393. The Makings of A Great Leader | The Honourable Tony Abbott
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 41 minutes
Words per Minute
137.34889
Summary
In this episode, former Prime Minister Tony Abbott and I discuss Australia's role on the world stage, the problems facing the Australian economy and culture, and the broader problems that face the West. We also discuss our joint involvement in the Alliance for Responsible Citizenship (ARC), a new venture grounded in London, designed to put forward a positive vision of the future that everyone could, in principle, be on board with voluntarily. We discuss the challenges Australia faces at the moment, and how they are making their way through the political and economic system, including climate change, climate change and the looming threat of war in Ukraine, as well as the country's role as a good friend to Canada and a partner in the fight against climate change. It's a fascinating and thought-provoking conversation, and I hope you enjoy it as much as I enjoyed recording it. Let this be the first step towards the brighter future you deserve. - Dr. Jordan B. Peterson Dr. Peterson is a world-renowned clinical psychologist, author and public speaker who has dedicated his life to treating depression and anxiety. With decades of experience helping patients, he offers a unique understanding of why you might be feeling this way, and offers a roadmap towards healing. In his new series, Dr. B.B. Peterson on Depression and Anxiousness: A Guide to a Better Life, he provides a roadmap toward a brighter, more peaceful and more prosperous future. , Dr. P. Peterson provides practical and accessible information about how to deal with anxiety and depression. We know how isolating and overwhelming conditions can be overwhelming, and we know how to find a lifeline to help you find a way to feel better. . and we want to reach out to those listening who may be struggling. We know that you are not alone, and there are many others who are also struggling. in need of help. Thank you for listening to listen to this episode of the Daily Wire Plus podcast. I hope it helps you find some solace in a place where you can help you feel better, not just here, but also here, wherever you are listening to this podcast, and know that there is hope and support in the help you can reach out. so that you can feel better in a better place so you can get some support and find a place to help you can have a brighter future that s not alone that s better than you can be
Transcript
00:00:00.960
Hey everyone, real quick before you skip, I want to talk to you about something serious and important.
00:00:06.480
Dr. Jordan Peterson has created a new series that could be a lifeline for those battling depression and anxiety.
00:00:12.740
We know how isolating and overwhelming these conditions can be, and we wanted to take a moment to reach out to those listening who may be struggling.
00:00:20.100
With decades of experience helping patients, Dr. Peterson offers a unique understanding of why you might be feeling this way in his new series.
00:00:27.420
He provides a roadmap towards healing, showing that while the journey isn't easy, it's absolutely possible to find your way forward.
00:00:35.360
If you're suffering, please know you are not alone. There's hope, and there's a path to feeling better.
00:00:41.780
Go to Daily Wire Plus now and start watching Dr. Jordan B. Peterson on depression and anxiety.
00:00:47.460
Let this be the first step towards the brighter future you deserve.
00:01:11.040
Today I'm speaking with Australian journalist and former Prime Minister, the Honourable Tony Abbott.
00:01:17.260
We met before once in Australia, and this will be a follow-up to that.
00:01:20.820
We discussed Australia's role on the world stage, the problems facing the Australian economy and culture,
00:01:28.620
the broader problems that face the West, how the quasi-cult of carbon threatens, in particular, the poor in the developing world,
00:01:36.920
why new religions propagate where traditional faith has been abdicated,
00:01:41.020
and the looming threat of war as China destabilizes and Putin pushes forward against Ukraine.
00:01:49.240
We also discuss our joint involvement in the Alliance for Responsible Citizenship, the ARC,
00:01:55.300
which is a new venture grounded in London designed to put forward a positive vision of the future
00:02:02.180
that everyone could, in principle, be on board with voluntarily.
00:02:08.080
So, Mr. Abbott, let's start by talking about Australia as a whole.
00:02:13.700
I mean, what role do you think Australia plays on the international front now?
00:02:21.100
Like, how do you think Australia should be conceptualized by people outside of the country?
00:02:26.640
Well, Jordan, I think Australia is one of those wonderful countries,
00:02:30.260
which is big enough to be interesting and significant,
00:02:35.340
but not so big as to be intimidating and threatening.
00:02:39.260
And Australia's history is such that there's really no one anywhere in the world who has a grievance against us.
00:02:48.520
And that's not true of so many other countries.
00:02:51.260
You think of the United States, you think of Britain, you think of France,
00:02:55.500
you think of Germany, you think of Italy, you think of Russia, you think of China.
00:03:00.260
There are grievances that different countries have against all of those countries.
00:03:05.760
All of those countries have great strengths as well.
00:03:09.060
But Australia is one of those happy places which has been a welcoming home to migrants from all over the world.
00:03:20.700
Yes, we fought on Britain's side in two world wars and we fought as America's ally
00:03:26.500
in just about every conflict over the last hundred years that America's been in.
00:03:32.460
And yet we've managed to do that while retaining, I think, our global reputation
00:03:38.900
as a country which is free, which is fair, and which wants to be a good mate
00:03:47.780
to the people and the countries of the world wherever we can.
00:03:52.380
So that, at least in principle, lays open the option for countries like Australia.
00:03:57.660
And I suppose this was true of Canada for a good while too, although I don't know if it is any longer,
00:04:02.580
to play a role in, what would you say, being a good faith partner in brokering peace, for example.
00:04:08.300
And so what problems do you think Australia faces at the moment?
00:04:13.420
And how are the issues that are broadly besetting the West, say,
00:04:19.040
on the cultural war front, making themselves manifest in Australia?
00:04:24.240
Well, the problems that every country has all the time are essentially,
00:04:35.060
And just at the moment, this is perhaps a little bit more acute than usual.
00:04:43.140
We've got all of the challenges which all of the Western countries currently face.
00:04:57.840
We've got all of the supply chain issues which arose from the pandemic.
00:05:02.420
And then the conflict in Ukraine, then the degree of decoupling with China.
00:05:14.880
While we are abundantly blessed, Jordan, with coal, with gas, with uranium,
00:05:24.180
But because of the emissions obsession, we are not using these blessings sufficiently to our own advantage.
00:05:39.300
We're exporting our coal and our gas to the countries that are still only too eager to get it.
00:05:45.140
But we're not readily using it as much as we should here.
00:05:49.460
And then, of course, being in the Asia-Pacific region, obviously, we're very conscious of China,
00:06:01.340
in particular, China under the Communist Party and the challenges that that poses.
00:06:08.660
I keep saying that the disruption that has been caused globally by the Russian attack on Ukraine
00:06:18.280
is small beer compared to the disruption that would be caused globally by any attack
00:06:25.840
from the Beijing regime on Taiwan, given its much greater significance in the world economy
00:06:32.340
and given the effective security guarantees that the United States has always given to Taiwan.
00:06:38.860
So, look, those constant challenges of security and prosperity are particularly acute right now.
00:06:47.680
You ask about the cultural issues which are afflicting the West.
00:07:24.000
but I'm not sure that there's that much rigorous learning going on,
00:07:33.380
We outlined a number of potential issues there of concern.
00:07:36.940
Let's dive in first to what you described as the emissions obsession.
00:07:40.960
And so, this is something that Australia and Canada share particularly.
00:07:53.340
And we are doing everything we can at the federal level in Canada
00:08:02.820
which is a really bad idea in a country like Canada,
00:08:06.100
which is massive and completely inhospitable to human life.
00:08:15.840
ambivalence about utilizing your natural resources,
00:08:20.040
very little compunction in sending them to China,
00:08:31.980
And if the Chinese are building coal-fired plants like madmen,
00:08:37.280
then what difference does it make to us in the West,
00:08:51.040
Like, what in the world is the possible rationale for that,
00:08:55.460
Well, Jordan, I find it as mysterious as you do.
00:09:05.240
without doing any good to the global environment
00:09:10.840
by refusing to use coal and gas in this country
00:10:13.760
what we know to have been the history of the planet,
00:10:34.120
But certainly the efforts that we in this country
00:10:51.700
Well, it seems to me that you could make a case
00:11:03.560
have actually made the emissions situation worse.
00:44:33.540
So he goes to investigate being, that's life, and
00:45:57.160
I mean, it was of stellar quality, and you were
00:46:13.960
just so well developed for us is one of the great
00:46:16.920
civilizational stories of our culture and of our
00:46:22.260
history, and part of the modern tragedy is that we
00:46:27.060
know so much, and yet we know so little about the
00:46:31.120
things that have really formed and shaped us as
00:46:35.060
And there's almost an amnesia now about the Bible
00:46:50.840
whether it's the Greeks, the Romans, the history of the
00:46:56.500
development of England and so on, and how the great
00:47:00.180
ideas spread from these places throughout much of
00:47:06.440
There's just this ignorance mixed with scorn, which I
00:47:14.660
I mean, we can know all about artificial intelligence, but
00:47:18.120
if you don't know anything about the culture and the
00:47:20.420
civilization which has made this possible, you are
00:47:23.560
intellectually impoverished, however clever you might be
00:47:34.820
Now, I guess I was blessed, if you like, by this sense of
00:47:43.300
respect verging on reverence for our history and for our
00:47:48.080
traditions, when I was very young, my mother would probably on a
00:47:54.780
weekly basis bring me home the now almost forgotten, but back
00:48:00.340
in the 1960s and 70s, very well-known ladybird books, which
00:48:05.380
popularised great historical stories, mostly from British
00:48:11.780
But, you know, there was Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar and
00:48:16.140
Plato and Aristotle and all these as well in there, and I just
00:48:22.940
And so I guess from a very young age, I wasn't scornful of these
00:48:36.980
And I guess that's what's sustained me, for better or for worse, all the
00:48:46.200
So you were exposed to biographical accounts of greatness when you were a kid.
00:49:01.500
I had nuns teaching me when I was in infant school.
00:49:07.080
I had Jesuits who were presiding over my primary and secondary education.
00:49:14.340
These were the days before the Western Church had been afflicted to the extent it
00:49:20.720
ultimately was by, I guess, the religious self-doubt that seems to have been associated with elements
00:49:34.640
Whatever foibles and faults they may have had, they were impressive human beings.
00:49:40.320
Certainly, they immensely impressed and helped me as a youngster.
00:49:45.420
And I've been lucky to carry all that throughout my life thus far.
00:49:49.400
I have had wonderful exemplars of courage, of faith, of inspiration, of insight.
00:49:58.980
And that's brought me along, carried me in its wake.
00:50:04.220
And my challenge is to be worthy of this great benefaction that I've had.
00:50:11.240
Well, you also said that your mother brought you these stories.
00:50:14.340
And that's kind of interesting psychologically and symbolically, because what that means
00:50:19.360
in a sense is that your mother brought you tales of the great men of the past, which
00:50:25.720
indicated that your mother, so the primary feminine influence in your life, was someone
00:50:33.200
who believed that that greatness of spirit actually existed.
00:50:36.840
Now, you could imagine the counterpart, right, because you could have had a mother or female
00:50:42.200
teachers who were bitterly resentful about the patriarchal oppression of the past, who
00:50:48.340
believed that every heroic figure was nothing other than a patriarchal oppressor, and that
00:50:53.520
was anti-masculine in the most fundamental sense in that manner.
00:51:00.240
And this is increasingly true, and I think it's increasingly a consequence of familial
00:51:06.680
There's no shortage of women who have never had a positive relationship with anyone masculine
00:51:15.260
You know, now, I talked to this leftist scholar, Naomi Wolf, a while back on my podcast, you
00:51:21.660
know, and she wrote The Beauty Myth, and she's been a pretty powerful voice on the left,
00:51:28.440
on the pro-patriarchal oppression front, right?
00:51:34.260
But, you know, she was raped when she was 11, and then she had a pretty dismal experience
00:51:39.720
with someone who was supposed to mentor her in university, and it left her fractured and
00:51:45.740
with a permanent animus against men, you know, and you can see that sort of thing spiraling
00:51:52.300
But your mother had respect for these historical figures.
00:51:58.780
What was the relationship between your mother and your father like on the personal front?
00:52:03.120
Look, you know, I don't claim to have seen every intimate moment, so to speak.
00:52:14.620
But my mum and dad had a long and, I think, pretty successful marriage, and they raised
00:52:25.640
All of us respected, well, my mum's still alive.
00:52:30.660
All of us respected our parents very much and have done our best to honour them.
00:52:36.380
But, look, I absolutely accept, Jordan, that, again, to use a phrase that the Jesuits used
00:52:43.540
to use back in the day, in a sense, we are all the product of those who have loved us or
00:52:50.720
And I guess if you've come from an affirming and supportive, intellectually curious, capable
00:52:59.520
family, you are more likely to turn out with a certain set of attitudes than if the
00:53:08.600
And, yeah, I can fully understand why someone whose experience of others has been bitter,
00:53:15.540
how they might be less optimistic and outgoing.
00:53:22.740
But if you believe, as I do, that most people, most of the time, are basically good, and if
00:53:31.780
you think, as I do, that the challenge is every day to try to come closer to being your best
00:53:37.860
self, well, that's a good way to live your life, because even if it's not perfect, at
00:53:49.980
That can stop the tragedy from degenerating into hell.
00:53:53.740
So that's at least a doorstop against the catastrophe of life.
00:53:58.440
You know, I've thought that through a lot, partly as a consequence of working as a clinician.
00:54:03.520
You know, I've seen people in very dire situations, and it's certainly the case that if Job-like
00:54:11.620
tragedies come to visit you in life, you can make the situation a hell of a lot worse by
00:54:18.920
You know, and you can point to the catastrophes and say, look, I have every reason to be bitter
00:54:23.240
and resentful, and the proper response to that is, well, be that as it may, and you could
00:54:30.380
If you go down that road, tempted towards it by the weight of your suffering, all that
00:54:36.560
will do is make your suffering much worse and universalize it.
00:54:41.040
See, that's what the book of Job concentrates on in such an interesting manner, Ray, because
00:54:46.320
Job has absolutely every reason to lift his middle finger towards the sky and to curse
00:54:52.980
I mean, God literally bets with Satan that Satan can't take Job out, you know, and that's
00:55:02.440
But I think the moral of the story is something like, no matter what happens to you in your
00:55:08.400
life, and this is a bitch of a thing to say, no matter what happens to you in your life,
00:55:14.900
no matter how deep the degradation and the suffering you are called upon to maintain
00:55:21.760
faith in the essential goodness of being and to orient yourself upward, you know, and
00:55:30.220
But the alternative seems to be degeneration into a kind of hopeless and bitter misery.
00:55:36.280
And one of the books that I read as a youngster was Viktor Frankl's famous book, From Death
00:55:43.440
Now, I didn't know too much, still don't know too much about the existentialism, but I do
00:55:48.300
know that he survived that by virtue of focusing on the love he had for his wife, the love he
00:56:01.220
The tragedy is that the modern world, while having less and less in the way of objective
00:56:19.560
difficulties, has less and less of the why that will enable us to endure the how.
00:56:28.600
So, you talked about humility as a precondition for your development of a certain kind of respect
00:56:39.580
And, you know, we could also talk about, so one of the, something I've learned about the
00:56:48.780
religious enterprise is that the emphasis on virtues like humility is allied with a sense that that has
00:57:02.560
So, the practice of faith in that regard is to actually practice, to consciously adopt an attitude,
00:57:10.920
let's say, of humility, and humility might be, in principle, you know, I still have something to learn.
00:57:18.840
I could learn to attend better to the treasures of the past.
00:57:27.960
And there are all sorts of counter-positions that the full play of the rational mind can produce
00:57:37.340
that will fight against that impulse, but it is something you can practice.
00:57:42.260
And the same thing seems to apply to, let's say, an attitude of gratitude.
00:57:48.020
And this is also part of the problem with the idea that you could orient yourself by mere facts.
00:57:59.120
Like, if you look at the conditions of life, especially when things are not going well for you,
00:58:04.640
you could easily proclaim, like the antinatalists proclaim, that life is so bloody miserable in its
00:58:11.280
essence that it would be better if it didn't exist at all.
00:58:13.900
Well, that's Mephistopheles, by the way, in Faust's, in Goethe's Faust, right?
00:58:19.480
Is the whole enterprise should just be scrapped because the suffering is just too much.
00:58:24.140
Well, the alternative to that is to attempt to practice finding what's good,
00:58:34.420
You know, like when my wife, a while back, my wife was afflicted with what she had been told
00:58:41.580
And in fact, the cancer that she had had only been reported by 200 people, and every single
00:58:51.720
And I watched her nearly die daily for like nine months.
00:59:00.080
And then she had surgical complications that, you know, the surgery probably, it was certainly
00:59:06.480
one of the factors that saved her life, but it also put her in great peril, you know?
00:59:14.780
Well, she turned to the things that she had in her life that were positive, right?
00:59:20.420
She really opened herself up, for example, to the love of her children in a way that even
00:59:26.300
though she had been a very good mother and had a very close relationship with her kids,
00:59:30.760
she found a dimension of love, of that maternal love that was fathomless, I would say.
00:59:42.320
And she also decided when her father, her father had to cope with the long-term neurological
00:59:51.540
degeneration of his wife, she had prefrontal dementia and she deteriorated from the age
00:59:58.040
of about 55 to about 70, you know, in the way that neurological diseases take you out piece
01:00:05.720
And he did that, he was stellar, man, he took care of her like a champ.
01:00:10.680
And like, he was a real man about town, but he just reoriented himself in a selfless manner
01:00:21.340
And that's another thing that happened to Tammy when she was ill, is that she abandoned a lot
01:00:27.340
of her pretensions and she allowed people into her life to support her.
01:00:31.860
And that was also part of that practice of being grateful even under dreadful circumstances.
01:00:38.140
And Jordan, this is where suffering is not ever something that we should go out and seek.
01:00:46.060
But if suffering finds us, if we react rightly to it, it is in its own way, or it can be at
01:00:57.060
And I'm thinking of a good friend of mine whose wife ultimately died of dementia.
01:01:07.780
For four or five years, she didn't know him, but he went every day, even so.
01:01:18.120
Well, just in case she did know, and because that was the duty of a husband for a wife in
01:01:29.500
And we can say, well, let's try to, you know, baptise the suffering.
01:01:40.680
Or we can say it's all too hard, and we can euthanise people, we can institutionalise people.
01:01:49.700
And I just think it's important that we choose the better way.
01:01:54.640
As far as we humanly can, we should choose the better way.
01:01:58.980
And again, if we go back to the teachings of Holy Mother Church, I mean, it's best if you
01:02:10.380
But even if you don't, you should keep going, because you just never know.
01:02:16.820
And maybe even if you don't think you're getting anything out of it, you might actually be getting
01:02:21.880
something out of it, which is beyond your comprehension, but is nevertheless making a difference.
01:02:30.080
Well, you know, when I was a kid, 13 or so, and starting to turn away from the Protestant church
01:02:38.240
that my mother in particular was part of, we didn't have a particularly religious home,
01:02:43.100
but she went to church every Sunday, and she liked to sing, and she liked the community.
01:02:46.880
And I got pretty sceptical about, probably about my emerging understanding of the conflict,
01:02:53.280
hypothetical conflict between, say, evolutionary views of the origin of man,
01:02:57.900
and the views that were being put forth in the church, and decided that it was appropriate
01:03:03.460
for me ethically to stop going, which caused my mother a certain amount of distress.
01:03:10.800
Now, part of my cynicism at that time, I suppose, was the kind of standard petty observation
01:03:18.720
of weekend, about the criticism of weekend Christians, right?
01:03:23.140
People go to church for an hour a week, and they proclaim their allegiance to this virtuous pathway,
01:03:29.700
and then they go back out into the world and do exactly what they were going to do anyways.
01:03:33.360
And, you know, there's some truth to that, I suppose, in that everyone can be hypocritical,
01:03:39.840
but that was also true of me, and I had an insufficient understanding of that at the time.
01:03:45.200
But I would also say, and this is to your point about what the practice might be doing for you,
01:03:50.620
even if you don't understand it, is that, you know, even an hour badly spent contemplating your own
01:03:58.820
inadequacies, let's say, in the form of sin and trying to aim upward, seems to be an improvement
01:04:04.280
over never doing it at all for even a minute, and which seems to be the alternative, right?
01:04:10.280
Because once you scrap the church, and this is the sort of thing that people like Richard Dawkins
01:04:15.940
and the atheist types would have us do, we'll just dispense with all that.
01:04:20.680
And his plan was that we'd all become Enlightenment rationalists, but we tend to degenerate into
01:04:25.640
polytheistic pagans instead, and then we don't even give a second's thought to anything approximating
01:04:33.840
And then these weird quasi-religions grip us and pull us down.
01:04:40.280
Look, you know, I do not claim to be a particularly virtuous person, and I certainly do not put
01:04:52.680
But I am confident, not that faith makes us good, but that faith makes us better.
01:05:01.480
And I am sure that I would be even worse, but for the fact that I had a wonderful early
01:05:13.280
beginning, and even now, pretty imperfectly, I try to practice it all.
01:05:21.560
So when you were the leader of the opposition, that was 2009 to 2013, and then you were prime
01:05:28.920
minister for two years. Now, you said that you didn't regard yourself as a sufficiently
01:05:34.360
developed person on the moral front, let's say, to enter the priesthood. You studied as
01:05:40.680
a Catholic seminarian, and so you took the devil's route into politics, let's say.
01:05:45.920
Now, you, yeah, you saw the dark. Okay, well, so tell me about your experiences as a leader
01:05:52.240
of the opposition and as prime minister. I mean, you got to see how things operated at the
01:05:56.600
highest level, both nationally and internationally. And so what did you learn about people? And
01:06:03.180
what did you learn about the kind of machinations that go on at the highest political levels?
01:06:08.540
And I'm also curious about your experiences on the international front, like with organizations
01:06:13.520
like the World Economic Forum and so forth. So what conclusions did you derive from this
01:06:19.040
time that you spent so integrally involved in the political landscape?
01:06:22.240
Well, I think the important thing is to say what you mean and do what you say. And it doesn't
01:06:32.160
matter whether you're the local cobbler or the local school teacher or a professor of law
01:06:40.580
or indeed the leader of a country. I just think you've got to say what you mean and do what
01:06:46.660
you say. And there were some leaders that I interacted with who I thought were brilliant
01:06:55.240
and capable, but I never really sensed that they were being fair dinkum with me. And there
01:07:01.400
were others who were probably less brilliant in some ways, but I got the impression that they
01:07:09.400
were being straight with me. And always that's the test. Can you be straight with someone? And
01:07:18.600
do you think that person is being straight with you? And I guess knowing that the world is made
01:07:27.320
up of all sorts of different people, some of whom will try to be helpful, some of whom will
01:07:34.140
not try to be helpful. You've got to try to conduct yourself in such a way that the people whose welfare
01:07:44.680
it is your duty to advance are as best as you can manage it, having their well-being advanced. So
01:07:52.660
as opposition leader, it was my job to try to work out what the then government was doing wrong
01:07:59.880
and what I might do that would make it less wrong or perhaps even more right. And then in government,
01:08:08.740
it was my job to try to ensure that to the extent government can, it's making bad situations better,
01:08:18.360
making good situations better, knowing that you're never going to make it all right.
01:08:25.360
There are some things which you probably can't even begin to improve. So you've got to know what's
01:08:33.800
within the purview of government and what's not really. And it's a question, I suppose, of applying
01:08:40.680
your insights and your judgment, hopefully, I guess, helped by such character as you've managed to
01:08:51.760
develop over the years in ways which make sense and make a difference. And look, I can talk about
01:09:00.700
different policies. But in the end, the job of everyone in public life is first to do no harm,
01:09:09.600
and then to try to respond intelligently to the exigencies of the day, all the time, hoping
01:09:17.980
to nudge things in a better direction, as best you can tell. That's the duty of everyone in public life.
01:09:27.080
How would you analyze the narrow and broader success of your attempts to play a straight game when you
01:09:38.480
were prime minister? I mean, you ran into a lot of opposition, and your faith ran into a lot of
01:09:47.120
opposition as well. And a cynic might look at your record and say, well, if you would have been a
01:09:55.100
little more instrumental in your tactics, a little more Machiavellian, let's say, you might not have
01:10:01.280
run into so much difficulty in opposition. I'm not necessarily saying that's the case. I'm asking
01:10:07.200
in retrospect, no, you attempted to play a straight game. In some ways, I think you were a man out of
01:10:15.860
time. You know what I mean? Is that the qualities that you brought to the position weren't necessarily
01:10:22.980
the ones that were being demanded loudly and publicly at the time? And your Catholicism, for example, is
01:10:29.580
certainly something that exists in opposition to the new environmentalist ethos. Arguably so, at least.
01:10:37.980
And so do you think that attempting to play a straight game worked for you? And if so, how? And do you think
01:10:46.080
that politics tends to attract people who are more likely to play a crooked game than other modes of
01:10:53.900
interacting with the world, business, art, culture? Well, Jordan, I think it would be generally thought
01:11:02.720
or conceded that I was a very effective leader of the opposition in that I brought my side of politics
01:11:12.020
back into government in record time. Now, I did that by, I suppose, ruthlessly focusing on the mistakes
01:11:22.720
of the then government and coming up with what I thought were feasible and principled and effective
01:11:32.100
ways of improving that. Now, I got into government and it would generally be thought that I was less
01:11:40.380
effective as a prime minister. And I guess the fact that my own party replaced me after two years
01:11:46.700
would provide a certain validation to that. But nevertheless, I did my best to try to temper
01:11:54.680
the emissions obsession. I did my best to stop the border protection disaster and I think pretty much
01:12:02.760
completely succeeded in that. I did my best to get taxes down, in fact, abolished a couple of taxes,
01:12:12.600
big taxes, the carbon tax and the mining tax. I did my best to reduce the regulatory burden,
01:12:19.760
did my best to honour and respect the traditions and the institutions which had stood the test of time.
01:12:26.400
Now, because I was probably against the zeitgeist in a way that most contemporary politicians are not,
01:12:38.580
I did attract a kind of visceral dislike, including from people inside my own party who were happy enough
01:12:46.520
when I was a successful leader of the opposition to put up with this more traditional conservative
01:12:55.520
approach to things, but decided once we were in government that they could do better. But look,
01:13:04.940
So why do you think you were so universally acclaimed as effective as leader of the opposition
01:13:12.980
and that that was then flipped on its head to some degree when you became prime minister,
01:13:20.340
when you became the prime minister itself, right? It doesn't exactly stand to reason. So what do you
01:13:25.100
think happened? Well, Jordan, the leader of the opposition has effectively one job to get his team into
01:13:31.440
government. The leader of a government has many jobs. You've got to try to ensure that everything
01:13:41.620
which is in the purview of government is handled as well as it can. So running a government is much
01:13:52.320
harder than leading an opposition. It is. And it's particularly difficult at the moment,
01:13:59.740
given that we are more fragmented and more polarised in the West than we have been for a long,
01:14:06.960
long time. And I suppose, I think it was more difficult as a conservative, because there's a sense
01:14:14.880
in which you're against the zeitgeist. You're out of sympathy with the temper of the times.
01:14:21.220
But rather than conform yourself to the so-called signs of the times, I think the important thing
01:14:28.540
is to push on with what you think is right and do your best to be good enough to overcome
01:14:37.440
the difficulties of these times. And notwithstanding the fact that I was only there for two years,
01:14:45.340
I think it was probably the most successful two years of the nine years of the recent coalition
01:14:52.480
government in this country. So, you know, I talked to Bibi Netanyahu about issues that were similar to
01:14:58.540
this. And he made himself dreadfully unpopular at one point in his political career by pursuing a round
01:15:05.020
of radical measures aimed at transforming Israel economically. And as far as I can tell, those
01:15:13.420
worked. But they took about 10 years to bear fruit. And he was sort of in the political wilderness that
01:15:18.680
entire time. But he certainly came back with a vengeance. And so one of the things I'm curious about is,
01:15:24.500
you know, are you pleased about the fact that you stuck to your guns? And if so, why, given the
01:15:32.180
defeat on the electoral front? And also, what did you learn from, suffer from, and benefit from
01:15:40.640
as a consequence of being attacked in the manner that you were?
01:15:45.260
One of the phrases I think I used on the night I was ejected from the parliament, Jordan, is that it's
01:15:52.900
better to be a fighter than a quitter. And if you're not prepared to lose in a good cause, you're not
01:16:02.200
really prepared to fight for a good cause. And so, look, I'm pleased that I did try to resist the
01:16:11.780
emissions obsession. I did try to get the government less burdensome on people's lives.
01:16:22.180
I did try to ensure that our country had a degree of integrity in its borders. I did try to ensure
01:16:31.780
that our country was an effective and valuable ally to our friends. And look, there are a few things that
01:16:44.320
I guess I might have done differently. Everyone makes mistakes. But fundamentally, I think what I was
01:16:54.420
trying to do was good and proper. Could I have been more emollient from time to time with colleagues? Of
01:17:03.760
course. Could I have lavished a little more time on some people? Sure. Might I have expressed myself
01:17:13.520
better in different circumstances? Well, absolutely. I've done plenty of dodgy interviews over the years.
01:17:21.600
Who hasn't? Who hasn't? But I think the project, if you like, the purpose, if you like,
01:17:32.560
was good and right. And I'd do it again in a heartbeat.
01:17:37.360
And what made you prepared to lose, do you think?
01:17:40.240
Well, in the end, it's about trying to make a difference. And if you want to make a difference,
01:17:56.000
you've got to strive for it. And if you're prepared to sacrifice that which you are striving for in order
01:18:02.160
to win, it's not about the cause, it's about you. And this is the problem in our public life right now.
01:18:13.280
Too many people seem to be about preferment, promotion.
01:18:21.440
It's about them. It's not about the country. It's not about the cause.
01:18:32.320
They would rather stay in office than make a difference.
01:18:35.520
Yeah. It's a very narrow, it's a very narrow conception of self. I mean, one of the problems with,
01:18:41.520
so if you look at the life outcomes of psychopaths, and psychopaths are particularly interesting,
01:18:46.960
eh? Because they're completely self-interested in the narrowly selfish sense. But one of the
01:18:53.040
interesting things about psychopaths is they betray their future selves just as badly as they betray
01:18:59.280
other people. So, like, a psychopath will take momentary gratification whenever he can get it.
01:19:05.600
And the problem with that is that there's always a price to be paid. And so, psychopaths are completely
01:19:10.640
incapable of learning from experience, and they're much more likely to end up in prison. And the reason
01:19:16.400
for that is that that impulsive, narrow focus on the demands of the self actually turns out to be
01:19:23.760
a very, very bad medium to long-term strategy, even if you're thinking selfishly, right? Because
01:19:31.120
you're not conceptualizing how you're going to be interacted with by people over any span of time. It's all
01:19:38.400
about now. You know, and when we talk about the power monger types being selfish, it isn't just that
01:19:45.280
they're selfish. It's that they're stupidly and narrowly selfish, in a manner that can't sustain
01:19:50.960
itself, yeah. One of the things that I often used to say to myself was, no unnecessary enemies. Now,
01:20:00.240
there are some necessary enemies, because if you want to do something that you really believe is right
01:20:06.240
for the country, and others oppose it, they are going to be your enemies, and you just can't avoid that.
01:20:11.040
But let's not gratuitously offend people, because we can. I mean, that's the mark of the bully.
01:20:21.920
It's not the mark of someone who has at least tried to be a statesman.
01:20:26.720
Yeah, yeah. Well, no unnecessary enemies. That's sort of like the doctrine of minimal necessary force.
01:20:32.880
Oh, it's a good doctrine. Let's turn our attention, if you don't mind,
01:20:36.080
to the international landscape. And so you have given a lot of thought, for example, to the issue
01:20:44.560
of China. I'm not a big fan of the CCP, not least because they support North Korea. And I would say
01:20:52.320
that any state that supports North Korea is, let's call them questionable on the moral front, to say the
01:20:58.800
least. And you guys in Australia, you have to deal with China in a way that's even more
01:21:05.440
immediate and threatening and promising than, say, those of us who are a little bit more distant.
01:21:12.240
And so what do you see looming on the international front vis-a-vis China? Their economy doesn't seem
01:21:18.560
to be very stable. They seem to be degenerating into a very comprehensive surveillance state tyranny.
01:21:25.200
Our hope in the West that increasing material wealth would liberalize China doesn't seem to be
01:21:32.960
bearing fruit, although, you know, the Chinese aren't starving and there's something to be said
01:21:37.120
for that. And we've had a lot of cheap goods as a consequence. So how do you conceptualize
01:21:44.880
China, the West's proper relationship with China? What are your views in that domain?
01:21:50.160
Well, I think it was the current American Secretary of State, Blinken, who said that we would cooperate
01:22:01.040
where we can, we will compete where we should, and confront where we must. I think that was the formula
01:22:10.080
he used. And I actually thought that was quite a good formula. In my time, when MH370 disappeared into the
01:22:21.520
wastes of the Indian Ocean with 240 people on board, of whom about 150 were Chinese nationals,
01:22:29.680
Australia put everything we had into that search because that was the right thing to do. And I think
01:22:39.440
the Chinese government appreciated that. By the same token, when China declared unilaterally air
01:22:48.160
defence identification zones over parts of the East and South China seas, we flew military jets
01:22:54.320
through there because, again, that was the right thing to do. When China was trying to create this Asia
01:23:03.600
Infrastructure Investment Bank, against the wishes of both America and Japan, our very good friends and
01:23:12.080
allies, we were prepared to join this. Although we insisted on changes to the governance structure,
01:23:19.920
because we wanted it to reflect the kind of governance structures that global bodies typically had,
01:23:27.840
rather than being simply a proxy for the communist government in Beijing. So, look, I think in my time,
01:23:36.640
we did pretty well. We successfully secured the first free trade deal between China and a G20 country.
01:23:46.880
But prior to 2015, I think it was still possible to be optimistic about China and to think that even under
01:23:55.440
the CCP, economic modernisation was going ultimately to lead to a degree of political liberalisation and that
01:24:04.640
over the decades, there would be some kind of convergence, if you like. Unfortunately, as we discovered
01:24:13.520
in the COVID period, if there was any convergence taking place, we were getting more like communist China
01:24:20.080
than they were getting like the liberal West. So, my attitude to China and to the CCP,
01:24:30.080
I think was fair enough, over-optimistic perhaps, but it was fair enough back then.
01:24:38.640
So, my view today is quite different. China is increasingly oppressing its own citizens.
01:24:48.960
It has crushed the freedom of Hong Kong, one of the world's great cities. It's
01:24:59.120
being monstrous towards its Uyghur, its own Uyghur citizens. It's bullying and threatening
01:25:06.560
all its neighbours. And it's now particularly focused on taking Taiwan by force if necessary. Now,
01:25:15.120
now I think that if the Beijing regime believes that it will be 1.4 billion Chinese against 24 million
01:25:28.240
Taiwanese, at some point in the near future, they will strike. And I just think it would be horrific
01:25:36.800
for 24 million Taiwanese to have their lives surrendered into the hands of a brutal dictatorship.
01:25:50.080
And while no one wants conflict, I think it is important for free countries like Australia
01:25:58.400
to join with our partners and allies such as the United States, such as Japan, such as the United Kingdom,
01:26:05.600
to say very clearly to Beijing, there will be the most severe consequences if you try to alter the
01:26:13.440
status quo by force across the Taiwan Straits. As I said earlier, Jordan, the Ukraine war has been
01:26:23.520
a catastrophe. But it would be any war over Taiwan would be several orders of magnitude greater. And
01:26:36.160
I think we have to do everything we can to deter that. But I think strength is much more likely to deter
01:26:48.960
concerned about the probability of Chinese assault on Taiwan. And so, you know, in my darker moments,
01:27:00.640
a little distraction to take my citizens' attention away from the catastrophes on the domestic economic
01:27:10.080
front might be quite welcome. There's nothing that unites a fractious population more than a targeted enemy.
01:27:16.880
It's a pretty easy thing to use propaganda to, you know, to agitate for a vision of a unified China,
01:27:25.280
as it should be. And so it would be a lovely distraction. And so, and you said, you know,
01:27:31.760
you take a peace through strength approach, let's say, and you talked a little bit, you made some
01:27:38.560
allusion a little bit to deterring China. Like, what do you think that the West could do on the
01:27:45.680
deterrence front that wouldn't increase the probability of a cataclysmic interchange between
01:27:52.240
the West and China? See, the terrifying thing about China is that they're likely more willing to
01:27:59.360
sacrifice their citizens than we are, right? And God only knows what price they'd be willing to pay to
01:28:07.840
invade Taiwan, for example, especially if that gave them a purchase on power for another five years.
01:28:14.720
So that's a very hard enemy to deal with, right? Because if they'll light themselves on fire to
01:28:18.880
singe you, that's a pretty difficult thing to contend with.
01:28:22.800
I take your point, Jordan, and I take your point. And I particularly take your point that
01:28:32.560
a dictatorship in trouble is a more unpredictable and dangerous dictatorship than a dictatorship that
01:28:39.840
thinks that its best days are ahead. But likewise, I don't think that free countries
01:28:50.480
can be blasé about the fate of what is practically a free and independent country.
01:28:59.120
I don't think that the democracy should depart from the one-China policy.
01:29:08.480
I don't think that the United States should change its strategic ambiguity as such.
01:29:16.560
But I do think that back channels and certain practical steps ought to be taken to try to ensure
01:29:26.800
that Beijing is under no illusions about the magnitude of the challenge it would face.
01:29:34.480
And I'm not necessarily President Biden's greatest fan, but on this particular issue, his statements
01:29:45.280
repeated now I think four times that the United States would defend Taiwan may well have sent a
01:29:52.640
strong message to Beijing, even though when officials have subsequently walked them back,
01:29:59.040
they have stressed that the posture of strategic ambiguity has not changed. I mean, I think he has
01:30:07.440
actually changed what strategic ambiguity means without abandoning the term.
01:30:14.160
What are your thoughts, sir, on the situation vis-a-vis Russia and the Ukraine?
01:30:19.440
I know that's a complicated topic. Well, look, again, I don't say this is easy.
01:30:33.200
I think it's monstrous. He regards Ukraine as a rebel province, just as Beijing regards Taiwan as a rebel
01:30:43.120
province. And unlike Taiwan, which has had a kind of a legally ambiguous situation now for decades,
01:30:53.600
Ukraine has been fully and legally independent for 30-odd years. Putin has never accepted that.
01:31:07.040
Even though Ukraine was no threat to Russia, even though NATO was no threat to Russia,
01:31:14.000
Russia. He sent his army across the border, expecting a rapid victory, expecting that his death squads would find and eliminate President Zelensky.
01:31:28.800
The Ukrainians have turned out to be much more united, much more heroic, much better prepared, much more imaginative,
01:31:38.960
much more creative on the battlefield. And so for the last 15 months, they have at worst stalemated the Russians and in some ways bested the Russians,
01:31:53.280
notwithstanding the fact that Russia has vastly more resources, vastly more manpower, vastly better weaponry.
01:32:02.000
And I think it's the duty of free countries such as mine to try to avoid escalating the war, sure, but also to try to do whatever we can to help the Ukrainians into the most advantageous possible position.
01:32:25.200
If things went optimally, let's say, for the Ukrainians, but realistically, optimally for the Ukrainians and for the West,
01:32:34.780
how do you think, like, what do you conceptualize as an ending?
01:32:40.140
You know, because one of the things I've really tried to puzzle out is, well, what's the end game here?
01:32:44.220
Like, if we got what we wanted, and by we, I mean the West that's supporting Ukraine,
01:32:49.900
if we got what we wanted, what would that look like? Do you have a sense of that?
01:32:56.300
Well, ideally, it would be Ukraine regaining every inch of its territory and driving every last Russian soldier off its land.
01:33:10.020
Now, in the end, I think it's up to the Ukrainians to decide what they are prepared to accept.
01:33:20.480
But at the moment, despite the fact that Putin is relentlessly and mercilessly devastating their infrastructure,
01:33:30.320
pulverizing their cities, they are determined to fight.
01:33:34.140
And the extraordinary thing is that this message that we got very, very pervasively prior to the 24th of February last year,
01:33:46.480
that really there were the Western Ukrainians and then there were the sort of Russian Ukrainians,
01:33:53.880
that appears to be largely a Putin-inspired myth.
01:33:59.300
The Russian-speaking Ukrainians appear to have been almost as appalled by the brutality of the Russian invasion as everyone else.
01:34:11.160
And Putin has succeeded in uniting the country in a way that maybe no one else has.
01:34:18.320
So, look, I think out of respect for the heroism of the Ukrainians,
01:34:24.540
we have to leave them to determine what they think is a satisfactory outcome.
01:34:35.280
Obviously, we do not have to support, and I would not expect this for a second,
01:34:48.160
But I do think that NATO and NATO's partners such as Australia should first do everything we humanly can
01:34:57.340
to help the Ukrainians into the best possible position militarily.
01:35:02.920
B, say to the Ukrainians that once this war is over, of course we will admit you into NATO.
01:35:14.420
And C, if there is any use of nuclear weapons by the Russians, well, we will then immediately admit you to NATO.
01:35:23.860
That would be, I think, a reasonable position for Ukraine's friends to adopt,
01:35:30.100
which is trying to avoid escalation, while at the same time trying to avoid the triumph of aggression and dictatorship.
01:35:43.520
So, all right, we're coming to the end of our time on YouTube.
01:35:47.660
I know you have a hard out that we negotiated a priori, and so I won't ask you any more questions.
01:35:53.400
I would, however, like to offer you the opportunity, if you think it would be useful,
01:35:58.560
to address anything that you think might be well communicated to people on whatever broad international level we manage with this podcast.
01:36:08.820
Is there anything else that you'd like to say to people before we close up this segment?
01:36:14.940
Well, Jordan, obviously I'm here because I have a great deal of respect for the work you've done over the last few years.
01:36:21.400
And I particularly admire the way you have reached a wide international audience,
01:36:31.400
particularly an audience of younger men, and tried to remind them of the enduring virtues.
01:36:39.620
You have tried to give them through your own insights and your own experience something to live for
01:36:50.360
and some ways of actually grasping those essential truths.
01:36:57.460
And look, I just think that countries like Australia, and look, I would extend this to the Anglosphere in particular,
01:37:12.900
and I suppose to the Western world more generally,
01:37:15.220
we have achieved so much, and largely through the influence of the Anglo-American ascendancy.
01:37:28.420
The whole world in 2020 was more prosperous, it was more safe, it was more free than ever before in human history.
01:37:37.880
And rather than despise and reject the values that created that,
01:37:51.740
And yes, to do our best to renew them and take them forward,
01:37:57.080
because I want the future to be at least as good as the recent past,
01:38:06.220
and yet things look much more ominous now than at any time since the early 1940s.
01:38:12.980
And I don't think we're going to fix it by surrender, whether it's economic surrender,
01:38:21.740
whether it's military surrender, whether it's cultural and civilizational surrender.
01:38:30.020
A decent and self-confident approach is going to be best for everyone.
01:38:37.760
Well, hopefully that's something that we can outline in more detail
01:38:43.660
with this Alliance for Responsible Citizenship, you know.
01:38:47.280
What was it that Churchill said at the beginning of his histories of the Second World War?
01:38:55.120
In defeat, defiance, in war resolution, in peace, goodwill, and in victory, magnanimity.
01:39:02.540
I mean, something like that is what we need today.
01:39:09.520
What we're hoping to do is to help inspire a vision for the future
01:39:14.500
that draws on the wisdom of the past with respect for the past,
01:39:20.360
with the kind of respect for the past that you described developing,
01:39:25.160
that people can ally themselves with voluntarily,
01:39:32.600
and that will offer a respite from unnecessary anxiety.
01:39:36.960
And with tremendous emphasis on the voluntary element, right?
01:39:40.820
We don't want to produce a vision that would rely on compulsion, force, and fear to implement,
01:39:51.120
I think that that's actually what everyone who has any sense
01:39:54.400
and who thinks about it for any length of time would want.
01:39:57.620
And so I'll see you in London, I believe, at the end of October,
01:40:02.580
and so that should be extraordinarily interesting,
01:40:05.100
and we certainly appreciate your participation.
01:40:12.300
Thank you to everyone watching and listening on the YouTube side
01:40:18.340
and to the Daily Wire Plus crew for facilitating this conversation.
01:40:22.460
And thank you again, Mr. Abbott, for your time and your insight.
01:40:30.280
We've had a lot of positive response in relationship to the ARC on the Australian side,
01:40:38.320
and we're hoping that that'll produce all sorts of positive things in the future.