The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast - March 25, 2024


434. The Darien Gap & Postmodernism | Bret Weinstein


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 42 minutes

Words per Minute

144.86494

Word Count

14,894

Sentence Count

857

Misogynist Sentences

7

Hate Speech Sentences

31


Summary

In this episode, Dr. Brett Weinstein joins me to talk about the Darien Gap, immigration, and shamanism, and how they can work together in order to unify a diverse society in the face of a diverse plurality. We also talk about his new book, The Sacred and the Shamanic, and why he thinks shamanism might be the key to unifying a society, even in face of diverse plurality, so that it becomes maximally productive, generous, and sustainable across time. And, of course, we take a look at the COVID disaster, and its impact on our understanding of what happened, and what we can do to prevent it from happening in the future. This episode is sponsored by Viking. Viking is committed to exploring the world in comfort, journey through the heart of Europe on an elegant Viking longship, with thoughtful service, cultural enrichment, and all-inclusive fairs. Discover more at Viking.co.nz/Viking. Viking is a company committed to discovering, caring, and celebrating all things Viking and all things related to Viking and Viking culture. Viking's mission is to explore, understand, and celebrate Viking culture and the Viking legacy through all mediums of knowledge and information. Viking s mission statement is simple: to make Viking a place where people can learn, experience, and share Viking's knowledge and experience. Viking Viking is an all inclusive festival and fair, with all inclusive fairs that celebrate the Viking way of life, and fairs where they celebrate Viking s Viking's Viking's connection with the Viking past and their legacy. Viking, Viking s journey to Viking's past and present. Viking has a mission to help others understand Viking s knowledge and understanding of the Viking's own history, and to help them understand Viking's legacy, so they can learn from Viking s past and learn more about Viking s connection with Viking s own past and past and future, and help them apply Viking s legacy to their own culture and their own story. It s mission to make the Viking culture to the world, and the world. the best way to understand the Viking story, Viking's story, and their impact on the world Viking s relationship to Viking s story and their future Viking's role in the Viking experience of Viking s work, and beyond Viking s experience, the Viking s contribution to the Viking tale, Viking tells us more about the Viking sagas, and so on, so we can be a little more inclusive and more.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Viking, committed to exploring the world in comfort, journey through the heart of Europe
00:00:05.480 on an elegant Viking longship with thoughtful service, cultural enrichment, and all-inclusive
00:00:11.660 fairs.
00:00:12.540 Discover more at Viking.com.
00:00:14.720 Hello, everybody.
00:00:30.180 I had the great pleasure today of speaking with Brett Weinstein, who I've talked to a fair
00:00:35.860 bit and who has mediated some of the debates I had with Sam Harris.
00:00:40.520 And, you know, our conversations have been very productive across the last, it's getting
00:00:45.720 to be seven or eight years.
00:00:47.760 We started today by talking about the Darien Gap and the problem of immigration, and we
00:00:52.660 moved from that to the solution to that problem after analyzing not least the fact that immigration
00:01:00.120 conducted in this manner is very hard on the people who are immigrating, you know, traversing
00:01:04.380 the jungle as they have to, being robbed and raped in consequence.
00:01:07.500 It's a very haphazard way of going about whatever the hell's going on.
00:01:11.640 We talked about that then in broader terms with regards to the relationship between the
00:01:17.300 fact of that uncontrolled and unrestrained immigration, like that's a pathologization
00:01:23.500 of something that's necessary and something that's also producing a somewhat of a constitutional
00:01:28.820 crisis at the moment.
00:01:29.820 We talked about that in relationship to broader conceptions of multiculturalism per se, and
00:01:34.840 talked about the advantages and disadvantages to that diversification of society.
00:01:40.420 And we went from there deeper, I would say, into a discussion of what it is that might
00:01:46.180 necessarily be key to unifying a society, even in the face of a diverse plurality, so that
00:01:53.080 it becomes maximally productive, generous, and sustainable across time.
00:01:57.440 And that led us into a discussion of, as Brett put it, the sacred and the shamanic as two
00:02:04.500 manifestations of that which is deepest.
00:02:08.300 So, join us for the ride.
00:02:11.540 Hello, sir.
00:02:12.340 It's been a while since we talked.
00:02:14.380 How are you doing?
00:02:16.240 I'm doing all right.
00:02:16.960 It's great to see you, Jordan, as always.
00:02:18.940 Sorry to hear about your troubles up in Canada.
00:02:21.960 Oh, yeah.
00:02:22.420 People bring that up, and it kind of surprises me, because I forget about it fairly quickly.
00:02:28.060 It's so absurd and preposterous that it's hard to take it with any degree of seriousness.
00:02:34.380 I think it's partly because it's more serious for other people in some ways than it is for
00:02:38.480 me.
00:02:39.600 I mean, there's not much they can do to me.
00:02:41.620 They can damage my reputation a little bit.
00:02:44.380 Oh, I don't know.
00:02:45.020 I think they're probably fueling your reputation.
00:02:46.900 But, you know, it's a badge of honor that they would go after you this way.
00:02:51.900 It's definitely flack over the target.
00:02:54.980 Yeah, well, at some point, too, it becomes necessary to stop your association with people
00:03:00.700 who have deviated from the appropriate course too dramatically.
00:03:05.460 So, and I have to figure out how to negotiate that.
00:03:08.840 Tell me, Brett, what are you up to?
00:03:10.660 Like, what does your life look like right now?
00:03:12.540 What are you working on?
00:03:13.640 What sort of problems are you and your wife trying to solve intellectually, practically?
00:03:19.180 Where are you in your life?
00:03:21.740 That's a good question.
00:03:23.440 At the moment, my mind is racing having just come back from Panama and looking at the migration
00:03:31.260 coming through the Darien Gap.
00:03:34.340 That was a shocking experience, even though I was pretty well-versed in the details of what
00:03:40.060 was going on.
00:03:40.800 And seeing it has changed a lot of things.
00:03:43.640 In my thinking.
00:03:45.400 So that's one thing.
00:03:46.960 I'm also quite focused on the fact that the COVID disaster, whatever its actual nature
00:03:54.680 was, is something that we've reached a lot of clarity at great cost.
00:04:00.220 But because we are not having a final discussion about what took place, the folks who made this
00:04:08.200 happen, the folks who orchestrated it, seemed to be building the structures that would have
00:04:13.600 allowed them to defeat the dissidents.
00:04:16.000 And most people are not paying attention to those changes.
00:04:20.660 And I have the sense that we're being set up for a rematch.
00:04:24.080 And it will not go well if we don't derail their efforts.
00:04:27.800 Okay, so you've been constant.
00:04:31.080 Well, okay, so let's put those together a little bit.
00:04:33.680 You were down in Panama with Michael Yon, if I remember correctly.
00:04:37.820 I do know this.
00:04:38.780 I was thinking about coming along, although that became impossible at the present time
00:04:43.680 for a variety of reasons.
00:04:44.860 Not least because I'm trying to finish up my most recent book.
00:04:49.620 But you were down there and you took a look.
00:04:52.580 So tell me about going down there.
00:04:55.060 Tell me what the advantages were of actually being there and maybe also the potential disadvantages.
00:05:00.340 I mean, looking at it from a distance obviously has its costs, but looking at it close makes
00:05:07.480 it extraordinarily personal.
00:05:08.820 And so I'm curious about what you've concluded, how you've recalibrated your views, what you
00:05:17.420 think is going on there, what you saw.
00:05:20.100 And then we'll talk more perhaps about, well, let's start with what's going on.
00:05:24.700 My understanding is that essentially the migration levels into the U.S. from the south have doubled
00:05:31.240 per year from their all-time high.
00:05:34.180 So there were something like 1.3 million people coming across the border in various forms,
00:05:40.580 say 20 years ago, and that was kind of a peak.
00:05:43.360 And then it declined quite precipitously for a number of years, and now it's doubled from
00:05:47.940 that, at least doubled from that peak.
00:05:49.780 So is that your understanding?
00:05:51.940 And what did you see?
00:05:54.620 Well, that's exactly the kind of thing that is impossible to assess based on direct observation.
00:05:59.880 Obviously, you want data over a long period of time at every place where people are crossing,
00:06:07.340 and I couldn't get that.
00:06:09.440 The truth is, I was unsure why I was going.
00:06:15.080 I felt very strongly that I needed to see it, but I couldn't explain to myself what that
00:06:20.020 was going to change because I had seen so much of the documentation before.
00:06:23.680 And what I discovered was that my intuition that I should see it in person was quite right,
00:06:30.700 that what changed was not so much looking through one's own eyes versus looking through
00:06:37.480 a camera lens, but the understanding of physically how things are distributed in space is not something
00:06:44.960 you can even pick up from the map.
00:06:47.520 You have to traverse some of these distances in order to see what's taking place.
00:06:54.780 And to give you an example of what that changes, there's obviously a terminology problem.
00:07:02.140 We have lots of people talking in terms of an invasion of the U.S., and we have other
00:07:07.340 people talking about a migration.
00:07:08.780 And what I came to understand in looking at this is that it's actually both things, and
00:07:17.460 they're not the same.
00:07:19.100 There's clearly a huge wave of people.
00:07:22.800 They are fleeing poverty and the collapse of their societies.
00:07:28.920 They are migrating north for economic reasons.
00:07:34.160 And this becomes quite apparent when you talk to people in the camps.
00:07:40.660 There are these transit camps where people who have just walked out of the jungle in the
00:07:44.220 Darien Gap are spending time recovering and, in large measure, accumulating enough money
00:07:51.840 to buy a bus ticket.
00:07:53.740 Almost everybody gets robbed walking through the Darien Gap, and so they arrive with nothing.
00:07:58.660 And, anyway, they spend time in these camps, and you can walk around and speak with them.
00:08:04.880 Often there are language barriers.
00:08:06.700 But the interesting thing is everybody seems eager to talk, and they all say the same thing
00:08:12.940 when you ask them why.
00:08:14.020 It's always about money.
00:08:16.960 And, you know, I don't mean to trivialize it.
00:08:20.780 Obviously, many of our ancestors migrated because of the poverty of their home countries and the
00:08:28.720 comparative opportunity they found in the new world.
00:08:32.160 But what it isn't is people seeking political asylum.
00:08:37.400 That's the excuse that's used at our southern border in the U.S.
00:08:40.600 But it's absolutely not true.
00:08:42.180 Not a single person said anything remotely like the idea that they were being oppressed or
00:08:49.760 targeted.
00:08:50.280 They were not being persecuted.
00:08:51.860 So, on the one hand, there is this large migration of people understandably looking
00:08:56.900 for opportunity.
00:08:59.940 And the problem is that the rules of our system say that that's not a justification for entering
00:09:05.740 the country because to the extent that people are entering the country for economic reasons,
00:09:10.300 they do so at the cost to Americans who are already here.
00:09:15.840 And it's obviously the obligation of our government to protect the interests of the citizens.
00:09:20.600 And this is a failure in that regard.
00:09:23.300 But what becomes apparent when you look at this migration, it has a certain character to
00:09:29.920 it.
00:09:30.220 It's recognizable and not so different from the waves of migration that we used to see come
00:09:35.360 up from Central America.
00:09:36.940 But there is this other movement of large numbers of people.
00:09:43.540 They are Chinese.
00:09:45.300 They are housed separately.
00:09:47.260 This is the thing that's really hard to understand, is that they effectively mix into this massive
00:09:55.480 migration of economic refugees, having traveled a different route.
00:10:00.620 Most of the Chinese migrants are actually skipping the tribulations of the Darien Gap by boat.
00:10:08.320 And they are housed in different places.
00:10:11.360 And when one attempts to go talk to them, there are two obstacles to getting any information.
00:10:18.240 One is that the border authorities, the Sena Front, forbids access to the camp where the Chinese
00:10:27.800 migrants are housed.
00:10:29.500 Now, some of the members of Sena Front are clearly not happy about the job that they have
00:10:34.500 been told to do.
00:10:36.460 But nonetheless, we were unable...
00:10:37.280 So what's that organization, Brett?
00:10:38.360 What's that organization?
00:10:40.300 Sena Front.
00:10:41.420 It is effectively the Panamanian Border Authority.
00:10:44.880 Okay.
00:10:45.260 So the Panamanian Border Authority.
00:10:46.680 And do you want to tell people exactly what the Darien Gap is?
00:10:51.020 Sure.
00:10:51.820 The Darien Gap is a 60-mile gap in the Pan-American Highway.
00:10:56.720 The Pan-American Highway runs 17,000 miles from Prudhoe Bay, Alaska, to the southern tip of
00:11:02.200 South America.
00:11:03.220 And there's only one place where you can't traverse it by road.
00:11:06.240 And that's in the Darien province of Panama, where Panama meets Colombia.
00:11:10.500 And what exists there is a formidable jungle.
00:11:15.780 It is an extremely treacherous place, even just at the physical level of crossing it.
00:11:23.120 It's something that requires a great deal of skill to get across it.
00:11:27.500 And most of the migrants do not have the requisite skills.
00:11:30.540 They certainly don't have the equipment.
00:11:32.040 And there's a human tragedy unfolding in the Darien Gap as a result of the fact that these
00:11:37.720 people are being encouraged to come across.
00:11:42.320 But that piece of road has never been completed, in part because the jungle is difficult, but
00:11:47.440 in large measure because that part of Panama is effectively ungoverned.
00:11:52.680 It's a no-man's land, in addition to being an ecological treasure, unique on Earth and
00:12:01.380 even more special because so much of the more accessible jungle in the neotropics has been
00:12:07.260 devastated by various processes, mining, illegal lumber extraction, etc.
00:12:14.880 Well, you were talking about the Chinese migration, which, you know, sounds to me like a complete
00:12:20.600 bloody mystery.
00:12:21.440 So, like, on what scale is this occurring?
00:12:25.480 Why are the Chinese housed differently?
00:12:27.980 Who are they?
00:12:29.200 Why are you forbidden?
00:12:30.640 You said there were obstacles to talking to them.
00:12:32.640 One was the Panamanian border authorities.
00:12:35.500 You had made allusion to another obstacle.
00:12:39.460 So, let's continue with the discussion of the Chinese.
00:12:42.320 So, the other obstacle is the Chinese themselves, who are absolutely not forthcoming in a way
00:12:51.740 that is utterly conspicuous.
00:12:54.600 Now, I've been to many places on Earth, some of them dangerous.
00:12:59.300 I've encountered people who were reluctant to talk because they feared some authority would
00:13:05.340 get wind of what they had said and that they would be punished.
00:13:07.900 This did not feel like that at all.
00:13:10.060 These were people who were not interested in conveying information about why they were migrating.
00:13:17.540 And, in fact, their tone, to the extent that one interacted with them at all, was mocking
00:13:24.400 of us for our interest.
00:13:26.660 In fact, there was one incident where Michael Yan, who has spent time in China and all over
00:13:32.300 the world, was trying to strike up a conversation.
00:13:38.680 And this one gentleman pretended to be Korean and not Chinese.
00:13:45.980 And Michael caught him.
00:13:49.300 He induced him to say something in Chinese.
00:13:51.840 And there was laughter amongst all of the folks sitting there.
00:13:55.720 They thought this was quite funny.
00:13:57.860 But, nonetheless, the Chinese migration is not entirely men, but it is heavily biased in
00:14:04.360 favor of men.
00:14:05.380 They appear to be young and fit, military age for the most part.
00:14:11.220 But the Chinese camp, I realized only after I had left, that I did not see children there.
00:14:19.260 That's very different than the other migrants, many of whom have children.
00:14:24.620 And they were everywhere in the other camps.
00:14:27.640 So there's something very special about whatever is going on with the Chinese migrants.
00:14:32.160 And it is very odd that the very same border authority that would not allow us into the
00:14:38.200 Chinese camp, a place called San Vicente, were perfectly happy to have us walk around
00:14:44.380 the other camp.
00:14:45.320 We were free to walk around and take photographs.
00:14:47.600 It was night and day different how they treated the two groups and for no obvious reason.
00:14:53.560 Is there any sense, do you have any sense of comparative numbers, say, of the economic
00:14:59.520 migrants versus the mysterious Chinese migrants?
00:15:03.860 And any sense of why this difference exists?
00:15:06.980 And what does Michael Yan think about that difference, just out of curiosity?
00:15:12.240 That is a great question.
00:15:14.500 Michael is obviously quite concerned about the meaning of the Chinese migration as a separate
00:15:18.980 matter.
00:15:19.320 And, you know, I must say, just for the benefit of clarity to your audience, my view is that
00:15:27.740 it is one of compassion for the Chinese people who I view as living under an oppressive regime.
00:15:35.720 And to the extent that that oppressive regime is an enemy of my country, I view people who
00:15:41.000 are being oppressed by it sympathetically.
00:15:44.720 But I did not have the sense that I was looking at people fleeing that regime.
00:15:49.080 I had the sense that I was looking at people who were migrating at the encouragement of that
00:15:57.000 regime.
00:15:58.000 Now, I can't say that that's definitely true, but that was definitely the flavor of it as
00:16:03.860 we were attempting to understand what we were saying.
00:16:06.340 I don't know what the comparative numbers are.
00:16:08.480 I know that we're talking about thousands of people a day, sometimes 10,000.
00:16:17.820 That's a number that I heard described by people in a position to know.
00:16:21.700 I also know it's very clear on the ground that the expectation is for those numbers to
00:16:28.840 rise considerably.
00:16:30.000 That there are elaborations of these camps being constructed.
00:16:34.200 And what does considerably mean, do you suppose?
00:16:36.240 Because that's about, we bandied around the figure of about three, three and a half million
00:16:40.420 earlier in the program.
00:16:41.860 And my understanding at the moment is that that's the case.
00:16:44.340 I've looked into the data to some degree and tried to update myself and to also view this
00:16:49.880 in some historical perspective.
00:16:51.280 So what do you think substantive increase means?
00:16:54.360 And you don't have any real idea what percentage of those so-called migrants are the Chinese
00:17:01.280 that you described.
00:17:04.600 Going online without ExpressVPN is like not paying attention to the safety demonstration
00:17:09.040 on a flight.
00:17:10.140 Most of the time, you'll probably be fine.
00:17:12.200 But what if one day that weird yellow mask drops down from overhead and you have no idea
00:17:17.120 what to do?
00:17:17.920 In our hyper-connected world, your digital privacy isn't just a luxury.
00:17:21.700 It's a fundamental right.
00:17:22.880 Every time you connect to an unsecured network in a cafe, hotel, or airport, you're essentially
00:17:27.860 broadcasting your personal information to anyone with a technical know-how to intercept
00:17:32.020 it.
00:17:32.360 And let's be clear, it doesn't take a genius hacker to do this.
00:17:35.560 With some off-the-shelf hardware, even a tech-savvy teenager could potentially access
00:17:39.660 your passwords, bank logins, and credit card details.
00:17:42.940 Now, you might think, what's the big deal?
00:17:45.040 Who'd want my data anyway?
00:17:46.600 Well, on the dark web, your personal information could fetch up to $1,000.
00:17:50.460 That's right, there's a whole underground economy built on stolen identities.
00:17:55.280 Enter ExpressVPN.
00:17:57.040 It's like a digital fortress, creating an encrypted tunnel between your device and the
00:18:01.040 internet.
00:18:01.720 Their encryption is so robust that it would take a hacker with a supercomputer over a
00:18:05.920 billion years to crack it.
00:18:07.320 But don't let its power fool you.
00:18:09.060 ExpressVPN is incredibly user-friendly.
00:18:11.160 With just one click, you're protected across all your devices.
00:18:14.560 Phones, laptops, tablets, you name it.
00:18:16.740 That's why I use ExpressVPN whenever I'm traveling or working from a coffee shop.
00:18:20.860 It gives me peace of mind knowing that my research, communications, and personal data
00:18:25.000 are shielded from prying eyes.
00:18:26.860 Secure your online data today by visiting expressvpn.com slash jordan.
00:18:31.620 That's E-X-P-R-E-S-S-V-P-N dot com slash jordan, and you can get an extra three months
00:18:37.000 free.
00:18:38.020 ExpressVPN dot com slash jordan.
00:18:39.860 I don't, and I also find it fascinating that the two migrations appear to fuse in Derry
00:18:55.760 and Panama.
00:18:56.580 There's no obvious reason for that.
00:18:58.420 To the extent that the Chinese are coming in by boat, it's almost, to me, it feels like
00:19:06.240 the familiar economic migration is cloaking something else, that there's a deliberate
00:19:16.180 choice to blend these two things so that people trying to discuss what's taking place will
00:19:21.360 mistake one for the other.
00:19:22.500 Now, I hope that's just my imagination running away with me, but the distinction in the demeanor
00:19:30.440 of the migrants and the behavior of those in charge of these camps was unmistakable.
00:19:37.060 Right.
00:19:37.280 Well, so what you have there for hard data, so to speak, is the fact of the difference in
00:19:43.280 the response of the authorities to the presence of the two types of camp, right?
00:19:48.180 Because that begs an obvious question.
00:19:50.280 It's like, well, if it's nothing but one thing, why are there two processes?
00:19:55.560 Right.
00:19:55.960 And I should also, just for the sake of completeness, say that we did see some Chinese folks in
00:20:01.380 the main camps.
00:20:03.380 Now, I don't know what the meaning of that exactly is.
00:20:06.080 We saw signs that were in Chinese, and the migrants in the main camps were not forthcoming either.
00:20:15.560 So I can't say what's taking place, but I can say that one of these migrations appears
00:20:24.400 to be highly organized and careful, and the other one is so disorganized as to be tragic.
00:20:32.940 The number of people who are being beckoned to cross the Darien Gap, who are being robbed,
00:20:39.980 that's virtually all of them, raped, which is a large fraction of the women crossing through
00:20:46.340 and dying in the gap because they were unprepared or victims of violence.
00:20:53.460 It's really, it's an unspeakable horror that anybody would be encouraging people to join that
00:21:00.980 migration.
00:21:02.940 Okay, so let's concentrate on that for a sec.
00:21:06.140 I want to leap up the ladder a bit conceptually here.
00:21:09.700 So, as you pointed out, the United States as being an immigrant country, it isn't obvious
00:21:21.420 what its carrying capacity is.
00:21:24.120 That's a very complicated problem.
00:21:25.760 It isn't obvious at all how much immigration is too little, optimal, or too much.
00:21:33.340 It's certainly the case that it's a straightforward thing to be sympathetic for people who are
00:21:41.960 moving merely because they want better economic opportunities for themselves and their children.
00:21:48.260 I mean, that's a very compelling reason.
00:21:49.800 It's not something to be made light of.
00:21:52.600 It's interesting that you observed there were very, there was almost no claim of necessity
00:22:00.540 for political asylum.
00:22:01.880 Now, what you would hope, possibly, is that we could have an intelligent discussion about
00:22:10.280 an optimized rate of migration.
00:22:13.000 Now, you pointed out that a rapid influx of poverty-stricken people into a stable society
00:22:19.580 potentially produces a situation where those people compete, especially with the people
00:22:26.340 who are struggling hardest in the current state for relative economic opportunity.
00:22:34.080 And so, that migration is typically not a detriment to people who are in established positions of
00:22:41.080 hierarchical advantage.
00:22:44.380 But they're definitely, or you could make the strongest case that they are genuine competitors
00:22:50.680 for people at the lower end of the socioeconomic distribution.
00:22:54.440 Now, we seem to be experiencing something akin to that in Canada.
00:22:59.240 We have the highest migration rate in the world at the moment, if I have my fingers correct,
00:23:05.080 or at least in the Western world, which is where people generally want to immigrate.
00:23:08.140 And one of the consequences of that, apparently, is an absolute explosion in housing prices.
00:23:14.380 And obviously, that's going to hurt people who are poorest the most.
00:23:19.020 Okay, but there is some utility in migration, let's say.
00:23:23.680 And it is also the case that the U.S. economy depends to some degree on the availability of
00:23:29.100 low-cost labor.
00:23:30.540 All right.
00:23:30.860 Now, what you would hope, in my estimation, is that that would be handled with some degree
00:23:37.120 of forethought and intelligence.
00:23:39.420 And that wouldn't be the kind of handling that would result in a constitutional crisis
00:23:45.640 in the U.S., which seems to be unfolding in a manner that's absolutely jaw-dropping.
00:23:50.180 But even perhaps more directly relevant to your story is, well, if we're being driven by
00:23:58.440 sympathy with those who are struggling to be free and to pursue economic opportunity in
00:24:04.540 the spirit of the great American dream, it's still immoral to have those people enter the
00:24:11.560 country, first, illegally, and second, second, at great risk to themselves in this haphazard
00:24:19.120 manner, and third, in a manner that's absolutely and 100% of clear benefit to cartel criminals.
00:24:26.240 So, so what the hell, Brett?
00:24:30.340 Like, and this opens up an even wider topic of discussion.
00:24:34.420 I mean, I would say from our discussions previously that your political views, such as they are,
00:24:43.920 were likely to be more liberal than mine have become.
00:24:49.440 I never regarded myself as a particularly conservative person until, well, until whatever's happened
00:24:57.040 in the last 10 years happened.
00:24:59.200 And, but, but I do believe that on some issues, at least, you're on the more progressive side
00:25:04.900 than me.
00:25:05.400 Now, you've been battled around in all sorts of interesting ways over the last decade, and
00:25:10.880 you've seen some very strange things transpire.
00:25:13.760 And it's clearly the case that your trip to the Darien Gap was one of those experiences.
00:25:19.440 And so, what do you make of the immigration issue?
00:25:23.660 What do you make of how it's handled?
00:25:24.960 And then, what do you think's going on, and why?
00:25:28.060 And what has this done in the long sequence of things that have exposed you to the kinds
00:25:36.840 of information that might require people, at least at some level, to modify their views?
00:25:44.160 All right, I'll try to remember all those questions.
00:25:46.460 Well, I'll try to remember them, too.
00:25:49.440 Um, the first thing to say is there is some rate of immigration that makes sense.
00:25:58.040 I don't really see this as an issue of carrying capacity because the number of migrants might
00:26:02.800 well, that is desirable, might well vary with the economic era.
00:26:07.580 But the problem here is that, A, we never had the discussion.
00:26:13.080 We are simultaneously facilitating this migration.
00:26:16.080 The American flag is visible on projects in this migration in the Darien of Panama.
00:26:23.160 We're facilitating it.
00:26:24.520 The international community is facilitating it through the IOM, the International Organization
00:26:29.520 of Migration, an entity that appears to believe that migration is simply in and of itself
00:26:34.580 a good thing.
00:26:35.580 And that's what's the organization?
00:26:38.580 IOM, the International Organization of Migration for Migration.
00:26:44.580 Um, the, the idea that these, uh, presumably well-intended people are inviting people into the horror of the, the Darien Gap, uh, is mind-blowing.
00:26:57.500 But nonetheless, if we were to decide that some level of migration was desirable at this moment
00:27:03.940 in history, you certainly wouldn't go about it this way.
00:27:07.160 For one thing, we are in effect repeating the error that we've seen in Europe, where a huge
00:27:15.080 wave of migration arrived and nobody thought to ask the question of the migrants if they
00:27:20.340 wanted to be European.
00:27:21.940 And so, a large number of people entered Europe who appeared absolutely hostile to the values
00:27:29.780 of the West.
00:27:30.380 And my feeling is, if you're going to bring people in, then you bring people in who want
00:27:35.620 to be part of your society.
00:27:37.560 It's the obvious question, and not asking it is such a dangerous mistake to make.
00:27:41.800 I can't believe we would repeat that error.
00:27:44.020 But we are absolutely doing it.
00:27:46.300 Now, I did not see the migration at the southern border, but many others have.
00:27:50.480 And they report that nobody is being asked anything.
00:27:53.880 People are effectively asked their, their identity, their name, and their birth date.
00:27:59.720 And nobody checks.
00:28:02.200 Now, that is certain.
00:28:04.880 Even if the majority of people arriving at our southern border are simply people looking
00:28:10.940 for a better way of life, who are disproportionately likely to be hardworking and to behave themselves,
00:28:17.560 that is certainly going to provide a mechanism for people who are not going to behave and
00:28:22.100 don't want to be part of the U.S. to arrive unannounced.
00:28:26.020 There's no way that doesn't turn into a disaster in the near term.
00:28:29.780 So, if the answer is...
00:28:30.440 And a disaster of what form?
00:28:32.200 A disaster of what form?
00:28:33.600 Apart from...
00:28:34.280 Now, you pointed to one thing, which is the general problem of integration.
00:28:39.080 And that brings up a whole wealth of potential issues.
00:28:42.620 Like, are we contemplating this through the lens of something like the classic melting pot?
00:28:48.620 Are we making the assumptions that there is a core set of Western values and even more
00:28:53.360 specifically American values that must and should be abided by people who come?
00:29:00.060 Are we abandoning the radical multicultural project that proclaims in the postmodern way that
00:29:06.340 there is no superordinate set of values?
00:29:09.160 And so...
00:29:09.680 And then...
00:29:10.720 So, that's more on the side of just the issue of integration per se and the issue of national
00:29:18.920 unity.
00:29:19.660 But then there's the darker part of that too, which is...
00:29:22.640 It's one thing to want to maintain your own culture.
00:29:25.740 It's another thing to be actively hostile to the culture that you are migrating to or invading.
00:29:34.040 Right?
00:29:34.680 I mean, those are very different people even.
00:29:37.280 I mean, at the worst, the former people are xenophobic.
00:29:41.580 At the worst, the latter people are armed enemies of your society.
00:29:46.040 Right?
00:29:46.560 And it's relatively...
00:29:47.880 Or psychopathic adventurers who are out to cause as much bloody mayhem for their own personal
00:29:53.940 satisfaction, including sadism, as they can possibly manage.
00:29:57.920 And if you don't think there are people like that, you're exactly the kind of idiot they
00:30:01.860 like to prey on.
00:30:02.700 So, okay.
00:30:04.900 So, you have concerns.
00:30:06.640 It sounds like you have concerns on both those fronts.
00:30:09.600 And I'm also curious about...
00:30:13.720 I mean, this is grounds for the deepest part of this discussion, potentially.
00:30:18.420 What might constitute the core values of the identity that people who would want to come
00:30:25.820 into the United States and be Americans...
00:30:28.440 Like, what is that core identity?
00:30:29.740 Because it's certainly the case that it doesn't look like Americans can come to any agreement
00:30:35.480 about that amongst themselves anymore.
00:30:37.620 And, you know, I'm not saying that as someone who isn't from a country where exactly the same
00:30:42.420 problems are making themselves manifest.
00:30:44.240 So, okay.
00:30:46.940 So, let's back up a little bit.
00:30:48.740 You see two problems here.
00:30:51.760 There's a problem of unregulated and badly planned economic migration.
00:30:58.060 And then there's a parallel problem of just exactly who is using that opportunity to do whatever
00:31:05.700 it is that they're doing.
00:31:07.160 Two separate categories of people.
00:31:09.340 Seems like at least a reasonable proposition or something to be apprehensive about.
00:31:13.700 Subsidiary problem, which is even if migration is good...
00:31:17.460 And as I said, historically, the allowance has been about a million people a year in the illegal
00:31:22.580 route, let's say.
00:31:24.660 Triple that is a lot.
00:31:26.100 We haven't had a chance to discuss that.
00:31:27.920 It looks like it's increasing.
00:31:29.960 And that brings us...
00:31:33.420 Brings forward the problem of integration.
00:31:36.700 And so, you pointed to this IOM, an organization, International Organization of Migration.
00:31:44.940 Is that the proper term?
00:31:45.800 For migration, yep.
00:31:47.200 Yeah?
00:31:47.720 And you said it is apparent to you and perhaps to them that unrestricted migration, and so
00:31:53.740 that would be like economic mobility, is that's what's driving us, is a philosophy of economic
00:31:57.940 mobility.
00:31:58.700 And that unrestricted migration is just a good thing in and of itself.
00:32:02.900 And there are, what, a variety of organizations who are pushing that proposition forward and
00:32:08.780 facilitating this movement.
00:32:10.620 And are they, like, advertising in the countries where these people are coming from?
00:32:14.460 How is this actually, how and why is this occurring, and how is it organized?
00:32:21.000 All right.
00:32:21.720 So, there's a bunch there.
00:32:23.000 I want to come back to the question of what are American values, what this has to do with
00:32:29.780 political left and right.
00:32:31.860 But I also want to address the question you just asked.
00:32:35.140 And so, there's a structure to this migration, which is not apparent to an outsider.
00:32:40.680 Most of the migrants are arriving in Quito, Ecuador.
00:32:45.920 It's not obvious why that should be.
00:32:49.020 Geographically, it's not the right place to start because Ecuador does not border Panama.
00:32:55.120 It happens that Ecuador has a policy of not requiring visas.
00:32:59.200 So, when people come from the Middle East, and there are many migrants in this migration
00:33:02.940 coming from the Middle East, odd as that sounds, they arrive in Quito, Ecuador.
00:33:09.360 They migrate through Colombia.
00:33:12.760 They enter the Darien Gap, and they cross over into Panama, at which point their journey
00:33:20.320 north is facilitated by these organizations very directly.
00:33:26.040 There are large buses, a huge fleet of them, that is constantly circulating.
00:33:31.580 And migrants are, as I've mentioned, they're almost always robbed as they cross the Darien.
00:33:40.020 It takes time for them to earn enough money to buy a bus ticket.
00:33:42.940 And if they don't earn enough money to buy a bus ticket, though this is not widely publicized,
00:33:47.940 they are given a ticket in order to speed them north.
00:33:51.180 And then, the strangest thing happens, which is all of the countries between Panama and the
00:33:58.240 United States, pass them along.
00:34:01.960 Now, Heather and I crossed through all of those borders, except the last one, between Panama
00:34:07.660 and Costa Rica, in 1991.
00:34:10.740 Every one of those borders was tightly controlled.
00:34:13.220 Nobody crosses, nobody gets waved through.
00:34:17.420 But now, if you're going north and you're in one of these buses, all of these countries
00:34:20.980 seem to have agreed that as long as you keep going, they're not going to say anything about it.
00:34:25.080 That's an odd fact, and it suggests a kind of international coercion in order to establish
00:34:33.000 this route and to keep it open.
00:34:36.200 So, the information about how to make the journey is being circulated, such that people know where
00:34:42.240 to fly and where to go from there.
00:34:45.540 You know, this is a modern migration.
00:34:47.380 Although, I met a young woman, Jennifer, who had just crossed through the Darien Gap, had
00:34:52.460 a horrifying story to tell.
00:34:54.040 Well, she's Venezuelan.
00:34:56.420 She was a college student, and she was fleeing the collapse of Venezuela.
00:35:01.120 She, in fact, said that she was headed to Costa Rica, where she intended to stop.
00:35:05.400 She was going to settle in Costa Rica.
00:35:07.340 But, in any case, the fact is, she had all of her money taken.
00:35:18.060 I did not ask her, though we spoke in oblique terms.
00:35:21.860 I'm quite convinced that she was raped while she was in the Gap.
00:35:27.360 And she was waiting to accumulate the money to get a bus ticket north.
00:35:34.680 I'm hoping that she will contact me and tell me how her journey is going.
00:35:39.960 But, nonetheless, yes, international organizations are creating the route and distributing information
00:35:47.060 about how to move.
00:35:49.360 These people start with cell phones that they're able to get up-to-date information.
00:35:55.680 The migration involves strange partners.
00:35:59.280 The Chinese camp San Vicente apparently involves lots of people having money wired to them from
00:36:05.640 family back in China via Western Union.
00:36:10.220 So, anyway, this is a different, it's a hybrid between the most low-tech slogging through jungle
00:36:18.400 and high-tech contact and exchange of funds and things that allows people to join these buses,
00:36:26.440 which are then spirited north.
00:36:30.420 But, yes, it's an open secret.
00:36:33.300 I mean, most Panamanians that I talk to, people in Panama City, were aware that there was some
00:36:38.880 migration but did not have very good information about it.
00:36:42.700 So, largely, this is just people passing through these societies.
00:36:48.240 Let's go back to the question you asked about political orientation and what the values are.
00:36:55.480 And I've done a lot of thinking about this long before I went to Panama to see this.
00:37:00.460 And I've come to the conclusion that we've been sold a bill of goods, and the bill of goods was called multiculturalism.
00:37:11.220 And the problem with multiculturalism is that it sounds like something that those of us who like to interact with people
00:37:18.320 from many different cultures should appreciate.
00:37:23.800 But it's, in fact, the opposite of the thing that we, the value that we actually hold.
00:37:28.660 The value that we actually hold, I would call Western cosmopolitanism.
00:37:33.540 Starting a business can be tough.
00:37:35.320 But thanks to Shopify, running your online storefront is easier than ever.
00:37:39.460 Shopify is the global commerce platform that helps you sell at every stage of your business.
00:37:43.520 From the launch your online shop stage, all the way to the did we just hit a million orders stage,
00:37:48.680 Shopify is here to help you grow.
00:37:50.860 Our marketing team uses Shopify every day to sell our merchandise,
00:37:54.000 and we love how easy it is to add more items, ship products, and track conversions.
00:37:58.800 With Shopify, customize your online store to your style with flexible templates and powerful tools,
00:38:04.120 alongside an endless list of integrations and third-party apps like on-demand printing, accounting, and chatbots.
00:38:09.860 Shopify helps you turn browsers into buyers with the internet's best converting checkout,
00:38:14.620 up to 36% better compared to other leading e-commerce platforms.
00:38:18.720 No matter how big you want to grow, Shopify gives you everything you need to take control
00:38:22.540 and take your business to the next level.
00:38:25.100 Sign up for a $1 per month trial period at shopify.com slash jbp, all lowercase.
00:38:31.140 Go to shopify.com slash jbp now to grow your business no matter what stage you're in.
00:38:36.400 That's shopify.com slash jbp.
00:38:39.860 Yeah, that's very different.
00:38:42.960 Western cosmopolitanism, it's the opposite, right?
00:38:46.960 Multiculturalism is the idea that people should not join our societies,
00:38:53.000 but they should maintain their own traditions in an isolated pocket,
00:38:59.460 and that we should effectively reject the idea of becoming one people in the West.
00:39:05.200 It's just a reduplication of the situation that obtains in the world at large with no appreciation
00:39:12.840 for the fact that if you bring people together and reduplicate the situation of the world at large
00:39:19.520 with no uniting meta-narrative, let's say, you also bring in all of the conflict.
00:39:27.360 Like, obviously, because the delusion seems to be that now just because they're,
00:39:33.620 and I think maybe it's fueled by this underlying materialism,
00:39:38.460 so maybe the notion is if you bring diverse people from all over the world,
00:39:43.180 regardless of their culture, and you provide them with sufficient economic opportunity,
00:39:47.740 given that conflict is driven fundamentally by economic need, let's say,
00:39:55.660 or economic differences, that that will just vanish somehow magically.
00:40:00.660 Now, I'm not saying anyone necessarily thought this through,
00:40:03.280 but, you know, my sense is this,
00:40:05.000 that the systems of ideas that are motivating these mass occurrences,
00:40:09.240 is they have their own internal spirit and forward-moving impetus,
00:40:17.780 and they can be full of internal conflict, and no one really sorts that out.
00:40:21.960 But that's what it seems to be.
00:40:23.680 It's got to be something like, well, we bring everyone together like they are where they already are,
00:40:29.140 but now because they're rich, it's going to work out fine.
00:40:31.800 And there isn't any universal system of values that needs to be preferred
00:40:36.440 other than the plenitude of economic opportunity.
00:40:39.880 And so why do you think there's something to that, right?
00:40:42.800 Because I would say you could make a case,
00:40:45.400 although it's not obvious that people who are in comparative poverty
00:40:48.700 are perhaps more likely to turn to conflict,
00:40:51.180 although I don't think the relationship is one-to-one.
00:40:53.740 What do you think is wrong with that theory of peace bequeathed by economic opportunity,
00:41:01.800 and why?
00:41:03.920 Well, let me put it in biological terms.
00:41:06.960 There are two basic reasons for any creature,
00:41:11.820 but especially humans, to collaborate.
00:41:15.060 The most primary reason is genetic relatedness.
00:41:20.280 The second reason is the value that is created through reciprocity.
00:41:27.060 And if you'll allow me to paint with a broad brush,
00:41:30.040 what we call the West, I believe,
00:41:34.020 is most fundamentally about the agreement to put aside our lineages
00:41:38.580 and collaborate because there is wealth to be produced.
00:41:43.460 And this notion, which, you know, it has its roots in antiquity,
00:41:50.880 but I believe that this was accidentally invented in its current form
00:41:56.060 by the American founding fathers.
00:41:58.800 That in essence, in order to confederate the colonies,
00:42:02.740 they built a set of rules that didn't put anybody at particular advantage.
00:42:07.160 Now, they did it imperfectly.
00:42:08.540 There's obviously some glaring defects in our founding documents and things.
00:42:12.840 But in general, they solved this tremendous problem.
00:42:15.880 And over the course of the next couple hundred years,
00:42:19.740 that system was so unbelievably productive.
00:42:24.220 By putting the people who were in the best position to collaborate into contact
00:42:29.380 and facilitating their putting their racial differences aside,
00:42:32.920 we became a powerhouse.
00:42:35.400 And so the American experiment became contagious
00:42:39.860 because once people saw how dynamic it was
00:42:43.120 and what a high price they had been paying
00:42:45.280 for putting their genetic relatedness first,
00:42:48.200 everybody wanted to join it.
00:42:49.840 So that is, to me, the West.
00:42:52.880 And although I am a patriotic American,
00:42:54.820 I am a patriot of that idea.
00:42:57.800 I think it is the thing that we should rally around.
00:43:01.100 And what it means is that we should take on this cosmopolitan notion
00:43:07.080 that you can partner with anybody.
00:43:10.160 It's really a question of whether they have the right insight and values,
00:43:14.360 not a question of what God they pray to.
00:43:18.080 And that is now under attack.
00:43:21.900 That is under attack from people who would fetishize our differences
00:43:27.560 and make it impossible for that kind of collaboration to happen.
00:43:31.340 So I do see the West as back on its heels
00:43:34.860 and in need of a vigorous defense,
00:43:39.900 which is part of why I'm doing what I'm doing.
00:43:42.620 I think the world is in great danger if that idea is lost,
00:43:46.960 even for a brief period.
00:43:49.360 Okay, so let me ask you about that.
00:43:51.360 And I do also want to return to,
00:43:53.600 I guess we're probably approaching it obliquely anyways,
00:43:56.460 to the transformation of your ideas about political and economic structure.
00:44:01.720 But there's an element of the argument that you just formulated
00:44:05.680 that I can't easily distinguish from the proposition
00:44:10.160 that mere material opportunity will bring peace.
00:44:15.060 So let me walk through your argument and summarize it.
00:44:18.620 Tell me if I've got any of it wrong.
00:44:20.280 And then let's delve more deeply into that possible paradox.
00:44:27.620 So the first thing you posit is that
00:44:30.020 the default social organization for human beings is kin relation, right?
00:44:37.920 And the word kind itself comes from kin.
00:44:40.220 And so we are, by nature,
00:44:44.320 more likely to extend our sense of self
00:44:49.440 to those who are genetically related to us.
00:44:53.460 And there's great utility in that,
00:44:55.620 not least on the reproductive front,
00:44:57.480 if you think about it across time,
00:44:58.900 but also it enables us to form
00:45:01.120 the tight blood-based bonds, so to speak,
00:45:04.900 that are least likely to be broken with the ravages of time.
00:45:11.160 Now, there is a transformation in viewpoint,
00:45:14.040 which you associated most particularly
00:45:17.080 with the founding of the United States,
00:45:20.140 that transformed that idea into something like
00:45:24.700 a more general appreciation for the possibilities
00:45:29.040 of radical altruistic reciprocity,
00:45:33.660 regardless of kin relation.
00:45:36.960 I wouldn't say altruistic.
00:45:39.600 The thing that drives it evolutionarily...
00:45:41.100 Reciprocally altruistic?
00:45:43.380 Reciprocally altruistic means
00:45:45.460 that we are at advantage by collaborating.
00:45:49.200 We both come out ahead.
00:45:50.040 Yeah, that's fine.
00:45:50.540 That's fine.
00:45:51.180 I'm sorry.
00:45:52.600 That's perfectly reasonable restatement.
00:45:57.380 So, the notion is that there's tremendous
00:46:00.560 comparative advantage to be gained
00:46:02.440 as a consequence of collaboration
00:46:04.120 independent of kinship.
00:46:06.060 And that's partly because you can draw
00:46:07.580 on a more diverse range of talents and abilities,
00:46:10.740 and developing that argument
00:46:12.800 might buttress suggestions
00:46:15.340 that a more diverse multicultural population
00:46:17.880 would be useful because of diversity of opinion,
00:46:20.100 if you buy that sort of thing.
00:46:23.280 But then...
00:46:24.620 And then...
00:46:25.460 So, I would take issue
00:46:27.100 with two of your propositions.
00:46:28.560 One is that the core of that
00:46:30.100 is somehow American.
00:46:32.020 And also, although I think
00:46:33.720 the Americans elaborated that very well,
00:46:35.760 but also that...
00:46:37.340 I don't see how to distinguish that
00:46:39.500 from the proposition
00:46:40.460 that mere economic success
00:46:42.740 will guarantee something approximating peace
00:46:46.180 independent of any other overarching framework.
00:46:50.680 Now, it seems to me...
00:46:52.980 So, give me one more minute
00:46:54.780 to elaborate on this,
00:46:55.920 and then I'd love to let you respond.
00:46:58.940 I think there are preconditions
00:47:01.040 that have to be met
00:47:02.840 for the idea that non-kin,
00:47:06.440 reciprocally, altruistic relationships
00:47:08.600 can be established.
00:47:10.560 I think those are metaphysical presumptions.
00:47:14.000 I think they're encoded generally
00:47:16.040 in what strikes us
00:47:18.800 as religious language,
00:47:20.660 which is a reflection
00:47:21.860 of their depth and necessity.
00:47:25.500 And those...
00:47:26.180 Among those are,
00:47:28.000 as far as I can tell,
00:47:29.260 are those presumptions
00:47:30.280 that are axiomatic
00:47:31.140 to the Judeo-Christian tradition.
00:47:33.280 I think those are a precondition
00:47:35.200 for the development
00:47:36.060 of that attitude
00:47:37.000 of radical, reciprocal altruism
00:47:39.980 to non-kin participants
00:47:42.140 that characterizes
00:47:43.580 in its highest form
00:47:45.480 the United States.
00:47:46.280 But I think it's a...
00:47:50.740 Even though that flowered madly
00:47:52.820 with the establishment
00:47:53.700 of the U.S.,
00:47:55.060 its roots are much, much deeper
00:47:56.860 than that.
00:47:57.360 Certainly, you have to give
00:47:59.180 some credit to Great Britain
00:48:00.500 and then to the entire
00:48:02.120 Western tradition behind that.
00:48:04.220 And then, it seems to me,
00:48:05.340 to the Greek and Judeo-Christian
00:48:06.780 traditions from which
00:48:07.900 that arose.
00:48:09.100 So, why stop with the U.S.?
00:48:11.380 I know you don't
00:48:12.300 in some fundamental sense,
00:48:13.500 but also,
00:48:14.600 what do you make
00:48:16.300 of the need
00:48:17.420 for extending
00:48:18.420 that notion of culture
00:48:20.840 beyond the merely
00:48:22.640 economic and pragmatic
00:48:23.920 or the self-evidently
00:48:25.300 economic and pragmatic?
00:48:27.140 All right.
00:48:28.520 First,
00:48:29.680 of course,
00:48:31.260 reciprocity
00:48:32.540 as the engine
00:48:34.760 of collaboration
00:48:36.100 isn't invented
00:48:37.380 by the American founders.
00:48:39.420 I mean, in fact,
00:48:40.400 every mutualism
00:48:41.680 that exists in nature
00:48:43.060 is of exactly this sort.
00:48:44.940 So, it's not that
00:48:46.080 they invented it.
00:48:47.560 What they did was
00:48:48.160 they invented
00:48:48.860 a set of rules
00:48:50.300 that made it
00:48:51.040 the basis for a society.
00:48:52.960 Right.
00:48:53.380 So, they codified it
00:48:54.440 more effectively
00:48:55.160 in a manner
00:48:56.180 that could be implemented
00:48:57.160 politically and economically.
00:48:59.280 Yeah.
00:48:59.660 In fact,
00:49:00.140 I would say
00:49:00.560 they codified it
00:49:01.680 well enough
00:49:02.480 for it to be
00:49:03.400 a functional prototype.
00:49:05.080 Yeah, okay.
00:49:07.020 That prototype
00:49:07.440 created
00:49:10.460 an unbelievable
00:49:13.600 period of dynamism.
00:49:15.520 When you think
00:49:16.620 of the number
00:49:17.300 of inventions
00:49:18.560 that are
00:49:19.940 American in origin
00:49:21.560 from
00:49:22.060 the airplane
00:49:23.360 to
00:49:24.120 the computer
00:49:25.520 to
00:49:26.260 plastics,
00:49:27.780 it's mind-boggling
00:49:29.780 how many things
00:49:30.780 Americans accomplished
00:49:31.840 in a short period
00:49:32.740 of time.
00:49:33.100 And my contention is
00:49:34.560 if
00:49:35.740 we had a society
00:49:36.920 in which you were
00:49:37.840 fundamentally predisposed
00:49:39.500 to collaborate
00:49:40.060 with those
00:49:40.700 who came from
00:49:41.300 the same place
00:49:42.040 you did,
00:49:42.920 most of that
00:49:43.660 wouldn't have happened.
00:49:45.000 Right?
00:49:45.240 That this happens
00:49:46.240 only when
00:49:47.160 you're liberated
00:49:48.020 to collaborate
00:49:49.000 with anyone
00:49:49.720 because they're
00:49:50.300 the right partner.
00:49:51.760 So,
00:49:52.260 that idea
00:49:54.000 has
00:49:55.180 a tremendous
00:49:56.120 amount of power
00:49:57.020 in it.
00:49:58.060 I also believe
00:49:59.220 that
00:49:59.740 it becomes
00:50:01.060 the nature
00:50:01.840 of
00:50:02.560 a functional
00:50:03.740 stable globe
00:50:04.680 that does not
00:50:05.260 rip itself apart
00:50:06.200 in conflict.
00:50:07.080 Now,
00:50:07.220 I take your challenge,
00:50:08.720 how do we know
00:50:09.520 that simply
00:50:10.080 distributing
00:50:10.740 the
00:50:13.300 spread
00:50:15.020 of
00:50:15.800 economic
00:50:16.720 well-being
00:50:17.460 won't cause
00:50:18.580 peace
00:50:19.060 to break out?
00:50:20.060 And the reason
00:50:20.420 It didn't in China.
00:50:22.520 It doesn't really
00:50:23.960 anywhere
00:50:24.620 absent this agreement.
00:50:25.940 What you want,
00:50:27.160 if
00:50:27.740 in the end
00:50:28.840 you start
00:50:30.100 realizing
00:50:30.700 that you are
00:50:31.700 closely related
00:50:32.440 to this set
00:50:32.960 of people
00:50:33.400 and at the
00:50:33.860 moment
00:50:34.160 whatever group
00:50:35.680 you have
00:50:36.360 is in a position
00:50:37.080 to get the
00:50:37.940 jump on some
00:50:38.600 other group
00:50:39.080 who's less
00:50:39.620 closely related
00:50:40.580 to you,
00:50:41.020 then that game,
00:50:42.500 the game of
00:50:43.520 lineage versus
00:50:44.400 lineage competition
00:50:45.900 and violence,
00:50:46.700 which has characterized
00:50:47.380 virtually all of
00:50:48.660 history until
00:50:49.300 the last couple
00:50:50.280 hundred years,
00:50:51.220 that game
00:50:52.040 is constant.
00:50:53.300 This is the only
00:50:53.860 alternative we have
00:50:55.020 to it
00:50:55.560 and
00:50:56.580 the hope
00:50:57.920 is that
00:50:58.980 it is
00:51:00.540 the best
00:51:02.260 I don't
00:51:03.400 I'm not
00:51:04.320 interested
00:51:04.980 as I know
00:51:06.100 you are not
00:51:06.760 in a world
00:51:08.240 where
00:51:08.840 well-being
00:51:09.620 is perfectly
00:51:10.660 evenly distributed.
00:51:12.220 I don't want it
00:51:12.940 perfectly evenly
00:51:13.600 distributed because
00:51:14.380 that suggests
00:51:14.920 It's impossible
00:51:15.420 in any case,
00:51:16.340 but yes.
00:51:17.600 Even if it were
00:51:18.300 possible,
00:51:19.300 a world in which
00:51:20.100 everything is evenly
00:51:20.860 distributed is a
00:51:21.780 world that is
00:51:22.340 punishing people
00:51:23.200 who contribute
00:51:23.900 more and rewarding
00:51:25.220 people who
00:51:25.800 contribute less.
00:51:27.460 What I want is
00:51:27.920 It also forestalls
00:51:28.780 any possibility
00:51:29.660 of trade
00:51:30.320 because if there
00:51:31.460 are no differences
00:51:32.300 between you and I
00:51:33.400 then of economic
00:51:34.920 significance
00:51:35.720 across the multiple
00:51:37.260 dimensions of
00:51:38.100 potential economic
00:51:38.980 comparison,
00:51:39.720 there's no motivation
00:51:40.920 whatsoever for us
00:51:42.160 to collaborate,
00:51:43.560 right?
00:51:43.880 Because we can't
00:51:44.620 rise out of our
00:51:45.380 radical equality
00:51:46.260 anyways,
00:51:47.140 plus everything we
00:51:48.040 have is exactly
00:51:48.840 the same.
00:51:49.660 So it means it
00:51:50.540 just makes a
00:51:51.140 mockery of the
00:51:51.860 notion of
00:51:52.540 progress
00:51:53.540 and trade
00:51:54.860 and that
00:51:55.460 means that
00:51:55.900 we're now
00:51:56.280 unable to
00:51:56.820 capitalize on
00:51:57.540 our differences.
00:51:59.000 So that is
00:51:59.540 the antithesis
00:52:00.260 of this diversity
00:52:01.360 that's being put
00:52:02.180 forward as a
00:52:02.880 panacea.
00:52:03.840 This is why
00:52:04.760 communism is so
00:52:06.040 closely associated
00:52:07.140 with scarcity
00:52:07.740 is it demotivates
00:52:08.980 exactly the thing
00:52:09.840 that makes a
00:52:10.320 society function.
00:52:11.160 So I don't
00:52:11.880 want that.
00:52:12.760 But, and if
00:52:13.920 we'll get back
00:52:14.760 to the question
00:52:15.340 of why I still
00:52:16.320 see myself
00:52:17.020 as a liberal,
00:52:18.340 I do want
00:52:19.200 to see something
00:52:20.060 as evenly
00:52:21.160 distributed as
00:52:21.940 possible.
00:52:22.380 and that is
00:52:23.400 opportunity.
00:52:25.220 Right?
00:52:25.640 The market
00:52:26.500 works best
00:52:27.660 when somebody
00:52:28.880 who has the
00:52:29.620 potential to
00:52:30.360 contribute something
00:52:31.320 wonderful is not
00:52:32.760 sidelined cleaning
00:52:33.760 someone else's
00:52:34.520 toilet.
00:52:35.300 Right?
00:52:35.740 So to the
00:52:36.840 extent that
00:52:37.520 everybody has
00:52:38.260 access to the
00:52:38.920 market and that
00:52:39.640 they are rewarded
00:52:40.400 when they bring
00:52:41.000 something to
00:52:41.520 humanity that
00:52:42.180 makes us better
00:52:42.920 off, you get a
00:52:44.140 system in which
00:52:44.880 wealth is not
00:52:46.700 perfectly evenly
00:52:47.460 distributed.
00:52:48.120 In fact, maybe
00:52:48.700 you would expect a
00:52:49.720 kind of Pareto
00:52:50.500 principle
00:52:51.340 distribution, but
00:52:53.020 that nobody is
00:52:54.200 frozen out, right?
00:52:55.440 If you're down
00:52:57.040 in the low
00:52:58.700 quadrant, according
00:53:00.120 to the Pareto
00:53:00.700 principle, but you
00:53:02.300 have the ability
00:53:03.300 to find your way
00:53:05.460 out by contributing
00:53:06.420 something good, then
00:53:07.340 your motivation to
00:53:08.160 do it is maximal.
00:53:10.100 And so, anyway,
00:53:12.280 that to me is
00:53:14.140 what a hard-headed
00:53:15.480 liberal would see
00:53:17.720 as desirable.
00:53:18.760 So, if I
00:53:20.340 understand you
00:53:20.980 correctly, you
00:53:22.200 see the limit
00:53:23.060 case to
00:53:23.680 multiculturalism as
00:53:25.000 something like the
00:53:26.060 fundamental antagonism
00:53:27.420 between a kin-based
00:53:29.340 ethical system and
00:53:30.940 a more abstracted
00:53:32.860 system based on
00:53:33.920 the notion of
00:53:34.980 abstracted
00:53:36.420 reciprocal
00:53:37.560 altruism.
00:53:38.440 It's something like
00:53:39.020 that.
00:53:39.380 So, what you're
00:53:40.300 basically saying is
00:53:41.420 that those two
00:53:42.620 orientations cannot
00:53:44.580 coexist peacefully.
00:53:46.700 They are, in
00:53:47.540 essence, antithetical
00:53:49.100 to one another.
00:53:50.360 And so, then that
00:53:51.080 begs the question.
00:53:52.060 The next question,
00:53:52.840 then, would be
00:53:53.600 something like,
00:53:55.160 are there cultures
00:53:56.660 that are more
00:53:57.380 tilted in their
00:53:58.340 ideological proclivities
00:53:59.800 towards the kin-based
00:54:01.640 allegiance system,
00:54:03.060 and others that are
00:54:03.980 more tilted, like the
00:54:05.380 European countries,
00:54:06.740 towards a more
00:54:07.680 abstract formulation
00:54:09.440 of what constitutes
00:54:10.760 productive and
00:54:12.380 generous reciprocal
00:54:13.280 altruism?
00:54:14.320 Look, you know,
00:54:14.880 here's a thought,
00:54:15.920 Brett.
00:54:18.440 In today's chaotic
00:54:19.740 world, many of us are
00:54:20.960 searching for a way to
00:54:21.860 aim higher and find
00:54:23.000 spiritual peace.
00:54:24.420 But here's the thing.
00:54:25.620 Prayer, the most
00:54:26.340 common tool we have,
00:54:27.540 isn't just about saying
00:54:28.440 whatever comes to mind.
00:54:29.760 It's a skill that
00:54:30.700 needs to be developed.
00:54:32.180 That's where
00:54:32.640 Hallow comes in.
00:54:33.800 As the number one
00:54:34.520 prayer and meditation
00:54:35.360 app, Hallow is
00:54:36.320 launching an
00:54:36.860 exceptional new
00:54:37.680 series called
00:54:38.400 How to Pray.
00:54:39.800 Imagine learning how
00:54:40.740 to use scripture as a
00:54:41.820 launch pad for profound
00:54:43.040 conversations with God,
00:54:44.760 how to properly enter
00:54:45.860 into imaginative prayer,
00:54:47.520 and how to incorporate
00:54:48.620 prayers reaching far
00:54:49.920 back in church history.
00:54:51.520 This isn't your average
00:54:52.640 guided meditation.
00:54:53.960 It's a comprehensive
00:54:54.800 two-week journey into
00:54:55.960 the heart of prayer,
00:54:57.320 led by some of the
00:54:58.060 most respected
00:54:58.820 spiritual leaders of
00:54:59.960 our time.
00:55:00.860 From guests including
00:55:01.800 Bishop Robert Barron,
00:55:03.220 Father Mike Schmitz,
00:55:04.200 and Jonathan Rumi,
00:55:05.480 known for his role as
00:55:06.400 Jesus in the hit
00:55:07.220 series The Chosen,
00:55:08.520 you'll discover prayer
00:55:09.460 techniques that have
00:55:10.280 stood the test of time
00:55:11.420 while equipping yourself
00:55:12.600 with the tools needed
00:55:13.400 to face life's
00:55:14.280 challenges with
00:55:15.020 renewed strength.
00:55:16.480 Ready to revolutionize
00:55:17.560 your prayer life?
00:55:18.560 You can check out
00:55:19.320 the new series as well
00:55:20.520 as an extensive
00:55:21.140 catalog of guided
00:55:22.160 prayers when you
00:55:23.060 download the
00:55:23.740 Hallow app.
00:55:24.740 Just go to
00:55:25.380 Hallow.com
00:55:26.240 slash Jordan and
00:55:27.180 download the Hallow
00:55:27.880 app today for an
00:55:28.760 exclusive three-month
00:55:29.780 trial.
00:55:30.620 That's Hallow.com
00:55:31.660 slash Jordan.
00:55:33.020 Elevate your
00:55:33.660 prayer life today.
00:55:38.680 So with these
00:55:39.820 large language models,
00:55:41.420 we now have the
00:55:43.040 opportunity to map
00:55:46.100 out semantic
00:55:47.760 space.
00:55:49.060 So let me give
00:55:49.800 an example of
00:55:50.600 this.
00:55:51.540 One of my
00:55:52.280 employees, a
00:55:53.300 former student,
00:55:54.680 has mapped out
00:55:55.580 the semantic
00:55:56.260 network of the
00:55:57.760 concept of God.
00:55:59.660 Now the way he
00:56:00.320 did that was to
00:56:01.240 find the
00:56:03.360 smallest possible
00:56:04.280 set of words
00:56:05.040 that can be
00:56:05.660 substituted in
00:56:07.360 discourse for the
00:56:08.360 idea of God.
00:56:09.320 it's a
00:56:11.560 substitutability
00:56:12.420 issue.
00:56:12.940 Okay, so
00:56:13.260 imagine this,
00:56:14.020 that there are
00:56:16.200 ten words or
00:56:17.900 concepts that
00:56:18.840 are most likely
00:56:20.540 to exist in the
00:56:21.680 same cloud of
00:56:22.560 conceptual space
00:56:23.580 as the idea of
00:56:24.420 God.
00:56:26.160 You could
00:56:26.920 dispense with that
00:56:27.820 central idea and
00:56:28.900 just use that
00:56:29.880 concatenation of
00:56:31.460 ten subsidiary
00:56:33.080 ideas as a
00:56:33.940 replacement.
00:56:34.440 then you can
00:56:36.320 imagine each of
00:56:37.020 those ideas has
00:56:37.960 a cloud of
00:56:38.640 associated ideas
00:56:39.680 around it.
00:56:41.320 Right?
00:56:41.940 And this is
00:56:42.720 literally encoded
00:56:44.080 in semantic
00:56:44.660 space.
00:56:45.160 It's a
00:56:45.440 statistical
00:56:45.920 relationship.
00:56:47.620 Now you could
00:56:48.200 imagine that
00:56:49.060 there's a
00:56:50.120 semantic web
00:56:51.240 around the
00:56:53.600 conceptualizations
00:56:54.720 of kin-based
00:56:55.600 ethical systems.
00:56:57.600 And there's a
00:56:58.600 center as well.
00:57:00.360 my brother
00:57:02.360 before anyone
00:57:03.260 else.
00:57:04.040 That might be
00:57:05.040 the concept at
00:57:06.160 the center,
00:57:06.680 something like
00:57:07.220 that, right?
00:57:08.120 But that could
00:57:08.940 be mapped.
00:57:09.480 Then you could
00:57:09.880 imagine that
00:57:10.500 this other
00:57:10.960 cloud of
00:57:11.600 concepts that
00:57:12.360 is associated
00:57:13.040 with abstract
00:57:13.980 reciprocal
00:57:15.040 altruism and
00:57:15.900 its formulation
00:57:16.600 also has a
00:57:17.780 center.
00:57:18.520 What that
00:57:18.940 should mean,
00:57:19.780 if you did
00:57:20.260 the same
00:57:20.660 mapping for
00:57:21.260 cultures,
00:57:22.480 is that you
00:57:22.960 should be
00:57:23.180 able to
00:57:23.380 place cultures
00:57:24.320 on a
00:57:24.940 continuum from
00:57:25.940 kin-based
00:57:26.940 orientation to
00:57:28.000 this more
00:57:28.860 abstract
00:57:29.360 formulation that
00:57:30.300 frees up
00:57:30.700 economic
00:57:31.100 resources,
00:57:32.580 right?
00:57:33.340 And then the
00:57:34.400 hypothesis you
00:57:35.260 would derive
00:57:35.720 from that is
00:57:36.280 that the
00:57:36.580 most difficult
00:57:37.220 problems of
00:57:37.900 integration would
00:57:38.680 arise as a
00:57:40.720 consequence of
00:57:41.300 trying to
00:57:41.640 integrate the
00:57:42.260 most kin-based
00:57:43.000 systems.
00:57:44.340 And you could
00:57:45.120 further hypothesize
00:57:46.200 that it might
00:57:46.820 even be worse
00:57:47.360 than that.
00:57:48.000 It might be
00:57:48.600 that the most
00:57:49.340 difficult people
00:57:50.140 to integrate
00:57:51.160 would be the
00:57:51.780 psychopaths who
00:57:52.720 take advantage
00:57:53.560 for themselves
00:57:54.440 of the ethos
00:57:55.560 of the kin-based
00:57:56.340 system, right?
00:57:57.960 Because we
00:57:58.500 always have the
00:57:59.100 psychopath problem,
00:58:00.080 right?
00:58:00.480 And people
00:58:01.240 don't like
00:58:01.740 that problem,
00:58:02.420 but it's a
00:58:04.020 world-destroying
00:58:04.800 problem.
00:58:06.080 So, okay,
00:58:06.780 so what do
00:58:08.160 you think of
00:58:08.640 that idea,
00:58:11.100 generally speaking?
00:58:12.640 Let's put the
00:58:13.380 psychopath part of
00:58:14.340 it aside for the
00:58:15.140 moment.
00:58:15.360 Yeah, yeah.
00:58:15.540 It's in the end
00:58:16.920 decisive, but let's
00:58:18.060 just take your
00:58:18.740 basic premise.
00:58:19.800 I fully agree
00:58:21.200 with this, and I
00:58:22.120 think we also
00:58:23.060 see it as a
00:58:25.940 progression in
00:58:27.780 these divine
00:58:31.000 texts, right?
00:58:32.900 We can read
00:58:33.600 very clearly
00:58:35.020 that the story
00:58:36.320 of the Good
00:58:36.940 Samaritan is
00:58:38.860 a story about
00:58:40.620 increasing the
00:58:41.860 size of the
00:58:42.760 circle of
00:58:44.060 collaboration.
00:58:45.980 And I would
00:58:46.720 argue that there's
00:58:47.420 an overarching
00:58:48.360 trajectory that,
00:58:51.160 as societies
00:58:52.260 become larger,
00:58:54.520 that the
00:58:55.120 mythology that
00:58:56.220 fuels them
00:58:57.200 encompasses this
00:58:59.020 idea.
00:58:59.860 And so you
00:59:00.180 keep getting
00:59:00.840 what are,
00:59:01.940 it's probably,
00:59:03.280 yeah, go ahead.
00:59:04.200 Well, you know,
00:59:05.680 Sam Harris,
00:59:07.140 with whom I know
00:59:08.260 you've had your
00:59:08.880 differences,
00:59:09.620 one of Sam's
00:59:10.560 motivations was
00:59:13.640 to ground an
00:59:14.720 ethos in the
00:59:15.980 objective that
00:59:17.740 could serve as
00:59:18.700 an irrefutable
00:59:20.100 counterposition to
00:59:21.480 the problem of
00:59:22.100 evil.
00:59:23.100 And he thought
00:59:23.880 that could only
00:59:24.480 be done
00:59:25.040 empirically,
00:59:26.520 right?
00:59:26.860 And that's
00:59:27.200 partly why he
00:59:27.940 is loath to
00:59:29.500 consider any
00:59:30.920 such superstitious
00:59:32.100 representation as
00:59:34.040 might be encoded
00:59:34.840 in religion.
00:59:36.060 But I've been
00:59:37.600 thinking along
00:59:38.220 lines parallel to
00:59:39.280 you, and it
00:59:40.220 seems to me that
00:59:40.920 he's looking in
00:59:41.660 the wrong
00:59:42.040 objective space.
00:59:44.640 So, because
00:59:45.720 the hypothesis
00:59:46.760 that you're
00:59:47.380 putting forward,
00:59:48.040 you correct me
00:59:48.640 if I've got
00:59:49.180 this wrong,
00:59:50.440 is that there's
00:59:52.740 a pattern,
00:59:54.160 might even be
00:59:54.900 partially mapped
00:59:55.940 already by
00:59:56.620 tit-for-tat
00:59:57.280 competitions,
00:59:58.160 but there's a
00:59:58.680 pattern of
01:00:00.060 complex social
01:00:02.740 interaction that
01:00:03.660 iterates best
01:00:04.700 across time in
01:00:06.340 an uphill
01:00:06.980 direction that
01:00:09.220 viewed over a
01:00:11.900 sufficiently long
01:00:12.720 period of time
01:00:13.560 can be seen to
01:00:14.480 have a stable
01:00:15.180 and emergent
01:00:15.780 structure.
01:00:16.840 That would be
01:00:17.380 its intrinsic
01:00:17.980 ethos.
01:00:19.100 And that's the
01:00:19.700 intrinsic ethos
01:00:20.540 that's captured,
01:00:21.600 let's say,
01:00:22.040 most effectively in
01:00:23.620 relationship to
01:00:24.420 political and
01:00:25.020 economic organization
01:00:26.140 by the founding
01:00:27.220 documents of the
01:00:28.060 U.S.
01:00:28.520 universe, but it's
01:00:29.480 real.
01:00:30.260 It's real.
01:00:31.400 It's real like
01:00:32.600 your relationship
01:00:35.780 with me and my
01:00:36.620 relationship with you
01:00:37.540 is dependent on
01:00:39.180 our willingness to
01:00:40.240 tell each other the
01:00:41.520 truth, to aim at a
01:00:43.160 mutually desirable
01:00:44.120 goal, and to
01:00:46.120 continue doing that
01:00:47.860 across time.
01:00:50.200 That's a pattern.
01:00:51.420 It's real.
01:00:52.320 It's objectively real.
01:00:53.460 Now, I'm finishing up
01:00:55.440 a book at the
01:00:56.020 moment called We
01:00:56.720 Who Wrestle with
01:00:57.400 God, and it's an
01:00:58.180 elaborated analysis
01:00:59.360 of the proclivity of
01:01:02.180 foundational narratives
01:01:03.520 to encode that
01:01:04.940 pattern of radical
01:01:05.900 reciprocity and to
01:01:07.800 expand its purview
01:01:09.340 and its depth of
01:01:10.880 representation across
01:01:12.160 time.
01:01:13.480 And that looks to me
01:01:14.760 like a place where
01:01:16.100 the findings of
01:01:18.020 evolutionary psychology
01:01:19.380 and biology can be
01:01:21.180 seen to dovetail
01:01:22.420 with the claims of
01:01:24.140 the metaphysical
01:01:25.020 stories upon which
01:01:26.380 our culture is
01:01:27.080 based.
01:01:28.020 Now, well, I'll
01:01:29.940 let you comment on
01:01:31.040 that because
01:01:31.460 obviously you can
01:01:33.260 see the parallel
01:01:34.000 between the way
01:01:34.740 that we're
01:01:35.080 approaching this
01:01:35.760 problem.
01:01:36.920 So, I haven't
01:01:38.600 concentrated as much
01:01:39.880 in my thinking on
01:01:41.120 the difference
01:01:42.840 between the kin-based
01:01:44.360 allegiance systems
01:01:45.500 and the more
01:01:46.260 abstract systems,
01:01:47.300 although I can see
01:01:48.120 that that seems
01:01:50.820 like a clear part
01:01:53.380 of the story,
01:01:54.380 right, of the
01:01:55.340 story of the
01:01:56.000 progression towards
01:01:56.980 a more productive
01:01:58.240 universalism.
01:02:00.540 So, how is this?
01:02:02.520 Okay, so, first of
01:02:05.140 all, why don't you
01:02:05.620 comment on that?
01:02:06.480 And then I want to
01:02:07.100 know what these
01:02:08.060 realizations have
01:02:09.000 done to the way
01:02:09.660 that you've been
01:02:10.240 thinking, and then
01:02:11.040 maybe we'll return
01:02:11.820 to the immigration
01:02:12.580 issue.
01:02:13.900 Sure.
01:02:14.800 Well, the first
01:02:15.560 thing to say is,
01:02:18.140 you know, I come
01:02:19.440 from a weird
01:02:20.740 discipline, and I've
01:02:22.220 departed from its
01:02:23.680 mainstream in order
01:02:24.960 to be able to be
01:02:25.880 productive in thinking
01:02:26.920 about humans, because
01:02:27.960 although humans are
01:02:28.980 an evolved creature
01:02:30.800 like every other,
01:02:31.720 they're a very special
01:02:32.680 creature in the way
01:02:33.640 they actually function.
01:02:35.280 But I could tell the
01:02:36.880 story that you just
01:02:37.800 told in what I
01:02:39.380 believe are rigorous
01:02:42.680 evolutionary terms.
01:02:44.840 And it would have
01:02:47.100 certain advantages to
01:02:48.660 be able to see
01:02:49.220 certain subtleties,
01:02:50.740 but it would be
01:02:51.420 pretty close to
01:02:52.520 useless from the
01:02:53.640 point of view of
01:02:54.260 operationalizing it as
01:02:55.980 the basis of a
01:02:56.940 society.
01:02:58.280 Far better if you
01:03:00.060 are going to
01:03:00.580 operationalize
01:03:01.520 something for
01:03:02.640 society to encode
01:03:04.280 it in a narrative
01:03:05.700 that is memorable
01:03:07.060 and transmissible
01:03:08.440 and resistant to
01:03:09.780 being corrupted.
01:03:12.800 Motivating, motivating
01:03:14.180 and stabilizing.
01:03:17.080 Comprehensible by
01:03:18.100 everyone, regardless
01:03:19.320 of level of abstract
01:03:20.880 intellectual prowess.
01:03:23.880 100%.
01:03:24.520 So, you know, there's
01:03:26.400 a moment during the
01:03:29.920 debate you had with
01:03:31.040 Sam, the two-night
01:03:31.920 debate you had with
01:03:32.840 Sam in Vancouver,
01:03:33.820 which I had the
01:03:34.640 privilege and honor
01:03:35.740 of moderating, where
01:03:38.360 Sam confronted you
01:03:40.220 and asked if you
01:03:41.660 really believed that
01:03:43.960 Jesus had been
01:03:45.680 resurrected.
01:03:47.360 Yeah.
01:03:47.900 And I remember this
01:03:49.760 moment like it was
01:03:50.680 yesterday.
01:03:52.180 You thought, you
01:03:54.220 must have thought for
01:03:54.960 a few seconds, and
01:03:56.800 you said, I behave as
01:03:59.300 if I do.
01:04:00.860 And I heard that, and
01:04:02.780 I thought, that is
01:04:05.100 the slam-dunk answer
01:04:08.420 to this question.
01:04:11.220 Sam didn't get it.
01:04:12.940 Right?
01:04:13.320 In fact, he doesn't
01:04:13.940 get it to this day.
01:04:15.480 But what you said
01:04:17.020 is the way an
01:04:19.500 evolutionist would
01:04:20.500 think about this,
01:04:21.280 because culture is a
01:04:24.380 means to an end.
01:04:25.340 What is that end?
01:04:26.760 It is to get your
01:04:28.380 genes, unfortunately,
01:04:30.460 lodged as far into
01:04:31.560 the future as you can
01:04:32.440 possibly arrange from
01:04:33.640 your current position.
01:04:34.720 And to keep them
01:04:35.820 there.
01:04:37.420 To, you want to
01:04:39.120 hand the ball off as
01:04:40.440 far into the future as
01:04:41.400 you can, and you want
01:04:42.340 to hand off the
01:04:43.220 motivation for those
01:04:44.380 who receive that ball in
01:04:45.560 the future to do it
01:04:46.660 again, right?
01:04:47.700 And eventually that
01:04:48.640 will fail.
01:04:49.520 Quick intervention
01:04:50.420 there, because we
01:04:51.600 should return to this,
01:04:52.640 because it's equally
01:04:53.700 salient.
01:04:55.180 It's a point equally
01:04:56.200 salient to the one that
01:04:57.320 you just described in my
01:04:59.080 discussion with Sam.
01:05:00.880 That's what the story of
01:05:02.040 Abraham represents,
01:05:03.440 because what God
01:05:04.940 promises Abraham is
01:05:07.880 that if he maintains a
01:05:10.240 certain pattern of
01:05:11.300 orientation and conduct,
01:05:13.580 that not only will he
01:05:14.860 have a son, which was an
01:05:17.100 impossibility for him and
01:05:18.360 his wife, but that he
01:05:19.700 will literally be the
01:05:20.740 father of nations.
01:05:22.300 And so what that story is
01:05:23.560 encoding is a pattern of
01:05:26.300 sacrificial attitude that
01:05:28.780 most optimally ensures the
01:05:31.740 preservation of genetic
01:05:33.120 material across the
01:05:34.660 broadest range of
01:05:35.600 possible situations as
01:05:37.800 indefinitely into the
01:05:39.400 future as can be
01:05:40.440 imagined.
01:05:41.700 And that's what it
01:05:42.480 means mythologically to
01:05:43.860 act in the light of
01:05:44.740 eternity, right?
01:05:46.360 It's that you're not,
01:05:47.780 and this is also, I think,
01:05:49.380 where people like Dawkins
01:05:50.760 go seriously wrong, and
01:05:52.000 the evolutionary
01:05:52.580 biologists in general,
01:05:53.940 people like Sigmund
01:05:54.660 Freud even, is that
01:05:56.120 reproduction is not sex.
01:05:58.440 Sex is a fragment of
01:06:01.520 reproduction, like
01:06:02.400 sex, reproduction is
01:06:04.040 sex for mosquitoes.
01:06:06.960 Reproduction is sex for
01:06:08.580 psychopaths.
01:06:10.440 But it's not
01:06:11.360 reproduction, sex is not
01:06:14.020 reproduction for people
01:06:15.180 who are engaged in this
01:06:16.460 higher order process of
01:06:19.420 maximally inclusive
01:06:22.280 reciprocal altruism.
01:06:24.020 Okay, so anyway, it took
01:06:25.500 me a long time to
01:06:26.360 understand this about
01:06:27.480 the story of Abraham
01:06:28.320 in particular, right?
01:06:29.440 Is that, now, I gotta
01:06:31.080 add one more thing to
01:06:32.440 that, because I think
01:06:33.620 this is equally
01:06:34.300 revolutionary.
01:06:35.800 So, Abraham's behavior
01:06:38.540 is characterized by a
01:06:39.840 particular sacrificial
01:06:41.660 attitude.
01:06:43.200 And that's famously,
01:06:44.680 obviously, and that's
01:06:47.540 a form of work.
01:06:48.740 Sacrifice is a form of
01:06:49.920 work.
01:06:50.240 You're sacrificing the
01:06:51.880 hedonic delights of the
01:06:53.200 present, and perhaps even
01:06:54.920 your orientation towards
01:06:56.260 immediate power for
01:06:57.780 something approximating a
01:06:59.120 long-term gain and
01:07:00.820 maybe a joint
01:07:02.160 psychological and
01:07:03.700 communal long-term
01:07:04.820 gain.
01:07:05.500 That's sacrifice.
01:07:06.680 Now, human sacrifice, we
01:07:08.080 work.
01:07:08.960 And once we know that,
01:07:10.060 and that's established in
01:07:11.080 the story of Cain and
01:07:11.920 Abel, by the way, it's
01:07:13.740 like it starts with Adam
01:07:15.060 and Eve, because they're
01:07:17.100 doomed to work after the
01:07:18.880 fall.
01:07:19.900 Cain and Abel
01:07:20.480 established two patterns
01:07:21.660 of sacrificial behavior.
01:07:23.760 Abraham is a
01:07:24.600 manifestation of one of
01:07:26.020 those patterns of
01:07:26.780 sacrifice.
01:07:27.900 The idea of the
01:07:29.560 sacrifice of that which
01:07:31.120 you love best to
01:07:32.900 facilitate further
01:07:34.620 adaptation is developed
01:07:36.660 extensively in the story
01:07:38.380 of Abraham with this
01:07:39.420 story of the potential
01:07:41.000 necessity of the
01:07:42.480 sacrifice of Isaiah.
01:07:43.760 And that's played out in
01:07:45.080 its full manifestation in
01:07:46.660 the gospel stories.
01:07:48.340 And the
01:07:49.440 culmination of this, and I
01:07:52.060 can't see how it can be
01:07:53.120 any other way, frankly, is
01:07:54.480 that the most appropriate
01:07:56.660 form of sacrifice that
01:07:58.800 guarantees the best
01:07:59.960 possible outcome, all
01:08:02.100 things considered, is the
01:08:04.020 full and radical
01:08:04.940 voluntary sacrifice of the
01:08:06.940 self in relationship to the
01:08:08.800 highest possible good.
01:08:10.320 And I think that's what's
01:08:11.580 encoded in the Christian
01:08:12.600 narrative.
01:08:13.400 That's what it looks like to
01:08:14.520 me.
01:08:15.200 It's a limit story, right, of
01:08:17.200 sorts, because it
01:08:18.500 investigates the nooks and
01:08:21.140 crannies of all the
01:08:22.960 dimensions of potential
01:08:24.280 self-sacrifice in service
01:08:26.820 of the highest and
01:08:27.580 integrates them.
01:08:29.040 And so, anyways, that's
01:08:30.340 partly what this new book
01:08:31.700 is about.
01:08:32.300 But that's where my
01:08:33.720 thought has gone further
01:08:35.080 with regard to the point
01:08:37.480 that you made about what
01:08:40.100 happened in Vancouver.
01:08:41.460 I knew then what you just
01:08:43.460 said, which was that I
01:08:45.240 answered that because I
01:08:46.420 knew that that was the
01:08:47.660 biologically appropriate
01:08:48.980 answer, right?
01:08:51.180 That's where the rubber
01:08:52.040 hits the road, man.
01:08:55.240 Hey, everyone.
01:08:56.300 Real quick before you
01:08:57.140 skip, I want to talk to
01:08:58.260 you about something
01:08:58.780 serious and important.
01:09:00.520 Dr. Jordan Peterson has
01:09:01.880 created a new series that
01:09:03.200 could be a lifeline for
01:09:04.360 those battling depression
01:09:05.420 and anxiety.
01:09:06.540 We know how isolating and
01:09:08.400 overwhelming these
01:09:09.120 conditions can be, and we
01:09:10.500 wanted to take a moment to
01:09:11.540 reach out to those
01:09:12.180 listening who may be
01:09:13.220 struggling.
01:09:14.140 With decades of experience
01:09:15.480 helping patients, Dr.
01:09:16.860 Peterson offers a unique
01:09:18.340 understanding of why you
01:09:19.560 might be feeling this way
01:09:20.560 in his new series.
01:09:21.980 He provides a roadmap
01:09:22.920 towards healing, showing
01:09:24.220 that while the journey
01:09:25.080 isn't easy, it's absolutely
01:09:27.060 possible to find your way
01:09:28.400 forward.
01:09:29.380 If you're suffering, please
01:09:30.600 know you are not alone.
01:09:32.540 There's hope, and there's a
01:09:34.160 path to feeling better.
01:09:35.820 Go to Daily Wire Plus now
01:09:37.120 and start watching Dr. Jordan
01:09:38.860 B. Peterson on depression
01:09:40.240 and anxiety.
01:09:41.500 Let this be the first step
01:09:42.960 towards the brighter future
01:09:44.260 you deserve.
01:09:46.860 That's, yeah, that's what
01:09:49.960 this whole experiment is, and
01:09:52.480 all of the architecture, all
01:09:54.460 of the language we have and
01:09:55.700 the structures, the belief
01:09:56.880 structures that we carry and
01:09:58.120 the stories that we transmit
01:09:59.820 them with, that architecture
01:10:02.320 is about something that we
01:10:04.020 can't see and didn't even have
01:10:05.960 a hint existed until a couple
01:10:07.800 hundred years ago.
01:10:09.720 So, that's a tough pill to
01:10:13.800 swallow.
01:10:14.120 And as you point out, most
01:10:15.260 people just don't have the
01:10:16.180 background to see.
01:10:17.740 Yeah, but I would also point
01:10:21.900 out, though, that if you
01:10:23.900 compare the difference
01:10:25.260 between what you said, I
01:10:27.520 behave as if I do, it
01:10:29.740 wouldn't matter if you spoke
01:10:31.920 as if you did, as long as you
01:10:34.220 behaved as if you did.
01:10:36.060 And it wouldn't matter
01:10:37.040 somebody who speaks as if they
01:10:39.040 believe it but doesn't behave
01:10:40.280 that way is the inverse.
01:10:41.940 The point is, this is all
01:10:43.220 about modifying behavior,
01:10:44.720 which brings me to this.
01:10:46.960 I would say, too, Brett, also,
01:10:48.640 attention.
01:10:49.740 You know, it's become
01:10:50.800 increasingly clear in the last
01:10:54.100 decade that the notion of
01:10:56.580 perception independent of
01:10:57.880 action is a falsehood, right?
01:11:00.000 Because your eyes are moving in
01:11:02.460 accordance with what you value
01:11:04.040 so that you can pick up the
01:11:05.740 relevant sense data all the
01:11:07.260 time.
01:11:07.540 And so the orientation of
01:11:11.580 ethos in action extends to
01:11:13.200 perception itself, to the way
01:11:15.340 the world makes itself manifest
01:11:16.960 to you as a consequence of the
01:11:19.100 choice that you make with every
01:11:21.200 glance about how you're going to
01:11:22.980 interact with it.
01:11:24.000 That also demolishes, it
01:11:25.980 demolishes the empirical, the
01:11:29.340 enlightenment empirical story.
01:11:31.060 It's done because the empirical
01:11:33.300 story was predicated on the
01:11:35.420 assumption that there was a
01:11:37.100 value-free perception.
01:11:39.120 And the postmodernists
01:11:40.200 critiqued that, and they were
01:11:41.420 right.
01:11:43.340 Now, I would actually
01:11:45.200 challenge you on this.
01:11:46.600 Great.
01:11:46.760 Because although at one level
01:11:48.680 you're correct, there's no way
01:11:51.200 to free yourself from
01:11:52.980 perceptual bias entirely.
01:11:55.420 I would argue that science
01:11:57.080 properly practiced, that is to
01:11:59.740 say, practiced carefully
01:12:01.160 according to the underlying
01:12:02.440 philosophy, not just the
01:12:03.840 motions, but the actual
01:12:04.980 philosophy of science that
01:12:06.400 makes it work, is
01:12:07.920 at the end of the day, it is a
01:12:11.540 slow tool that has one major
01:12:15.760 advantage, which is that it is
01:12:17.200 capable of telling you that
01:12:18.680 which you don't expect and don't
01:12:20.520 want to hear.
01:12:21.640 Right?
01:12:22.040 It tells you things that are,
01:12:24.760 you are not predisposed to see,
01:12:26.940 but it has to be wielded in the
01:12:29.820 proper manner.
01:12:30.700 The fact that it takes place
01:12:31.940 in a laboratory isn't good
01:12:33.040 enough.
01:12:33.880 The fact that it's reported in
01:12:35.200 a scientific paper doesn't do
01:12:36.520 it.
01:12:36.860 You have to do the method
01:12:37.900 correctly, and then it can tell
01:12:39.240 you what you wouldn't have
01:12:40.760 happened on through the process
01:12:42.120 you're describing.
01:12:43.400 Yes.
01:12:44.360 I would say yes, but, and I
01:12:46.460 think it's yes, but, for the
01:12:47.960 reason you already outlined, at
01:12:49.820 least in part, in your
01:12:50.980 discussion of the relationship
01:12:52.220 between kin orientation and this
01:12:54.420 more abstract orientation.
01:12:56.580 So, I would say that what science
01:13:00.540 allows you to do is to circumvent
01:13:02.300 and transcend your own, your own
01:13:04.560 particularized biases.
01:13:07.180 But, it can't happen at all in the
01:13:11.540 absence of an orientation that's
01:13:13.140 encapsulated within this
01:13:14.640 reciprocally altruistic, broader,
01:13:17.660 abstract ethos.
01:13:18.640 So, because, for example, imagine
01:13:22.380 you're a cancer researcher.
01:13:25.260 So, you're accepting an ethos
01:13:27.940 axiomatically before you analyze
01:13:30.560 the data.
01:13:31.460 And the ethos is something like,
01:13:34.020 it would be better if there was
01:13:35.020 less suffering.
01:13:35.960 It would be better if there were
01:13:37.540 fewer cancer victims.
01:13:38.940 It would be better if we knew more
01:13:40.340 about disease in general.
01:13:42.580 And the results of my truthful
01:13:44.860 investigation will be of benefit to
01:13:47.460 people regardless of their
01:13:48.780 relatedness to me.
01:13:51.260 And all of those are intellectual
01:13:53.860 pre-commitments that have to occur
01:13:55.920 before you can even face the data
01:13:58.500 in your spreadsheets properly.
01:14:00.220 If your ethos is, I'm going to
01:14:03.100 extract from this spreadsheet, the
01:14:05.620 patterns in this spreadsheet, the
01:14:06.920 story that will maximally benefit me
01:14:09.280 and my family economically in the
01:14:11.240 short term, then you instantly become
01:14:13.540 a careerist scientist and you pollute
01:14:15.820 the entire enterprise.
01:14:17.580 And so, I would say that that science
01:14:20.540 only works if it's embedded in the
01:14:22.240 ethos towards which we're developing.
01:14:25.180 I think, I mean, I've tried to break
01:14:27.460 that argument into bits and, but I
01:14:30.640 can't.
01:14:31.080 I can't move that argument.
01:14:34.180 No, you're entirely right.
01:14:35.880 And as much as my argument earlier about
01:14:40.280 the value of opportunity being as
01:14:42.700 broadly distributed as possible runs
01:14:44.540 counter to this, one advantage of the
01:14:47.820 glory period of science where it was
01:14:51.400 done by gentlemen scientists was that
01:14:54.100 they did not have the perverse
01:14:55.900 careerist incentives.
01:14:57.800 They served their interests by being
01:14:59.600 right in the long run.
01:15:01.960 That's how they became immortal.
01:15:03.380 And that is a good, a good motivator.
01:15:06.800 And what we have now has taken something
01:15:09.140 that looks exactly like science and
01:15:11.500 turned it on its head.
01:15:13.360 It's just, it's obscene.
01:15:15.360 And, you know, I think COVID taught us
01:15:18.820 this lesson in spades.
01:15:21.060 We saw for the first time the level at
01:15:26.340 which this is just, it is a distilled
01:15:30.020 form of corruption that is so pernicious
01:15:32.680 that it can, you know, it can actually take a
01:15:35.340 poison and label it as a cure and it could
01:15:37.760 take the cure and label it as a poison and
01:15:39.440 it doesn't even blink.
01:15:41.140 So that's what happens if the other
01:15:43.040 incentives are allowed to pervade the
01:15:45.020 system.
01:15:45.860 And we have to rescue ourselves from it
01:15:47.900 because that's, that's where we are
01:15:49.260 across the board as far as I can tell.
01:15:51.120 Well, we should note too, historically
01:15:53.320 speaking, that the scientists of the
01:15:56.980 type that you described, the genuine
01:15:59.820 scientists, were very much akin to monks
01:16:03.480 in a monastery.
01:16:04.680 And I mean, their universities were
01:16:06.380 monasteries to begin with, and they
01:16:08.680 were saturated, whether they knew that
01:16:10.520 or not, by that ethos.
01:16:12.280 Now, they had a hard time distinguishing
01:16:17.140 between the descriptions they generated
01:16:20.360 as a consequence of their objectifying
01:16:23.000 process and the narratives that
01:16:25.900 structured the ethos within which they
01:16:28.720 operated, right?
01:16:30.060 They, they, they confuse the motivating
01:16:33.660 dream with the material objective facts.
01:16:38.740 And this is still what people like Dawkins
01:16:40.500 and Harris are doing.
01:16:41.880 They don't understand that there's a
01:16:44.700 difference between the structure of the
01:16:47.340 maps of meaning that organize our
01:16:50.200 perceptions, structure our attention and
01:16:53.380 our actions, and the facts that present
01:16:56.820 themselves to us as a consequence of this
01:17:00.200 process of objective comparison that
01:17:02.980 emerges as a consequence of the
01:17:04.520 scientific process.
01:17:06.300 Well, you know, in both of their cases,
01:17:09.860 and I don't mean to take them to task
01:17:11.540 specifically, but they've, they've sort of
01:17:13.400 volunteered for that job.
01:17:15.600 The most glaring example of the blindness
01:17:19.500 that this creates is their failure to
01:17:22.760 recognize that religious belief is every
01:17:28.180 bit as deserving of an evolutionary
01:17:30.880 explanation as a wing or an eye or a
01:17:35.740 pigment, any of these structures.
01:17:38.200 And so to dismiss religious belief as a
01:17:41.420 pathology is so, it is shirking the most
01:17:47.040 fundamental responsibility that a
01:17:48.720 scientifically minded person has to look at
01:17:50.760 a pattern and say, I can tell that that
01:17:53.760 means something, but I don't yet know what
01:17:55.760 it is, right?
01:17:56.700 I'm not going to dismiss it just because I
01:17:58.180 don't get it yet.
01:17:59.620 Right.
01:18:00.040 Absolute.
01:18:00.620 Absolutely.
01:18:00.920 That's exactly right.
01:18:01.960 Is that they're not, I agree with you
01:18:03.500 completely, is that they're not, I looked
01:18:07.180 at the religious landscape like a
01:18:08.840 biologist.
01:18:10.020 It's like, what the hell is going on here?
01:18:12.520 Right.
01:18:12.860 What is happening here?
01:18:14.220 It, it, it's, it's no more rational
01:18:16.580 than what would you say?
01:18:18.960 The morphology of a platypus, right?
01:18:22.740 It's, it's strange and paradoxical and
01:18:25.040 dreamlike and peculiar, like most
01:18:26.980 manifestations of nature.
01:18:28.700 Okay.
01:18:28.920 Here I've got another proposition for you.
01:18:31.020 Tell me what you think about this.
01:18:32.560 Because I've been trying to define the
01:18:35.360 religious.
01:18:37.580 Okay.
01:18:37.860 So imagine this, that let's take a, let's
01:18:40.760 think about that semantic network of
01:18:42.560 meaning again.
01:18:43.320 Now imagine that some of the concepts that
01:18:46.940 you have are more dependent on some
01:18:50.720 concepts than on other concepts.
01:18:53.580 So now imagine your conceptions aren't
01:18:56.000 just a, they're not just an aggregation
01:18:58.920 of words and they're not just a network
01:19:01.760 of words.
01:19:02.760 They're a hierarchy of concepts.
01:19:04.940 And here's how you define a hierarchy.
01:19:07.140 Some things that you believe are more
01:19:10.320 dependent on other things than on a set
01:19:13.900 of different things.
01:19:14.700 So here's an example.
01:19:16.820 One of the fundamental predicates of a
01:19:18.880 marriage is fidelity.
01:19:23.040 And so what that means is that when the
01:19:25.280 presumption of fidelity is violated, the
01:19:28.940 marriage shakes and trembles.
01:19:30.900 It isn't generally the case that whether
01:19:33.940 or not your wife washes the dishes as
01:19:37.260 quickly as you might like is a fundamental
01:19:39.520 predicate of your marriage.
01:19:41.080 Because not very much depends on that.
01:19:43.240 So there's a network of dependency.
01:19:46.160 And I think we track that emotionally, by
01:19:48.300 the way, Brett, I think we track that
01:19:50.020 emotionally such that our emotions know
01:19:53.420 where in the hierarchy of dependency a
01:19:56.060 given concept sits.
01:19:58.260 And if that's threatened, it produces
01:20:00.840 both more excitement in the exploratory
01:20:03.660 sense and more apprehension because
01:20:06.080 entropy is released.
01:20:08.020 And the best models of anxiety now are
01:20:10.400 entropy release models, by the way.
01:20:12.500 So there's a hierarchy of dependency.
01:20:14.580 Okay, that's the depths.
01:20:15.880 When we say that an idea is deep, what we
01:20:18.680 mean is that a very large number of other
01:20:22.300 propositions depend for their validity on
01:20:25.000 the validity of that idea.
01:20:26.600 Now there's a hierarchy and there's
01:20:28.820 something at the bottom or at the apex.
01:20:31.380 You can use either metaphorical structure.
01:20:33.940 And we've been inferring for centuries what
01:20:36.540 that core foundation or apex piece might be.
01:20:43.380 Right?
01:20:43.680 And so what is religious is what is most
01:20:49.640 deep.
01:20:50.200 That's a definition.
01:20:51.200 It's a definition.
01:20:52.760 And what is deep is that which,
01:20:56.160 what much, upon which much relies.
01:20:59.960 Right?
01:21:00.500 And so the first thing I'd like, and you
01:21:03.900 know, you can see the same thing in science.
01:21:05.440 We know that there are fundamental theorems
01:21:07.080 in science upon which whole disciplines
01:21:09.880 rest.
01:21:11.080 There's no difference.
01:21:12.100 We know that there are contributors to the
01:21:14.420 scientific enterprise who are very vastly
01:21:16.400 cited.
01:21:16.940 And we presume that their ideas are deep,
01:21:20.460 not least, because the consequence of that
01:21:23.100 mass citation is the embeddedness of those
01:21:25.800 ideas in almost every other idea of the
01:21:28.820 discipline.
01:21:30.560 So, okay, so the first question would be,
01:21:33.380 what do you think of that idea of depth?
01:21:36.460 Like, technically speaking, and then imagine
01:21:40.280 that the emotions that are elicited when
01:21:44.420 things move in the depths are the array of
01:21:49.060 emotions that have been associated with
01:21:51.840 religious phenomenology since time immemorial.
01:21:57.080 Well, that's quite interesting.
01:22:00.200 I'm recognizing, you know, I'm sort of the
01:22:04.160 odd man out in a lot of the circles that I
01:22:06.760 travel in these days.
01:22:08.760 I'm shocked, Grant.
01:22:09.920 But I, you know, I spend a lot of time with
01:22:15.260 conservatives.
01:22:16.460 There are a lot more religious people in my
01:22:20.780 life than I would have expected.
01:22:22.480 Maybe they outnumber the secularists considerably
01:22:25.920 at this point.
01:22:26.980 But I've been thinking about why that might be.
01:22:30.500 And what I'm realizing is that there is, let's
01:22:37.280 say, among the COVID dissidents, there are quite a
01:22:40.260 number of religious people who stood up at great
01:22:46.540 personal cost and said what needed to be said in
01:22:50.040 order to break the spell.
01:22:55.620 And I think the reason for that is because if you have a
01:23:02.060 religious structuring to what you're, I've forgotten what
01:23:06.420 term you use, but I would say that we have this
01:23:08.720 hierarchy, you call it a hierarchy.
01:23:10.480 I would say it's a model which we take in, we build it
01:23:15.580 based on what works, what doesn't work.
01:23:18.480 We build up a model over a lifetime and we're very
01:23:20.800 reluctant to pull a piece out on which much depends
01:23:23.660 because then suddenly our model doesn't work, right?
01:23:26.140 So people who have a religious model of the universe
01:23:30.840 where they actually believe, they're not just going
01:23:33.300 through the motions, have a motivational structure that
01:23:38.560 upends the game theory that causes so many people to
01:23:41.960 falter, right?
01:23:43.280 If you believe that you are being watched and perhaps
01:23:49.300 guided by an intelligence that if you do the right thing,
01:23:55.400 then whatever pain your enemies may inflict upon you will
01:24:00.820 be dwarfed by the reward that you will get in the end.
01:24:05.020 The eternal reward.
01:24:06.280 The eternal reward, exactly.
01:24:08.680 Then the point is you're in a lot better position to stare
01:24:11.380 down tyrants and bullies than somebody who is trapped in
01:24:16.660 their somatic experience of the moment.
01:24:19.580 Absolutely.
01:24:20.800 Or their desire for power for that matter.
01:24:24.120 Right.
01:24:24.440 So there are lots of traps that people who have a deep
01:24:28.440 relationship with this sort of thinking can avoid.
01:24:33.640 But the number of, let's put it this way, every religious
01:24:38.780 scientist has an utterly idiosyncratic way of holding
01:24:44.060 those beliefs in the mind so that they don't trip over the
01:24:47.340 parts that conflict with what they know from the laboratory.
01:24:51.380 So it's a very odd landscape.
01:24:55.760 And mostly, there's something about it that actually reminds me of
01:25:00.800 the way Jews often hold religious belief, which is its purpose isn't
01:25:07.100 really to be pushed on all that much.
01:25:09.460 A congregation holds their belief structure at a great range of distances from themselves.
01:25:18.840 Some people absolutely believe this is the literal word of God, and other people have
01:25:24.000 a very remote relationship with it.
01:25:26.180 But it's not a zero relationship.
01:25:27.680 It's just one in which it doesn't impinge directly on their analytical thinking.
01:25:34.640 So that freedom to hold that relationship in a uniquely generated fashion that doesn't
01:25:43.080 conflict with the rest of the model one uses to deal with the universe is, I think, necessary.
01:25:49.700 And it, again, speaks to a strength of the West, right?
01:25:54.540 That we are not about interfering.
01:25:55.900 The separation of church and state allows that to some degree, right?
01:25:59.420 Because what you're pointing to, to some degree, is the optimization of stability and play, right?
01:26:09.540 And some people are going to vie for more stability and less play, probably in accordance with their temperament
01:26:15.660 and perhaps their intellectual capabilities.
01:26:18.380 And others are going to, as a consequence of that distancing, let's say, allow for a wider range of experimentation
01:26:25.260 within what is still a walled enclosure, right?
01:26:30.560 At some distance.
01:26:32.800 The territory that they're allowed to range through is broader.
01:26:37.680 Now, the price they might pay for that is a little more entropy in the system, right?
01:26:42.020 A little more existential anxiety.
01:26:44.120 But the advantage would be that they can experiment.
01:26:47.980 I got something cool to tell you biologically.
01:26:50.420 You tell me what you think about this.
01:26:53.180 This was only discovered in November of 2022.
01:26:58.020 So you know that, for all intents and purposes, that the molecular alterations that facilitate
01:27:06.800 mutation are random.
01:27:09.640 And there's real good reasons for that randomness.
01:27:12.620 Partly because, to the degree that mutations are caused by radiation,
01:27:17.540 the striking point of the radiation is random.
01:27:22.500 However, there is a hierarchy of repairability.
01:27:27.140 So the more...
01:27:28.240 Yes, there is.
01:27:28.820 Yes, exactly.
01:27:29.780 This is a deadly finding.
01:27:31.380 So what that means is, and I haven't been able to reconcile this entirely with my understanding
01:27:36.760 of evolutionary biology, but that means there's a core set of principles by which the system
01:27:43.480 operates.
01:27:44.460 And then out on the fringe, there's allowable room for variation and experimentation, right?
01:27:51.120 And I think that that's the pattern of all conceptual structures.
01:27:55.120 There's a core set of foundational principles.
01:27:58.440 And those are religious principles, and I don't care if you're religious or not, is that they
01:28:04.280 serve the function of the deepest mechanisms of orientation.
01:28:08.640 So I don't care what you call that.
01:28:11.080 It doesn't matter because they're there.
01:28:13.600 And then experimentation can take place on the fringe.
01:28:16.580 Now, temperamentally, some people would be inclined to experiment at deeper levels, right?
01:28:22.880 And that would be the difference between someone who's less or more fundamentalist in their
01:28:27.400 orientation.
01:28:29.160 So what do you think of that as an analogy on the biological side?
01:28:35.000 Well, I've been playing with that analogy from the biological side, and I have a framework
01:28:41.100 built up.
01:28:41.920 So I refer to these two poles as the sacred and the shamanistic.
01:28:47.920 And the idea is that even within a religious tradition, right, there is the sacred, which are
01:28:52.760 the things that one is most loathe to upend because they are most fundamental.
01:28:58.920 And then there's the shamanistic, where, you know, depending on the tradition, the monks
01:29:04.220 may be experimenting with, I don't know, hallucinogenic substances.
01:29:09.960 And the point is, we don't ask them too much what they're doing.
01:29:14.560 And if they find something important, they report it out in a way that we can disavow
01:29:19.720 it if need be.
01:29:21.140 But the point is, both of these processes are there for a reason.
01:29:25.280 And the fact is, we see exactly this in the genome.
01:29:29.980 And it even extends beyond what you've suggested.
01:29:32.320 It's not just a repairability issue.
01:29:34.040 So we have the ability, for example, let's take immunity.
01:29:41.860 The way immunity develops when you encounter a disease is something called clonal selection,
01:29:49.500 in which a subset of your cells literally evolves on the scale of hours to days in order to defeat
01:29:57.520 that pathogen, right?
01:29:59.020 So this is a part of the body that has become genetically experimental because it is necessary
01:30:08.160 to do so in order to fight an enemy that your body has never seen.
01:30:12.160 So anyway, yes, sacred to the shamanistic, that exists in the genome.
01:30:17.160 It exists in religious traditions.
01:30:20.020 And we are messing this up.
01:30:22.220 We are not realizing that much of, that basically culture is a means to an end, that genes have
01:30:31.200 produced a mind that is fundamentally cultural because it can evolve more rapidly than if
01:30:36.740 it were genetically.
01:30:38.020 Right.
01:30:38.380 But the problem with that is that much of the stuff that is generated in the moment is noise,
01:30:44.960 right?
01:30:45.180 You can look at longstanding genes and say, I know they must have served the interests of
01:30:49.820 the lineage that carried them because they stood the test of time, right?
01:30:54.380 Yes.
01:30:54.440 They have a cost and yet they stood the test of time.
01:30:56.380 But culture, you don't know that something is useful until it's lasted for at least hundreds
01:31:03.200 of years, which means that most of the new stuff that we see is probably bad for us and
01:31:07.620 we don't have enough skepticism of it.
01:31:09.320 Yeah, well, that's actually why I think there's variability in trait openness.
01:31:13.020 It's like some of the new stuff is absolutely vital.
01:31:20.060 More of it is deadly and most of it is noise.
01:31:24.740 Now, if you're high in openness, it's a high risk, high return strategy.
01:31:29.180 You're very, very likely to fail, which is generally the fate of most would-be entrepreneurs
01:31:34.080 unless they repeat the experiment multiple times.
01:31:37.300 If you do succeed, you can succeed unbelievably radically, right?
01:31:42.400 And then you might say, well, to hell with openness.
01:31:45.120 So that would be no shamanic tradition, let's say.
01:31:48.080 But the problem with that is then there's no variability or experimentation and that doesn't
01:31:54.640 work either because the future is actually different from the past, right?
01:31:59.340 So there has to be experimentation because otherwise you can't keep up.
01:32:03.520 So this is also, so this, as far as I can tell, Brett, this seems to be a place where the
01:32:07.780 evolutionary biology and these new models of theological thinking can dovetail perfectly.
01:32:13.620 We can say something like, well, the relationship between ideas is akin to the relationship between
01:32:18.840 the relationship that obtains that governs mutation.
01:32:23.700 It's the same thing.
01:32:25.060 It's logically enough because idea of proliferation is the analog to mutation.
01:32:29.280 So why wouldn't it be the same thing?
01:32:32.640 And it implies that on both those levels, there's a core set of axiomatic principles that you
01:32:40.520 violate very rarely and at your extreme danger.
01:32:43.920 This is, by the way, that this is the reason that Uzzah dies when he touches the Ark of the
01:32:49.380 Covenant, right?
01:32:51.080 So the Israelites are packing the Ark of the Covenant across the desert and they trip a
01:32:55.400 little bit and this soldier reaches out to steady the Ark and God strikes him dead.
01:33:00.160 And David is unhappy about that, believing it to be unjust.
01:33:04.960 But the moral of the story is there are certain things that you touch at your peril, regardless
01:33:10.800 of the potential benevolence of your motivations.
01:33:14.480 That's fascinating.
01:33:16.120 So I have one thing.
01:33:17.480 This is probably not going to make a tremendous amount of sense yet.
01:33:20.460 We'll have to unpack it another time because it's a deep discussion.
01:33:24.100 But it's not really that culture is like the genome.
01:33:32.420 It does have a superficial resemblance in the way it evolves.
01:33:36.360 But the way to see it most clearly is that culture is one of several epigenetic mechanisms.
01:33:44.600 And as much as it is strange to think of it this way, all the epigenetic mechanisms
01:33:49.800 seem to abide by the same set of rules.
01:33:54.620 And the rule, I'll just distill it for you.
01:33:57.000 We call it the Omega.
01:33:58.220 Heather and I call it the Omega Principle.
01:34:00.680 The idea is that epigenetic phenomena are more powerful than genes because they are more
01:34:08.320 rapidly adapting, but they are subservient to the genes' motivation.
01:34:16.600 In other words, they have to serve genetic ends, at least historically.
01:34:20.840 Now, I do wonder, and one of the things I worry about in the revival of religious belief
01:34:28.200 that we are watching, the thing I'm concerned about is that actually we are at a unique moment
01:34:34.800 in history where we have to turn the tables on the genes.
01:34:40.700 The genes are utterly immoral.
01:34:44.500 They've produced a mental structure which is capable of morality, but they've done that
01:34:50.380 as a means to an end.
01:34:51.640 And my feeling is that what is best about humans, what distinguishes us from all of the
01:34:55.840 other creatures, is not our morphology.
01:35:00.420 It's what we are cognitively capable of.
01:35:02.820 It's the goodness.
01:35:04.440 It's the insight.
01:35:05.700 The compassion.
01:35:07.020 Those are the things which should be in the driver's seat, but they're not.
01:35:11.340 And you and I have talked before about the danger of tragedies of history reoccurring, that
01:35:19.200 these are spasms that tap into predispositions inside the human character that people don't
01:35:26.920 expect because they grow up during times when they're not visible and then suddenly they emerge.
01:35:33.400 And I'm not, there's no way that it can be safe to experiment with such a fundamental change, but I'm
01:35:42.680 concerned that if we don't figure out how to put our better angels in charge, that we are going to be
01:35:50.760 condemned to that same pattern reoccurring with ever more ferocious weaponry.
01:35:57.680 Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
01:36:00.040 Well, that is the issue of the moment.
01:36:02.660 Not, not, not only weaponry, not only the, I mean that term generally, the technology.
01:36:10.300 Yeah, exactly, exactly.
01:36:11.440 Well, this is, see, one of the things that really, maybe we can close with this because
01:36:15.020 we're at the right time to do that.
01:36:17.700 One of the things that Carl Jung pointed out at the end of the Second World War, I think
01:36:24.080 actually it was when the hydrogen bomb was developed, to tell you the truth.
01:36:27.000 And this is what he was pointing to in his work on alchemy, by the way, which is why he
01:36:32.480 delved into alchemy.
01:36:33.440 He was trying to understand the substrate of intrinsic value that even guides the scientific
01:36:39.100 endeavor.
01:36:40.440 So that's what he was up to.
01:36:41.900 Now, the reason he was doing that was because he believed that we had rapidly expanded our
01:36:48.000 technological capacity since the dawn of the scientific revolution, but had failed to do
01:36:53.780 the same with our understanding of our underlying ethos.
01:36:58.280 And so now we were as primitive ethically as we were in 1450 with the tools of the 21st century.
01:37:06.960 And that there is no, if you're going to have big toys, you better be a wise player.
01:37:12.600 And we're at that moment.
01:37:15.460 And my sense is that, and I would say the positive consequence of this hypothetical revival that
01:37:22.660 you're describing would be that I think we can actually become conscious of these things
01:37:27.480 explicitly in a way that wasn't possible before.
01:37:30.620 I think that's right at hand before us.
01:37:33.060 I think that that's what's making itself manifest to people like Ayaan Hirsi Ali and like Neil
01:37:39.100 Ferguson and like Douglas Murray and like you, and we can see, and Jonathan Paggio, we can
01:37:46.160 see a shift, a tectonic shift at the level of conceptualization.
01:37:51.340 It might even be that the entire culture war is a manifestation of that emerging shift,
01:37:57.900 right?
01:37:58.540 Because we're at war to some degree with the idea that there isn't anything other than
01:38:04.480 hedonism and power, right?
01:38:07.080 And that's the radical proposition.
01:38:10.800 Certainly the postmodernist proposition was that, especially emanating from people like
01:38:15.620 Foucault and Derrida, was that there was, especially Foucault, there wasn't anything other than
01:38:20.540 power.
01:38:21.700 And power is always utilized in the service of a short-term hedonism because why the hell
01:38:26.520 else would you bother with the power?
01:38:29.760 So maybe let me try to summarize those things because I think we've arrived somewhere very
01:38:36.200 important.
01:38:36.560 Can we start even with the Darien Gap?
01:38:39.420 Oh, that's going to be an interesting trick.
01:38:41.140 Let's see if I can find a way.
01:38:43.120 Yep.
01:38:43.260 But what you're pointing to, we are somewhere new in history because of the power of our
01:38:51.200 technology, which takes off the table the traditional way that terrible problems like this have been
01:38:57.760 solved by evolution.
01:38:58.760 Evolution was a process in which people whose belief structures or orientation or models
01:39:05.520 were dangerously off could go extinct, leaving behind those whose models weren't so broken.
01:39:11.620 We can't do that now.
01:39:13.240 That tool, as terrible as it was, at least worked.
01:39:16.180 What we have now is a system where we are all tied together such that the bad folks may get what
01:39:25.100 they deserve, but we're also going to get what they deserve. And the tool for thinking your way
01:39:30.760 out of such a puzzle without actually having to go through extinctions of various populations
01:39:36.240 is consciousness. Consciousness evolved, I would argue, for this exact purpose, for addressing novelty
01:39:43.600 and being able to see, to follow through what will happen if I behave in a certain way so that
01:39:48.500 you don't have to suffer that consequence selectively.
01:39:50.740 So that you can sacrifice your stupidity.
01:39:54.460 Right. And I guess this does bring us back to the question of the Darien Gap, because what
01:40:00.700 we see going on in Panama really looks like an old model that is now taking on tremendous new
01:40:13.740 power and putting us in global jeopardy by deciding to move people and resources to dispense with the
01:40:24.460 consent of the governed. And that is going to end very badly. So the message to us is that the peril we
01:40:33.860 detect in places like Darien, it's telling us something, which is that we need to rise to a kind of
01:40:41.260 collective consciousness. We need to realize that what is binding us together is not genetic
01:40:47.740 relatedness. It is common purpose that we all, if we think clearly, should want to bequeath to our
01:40:55.120 descendants a marvelous world. And instead, we are going to give them a world that is greatly diminished
01:41:01.940 even to the one that we were given. So I think it is that moment.
01:41:06.500 Yeah, I think so too. God help us.
01:41:11.620 Absolutely.
01:41:13.220 All right, sir. Well, everybody, for everybody watching and listening, I'm going to delve further
01:41:17.400 into these ideas with Brett in the half an hour that we'll spend together on the Daily Wire Plus
01:41:22.280 side of the platform. So if you're inclined to join us there, then please feel more than welcome to do so.
01:41:28.860 Can I add something? For those who are interested in a deeper look into the questions raised by what's
01:41:34.320 going on in Panama, if they go to the Dark Horse, Dark Horse is one word, the Dark Horse Locals
01:41:40.980 community, there's a discussion between myself and Chris Martinson there in which we explore this stuff
01:41:46.400 in great depth.
01:41:47.740 All right, excellent. So everybody's enjoined to go do precisely that.
01:41:52.340 Right, yes. And to also take up Brett's challenge to view these political events and economic events,
01:41:59.180 these practical on the ground events in light of the broader reality of the culture war that is tearing
01:42:05.440 us to pieces. So, all right. So, well, thank you very much, Brett. And to everybody watching and
01:42:11.620 listening, thank you very much for your time and attention. And on to the next challenge.
01:42:17.500 Thanks, Jordan. Love you, brother.
01:42:18.800 Love you, brother.