The World is Your Oyster
Episode Stats
Length
2 hours and 28 minutes
Words per Minute
172.49387
Summary
In this episode, Dr. Jordan V. Peterson talks about his new series, 12 Rules for Life: A 12 Rules For Life Lecture, recorded in Winnipeg, Canada in 2018. Dr. Peterson is a Canadian clinical psychologist, author, and public speaker with decades of experience helping patients struggling with depression and anxiety. With a unique understanding of why you might be feeling this way, and a roadmap towards healing, he provides a roadmap toward healing, showing that while the journey isn t easy, it s absolutely possible to find your way forward. If you re suffering, please know you are not alone. There s hope, and there s a path to feeling better. Go to Dailywire Plus now and start watching Dr. J.B. Peterson s new series on Depression and Anxiety. Let this be the first step towards the brighter future you deserve. When we return, The World is Your Oyster. - The Jordan Peterson Podcast, Season 2, Episode 24: "The World is your Oyster." - a lecture from 2018, recorded at the University of Manitoba's Centre for Integrative Mental Health and Wellness, hosted by Dr. V.V. Peterson, featuring a panel of experts from all walks of life and perspectives from around the world. In this episode I discuss how to deal with anxiety, depression and depression, and how to overcome them. I also talk about poetry, poetry, and poetry. If you like poetry, then you'll love this episode! I hope you'll check out my new book, Maps of Meaning, by Karl Marx, which is out now. which I'm working on an audio version of the book I'm writing about poetry by me. Listen to the original poem I wrote by me, "Maps of Meaning." - a book I wrote about poetry about poetry and poetry, written by me in the first half of this episode of the podcast, "12 Rules for life" by me and the other half of the audio version I'm currently working on. of my book, "Mapping of Meaning. by me (listen to the poem I'm reading by me). I'm so excited about this book, I hope it's going to be a beautiful, beautiful, lovely, beautiful and beautiful, and I hope that you're going to love it. Thank you for listening to it! - Thank you so much for listening and sharing it with me, I can't wait to share it with you.
Transcript
00:00:00.940
Hey everyone, real quick before you skip, I want to talk to you about something serious and important.
00:00:06.480
Dr. Jordan Peterson has created a new series that could be a lifeline for those battling depression and anxiety.
00:00:12.740
We know how isolating and overwhelming these conditions can be, and we wanted to take a moment to reach out to those listening who may be struggling.
00:00:20.100
With decades of experience helping patients, Dr. Peterson offers a unique understanding of why you might be feeling this way in his new series.
00:00:27.400
He provides a roadmap towards healing, showing that while the journey isn't easy, it's absolutely possible to find your way forward.
00:00:35.360
If you're suffering, please know you are not alone. There's hope, and there's a path to feeling better.
00:00:41.800
Go to Daily Wire Plus now and start watching Dr. Jordan B. Peterson on depression and anxiety.
00:00:47.480
Let this be the first step towards the brighter future you deserve.
00:00:57.400
Welcome to Season 2, Episode 24 of the Jordan B. Peterson Podcast.
00:01:02.900
I'm Michaela Peterson, Dad's daughter, collaborator, manager, and currently on a week-long fast just to see what happens.
00:01:14.960
I've still been exercising, just living my life.
00:01:19.640
I've been doing fasting for the last three months, between 18 and 24 hours, 48 hours, and I swear the more I do it, the easier it gets.
00:01:29.920
I did a DEXA scan last week, which measures body fat accurately and muscle tissue and bone density, and we'll see what a week of salt water does to me.
00:01:39.120
I don't think it'll do a lot, to be honest, but that will be fun to put up on YouTube.
00:01:43.720
I'm not going to get into a weekly update about family, because honestly, things are still crazily up in the air.
00:01:51.840
We'll know more next week, and I'll update you then.
00:01:55.740
Something I learned recently that might be helpful, a random piece of information.
00:02:00.140
Did you know cold showers or cold water immersion lowers cortisol levels?
00:02:05.620
If you're having trouble sleeping, it should help with that too.
00:02:11.340
Please enjoy this podcast, a 12 Rules for Life lecture from 2018, recorded in Winnipeg.
00:02:16.780
For you Americans who don't recognize Winnipeg, it's in the middle of Canada.
00:02:22.780
Will you pass through it if you drive from Toronto to Vancouver, though?
00:02:30.380
I was able to title this week's episode, so I've titled it,
00:02:38.220
When we return, The World is Your Oyster, a 12 Rules for Life lecture by Jordan V. Peterson.
00:02:44.620
Thank you very much, all of you, for coming here tonight.
00:03:02.120
It's wonderful to see you all, and it's great to be in Winnipeg.
00:03:07.640
I've been using these lectures as an opportunity, because they are an opportunity,
00:03:15.200
I mean, to have serious conversations with people.
00:03:18.840
It might be strange to think about a lecture as a discussion or a conversation,
00:03:22.880
but it is a conversation, you know, unless you're just reading it or working off pre-prepared notes.
00:03:30.080
You know, if you're just addressing the audience and you're watching everybody and listening to people,
00:03:36.000
listening to the watching individuals, but listening to the whole crowd as well,
00:03:39.760
and you can tell how people are responding, and you can see if people are following the arguments.
00:03:43.920
And so, you know, when you participate in a conversation, there's a lot of nonverbal participation as well.
00:03:49.020
You know, the way you hold your eyes and, well, the way you move.
00:03:53.340
I know when I've got the audience engaged, that it's silent.
00:04:01.240
You know, their attention is focused on the front, so I can tell when I'm in the right place,
00:04:05.960
so to speak, conceptually, and when everyone's on board.
00:04:09.620
And I get a chance to keep working on the ideas that I've been working on for 30 years in real time,
00:04:19.140
And I'm going to talk a fair bit about the book tonight, about 12 Rules,
00:04:25.880
and a little bit about my other book, Maps of Meaning,
00:04:35.180
then you might take a shot at listening to Maps of Meaning.
00:04:40.280
It's a hard book, but the audio version, I think, makes it more accessible.
00:04:48.600
And then I was reading some poetry today, too, so I thought I might share that with you.
00:05:00.860
And so I found, I stumbled across some of the poems that he wrote when he was a young man.
00:05:05.900
And, you know, I noticed with my book, my first book, Maps of Meaning, actually started as a poem.
00:05:14.060
And I was trying to express some ideas I had about, well, I was kind of obsessed with the Cold War
00:05:20.060
and about what I knew about Nazi Germany, both of those things.
00:05:23.320
And they were plaguing me, along with questions about the meaning of life in the face of its suffering.
00:05:31.660
And then I noticed that often my undergraduates, who were really trying to wrestle seriously with an essay,
00:05:39.400
with an idea of, you know, if they were going to write about something that really gripped them personally,
00:05:43.420
is that sometimes they would start by writing poetry.
00:05:50.580
Like, what, and then at the same time, or along the same years, I suppose,
00:05:56.100
I also spent a lot of time trying to understand the role of art in art and literature,
00:06:04.300
Because obviously, obviously, engaging in artistic production,
00:06:10.060
including writing of such things as poetry, is actually a form of thinking, right?
00:06:14.540
I mean, you kind of get the idea, which is a misbegotten idea,
00:06:18.960
that what artists do is produce beautiful things.
00:06:27.680
And the productions are the secondary consequence of the thought process.
00:06:31.600
And they kind of encapsulate the thought process.
00:06:33.540
Like, what artists do, visual artists say, painters,
00:06:43.820
And when you look at their art, you learn how to look at the world.
00:06:49.340
And you learn what's remarkable about individuals,
00:06:52.080
and what's remarkable about landscapes, what's beautiful, all of those things.
00:07:02.640
they first encounter what they don't understand,
00:07:07.440
You don't have to think about what you already understand.
00:07:10.880
You have to think about what you don't understand.
00:07:15.080
because they don't just magically appear in your head with no preparation.
00:07:22.500
And the first way that you encounter what you don't understand
00:07:29.700
And what artists, real artists, do is they go out to the frontier,
00:07:34.860
and they reconceptualize perception using imagination,
00:07:38.380
and they lay the ground for fully articulated knowledge.
00:07:47.360
because it stands halfway between the image and the fully articulated word.
00:07:52.800
Because, of course, poetry is richly image-laden and also saturated in emotion.
00:07:59.820
And so, it's often the case if you're trying to express an idea.
00:08:04.820
but it's often the case that if someone is trying to express an idea,
00:08:08.220
they'll do it in song, or they'll do it in poetry,
00:08:11.000
before they can express it as full-fledged philosophy.
00:08:16.840
and that manifests itself in being gripped by motivation and emotion.
00:08:27.240
And then, maybe it can be represented in story.
00:08:29.820
And only after that can it be fully articulated.
00:08:34.700
It goes from the absolute unknown itself to the relatively unknown.
00:08:38.740
That would be the domain of imagination and dream.
00:08:41.260
And then, from that, fully articulated verbal representations are extracted.
00:08:51.100
mostly, this is a bit of an oversimplification,
00:08:54.680
Your right hemisphere is involved in that initial imaginative grappling process
00:09:05.260
then your left hemisphere dominates more and more
00:09:09.160
So, that's the process by which thought is generated.
00:09:13.120
artists are on the forefront of conceptual revolutions.
00:09:20.700
which laid the groundwork for the emergence of the modern West,
00:09:26.460
It was great artists, especially in northern Italy.
00:09:28.500
There was this absolute flowering of staggering art.
00:09:35.240
and this was when medieval times shifted to modern times,
00:09:38.160
is, you know, the religious images that medieval people used
00:09:52.200
And very, very iconic images of Christ, for example.
00:10:00.200
then all of a sudden you saw these religious figures
00:10:07.600
And there was a revolution in an idea that accompanied that,
00:10:10.760
because what it meant was that the divine images,
00:10:15.620
and transformed into something that was much closer
00:10:24.080
for the generation of the spread of democratic ideas,
00:10:29.000
the idea that each individual was important enough
00:10:31.780
to be regarded as the locus of political responsibility.
00:10:36.020
And that was all laid out by the artists first.
00:10:40.220
And that's why these paintings from northern Italy,
00:10:56.460
by great masters like Da Vinci and Michelangelo
00:11:07.880
and each of those paintings would have been worth,
00:11:12.580
with like three billion dollars worth of paintings.
00:11:21.680
in the middle of the most expensive city in the world,
00:11:32.900
There's no way you spend that much time and effort
00:11:43.680
You know, paintings go for 200 million dollars.
00:11:45.780
It's like, what's going on with that, you know?
00:12:41.480
his writing is well regarded as close to immortal
00:12:44.740
as anything that human beings produce might be,
00:12:47.400
and the reason for that is that it's endlessly dense.
00:12:55.600
into anything profound and never come up again.
00:13:01.340
And so, and he makes a set of propositions here,
00:13:12.140
Okay, well, that's a metaphysical presupposition, that,
00:13:15.700
It might even be an ontological presupposition.
00:13:18.720
So ontology is the study of the structure of being.
00:13:21.940
And so Shakespeare's actually making an ontological argument.
00:13:42.840
That's a particular way of looking at the world.
00:13:50.460
And so there's something very technically very interesting about that claim
00:13:58.640
is that the world is best conceived of as a forum for action
00:14:02.680
because, of course, that's what the stage is for.
00:14:08.780
And there's a secondary consideration that emerges out of that
00:14:12.020
is that, well, if the world's a stage and you play your part,
00:14:19.360
And you might say, well, maybe that's the fundamental question of life.
00:14:53.240
Because it might not be one you would choose consciously.
00:14:56.760
You might be acting something out unconsciously
00:14:58.720
that's a tragedy, a catastrophe, or worse than that.
00:15:02.180
And you should understand what it is that you're up to.
00:15:20.080
then it might be that you're playing the wrong sort of part.
00:15:49.740
and you play a part whether you know what the part is or not.
00:16:03.760
once I started to understand the psychoanalysts,
00:16:29.980
that isn't really the way they looked at the world.
00:16:32.820
was that you're composed of a lot of different sub-personalities
00:16:52.980
every drive tends to philosophize in its spirit.
00:16:58.300
You know, and so you can be possessed in some sense
00:17:08.120
Because you do stupid things when you get angry, right?
00:17:14.160
Or maybe you're having trouble controlling your diet
00:17:22.960
That's what happens to people with eating disorders.
00:17:34.100
And, you know, you do that if you're foolish in love.
00:18:03.700
And that's what happens in the case of ideology.
00:57:03.200
marshal, blackest agony. Who looks on it with a
00:57:33.740
poem. Literally. You know, it reminds me, and I
00:57:51.020
about the rebellion of Satan against God. And it's
00:57:54.520
an attempt by Milton, like around the canonical
00:58:01.780
narrative substructure of our culture. There's a
00:58:05.040
cloud of images and stories that are not really
00:58:17.800
the biblical corpus. Very, very, very, very few
00:58:21.940
references. Almost none. But there's this cloud of
00:58:34.660
narrative writings. And what Milton tried to do
00:58:40.100
wrote Paradise Lost. And it's about the highest
00:58:45.880
approximately equivalent to rationality, I would
00:58:48.800
say, attempting to displace what's transcendent
00:58:59.300
something like that. And this poem really, really
00:59:01.380
reminds me of that. And I don't know if Marx was
00:59:03.840
reading Paradise Lost at that point or not. In some
00:59:09.140
sense, it doesn't matter because Paradise Lost had
00:59:10.900
such a walloping impact on European culture that
00:59:16.080
implicitly from everything else he read anyways. So,
00:59:19.680
but it's quite a telling poem because the person
00:59:22.980
who wrote it is a very, very angry, desperately
00:59:27.400
angry, you know, and hopeless and then worse, out
00:59:32.900
for revenge. And then worse, out to build a structure
00:59:36.520
that would extract that revenge. It's like, well, you
00:59:41.100
know, what happened with Marx is quite the damn
00:59:43.960
mystery. What, the way his ideas unfolded in the
00:59:48.560
why, why, why that happened. And, you know, there
00:59:59.040
Marxist story. And then there's the, well, then
01:00:10.640
comprehension, right? At least a hundred million
01:00:16.600
it meant to die. I was, I was, uh, what it meant
01:00:19.720
to die under communism. I was, uh, looking online
01:00:32.940
because it's, it's common now when everybody, when
01:00:44.640
deaths, for example, that's from the Black Book of
01:00:49.400
reference about what happened in the Soviet Union
01:00:51.900
and Maoist China. It's common now that people who
01:00:55.600
are attempting to revive the spirit of Marxism, and
01:00:59.500
there seem to be more of them all the time, uh, to
01:01:02.820
make counterclaims that capitalism killed just as
01:01:05.780
many people. And then they, the, usually the stats
01:01:14.200
they had lack of, you know, they didn't have access
01:01:19.080
proper medication. And so, I mean, if you stack up
01:01:22.460
those deaths beside the deaths that were produced by
01:01:24.900
the communists, then you can, you know, you can, you
01:01:27.940
can even the scales. But it's quite the piece of
01:01:30.860
logic as far as I'm concerned, because there's a big
01:01:33.600
difference between the fact that people die, and even
01:01:37.940
the fact that perhaps they wouldn't have to die if other
01:01:40.280
people intervened and saved them, and actually killing
01:01:43.680
people. Like, that's, seriously man, that's a big difference. And
01:01:48.340
like, and one of the logical flaws there is like, everybody
01:01:51.920
dies. You can't blame that on capitalism. Now, you might be
01:01:56.520
able to say, well, you know, capitalists could have been better
01:02:00.600
at distributing their resources more effectively, so that
01:02:04.340
more people were protected against a mortality that emerged
01:02:08.540
too soon. And, you know, there's, I suppose there's some
01:02:12.240
truth in that critique, because none of us are perfect, and
01:02:16.020
none of our systems are perfect. And perhaps it's possible that
01:02:19.420
those who, over the last hundred years, have generated some
01:02:22.960
excess wealth, could have been more intelligent, and, and what
01:02:27.080
would you say? Intelligent, and wise, and thoughtful, and
01:02:30.460
far-seeing, and done better with their money than they did. Fair
01:02:36.860
enough. But that is not the same as lining people up, and
01:02:40.860
shooting them, and torturing them, and actively killing them. And
01:02:44.860
that's what happened with the communists. And so, we need a...
01:02:48.600
And so, this moral equivalence of the communist system and the
01:03:03.240
capitalist system is, it's preposterous. Now, one of the things
01:03:08.120
that's also quite interesting in that light is what's been
01:03:13.920
happening economically around the world, especially in the last
01:03:17.000
15 years. Because things have really transformed themselves in
01:03:21.500
very interesting ways. So, you know, the wall didn't fall till
01:03:27.080
1989, right? So really, that's when the Second World War ended, as
01:03:30.900
far as I'm concerned, is in 1989. You know, the dramatic part of it
01:03:35.880
ended in 1945, but the Cold War raged until 1989. And that was an
01:03:43.520
extension of World War II. And, you know, there was constantly
01:03:46.560
bubbling up all over the world. It bubbled up in Korea, and it
01:03:49.320
bubbled up in Vietnam, and Cambodia, and throughout Africa, and all
01:03:54.060
through South America, you know, as the capitalists and the
01:03:56.560
communists fought for control over people's psyches, and also their
01:04:02.100
territories. And that didn't really stop until 1989. And so, from then
01:04:08.880
onward, there wasn't the same tremendous pressure from the radical
01:04:14.020
left to warp and twist governments all over the world into the
01:04:19.740
collectivist vision, let's say. And so, what's been the consequence of that?
01:04:28.920
The removal of that ideological pressure, or at least the partial
01:04:32.920
cessation of that ideological pressure? Well, there wasn't a lot of...
01:04:37.920
In a world where traditional values are under siege, it's crucial to stay
01:04:41.940
sharp both mentally and physically. Enter Responsible Man, a Daily Wire
01:04:46.080
Ventures company that understands what it means to be a pillar of strength in
01:04:49.360
these challenging times. They've created the Emerson Multivitamin not for the
01:04:53.020
faint of heart, but for men who shoulder their responsibilities with pride.
01:04:56.260
The Emerson Multivitamin contains 33 key ingredients that work in harmony to
01:05:00.080
fortify your immune system, sharpen your mental acuity, and maintain the
01:05:03.680
strength of your heart and muscles. It's not just a vitamin, it's fuel for the
01:05:07.480
culture battle that we face every day. And here's something to make you stand
01:05:11.160
just a little taller. Every Emerson Multivitamin is proudly made in the U.S.
01:05:15.080
of A. No compromises, no shortcuts, just pure American craftsmanship.
01:05:19.420
Take advantage of Responsible Man's fall sale. Visit Responsible Man and use code
01:05:23.260
Daily Wire to get 50% off or just $19.99 for your first order. But hurry, because
01:05:28.120
this deal won't last long. Remember, a resilient society needs resilient men.
01:05:32.620
Start your journey to better health and a stronger America with Responsible Man
01:05:35.880
Vitamins. That's ResponsibleMan.com, code Daily Wire for 50% off or just $19.99 for
01:05:41.640
your first order. Responsible Man, because true strength comes from within.
01:05:45.740
Let's be real. French fries are the only good tasting vegetable out there, but
01:05:49.440
unfortunately they're not very healthy. Balance of Nature fruit and veggies are the
01:05:53.020
most convenient way to get your daily intake of fruits and vegetables. You know, like
01:05:56.440
the kind of vegetables that actually count. Balance of Nature uses an advanced cold
01:05:59.960
vacuum process that encapsulates fruits and vegetables into whole food supplements
01:06:03.540
without sacrificing their natural antioxidants. The capsules are completely
01:06:07.300
void of additives, fillers, extracts, synthetics, pesticides, or added sugar. The
01:06:12.000
only thing at Balance of Nature fruit and veggie capsules are fruits and veggies.
01:06:15.220
You need nutrients to function at your best each and every day. Balance of Nature
01:06:19.000
helps you do just that. Go to balanceofnature.com and use promo code
01:06:22.620
WIRE for 35% off your first order as a preferred customer, plus get a free
01:06:26.700
bottle of fiber and spice. That's balanceofnature.com, promo code WIRE.
01:06:32.200
There wasn't, things didn't change a lot for a while after that, but that's not
01:06:35.960
surprising. You know, when something falls apart, well, there's going to be a bit
01:06:39.920
of a catastrophe in its aftermath, no matter what it is. And then it takes a while
01:06:43.860
for the new situation to sort of manifest itself. And, you know, what's been
01:06:48.100
happening over the last, let's say, since the year 2000. It's only a decade
01:06:52.560
after the wall fell down. What's been happening since the year 2000 is actually
01:06:56.780
quite miraculous. And so let me lay that out a little bit. So I first figured this
01:07:02.260
out. I worked on a UN committee about four years ago. It was a committee set up by
01:07:07.220
the UN Secretary General to produce a document that was like maybe an overview
01:07:14.220
of something approximating economic, sustainable economic development, whatever
01:07:18.640
that means. It's a hard thing to, what is sustainable is really, really hard to
01:07:24.240
figure out. But that was the idea. And you can kind of see the rationale for that.
01:07:27.940
It's like you don't want to do something today that completely screws you over in a
01:07:31.560
week, right? You don't want to do something in a year that makes things worse
01:07:35.160
five years from now. So if you're sensible, whatever you do today also works
01:07:40.960
tomorrow and next week and next year and 10 years from now, and maybe works for you
01:07:45.180
and your family and your community as well, all at the same time. And so it's
01:07:49.880
trying to operate within that system of multiple constraints that you might
01:07:53.420
regard as something approximating sustainable. So we were trying to wrestle with
01:07:59.580
that. What would it be like? What would it mean to have a sustainable fishery, for
01:08:03.700
example, or maybe a sustainable energy policy, et cetera, et cetera, to start thinking
01:08:09.580
over some reasonably long period of time, which even in itself is even a
01:08:13.700
complicated problem because it's not obvious what period of time you should
01:08:16.900
think over. You might say, well, we should think over a thousand years because we
01:08:20.840
have the long-term vision. It's like you don't know what it's going to be like in
01:08:25.980
10 years. You know, at the rate of tech, the rate of technological
01:08:29.500
transformation right now is so unbelievably extreme that I don't think we can even
01:08:33.540
see very clearly 10 years down the road. So it's hard to plan for like a thousand
01:08:37.280
years, you know. So anyways, that's all very complicated. But we were producing this
01:08:44.160
document and I got the opportunity to, first of all, watch how a document like
01:08:49.880
that was produced. You know, it's like, well, who works on a higher level plan like
01:08:55.940
that? Well, all the people that were on the committee were former heads of states,
01:08:59.420
the people who were technically appointed to the committee. And then they all
01:09:04.360
produced hierarchies of people underneath them who actually worked on the
01:09:07.380
document. Because there are those people, like if you're the ex-president of
01:09:11.160
France, you're busy. You're busy. Like you're moving around, man. You're occupied
01:09:16.440
all the time. You don't have time to spend two years thinking about a new plan for
01:09:22.500
sustainable global development. So even though you might be the figurehead on the
01:09:26.780
committee, you don't do any of the work. And so it gets passed down to the people
01:09:31.000
that you're associated with until it gets to someone who will actually do it.
01:09:36.740
Well, who are those people? Well, they're usually, sometimes they're academics,
01:09:42.100
sometimes they're political bureaucrats. They're people that, for one reason or
01:09:45.560
another, have a little bit of extra time and interest. But none of them are trained
01:09:49.140
to do this. Because no one's trained to produce a global plan for economic
01:09:53.440
sustainable development. Nobody has that training. So none of the people doing it
01:09:57.820
know what the hell they're doing. So, and it's not that surprising because it's a
01:10:02.700
complicated problem. So that was interesting to watch. And then we got the
01:10:06.640
first draft of the document. And it was awful. It was awful. It was like it was
01:10:11.160
written in 1984. It was a Cold War document. It was North against South. You know, the
01:10:16.220
privileged North against the underprivileged South. And it was capitalist
01:10:19.140
against socialist. No sense that, you know, that there could be cooperation
01:10:24.040
between those two ends of the political distribution. No sense that the South was
01:10:28.280
not what it was in 1984. I mean, the developing world has developed a lot since
01:10:32.780
1984 and is developing extraordinarily quickly. And, you know, I mean, is China
01:10:39.020
more of an economic powerhouse than the United States? Well, no. But China plus India
01:10:44.760
might be, you know, I mean, the tide is turned in many ways. So it was unbelievably
01:10:49.700
outdated. So we thought, well, we'd rewrite the narrative and not so much look for
01:10:54.380
oppressors and victims and all of that horrible nonsense, but to see if we could
01:10:59.280
put together a document that was predicated on the idea that everybody could
01:11:02.840
work together in some loose, what would you call it, some loose
01:11:11.040
association of goodwill and that we could make things better instead of just pointing
01:11:15.540
to whose fault everything was. And so we rewrote the underlying narrative. And that
01:11:23.540
was interesting, too, because one of the things I learned, this is a rule that I didn't write
01:11:27.360
in Twelve Rules, but it was one of the possible rules. Opportunity lurks where
01:11:33.360
responsibility has been abdicated. So one of the things you learn if you do that sort of
01:11:39.680
thing, that sort of thing I was talking about, is that if you actually do the
01:11:42.640
writing, then you win. Because for someone to do something about that, they would have
01:11:49.000
to do the writing. And it's just easier just to take what you've written than it
01:11:55.060
is to write a whole different thing. And so you might think, well, why the hell do I
01:11:59.940
have to do the writing? And the answer is, well, because then you get to do the
01:12:03.840
writing. And it's an interesting thing, you know, if you're at work, I mean, I don't
01:12:07.640
think that you should allow people to take advantage of you. I think that's a big
01:12:10.480
mistake. But, you know, if you're angry because excess responsibility has been
01:12:14.640
dumped on you, you know, independent of whether or not you're being taken advantage
01:12:18.540
of, that's a different issue. You might reverse that and think, well, where the
01:12:24.080
responsibility is, that's where the authority is. And if it happens to fall to
01:12:28.220
you, that makes you indispensable, man. That gives you a stake in the game. So that
01:12:35.440
was quite interesting. So I got a chance to read about, I don't know, 200 books in
01:12:40.840
the months that I was working on this document. And most of those were books on
01:12:46.340
economic development, but also on ecological matters, right? So I was
01:12:51.260
interested in climate change and overfishing and deforestation and the
01:12:55.500
demolition of, like, what, decline in speciation, extinction, you know, all the
01:13:02.460
things you hear about that are looming catastrophes that bedevil the human race
01:13:07.180
and the planet, some of which we're responsible for. And I read a bunch,
01:13:11.860
everything I could get my hands on, including books by people like Bjorn
01:13:16.060
Lomborg, who put himself forward as the skeptical environmentalist. I would highly
01:13:19.760
recommend Bjorn Lomborg, by the way. He wrote a book called How to Spend 75
01:13:23.940
Billion Dollars to Make the World a Better Place. And it's a really, really smart
01:13:28.080
book. So, and that's not very much money, by the way, because there's like 7 billion
01:13:32.080
of us, so that's like, what, 75, 10 bucks each. It's just nothing, you know. Mostly
01:13:38.600
what he found was that we shouldn't be concerned about things like climate
01:13:41.400
change, and we shouldn't even be concerned about overfishing, which is a
01:13:44.300
real problem, or deforestation, or any of that. What we should really be concerned
01:13:48.060
with is getting enough nutrition and health care to small children. That the return on
01:13:57.520
that, from an economic perspective, is 250 to 1. And it kind of makes sense, right?
01:14:02.240
Because, you know, out there in the developing world, there's a lot of
01:14:05.100
potential geniuses, let's say. You know, and I'm not trying to elevate geniuses to
01:14:10.300
a point of, what would you say, value among ordinary people. That's not the point
01:14:14.780
I'm making. The point I'm making is that, you know, now and then a genius comes
01:14:19.600
along who offers something to the world that's so absolutely remarkable that
01:14:24.420
everyone is better off for it. And you don't know who that's going to be. It
01:14:28.300
could be any one of those little tiny kids, right? They all have brains. They're
01:14:32.020
all unbelievably complicated creatures. And the fact that they're not all being,
01:14:37.260
what would you say, encouraged. They don't all have the minimal resources
01:14:43.400
necessary to manifest at least their physiological peak is a real catastrophe
01:14:48.720
for everyone. And that's also why the return on investment for early childhood
01:14:55.220
care is so absolutely high. And what Lombard did was say, well, he took a bunch
01:14:59.240
of economists, some Nobel winning, prize winning economists, he took the UN goals.
01:15:04.540
There's about 150 UN development goals, which is way too many. 150 goals is no goals,
01:15:09.960
right? If you have 150 goals, it's like, I'm not talking to you. I'm certainly not
01:15:14.720
working with you. It's like, you have 150 goals. Like, if you have, if you have like
01:15:19.400
two goals, or if you at least have a hierarchy of goals, this is the most
01:15:24.380
important thing. This is the second most important thing. The third most important
01:15:27.760
thing. Well, then we could work together, but 150 goals, you're just a chaotic mess.
01:15:32.420
And the UN actually had 150 goals, and they would not prioritize them because as soon
01:15:38.800
as they prioritized one goal over another, they annoyed the people who had the
01:15:42.140
secondary goal. So why is that goal more important than my goal? Well, some goal has
01:15:47.460
to be more important because we can't do all these things at once. Well, you're not
01:15:51.420
sacrificing my goal. Well, then we can't do anything. Well, that's okay, as long as
01:15:55.580
you don't sacrifice my goal, right? So that's, that's the stasis. And so what
01:15:59.820
Lombard did, because he's smart, is that he took teams of economists, some of them were
01:16:05.200
Nobel prize winning economists, and he said, okay, here's the deal. You've got a finite pot of
01:16:09.940
money, 75 billion. It was 50 to begin with, but he updated it because, you know, time,
01:16:15.420
times went on and inflation knocked the value of the currency down a little bit. And he
01:16:19.860
said, okay, here's the deal. Take these 150 UN goals and analyze them economically and
01:16:27.980
figure out where you get the most bang for the buck. It's like, we're not going to be able
01:16:31.340
to do all 150. We don't have infinite resources. We have finite time. We have finite resources.
01:16:36.500
Prioritize. And so, and the best way to prioritize, use money to prioritize, not because it's such a
01:16:43.760
great way of prioritizing, but because we don't have a better way of doing it. So you can only use
01:16:48.300
the best thing you have at your disposal, no matter how bad it is. And money isn't perfect, but
01:16:53.380
it has its utility. It's a universally accepted standard of value. That's something. And so he said,
01:17:01.840
well, rank order, rank order, the priorities in terms of return on investment, justify how you
01:17:07.140
do the calculations. Then he had all 10 teams do that. And then he averaged across the teams and
01:17:12.780
came up with a final ranking. It was pretty smart, eh? It's like, well, we might as well take our
01:17:17.540
resources and do the most we can with them in the shortest period of time. And so, and what he found
01:17:23.200
out, I think four of the top 10 goals had to do with the improvement of early childhood health around
01:17:28.600
the world. So that was quite cool. It's like, well, what should you be concerned about? Climate
01:17:32.900
change? Doesn't look like it. First of all, you don't know what the hell to do about it. Like, what
01:17:37.380
are you going to do about it? And not only that, the measurement error in climate change is so large
01:17:42.820
50 years out that even if you did whatever it is that you think that you should do now at whatever
01:17:48.620
cost, you wouldn't be able to tell 50 years from now if what you did had any effect because the
01:17:54.100
measurement error is so high that it's going to wash out in the measurement. Now, I'm
01:17:58.540
not saying we shouldn't be concerned about the climate. That's not my point. My point is we
01:18:02.920
don't know what to do about it. And there's a bunch of other problems that we have that are really
01:18:06.600
pressing that we do know what to do about and we could solve them. And so we could solve them
01:18:10.860
effectively and we know how to do it. And well, okay. So, more importantly, more importantly,
01:18:19.000
reading Lomburg, a variety of other people too, and there's been about 10 books published in the last
01:18:23.920
10 years all documenting the same thing. Steven Pinker's Enlightenment Now is one of them. And
01:18:29.040
Hans Rosling, who's a great data visualizer, Scandinavian guy, just wrote another book,
01:18:34.300
Facts. I can't remember the name of the book, unfortunately, at the moment, but it's Hans Rosling.
01:18:39.480
And Matt Ridley has written a book as well like this. And there's a number of them. And
01:18:45.280
there's an organization online that tweets constantly, humanprogress.org. And then Matt
01:18:53.060
Ridley does This World in Data. And these people are doing empirical analysis of the rate of economic
01:18:59.700
growth around the world. And since the year 2000, we have been getting richer worldwide at a rate that's
01:19:08.720
absolutely unprecedented in the history of mankind. There's nothing to compare it to. And no one knows.
01:19:15.020
The World in Data people, or was it, was it human, I think it was human progress, did a poll in the
01:19:22.400
United States. So, here's a fact, okay. So, one of the millennia goals, millennium goals, was to have
01:19:28.940
the number of people in absolute poverty between the year 2000 and 2015. Because that's a major league
01:19:36.280
goal, right? Because people have been poor forever. And not just a little poor, like seriously starving
01:19:43.760
poor. There were famines, major famines, in developed countries in Europe in the 20th century.
01:19:50.360
In places like Sweden. In places like Italy. And not just after World War II. Like famine was the norm.
01:19:56.260
And you know, in 1895, the average person in the Western world lived on less than a dollar a day in
01:20:02.340
today's money. Which is less than half of the current UN criteria for absolute poverty. And so that was
01:20:09.500
everyone, man. Everyone up to 1895 was so goddamn poor, you cannot even imagine it. Right? And suffered
01:20:17.280
everything that went along with that. Right? Terrible mortality in childbirth. Right? Terrible mortality for
01:20:23.360
babies. Also for mothers. Right? Very low probability of reaching an old age. You are unbelievably
01:20:30.000
likely, if you were a kid born around, you know, a 10-year-old in 1895, very likely to lose one parent
01:20:36.660
before the age of 10. And pretty damn likely to be without both of them by the time you were 15.
01:20:41.580
And there were hardly any people that were well off. And even the ones that were well off, it's like,
01:20:47.080
they weren't that well off, man. They didn't have toilets. Right? I mean, and everybody laughs about
01:20:52.980
that. It's like, no, no, you don't get it. They didn't have toilets. That's a big problem. And they
01:20:59.040
didn't have central heating. And they didn't have air conditioning. It's like, central heating's a bit...
01:21:03.960
Well, you Canadians. You're all Canadians. You know what it's like. Central heating, man. Yeah.
01:21:08.520
That's good. It stops you from dying for like six months of the year. It's a big deal, you know.
01:21:14.360
And they didn't have refrigeration. You should try living without a refrigerator for a week. You think
01:21:19.480
you're poor. It's like, you're not poor. You have a refrigerator. You're rich, man. That's a...
01:21:24.700
And it's not some little ratty refrigerator that costs you like a year's salary and has one cubic foot
01:21:29.860
of space in it, which was what the first refrigerators were like. It's a great big
01:21:33.380
bloody refrigerator. You can put a whole moose in it. And so, and you think, well, everybody's got a
01:21:38.800
refrigerator. It's not a big deal. It's like, just because everyone has it doesn't mean it's not a
01:21:43.820
big deal. It's a really big deal. You know, and I think it was the people at Human Progress wrote a
01:21:49.700
little essay a while back pointing out that you're probably better off as a member of the, say,
01:21:56.880
you're barely in the middle class. You're probably better off than John Rockefeller was in 1895.
01:22:02.680
So you're better off as a member of, you know, just kind of an entry member, entry-level member of the
01:22:08.620
middle class now than the richest person in the world in 1895. So that's really something to think
01:22:15.220
about. And so, okay, so that's how poor everyone was in 1895. And man, we've been getting richer like,
01:22:21.480
like nobody's business since then. It's been this exponential curve. You know, and some parts of the
01:22:26.220
world got richer first, but, and some people got richer first, but you got to think that through.
01:22:30.980
It's like, well, of course, some countries got richer first. What do you expect? Everybody's
01:22:35.680
going to become, go from not rich at all, absolutely poor. They're just going to make one leap,
01:22:41.540
everyone, all 7 billion people are all of a sudden going to be rich. It's like, that isn't going to be
01:22:45.960
how it works. Some countries were going to get rich first. And within those countries, some people were
01:22:51.640
going to get rich first. But now you think about, you think about the rate of technological advancement
01:22:56.840
that's upon us. You know, it was probably what, 15 years ago, 10 years ago that big screen TVs came
01:23:03.000
out. And when they first came out, they were like, you know, you got a 50 inch TV. It was a status symbol,
01:23:08.240
probably cost you $15,000, something like that. And you know, you got to have one and you got to have
01:23:14.000
one if you were rich. But it was like, four years later, five years later, they're basically free.
01:23:22.540
Right? I mean, how many screens have you guys thrown out in the last five years? Right? It's
01:23:28.620
like, oh no, my screen is this thick. Well, first of all, it was this thick. Oh no, my monitor is too
01:23:33.140
thick. Better throw that away. Well, now it's this thick. Oh no, that's too clunky. Now they're this
01:23:38.220
thick. It's like, they're so cheap, you can just throw them away. And now everybody has a 65 inch
01:23:43.340
screen. And you wouldn't have had those if the rich people wouldn't have had them first. That's
01:23:47.140
the other thing that's kind of interesting about rich people that no one ever thinks about. It's
01:23:50.380
like, rich people are necessary to buy expensive things first. Because otherwise you can't produce
01:23:57.700
a market, you know? Like the people who built the large screen TVs had to sell the first ones for
01:24:02.640
like $25,000 each. So that they could get so cheap that everybody could have them for free. And so this
01:24:09.340
is something I've been thinking about with regards to inequality is that, you know, one of the
01:24:14.820
advantages to making some people, to giving some people large pools of cash or to allow them to
01:24:20.840
accrue that or to encourage them to accrue that is so that when a new consumer product enters the
01:24:25.620
market at a high cost, there's actually a market for it so that the people who produce it can generate
01:24:30.340
enough of them to saturate the wealthy market so they can drive down the price so that everybody else
01:24:34.780
can have them. So what if it was the case that the price all of us pay to have cool things is that
01:24:40.120
there has to be rich people? I mean, it seems, I'm not sure about this. It's an idea that I've been
01:24:45.280
just toying with over the last few months, but it's not obvious to me that it's false. And like,
01:24:50.000
who cares if you have to wait four years for your damn 50-inch flat screen TV? It's not like you're
01:24:54.520
sitting there without a refrigerator. You've got a refrigerator, you know? So, okay, so everybody was
01:25:02.040
bloody dirt, horribly dirt poor in 1895, even in the developed world where, you know, things were
01:25:07.420
better than they were in the rest of the world because in the, it was horrible in the West, but
01:25:12.400
it was absolutely brutally catastrophic everywhere else. And so, and then, you know, this technological
01:25:18.240
miracle occurred and a lot of that's a consequence of free market principles. A lot of it, a huge amount
01:25:23.740
of it. And so, well, you know, we started to get rich and we got richer and richer and richer and
01:25:28.640
richer. And then the gap between the West and the rest of the world grew. And, you know, that allowed
01:25:34.560
for us to criticize ourselves to some degree. It's thought, well, maybe what the West is doing
01:25:39.400
is exploiting everyone and that's why we're rich. And, you know, there's a certain amount of truth to
01:25:44.200
that because no system is perfect. And when you produce a corporation or a government or there's a
01:25:50.900
certain amount of exploitation that's bound to go along with it because no human structures are
01:25:55.920
without their imperfections. But, but in the final analysis, the, the West is rich because
01:26:02.520
it's extracted resources and made the rest of the world poor argument is not correct because
01:26:07.560
everybody started brutally poor. And not only that, everybody started brutally poor and almost
01:26:15.500
everybody suffered under tyrannical governmental structures. And so the baseline for human existence
01:26:22.560
is starvation and catastrophe under the yoke of tyranny. And whenever that isn't happening, it's a
01:26:29.120
bloody miracle. And so you can't just put that at the foot of some system. You can't say, well, that's a
01:26:35.060
consequence of capitalism or the West. It's like, no, it's not. That's the default condition of
01:26:39.480
existence. It's way easier to starve under tyranny than it is to be wealthy and freedom. It's way more
01:26:45.760
likely. And the fact that anybody got to the point where they were free and then also wealthy, it's like
01:26:50.840
we should just be, we should just be constantly amazed beyond comprehension that anything like
01:26:57.560
that ever happened even once. And the cool thing is it's happening everywhere. So the millennium goal
01:27:03.620
for the UN was to have the number of people in absolute poverty from the year 2000 to the 2000,
01:27:08.480
2015. And we did it three years earlier. Think about that. That's half as many people were in absolute
01:27:18.080
privation over a 12-year period. Here's the projection. By the year 2030, there won't be anybody
01:27:24.860
on the planet who's absolutely in poverty. Right? That's 12 years from now, we'll have been done with
01:27:31.420
that. And so that's just, it's just, I can't figure out why that isn't a headline every day.
01:27:38.280
300,000 more people no longer in poverty. Right? That'd be a good headline to wake up to.
01:27:44.720
Here's something that's cool. The child mortality rate in Africa
01:27:49.240
is now the same as the child mortality rate in Europe in 1950. That's how narrow the gap has
01:27:57.180
become. That's a 60-year gap. That's all that's left between the least developed part of the world
01:28:02.680
and the most developed part of the world. So, and the rates of death of women in childbirth have
01:28:09.180
absolutely plummeted around the world. And more and more people have access to fresh water. And
01:28:13.760
more and more people have access to vaccines. And more and more people have access to food.
01:28:19.560
We have enough food for everyone. And here's something else. You know, we're going to overpopulate
01:28:23.500
the planet. We're all going to die. It's like, no, we're not. That's wrong. We're going to peak at
01:28:28.880
9 billion. That's what the demographic projections indicate. Because what seems to have happened,
01:28:33.660
and no one guessed this, all you have to do to bring population under control is educate women.
01:28:39.300
As soon as you educate women, instead of having eight children, you know, four of whom die,
01:28:44.580
they have two children, both of whom survive. Or they have 1.5 children. It's not even replacement.
01:28:50.260
So not only are we going to peak at 9 billion sometime in the next 40 years, but then the population
01:28:56.040
is going to decline precipitously. In 50 years, the big problem will be that there aren't enough people.
01:29:01.060
So when we have enough food to feed all those people, like we're going to have to
01:29:04.820
be careful and continue doing what we're doing, but we have enough food for everybody.
01:29:10.940
And so, and not only that, we're becoming more productive in our ability to generate food all
01:29:15.440
the time. So not only do we have enough already, but food is getting cheaper and cheaper and cheaper,
01:29:20.600
and all things considered of higher quality. You know, now that doesn't mean that the quality
01:29:26.100
couldn't be improved, but compared to potato peelings, you know, and gruel, and dirty water,
01:29:36.380
which was like the standard diet for people for a very long period of time, we're not doing
01:29:41.380
too bad. So, okay, so back, we'll go back to Shakespeare. All the world's a stage, right? So what I was doing
01:30:07.380
in some sense with that part of the lecture was setting the stage. You know, you think, well,
01:30:15.200
if you're going to play your part, you should know what the stage is. Like, where are you exactly?
01:30:19.940
What's going on around you? And it's hard to say, you know, and it's very easy to be pessimistic, and I
01:30:25.460
think we're, oh, the human progress people also polled Americans to find out how many people knew that
01:30:32.000
the rate of poverty had fallen by half between the year 2000 and 2012, and 95% of Americans have no idea
01:30:38.500
that that happened. So, and I suspect most of you didn't know that, and I suspect that there's a
01:30:45.460
substantial percentage of you who doubt whether it was actually true, you know, and question, well,
01:30:50.240
were they gerrymandering the definition of absolute poverty? And it's an arbitrary definition, but
01:30:56.040
you've got to define it in some manner, and no matter how you define it, it fell by half.
01:31:02.760
So that's a great thing. So, but people don't know. Why don't they know? I don't know the answer
01:31:11.880
to that. Like, part of me thinks, maybe there's a couple of things going on. One might be, I think
01:31:17.860
one of the things that happened since the 1970s was that the prosperity of the developing world
01:31:25.080
was purchased at the relative expense of the North American and European working class.
01:31:31.740
Because one of the things that you've seen happen since 1970, there's some arguments about this,
01:31:36.340
because your money buys higher quality items now. So even if you have the same amount of money as
01:31:41.800
you did in 1970, the things you can buy are better. So even if you have the same income,
01:31:47.260
it might be that you're richer now. But it's hard to calculate those things. But independent of that,
01:31:52.600
working class wages have remained pretty flat since the 1970s. You know, and the bargain with
01:31:57.160
the working class in North America and in Europe was something like, work hard, and your children
01:32:01.820
will have a better life than you do. And maybe even your future self will be better off than you are
01:32:06.280
now. But that's kind of flatlined. And there's a lot of reasons for it. And so I think what that's
01:32:12.300
done is produce a certain amount of disenchantment in the West that the radical leftist types have
01:32:18.640
been capitalizing on. And so even though all around the world things are getting better at a rate that's
01:32:24.980
so fast that you probably couldn't improve it if you tried, the West seems to be at odds with itself
01:32:31.880
about its moral, what would you say, its morality and its vision and the propriety of its mode of
01:32:41.380
operating in the world. And, you know, I think that's a catastrophe, actually. Because as far as I can
01:32:50.040
tell, the reason that this economic miracle is taking place, and has started, say, since the year 2000,
01:32:55.840
is because the damn radical leftist collectivists lost in 1989. They stopped mucking up the planet.
01:33:04.280
Increasingly, governments around the world are experimenting with free market solutions and a certain
01:33:08.620
amount of freedom. And as a consequence, people are getting rich way faster. You know, that's what happened
01:33:14.400
in China. You know, what happened in China, you know how the open market started to develop, was a bunch of
01:33:21.000
farmers met in secret, collectivized farmers, who were producing nothing and starving as a consequence,
01:33:26.880
met in secret and decided that they were going to parcel out their collective plots privately. And the
01:33:32.600
punishment for doing that was death when they started to do it. But they met clandestinely in secret and
01:33:38.300
they parceled out their plots. And they all decided that you could keep what you grew. And all of a sudden,
01:33:43.980
man, they were producing food like mad. And of course, the authorities got curious about that and
01:33:50.380
found out what they were doing. And, you know, you and began to do what you'd expect the communist
01:33:57.120
totalitarians to do. But they needed the damn food. And so they decided, weirdly enough, to leave these
01:34:06.220
people alone and to encourage that kind of experimentation. And that was the genesis of the origin of the free
01:34:12.660
market experiments in China. It was just a couple of farmers who, you know, took it upon themselves to
01:34:17.620
risk their own lives to try to do something that was actually productive. And so the communists
01:34:24.120
introduced free market principles into the Chinese system. And, well, the rest is history. You know
01:34:28.860
what's happened to China over the last 40 years. It's just, it's a miracle beyond comprehension. Same
01:34:34.060
with South Korea, right? Which was, South Korea was an unbelievably poor place and underdeveloped.
01:34:40.280
And now it's an economic powerhouse. And India, which is completely ungovernable. I mean,
01:34:44.940
you know, we have trouble in Canada with two languages. It's like, I think there's 300 languages
01:34:49.420
in India, right? And an absolute plethora of religious beliefs and an immense population. I mean,
01:34:55.420
it's a complicated place, man. And nonetheless, India, it's like, it's cruising. There aren't people
01:35:01.660
starving. Or if there are, there's a lot fewer than there were, you know? And in China, well,
01:35:06.340
people don't starve. There's, there's plenty of food for everyone in China. It's like,
01:35:10.960
what a miracle that is. Who would have ever guessed that was going to happen? And so we have
01:35:15.960
every reason to be optimistic. And so, all right. So let's say that sets the stage. What's the stage?
01:35:22.080
We're in a world that could continue to radically improve if we don't do anything stupid and muck it up.
01:35:28.820
Right? And so, the thing about this, this poem I read of Marx is like, there's dark motivations in
01:35:35.200
that, you know? Marx pretty much lays out his desire to demolish and destroy. He's vengeful. He wants to
01:35:41.420
tear things down. And I see that as a threat in the West, you know? We don't have, we don't, our
01:35:48.380
institutions, many of our institutions don't seem to either understand what we have or appreciate it or be
01:35:53.920
humbly grateful for it or to regard it as the miracle that it is. And that's very, very dangerous
01:36:00.200
because, because it is a miracle. And it's a particular kind of miracle. And it's this, it's
01:36:06.140
the sort of miracle that I was trying to, I was trying to lay out in dramatic terms, at least in
01:36:11.320
part in 12 Rules for Life. It's like, well, why does, why does what we do in the West work?
01:36:17.820
Well, I think the first reason is, and this is what I think we got really right, and I think
01:36:24.920
in the West we articulated this more comprehensively than had ever been articulated in the history of
01:36:31.500
the world. What's the primary level of analysis when you're trying to understand the structure of
01:36:38.220
reality? Well, that's Shakespeare's point. All the world's a stage and every individual comes out and
01:36:43.780
plays his or her part. That's the right level of analysis. The individual. You set up your society
01:36:50.480
predicated on the idea that the individual is of ultimate value. And that's, to some degree,
01:36:57.240
that's a matter of rights. And here's, here's something I think we've done wrong, technically
01:37:01.860
speaking, in our political systems, probably in our international development as well. When we're
01:37:06.280
talking about the primacy of the individual, we concentrate on rights. But I think that's wrong.
01:37:12.660
I think what we should do is concentrate on responsibility instead. And so.
01:37:24.560
Okay, so it's interesting. So it's interesting, you know, you might ask yourself, well, why would
01:37:29.180
everyone clap about that? You know, well, it's really a serious question because rights, I mean,
01:37:34.380
hey man, that's what you get to do. Like the world's your oyster. It's like, so, well, so why don't
01:37:38.800
clap about that? Well, responsibility, that's a whole different story. It's like, that's a burden
01:37:43.540
for you, man. It's like, get out there and do your part. There's important things for you to do.
01:37:48.520
There's a heavy weight on you. And you need to bear up underneath it. It's like, well, why would you
01:37:53.540
clap about that? Well, it's a good, because, and I'm asking this seriously, because one of the things
01:37:58.640
I've noticed, this has really blown me away. I can't really come to terms with it, is that I've been
01:38:03.880
trying to figure out why what I've been talking about has resonated with people. And there's a
01:38:08.620
technical reason. The technical reason is these new media forms like YouTube and podcasts have
01:38:14.320
enabled long form, like global long form philosophical discussion. That's never happened
01:38:20.340
before, right? TV, you get six minutes or 30 seconds, right? And so if you have a complicated
01:38:26.160
message, you have to soundbite it to 30 seconds or maybe to six minutes. With YouTube and podcasts,
01:38:32.500
you can talk about complicated things for a very long time. And it turns out that people
01:38:36.340
are, want that. Interestingly enough, there's a huge market for that. We're smarter than we
01:38:42.180
thought. Our technologies made us look stupider than we are. So, and I think part of the reason
01:38:48.800
that what I've been doing is successful is because I've been fortunate enough to be an early adopter
01:38:54.320
in a new technological space that was relatively uninhabited. And so that's a useful thing to know.
01:38:59.600
But the other thing that I've noticed, because at the beginning of this talk, I said, you know,
01:39:04.860
I'm always watching individuals when I'm speaking with them, but also listening to the crowd. And one
01:39:09.980
of the things I've noticed is that whenever I talk about responsibility, especially and its relationship
01:39:15.020
with meaning, the crowd goes completely silent. And it's happened in every single venue that I've
01:39:20.280
talked to. And it's a reflection of the fact, the same, it's reflecting the same thing that drove you
01:39:26.100
to applaud when I talked about responsibility. It's like, I think we've talked about rights for so
01:39:30.400
long in the West that we're exhausted by the discourse. And we need the corrective because
01:39:35.920
there are no rights without responsibilities. They're the same thing. Your rights are my
01:39:40.160
responsibilities. They're the same thing. And, and, but there's something that's more,
01:39:44.040
that's deeper, I think, than that. And this is, this is, I think, the other issue that's struck a chord
01:39:51.620
with people. The stage I set, said, you know, you can't lay the suffering of the world at the West,
01:40:01.200
at the feet of the West, because the suffering of the world is built into the structure of the world.
01:40:04.940
Starvation, death, brutality, all of that, that, that's, that's the easy default. That's the state
01:40:12.300
of the world. And it takes tremendous work to, to, to produce a counterposition to that, to make sure
01:40:19.540
that everyone has enough, and to make sure that our institutions are, are free and, and flourishing.
01:40:24.660
That's hard. And so, so it's hard to do it practically, but it's also hard to do it psychologically,
01:40:31.520
because if the state of the world, the fundamental bottom level of reality is something like
01:40:37.440
suffering, I think it's suffering tainted with malevolence, it's something like that,
01:40:41.520
then you also need something psychological to set against that. Or you end up in a situation like
01:40:46.360
Marx, you know, where he's outraged at the structure of the world and desires to wreak havoc and take
01:40:51.180
revenge as a consequence, which he seems to have done extraordinarily effectively. If you don't have
01:40:56.760
that meaning, then it's very difficult to, to reconcile yourself to the conditions of existence,
01:41:02.680
right? Because even if you're fortunate, and as we all are, even if you're fortunate, your life is
01:41:08.280
still very hard, you know, you're, you're, you're fragile in all sorts of ways, so is your family,
01:41:12.720
you're going to face the death of the people that you love, and, and yourself for that matter, and,
01:41:16.400
and there's going to be some bloody rough times along the way, and they'll be rough enough so that
01:41:20.060
they'll make you feel like shaking your hand at the sky and just asking what the hell's going on,
01:41:24.600
you know, and so you need something to set against that, you need a meaning to set against that, to
01:41:29.860
justify your life in the face of that suffering, and I think that that's why people are happy about
01:41:37.100
the discussion of responsibility, because it's actually not rights that give your life meaning,
01:41:43.440
it's responsibility, and, and to know the connection between responsibility and meaning,
01:41:49.340
especially once you know the connection between meaning and the antidote to suffering,
01:41:54.160
it's like, well, what's the antidote to suffering? Well, it isn't lack of suffering, man,
01:41:59.580
because that ain't happening, so, I mean, you can stave it off, and the less starvation, the better,
01:42:05.840
let's say, but fundamentally, there's an eradicable amount of suffering that's going to be associated
01:42:10.100
with your life, well, you need something to set against that, something that, it's a vision that's
01:42:15.480
sufficiently noble to make the suffering worthwhile, something like that, even to yourself,
01:42:20.660
to stop you from becoming bitter, and then you think, well, where do you find that meaning? It's
01:42:24.800
not in your rights, your rights allow you to do whatever you want, and doing whatever you want is
01:42:31.180
actually, that's sort of what an impulsive teenager does, you know, just do whatever you want, it's like,
01:42:37.440
no, that isn't how it works, you can tell that by looking at people that you admire, or even looking
01:42:43.860
at yourself when you admire yourself in those rare moments that you might dare to do that,
01:42:47.600
you know, it's like, well, who do you look up to? Well, you certainly don't look up to people that
01:42:53.080
don't take care of themselves, for starters, like, if someone has to take care of you as a grown man,
01:42:58.820
it's like, that's, I mean, unless you've been cut off at the knees, you know, unless some terrible
01:43:03.420
tragedy has befallen you, you're just not living up to your responsibility, and your cost, you're not
01:43:08.920
who you could be, and you're taking from someone else, no one admires that, unless you're a psychopath,
01:43:14.140
no one admires that, well, that's what psychopaths do, and so, you know, they might find that admirable,
01:43:19.500
but no one else does, and they're relatively rare, and they're generally not very successful, so it's
01:43:23.960
a bad strategy, so, well, you have to keep running away if you're a psychopath, because people figure
01:43:29.580
out who you are, and then they won't have anything to do with you, so if you're a psychopath, you're a
01:43:33.540
nomad, and, and, you know, you can go around being a parasite, and it sort of works, but not really,
01:43:39.500
and so, it's, it's not the attitude to, to found a whole state on, let's say, or a family, or a relationship
01:43:45.540
with yourself, and so, you admire people spontaneously that take responsibility for themselves, but then,
01:43:52.540
that's not all of it, you know, the people you really admire, you think, well, he's a good man, or she's a good
01:43:58.300
woman, and, and not only, you know, is she, is she sensible, and, and, and secure in herself, but she's got
01:44:05.880
something left over for her family, so she's conducting her life responsibly, and taking care
01:44:11.720
of her family, it's like, good for her, and under difficult circumstances, and then, maybe you meet
01:44:16.700
someone who's even gone a little farther than that, and they kind of got their own life under control,
01:44:20.900
and they've got their family's life put in pretty decent order, and then they have a little left over
01:44:26.320
for the community, right, so they're out there trying to do decent things, and, you know, most of the people
01:44:31.060
that I've met, not everyone, but most of the people that I've met, who have excess wealth, and I've met
01:44:36.340
a lot of people like that now, especially in places like Silicon Valley, most of those people spend a
01:44:41.600
substantial amount of time trying to figure out what good things they could do with their excess
01:44:45.640
money, and it isn't because they're good people, exactly, although sometimes that's the reason, it's
01:44:51.260
because it's actually, if you have money, well, what are you going to do, how many yachts do you need,
01:44:56.580
one is more than enough, you don't even want to have one, actually, because they're more trouble
01:45:01.280
than they're worth, but if you have one, you certainly don't need two, it's like, what are you
01:45:05.680
going to do, well, maybe you could do something useful with your money, you know, maybe there's
01:45:10.580
people that, whose careers you could help foster, maybe there's a business that you could build,
01:45:14.680
there's some, some major problem in the world that you could try to solve, Bill Gates, you know,
01:45:19.660
he's trying to kick the slats out of the five biggest transmissible diseases, that's a hell of a
01:45:24.900
thing, maybe we should give him 60 billion dollars, it's like, which we already did, it's like, you
01:45:30.200
know, but he gave us these personal computers in return, which wasn't such a bad trade, and now he's
01:45:34.940
off there trying to get rid of malaria, well, if the cost of getting rid of malaria is that Bill Gates
01:45:40.380
has to have 60 billion dollars, it's like, that's a pretty good, that's a pretty good bargain, and he's
01:45:44.860
actually making headway, you know, we'll probably get rid of polio in the next couple of years, if the
01:45:48.840
bloody Islamic terrorists would stop harassing people who are doing vaccinations, we'd already have that
01:45:54.080
done, but we might be able to get rid of the five big transmissible diseases in the next 15 years,
01:45:59.380
that'd be a hell of an accomplishment, and so, you know, you, you've got the responsibility for you,
01:46:04.880
you've got responsibility for your family, if you want it, you've got responsibility for your community,
01:46:09.120
and you can have people finger wagging at you, saying, you know, you should take your, you should
01:46:13.500
take your responsibility seriously, and that just produces a kind of, who are you to tell me what to
01:46:20.060
do, sort of response, you know, and, and, and I think that's where the conservatives have fallen
01:46:24.440
down, the classic conservatives, because they get a bit finger waggy, and, and, and fundamentalist about
01:46:29.660
the whole thing, and, but it, you can make a much better case, you can say, look, life's rough, man, for
01:46:35.240
you and everyone else, and you could do something about that, you, like, you couldn't do everything
01:46:40.440
about it, but you could, you could definitely do something about it, and you could certainly make it a
01:46:44.520
hell of a lot worse, that's in your power, so you can make it worse for you, and for everyone else,
01:46:49.700
that's, you've got that, if you want it, you could at least not do that, that would be something,
01:46:56.640
and then, well, that would be something, like, you could just refrain from making things worse,
01:47:01.520
that'd be a nice start, but then you could really push yourself a bit, and think, no, no,
01:47:05.380
I'm actually going to aim to make things better, I'm going to take, and, and the way I'm going to do
01:47:10.100
that is to take responsibility, so here's, there's a couple of great ideas that the West has,
01:47:15.160
so the first idea is, the individual is sovereign, there's something divine about each person,
01:47:21.320
there's a locus of ability in each person, that's so valuable, that the integrity of the state itself
01:47:27.920
should be founded on recognition of that, and that, that is one of the great and miraculous human
01:47:35.380
ideas, to think that's the case for everyone, is, it's amazing that anybody ever came up with that
01:47:41.820
idea, and, and, and even more amazing that we basically all share that idea, and that we founded
01:47:46.320
our state on it, and that it works, it works, you found a state on that idea, it works, and then
01:47:50.900
associated with that idea is that that sovereign individual has a sovereign ethical responsibility,
01:47:56.780
twofold, one is to work diligently to eliminate unnecessary suffering in the world, you certainly do
01:48:04.700
that if you're taking care of your family, right, I mean, you want to protect your children from undue
01:48:09.460
suffering, not from everything, not from challenge, certainly, but from, from base misery, you know,
01:48:16.200
and that, the same for you, and perhaps the same for your community, and the other thing to do is to
01:48:21.740
constrain malevolence, right, to work to eradicate evil in you, first in you, first and foremost in you,
01:48:30.920
that's a big enough job, man, you constrain it in yourself, you'll start to constrain it everywhere
01:48:35.680
else, you wrestle with that in yourself, and so that's, that's expressed in the New Testament
01:48:40.300
story of, at least in part of Christ encountering Satan in the desert, right, and, and what, foregoing the
01:48:46.820
temptations of power in order to constrain malevolence, but it's portrayed as a psychological drama, and so that's
01:48:52.920
responsibility, it's like, well, the world is a bitter place in many ways, and the bitterness is made worse by the
01:48:58.620
malevolence of you, and everyone else, and, and so what do you, and, and then that can drive you to despair,
01:49:03.840
certainly, drive you to madness, right, and worse, it can drive you to murder, it can drive you to genocide,
01:49:10.700
it can drive you to torture, like, and it does, and it's not surprising, well, what do you do about that,
01:49:16.100
and you do an about face, and you think, the world is characterized by suffering and malevolence,
01:49:22.020
but the meaning, there's meaning to be had, and the meaning to be had is in the responsibility, and the
01:49:27.800
responsibility is to alleviate the suffering, and constrain the malevolence, and that, that, that puts an aim in
01:49:33.720
your life, and weirdly, this is so strange, this is the strange part of it, is that if you turn around and you
01:49:39.420
adopt that responsibility, despite its daunting nature, voluntarily, then that instantly produces the meaning that works as a
01:49:46.580
medication against the suffering, even if you don't dispense with the suffering, it's like, at least you have a
01:49:51.340
challenge that's worth living for, right, Nietzsche said, he who has a why can bear any how, it's like, so,
01:50:00.720
and I'll end with this, I figured something out the other day, and it took me like 30 years to figure this
01:50:06.000
out, so, some of you, some of you have watched my lectures, and you know, I lecture about Pinocchio, for
01:50:13.180
example, and there's a deep mythological idea in Pinocchio, and the idea is that you should, you should
01:50:18.680
rescue your father from the belly of the beast, it's something like that, and so I've been thinking about that, it's like, well,
01:50:26.320
why would the spirit of your father be lying latent in the belly of a beast, what, what possible sense would that make, and you all
01:50:32.920
know this is true, you know this, because you watch things like Pinocchio, and you watch a puppet, marionette, who's being pulled by
01:50:39.820
strings that aren't his, descend to the depths of chaos, and rescue his father, and that makes sense to you, who knows
01:50:46.700
why, but it does, and you watch the Lion King, and you see the same thing with Simba, because when he undergoes his
01:50:52.500
maturation transformation at the end of the movie, he follows the shaman down into the depths of the jungle path, and
01:50:58.260
looks in the reflective pool into the depths, and then sees his father echoed in the sky, and his father tells him to remember
01:51:04.840
who he is, and that's fine with you, you, you gather that, it, it makes sense archetypally, the question is why, okay, so
01:51:11.880
here's, here's a, here's an idea, so you need to confront challenges, that's how you grow, that's how you become
01:51:19.040
stronger, the clinical evidence for that is clear, then you can think of the notion of challenge itself, so that's also
01:51:24.980
part of the stage setting, the notion of challenge itself is that you, you stand on the abyss, and you face the abyss, right, and
01:51:30.860
that's your own death, for that matter, that's the suffering, and the malevolence of the world, the darkness of the
01:51:35.900
world, and in the darkness, you see a terrible monster, and that's a thing that will take you down, and then you go
01:51:41.800
down there into it, and what happens when you get inside it, is you find the spirit of your dead father, and what
01:51:46.940
does that mean? Well, one of the things we know is that if you face things, you get stronger, now it's partly
01:51:54.160
because you learn, now you, you never learn without difficulty, right, because you have to, you learn by
01:51:59.500
facing challenges that you haven't yet faced, and so it's difficult, you get more informed as you face
01:52:05.240
challenges that you haven't faced, so there gets to be more to you, you get to be more like a complete
01:52:10.520
human being, right, you get to be more like the embodiment of the ancestral spirits, it's something
01:52:15.620
like that, by, by, by challenging yourself, so your question is, well, what would you become if you face the
01:52:21.240
ultimate challenge properly, we'd become the ancestral father, it's something like that, but
01:52:26.240
there's something even more remarkable about this, so one of the things that biologists have figured
01:52:30.620
out, neurologists and geneticists have figured out in the last 10 years, this is so cool, if you go to
01:52:37.480
somewhere that you haven't been, so you challenge yourself, new genes, genes that haven't been turned
01:52:43.460
on in your brain turn on, and they code for new proteins, and they make new structures, and so part of your
01:52:49.260
potential, because you have potential, whatever the hell that means, part of your potential is locked in
01:52:55.220
your genetic code, and it won't turn on until you put yourself in a situation of challenge, and so you
01:53:01.640
actually transform physiologically as a consequence of facing things voluntarily, you turn, you turn
01:53:07.640
parts of you that aren't on, on, and so the question might be, well, if you face a little challenge,
01:53:13.740
parts of you turn on, and you learn, if you face a bigger challenge, even more of that happens, you
01:53:20.120
know that if you go to the gym, the heavier the weights you lift, the more you start to develop,
01:53:23.960
assuming you're careful, and it's not that mysterious, the question would be, well, who would you be if
01:53:29.740
you faced the ultimate challenge, and the answer to that would be, well, you would be everything you
01:53:34.420
could be, and the question then would be, well, who would you be if you could be everything you could
01:53:38.840
be, and the answer to that would be, you would be the person that could tolerate the tragedy of being,
01:53:43.520
that's who you'd be, you'd be the person who would take responsibility for that, you'd be the person
01:53:48.340
that would constrain the malevolence in your own heart, and work for the betterment of being,
01:53:53.280
that's who you would be, that's why your father is to be found in the bottom of the abyss. Thank you.
01:53:59.260
What do you think, man? 45 done. Now, what do we got? Like, another 40 coming, 16 stops in Europe.
01:54:19.160
Yeah, 40 more cities, probably, something like that, or maybe more over the next six months.
01:54:26.440
Lots, lots of cities. What are you going to do in August? You're going to relax a little bit?
01:54:32.900
Yeah, I think so, I think so. I've got, I've got a talk in Regina on the 14th, and one in Saskatoon
01:54:39.720
on the 16th, so it's this leg that's finished, but I don't have any other public talks during that
01:54:44.640
period of time until September 5th, and then we start going down the east coast, right, because we've got
01:54:48.600
20 cities lined up along the east coast, smaller cities. Partly, what I'm going to do is,
01:54:56.440
I was just figuring this out today, I had the great honor of being asked to write the introduction
01:55:04.520
to the 50th anniversary version of the Gulag Archipelago, which is going to be published
01:55:12.520
And so, I finished that, I finished that today and got it off, so that was, that was good. And I heard
01:55:25.000
from the Solzhenitsyn family this week, and they were very happy with the introduction, so that was a
01:55:29.880
big deal, because it was a daunting task to write something that vaguely deserved to be associated with
01:55:39.160
a book like that. And one of the things we're going to do to publicize, I suppose,
01:55:46.520
the existence of the new version, it's also the 100th anniversary of Solzhenitsyn's birth this year,
01:55:54.440
and so those two things dovetailed very nicely, is I'm going to read the introduction as a YouTube
01:56:00.040
video, and I'm going to make a, I'm going to put images with it. So I'm going to spend, I think that'll be
01:56:05.400
fun, because I like editing video, it's really challenging and interesting, and so I'll put
01:56:09.560
together a little documentary and get that ready for release in November, and I think that would be
01:56:13.720
a relatively, I wouldn't call it entertaining thing to do for the next while, but it'll be very engaging.
01:56:19.400
And we're, we're working on getting the videos out from the Sam Harris talks, and so that should
01:56:27.480
happen in the next little while. We're trying, trying to figure out how to distribute them properly,
01:56:34.920
and, and what to do with them, and I'm going to New York tomorrow, and I'm going to speak to,
01:56:41.400
I'm going to be on, PBS invited me, which is quite strange, because the liberal left media has had
01:56:48.120
nothing to do with me, except the odd, well, more than odd hit piece, and you know, they're basically
01:56:55.640
continuous, but I'm going to be on Frontline tomorrow, next day, and then on a Fox show after
01:57:00.760
that, so that's New York. And I'm working on negotiating the contract for my next books,
01:57:07.640
as well, this month, so. You do realize the question I asked you is, how do you relax?
01:57:13.240
Well, you know, I really, I really enjoy this tour, but it's, you know, there's no time for error,
01:57:23.640
there's no space for, for mistakes, and my wife and I have been touring, and she's been extraordinarily
01:57:29.480
helpful, and keeping everything on track, so just not having that responsibility for travel,
01:57:37.400
and, and this, at the end of the day, will be relaxing, and I'm less, I'm also less stressed
01:57:44.920
about the media noise around me, because, you know, for a long time, it's gone, it's gone like this,
01:57:53.240
and I've never been sure if I was going to get taken out by something like that New York Times piece,
01:57:57.960
but so far, I haven't been taken out, and it doesn't look like, I will never say that.
01:58:07.400
It isn't obvious that the situation is getting worse for me.
01:58:23.560
Someone, someone I know says, choose your words carefully. I think we just saw it right there.
01:58:28.040
Yeah, that's for sure. Yeah, don't tempt fate, that's for sure.
01:58:30.520
All right, you know I'm starting with this one, because it has come up at every Canadian.
01:58:47.960
It did, yeah. Yeah, it did. They're going to inflict, they're going to inflict me on,
01:58:55.080
A, it isn't clear I'm qualified. It isn't, I haven't had a political career. I'm not a professional
01:59:04.280
administrator. There's a trillion things I don't know about how to run something complicated,
01:59:09.000
like a modern economy. So that's, and it would be a daunting learning curve. B, I can't speak French
01:59:15.960
very well. C, I have all these other things that I'm doing that seem to be important. And maybe they're,
01:59:24.520
they're more, maybe I'm more suited for them. I mean, one of the things I'm working on right now,
01:59:28.680
some of you know this perhaps, is that I wanted to build something approximating an online university.
01:59:35.080
And so I hired some people to do that recently. There's three of us, three people hired, very,
01:59:39.240
very smart kids, very technologically savvy, man. They can solve problems like it's just nobody's
01:59:45.240
business. It's really something to see. And we want to build a universal education system,
01:59:52.040
not a university, but something broader than that, because we thought there's no sense restricting it to
01:59:57.080
the age range that would be in university. There's, there's just no reason to do that. So we want to
02:00:03.000
build a universal education system that will provide a high quality university equivalent education
02:00:10.440
for something between one-tenth and one-one-hundredth the cost with no administrative overhead and with
02:00:16.760
and, and more importantly, we're going to set it up so that it will be impossible to mess with the
02:00:30.520
grading scheme. No ideological interference with the grading scheme. None.
02:00:35.640
And so that project is, perversely enough, actually ahead of schedule, which really
02:00:48.360
staggers me, because we've only been working on it for about three months full-time, but we're a year
02:00:54.600
ahead of where I thought we'd be at this point. And so that's very exciting, and, and I'm very interested
02:00:59.720
in devoting a substantial amount of time to that. And so there's all these projects that I would have to
02:01:04.200
put on hold if I decided to do something political, and it isn't obvious to me that that would be
02:01:11.240
smart. So I think I'll just keep doing what I'm doing, at least for the foreseeable future.
02:01:23.160
For the record, I think we can all agree if Trudeau can do it, he can do it, right?
02:01:26.360
I'm going to drag you into this thing, kicking and screaming one way or another.
02:01:37.160
Yeah, I don't know if that was a compliment, by the way.
02:01:39.000
Any advice for a parent navigating their children through the digital age?
02:01:49.960
Yeah, that's a tough one, man. Well, I, I've had some friends who, with teenagers,
02:02:02.520
and they've run into vicious trouble because of what's happened with their kids online. Like,
02:02:06.520
just absolutely horrible trouble. You know, because a kid can get in trouble online in ways that,
02:02:12.600
well, so can adults, obviously. But imagine if you were 13. Imagine this, eh? And you wrote down
02:02:19.800
what you thought and let everybody know. It's like, that's bad enough, man. Don't do that.
02:02:25.960
And then you wrote it down in a way that could never be erased.
02:02:31.560
And then everything you did was recorded so you could never forget it for the rest of your life.
02:02:37.000
Jesus, that's so dismal, man. Like, the best thing about being 13 is that you get to forget it.
02:02:42.600
So, I don't know. I've been, I've been talking to my friends and the people who have been affected
02:02:49.880
by this, trying to figure out what to do. And it's really hard because, you know, you can't,
02:02:55.960
your kids, teenagers, they're pretty sad little specimens if they don't have a smartphone,
02:03:03.720
you know, in the broader culture. So, it doesn't look like something that's, that's easy to deny them.
02:03:10.040
They also don't pick up the technological prowess then. And that's a mistake because, like,
02:03:14.280
you better know how to use one of these things because otherwise you're just gone. You're lost.
02:03:26.840
you know, when I talked to my kids about experimenting with illicit substances,
02:03:31.320
I said, look, you're probably going to experiment, but if you're stoned, I don't want to know it.
02:03:41.720
So, if you're experimenting, you better keep yourself under control well enough so I can't
02:03:46.280
tell that you're screwed up because otherwise you're not handling it properly. And so, well,
02:03:52.760
that seems to me to be about, right, like, what the hell are you going to do? You're going to say,
02:03:55.840
don't experiment. It's like, I mean, we're going to make pot legal. It's already 95% there. So,
02:04:06.160
it's, it's pretty hypocritical to give that advice. But you can help your kids. The rule's got to be
02:04:11.440
something like, don't do so, don't do something so damn stupid that you ruin the rest of your life.
02:04:16.640
Right? That's the fundamental rule with regards to playing with fire. And maybe you can help your
02:04:21.760
kids, maybe you can help make your kids sensible enough so that they won't make any fatal errors
02:04:28.320
playing with complicated technology. You know, but I'm just as happy that my kids are old enough now so
02:04:35.600
that they're not facing this. The world was pretty digitized when they were, because they were 24 and 26,
02:04:40.880
you know, 10 years ago, social media was still around, but not like it is now. So,
02:04:50.960
don't have any easy answers for that, unfortunately.
02:04:56.000
Do you think you moved Sam Harris at all during your four talks?
02:05:03.520
Oh yeah, I think so. But I think he moved me too. You know, I mean,
02:05:08.720
Harris is not an unreasonable guy. He's a very articulate spokesperson for a particular perspective,
02:05:14.800
a powerful perspective. The materialistic atheist perspective is an unbelievably powerful perspective.
02:05:20.880
So, and he's very good at articulating it. And Sam's heart is in the right place, as far as I'm
02:05:27.280
concerned. Like, the reason that he wants to ground ethics in facts is so that we have a solid ethical
02:05:33.840
structure. You know, I just don't think that, I don't think that the answers that he provides
02:05:41.040
are sufficiently, I think they're low resolution and they don't have sufficient poetic power.
02:05:50.880
And that's a big problem. Because he overvalues rationality. And I don't think we should undervalue
02:05:59.840
it. I'm certainly a fan of the enlightenment. I mean, I'm a scientist. I use rational means all
02:06:05.760
the time. And I try to be very clear in what I write and say. But rationality is embedded in the body.
02:06:15.680
And the body is something that's far more complicated than mere rationality. And it requires poetry and
02:06:21.040
art. And it requires narrative. And it requires wisdom and dance and music and art. And all of those
02:06:29.040
things that the rationalists tend to think of as mere epiphenomena of something more fundamental. And they're
02:06:34.400
wrong. They've got it backwards. And so, it isn't that I fault Sam for why he's doing what he's doing.
02:06:43.360
He would like to see the sum total of suffering in the world reduced. And he's terrified of religious
02:06:49.520
fundamentalism. And no wonder. But I don't think that the answer provided by the materialist atheists
02:06:56.560
has the motivational potency to serve as a bulwark against nihilism or totalitarianism.
02:07:04.960
And so, that's why we differ. And we had a real conversation. You know, it lasted 10 hours,
02:07:11.920
four sessions, 10 hours. And, you know, we hit each other, I would say, as hard as we could. You know,
02:07:19.920
also noting that we were trying to work towards the same end, which was clearer discourse. And
02:07:25.520
and some development of some vision about how to proceed with this terrible problem of meaning.
02:07:33.040
But it wasn't like he didn't listen. You know? I mean, it was a real conversation. And I think we're
02:07:41.280
both more articulate than we were before the conversation. Like this thing that I talked about
02:07:48.240
tonight, why the father is in the belly of the beast. I don't think I would have figured that out
02:07:52.160
if I wouldn't have talked to Sam for 10 hours. And like, I'm really happy I figured that out. That's a,
02:07:57.440
that's, that blew me away when I finally realized why that image existed. It's, that's really
02:08:02.400
something. You know? And that's, that's why it's useful to engage with people who are of good faith,
02:08:08.480
who have opinions that are different from yours. That's thinking. That's what thinking is. And
02:08:14.880
thinking gets you places, places you need to go. So it was definitely worthwhile. And yes,
02:08:20.080
I think we were both moved by it. And I think the audience was as well. So.
02:08:27.360
We know some of your heroes who are long gone. Do you have any living heroes?
02:08:50.880
Living heroes is rough because it takes a long time to figure out if someone's a hero.
02:08:55.040
You know? I mean, I have people that I respect and scientists, particularly, and lots of great
02:09:00.240
scientists. But it takes a long time to establish a reputation, like a real reputation. And so,
02:09:05.280
usually by the time you do, you're dead, which is kind of unfortunate. And so, so, but Ali, for sure.
02:09:12.160
I mean, I thought her book, Infidel, was a staggering piece of work. And she's insanely brave.
02:09:19.360
You know? And now and then you see these people that, you know, Douglas Murray's like that. Murray,
02:09:23.760
he's got a spine of steel, that guy. It's really something to meet him because he's very affable,
02:09:28.640
eagle-less guy, you know, not arrogant, soft-spoken. But if he has his mindset on something,
02:09:41.840
there is no move in him. And it's really something to meet people like that. You know,
02:09:46.000
they're quite rare. Lindsay Shepard, the girl from Wilfrid Laurier, I certainly admire her. I mean,
02:09:55.200
she's young. She's just a kid, really. You know, early 20s. And the university brought everything
02:10:01.600
it had to bear on her. And she basically crossed her arms and said, I'm not moving. And then didn't.
02:10:28.720
He asked me this before. I told him, the reason I wear pants is so that I don't have to answer that
02:10:38.400
question. Don't point at me. These are the questions there. I know. And that one comes up a lot.
02:10:47.360
Is there one public policy that you could enact in Canada that you think might fix things?
02:11:03.200
No, not one. No, it's too complicated. And besides, you don't fix things. That isn't how things work.
02:11:11.120
You know, what you do is you look at a problem. And then the deeper, the more you look at it,
02:11:18.160
the more micro problems you see that it's made of. Right? Because, you know, there's this old
02:11:24.960
story that if you cut off the head of a hydra, then six more heads grow. Well, that's the world.
02:11:30.160
That's why that's a hero myth. It's like, you face a problem, and you find out that it's a whole set of
02:11:34.880
problems. And then you look at each problem, and you see that's a whole set of problems. That's the
02:11:38.800
problem with ideology, because ideology says, we can solve all those problems at once. It's like,
02:11:43.440
no, you can't. You don't even know what the damn problem is. It's like, the problems are
02:11:47.440
really complicated. They're really, really, really, really complicated. And so, you know,
02:11:53.280
I would have, I would have a method. I liked Lomberg's method. It's like, okay, well,
02:11:58.080
the first thing we would do is say, well, what are the problems? You know, what are the big problems
02:12:03.680
facing Canada? The gender wage gap? That's not one of them. Okay. So,
02:12:14.080
despite, despite the fact that it was referenced, the gender was referenced 385 times in the federal
02:12:20.800
budget, you know. So, well, what are the problems? Well, that's, that's a hard problem. And I'm not
02:12:26.160
being dismissive about that, or treacherous intellectually. There's a man named Hans Isaac,
02:12:32.880
who wrote a great book called Genius. And he, he's a great psychologist, was the world's most
02:12:36.880
cited psychologist for a long time. One of the things he pointed out was that the most difficult
02:12:41.440
cognitive problem is to formulate the problem properly. Because if you formulate a problem
02:12:49.120
properly, you're a fair ways to solving it. So, the first question would be, it's like, well,
02:12:54.240
what are the problems that confront us as a nation? Well, what you do is you'd, you'd do some
02:12:59.760
information gathering to find out. You'd have people, experts, and common people. Everyone's
02:13:05.440
like, well, what are the problems? What, what's wrong with us that we could fix? Well, then you'd,
02:13:10.960
you'd gather a nice conglomeration of problems. And you'd think, okay, well,
02:13:19.040
how would we rank order these problems? And could we generate sets of solutions to them? And then could
02:13:24.080
we test different solutions to see if they would work? So, I would say that the way to solve complex
02:13:29.520
problems is to have a complex problem-solving methodology. And social scientists, scientists
02:13:35.760
in general, have a complex problem-solving methodology. Specify the problem, generate
02:13:40.960
hypotheses about how it might be solved, test a variety of variants to see which ones work, specify
02:13:46.880
your outcome measures properly. That's how things should be handled. And so, I would never think that
02:13:52.240
there is one thing that could be done. Because that's, that isn't how the world works, man. It's,
02:13:59.920
it's, problems are complicated. They're high resolution. And generally, what you do is solve
02:14:05.120
micro-problems partially. But if you do a bunch of that, things get better. Like, it works. Incremental,
02:14:10.320
and that's, you know, that's one of the lessons in 12 rules for life, is don't underestimate the utility
02:14:15.200
of incremental improvement. It's, you, because it starts to compound. So, it's okay to focus on
02:14:22.240
a problem and decompose it into a micro-problem until you, you're biting off exactly as much as you
02:14:27.040
can chew. Fix that. Then you'll be able to fix the next thing, and then you'll be able to fix the next
02:14:31.680
thing. And so, it's a method. And, and it would be application of that method that would be the solution to the
02:14:38.160
problem. Yeah. This is interesting. As a therapist, have you ever been in therapy?
02:14:54.080
No. Well, look. Yet, it's complicated. Because, um, I would say the answer to that is yes and no.
02:15:03.360
No. Uh, one of the things I learned from reading Carl Jung, Jung said, um,
02:15:11.840
moral effort is a substitute for therapy. Something like that. Well, that's because
02:15:17.040
therapy is actually a moral process. Why? Well, because you go to a therapist because
02:15:22.560
your life isn't what it could be by your own proclamation, right? And that might be a physical
02:15:29.840
thing. You might be ill, and that has to be sorted out because people get sick. And, you know,
02:15:35.440
there's lots of variants of depression and other disorders, too, that are
02:15:39.760
mostly a consequence of physical illness of one form or another. And so, that has to be sorted out.
02:15:45.040
But then, people make strategic errors, and they don't have a well-developed vision for their life
02:15:49.680
and all of that. So, you help people through that. And, you know, I did a lot of analysis of my own
02:15:54.880
dreams and a lot of writing and thinking about things. And so, um, and I have a lot of communication
02:16:02.080
with my wife and my friends as well. My wife in particular, I would say. And that's been deeply
02:16:09.520
therapeutic in the rough sense. I mean, in the harsh sense, because, you know, we really have a
02:16:16.560
close relationship, but it's a combative relationship. You know, like, she doesn't
02:16:22.000
stand for any nonsense. And neither do I. And so that, and her less than me, even, I would say.
02:16:28.640
Which is a good thing. It was funny. The kids used to come over to our house,
02:16:32.160
you know, when they were teenagers. And we liked that. We liked our teenagers, oddly enough. And, um,
02:16:38.320
we liked having their friends over. But there was a rule in our house, and all their friends knew it,
02:16:43.600
which was, you are welcome here. Really. But if you do something stupid, and we never have to see
02:16:49.040
you again as a consequence, that's perfectly okay with both of us. And so, and when the kids first
02:16:56.160
came over, they were, first came over and didn't know the house very well, they were mostly afraid
02:17:00.720
of me. But after they'd been there for about a month, they were mostly afraid of Tammy.
02:17:08.080
So that's therapy, man. That's a relationship, right?
02:17:10.480
Yeah. Yeah, it is. Because you, you, you're, you're stupid and ignorant. And so is your partner.
02:17:15.200
And if you bash yourself against each other long enough, you both get tempered a bit.
02:17:19.440
And maybe you're, you're a little smarter than, a little wiser than you might otherwise be. Because
02:17:23.920
you had to take that other person into account. And they had to take you into account. And you have
02:17:28.080
to solve difficult problems together. And, and so that's been good. Like, we fought a lot.
02:17:32.880
Hard fights, and, and, and vicious fights, often. But productive. You know, because
02:17:37.920
the goal of the fight was to not to have to have the fight again.
02:17:42.960
And, and those are hard fights, man. Because sometimes they're about deep things. Problems
02:17:48.160
in life. Problems that you're carrying forward as a flawed personality. Problems that are part
02:17:53.600
and parcel of your being because of your screwed up family. You know, because you carry multi-generational
02:17:59.360
pathology forward with you. Um, and so that relationship has been very therapeutic, I would
02:18:10.160
Tami's here, by the way. Give it up for Tami. She's here somewhere.
02:18:12.720
Oh, I like this one. Yeah, well, one thing about that too. Like, because we, we put each other
02:18:27.760
through the mill, I would say. And to some degree, because life also did that. Our daughter was very
02:18:33.200
ill for a long time. And so that was challenging. Um, we've been able to do what we've been doing for
02:18:40.480
the last 60 days. Like, we've had a very intense schedule and under very stressful circumstances.
02:18:45.920
And we don't, we're fortunate in that we're not carrying so much excess relationship baggage with
02:18:53.600
us that that is compromising our ability to do this. And so that's, that's been extraordinarily helpful.
02:19:00.640
The, the combat, you know, that straightens things out is, it's, it's, it's tense and it's conflictual.
02:19:07.520
And people avoid that sort of thing all the time. And they're really, it's okay. It doesn't matter.
02:19:10.800
We don't have to fight about that. It's like, that's such a lie. It's like, yes, you do. You
02:19:15.040
have to, you have to, you have to fight about it. You have to straighten it out. And people avoid that
02:19:19.280
like mad. And then the disagreements accumulate. Then they turn into a terrible monster and they eat
02:19:24.800
you. And then you're in divorce court for like 15 years, scrapping over your kids while you give
02:19:29.120
your lawyers $300,000. And then, then you have the fights you didn't have, you know, and it's,
02:19:35.520
it's expensive and horrible. Yeah. It's, I mean, I've seen plenty of this. I'm a therapist. I've seen
02:19:39.920
plenty of this. When you were a kid, what did you want to be when you grew up?
02:19:55.520
Well, it varied. I mean, I remember, I don't know if I should tell you this, but I'm going to anyways,
02:20:01.920
because I told a reporter this at Toronto Life and he made a, you know, he, he didn't treat it
02:20:10.000
kindly, let's say. He was kind of a son of a bitch that time. Well, it's funny because he was kind of
02:20:17.960
a gifted writer. He could actually write, but he didn't have any confidence in his own ability or
02:20:22.080
that of his audience. So he would tell a story about me, which was like an accurate story.
02:20:25.780
And then he would write like a paragraph about what you should think about what you just read,
02:20:31.700
which isn't what you do if you're a good writer, right? What you do is you just tell the story and
02:20:35.400
you let your audience make up their own mind. But he couldn't do that. He'd tell the story,
02:20:39.280
which he could do. He did his research. And then he'd say, well, here's how you should think about
02:20:43.560
this if you were a good person. It's like, so when he wrote this piece, which I wasn't very happy
02:20:48.480
about, because I was very, I think, kind to him and welcoming and honest. And, you know, he wrote
02:20:55.020
this nasty little piece. And I wrote to him, I said, you know, you're, you, you, you perverted
02:21:01.600
your own talent because you're actually a pretty damn good writer. And yet you didn't have enough
02:21:05.020
confidence in your ability or that of your audience to separate the wheat from the chaff.
02:21:09.560
You had to tell them what good thinking people should think. Anyways, when I was a kid,
02:21:14.720
one of the first political memories I have is, is Robert Kennedy's assassination. And I followed
02:21:24.340
that. I think it was only about six when that happened. I might even have been younger, but I
02:21:27.680
think it was six because it was quite shocking. And I remember his funeral and there were hordes
02:21:34.960
of people at his funeral. And I thought, I'll have a funeral like that. And I don't really know what to
02:21:39.940
make of that because it was a hell of a thing for a six-year-old kid to think, you know? So I don't
02:21:44.900
know where that thought came from. And, but, but it is an early memory. And he, he assumed, he assumed
02:21:51.280
that that meant that I was narcissistic. And I don't really think that's the issue. It's like Kennedy
02:21:55.760
was shot. That's not exactly the sort of thing that you'd hope for. So, so, but I always had some
02:22:02.500
sense, I suppose, that I was going to be involved in large scale enterprises of one form or another.
02:22:12.860
And I worked for the NDP when I was a kid from the time I was 13 till the time I was 16. I ran for
02:22:18.000
vice president of the Alberta NDP when I was 14. And, and I wrote my own speech despite what people
02:22:25.640
thought. And so I, I, I, I thought about a political career for a long time. I thought
02:22:33.700
about a scientific career. And then I decided that I was going to work as a psychologist. And all those
02:22:40.320
things have come true to some degree. I mean, there's a political element to what I've, I've been
02:22:44.320
doing sort of secondarily, but that's, that, well, that's, that was sort of the scope of my ambition
02:22:54.200
when I was a kid. So I think it was partly my father's doing, you know, because my father was
02:23:01.000
unbelievably, my father is unbelievably good with little kids. He, he's really, he's got a gift for
02:23:08.040
it, you know. And I think that I've learned that from him because I really like little kids and we
02:23:14.080
get along great. I get along with little kids right away. I get along with teenagers too. And my dad
02:23:18.440
wasn't so good about that. He didn't really trust teenagers. But, um, one of the things my father
02:23:25.400
instilled in me or allowed to develop in me was he had an unshakable confidence that I could do
02:23:32.220
whatever I set my mind to. And he completely believed that. Now he was a harsh guy, man. Like
02:23:38.160
he had high standards and it was a weird, weird living with him because he thought that I could do
02:23:43.980
whatever I set my mind to, but nothing I ever did was good enough. Well, it's a funny, it's a really
02:23:50.740
funny crucible, you know, because on the one hand, it's extremely encouraging. And on the other hand,
02:23:55.740
it's hard because you never, you never, you never good enough. And, but, you know, maybe that's not a
02:24:02.940
bad combination. It, it might be that, because you need judgment in your life and how, who knows how high
02:24:09.320
you should set the standards. It's like, what makes you think that what you're doing is good enough?
02:24:13.720
Maybe you could do better. So should I be on the side of you that's doing good enough? Or should I
02:24:19.360
be on the side of you that could be doing better? And he was, he was a disagreeable, my dad, he's still
02:24:24.800
alive. He's a disagreeable guy. You know, he's not currying favor. It's like, and there's some, that's an
02:24:31.380
admirable trait, even though it's got its harsh side. So, because it would have been a relief to me
02:24:36.240
as a kid to have been able to do something that was good enough, you know. And I'm not complaining
02:24:43.700
about this. It's genuine mystery to me. But that was certainly offset entirely by his belief that I
02:24:52.020
could do whatever I set my mind to. So he gave me a kind of unshakable fundamental confidence, I would
02:24:58.400
say. And, and it, that's been a great gift to me. And one of the things I've seen too is, one of the things
02:25:04.120
that people tell me a lot in this tour, they thank me for the encouragement, you know, because I am
02:25:11.700
lecturing to people and suggesting that they could be more than they are, and that that's really part of
02:25:16.220
them. And many, many people thank me for that. And one of the things I've realized is that not being encouraged
02:25:24.380
sufficiently is the norm. And I can't say that was my lot. I was encouraged sufficiently. So that was,
02:25:32.540
that was a great gift that I had from my parents.
02:25:37.220
Well, I just want to say to you guys, if you think Jordan has affected you, try traveling the world
02:25:52.780
with him for two and a half months, and having him look at you while he's answering a lot of these
02:25:57.780
questions. And I've said it to you privately, but I am a better person now than when we started this
02:26:12.360
Sorry, Dave, you set yourself up for that one, man.
02:26:14.780
I taught him a little comedic timing, too. So give and take. Really, this has been the,
02:26:20.580
as we end this leg of it, and now we're going to take a month off. This has been just the,
02:26:25.740
I mean, professionally, the thrill of my life. But personally, it's been, it's moved me, truly.
02:26:30.180
It's moved me, and I thank you for that. And on that note, I'm going to get out of the way
02:26:34.520
and make some noise for Jordan Peterson, everybody.
02:26:44.600
If you found this conversation meaningful, you might think about picking up Dad's books,
02:26:48.620
Maps of Meaning, The Architecture of Belief, or his newer bestseller, 12 Rules for Life,
02:26:52.800
and Antidote to Chaos. Both of these works delve much deeper into the topics covered in the
02:26:57.160
Jordan B. Peterson podcast. See jordanbpeterson.com for audio, ebook, and text links,
02:27:02.820
or pick up the books at your favorite bookseller. Also, subscribe to his email list if you're on
02:27:07.880
his website. I really hope you enjoyed this podcast. If you did, please leave a rating at
02:27:12.880
Apple Podcasts, a comment, a review, or share this episode with a friend. Next week's episode is
02:27:18.420
another 12 Rules for Life lecture from Regina, Saskatchewan, recorded on August 14th, 2018.
02:27:24.600
We're still making our way through the 12 Rules Canadian Tour. Hopefully, you're enjoying it.
02:27:30.080
Talk to you next week. More updates then. Hopefully, good ones.
02:27:34.260
Follow me on my YouTube channel, Jordan B. Peterson, on Twitter, at Jordan B. Peterson,
02:27:40.660
on Facebook, at Dr. Jordan B. Peterson, and at Instagram, at Jordan.B. Peterson.
02:27:46.920
Details on this show, access to my blog, information about my tour dates and other events,
02:27:53.680
and my list of recommended books can be found on my website, JordanBPeterson.com.
02:27:59.640
My online writing programs, designed to help people straighten out their pasts,
02:28:04.420
understand themselves in the present, and develop a sophisticated vision and strategy for the future,
02:28:09.700
can be found at SelfAuthoring.com. That's SelfAuthoring.com.