516. Michael Malice: A Clinical Analysis
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 42 minutes
Words per Minute
189.46597
Summary
In this episode, Dr. Michael M. Mellis joins me to talk about virtue signaling, narcissism, and why we should all celebrate January 6th as a national holiday. We also talk about how narcissists think their narrative is the reality, and how they get enraged when challenged with it.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hello, everybody. I had the opportunity today to sit down and talk, play really with Michael
00:00:22.900
Mellis. And that's always fun. Michael's a, he's a genuine delight to have a conversation
00:00:29.160
with. You never know what direction it's going to go in. Many directions, all of which have a certain
00:00:33.400
coherence. He's got a great sense of humor and irony and is extremely sharp and unpredictable.
00:00:42.520
So that's ridiculously fun. And he always has something useful to say. So what did we talk
00:00:49.480
about today? Well, we talked about the terrible attractiveness of the kind of virtue signaling
00:00:58.020
that other people make sacrifices for. Motivation for deep evil. Michael has studied totalitarian evil.
00:01:06.420
He was curious about the more mundane forms of pathology, the sorts of things that motivate
00:01:13.940
not only pedophilia, but extreme sadistic pedophilia, let's say. So that always makes for
00:01:20.800
enjoyable conversation. We talked about Michael shifting views with regards to the marginal,
00:01:31.140
let's say, as a creative anarchist by personality and political inclination. Michael is prone to
00:01:40.760
presume that the different against the same or the, what would you say, exceptional against the normal
00:01:49.700
is admirable. But he's also come to recognize that the center can be dissolved in a manner that's
00:01:58.660
cataclysmic and the diverse and the creative can degenerate into the monstrous and dangerous. And so we
00:02:05.780
talked about that technically, psychologically, sociologically. We talked about Camille Paglia,
00:02:13.080
who's a hero of Michael's, the brilliant female literary critic, unpredictable and sparkling,
00:02:22.140
and Michael's request to me that I broker an invitation, which I could do, I suppose, with some
00:02:28.700
degree of success probability. And we surveyed the landscape. Fundamentally, what we did was survey
00:02:38.760
the landscape of counterproductive moralizing and analyzed its effect on psychological and political
00:02:46.380
behavior. And it was great fun. So join us for that.
00:02:51.940
I suppose you think this should be a national holiday.
00:02:55.040
Well, kind of. Don't you? We took down Trudell. That's the spirit of January 6th.
00:03:01.480
Thank God. You know, I watched his resignation speech today. Apparently, the wind blew it away
00:03:09.880
just a couple of minutes before his actual speech. So he had to wing it. And you can tell. And you know
00:03:15.660
what I really found fascinating about it was, and I think it's perfectly in keeping with his essential
00:03:20.720
narcissism, is the first statements he made were about him. He said something like,
00:03:28.720
well, you all know I'm a leader and that, or I'm a fighter. You all know I'm a fighter and I don't
00:03:36.140
quit. It's like, well, this isn't about you. I can't believe that, I can't envision saying
00:03:43.560
something like that about myself. You know, can you imagine going out in front of a national audience
00:03:50.820
I can't imagine anyone calling you a leader. That's true.
00:03:55.600
In all seriousness, to your point, I'm sorry to cut you off. You know better than I do from
00:03:59.560
your work at Shrink, narcissists think their narrative is the reality. They literally believe
00:04:04.220
what they say is true. And when you challenge that, they get enraged because it's, in effect,
00:04:12.380
Well, there's an interesting corollary to that, you know. Statistical analysis of language,
00:04:21.300
kind of using something approximating early large language models was just factor analysis,
00:04:26.620
but it's analogous, showed that there's no difference between being self-conscious and being
00:04:35.120
miserable. They're so tightly associated that you can't distinguish them.
00:04:41.220
So, the default reality is that if you prioritize yourself, the associated emotion is negative.
00:04:52.020
So, narcissists are in a game that just can't possibly be won.
00:04:55.480
Wait, but isn't it more the case that they can't prioritize their self because there is no self?
00:05:00.120
Well, the self is a funny thing, Michael. This is something we might as well talk about this,
00:05:04.680
you know. A human being is something that's organized on many levels, right? So,
00:05:09.520
if you think about it neurobiologically, for example, I'll give you an example.
00:05:14.000
If you take a cat, a female, that works better on female cats, partly because their sexual behavior
00:05:18.920
is a little less complex to organize. You can take out the whole, almost the whole brain of a female
00:05:24.300
cat, the whole cortex, and most of the centers of emotion, and leave it only with the hypothalamus,
00:05:30.200
which is just a cap on the top of the spinal cord. And that cat, in a relatively unchanging
00:05:36.580
environment, can function. It can eat, it can mate, it can defend itself, it can drink,
00:05:43.240
it can regulate its temperature. Like, it's functional. And this is the weirdest thing,
00:05:47.920
it's hyper-exploratory. So, think about that. A cat with no brain is hyper-exploratory.
00:05:53.860
Okay. So, the hypothalamus regulates basic motivational states like lust and hunger and
00:06:01.420
thirst and temperature regulation, defensive aggression, right? And so, it's the first place
00:06:10.940
where reflexes transform into something like personalities. But there's a sets of them,
00:06:16.520
right? Like, you know what? A cat that's involved in defensive rage isn't a cat that's in the mood
00:06:21.980
for mating, right? So, it swaps between these fundamental motivational states. Well,
00:06:26.160
each of those motivational states has a self. And Nietzsche pointed this out back in an unrelated
00:06:33.020
investigation, in a sense. But he said, every drive philosophizes in its spirit.
00:06:40.420
So, these underlying motivational states, like, they're not just drives, like reflexes. They come
00:06:45.180
with perceptions, thoughts, attitudes, political opinions, like they come fully fledged. But imagine
00:06:53.280
if you're really immature, badly socialized, they just operate in sequence. That's like a toddler.
00:06:58.840
Well, when people talk about their self, usually they talk about something like possession by one
00:07:05.460
of those lower states. Now, then you could imagine that could be integrated. Right.
00:07:09.100
And that's what happens when you mature. But then that integration and being social are almost
00:07:15.200
exactly the same thing. Like, you know, if I was a solitary animal living in the woods,
00:07:20.200
I could just cycle through my underlying motivational states. There'd be no real reason to regulate or
00:07:25.740
integrate them. But as you mature, you integrate them so that they take the future into account and
00:07:32.060
other people into account. But then, so then the self starts to become, well, reflexes, basic motivational
00:07:38.380
states, integrated personality, but that it's integrated into a relationship and a family and
00:07:43.760
a community and a society. And it isn't obvious at all which of those takes priority. And one of the
00:07:51.260
things I've been thinking about is that our definitions of mental health are, and this is partly
00:07:56.800
psychologists' fault, are really badly flawed because we think of sanity as a characteristic of
00:08:03.060
the self, but it's probably something like harmony between all these, simultaneous harmony between all
00:08:10.360
I wrote a short list of things I want to talk to you about, and we were already hitting it. And what I
00:08:14.140
want to talk to you about at length, I want to hear your thoughts at length, is that what you just
00:08:20.580
Because I think that's the kind of thing when you're starting out in any career, it's not possible
00:08:24.660
because you're going to have to subordinate yourself to your boss, your superior is somewhat,
00:08:30.760
Well, I think you hit the target dead center by bringing up self-actualization. Okay, so this
00:08:38.060
was, this idea emerged in the late 1950s and the 1960s, right? First of all, with the existential
00:08:45.940
psychologists and psychoanalysts, and then with the humanists like Maslow and Rogers. And it was kind
00:08:52.560
of a substitute for religious pursuit. Like it'd be the secular substitute for religious pursuit. There was
00:08:58.600
this idea that there was a self, which is something like the liberal project, I would say the liberal
00:09:04.340
individualistic project, and then that that could be actualized. But, but there's a real problem with
00:09:09.880
that because, look, I had a neighbor say to me once, no mother is any happier than her most unhappy
00:09:19.680
Right. Right. Which, you know, strikes me as highly plausible. So because if you're socialized,
00:09:26.220
you're in a nexus of relationships. Right. And if those relationships aren't harmonious,
00:09:31.380
voluntary, playful, you're miserable. And that means that the self-actualization isn't self. It's more
00:09:40.180
like conducting yourself in a manner that enables harmony to exist, like a musical harmony at all these
00:09:46.540
levels simultaneously. So you have to conduct yourself. If you're going to not be swamped by
00:09:51.620
negative emotion, this goes back to Trudeau. If I only think about my local self now and maximizing
00:09:57.660
that, you might say, well, I get exactly what I want or something in me does. Why wouldn't I be
00:10:02.720
happy? Well, part of the reason is I'm sacrificing the future because I'm being impulsive. And also,
00:10:08.240
if it's all about me, who the hell's going to want to be around me?
00:10:11.800
Well, I had, please, because again, this is your forte, not mine. I had always thought of
00:10:17.040
self-actualization, if I had to define it as, I'm myself 24-7. I'm myself when I'm at home. I'm
00:10:23.440
myself when I'm with my friends. I'm myself in a professional setting where you're always in a
00:10:27.440
position to be yourself. And I think when you have people around you who like you, respect you,
00:10:32.740
admire you, you can have that. And it is very harmonious because you don't have to change
00:10:37.740
who you are or how you talk if you're in the morning, evening, night, or no matter the setting.
00:10:42.820
So, Carl Jung talked about something akin to that. And I think that's partly the source of the ideas.
00:10:49.560
So, he believed that there was a core self. But Jung believed that the core self,
00:10:56.020
this is something we can talk about in great detail, but Jung identified the core self.
00:11:00.740
He thought that Christ was an archetype of the core self. There was a technical reason for that.
00:11:05.620
And then he thought the self was guarded, in a sense, by persona, which is exactly what you're
00:11:11.360
wearing, right? You've got a mask on. And so, the persona would be the tool that you use to,
00:11:17.760
this is one way of thinking about it, the tool that you use to manipulate the social environment
00:11:22.040
so that you don't cause undue stress and so that you get what you want. Now, you, like you,
00:11:29.040
apparently, would presume that if you're well-constituted, there's no real division between
00:11:35.400
the persona and the self. Now, it can be a bit more complicated than that because one of the
00:11:40.880
things Jung pointed out was that there are times when you want a persona. Like, you want to put out
00:11:47.940
a shallow version of yourself in a way. So, imagine, for example, that you go into a bank and you're
00:11:53.200
just going to do a business transaction with the teller. You don't want, whether you want the teller's
00:12:00.340
full self there or not is a matter of dispute. Really, what you want is a pretty generic
00:12:06.720
transaction, right? Right. So, there are times when you need to know when you present a generic
00:12:11.720
version of yourself. But my point is that bank teller isn't really in a position to be self-actualized
00:12:15.760
because they have to subordinate themselves to Chase or whatever the company is.
00:12:20.300
Well, you know, okay, so let's, I've been thinking about an idea akin to that
00:12:25.180
in relationship to the Exodus story. Okay. No, so the Exodus story presents kind of an
00:12:31.440
archetypal landscape of human destiny. And you might say one of the ways of interpreting it is that
00:12:38.400
everybody starts out as a slave. And that would be, I think, akin to your idea that the bank teller,
00:12:45.400
for example, isn't in a position to be self-actualized, right? Because they're so constrained by the
00:12:51.340
demands of the situation that there's no room for, what, individual creativity or full individual
00:12:57.520
expression. I can give you an example that happened to me when I, in 2000, I was working at Goldman
00:13:02.140
Sachs as a help desk, right? So, how it worked is- I can't imagine that. Why? I was better than
00:13:07.300
everyone else on the team combined because I knew how to be helpful. Because I knew, what I understood
00:13:11.480
was when that person is calling you, they don't want an answer, they want reassurance.
00:13:16.780
If you're at the point when you call the help desk, you're freaking out. You just want to know
00:13:21.060
someone will take care of it. I don't care what the answer is. I'm outsourcing my concern. So,
00:13:26.000
I understood the rest of my team didn't because they'd be like, oh, I don't know. I'm like,
00:13:29.860
don't add to their stress. They're stressed enough. You're there to ameliorate their stress.
00:13:33.820
Yeah, well, that's great. I mean, partly what you want-
00:13:35.720
I'm going to be looking for what I said earlier with this bank teller. And a lot of times they
00:13:39.880
would want overtime. And I wouldn't want to do the overtime because I wanted to go home and work
00:13:44.560
on my writing and so on and so forth. And overtime was time and a half. I'd rather have that hour
00:13:49.040
than that time and a half. My co-workers, I'm using this term literally, couldn't understand
00:13:55.600
that. They're like, you're getting paid time and a half and the team needs you. And I'm like,
00:13:59.740
I don't care. I'd rather have my time. And for these types of people, that self,
00:14:06.200
it makes no sense. You're there to help the team. The team needs you. QED.
00:14:10.380
Okay. So let's take apart that idea of your time. Because the way you phrased that, for example,
00:14:18.980
there's an implicit assumption there that's underlying our discussion that there's a
00:14:23.260
distinction between your time and company time. Yes. Okay. So I want to hit that from two
00:14:29.120
perspectives. One would be, well, they're both your time because you decided to go work for the
00:14:33.560
company. Right. But so that's a voluntary choice. Sure.
00:14:37.600
Just like it is to pursue what's your time. So then the question would be, what is it in you
00:14:45.420
that you were serving when it was your time specifically rather than company time? You
00:14:52.060
know what I mean? It's like, how do you, because you did both of them voluntarily.
00:14:55.700
But I didn't do both of them for free. Right. Okay. So one of the distinctions would be
00:15:00.000
the thing that you're doing when you spend your time, the time you characterize as my time.
00:15:10.380
Okay. Why? What was it about it that made it valuable in the absence of external reward?
00:15:16.780
Because that was what I wanted to be as a person. And I was working my writing and things like that
00:15:22.400
and trying to make it. Whereas the Goldman Sachs stuff, this is, there was no future in it for
00:15:28.040
Right. Yeah. Okay. So that's an interesting aspect of that. So would we say that?
00:15:34.580
So it's a new year, 2025. And you're thinking, how am I going to make this year different? How am I
00:15:38.980
going to build something for myself? I'm dying to be my own boss or see if I can turn that business
00:15:43.040
idea I've been kicking around into a reality, but I don't know how to make it happen. Well,
00:15:47.460
Shopify is how you're going to make it happen. And let me tell you how. The best time to start
00:15:50.940
your new business is right now. Shopify makes it simple to create your brand, open for business
00:15:55.340
and get your first sale. Get your store up and running easily with thousands of customizable
00:15:59.280
templates, no coding or design skills required. Their powerful social media tools let you connect
00:16:03.980
to your channels and create shoppable posts to sell everywhere people scroll. Shopify also makes
00:16:09.200
it easy to manage everything, shipping, taxes, and payments from one single dashboard. Well,
00:16:14.380
what happens if you don't act now? Will you regret it? What if someone beats you to the idea?
00:16:17.960
Don't kick yourself when you hear this again in a year because you didn't do anything now.
00:16:21.840
Established in 2025 really has a nice ring to it. Don't you think? Sign up for your $1 per month
00:16:26.240
trial period at shopify.com slash jbp. That is all lowercase. Head over to shopify.com slash jbp to
00:16:33.360
start selling with Shopify today. Again, that's shopify.com slash jbp.
00:16:37.680
It was easy for you and maybe it's easy for people in general to assume that what they're
00:16:46.280
doing is having their time if what they're doing with that time is investing in their
00:16:51.480
future. I don't think they were thinking about the future. No, you, when you were doing your
00:16:55.820
writing was the fact that it was motivationally relevant to you directly associated with the
00:17:01.840
fact that it was an investment in the future. Like why was your writing, why did your writing
00:17:06.760
take precedent and why did you identify the time you spent writing as serving you? Like
00:17:12.860
I'm after a definition of you. What do you mean by you?
00:17:15.760
My definition of me as I saw it then, though I was in a position to implement it, is someone
00:17:21.500
who is a writer, someone who is a creative person, someone who's a thinker. There was no
00:17:25.600
part of me that wanted to be that corporate helper.
00:17:29.240
Right. Okay. So then I would say that's akin to the distinction between slave and sojourner,
00:17:38.340
So, you know, there's this, one of the elements that underlies the general critique of capitalism
00:17:47.440
Right now, you can criticize that in that, well, slaves can't quit. And the critic would
00:17:54.280
say, well, I can quit one job, but if I don't get another one, I'll starve. So like, I'm
00:17:58.780
in a slavery position, so to speak. Now, I think the most effective way of countering
00:18:05.240
that is likely that if you're not charting your own destiny, then you are a slave.
00:18:11.620
But I think there's a big difference, and this is why the Exodus metaphor does not apply
00:18:15.540
here. I think a lot of people want the cage. I think H.L. Mencken is right. The average man,
00:18:21.340
H.L. Mencken, H.L. Mencken said the average man doesn't want to be free. He simply wants
00:18:26.260
to be safe. You don't see that in Exodus. The Jews wanted to escape Egypt. There were
00:18:30.240
none of them that stayed behind. They go, oh, you know, I got a pretty good hero under
00:18:32.880
Pharaoh. They all want to be free, and that's not accurate.
00:18:35.140
But they do, like, well, they're lost in the desert, because that's part of what happens
00:18:40.920
on the way to freedom, so to speak. They do get whiny as hell.
00:18:44.160
They pine for the days when the tyrant told them what to do. They said, well, at least we have
00:18:51.000
we had like a variety. They're getting manna from heaven, right? They said, well, we don't
00:18:54.540
have onions and garlic anymore, even though they're getting heavenly food. So they do revert
00:18:59.740
to that slave, what would you say, that longing for slavery. And I do agree that that is being
00:19:08.080
part of the reason, this is something that I think is really worth discussing with you,
00:19:12.860
part of the reason that people are wage slaves, let's say, is because they don't want to take
00:19:19.780
on the responsibility of charting their own course. Now, I think people often also don't
00:19:24.400
know how. Like, our school systems, for example, were set up to not teach people to do that.
00:19:30.540
It's the Bismarck model, where they wanted to make everyone homogenized to little soldiers.
00:19:36.520
It's funny how, one of the things I love about social media and kind of new media is that it
00:19:41.280
allows people to question things they never thought to even question for their whole life.
00:19:45.020
I'll give you a parallel example. The great leader, Kim Il-sung, who founded North Korea,
00:19:49.720
he had a big tumor on the back of his neck. It was too close to his spine to operate.
00:19:56.280
And it kept bigger and bigger throughout his life. And he was always photographed from this angle.
00:20:00.520
And I heard differing accounts about whether North Koreans knew about this.
00:20:04.260
And I met a refugee and I said to her, did you know about this thing? She goes, oh yeah,
00:20:08.820
it was an old war injury. And I said, why would a war injury get bigger throughout his life?
00:20:13.560
And she just stopped. And she's like, holy crap. She never questioned. And she knew in the face,
00:20:16.980
it was a lie, but she never questioned that it was a lie. Let's look about education.
00:20:21.600
Why are we all going to school at the same time and learning everything at the same pace?
00:20:26.120
It makes no sense. You're probably, me might be better at math. I might be better at,
00:20:31.940
Yes. It makes, and when you stop and think, you go, especially with technology nowadays,
00:20:35.480
you can have dynamic testing, you know, okay, once a month you test, you stay here,
00:20:40.000
you get extra help. That's fine. You can read ahead. But somehow we all have to
00:20:45.160
start school at the same time, study everything at the same rate. And people who get are worse than
00:20:51.000
others or some, not do any fault of their own, are punished. It makes no sense, but we never
00:20:55.300
question it. And now thanks to podcasting like this, you'd be like, wait a minute,
00:20:58.900
this is kind of weird, isn't it? Why does everyone have to learn everything at the same rate
00:21:03.640
Well, you know that it was the school systems were established in accordance with the Prussian
00:21:10.640
And that the goal there was to make obedient soldiers and really, literally to crush out
00:21:19.540
Just one more thing. There's a book called Illiberal Reformers, which talks about this at
00:21:22.960
length. It's amazing the boner Western leftists have for European ideas. Like they went over to
00:21:29.480
Prussia, they saw this. And because it's foreign, it's like, oh my God, this is amazing. This is
00:21:34.080
next gen. Same thing happened a couple of generations later with Lenin and the communists.
00:21:37.940
It's like, okay, it's from overseas. It must be better than our stupid American values is how
00:21:42.520
they perceived it. And the consequences have been absolutely disastrous. Like we've,
00:21:47.860
if you ask most conservatives in 2019, could COVID have happened in America, the lockdowns and all
00:21:53.960
the submission, they would have laughed in your face, but they ran the experiment. They have the
00:21:58.020
data. Their theory was wrong. People are docile.
00:22:02.440
I was shocked at the degree of, well, my conclusion observing Toronto during the COVID was that
00:22:09.000
70% of Canadians would have worn a mask for the rest of their life. And I would say
00:22:16.620
30% of them would have worn that mask happily if they could have continued informing on their
00:22:23.980
neighbors. Oh yeah. And the thing that's crazy to that is Canada is not a hospitable country.
00:22:28.960
It's a nation of frontiersmen. And look at Scotland. Like what happened to these peoples?
00:22:33.960
Or Australia. Oh yeah. Right. Yeah. There you go. And now they're, they're castrati.
00:22:39.040
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Well, we did get rid of Trudeau today.
00:22:44.700
Yeah. But I mean, this is kind of, this is ripping. I mean, first of all, I think it's kind
00:22:49.100
of crappy of him to set up his successor and take a major loss like Kim Campbell had to face. It was
00:22:54.260
a 93. So, but I mean, I don't, I'm sure there's room for hope with Pierre, but it's, he's a symptom.
00:23:01.320
He's not the, he's not the cancer. Don't you think?
00:23:03.920
Yes. Yeah. Hey man, Canadians voted for him. And I would say that the default Canadian,
00:23:12.320
if presented with his policies one by one would still agree with virtually all of them.
00:23:18.700
Yeah. And that's true of the conservatives as well.
00:23:23.040
You know, the, the, the malaise is very, very deep. Yeah. Okay. So back to this, I'm, I, I still want
00:23:29.920
to dig in a little further into this, your dream. So we have this program online called
00:23:36.500
Future Authoring that helps people lay out a plan for the future.
00:23:41.540
Yeah. Well, it, it, it, it has almost a miraculous effect. It's really quite stunning. And I'm still,
00:23:49.880
I still find this difficult to believe because psychological interventions usually don't work.
00:23:56.340
And they often, if they work, they don't have the results that you intend, which is partly because
00:24:01.700
if something's kind of working well, it's really hard to improve it. It's way easier to buck it up
00:24:06.020
in ways you don't understand. Okay. So the future authoring program asks you to, okay. So you make
00:24:12.880
a contract with yourself like a covenant. So the covenant is something like this. If you could have
00:24:18.740
what you wanted in five years. And so what you wanted would be, you'd be satisfied with that or
00:24:23.440
thrilled with it even, and things would be going well enough for you so that you weren't swamped
00:24:28.960
by misery, which is really what people want, but they want to not be swamped by misery. They don't
00:24:33.360
want to be happy. Okay. Right. Yeah. Right. Yeah. Yeah. It's very important to know that. It's a very
00:24:38.240
distinction. Yes. It's a very good distinction. Yes. So then can you imagine anything that would
00:24:43.560
satisfy you? So this is like a pretend game that a kid would play, you know, like it's fantasy. It's
00:24:48.940
like, okay, you get to have what you want now, but there's a condition here. You actually have to
00:24:52.860
be taking care of yourself like someone you care for. Yeah. Okay. So now you posit yourself
00:24:57.260
as someone you care for. Now you get to have what you want. What would satisfy you? But
00:25:02.660
you have to specify it. Sure. Okay. So then we have people write just for 15 minutes with
00:25:07.320
no real self-criticism. What might that be like? And then we have them criticize it a bit
00:25:14.320
because you have to make it into a strategy and then differentiate. It's like, well, what would
00:25:19.660
you want for a relationship? What would you want with regard to your family, your career,
00:25:24.380
your education, your care of yourself, your service to the community, your mental and physical
00:25:30.260
health? And again, same rules apply. You get to have what you want. Okay. So now we had
00:25:37.880
young people do this when they came to college on their orientation day. 90 minutes. That's all
00:25:45.500
they wrote. They either wrote for 90 minutes or they wrote about what they did for the last
00:25:49.200
two weeks for 90 minutes. So it was randomized, randomized study. The kids who did the self-authoring
00:25:55.620
program were 50% less likely to drop out the first year. Oh, wow. Yeah. 50%. Yeah. Yeah.
00:26:02.420
And even the college where we did this, it's stunning for a 90 minute intervention. Even the college
00:26:11.220
that we did the intervention in wouldn't implement the program. We got zero takers on the university
00:26:16.180
side, which is, you know, very telling as far as I'm concerned. But the reason I brought it up is
00:26:22.280
because the alternative to being a slave, let's say, which would be the alternative to self-actualization
00:26:29.460
is charting your own course. But then this is the question I have for you. Like you were doing that
00:26:36.900
when you had these dreams of writing, but why did you identify writing with yourself and why were you
00:26:44.220
motivated to pursue it? You know, cause that's work too, like working at Goldman Sachs. So this was my
00:26:49.700
list. I remember the list distinctly and I've checked them all off. Okay. No alarm clock, never have to
00:26:56.380
talk to someone I don't want to, and never have to engage in small talk. That was all I wanted.
00:27:01.820
So I've done standup for a little bit. And that was very frustrating for me because of the lack of
00:27:07.600
causality, meaning a joke that kills one night would bomb the next. And that threw me for a loop
00:27:12.120
writing. I could do it in my underwear, my house, my own time. So that, so to have those things
00:27:18.260
is to me, self-actualization and a huge, huge blessing.
00:27:22.940
Right. So that, that, a blessing. Yes. I don't take it for granted. The president doesn't have that.
00:27:28.780
So, you know, when, when God comes to Abraham, he comes as the voice of adventure. And what he
00:27:36.720
tells Abraham is that if he follows that voice, his life will be a blessing to himself. Right.
00:27:42.720
There's other aspects of the deal, but that's one of them. His life will be a blessing to him.
00:27:47.160
You set out the preconditions for what your life would be like if it was a blessing.
00:27:50.760
Yes. You said, so you're very high in openness. So you didn't want any small talk. You wanted to
00:27:55.720
get to the heart of the matter. Yes. Yes. Get to the depths right away.
00:27:58.220
Me and Michaela are zero in agreeableness. Yeah.
00:28:00.340
So I never have to talk to someone I don't want to. Yeah.
00:28:02.420
And I like my biorhythm. I go to bed at two, I wake up at 11, Monday to Sunday.
00:28:08.720
Right. Right. So you're, you're an evening person. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. That's,
00:28:12.480
that's often associated with openness. Is that true?
00:28:15.140
Yeah. Yeah. There's, there's actually the person, there are morning people and evening people
00:28:19.160
and they have different temperaments. Okay. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Um, so you wanted to not
00:28:25.940
to have to engage in pointless small talk. Right. Right. You said you want to set your
00:28:30.800
own temporal rhythm. Right. Right. Although is it disciplined or is it erratic or do you
00:28:35.240
just get up at the same time, but later in the day? It's organic. You just get up. Yeah.
00:28:39.320
And that's okay. Yes. The best. Yeah. Okay. Okay. Yeah. It's better for me psychologically
00:28:44.920
if I get up at a regular time. But that is regular time. It's 11. Oh, you, but that's
00:28:49.160
what I asked. You get up at 11. Yes. But that, okay. So it's stable, but it's your choice. Yes.
00:28:53.960
Right. So that means- I don't have a clock. My body just wakes up. Right. So that means
00:28:57.100
it's not, what would you say? It's not, um, undisciplined. Sure. You know what I mean?
00:29:02.100
I'm very disciplined. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. So you wanted not to have to engage in trivial
00:29:07.640
interactions. Right. You wanted to get up on your rhythm. Right.
00:29:11.360
What else? Never have to talk to someone I don't want to. Right. No small talk. Yeah.
00:29:16.620
Right. So that's part of the small talk thing. Why do you distinguish them then? You wanted
00:29:20.760
to not have small talk and you also wanted not to talk to anybody you didn't want to talk to.
00:29:24.600
Well, not interact. So not just talk. Like if I, like if I don't have to go to some event
00:29:28.660
I don't want to, or be trapped in a conversation. Right. So you really wanted to choose the parameters
00:29:33.240
of your social. That's all you wanted. That's it. Were there other things? That was it.
00:29:36.320
I mean, I said, if that was my list, I've made it like in my head. I like being like now there's
00:29:41.320
other ancillary things. Like don't look at the check at a restaurant. Don't care. If I want to
00:29:45.500
go on a trip once in a while, I can. But I think at a certain point, this is what I want to talk to
00:29:48.980
you about is at a certain point, we and I have discussed this off camera. You stop driving the
00:29:55.160
car and you start surfing. Because I think when you reach a certain level of success, whatever comes
00:29:59.480
next is so often so random and circuitous. Like I've talked about this with Roseanne, you know,
00:30:03.780
one day the president's complaining about a song she sings. This is not the kind of thing you can
00:30:07.280
plan for and expect. Right. So once you reach a certain level of success, things just maintain
00:30:11.140
their momentum. And I talked about this with Rogan also. He's like, yeah, just wake up. You're like,
00:30:15.680
okay, you know, Prince Charles is complaining about me. This is my life. And you have to accept it.
00:30:20.540
You have that too. You want to be Jordan Peterson.
00:30:22.480
Yes, yes. Well, so that's the, there's a specific reason I wanted to bring this up. So
00:30:31.140
when I was writing We Who Wrestle with God, I was looking at character, their characterizations
00:30:36.420
of the divine. That was going to be the subtitle. We used perceptions instead, but
00:30:40.080
it doesn't matter. What, what the stories do, as far as I am concerned, or at least one of their
00:30:48.200
functions is to figure out what principle should be superordinate. Now you did that. You, you had three
00:30:53.920
parameters for your superordinate principle. And you identified that with yourself, right? That,
00:30:58.640
that would satisfy me. So, so the God, the divine in the Abrahamic encounter is the voice of
00:31:06.340
adventure. And so God's covenant, his contract there, because it's put in contractual form.
00:31:12.460
If you follow this voice, then the following things will happen. You'd be a blessing to yourself.
00:31:17.860
Viking, committed to exploring the world in comfort. Journey through the heart of Europe
00:31:22.920
on an elegant Viking longship with thoughtful service, cultural enrichment, and all-inclusive
00:31:34.000
Your name will become known among other people justly.
00:31:38.180
Right. So that's a good author. That's a good offer, right? Because people want social standing
00:31:42.940
and that can be gamed and it can be falsified, but it can also be genuine.
00:31:47.260
Right. Okay. You'll do something of lasting significance. So that's cool. That would be
00:31:57.640
Right. And then you'll do it in a way that will be a blessing to everyone else.
00:32:02.320
It'll multiply the pie instead of, okay. And then the, okay. Then the association of the promised
00:32:08.820
land with that is that if you follow that call, then the world turns into a field of unpredictable
00:32:20.700
Because you don't know what's going to happen. I know. It is true. That's the opposite of
00:32:24.940
No, but I'm telling to the audience, like when you're young, I'm telling you, like, this
00:32:28.640
is the advice I always give them. I say this all the time. Let's suppose you're a new
00:32:31.480
author, right? It's an easy example. Go into the bookstore, look at those crappy,
00:32:35.300
crappy books on the shelves that you're like, I can't believe this is a book deal. That could
00:32:40.700
Their friends are like, how did this guy get a book deal? And when you put it in terms
00:32:44.080
like that, all of a sudden, what would have seemed impossible because of your schooling,
00:32:48.160
like, oh, you're not going to be an author. It's like, oh, wait a minute. I can do this.
00:32:51.700
Or you could be a band that no one's heard of, but you pay the rent and you create your
00:32:55.960
music and you've got a dedicated fan base. That's heaven on earth. You don't have to be
00:33:03.460
Exactly. So yeah, look at what happened to John Lennon.
00:33:06.820
So we have this bizarre Pareto distribution in American aspirations where unless you're
00:33:13.820
at the very, very top, you're kind of a failure. And like, that's ridiculous. You don't have
00:33:20.540
There's also another way of dealing with the Pareto distribution problem, right, which
00:33:25.340
is just so everybody listening is clear, is that the bulk of the rewards go to a small
00:33:30.980
minority of people in any field. Now, a small minority of people in every field do the productive
00:33:36.260
work, too. So let's not forget. But one of the ways that a sophisticated society deals
00:33:41.440
with that is just by generating an indefinite number of games.
00:33:44.540
Right. Here's a cool thing that I've noticed about people. Imagine that you're kind of out
00:33:50.940
on the Pareto distribution in one dimension. It's like, you know, so you've got specialized
00:33:55.660
knowledge. There's quite a few of you. But if you have specialized knowledge in two areas
00:34:03.600
And if there's three, it's like, you're that person. You're the only person playing
00:34:07.900
that game. So that's a good thing for everybody who's watching and listening to know. It's
00:34:11.340
like, get really good at something. And then that makes you exceptional. And you're going
00:34:15.940
to be somewhat successful just because of that. But then if you add another distant skill
00:34:21.320
to that, and you overlap them, it's like, you're pretty rare. And three, no one's like you.
00:34:26.620
So I had a question I had for you, and then I was going to put you a little bit on the spot
00:34:29.440
in a fun way. Who did you model? You basically became Jordan Peterson, not overnight, but it
00:34:35.360
was pretty quick, right? To go from just a professor to kind of-
00:34:38.700
Yeah, right. As a totic. Who did you model yourself after? There had to be someone who's
00:34:44.540
like, all right, I don't know what I'm doing here. Like, who do I want to be like who paved
00:34:48.680
Oh, that's easy, really. They were people that I encountered in books.
00:34:55.480
Definitely. Well, I would say, like I read a lot, and some books had a massive effect
00:35:01.820
on me. Like my pattern for reading was I had a problem I was always trying to solve. I
00:35:06.220
was trying to solve the, I was trying to understand evil. That's been like my motivation since I
00:35:10.920
was like 13. And then now and then I'd run across an author and I'd think, oh, this person
00:35:16.560
knows something I don't, seriously. And then I'd just read everything they read, wrote, and
00:35:21.640
then I'd find out who influenced them and I'd read that. And so, you know, the cardinal
00:35:26.380
people who influenced me were Carl Jung, for sure, Nietzsche.
00:35:31.680
Carl Rogers was a pretty big influence. There was some biological psychologists, Jeffrey
00:35:36.580
Gray. I learned a lot about the brain from Jeffrey Gray.
00:35:39.160
But none of these people were public intellectuals like you are.
00:35:43.380
What I meant is who, is there anyone you model yourself after in that regard?
00:35:52.260
The reason it worked for me, likely, is because I had a unique lecturing style.
00:35:58.960
Yeah, but lots of people have unique lecturing styles.
00:36:04.120
See, I trained myself pretty much from the beginning of my career to speak without notes.
00:36:15.120
The combination of speaking without notes and then dealing with this, like, major existential
00:36:24.480
And I would say at the time, I experimented with YouTube just as an experiment, basically.
00:36:33.020
A producer came to me 20 years ago for a little television station, kind of like an NPR, Canada's
00:36:40.360
equivalent, TV Ontario, and asked to film one of my classes.
00:36:49.980
And so I had a taste of popular success as a professor.
00:36:57.020
Did you watch those clips to see what you could improve, what you did wrong?
00:37:03.580
Well, if you're really speaking to an audience, you know this likely as a stand-up and as
00:37:09.800
If you're really speaking to an audience, they tell you.
00:37:19.380
And the most telling part of the feedback is silence.
00:37:27.160
They're not moving, which means it's so interesting.
00:37:29.460
Because what that means neurophysiologically is there's all these competing motivations
00:37:35.320
And what happens if you decide to do something, the thing you're doing wins a Darwinian competition
00:37:42.520
over all the other things you could be doing and suppresses them and inhibits them.
00:37:46.440
And the more powerful the central motivational state, the more complete the inhibition.
00:37:52.780
And so what I'm trying to appeal to people in a lecture is, like, the lecture is a journey.
00:38:02.900
And if the quest is successful, they're dead silent, right?
00:38:05.840
They're just, they're tangled right into the discussion.
00:38:09.180
And that's, there isn't anything more fun than that.
00:38:11.460
Like, it's ridiculously entertaining to do that.
00:38:13.920
So I'm going to, I'm going to put you a little bit on the spot.
00:38:15.920
And this is also in teaching people at home how to ask someone for a favor, right?
00:38:20.660
So the key, in my opinion, asking for a favor is give that person the space to say no.
00:38:31.680
Because I've had people make demands, get me on Rogan.
00:38:33.800
It's like, you're really, it's a big ask, you know, like, like worded a bit away.
00:38:38.960
So when I was growing up, there was someone I was modeling myself after.
00:38:43.540
And you know, that question people ask, if you have dinner with anybody, anybody, there
00:38:47.300
is this person, and this person is a big fan of yours.
00:38:50.920
And I would love it if you feel comfortable telling them, hey, have break bread with Michael
00:39:00.960
Oh, she was my role model when I started out trying to do this kind of stuff.
00:39:08.440
It goes along with your stance as an anarchist, right?
00:39:11.260
Well, look, this is one of the principles that we're using to guide the development of
00:39:19.560
Policies that require fear and force are bad policies.
00:39:23.220
Now, it's tricky when it comes to the regulation of criminal behavior, right?
00:39:28.300
Because the really psychopathic, antisocial people, they don't play a social game.
00:39:34.140
Or people can't think ahead, even those who just can't think past the next moment.
00:39:39.020
I mean, psychopaths are notorious for not learning from experience.
00:39:42.380
But non-psychopaths as well, at a certain intelligence level, they're not thinking in
00:39:51.920
I was going to ask you when you were talking about your decision to become a writer.
00:39:55.880
I mean, you're blessed with an extremely high level of verbal intelligence, right?
00:40:04.460
But then, but there's quite a correlation between intelligence and socioeconomic status.
00:40:13.900
And the second best predictor is conscientiousness.
00:40:20.820
You know, or on the entrepreneurial space, it's openness, right?
00:40:29.000
That's interesting, because so many entrepreneurs I know are so, like, kind of, like, basic in
00:40:34.080
Well, the managerial types tend to be intelligent and conscientious.
00:40:38.200
The entrepreneurial types tend to be intelligent and open.
00:40:41.100
So, there's a pathway to, like, it's likely that a serial entrepreneur is going to be high
00:40:52.600
Like, an open person is switching games all the time.
00:40:55.580
Whereas, like, a more managerial person picks a game.
00:41:03.080
But it works terribly when the game stops working, right?
00:41:05.620
Which is why you need some entrepreneurs in your organization.
00:41:08.640
So, yeah, so I was wondering about this adventure issue.
00:41:15.140
And so, then you might say, well, what's your probability for success as an adventure if
00:41:23.860
But my suspicions are that strength of character will do the trick.
00:41:27.900
You know, because one of the pathways to success in a functional society is that people can
00:41:37.440
This is kind of insane that you, that's insane, but it's fortuitous to say this because I've
00:41:41.260
given talks for young people about, like, what I wish I'd known at their age.
00:41:44.120
And I tell them, don't strive for excellence because you're not gonna be able to do it.
00:41:49.320
If I can rely on you as someone who's working for me, and you say, I'll have this paper on
00:41:58.360
In fact, I'd rather have you say, I'll have it for you on Wednesday and give it Wednesday
00:42:05.420
Because I know I could schedule it around the Wednesday.
00:42:08.460
Well, the other thing too, see, if you're reliable, this is why honesty is the best policy.
00:42:14.060
If you're reliable, and you already pointed this out, you're low entropy.
00:42:19.320
Right, it's like, I can reduce you to one pixel.
00:42:27.360
I also appreciate the irony of the anarchists advising people to minimize the chaos that
00:42:33.000
Well, but when we talked to you, when we talked about anarchy before, like you stressed the
00:42:38.620
Right, and that strikes me as, well, that's why we made that a principle for our policy
00:42:46.580
It's like, if you can't offer people an invitational vision, so they say, yeah, yeah, I would do
00:42:57.080
So I think, like, a cardinal way of identifying tyrants is they use fear and compulsion.
00:43:05.140
And so this is a good, also, for you people to know who are watching and listening, is if
00:43:10.080
you're listening to a politician, and they're trying to motivate you fundamentally with fear,
00:43:15.900
or they're proposing the use of compulsion, you know, say in the case of an emergency, it's
00:43:23.140
like, yeah, probably you're a tyrant, probably you're a tyrant, even in an emergency, right?
00:43:33.780
Well, that's exactly the problem, is that, well, the emergency is pretty convenient for
00:43:38.260
you if you happen to be a tyrant, and part of the reason the idea of the apocalypse is
00:43:45.440
archetypal is because there's always an emergency.
00:43:51.600
And so you can conjure up an emergency at a moment's notice.
00:43:55.900
So I don't know whether I should look at the blue eye or the red eye.
00:44:11.540
You know, I could send her a note and tell her who you are.
00:44:20.340
I will, and I've, I've, I've Klaus, she will know.
00:44:23.760
I'll tell you what this, I have Candy Darling's journal.
00:44:52.220
Well, he had a very, he has one tuxedo that was a stage outfit.
00:44:58.360
So what you should do is you should write me a paragraph.
00:45:07.240
Like I went and talked to Paglia and it was, it was hard.
00:45:11.640
Well, she was very apprehensive because she's been abused and used by all sorts of people
00:45:19.440
She was extremely hospitable once we got there, my wife and I, and she knew that we were up
00:45:25.600
She just flipped and she was extremely inviting, but she's got a wall and it's a protective
00:45:31.040
So I think one of the things you'd have to do in the paragraph is reassure her.
00:45:42.940
My dream for Camille Paglia is to have her talk to Ben Shapiro because they're both machine
00:45:49.200
And so I'd love to see that just as a spectacle.
00:45:57.340
I can imagine even better maybe would be Russell Brand, Ben Shapiro, and Paglia.
00:46:02.260
Those are the three most verbally fluent people I've ever seen in my life.
00:46:11.600
Real quick before you skip, I want to talk to you about something serious and important.
00:46:15.820
Dr. Jordan Peterson has created a new series that could be a lifeline for those battling
00:46:21.580
We know how isolating and overwhelming these conditions can be, and we wanted to take a moment
00:46:26.660
to reach out to those listening who may be struggling.
00:46:29.500
With decades of experience helping patients, Dr. Peterson offers a unique understanding of
00:46:34.460
why you might be feeling this way in his new series.
00:46:37.280
He provides a roadmap towards healing, showing that while the journey isn't easy, it's absolutely
00:46:44.680
If you're suffering, please know you are not alone.
00:46:47.860
There's hope, and there's a path to feeling better.
00:46:50.540
Go to Daily Wire Plus now and start watching Dr. Jordan B. Peterson on depression and anxiety.
00:46:56.800
Let this be the first step towards the brighter future you deserve.
00:47:09.940
Because Pallia was my, who I wanted to be when I grew up in many ways.
00:47:15.760
Because what I found fascinating about her is she is the kind of person where
00:47:20.320
even if she's dead wrong, I want to hear her say more.
00:47:26.080
It is very rare when you, like she was, like 10 years ago, she was talking about how great
00:47:31.940
And I'm sitting there, I'm like, Camille, Ms. Paglia, come on, like, are you serious?
00:47:36.080
And it did not diminish my respect for her in the slightest.
00:47:39.160
So when someone has takes, and people say this about me, they're like, I don't agree
00:47:43.240
with half the things you say, but I love how your brain works.
00:47:45.900
That to me is like the epitome of a public intellectual or even if they're dead wrong
00:47:51.200
or like I know enough about a subject where I'm like, this person's way off.
00:47:58.220
You know, so one of the things I've learned to do in lectures is before I go on stage,
00:48:04.540
It's like, it's a question that matters to me, which is also something you should do
00:48:10.180
It matters to me and I don't know enough about it yet.
00:48:16.440
And so then what I'm trying to do on stage is get farther in my thinking and maybe to come
00:48:21.160
If I can do that, then that's like the punchline, right?
00:48:23.520
That's very satisfying, but in some ways it doesn't matter because the journey is what
00:48:30.920
And I think what you're pointing out is that there are certain kinds of intellectuals whose
00:48:34.960
thought quality is so rich that the journey is worth the...
00:48:40.980
Like the way she talks, I can do it, I'm not gonna...
00:48:48.120
She was just, I mean, I was like, okay, this...
00:48:55.180
She's so, I mean, she's so all over the map politically.
00:48:58.460
I mean, she's a hardcore atheist, but she goes on and on about the Catholic Church and the
00:49:02.680
beauty it brings and the venerance that people have for it and how valuable it is.
00:49:06.760
And her, you know, she's very big on Warhol, but at the same time her veneration of the
00:49:11.420
classics and her insane contempt for how that's being thrown into the garbage can and we're
00:49:17.040
losing thousands of years of creative history simply because it's predominantly white men
00:49:21.080
is to her just complete madness and she's correct.
00:49:24.780
So there's so much I would love to talk to her about and just pick her brain and just
00:49:29.660
Because I think there's certain people when you find them at the right age, you know,
00:49:33.440
like Catcher in the Rise, this, the fountainhead for certain people, it really kind of codifies
00:49:39.000
Yeah, yeah, you know, I've been thinking about the function of religious texts in exactly
00:49:45.740
I think partly, so it looks very much like a description of the structure through which
00:49:55.060
So there's an infinite number of facts, but they have to be sequenced and prioritized.
00:49:59.040
And the way someone sequences and prioritizes is their story.
00:50:05.680
Yeah, people don't want truth, people want narratives.
00:50:11.720
So I think that what a core, what core stories do, so this would be, say, the fairy tales
00:50:18.580
would do this, or any stories that are shared broadly across a culture is they actually,
00:50:26.240
A book has a different effect on you depending on when you read it.
00:50:32.120
So, and it's definitely the case that books you read, let's say, in your mid-adolescence
00:50:41.460
I think what happens is the story that strikes you provides a framework for memory, and then
00:50:52.140
And I think that part of the problem with moving away from broad knowledge of the biblical
00:50:57.800
stories is that the foundation of our perceptions is no longer unified.
00:51:03.420
And when that's the case, I mean, some variation is good because you don't want everybody thinking
00:51:09.920
But if there's too much variation, you can't even talk to each other.
00:51:17.440
I was someone who's very big, encouraging political division.
00:51:21.400
And, you know, Thomas Sowell says there's no solutions, only trade-offs.
00:51:26.300
I was naive because I didn't realize the trade-off is how dumb political discourse has gotten.
00:51:31.800
Where people, no one's holding them in check, so people are free to say just completely stupid
00:51:36.420
And since you're surrounded by this echo chamber, and anyone who says, hey, this is stupid,
00:51:41.240
now you sound like the out-group, it becomes self-validating, and it's really horrifying.
00:51:47.060
So we've been, I've been working on trying to conceptualize why that happens, particularly
00:51:52.660
with Jonathan Paggio, we've been drawing, and John Verveke, we've been drawing a bunch
00:51:57.300
of different sources trying to understand the structure of a concept or a perception.
00:52:05.280
This is also the same structure as the tabernacle, by the way, in architectural form.
00:52:17.120
That's what a flag establishes when you move to a new territory.
00:52:20.200
There's a center, okay, and the center is the ideal, that's a good way of thinking about
00:52:24.900
Or the center is the place that looks upward, okay?
00:52:27.920
And then around the center, there are margins, and the farther away you get from the center,
00:52:33.980
the less like the center the phenomena is, and they start to multiply.
00:52:38.980
So now, a concept that's only center is too rigid, and a concept that's only margin is
00:52:49.320
And so what we need is a balance between the center and the margin.
00:52:53.080
Your proclivity would be, I think, because you're open, would be to deprioritize the center
00:53:01.680
But you just said you realized that if you, the margin's fine.
00:53:06.380
The margin of the margin, it's like, oh, that's less fun.
00:53:10.920
The other point I made in my book, The New Right, is that when you're in the center,
00:53:16.520
You have no capacity really for distinguishing between the two of them, because they both
00:53:19.680
sound completely crazy to you, and something you'd never heard before.
00:53:23.000
And I thought, okay, then we got to kind of knock the center out.
00:53:26.040
But then what's happening is you kind of get these new centers, which kind of crystallize.
00:53:33.780
And also, as you know from a lot of your work, the more insane, the more sticky it gets.
00:53:39.700
Because people take pride in having insane views, because it's like an agnostic thing.
00:53:48.060
Well, it also mimics creativity, so you can wear that.
00:54:00.920
Say that's archetypal masculinity, that ideal center.
00:54:11.060
Right, and the odds that they're all going to be positive is very low.
00:54:14.040
Well, the mere fact that they're multiplicitous is already a problem, because it's an entropy problem.
00:54:18.620
It's like, what am I going to do with all this?
00:54:23.100
You know, you want, you know, if you have a toddler who's, say, three, and he has a closet or she has a closet full of clothes, say, 20, 30 outfits, you open the door and you say, what do you want to wear today?
00:54:38.020
You take three outfits and lay them on the bed and you say, well, which one do you want?
00:54:44.020
And it's because, you know, this has actually been figured out technically.
00:54:47.980
It was figured out by, uh-oh, I'm going to forget his name, Friston, Carl Friston.
00:54:58.000
We were trying to tie the idea of anxiety to entropy, to make it physical.
00:55:15.320
Well, then it's, that's what the hydro paralyzes you when you look at it.
00:55:23.380
So if you go to a store, imagine there's, try buying a printer.
00:55:32.380
By the time you go through all 500, most of the models have changed, right?
00:55:39.760
And so what that means is if you have 500 printers and you have to choose the best one,
00:55:45.320
So you actually want to go to a store where there are four printers.
00:55:47.940
Because like one printer, that they're making you buy that printer.
00:55:55.420
You don't want totalitarian centrality, but you don't want indefinite amorphousness.
00:56:02.200
This, this would be, I don't know if that's a critique of all out anarchism, is it?
00:56:07.340
No, no, but, but it speaks because all out anarchism would still have leadership.
00:56:12.920
And with that, have you ever seen The Devil Wears Prada?
00:56:18.540
So do you remember the speech that Meryl Streep gives to Anne Hathaway?
00:56:25.140
So Anne Hathaway's, Meryl Streep is Anna Wintour.
00:56:28.220
She's head of Vogue magazines, you know, Romana Clef, Romana Clef, however it's pronounced.
00:56:37.500
And they're trying to say which belt would go with this ballerina skirt.
00:56:42.560
They're, they're, they're too, or there's some of the characters, like they're too similar.
00:56:47.520
And they look, everyone in the room looks at her as like, something funny?
00:56:50.160
And she goes, I'm sorry, I'm just still, these belts look the same to me.
00:56:55.220
And the venom from Meryl Streep's character, she's like, this stuff?
00:57:05.620
But what had happened was, five years ago, Yves Saint Laurent had, that sweater isn't blue or turquoise, it's cerulean.
00:57:14.100
Because five years ago, Yves Saint Laurent had cerulean military jackets.
00:57:18.640
And then it was in all, a cerulean spread out to all designers.
00:57:29.540
Because you're pretending you don't, what you're trying to say with your outfit is that you don't care about fashion.
00:57:36.720
But what you don't know is, that cerulean sweater has been picked for you by the people in this room.
00:57:46.640
And you've picked it from the bottom of a 10 hierarchy.
00:57:50.740
10 rung social hierarchy that you're at the bottom of, and you don't even know it.
00:58:04.060
But point being, you need leaders who are going to be winnowing things down.
00:58:08.200
So that person at the bottom has that limited choice.
00:58:11.280
Because at the end of the day also, you don't need the best printer.
00:58:18.820
Like this idea that you need the best is also spurious.
00:58:24.620
You know, you could spend a year finding the best printer, but then like,
00:58:27.840
you could have spent that year doing a lot of other things.
00:58:30.520
So like what, this printer that's like $50 cheaper is not going to work?
00:58:35.140
Well, there's an economist, Simon, great economist.
00:58:38.440
He was the guy who had the bet with Paul Ehrlich about whether.
00:58:46.540
Simon came up with a concept called satisficing.
00:58:50.200
And satisficing is a reflection of exactly what you just described.
00:58:53.660
It's like you don't, with most decisions, you don't go for the best.
00:59:00.080
And once you hit that threshold, you say that that's what people do with their mates.
00:59:05.100
Oh, well, you know, my friend Ron Messer said, he goes, every woman's crazy.
00:59:11.760
So you find the woman who's crazy, you can handle.
00:59:15.520
So you're not going to find that anyone who, this, this very horrible, how women are given
00:59:20.020
this kind of Disney idea that you need Prince Charming.
00:59:26.000
And when you find that problem, you could handle men as well as females.
00:59:31.220
One of your problems is to find someone who can stand you.
00:59:38.000
Oh, so I was an intern at the Cato Institute in 1997.
00:59:41.420
And we had to go out distributing videotapes, whatever.
00:59:44.500
He's giving a talk in the auditorium downstairs.
00:59:49.500
And I'm looking at the monitor and it looked like he had horns.
00:59:56.060
And what had happened was at the beginning of the talk, he said, since the environmentalist
01:00:00.000
think I'm a devil, and he took suction cupped horns and stuck them on his head.
01:00:11.820
And what I love about him, and I think it's very important for people in our space, is
01:00:15.860
he had a sense of levity and a sense of positivity.
01:00:19.140
I think a lot of times, and I'm sure you agree, nefarious political movements attract
01:00:29.460
And people who are agnostic about politics or aren't informed, which is perfectly fine,
01:00:33.840
they're like, I want to go where the fun people are.
01:00:37.120
And it's very sinister and very tricky, but very effective.
01:00:59.580
Well, I think kind of the difference maybe is the voluntary element.
01:01:05.180
I had this weird kind of obsession when I was teaching in Boston because I was teaching
01:01:10.220
about horrible things, terrible things like the Holocaust and the gulag and like the depths
01:01:17.200
And I got this voice in my head that kept saying, if you could master this, you'd do that with
01:01:29.780
Like, how the hell am I going to talk about these topics that are...
01:01:36.780
Because my book on North Korea, Dear Reader, it's written from Kim Jong-il's perspective,
01:01:41.860
And their propaganda is humorous in the sense of absurd.
01:01:51.860
So they have something there called the Tower of the Juche idea, which is, this is true,
01:01:55.960
the biggest stone obelisk in the world or concrete obelisk, whatever.
01:01:59.360
And according to their literature, it was Kim Jong-il's idea and no one else had ever thought
01:02:05.140
For that to be true, and this is how I lay out the scene, the architects must have sat
01:02:09.980
together and no one even as a brainstorm had this as a suggestion.
01:02:13.340
And I imagine one of the architects being like, you know what?
01:02:15.340
Let's make this the second tallest stone obelisk in the world.
01:02:19.860
And then Kim Jong-il comes in and goes, guys, let's make it the biggest...
01:02:24.900
And they're like, oh my God, no one's ever thought of this.
01:02:27.680
But that, for their propaganda to be true, that is what would have to be the backstory.
01:02:32.140
Another example that they have is there was an amusement park, Funfair, that they built
01:02:37.940
And Kim Jong-il, the dear leader, wants to make sure, this is like a South Park episode,
01:02:43.700
So he gets on all the rides and everyone's like, can we ride it with you?
01:02:47.920
I have to make sure that the elderly and children aren't harmed.
01:02:50.980
And he did all the rides by himself and there was a light drizzle, so you know he's very
01:02:56.860
And they present this story with a straight face and you read this and you realize how
01:03:02.140
humorous it is that this is what's positive as truth in this country.
01:03:06.220
Now, my last chapter in the book is where the mask drops and it gets very, very dark very,
01:03:14.960
You know, did you ever- did you watch The Death of Stalin?
01:03:18.020
That's what my- I mean, he also did Veep, which is probably like the best comedy of all
01:03:27.380
Julia Louis-Dreyfus, Julia Louis-Dreyfus blocked me because she plays Selina Meyer, who's the
01:03:36.320
I go, you won several Emmys for demonstrating that all politicians are sociopaths blocked.
01:03:41.180
That show is a complete masterpiece because as the seasons go on, the mask drops more and
01:03:49.940
And the first season, she's this bumbling vice president.
01:03:55.920
And by the end, it's full-blown brazen sociopathy.
01:04:00.420
And she's such a great comedic actress and so charismatic.
01:04:04.800
Like there's this one scene where her assistant's in the hospital, right?
01:04:16.160
Like it never even ends her head that this water would be for the guy in the bed because
01:04:20.600
So there's so many moments like this throughout the show.
01:04:25.140
There's this one great scene where after Stalin dies, spoiler alert, he dies, death of Stalin,
01:04:32.420
And Khrushchev says to her, I promise nothing bad will happen to you.
01:04:44.080
But like, this is the reality that these people lived in.
01:04:48.040
Well, I've, I was obsessed with the idea of evil clowns for a while because I started
01:04:54.540
The evil clowns of classic horror trope, right?
01:04:58.400
Like Stephen King wrote this strange book called It about this clown who is an alien.
01:05:08.960
And it's an evil clown of cosmic significance who lives.
01:05:16.000
But it's partly because like, there's this old idea in, in, in, in traditional Christianity
01:05:22.820
that, that Lucifer, that the devil, that Satan can't produce anything original.
01:05:32.840
And there is this evil clown element to totalitarian states.
01:05:37.060
It was really captured very well in that death of Stalin.
01:05:44.580
You know, it's funny that you say that because when people ask me about why I write the book,
01:05:47.860
I said this, I'm like, look, I've got a very small microphone.
01:05:50.780
There's only so much I can do about North Korea.
01:05:52.860
And I said, what can I, I can do is people will look at that country and they see the
01:05:58.780
And I go, all I want to do is move the clown a little bit, move the camera a little bit.
01:06:02.940
And you see behind that clown, there's a lot of dead bodies.
01:06:05.600
And all of a sudden you're like, this isn't funny at all.
01:06:10.900
Well, the comical element, I think, comes in the preposterousness of the lies.
01:06:17.160
Because, and this is also partly why the gender thing bothers me so much.
01:06:22.200
I mean, there's many reasons why it bothers me.
01:06:24.340
The brutal surgery being, you know, not least among them.
01:06:27.400
But I believe that there is no more fundamental perceptual axiom than the capacity to distinguish
01:06:37.720
Creatures could distinguish between the sexes for hundreds of millions of years before there
01:06:47.760
And obviously, because if you can't distinguish between male and female at some level, you
01:06:58.300
There's a, there's a, I think, at least the giant cuttlefish, maybe other species.
01:07:02.460
There's a male that present as female and they wait for the alpha bull males to go away
01:07:08.160
and then they rape or at least impregnate the females.
01:07:16.000
So, so the problem with that, the gender bending foolishness, and I think it's part of this
01:07:21.880
like evil clown pathology is that if you, yes, that's for sure.
01:07:25.700
If you can get people to accept the lie that a man can be a woman, all other lies are trivial
01:07:35.580
There's, there's a, there's a weird sub-narrative.
01:07:40.000
Sorry, I'm obsessed with biblical references because I've been immersing myself in it for
01:07:44.800
But there's a biblical idea that's a strange one, that when the abomination of desolation
01:07:49.920
is raised to the highest place, put on the altar, it's time to head for the hills.
01:07:55.460
It's a statement that when the thing that, when the order is perverted 100%, right, when
01:08:02.360
the worst possible thing is elevated to the highest possible position, things have deteriorated
01:08:07.500
to such a point that you better take appropriate steps.
01:08:15.240
I think these could, I mean, what about going on with, with Rotterham, those stories?
01:08:19.200
You talk about, you know, trying to understand evil.
01:08:22.300
I mean, these things where I don't even get into the details, people could Google it.
01:08:28.260
You just, I, you try to, whenever I'm going to get a little bit graphic here.
01:08:32.780
Whenever I hear these stories of like some CNN producer getting arrested for having imagery
01:08:37.960
of children, I always hope, I read the article just to get the details.
01:08:42.020
I'm like, I hope it's like they're watching teenage girls and there's some kind of conversation
01:08:46.540
we could have about how high schoolers are overly sexualized.
01:08:49.540
Then you read it and it's like infants and children being tied to chairs and there's message
01:08:58.060
So it's not just one guy, like he's got a community.
01:09:00.860
And you see this and you're like, what, you're a shrink, I'm not.
01:09:08.280
If you feel really want an answer to that, I do, because you were talking about understanding
01:09:12.240
It's like, I can understand evil in the sense of sadism, but a child is weak.
01:09:17.420
It's like beating the crap out of, it's like taking candy from a baby is not an accomplishment.
01:09:25.940
Yes, I want an answer because I'm not the only one.
01:09:28.740
When I talk about the social media, people are like, I can't wrap my head around it.
01:09:37.360
I'm like, this is a, this is an alien thought process.
01:09:41.760
So in the story of Cain and Abel, I'm bringing it up because.
01:09:45.840
It's the, it's the first biblical story about real people.
01:09:55.660
That's the first thing that happens in the profane world.
01:09:59.780
So Cain, he's working away, hypothetically, and he's not getting anywhere.
01:10:09.860
And the other is the cosmos is constituted improperly.
01:10:14.140
That's, and he decides that the cosmos is constituted improperly.
01:10:18.200
So he's doing what he can and everyone should know it.
01:10:21.480
And he's working himself to death and it ain't working.
01:10:26.080
Whereas his brother, like the sun shines wherever he goes, everyone loves him.
01:10:32.420
So it's Cain's failing, trying hard, failing, making sacrifices, failing, Abel, no effort
01:10:40.980
So Cain decides he's going to go and have it out with God because it's not his fault,
01:10:45.600
And so he says to God that Abel, everything's going well for him.
01:10:54.360
And I'm bitter and miserable and resentful and no wonder.
01:10:58.840
And God says, well, you got a couple of things wrong with your theory there, buddy.
01:11:02.740
The first theory is that that's wrong is that your failure is not what's making you miserable.
01:11:08.720
And God says, there's an intermediary figure playing a role here that you don't understand.
01:11:15.220
He says, sin crouches at your door like a sexually aroused predatory animal.
01:11:21.000
And you invited it in to have its way with you.
01:11:24.080
So you engaged in a creative dialogue with the figure of evil because you felt you were
01:11:32.340
justified, because you're resentful, because you're failing.
01:11:34.780
Now, while you were failing, you could have learned, you could have decided it was your
01:11:42.120
And so God tells Cain, I don't think it's my fault.
01:11:51.780
And then he invites his brother to go do something with him, like in good faith.
01:12:02.860
Because Cain is existentially wounded because his sacrifices are being rejected.
01:12:14.480
You take the most innocent possible creature and you do the worst possible thing to them.
01:12:27.600
You know, I was thinking about in terms of a pornographic aspect, but it's actually literally
01:12:38.860
Christ says in the gospels that, you know, that the people who sullied children, he says
01:12:43.420
something like it would be better for them if they, you know, if a heavy weight was wrapped
01:12:47.460
around their neck and they were thrown into the ocean.
01:12:53.880
It's the, it's the, it's the ultimate middle finger to the, to reality and being.
01:12:59.900
It's like, you f*** with me, I'm going to f*** with you.
01:13:05.380
And so, and then there's that perverse delight that's, there's a novelty edge to that too.
01:13:10.000
So you get sexual gratification for a multitude of reasons.
01:13:14.880
One reason is just sort of reflexive, like sexual activity in itself is pleasurable, but
01:13:22.740
And that's partly what motivates diverse creatures to seek out multiple sexual partners.
01:13:30.620
Because when people start watching pornography, they start with the sorts of things that you
01:13:34.420
described, like attractive women of, attractive nude pictures of, you know, of, of lithe women.
01:13:41.720
But then after 10,000 of those, it's like, well, maybe a little variation.
01:13:47.200
And then you can chase, that's that inviting that spirit in.
01:13:54.100
They chase that edge right to the logical conclusion.
01:13:57.020
The logical conclusion is a long, long, long way down.
01:14:05.240
Because, see, one of the things God tells Cain is that he invited this spirit in to have
01:14:12.760
There's like a myth, there's a whole sequence of mythological stories around it.
01:14:17.420
For someone to do something like shoot up an elementary school, they fantasized about
01:14:26.900
You might as well call it that, because for all intents and purposes, that's what it is.
01:14:31.720
They've invited it in, and it's taken possession of them.
01:14:35.240
And it's fantasizing in that spirit, what's the worst thing I could do?
01:14:41.440
That, to me, it's a lot easier to wrap my head around, I hate everyone in this school.
01:14:49.520
I was specifically referring to Sandy Hook in that case.
01:14:53.080
I would say, in terms of level of sin, you know, I'm annoyed at my classmates.
01:15:02.860
Although, you know, there's a darkness in that.
01:15:15.080
Like, it's the, it's the, and there's more to it.
01:15:18.840
It's like, because this is why it's Luciferian.
01:15:21.800
So Lucifer is the usurper, technically speaking, right?
01:15:24.860
So he's often the intellect, by the way, that wants to put itself in the highest place.
01:15:30.300
Well, there's nothing more that makes you the commanding officer of the cosmos than to
01:15:37.240
take the most profound moral rule imaginable and to invert it, right?
01:15:43.900
And these, like, I know what people like this are like.
01:15:46.780
They also think, I'm so smart, no one will ever catch me.
01:15:50.200
And I can toy with people, too, because I can hint at this.
01:15:53.940
Because they're so stupid, they won't even notice.
01:15:57.880
That's what happens to Raskolnikov in Crime and Punishment, right?
01:16:02.140
And the prosecutor does a brilliant job of toying with him.
01:16:05.820
Why, there's something else I've been, I've been wondering about.
01:16:08.000
Why do you think it's so, I'm scared to ask, because you answered that last question in
01:16:16.060
Why do you, people don't want to know any about, anything about this.
01:16:18.880
Why do you think there is such a movement, in your opinion, God, I'm scared to ask this,
01:16:27.440
I had this tweet, I said, if we cared half as much about childhood assaults as we do
01:16:39.980
Just like, if we, if the media cared a tenth as much about childhood assaults and certain
01:16:44.880
kinds of assaults as they do about global warming, things would be a lot better.
01:16:48.000
This is something that you could fix right now.
01:16:49.440
It's not some hypothetical of the environment in a hundred years.
01:16:51.840
Because, and it's, this is crazy, moral panic, mass hysteria.
01:17:06.320
Well, it's, yeah, but, but, but they're covering it up.
01:17:09.520
Yeah, but, well, yeah, yeah, there's the racial thing.
01:17:13.360
And people are afraid that they're going to be targeted by the woke mob.
01:17:15.980
If they stand up, they're going to be called Nazis and neo-Nazis.
01:17:33.420
Now, if you're a good person, you do that by being useful.
01:17:39.740
Narcissists and psychopaths game the reputational system.
01:17:45.180
Often successfully enough to be attractive, you know, especially if they're men.
01:17:50.480
Because naive young women are attracted to psychopaths because they game the system so effectively.
01:17:55.820
But that proclivity to game the reputational system is a very deep temptation.
01:18:03.440
One of the commandments, I think it's the third, but it might be the fourth, is to not use God's name in vain.
01:18:14.980
It means do not claim divine inspiration for pursuing your own agenda.
01:18:21.620
I'm doing something low and terrible for the best possible reasons.
01:18:28.000
I'm exercising all my sadistic desires, like baria, and I'm doing this for the benefit of the poor.
01:18:35.380
So you don't ever want to underestimate the attractiveness of moral posturing, especially if someone else is paying for it.
01:18:43.060
So in the UK, it's like, I'm tolerant, I'm cosmopolitan, I'm open to diversity, we can welcome immigrants of all stripes in.
01:18:50.980
And if the cost for me displaying my cosmopolitan sophistication is that 10,000 working class women get raped, girls?
01:19:09.020
They are afraid of being prejudiced, you know, because it's easy once there's a pool of bad actors in a given identifiable group to tar the whole group.
01:19:19.180
And when you should do that, when you shouldn't, is not a simple question.
01:19:23.240
There's lots of complex reasons, but one of them is there's no limit to the degree that people will elevate their own moral status falsely, especially if someone else pays the price.
01:19:36.340
I hear you, and that explains the UK, but this is the case in the US as well.
01:19:40.300
They pretend this isn't a thing or that it's not a big deal, or it's some kind of right-wing issue.
01:19:44.840
Well, part of it, too, Michael, I think, is just that people don't, like, you didn't like my explanation for the child.
01:19:55.700
Okay, so Michael Schellenberger, when he broke the WPATH files, I interviewed him, and I asked him, well, we talked about it, and he said that he first got wind of this butchery because I did an interview with Abigail Schreier.
01:20:13.360
She is great and very, very brave, and I did that just as I was recovering, and it just made me so nervous.
01:20:19.700
Like, I was barely functioning, and it was such a terrible interview to do.
01:20:23.060
It was really early in the trans butchery cycle, and I knew we'd get pilloried for it.
01:20:28.360
I thought it might sink me, and I thought, you know, we're going ahead with this.
01:20:33.020
And she laid out, as you know, the absolute travesty of this entire catastrophe.
01:20:40.080
Now, Schellenberger watched that, and he said he couldn't believe it.
01:20:47.040
It wasn't until two years later that he started, you know, it was in his mind, but I think that's so telling because Schellenberger's not naive now.
01:20:55.080
He tilted towards the left, and so he's going to have the kind of temperament that's inclined to think the best of people.
01:21:02.060
Which is a great inclination, except not when you're dealing with psychopaths.
01:21:08.280
In which case, it's exactly the wrong attitude.
01:21:11.000
And the problem with the left often is they have no imagination for evil, and some of that's naivety, and some of it's like willful blindness.
01:21:21.660
You don't want to know what sort of snakes are in people's minds.
01:21:24.220
Like, I studied sociological evil and psychological evil for 40 years, right, trying to get to the bottom of it.
01:21:31.340
I had some pretty bad actors in my clinical practice and saw some things all the way to the, I wouldn't say all the way to the bottom.
01:21:42.120
Lies get so deep that you literally can't get to the bottom of them.
01:21:45.960
You scrape something away and you think, finally, it's like, no, just another layer of lies.
01:21:51.400
Well, you know that from studying totalitarianism.
01:21:54.220
But so part of it is, Michael, it's not only that.
01:21:56.120
It's like you read these stories about, like, someone who's with an underage kid, and you think that's the basement, and then you hear about England, and it's like, oh, this person's a saint.
01:22:06.340
It's just like, holy crap, I thought this was the bottom.
01:22:09.040
And there's a trap door, and there's another cellar.
01:22:14.080
You know, and one of the things I've learned, too, this is also something that's awful.
01:22:17.240
Well, so imagine that you say you're married, right, and you hit a sequence of conflicts with your wife, and they repeat.
01:22:26.660
Okay, so there's a hole there in your relationship.
01:22:29.420
And so usually people just walk around those, and they try to, like, not delve into it, partly because when you start delving into it, the person's going to accuse you.
01:22:44.020
But if you go past the anger, and you go past the tears, and you delve in, you go down Dante's hell, and at the bottom, you find betrayal.
01:22:51.540
And then there's trauma there, and then the person has to, like, really cry, and really reconfigure, and admit to, God, sometimes it didn't even happen to them.
01:23:01.040
Sometimes they're carrying the burden of something that happened to their mother.
01:23:05.500
You know, and you have to go all the way to the bottom to exercise that.
01:23:10.200
And if you do that, it changes your view of human nature.
01:23:13.300
It's like, like you said, you know, you get these, oh, I don't know, some guy's attracted to 16-year-old girls, you know.
01:23:20.460
And you think, well, low, within the realm of human comprehension, low.
01:23:27.180
And then you think, you're just, like, you're in the first circle there, buddy.
01:23:32.860
It's funny, I'm so well-versed in political evil, that this kind of depravity, because political evil is easy to understand, and that amoral people who seek power at any cost.
01:23:55.880
So when I hear these stories, I feel completely naive, because until you just said that.
01:24:07.200
So imagine that, you know, you make a moral error.
01:24:20.080
It's like, no, you steal the car, and then you burn it.
01:24:27.960
I just wanted to steal it, and now I'm going to burn it.
01:24:30.480
And he's the guy that terrifies all the criminals.
01:24:32.840
It's like, because the criminals, it's not iniquity for the typical criminal.
01:24:49.260
They're aiming up a crooked way, and I'm not trying to rationalize.
01:24:52.880
It's like, they're not aiming at, well, part of them is,
01:25:05.920
So the book starts out, it's this guy who's in prison.
01:25:16.840
And a prison psychiatrist goes and gives him a cigarette.
01:25:20.420
And Panzram, the guy who wrote the autobiography, said,
01:25:23.520
that's the only nice thing anybody ever did for him in his whole life.
01:25:26.920
Now, whether or not that's true, that's not the point.
01:25:31.100
And so the psychiatrist starts to interview this Panzram character,
01:25:43.260
I could kill 12 men in the time it's taken you to knot that rope.
01:25:48.660
And Panzram was brutalized when he was a child,
01:25:54.020
And he decided that he was going to aim down for his whole life.
01:25:58.260
And so he almost started a war between Great Britain and the United States.
01:26:01.440
He wanted to burn everything to the ground, everything.
01:26:06.300
He even told us, the psychiatrist asked him to write his autobiography.
01:26:09.860
It's called Panzram, and so that's what he did.
01:26:12.160
He told the psychiatrist never to turn his back on him.
01:26:16.540
Because he thought, even though he liked the psychiatrist,
01:26:18.920
insofar as Panzram could like anyone, he thought, give me an opportunity, buddy.
01:26:28.600
There's some overlap with political psychopathology,
01:26:33.280
You know, God only knows what those people are up to,
01:26:40.280
I have a death warrant signed by him in my kitchen, framed.
01:26:45.840
And it's like, it's not even worth a nice piece of paper.
01:26:49.120
That's how little someone's life was worth then and there.
01:26:55.860
They didn't worry about the good printer, Jordan.
01:26:57.400
I read Theodore Dalrymple's account of going to North Korea,
01:27:03.040
And he went into the big department store there
01:27:05.580
where everyone's an actor and all the artifacts aren't real.
01:27:10.580
He was like the only person who actually bought something in the store
01:27:14.540
And he detailed out the ways the pen didn't work.
01:27:17.440
Like, you just have no idea how many ways a pen could not work.
01:27:20.780
The little pocket clip can, you know, come off.
01:27:28.340
Like, for a pen to work, a hundred things have to be not lies.
01:27:32.420
In that kind of totalitarian state, absolutely everything is a lie.
01:27:41.760
Because if you have this nice pen in your pocket, that's what it works.
01:27:53.740
And that is part of the problem with the marginal.
01:27:55.600
So, you know, we were talking about the center and the margin.
01:27:58.200
It's like, Jonathan Paggio explained this to me.
01:28:04.280
So, in sacred architecture, the architecture of cathedrals, there was often monsters on
01:28:12.240
And the monsters are because as you move farther and farther away from the center, you get into
01:28:18.800
Now, by the definition of the center, granted, but this is the case for every conceptual scheme
01:28:31.940
Drifting out into the marginal and then the monstrous.
01:28:36.760
And this is the problem with the, part of the problem with the postmodernist ethos.
01:28:47.060
It's like, wait till there's one under your bed.
01:28:56.220
You know, for Foucault, all the people who were in prison were victims.
01:29:03.540
You saw this in what brought down the Scottish government, the Scottish prime minister?
01:29:08.760
Remember, she put the activists in the women's prison.
01:29:24.680
The thing that I think that you obviously know that I think a lot of people haven't codified
01:29:28.920
is that a big portion of leftist thought is based on the idea that human beings never
01:29:36.840
And those who do, it's in such small numbers that it doesn't really matter.
01:29:40.560
And we can talk about it in sports where like if someone's a wrestler, they have to make
01:29:44.720
So, if you kind of lose 15 pounds of fluid and you're 160 on the day of the weigh-in,
01:29:49.580
you can actually be someone who's 180 pounds and you're going to fight someone who's much
01:29:54.300
And I'm sure, I haven't looked this up, that there was one guy who was like, wait a minute,
01:30:01.140
But if I'm 160 on that day, if I just have diarrhea and just dehydrate myself, I'm going
01:30:08.960
If you have this, you're telling me that one person is going to say, okay, wait, if I just
01:30:12.700
say I'm female, I can just run the table in a given sport.
01:30:20.340
Well, you remember, who was the comedian that was wrestling women, Man on the Moon?
01:30:27.540
He knew that there was part of him, his evil little soul that knew that was coming.
01:30:35.440
This is actually, this wants to, this is, I want to segue into what I really want to
01:30:41.080
Something that I relate to a lot, and you're probably going to go on for five hours, and
01:30:47.400
What is the, why is the trickster archetype so important?
01:31:00.760
Well, Jung said the trickster is the precursor to the savior.
01:31:09.360
He's a marginal character, but the trickster is a psychopomp.
01:31:31.160
Okay, now your perceptual systems are navigation tools.
01:31:41.600
You see pathways, tools, they move you forward.
01:31:56.680
Agents of magical transformation, like wizards, what do they do?
01:32:03.540
A trickster is an agent of magical transformation.
01:32:09.100
You don't know because a trickster is, so imagine you're playing game A, right?
01:32:14.240
But there's someone who's playing game D and they come to visit.
01:32:19.380
Okay, now they're a trickster because they're not playing by the same rules.
01:32:24.520
And when you interact with them, it's magical because they're emblematic of another way of being.
01:32:29.860
Well, that could be a descent into the abyss or it could be an ascent to a higher game.
01:32:35.820
And the thing is, is that in all likelihood, you're going to be afraid.
01:32:41.300
So when Gandalf, for example, when Gandalf comes to visit the hobbits, they're kind of in awe of him,
01:32:53.600
Like he knows there's something to this guy, but, and the strider too, Aragorn, kind of plays the same role.
01:33:02.260
Well, your game could fall apart, in which case the trickster is like, he's opened the portal to hell, but your game could be elevated, in which case he's a harbinger.
01:33:15.500
And so tricksters, tricksters introduce the possibility of a new game, you know, and even comedians do that all the time, because what they're doing, a joke is often, here we are in this world.
01:33:28.680
And then, no, it's actually this world, and everybody laughs, you know, and that's the punchline.
01:33:34.140
And so the comedian is a trickster, and he's a world shifter.
01:33:39.480
And so the tricksters, now, the trickster and the fool are similar archetypal creatures.
01:33:45.320
And the fool is also the precursor to the savior, because when you play a new game, you're a fool, the beginner, right?
01:33:54.740
You have to accept the trickster and the fool to play a new game.
01:33:59.280
And so certainly comedians play that role all the time.
01:34:08.660
Well, a joke is something like an introduction to a new, it's an introduction to a new way of perceiving.
01:34:14.120
So, you know, it's a micro, it's a micro transformation.
01:34:19.440
I think part of the way that you distinguish the positive tricksters from the negative tricksters is the positive tricksters use play and humor and invitation, right?
01:34:32.240
That's the right, but that's definitely the right basis for policy.
01:34:40.760
Well, you just said the good kind of trickster uses games, you know.
01:35:00.020
Well, there's the trickster component that we talked about with regards to the black comedy.
01:35:05.880
That was the only safety valve that they had, this dark humor.
01:35:19.040
Solzhenitsyn did a pretty good job of detailing out Stalin's attitude towards everyone around him.
01:35:25.080
He thought everyone around him was contemptible and lied all the time and couldn't be trusted.
01:35:32.560
Right, and so you can see the spiral he was in.
01:35:43.120
And they lie, and it just goes, you know, it just spirals completely out of control.
01:35:48.740
I mean, you can think of Stalin as a rational actor in some ways.
01:35:51.900
It's like, what would you be like if every single person around you did nothing but suck up and lie to you 100% of the time?
01:35:59.820
What's interesting about this, this is a very divergent example of this.
01:36:09.640
When Roseanne Barr, when she had her show, she had a whole crew of writers.
01:36:14.820
And she had them by number, and she saw that the people would laugh at their own jokes because they were trying to sell them.
01:36:22.560
It was hard for her to figure out, okay, is what...
01:36:25.080
Or she would intentionally say things that aren't that funny to see if people are like, ah, ha, ha, ha.
01:36:29.880
She'd be like, okay, you're not laughing because what I'm saying is that funny.
01:36:32.760
You're laughing because you want to appease me.
01:36:34.480
And when you get at that level, it's almost inevitable that...
01:36:37.700
And some people are really good at it because they have a proximity to power they're going to want to pass.
01:36:50.280
I mean, my impulse throughout my life was to, especially in professional settings, like at the university, to take people at their face value.
01:37:03.860
But partly the reason it worked is because I was in very rarefied environments.
01:37:07.960
I was at McGill when McGill was functional, and then I was at Harvard when Harvard was functional and the University of Toronto.
01:37:13.720
And so the typical person who came my way was playing mostly a straight game.
01:37:19.140
Well, as I became more known, let's say, the percentage of bad actors who present themselves increases.
01:37:28.980
And so you become more skeptical that way, too.
01:37:33.020
So, and you can imagine, well, that's one of, obviously, the dangers of power.
01:37:42.720
Whenever I meet, and I'm obviously not your level, but whenever I meet someone at an event, I always throw out a marginally inappropriate comment is the first thing.
01:37:51.420
Because they're not going to have the skill set to mask their reaction.
01:37:56.000
So if they laugh or they find it funny, that's good.
01:38:01.580
But if they kind of give me attitude, I'm like, okay, this is going to be someone I'm going to have difficulty engaging with.
01:38:07.780
Because if they can't handle me at a one, they're not going to be able to handle me at a ten.
01:38:12.320
Well, people, I think that's not an atypical game for people who are sort of comedically oriented and playful.
01:38:21.180
It's like when little kids come to a playground, they start interacting with each other in an immature way.
01:38:29.000
Like if they're four, they'll sort of start off at two-year-old level.
01:38:32.060
And then they ratchet up and see if the other child can play the same game.
01:38:39.160
Now, you know, four-year-olds can play with two-year-olds.
01:38:41.620
But for a play partner, they want someone who's going to push them.
01:38:46.320
They ratchet up to see if they're at the same level with regards to the game.
01:38:50.820
This is, you know, one of the things that you might think about with regards to small talk.
01:39:03.560
They want to offer their little offerings to get the exchange going.
01:39:06.620
Now, part of what you're likely objecting to is that people who aren't high in openness won't take the conversation down, right?
01:39:24.240
And that's very frustrating if you're an open person.
01:39:28.880
Yeah, I always say there's, I use this example all the time.
01:39:34.440
If you're at a party and you meet someone who's like a guinea pig breeder, there's either, well, that's weird.
01:39:42.160
And my people, people I like, and me, I'm definitely number two.
01:39:45.700
Whatever it is, if you have a passion or some technical knowledge and this means a lot to you, tell me.
01:39:50.020
That's why I love being a clinical psychologist.
01:39:52.380
People, if you get people actually telling you what they're like, they're unbearably interesting.
01:39:58.000
Yeah, this is true even for simple people because there are no simple people.
01:40:02.120
The ones who are less intellectual are less articulate and it's harder to get their stories out of them.
01:40:06.980
Well, it's the 115s who are the problem, aren't they?
01:40:10.760
The marginally intelligent who think that they're brilliant and fascinating.
01:40:14.120
Well, then their ideas tend to be dull, but that doesn't mean they are.
01:40:20.080
Like, yeah, there's nothing worse than a dull ideologue.
01:40:25.060
But if you get people talking about what they know, and they're often very hesitant to do that because they don't want to, no one's ever listened to them.
01:40:35.000
And they're afraid, like the guinea pig breeder, that they'll just be laughed at if they let people know what they're really like.
01:40:40.000
But people are unbelievably interesting if you can get them talking.
01:40:45.800
We should talk about the current political situation.
01:40:51.440
So, always a pleasure talking to you and seeing you.
01:40:55.040
And I had no idea what we were going to talk about.
01:40:58.180
And we didn't talk about any of the things, really, that I thought we might talk about.
01:41:04.700
So, and hopefully everybody else found that it was so, too.
01:41:39.820
It's like that first band you fall in love with.
01:41:41.800
Maybe 20 years later, you listen to them, you're like, they're not that good.
01:41:44.040
But man, when you were 16, no one's going to tell you any different.
01:41:47.020
Well, the thing about Pelley is she is that good.
01:41:54.640
And thank you, everybody, for watching and listening.
01:41:56.640
And to the film crew here today in Scottsdale for setting up this crazy site.
01:42:03.300
And join us on the Daily Wire side because I didn't talk to Michael at all about the strange
01:42:08.400
political situation that we happen to be in now.
01:42:10.720
And I want to get his feelings about, well, about Musk and about the strange group of people
01:42:16.820
who've aggregated themselves around Trump and about what he thinks is going to happen
01:42:21.140
in the next year and what he hopes is going to happen.
01:42:23.180
And so join us on the Daily Wire side for that.