01:39:43.000 the case
01:39:43.440 that in
01:39:43.740 an era
01:39:44.100 of rapid
01:39:44.540 technological
01:39:45.060 transformation
01:39:45.660 that
01:39:46.200 lifelong
01:39:47.100 learning
01:39:47.620 is
01:39:47.940 necessary
01:39:48.640 practically
01:39:49.240 but it's
01:39:49.660 also
01:39:49.960 why the
01:39:50.760 hell
01:39:50.900 wouldn't
01:39:51.140 you want
01:39:51.520 that
01:39:51.760 because
01:39:52.000 it's
01:39:52.200 part of
01:39:52.480 what
01:39:52.620 keeps
01:39:52.860 you
01:39:52.980 updated
01:39:53.420 so
01:39:54.300 I
01:39:54.780 remember
01:39:55.020 the
01:39:55.180 first
01:39:55.340 class
01:39:55.600 I
01:39:55.740 took
01:39:55.940 at
01:39:56.060 Extension
01:39:56.440 School
01:39:56.860 it was
01:39:57.600 in
01:39:57.740 statistics
01:39:58.160 that I
01:39:58.480 went to
01:39:58.800 my
01:39:58.940 first
01:39:59.140 class
01:39:59.320 probably
01:39:59.560 dressed
01:39:59.860 like I
01:40:00.180 am
01:40:00.360 now
01:40:00.580 with
01:40:00.700 a
01:40:00.800 leather
01:40:00.960 briefcase
01:40:01.560 and
01:40:02.300 everyone
01:40:03.380 else
01:40:03.760 I was
01:40:04.080 not
01:40:04.420 the
01:40:04.640 oldest
01:40:04.920 at
01:40:05.420 all
01:40:05.780 but
01:40:06.260 everyone
01:40:06.500 else
01:40:06.820 is
01:40:06.960 in
01:40:07.120 jeans
01:40:07.400 and
01:40:07.620 t-shirts
01:40:08.040 and
01:40:08.340 backpacks
01:40:09.060 and
01:40:09.320 I
01:40:10.200 haven't
01:40:11.340 dressed
01:40:11.700 like that
01:40:12.240 for
01:40:12.560 decades
01:40:13.120 but I
01:40:13.560 went
01:40:13.760 out
01:40:14.020 and
01:40:14.200 I
01:40:14.620 got
01:40:14.800 a
01:40:14.920 couple
01:40:15.040 of
01:40:15.160 t-shirts
01:40:15.560 and a
01:40:15.820 backpack
01:40:16.140 and
01:40:17.300 the
01:40:17.680 most
01:40:17.960 transformational
01:40:19.880 thing
01:40:20.200 happened
01:40:20.520 to me
01:40:21.000 first
01:40:21.860 recognition
01:40:22.500 I'm
01:40:22.860 learning
01:40:23.180 something
01:40:23.640 I
01:40:23.920 want
01:40:24.500 to
01:40:24.740 learn
01:40:24.960 I'm
01:40:25.700 fully
01:40:26.180 engaged
01:40:26.620 and
01:40:26.840 that
01:40:26.960 makes
01:40:27.180 you
01:40:27.260 the
01:40:27.400 best
01:40:27.620 kind
01:40:27.820 student
01:40:28.240 I
01:40:29.200 think
01:40:29.660 so
01:40:29.860 but
01:40:30.020 everyone
01:40:30.400 else
01:40:30.840 there
01:40:31.680 were
01:40:31.920 Harvard
01:40:32.860 college
01:40:33.300 kids
01:40:33.720 there
01:40:33.900 taking
01:40:34.260 summer
01:40:34.540 classes
01:40:34.900 and
01:40:35.160 there
01:40:35.280 were
01:40:35.340 people
01:40:35.580 older
01:40:35.780 than
01:40:35.920 me
01:40:36.100 it
01:40:36.540 didn't
01:40:36.860 matter
01:40:37.240 I
01:40:38.320 love
01:40:38.620 teaching
01:40:38.980 at
01:40:39.120 the
01:40:39.240 extension
01:40:39.540 school
01:40:39.860 I
01:40:40.040 mean
01:40:40.200 at
01:40:41.100 Harvard
01:40:41.500 the
01:40:42.260 undergraduates
01:40:43.400 in the
01:40:43.920 formal
01:40:44.400 school
01:40:44.760 were
01:40:45.060 smarter
01:40:45.480 than
01:40:45.800 the
01:40:46.100 people
01:40:46.860 on
01:40:47.180 average
01:40:47.480 in
01:40:47.640 the
01:40:47.760 extension
01:40:48.040 school
01:40:48.400 but
01:40:48.900 the
01:40:49.080 extension
01:40:49.440 school
01:40:49.780 people
01:40:50.080 were
01:40:50.320 a
01:40:50.480 lot
01:40:50.660 more
01:40:50.920 motivated
01:40:51.380 to
01:40:51.620 learn
01:40:51.880 right
01:40:52.480 there
01:40:52.980 was
01:40:53.320 no
01:40:53.580 one
01:40:53.860 not
01:40:54.220 attending
01:40:54.700 because
01:40:57.820 probably
01:40:58.040 asking
01:40:58.400 questions
01:40:59.000 that
01:40:59.220 were
01:40:59.460 I
01:40:59.680 actually
01:40:59.860 took
01:41:00.040 a
01:41:00.160 psychology
01:41:00.540 class
01:41:01.040 probably
01:41:02.660 in the
01:41:02.880 building
01:41:03.120 of
01:41:03.320 William
01:41:04.060 James
01:41:04.360 yeah
01:41:04.660 and
01:41:06.000 you know
01:41:06.900 again
01:41:07.680 I was
01:41:08.600 there
01:41:08.820 with
01:41:09.040 a lot
01:41:09.600 of
01:41:09.700 even
01:41:09.840 high
01:41:10.180 school
01:41:10.620 learners
01:41:11.500 at a
01:41:11.780 summer
01:41:11.940 school
01:41:12.140 program
01:41:12.580 but I
01:41:13.460 realized
01:41:13.720 the
01:41:13.860 professor
01:41:14.160 was
01:41:14.320 enjoying
01:41:14.620 the
01:41:14.800 questions
01:41:15.200 I
01:41:15.360 was
01:41:15.480 asking
01:41:15.780 they
01:41:16.160 were
01:41:16.220 just
01:41:16.400 different
01:41:17.140 to
01:41:17.360 the
01:41:17.480 question
01:41:17.760 yeah
01:41:17.880 they
01:41:18.220 were
01:41:18.280 serious
01:41:18.580 questions
01:41:19.040 when
01:41:20.400 were
01:41:20.560 you
01:41:20.660 there
01:41:20.920 I
01:41:22.080 started
01:41:22.360 in
01:41:22.520 2015
01:41:23.120 2016
01:41:23.860 I
01:41:24.200 would
01:41:24.320 have
01:41:24.440 taken
01:41:24.660 the
01:41:24.840 psychology
01:41:27.820 point
01:41:28.100 is
01:41:28.620 that
01:41:29.440 the
01:41:29.880 recruitment
01:41:30.380 cycle
01:41:30.960 for
01:41:32.200 many
01:41:32.860 career
01:41:33.780 options
01:41:34.160 is linked
01:41:34.660 to the
01:41:34.860 education
01:41:35.220 cycle
01:41:35.640 so you
01:41:36.280 can't
01:41:36.560 change
01:41:36.820 one
01:41:37.160 without
01:41:37.380 the
01:41:37.640 other
01:41:37.860 you
01:41:38.460 have
01:41:38.660 people
01:41:39.720 say
01:41:39.960 well it's
01:41:40.360 fine
01:41:40.840 certain
01:41:41.720 companies
01:41:42.500 allow
01:41:42.800 recruitment
01:41:43.200 later in
01:41:43.620 life
01:41:43.780 but it's
01:41:44.060 not the
01:41:44.380 normal
01:41:44.680 thing
01:41:44.980 to do
01:41:45.320 it's
01:41:45.500 a
01:41:45.640 risk
01:41:46.000 so if
01:41:47.060 you're
01:41:47.240 a
01:41:47.380 woman
01:41:47.600 or a
01:41:47.920 parent
01:41:48.180 taking
01:41:48.480 time
01:41:48.860 out
01:41:49.140 to
01:41:49.380 raise
01:41:49.540 a
01:41:49.660 family
01:41:50.000 because
01:41:50.580 you
01:41:50.720 think
01:41:50.940 you
01:41:51.120 want
01:41:51.500 to
01:41:51.660 do
01:41:52.060 that
01:41:52.260 exclusively
01:41:52.720 earlier
01:41:53.160 on
01:41:53.420 that's
01:41:54.100 a
01:41:54.300 risk
01:41:54.560 today
01:41:54.780 you
01:41:55.000 might
01:41:55.200 not
01:41:55.400 get
01:41:55.680 on
01:41:55.860 that
01:41:56.020 path
01:41:56.340 and
01:41:56.460 you
01:41:56.540 might
01:41:56.680 not
01:41:56.840 get
01:41:57.040 the
01:41:57.360 recruitment
01:41:57.640 yeah
01:41:57.800 you know
01:41:58.140 I don't
01:41:58.760 really buy
01:41:59.200 that
01:41:59.520 I don't
01:42:00.040 really buy
01:42:00.480 that
01:42:00.740 because I
01:42:01.200 had one
01:42:01.820 student
01:42:02.120 for example
01:42:02.760 Shelly
01:42:03.960 Taylor
01:42:04.280 who
01:42:05.500 no
01:42:06.260 sorry
01:42:06.760 Shelly Carson
01:42:07.600 she came
01:42:09.580 back to
01:42:10.280 Harvard
01:42:10.960 as a graduate
01:42:11.660 student
01:42:12.200 at
01:42:12.700 in her
01:42:13.380 40s
01:42:13.780 I was
01:42:14.560 younger
01:42:14.800 than her
01:42:15.160 as her
01:42:15.680 supervisor
01:42:16.360 she'd been
01:42:17.200 an airline
01:42:17.580 stewardess
01:42:18.120 pretty middle
01:42:18.900 class life
01:42:19.640 had been
01:42:20.740 out of the
01:42:21.120 academic
01:42:21.440 stream
01:42:21.820 for quite
01:42:22.180 a while
01:42:22.460 and
01:42:22.680 was
01:42:23.440 quite a
01:42:23.880 lot older
01:42:24.280 than most
01:42:24.680 of the
01:42:24.880 graduate
01:42:25.120 students
01:42:25.540 and
01:42:25.900 she
01:42:26.860 hit it
01:42:28.100 hard
01:42:28.360 and
01:42:28.680 developed
01:42:29.040 a bang
01:42:29.340 up
01:42:29.480 career
01:42:29.760 and
01:42:30.000 she's
01:42:30.380 managed
01:42:30.680 that
01:42:30.920 quite
01:42:31.140 successfully
01:42:31.700 and I
01:42:32.120 think
01:42:32.360 that
01:42:32.600 that's
01:42:33.460 not
01:42:34.120 normal
01:42:34.580 you know
01:42:34.980 it's
01:42:35.200 not
01:42:35.340 the
01:42:35.480 standard
01:42:35.700 practice
01:42:36.160 but it's
01:42:36.620 by no
01:42:36.940 means
01:42:37.160 impossible
01:42:37.620 and given
01:42:38.140 that women
01:42:38.580 do have
01:42:39.020 that
01:42:39.260 seven year
01:42:39.800 advantage
01:42:40.520 in terms
01:42:40.960 of
01:42:41.100 lifespan
01:42:41.460 there's
01:42:42.560 man
01:42:43.220 you think
01:42:44.500 you're
01:42:44.700 out of
01:42:45.000 the running
01:42:45.500 on the
01:42:46.380 education
01:42:46.880 and career
01:42:47.340 front
01:42:47.640 when you're
01:42:48.020 35
01:42:48.400 you're
01:42:49.320 out of
01:42:49.500 the running
01:42:49.800 on the
01:42:50.060 reproductive
01:42:50.440 front
01:42:50.920 you're
01:42:51.820 not
01:42:51.960 really
01:42:52.280 out of
01:42:52.540 the running
01:42:52.860 on the
01:42:53.160 education
01:42:53.540 and career
01:42:53.940 front
01:42:54.240 and I've
01:42:54.620 seen lots
01:42:55.020 of people
01:42:55.500 hit the
01:42:57.380 education
01:42:57.940 ground
01:42:58.420 running
01:42:58.900 in their
01:42:59.720 30s
01:43:00.280 mid 30s
01:43:01.260 sometimes
01:43:01.540 later
01:43:01.960 and have
01:43:03.140 a whole
01:43:03.400 new
01:43:03.620 career
01:43:03.980 I mean
01:43:04.440 Jesus
01:43:04.720 at 40
01:43:05.420 you can
01:43:06.000 still have
01:43:06.360 30 years
01:43:07.240 at your
01:43:07.620 new
01:43:07.840 career
01:43:08.260 so that's
01:43:09.760 that's a
01:43:10.140 very optimistic
01:43:10.760 way of
01:43:11.240 looking at
01:43:11.720 it
01:43:11.880 and so
01:43:12.980 alright
01:43:13.780 so well
01:43:14.260 for everybody
01:43:14.720 watching and
01:43:15.400 listening on
01:43:15.900 YouTube
01:43:16.180 and its
01:43:16.740 associated
01:43:17.260 platforms
01:43:17.860 thank you
01:43:18.880 very much
01:43:19.240 for your
01:43:19.500 time and
01:43:19.800 attention
01:43:20.160 and to
01:43:23.120 Stephen Shaw
01:43:23.780 for agreeing
01:43:24.500 to talk to
01:43:24.960 me today
01:43:25.280 about birth
01:43:25.800 gap
01:43:26.080 and about
01:43:26.500 the issue
01:43:27.560 of declining
01:43:29.200 birth rates
01:43:29.820 and population
01:43:30.860 shrinkage
01:43:31.500 bringing that
01:43:33.420 to everyone's
01:43:33.860 attention
01:43:34.200 bringing the
01:43:34.940 issue of
01:43:35.780 unplanned
01:43:36.560 childlessness
01:43:37.400 to everyone's
01:43:38.660 attention
01:43:39.040 because that's
01:43:39.780 a crucial
01:43:40.140 issue here
01:43:40.800 to note
01:43:41.780 the existence
01:43:42.440 of a problem
01:43:43.180 and to give
01:43:43.640 it a name
01:43:44.120 is to bring
01:43:44.940 it out of
01:43:45.340 the darkness
01:43:45.840 and to
01:43:46.320 unshroud it
01:43:47.060 let's say
01:43:47.560 and that's
01:43:48.640 an extremely
01:43:49.100 useful thing
01:43:49.700 to do
01:43:50.080 and I'm
01:43:51.300 going to
01:43:51.500 talk to
01:43:51.880 Stephen
01:43:52.140 for another
01:43:53.240 half an
01:43:53.600 hour on
01:43:54.020 the Daily
01:43:54.300 Wire Plus
01:43:54.740 platform
01:43:55.220 I'd like
01:43:55.960 to spend
01:43:56.920 half an
01:43:57.320 hour with
01:43:57.780 my guests
01:43:58.380 investigating
01:44:00.000 how their
01:44:01.120 pathway
01:44:02.500 through life
01:44:03.140 made it
01:44:03.520 manifest
01:44:04.040 made itself
01:44:04.580 manifest
01:44:05.540 to them
01:44:06.240 both in
01:44:06.840 terms of
01:44:07.240 the problems
01:44:07.800 that gripped
01:44:08.380 them
01:44:08.640 the concerns
01:44:10.260 they had
01:44:10.760 both voluntary
01:44:11.880 and involuntary
01:44:12.700 and the
01:44:13.020 opportunities
01:44:13.480 that presented
01:44:14.120 themselves as a
01:44:14.820 consequence
01:44:15.260 and so if
01:44:16.040 you're interested
01:44:16.480 in that
01:44:16.940 then please
01:44:18.220 head over
01:44:18.600 to the
01:44:19.020 Daily
01:44:19.220 Wire Plus
01:44:19.780 platform
01:44:20.320 you could
01:44:20.700 consider
01:44:21.080 supporting
01:44:21.520 them
01:44:21.720 in any
01:44:22.020 case
01:44:22.300 they
01:44:22.500 have
01:44:23.020 also
01:44:23.360 worked
01:44:24.240 diligently
01:44:25.080 to make
01:44:25.580 the kind
01:44:25.920 of conversations
01:44:26.500 I had
01:44:26.900 today
01:44:27.220 possible
01:44:28.280 and that's
01:44:29.040 much appreciated
01:44:29.580 to the film
01:44:30.080 crew here
01:44:30.520 in Vancouver
01:44:31.620 because that's
01:44:32.380 where I am
01:44:32.720 today
01:44:32.980 thank you
01:44:33.420 very much
01:44:33.920 and thank
01:44:35.620 you all
01:44:35.940 for your
01:44:36.240 time and
01:44:36.520 attention
01:44:36.860 good to
01:44:38.020 talk with
01:44:38.380 you
01:44:38.520 you bet
01:44:39.760 you bet
01:44:40.320 hello everyone
01:44:42.840 I would
01:44:43.500 encourage you
01:44:43.960 to continue
01:44:44.500 listening to
01:44:45.380 my conversation
01:44:46.180 with my
01:44:46.740 guest on
01:44:47.780 dailywireplus.com
01:44:49.780 you