417. How to Manage Your Job, Your Company, Your Life | Derick Cooper
Summary
In this episode, Dr. Jordan B. Peterson speaks with Derek Cooper, CEO of QOL Medical, a private pharmaceutical company that specializes in the production of treatments and the origination of treatments for rare diseases. Dr. Peterson and Derek discuss how they first met, how they became friends, and how they began to work together on Ralston College in Savannah, Georgia. They also discuss the similarities and differences between cognitive and evolutionary biology, and discuss how the two can be applied to the treatment of anxiety and depression, and the challenges they each face in understanding how they are related and different from each other in their respective domains of knowledge and experience. This episode is sponsored by Daily Wire Plus, a company that provides tools and resources to help people struggling with depression and anxiety. Go to Dailywire.plus/Dailywireplus to get 20% off your first month with discount code: DEPRESSION20 for a chance to win $200 and receive a free copy of his new book, "Depression and Anxiety: The Complete Guide to Recovery from Depression and Depression: A Guide to Find a Bright Future You Deserve." about his new series, "The Dark Side of Depression and Anxiety." Dr. B.P. Peterson discusses his journey to recovery from the dark side of life and offers practical tips, tricks, and strategies to help you find relief from the overwhelming feelings of anxiety, depression, panic attacks and panic attacks. and stress. The Dark Side Of Life, he has been working toward for years, and offers a roadmap toward a brighter future you deserve. Let s take the brighter, more positive and more positive thoughts and a healthier, more hopeful future. Thank you for listening to this episode. . and , Dr. P. Peterson is of Dailywireplus is a new series that could be a lifeline for those struggling with Depression and Anxious thoughts and feelings of peace, and a place to connect with others who are also struggling with their own brighter future, and find a way to feel better, not less lonely, more purpose and a brighter, better place to live a better life. We know how isolating and more purposeful, and we want to reach out to those listening who may be feeling better. of the people who are not alone, let s feel better thank you, thank you for being kinder, more connected, and more connected in the next episode.
Transcript
00:00:00.960
Hey everyone, real quick before you skip, I want to talk to you about something serious and important.
00:00:06.480
Dr. Jordan Peterson has created a new series that could be a lifeline for those battling depression and anxiety.
00:00:12.740
We know how isolating and overwhelming these conditions can be, and we wanted to take a moment to reach out to those listening who may be struggling.
00:00:20.100
With decades of experience helping patients, Dr. Peterson offers a unique understanding of why you might be feeling this way in his new series.
00:00:27.420
He provides a roadmap towards healing, showing that while the journey isn't easy, it's absolutely possible to find your way forward.
00:00:35.360
If you're suffering, please know you are not alone. There's hope, and there's a path to feeling better.
00:00:41.780
Go to Daily Wire Plus now and start watching Dr. Jordan B. Peterson on depression and anxiety.
00:00:47.460
Let this be the first step towards the brighter future you deserve.
00:00:57.420
Hello everyone. Today I have the opportunity to speak with Mr. Derek Cooper.
00:01:16.080
Derek's the chief executive officer of QOL Medical, which is a private pharmaceutical company that specializes in the production of treatments
00:01:25.700
and the origination of treatments for rare diseases.
00:01:28.620
So, you can understand how that properly done could be a very worthwhile enterprise.
00:01:34.460
I've got to know Derek over the last few years.
00:01:38.640
He volunteered to be of aid to my enterprise in whatever way might be useful a while back.
00:01:45.300
And after investigating his background a bit, both Michaela, my daughter, and I reached out to him,
00:01:51.360
and we've established a very productive relationship.
00:01:54.340
We worked together on Ralston College in Savannah, Georgia, and he's a benefactor of that institution.
00:02:01.540
And we've gone on a number of adventures together in Greece with the people from Ralston College,
00:02:07.440
the students and some of the other principals and benefactors.
00:02:12.520
I've had a lot of conversations with Derek about deep biological matters.
00:02:16.180
He's an expert in immunological function, and as he's instructed me about the adaptations that the immunological system is capable of,
00:02:25.600
we've been able to work out a mapping of the manner in which the immunological system works to stave off pathogens
00:02:32.540
and the manner in which human thought and general behavioral adaptation progresses.
00:02:38.560
And that's one of the things that I wanted to share with everyone today.
00:02:41.760
And I think we did that quite effectively, bringing the communication patterns of bees along for the ride.
00:02:48.580
It's very interesting, you know, to talk to someone whose knowledge is quite disparate from yours in some ways,
00:02:56.440
and still where the communication still remains in the boundaries of mutual comprehensibility.
00:03:03.500
And so I also walked Derek through his experiences as a businessman,
00:03:09.520
first working for a large baked foods enterprise and then as an investment banker.
00:03:14.360
We tied that into our biological discussion as well,
00:03:18.400
talking about how experience can be mined to lead to, what would you say,
00:03:26.160
the facilitation of broader and broader patterns of adaptation, practically and conceptually.
00:03:32.000
And so that's all on the table in this discussion.
00:03:46.060
Actually, I was sitting right here and Michaela introduced us.
00:03:50.460
I reached out to Michaela back when you were having some health issues
00:03:55.300
because I run a pharmaceutical company and just have some access to resources
00:04:00.800
and offered to help however I possibly could because I've, over time,
00:04:06.340
developed a lot of respect for what it is that you're doing in the world.
00:04:11.840
Yeah, well, you have been a tremendous amount of help.
00:04:20.180
And to a large degree, I suppose our most intensive collaboration
00:04:24.440
has been with regards to Ralston College in Savannah.
00:04:27.800
And we'll talk about Ralston as we walk through this interview.
00:04:31.880
But Derek's also been very helpful in relation to the tour as well
00:04:37.460
and has provided me with transportation and so forth.
00:04:43.520
And we've also had a variety of extremely productive conversations,
00:04:51.740
So I've traveled with Derek to Greece as part of her collaboration
00:04:58.720
Some of you watching and listening will be familiar with him
00:05:03.140
And Dr. Blackwood is president of Ralston College.
00:05:07.540
And Derek is one of its supporters and developers.
00:05:11.760
And so we've traveled to Greece a number of times
00:05:15.380
and gone to some remarkable places and had some amazing adventures
00:05:19.460
and also had the opportunity to get to know each other
00:05:26.080
And the conversations have been extremely enlightening to me,
00:05:29.800
partly because Derek knows a lot in the biological realm,
00:05:35.620
especially with regard to immunological function.
00:05:37.820
That's something I really hope to touch on today.
00:05:39.500
And we've found all sorts of interesting parallels
00:05:42.300
between how the immune system works and how cognitive systems work.
00:05:45.780
And part of the reason I wanted to interview Derek today,
00:05:48.180
apart from the fact that he's an interesting character
00:05:50.120
on the entrepreneurial side, as well as the cognitive side,
00:05:54.380
is because of what he knows on the biological front.
00:05:57.480
I thought that would be really interesting to bring to people's attention.
00:06:00.840
So let's start, if you don't mind, let's start with your company.
00:06:03.940
Do you want to describe it and describe its scale and exactly what you do?
00:06:10.240
So it's a mid-size, maybe large, private specialty biopharmaceutical company.
00:06:20.140
So we focus primarily on genetic diseases and therapies for those diseases,
00:06:26.800
which involve understanding the sort of genetic background for why those diseases may occur.
00:06:35.520
And then once you sort of capture that biological dynamism,
00:06:42.220
you investigate how you can possibly counter whatever may be going wrong.
00:06:47.640
So the scale of our company, we have a couple hundred employees,
00:06:54.300
primarily in the U.S., although we do have some European operations.
00:06:58.320
And we sort of run the gamut from the manufacturing side we have in-house
00:07:03.860
to sales and commercial operations, as well as clinical development, etc.
00:07:09.120
So we do a fully integrated biopharmaceutical company.
00:07:15.240
So you told me at one time, paradoxically, that there's nothing rare about rare diseases
00:07:25.460
So maybe you could explain to everybody what that means.
00:07:29.260
Yeah, so I think that a rare disease in the U.S. at least is defined as a disease
00:07:45.820
Each silo, each disease is rare because they tend to be fairly impactful to human health
00:07:56.640
And so when they are more significant in terms of human health,
00:08:01.260
it's they're less likely to have survived through evolutionary history.
00:08:06.080
So each rare disease in and of itself is unique and relatively small
00:08:13.780
in terms of the prevalence or the number of people that would have the disease.
00:08:18.240
But overall, the total people with rare diseases,
00:08:22.080
if you add up all of the categories of each individual disease,
00:08:29.260
And another thing that's happening just as we evolve in the industry
00:08:33.100
and learn more about the genetic background of different diseases,
00:08:37.740
what we're learning is that they have implications for other diseases.
00:08:43.100
So a rare disease that impacts cognitive function, for example,
00:08:47.840
we find that maybe minor mutations with something like that
00:08:51.680
could have a broader impact on a disease like dementia, for example.
00:08:58.920
And so then you learn about the disease in a broader context
00:09:04.480
by focusing on the sort of hyper-severe portion of the...
00:09:09.840
Well, that's, I suppose, in some ways, that's almost a scientific truism
00:09:14.740
because it turns out that because everything is ultimately connected,
00:09:19.800
if you investigate anything deeply enough, even something rare,
00:09:23.420
you start to find commonalities and associations between what you're studying
00:09:29.560
and all sorts of things that are relevant to the broader world.
00:09:32.480
One of the things you see in the careers of scientists often is that
00:09:35.560
they start out to some degree, maybe when they're undergraduates, as generalists.
00:09:40.980
Then they specialize intensely on a phenomenon that might seem trivial
00:09:49.860
genetic mutations in fruit flies, I suppose, comes to mind.
00:09:54.220
But as the scientist develops his or her career
00:09:58.340
and starts to approach the limits of their cognitive ability,
00:10:02.400
the connections between what they're studying and everything else
00:10:06.160
start to become more and more apparent to them.
00:10:08.420
And as their careers progress, they become broader and broader
00:10:13.580
And I think that's a, this is partly why I think it's possible
00:10:17.900
for people to follow what they're interested in
00:10:23.580
Because if you follow what you're interested in, even if it's a pinpoint,
00:10:27.740
it'll lead you to, if you do it properly and in a disciplined manner
00:10:31.940
and striving uphill, it'll lead you to wherever you want to go.
00:10:35.760
And I guess this is partly also what happened to you.
00:10:38.060
And I'm kind of interested in that on the autobiographical front
00:10:44.860
You were in investment banking for 16 years, right?
00:10:47.700
So maybe walk us through that and tell everybody how it is
00:10:52.020
that you, your interests transformed across that period of time
00:10:56.580
and how you ended up, first of all, in investment banking
00:10:59.220
and then out of it and then into the company that you now run.
00:11:03.200
Yeah. So, so when I left undergraduate school at Washington and Lee,
00:11:08.940
I started in what's called corporate finance and investment banking,
00:11:12.860
which is sort of the, the capital raising side.
00:11:17.520
We, we would help small and mid-sized companies go public
00:11:21.220
or raise debt and, and execute on an acquisition, that kind of thing.
00:11:26.560
Um, and then I ended up, uh, moving to a, um, I moved to a family owned business
00:11:34.840
that my father, uh, had built after working for a good size fortune 500 company
00:11:41.440
for, for many years, he left in the late eighties and started his own company
00:11:48.200
So I, I moved into the operations of a baked food business.
00:11:53.660
We had 2,500 employees at one point, um, operations throughout the Southeast.
00:12:00.320
Um, we then sold that company about 10 years later.
00:12:03.960
So in the late nineties, I worked for that company for a while.
00:12:07.180
And, and after we sold it, I went to work for a company in Nashville, Tennessee,
00:12:12.440
actually, which was a, a mezzanine, it was called a mezzanine capital.
00:12:16.000
That's basically, um, helping invest in small companies so they can, they can grow.
00:12:24.320
It was right in the, uh, sort of peak of the internet craze.
00:12:28.540
So we were, um, would be the defining characteristic of what was happening in the capital markets
00:12:35.180
And so we're, um, making a lot of investments in a lot of different small companies.
00:12:40.860
Um, and then, uh, that company was sold and I, I sort of talked to my family and some
00:12:47.060
friends and we ended up putting together a, a private, uh, equity investment company that
00:12:53.200
ultimately made an investment in this pharmaceutical company in 2003.
00:12:58.620
And then I just, I was on the board initially and got to know the company and then joined
00:13:05.000
the company full-time in 2010 as CEO and have been there ever since.
00:13:10.880
So when you started out in the big foods company, what did you, what, what did you, what did
00:13:21.760
And what, and so what did it teach you personally?
00:13:26.240
And what did it teach you that enabled you to make the move to the investment banking side
00:13:30.880
of things and then into the pharmaceutical industry?
00:13:34.820
So you, because the reason I'm asking, I suppose, is because you have an intellectual interest
00:13:38.300
that we'll explore in relationship to biology, but you also have business knowledge and interest
00:13:43.640
that enables you to not only investigate cognitively, let's say, and conceptually, but to run a business
00:13:50.040
successfully and profitably and to manage people while doing that.
00:13:53.440
And that's a, you know, that's not an obviously overlapping skill set.
00:13:58.160
So I'm curious to pull out the threads and to explain, you know, how both of those abilities
00:14:06.240
You started with this baked goods, baked foods company.
00:14:10.180
So I think, I think maybe it is more of an overlapping skill set because a baked foods
00:14:15.580
company is defined by sort of a hyper-competitive environment.
00:14:19.700
And it's very much what I would call a cost-driven business.
00:14:24.780
And what I mean by that is you have to watch your costs very, very carefully because the margins
00:14:31.860
We basically were producing a very high volume of like white bread and the basic stuff that
00:14:40.400
you get on the shelf in a Walmart grocery store, white bread and wheat bread and hot dog and
00:14:45.820
hamburger buns and distributing them to, I mean, we had a facility in Valdez, North Carolina
00:14:53.300
that would make 50,000 pounds of an hour just to, just to put some perspective on this.
00:14:59.460
So because of that fairly low margin cost-driven business, you have to manage the hierarchy
00:15:06.780
of costs really, really precisely because anything that sort of grows or gets out of control can,
00:15:14.640
can be disastrous in terms of the cost of the business.
00:15:18.020
So it's sort of the extreme side of pencil sharpening.
00:15:24.100
I would say the pharmaceutical business by juxtaposition is almost the complete opposite.
00:15:30.860
It is driven by a focus on the intellectual property development around a unique approach to treating
00:15:42.780
a particular disease, which is highly complex and requires an extraordinary amount of thinking
00:15:53.580
And the consequence of that is that the margins in the industry are just completely different
00:16:01.440
because the investment comes on developing the product and the patent portfolio around the product
00:16:09.600
and that kind of thing, as opposed to managing the cost explicitly.
00:16:16.920
It's not one I've thought about before because one of the things that we do somewhat uniquely
00:16:21.620
with our company is we manage our costs pretty rigorously, even though we don't necessarily
00:16:29.880
have to because it is a more profitable business than baked foods, for example.
00:16:35.460
But what I've found in doing that is that it limits chaos.
00:16:41.360
Because if you sort of are continuously hyper-focusing on what it is that is your goal and make sure
00:16:50.740
that you are not allowing noise to enter the situation in pursuit of that goal, well, it's
00:17:01.900
To be focused and not allow the organization to become too chaotic in pursuit of a goal is...
00:17:09.360
Going online without ExpressVPN is like not paying attention to the safety demonstration on a flight.
00:17:17.520
But what if one day that weird yellow mask drops down from overhead and you have no idea what to do?
00:17:23.220
In our hyper-connected world, your digital privacy isn't just a luxury.
00:17:28.180
Every time you connect to an unsecured network in a cafe, hotel, or airport,
00:17:32.660
you're essentially broadcasting your personal information to anyone with a technical know-how to intercept it.
00:17:37.540
And let's be clear, it doesn't take a genius hacker to do this.
00:17:40.860
With some off-the-shelf hardware, even a tech-savvy teenager could potentially access your passwords,
00:17:51.900
Well, on the dark web, your personal information could fetch up to $1,000.
00:17:56.280
That's right, there's a whole underground economy built on stolen identities.
00:18:02.320
It's like a digital fortress, creating an encrypted tunnel between your device and the internet.
00:18:06.600
Their encryption is so robust that it would take a hacker with a supercomputer over a billion years to crack it.
00:18:16.860
With just one click, you're protected across all your devices.
00:18:22.040
That's why I use ExpressVPN whenever I'm traveling or working from a coffee shop.
00:18:26.180
It gives me peace of mind knowing that my research, communications, and personal data are shielded from prying eyes.
00:18:31.900
Secure your online data today by visiting expressvpn.com slash jordan.
00:18:36.900
That's E-X-P-R-E-S-S-V-P-N dot com slash jordan, and you can get an extra three months free.
00:18:45.160
Yeah, so I'm trying to think of that from a psychological and a trait perspective.
00:18:53.220
I mean, we know very well that success in complex endeavors is primarily dependent on intelligence, but that personality trait variance also plays a role.
00:19:04.180
And so when you're talking about very tight cost control, I immediately think of two things, and one is conscientiousness.
00:19:16.200
The ability and willingness and desire, for that matter, to pay attention to details.
00:19:22.660
And I would also suspect a certain degree of disagreeableness, too, because when you're talking about control of costs, let's say, to me, and this is partly practical experience speaking, that also means the ability to say no, right?
00:19:43.200
But then on the product development side, let's say, with regards to the pharmaceutical industry, that seems to be more something associated with high levels of openness and creativity and interest in intellectual matters.
00:19:55.300
And so that's a relatively rare combination, extremely high openness.
00:19:59.780
And I know that's characteristic of you because I've talked to you a lot, and you're unbelievably interested in ideas, but you're also extremely detail-oriented.
00:20:08.980
And so it sounds to me like you really did, when you were working in the baked foods industry, did you enjoy the detailed management that was associated with keeping the company functional despite it being lean?
00:20:31.140
That was not something that I found interesting.
00:20:33.760
It's necessary, and I understood the value from a good management perspective, but I am a bit of a chaos seeker from an openness perspective.
00:20:51.380
And so an overly ordered organization is not optimum for me.
00:20:56.460
Right, so you weren't fundamentally interested in, so for everyone listening and watching, if you're temperamentally suited to be a manager, let's say, what that means most basically is that you're intelligent and that you're conscientious and that you have a certain degree of emotional resilience.
00:21:17.640
Those are the best predictors on the managerial front.
00:21:19.700
On the entrepreneurial front, the best predictors are intelligence, once again, because that's universal across any domain that's complex, but trait openness.
00:21:30.720
And openness is basically aesthetic appreciation on the one hand and interest in ideas and intellectual exploration on the other.
00:21:38.200
And my empirical investigations into predicting entrepreneurship showed quite clearly that the major trait predictor there was openness by a substantial margin.
00:21:47.280
And so it sounds to me like when you were in your baked foods incarnation, let's say, that there was plenty of room there for conscientiousness, but not necessarily as much room as you have now for the investigation into deep problems, the intellectual investigation.
00:22:11.680
Yeah, I think that there's a, if you're a very open person, it's good to work on the discipline.
00:22:20.240
You know, if you're like a CEO, ultimately, your responsibility is strategic.
00:22:26.740
You need to be looking ahead and deciding where the organization is going and what it is that you're going to do and how you get there.
00:22:33.800
And, but you have to learn to constrain your own openness in terms of seeking those things because if you don't, you will become the biggest source of chaos in the organization because very open people tend to be, well, open to lots of different ideas.
00:22:52.420
And so, if you can discipline yourself on that front first, then I think that it propagates throughout the organization ultimately.
00:23:04.220
And it's like anything, you have to draw the boundary between chaos and order intelligently.
00:23:10.340
As a matter of fact, I think you could even define competence that way as the sort of optimum dynamic positioning of the boundary between order and chaos depending on the circumstances.
00:23:23.320
And it does change because, do you have any idea how in your present business you make a decision about, so, okay.
00:23:35.560
So, if you're open, any given idea has a high probability of triggering a set of associated ideas.
00:23:42.880
And the more open you are, the larger the gap is between the ideas that are triggered.
00:23:48.900
So, in fact, when you're talking to highly open people, they'll jump from one topic to another.
00:23:54.300
And if you're less open, you may not understand that there's any connection between those ideas at all.
00:23:58.880
Now, the advantage to that is that you bring things together that are not normally conceptualized together.
00:24:04.160
And also, you're a seeker of multiple pathways.
00:24:08.760
But the disadvantage, as you're inferring or even pointing out, is that, well, if you have 30 open people working on a project, there's going to be like 900 ideas a day.
00:24:23.640
But the problem is that, well, most great ideas are still going to fail.
00:24:28.520
Pursuit of any great ideas, unbelievably time-consuming and costly.
00:24:35.860
And so, how have you learned, do you think, to distinguish between the ideas that attract your interest that are worth pursuing and the ideas that attract your interest that are, you know, that you have to let fall by the wayside?
00:24:48.760
And, you know, how have you learned to deal with that conceptually, but also practically, right?
00:24:52.820
Because you can have people around you that can help you with that, too.
00:24:55.960
So, how have you solved that problem, given your openness?
00:25:03.140
I think that what occurs is a process of sort of aligning the opportunity with the relevant sacrifice that you have to.
00:25:15.980
In the investment world, we call it good capital allocation.
00:25:21.160
So, the way that you do this with investments is you sort of create a hierarchy of your opportunities.
00:25:27.860
And whatever is at the top of the hierarchy, your very best opportunity where you can get the best return, you put as much resource into that opportunity.
00:25:37.020
So, fill that bucket first before you allow – Warren Buffett actually says this in an extraordinarily pithy manner.
00:25:47.380
He says, you know, when you're 25 years old, sit down and write down the top $25 that you have for your life.
00:25:54.160
Draw a line under number five, tear the page off, keep the top five, and don't do anything else.
00:26:03.780
I mean, you can make, you know, some changes, but it's a capturing of this concept of hyper-focus.
00:26:10.360
And so, I think you have to – if you have an extraordinary opportunity, you're willing to direct more sacrifice to that opportunity, as you should.
00:26:22.340
And so, it's a mathematical – it's a math-esque balancing of the equation of how good is the opportunity and how much is it going to cost to pursue it.
00:26:34.000
Right, right. Well, so, there's a number of avenues of exploration that are germane to that observation.
00:26:42.780
So, one is – so, if you talk to managers of small and large companies about what frustrates them, one of the things you find very rapidly is they're frustrated by the constant necessity of having to put out fires.
00:26:57.540
So, they're so busy dealing with, like, crisis minutiae that they never get a chance to strategize over the long run or even to sit down and think about what a reasonable medium to long-term strategy is.
00:27:11.940
But part of the reason is this, is that the typical manager – so, the typical manager, first of all, fails.
00:27:18.320
The empirical estimates are that 65% of managers add negative net value to their companies.
00:27:23.720
Right, so, that's a pretty damning – that's a pretty damning statistic.
00:27:31.120
Well, that's – so, what happens to managers very frequently is that they spend the majority of their time with their worst employees.
00:27:40.940
And so, the perverse management strategy, which is well-documented empirically, is that you do the same thing with your employees that you do with your goals, according to your description, which is you figure out the people who are stellar performers and you spend all your time with them.
00:27:59.120
And part of the reason is that the payoff, as a consequence of facilitating your stellar employees or partners, let's say, is exponential and not linear.
00:28:13.240
And so, also, the probability that if you're dealing with problem employees that you're going to be able to do anything for them in the medium to long run is extremely low.
00:28:22.620
You don't have the time or the energy, and they may not have the inclination.
00:28:26.020
I mean, managers aren't clinical psychologists, and their employees aren't people who are coming to them for psychological help.
00:28:32.620
So, there's an analogy there, you know, and the other thing I'm –
00:28:36.840
Yeah, I think that that's directionally partially correct.
00:28:44.860
I think that you – yeah, at a high level, it's definitely a Pareto distribution, and you want to focus your time and energy on the sort of uber-competent people that can get a lot of things done.
00:28:59.620
But you need to build a functional organization that has a lot of different people in a lot of different roles.
00:29:06.920
And you can't do that by saying, well, we're just going to focus on, you know, these two or three superstars and hope everything else works out.
00:29:16.400
You have to understand how the entire organization functions up and down the hierarchy.
00:29:23.960
And I would say that chaos to me, if things are going wrong in some element of the organization, it's, you know, the sort of hyper-manager conscientiousness types that you're describing.
00:29:41.740
They don't want anything to sort of disturb the organization.
00:29:45.540
And I don't think that's actually exactly right.
00:29:50.420
I think that when, you know, and sort of the sign of chaos to me is that the idea of proliferation just kind of starts to go crazy.
00:29:59.020
You get all these, well, maybe we should do this.
00:30:03.320
And that's a sign of, I think, in the business context, it's a sign of one of two different things.
00:30:13.440
Either you have not communicated the goal clearly as a leader or you don't have the right goal and people aren't sure what to do.
00:30:23.220
And so they're actually doing the right thing in the sense that if you don't know what to do and what you are doing isn't working, changing is a good idea.
00:30:34.380
Now, that doesn't mean that you necessarily are changing in the right direction because you may or may not have access to or be privy to what is going on in other aspects of the organization.
00:30:44.340
But to me, it's a smoke signal of something that you need to pay attention to.
00:30:51.100
And the other thing that typically I see that causes chaotic behavior is people have a goal.
00:30:59.120
The goal is relatively clear and they realize they're not going to be able to make the goal.
00:31:03.340
And so there's sort of a fear or threat aspect that's starting to occur and they feel like whatever it is that they're doing isn't working and they need to make a change in order to make sure that they're successful.
00:31:16.940
So, in a sense, both of those reactions are correct, but you need to understand what it is that's motivating the person to sort of change direction so that you can either help them get to the goal or make sure that the goal is clear.
00:31:34.620
And it's not necessarily just that there's a misalignment of competence, I think, which was your description.
00:31:46.380
Well, I guess I'm also wondering, it may be the case as well, it's complicated when it comes to intelligence because intelligent people tend to perform better wherever they're put if it's complex.
00:32:00.080
But you could imagine a situation where there's a lot of different sub-games in your corporate environment and they're all necessary.
00:32:10.720
So maybe there's a distinction, let's say, between sales and research.
00:32:18.120
The great people on the sales side aren't going to be the same people who are the great people on the research side.
00:32:27.020
So there's going to be a distribution of competence by specialized bin.
00:32:33.640
I mean, one of the things we know psychologically about specialized bins, let's say, for example, because you might ask yourself, well, how do you conceptualize the different?
00:32:41.300
What does it mean for an occupation to be different from another occupation, right?
00:32:47.400
Because obviously nurse and doctor are similar, but probably, you know, doctor and graphic artist aren't that similar.
00:32:56.560
And so it begs the question of what constitutes similarity and interest seems to be relevant in that regard, right?
00:33:04.760
Starting a business can be tough, but thanks to Shopify, running your online storefront is easier than ever.
00:33:12.180
Shopify is the global commerce platform that helps you sell at every stage of your business, from the launch your online shop stage, all the way to the did we just hit a million orders stage?
00:33:23.020
Our marketing team uses Shopify every day to sell our merchandise, and we love how easy it is to add more items, ship products, and track conversions.
00:33:31.500
With Shopify, customize your online store to your style with flexible templates and powerful tools, alongside an endless list of integrations and third-party apps like on-demand printing, accounting, and chatbots.
00:33:43.040
Shopify helps you turn browsers into buyers with the internet's best converting checkout, up to 36% better compared to other leading e-commerce platforms.
00:33:50.800
No matter how big you want to grow, Shopify gives you everything you need to take control and take your business to the next level.
00:33:57.820
Sign up for a $1 per month trial period at shopify.com slash jbp, all lowercase.
00:34:03.780
Go to shopify.com slash jbp now to grow your business, no matter what stage you're in.
00:34:11.480
Yeah, you know, I think that your goal is to run any organization, but well, I'll focus on a pharmaceutical company.
00:34:25.040
If you want to run it well, you absolutely need to understand people.
00:34:29.720
And I think that one of the things that you've been tremendously helpful to me with is things like the Big Five personality profile.
00:34:38.320
And I understand myself, and I think if you can understand what it is that you're good at and what it is that you are not good at,
00:34:47.620
and there's a key component to that, which I would describe as epistemic humility.
00:34:52.520
You have to know the boundary of what you know and what you don't know.
00:34:57.560
And if you can fill in the gap, if you can understand that and fill in the gap properly, then the organization will function better.
00:35:10.140
Because you're sort of aligning different skill sets appropriately with what needs to be done.
00:35:15.960
So I think, and you know, another key component to this, I would say that I've learned from listening to you,
00:35:22.620
is that because different people perceive the world differently, they, there's, you have to understand at least somewhat,
00:35:34.000
you have to have some concept of what their reference frame is.
00:35:37.700
Because if you're a highly ordered, you know, conscientious person, then someone who's a creative marketing person,
00:35:49.780
it's almost a different language in terms of how those people view the world.
00:35:54.340
And so you need to sort of, you need to align the way that you communicate with the recipient of the, of the communication.
00:36:02.240
Because, I mean, it literally is almost like a different language.
00:36:08.300
Well, and you know, we hear a lot of squawking about diversity in the culture wars that are raging,
00:36:14.320
but there is relevant appreciation for diversity.
00:36:18.720
And real, true diversity is actually diversity of temperament,
00:36:22.620
because we know there are five temperaments, dimensions of temperament.
00:36:27.980
and we know that there are different skills associated with them, and that those differences are real.
00:36:33.460
So we know, for example, if you're extroverted, rather than introverted,
00:36:37.200
you're going to be motivated by social interaction.
00:36:41.440
And it's going to energize you, rather than innervating you.
00:36:45.700
And it's highly probable, especially if you're involved in sales,
00:36:49.500
this isn't invariably the case, but it's highly likely,
00:36:52.580
that like sales, especially sales that involve a lot of presentations,
00:36:56.600
meeting a lot of people, a lot of group presentations,
00:36:58.960
that's much more suitable for someone who's extroverted.
00:37:05.020
And in the extreme, you know, there's pathologies associated with every skill.
00:37:11.280
They can also, you know, that can degenerate into mania.
00:37:16.240
But it is extremely useful to know that people are actually different.
00:37:21.060
You know, the people who are higher neuroticism,
00:37:22.760
they're going to be much more sensitive to threat.
00:37:25.100
And so you can imagine that that would be one of the things
00:37:30.800
And that might be a very bad thing on the strictly entrepreneurial side.
00:37:35.120
But you might imagine, too, that having a few people around that
00:37:37.640
who serve as canaries in the coal mine could also be extremely useful.
00:37:41.540
And agreeableness is particularly interesting in that regard,
00:37:44.720
because there are really pronounced advantages and disadvantages
00:37:49.520
So disagreeable people, they're much more likely to bargain hard for themselves.
00:38:06.300
But they'll tell you exactly what the hell's going on.
00:38:14.160
can help you stop you from being taken advantage of,
00:38:19.060
Whereas agreeable people, they can be taken advantage of.
00:38:21.640
But they're very good at facilitating social bonds between people
00:38:26.080
and making the environment have that feeling of what closeness and intimacy.
00:38:37.580
Agreeable people will tell you what they really think.
00:38:43.320
Because if I'm making a mistake in leading an organization,
00:38:48.840
And agreeable people won't tell you that you're making a mistake.
00:38:52.600
Because they don't like to upset the apple cart.
00:39:03.060
One of the upsides of viewing the world this way
00:39:10.600
But there is a very large number of potential games that people can play.
00:39:16.140
And if you're running something like a corporation,
00:39:26.380
you can put them into a game that they'll be highly motivated to play.
00:39:30.040
And so you can get the advantage of that diversity.
00:39:40.020
What you're measuring in terms of excellence and performance
00:39:45.600
that you're not going to look for the same kind of performance,
00:39:49.440
as you said, from a creative marketing director
00:39:51.740
that you might expect from someone who's assigned to manage
00:40:00.840
I mean, that is a very good description of good management, right?
00:40:05.180
It's to align personality and competence with the job.
00:40:32.100
And it offers people a five-dimensional analysis
00:40:49.080
So it gives you 10 different aspects of your personality.
00:40:55.200
And so you can take that and find out where you sit,
00:41:14.020
your similarities and differences with that person.
00:41:16.420
Because that's also really useful to know, right?
00:41:42.240
on elements of the world that are somewhat opaque to you.
01:20:20.320
happening is that antibody that sort of vaguely
01:20:24.240
grasps the bacteria, it gets copied. So the, the
01:21:07.900
are millions of copies made from here to here. And
01:21:49.140
just proceeds with a higher and higher level of,
01:21:53.140
of what's called affinity. It's precision. It's
01:22:05.400
coastline with blocks. And so you could imagine
01:22:16.400
obviously wouldn't fit very well because they're
01:22:23.760
better in some areas of the coast than others. And
01:22:25.980
so then once, so maybe it would be a block or a
01:22:28.520
triangle or a circle or something like that. And
01:22:30.720
then you could proliferate. Once you got the 10 square
01:22:34.320
mile blocks in place, you could proliferate like one,
01:22:37.060
one mile by one mile blocks and then 500 foot by 500
01:22:46.440
describing is a fractal dimension actually. Right. Right.
01:22:49.580
And so I'm going to use a slightly different analogy and
01:22:53.760
translate that to, so imagine you could, you could get
01:22:57.340
on a 200 foot boat and just sail around the Island of
01:23:00.180
Britain. I think that's about 3000 kilometers, or you could
01:23:03.760
go in and out of every, uh, cove. Yep. And that gets to 6,000
01:23:09.540
kilometers, call it. Or you could get on a 10 foot row boat
01:23:13.500
and, and go in and out of every river and, and little nook
01:23:17.220
and cranny. Right. Or you could use a one foot measuring
01:23:20.580
stick and measure around every single rock. And so when you,
01:23:25.620
a fractal dimension is, is a way of measuring, it's a way of
01:23:30.300
mathematically measuring the complexity in something. And so
01:23:32.980
right. The way you can discern this is that as your
01:23:36.240
measuring stick decreases in size, the total perimeter of the
01:23:41.000
Island of Britain is going to dramatically logarithmically
01:23:44.720
increase. And so you go, as you go from the 200 foot yacht to a
01:23:48.820
one foot measuring stick, you go from 3000 kilometers to 300,000
01:23:53.460
kilometers. Right. Right. Right. It's astronomical
01:23:56.040
increase. So what the, what the immune system does is sort of
01:24:01.280
true enough. I think your description is perfect. It's sort
01:24:04.420
of optimum fractal dimensional, uh, Goldilocks. Yes. It, it, it, it
01:24:13.400
finds one or two or three different, what are called. And so
01:24:16.720
it just maps one cove. It maps part of one cove. And then once it
01:24:20.280
gets that, that cove is the same on every city. Imagine there are
01:24:24.960
thousands of Britons all over the Atlantic ocean and you map one
01:24:29.700
cove. Now your immune system goes, okay, I know this. I know this
01:24:33.480
one cove and all of these bacterial cells have this cove. So I know how
01:24:38.060
to identify all of them. Right. I don't need to keep, I don't need to
01:24:40.900
keep mapping the whole entire thing. Right. And so good enough and good
01:24:44.240
enough in that situation would be the immune system just has to map
01:24:47.760
that organism well enough so that it can stop it. Yes. Yes. And that's a kind
01:24:54.820
of understanding. Right. Well, this is part of the reason I got attracted to the
01:24:58.520
new England pragmatists because they have a philosophy of knowledge. That's
01:25:03.420
very much akin to this is that how do you know when something is right? It's
01:25:08.120
like, well, first of all, you have to set a target and then it's right. If you
01:25:13.840
can use it to hit the target. And that's actually the definition of what
01:25:19.160
I think it's the right boundary between order and chaos. And I mean, you used a
01:25:25.500
definition of truth. I think it was with Sam Harris of evolutionarily
01:25:31.060
advantageous, basically something like that. Right. Well, it promotes survival and
01:25:36.260
reproduction, something like that. Right. So here's the definition. If your immune
01:25:40.840
system identifies a couple of epitopes or coves on a bacterial cell and it wipes out
01:25:49.140
all the bacterial cells, it can identify the bacterial cell. It's done. And so, and
01:25:56.020
then the really interesting thing happens is that that library gets encoded in almost
01:26:01.420
like a language in what's called a memory B cell. And those are kept in a library. And
01:26:07.600
so the next time that bacterial cell comes into the body, the sequence of fractal dimensions
01:26:17.600
of antibodies from the broad to the more and more specific, that's all maintained. So, so
01:26:23.780
it, it can identify the bacterial cell at multiple levels of analysis, large coves and
01:26:28.940
small coves. Right. So if there's a mutation, it doesn't have to start from square one.
01:26:33.380
You can go back to sort of halfway between the general and the specific and start at the
01:26:39.480
point where the fractal dimension no longer matches. Okay. Okay. So there's, there's two
01:26:45.120
things that are relevant there. Practically speaking, I would say, and the first is if
01:26:51.760
you're negotiating with someone like your wife, it's useful to, to let her, let's say, wander
01:26:59.800
around the problem space until she comes up with a first approximation of a solution. And you don't
01:27:05.520
want to criticize that to death too badly because even though it's not a great fit, it's better
01:27:10.720
than the initial state. And then what you're doing as you're negotiating is you're, you're
01:27:15.960
getting a, you're getting a tighter and tighter grip. Yep. Yeah. Yeah. I think, I think, I think that the
01:27:22.640
immune system is perhaps a good analogy to hypothesize about in terms of the way that human
01:27:30.660
thought. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. It strikes me as highly probable. I think the human thought sort of
01:27:35.420
proceeds from the general to the specific so that maybe, you know, with, you would know this better
01:27:41.520
than me, but, but with a child is sort of learn the hierarchy of things as, as they mature at a
01:27:47.140
young age. So, so a blueberry might be something like food, fruit, berry, blueberry. Oh, you know,
01:27:54.120
that's proportionate to word length, by the way, the shorter words, the shorter words map onto more
01:28:00.800
fundamental concepts, right? And those words have been conserved in linguistic history.
01:28:05.840
That's fascinating because that's the same. Yep. Yep. They call those primary level or base level
01:28:09.980
words. Yep. Cat is one, by the way. Wow. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Or dog. That's the same thing as the antibody
01:28:17.440
gaining sophistication as it proceeds sort of down the, I, I call it cone centricity, but it's,
01:28:24.960
it's really concentric, but with another, imagine a upside down traffic cone is really a hierarchy,
01:28:31.540
but you're, you're getting more and more specific as you, and more and more technically sophisticated.
01:28:36.960
Okay. So imagine this, imagine this then, then. So the, an archetype is like a shoulder. It's like this,
01:28:44.600
it's like this from the, from the shoulder to the elbow. It's like, it's a general purpose,
01:28:49.220
problem solving approach. And it isn't, you have to make it specific, right? To match it to the precise
01:28:57.040
conditions that obtain in the environment. But the stories we conserve, the narratives we conserve
01:29:02.600
are those general purpose, problem solving tools that have the broadest possible application. Then
01:29:08.220
you can imagine this too, Derek, you can imagine this is that if you hear a story and it really
01:29:15.280
strikes you and it's memorable, that's because your memory has evolved to have a place for that story,
01:29:22.900
because that story is so necessary that without it, you, you're functional, your functional,
01:29:32.800
your, your general functionality would be massively impaired.
01:29:36.360
And so it's like the, yeah, it's like the antibody is, it goes, you can go back to the general,
01:29:41.900
generality level where it resonates with whatever it is that you're, I think that's some, maybe
01:29:48.300
something like a heuristic in terms of problem solving. You're, you're, you're looking for a
01:29:55.140
pattern similarity at the level of analysis that matches the new problem appropriately. You, you were
01:30:02.020
sort of describing this earlier, you know, when you, when you describe one, when you, when you learn how
01:30:08.120
one genetic disease works, well, there's a lot of knowledge that you learn that translates to
01:30:12.640
another genetic disease. It's not exactly the same protein, but in terms of DNA and RNA and all of
01:30:19.640
the functional, uh, elements that go wrong with the genetic disease, many of them are the same.
01:30:25.040
Okay. So, so, so, so, well, so imagine that there's a behavioral space where evolutionary competition
01:30:32.100
between strategies occurs. And we, we've already agreed on the fact that the strategies that are
01:30:39.340
going to work consistently across time in a social organization are going to be functions of iterated
01:30:47.220
reciprocal interactions. They have to be, because that's what defines a society. Okay. So now imagine
01:30:52.880
those are all laid out through behavioral cooperation and competition. Okay. Now imagine you have a mapping
01:30:59.940
function and you can map those strategies. That's what a story is. Okay. Now imagine those stories have
01:31:09.380
levels of generality and specificity, right? And so if you told your story, it would be specific to your
01:31:16.920
time and place and the conditions of your life, but it would also be a variant of a broader story
01:31:23.100
that people could rely on to orient themselves in conditions that were somewhat similar to yours.
01:31:29.300
There's a whole hierarchy of those. So I would say the deepest, the deepest and most general stories
01:31:35.860
are the, we define them as the religious stories and translating them into their specific application
01:31:42.900
is actually quite a complex act, right? It's like you can take a general, a general heuristic,
01:31:51.140
which would be coded as a narrative. And it might not be obvious to you how to apply that to the
01:31:56.460
conditions of your life. That's a problem you have to solve, but that doesn't mean it's not without
01:32:00.400
worth because it's a good, it's a, it's a great starting place. I don't know if this, this analogy is,
01:32:08.780
is appropriate, but I think what you're describing is the changing of the, the sort of dynamic moving of
01:32:19.340
the boundary between order and chaos as you proceed down the level of specificity from the general to
01:32:27.620
the specific. So, so, so actually what's happening there is, is the, it's the same thing as the antibody
01:32:34.200
is the, the, the boundary is moving. The boundary is getting closer and closer to the target.
01:32:41.040
And, and I think, yeah, definitely, definitely. Well, and in some ways too, the target might also becoming
01:32:47.540
clearer and clearer, right? Because, because you imagine that's happening in two ways, right? Because it's
01:32:52.220
happening, you're trying to minimize the distance between you and the target, but you're also trying to
01:32:58.820
minimize the ambiguity in relationship to the target as you move towards it.
01:33:03.280
You're trying to get rid of the noise. You're trying to get rid of it.
01:33:04.580
Yeah. The perceptual noise. Exactly. And that, and that is a matter of zeroing in, which is,
01:33:09.040
you know, basically how we describe it. And, and yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
01:33:12.940
That, that, that's how, that's how bees rank order. That's, they rank order flower beds based on
01:33:21.880
the frequency of bees coming back from flower bed and, and saying, this is a flower bed of value,
01:33:32.300
which, which they communicate in a pretty sophisticated manner. And so what they're
01:33:37.280
actually doing is, you know, they start in the morning and they, they leave the hive and they
01:33:41.760
fly around and it's, it's random. They don't know where the flower beds are. And then throughout the
01:33:48.440
day, different bees identified different flower beds that have more nectar and less nectar. And then
01:33:55.920
they come back and they communicate that they found a flower bed and that there's nectar there.
01:34:02.300
And then the hive redirects the sacrifice to the most valuable flower bed based on the value,
01:34:10.540
the amount of value in each individual flower bed. So what ends up happening is you, you create a
01:34:15.420
hierarchy from the general to the specific. It's sort of a parade of distribution is what it is,
01:34:21.040
where you're targeting, you're targeting the, the sacrifice more and more and more algorithmically
01:34:28.200
to the most, to the highest value. Right. Right. Okay. And so, okay. So, so let's walk through that.
01:34:33.980
So it's random to begin with because the bees go in every direction. Okay. Now some bees come back
01:34:38.680
and report. Now you, I think you told me that the length of the dance of the individual bee is
01:34:46.380
proportionate to the store that they're trying to indicate. And so, so then the human equivalent to that
01:34:53.500
would be like, if I watch you put a lot of time and effort into convincing me of something,
01:34:58.240
it's going to be more convincing because you are, what you're doing is indicating by your
01:35:03.780
sacrificial action, which is your dumping of time and effort into that attempt, that you're,
01:35:09.340
that's your commitment to the goal. And so that's a pretty valid indication, at least of your estimation
01:35:15.160
of how valuable that goal is. Yeah. Well, I mean, you, the, the dance, uh, if you, if you watch,
01:35:21.900
uh, the sugar plum fairies, the dance increases in the level of excitement to indicate the procession
01:35:29.720
towards value. Right. So I think, I think that's what you're just, is that, is that what you're
01:35:35.220
describing? Um, yeah, well, you, you, you want to think about how, well, how bees would indicate to each
01:35:41.300
other the reliability of the message. And it's got to be something like the, that the, the bee,
01:35:47.160
a bee that's willing to risk a lot of effort in the dance has obviously found a source of energy.
01:35:51.760
Yeah. Yeah. Well, I think, I think it's actually more precise than that. So, so there's sort of
01:35:56.240
three. So this guy, Von Frisch, uh, got the Nobel prize for discovering this in like 1973. And,
01:36:03.120
um, what he discovered is three different elements of how bees encode the location of value in a
01:36:12.820
language. I mean, their dances is really a sort of a proto language. And what they do
01:36:17.280
is they, they find a flower bed, they gorge themselves on nectar. So they're, they're covered
01:36:23.220
in pollen and nectar. So, so one telltale sign of a valuable flower bed is that bee actually comes up
01:36:30.880
and he, he throws up in the middle of the, of the hive. And so he smelled, he's just covered in
01:36:36.580
flower smell. And then, and then he, he does a dance and there are two aspects of the dance that
01:36:42.400
actually create a vector. Um, one is the length of the dance and it's, it's, it's extraordinarily
01:36:48.340
precise. So the length of the dance, every second, I think represents about a thousand meters.
01:36:54.980
So if one second dances, the flower bed is a thousand meters away.
01:36:58.840
Okay. The curvature from the, so the, the bee sort of goes in a straight line and then he curves
01:37:04.960
out to the start. The curvature of his dance indicates the direction of the flower bed
01:37:11.900
as an angle off of the direction of the sun. I mean, it's unbelievably sophisticated.
01:37:17.960
So the week five, he looks up at the sun and he says, okay, this bee just told me the flower bed is
01:37:24.380
45 degrees off the angle of the sun. So go East, you know, a thousand meters and yeah, yeah. It's
01:37:34.000
unbelievable. So then what I, I don't know that this part is true. I'm sort of guessing here, but
01:37:38.540
then I think what probably happens is that because that flower bed is so valuable and because there's
01:37:46.040
so much nectar there, more and more bees come back and they dance. And so that creates a hierarchy,
01:37:53.640
right? There's more and more bees that are dancing and that track more attention. I wonder if they get
01:37:58.320
more precise in their specification too, as further exploration occurs. Probably on, I would, it's
01:38:04.080
probably a weighted average of all the bees coming back and doing a very similar dance that, that tells
01:38:10.960
you, um, where the flower bed is. And so that, yeah, they ultimately direct their sacrifice in a
01:38:17.940
highly intelligent algorithmic way. And the sacrifice is their willingness to expand energy,
01:38:24.020
right? When we talk about sacrifice, here's the bees burn up energy flying around. So that's the
01:38:29.140
sacrifice. Yeah. Well, another thing this, uh, Von Frisch figured out, which this is even more
01:38:34.660
fascinating is that bees can lie. So, so you can have cane bees and able bees and a cane bee will
01:38:43.440
come back and do a dance, but not be covered in pollen and, and not have found that valuable of a
01:38:52.040
flower bed. So it's a virtue signaling bee. He's a virtue signaling bee. Yeah. And the other bees will
01:38:58.240
pay less attention if you don't smell, if you don't have sort of highly potent flower smells.
01:39:05.380
I wanted to, did, did, did Von Frisch figure out why a bee would falsify his report? I mean,
01:39:12.640
obviously, the obvious answer is obvious answer is for attention, you know, but it's not easy to
01:39:18.260
translate that into the bee world. Yeah. Yeah. I don't know that we know that part, but
01:39:23.180
narcissist, those are narcissist bees, by the way. Postmodernist bees. Yeah.
01:39:28.240
Yeah. They signal for treasure when that exists. Right. Right. Well, I mean, this tells you a lot,
01:39:33.880
right? Because the postmodernists think that there's no hierarchy. It's just all made up and
01:39:38.980
we can sort of invent whatever hierarchy we want to. Well, bees can find value. Right. So, so, so it's
01:39:47.940
so deep in nature that if bees can do it, well, human beings can damn well do it. Right. Well,
01:39:54.400
and I would bet my bottom dollar that the systems that are activated when a bee watches another bee
01:40:00.160
dance in a particularly motivated way are mediated by dopamine. It's highly probable,
01:40:05.700
right? Cause that's, well, that's conserved so far down. Yeah. Yeah. I bet, I bet you're right. And,
01:40:10.640
and so it's, it's going, they definitely, they have all kinds of interesting behaviors. I mean,
01:40:15.340
when I, when a hornet comes in and starts trying to take bees, they scream, they literally scream predator,
01:40:22.540
threat. And, and so they, they have, they have behavioral patterns that are prey and predator.
01:40:30.140
I mean, going and finding the flower is a predatory behavior. It's, it's, it's, it's value
01:40:35.760
constructing. Right. When the bear hierarchy. Yeah. When the bear comes, that's a predatory threat to
01:40:42.500
the bee. They create chaos. Right, right, right. Around to, to, to disrupt the goal seeking behavior of
01:40:50.360
the predator. And so, so the, the level of, actually they sort of balance level of chaos and
01:40:56.880
order depending on the situation. So, so when a hornet comes to the nest, what they'll, they'll
01:41:02.140
actually do is, is a highly, highly, almost hyper-ordered, uh, uh, dance. They, they surround
01:41:10.120
the, the hornet and all the bees around the hornet start beating their wings in, in synchronous
01:41:15.760
fashion and they raise the temperature. So they can, they can survive, I don't know, like 106
01:41:20.820
degrees and hornets die at 104 degrees. So it's, it's the same thing. Right. So they, like a fever.
01:41:27.660
Yes, a fever. It's a fever. Wow. That's amazing. Isn't that amazing? Right. They cook, they cook the
01:41:32.640
wasps, eh? They cook the wasps. They literally cook the wasps without cooking themselves. Right. So
01:41:38.920
that's, that's right on the border of chaos. Right. Right. Right. Perfect management. Right.
01:41:45.080
You know, it's like, it's like the peak of a Beethoven symphony or something. It's, it's as
01:41:50.380
far as you can possibly push it and still maintain order. Right. Right. Okay. So let's, let's close
01:41:56.480
this up by, by tying some things together. Okay. So when you moved from investment banking
01:42:01.180
into the pursuit of cures for rare diseases, you talked a little bit about, you know, how that
01:42:07.580
had prepared you to do it. You talked a little bit about your motivation because you're actually
01:42:11.480
inclined ethically, let's say, and therefore on a motivational basis to pursue cures that
01:42:17.360
are going to be of benefit to people. How did your intellectual interests align with your
01:42:23.520
pursuit in the new company? Well, I'm, I'm fundamentally just a curious person. So, so I love learning
01:42:33.120
new things. And I, I, I realized I had an entropic gap in terms of my knowledge. And when I started
01:42:41.380
with the biopharmaceutical company, that's a, that's an inadequate description of what I did
01:42:45.700
not know actually. And so I just went to work. I read, I just started reading. I went to classes.
01:42:52.400
I, I just did all I could to, to educate myself on every dynamic of biology I, I possibly could.
01:43:01.220
So what do you think? Okay. So now if I understand correctly, you came across this company when you
01:43:06.900
were working in the investment banking realm and then, okay. And then you got deep. Now,
01:43:10.880
why do you think you got so deeply interested in this particular company? Like what was the calling
01:43:17.380
there? So one of the things, Derek, that I've been working on, you can tell me what you think
01:43:20.700
about this because I think it's an extra cool idea. I think that what's occurred to me as a
01:43:26.120
consequence of walking through the biblical stories is that the Yahweh, the God that's presented in the
01:43:31.840
Old Testament is a dynamic process that's conscience on the one hand. So that calls you out on your
01:43:42.680
misbehavior and that's calling on the other. So God is the spirit of conscience and calling. That's a good
01:43:48.640
way of thinking about it. And so calling makes itself manifest in those things that grip your
01:43:53.440
interest. And conscience makes itself manifest in, it's like the grip of, it's almost like the grip
01:44:00.660
of, it's something like predation because when you do something wrong, that behavior, that element of
01:44:08.940
yourself should be eradicated. And conscience tells you what part of you should die. And it tells you
01:44:15.940
what part of you should die instead of you, right? And so calling is like the bee dance in some ways.
01:44:23.140
Calling is what indicates to you, for whatever reason, where the treasure lies. And conscience
01:44:27.560
is what tells you when you're deviating from the path. And the united spirit that's presented in the
01:44:33.340
Old Testament looks like the dynamic interaction of calling and conscience. And I really like that.
01:44:39.060
I mean, it makes sense to me because we can follow our calling and we should attend to our conscience.
01:44:42.820
And if you're doing something you're really interested in and your conscience is clear,
01:44:47.040
things are going pretty nicely for you. Like that's a good place to be. So, okay. So you came
01:44:51.320
across this company. And so what was it in that that called to you, do you think?
01:44:56.540
Initially, it was the dynamic environment of the academic challenge that was highly intriguing.
01:45:04.620
And so I think that was definitely part of it. But, you know, to summarize what you just said,
01:45:12.160
you speak about adventure. I think that an adventure, you don't necessarily have to have
01:45:18.760
exactly the right calling to go on an adventure. I think-
01:45:26.460
It can be a low-resolution adventure. It could be.
01:45:29.060
Yes, exactly. I think that what ends up happening if you just, an adventure is that first step into
01:45:35.640
chaos, like the bee getting up in the morning and flying around. It doesn't know where the flower
01:45:39.340
that is. The only way to find it is just to start down the path. And I think that maybe conscience
01:45:46.720
is the, as you proceed down the path, your accuracy of path direction evolves more specifically.
01:45:57.900
And I don't know exactly how that happened. Well, I think it's this, what we've been discussing,
01:46:03.000
Well, you'd learn more about pathways that lead nowhere.
01:46:06.560
Yeah. It's gaining knowledge about where to set the boundary between order and chaos. I think it's
01:46:11.840
something like that because you need a little bit of chaos. If you don't have chaos, you can end up
01:46:20.160
Well, and also, if there's no chaos too, the other problem too is that, you know, you have to pursue
01:46:25.600
a goal in a manner that allows you to pursue other goals when you're done with that goal.
01:46:31.000
So as you're pursuing the goal, you want to be accreting information that allows you to pursue
01:46:35.420
other goals, right? So there's a goal and a meta goal all the time. And the meta goal is going to be
01:46:40.220
something like increased flexibility in positing and pursuing future goals. You don't ever want
01:46:49.140
You know, this is why like a liberal arts education is such a good thing because knowledge of multiple
01:47:01.060
It's algorithmic or analogic pattern recognition that, and I think this has actually been helpful
01:47:07.320
to me in terms of my lack of highly specific background in the pharmaceutical industry.
01:47:13.620
I've done other things that actually, well, they don't constrain me to the, if you've always done
01:47:22.960
something this way, this is why we do it because we've all done it this way. And I come in and go,
01:47:27.380
well, why? Because over here in this functional area, we did it this way. And so you ask the questions
01:47:35.420
that can actually, I'm, I'm a source of chaos, I guess, would be, hopefully just the item of chaos.
01:47:41.720
Because you want to, you want to constantly be tilting you towards the optimum, which requires
01:47:52.840
Yeah. Yeah. Well, one of the things I've noticed about successful people, and this is something that's
01:47:57.800
very practical for those of you who are watching and listening, is that there's lots of people who are
01:48:02.200
specialized, no, there's a minority of people who are specialized in any given area. And being
01:48:08.980
specialized in a given area is very useful because there's a minority of people who are specialized.
01:48:14.200
And so that marks you out. It gives you something to trade. But then there's a much smaller number
01:48:20.120
of people who are specialists in two relatively unrelated domains simultaneously, right? So maybe
01:48:25.360
you're one in a thousand here, and you're one in a thousand here, and assuming there's some overlap,
01:48:31.080
you're one in 500,000 in that, in that overlap. And then if you add a third domain of specialty,
01:48:40.800
And so, yeah, I think that's, that's actually a real problem in the world, is that what you're
01:48:47.580
describing in some respects is sort of what Ian McGilchrist talks about in terms of a highly,
01:48:53.260
highly left-brained specialization such that you're hypermyelinated and concretized in one area,
01:49:06.420
It's a understanding how multiple functions may interact, the patterns of behavior may interact
01:49:12.920
Right. It's a kind of blindness of specialization.
01:49:15.300
Yeah, yeah. And I think you can't, I can't, I think you cannot be right-brained integrated in
01:49:21.820
your thinking without being multi-dimensional in your education. I don't.
01:49:27.180
Right, right. So that's a good, okay, well, the, well, the other thing that, that that sort of
01:49:30.820
points out too, and this is more or less relevant to Ralston College is that, so you imagine that one
01:49:35.460
of the things that you're doing with a classical education is that you're increasing the dimensionality
01:49:40.980
of the, maybe what, so imagine it's sort of akin to those shoulder-to-elbow elements of the, of the immune
01:49:49.940
system. So if you have a good general education, you have a lot of those.
01:49:58.300
So then you can see almost every bacteria and viral protein, yeah.
01:50:02.040
Right, at least you have a starting, you have a starting place, you have a starting place, and,
01:50:05.760
right, and these have been conserved, right, the best of the past is the conservation of these
01:50:13.780
That's archetypal and biblical stories is what it is.
01:50:17.240
It's the first, it's the first part of the arm. It sort of gives you a doorway into the maze.
01:50:24.140
Okay, so then, okay, so then imagine this too. So, so this is, this has something to do with
01:50:29.760
certain degree of cultural homogeneity. So imagine that there's a hundred of us, and we were all
01:50:35.140
raised on the same stories. Okay, now these are stories that are, like, they're first-pass
01:50:40.940
approximations to solutions. But because we all know the stories, they're also first-pass
01:50:46.520
approximations, so partial solutions, that we would already regard as ethically viable.
01:50:52.580
Because we've got the same initial, we've got the same initial.
01:50:58.620
Yeah, you can't, you can't, you can't have a functional society without a shared language.
01:51:03.100
It doesn't work. You and I can't communicate if we don't have the same language.
01:51:09.920
Right, well, and maybe what we're talking about here is, like, the prototypical elements
01:51:16.500
Yeah, I think, I think it's sort of a language of morality, maybe.
01:51:20.300
Yeah, well, I don't know, I don't know if there's a difference between a hierarchy of
01:51:24.680
value and a morality. I think those might be the same thing.
01:51:27.480
Yeah, I think so, too. I think this exists in biological systems broadly. It's more of
01:51:36.360
a micro level than the macro level that you're describing. But I think, you know, you could
01:51:41.960
define, like, you're going to have to give me a little bit of leeway here, but you could
01:51:48.060
define a living system as the ability to dynamically manage the boundary between order and chaos
01:51:58.780
to direct sacrifice. I think all living things have the ability to do that. They all share it. And,
01:52:05.440
you know, there's a good reason for that, because the physical world itself, outside of nature and
01:52:10.380
living things, is somewhat chaotic, right? There's, even at the quantum mechanical level or quantum
01:52:17.620
physics level, we know that things can be waves or particles. They can randomly become something
01:52:23.120
completely different. So there's a dynamism that's in the physical world. So I think, by definition,
01:52:29.940
biology has to be able to navigate a highly complex environment that shares the tension between order
01:52:38.940
and chaos. Yeah. Well, it seems like that. It seems like that in the archetypal accounts, because
01:52:44.980
the constituent elements of reality in the narratives of value are order and chaos. And the third element
01:52:52.900
is the ability to traverse that border. I mean, so in the Taoist worldview, you just see that absolutely
01:52:58.540
clearly is what's the world made of? Well, it's made out of chaos. So that's something like entropy,
01:53:03.220
and it's made out of order. And that's something like predictability. And then,
01:53:07.420
and the dynamic interaction between them, what would you say? And then it's the ability to
01:53:12.660
mediate between those two forces dynamically that constitutes, well, you said it constitutes life.
01:53:19.160
It certainly constitutes consciousness, that's for sure. Does it constitute life? Yes, likely. It's acted out.
01:53:25.200
I mean, it's happening at the cellular level. It's happening at bees do this, ants do this. They map,
01:53:31.480
they create a boundary and randomness in order to direct sacrifice to sensory, perceptive,
01:53:41.780
phenotypically relevant value. That's too targeting. But, you know, and every species is doing this
01:53:49.600
differently, but they're basically doing the same thing. Well, you look at, look at, well, look at the,
01:53:53.760
look at the dragon archetype, the dragon fight story. I mean, the, that's a map of value and what
01:54:01.220
it says. So, and Jung believed this was the core value in alchemy, in Sturkulinus Inventure, which was
01:54:08.100
in that what you most want to find will be found where you least are inclined to look. And Jung's take
01:54:14.600
on that was, well, you're weakest at your blindest point. And so, of course.
01:54:20.040
You have to go into chaos. You can't find value if you don't, that first step on into chaos. It's
01:54:26.640
impossible because by definition, the value is not in, it's not maintained perpetually inside of
01:54:34.500
order. It can't work. You have to seek new, new value. Right, right. Because the order is exhaustible.
01:54:41.700
Yeah. Otherwise the bear is going to come and steal all your honey. Well, you see, well, you see the
01:54:46.140
same thing with the bees. It's like if they get locked onto a flower bed, that's great until they
01:54:51.340
take all the resources. And then that whole pattern is now longer, no longer, not only no longer
01:54:57.400
functional, it's deadly. Right, right, right, right. Yeah, exactly. And then they have to revert to a
01:55:03.440
random search, at least to some degree. Yeah. So I think this, this boundary setting mechanism
01:55:11.280
it enables different species to direct what it is they're doing. It's sort of an intelligent
01:55:20.360
direction of behavior that is phenotypically specific. So, you know, to a bat, to a bee,
01:55:31.880
God is the flower bed, right? So they are wired to rank order flowerness is what they're actually
01:55:40.520
doing. Yeah. To a bat, God is a big fat mosquito at dusk. So they are, they fly out of the cave at
01:55:49.020
dusk and they rank order mosquitoes and they target their efforts and their sacrifice to the Doppler
01:55:55.480
effect, the sound bouncing off of the fattest mosquito. So it's a completely different way of
01:55:59.880
seeing the world. Right. Well, and for human beings, God is something like the pattern of
01:56:04.700
the spirit. So we'll say the pattern of behavior that best instantiates the most positive, positive,
01:56:11.820
possible reputation in the minds of other people. Yeah. Yeah. I think, yes, yes. And I think that that
01:56:17.320
by definition, I think that by definition, you touched on this very nicely earlier, it has to
01:56:23.200
transcend different perspective and different worldviews. So God has to take into account the
01:56:30.440
variation of agreeableness and the variation of neuroticism. Right. It's outside of all that.
01:56:36.020
Yeah. Because you need neuroticism, right? Because you want the zebra who's hypersensitive to the lion
01:56:42.560
that's threatening. Right. To alert the whole herd. To alert the whole herd. You need that. So,
01:56:47.600
yeah. So, but, but for some reason, you know, I think chaos is fundamentally a prey response. So,
01:56:57.160
so the, the zebras create chaos when they sense the predatory lion approaching them. And that for
01:57:03.700
some reason. I have to think about that. That's, that's very interesting because that, that also
01:57:08.360
means that the victims should sow chaos. Victims should sow chaos. Exactly. Exactly. I think,
01:57:14.600
you know, maybe part of it is, is that in higher ed, we are teaching people that they are victims.
01:57:21.780
Yeah. Your sole reference frame of the world is that, you know, it's sort of this weird dichotomy
01:57:28.220
where you can be anything and do anything you want to be. Totally unconstrained. Yeah. Yeah. But,
01:57:33.380
but there's this hyper oppressive patriarchal hierarchy that is going to keep you from being
01:57:40.660
successful. Yeah. You have no chance of being successful. Well, it's going to eat you. Basically,
01:57:47.700
we're teaching young people that they cannot be successful. And so of course, they're going to
01:57:53.820
have a prey response to being told you're being preyed upon. Well, that's very interesting. I hadn't
01:57:58.020
thought about that, that, that, that sowing of chaos as a prey animal response. That's very
01:58:03.460
interesting. Yeah. Off to stew on that. It's a hypothesis, but yeah, yeah, yeah. Stew on it because
01:58:09.160
I think, um, you know, we're sort of getting both aspects of it wrong. The, the predatory value
01:58:14.840
seeking goal oriented side of the equation, which is what you say in 12 rules for life,
01:58:20.880
go make something of yourself and become a better person. And, um, all of the good things
01:58:25.800
that happen downstream of that, that is the predatory side of the equation. I think in, in,
01:58:32.000
in translating the analogy to nature and the, the prey side of the equation is sort of hyper
01:58:38.900
victimization where, and we're teaching young people. Yeah. Well, that, that first pattern
01:58:45.460
deteriorates into predator and the second pattern deteriorates into prey. Right. Yeah. Yeah,
01:58:52.460
exactly. Exactly. Right. And I think that's probably true. I think that's probably true. And this is
01:58:56.640
partly why the more radical left-wing end of the interpretive spectrum is difficult to get rid of is
01:59:01.960
because that first pattern of goal seeking can deteriorate into predator and often does.
01:59:08.300
Right. Absolutely. That's, that's the sort of an extremist, uh, you know, narcissistic bully
01:59:14.560
is the hyper predator. Right. Right. Directionally, the, the, the, the, the far left has the vector
01:59:21.980
correct. I mean, those people definitely exist. Yes. Yeah. And those tendencies. Yeah. But, but the
01:59:27.640
categories, the ideological pattern categorization of every predatory behavior as narcissistic psychopath
01:59:36.480
is just, well, misses the nuance of the olive oil for wine trade that is, that actually does have an
01:59:44.080
ethic built into it that they just say, well, that doesn't exist. Right. All treasure hunting behavior
01:59:49.760
is not predatory. Exactly. Well, how's the bee going to eat? Right, right, right. Okay. Okay. Well,
01:59:55.320
that's a good place to end, Derek. That's a good place to end. You know, that's a nice, that's a
01:59:59.560
nice summation of what we've been discussing. So for everybody who's watching and listening,
02:00:03.640
I'm going to continue to talk to Derek for another half an hour on the daily wire plus side, as I do
02:00:07.860
with all my guests. And so if you want to join us, then I'm going to have to take five minutes and
02:00:12.380
figure out where I want to take this next, but, um, it'll probably be a continuation of the biological
02:00:17.900
analogy because I think it's, I think it's extremely useful. So if you want to join us for that,
02:00:22.820
do so to everybody who's watching and listening, thank you very much for your time and attention,
02:00:27.620
Derek. Thanks very much for talking to me today. Yeah. Yeah. Well, I'm glad we got to weave in,
02:00:32.900
uh, like the practicalities of your career into, you know, the philosophical and biological
02:00:40.280
discussions that we've had before. That's exactly what I was hoping to accomplish. And I think we
02:00:45.160
managed that. So thank you very much for that, sir. Let's take five. And for everybody watching and
02:00:50.100
listening again, thanks for your time and attention.