00:16:44.980So you watch a lot of different people act in a lot of different situations, and you start to extract out regularities of action and attention.
00:17:00.380And so if you go see an action-adventure movie, like a James Bond movie, let's say, what you get is a distillation of romantic adventure, right?
00:17:10.280everything that isn't romantic or adventurous is edited out and you might say well that's
00:17:14.920unrealistic it's like well not exactly it's not exactly unrealistic it's more like hyper realistic
00:17:20.660it's like the the writer and the filmmaker decided to watch a thousand people and pull out the most
00:17:28.100exciting elements of their life the most exciting and romantic elements of their life you might say
00:17:32.320and then amalgamate all those into something that's super romantic and super exciting to get
00:17:37.680to the core of what constitutes romantic adventure itself and then you're pretty interested in that
00:17:42.680you'll go you'll go watch that movie partly to be entertained but also partly maybe to live the life
00:17:49.460you haven't lived that's a good way of thinking about it but also maybe to get to the core of
00:17:53.980what constitutes a romantic adventure to learn and so it's a distillation now
00:17:59.500here's a question for you is an abstraction more or less real than the thing that it's
00:18:06.840abstracted from right because if you make this fact fiction separation you say fiction is
00:18:13.320falsehood it's not true it never happened you you're you're left with a problem that
00:18:20.020you could make the same criticism of abstraction per se like we abstract out numbers for example
00:18:26.760from a multitude of different amalgamations to fruit, to cars, to people.