The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast - February 21, 2019


Our Cultural Inflection Point and Higher Education


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 59 minutes

Words per Minute

171.07388

Word Count

20,450

Sentence Count

253

Misogynist Sentences

17

Hate Speech Sentences

17


Summary

In this episode, Dr. Jordan Peterson and Stephen Blackwood discuss Solzhenitsyn's The Gulag Archipelago and the importance of the inflection point as a cultural moment in human history. Dr. Peterson and Dr. Blackwood also discuss the legacy of the Soviet dissident and communist writer, Aleksandr Solzhenitzyn, and the role that his work played in shaping our understanding of the Cold War era and the legacy he left behind. This episode is brought to you by Energize, a new podcast by ZeroZero Media's Blue Circle Studio, and presented by Enbridge. To support this podcast, you can make a donation at Donations.org/Energize or by following the link in the description. To find a list of our sponsors and show-related promo codes, go to gimlet.fm/OurAdvertisers and use the promo code POWER10 at checkout to receive 10% off your first order of $10 or more. Thanks to our sponsor, Enbridge, for making this podcast possible! The Future of Energy is a partnership between Enbridge and Zero Zero Media. To learn more about their products and services, visit enbridge.media/Our Energy. To find out more about Enbridge's solar farm, visit our solar farm and solar farm products, visit bit.ly/OurEnergiesave. We're making solar farming, check out their website here. We're giving away a $10,000 to a third-party solar farm! and we'll be giving you a chance to win a 5-day Testo solar farm day care package valued at $100,000 or more than $150,000 in total! with the offer of $50,000,00 and a total of $200,00 in total,00,00.00 at Enbridge will get the chance to use the offer, plus a second year of Enbridge gets you access to a complimentary 4-day shipping plan and a 3-day VIP membership offer, and a $5,000 discount when they receive a discount of $4/day, they also get a VIP discount, they'll get a discount, and they'll receive $4,00 will get a mentor discount, plus they'll also get $4 VIP access to the offer that gets you a VIP 4-choice option, they get a second-place promo code, and two-day access to 5-choice pricing offer.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 What is the future of energy?
00:00:02.180 Find out on Energize, a new podcast brought to you by GZERO Media's Blue Circle Studio
00:00:07.400 and presented by Enbridge.
00:00:09.180 I'll be bringing you a series alongside Enbridge CEO Greg Ebel.
00:00:13.160 Listen wherever you get your podcasts.
00:00:16.440 Hey everyone, real quick before you skip, I want to talk to you about something serious
00:00:20.640 and important.
00:00:21.780 Dr. Jordan Peterson has created a new series that could be a lifeline for those battling
00:00:26.200 depression and anxiety.
00:00:27.540 We know how isolating and overwhelming these conditions can be, and we wanted to take
00:00:32.360 a moment to reach out to those listening who may be struggling.
00:00:35.480 With decades of experience helping patients, Dr. Peterson offers a unique understanding
00:00:40.160 of why you might be feeling this way in his new series.
00:00:43.240 He provides a roadmap towards healing, showing that while the journey isn't easy, it's
00:00:47.740 absolutely possible to find your way forward.
00:00:50.640 If you're suffering, please know you are not alone.
00:00:53.820 There's hope, and there's a path to feeling better.
00:00:56.480 Go to Daily Wire Plus now and start watching Dr. Jordan B. Peterson on depression and anxiety.
00:01:02.760 Let this be the first step towards the brighter future you deserve.
00:01:06.300 Welcome to the Jordan B. Peterson podcast.
00:01:14.120 To support this podcast, you can make a donation at jordanbpeterson.com slash donate, or by following
00:01:21.480 the link in the description.
00:01:23.880 Dr. Peterson's self-development programs, self-authoring, and understand myself, can be found at self-authoring.com
00:01:31.640 and understand myself.com.
00:01:33.960 Thank you.
00:02:03.940 I'm Stephen Blackwood.
00:02:04.740 I'm part of a small team of people founding a new university in Savannah, Georgia.
00:02:09.700 I'm the president of that new institution.
00:02:12.120 I'm here today at Cambridge University, an ancient, august, and beautiful institution.
00:02:18.980 And I have the great pleasure today to have with me Dr. Jordan Peterson, professor of psychology
00:02:25.720 of the University of Toronto, and, I think it is safe to say, an unignorable figure of our time.
00:02:32.800 Jordan, it's a real pleasure to have you here today.
00:02:35.440 Thank you.
00:02:36.100 Thanks.
00:02:36.820 Pleasure to be here.
00:02:37.760 This unbelievable place.
00:02:39.480 Jordan and I are going to talk today about what he has called the inflection point.
00:02:44.340 And my hope is that that conversation will lead us into a discussion of the possibilities for cultural renewal.
00:02:55.140 Indeed, the possibilities for the renewal, the renaissance of a more fully human culture.
00:03:03.480 Jordan, I think you've called the inflection point, or called our cultural temporal moment, a kind of inflection point.
00:03:12.180 Why don't we start there?
00:03:13.220 What is the inflection point?
00:03:15.680 Well, I think we're deciding, we're trying to decide if there's such a thing as a direction to move forward to into the future.
00:03:22.980 That's what it looks like to me.
00:03:25.940 I mean, on the one hand, we're making tremendous technological progress in all sorts of directions simultaneously,
00:03:34.320 and that seems to be having mostly positive effects, especially economically, especially on a global scale.
00:03:41.300 And on the other hand, we seem more confused about the foundations of our culture and the potential directions that we're moving in
00:03:49.940 than we have been for a while.
00:03:51.740 And that seems especially acute in educational institutions, and that seems to be a consequence of the constant cultural critique
00:04:00.240 that's been generated, I would say, mostly on the postmodern edge, edge of the academic, what would you say, academic territory.
00:04:12.120 So we're trying to figure out what's next, and what do we have to offer to students, all of that.
00:04:21.740 I know that just yesterday was published the 50th anniversary edition of Solzhenitsyn's Gulag Archipelago
00:04:33.920 with a forward that you've, a forward written by you, which I think you've described the writing of as one of the greatest honors of your life.
00:04:44.740 Have I got that right?
00:04:45.520 Yes.
00:04:45.840 Academic honor.
00:04:46.620 Now, I suppose the question I have there is, why is that so important?
00:04:52.980 Well, the book was important because it was the first, it was the first work that succeeded in undermining the Marxist project
00:05:03.300 from a moral and an intellectual perspective simultaneously.
00:05:08.340 I mean, other people had pointed out the terror of the Soviet enterprise.
00:05:14.860 Malcolm Muggeridge and George Orwell, among others, often people on the left, interestingly enough.
00:05:19.820 But it was always possible, right up until the end of the 1960s, for the people who held on to that collectivist, utopian dream in the West
00:05:31.220 to rationalize what had happened in the Soviet Union, partly by sweeping it under the rug,
00:05:37.080 but also partly by, while using the old adage that you can't make an omelet without breaking a few eggs,
00:05:44.980 it became obvious by the end of the 1960s that the omelet wasn't very well prepared
00:05:51.620 and that millions of eggs, so to speak, to belabor a metaphor, had been broken.
00:05:58.500 And so when Solzhenitsyn wrote his great book, it became impossible for anyone who was willing to be part of the cultural moment
00:06:09.920 to ignore the fact that something had gone dreadfully sideways
00:06:14.500 and that it couldn't be attributed merely to a cult of personality or to some abnormality
00:06:19.760 that wasn't intrinsically part of the doctrine itself.
00:06:23.600 And so that was partly what Solzhenitsyn revealed about the Soviet Union as such,
00:06:28.480 but at the same time, the evidence that precisely the same thing had been happening in places like Maoist China,
00:06:35.200 perhaps to even a larger degree, well, undoubtedly to a larger degree,
00:06:39.680 and then in Cambodia and all the other places where Marxism produced utterly murderous consequences.
00:06:49.760 And so that was the book that did that, and it made Marxism morally repugnant.
00:06:57.400 It was also one of the events that catalyzed the transformation of Marxism into identity politics,
00:07:05.000 as far as I'm concerned, because a lot of the people who held the victim-victimizer narrative as sacrosanct,
00:07:13.040 that that was the appropriate way to look at the world,
00:07:15.020 to divide people into identity groups of whatever form,
00:07:18.620 and then to see history as the battle between them, history, the present and the future,
00:07:25.360 that transmuted, especially in France,
00:07:30.180 because even though the Marxists had been unmasked,
00:07:34.320 the murderousness of the doctrine had been unmasked,
00:07:37.440 that didn't, the people who'd held that doctrine were still looking for the easiest lateral move.
00:07:43.060 And so that was one of the driving forces for the development of postmodernism.
00:07:48.180 Not the only one.
00:07:49.380 It's the postmodernists that also figured out something,
00:07:51.940 or run across something that really is an intractable problem.
00:07:55.660 They ran across the problem of categorization.
00:07:58.940 And that actually happened in multiple disciplines at the same time,
00:08:02.700 including artificial intelligence and psychology.
00:08:05.360 People start to realize about, in the early 60s,
00:08:08.800 it was probably under the pressure of the AI types,
00:08:11.540 that it was very difficult to perceive the world,
00:08:14.460 because objects aren't just there for the looking.
00:08:17.300 Because every object is made of sub-objects,
00:08:20.520 and is part of a higher order structure of objects,
00:08:23.760 and defining what constitutes the appropriate boundary to put around a phenomenon,
00:08:28.860 so that it can be perceivable as an object,
00:08:30.860 turns out to be a virtually impossible task.
00:08:33.020 We're not sure how it can be managed.
00:08:35.460 And so that realization of the intrinsic complexity of things
00:08:41.500 led to a crisis, I would say, an intellectual crisis,
00:08:46.060 which was, well, if there's a near infinite number of ways
00:08:49.680 to perceive a finite set of entities,
00:08:52.740 how is it that you can call any one interpretation
00:08:55.680 either canonical or valuable?
00:08:58.540 And that's part of the postmodern skepticism, let's say, of metanarratives,
00:09:02.580 and it's actually a reasonable critique.
00:09:05.540 The problem is, as far as I'm concerned,
00:09:07.920 that what the postmodernists did was use that problem,
00:09:11.440 which is a genuine problem,
00:09:13.340 as a critique of the structure of the West.
00:09:17.480 And then instead of addressing the problem directly,
00:09:20.380 which is, well, the world is very complex,
00:09:22.800 but we do, in fact, perceive it,
00:09:24.680 and there actually are value structures,
00:09:26.600 they just circumvented that and popped back
00:09:29.620 into the bastardized form of Marxism
00:09:32.960 that we see today as identity politics.
00:09:35.180 And that's been extraordinarily destructive to the universities.
00:09:39.160 Well, let's talk about that a bit more,
00:09:41.340 because it seems to me that it would be a great shame
00:09:44.920 if people were to think that your writing this forward
00:09:50.340 to Solzhenitsyn was simply to document
00:09:52.880 something as an historic phenomenon,
00:09:55.120 as essentially important as that historic documentation is.
00:10:00.260 It seems to me that what is of interest to you
00:10:02.960 is not simply to shed light on the terrors,
00:10:06.680 the hundred million slaughtered,
00:10:08.420 in the course of the various communist revolutions
00:10:11.340 of the 20th century,
00:10:13.000 those various ideologies motivated by Marxism
00:10:16.200 and other forms of philosophical ideology,
00:10:20.720 but because it seems to me that you take
00:10:23.780 what was present in that philosophically,
00:10:26.400 ideologically, still to be at work,
00:10:29.420 or to have been, as it were, reborn in the West.
00:10:33.780 And so I suppose what I'd like to ask you about
00:10:35.160 is what are the characteristics
00:10:36.920 of the Marxist ideology
00:10:41.180 that led to that very obvious death and destruction,
00:10:46.640 which in a subtler way you see to be,
00:10:49.280 am I right to say,
00:10:50.500 you see to be at work in the West.
00:10:53.300 So I'd like,
00:10:53.960 it seems to me very important
00:10:55.080 that we have a deep sense
00:10:56.800 of what the governing assumptions
00:10:59.440 of our culture are,
00:11:01.180 or it's hard to transcend them.
00:11:02.900 Yeah, well,
00:11:03.580 that is exactly the issue
00:11:04.820 because the question is
00:11:06.220 whether or not the past is over.
00:11:07.920 I mean, there's a Marxist philosopher
00:11:10.520 named Richard Wolff
00:11:12.660 who challenged me recently on YouTube
00:11:15.100 to a debate,
00:11:16.660 and really the answer that I posted
00:11:18.800 was this forward,
00:11:20.320 and he accused me of being stuck in the past.
00:11:23.660 You know, it's, well,
00:11:24.400 the wall fell in 1989
00:11:27.900 and the horrors of the Soviet era are over,
00:11:30.800 and we can't paint,
00:11:34.540 we can't eternally tar Marxism
00:11:36.420 with the brush of these past events.
00:11:38.440 I mean, as if these events are over,
00:11:41.560 or as if 50 years is sufficient time
00:11:44.780 to forget about the corpses.
00:11:46.580 But that's his idea, you know.
00:11:49.020 And to me, it's the same idea
00:11:50.580 that you might put forward
00:11:51.980 if you were a neo-Nazi
00:11:53.500 by saying that,
00:11:54.800 well, you know,
00:11:55.620 all that happened back in 1945.
00:11:58.220 The fundamental doctrine was sound,
00:12:00.300 and we can't allow our judgment
00:12:01.800 about these eternal truths
00:12:03.900 manifested in the National Socialist doctrine
00:12:06.820 to be forever tainted
00:12:08.180 by some unfortunate historical events.
00:12:11.180 And I think that that's just,
00:12:13.300 well, I don't even know what to say about it.
00:12:15.440 I mean, one of the telling things
00:12:16.660 about his comments
00:12:17.440 was that he only talked about the Soviet Union
00:12:20.040 and not all the other terrible places
00:12:22.360 that the same doctrine had been implemented
00:12:24.340 with equally murderous effects.
00:12:27.120 And so that was quite the argument by evasion.
00:12:30.260 But what I try to do in the forward
00:12:32.000 and in my thinking in general
00:12:33.640 is I'm always trying to get to the bottom of things.
00:12:36.580 What's at the bottom?
00:12:38.680 And it seems to me that what happened,
00:12:41.440 if you look at what happened
00:12:42.500 in the Russian Revolution,
00:12:44.400 like the first thing you want to do
00:12:45.760 is give the devil his due.
00:12:47.560 Okay, and the way you do that
00:12:48.640 is by pointing out that hierarchical structures,
00:12:52.120 we'll start even before that.
00:12:54.440 People have problems that have to be solved.
00:12:57.060 Life is a sequence of problems
00:12:58.480 that have to be solved.
00:13:00.120 If you don't solve the problems
00:13:01.780 that life puts forward,
00:13:02.960 you suffer and you die.
00:13:04.040 So assuming that you don't want those two outcomes,
00:13:07.260 then there are problems you have to solve.
00:13:09.460 And so you have to set an aim
00:13:11.720 and the aim is to solve the problem.
00:13:14.040 And then because we're social creatures,
00:13:15.880 we have to solve the problems
00:13:17.100 by organizing collectively.
00:13:19.160 And the way we do that,
00:13:20.260 generally speaking,
00:13:21.180 in relationship to an aim
00:13:22.360 is to produce a hierarchy.
00:13:23.420 And the reason for that is that
00:13:25.380 if you have a problem
00:13:26.540 and you want it to be solved
00:13:27.840 and you get a variety of people working on it,
00:13:30.340 you're soon going to discover
00:13:31.660 that some people are much better
00:13:32.920 at solving the problem than others.
00:13:34.380 And that will inevitably produce a hierarchy.
00:13:36.420 And it should,
00:13:37.480 because then even the structure of authority
00:13:41.380 is in sync with the aim.
00:13:46.360 And the aim is valuable
00:13:47.240 because it's a problem
00:13:48.160 that everybody agrees
00:13:49.180 that is an actual problem.
00:13:50.980 So you're going to get
00:13:51.780 hierarchical organizations
00:13:52.980 and you should.
00:13:53.980 Now the problem with that
00:13:55.180 is that as soon as you produce
00:13:56.320 a hierarchical organization,
00:13:57.960 two things happen.
00:13:59.160 One is that a small minority of the people
00:14:01.320 do almost all the creative work.
00:14:02.920 That's the Pareto principle.
00:14:04.320 And the other is that
00:14:05.200 the benefits of the hierarchy
00:14:06.820 flow disproportionately
00:14:08.200 to a small number of people at the top.
00:14:10.960 So, and that's another manifestation
00:14:12.660 of the Pareto principle.
00:14:13.680 And it is something that Marx pointed out,
00:14:15.540 although he blamed it on capitalism,
00:14:17.160 which is a big mistake
00:14:18.520 even if you're concerned
00:14:19.960 for those the hierarchy dispossesses.
00:14:22.900 So you produce a hierarchy,
00:14:25.000 both the work flows from a minority of people
00:14:27.880 and the benefits flow to a minority of people.
00:14:29.800 And those might not be the same people,
00:14:31.680 by the way, right?
00:14:32.480 Because hierarchies aren't perfect
00:14:34.100 in their ability to distribute resources
00:14:36.320 as a consequence of productive effort.
00:14:40.340 That's part of the problem
00:14:41.360 with hierarchical organizations.
00:14:43.300 But then what the hierarchy does
00:14:45.200 is produce a layer of the dispossessed
00:14:47.720 that stack up at the bottom near zero.
00:14:50.680 And it's the majority.
00:14:52.020 It's always the majority.
00:14:53.340 So that's the price you pay for hierarchies.
00:14:55.200 Now, what the left does is say,
00:14:57.720 look at the dispossessed
00:14:59.440 and keep the hierarchy flexible enough
00:15:02.260 so that it can twist and bend
00:15:03.580 and transform when necessary,
00:15:04.980 but also so that the dispossessed
00:15:06.380 don't fall so close to zero
00:15:07.840 that A, that they're done,
00:15:10.340 they're in misery,
00:15:11.560 B, that the talents they might possess
00:15:14.120 can't be utilized,
00:15:15.500 and C, that the whole structure
00:15:17.640 doesn't become so untenable
00:15:18.960 that it destroys itself
00:15:20.460 because of the inequality.
00:15:22.200 Perfectly reasonable propositions.
00:15:24.100 And so then you could say,
00:15:25.500 well, there's a certain number
00:15:26.720 of people on the left
00:15:27.600 who are genuinely motivated
00:15:29.500 by concern about dispossession
00:15:32.860 as well as the dispossessed.
00:15:34.400 Of course.
00:15:34.820 Fine.
00:15:35.360 So that's to give the devil his due.
00:15:37.380 And so then you might say,
00:15:38.320 well, there was moral reasons.
00:15:39.820 There were moral reasons
00:15:40.860 for at least a subset of those
00:15:42.940 who were involved
00:15:43.480 in the Russian Revolution
00:15:44.440 to be involved.
00:15:45.960 They were interested
00:15:46.800 in helping the dispossessed.
00:15:48.180 But there's a problem.
00:15:49.960 And this is the problem of the left.
00:15:51.820 There's problems on the right as well.
00:15:53.620 The problem on the right is
00:15:54.720 once the hierarchy is established,
00:15:56.520 those who dominate the top
00:15:57.720 have every right to overstate
00:15:59.400 the moral virtue of the hierarchy
00:16:01.100 because it privileges them in particular.
00:16:03.860 On the left, the problem is
00:16:05.360 is that it's not easy to distinguish
00:16:07.420 between care for the dispossessed
00:16:09.420 and hatred for those who occupy positions of,
00:16:13.600 well, you could say authority.
00:16:15.080 The leftists would say power.
00:16:16.840 You could also say competence,
00:16:18.120 which I think is more to the case,
00:16:19.900 or ability.
00:16:21.000 It's not easy to distinguish
00:16:22.560 care for the dispossessed
00:16:24.200 from hatred for those
00:16:26.160 who occupy the preeminent positions
00:16:28.240 in the hierarchy.
00:16:29.480 And if it's power,
00:16:30.980 then it's hatred for power.
00:16:32.120 But if it's competence,
00:16:33.840 and it is competence
00:16:34.920 if the hierarchy is functional,
00:16:36.560 then it's hatred for the competent.
00:16:38.580 Okay, then you say,
00:16:39.440 all right,
00:16:39.760 so those are the two competing motivations.
00:16:41.840 Care for the dispossessed
00:16:42.880 and hatred for the,
00:16:43.880 let's say, competent.
00:16:44.820 Let's play that out,
00:16:47.220 historically speaking,
00:16:48.300 and see which is the more powerful force.
00:16:50.540 Well, that got played out very rapidly
00:16:52.200 in the Russian Revolution.
00:16:53.660 And what happened was,
00:16:55.240 even if there was a minority,
00:16:58.540 perhaps even a majority,
00:17:00.160 although there wasn't,
00:17:01.340 but perhaps even a majority
00:17:02.720 of those who truly cared for the dispossessed,
00:17:05.260 those who hated the competent,
00:17:07.480 slaughtered them.
00:17:08.160 It turned out that the hatred
00:17:10.460 was a much more potent
00:17:12.080 geopolitical force
00:17:14.880 than the compassion.
00:17:16.760 And then,
00:17:17.160 and another twist occurred too,
00:17:19.280 because the narrative was
00:17:21.760 bourgeoisie against proletariat,
00:17:24.660 let's say,
00:17:25.060 and so that's those
00:17:25.800 at the uppermost pinnacle
00:17:27.260 of the hierarchy
00:17:27.840 against those who were the dispossessed.
00:17:29.700 And that was also
00:17:30.400 the historical narrative.
00:17:31.940 And then it was the right
00:17:33.500 and responsibility
00:17:34.340 of those who were oppressed
00:17:35.540 to rise up.
00:17:36.340 But that ran into another problem,
00:17:38.600 which is basically the problem
00:17:39.920 that the postmodernists,
00:17:42.840 especially on the feminist side,
00:17:44.320 have now identified
00:17:45.180 as intersectionality.
00:17:46.840 It's like,
00:17:47.180 well,
00:17:47.540 turns out that you're,
00:17:48.980 you can't so easily
00:17:49.980 be placed into one group.
00:17:52.260 Like,
00:17:52.580 in fact,
00:17:53.340 this is the perception problem
00:17:54.740 that we talked about before.
00:17:56.540 There's a very large number
00:17:57.920 of groups you could be placed in.
00:17:59.540 It might be an unlimited
00:18:00.940 number of groups,
00:18:02.060 in fact.
00:18:03.100 And so,
00:18:04.080 then,
00:18:04.580 if you're motivated
00:18:05.340 primarily by hatred
00:18:06.520 and your desire
00:18:08.680 is to produce
00:18:09.340 as much mayhem as possible,
00:18:10.960 you can take
00:18:11.460 any given person
00:18:12.400 and you can analyze
00:18:13.740 the multiple groups
00:18:14.780 that they belong to,
00:18:16.220 and then you can find
00:18:17.020 one group
00:18:17.760 in which they're
00:18:18.500 the oppressor.
00:18:19.920 And then,
00:18:20.380 because there's no excuse
00:18:21.780 whatsoever for the oppression,
00:18:23.300 even if there's
00:18:23.860 one dimension
00:18:24.460 of your identity
00:18:25.240 along which you're
00:18:26.280 an oppressor,
00:18:27.060 then you're grist
00:18:28.580 for the bone-crushing
00:18:31.100 mill
00:18:31.960 of the Soviet work camp.
00:18:34.340 And that's exactly
00:18:35.180 what happened.
00:18:36.100 And so,
00:18:36.680 as the Soviet revolution
00:18:37.980 progressed,
00:18:39.100 more and more people
00:18:40.160 got thrown into
00:18:41.520 the cauldron,
00:18:42.720 let's say.
00:18:43.340 The socialists,
00:18:44.300 the students,
00:18:44.960 the religious people,
00:18:46.140 the old,
00:18:46.640 the original revolutionaries,
00:18:49.580 Stalin had all them killed,
00:18:51.080 because there was some,
00:18:52.320 and if it wasn't you
00:18:53.300 that was guilty
00:18:53.980 because of your group membership,
00:18:55.460 then they just expanded
00:18:56.460 the capacity of,
00:18:57.800 the parameters
00:18:59.020 of the idea of group.
00:19:00.580 Well,
00:19:00.880 you're not an oppressor,
00:19:02.400 but your grandfather
00:19:03.460 was a landowner.
00:19:05.140 Well,
00:19:05.360 that's good enough.
00:19:06.100 That's your class.
00:19:07.520 And so,
00:19:08.820 that's sufficient justification
00:19:09.980 to throw you
00:19:10.980 to the wolves as well.
00:19:12.460 And so,
00:19:12.800 what you saw
00:19:13.320 is this just
00:19:14.040 unbelievable
00:19:15.300 expansion
00:19:16.660 of murderousness
00:19:18.680 driven by
00:19:19.800 the twin
00:19:20.900 improper
00:19:22.440 presuppositions
00:19:23.480 that you could
00:19:24.200 define people
00:19:24.940 by their group identity,
00:19:26.260 and that history
00:19:27.000 was best conceptualized
00:19:29.660 as a battle
00:19:30.400 between
00:19:30.900 the fortunate
00:19:32.220 and the unfortunate
00:19:32.900 along those group identities.
00:19:34.420 Yes.
00:19:35.880 If we could pick up
00:19:36.760 that notion
00:19:37.220 of the group identity
00:19:38.200 and the collect,
00:19:39.000 what you call
00:19:39.380 the collectivist thinking,
00:19:41.620 it seems to me
00:19:42.200 that might be opposed
00:19:43.260 to a kind of robust view
00:19:45.420 of the human individual
00:19:47.100 as the site
00:19:47.900 of responsibility
00:19:48.760 and agency,
00:19:50.720 suffering,
00:19:51.780 and so it seems to me
00:19:53.500 that
00:19:54.100 what I'd like to ask you about
00:19:55.980 is the connection
00:19:57.020 between,
00:19:58.240 or the ways in which
00:19:59.100 the collectivist thinking
00:20:00.320 results in the annihilation
00:20:02.480 of all human particularity,
00:20:05.500 whether it's economic
00:20:06.500 or familial
00:20:09.040 or,
00:20:11.240 you might say,
00:20:12.420 it seems to me
00:20:12.880 that what's going on
00:20:13.660 in the collectivist thinking
00:20:14.720 is the absolute enemy
00:20:16.100 of human particularity
00:20:20.200 and freedom itself.
00:20:21.200 Yes, yes.
00:20:21.380 It's the enemy
00:20:21.860 of the idea
00:20:22.420 of the individual,
00:20:23.440 the sovereign individual,
00:20:24.360 which is the central idea
00:20:26.040 of the West.
00:20:26.740 I mean,
00:20:26.960 and that's manifested
00:20:27.800 in the underlying
00:20:28.540 religious structure.
00:20:29.560 So,
00:20:30.060 if you think about Christianity,
00:20:31.620 for example,
00:20:32.220 you think about Christianity
00:20:33.240 psychologically,
00:20:34.620 you strip it of its metaphysics,
00:20:36.240 at least for the purposes
00:20:37.500 of the argument,
00:20:38.700 you see the emergence
00:20:39.620 of the idea
00:20:40.300 of the divine individual
00:20:41.500 as,
00:20:42.120 as,
00:20:43.040 well,
00:20:43.320 as,
00:20:44.260 as what,
00:20:44.880 as part of what's,
00:20:46.360 what,
00:20:46.780 as part of divinity itself,
00:20:48.540 right,
00:20:48.720 as an integral,
00:20:49.560 that's part of the Trinitarian idea,
00:20:51.060 of the part of divinity itself.
00:20:55.080 And that divinity,
00:20:55.980 to me,
00:20:56.800 is the capacity
00:20:58.300 of the,
00:20:59.360 of individual consciousness
00:21:00.540 to generate order
00:21:02.360 from potential.
00:21:03.740 So,
00:21:03.960 the way I look at people,
00:21:05.260 first of all,
00:21:06.100 so,
00:21:06.520 like,
00:21:07.040 people who have been criticizing
00:21:08.580 what I've been doing
00:21:09.320 think about my philosophy,
00:21:12.580 such as it is,
00:21:14.480 not that it's mine,
00:21:15.720 as a sort of variant
00:21:17.260 of Ayn Rand's ideas
00:21:19.240 of the centrality
00:21:20.340 of the individual,
00:21:21.160 individual above all.
00:21:22.260 That's not the issue.
00:21:23.680 It's a conceptual issue,
00:21:25.280 is that what,
00:21:26.660 what,
00:21:27.640 what category
00:21:28.560 is to be primary.
00:21:30.480 And for me,
00:21:31.280 the individual
00:21:31.820 is to be primary.
00:21:33.300 And there's a variety
00:21:34.200 of reasons for that.
00:21:35.180 First of all,
00:21:35.700 the individual
00:21:36.160 is the locus of suffering,
00:21:37.940 and also the locus
00:21:39.020 of responsibility.
00:21:40.520 So,
00:21:40.740 so those are really
00:21:41.600 the two reasons
00:21:42.340 that the individual
00:21:43.800 has to be made primary.
00:21:47.240 But,
00:21:47.860 and the divinity element
00:21:49.220 of the individual,
00:21:50.580 and this,
00:21:51.240 I think,
00:21:51.460 is coded
00:21:51.860 in our deepest stories,
00:21:53.100 it's really deeply
00:21:54.000 coded in Genesis,
00:21:55.500 particularly in the
00:21:56.260 opening chapters of,
00:21:57.460 opening verses of Genesis,
00:21:59.280 is that what human beings
00:22:00.920 confront in their lives
00:22:02.220 is akin to what God
00:22:04.160 himself confronted
00:22:05.140 at the beginning of time.
00:22:06.880 And so,
00:22:07.780 it's easy for us
00:22:09.440 to believe that we're
00:22:10.240 deterministic creatures
00:22:11.420 like clocks,
00:22:13.340 and that it's the past
00:22:14.740 that drives us forward
00:22:15.780 in a deterministic manner
00:22:17.280 into the future.
00:22:18.120 But I don't believe
00:22:19.680 that's the case.
00:22:20.940 I actually don't think
00:22:21.880 there's any evidence
00:22:22.540 that that's the case.
00:22:24.400 Welcome to the
00:22:25.460 Jordan B. Peterson podcast.
00:22:28.180 To support this podcast,
00:22:30.020 you can make a donation
00:22:30.940 at jordanbpeterson.com
00:22:32.960 slash donate,
00:22:34.400 or by following the link
00:22:35.960 in the description.
00:22:37.800 Dr. Peterson's
00:22:38.780 self-development programs,
00:22:40.580 Self-Authoring,
00:22:41.780 and Understand Myself,
00:22:43.400 can be found at
00:22:44.340 self-authoring.com
00:22:45.580 and understandmyself.com.
00:22:49.420 Going online without ExpressVPN
00:22:51.340 is like not paying attention
00:22:52.760 to the safety demonstration
00:22:53.840 on a flight.
00:22:54.860 Most of the time,
00:22:55.700 you'll probably be fine,
00:22:57.020 but what if one day
00:22:58.160 that weird yellow mask
00:22:59.380 drops down from overhead
00:23:00.400 and you have no idea
00:23:01.900 what to do?
00:23:02.680 In our hyper-connected world,
00:23:04.160 your digital privacy
00:23:05.140 isn't just a luxury.
00:23:06.460 It's a fundamental right.
00:23:07.800 Every time you connect
00:23:08.600 to an unsecured network
00:23:09.780 in a cafe, hotel,
00:23:11.140 or airport,
00:23:12.080 you're essentially broadcasting
00:23:13.260 your personal information
00:23:14.360 to anyone with a technical
00:23:15.800 know-how to intercept it.
00:23:17.160 And let's be clear,
00:23:18.020 it doesn't take a genius
00:23:19.100 hacker to do this.
00:23:20.340 With some off-the-shelf hardware,
00:23:21.920 even a tech-savvy teenager
00:23:23.320 could potentially access
00:23:24.460 your passwords,
00:23:25.480 bank logins,
00:23:26.260 and credit card details.
00:23:27.740 Now, you might think,
00:23:28.960 what's the big deal?
00:23:29.840 Who'd want my data anyway?
00:23:31.400 Well, on the dark web,
00:23:32.540 your personal information
00:23:33.680 could fetch up to $1,000.
00:23:36.020 That's right,
00:23:36.560 there's a whole underground economy
00:23:38.080 built on stolen identities.
00:23:40.060 Enter ExpressVPN.
00:23:41.840 It's like a digital fortress,
00:23:43.300 creating an encrypted tunnel
00:23:44.480 between your device
00:23:45.500 and the internet.
00:23:46.520 Their encryption is so robust
00:23:48.100 that it would take a hacker
00:23:49.120 with a supercomputer
00:23:49.980 over a billion years
00:23:51.380 to crack it.
00:23:52.160 But don't let its power fool you.
00:23:53.860 ExpressVPN is incredibly
00:23:55.300 user-friendly.
00:23:56.300 With just one click,
00:23:57.320 you're protected
00:23:57.760 across all your devices.
00:23:59.340 Phones, laptops, tablets,
00:24:00.940 you name it.
00:24:01.520 That's why I use ExpressVPN
00:24:02.900 whenever I'm traveling
00:24:04.020 or working from a coffee shop.
00:24:05.640 It gives me peace of mind
00:24:06.720 knowing that my research,
00:24:08.040 communications,
00:24:08.540 and personal data
00:24:09.800 are shielded from prying eyes.
00:24:11.660 Secure your online data today
00:24:13.180 by visiting expressvpn.com
00:24:15.280 slash jordan.
00:24:16.400 That's E-X-P-R-E-S-S
00:24:18.440 vpn.com slash jordan
00:24:20.160 and you can get
00:24:20.780 an extra three months free.
00:24:22.800 Expressvpn.com slash jordan.
00:24:24.660 Starting a business can be tough,
00:24:30.340 but thanks to Shopify,
00:24:31.520 running your online storefront
00:24:32.800 is easier than ever.
00:24:34.480 Shopify is the global commerce platform
00:24:36.480 that helps you sell at every stage
00:24:38.020 of your business.
00:24:38.760 From the launch your online shop stage
00:24:40.660 all the way to the
00:24:41.380 did we just hit a million orders stage,
00:24:43.720 Shopify is here to help you grow.
00:24:45.800 Our marketing team uses Shopify
00:24:47.200 every day to sell our merchandise
00:24:48.660 and we love how easy it is
00:24:50.300 to add more items,
00:24:51.560 ship products,
00:24:52.160 and track conversions.
00:24:53.840 With Shopify,
00:24:54.600 customize your online store
00:24:55.740 to your style
00:24:56.680 with flexible templates
00:24:57.780 and powerful tools
00:24:58.840 alongside an endless list
00:25:00.520 of integrations
00:25:01.240 and third-party apps
00:25:02.220 like on-demand printing,
00:25:03.640 accounting,
00:25:04.220 and chatbots.
00:25:05.280 Shopify helps you turn browsers
00:25:06.740 into buyers
00:25:07.520 with the internet's
00:25:08.240 best converting checkout,
00:25:09.640 up to 36% better
00:25:11.020 compared to other
00:25:11.760 leading e-commerce platforms.
00:25:13.740 No matter how big
00:25:14.460 you want to grow,
00:25:15.340 Shopify gives you
00:25:16.080 everything you need
00:25:16.820 to take control
00:25:17.560 and take your business
00:25:18.580 to the next level.
00:25:20.140 Sign up for a $1 per month
00:25:21.520 trial period
00:25:22.140 at shopify.com
00:25:23.460 slash jbp
00:25:24.580 all lowercase.
00:25:26.080 Go to shopify.com
00:25:27.300 slash jbp now
00:25:28.460 to grow your business
00:25:29.480 no matter what stage
00:25:30.720 you're in.
00:25:31.380 That's shopify.com
00:25:32.720 slash jbp.
00:25:46.820 I'm Stephen Blackwood.
00:26:06.380 I'm part of a small team
00:26:07.600 of people founding
00:26:08.280 a new university
00:26:09.040 in Savannah, Georgia.
00:26:10.840 I'm the president
00:26:11.780 of that new institution.
00:26:13.420 I'm here today
00:26:14.380 at Cambridge University
00:26:15.880 an ancient,
00:26:18.140 august
00:26:18.540 and beautiful institution
00:26:19.780 and I have the great
00:26:21.280 pleasure today
00:26:21.980 to have with me
00:26:23.640 Dr. Jordan Peterson,
00:26:26.080 professor of psychology
00:26:27.100 of the University of Toronto
00:26:28.300 and I think it is safe
00:26:29.900 to say
00:26:30.340 an unignorable figure
00:26:32.380 of our time.
00:26:34.240 Jordan, it's a real pleasure
00:26:35.000 to have you here today.
00:26:36.840 Thank you.
00:26:37.620 Thanks.
00:26:38.220 Pleasure to be here
00:26:38.960 in this unbelievable place.
00:26:40.920 Jordan and I are going
00:26:41.520 to talk today
00:26:43.000 about what he has called
00:26:44.460 the inflection point
00:26:45.700 and my hope
00:26:48.320 is that that conversation
00:26:49.420 will lead us
00:26:50.280 into a discussion
00:26:53.600 of the possibilities
00:26:54.540 for cultural renewal.
00:26:56.680 Indeed,
00:26:57.360 the possibilities
00:26:58.240 for the renewal,
00:27:01.640 the renaissance
00:27:02.360 of a more fully human culture.
00:27:06.800 Jordan,
00:27:07.400 I think you've called
00:27:08.040 the inflection point
00:27:09.680 or called our cultural
00:27:11.040 temporal moment
00:27:11.820 a kind of inflection point.
00:27:13.200 Why don't we start there?
00:27:14.600 What is the inflection point?
00:27:16.960 Well,
00:27:17.660 I think we're deciding,
00:27:19.680 we're trying to decide
00:27:20.720 if there's such a thing
00:27:22.160 as a direction
00:27:22.780 to move forward to
00:27:23.660 into the future.
00:27:24.900 That's what it looks like
00:27:25.960 to me.
00:27:27.360 I mean,
00:27:27.820 on the one hand,
00:27:30.380 we're making
00:27:30.860 tremendous technological progress
00:27:32.900 in all sorts of directions
00:27:34.560 simultaneously
00:27:35.360 and that seems
00:27:36.480 to be having
00:27:37.120 mostly positive effects,
00:27:39.680 especially economically,
00:27:40.840 especially on a global scale.
00:27:42.680 And on the other hand,
00:27:43.500 we seem more confused
00:27:46.040 about the foundations
00:27:48.500 of our culture
00:27:49.180 and the potential directions
00:27:50.500 that we're moving in
00:27:51.340 than we have been
00:27:52.480 for a while.
00:27:53.140 and that seems
00:27:53.940 especially acute
00:27:54.800 in educational institutions
00:27:56.960 and that seems
00:27:58.540 to be a consequence
00:27:59.340 of the constant
00:28:00.700 cultural critique
00:28:01.640 that's been generated,
00:28:03.140 I would say,
00:28:03.740 mostly on the postmodern edge,
00:28:06.500 edge of the academic,
00:28:08.720 what would you say,
00:28:09.960 academic territory.
00:28:13.480 So,
00:28:13.740 we're trying to figure out
00:28:16.480 what's next
00:28:18.880 and what do we have
00:28:20.020 to offer to students,
00:28:21.020 all of that.
00:28:21.580 I know that
00:28:26.000 just yesterday
00:28:27.360 was published
00:28:28.460 the 50th anniversary edition
00:28:32.180 of Solzhenitsyn's
00:28:34.180 Gulag Archipelago
00:28:35.300 with a foreword
00:28:36.660 that you've,
00:28:39.080 a foreword written by you,
00:28:41.180 which I think you've described
00:28:42.300 the writing of
00:28:42.840 as one of the greatest honors
00:28:44.580 of your life.
00:28:46.120 Have I got that right?
00:28:46.900 Yes.
00:28:47.220 Academic honor.
00:28:48.480 Now,
00:28:49.080 I suppose the question
00:28:49.820 I have there is,
00:28:50.580 is,
00:28:51.580 why is that so important?
00:28:54.160 Well,
00:28:54.920 the book was important
00:28:56.000 because it was the first,
00:28:57.260 it was the first work
00:28:59.880 that succeeded
00:29:01.840 in undermining
00:29:03.500 the Marxist project
00:29:04.680 from a moral
00:29:06.200 and an intellectual
00:29:07.680 perspective simultaneously.
00:29:09.680 I mean,
00:29:09.920 other people had
00:29:10.700 pointed out
00:29:11.960 and pointed out
00:29:11.980 the terror
00:29:13.500 of the Soviet enterprise.
00:29:16.380 Malcolm Muggeridge
00:29:17.200 and George Orwell,
00:29:18.400 among others,
00:29:19.120 often people on the left,
00:29:20.400 interestingly enough.
00:29:22.000 But,
00:29:22.600 it was always possible
00:29:24.620 right up until the end
00:29:25.820 of the 1960s
00:29:26.880 for the people
00:29:28.080 who held on to that
00:29:29.340 collectivist,
00:29:30.720 utopian dream
00:29:31.620 in the West
00:29:32.600 to rationalize
00:29:34.140 what had happened
00:29:34.920 in the Soviet Union,
00:29:36.260 partly by sweeping it
00:29:37.500 under the rug,
00:29:38.440 but also partly by,
00:29:40.180 while using the old adage
00:29:42.520 that you can't make an omelet
00:29:44.400 without breaking a few eggs,
00:29:46.820 it became obvious
00:29:47.900 by the end of the 1960s
00:29:49.760 that the omelet
00:29:51.320 wasn't very well prepared
00:29:52.940 and that millions of eggs,
00:29:55.480 so to speak,
00:29:56.300 to belabor a metaphor,
00:29:57.940 had been broken.
00:29:59.860 And so,
00:30:00.520 when Solzhenitsyn
00:30:01.340 wrote his great book,
00:30:03.520 it became impossible
00:30:05.280 for anyone
00:30:06.000 who was
00:30:06.920 willing to be
00:30:09.680 part of the cultural moment
00:30:11.300 to ignore the fact
00:30:12.240 that something had gone
00:30:13.960 dreadfully sideways
00:30:15.880 and that it couldn't be attributed
00:30:17.700 merely to a cult of personality
00:30:19.360 or to some abnormality
00:30:21.140 that wasn't intrinsically
00:30:23.060 part of the doctrine itself.
00:30:24.980 And so that was partly
00:30:25.820 what Solzhenitsyn revealed
00:30:28.140 about the Soviet Union
00:30:29.120 as such,
00:30:29.880 but at the same time
00:30:30.900 the evidence that
00:30:32.360 precisely the same thing
00:30:34.400 had been happening
00:30:35.080 in places like Maoist China,
00:30:37.000 perhaps to even a larger degree,
00:30:39.000 well,
00:30:39.340 undoubtedly to a larger degree,
00:30:41.060 and then in Cambodia
00:30:42.640 and all the other places
00:30:44.300 where Marxism
00:30:46.140 produced utterly
00:30:48.480 murderous consequences.
00:30:51.080 And so,
00:30:52.100 that was the book
00:30:53.140 that did that
00:30:54.460 and it made Marxism
00:30:57.280 morally repugnant.
00:31:00.120 It was also
00:31:00.940 one of the events
00:31:02.040 that catalyzed
00:31:02.820 the transformation
00:31:03.440 of Marxism
00:31:05.120 into identity politics
00:31:06.280 as far as I'm concerned
00:31:07.240 because a lot of the people
00:31:08.320 who held the
00:31:09.600 victim-victimizer narrative
00:31:12.480 as sacrosanct,
00:31:14.440 that that was the appropriate way
00:31:15.600 to look at the world,
00:31:16.400 to divide people
00:31:17.260 into identity groups
00:31:18.980 of whatever form
00:31:20.020 and then to see history
00:31:21.840 as the battle
00:31:23.220 between them,
00:31:24.380 the history,
00:31:25.180 the present
00:31:25.940 and the future,
00:31:27.300 that transmuted,
00:31:30.180 especially in France
00:31:31.220 because even though
00:31:32.700 the Marxists
00:31:33.360 had been unmasked,
00:31:35.760 the murderousness
00:31:36.560 of the doctrine
00:31:37.120 had been unmasked,
00:31:38.840 that didn't,
00:31:40.460 the people who'd held
00:31:41.380 that doctrine
00:31:41.900 were still looking
00:31:42.600 for the easiest
00:31:43.340 lateral move
00:31:44.280 and so that
00:31:45.480 was one of the
00:31:46.380 driving forces
00:31:47.000 for the development
00:31:47.740 of postmodernism,
00:31:49.500 not the only one.
00:31:50.760 It's the postmodernists
00:31:51.620 that also figured out
00:31:52.860 something
00:31:53.320 or run across
00:31:54.660 something that really
00:31:55.400 is an intractable problem.
00:31:57.140 They ran across
00:31:57.840 the problem
00:31:58.360 of categorization
00:31:59.500 and that actually
00:32:01.600 happened in multiple
00:32:02.440 disciplines at the same time
00:32:03.860 including artificial
00:32:04.780 intelligence and psychology.
00:32:06.800 People start to realize
00:32:08.300 about in the early 60s
00:32:09.920 it was probably
00:32:10.700 under the pressure
00:32:11.320 of the AI types
00:32:12.360 that it was very difficult
00:32:14.760 to perceive the world
00:32:15.740 because objects
00:32:17.000 aren't just there
00:32:17.920 for the looking
00:32:18.680 because every object
00:32:20.620 is made of sub-objects
00:32:21.860 and is part of
00:32:22.700 a higher order
00:32:23.660 structure of objects
00:32:24.660 and defining
00:32:26.920 what constitutes
00:32:28.000 the appropriate boundary
00:32:29.060 to put around
00:32:29.740 a phenomenon
00:32:30.240 so that it can be
00:32:31.000 perceivable as an object
00:32:32.140 turns out to be
00:32:32.800 a virtually impossible task.
00:32:34.460 We're not sure
00:32:35.200 how it can be managed
00:32:36.840 and so that realization
00:32:40.640 of the intrinsic complexity
00:32:42.260 of things
00:32:42.880 led to a crisis
00:32:45.320 I would say
00:32:46.000 an intellectual crisis
00:32:47.000 which was
00:32:48.060 well if there's
00:32:49.500 a near infinite number
00:32:50.600 of ways to perceive
00:32:51.780 a finite set of entities
00:32:53.720 how is it that you can
00:32:55.560 call any one interpretation
00:32:57.060 either canonical
00:32:58.300 or valuable
00:32:59.180 and that's part
00:33:00.920 of the postmodern
00:33:01.840 skepticism
00:33:02.800 let's say
00:33:03.240 of metanarratives
00:33:03.940 and it's actually
00:33:04.680 a reasonable critique.
00:33:06.780 The problem is
00:33:08.220 as far as I'm concerned
00:33:09.200 that what the postmodernists
00:33:10.520 did was use
00:33:11.480 that problem
00:33:12.720 which is a genuine problem
00:33:14.180 as a critique
00:33:17.100 of the structure
00:33:17.940 of the West
00:33:18.580 and then instead
00:33:19.480 of addressing
00:33:20.380 the problem directly
00:33:21.480 which is
00:33:22.220 well the world
00:33:23.100 is very complex
00:33:23.940 but we do in fact
00:33:25.340 perceive it
00:33:25.920 and there actually
00:33:26.920 are value structures
00:33:28.000 they just circumvented
00:33:29.640 that and popped
00:33:30.620 back into
00:33:31.260 a bastardized form
00:33:32.360 of Marxism
00:33:34.360 that we see today
00:33:35.080 as identity politics
00:33:36.220 and that's been
00:33:37.160 extraordinarily destructive
00:33:39.380 to the universities.
00:33:40.600 Well let's talk about
00:33:42.040 that a bit more
00:33:42.580 because it seems to me
00:33:44.020 that it would be
00:33:45.140 a great shame
00:33:46.300 if people were to think
00:33:47.460 that your writing
00:33:51.060 this forward
00:33:51.720 to Solzhenitsyn
00:33:52.560 was simply to document
00:33:54.260 something as
00:33:55.160 an historic phenomenon
00:33:56.060 as essentially important
00:33:57.920 as that historic
00:33:59.600 documentation is.
00:34:01.220 It seems to me
00:34:02.340 that what is
00:34:03.040 of interest to you
00:34:04.340 is not simply
00:34:05.240 to shed light
00:34:06.860 on the terrors
00:34:08.000 the hundred million
00:34:08.760 slaughtered
00:34:09.800 in the course
00:34:10.960 of the various
00:34:11.840 communist revolutions
00:34:12.720 of the 20th century
00:34:13.820 those various
00:34:15.260 ideologies
00:34:16.200 motivated by Marxism
00:34:17.580 and other
00:34:18.000 forms of
00:34:20.260 philosophical ideology
00:34:22.100 but because
00:34:23.740 it seems to me
00:34:24.540 that you take
00:34:25.160 what was present
00:34:26.680 in that philosophically
00:34:27.700 ideologically
00:34:28.380 still to be at work
00:34:30.100 in
00:34:30.780 or to have been
00:34:32.480 as it were
00:34:32.920 reborn
00:34:34.340 in the West
00:34:34.620 and so I suppose
00:34:35.700 what I'd like to ask you
00:34:36.400 about is
00:34:36.680 what are the
00:34:37.300 characteristics
00:34:38.300 of
00:34:39.300 the Marxist
00:34:41.760 ideology
00:34:42.560 that led to
00:34:44.260 that very obvious
00:34:46.760 death and destruction
00:34:47.520 which in a
00:34:48.660 subtler way
00:34:49.900 you see to be
00:34:50.680 am I right to say
00:34:51.680 you see to be
00:34:52.400 at work
00:34:53.100 in the West
00:34:53.880 so I'd like
00:34:55.100 it seems to me
00:34:56.000 very important
00:34:56.480 that we have
00:34:56.900 a deep sense
00:34:58.180 of what the
00:34:58.780 governing assumptions
00:35:00.820 of our culture are
00:35:02.480 or it's hard
00:35:03.280 to transcend them.
00:35:04.340 Yeah well
00:35:04.760 that is exactly
00:35:05.740 the issue
00:35:06.200 because the question
00:35:07.360 is whether or not
00:35:08.000 the past is over
00:35:08.900 I mean there's a
00:35:09.880 Marxist philosopher
00:35:11.900 named Richard Wolff
00:35:14.040 who challenged me
00:35:15.520 recently on YouTube
00:35:16.480 to a debate
00:35:17.760 and really
00:35:18.780 the answer
00:35:19.480 that I posted
00:35:20.180 was this forward
00:35:21.160 and he accused me
00:35:22.820 of being stuck
00:35:24.140 in the past
00:35:24.860 you know
00:35:25.200 it's well
00:35:25.600 the wall fell
00:35:28.440 in 1989
00:35:29.240 and the horrors
00:35:30.120 of the Soviet
00:35:30.740 era are over
00:35:32.000 and we
00:35:32.920 we can't
00:35:34.480 paint
00:35:35.220 we can't
00:35:36.360 eternally
00:35:36.820 tar Marxism
00:35:37.820 with the brush
00:35:38.480 of these past
00:35:39.300 events
00:35:39.820 I mean
00:35:40.540 as if
00:35:41.060 these events
00:35:41.920 are over
00:35:42.380 or as if
00:35:43.740 50 years
00:35:44.960 is sufficient
00:35:45.820 time to forget
00:35:46.600 about the corpses
00:35:47.620 but that's his
00:35:48.700 idea
00:35:49.600 you know
00:35:50.220 and to me
00:35:50.980 it's the same idea
00:35:51.940 that you might
00:35:52.780 put forward
00:35:53.360 if you were
00:35:54.160 a neo-Nazi
00:35:54.860 by saying that
00:35:56.000 well you know
00:35:56.760 all that happened
00:35:57.800 back in 1945
00:35:58.880 the fundamental
00:36:00.320 doctrine was sound
00:36:01.540 and we can't
00:36:02.340 allow our judgment
00:36:03.180 about these
00:36:04.180 eternal truths
00:36:05.280 manifested in the
00:36:06.760 National Socialist
00:36:07.820 doctrine
00:36:08.200 to be forever
00:36:09.100 tainted by some
00:36:10.080 unfortunate historical
00:36:11.360 events
00:36:12.160 and I think
00:36:13.140 that that's just
00:36:14.100 well I don't even
00:36:15.640 know what to say
00:36:16.200 about it
00:36:16.620 I mean one of the
00:36:17.440 telling things
00:36:18.040 about his comments
00:36:18.820 was that he only
00:36:20.000 talked about the
00:36:20.740 Soviet Union
00:36:21.400 and not all the
00:36:22.440 other terrible places
00:36:23.740 that the same
00:36:24.480 doctrine had been
00:36:25.320 implemented
00:36:25.740 with equally
00:36:26.540 murderous
00:36:27.200 effects
00:36:27.920 and so that was
00:36:29.220 quite the argument
00:36:30.280 by evasion
00:36:31.140 but I
00:36:31.880 what I tried to do
00:36:32.800 in the forward
00:36:33.420 and in my thinking
00:36:34.560 in general
00:36:35.020 is I'm always
00:36:36.000 trying to get to
00:36:36.720 the bottom of things
00:36:37.660 what's at the bottom
00:36:39.480 and it seems to me
00:36:41.520 that what happened
00:36:42.420 if you look at what
00:36:43.600 happened in the
00:36:44.120 Russian Revolution
00:36:44.900 like the first thing
00:36:46.700 you want to do
00:36:47.140 is give the devil
00:36:47.840 his due
00:36:48.320 okay and the way
00:36:49.520 you do that
00:36:50.020 is by pointing out
00:36:50.980 that hierarchical
00:36:52.540 structures
00:36:53.100 we'll start even
00:36:54.520 before that
00:36:55.620 people have
00:36:56.320 problems that
00:36:56.860 have to be
00:36:57.340 solved
00:36:57.700 life is a
00:36:59.020 sequence of
00:36:59.540 problems that
00:37:00.080 have to be
00:37:00.540 solved
00:37:00.860 if you don't
00:37:02.420 solve the
00:37:02.860 problems that
00:37:03.340 life puts
00:37:03.900 forward
00:37:04.220 you suffer
00:37:04.760 and you die
00:37:05.420 so assuming
00:37:06.480 that you don't
00:37:07.180 want those
00:37:07.800 two outcomes
00:37:08.520 then there are
00:37:09.100 problems you
00:37:09.540 have to solve
00:37:10.100 and so you
00:37:12.220 have to set an
00:37:12.840 aim
00:37:13.120 and the aim
00:37:14.020 is to solve
00:37:14.580 the problem
00:37:15.080 and then because
00:37:16.120 we're social
00:37:16.720 creatures we have
00:37:17.500 to solve the
00:37:18.040 problems by
00:37:19.040 organizing
00:37:19.540 collectively
00:37:20.180 and the way
00:37:20.880 we do that
00:37:21.480 generally speaking
00:37:22.460 in relationship
00:37:23.140 to an aim
00:37:23.740 is to produce
00:37:24.260 a hierarchy
00:37:24.800 and the reason
00:37:25.880 for that is
00:37:26.560 that if you
00:37:27.300 have a problem
00:37:27.920 and you want
00:37:28.540 it to be solved
00:37:29.220 and you get a
00:37:30.160 variety of people
00:37:30.820 working on it
00:37:31.500 you're soon going
00:37:32.540 to discover that
00:37:33.280 some people are
00:37:33.880 much better at
00:37:34.460 solving the problem
00:37:35.100 than others
00:37:35.560 and that will
00:37:36.220 inevitably produce
00:37:37.260 a hierarchy
00:37:37.680 and it should
00:37:38.420 because then
00:37:39.440 even the
00:37:41.000 structure of
00:37:42.220 authority
00:37:42.760 is in sync
00:37:45.900 with the aim
00:37:47.380 and the aim
00:37:48.180 is valuable
00:37:48.620 because it's a
00:37:49.280 problem that
00:37:49.780 everybody agrees
00:37:50.560 that is an
00:37:51.500 actual problem
00:37:52.180 so you're going
00:37:52.940 to get
00:37:53.160 hierarchical
00:37:53.780 organizations
00:37:54.380 and you should
00:37:55.080 now the problem
00:37:56.120 with that
00:37:56.560 is that as soon
00:37:57.160 as you produce
00:37:57.700 a hierarchical
00:37:58.360 organization
00:37:58.960 two things
00:37:59.860 happen
00:38:00.240 one is that
00:38:01.220 a small minority
00:38:02.180 of the people
00:38:02.700 do almost all
00:38:03.380 the creative work
00:38:04.160 that's the
00:38:04.740 Pareto principle
00:38:05.300 and the other
00:38:06.200 is that the
00:38:06.780 benefits of the
00:38:07.760 hierarchy
00:38:08.200 flow disproportionately
00:38:09.580 to a small
00:38:10.400 number of people
00:38:10.980 at the top
00:38:11.560 so and that's
00:38:13.340 another manifestation
00:38:14.140 of the Pareto principle
00:38:14.960 and it is something
00:38:15.680 that Marx pointed out
00:38:16.740 although he blamed
00:38:17.560 it on capitalism
00:38:18.280 which is a big
00:38:19.520 mistake even
00:38:20.300 if you're concerned
00:38:21.320 for those
00:38:22.580 the hierarchy
00:38:23.300 dispossesses
00:38:24.080 so you produce
00:38:25.120 a hierarchy
00:38:25.720 both the work
00:38:27.340 the work flows
00:38:28.160 from a minority
00:38:28.880 of people
00:38:29.260 and the benefits
00:38:29.980 flow to a minority
00:38:30.860 of people
00:38:31.200 and those might not
00:38:32.040 be the same people
00:38:32.920 by the way
00:38:33.460 right because
00:38:34.160 hierarchies aren't
00:38:35.020 perfect in their
00:38:35.840 ability to distribute
00:38:37.120 resources as a
00:38:38.120 consequence of
00:38:39.000 productive effort
00:38:41.200 that's part of the
00:38:42.500 problem with
00:38:42.900 hierarchical
00:38:43.480 organizations
00:38:44.120 but then
00:38:45.240 what the hierarchy
00:38:46.300 does is produce
00:38:47.340 a layer of the
00:38:48.340 dispossessed
00:38:49.120 that stack up
00:38:50.320 at the bottom
00:38:50.900 near zero
00:38:51.820 and it's the
00:38:52.660 majority
00:38:53.200 it's always the
00:38:53.860 majority
00:38:54.280 so that's the price
00:38:55.560 you pay for
00:38:56.000 hierarchies
00:38:56.500 now what the
00:38:57.540 left does is say
00:38:58.780 look at the
00:39:00.000 dispossessed
00:39:00.820 and keep the
00:39:02.340 hierarchy flexible
00:39:03.340 enough so that it
00:39:04.060 can twist and bend
00:39:04.980 and transform when
00:39:05.860 necessary but also
00:39:06.700 so that the
00:39:07.240 dispossessed don't
00:39:08.080 fall so close to
00:39:09.000 zero that
00:39:09.760 A that they're
00:39:11.180 done
00:39:11.600 they're in
00:39:12.100 misery
00:39:12.520 B that the
00:39:14.180 talents they
00:39:14.840 might possess
00:39:15.500 can't be utilized
00:39:16.600 and C that the
00:39:18.320 whole structure
00:39:19.020 doesn't become so
00:39:19.800 untenable that it
00:39:21.040 destroys itself
00:39:21.840 because of the
00:39:22.420 inequality
00:39:22.920 perfectly reasonable
00:39:24.520 propositions
00:39:25.500 and so then you
00:39:26.400 could say well
00:39:27.020 there's a certain
00:39:27.840 number of people
00:39:28.480 on the left
00:39:29.000 who are genuinely
00:39:30.220 motivated by
00:39:31.560 concern about
00:39:32.860 dispossession as
00:39:34.640 well as the
00:39:35.100 dispossessed
00:39:35.680 of course
00:39:36.120 fine so that's to
00:39:37.480 give the devil his
00:39:38.280 due and so then
00:39:39.140 you might say well
00:39:39.820 there was moral
00:39:40.800 reasons there
00:39:41.420 were moral reasons
00:39:42.240 for at least a
00:39:43.520 subset of those
00:39:44.320 who were involved
00:39:44.860 in the Russian
00:39:45.340 revolution to be
00:39:46.460 involved they were
00:39:47.780 interested in helping
00:39:48.660 the dispossessed
00:39:49.380 but there's a
00:39:50.180 problem and this
00:39:51.740 is the problem
00:39:52.340 of the left
00:39:53.020 there's a problems
00:39:54.060 on the right as
00:39:54.720 well the problem
00:39:55.460 on the right is
00:39:56.120 once the hierarchy
00:39:57.080 is established
00:39:57.720 those who dominate
00:39:58.660 the top have
00:39:59.320 every right to
00:40:00.180 overstate the
00:40:00.980 moral virtue of
00:40:02.000 the hierarchy
00:40:02.480 because it
00:40:02.980 privileges them
00:40:04.060 in particular
00:40:04.800 on the left
00:40:05.980 the problem is
00:40:06.740 is that it's
00:40:07.740 not easy to
00:40:08.340 distinguish between
00:40:09.260 care for the
00:40:10.080 dispossessed
00:40:10.800 and hatred
00:40:11.720 for those who
00:40:12.980 occupy positions
00:40:14.320 of well you
00:40:15.500 could say
00:40:15.800 authority the
00:40:16.580 leftists would
00:40:17.220 say power you
00:40:18.340 could also say
00:40:18.980 competence which
00:40:20.020 I think is more
00:40:20.680 to the case or
00:40:21.400 ability it's not
00:40:22.980 easy to distinguish
00:40:23.800 care for the
00:40:24.960 dispossessed from
00:40:26.060 hatred for those
00:40:27.560 who occupy the
00:40:28.780 preeminent positions
00:40:29.640 in the hierarchy
00:40:30.340 and if it's power
00:40:32.240 then it's hatred
00:40:32.880 for power but if
00:40:33.720 it's competence
00:40:34.620 and it is competence
00:40:36.320 if the hierarchy
00:40:37.160 is functional then
00:40:38.180 it's hatred for the
00:40:39.080 competent okay
00:40:40.200 then you say
00:40:40.760 alright so those
00:40:41.460 are the two
00:40:41.820 competing motivations
00:40:42.700 care for the
00:40:43.700 dispossessed and
00:40:44.420 hatred for the
00:40:45.100 let's say competent
00:40:46.220 let's play that
00:40:48.220 out historically
00:40:49.020 speaking and see
00:40:50.160 which is the
00:40:50.640 more powerful
00:40:51.160 force well that
00:40:52.380 got played out
00:40:52.960 very rapidly in
00:40:53.780 the Russian
00:40:54.080 revolution and
00:40:55.160 what happened
00:40:55.660 was even if
00:40:57.380 there was a
00:40:58.240 minority and
00:41:00.000 perhaps even a
00:41:00.600 majority although
00:41:01.700 there wasn't but
00:41:02.880 perhaps even a
00:41:03.780 majority of those
00:41:04.520 who truly cared
00:41:05.340 for the dispossessed
00:41:06.280 those who hated
00:41:07.480 the competent
00:41:08.440 slaughtered them
00:41:09.580 it turned out that
00:41:11.360 the hatred was a
00:41:12.320 much more potent
00:41:13.460 geopolitical force
00:41:16.280 than the
00:41:16.840 compassion and
00:41:18.200 then and another
00:41:19.100 twist occurred too
00:41:20.420 because the
00:41:21.820 narrative was
00:41:23.140 bourgeoisie against
00:41:25.240 proletariat let's
00:41:26.220 say and so that's
00:41:26.980 those at the
00:41:27.800 uppermost pinnacle of
00:41:28.820 the hierarchy against
00:41:29.560 those who were the
00:41:30.120 dispossessed and that
00:41:31.420 was also the
00:41:31.940 historical narrative
00:41:32.980 and then it was the
00:41:34.080 right and
00:41:35.080 responsibility of
00:41:36.100 those who were
00:41:36.580 oppressed to rise
00:41:37.420 up but that ran
00:41:38.800 into another problem
00:41:39.680 which is basically
00:41:40.700 the problem that
00:41:41.600 the post-modernists
00:41:43.840 especially on the
00:41:44.840 feminist side have
00:41:45.860 now identified as
00:41:46.820 intersectionality
00:41:47.740 it's like well
00:41:48.720 turns out that
00:41:49.680 you're you can't so
00:41:51.040 easily be placed
00:41:51.980 into one group
00:41:52.940 like in fact this
00:41:54.940 is the perception
00:41:55.680 problem that we
00:41:56.420 talked about before
00:41:57.320 there's a very large
00:41:59.000 number of groups you
00:41:59.880 could be placed in
00:42:00.620 it might be an
00:42:01.760 unlimited number of
00:42:03.040 groups in fact
00:42:03.920 and so then if
00:42:06.160 you're motivated
00:42:06.700 primarily by hatred
00:42:07.900 and your desire is
00:42:10.320 to produce as much
00:42:11.100 mayhem as possible
00:42:12.040 you can take any
00:42:13.040 given person and
00:42:14.300 you can analyze the
00:42:15.380 multiple groups that
00:42:16.380 they belong to and
00:42:17.760 then you can find one
00:42:18.780 group in which they're
00:42:19.880 the oppressor and
00:42:21.420 then because there's
00:42:22.580 no excuse whatsoever
00:42:23.680 for the oppression
00:42:24.500 even if there's one
00:42:25.480 dimension of your
00:42:26.180 identity along which
00:42:27.500 you're an oppressor
00:42:28.220 then you're grist
00:42:29.960 for the for the for
00:42:31.440 the bone-crushing
00:42:32.400 mill of the of the
00:42:34.560 soviet work camp
00:42:35.600 and that's exactly
00:42:36.560 what happened
00:42:37.180 and so as the
00:42:38.480 soviet revolution
00:42:39.360 progressed more and
00:42:41.040 more people got
00:42:41.880 thrown into the
00:42:43.220 cauldron let's say
00:42:44.520 the socialists the
00:42:45.780 students the
00:42:46.440 religious people
00:42:47.200 the old the the
00:42:48.780 the old the
00:42:49.780 original revolutionary
00:42:50.720 Stalin had all them
00:42:51.820 killed because there
00:42:52.780 was some and if it
00:42:54.120 wasn't you that was
00:42:55.040 guilty because of
00:42:55.840 your group membership
00:42:56.620 then they just
00:42:57.400 expanded the capacity
00:42:58.460 the the parameters
00:43:00.380 of the idea of
00:43:01.220 group well you're
00:43:02.520 not an oppressor
00:43:03.660 but your grandfather
00:43:04.840 was a landowner
00:43:05.980 well that's good
00:43:07.120 enough that's that's
00:43:08.000 that's your class
00:43:08.900 that's that's and so
00:43:10.080 that's sufficient
00:43:10.840 justification to throw
00:43:12.220 you to the wolves as
00:43:13.020 well and so what you
00:43:14.440 saw is this just
00:43:15.420 unbelievable expansion
00:43:18.040 of murderousness
00:43:20.060 driven by the twin
00:43:22.280 improper presuppositions
00:43:24.840 that you could define
00:43:26.000 people by their group
00:43:26.920 identity and that
00:43:28.000 history was best
00:43:29.180 conceptualized as a
00:43:31.440 battle between the
00:43:33.060 fortunate and the
00:43:33.860 unfortunate along those
00:43:34.860 group identities
00:43:35.600 yes and if we could
00:43:37.920 pick up that notion of
00:43:38.740 the the group identity
00:43:39.580 and the collect what you
00:43:40.620 call the sort of the
00:43:41.500 collectivist thinking
00:43:42.420 it seems to me that
00:43:43.780 might be opposed to a
00:43:45.540 kind of robust view of
00:43:47.120 the human individual as
00:43:48.920 the site of
00:43:49.420 responsibility and
00:43:50.580 agency suffering and
00:43:53.460 so it seems to me that
00:43:55.460 what I'd like to ask you
00:43:57.180 about is the is the
00:43:57.980 connection between or
00:43:59.800 the ways in which the
00:44:00.660 collectivist thinking
00:44:01.700 results in the
00:44:03.120 annihilation of all human
00:44:05.680 particularity whether
00:44:07.060 it's economic or
00:44:08.840 familial or you might
00:44:13.380 say it seems to me that
00:44:14.360 what's going on in the
00:44:15.420 collectivist thinking is
00:44:16.360 the absolute enemy of
00:44:18.580 human particularity and
00:44:21.880 freedom itself
00:44:22.580 the enemy of the idea of
00:44:23.940 the individual the
00:44:24.940 sovereign individual which
00:44:26.420 is the central idea of
00:44:27.580 the West I mean and
00:44:28.420 that's manifested in the
00:44:29.600 underlying religious
00:44:30.320 structure so if you
00:44:31.740 think about Christianity
00:44:32.800 for example you think
00:44:33.920 about Christianity
00:44:34.600 psychologically you
00:44:36.140 strip it of its
00:44:36.740 metaphysics at least for
00:44:38.160 the purposes of the
00:44:39.260 argument you see the
00:44:40.660 emergence of the idea of
00:44:41.840 the divine individual as
00:44:43.280 as well as as what as
00:44:46.400 as part of what's what
00:44:47.880 as part of divinity
00:44:49.180 itself right as an
00:44:50.360 integral that's part of
00:44:51.420 the trinitarian idea of
00:44:53.120 the part of divinity
00:44:55.460 itself and that divinity
00:44:57.120 to me is the capacity of
00:45:00.140 the of individual
00:45:01.340 consciousness to generate
00:45:03.140 order from potential so
00:45:05.240 the way I look at people
00:45:06.400 first of all so like
00:45:08.060 people who have been
00:45:09.460 criticizing what I've been
00:45:10.440 doing think about my
00:45:12.340 philosophy such as it is
00:45:15.300 not that it's mine as a
00:45:17.980 sort of variant of Ayn
00:45:19.680 Rand's ideas of the
00:45:21.180 centrality of the
00:45:22.020 individual individual
00:45:22.860 above all that's not the
00:45:24.280 issue it's a conceptual
00:45:25.860 issue is that what what
00:45:28.680 what category is to be
00:45:30.600 primary and for me the
00:45:32.760 individual is to be
00:45:33.680 primary and there's a
00:45:35.340 variety of reasons for
00:45:36.200 that first of all the
00:45:37.180 individual is the locus of
00:45:38.440 suffering and also the
00:45:40.160 locus of responsibility so
00:45:42.020 so those are really the
00:45:43.160 two reasons for that the
00:45:44.840 individual has to be made
00:45:45.800 primary but and and the
00:45:49.720 divinity element of the
00:45:50.920 individual and and this I
00:45:52.640 think is coded in our
00:45:53.600 deepest stories it's it's
00:45:54.820 really deeply coded in in
00:45:56.300 Genesis particularly in the
00:45:57.640 opening chapters of opening
00:45:59.160 verses of Genesis is that
00:46:01.060 what human beings confront in
00:46:03.180 their lives is akin to what
00:46:05.160 God himself confronted at the
00:46:06.900 beginning of time and so
00:46:08.580 it's easy for us to believe
00:46:11.260 that we're deterministic
00:46:12.360 creatures like clocks and
00:46:14.920 and that it's the past that
00:46:16.320 drives us forward in a
00:46:17.720 deterministic manner into the
00:46:19.220 future but I don't believe
00:46:21.060 that's the case I actually
00:46:22.940 don't think there's any
00:46:23.620 evidence that that's the
00:46:24.520 case because people are so
00:46:25.560 complex you actually can't
00:46:27.040 predict them as if they're
00:46:28.500 deterministic except in in
00:46:30.100 very constrained circumstances
00:46:31.380 and so it's a hypothesis but
00:46:33.340 it's not a very good one and
00:46:35.620 although it has its utility
00:46:37.860 what what what seems to me
00:46:40.800 to be the case and I think
00:46:42.240 this is how people
00:46:43.080 conceptualize themselves and
00:46:44.980 how they act towards
00:46:46.260 themselves and towards other
00:46:47.860 people and how our social
00:46:49.420 structures or political
00:46:50.900 structures are constituted is
00:46:52.940 that human beings constantly
00:46:55.480 confront a landscape of
00:46:57.180 possibility it's potential
00:46:59.000 itself and and we have a
00:47:00.740 belief in the idea of
00:47:01.760 potential we have an idea
00:47:03.540 that there are things that
00:47:05.180 could be it's a very strange
00:47:07.240 conception of reality because
00:47:08.420 it's not a materialistic
00:47:09.480 conception because things
00:47:11.360 that could be aren't
00:47:12.240 measurable in any sense
00:47:13.620 right but we certainly act as
00:47:15.520 if they exist and we all
00:47:17.820 treat each other as if our one
00:47:20.560 of our fundamental ethical
00:47:21.860 requirements is for you to
00:47:26.080 confront that potential
00:47:27.300 properly and that would be to
00:47:28.940 live up to your
00:47:29.540 responsibility it's just you
00:47:31.000 have these gifts and talents
00:47:33.140 talents and and possibilities
00:47:35.460 that have been granted to
00:47:36.900 you and if you fail to make
00:47:39.240 use of them your talents let's
00:47:41.080 say then that's a sin of
00:47:43.200 sorts and that's a religious
00:47:46.060 way of thinking about it but it
00:47:47.200 doesn't matter because that's
00:47:48.620 how people treat each other if
00:47:49.740 you have a child for example or
00:47:51.740 or a spouse or a friend brother
00:47:54.520 anyone you care about and you
00:47:56.460 see you have the intuition that
00:47:59.040 they could be making more of
00:48:01.260 themselves and what they have
00:48:03.000 than they are then you're
00:48:04.520 deeply disappointed in that and
00:48:06.280 the reason you're disappointed in
00:48:07.720 that is because there's a call to
00:48:10.300 us an existential call to confront
00:48:13.700 that potential that's that's
00:48:15.480 everywhere that faces us in every
00:48:17.560 direction and to transform it into
00:48:20.320 the most functional and habitable
00:48:23.420 order possible and the way that
00:48:26.220 that is to be done properly is with
00:48:28.280 truth and and i think that all of
00:48:30.700 those ideas are integral to the
00:48:33.720 judeo-christian substrate of
00:48:35.560 western culture they're fundamental
00:48:37.140 ideas and so if you put the group
00:48:40.780 before the individual then all of
00:48:43.560 that disappears like when you're
00:48:45.520 when you're debating with the
00:48:47.020 radical leftist postmodern types
00:48:48.920 about free speech you're actually
00:48:50.880 not debating with them about free
00:48:52.260 speech because they don't believe in
00:48:54.120 free speech it's not part of their
00:48:55.760 conceptual universe because for for
00:48:58.060 speech to be free and therefore
00:49:00.080 valuable the people conducting the
00:49:03.160 conversation have to be sovereign
00:49:06.160 individuals capable of generating
00:49:08.620 independent thought independent of
00:49:10.680 their canonical group identity and
00:49:13.040 reach a consensus through that process
00:49:15.340 of dialogue none of that exists in the
00:49:17.920 postmodern world all of those
00:49:19.660 preconceptions would be attributed to
00:49:22.000 well something like eurocentric
00:49:23.760 neo-colonialism something like that
00:49:26.520 it seems to me that what's at work
00:49:27.480 of that is is a radical dismissal of
00:49:29.520 the possibility that the individual
00:49:30.840 has access to anything at all that is
00:49:33.060 to say that that that in if you don't
00:49:35.580 the belief in free speech is
00:49:37.900 fundamentally motivated by the by or
00:49:40.240 or sustained by the confidence that
00:49:43.140 our discourse our dialogue that human
00:49:45.080 thinking itself can reach something
00:49:47.200 stable that it has a relationship
00:49:49.160 beyond yeah but beyond immediacy and
00:49:52.400 that and that and that they're on
00:49:54.080 power and beyond power it reaches
00:49:56.480 beyond power to truth there's no point
00:49:58.460 never having a conversation about
00:49:59.960 anything if the conversation itself
00:50:03.200 doesn't have access to something
00:50:04.880 transcended exactly right well so what
00:50:06.860 happens with when this is especially
00:50:08.540 true for people like Foucault and
00:50:10.520 Derrida to to some degree is well the
00:50:12.740 first thing you do is you define the
00:50:14.360 fundamental motivation as power because
00:50:16.460 that's all there is is there's the
00:50:18.060 dominance of one group or the other
00:50:19.520 and so then the dialogue has to serve
00:50:23.000 power because that's all there is and
00:50:25.040 so yeah all of that is obliterated and
00:50:27.400 and by by doing that actually the the
00:50:31.000 the postmodernists make it impossible
00:50:33.880 for them to solve the conundrum that
00:50:35.980 validly drove post postmodernism to begin
00:50:38.560 with so the conundrum is infinite set of
00:50:41.340 potential interpretations that's a real
00:50:43.480 conundrum that's the problem of
00:50:45.380 complexity right and and it's real so
00:50:48.620 then the question is well is there any
00:50:50.540 solution to the problem of complexity
00:50:52.400 and this is where issues of moral
00:50:54.380 relativism start to become paramount
00:50:58.220 because if there's no solution to the
00:50:59.960 problem of complexity then there's no
00:51:02.420 canonical interpretations and all the
00:51:04.640 interpretations are just well what would
00:51:06.920 you call it there they're expedient they
00:51:09.320 have the expedience of power but see my
00:51:12.860 best pathway through that essentially I
00:51:16.100 think has come from the developmental
00:51:18.260 psychologist Jean Piaget and Piaget could
00:51:21.500 be considered a neo Kantian you know the
00:51:24.500 Kant's fundamental doctrine was act such
00:51:27.860 that if your action became a universal
00:51:30.020 maxim that that would be of universal
00:51:31.940 benefit and so and but but Piaget
00:51:34.820 differentiated that and and and and
00:51:38.720 demonstrated how that evolved naturally in
00:51:41.300 the course of the spontaneous maturation
00:51:44.180 of children through play it's absolutely
00:51:46.760 brilliant so I can give you a quick
00:51:48.740 example so my granddaughter who's 14
00:51:52.280 months old has just learned a new game
00:51:54.080 and the game is she plays it with her
00:51:56.540 wooden spoon and the game is she has the
00:51:58.940 spoon and then she looks at you and then
00:52:00.620 she gives you the spoon and then you take
00:52:02.780 it from her and she lets it go and then
00:52:04.580 she watches you and then you give the spoon
00:52:06.620 back and she's very happy to get the spoon
00:52:08.540 back but she's also very happy to give it
00:52:10.520 to you and then she turns to the next
00:52:12.380 person and she gives them the spoon and
00:52:14.420 then she gets it back and then you can
00:52:16.400 play with her and and the play is well now
00:52:19.700 you've you've you've you've you've started to
00:52:22.700 embody the principle of reciprocity right we
00:52:25.640 can trade and and it's a repeating game it's
00:52:28.460 not one trade you don't end up with the
00:52:30.380 spoon and I don't end up with the spoon we
00:52:32.540 both have the spoon some of the time across
00:52:34.940 time and there's some utility in the
00:52:37.220 exchange itself okay so she's playing
00:52:39.620 with that and thrilled about and no
00:52:41.240 wonder because it's a walloping walloping
00:52:43.880 discovery and so then you take the
00:52:45.920 spoon from her and maybe you you hold it a
00:52:48.200 little longer than she expects and that
00:52:50.300 makes her a little nervous but then you
00:52:51.800 give it back and then she's relieved and
00:52:53.240 that makes her happy or you cover the
00:52:54.920 spoon with your hand and then she's a
00:52:56.900 bit confused about where it might be and
00:52:58.280 you show it to her and you give it back
00:52:59.900 and she's happy about that or she reaches
00:53:02.600 out to grab it and you pull it away a
00:53:03.920 little bit and move it back and forth so
00:53:06.020 she has to do a little more effort to
00:53:07.460 get it and as long as you don't push
00:53:09.440 that and it's a bit of a challenge to
00:53:11.480 her both both physically in terms of
00:53:14.840 coordination but also psychologically in
00:53:17.720 terms of delay of gratification she also
00:53:19.700 finds that gratifying and and the reason
00:53:22.400 for that is that you're you're showing how
00:53:24.740 her how robust and resilient the idea of
00:53:28.580 reciprocity is across sequences of
00:53:30.980 transformations and it's just this little
00:53:33.140 thing you do at the table you think well
00:53:34.580 that's nothing it's like no it's
00:53:36.140 something and so the Piagetian idea is
00:53:39.680 something like there's an there's an
00:53:42.080 implicit morality that emerges to
00:53:43.860 constrain the infinite set of
00:53:45.380 interpretations and it has to do with the
00:53:47.480 structure that will maintain reciprocity
00:53:49.400 optimally in the largest including the
00:53:53.300 largest number of people across the
00:53:54.800 largest amount of time and so and so the
00:53:58.040 way that I've been portraying that for the
00:53:59.780 people who've been listening to my lectures is
00:54:01.400 that well you need to take responsibility
00:54:02.840 for yourself as if you care for yourself
00:54:05.660 okay so first we figure out what's
00:54:07.820 yourself well it's not just you now
00:54:09.740 because you aren't just you now you're the
00:54:12.740 community of you's that extra stretch
00:54:15.160 across time so in order for you to take
00:54:17.340 care of yourself properly now you have to
00:54:19.560 learn to play an iterative game with
00:54:21.260 yourself that's sustainable and even
00:54:23.680 potentially improvable across time and
00:54:26.000 there aren't many games that you can play
00:54:27.840 like that so that starts to radically
00:54:29.460 constrain the set of possibilities and
00:54:31.620 then it's more constrained than that
00:54:32.760 because not only do you have to play a
00:54:35.100 game with yourself that can repeat across
00:54:36.900 time to minimize suffering to remove the
00:54:39.960 possibility of death to allow for the
00:54:42.000 possibility of productive movement and a
00:54:43.740 certain amount of happiness but you have
00:54:45.480 to do that with other people around you and
00:54:48.080 across time and so there's you and the
00:54:50.640 multiple you's embedded in your family and
00:54:53.440 and the multiplicity of your family members
00:54:55.900 embedded inside a culture and and the
00:54:59.140 extension of that culture across time and
00:55:01.360 so for you to act properly then all of
00:55:03.760 those things have to be harmoniously
00:55:05.320 balanced at the same time and that
00:55:07.180 radically reduces the set of potential
00:55:09.880 interpretations and that's the antidote to
00:55:12.520 the to the chaos of of of of the infinite array of
00:55:17.860 potential perceptual worlds and and well and
00:55:23.420 and then there are questions that emerge
00:55:25.040 out of that like well what's the best way
00:55:26.780 to play that game but we certainly know
00:55:28.580 that reciprocity fair play the spirit of
00:55:31.760 fair play is is is immensely important to
00:55:34.760 that that's what Piaget documented and that
00:55:36.800 what it's what we all know and also that
00:55:39.320 there's something about truth that's
00:55:40.820 absolutely integral to that as well so and
00:55:44.000 the postmodernists just they just they got
00:55:46.640 the problem right but they they never went
00:55:51.320 the next steps and it's partly because well
00:55:54.680 why is it why is it they had an easy answer
00:55:57.820 at hand that required almost no transformation
00:55:59.780 in their original worldview well we'll just
00:56:02.180 keep the Marxism we'll just transform it into
00:56:04.220 something that looks different and that'll be
00:56:06.560 good enough minimal change so it seems to me
00:56:09.920 that that the that the the the the collective the
00:56:12.720 collectivist thinking that's at work in the
00:56:14.740 insistence that only the group matters has the
00:56:17.400 effect of radically annihilating the integrity
00:56:21.360 of the individual in fact that maybe even
00:56:23.280 it's it's essence well I think I think it's
00:56:24.960 it's a actually that is it's a I believe so at
00:56:27.480 the bottom like and because there's a there's
00:56:29.620 a murderousness at the bottom of the
00:56:31.400 collectivism that needs to be accounted for and
00:56:34.500 so I I see what's at the bottom and this is
00:56:37.040 partly consequence say of the insistence that
00:56:40.320 the West is a patriarchal tyranny the the desire
00:56:43.360 is it's the Cain and Abel desire see Cain was
00:56:47.260 jealous of Abel not so much because Abel
00:56:50.020 was God's favorite but because Abel
00:56:52.420 deserved to be God's favorite because he
00:56:55.100 had done things right and it's very bitter
00:56:57.580 it's very bitter in life to see a gap widening
00:57:02.400 between you and someone else period but it's
00:57:05.560 particularly bitter if you know the gap is
00:57:07.480 widening because the person who is doing well
00:57:09.360 is doing is actually doing good and doing
00:57:13.020 well and that implies at least in eradicating
00:57:17.520 the vagaries and randomness of life and I'm
00:57:19.920 perfectly aware of those as factors it's it's
00:57:23.820 bad enough to be down but it's worse to know
00:57:26.600 that you're down because you've put yourself
00:57:28.860 down and then you have a choice which is do
00:57:32.700 you do turn against the ideal itself because
00:57:36.060 it becomes so painful to gaze upon it or do
00:57:39.540 you destroy the ideal out of vengeance and
00:57:41.940 spite and that's and that's that's a simpler
00:57:45.600 pathway forward than decomposing and
00:57:47.760 deconstructing yourself and being reborn the
00:57:50.700 the Christian idea for for lack of a better word is
00:57:55.140 that something has to be sacrificed in order for
00:57:58.260 the potential of the future to be manifest in
00:58:01.080 the best possible way there's always a demand for
00:58:03.120 sacrifice the question is what should be
00:58:05.060 sacrificed and the answer is you that's the
00:58:09.560 answer it's you that should be sacrificed
00:58:12.200 and then the question is well what part of
00:58:13.760 you and and the answer that is well the
00:58:16.160 part of you that's not worthy that needs to
00:58:18.200 be put into the flame that needs to be
00:58:20.000 burnt off and and that's a process of
00:58:22.520 death and and rebirth and if there's lots of
00:58:24.860 you that has become corrupt then most of
00:58:28.820 what passes through the fire will be burnt
00:58:31.640 off and that's terribly painful for people it's
00:58:34.160 it's that's the desert you know imagine that
00:58:36.920 you're that your essential personality
00:58:38.660 structure is tyrannical so you're a rigid
00:58:41.300 ideologue you're cast in stone and so you
00:58:43.940 decide to move from the tyranny you escape from
00:58:46.100 the tyranny well where do you end up well you
00:58:48.320 don't end up in the promised land you end up in
00:58:50.340 the desert for 40 years and maybe you die there I
00:58:53.540 mean even Moses did so it's out of the frying pan into
00:58:57.420 the fire that's for sure and it's no wonder that
00:58:59.880 people are loath to to to let go and then the
00:59:02.520 more tyrannical they've become the more they've
00:59:04.560 restricted their possibility and all of that and
00:59:07.320 sold their soul to the dogma of human beings let's
00:59:10.560 say as Solzhenitsyn would describe it the less there is
00:59:13.560 of them that will be left after everything is stripped
00:59:16.380 bare and that's a terrifying that's a terrifying
00:59:19.980 possibility it's much easier to take the other route and it
00:59:22.980 becomes easier and easier and then well there are other
00:59:25.380 motivations that pile up as well bitterness the hatred
00:59:28.680 that bitterness can because you know you've lost your
00:59:31.020 chance right you had your chance and you've and you
00:59:35.060 squandered it and the feeling of that I think that's why
00:59:38.760 Cain tells God after he gets caught after his murderous act
00:59:42.960 he says that his punishment is more than he can bear because
00:59:46.500 it's the realization of what he's done he's destroyed his
00:59:48.900 own ideal and that's what you do if you're a collectivist you
00:59:52.280 destroy yourself as an individual and that's all you
00:59:55.320 have and so there's there's nothing in that except I would
01:00:00.060 say a continually opening pit of hopelessness and despair and
01:00:04.500 then that drives bitterness and hatred and desire for revenge and
01:00:07.800 all of that it's a terrible cycle and we've seen it play itself out
01:00:11.240 over and over and and and and we haven't yet precisely learned from
01:00:15.700 that so to me it's part of an eternal struggle you know it's been outlined as a
01:00:21.320 as a war in some sense that's going on in the human psyche since the beginning
01:00:26.060 of time for for all intents and purposes it seems to me Jordan that your
01:00:29.960 position is is fundamentally a positive one it's an affirmation of human
01:00:35.400 dignity the freedom that dignity demands and an affirmation of the infinite
01:00:40.980 particularity of human life you were if one were to contrast the collectivist
01:00:47.220 thinking on the one hand if one might call it a kind of abstract rationality as
01:00:52.720 if there's one solution to fit them one size fits all kind of top-down logic
01:00:57.420 what's on the other side what's the what's the antidote to that in the
01:01:01.160 individual yeah it is particularity I mean one of the things I talk about in
01:01:05.540 12 rules for life and this is and in my lectures this has become a meme strangely
01:01:10.480 enough something that's widely distributed on the web partly because
01:01:13.520 there's a comical element to it it's to clean up your room and everyone laughs
01:01:17.820 about that because I'm taking that seriously it's like well clean up your
01:01:21.480 room everyone's mother has told them that a thousand times right but I try to
01:01:26.200 explain why it's like well you have a bit of chaotic potential right in front of
01:01:31.500 you it's in some sense infinite in its potential and the the domain in which you
01:01:37.640 can manipulate that might be rather restricted because of the restrictions
01:01:41.960 that that are part and parcel of your existence but maybe you have your room
01:01:46.300 and you might think you might have contempt for that and so it's a complete
01:01:49.900 bloody catastrophe but you don't have to you can think well I've got a little it
01:01:55.600 isn't a room it's a place of potential and as soon as you know that then it's it's
01:02:00.320 not your room anymore it isn't a room the room that you see is your
01:02:05.280 preconception of the space that you inhabit what's there is is a fragment of
01:02:11.200 infinity that's what's there and what you see is the is the is the low resolution
01:02:18.640 consequence of your assumption and lazy habit and blindness that's your initial
01:02:24.460 room and you think well no that's not the room see part of what artists do for
01:02:28.060 example when van gogh paints a room and you look at it glowing he's trying to show
01:02:32.920 you what's beyond your perception of the room and I mean this technically like the
01:02:38.140 way that your visual system is set up is that whenever memory and presumption can
01:02:43.240 can can replace direct perception it will because it's simpler so you literally see what
01:02:51.120 you expect to see and if what you see is dull and drab and boring and pointless and and and
01:02:58.660 and uninspiring then that's you it's not what's there and what the artist does when he or she
01:03:05.300 re-represents that mundane reality is to remind you of what's behind it the potential that's there
01:03:11.420 and so what I'm suggesting to people is that they take the potential that's right in front of them
01:03:16.340 it's like okay and here's the rule you're aiming up there's something that you could change
01:03:24.260 that you would change that might be a very small thing could well that's within the grasp of your
01:03:30.640 power would is within the grasp of your will to combine those two things might be very small shift
01:03:36.200 you might only be willing to make a very tiny step forward it's like fine good enough make a tiny step
01:03:43.000 forward and that makes you a slight bit stronger than you were before and then the next step can
01:03:48.720 be slightly larger and it's it's the path of humility it's what people it's what people act out
01:03:56.420 when so there's this cathedral it's actually it's not a cathedral it's an oratorial in montreal
01:04:02.320 i think it's the second largest one in the world it's set on a hill at the top of a hill
01:04:06.280 and there's a huge staircase leading up to it from the bottom of the hill and people often who are
01:04:13.460 crippled and who are on crutches and so forth or in wheelchairs go there and make their way painfully
01:04:19.260 up the hill or maybe they do that on their knees and the idea is that they're struggling incrementally
01:04:26.180 uphill step by step despite their burdens to reach the city of god on the hill and they're acting out
01:04:33.540 that's life it's like the the proper aim is the city of god on the hill and what is that well that's
01:04:40.200 that place that we talked about already where these levels of responsibility are stacked together
01:04:45.660 harmoniously so that you're acting in your best interest and in your family's best interest and
01:04:51.140 in and in the world's best interest and i would say in the best interests of reality itself right
01:04:57.680 assuming that we have some integral role to play in reality which is certainly at least true at the
01:05:03.300 human level that's the city of god on the hill that beckons to everyone and you you move up that
01:05:10.260 you move towards that humbly so that's one step at a time and you do it despite your burden and your
01:05:17.620 suffering all of that that's all dramatized in that and it's it's a perfect drama of that and would
01:05:23.280 you even say it's not simply despite your suffering it's in and through your particular suffering i mean
01:05:27.980 one thing that strikes me about you know clean up your room clean up your room yes the affirmation
01:05:33.260 of the particularity of your life i mean one thing that strikes me but deepest in our human experience
01:05:37.480 is that it is infinitely particular i mean that you mentioned your your granddaughter i mean the the
01:05:42.940 the loves the people the experiences the places that were shaped by they're not places in the abstract
01:05:48.900 this this top-down sense as if there could be the you know the same kinds of clothes and the same
01:05:54.640 kinds of experience for all human beings it that that that's the enemy of the very deepest truth
01:06:01.740 of our human experience which it seems to me is infinitely particular but not infinitely particular in
01:06:08.080 the sense in which those particularities just go all off into nothingness those particulars are
01:06:12.080 precisely our points of access to the transcendent to the infinite to the to the to to to that which
01:06:19.080 that's where the reality is yes yeah well so that's why jung said that modern men can't see god because
01:06:24.480 they don't look low enough yes they're not they're not paying attention to the importance of the
01:06:28.620 particularities because the particularity is where the pen meets the paper right yes and it's just a
01:06:33.880 tiny dot every every like when you're when you're writing it's it's a dot and then it extends into a line
01:06:39.340 and those transform into words and sentences and paragraphs but the particular act is where the pen
01:06:44.280 meets yes yes yes that's that focal point right that's the center of the cross by the way yes same
01:06:50.000 yes yes well you mentioned the cross i mean certainly in the in in in in the in the history of of the
01:06:56.720 west one of the ways this comes through is uh and in the east too is in christian theology is the
01:07:01.520 very notion of the incarnation you know what is that to say but that the the infinite is in the
01:07:07.300 particular and that they that that they are that they are co-inherent that the infinite in fact has
01:07:13.060 no life except in the particular and the particular itself has a relation to or is comprehended by that
01:07:22.580 very infinite and so it seems to me that that what is going on there is an affirmation that every
01:07:30.020 particularity no matter how tiny itself is revelatory of of a transcendent and yes well that i think it
01:07:39.940 was from the gospel of thomas but i might have this wrong the kingdom of god is spread upon the earth but
01:07:44.400 men do not see it and that's that that's that infinite that's that infinite possibility in each
01:07:49.960 moment of particularity and that is what artists that is what great artists are reminding yourself
01:07:54.900 they'll take a a a slice of space in time was it monet who painted the haystacks he went out into
01:08:03.900 the fields in france and he painted the same haystack like many many times under different
01:08:08.820 conditions of lighting just to show how different yes if it's if it's a haystack it's the same thing
01:08:14.800 but it wasn't he paid attention to the particularities and so what great artists are trying to do is well
01:08:20.740 first of all so imagine a painting so it's a painting of of a landscape and so the first thing
01:08:26.440 is that it's it's layers of time because the painter has gone out there and seen the landscape and then
01:08:32.300 seen it again and then seen it again and then seen it again and then seen it again and then seen it
01:08:35.120 again and has to pay attention to the particularities of the light and the color and all of that to
01:08:39.900 represent it properly so it's and and and the mere fact that he's done that is it's it's the acting out
01:08:47.720 of the idea that in this tiny slice of time and space there's something worth attending to for an
01:08:55.860 infinite amount of time but you can't because you just can't do it but you need to know that you could
01:09:02.100 do it and that it would be worthwhile and so the painter encapsulates the landscape and then frames it
01:09:07.840 and says like look look through this window at the transcendent that's behind the low resolution
01:09:15.980 representation of your assumption the blindness that you the the expedient blindness that you by
01:09:21.740 necessity bring to bear to every situation remember what's behind this always remember what's behind
01:09:27.660 this and that's what art calls us to do that's what beauty calls us to do is to make a contact with
01:09:33.220 that and then you say well the problem with the particularly the problem with the particularity
01:09:38.260 is that it brings suffering and the bringing of suffering with particularity can also allow evil to
01:09:44.440 enter the world because that particular suffering can engender bitterness and resentment and hatred
01:09:49.760 and all of those things and the desire to destroy so the particularity carries with it a tremendous risk
01:09:54.820 and a tremendous burden and so the answer the question is well how do you tolerate the particularity
01:10:00.500 and take advantage of the potential and the answer is to make a relationship with the infinite
01:10:05.680 that's behind the particularity and that's the fundamental religious idea is to if you can maintain
01:10:12.080 the particularity but also stay in contact with what's transcendent and infinite beyond that
01:10:19.080 then you can then you have the potential strength to tolerate the catastrophe of what's limited
01:10:25.800 yes and then you get to have your cake and eat it too in principle yes yes I want to return to education
01:10:31.400 in a moment but but on the way there as it were Jordan I want to ask you you you've talked about this this the inflection point
01:10:41.080 what is the inflection point and how might it be understood relative to what I would I take to be a very decadent worldview in its last gasps
01:10:53.080 it seems to me even that many of the frankly simply slanderous attacks on you personal personally blatant misrepresentations of the the very plain fact of what you're saying
01:11:10.080 it seems to me that there's an animus there that is precisely definitely an animus there's an animus there but the question is where is that coming from
01:11:17.080 well if you look at Derrida for example and his critique of the idea of logocentrism you know as as the as the central motif of the West let's say and he and he knew at multiple levels what that critique meant because he knew what logos meant logos means embodied truth and there is of course a religious dimension to that but it's a
01:11:40.080 and so he was criticizing the notion of phallogocentrism and and so he was going right at the core of the
01:11:47.080 doctrine of the individual now the question is why might someone do that now I think the reason for that fundamentally is that there's a terrible responsibility that goes along with it
01:11:58.080 so imagine that you offered people here here's the offer offer one
01:12:05.080 you you don't matter you it's it's a really say the narrowest of materialist viewpoints is you weren't here then you were for a brief period of time and then you're gone and that all washes out in the endless sands of time
01:12:19.080 nothing in your life is significant nothing about humanity is significant nothing about the world itself is significant it's all a matter of blind random chance and it's all the same in the end
01:12:30.080 who cares in a million years right and and the price you pay for that is insignificance but the advantage that you gain from that is that fundamentally you have no responsibility
01:12:42.080 because nothing you do matters and so then there's no moral burden there's no obligation and of course if you can gather expedient pleasure while you're deteriorating pointlessly then that's all to the good
01:12:54.080 that's all to the good so it's it's a libertinism as well and that's inviting obviously because short term pleasure is by definition inviting and so you can abandon any pretension to a relationship with the infinite and consider that only a sign of delusion and weakness assume that your life is material and irrelevant it doesn't matter and then you can shrug off all responsibility and pursue short term pleasure while there's some real advantages in that it's very it's a very easy pathway
01:13:23.080 the alternative is as far as i'm concerned is no you don't understand you are the you are the center of the world past center of the world it has many centers and you do partake in this process of casting the potential of the future into the reality of the present and the past that's what your consciousness does and the quality of what you produce is dependent on your
01:13:53.060 on the ethics of your choice your choice your choice between good and evil in every moment is what determines the course of the world and that's on you it's like well that's deeply meaningful but it's unbelievable it's in its ultimate responsibility in in the literal sense and i think that in order for us to set things right we have to understand that we we have to take on that burden of ultimate responsibility as if it's not only as if it's ours which it is but as if there isn't anything better that we could do
01:14:23.040 and i and one of the things that i found so gratifying about the lecture tour that i've been doing is that and why i keep doing it the live events in particular because we've done about a hundred of them now so far is that when i explain to the audiences and this is especially true it's been seems to be especially true of of men but of young men but not so young even to say look you you have you you have an ethical obligation
01:14:53.040 what you can possibly conceive of and that's the primary call to adventure in life and that call to adventure is so worthwhile that it justifies the particularity everybody it's like lights go on they think oh i see so you need a meaning
01:15:11.100 meaning to set against the suffering and to protect you against that temptation towards malevolence you need that well where's the meaning to be found well it's not happiness it's not short-term pleasure it's not it's not self-development it's not self-esteem it's none of those things that are so focused on on on the individual psyche even it's it's literally the stumbling uphill towards the city of god yes with your burden
01:15:41.100 no they admire responsible people they already got that say well that's what you should become and they think and not only that that that's what you could become because that's what you are in the deepest sense yes yes yes would you would you say that that that that that the antidote to nihilism is meaning
01:15:57.520 and if so uh you know i think you've described yourself jordan as uh you've said i think you're the surfer not the wave and i suppose i want to ask you what is the wave because it seems to me we're at a moment of very
01:16:11.000 very great uh cultural potential and it could go any number of ways but that the very fact of what one might call the jordan peterson phenomenon uh worldwide your book translated into dozens of languages your lecture halls packed uh is a sign of a longing uh a self-conscious longing for for for for meaning how would how would how would you how would you describe what that wave is that that you didn't create but that you well some of it
01:16:40.980 some of it's technological so so i would say that wave is it's got multiple levels so so we could start from
01:16:47.800 uh we'll start from i i would say what's most obvious and that would be the medium rather than the message so
01:16:53.660 i um and these people that i've been associated with this intellectual dark web group we're we're in the fortunate position of being early adopters of extraordinarily powerful technologies
01:17:04.280 so and and the technologies are twofold there's there's online video and then there's podcasts and and so
01:17:11.560 they're technologically revolutionary in a variety of ways so online video is revolutionary because it brings
01:17:18.460 something closely akin to a live performance to an infinitely large number of people on demand permanently
01:17:27.660 so then you think well what's the advantage of a book well it's permanent it's relatively low cost it's easily
01:17:34.740 distributable right so well what's the advantage to online video well it's it's inexpensive it's not
01:17:40.800 inexpensive it's free it's far easier to produce than a book like the lag time from video to publication is
01:17:48.180 the day like we could put this online today instead of the three-year lag that a book would require and then
01:17:55.180 far more people can watch and listen than can read
01:17:58.840 because reading is a minority ability in in some sense really fat real real expert level reading
01:18:05.020 you know that because such a tiny minority of people buy books and people are made uncomfortable by books
01:18:10.120 they're intimidated by them even if they have the intelligence in principle to do the reading it's not part of their
01:18:15.640 cultural milieu that's a small minority of people and so all of a sudden online video allows
01:18:21.440 allows the spoken word to have the same impact as the written word and that's deadly that's a gutenberg
01:18:28.300 revolution and then with podcasts that's even magnified because you don't have to sit and watch a podcast
01:18:35.540 you can walk around you can exercise you can do the dishes you can you can drive many people who come to
01:18:41.480 my lectures are like long-haul truckers and guys who run forklifts and you know they're in their machinery
01:18:47.900 all day and all they do is listen to podcasts and so all of us and they can listen to the podcast
01:18:54.660 because more people can listen than can read and maybe way more people can listen than can read we
01:18:59.860 have no idea maybe the potential market is 10 times as big and so they can do it when they want to
01:19:05.620 they can also do it in private if you read and you're on the subway people can tell you're reading
01:19:10.520 if you're sitting at home and reading well then you're with a book and if you're uncomfortable with a
01:19:14.280 book you think that's pretentious or presumptuous or part of a class that you don't belong to or
01:19:18.760 anything that makes you feel inferior well you can just circumvent that you listen in private
01:19:23.860 and so people and people are taking that opportunity like mad and so that's part of the wave let's say
01:19:30.600 that technological revolution in communication that's illustrated that people have far more depth
01:19:36.460 and capacity to concentrate than anyone would have imagined you even see this with netflix and hbo
01:19:41.680 it used to be on tv there was an idea that while movie was about as long as you could attract
01:19:47.000 people's attention for 90 minutes that's the most the typical person could concentrate for it's like
01:19:52.200 that turned out to be complete rubbish people will follow these incredibly complex like literary level
01:19:58.120 net narratives breaking bad for example that has multiple characters following multiple streams of
01:20:03.820 development for for endless hours and they'll binge watch it so we have way more capacity for sustained
01:20:10.340 concentration than we thought and these new bandwidth unlimited technologies are revealing that to us
01:20:16.820 and i happen to be an early adopter of this and so that's that's part one of the wave and then
01:20:23.320 then there's the message part and it has something to do with see our culture for a very long time
01:20:29.380 has articulated out a a right of rights you have rights you need to demand them you need to claim them
01:20:35.960 it's like but but that's that's that's half the story and it's not the most salutary half because
01:20:42.400 it turns out that the meaning in your life isn't the consequence of the claiming of rights the rights
01:20:48.820 are in some sense what other people owe you i know there's more to it than that but but it's that in large
01:20:53.920 part well you can just get what you're owed it's like no that's not where you're going to find your
01:20:58.840 meaning what you're going to find where you're going to find your meaning is responsibility which is the
01:21:03.580 other half of the rights responsibility equation and people don't know that this is the the the the
01:21:10.300 the what would you call this is where this is where this is the point where things come together
01:21:15.780 properly you need a meaning in your life to forestall the suffering and to make you strong enough to
01:21:20.920 resist malevolence where's the meaning to be found rights impulsive pleasure and happiness no
01:21:26.740 responsibility oh who would have guessed that it's not part of the narrative because the
01:21:34.400 responsibility narrative even is usually about duty or patriotism or something like that which
01:21:38.580 which is okay but it's it's it's an ideological narrative too in its own right this is different
01:21:44.500 it's like no you don't understand is that what makes life worth living is to pick up the
01:21:50.620 to to to take its catastrophe and embrace it and carry it and to realize through that process
01:22:00.300 who you are so one of the things i figured out in this lecture tour there's this old idea
01:22:04.960 that you go into the abyss it's a nietzschean idea that you can gaze into the abyss you gaze long
01:22:10.860 and what you find in the abyss is a monster tolstoy wrote about that that's the dragon at the bottom
01:22:16.100 of the abyss let's say that's satan himself for that matter and but if you go into that into that
01:22:21.980 as deeply as you can what you find is your you you find you find you find your your your fragmented
01:22:28.780 father in a in a comatose condition in a in a in a desiccated and and and separated condition
01:22:38.140 and then you revivify that well what does that mean it means something it means that if you look in
01:22:44.880 the darkness you find the light that's one thing it means and that the light really stands out
01:22:49.060 against the darkness but that the light is to be found in the darkness so that's a very interesting
01:22:53.320 thing that's a quest narrative but it means more than that it means something fundamental so we know
01:22:58.640 for example that if you take yourself out of your current state of of predictability and safety you
01:23:07.620 put yourself in a new situation you'll learn right you'll absorb you'll incorporate new information
01:23:12.780 so that's a cognitive issue but that isn't all that happens what happens is that new genes turn on
01:23:18.900 within you and code for the production of new proteins and that happens neurologically new parts of you
01:23:24.940 turn on and so the idea is that if you can move yourself out into the world and push yourself out
01:23:31.040 against a maximum array of challenges more and more of you turn on turns on and then the question
01:23:37.680 would be well what would you be if all of you that could be turned on was turned on and the answer
01:23:43.460 would be you would be the resurrection of the ancestral father that's what you would be and so
01:23:48.940 that's why christ says i am the way and the truth and the life and no one comes to the father except through
01:23:54.680 me what that means is that if you take on the unbearable burden of being voluntarily then that transforms
01:24:02.880 you into the ancestral father and that's true and so that's unbelievably optimistic because what it
01:24:09.540 it's so interesting because it's it's dark beyond belief right say well the world is characterized by
01:24:15.400 suffering and by malevolence of a depth that's virtually beyond comprehension but if you choose
01:24:20.560 to comprehend that what you discover in that is the light that destroys the darkness and that's
01:24:27.420 well that's and that's really something to discover it's it's the it's it's the discovery
01:24:34.240 that there isn't a discovery that's more profound than that that's the search for the holy grail or
01:24:39.060 the philosopher's stone all of that it isn't that that isn't that the search and indeed the finding
01:24:44.360 that every human being is is made for um what i want to ask you jordan is about the role of education
01:24:50.880 here so it seems to me that that what the meaning that people are finding in your work that you can
01:24:57.240 listen to in a podcast you can you can you can while you're doing a long run uh uh drive across the
01:25:04.140 prairies or wherever it may be um but it seems to me that that the the deconstruction of our culture
01:25:11.520 by a worldview that has denied the integrity of the individual that has denied the individual's
01:25:18.060 relation to the transcendent to any stable knowing denied the dignity of the individual that that
01:25:26.300 deconstruction it's not for no reason that the the postmodern view calls itself deconstruction that
01:25:32.480 has very deconstructive effects in my view in the world it seems to me that the rebirth of a or the
01:25:38.960 the renaissance of a more adequate to more fully human culture depends on more than it depends on
01:25:46.240 institutional life we need cultural forms we architecture there's all kinds of a fully a full
01:25:51.960 culture as a complex uh uh an infinitely complex structure uh but i think we've we've as it were
01:26:00.300 deleted out the memory banks in so many profound ways and so what i'm what i'd like to ask you about
01:26:06.820 is the we still have the libraries we still have the libraries well thank god for that well thank god
01:26:10.880 for that and that's where i want to turn to education because you say in uh at one point you say
01:26:14.860 that that we need to rescue the treasure trove of the past the treasury rescue the values of the
01:26:20.840 treasure trove of the past and to integrate them and i suppose i'd like to ask you about the role
01:26:25.720 that's what the universities are for is to remind people to to to lead people to doing that i mean
01:26:31.380 we wandered around cambridge today and you showed me king's chapel for example which is so beautiful
01:26:35.660 that it's just beyond belief and like that's a call right that it's a call to a mode of being
01:26:40.700 and it's a socrates believed that all learning was remembering and and it's true in the sense that
01:26:47.240 we just discussed is that through encounter with the tragedy of life and the malevolence of life
01:26:52.540 that that more of you will come to manifest itself but that can be that can be facilitated by your
01:27:00.040 incorporation of the greatness of the past so you say well each great philosopher each great thinker
01:27:05.740 is a fragment of the ultimate ancestral being is a fragment of of god the father let's say
01:27:12.180 and you get a fragment from nietzsche and you get a fragment from plato and you get a fragment from
01:27:17.280 wittgenstein and you get a fragment from shakespeare and and and there's something imagine this there's
01:27:23.320 something that makes all those people great it's whatever greatness is and it's broken up apart
01:27:30.060 it's broken up across all of them but if you if you experience if you're exposed to each of them
01:27:35.940 then you you absorb what's you're you're exposed to and have the possibility to imitate and absorb
01:27:42.560 that greatness across its its fragmentation across many people and then you can that can come to awaken
01:27:50.180 that within you and that is the purpose of the universities and the reason for that it isn't it isn't
01:27:55.460 something casual it's like well it's it's it's good to be more if you go to university and you
01:28:00.980 take a humanities degree you'll come out more well-rounded you know that's that's not the that's
01:28:05.640 not it's such it's such a weak way of putting it it's that no you wake up and realize who you are and
01:28:11.640 then you're ready to take the world on your shoulders yes and that's what the universities are here and
01:28:16.020 that's what students students are dying for that yes that's why men are abandoning the universities is
01:28:21.060 because that call isn't there yes well there's no answer to the call you might say i the the seems
01:28:26.520 to me that the the wave is the longing the longing for that call to be answered and it seems to me
01:28:31.440 that our universities have failed us and not only failed us well exactly they're antithetical to you
01:28:36.620 might call them the the water main that is distributing a worldview that is corrosive of of of of
01:28:42.740 of what is best in the human being well the the the doctrine so one of the fundamental doctrines of the
01:28:49.300 of the collectivist leftists especially on the feminist end of things is the idea that western
01:28:56.140 culture is a patriarchal tyranny and so first of all we could say well that's inappropriate
01:29:01.600 psychologically because the way that you represent culture archetypally is with the tyrant and the
01:29:07.640 wise king and so you can say that there's the tyrant and that's always true but you also have to say
01:29:13.000 that there's the wise king but there's no wise king there's only a tyrant okay and that tyrant is
01:29:18.280 that's all men it's all male and so and so then and so that's a view of history right is that the view
01:29:25.080 of history is that well women have been the primary force of oppression in relationship to women
01:29:31.120 throughout history has been men no idea about the cooperative endeavor of men and women or their
01:29:37.100 mutual desire to lift each other out of misery which is a much more accurate way of representing
01:29:42.000 history in a much more grateful and appropriate way none of that no it's a patriarchal tyranny
01:29:47.360 and men are responsible okay well so where does that leave young men well let's say young men are
01:29:52.920 attempting to manifest competence in the world and to become good people well there's no good and
01:29:59.240 there's no competence there's only power and it's related to the patriarchal tyranny and so
01:30:03.460 that conflation of competence with power which is an absolutely pathological move in my estimation
01:30:09.900 is also the desire to discourage and to devalue and to destroy and partly it's based on fear because
01:30:18.400 the idea would be well a fully fledged man is nothing but a powerful tyrant and therefore dangerous
01:30:24.380 better to emasculate him completely so he's nothing but harmless even though he's useless he can't do
01:30:30.020 anything that's bad which is unbelievably horrifying that's the castrating mother the freudian castrating
01:30:36.280 mother that's the terrible element of of the of the female body politic that's the evil queen that's
01:30:42.540 the counterpart to the evil king something we never talk about so and that's what's facing young men is
01:30:48.620 that at least they're discouraged from from becoming what they could be at least they're not encouraged
01:30:56.060 but it's worse than that they're actively discouraged and so the universities have become
01:31:01.320 they've become institutions of active discouragement and especially for men and so what's the consequence
01:31:08.180 of that well especially in the humanities and social sciences well it's obvious all you have to do is
01:31:13.320 look at the statistics all the men are leaving there won't be a man left in the humanities and social
01:31:18.380 sciences in 15 years at the current rate of of gender transformation of the disciplines and then you see
01:31:24.420 this equally appalling phenomena occurring phenomenon occurring which is that virtually all of the
01:31:31.040 female dominated disciplines are politically correct and i think that the reason for that is that the
01:31:36.940 reasonable women don't know how to regulate the behavior of the unreasonable women the the benevolent
01:31:42.740 queen can't regulate the evil queen and that and that hatred for the patriarchy that's the feminist part of
01:31:51.420 the post-modern neo-marxist monster is is has decided that emasculated and weak men are preferable to
01:31:59.180 tyrants and but and those are the only options because there's no such thing as genuine competence
01:32:03.600 what you want to call young men forward to do is to take their place and say look you have you have to
01:32:08.960 understand it's not just about you is the world will be a lesser place without without that which you
01:32:16.040 could reveal to it because of your particularity and that hole that you leave by the absence of your
01:32:23.680 presence is going to be filled with something terrible not just something neutral but something
01:32:28.420 terrible and that's on you and so you you you have a calling that's that's vital and and people people
01:32:35.840 need that they're dying they die yes yes it seems to me that the ideology that's dominant and very much
01:32:42.060 of the university is not only destructive in all these ways but just boring and that it's patent
01:32:50.320 inadequacy to our deepest human longings male female of of all of all races and kinds that the deep
01:32:58.580 transcendent longings that we all have the the need for self longing for self knowledge that that
01:33:05.180 ideology is it's is is patently inadequate to its satisfaction what i see in young people today many many
01:33:11.880 young people i know you see this in the thousands that you encounter is is they're not interested in
01:33:18.200 fighting some cultural war they simply want to discover the deepest truth of themselves and um so
01:33:25.660 i want to ask you a little bit about about the role of education we talked about the lighting up and the
01:33:30.060 awakening the encounter with depth and truth um you know there's a certain kind of abstract view of
01:33:36.640 education as though it's a kind of inert process you're just sort of downloading into the into the
01:33:42.900 into the mind but in fact the nature of our of our of our of our the nature of our souls is such that
01:33:52.120 it's an it's a dynamic reality you know the room is not just the room it's the place in which you
01:33:58.200 you encounter yourself in the in the in the rule of clean up your room but it seems to me that that's
01:34:02.520 what's going on in in in all education at its best and that it's not enough simply for the library to
01:34:08.480 be there there needs a certain mediation of the institution so for example we could have a there's
01:34:13.320 a piano on the other side of this room you know we could say well there's a piano you're you're free
01:34:17.220 to play the piano but i i can't play the piano i don't know the chords and the scales i haven't
01:34:21.680 and yet if i if i if i did all that then what i can make happen on the piano is infinitely richer than
01:34:32.440 if i've never learned to play the piano and i suppose i suppose when we talk about rescuing
01:34:36.760 the values of the treasure trove that's discipline as the precondition for freedom yes right which is
01:34:41.760 which is a which is actually a nietzschean idea at least in part i mean it's older than that it's
01:34:45.760 the apprenticeship idea it's that it's that before before you can be a painter who can paint what's
01:34:52.340 beyond mere memory you you have to inculcate that discipline skill and a lot of that is painful
01:34:59.360 repetition and hard grinding work it's the sacrifice of the present for the future but once you manage
01:35:06.960 that then things open up and and virtually everything you learn of value is like that's very
01:35:11.880 very very very difficult to learn to write and there's arbitrary arbitrary rules that you have
01:35:17.360 to follow and bind yourself to and while you're learning those rules the probability that you have
01:35:22.380 any creative freedom to speak of or any facility with the rules is very low you're a you're a rank
01:35:28.120 beginner and and even to some degree whatever creativity you have is going to have to be stifled
01:35:34.040 while you're passing through that that keyhole but if you pass through it then something massive
01:35:40.660 opens up on the other side and it is definitely the case that disciplinary institutions universities
01:35:46.720 are exactly that is their places of guidance and and their places to encourage people to develop the
01:35:53.240 discipline that's necessary to see beyond the discipline i mean that's why we have disciplines
01:35:57.580 right i mean the words aren't there by accident you have to narrow yourself first and then you can
01:36:03.660 broaden outward and so that's and that's part of the process of maturation that part of the that's part of
01:36:09.160 the sacrifice of childhood say in childhood you're nothing but potential but it's not realized and
01:36:15.400 you don't know how to realize it and so then the question is well how do you get to a point where
01:36:19.320 you realize the potential and the answer is you sacrifice almost all of it to a single direction
01:36:24.540 this is nietzsche's commentary on the catholic church he's a great admirer of the catholic church
01:36:29.340 despite the fact that he was also a radical critic critic of christianity said the cat see the thing
01:36:36.080 about the catholic church is that it forced everything to be interpreted within a single
01:36:41.840 explanatory framework and that was a discipline and once that discipline was established then
01:36:47.940 the disciplined mind could explode in every direction which is precisely what happened
01:36:52.400 and so and and and that's the thing about growing up is that when you're a teenager and a young adult
01:36:58.380 you have to sacrifice everything you could have been as a child to be the one thing that you're aiming
01:37:04.120 at but then that opens up and and the universities are part and parcel of that process and you need
01:37:09.580 the guidance because the the the library is too large to wander through it unaided yes and that and
01:37:17.600 and i think that comes down to to the to the question of of what you need to what what are the books that
01:37:23.360 can be read to be transformative i mean we you know it's you know the the the otherness that realizes
01:37:29.400 and that awakens and opens up the self that light that turns those lights on is not just a random
01:37:34.000 otherness i mean you can look at a at a brick wall all day and never get anything like what
01:37:38.960 we get by looking at the king's chapel that we just came from a few minutes ago
01:37:43.280 that that that the the levels of pattern and depth and beauty that are present in that building
01:37:49.240 that's a kind of metaphor for what the most wonderful most fecund texts of our own of our own past offer to
01:38:02.840 us you know there they are lying on the shelf but when opened up uh and explored fully they open up in
01:38:10.560 us yeah they are portals so it's a book isn't a book a book isn't paper yes that that's you that's your
01:38:16.460 memory that's your perception of the book it's a portal yes and and and you know one of the ideas
01:38:22.260 the postmodern idea is that well there's no canon and if there is a canon it's only there to support
01:38:27.880 the tyrannical patriarchy because of course the tyrannical patriarchy is the explanation for
01:38:32.000 everything but i've been trying to solve that problem technically with i have a small staff that's
01:38:36.580 trying to produce an educational system online and we've been trying to understand well what is it
01:38:41.620 makes a book canonical there's actually a technical answer to that so you imagine that books exist in
01:38:48.140 relationship to one another that's a perfectly reasonable postmodernist claim by the way books
01:38:52.720 exist in relationship to one another okay well some books have hardly any relationship to other books
01:38:58.040 those are trivial books now they might be undiscovered works of genius that's another possibility if
01:39:03.840 they're recently written but it doesn't matter because you can't separate the wheat from the chaff
01:39:08.100 at present it's too difficult there's too much chaff but if you go back into the past you can rank
01:39:13.960 order books by the degree to which they've influenced other books so it's like citations in some sense
01:39:20.160 and the books that have influenced the largest number of other books are the canonical books
01:39:25.060 and the ultimate canonical book in the west is clearly the biblical corpus because it's influenced
01:39:29.800 virtually everything and so you have to know it because it's implicit in everything else and so you start
01:39:36.380 there and so you have that you have that knowledge at least to some degree and it gives you the
01:39:41.600 foundation the metaphorical foundation the conceptual foundation the mythical foundation that you can
01:39:47.860 use to then well then maybe you can now that now shakespeare opens up to some degree and now milton
01:39:53.080 opens up to some degree and dante opens up to some degree and you think well why should those open up
01:39:57.820 and answer is well as the social constructionist claim you're at least in part a historical creature
01:40:06.060 well then those books are about you they're the the patterns in those books are the patterns of your
01:40:12.820 perceptions and your actions and without understanding them then you don't know who you are and you can't
01:40:18.000 guide yourself properly through life and so you you you come into university and you encounter experts and
01:40:24.540 they say look this is canonical why because it's had a disproportionate influence on everything else
01:40:31.140 so you need there's something here that you need to know about because it's about you and and it isn't
01:40:36.340 about the you that's here now in some sense it's about the you that can unfold across time in the in the
01:40:42.160 best possible way so each of those works is a call to adventure every painting that's a great painting or
01:40:48.220 a building like the king's chapel if that's not a call to adventure i mean what else could it be
01:40:54.000 we were talking about that so these ancient buildings these great ancient buildings that
01:40:58.760 europe is littered with these were people would were aiming at something beyond themselves beyond the
01:41:05.480 span of their lifetime they they engaged in the collective manifestation of these great works to
01:41:10.980 aim to to to participate in aiming something that at something that was beyond them it was a divine aim
01:41:17.660 they had that that will to produce this beauty that transcended centuries you know and maybe the will
01:41:24.440 that produces beauty is always aligned with that which transcends centuries maybe those are the same
01:41:29.340 things and even paintings oil paintings you know they they take a moment in time and they cast it into a
01:41:36.360 permanent form that can be that can be preserved across centuries and so there's something about
01:41:41.360 there's something about the establishing a relationship with eternity that's key to the construction of
01:41:47.800 something that's beautiful and then that in itself becomes a call to a relationship within with eternity
01:41:52.700 so and you need that people hunger for it i'm at the university of toronto there's the the there's
01:41:59.400 the european cathedral side of the campus the older part and then there's the modern factory side of the
01:42:06.060 campus and it's soul deadening my building is made out of cinder blocks you know and my my brother-in-law
01:42:12.800 who's his own sort of genius calls that hosable architecture anything could happen there and you
01:42:18.340 could wash it away it's like and it's just it's it's it's i have my students now and then sit in the
01:42:24.380 classroom like that and look at it and tell me how it makes them feel random wires hanging from the
01:42:30.120 ceiling you know nothing but cinder block the cheapest form of construction nothing that's beautiful
01:42:35.300 pure boring dull utilitarianism with these bare shiny desks and terrible fluorescent lighting it's like
01:42:42.940 it's ugly right to the core and it and it's it's corrosive it eats away at the heart of the
01:42:47.940 university which is about the beauty that's eternal and and that isn't optional it's not impractical
01:42:55.200 it's it's the most practical it's it's it's that upon which the idea of practicality itself is
01:43:02.040 predicated and that's the university and people should be flocking to the universities dying to
01:43:08.280 be educated because they are dying to be educated i have dozens of young men who come to me all the time
01:43:14.800 after my talks and say look they give me a note one did last night here's the note six weeks six
01:43:22.800 months ago i was deeply suicidal i had no reason to live i was completely nihilistic so i started watching
01:43:27.780 your lectures i started to adopt a more responsible outlook i realized that that was important i started
01:43:34.260 to try to tell the truth and to put myself together and without that i wouldn't be here and that's a
01:43:39.860 little note and that happens over and over you know and then i go talk to journalists and this happened
01:43:46.140 in scandinavia it happened with this gq interview i just did well your message is primarily directed
01:43:51.360 towards young men it's like and there's this judgment about that it's like oh there's a problem with
01:43:56.680 that is there i mean that wasn't the point but that is the audience is what there's something
01:44:01.880 there's something wrong with talking to young men and encouraging them it's like that makes me somehow
01:44:07.420 somehow suspicious the hatred of humanity that is present in that critique is mind-blowing it is it's
01:44:14.920 it's absolutely beyond belief and you think well it's only misogyny it's like no it's not it's like
01:44:19.980 what who are you leaving for the women to have as partners these demolished and weak well it's a zero-sum
01:44:26.520 quality of it i mean as if as if as if lifting up any human being is not a good for all of us i mean
01:44:32.520 that's the whole point about the the necessity of our care for the oppressed is because they are part
01:44:38.280 of us no you only care about them in groups the individual oppressed person is irrelevant it's the
01:44:44.200 group of oppressed people that's relevant and so if you just help one person oh well you see then
01:44:49.000 then that's in that's that that that that flies at the heart of the collectivist doctrine you said
01:44:54.500 very very powerful when you talked about people should be flocking to the universities you're an
01:44:59.220 image that comes to my mind is the image of a fountain and your people come to the fountain to
01:45:03.540 drink to slake their thirst and and and and it seems to me that we need we need new institutions of
01:45:10.100 higher education that's the fountain of living water yes yes that's why moses that's why moses is a
01:45:15.460 master of water in the desert yes so he's not a master of stone yes yes yes yes and one thing that really
01:45:20.900 excites me jordan is that is that what we see right now in is is this longing so many thirsty people
01:45:26.820 it seems to me we simply need to to build new fountains because you know as you say the books
01:45:32.180 are in the library we can we can we can give a rebirth to the past in the form of the hunger and
01:45:38.900 thirst that are in young people simply by feeding it and that it seems to me that that there's a kind of
01:45:44.660 cultural passivity particularly when it comes to the university people say oh well you know you could
01:45:49.460 never do anything about that well you know the universe they're just well you just have to kind
01:45:53.700 of write them off well why do we have to do that why can't we start new ones people there have been
01:45:58.420 thousands of universities started over over the years come into the university and they've got this
01:46:03.060 facade of cynicism you know that partly because they haven't had great experiences with the educational
01:46:08.420 system and it's no wonder and partly because all the way back to the to the beginning yes i mean you've
01:46:13.140 talked about this in your book the university that's to interrupt that the the what what moves in in
01:46:19.140 the whole k-12 educational system in a certain sense was founded in large part to bring about
01:46:25.620 that collectivist control and to to stultify and to annihilate the the the freedom of the individual
01:46:32.980 and so that's that's pretty well ingrained by the time someone comes to university and no wonder they
01:46:38.180 don't like they don't think they like educational institutions yes well but but they're still desperate
01:46:42.260 enough to come and they might say well i'm doing this practically because i need a degree to get a job which
01:46:46.740 is you know as perfectly reasonable it's perfectly reasonable as a as a fragmentary ambition it's
01:46:52.180 it's a good fragmentary ambition but their their their their core is dying for something deeper than
01:47:00.100 that and they're coming they're coming to university the way that you enter a cathedral properly if you
01:47:07.060 enter it properly they come prayerfully they're hoping but they won't talk to anyone about it they're hoping
01:47:12.740 god i hope that what i need is here and if you provide that then they're just overwhelmed by it
01:47:21.460 and and then they're motivated to to work and to move and to put themselves together because it doesn't
01:47:26.820 take much water on to really transform a parched surface and these young people they have their cynical
01:47:33.700 facade and it's easy to be intimidated by that because they're they're judgmental in their lectures and in
01:47:38.900 your lectures and maybe they're not paying attention and they're snapping gum and they're playing with
01:47:42.500 their computers but there there is part of them that's at the back listening and hoping that something
01:47:48.500 will emerge that will captivate them and when that happens then well then well then that's when it
01:47:53.780 becomes something absolutely remarkable to be an educator because then you're providing guidance and
01:48:00.260 you're providing the guidance that that's that's well that's that's that's the bread that's more than mere
01:48:06.100 material bread and then the students are extremely extraordinarily rewarding to work with because
01:48:10.900 they're so it's not pleased it's way more than pleased they're so engaged by what's happening that
01:48:16.820 the whole thing comes alive that's that's when it's a great thing to be an educator and what it's been
01:48:23.060 great for me to go on this lecture tour because which is why i keep doing it is because every evening
01:48:29.060 it's like that i get 2500 people in an auditorium and i start talking about the things we've been talking
01:48:34.660 about everybody's dead silent and they're locked onto it and it's it's an unbelievably gratifying
01:48:40.740 process and then people come up and say you know oh this has been so useful to me things were so
01:48:46.580 terrible and falling apart in so many ways and like all of a sudden i'm just stacking these things up
01:48:51.380 and putting them together it's so interesting watching the young men who come and talk to me and
01:48:56.740 it's it's young women as well well not always just so young uh many of the women come and say thank you
01:49:02.420 very much for what you've done for my sons for example but the men come up and they say it's
01:49:06.980 like they're telling me a secret you know and it's the sort of secret that you'd only tell an intimate
01:49:11.380 friend that you trusted it's like you know man i i wasn't doing so well and these are often rough
01:49:16.100 looking guys you know um they say look i've been really trying to get my act together you know i've been
01:49:22.100 working it out with my wife and i've been i've been trying to get my relationship with my son
01:49:26.500 straightened out and and here's my father by the way he came along with me and we're getting along just
01:49:30.420 fine and it's really working and they say it in a hushed voice you know and and they say thank you
01:49:35.700 very much and i say great that's so great i'm so thrilled to hear that and they they're telling me
01:49:41.220 that because they're hoping that i would in fact be thrilled to hear that because they want to tell
01:49:46.100 it to someone who would be thrilled to hear it and i am thrilled to hear it because i do believe that
01:49:52.420 the that redemption is something that is accomplished at the level of the individual and
01:49:57.860 every time you hear someone say um that they've that they're they've oriented themselves properly
01:50:05.220 it's like a bell rings in heaven it's exactly that and so well so well so that's absolutely and
01:50:14.100 chronically overwhelming but it's it's absolutely remarkable to see this to see how much desperation
01:50:20.820 there is for this when i talk to audiences about the relationship between responsibility and meaning
01:50:26.100 they inevitably go dead silent there's not a there's not a rustle there's not a cough it's like
01:50:32.180 is that the secret is that the secret is that it's the voluntary adoption of responsibility it's like well
01:50:37.780 that's the that's the central message of the west it's like to pick up your cross and bear it
01:50:43.540 you know and everyone's been told that but they don't know what it means
01:50:47.060 because it's not been articulated enough so that it becomes something that's practical it's like
01:50:51.220 yes look at the terrible responsibilities you have right in front of you your family is hurting
01:50:57.300 you're in trouble there's problems in the world it's like all of that's right there and all you have
01:51:02.740 to do is all you have to do is take responsibility for it and then you've got what you need all of a
01:51:09.460 sudden you think oh that's what i needed i didn't know that i thought that was something to avoid
01:51:13.860 it's an impediment to short-term hedonistic pleasure you know and to happiness there's nothing
01:51:18.980 happiness about happy about lifting the suffering of the world onto your shoulders it's like this is
01:51:24.100 way way better than happiness isn't what you feel in the king's chapel it's something so magnificent that
01:51:32.500 happiness pales in comparison and so it's it's it's thin gruel happiness and young people know that
01:51:40.260 they're pursuing hedonistic pleasure and you know no wonder but there's nothing in it that's
01:51:45.220 sustaining and all it does is make you cynical it's like is that's all there is another one night stand
01:51:51.140 another another binge party you know and it's not like i have anything against in principle against
01:51:57.620 some of that exuberant youthful hedonism that but but it's it's not if look the universities have
01:52:07.620 turned into places of parties why well because that's what the students find best to do there
01:52:14.100 well that's not good what you want to offer them is a reason to not party it's like no you gotta
01:52:20.180 understand you come to this class hungover you're not going to be able to get it you're not going to
01:52:25.060 be able to write properly you're going to pay a price for that hedonism it's like and the price will
01:52:29.940 be too high for you to bear it's like oh well enough hedonism for me then like i've got something
01:52:34.500 important to do that's the way out of that but that that thing that's more important has to be
01:52:39.780 offered and it can be offered so when i've seen it happen over and over to people and it's it's
01:52:44.660 it's extraordinarily good for them if you're an addict and i've talked to many people who are
01:52:49.140 addicted you need a reason to stop being addicted which means you need something better than the drug
01:52:57.140 well that's what you offer at universities it's something better it's something better than everything
01:53:01.700 else and if you're not offering that then it's it's all a facade it's all a factory a knowledge
01:53:07.460 factory which is the modern university factory knowledge factory products seems to me and we'll
01:53:15.300 conclude here i think momentarily it seems to me that that the time is ripe for a radical and beautiful
01:53:22.660 rebirth of a more fully human culture and when i hear you speak jordan about your lectures and
01:53:28.820 you know what what what moves me deeply is is the the love that you have for the people who come to
01:53:38.420 you and i suppose i want to just conclude on a question uh about i want to conclude on an optimistic note by
01:53:50.500 by drawing out what's in that love it's that the potential that is that lies in those in each and every
01:53:58.100 individual for deep transformation for connection to the transcendent and and and and and and and
01:54:05.460 and just to talk about that that longing that seems to me that that that longing is overwhelming
01:54:12.260 and if only we can start to can refill the fountains with water or build new fountains that
01:54:19.140 the possibilities are beyond our our imagining right for the point yes the point we're at at the moment
01:54:28.180 that's what partly why this is an inflection point too because so many things are transforming
01:54:33.220 the landscape of possibility is opening up to us in a way that it it never has partly because of our
01:54:39.060 technological transformations and so the importance of the particularities of our ethical choices are becoming
01:54:45.940 more and more exaggerated because while we're going to build artificial intelligence and it's going
01:54:52.660 to be a reflection of us and so we better make sure that it reflects the part of us that we want
01:54:57.300 reflected and you talked about that care for people as the care for me is predicated on my realization
01:55:03.700 that i prefer heaven to hell having done what i could to explore hell let's say in my academic career
01:55:09.700 and in my private life and in my and in my clinical practice and to see what's there that unnecessary
01:55:15.540 suffering and that malevolence is like well it would be best to move away from that towards something
01:55:21.300 better that's something i genuinely believe that it's it's it's for the best for everything that we
01:55:27.460 aim up and then when i see someone decide to aim up i think well that's that's something that's one more
01:55:33.060 step away from hell it's not just the it's not just the climbing up the hill painfully towards the city
01:55:39.780 of god it's move away from the abyss and i think it's easier for people to believe in the abyss it was
01:55:45.060 for me to believe in the existence of malevolence and apocalypse and catastrophe i mean all you have
01:55:50.020 to do is study history to believe that think well not that anything but that away from that well away
01:55:57.060 from that is amorphous right it's again it's like moses leading his people from from the tyranny in egypt
01:56:02.420 it's like well where are we going well away from that well that's into the desert and that's where
01:56:10.420 we are now well that's not so good but at least it's away from that well that's something but
01:56:15.620 then there's something beyond that it's like well what is it that we're striving towards and
01:56:19.540 and well we we can each imagine that in our own way in some sense but i would say well you start locally
01:56:24.980 it's like fix up what you can fix up when you see a problem that announces itself to you a small
01:56:30.420 problem that's your problem that you could fix that's your one step forward take it yes it seems
01:56:37.060 to me in addition to that that life of the individual we we need to think very broadly about
01:56:42.180 the institutional life that supports all of that individual uh realization and freedom we need to
01:56:49.940 think about universities when you think about our architecture we need to think about that is to say
01:56:54.580 that that that the the whole horizon that lies before us needs to be considered for the fullness of
01:57:03.220 possibility that that it holds and that those possibilities are not realizable simply by you know
01:57:12.020 this individual doing this and that individual doing that but that they also require a kind of um
01:57:17.780 um it requires that we think about the whole and that we allow to give birth we allow to come into
01:57:25.860 being the kinds of institutional lives institutional life that um upon which our realization depends upon
01:57:36.100 which that awakening depends and so it simply can't be a simply a matter of of our living our lives in a
01:57:41.700 kind of solitary way no i was thinking about you know what we we what you know to think about what
01:57:47.460 are the fountains on which you know if we're in the desert it seems to me that that okay so we're in
01:57:53.620 the desert it's a it's a it's a lonely and dry place but there we're the narrative fragments we're
01:58:00.420 the narrative sure that's all the deities that the the israelites come to worship the false idols
01:58:05.140 because the narrative fragments and that is the precisely the moment paradoxically at which
01:58:11.140 we can rediscover ourselves what our what our nature what our longing is for and so it seems
01:58:16.260 to me that we're at a time of astonishing possibility but that we must take it up well
01:58:23.540 hopefully you know when you train graduate students and you train undergraduates you know
01:58:27.140 you orient them towards the truth and then they learn to teach in accordance with that and that
01:58:32.900 and that facilitates the process that we're describing and that they regard the relationship
01:58:37.540 with individual students as of paramount importance and see the teaching as something that's noble
01:58:42.260 and the research as well yes yes the awakening of each particular individual say in an educational
01:58:46.900 institution is precisely what allows them to go on in in ten thousand ways in ten hundred thousand
01:58:53.220 ways throughout their lives to to to transmit and open up those transcendent possibilities
01:59:00.340 communities thank you jordan very much my pleasure
01:59:13.700 you
01:59:30.340 you