The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast - February 02, 2020


Playing the Hierarchical Game - Part one


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 8 minutes

Words per Minute

169.21617

Word Count

11,593

Sentence Count

237

Misogynist Sentences

3

Hate Speech Sentences

15


Summary

In this episode, Dr. Jordan B. Peterson delivers a lecture called Playing the Hierarchical Game, Part 1, recorded in Melbourne, Australia on February 13, 2019. Dr. Peterson talks about his new series, 12 Rules for Life: A Guide to a Better Life, which focuses on mental health and wellness. In this lecture, he discusses the benefits of social media, the role of the Internet in society, and the importance of having a healthy relationship with your mental health, as well as the role that the Internet has played in shaping the way that we think about mental health in the 21st century, and why we should all be grateful that we have access to the information we need to make informed decisions about our mental health. He also discusses the value of the social media revolution, and how it can be used to improve the lives of millions of people around the world, including those struggling with anxiety, depression, and post-depression. Let this be the first step towards the brighter future you deserve. Enjoy the podcast, and don't forget to subscribe to Daily Wire Plus to get immediate access to new episodes of the podcast. Subscribe, rate and review on Apple Podcasts, and subscribe on your favorite streaming platform so you don't miss the next episode! Subscribe on iTunes, and share the podcast on your social media platforms so you can be notified when new episodes are available! Subscribe to Dailywire Plus to stay up to date with the latest episodes! Learn more about your ad choices and become a supporter of The Jordan Peterson Podcast! Connect with Jordan Peterson on social media! Subscribe to The Jordan B Peterson Podcasts! Subscribe on Anchor.fm/The Jordan Peterson is a podcast that helps you get exclusive ad-free versions of his newest episodes and more! Click here to receive exclusive shoutouts and shoutouts from Dr. BONUS episodes, plus other perks! Subscribe and shout outs throughout the week, including tips on how to be featured on his new podcast, social media tips, tips, interviews, and more on his upcoming books, and so much more. , and more. Subscribe to his new episodes, subscribe to his newest podcast, The Jordan's new book, Playing The Hierarchy Game Podcasts The Secret Life Lesson, The Dark Side of the Mind, The Other Side of My Life, The Real Life Story, wherever he writes about it's Best of It All? .


Transcript

00:00:00.960 Hey everyone, real quick before you skip, I want to talk to you about something serious and important.
00:00:06.480 Dr. Jordan Peterson has created a new series that could be a lifeline for those battling depression and anxiety.
00:00:12.740 We know how isolating and overwhelming these conditions can be, and we wanted to take a moment to reach out to those listening who may be struggling.
00:00:20.100 With decades of experience helping patients, Dr. Peterson offers a unique understanding of why you might be feeling this way in his new series.
00:00:27.420 He provides a roadmap towards healing, showing that while the journey isn't easy, it's absolutely possible to find your way forward.
00:00:35.360 If you're suffering, please know you are not alone. There's hope, and there's a path to feeling better.
00:00:41.780 Go to Daily Wire Plus now and start watching Dr. Jordan B. Peterson on depression and anxiety.
00:00:47.460 Let this be the first step towards the brighter future you deserve.
00:00:51.040 Welcome to the Jordan B. Peterson podcast.
00:00:59.240 I'm Michaela Peterson, Dad's daughter and collaborator.
00:01:02.260 Today's episode is a 12 Rules for Life lecture called Playing the Hierarchical Game, Part 1, recorded in Melbourne, Australia on February 13th, 2019.
00:01:12.540 Enjoy the podcast.
00:01:18.140 Playing the Hierarchical Game, Part 1.
00:01:20.400 A Jordan B. Peterson 12 Rules for Life lecture.
00:01:41.160 Man, that's a lot of Australians.
00:01:43.020 Well, thank you very much for coming out.
00:01:49.560 It's really quite something to see all of you here.
00:01:52.580 As Dave said, this is the largest venue that we've spoken at.
00:01:57.860 I had a couple of debates with Sam Harris, one in Dublin and one in London, that were in larger venues.
00:02:07.140 But as far as speaking specifically about 12 Rules, this is, oh, damn near twice as big as the next biggest auditorium.
00:02:18.700 I think we were at the Apollo in London and it held 30, it held 3,000 people.
00:02:25.520 And so that was good.
00:02:26.280 But this is, this is really something.
00:02:30.880 There must be quite a dearth of things to do in Melbourne tonight.
00:02:34.640 No, seriously, though, it's remarkable to see all of you come out to engage in what I believe to be fundamentally a serious conversation about psychological and philosophical and perhaps certainly ethical, perhaps even religious issues.
00:02:56.240 And, you know, who would have ever guessed that there was a mass market for that, you know?
00:03:01.160 So, and apparently there is.
00:03:04.060 And maybe we're smarter than we think we are.
00:03:06.660 And I have a suspicion that that might be the case.
00:03:10.140 One of the things that I've noticed about the intellectual dark web types, you know, that's a name that Eric Weinstein, you might be familiar with him, came up with.
00:03:19.260 And it wasn't like we all got together and built a little fort out in our backyard and, you know, called it the intellectual dark web.
00:03:27.380 He just happened to coin the term.
00:03:29.520 And a number of people were included for one reason or another.
00:03:33.840 And I've spent a fair bit of time trying to understand why that coinage stuck and what it might be that united this very strangely diverse range of people.
00:03:46.220 And I think it's really three things.
00:03:48.140 One is that each of them, from Joe Rogan to Shapiro, the same with Sam Harris, are all people, and Dave, are all people who have their independent media platforms, right?
00:04:04.480 They're not part of a corporate structure.
00:04:07.820 They're not beholden to anyone.
00:04:09.680 They're financially independent.
00:04:12.320 And they've built that themselves.
00:04:14.740 And so they can say what they want.
00:04:16.960 And so that's kind of cool to see that happening, to see the technology that enables online video, which is really a complex form of broadcasting,
00:04:29.180 and also online podcasts, which is a complex form of radio, enable that sort of independent journalism.
00:04:38.100 And to see people able to, not precisely exploit that, but make use of it, that's a very good thing.
00:04:46.440 And I'm thinking that that might be a real positive outcome of the social media revolution.
00:04:53.900 I mean, there's lots of downsides.
00:04:55.340 I think Twitter is a downside.
00:04:56.680 It's a pretty rough platform.
00:04:59.900 And the commentary on social media platforms can be pretty brutal.
00:05:04.200 We really haven't figured out how to regulate it well yet, so that it's civilized.
00:05:08.260 Not so that it's censored, right?
00:05:10.260 Because that's a mistake.
00:05:11.540 Censored and civilized aren't the same thing.
00:05:14.220 Properly regulated is civilized.
00:05:16.120 And we don't know how to do that.
00:05:17.160 But YouTube and podcasts have opened up a huge market for intellectual material in a manner that's never really happened before.
00:05:26.440 And you're also seeing this happen with audiobooks.
00:05:29.780 You know, the audiobook market has absolutely exploded in the last five years.
00:05:33.840 About a third of books sold now are audiobooks.
00:05:36.160 And so, and that seems to be because people, having become accustomed to podcasts, are downloading audiobooks and listening to them in their cars or when they're exercising or when they're doing housework or, you know.
00:05:50.000 And it's one of the advantages of this new media type is that you have it on demand and you can play it at your leisure or when you're working, for that matter.
00:05:59.020 And so, you know, I have all sorts of working class guys come up and talk to me after the show.
00:06:04.300 Long haul truck drivers and those sorts of people who have a lot of time, you know.
00:06:09.060 Obviously, they're concentrating on what they're doing, but they have spare time to listen.
00:06:13.180 And they're listening to, you know, three-hour Joe Rogan podcasts on all sorts of abstract subjects and my lectures as well.
00:06:21.300 And it's really something to see that happening.
00:06:23.360 And so, that's one element of the intellectual dark web that's interesting and tied in with the new media revolution.
00:06:32.000 Because it really is a revolution to have video on demand like that and to have it so easy to produce and to have it permanent and to have it distributed everywhere in the world
00:06:41.520 and to have it subtitled in all sorts of different languages and to have it essentially free of charge and able to be produced in a day or two.
00:06:50.680 I mean, it's, and then it's permanent like a book.
00:06:53.640 It's really something new.
00:06:55.740 And then the same with the audio version.
00:06:58.840 And I do believe it may be the case that more people can, like a lot of people are intimidated by books for all sorts of reasons.
00:07:07.720 I mean, highly literate reading is a relatively rare skill.
00:07:13.260 Like, it's not overwhelmingly rare, but it's relatively rare.
00:07:17.220 But listening, man, people can listen, you know.
00:07:21.120 And so, all of a sudden, this complicated information is available to people who can listen.
00:07:26.820 And maybe that's ten times as many people who are likely to read.
00:07:29.820 Or maybe it's fifty times as many people who are likely to read.
00:07:32.960 So, God only knows what the consequence of that is going to be.
00:07:36.100 That could be a real education revolution.
00:07:38.260 And hopefully we'll be smart enough to take advantage of that carefully over the next ten years and find out if that is the case.
00:07:45.660 I'm optimistic about it because one of the things that really is cool about the internet is that, you know, if you want to learn something,
00:07:53.060 you can pretty much type in your question, whatever it is, and somebody will have put up a YouTube video that tells you how to do it.
00:08:01.340 And, you know, you might have to sort through two or three of them before you find someone who's done a very high-level job of the explanation.
00:08:11.880 But they've done it, and often, you know, they run an ad maybe and monetize it a little bit.
00:08:17.160 But mostly, I would say it's an altruistic gesture.
00:08:20.480 And so, that's really something.
00:08:22.060 And the other thing the intellectual dark web people have in common is that, well, they're opinionated and fairly tough-minded.
00:08:33.600 But, more importantly, they don't think their audience is stupid.
00:08:39.740 And that's really something.
00:08:41.400 And I think they're right.
00:08:43.240 I'm not going to assume instantaneously that that's a consequence of something particularly moral about the people who make up that group.
00:08:54.980 I think it is a testament to their faith in the essential nature, in the essential quality of human nature.
00:09:03.340 But I also do think it's a reflection of the medium itself.
00:09:06.620 Because it's funny, when I step into a television studio now, like a classic television studio, which happens from time to time,
00:09:13.760 and which is apparently going to happen with Australia's Q&A on the 25th, which should be quite interesting.
00:09:25.340 Going online without ExpressVPN is like not paying attention to the safety demonstration on a flight.
00:09:30.820 Most of the time, you'll probably be fine.
00:09:32.760 But what if one day, that weird yellow mask drops down from overhead, and you have no idea what to do?
00:09:38.660 In our hyper-connected world, your digital privacy isn't just a luxury.
00:09:42.460 It's a fundamental right.
00:09:43.760 Every time you connect to an unsecured network in a cafe, hotel, or airport,
00:09:48.040 you're essentially broadcasting your personal information to anyone with a technical know-how to intercept it.
00:09:53.100 And let's be clear, it doesn't take a genius hacker to do this.
00:09:55.980 With some off-the-shelf hardware, even a tech-savvy teenager could potentially access your passwords, bank logins, and credit card details.
00:10:03.740 Now, you might think, what's the big deal?
00:10:05.800 Who'd want my data anyway?
00:10:07.360 Well, on the dark web, your personal information could fetch up to $1,000.
00:10:11.960 That's right, there's a whole underground economy built on stolen identities.
00:10:16.000 Enter ExpressVPN.
00:10:17.780 It's like a digital fortress, creating an encrypted tunnel between your device and the internet.
00:10:22.040 Their encryption is so robust that it would take a hacker with a supercomputer over a billion years to crack it.
00:10:28.120 But don't let its power fool you.
00:10:29.920 ExpressVPN is incredibly user-friendly.
00:10:32.300 With just one click, you're protected across all your devices.
00:10:35.300 Phones, laptops, tablets, you name it.
00:10:37.480 That's why I use ExpressVPN whenever I'm traveling or working from a coffee shop.
00:10:41.620 It gives me peace of mind knowing that my research, communications, and personal data are shielded from prying eyes.
00:10:47.340 Secure your online data today by visiting expressvpn.com slash jordan.
00:10:52.340 That's E-X-P-R-E-S-S-V-P-N dot com slash jordan, and you can get an extra three months free.
00:10:58.680 ExpressVPN dot com slash jordan.
00:11:04.380 Starting a business can be tough, but thanks to Shopify, running your online storefront is easier than ever.
00:11:10.420 Shopify is the global commerce platform that helps you sell at every stage of your business.
00:11:14.540 From the launch your online shop stage, all the way to the did we just hit a million orders stage, Shopify is here to help you grow.
00:11:21.280 Our marketing team uses Shopify every day to sell our merchandise, and we love how easy it is to add more items, ship products, and track conversions.
00:11:29.620 With Shopify, customize your online store to your style with flexible templates and powerful tools, alongside an endless list of integrations and third-party apps like on-demand printing, accounting, and chatbots.
00:11:40.820 Shopify helps you turn browsers into buyers with the internet's best converting checkout, up to 36% better compared to other leading e-commerce platforms.
00:11:49.640 No matter how big you want to grow, Shopify gives you everything you need to take control and take your business to the next level.
00:11:56.060 Sign up for a $1 per month trial period at shopify.com slash jbp, all lowercase.
00:12:01.580 Go to shopify.com slash jbp now to grow your business, no matter what stage you're in.
00:12:07.360 That's shopify.com slash jbp.
00:12:09.760 Yeah, strangely enough, I'm actually looking forward to that, because I've been feeling a lot better recently, and so it'd be actually nice to have a conversation with a journalist when I wasn't feeling half dead, and to see how that goes.
00:12:26.300 So, it'd be nice to have a conversation at one point when I was at the top of my game, and so I don't know if I'm at the top of my game right now, but I am definitely feeling a lot better than I have for a long time.
00:12:38.080 So, yeah, yeah, I'm really, thank God for that, man.
00:12:43.000 It's, hopefully that will be reflected in some reasonable quality of discourse tonight, and perhaps a tiny bit of wit, but we'll see how that goes.
00:12:51.940 So, when I step into an old school television studio, it feels like 1975 in some sense, you know, the person I'm talking to isn't really there.
00:13:09.640 They're really a speaking device for the corporation, and they have to be, because the corporation, which is running high bandwidth, you know, high experience,
00:13:21.940 low bandwidth television, where every minute or every second is extraordinarily expensive, they can't really take risks, they can't have free-flowing conversations on the off chance that something goes dreadfully wrong, and it might, right?
00:13:37.140 And, and so everything is scripted, and then, you know, you have 30 seconds to make your point, and, like, there's just some things you can't say in 30 seconds, you know?
00:13:46.360 You have to, you have to compress them down to the point where they actually, they're actually foolish.
00:13:52.640 It's actually foolish to try to do it, but, you know, what else do you have?
00:13:56.780 Whereas with these long-form conversations, man, you can actually have a discussion about something, and you can, you can try to get to the bottom of it.
00:14:03.840 And so that's, that's pretty cool, and then, and then it turns out that people will actually follow along.
00:14:09.520 Like, I was actually absolutely stunned by, I had four debates with Sam Harris earlier this year, two in Vancouver, and one in Dublin, and one in London.
00:14:19.240 And, and, and each of them lasted about three hours, and we were going to do a Q&A for each of them, but as it turned out, while we were talking, we got into the conversation, and then we asked the audience to vote by clapping whether we should continue the conversation or move to the Q&A.
00:14:35.560 And it was overwhelming majority of people wanted the conversation to continue, and so basically, what happened was something approximating a 12 to 15 hour continuous conversation about the relationship between facts and values or science and religion, you know?
00:14:53.980 And that's a fairly solid philosophical discussion, and that isn't necessarily the case that Sam and I are the two people in the world who would be most qualified to undertake such a discussion.
00:15:04.440 But, you know, we did our best, and it was a pretty high-level conversation.
00:15:09.240 I mean, for me, it was approximately the level, I think, that would characterize a pretty decent PhD dissertation defense, and that's fairly high-level intellectual conversation, and the audience was just with us the entire time.
00:15:24.080 And so, that's cool, man, you know?
00:15:26.100 It could easily be that our relatively primitive initial mass communication technologies, like television, made us look a lot stupider, even to ourselves, than we actually were, because everything had to be compressed to a very short period of time.
00:15:45.780 Everything had to be scripted, so it couldn't be spontaneous discussion.
00:15:49.160 You couldn't assume that your audience knew anything, because maybe it was the first time they watched the show.
00:15:55.600 You couldn't assume that they remembered anything, because you didn't know, like, if it was a series, whether they had participated in the entire series.
00:16:02.860 You had to aim at the lowest common denominator, and you couldn't assume much of an attention span.
00:16:08.760 But it turns out that people have an incredible attention span.
00:16:12.420 You know, like, I was just re-watching Breaking Bad, and I don't know how many hours Breaking Bad is.
00:16:17.140 It's like, what, there's six seasons?
00:16:20.040 It must be 60 hours, I think, something like that.
00:16:23.080 And it's, so really, it's a continuous 60-hour movie.
00:16:27.680 And that's a long movie, and it's really engrossing.
00:16:30.900 And there's all sorts of other shows that are perhaps of equal complexity.
00:16:35.020 And man, people have no problem with them at all, right?
00:16:37.760 They just eat them up.
00:16:39.000 So it turns out that, well, it turns out maybe we're not so stupid.
00:16:42.820 And so that'd be nice if we weren't so stupid.
00:16:46.700 And I'm kind of tired of everyone assuming that we are, just like I'm tired of everyone assuming that we're some sort of cancer on the planet, you know?
00:16:55.540 I don't like that attitude about human beings.
00:16:59.600 I think it's, I think there's something deeply, deeply wrong about it.
00:17:03.520 So, you know, this is something, something that's just kind of an interesting historical tidbit.
00:17:10.800 Back in the late 1800s, there was a biologist named Thomas Huxley, and he was the famous novelist.
00:17:17.600 Eldest Huxley's, I think, great-grandfather, perhaps grandfather, and very intelligent man,
00:17:23.320 and a very, very gifted family.
00:17:27.840 And Huxley was a great defender of Darwin, by the way, too.
00:17:31.180 And he was commissioned by the English government to do a study of oceanic resources.
00:17:38.520 This was back in the 1890s.
00:17:41.000 And because the English at that point were concerned to some degree that, you know,
00:17:47.160 maybe it would be possible that we would overfish and cause trouble because of that.
00:17:53.600 And Huxley did an exhaustive study, and he concluded that there were so, there's so much ocean,
00:18:01.560 and there's so much resource in the ocean that there wasn't a possibility that human beings with their rather puny technologies
00:18:09.260 could ever do anything but put a small dent in the absolute overwhelming plenitude of the, of the, of, of, of,
00:18:17.160 the, of the, of the water that covers more than half the planet.
00:18:22.020 And so that's only 130 years ago, thereabouts.
00:18:26.560 That's, that's not that long.
00:18:27.920 You know, that's two relatively old men ago.
00:18:31.060 It's not that long.
00:18:32.940 And, you know, yeah, put them back to back, sort of.
00:18:37.380 And so that's yesterday, in some sense.
00:18:40.060 And it really wasn't at all until the 1960s that we had some sense that we had developed technologically
00:18:46.160 to the point where some of what we could do mechanically might start to have planetary repercussions.
00:18:55.940 Say with, you know, we, we saw that with air quality in cities, for example, and, and the denuding of, of, of, of the countryside.
00:19:03.140 And, and then perhaps the overfishing in relationship to the oceans, which started to happen after World War II.
00:19:09.120 But nobody had any sense, really, until 1960 that, well, maybe we had to take care of things a little bit better than we were.
00:19:17.480 Because there was more of us.
00:19:20.440 We were starting to become a force that was, to some degree, a match for nature.
00:19:25.880 You know, and, and bloody well, thank God for that, you know, because nature was more than a match for us for a very long period of time, right?
00:19:33.940 Our, our, our species has come up through, through, through, through epochs, eons of absolute brutal, um, privation and difficulty and, and starvation and, and freezing temperatures
00:19:50.040 and, and burning in the desert sun and lack of water and lack of, of hygienic facilities and, like, just hand to mouth suffering.
00:20:02.720 And, you know, we've managed to organize ourselves to the point where that's still the lot of a substantial number of people on the planet,
00:20:12.520 but that's decreasing very rapidly.
00:20:15.020 You know, the UN now projects that by the year 2030, abject poverty, which is defined as living on less than a dollar a 90, dollar 90 a day in, in today's US money, will be eradicated.
00:20:28.620 There won't be anybody in the world that poor, and the cynics say, well, that's a pretty damn low, uh, um, barrier, let's say, but if you double it,
00:20:38.940 you also see that's decreasing very rapidly, and if you triple it, you see that's decreasing very rapidly, and you've got to draw the bloody line somewhere,
00:20:46.480 you know, and abject poverty is abject poverty, and the fact that it's decreased by 50% in the last 12 years, from 2000 to the year 2012,
00:20:56.880 we decreased the absolute level of abject poverty in the world by 50%, right?
00:21:02.160 It was the fastest economic, it was the most spectacular economic miracle in the history of humankind.
00:21:08.960 And, you know, you hardly ever hear about it, hardly anyone knows about it, it's like, it's, it's a bloody miracle,
00:21:15.160 there's more middle class people in the world now than non-middle class people,
00:21:19.320 and there are way more obese people than there are starving people.
00:21:23.640 And so, that's something to celebrate, you know, I mean, it's a funny thing to celebrate, but, but it's a, it's a, it's quite the thing to celebrate,
00:21:31.860 and the fastest growing economies in the world are in sub-Saharan Africa, and, and they're growing at 5 to 7% a year,
00:21:39.220 so it looks like the economic miracle that's, you know, that took place in India, and in China, most of Southeast Asia,
00:21:45.380 is really starting to kick in in Africa, and it's, seems at least in part, it's because of the collapse of the Soviet Union back in the 1989,
00:21:52.660 and the, the lack of overt pressure to have African countries pursue the most pathological possible economic doctrines
00:22:04.340 that anybody could ever imagine, they just stopped doing that, has freed people up to start to become,
00:22:10.780 well, if not rich, at least richer, and at least with the possibility of a continual rise upward, you know,
00:22:16.780 the child mortality rate in Africa now is the same as it was in Europe in 1952, I mean, that's, that's really something, you know,
00:22:25.900 and, and, um, um, longevity rates have increased tremendously in Africa, and, well, you know, we're kicking the slats out of some major diseases,
00:22:37.580 polio's pretty much gone, it looks like we're putting a pretty good dent in malaria, that'll do great things for Africa,
00:22:43.580 I think there's a real possibility with some concerted effort that we could get rid of tuberculosis in the next 15 years or so,
00:22:50.320 if we made that a target, that would be something, you know, that's an ancient scourge of mankind, we could certainly do without that,
00:22:57.960 so, there, and, and, and there are intelligent people who are working hard on trying to eradicate these problems,
00:23:04.640 and they're doing it successfully, and so, you know, I'm, I'm not, I'm not in favor of the whole,
00:23:12.560 there's something wrong with humanity, and we're a scourge on the bloody planet,
00:23:16.780 and it would be better off if there were fewer of us, and the whole planet would be thriving if there were none of us at all,
00:23:23.180 I think that there's something unbelievably dangerous about that attitude,
00:23:27.340 and I think it's, it's ungrateful, and unfair, and unsympathetic, and ungrateful, and non-empathetic,
00:23:34.940 because I really do see that, like, I know, I don't know a lot about human history,
00:23:40.480 because God, there's a lot of history to know about, you know, and the more you know about human history,
00:23:46.080 the more you know that there's just endless details that you have no idea about,
00:23:52.500 but if you, if you do a reasonable overview, you, you do see that it's, it's a bloody mess, you know,
00:23:59.280 that it's, it's, it's privation, and war, and catastrophe, and brutality, and struggle, and, and strife, and difficulty,
00:24:08.320 all, the entire way through, you know, people striving against odds that are just absolutely astronomical,
00:24:15.580 astronomical, and yet succeeding, you know, that overall, the, the story overall is one of,
00:24:22.700 I wouldn't say unbroken progress, but it's decent progress, and it's better now than it's ever been,
00:24:28.120 by a huge margin, and there's every bit of evidence to suggest that it could continue to get better,
00:24:34.920 and better, and better, you know, here's another thing that's really cool,
00:24:38.560 do you know that we're adding four years of life expectancy every year now,
00:24:44.120 so, once we hit a year every year, then that's it, we don't die anymore, but those last eight months a year,
00:24:51.040 they're going to be, they're going to be tough to manage, you know, but four months a year is really something,
00:24:56.520 and so, you know, we're basically living longer, and we're living healthier, and we're smarter than we were,
00:25:02.840 because we're much more, our nutritional levels are higher than they were, because, because we're not starving,
00:25:08.000 especially the people at the bottom end, and, you know, we're educating people all over the world,
00:25:13.920 the Chinese graduate more engineers every year than the U.S. have engineers,
00:25:20.600 now, that's terrifying, because, God, all we, we've got all these engineers already,
00:25:25.480 and they're making gadgets at such a rate, that you can't even keep track of the gadgets, right,
00:25:31.600 you go online, and, like, there's all these technologies, and all these subcultures using them,
00:25:37.420 and you don't even know what the technologies are, if you're fully informed,
00:25:42.700 you can't keep up with the new stuff that you might buy, and it's not like it's trivial technology,
00:25:49.840 it's unbelievably powerful technology, like, I'm in awe of many of the young people that I work with,
00:25:55.760 because they're more, they're, they're savvier about the technological infrastructure
00:26:01.620 that constitutes the web than I am, because I'm old, and it, and it's hard to keep up as you get old,
00:26:08.060 and, you know, they come up with tools to make difficult things very simple, very rapidly,
00:26:13.960 and there's just subcultures everywhere that are doing this at an unbelievably rapid rate,
00:26:19.860 you know, and you go to somewhere like Silicon Valley, and I've spent a lot of time in Silicon Valley,
00:26:23.580 and it's, it has its problems, but, Jesus, there's a unbelievable collection of smart people there,
00:26:30.240 and, and they're working on things like, they're working on things like mad, and, and, and it's working,
00:26:36.940 you know, you see someone like Elon Musk, I mean, what the hell do you make of someone like that,
00:26:42.080 you know, I mean, what did he do, he made an electric car, which is basically impossible,
00:26:46.540 and it works, which is basically impossible, and then he built an infrastructure,
00:26:50.660 so that you could charge the damn thing, wherever you drove, and that was basically impossible,
00:26:56.480 and then he made it cheap, because if you buy an electric car, and you factor in the price of gas,
00:27:02.780 the electric car is actually about as expensive as the gasoline car, and so that was unbelievable,
00:27:08.940 and then he built a bloody rocket, which was one-tenth the price, or less, that, of a NASA rocket,
00:27:15.800 that you could reuse, which was impossible, and then he put one of his cars on top of the rocket,
00:27:22.660 and he shot it up into space, and then this happened, right, this all happened, and he's still alive,
00:27:29.440 and, you know, and then he went and blew it all by smoking pot on Joe Rogan, you know, because,
00:27:35.820 because, well, it's so funny, you know, we, you know, we like our insane geniuses, like predictable,
00:27:45.760 and, and, and, and, and safe, and so we don't want them doing strange things like having a tiny puff
00:27:51.560 of marijuana on a show famous for marijuana, so, so anyways, you know, that's all, that's all good news,
00:27:59.840 it's, it's all good news, man, and I learned a lot about this, I worked for the UN for a while,
00:28:05.340 like indirectly, um, and, and I, and I wasn't paid for it, by the way, it was volunteer work,
00:28:10.780 I worked on this, uh, um, uh, document, which was the report to the Secretary General on sustainable
00:28:18.820 economic development, it's quite funny, because a lot of the right-wing conspiracy theorists are
00:28:23.440 having a field day with that, man, that I'm some sort of, like, closet globalist shill, because I,
00:28:31.020 because I work momentarily for the UN, it's like, well, what, what the hell are you supposed to do
00:28:36.400 when you're asked to do something like that, you know, there was a document that was being prepared
00:28:40.480 that was supposed to lay out some halfway's intelligent vision of what things might be like
00:28:46.680 if the international community cooperated for the next 30 years, it wasn't, it wasn't like,
00:28:52.060 there weren't brutal guidelines that were going to be enforced by jack-booted Nazis, it was,
00:28:57.240 it was just a proposal paper, and so we had a chance to, to, to work on it, there was only one Canadian
00:29:03.920 team, and I got, I got placed on that, and that was kind of cool, and so it gave me an opportunity
00:29:09.440 to spend two years reading about economics and about ecology at the same time, and so, and what
00:29:17.120 was so weird about that was the more I read, the more optimistic I got, and I thought, well, that isn't
00:29:22.620 what I expected, like, I thought we were going to hell in a handbasket at quite the, quite the rapid rate,
00:29:27.400 and, you know, I mean, there's no doubt that we're doing some stupid things, and I would say the stupidest
00:29:33.540 thing we're probably doing is overfishing the oceans, because there's just no use, it's just,
00:29:39.480 there's just no use in that, it's, it's completely destructive, it doesn't do anybody any good,
00:29:44.040 and it could be stopped, but I know that your country, for example, is starting to put aside
00:29:48.140 marine park reserves that are fishery-free, essentially, and you don't need a lot of that
00:29:54.800 before the ocean can regenerate itself, because it's actually pretty good at that.
00:29:58.440 One of the things that's kind of funny, you know, remember when that, when there was that big oil
00:30:03.820 spill in the Gulf of Mexico? You know there were more fish there two years later than there were
00:30:09.020 before the spill? You know why? Because people stopped fishing, so it turned out that the pollution
00:30:16.680 was really good for the fish. It's like, yeah, well, that's why you have to do your research carefully,
00:30:24.800 because you never know, you know, you never know what's true and what isn't, and so that was,
00:30:28.840 that was pretty interesting. The same thing happened in World War II, by the way,
00:30:32.380 in, in the North Sea, because the North Sea had been fished out pretty badly, and then
00:30:35.940 during World War II, it wasn't all that safe to go out and fish in the North Sea, because,
00:30:41.120 you know, you would get sunk by a submarine, and that was not very bright, so, um, people stopped
00:30:46.740 fishing, and the fish came back very rapidly, and fish do that, because they breed quite quickly,
00:30:51.500 and so if you just leave the damn things alone for a while, most of them come back, but, um, but,
00:30:58.060 you know, apart from the fisheries, which, which is, is really quite an appalling and, and, and,
00:31:03.360 and pessimistic story, although not hopeless, um, and people are waking up to it, and, and building
00:31:09.840 these marine reserve parks, for example, a lot of the ecological news was surprisingly good,
00:31:15.700 way better than I thought it would be, uh, you know, so, for example, there are more forests in the
00:31:21.160 northern hemisphere than there were a hundred years ago, so, who would have guessed that? I wouldn't
00:31:26.620 have guessed that, partly it's because marginal farmland has returned to forest, so, and because
00:31:31.980 we've got more effective at, at, um, at agriculture by a huge margin, and, uh, there are more forests in
00:31:39.740 China than there were 30 years ago, and so that's something, and it turns out when people burn coal,
00:31:45.180 which is, you know, kind of polluting, they don't burn wood, so, you know, they're going to burn
00:31:51.240 something, because they don't like eating raw, inedible things, and freezing to death, so they're
00:31:57.700 going to burn something, and it turns out that coal is actually, uh, preferable to wood, um, and so,
00:32:04.300 well, and so these things are complicated, and the, the ecological story looked better than,
00:32:11.360 than I would have ever guessed, even the overpopulation issue, you know, ever since the
00:32:16.260 1960s, with Paul Ehrlich, and the population bomb, there was this terrible pessimism, that we were
00:32:23.640 going to breed, you know, like, like uncontrolled rats, until every square inch of the world was, like,
00:32:30.300 covered with, with some starving skeleton, and that that was all going to happen by the year 2000,
00:32:35.840 when there would be mass starvation, and the, the price of commodities would have blown through the roof,
00:32:41.120 and we would run out of oil, and, and all the, uh, all the, uh, um, commodities that we need to
00:32:47.920 maintain a reasonably standard, reasonably high standard of living, and, you know, that didn't
00:32:52.760 happen, and not only did it happen, is that rates of poverty went down, and rates of hunger went down,
00:33:00.220 even though the population went way up, and so there are more people who are hungry now, than there were
00:33:05.760 50 years ago, but there are far fewer proportion of people who are hungry, and that's really something,
00:33:11.860 and so, the overpopulation, doom and gloomers, were absolutely wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, and we're going to
00:33:20.260 peak at 9 billion, that's what it looks like, all the projections indicate something around 9 billion, and that's
00:33:26.340 only 2 billion more than we have, like, it's not nothing, it's still 2 billion people, but we're, but at the rate at which we're improving agricultural output, and with regards to efficiency of agricultural output, there's no evidence whatsoever that we're going to run out of food, and, you know, a country like Uganda, this is quite interesting, if Uganda, which is a very big country, by the way,
00:33:47.400 if it was utilized properly, it has a water table underneath it, and plenty of water, if Uganda was utilized properly, it could feed all of Africa, and so, it's not like we're making full use, even, of the agricultural capacity, that we have available to us, and so, there's no, we're not going to overpopulate the world, and leave everybody, like, starving, in, on, on, like, Easter Island, with nothing but giant heads, and no trees, that's not going to happen,
00:34:16.140 and, and, and in fact, I have a sneaking suspicion that within 100 years, one of the biggest problems that we'll be facing is a declining population, and that that'll be worrisome, I mean, we won't be concerned about that at the moment, but, um, that whole doom and gloom scenario just seems to be, to be wrong, and, you know, there are, there are fewer wars than there were by a large margin, the overall rates of homicidal behavior in the world have plummeted,
00:34:44.020 the rates of death by terrorism over the last 50 years have plummeted, um, there's, there's a lot of good news, there's way more good news than there is bad news, and that's, there's no wars in the western hemisphere, there's a piece of good news, you know, that's a remarkable thing, so, and, you know, and, and it's been, it's been 70 years since World War II, and we've had thermonuclear weapons since then,
00:35:11.040 and, and, of course, everyone's terrified of those bloody things, and, and no wonder, and maybe that's for the best, because we, maybe we needed something to really terrify us, you know, it's certainly possible, but, even though there's always the possibility of a mistake, and there's still the possibility of a nuclear outbreak, we haven't used them, and we haven't had a third world war, and almost all of us here have lived in, what do you gotta think, man, comparative peace and prosperity,
00:35:36.700 if you compare it to any other time and place, anywhere else in the world, at any point in history, which is not perfect, because, you know, you're still getting old, and you're still gonna die, and, and we haven't, we haven't, we haven't, what, we haven't defeated all the diseases that, that beset us, but, God, it could be a lot worse, and we seem to be making it a lot better, and so, and so, look, this is what happened to me, you know,
00:36:04.020 when I wrote my first book, which was Maps of Meaning, I was looking at something that was really dark, it was really dark, I, I was interested in totalitarianism, and I'm still interested in totalitarianism, I don't care if it's, whether it's on the left or the right, it doesn't matter to me, it's this, it's this totalizing view, that's predicated on the assumption, that you can take a set of, a few simple axioms, about the way the world is, and always was,
00:36:32.840 and then you can decide how society would be structured, and then you can force people into acting that way, and the utopia will come. I'm, I'm not fond of that sort of thinking, I don't think there's any evidence that it's, um, viable, partly because the world's too complicated to manage that, and you just can't get your axioms right.
00:36:53.700 And besides, things shift around on you, and even if you're right today, something's going to turn on you tomorrow, and you're going to have to update your model a bit, and if you don't, well, then all hell's going to break loose, so,
00:37:05.860 but then, you know, I was interested in totalitarianism, partly because, because, for psychological reasons, I was interested in why people were so committed to belief systems, that they were willing to put everything to the torch, essentially, so, mostly I was concerned about the ideological struggle between the western world, and the communist world, particularly the Soviets, but not only the Soviets.
00:37:32.920 Um, and, and, and I was curious in a sort of post-modern way, because, you know, you might say, well, you know, the Marxists, they have their viewpoint, and, you know, inequality of income distribution is a problem, and maybe things should be fairer, and maybe the fact that there are relatively poor people in the west, and relatively rich people in the west, is a consequence of oppression, and maybe something could be done about that, and the western way of looking at the world is just an arbitrary set of rules, and,
00:38:02.920 the communist way of looking at the world is another arbitrary set of rules, maybe you could even say that about the fascist way of looking at the world, although, somehow people are much less likely to agree to that, which is quite interesting, because it, it means that, by and large, we have come to a collective decision,
00:38:21.320 that there are some forms of arbitrary games, let's say, set up on axiomatic structure, that are wrong, you know, and, and it's a very rare person, who thinks that what the Nazis did was, was justifiable, was right, in any, in any fundamental sense.
00:38:39.140 That's interesting, you know, because it means that, collectively, we have come to a decision, that there is a difference between good and evil, if you assume that what the Nazis did was evil, which I think is a fairly reasonable assumption,
00:38:54.300 I don't, I don't, I don't know what you would do with the word evil, if what happened in places like Auschwitz didn't deserve that epithet, you need some other word that was just as dark to describe what happened,
00:39:07.000 so, you might as well just use evil, because everybody knows what it means, so we have come to a conclusion that there are things that we shouldn't get up to, you know, and that also implies that we've come to some conclusion about what constitutes good,
00:39:22.260 some general sense that whatever the opposite of what, let's say, the Nazis did, and I would say also the collectivist communists, whatever the opposite of that is, whatever that might be, that's good,
00:39:35.780 and that we should be pursuing that, and so that's a good thing, because it kind of pulls us out of the moral relativistic problem, not exactly, because it's not defined perfectly or anything,
00:39:45.800 you know, to say, well, you shouldn't be a Nazi, it's like, well, it's kind of vague, you know, okay, no arm bands, no goose stepping, but then what?
00:39:56.320 Well, that's a complicated question, to figure out how to conduct yourself, so that you would be unlikely to participate in the horrors of a totalitarian ideological system,
00:40:09.720 if the advantages of doing so were offered to you in a realistic way, that's really the moral issue, because, you know, if you read about Nazi Germany,
00:40:18.560 and you read about communist Soviet Union and China, you understand that those systems were very attractive to people,
00:40:28.240 and there were reasons for that attractiveness, and that had you been there, there's a high probability that you would have been attracted by those ideas,
00:40:38.040 and you can see that now, because there's a big resurgence, for example, both on the left, on the right, but I would say primarily on the left, especially in the academic world,
00:40:49.220 there's a big resurgence in the same kind of ideas that inspired generations of Soviet utopians, say, back in the early 1900s,
00:41:03.080 when they had not so much evidence that what they were doing was absolutely bloody, pointless, and murderous, you know,
00:41:10.660 and so that does separate the modern people who suggest that such things from those who believed it a hundred years ago,
00:41:17.220 but nonetheless, you know, the point is, is that those ideas are so attractive that they still, they still resonate with people,
00:41:25.300 and you have to take that seriously, because it means they probably resonate with you,
00:41:28.600 and some of it is, I deal with this to some degree in chapter one, stand up straight with your shoulders back,
00:41:35.800 because it really is a discussion of hierarchies, and I actually try to make a case, like I like to make a case for hierarchy,
00:41:44.800 you know, the radical leftist types, the post-modernists in particular, and I put this mostly at the feet of people like Foucault,
00:41:53.100 he'd be, he'd be villain number one, although he was influenced heavily by Marx, and his own special sense of resentment,
00:42:01.680 intellectual resentment and arrogance, so, which, which, which made him into a sort of perverted and malevolent and underhanded Marx,
00:42:09.500 which is really something to be, because just the ordinary Marx wasn't so great,
00:42:14.300 you know, and, and, and Foucault makes this fundamental case that human, that there's no real truth,
00:42:22.180 and that what passes this truth is the dominant opinion of the dominant group,
00:42:30.220 and by dominant, he means those that hold the power, and, and so, that's a hell of a pessimistic view of the world,
00:42:39.720 and it's wrong, it's, it's wrong, and it, like, it's seriously wrong,
00:42:45.700 um, and, and I'm gonna, I'm gonna lay out why it's wrong, I mean, first of all, it doesn't even work for kids,
00:42:53.860 you know, if you look at how kids organize themselves on the playground, there are bullies,
00:42:58.680 and it's interesting, if you study bullies, you find out that they're not necessarily the most unpopular kids,
00:43:05.760 there are outcast kids, who are more unpopular than the bullies, and the bullies are ambivalently popular,
00:43:12.680 they have some friends, and they have some enemies, so, you know, so, it's not entirely counterproductive to be a bully,
00:43:20.340 but it, it starts working, it starts working less and less well as you get older,
00:43:24.740 and so, it's, it's not doing so well by the time you hit junior high, and by the time you're at high school,
00:43:29.920 it's not a very effective strategy at all, and a bully is someone who uses power,
00:43:35.040 it's like, bloody well, do what I want, or I'll hit you, or I'll do something else that you won't like,
00:43:41.960 that will be physical, or maybe it'll be psychological, but if the psychology doesn't work,
00:43:46.560 calling you names, demeaning you, um, you know, talking behind your back,
00:43:51.160 which is a very common form of female bullying, because females have their own forms of bullying,
00:43:55.760 and they're very effective, you know, if that doesn't work, then I can just take you out of the schoolyard,
00:44:00.100 and pound you, and if I can't pound you myself, well, then I'll pound you with one of my friends,
00:44:04.360 and that'll be just as effective, and you'll bloody well do what I want you to do, and that's power,
00:44:10.060 and it's like, really, that's the basis of our society? That's, that sort of power? That's how we
00:44:17.760 organize ourselves? I mean, it's, it's patently ridiculous. First of all, most children who are
00:44:24.580 popular, let's say, universally popular, and who do well socially, aren't bullies.
00:44:30.740 They're good at playing with others, and they learn that between the age of two and four,
00:44:36.480 and they learn very straightforward rules, like reciprocity. That's the big one, it's, there's a
00:44:43.280 couple, reciprocity is one, trust is another, to abide by your word, but those are the same thing,
00:44:49.160 reciprocity and trust are very similar. It's like, well, you know, we'll take turns, you play my game now,
00:44:55.840 and I'll play your game tomorrow, you know, and you guys have had friends that were real friends,
00:45:00.980 and you know perfectly well that if you have a good friend, you don't have to keep track exactly
00:45:05.520 of what you do for each other. You don't write it down on a piece of paper, and, you know, put a
00:45:10.000 check mark beside it, unless you're, unless you're a little bit on the paranoid side, and, and, and,
00:45:15.140 and that's only the beginnings of your problems, and what you do is, you know, you kind of keep track of
00:45:21.260 who does what for who, and you kind of keep the balance equal, and you do that because, well,
00:45:28.200 that's what you do if you're awake, and conscious, and a decent person, and if you have a relationship,
00:45:32.620 if you're in a marriage, it's the same thing, you know, it's like, you don't obsessively keep track
00:45:39.180 of who owes what, when, and why, that, that's a sign of a degenerating relationship. What you do is,
00:45:46.220 well, you do what you can for your partner, and they do what they can for you, and you're both
00:45:52.080 aware of that, and you assume goodwill, and with any luck, that iterates across time, and it's a
00:45:58.220 sustainable game. It's not bloody power, and, you know, you know, there's nothing more miserable than
00:46:03.560 being in a relationship where, where the, where the rule is, do what the hell I want, or suffer the
00:46:11.160 consequences, you know, and what kind of relationship are you going to get out of that, even if the
00:46:16.080 person is cowed enough to do what you want them to do, when you're there, and enforcing it,
00:46:25.160 they're not going to put their whole heart into it, that's bloody well for sure, they're going to be,
00:46:29.500 if they have any sense at all, and they do, and if they have any spirit at all, and they do,
00:46:33.580 they're going to be undermining what you're forcing them to do all the time, there's an old Soviet joke,
00:46:39.760 they pretend to pay us, and we pretend to work, right, great, that's a hell of a way to run a
00:46:49.840 society, and, and, and, and that's exactly how that society ran, so all you do with force is engender
00:46:56.040 bitterness, and resentment, and if the person that you're, that you're exerting force on can't exert
00:47:03.180 the same level of physical force back, it's not like they're not going to take their revenge in
00:47:08.340 other ways, they're not going to cook you wonderful meals, they're not going to be, what would you call
00:47:14.480 it, enthusiastic sexual partners, you know, they're going to get their revenge when they can, unless
00:47:20.720 you've crushed their spirit completely, and then, then it serves you right, because then you're dragging
00:47:26.080 around behind you someone whose spirit you've crushed completely, and that's a hell of a way to live,
00:47:32.740 and so, what is this idea that our society is fundamentally predicated on power, you know, and
00:47:38.880 that's the post-modern claim, we, we, we group ourselves into our groups, whatever the hell they
00:47:44.100 happen to be, sex, gender, ethnicity, whatever the flavor of the month is, there's an infinite number of
00:47:51.140 ways we could group ourselves, and then we organize ourselves into power hierarchies, and we dominate
00:47:56.160 each other, and then all of those groups go to war against one another, and the most dominant group that
00:48:01.920 has the most power wins, it's like, I don't know what, what the hell planet Foucault grew up on, you know,
00:48:08.680 that, that might be the definition of, like, the worst African dictatorship of the last 100 years,
00:48:15.260 but it's not a description of our society, and it's not a description of the way that people organize
00:48:20.580 themselves into hierarchies, which was the point I was trying to make in rule one, when I talked about
00:48:26.180 hierarchies, now, it's very important where you are in your hierarchical position, with regards to other
00:48:33.340 people, in relationship to your mental health, and this is a really important thing to understand,
00:48:38.000 because you have an ancient counter in your brain, and that was the point of the biological
00:48:42.900 comparisons, that lobsters being one set of comparisons, but not only lobsters, we know perfectly
00:48:49.840 well, animal behaviorists, people who know their neuropsychopharmacology, know perfectly well that
00:48:55.340 the serotonergic system operates quite similarly across most animals with complex nervous systems,
00:49:02.940 and one of the things that it does is track relative status position, and in, in, in birds,
00:49:10.080 wrens, which is another example I used, a lot of it is power, you know, wren's a little bird,
00:49:15.420 it's quite a cute bird, it sings very nicely, and you think it's harmless, but it, but it's not,
00:49:20.760 it's a vicious little character, and I used to sit in my backyard and record wren songs on my,
00:49:26.060 on my tape recorder, and the wren that lived in our backyard would dive-bomb it, you know,
00:49:30.640 four inches away, and it was very brave of him, and he had a little nest that, that, that was up in a tree,
00:49:37.220 and there were some nests that we had built, birdhouses, in, in the neighborhoods nearby,
00:49:42.060 in the, in the yards nearby, and he would go, like, half his, half his day spent stuffing those other birdhouses
00:49:49.460 with sticks, so full that no bird could get in them, you know, it was like, this is my damn yard,
00:49:55.700 which is what he was saying when he was singing so beautifully, and you better look the hell out,
00:50:00.260 because if you build, I'm gonna stuff your damn house with sticks, and if I see you sitting on a branch,
00:50:05.020 I'm gonna dive-bomb you and knock you off, and that's power, and that's what wrens do, despite the
00:50:11.740 fact that they're cute, and chickens do the same thing, there are pecking orders among chickens, and
00:50:17.040 virtually every animal, wolf packs organize themselves into hierarchies, and chimpanzees organize
00:50:21.920 themselves into hierarchies, and like, there are rat hierarchies, and hierarchical organization is the rule
00:50:29.600 among animals that live somewhat socially, and even those who don't, that occupy the same geographical
00:50:37.240 territory, there has to be some way of organizing access to relatively scarce resources that doesn't
00:50:44.660 result in chronic combat, because chronic combat, well, look, you're ren A, and you're ren B, and you
00:50:52.380 decide to have it out, so you peck yourselves half to death, and you're ren C, and so you got a little
00:50:57.100 bit more patience, you just wait until those two wrens beat each other to death, and then you move in, it's like
00:51:03.140 it's a stupid solution, it doesn't even work for wrens, let alone people, and so, you know, the wrens
00:51:10.880 announce their prowess, and they do that with the quality of their song, and their displays, and they
00:51:18.020 indicate to one another who shouldn't be messed with, and then there's a minimum of combat, and you could make
00:51:26.280 a pretty good case that that's power, that that's power, but like, it's not like wrens get together, and
00:51:32.780 build, like, wren apartment houses, and then, and then go out on collective worm hunt insects, I guess,
00:51:39.760 collective insect hunting expeditions, and bring them all back, and distribute them, and, or, or, or, or, or make
00:51:46.080 insect farms, so that there's more insects for all the wrens, they haven't got that far, you know,
00:51:51.680 they're competing in a zero-sum game, and that isn't what human beings do, we figured out how to
00:51:58.520 not have zero-sum games a very, very long time ago, and it turns out that if the game you're playing
00:52:05.220 isn't zero-sum, right, which means that there's only a finite number of resources, and everybody has to
00:52:11.080 fight to the death for them, and some are going to get the lion's share, and others are going to starve,
00:52:16.580 if you're not playing a zero-sum game, then you can learn to cooperate and compete in an intelligent,
00:52:23.100 civilized manner, and all of a sudden, there's more than enough for everyone, now, still, some people are
00:52:29.140 going to have more than others, you know, and, but there's nothing, how are you going to stop that,
00:52:36.440 and do you want to, like, do you want to only know what, do you want to only be allowed to know what
00:52:42.200 everyone else knows, you don't get to know anything that no one, than anyone else knows, because it's
00:52:46.420 got to be equal, you want everyone to be exactly the same amount of attractive, you know, which,
00:52:51.980 and if you averaged attractiveness overall, and you only allowed each person to be as attractive as
00:52:56.940 the average person, there'd be not much attractiveness left in the world, and it seems to me that that
00:53:02.080 would be quite the loss, you know, and strength, you're not allowed to have any additional strength,
00:53:07.340 or, or, or, or ambition, or talent, or, or, or, or, let's say, athletic ability, it's like,
00:53:15.200 or artistic ability, I mean, aren't we kind of happy that there's massive inequality in the
00:53:22.280 distribution of talent, I know it's, it's, I know it's harsh and hard, but you, you can't expect
00:53:28.040 everybody to have every talent that there is, and it would be a hell of a sacrifice if no one got to
00:53:33.440 have any talent, because it wouldn't be fair, and so I don't get the whole equality of outcome
00:53:38.720 thing, it, it isn't, it isn't going to work, there aren't that many geniuses, you know, we want to
00:53:46.060 exploit the geniuses, and get them to work for us, and if the, if the, if the price is, is that somebody
00:53:54.560 has more than you do, of something, well, suck it up for Christ's sake, well, Jesus, seriously, man,
00:54:03.220 it's like, look, how much more do you have than most people have, you know, you, you need, you need to
00:54:11.760 make $30,000 a year to be in the top 1% of the socioeconomic distribution worldwide, you know, you
00:54:18.420 always hear about the 1%, right, of the evil 1%, and they churn, by the way, because it's not the same
00:54:23.900 people all the time, it's like, all of you here are in the evil 1%, and you think, well, that's not very
00:54:30.280 fair, because I was really only talking about within my country, my, well, that's convenient for
00:54:35.160 you, you know, it makes it really, really convenient argument for you, it's like, well, all those other
00:54:41.080 people, those foreigners, they don't count, if they're poor, who the hell cares, it's, it's, it's, it's the
00:54:46.920 Australians that matter, you know, and so, no, that's, that's, that's a non-starter, you know, and, and by
00:54:52.980 historical standards, you're doing a hell of a lot better than the top 1%, I can tell you that,
00:54:57.440 I read a nice article by a coalition called Human Progress the other day, and they were
00:55:02.380 comparing the typical middle-class person who lives now with Rockefellers in the 1919s, and
00:55:10.600 say, well, would you rather be a middle-class person now, or Nelson Rockefeller in 1919, and
00:55:16.440 the answer seemed pretty damn clear that, well, you know, if you were Nelson Rockefeller, then
00:55:22.820 you would have been richer than anyone else, and there's something to be said for that status,
00:55:27.060 right, because people do like to have more than others, it's a, it's a, I don't know
00:55:31.380 if it's a good thing or not, but it is one of the things that we like, and so you'd have
00:55:35.320 that, you'd be richer than everyone else, but there'd be all sorts of things that you
00:55:39.860 have that now, that Nelson Rockefeller wouldn't have had a hope of purchasing, like the antibiotics
00:55:47.680 that he would have needed to stop his son from dying, for example, you know, just as a
00:55:53.540 start, and so, so I think this, this, this, this, this complaint about inequality, look,
00:56:01.400 no one likes inequality exactly, you walk down the street, this is why I always get a kick
00:56:05.440 out of people who protest, I'm against poverty, it's like, really, you're against poverty, and
00:56:15.520 you think that's a unique enough attribute, so that it was worth your time to make a sign
00:56:23.960 that said that you were against poverty, and show other people, it's like, I've never met,
00:56:31.620 I've never met anyone that was for poverty, you know, you walk down the street with someone
00:56:37.240 who's pretty well off, you know, and they've got 1920s spats on, and a bowler, and they're
00:56:42.020 feeling pretty damn rich, and a stockster certificate sticking out of their back pocket, and you
00:56:46.780 know, there's a homeless person there, and they give them a good kick, and they say, the
00:56:50.700 more poverty, the better, it's like, no, you know, when people walk down the street, and
00:56:57.280 you see homeless people, and they're often, homelessness is a complex problem, like you
00:57:01.720 think, well, the homeless people are poor, it's like, yeah, yeah, man, that's like one problem
00:57:08.860 they have out of 50, and like, I've worked with poor people, you know, in my clinical
00:57:13.940 practice, and poor in multiple dimensions, and many of them, you gave them money, they
00:57:18.960 were just done, especially if they were like alcoholics and cocaine addicts, as long as
00:57:23.500 they were broke, they had some hope of living through the next month, but as soon as their
00:57:28.960 unemployment check showed up, man, they were face down in the ditch three days later, right,
00:57:34.000 nothing but cocaine and alcohol with all their idiot friends for three days, and then they'd
00:57:38.360 show up back in my practice saying, you know, God, I relapsed again, they said, well, what
00:57:42.920 happened, well, my money came in, it's like, yeah, money's really going to do you a hell
00:57:47.380 of a lot of good, it'll just kill you faster than poverty, now, not that there's anything
00:57:51.900 good about poverty, but it's not like these are simple problems, you know, walk down the
00:57:56.000 street, and you see someone who's been an alcoholic for 20 years, and maybe they're addicted
00:57:59.800 to methamphetamines as well, or maybe they're schizophrenic, it's like, it isn't unequal
00:58:05.240 distribution of monetary resources that is the primary cause for that problem, and it
00:58:13.300 isn't going to be some sort of straightforward redistribution that's going to fix it, because
00:58:18.680 it's way more complicated than that, and so, and then the whole power thing, too, it's like,
00:58:26.280 look, I get it, I get the left wing, I get the left wing issue, and I really do, and I think
00:58:31.440 I get it better than the damn left wingers get it, because, you know, most of the radical
00:58:36.200 types, they follow Marx, and they say, well, one of Marx's dictums was that capital tended
00:58:42.020 to accumulate in the hands of fewer and fewer people, and that's right, that's true, wealth
00:58:48.360 and capital, income for that matter, but not only that, whatever it is that you might like
00:58:55.100 to have accumulates in the hands of smaller and smaller numbers of people, it's a principle
00:59:00.820 that was discovered by an economist named Pareto, Vilfredo Pareto, and he pointed out
00:59:06.240 something that had been pointed out in the Gospels, by the way, thousands of years earlier,
00:59:10.540 which was, to those who have everything, more will be given, and from those who have nothing,
00:59:15.180 everything will be taken away, the rule being, once you start to succeed at something, the
00:59:20.560 probability that you will continue to succeed ever more rapidly increases, so there's an
00:59:26.300 exponential function with regards to success, but there's also an exponential function with
00:59:31.740 regards to failure, so failure and success aren't like this, they're like this, fail, fail, die,
00:59:40.240 succeed, succeed, succeed ridiculously, like it's this weird curve, and it's funny, because it
00:59:46.100 doesn't just characterize economics, it's a really fun, it looks like a really fundamental
00:59:50.700 economic law, I was actually quite shocked when I first learned about this, which was only
00:59:54.640 about 15 years ago, because I thought most things were normally distributed, and it turns
00:59:59.400 out that that's not true, what people produce creatively isn't normally distributed, a small
01:00:07.220 proportion of people produce most of what's of value, it doesn't matter what it is, and you
01:00:12.700 know this, it's like, how many books does Stephen King sell, it's like half the books, right, and
01:00:22.480 then there's the next guy after Stephen King, and no one even knows who he is, and he sells
01:00:27.020 like one-tenth as many books as Stephen King, and then there's author number 50, and out of
01:00:33.900 the thousands and thousands of authors, and he's barely scraping by, and then there's the bottom
01:00:39.600 99.9%, and they can't make a living writing, and that's how it is, and it's the same with
01:00:46.220 musicians, and it's the same with athletes, you know, if you look at number of goals scored,
01:00:53.340 for example, in hockey, I'm a Canadian, so I'll use that, there's a small percentage of absolutely
01:00:58.900 phenomenal hockey players, even in something as amazing as the National Hockey League, or any
01:01:04.400 professional sports league, you know, you, you have to be one hell of an athlete to make
01:01:08.220 it in a professional sports league, and still, you get this tiny group of superstars who are
01:01:15.140 way better at it than anyone else, you know, and, and so there's this weird rule that as
01:01:20.360 you get more, getting even more gets easier, and who knows why it is exactly, partly it's
01:01:26.860 practice, but, and it characterizes all sorts of situations, like, it characterizes the size of
01:01:34.020 planets, a small number of planets have almost all the mass, it characterizes stars the same way,
01:01:42.460 it characterizes biomass in the, in the, in the Amazon jungle, it characterizes city size,
01:01:51.180 a small percentage of cities have almost all the people, it's like, well, what, what's that,
01:01:55.880 and then, and then you go back 10,000 years, you look at the Paleolithic grave site, and you see
01:02:00.860 what people are buried with, and, like, there's one guy, there's two guys there, it's covered with
01:02:05.300 gold, right, there's, the, the grave site is insanely rich, and everyone else has, like, a bone, and it's
01:02:11.240 theirs, and that's it, you know, and, and so you analyze Paleolithic grave sites, you see exactly the
01:02:17.060 same Pareto distribution, a small number of people are buried with all the wealth, and almost everyone
01:02:22.440 else has none, and so it's this unbelievably deep proclivity of resources to distribute themselves
01:02:31.860 unequally, and you know this, too, because you play games like Monopoly, right, you've all played
01:02:37.640 Monopoly, what happens when you play Monopoly? You all start out equal, right, exactly 100% equal,
01:02:45.720 and you all have an equal chance of winning, because it's basically a game of chance, not entirely,
01:02:50.720 because you can play stupidly, but, you know, but, but you can only play so intelligently,
01:02:56.480 because you're at the mercy of the dice, and what happens inevitably is that some evil capitalist
01:03:03.880 ends up with all the money, and all the hotels, and all the houses, and just, like, takes you out,
01:03:10.420 and yet you play, and you don't think, oh my god, you know, there's something fundamentally unfair
01:03:14.880 about that, or maybe you play non-competitive Monopoly, where after every round, you redistribute
01:03:21.580 the money, so everyone, right, so there's no fun in that, and so, and so the, so the problem with
01:03:34.320 Karl Marx, as far as I'm concerned, is that he was nowhere pessimistic enough, it's like, no, you can't
01:03:40.700 blame inequality on capitalism, in fact, capitalism is pretty good at ameliorating inequality, like,
01:03:47.240 there's still plenty of inequality in capitalist societies, make no mistake about that, and you
01:03:52.420 can make some claim, although it's a tricky one, that some indices of inequality have increased over
01:03:58.300 the last 20 years, it depends on how you measure it, because it's complicated, because, you know,
01:04:02.380 even poorer people now have access to, well, let's say, iPhones, which have more computational power
01:04:08.900 than the entire system that put the Apollo 11 on the moon, which is, you know, for $600, which isn't a
01:04:15.360 bad bargain, so, so it's not that easy, it's not that easy to do those economic calculations, but one of
01:04:23.360 the things you can say about capitalism, and about private property, and about the idea that people
01:04:27.940 have a right to what they earn, and a right to what they own, is that it's pretty damn good at
01:04:33.820 generating wealth, and the wealth isn't equally distributed by any stretch of the imagination, but
01:04:39.580 a fair bit of it goes to the bottom, and that's why we're seeing, well, a relative dearth of, of
01:04:45.940 tremendous deprivation, and you might say, well, we want to squeeze out that last bit of inequality, and
01:04:52.200 it's like, well, maybe we do, and maybe we don't, it's not so obvious, first of all, because even if we
01:04:58.720 did want to, we don't know how, and we certainly do know that if there are some ways that if we go
01:05:05.680 about it, then things really go to hell in a handbasket really fast, and everyone ends up equal,
01:05:10.920 because they're all starving and dead, you end up in a situation like Venezuela, not that they're all
01:05:16.380 starving and dead, but the average Venezuelan lost 17 pounds in the last year, and that wasn't from
01:05:21.940 voluntary diet, right, and that's a very rich country, and so we do know that there are ways
01:05:28.360 of ameliorating inequality that just don't work, and so it's a dangerous thing to mess with, because
01:05:34.480 we don't understand it. Now, you know, that doesn't mean we shouldn't try to understand it, and that
01:05:39.840 also doesn't mean that the left doesn't have a point, you know, if, if your society becomes too unequal,
01:05:46.320 and too many people stack up at the bottom, and they don't have an opportunity to move forward,
01:05:50.800 that seems like it's bad for everyone, and so we could, we could agree on that, and we could try
01:05:56.440 to set up our hierarchies, so that they're not too brutal for the people who end up at the bottom,
01:06:01.520 right, that would be nice, if we could be sensible, and figure out how to do that, but I think we're
01:06:07.000 not doing that bad a job of figuring out how to do it. We build infrastructure that everybody can use,
01:06:12.200 we have the universal education systems, and so on, and they're not perfect, but they're, they're far
01:06:16.900 from, they're far from catastrophic, and they're a hell of a lot better than they were a hundred years
01:06:22.800 ago, so we are making some progress on that. I think the problem with the radical leftists is that
01:06:28.200 they don't take the problem of inequality seriously enough. They blame it on capitalism. It's like,
01:06:33.180 sorry, that's wrong. It's a way deeper problem. It wasn't capitalism that produced inequality of
01:06:40.660 gravesite wealth distribution in paleolithic Europe 10,000 years ago, and it's not capitalism
01:06:47.740 that makes some stars have all the mass, right? It's a different order of problem, and so we have
01:06:55.380 to be more sophisticated than economists were 150 years ago when we talk about inequality.
01:07:00.780 If you found this conversation meaningful, you might think about picking up dad's books,
01:07:04.840 Maps of Meaning, The Architecture of Belief, or his newer bestseller, 12 Rules for Life,
01:07:08.880 An Antidote to Chaos. Both of these works delve much deeper into the topics covered in the Jordan
01:07:13.900 B. Peterson podcast. See jordanbpeterson.com for audio, ebook, and text links, or pick up the books
01:07:19.640 at your favorite bookseller. Remember to check out jordanbpeterson.com slash personality for
01:07:24.560 information on his new e-course. Tag Jordan or I on Instagram to share your results from the
01:07:29.640 Discovering Personality course. I really hope you enjoyed this podcast. Stay tuned for the second half,
01:07:35.300 plus the Q&A next week. If you did enjoy this lecture, please leave a rating at Apple Podcasts,
01:07:41.180 a comment, a review, or share this episode with a friend. Thanks for tuning in and talk to you next
01:07:46.060 week. Follow me on my YouTube channel, Jordan B. Peterson, on Twitter, at Jordan B. Peterson,
01:07:52.780 on Facebook, at Dr. Jordan B. Peterson, and at Instagram, at jordan.b.peterson. Details on this show,
01:08:01.340 access to my blog, information about my tour dates and other events, and my list of recommended books
01:08:07.560 can be found on my website, jordanbpeterson.com. My online writing programs, designed to help people
01:08:14.740 straighten out their pasts, understand themselves in the present, and develop a sophisticated vision
01:08:20.180 and strategy for the future, can be found at selfauthoring.com. That's selfauthoring.com.
01:08:27.780 From the Westwood One Podcast Network.