The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast


353. The US Dollar Might Collapse | Peter Schiff


Summary

In this episode, Peter Schiff, the economist and stockbroker who successfully predicted the 2008 housing crisis, discusses the current market, hyperinflation, fiat currency, and the value of gold in times of instability. Peter Schiff is a former Wall Street Journal best selling author, hedge fund manager, and hedge fund analyst who served as the Director of the Federal Reserve from 1987-1993. He is a regular contributor to CNN and Bloomberg, and is a frequent guest on Fox News and CNN Worldwide. Peter Schiff has been a member of the House of Representatives since 1987 and served as an advisor to President George W. Bush from 2001-2009. He is the author of the book, "The Great Depression: How to Overcome Depression and Anxiety: A Guide to Recovery from Depression and Anxiety" and is the host of the daily financial news show, The Financial Times' Financial Crisis Reporting Project, which focuses on the current financial crisis and its impact on the world. If you are struggling with depression or anxiety, Dr. Jordan Peterson's new series could be a lifeline for those struggling with these conditions. Dr. Peterson offers a unique understanding of why you might be feeling this way, and offers a roadmap towards healing. If you're suffering, please know you are not alone. There's hope, and there's a path to feeling better. Go to Daily Wire Plus now and start watching Dr. J.B. Peterson's series on Depression and Anxiousness. Let this be the first step towards the brighter future you deserve. -Let's all work together towards a brighter, more peaceful, more prosperous, more free, more productive, and more prosperous world. -Dr. Jordan B. Peterson -EDUCATION and a life filled with more freedom, freedom, prosperity, and a better future you can all of us can all be a better you all have a more prosperous and more peace and a more fulfilling life. -Daily Wire Plus - Subscribe to DailyWire Plus Subscribe to get immediate access to all of the latest news and access to the latest episodes of the most influential financial and information you can access to information that matters most important to you, your day-to-day life, your answers to your day to day life. Subscribe to stay up to keep up to date on the most important things in the world, your most influential source of information and your most important resource, your daily dose of inspiration and business guide to everything you need to get the most of your day and business


Transcript

00:00:00.960 Hey everyone, real quick before you skip, I want to talk to you about something serious and important.
00:00:06.480 Dr. Jordan Peterson has created a new series that could be a lifeline for those battling depression and anxiety.
00:00:12.740 We know how isolating and overwhelming these conditions can be, and we wanted to take a moment to reach out to those listening who may be struggling.
00:00:20.100 With decades of experience helping patients, Dr. Peterson offers a unique understanding of why you might be feeling this way in his new series.
00:00:27.420 He provides a roadmap towards healing, showing that while the journey isn't easy, it's absolutely possible to find your way forward.
00:00:35.360 If you're suffering, please know you are not alone. There's hope, and there's a path to feeling better.
00:00:41.780 Go to Daily Wire Plus now and start watching Dr. Jordan B. Peterson on depression and anxiety.
00:00:47.460 Let this be the first step towards the brighter future you deserve.
00:00:57.420 Hello everyone, I'm speaking today with Peter Schiff, the economist and stockbroker who successfully predicted the 2008 housing crisis.
00:01:17.520 Today, we will discuss the current market, hyperinflation, fiat currency, and the value of gold in times of instability.
00:01:28.880 Looking forward to the conversation.
00:01:31.340 So thank you very much for talking to me today and to everyone who's watching and listening.
00:01:37.120 Thank you for your time and attention. That's much appreciated.
00:01:39.880 Thank you very much.
00:02:09.880 Thank you very much.
00:02:39.880 Thank you very much.
00:03:09.880 Thank you very much.
00:03:39.860 Thank you very much.
00:03:41.860 Thank you.
00:03:57.860 respect, if you're, you know, United States, you're a congressman, you're a senator, you know,
00:04:03.040 it's a career that a lot of people would aspire to. And once you get there, you know, once you
00:04:08.320 get to Washington, and I'm sure this is true in, you know, every country in Europe and all around
00:04:13.400 the world that, you know, you like it, right? You like the lifestyle, you like the prestige
00:04:18.260 that comes with being a government official. So you want to stay there, right? Well, how do you
00:04:25.400 stay in office? Well, you got to keep getting elected. You know, in the United States, you know,
00:04:30.860 we get elections every two years, right? So politicians are very concerned about, you know,
00:04:37.120 the polls, and they're constantly got their finger in the air, seeing where the winds are blowing, and
00:04:42.800 they don't want to say anything or do anything that might jeopardize their re-election. And of course,
00:04:49.120 one of the most important things that you need to get re-elected is you need a lot of money.
00:04:52.540 You need to spend money on advertising, on television, which is expensive. And so you tend to
00:05:00.000 cater to donors, whether it's a corporation or, you know, a union, anyone that can provide a lot of
00:05:09.240 money. You need to do things that are in their interest. And so what is usually sacrificed by these
00:05:17.260 politicians is the national interest. Doing what's right for the country is secondary to doing what's
00:05:24.440 right for themselves. And also, in order to be successful as a politician, you have to be a
00:05:31.320 really good liar. And that's probably why a lot of lawyers go into politics, because lawyers, you know,
00:05:37.240 they're paid to lie. I mean, you have to argue your client's case, even if you know they're wrong,
00:05:42.380 right? And you have to put on a defense or whatever it is. And so lawyers are generally pretty good
00:05:47.340 liars. And so they become politicians. Because if you're honest and you tell the truth, you're not
00:05:54.020 going to have a career in politics. You're just not going to, even if you manage to get elected telling
00:05:58.740 the truth, you're not going to stay in office telling the truth. So you got to lie. So here's
00:06:03.440 the situation. So you've had decades of politicians buying their reelection by promising voters something
00:06:12.220 for nothing. Because unfortunately, that's what a lot of voters want. They want something from the
00:06:17.240 government. So if you're running for office, like I ran for office in 2010, I once in Connecticut.
00:06:23.900 But, you know, all I promised was more freedom. I'm going to leave you alone. I'm going to repeal
00:06:28.120 government laws, regulations. I'm going to leave you free to do what you want. And I'm not going to
00:06:33.280 interfere with you. Some people like that message. But a lot of people, that's not what they want.
00:06:38.200 They don't want to be free. They want to be taken care of. They want to know, what are you going to
00:06:42.020 give me? What stuff am I going to get if I vote for you, right? What free stuff? And so-
00:06:48.000 Yeah, well, that's attractive in the short term, especially if you're not paying attention, right?
00:06:52.200 And lots of people don't pay that much attention to political discourse. And so if you offer something
00:06:57.480 tangible and immediate, that's gripped short-term attention. And that can be an effective strategy.
00:07:04.600 And so it's this proclivity to gift in this manner that drives inflation. Do you want to
00:07:11.800 define inflation for people? Yeah, I will in a sec.
00:07:13.840 Do you know exactly what we're talking about? Yeah, I will. I'm getting there. And it's even worse when
00:07:18.500 it comes to trying to take away something. Like if you want to cut a program spending, that's even
00:07:25.220 worse. Because once a voter has something, nobody wants to take it away. In fact, even some of the
00:07:31.060 politicians, let's say Republicans in the United States that might have opposed certain government
00:07:36.840 welfare type programs, you know, when they started, once they're in place, even those people won't vote
00:07:44.100 to take them away. That's how a danger it is. So the situation is you've had all these politicians
00:07:49.760 who have promised so much stuff that the taxpayers can't deliver. And of course, when politicians
00:07:56.440 want to give voters something, they don't want them to pay for it. So they want to spend money,
00:08:02.600 but they don't want to raise taxes because governments don't have any money. They only have
00:08:07.260 the money they take. They have to take money from the people in order to give money back to the people.
00:08:11.940 And so if the government's taking your money, that you don't like. So with paper money,
00:08:18.520 which unfortunately we have now fiat currency where governments don't need gold, real money,
00:08:25.140 they could just create paper money out of thin air, right? They could just manufacture it digitally
00:08:30.260 and there it is. That enables governments to spend without collecting taxes. They run these large
00:08:37.780 deficits and they're able to print the difference and hand out that money so they can give people
00:08:45.000 money without also taking the money away. And now they don't mind taking money away from rich people
00:08:51.000 because, you know, there's not as many of those, right? So they don't lose as many votes. Although
00:08:55.460 certain rich people can donate a lot to their campaigns, which often, you know, prevents the taxes
00:09:01.980 from getting too high. But inflation, you asked for the definition. Inflation is really just another
00:09:11.680 tax because governments create inflation. And inflation is also probably one of the most
00:09:22.000 misunderstood words in the English language. And deliberately so. I think governments around the
00:09:27.560 world kind of led the campaign to redefine inflation. So if you go back to the origin of the word,
00:09:34.900 and if you have a dictionary, even from the 1980s, a Webster's Dictionary, you'll get the real
00:09:40.680 definition of inflation. So inflation is an expansion of the money supply. That's all it is.
00:09:47.100 Deflation is a contraction of the money supply. So if you even think about the word inflate,
00:09:52.600 inflate is to expand, like a balloon. If you fill a balloon with air, it expands. So with inflation,
00:10:02.200 what's being expanded is the money supply. And who expands the money supply? Governments.
00:10:09.440 You know, or they do it generally now through a central bank, but it's the central banks of these
00:10:14.240 governments that are expanding the money supply. Now, when you expand the money supply, you have more
00:10:18.840 money. Well, if you have more money, but you don't have more stuff to buy, well, the price of
00:10:24.640 everything goes up. That's just basic economic supply and demand. The more money there is, the less
00:10:30.620 each individual monetary unit is worth. And now prices go up. Now, what governments have done
00:10:37.480 is they've said, price is going up. That's inflation. No, it's not. That is the consequence
00:10:44.380 of inflation because prices don't expand. Prices go up and down as a result of inflation. Now,
00:10:51.280 what happens is sometimes prices don't go up, but you still have inflation. And that's because
00:10:57.760 without that inflation, prices would have gone down. And if prices don't go down because government
00:11:04.120 creates inflation, that still represents a loss to the people because they lost the benefit of lower
00:11:12.160 prices. Because in capitalism, the tendency of capitalism is to reduce prices. That's why it's
00:11:20.080 so good, because you keep coming up with better ways of producing, more efficient ways, economies of
00:11:25.960 scale. If you look at the CPI, for example, in the United States in 1800, and then you look at the
00:11:33.220 same CPI in 1900, and they have the data, prices were cut in half. You had a hundred-year period
00:11:39.380 where you had deflation or prices falling for a hundred years. And that was a good thing. All
00:11:46.400 the politicians now tell us that we need prices to go up, that we must have inflation, the way they
00:11:53.060 define it, of 2% a year. Why? Why do prices have to go up every year? Why can't they go down every
00:11:59.640 year? Isn't that better if stuff gets cheaper, if the cost of living goes down? Of course it is.
00:12:04.540 But these politicians are trying to sell this lie to the public that rising prices are somehow
00:12:11.580 necessary for prosperity, that if prices don't go up—
00:12:14.900 Okay, so let me sum up what you've said. So the first thing you said that I think is worthy of note
00:12:21.580 for people to remember is that the price of something is a function of the ratio of the money
00:12:28.540 available to the goods available. And so if you make money twice as available, then things cost
00:12:34.720 twice as much. And then you defined inflation in that regard. You said inflation isn't prices going
00:12:43.320 up. Inflation is the value of money going down. And so it isn't because things are becoming more
00:12:50.120 expensive. It's because there's more money chasing the same amount or fewer items. Now, you could
00:12:54.880 imagine an inflation in a particular sector that would emerge because that thing has become more
00:13:00.860 scarce. But general inflation is a reflection of the inflation of the money supply.
00:13:06.200 Right.
00:13:06.700 Then you said, well, here's the—let me just finish the summary. You said there's drivers
00:13:12.100 of that inflation of the money supply. And the basic driver is that because we have a fiat currency
00:13:18.480 that isn't pegged to something permanent, let's say, like gold, and because politicians can create
00:13:26.300 money by printing it, they're incentivized to do so because they can offer people who aren't paying
00:13:31.720 much attention cheap gifts for nothing. And the fastest way to pay for that, because they don't want
00:13:39.100 to raise taxes, is to increase the money supply. And then you might say, and this is where we could
00:13:44.180 bring this home to land is, well, what's so bad about that is that we defer our expenses into the
00:13:49.760 future. People get more free stuff from the government. There's a bit of a tax. That's the
00:13:55.140 inflation tax, let's say. But all in all, the system works pretty well. But you started this whole
00:14:00.960 discussion by saying the biggest threat to the financial integrity of people, individuals over the
00:14:07.260 long run, is inflation. And so why does that pose the cardinal danger to long-term financial security
00:14:15.440 and prosperity for people? Going online without ExpressVPN is like not paying attention to the
00:14:20.800 safety demonstration on a flight. Most of the time, you'll probably be fine. But what if one day that
00:14:26.140 weird yellow mask drops down from overhead and you have no idea what to do? In our hyper-connected world,
00:14:31.900 your digital privacy isn't just a luxury. It's a fundamental right. Every time you connect to an
00:14:36.600 unsecured network in a cafe, hotel, or airport, you're essentially broadcasting your personal
00:14:41.540 information to anyone with a technical know-how to intercept it. And let's be clear, it doesn't
00:14:46.260 take a genius hacker to do this. With some off-the-shelf hardware, even a tech-savvy teenager
00:14:51.040 could potentially access your passwords, bank logins, and credit card details. Now, you might think,
00:14:56.680 what's the big deal? Who'd want my data anyway? Well, on the dark web, your personal information
00:15:01.380 could fetch up to $1,000. That's right, there's a whole underground economy built on
00:15:06.420 stolen identities. Enter ExpressVPN. It's like a digital fortress, creating an encrypted tunnel
00:15:12.180 between your device and the internet. Their encryption is so robust that it would take a
00:15:16.580 hacker with a supercomputer over a billion years to crack it. But don't let its power fool you,
00:15:21.580 ExpressVPN is incredibly user-friendly. With just one click, you're protected across all your devices,
00:15:27.020 phones, laptops, tablets, you name it. That's why I use ExpressVPN whenever I'm traveling or working
00:15:32.460 from a coffee shop. It gives me peace of mind knowing that my research, communications,
00:15:36.520 and personal data are shielded from prying eyes. Secure your online data today by visiting
00:15:41.520 expressvpn.com slash Jordan. That's E-X-P-R-E-S-S-V-P-N dot com slash Jordan,
00:15:48.000 and you can get an extra three months free. ExpressVPN dot com slash Jordan.
00:15:52.360 Yeah, well, first of all, it's not working well. That is the problem. It worked much better when
00:16:00.940 we had honest money. When we were on a gold standard, if governments wanted to spend money,
00:16:05.920 they needed gold. And where did they get it? They had to collect taxes because they couldn't
00:16:09.880 create the gold. It needed to be mined. And so it was an honest system, and it was disciplined
00:16:16.620 on politicians. Now, the politicians don't want to be disciplined any more than, you know,
00:16:21.360 teenagers want to chaperone at the prom, right? So, you know, they want to do a lot of stuff that
00:16:25.800 the chaperone won't allow. And so gold was keeping politicians in check. But to your point about
00:16:32.800 individual prices, you can't confuse prices individually will go up and down based on the
00:16:39.400 supply and demand. But if the price of one thing goes up, it's going to necessitate the price of
00:16:44.460 something else to go down. And so the general level of prices won't change. It's only when you
00:16:50.180 have the expansion of the money supply that the price of everything goes up because the value of
00:16:54.680 money is going down. And so now you need more money to buy stuff. But the problem now is because
00:17:00.780 these governments have run such enormous deficits and, you know, inflated the housing bubble that
00:17:09.480 popped in 2008 in the U.S. and then a decade or more of massive deficit spending, quantitative easing
00:17:16.160 programs. And by the way, quantitative easing is inflation. They've basically, you know, taken
00:17:22.240 inflation and put a nice sounding name to it because quantitative easing is printing money and buying
00:17:28.520 government bonds. That's inflation. But if the politician said our policy is inflation, you know,
00:17:34.640 the public doesn't like that. So they said, no, we're doing quantitative easing. And somehow that
00:17:39.400 sounds, you know, more palatable than inflation. But they've created so much. And for years and years,
00:17:46.620 these central bankers were telling us that inflation is too low. We don't have enough inflation
00:17:50.900 because it's not 2%. And again, we don't need prices to go up. You know, and the reason they say that
00:17:58.500 prices have to go up is they claim that we won't buy stuff, that if we think prices are going to go
00:18:03.720 down, we'll just hold off on buying indefinitely, waiting for a cheaper price, and the economy is
00:18:09.000 going to collapse. And that's a bunch of BS because you buy things when you need them and when you can
00:18:14.240 afford them. I mean, if that was true, nobody would own a cell phone. Nobody would own a laptop
00:18:18.820 computer. Nobody would have a television set because all those things get cheaper every year,
00:18:24.000 yet we keep buying them. So it's nonsense that we won't buy if price is going down. In fact,
00:18:29.400 prices going down create demand. If you can't afford something, the way to buy it is for the
00:18:34.920 price to go down, and then you can afford it, and then you buy it. But they've created so much
00:18:39.980 inflation when they said it was too low that now it's exploded, right? You've got double-digit
00:18:46.680 inflation or high single-digit inflation pretty much in all the vast economies in the world.
00:18:51.860 And no government anywhere in the world is willing to actually do what it takes to reduce inflation
00:19:00.680 because, A, they have to accept responsibility for creating it, and then, B, they have to
00:19:06.600 significantly reduce government spending and or raise taxes on middle-class voters. And neither of
00:19:15.380 those choices are politically expedient. And so politicians now are under more pressure than ever
00:19:21.760 to continue to finance their spending through inflation. So the inflation tax is going to get
00:19:29.600 bigger and bigger and bigger every year. And the reason that that's such a problem is it's really
00:19:37.780 the worst possible tax because it impacts the people the most who can afford it the least.
00:19:45.220 It's the middle class, the working poor, and the retirees who are living off of fixed income.
00:19:52.640 They end up paying the inflation tax the most. They have some savings. They have a pension.
00:20:00.360 They have an annuity, a cash value and insurance policies. All this stuff gets destroyed.
00:20:07.780 Wealthier people who tend to own assets and who have more good debt, right? Bad debt is consumer debt.
00:20:15.100 You go out and you borrow money and you spend it. You buy a consumer good. You buy a TV with your
00:20:20.320 credit card and that's bad debt. Or you take a vacation and you pay for it on a credit card.
00:20:24.880 But if you buy an asset, particularly an income-producing asset, a piece of property,
00:20:30.120 a business, a stock, if you borrow money and you buy an asset, and that asset is appreciating and
00:20:38.680 generating income, inflation is your friend. Inflation helps you out because it wipes out
00:20:44.740 the value of your debt and you still have the asset. So wealthy people, very wealthy people,
00:20:50.480 if they invest the right way, will benefit from inflation.
00:20:56.040 So inflation is particularly hard on non-entrepreneurial savers. So people who've put
00:21:03.260 away a certain store of value, maybe that's in a pension, who aren't invested in some active
00:21:09.200 enterprise that could be generating revenue, it just devastates them. And if it's 4% a year,
00:21:15.220 they lose what? What does that mean? They lose half the value of their investment in like
00:21:19.460 4% a year. It'd be something like 10 years.
00:21:23.040 Yeah. And unfortunately, it's going to be a lot higher than 4%.
00:21:28.820 Yeah. Let's talk about that for a second. So two questions about that that come along with what
00:21:35.700 you've already laid out. The first question is, how is the inflation rate calculated? That's
00:21:42.520 mysterious, right? Because it relies on the consumer price index.
00:21:45.940 That's another big part of the fraud. Because certainly in America, and I know a lot more about
00:21:51.480 the US CPI, let's say, than I do about CPIs in other countries. But my assumption is that the
00:21:58.040 politicians are being dishonest everywhere. Because the inflation rate, it's like a report card.
00:22:05.280 And if our kids were responsible for grading their own report cards, it wouldn't be as shocker if they
00:22:12.880 came home with all A's, right? So that this is the problem that we've hired the government to grade
00:22:18.960 its own success in the economy. Because high inflation would be bad. So the government,
00:22:28.860 again, when they're measuring inflation and they're looking at prices, they're looking at
00:22:33.400 an effect. They're not looking at the thing itself. But over the years, governments have changed
00:22:41.780 the methodology for measuring price increases. So the CPI that we use today is nothing like the one
00:22:50.640 that we used, say, in the 1970s. Yeah, that's exactly what I want to focus on. So the CPI,
00:22:56.800 for everyone listening, that's the Consumer Price Index. And it's, in principle, please correct me if
00:23:02.180 I've got any of this wrong. It's the average cost of something like a standard basket of goods.
00:23:08.880 That's what it used to be. But the question then is, which goods? Yeah, okay, so let's go into that.
00:23:13.540 It used to be there was, the basket didn't change. They picked a basket and they just measured the
00:23:20.440 same basket year after year. And so you could see the changes. Now the basket changes. The politicians
00:23:28.360 decide what to put in the basket and when to take out. And generally, they take out stuff that's gone up.
00:23:35.160 And they put in stuff that hasn't gone up as much. There's all this substitution. There's a lot of
00:23:41.180 other indexes that they use where they have hedonics or in a CPI, there's hedonics. And so what
00:23:47.000 hedonics is, is the statisticians who compute the CPI, they look at a product and they don't use the
00:23:55.540 actual price. They subjectively decide if they think that product got better. And if they think it got
00:24:02.740 better, they adjust the price down. Now, maybe it didn't get better. And a lot of times stuff gets
00:24:08.780 worse and they don't, they don't adjust for that. Like let's say they're looking at airline prices and
00:24:17.120 they just look at the ticket price and they say, wait a minute, but you're charged extra for luggage.
00:24:20.940 You're charged extra for a blanket. You're charged extra for food. Oh, you know, they just look at the
00:24:25.200 price. You know, a lot of quality has gone down and a lot of things that hasn't been captured.
00:24:30.160 And you know, I did this exercise. I did this a long time ago in 2013 and I made a YouTube video
00:24:36.040 about it, but I just did this for kicks. I looked at the CPI in 2013 and according to the CPI over the
00:24:46.140 prior 10 years, um, the, the price of newspapers and magazines had gone up about 30% according to the
00:24:55.560 CPI. In 2013 magazines and newspapers were 30% more expensive than they were in 2003.
00:25:02.340 Well, I decided to check because it's easy to do. You know, you could just go on the internet and you
00:25:07.400 could see a picture of those magazines because they put the price right on the cover. So I took
00:25:12.680 about 20, I took like 20 of the most circulated newspapers and magazines in the country. And I just
00:25:19.740 looked at what the price was in 2003. And then I took the exact same magazines and I looked at the
00:25:26.980 price on the cover and I just compared it over the 10 years. And what I found was that the actual
00:25:33.960 increase in price wasn't 30%. It was 130%. So the question is, where did that extra 100% go? Because,
00:25:42.580 you know, those are the prices. So obviously the CPI is rigged in such a way as to have a number.
00:25:52.620 It's not that people lie when they calculate, like they get a certain number and they say,
00:25:56.660 oh no, that's too high. The methodology that is used has been engineered to mask the real degree
00:26:05.960 to which prices are rising.
00:26:08.560 You also pointed to something else that's a fundamental flaw if your reasoning is correct,
00:26:13.740 which is that if inflation is best construed as ratio of money to goods, merely calculating
00:26:20.540 inflation as a consequence of price increase doesn't capture the essential element of the
00:26:25.180 inflation. So that's a huge problem too.
00:26:27.660 Because let's say prices should have gone down by 3% and instead they go up by 2%.
00:26:32.560 That's 5% inflation in that my cost of living is 5% higher than it would have been
00:26:39.520 had you not had the inflation. And again, if you think about inflation as a tax,
00:26:44.840 when the government taxes you legitimately, let's say through a sales tax or an income tax,
00:26:50.180 whatever, the government takes your money. Money that you had goes to the government and then the
00:26:54.600 government takes that money and gives it to somebody else, right? You lose your money.
00:26:57.520 But when they tax you through inflation, they don't take any of your money. You get to keep your money,
00:27:02.380 but they print new money and they give that money to somebody else. Now, when that somebody else
00:27:06.820 spends that money that he didn't earn, it drives up your prices. So now you pay more. So the government
00:27:13.000 didn't take your money. They took your purchasing power. So it's the same thing. And you know,
00:27:18.720 another thing on our CPI, how they changed is once upon a time back in the 70s, housing prices were in
00:27:27.360 the CPI and so were rents. And that's about a third of the CPI, which is shelter. But somewhere along the
00:27:35.300 way, they decided to use something called owner's equivalent rent instead of actual rent or actual
00:27:41.360 home prices. Now, what is owner's equivalent rent? Well, it's a fiction that they made up that nobody
00:27:46.640 actually pays. Apparently, the government calls people at random and asks them if they own their
00:27:55.620 home, how much do they think they could rent it for if they were to rent it? And they keep track of
00:28:01.020 those numbers. Now, I don't know, like, you know, who they're asking. I mean, I've owned homes for a long
00:28:06.720 time. I've never gotten a call from a government guy wanting to know what I think I could rent my house
00:28:11.240 for. But if you're not a landlord and you're not in the rental market, how the hell do you know what
00:28:15.800 you could rent your house for? It's such a ridiculous way to try to measure the cost of
00:28:20.700 shelter by using a number. Okay, so let me ask you a question about that because I've really been
00:28:26.800 curious about that because it's obvious the case in Canada in particular, like housing and rent prices
00:28:33.440 have skyrocketed in the last eight years. And that's not reflected in the inflation statistics. And that
00:28:39.940 seems to be a major oversight, at least according to one line of argumentation, because that's one third
00:28:45.640 of what people spend their money on. Now, you could argue, and this is where it gets complicated,
00:28:50.540 as far as I can tell, that if what you've bought is an asset that generates income and its value goes
00:29:00.600 up, that's actually not a cost to you. It's an advantage. You already made reference to that.
00:29:04.780 Well, only if you own the asset.
00:29:07.540 Yes, if you own it.
00:29:08.320 If you want to buy it and the price has gone up, it's a disadvantage, right? Because now
00:29:12.880 the assets that you want to buy are more costly.
00:29:16.480 Right. So does that imply that a proper CPI that would include the cost of shelter would be
00:29:23.880 calculated on the basis of those who want to buy rather than those who already own?
00:29:29.860 Yeah, because-
00:29:30.220 And I'm trying to figure out how to measure inflation properly here, right?
00:29:33.540 You're right.
00:29:33.720 Very complicated problem.
00:29:35.040 If you already own a home, then the cost of buying another one is not as important to you. Of course,
00:29:42.320 a lot of people that own homes, they may want to buy bigger homes as their families grow, and so it
00:29:46.880 would be. But for those people, what's important are your maintenance costs, your insurance costs,
00:29:56.180 your property taxes. There are a lot of other factors that would be significant to you. If you don't
00:30:02.940 own, if you're a renter, then obviously rent is of primary importance to you. You're paying rent.
00:30:09.300 There's all sorts of valid ways that the government could measure shelter as a component of the cost
00:30:15.140 of living. But in the United States, they don't choose any of those valid ways. They choose another
00:30:19.640 way. And they're doing that because they want the number to be lower. They don't want to report high
00:30:25.120 inflation. And they even do this as part of the GNP, because when they report GDP, they don't even do
00:30:32.180 GDP anymore. It's GDP now that they report, gross domestic product. In order to get the number,
00:30:38.060 they have to deflate it. There's a deflator which adjusts the GDP for prices. And the government
00:30:44.460 always underestimates that deflator so the GDP looks bigger than it really is. Because in many cases,
00:30:51.900 economies are actually contracting in real terms. But because the government is dishonest in the way
00:30:56.940 it reports, it reports economic growth, even though there is no real growth. It's inflation,
00:31:02.920 which creates the illusion of growth. That's another reason that politicians like inflation.
00:31:07.580 And of course, when inflation drives up the stock market and the real estate market,
00:31:11.540 people think they're richer, right? Because, oh, my house has gone way up, my stock. But it hasn't
00:31:16.220 gone up. Your money has gone down, right? But people don't necessarily connect those dots.
00:31:22.700 You know, they think they're wealthier. But also, if you think about, as I said earlier,
00:31:28.580 inflation benefits debtors. It's a transfer of wealth from creditors to debtors. Who are the biggest
00:31:34.920 debtors in the world? Governments. And the biggest, most highly indebted government is the United States
00:31:42.360 government. We have $32 trillion of funded debt, almost, and our unfunded liabilities,
00:31:48.300 commitments that have been made where they didn't borrow the money, but they're on the hook,
00:31:51.600 like guaranteed student loans or guaranteed pensions, Social Security, Medicare, all that
00:31:56.800 stuff. That's like $100 trillion. So when the government creates inflation, they repudiate
00:32:02.940 enormous amounts of their debt. And so the governments have massive incentives to create inflation,
00:32:09.500 but then they have massive incentives to lie about it and pretend it's not as bad as it is and blame
00:32:15.820 other people, which is the main reason that they redefined inflation from the expansion of the money
00:32:21.560 supply to rising prices. Because when you know inflation is an expansion of the money supply,
00:32:26.920 then you know who causes it. It's the government. You can't blame greedy corporations for it. You can't
00:32:33.480 blame Putin for it. Putin doesn't print our money. We do. The Federal Reserve does. And so when
00:32:39.440 politicians can redefine inflation, they can blame everybody but themselves.
00:32:44.160 Starting a business can be tough, but thanks to Shopify, running your online storefront is
00:32:50.380 easier than ever. Shopify is the global commerce platform that helps you sell at every stage of
00:32:55.420 your business. From the launch your online shop stage, all the way to the did we just hit a million
00:32:59.760 orders stage, Shopify is here to help you grow. Our marketing team uses Shopify every day to sell
00:33:05.500 our merchandise and we love how easy it is to add more items, ship products and track conversions.
00:33:10.400 With Shopify, customize your online store to your style with flexible templates and powerful tools
00:33:16.120 alongside an endless list of integrations and third-party apps like on-demand printing,
00:33:20.920 accounting and chatbots. Shopify helps you turn browsers into buyers with the internet's best
00:33:25.820 converting checkout, up to 36% better compared to other leading e-commerce platforms. No matter how
00:33:31.540 big you want to grow, Shopify gives you everything you need to take control and take your business to
00:33:36.080 the next level. Sign up for a $1 per month trial period at shopify.com slash jbp, all lowercase.
00:33:43.380 Go to shopify.com slash jbp now to grow your business no matter what stage you're in. That's
00:33:49.040 shopify.com slash jbp. Okay, so let me ask you a kind of a modified Ponzi scheme question because this
00:33:59.280 is something that's bedeviled me. So I understand that, so I have two questions. I understand that getting
00:34:05.140 the measurements of something as fundamental as inflation correct is absolutely necessary.
00:34:11.520 So one of the things I've wondered is like, why aren't there independent teams of economists
00:34:16.020 who generate various true estimates of inflation, make them public so that the public itself could
00:34:25.340 gather a basket of independent estimates and know for themselves what the inflation rate is.
00:34:30.800 Very curious about that. Well, they are. They are out there. I mean, there's a website shadow.
00:34:36.140 Who's reliable? Who's reliable? Yeah, you know, well, I think the least reliable would be the
00:34:41.780 government, right? Yeah, yeah. You don't want their statistics because they're completely biased,
00:34:47.120 right? You know, it's like, you know, the mafia is not going to give you accurate statistics on crime,
00:34:52.420 right? So you got to look to independent sources. But I think it's kind of obvious, though, if you
00:35:00.780 understand what inflation is and you see the enormity. I mean, the United States is running $2
00:35:05.320 trillion a year plus deficits now. And technically, we're not even in a recession. The deficits are
00:35:10.840 going to get even bigger when this next recession starts. But how are we financing those deficits?
00:35:17.420 It's inflation. There's just no other way. Look at the Federal Reserve's balance sheet. So we know that
00:35:23.320 inflation is going to be a significant threat. It's going to reduce the value of money. And so that has
00:35:33.260 to be the single most important factor in driving your decisions on savings, on investing.
00:35:43.120 You know, and even for, in this day and age, if you don't have a lot of money to invest,
00:35:50.440 you know, I've been saying this for years to people. I started talking about it several years
00:35:54.280 ago. People have to stock up on things. You know, buy things that you're going to use in a year or two,
00:36:00.800 buy it now. Because it's going to be a lot more expensive if you wait. Why hold on to the cash if the
00:36:07.280 cash is going to lose value? Just buy the things that you're actually going to need, because those things
00:36:12.920 will retain their value if you're planning on using them.
00:36:16.660 So here's the Ponzi scheme question. So because of the efficiencies of the capitalist system,
00:36:25.840 free market system, let's say, we are generally able to produce more for less. And in some instances,
00:36:33.780 we seem to be doing that faster and faster. So consumer electronics are a good example, and price of
00:36:39.660 computation and so forth. And so what that means is that independent of inflation, because of
00:36:46.080 technological progress, things will get cheaper in the future. The future will be richer than the
00:36:51.780 present. So then you might say, if you're a politician, you say, well, if that's the case,
00:36:56.280 and if that's invariably the case, then why not defer our debt to the future? Like essentially,
00:37:02.860 why not borrow from the future? Because the future is going to be wealthier than the present.
00:37:06.760 And then I wonder, if we had a 3% increment in actual productivity per year, then maybe we could
00:37:15.880 tolerate a 2% inflation rate, because fundamentally, the tendency for things to get cheaper because of
00:37:23.180 enhanced productivity would be balanced by that inflationary proclivity. So are the politicians,
00:37:28.580 could you make a case that the politicians are making a good bet because they're throwing the debt
00:37:33.680 into the future when we're going to be richer? No, well, they are making a politically opportunistic
00:37:40.620 decision. Yeah, fair enough. Because they're telling the voters, hey, don't worry about it.
00:37:45.420 Your grandkids will pay for it, right, or whatever. And of course, not all voters have kids, right? Some
00:37:51.320 voters, you know, don't have kids. And so what do they care if somebody else's grandchildren pay for
00:37:56.740 their program? But the only time you could justify borrowing from the future is if you are creating
00:38:06.840 something that future people will benefit from. Let's say a capital investment. Let's say the
00:38:13.500 government is going to build a bridge, and that bridge is going to be there for 100 years, right?
00:38:18.180 And people who aren't even born yet are going to benefit from that bridge. Okay, maybe they can
00:38:24.020 sell bonds to finance the construction of that bridge that future people will end up paying because
00:38:30.220 they're going to have the benefit of that bridge. So you can make an argument for debt to support
00:38:35.280 that. But if we're going to borrow money just to pay for welfare benefits or Social Security benefits,
00:38:41.120 where we're leaving our children and grandchildren with nothing but a bill, right? They don't have a bridge or
00:38:47.020 a capital asset. The money's been spent. I see. So your argument basically is that if you're
00:38:54.060 borrowing from the future isn't designed specifically to drive productivity, let's say,
00:39:02.380 then it's a degenerating bet. Yeah, I don't think it's borrowing from the future. I think it's
00:39:07.200 stealing from the future. You're trying to steal. Yeah, okay, fair enough, fair enough.
00:39:10.680 But, you know, a lot of this stuff is going to backfire because I think the current generation
00:39:16.240 is going to pay for a lot of this stuff because the dollar is going to collapse. You know, we could
00:39:22.520 have hyperinflation. And because future generations are not going to pay this. You know, they're going
00:39:28.820 to leave. You know, they'll leave the countries that because they're not going to want to be subjected
00:39:32.900 to the confiscatory tax rates when they can't get commensurate benefits from government.
00:39:38.660 They're going to leave. The currency is going to collapse in value. And we're already there. I mean,
00:39:46.480 we're already at that point because you're talking about this intergenerational Ponzi scheme.
00:39:51.220 That's really what Social Security is. I mean, it wasn't created that way in the 1930s when Roosevelt
00:39:56.640 first concocted this Social Security. And it was totally unconstitutional and unfortunate that we
00:40:03.520 haven't. But the idea was that it was like insurance. The government was going to take
00:40:08.040 the money and invest it. And then when everybody was older, you would get paid your benefits. And
00:40:13.240 they even called the taxes premiums. But the whole thing was a con because it never was insurance
00:40:18.440 because the government never invested the money. They spent the money. And now they gave themselves
00:40:23.500 an IOU. They created these things called trust funds. And so what would happen is the government
00:40:27.980 would collect the money from Social Security. Then they would take the Social Security money
00:40:31.640 and spend it on whatever, military or whatever they were doing. But then they would put an IOU in
00:40:36.980 the government trust fund in the form of a bond. And then they would say, oh, we have an asset in
00:40:41.460 this trust fund. We have a bond. That's not an asset. It's your own debt. It's like if I write
00:40:47.080 myself a check for a million dollars, I can't take that uncashed check and claim I've got a million
00:40:52.540 dollar asset. No, I mean, it's also a million dollar liability. So there never was any money in Social
00:40:58.500 Security. They spent it all there. The system is broke. And now they have to keep raising taxes
00:41:04.140 on the workers. But now they won't even raise taxes on the workers. So they just keep they create
00:41:10.520 inflation to pay for Social Security.
00:41:14.120 Okay, so let me let me offer another rosy scenario, sort of like the borrowing from the future
00:41:19.980 scenario. So I've been thinking about this issue of fiat currency and the fact that the currency
00:41:25.900 is unmoored. But we have a situation in the world now where every currency is unmoored,
00:41:33.440 right? And so you might say, no matter what form of money you use, you're making a bad bet. You're
00:41:42.120 relying on something unreliable. But if you're going to rely on something unreliable, you should rely on
00:41:48.720 the least unreliable currency, right? And so then you might say, well, the least unreliable currency
00:41:56.100 becomes by default, the standard and the US has managed that for 50 years, 60 years. And so why
00:42:04.620 isn't it the case? Because you said, for example, well, people who are subject to unfair tax because
00:42:11.020 of future deferral of debt will leave. But I could say, yeah, but there won't be anyone better to go.
00:42:18.820 No, there will be. And so the whole world doesn't, you know, there have those tax rates of a certain
00:42:26.160 country, you know, saddles its future generations with too big a debt burden. Those, you know,
00:42:35.460 they could leave and go to a country that doesn't have that demographic problem, that big of a debt
00:42:41.800 burden. And of course- Right. So you think there'll still be enough, even if everyone's on fiat currency
00:42:47.640 and if all the currencies are corrupt, you still think there'll be enough variability in corruption
00:42:52.240 so that people will vote with their feet like they are in the US moving from- Correct.
00:42:56.720 Democrat states to Republican states. And the idea that, you know, it's the, you have to settle for the
00:43:02.480 least bad currency. And again, currency isn't even really money. Money is a commodity. Gold was money.
00:43:09.680 Silver, you know, it would be money. Legitimate currency, which is backed by real money, is currency.
00:43:17.860 What we have now is fiat currency. And both fiat currency and legitimate currency are substitutes for
00:43:24.160 money. They're not actual money, but they substitute. And they can function as money, but they're not really
00:43:29.560 money in the real sense of how you define money as the most marketable commodity, which is what would
00:43:35.540 be money. But people have been saying, well, you know, the dollar is the cleanest shirt in the hamper.
00:43:42.180 And, but I think the dollar only appears clean because of its status as the reserve currency.
00:43:51.140 And I think that status is in jeopardy. And when it's lost, then the dollar is going to be the,
00:43:58.720 by far the dirtiest shirt in, in, in, in that hamper. So, so, so, okay. So two questions from that.
00:44:04.720 So first of all, maybe you could walk everybody through why the government is the biggest debtor,
00:44:11.000 because people aren't really clear, even for example, about the difference between the deficit
00:44:15.740 and the debt. And they don't know what the debt means to them in real terms, because it's always
00:44:20.700 expressed in these huge numbers, like 132 trillion. It's like, no one knows what that means.
00:44:25.880 But they could figure that out if they knew how much of that debt they were responsible for,
00:44:31.080 or their families. Yeah, so you've got, you've got two things. First of all, why is the government
00:44:34.580 the big debtor? Well, you've got the national debt, which is the accumulation of every year's budget
00:44:41.640 deficit. And then you've got the annual budget deficit, which adds to the total debt.
00:44:47.940 But when I'm talking about creditors versus debtors, nations can either be a creditor nation
00:44:54.140 or a debtor nation. A creditor nation is a nation in which the world owes it money, more money than it
00:45:00.820 owes the world. A debtor nation owes the world more than it's owed. So prior to the U.S. going off the gold
00:45:07.980 standard in 1971, and in fact, all the way up to probably the early 1980s, the United States was
00:45:15.180 the world's biggest creditor nation. We generated tremendous amounts of wealth under a freer economy
00:45:24.060 than the one we have today, and one that was governed by the disciplines of a gold standard. So
00:45:28.300 we became the world's wealthiest creditor nation. Today, after 50 years of fiat money, America is not
00:45:36.780 only the world's biggest debtor nation. America owes more money than all the other debtor nations of the world
00:45:44.100 combined, right? That's how much our financial position has eroded. Now, when the dollar became the reserve
00:45:53.320 currency, it became the reserve currency because of America's financial and industrial might. We were the world's
00:46:01.200 biggest creditor nation. We also had huge trade surpluses. Now we have massive trade deficits. I
00:46:07.980 mean, over a trillion dollars a year. But when the dollar became the reserve currency, we made everything.
00:46:13.680 You know, all the consumer electronics that are now made in Japan or Korea or China, all that stuff was
00:46:19.600 made in America. I mean, if you wanted anything, we made it in this country, in America. And so since
00:46:25.960 everybody wanted American products, everybody needed American dollars to buy them, and the American dollar was as
00:46:32.740 good as gold. Because if you had dollars, you had gold. If you had $35, you could get an ounce of gold from the
00:46:38.800 government. It was convertible. And so under those conditions, the U.S. dollar became the reserve currency. But
00:46:45.140 today, the dollar would never be the reserve currency today if it wasn't already there, right? Nobody would pick the
00:46:52.620 dollar given our financial position, our trade imbalances. But, you know, it's been the reserve
00:46:58.500 currency because, you know, for the tradition of the fact that it's been. But in order for the world to
00:47:06.620 maintain this status, it's very expensive for the world. It's a huge benefit for America. I said we have
00:47:14.800 a trillion dollar a year trade deficit. That means the world has to supply America with a million dollars
00:47:21.480 worth of merchandise for which it doesn't get paid, right? It doesn't get products. You know, most
00:47:28.120 countries, in order to import, have to export. You have to export something in order to pay for your
00:47:35.200 imports. Well, we don't have to export anything. We just print money and export that. Well, that costs
00:47:39.600 nothing. But the rest of the world has to produce real stuff and use resources, land, labor, and capital
00:47:45.320 to produce products. So Americans get to live beyond their means because of the dollar status.
00:47:51.460 But the rest of the world collectively lives beneath its means. And of course, it's not
00:47:57.440 consistent because some countries have to live even further below their means, depending on how big a
00:48:04.520 trade surplus they have with the United States. That's how much they're subsidizing the U.S. economy.
00:48:10.860 So a lot of the emerging markets bear an even bigger burden of preserving the dollar status.
00:48:19.980 And so I think the world is starting to move away from the dollar, not only because of the economic cost
00:48:26.360 of maintaining it, but now we have raised the political risks. If you look at what the Biden
00:48:35.240 administration did with Russia, the unprecedented sanctions on Russia, this has really highlighted
00:48:46.260 the tremendous risk that every sovereign nation assumes by being beholden to the dollar,
00:48:54.620 because it puts tremendous power in the hands of the United States. It's like putting a noose around
00:48:59.600 your neck and then throwing it over a tree to America, who's holding the other end. Then you're
00:49:04.960 hoping that they don't pull. I mean, nobody wants to really be in that position, especially if you're
00:49:09.760 a country like China, where we've kind of made China our enemy. But in reality, China provides
00:49:16.280 America with the largest annual subsidy. They're our biggest trade deficit is with China. So they
00:49:23.960 supply us with more merchandise than anybody else. And they're our largest creditor. Now, some people
00:49:28.920 say it's Japan, but no, it's actually China because you have to take Hong Kong because Hong Kong is part
00:49:35.140 of China. So if you take all the treasuries that Hong Kong owns and the treasuries that China owns,
00:49:39.880 that's more than Japan. So they're our biggest banker. They supply us with credit. They supply us
00:49:44.980 with merchandise, right? That's all going to end, right? China is going to wean itself of that.
00:49:50.900 Okay. So let's go after that. So you said, and let me see if I got the reasons right. You said,
00:49:57.120 well, the American dollar could stand as the fundamental currency because it had come off
00:50:04.620 the gold standard, but had still benefited from that. It was extraordinarily productive. It ran huge
00:50:09.240 trade surpluses. It was a dynamic, expanding, rich country with a very stable currency. So it could
00:50:15.820 run on that for a long time. And you said, however, now, if people looked at the American
00:50:21.400 economic situation, the American dollar, without that historical context, there's no way the US
00:50:27.780 dollar would be the reserve currency. But then we're back to the dirty shirt in the hamper problem.
00:50:32.420 And I know the Russians and the Chinese and the Brazilians, et cetera, are wrestling with that.
00:50:38.040 They're trying to move people away to some degree from the dollar as a reserve currency. But
00:50:42.920 nobody in their right mind is going to trust the Chinese currency. So where do people go if it's
00:50:50.000 not the American dollar that's going to be the standard for all the reasons you laid out? Well,
00:50:54.880 you know, the euro doesn't look better, really. And certainly, you have to be insane to use Chinese
00:51:01.180 currency, I think. See, that is the false choice that everybody thinks we have to make. One of the
00:51:06.660 reasons that people are so arrogant, particularly in America, that the dollar status is not in
00:51:13.800 jeopardy. And so that we can keep on running these huge deficits, we can keep on creating inflation,
00:51:19.600 and the world's got no choice, right? But to stick with the dollar, because are they going to go to
00:51:24.920 the euro? Are they going to go to the yen? You know, the pound? I mean, the renminbi. I agree.
00:51:29.740 All of those currencies also have problems. And so do you really want to switch from one
00:51:37.520 flawed fiat currency to another, even if those other fiat currencies may be less flawed than the
00:51:42.800 dollar, right? Do you really want to make that shift? I don't think that that's what's going to
00:51:47.680 happen. What everybody is missing is that there is an alternative to the dollar that doesn't involve
00:51:54.360 another fiat currency. And that's gold. That is real money. Everybody forgets that for thousands
00:52:01.020 of years, gold was money. It was money because it worked. Now, over the course of time, we had paper
00:52:09.120 currencies that would rise and fall. I mean, hundreds of years ago, they were paper currencies that are now
00:52:13.980 worthless, and you don't even know their names. You know, they come and go. But gold has stayed.
00:52:20.020 You know, gold works as money. And so I think what these central banks are going to do
00:52:25.660 is as they get out of dollars, they will just increase their holdings of gold. Gold will be
00:52:31.820 the monetary anchor. Gold will be the reserve monetary asset, just the way it was before the
00:52:37.860 dollar. It wasn't the British pound. I mean, the British pound was a dominant currency, but gold was
00:52:43.000 what everybody owned. The British backed the pound. Do you see any evidence that some of these
00:52:48.840 alternate currencies are starting to back their currency claims with gold? Oh, yeah.
00:52:54.680 What's happening on the- Central banks are now buying more gold than they've bought in decades,
00:53:02.560 especially a lot of the emerging market countries. Not even maybe so much the United States isn't buying
00:53:09.560 any gold, and maybe some of the more mature countries, but a lot of other countries that had
00:53:16.720 predominantly held dollars and then to a lower degree, euros or yen or pounds, these countries
00:53:24.240 are increasingly buying gold. That's why gold is at a record high. I mean, gold's around $2,000 an ounce,
00:53:31.160 but in terms of just about every other currency on the planet, gold has been hitting all-time record
00:53:37.200 highs. And again, that's not really gold going up. That's all these fiat currencies going down.
00:53:42.880 But one of the reasons that countries would want gold as opposed to the dollar is the U.S. government
00:53:50.080 doesn't have any control over it. Gold is an asset that's not also somebody else's liability,
00:53:55.680 and nobody could create it. You have to mine it. No one country has the advantage. So why would you
00:54:02.060 want to take away that privilege that the United States has and just bestow it on somebody else who is
00:54:09.480 going to abuse it the same way? I mean, the United States abused that privilege that we had, and we
00:54:14.840 exported all this inflation to the world. We took advantage of the position that we were in.
00:54:21.620 So why would you want to put another nation in a position to similarly take advantage of the world?
00:54:27.600 It's much better to go back to honest money. And again, even when we were on Bretton Woods before,
00:54:34.720 you know, 1971, and we were on the dollar standard, it was because the dollar was backed by gold. Again,
00:54:41.020 if you held dollars, you held gold. That's where the saying came from, the dollar is as good as gold.
00:54:47.400 In fact, the legal definition of a dollar is a weight of gold. That's what a dollar is. Dollars are gold.
00:54:54.760 The paper currency that circulated Federal Reserve notes are not dollars. They are notes of the Federal
00:55:01.620 Reserve. Initially, those Federal Reserve notes were payable in dollars. The dollars were the gold that
00:55:08.860 the Federal Reserve notes paid. Because if you think about what a note is, a note is a promise to pay
00:55:13.800 something. A Federal Reserve note is supposed to pay something. Well, what did it pay? It paid gold. It paid
00:55:20.020 dollars. Today, Federal Reserve notes pay nothing. Their IOUs, nothing. The Federal Reserve is not obligated to
00:55:26.320 give you anything. I mean, if you have a $10 bill. Okay, so people might object, and they have,
00:55:33.140 that, well, gold is just another arbitrary standard of value. It has some intrinsic worth.
00:55:39.400 It's useful for jewelry. It's useful for certain industrial applications. But it's just another
00:55:45.820 psychologically valuable currency without any intrinsic value. And so it shouldn't be a repository
00:55:53.180 of value in principle that's any more stable than, let's say, a well-managed or even a badly managed
00:55:59.280 fiat currency. And so why is it that gold has proved itself, let's say, over centuries or millennia
00:56:08.320 as a storehouse of value? What is it about gold intrinsically, let's say, that seems to have given
00:56:14.640 at that edge. The idea that gold doesn't have any intrinsic value is just pure nonsense. It's obviously
00:56:23.140 politicians have a vested interest in trying to diminish gold as a monetary alternative to the fiat
00:56:30.940 system. And even now, you have a lot of cryptocurrency enthusiasts who say the same thing. Well, you know,
00:56:36.820 gold has no value because they want to justify something like Bitcoin, which also has no value, and say, well,
00:56:42.080 gold worked as money and it has no value, so Bitcoin could work. Well, it's not true that gold has no
00:56:48.080 value. Gold is the most valuable, the most useful metal on the periodic table. Gold became money because
00:56:58.360 it was such a valuable commodity. But gold has a lot of properties that make it uniquely qualified to be
00:57:06.900 money more so than other commodities. That's why gold was so successful over the centuries as money because
00:57:15.900 people preferred to use it as money. It wasn't governments that decided gold is going to be money. The people
00:57:22.920 decided that gold was going to be money. And once the people decided that gold was going to be money, if you were a
00:57:28.820 king, you know, well, you would tax people in gold because if you wanted to pay your soldiers to protect you,
00:57:33.900 your soldiers wanted gold, right? So it was the money created in a free market and it beat out
00:57:40.780 all other forms of money because gold, you know, a gold coin, they're all the same. You can melt gold
00:57:47.920 down and you can make it into coins. It's fungible, it's portable, it's divisible. But the other aspect of
00:57:55.160 gold, that is the key. You can save gold because if I have an ounce of gold in a hundred years, in a thousand
00:58:02.700 years, it's exactly the same. It doesn't lose any of its properties. And in fact, even if I take my
00:58:08.160 gold and I make, you know, I make a ring out of it, or I use it to make a watch, right? You can melt
00:58:15.120 this ring down and you get your gold back and it's exactly the way it was. You could do something else
00:58:20.200 with it. There's really no other metal. You can keep using it over and over and over again. I mean,
00:58:25.660 they fill teeth with gold. If you find somebody buried in the ground, you know, you could take their
00:58:30.060 fillings and, you know, the gold's still there. You know, ships from the 1400s, 1500s, they sink.
00:58:37.900 If they recover the wreckage, the only thing that's still there is the gold. And it looks exactly the
00:58:43.220 way it looked when the ship sank 500 years ago. So from a point of savings, because money has to
00:58:50.340 satisfy three primary conditions. Two of them are a unit of account and a unit of exchange.
00:58:56.320 But the third one is a store of value. And that's important because it's also makes it possible to
00:59:04.040 do loans, that I can borrow money, you can lend money, and you can be repaid. And you know that
00:59:09.240 the money that you're going to get repaid is going to retain its value. And so that's something that
00:59:14.620 gold does better than other metals. But the value of gold, even if I'm not using my gold today as a
00:59:23.880 metal, let's say I have gold stored in a safe and say, well, you know, you're not using it for
00:59:27.500 anything. That's true. But I'm preserving the future use of that gold. Somebody in the future
00:59:34.060 is going to need that gold. And so I'm storing it right now. Because, you know, there are more uses
00:59:39.760 for gold that are discovered all the time because of its very unique properties. I'm sure in 100 years
00:59:46.240 or 1,000 years, there will be more uses for gold than there are now.
00:59:50.340 What is the future of energy? Find out on Energize, a new podcast brought to you by GZERO Media's
00:59:56.660 Blue Circle Studio and presented by Enbridge. I'll be bringing you a series alongside Enbridge CEO,
01:00:02.820 Greg Ebel. Listen wherever you get your podcasts.
01:00:05.140 Okay, so let me push you on the crypto front for a second. So, you know, I've been contemplating
01:00:15.160 permanent storehouses of value, concerned about such phenomenon that we've been discussing as
01:00:22.420 inflation and potentially hyperinflation, which is far from rare, even among developed countries.
01:00:27.180 I think you have a 1% chance if you live in a developed country of hyperinflation incident at
01:00:35.560 some point in your life. It's something like that. But anyways, the cryptocurrency people, and I think
01:00:40.520 the Bitcoin people have made this case the best, is that they've managed to duplicate gold in its
01:00:46.720 important elements in that they've produced a storehouse of value that can't be corrupted because
01:00:51.980 it's blockchained and distributed. And that's a nice argument. That also gets more scarce
01:00:57.000 with time, which was quite the brilliant technological innovation that requires work to obtain. And so
01:01:07.120 that's the Bitcoin mining, but that is also easily distributable digitally. And so it's out of the
01:01:13.700 hands of governments. It's an uncorruptible store of value. It's widely distributed and it's easily
01:01:19.880 moved. And so, you know, that's not, that accounts for a fair number of the properties that you described
01:01:26.460 a monetary unit had to possess. So what do you think of crypto in general, but more specifically
01:01:35.780 about Bitcoin, because I think it's king of the cryptos. And do you think there's a case to be made
01:01:41.900 that gold has an advantage that crypto cannot duplicate? And then we might ask, well, what if
01:01:46.820 you had a gold-backed crypto? Because maybe then you could have the best of both worlds. So what are
01:01:52.660 your thoughts about the, I mean, Bitcoin's done pretty well for a currency that doesn't exist,
01:01:57.140 you know, that's not government mandated, et cetera. It's stored its value. There's a lot of
01:02:02.680 variability. Well, first of all, Bitcoin isn't a store of value because you can't store something
01:02:09.100 that you don't have, right? First, you have to have the value. So as I said, gold's value is its use
01:02:14.820 as a metal, right? That's what you're storing is the future use of gold and metal, whether you're going to
01:02:19.700 use it in jewelry or as a conductor in electronics or in medicine, whatever it is, you're storing
01:02:25.240 that. Bitcoin only has a price, doesn't have value. Price is something that you pay, right? Value is
01:02:33.120 something that you get. When you buy Bitcoin, you pay a price, but you get no real value.
01:02:37.760 And now I agree, the price of Bitcoin has gone way up from when it was first started, where, you know,
01:02:43.000 you could get multiple Bitcoins for a fraction of a penny or a dollar or whatever. They started next to
01:02:48.900 nothing. And at one point, people were paying almost $70,000 for Bitcoin. Currently, it's around
01:02:56.720 $27,000 as we're recording this. So depending on when you bought, you potentially made a lot of money
01:03:03.600 if you sold. If you bought during the mania hysteria of 2021, you know, you've lost a lot of your money
01:03:11.020 if you get out. But looking at Bitcoin, look, Bitcoin did an excellent job of replicating
01:03:18.740 the qualities that gold has that made it better money than, you know, cattle, you know, or salt or,
01:03:28.360 you know, other commodities that have been money, right? Gold did, has certain properties and Bitcoin,
01:03:33.720 you know, captured those properties. But the most important property at all, of all, is gold's
01:03:41.560 metallic properties, gold as a commodity. Bitcoin has none of that. And so Bitcoin, just like a fiat
01:03:51.360 currency, what gives a fiat currency its value? Just confidence. People just believe that it has
01:03:57.440 value. They believe that people will accept it. Now, part of that belief is driven by governments,
01:04:02.740 which declare it legal tender and which require it for payment of taxes. And so there is some real
01:04:08.560 demand for dollars if you live in America. There's a demand for euros if you're in Europe because you
01:04:13.580 have to pay taxes. And if you don't pay taxes, they could put you in jail. And so in order to avoid
01:04:18.380 jail, you need the currency that the government demands. But Bitcoin is similar to fiat in that all
01:04:27.740 of its value comes from faith and confidence. People just believe that people in the future will want
01:04:32.940 it and they'll pay a higher price for it. Except there is no legal currency status. There is no
01:04:39.580 government really, maybe other than El Salvador. I don't know what's going on over there. But there's
01:04:43.620 no government that is accepting tax payments in Bitcoin. So there's no natural demand other than
01:04:51.140 the speculative demand from people who think they're going to get rich. I mean, people who buy Bitcoin
01:04:56.000 are buying it because they expect the price to go up. And the people who buy it from them thinks
01:05:01.200 the price is going to go up. So it's this greater fool theory that the price is going to go up and
01:05:06.100 that's what's driving people to buy it. It's very cumbersome if you want to use it as a medium of
01:05:12.520 exchange or a unit of account. It's too volatile to be a unit of account. It's too expensive to be a
01:05:17.240 medium of exchange and it can't be a store of value. So it's not gold. It's digital fool's gold.
01:05:24.360 But you hit the nail on the head when you talked about a crypto that's actually backed by gold.
01:05:32.260 That works. That solves all the problems that Bitcoiners claim gold has. Well, you know,
01:05:40.480 I can't send my gold around the world. I can't use my gold to buy a cup of coffee. Well, yes,
01:05:45.640 you can. It's a lot better than Bitcoin. If I have gold stored with any third party,
01:05:51.800 it could be a government, it could be a private company, it could be anybody. You could tokenize
01:05:56.780 that gold and have a Bitcoin, similar cryptocurrency, that is a digital representation of that actual
01:06:06.000 gold. It's like a warehouse receipt, an IOU for gold. And then if I wanted to give you some of my
01:06:12.660 gold, I wouldn't have to ship you my bar. I could just send you my tokens, you know, over the internet.
01:06:19.300 And now the ownership goes from me to you. You know, it's an improvement on paper money. Because
01:06:27.060 again, initially, paper money came as a substitute for gold. I had my gold stored with a blacksmith.
01:06:33.960 And instead of lugging my gold around, my blacksmith gave me an IOU. And then I could
01:06:38.800 circulate that IOU because everybody knows the gold is there. And instead of having to get it,
01:06:43.740 they just circulate the IOU in a paper terms. Well, it's much more efficient to do it crypto
01:06:51.820 digitally. And you can take an ounce of gold or a gram of gold and divide it, you know, to tiny
01:06:58.300 little pieces so that I could buy a cup of coffee and pay the barista with my gold using the token.
01:07:06.380 And it would be faster and cheaper than Bitcoin. And the difference is when I'm paying with gold,
01:07:12.360 I'm paying with something real. I'm getting one commodity for another. I'm getting coffee and
01:07:17.300 the guy that sold me coffee is getting gold. And you can actually denominate the price in gold
01:07:23.500 because gold is stable. I mean, it can function much better as a monetary instrument. The only thing
01:07:29.360 that you have, you have to trust, you have to trust the third party. But I mean, capitalism is all about
01:07:35.320 trusting third parties. I mean, private third parties, we, we buy an insurance policy. People
01:07:40.520 buy life insurance, fire insurance, health insurance. It's all a third party that's selling
01:07:45.000 you that policy. The policy is only as good as the third party's ability to, to pay, you know, how do
01:07:51.320 you, you know, we have rating agencies, we have capitalism, we have competition for reputation.
01:07:56.280 There is no reason that you can't have third parties to store your gold. And then you could
01:08:02.860 use it. You don't have to store all of your gold that way. You can keep a lot of your gold yourself,
01:08:06.740 but the gold that you want to use as a media of exchange, you can use that digitally. And that
01:08:13.860 works much better than Bitcoin. You have real value. You have real. Well, I've talked, I've talked to
01:08:19.460 people who have attempted to produce gold backed cryptocurrencies, and they've run into, from my
01:08:27.200 understanding, a variety of legal impediments on that front. Do you know of anybody who's doing that
01:08:32.480 successfully? And if so, why aren't they prime competitors, let's say in the international market
01:08:39.900 for Bitcoin? I mean, the argument you laid out seems to make sense. And so you'd think, well, you'd think
01:08:44.720 two things, you'd think, given that governments are rushing to digital currencies, and that some
01:08:51.340 governments would like to displace the US dollar as the reserve currency, that the logical thing to do
01:08:57.620 for some enterprising country would be to produce a digital currency that was gold backed. And so what's
01:09:04.500 happening on that front? Okay, so there's two things. First of all, the demand that is mainly coming
01:09:13.060 in cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin, is to get rich, right? People want to buy Bitcoin because
01:09:21.180 they think it's going to go to the moon. And so that's really the demand for cryptocurrencies.
01:09:27.940 It's not to have an alternative as a medium of exchange and as a unit of account. Most people that
01:09:35.740 are buying Bitcoin, they still use dollars or euros or pounds in their transactions. They just hoard their
01:09:42.040 Bitcoin because they think they're going to get rich. And so there's no real demand yet for a
01:09:50.660 cryptocurrency that's backed by gold to be used as a medium of exchange. People are still content to
01:09:56.980 use their fiat currencies for that role. But I think that once this crypto bubble really pops
01:10:05.840 and the losses, you know, stack up and people get burned and they're no longer interested in these
01:10:14.680 get rich quick schemes. And they really start to focus on an alternative, not to get rich, but to
01:10:23.680 preserve what they have, right? Because that's what gold is, right? Physical gold is not about getting
01:10:28.920 rich. It's about avoiding becoming poor. It's about avoiding the inflation tax. And so I think as the
01:10:36.080 inflation rates get worse throughout, you know, the world, there will be more of a demand for an
01:10:45.080 alternative medium of exchange to these fiat currencies that can also store value.
01:10:50.500 Well, you said, you said some of that is happening already. You said that many countries around the
01:10:55.320 world, the central banks are buying gold. The central banks, right. It seems to be a, right,
01:11:01.420 right. So, and many of those central banks are also starting to experiment with the idea of an
01:11:06.640 imposed digital currency. Well, there, there's flirting on the margins. But what they're talking
01:11:11.540 about is a digital fiat currency that just gives them more control. Yes, I know. They just want,
01:11:16.880 and if they want to eliminate cash, it's just inherently a very oppressive monetary system that
01:11:23.500 concentrates even more power in government and diminishes individual liberty and makes it easier
01:11:29.600 for governments to become more tyrannical. So that's a whole different topic. But staying on
01:11:34.980 a gold-backed crypto. So one reason is that there's not a lot of demand for it yet.
01:11:40.460 The other problem, though, is that to the extent that there is some demand, there is such a huge
01:11:47.700 regulatory impediment. And I think it's deliberate on the part of governments. Governments
01:11:53.380 don't want to have to compete with gold. And so the barrier that a lot of companies face,
01:12:01.240 because it's very easy to tokenize gold. This is not a hard process. It's the regulatory environment.
01:12:07.960 It's the money laundering laws, you know, that are there, that make it very expensive to get into this
01:12:17.920 business. Because you have to comply with all these rules and regulations. And also you have
01:12:25.820 the potential for governments to declare these tokens securities, which they're not. But some
01:12:32.460 government can say, no, it's a security. And now it's got to be registered. And you've got to comply
01:12:37.100 with all these other rules and regulations. So government makes it very expensive to compete
01:12:43.040 with their fiat currencies. So what has to happen is the advantage of a gold-backed crypto has to be
01:12:51.600 so large that it could absorb those costs. And that's going to happen because the inflation is
01:12:57.620 going to be so high. But also, you're going to have sovereign nations potentially coming out
01:13:03.520 with gold-backed cryptos. In the United States, you may have state governments coming out with their own
01:13:08.820 official gold-backed cryptos. I mean, all of this is going to happen. The market is going to find
01:13:17.700 solutions to this problem. You know, whenever the government, you know, has some type of service
01:13:23.600 that it provides, and of course, all government services are going to be flawed. You know, we talked
01:13:28.200 about how capitalism lowers prices. Governments raise prices. Whenever you look at an industry
01:13:33.720 that's heavily regulated, education, right? Prices go up all the time because the government is so
01:13:40.680 involved. That's why it keeps getting more expensive. And the quality goes down. The quality
01:13:45.540 of education. I mean, a high school degree, you know, 50 years ago is way more valuable than a college
01:13:51.680 degree today, even a master's degree. So governments have destroyed- Especially a master's degree.
01:13:56.660 Yeah. The governments have destroyed the value of degrees while dramatically increasing the price to
01:14:03.340 get one. So government drives quality down and price up. The free market does the reverse. It drives
01:14:10.200 quality up and price down. Government, let's say the post office, right? Post office was a problem. And so
01:14:19.500 then FedEx came along, right? And okay, we can avoid the post office. Or more recently,
01:14:24.400 governments create monopolies in taxi cabs. Well, Uber comes along, Lyft comes along and creates some
01:14:34.220 competition to these government monopolies. So the same thing is going to happen with money.
01:14:40.080 Government money is so bad and it's going to get worse that the market is going to offer alternatives.
01:14:48.440 And yes, the government is going to try to put up roadblocks to protect its monopoly.
01:14:53.540 But ultimately, it won't work. And, you know, the people will find ways around it.
01:15:01.260 Okay. Okay. So, well, let's turn on the recommendation front now. So, and we can talk a
01:15:06.260 little bit about your particular business as well. So I would say that one of the threads running
01:15:11.780 through our conversation is, well, first of all, you're cautioning people against the immense danger,
01:15:17.720 not only of inflation, but of potential hyperinflation. And you're making the case that
01:15:22.900 fiat currencies, including the American dollar, are intrinsically weak and getting weaker for a
01:15:28.760 variety of reasons. And that's true systemically, not only in the US, and that that's going to
01:15:35.780 inevitably increase inflationary pressure. Now, we've seen a fair bit of that in the last two years,
01:15:41.440 let's say. And it's certainly, I think, evident to anyone who's thinking that the actual inflation
01:15:46.300 rate is much higher than the pronounced inflation rate. Okay. So now, hypothetically, people are going
01:15:52.200 to want to know how to protect themselves against inflation if they're trying to store wealth in the
01:15:57.320 long run, trying to maintain their savings at minimum, let's say. And you make a strong case that
01:16:04.560 gold is the proper medium in which to invest savings that you wish to maintain. Now, you
01:16:12.680 broker gold purchasing services. We can walk through that a little bit. And so someone could say, well,
01:16:18.460 you know, you have an iron in the fire. You have a stake in the outcome here. It's not surprising that
01:16:22.360 you're putting forward the pro-gold vision. But I presume the reason you're doing that is because
01:16:27.080 you actually believe it and are invested that way yourself. So what would you recommend to people who
01:16:32.500 are listening, and these would be people of a moderate income, let's say, or perhaps on the lower
01:16:38.280 side, what would you recommend to them to be doing in order to protect themselves against the threat of
01:16:45.720 inflation as the future rolls forward? Yeah. Well, first of all, absolutely right. I don't promote
01:16:51.360 gold because I have a bunch of gold I'm looking to unload. I mean, I went into that business because I
01:16:56.980 believe that people need to own it. I mean, in fact, I started shift gold. I was, I owned a broker
01:17:05.000 dealer and a lot of my customers wanted gold because I promoted gold. I talked about it, but I
01:17:11.280 didn't, I didn't sell it at the time. I was just, you know, I was stockbroker and I was helping people
01:17:16.160 with their stock portfolios, but I also recommended that they go and buy some gold and they would go and
01:17:21.560 buy it from other companies. But what was happening is people were getting ripped off. A lot of these
01:17:26.680 gold merchants were overpricing their products. They were, you know, pushing them into numismatics
01:17:32.920 or these collectibles. And I didn't like what was going on. And so in order to make sure that my
01:17:38.460 customers didn't get ripped off, I started my own business so that they could buy gold from me and
01:17:44.320 I could make sure that they weren't pushed into these other products and that they bought bullion and
01:17:49.600 they paid a low price for it. So that's how I got into the business because I believed in it.
01:17:55.040 Now, I don't look at gold though as an investment. I look at gold as money. So to the extent that you
01:18:01.680 want to keep liquidity, you don't want to make an investment, right? You don't want to buy real
01:18:07.540 estate. You don't want to buy stocks. You don't want to buy bonds. You just want to keep some cash.
01:18:12.800 That's where I see gold as a place in the portfolio, right? And not the cash that you might need. I mean,
01:18:19.180 at least now, I mean, when we're starting to use gold back crypto, then you could keep everything
01:18:24.940 in gold. But for now, you want to pay your rent. Your landlord isn't taking gold yet. I mean,
01:18:29.820 he probably will in the future, but right now he wants, you know, dollars or euros. So you got to
01:18:34.700 keep some cash to pay your bills. But if you're talking about cash that you're going to hold onto
01:18:40.100 that you might use in a few years, maybe to make an investment, maybe you think real estate's going to
01:18:46.220 go down. Maybe you think stocks are going to go down. And so you want to have some dry powder to
01:18:51.300 buy. That's where you want to keep gold instead of currency, because currency could lose so much
01:18:56.820 value that, you know, stocks can go down in value, but still go up in price. You know, so let's say
01:19:03.460 stocks could go down 10 or 20% in terms of gold, but they can go up in terms of dollars or euros.
01:19:11.580 So it's better to hold your dry powder in honest money. And especially now, because if you look
01:19:17.880 around the world, interest rates in almost every country are still below the official inflation
01:19:23.240 rates, which means rates are negative. And of course, the real inflation rates are much higher
01:19:28.080 than the official rates. So you're losing a lot in cash. Maybe 10, 20 years ago, that wasn't the case.
01:19:35.140 You could get an interest rate that exceeded the rate of inflation. And so you were paid for the loss of,
01:19:41.200 uh, purchasing power. And people would say, Hey, you don't want to own gold because you're giving up
01:19:45.980 that interest. Well, now there is no interest. There's negative interest. Gold actually lets you
01:19:50.960 avoid that negative interest because negative interest is a loss that's imposed on you by
01:19:56.660 holding a currency. So you avoid that loss by owning gold. So gold, uh, is a substitute for money,
01:20:02.720 but you want to make investments. You don't want to just leave all your money in gold. Gold is a metal.
01:20:09.180 It's not doing anything. It's not producing anything. Uh, you're going to do better over
01:20:13.900 time, investing in productive assets. And that's what I do. Right. If you can identify them.
01:20:21.120 Yes. And if you don't overpay for them, I mean, that's a mistake that a lot of people make.
01:20:25.080 They look at a company that has a good product and they think, Oh, let me buy that stock. Well,
01:20:31.960 the stock could be way overpriced. So it's not just buying a good company. It's paying the right price.
01:20:38.640 Right. Because that's, what's going to determine your long-term return. If you overpay for an
01:20:45.120 asset, you're probably going to lose money eventually. Now you can, how would you, how do
01:20:49.100 you view, how do you view, let's say the relative importance of something like a good. So there are
01:20:54.980 these funds, which I'll just outline this for people who are listening that allow you to purchase
01:20:59.320 a basket of stocks essentially. And often those stocks are weighted to the index is used to assess
01:21:08.020 stock market performance. And so you can buy shares in a mutual fund, in a fund, let's say,
01:21:15.260 that owns a basket of stocks, a large basket of stocks. And so then you average your risk across
01:21:21.540 many companies and you benefit in principle from the average increase in productivity across that
01:21:27.180 basket of stellar companies. And so those, those index portfolios have proved to be a pretty good
01:21:34.360 alternative to actively managed money. And how do you see investing in gold in relationship to
01:21:40.300 something like investing in an index fund? Well, I mean, they're very different. So first of all,
01:21:46.560 the, the, the idea of just indexing and just say, look, I'm just going to buy the market. I'm going to
01:21:51.720 buy all these stocks, you know, in certain periods of time, that could work out, right? Because if a lot
01:21:58.640 of money is flowing into those indexes, it's going to push up the price of the stocks that are included
01:22:03.380 in those indexes. But right now, because so many people have indexed, the stocks in those indexes,
01:22:11.840 by and large are overpriced. And if you buy, if you overpay for an asset, as I said, you're going to
01:22:18.500 lose eventually. Now you can overpay for an asset and you can make money if you can sell it to somebody
01:22:23.480 who overpays by an even greater amount. And so you could trade overpriced assets if you're nimble
01:22:29.300 and make money. But if you're a long-term investor, the way to make money is to buy something cheap,
01:22:35.180 buy it when it's undervalued, especially if it pays a good dividend, because now you can collect
01:22:39.780 your dividends while you're waiting for the asset that you bought cheap to become expensive. And I
01:22:46.080 don't like passive investing. You know, what I do for my clients and what I do personally is I actively
01:22:52.140 invest. And over the long run, that is much better than indexing. Over certain periods of time,
01:23:01.280 indexing can do better. And then it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy because the money gets
01:23:08.900 sucked in chasing the performance. How do you know that your active investing is allowing you to
01:23:16.560 accurately identify stocks that are properly or underpriced? I mean, that's the million-dollar
01:23:22.080 question. Well, there are some basic truths to assessing value of a business, right? You could
01:23:30.840 look at a business because that's what a stock is. When you're buying a stock, you're buying a piece of
01:23:36.260 business. So you look at the business and you could look at the revenues, the profits, the debt.
01:23:43.360 You know, you could look at all these metrics and you can tell, you know, is it cheap? Am I buying the
01:23:51.580 income potential of this business? Am I getting a good price? You can look at ratios historically
01:23:58.040 that show you that something is cheap or expensive. Now, the problem that a lot of people have is their
01:24:05.220 time horizons are so short. Because yes, an asset can stay cheap for a while before the price goes up.
01:24:11.620 And usually, when you get something cheap, it's because there's a problem. Something's got to be
01:24:17.920 going wrong that's causing people to sell. So what you have to be able to do is do your homework
01:24:22.940 and decide, is this problem that is hurting the price of this stock, is it fixable? Is it long-term?
01:24:31.280 Can we see beyond this problem to the solution? And is the market getting something wrong and I'm
01:24:37.400 getting a good price? Conversely, when stocks are expensive, it's because they're doing great and
01:24:43.540 everybody loves them. And then what you have to decide is, well, are people being too optimistic about
01:24:48.820 this company that's doing really well? Are there problems that the market is not paying attention to
01:24:53.800 that are likely to come up in several years? So there are ways to do this. And if you're smart and you
01:25:01.080 have basic principles over a long run, I think you're going to outperform just a static basket
01:25:08.220 of stocks where you're just going to pay whatever price the market is demanding. I mean, people say,
01:25:13.520 well, the market- And you're saying that's partly because
01:25:15.160 these index stocks, they also tend to be somewhat inflated in value because so many people have
01:25:21.480 dumped money into them. Exactly.
01:25:23.080 So that's artificially inflating the price of the entire basket, right? Right.
01:25:26.680 Then that runs at counter purposes to the idea of random sampling. It's no longer random if you're
01:25:32.080 buying a preferentially priced basket of stocks. And then it's going to work in reverse when a lot
01:25:36.640 of people want to get out of the indexes, all these stocks are going to get sold. Because a lot of these
01:25:42.520 stocks don't even pay dividends. I mean, the problem is, let's say you're buying a bunch of stocks.
01:25:47.620 They don't pay dividends. If you retire and you have all these stocks and now you need money,
01:25:53.080 to pay your bills because you don't have a job, you've got to start selling your stocks.
01:25:57.400 And that puts downward pressure.
01:25:58.980 So by placing those stocks in an index, they're no longer independent either, right? You bundle
01:26:05.920 them together. And so the presumption of independence that was there to begin with is violated by the
01:26:11.120 bundling of the stocks in the index.
01:26:13.200 But the other point I'm trying to make is if I'm building a portfolio for my clients of companies that
01:26:18.840 I'm buying cheap, and because I'm buying them cheap, I'm getting a high dividend. I'm getting
01:26:23.060 a lot of income on my stock. Because see, if you're just buying a stock because you think
01:26:27.420 the price is going to go up, that's just speculating. You could be wrong. The price
01:26:31.360 could go down. I'm buying stocks that even if the price never goes up, I still make a good
01:26:36.640 return because I'm getting a dividend right now, regardless of what happens to the stock
01:26:41.000 price. So if you build a big portfolio of good dividend paying stocks while you're still
01:26:46.400 working and you don't need the income, you can take those dividends and buy more stocks
01:26:50.740 and build up your portfolio. But then when you retire, you don't have to sell your stocks.
01:26:56.060 You just take your checks, your dividends, and you start spending those. You stop reinvesting.
01:27:01.380 And so that's not a Ponzi mentality. That's legitimate investing in the market by buying
01:27:07.380 companies that throw up. And the most important thing, though, that I think people could do now
01:27:11.600 is recognize, though, if I'm right about what's going to happen to the dollar and the U.S.
01:27:16.060 economy, the companies I'm buying are international and their customers are outside the United
01:27:24.980 States. And these are the customers that are going to benefit when the dollar declines and the U.S.
01:27:31.240 loses that reserve status and Americans can no longer live above their means. That means a lot
01:27:36.960 of other people who are living beneath their means, they're going to get a reward from the
01:27:41.400 dollars, a loss of status. And those consumers in those other countries are now going to be
01:27:48.540 in better shape. I want to own businesses that have those customers. I want businesses whose
01:27:54.820 customers are going to get richer, not whose customers are going to get poor. I want customers
01:28:00.040 who have a lot of savings, not a lot of debt. So I own businesses that are going to be able to thrive
01:28:06.380 in an economy where the U.S. economy is in a lot of trouble, where it's in stagflation. And I also own
01:28:13.460 companies that sell products and provide services that people need. And they're going to continue to
01:28:20.680 buy those goods and services, even if they have to cut back on other things to afford it. You don't want
01:28:26.360 to have a portfolio where consumers can easily do without what you're selling. Or if you're not even
01:28:32.860 selling anything, a lot of these tech companies, all their income is from advertising. They give
01:28:38.460 away the products and they have advertisers. But if the consumers can't afford to buy products that
01:28:43.980 the advertisers are advertising, then all that ad revenue goes away. And a lot of these tech
01:28:49.640 companies that have these really high multiples, they're going to come crashing down.
01:28:54.080 Okay. So if you were, we're starting to come to near the end of the time for our discussion. If you
01:29:00.920 were giving people advice who are beginning to invest, let's say these are people who might say
01:29:07.160 have a hundred to $5,000 a month to invest, what would you recommend? When do you think people
01:29:18.080 should start doing that? At what level of income should you start to consider putting away some of
01:29:22.980 your money? How much should you put away? And then what concrete steps could you take to start doing
01:29:28.060 this? It's broken down in a very simple manner because lots of people have no idea how to start
01:29:32.760 doing this. When it comes to investing, I mean, the earlier you start, the better because you get the
01:29:37.680 compounding effects of that. Now, if you allow inflation to destroy the value of what you've
01:29:44.800 invested, then, you know, that's no good. But if somebody only has, you know, $500, $1,000 a month to
01:29:52.700 invest. I mean, what I would recommend is that they use my mutual funds. I mean, you could go
01:29:57.360 to my website, europac.com. Now, I think the minimum is $2,500 to get your account going,
01:30:06.960 right? So you have to have at least that amount. That's not a lot, but you can go on my website and
01:30:11.020 just buy my funds. Now, my funds are also available at all the discount brokers. So if you
01:30:15.580 have an account at Schwab or Fidelity or Ameritrade or, you know, all these, you know, my funds are on
01:30:22.600 their platforms. But then I think the incremental investment, you can invest $100 or $500 at a time.
01:30:31.780 You know, you can have small investments once you've established the portfolio. But then you do
01:30:38.420 get the benefit of professional management and diversification. You get a big portfolio of stocks
01:30:44.920 that are actively managed by me and my team, where we are, you know, looking for good opportunities,
01:30:52.420 buying stocks when they're cheap, selling them if they get too expensive, you know, constantly,
01:30:58.480 you know, evaluating our holdings, making sure that the stocks that we thought were cheap
01:31:04.120 because they had a problem, that those problems are being solved and that we're right on our research.
01:31:10.060 And if something comes up and we think we've made a mistake, we can sell a stock and redeploy the
01:31:16.480 money. Or if we find an opportunity that we like better than one that we have, we can, you know,
01:31:21.340 we can make the changes. That's something that you can't do when you're just in a static model,
01:31:28.920 you know. And that's why my funds, the performance has been so fantastic recently in the last, you know,
01:31:36.000 one, three and five years relative to our peers is because we've done such a good job of stock
01:31:43.240 picking and sector allocation. I mean, not only are we way ahead of our benchmarks, which would be
01:31:48.280 an index, but we're way ahead of everybody else who's trying to beat the indexes. But I think the
01:31:53.900 time period where my funds are going to do the best and I have a value fund, a dividend payer fund,
01:32:00.500 an emerging market fund, a gold fund, and an international bond fund, it's going to be in the
01:32:07.120 future years when the dollar is really weakening. I mean, the dollar hasn't weakened dramatically yet.
01:32:12.540 I mean, in terms of purchasing power, it has. I mean, that's clear. I mean, you need more dollars to
01:32:16.580 buy everything. But in terms of euros or yen or pounds, that's not the case. But that's coming. I think
01:32:23.480 we're going to see a substantial decline in the dollar relative to these other currencies. And that is the
01:32:28.680 environment where my funds are going to do the best. And as inflation rates pick up and we see
01:32:34.060 bigger increases in commodity prices, that's going to really benefit my investment strategy.
01:32:41.260 Okay. So let's close with this, perhaps. So the devil, to some degree, is always in time frame,
01:32:47.900 you know, and you've made a case for the inevitable weakening of the American dollar as a reserve
01:32:54.380 currency and of its value as a fiat currency. And that's in keeping the latter part in particular,
01:32:59.840 in keeping with its gradual descent into comparative lack of value against gold since 1971.
01:33:06.900 But so the devil is always timing. And so over what period of time do you think this unfolding
01:33:16.440 into a more inflationary period is going to occur? And what makes you reasonably convinced,
01:33:22.460 let's say, of your timing? Well, timing is always difficult. I mean, I know what's going to happen.
01:33:29.640 I've known what's going to happen for a long time. That might be the problem. But where we are right
01:33:35.920 now is exactly where I've been forecasting we would be, even going back to, you know, my predictions of
01:33:43.440 the 2008 financial crisis. You know, I knew that crisis was coming because I understood the mistakes
01:33:49.120 that the Federal Reserve made to create that housing bubble. And I knew the consequences for
01:33:53.400 the financial system when it popped. But even before the bubble popped, I knew the mistakes
01:33:59.160 the government was going to make. I predicted QE before I even knew the word. I knew they would do
01:34:04.340 this. And I knew they would inflate an even bigger bubble that has finally popped. Because I knew that
01:34:10.620 eventually the Fed would be in a position and other central banks where they would have created so much
01:34:16.560 inflation, that they would now be under pressure to do something about the inflation problem.
01:34:22.120 But they couldn't do that without creating a worse financial crisis than the one that they used
01:34:27.800 inflation to mitigate in 2008. And that financial crisis has already started. We saw that with the
01:34:33.920 failure of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank. And a lot more banks would have already failed
01:34:39.120 had they not been bailed out. The government, you know, came in and propped them up and printed more
01:34:44.520 money and came to the rescue, which is another mistake. But we're at a point now where inflation
01:34:52.160 is going to start to run out of control because the Fed has started to return to inflationary monetary
01:34:57.240 policies when inflation has already, you know, triple its 2% target. We're starting another recession
01:35:06.520 from the weakest, you know, financial position that we've ever been in. And all the stuff that's been
01:35:14.320 happening is stuff that I predicted. In fact, even when COVID first started and everybody was saying,
01:35:21.640 oh, this is very deflationary. I said, no, it's not. It's massively inflationary because people are not
01:35:27.880 working, they're not producing, and we're printing even more money than ever. We're actually paying people
01:35:33.340 more to stay home than they earned when they actually were productive. I said, this is, you
01:35:37.380 know, creating even more inflation. And so we're at this ticking point, you know, and in fact, when
01:35:43.980 the central banks had to keep interest rates at zero for so long, they did that for a reason. That was
01:35:49.720 because they didn't want the whole thing imploding. So they kept it on life support until they couldn't
01:35:54.300 do it anymore because of the outbursts of consumer prices. But I think we've passed that point.
01:35:59.960 And so this is happening. This is the time frame where the air is coming out of this bubble. It's still
01:36:06.420 early. If you remember, in 2007, when the subprime market blew up, and I was very, you know, active there,
01:36:14.760 we had shorted the subprime market. I mean, you know, they made, wrote a book, they made a movie about
01:36:20.320 that trade. Well, I lived that trade. We did that trade. So I was predicting, you know, subprime. I mean, you can
01:36:26.300 go, one of my videos on YouTube is mortgage banker speech I gave in 2006 in front of 3,000 mortgage
01:36:33.620 bankers. I went there to promote this hedge fund that was shorting subprime, but you can still watch
01:36:38.240 my talk. What you don't have on the internet is the smaller talk that I gave later specifically on
01:36:44.980 that fund, right? This was the larger talk. I had about maybe 50 people that came to the smaller
01:36:50.080 presentation about the fund. But I knew at that time that the bursting of that bubble would create
01:37:06.220 this crisis. But when the subprime problem initially reared its head, everybody said,
01:37:12.240 don't worry about it. The Federal Reserve said it was contained. Ben Bernanke said, don't worry about
01:37:16.460 subprime. It's contained. Well, I was on television at that time, all the time. I used to be on cable
01:37:22.160 news every week back then. I said, no, it's not contained. This is the tip of an iceberg. This is
01:37:26.960 a huge problem in the entire mortgage market. We're headed for a financial crisis. You know, it's anything
01:37:32.820 but contained. Well, the government got that wrong. Then when inflation really burst out as far as high
01:37:39.260 prices in 2021, what did they say? Oh, don't worry about it. It's transitory, right? Well, I said, no,
01:37:45.640 it's not transitory. It's permanent. It's here to stay. They were wrong again. Well, they're ignoring
01:37:50.040 the warning signs again, just like they ignored the subprime problem, just like they ignored the
01:37:56.840 outbreak of the CPI. They're ignoring all the early warning signs of the financial crisis that we're in
01:38:03.560 now and the great recession that's beginning that is much worse than the last one. And so the significant
01:38:12.280 thing is going to be the difference, because I think this time we're headed for a currency crisis.
01:38:17.080 That's going to be the end result of this next collapse is going to be the end of the dollar
01:38:22.180 status in a currency crisis. And so you have to have a very different investment portfolio than the one
01:38:28.800 you had in the prior decade. Just hiding out in tech stocks isn't going to work. Those stocks are
01:38:33.800 going to go down. You have to have the international value, the dividend paying, the commodity exposure,
01:38:39.100 old-fashioned type investing, gold. And that's what I'm doing. And again, for wealthier people,
01:38:47.160 you don't necessarily have to buy my funds. You can buy my funds, but we have separately managed
01:38:51.400 accounts. So if you contact Europe Pacific Asset Management, we manage portfolios, individual
01:38:56.740 portfolios of stocks that I think will perform extremely well during the economic environment
01:39:04.560 that we're in and that we're going to continue to be in. Most people, unfortunately, are going to get
01:39:09.620 wiped out. People are going to lose a lot in this environment, but there's going to be a small
01:39:14.400 percentage of people, there always are, who will make money during this time period. And I just prefer
01:39:20.940 to be among those people, right? Just like, you know, not everybody made money off the subprime
01:39:25.740 collapse. There were a number of people who understood the problem and bet against the conventional
01:39:31.420 wisdom and they made money. And the conventional wisdom is generally wrong, and it's wrong right now.
01:39:37.280 They expect things to happen and aren't going to happen. They have a lot of confidence and faith in
01:39:41.800 central banks and the Fed, and they're wrong. This is not going to end the way they believe. There is a
01:39:47.560 huge mispricing of assets now, just like there was for mortgages back then. A lot of people don't
01:39:53.680 understand this, and they're going to suffer, but the people who understand it are going to profit.
01:39:58.760 And I'm hoping that as many people as possible, I can help them profit by getting them properly
01:40:06.060 positioned with their portfolios. All right. Well, that's an excellent place to stop, I would say.
01:40:11.880 We're pretty much right on time there. And so, for everybody who's watching and listening, thank you
01:40:17.000 very much for your time and attention. And Peter Schiff, thank you very much for talking to me today and
01:40:21.400 walking me through a lot of this somewhat elementary material. But it's very good for people to hear
01:40:26.480 exactly how these things work, right? Because we're not well taught on the financial front.
01:40:31.420 And many of the terms that are bandied about, inflation, debt, deficit, investment for that
01:40:36.400 matter, gold standard, fiat, people don't understand these things. And to provide people
01:40:41.480 with that information is extremely helpful. We will link to all of the opportunities that Peter
01:40:48.640 described in the description of the video. So, you can check that out if you want.
01:40:52.080 And I'm going to switch over to the Daily Wire Plus side now and talk to Peter for another half an
01:40:58.100 hour. I do that with all my guests to get a little bit more biographical information to find out how
01:41:02.840 he got where he is and maybe to delve a bit more deeply into his ability to have prognosticated
01:41:09.620 accurately regarding the 2008 financial crisis, which was quite the interesting catastrophe in which he
01:41:16.900 seemed to get right when very few people did. So, for all of you who are watching and listening,
01:41:21.680 maybe you can direct your interest to the Daily Wire Plus side and offer them some support in doing
01:41:26.920 so. They make these podcasts, for example, possible and at least at the quality that they're now being
01:41:32.000 broadcast. And Peter, thank you very much for agreeing to talk to me today and for sharing what
01:41:36.060 you know with everybody who's listening. And we'll talk again right away and hopefully we'll have a chance
01:41:43.020 to meet at some point in the future. Jordan, it's been my pleasure to be here. I really appreciate
01:41:47.260 the opportunity to speak with your audience and hopefully I can come back and we can expand on
01:41:52.300 these principles. And yeah, if you're ever out here in Puerto Rico or Connecticut, I'm there once in a
01:41:58.440 while, but happy to meet you. Yeah, well, hopefully that'll happen in the not-too-distant future.
01:42:05.140 And once again, oh, and to everybody here, I'm in Monastery at the moment.
01:42:09.860 Heligen-Croix, just outside of Vienna, taping this podcast. And to the crew here, thank you very
01:42:15.460 much for your help. To the Daily Wire Plus people for setting this up, that's always much appreciated.
01:42:19.600 And Peter, thanks again. Everyone watching, ciao. Thanks for participating and we'll see you on the
01:42:25.180 next podcast. Hello, everyone. I would encourage you to continue listening to my conversation with
01:42:32.360 my guest on dailywireplus.com.