Daily Wire Backstage: Introducing the 2nd Greatest Commercial Ever
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 59 minutes
Words per Minute
212.1695
Summary
Ben Shapiro, Andrew Klavan, Matt Walsh, and Michael Knowles join host Jeremy Boring on the latest episode of The Daily Wire Backstage. Plus, a brand new Jeremy s Razor commercial is revealed, and it's not what you thought it was.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hey everybody, this is Matt Walsh. Drop everything you're doing and check out the latest episode of
00:00:03.720
Daily Wire backstage. You're going to hear Jeremy Boring, Ben Shapiro, Andrew Klavan,
00:00:07.540
Michael Knowles, and yours truly talking about all the important issues affecting you and your
00:00:11.000
family. You don't want to miss it unless you're a leftist, in which case you're canceled.
00:00:30.000
Welcome to the Daily Wire backstage. I'm Jeremy Boring, joined by Ben Shapiro, Andrew Klavan,
00:00:43.320
Matt Walsh, and Michael Knowles. Glad to be back with you guys. It's been a minute.
00:00:47.640
Just a reminder that we'll be taking some questions during the course of the show from
00:00:51.380
our Daily Wire Plus subscribers. If you're not a Daily Wire Plus subscriber, head over to
00:00:55.760
dailywireplus.com and join today. If you are, head over there, ask us your questions. We're
00:01:00.340
going to do our best to get a lot of answers out tonight. Interaction with our subscribers is one
00:01:04.420
of the most enjoyable aspects of doing this show. It is, in fact, the only enjoyable aspect of doing
00:01:09.560
this show. No, I like being with you guys. It's a great show. We have fun. We get to smoke Mayflowers.
00:01:15.320
We're also going to do something really enjoyable for me tonight. I don't know if it'll be enjoyable
00:01:21.340
for anybody else, but they told me just as I walked on stage, hey, we've got a little bit of a
00:01:25.380
problem. I said, what's that? They said, well, when we've been promoting the show all week, we've
00:01:29.140
been saying, you know, tune in for Daily Wire backstage. You'll get all your favorites, Ben
00:01:33.800
Shapiro, Michael. Plus, we're going to have shocking news, like big news, really big news. I said, cool.
00:01:42.080
What is it? And they said, well, it was a bit of an oversell. We don't have anything. I said, what do
00:01:48.900
you mean? You actually marketed the show publicly. You said, plus giant earth shattering something new.
00:01:54.600
And they said, yes. I said, and you don't have anything earth shattering? And they said, no,
00:01:58.440
we don't have anything new at all. I said, well, how does a thing like this happen? And they said,
00:02:02.840
well, we have, uh, you told us to do it. That's fair. That sounds like something I would do.
00:02:09.240
But what occurred to me is that I, in my back pocket, do in fact have something new and earth
00:02:15.640
shattering and cool that we could premiere on this show, except we weren't planning to premiere it until
00:02:20.200
a week from now, which means they are scrambling backstage to put together just for you guys today,
00:02:26.280
the brand new second generation Jeremy's Racers commercial. We're going to be world premiering
00:02:32.820
it right here on the show in approximately 15 minutes. So, uh, call all your friends, uh,
00:02:38.200
especially the scruffy ones. Tell them we will be, we'll be doing something. I think it will,
00:02:46.440
uh, I think people will enjoy it. Every one of you play some small role in the, uh,
00:02:51.040
I'm just glad. I'm really glad to hear because all week I've been reading off the teleprompter.
00:02:55.140
I said, this is going to be the biggest show ever. Jeremy has a huge announcement and I felt
00:02:59.420
out of the loop. Yeah. I'm glad I was sad that I didn't know what it was. Now I'm glad that you
00:03:04.000
also did. Matt literally turned to me earlier today in the makeup chair and he was like, so what's
00:03:07.740
this thing that's happening tonight? I was like, I don't know. I'm just one of the owners of the
00:03:10.800
company. Truly when they said back, when they said, no, you told us to say that I don't have
00:03:17.240
any idea what I thought it was going to be. I mean, I must've thought it was good. I think maybe
00:03:21.400
this is pitiful. What kind of maybe in the back of my head, I thought we were going to premiere
00:03:24.920
the commercial. I can't think of any other huge news that I wanted to, but it is huge. We,
00:03:31.600
yeah, obviously, uh, we've, this is a long time in the making. You know, the first commercial has been
00:03:35.900
called by some, including our marketing department who titled it on YouTube, the greatest commercial
00:03:40.780
ever. Uh, and I stand by it. I think it was in fact, the greatest commercial ever. Uh, it was the
00:03:49.180
most, uh, well justified launch of a company ever, but what it wasn't was the greatest razor ever.
00:03:55.700
And as it turns out, making a razor is very difficult because it takes a razor sharp blade
00:04:01.300
and runs it across people's most sensitive spots. And so we've worked really hard over the last two
00:04:06.300
years to completely redesign our razor. I never thought that I would employ engineers. One of my
00:04:11.420
favorite things about being a guy who never made it through college is that like I employ Yale
00:04:15.400
graduates and I employ Harvard graduates. I employ lawyers, you know, but I never thought I would
00:04:20.460
employ engineers. And now we have full-time engineers on staff. We've been hard at work. We've got brand new
00:04:24.700
partners. We've moved all of our manufacturing out of China. And this new razor is world-class. It's on par
00:04:30.200
with the best razors, uh, in the market. And it comes now, I think, alongside our other products
00:04:35.660
through Jeremy's razors, like our shampoo, our conditioner, our lotions, our deodorants,
00:04:38.740
which are already top tier products. The only thing that was lagging was that razor because it's a,
00:04:44.720
again, a very difficult thing. Takes a lot of engineering. We finally have a really competitive
00:04:48.400
product. And I think we have a somewhat hilarious and deeply offensive commercial to attend to its
00:04:55.140
launch. So again, come back in here in about 15 minutes and we'll bring that to you.
00:04:58.620
And meanwhilest, the world doesn't get better between backstages. It only seems to get worse.
00:05:05.580
And there's a new sort of, I shouldn't say new, it's been sort of fomenting for the last handful
00:05:11.300
of years, but I think it's really gaining prominence now, both in the very intellectual part of the
00:05:17.560
American right, but also in the very fringe parts of the American right. And the fact that,
00:05:22.920
the fact that what I'm about to bring up is happening in both of those places, like
00:05:26.920
people who we all in this room read, people with whom we are friendly, people with whom we admire
00:05:32.920
are participating in this conversation. Also the complete whack jobs, the people who I don't think
00:05:38.460
should have any voice in our movement. I think that they, that they're malevolent forces
00:05:42.460
are also circling the same idea. That makes the idea, I think, something that we should talk about.
00:05:48.340
And that's this idea that the American experiment is over. This idea that none of our institutions
00:05:56.380
that have taken us through the last two plus centuries on this continent exist anymore,
00:06:02.760
that we can't find any solution to our cultural and political problems through the political
00:06:07.520
system. And that perhaps it's time to look to older systems, strongman, monarchy, even dictator.
00:06:13.220
I mean, when you have major voices in the sort of conservative intelligentsia
00:06:18.040
openly discussing the idea of whether a dictator will be required to save this country, or an emperor
00:06:24.120
would be required to save this country, or a king would be required to save this country.
00:06:28.900
I think that that's something that merits actual conversation. So I thought rather than talking
00:06:33.940
about the latest stupid thing Joe Biden said, or, you know, the most salacious details from the Trump
00:06:38.660
trial, although they are fun to talk about. Let's talk about something that we can only talk about
00:06:43.420
when we're together. Let's get to the deep stuff. So Michael, you're a monarchist.
00:06:46.180
Yeah, well, look, they tie in. He pins it on the Catholic that we're all crypto monarchists.
00:06:52.280
We all think Trump is Caesar. I didn't say crypto.
00:06:54.260
Yeah. By the way, we don't think that Donald Trump ought to be Caesar. We think that Baron Trump
00:07:00.340
ought to be Caesar. Okay, those are very different things. No, look, the problem is this. I am not
00:07:05.700
calling for the overthrow of the American regime. The problem is that the American regime has been
00:07:09.860
overthrown, and it has been overthrown by the 17th Amendment, which fundamentally orders the
00:07:14.580
relationship of the states to the federal government. It's been overthrown by Congress
00:07:18.820
giving away all of its power to the executive agencies. It's been overthrown by any number of
00:07:24.740
things that have taken place, not over the last 10 years, but over the past 150 and 200 years.
00:07:29.500
And even that is not necessarily to be lamented. It just happens. You can't rewind the tape. You can't go
00:07:34.000
back in time. But the argument to look towards certain classical thinkers, notably Polybius,
00:07:39.080
is that there are different kinds of government. Our founding fathers and framers wrote about this
00:07:43.640
a lot, and I think they were channeling Aristotle and Polybius. Polybius' idea of the cycle of regimes
00:07:49.740
is that you've got three acceptable forms of regime, and then you've got their kind of evil twins.
00:07:56.060
So you've got monarchy, which can be good. Monarchy, when it's good, is governing for the common good.
00:08:01.560
When it goes bad, it's a tyranny, and it's just like a dictator for his own self-aggrandizement.
00:08:07.240
Aristocracy can be good. There have been good aristocracies. Aristocracy means good,
00:08:10.980
you know, or governing for the good. The bad version of that is oligarchy. We see those all
00:08:16.140
around the world. Democracy can be good. A republic can be a really good thing, but it turns into mob
00:08:20.840
rule when it goes bad, and you ignore the common good, and you govern for yourself, and our framers and
00:08:24.980
founding fathers wrote about that ad nauseum. So the question is, where are we in that cycle of
00:08:31.580
regimes? Unless you believe that America just paused history, if you really believe, as Fukuyama,
00:08:40.300
at the very least, is caricatured as having said, that we've reached the end of history, and it's
00:08:44.660
over, and liberal democracy won, and unless you think history is really over, then you do have to
00:08:51.140
entertain the possibility that something will come next. Yeah, right. I mean, I don't know who those
00:08:56.800
guys are that you just mentioned. There's some buddies of mine from New York. Was it Plebius? Okay.
00:09:01.140
I'm kind of, I agree almost with the diagnosis of the people you're talking about, Jeremy,
00:09:10.680
that I do think that the institutions are fundamentally broken. I don't see any political solution
00:09:16.860
to it, but I also don't think that a dictator is the solution either. So essentially, we're just
00:09:23.640
screwed, right, is where I land on it, I guess. I might have guessed where you would think.
00:09:30.220
Hopelessness. You know, here's the reason, it's all a question of timing. I've been having this
00:09:34.820
conversation with my son since he was little. When do you jump off the carousel? Because there's no
00:09:39.780
point dying for a regime that is no longer worth, there's no point pulling a Cato and, you know,
00:09:44.620
saying, oh, we have to bring back the republic when the republic is over. Right. But here's the
00:09:48.420
one indication that the republic is not yet over. Because remember also that despair is a self-fulfilling
00:09:52.860
prophecy. If you despair and you don't fight for what you have, you're not going to keep what you
00:09:56.820
have. One person, Donald Trump, was elected and the entire government and the press and the academy
00:10:06.100
and the intelligentsia acted like a Jew had walked into a Nazi Bund meeting. They acted like the
00:10:13.200
worst possible thing. There's one guy, one guy, a loud mouth, who doesn't really know what he's
00:10:17.860
doing. He probably never read the Constitution. And all of this force had to be put together to throw
00:10:23.680
him out. The lies that are being told as we're speaking, the trials they put him through, the
00:10:29.300
violations of our norms, all of these things, which makes me think they're vulnerable. It makes me think
00:10:35.120
that the system that is in place is not invulnerable, you know, that it can be taken down.
00:10:41.100
And so if it can be taken down and if it can be taken down without mass violence,
00:10:45.660
it seems worthwhile because the essential premise of the founders was that people were a certain way,
00:10:55.080
which is that they should be free. They didn't say that they wanted to be free. That was the
00:10:59.480
George W. Bush ridiculous statement that people want to be free. People don't want to be free.
00:11:03.580
They want to be taken care of. But that the people should be free, I think, remains true. And so
00:11:07.960
that remains worth fighting for until it's not. But isn't there, there's this observation of
00:11:12.900
Tocqueville, who writes Democracy in America, probably the best observer of early American
00:11:18.540
politics. And he observes that the rhetoric of the revolution and the post-revolution is very liberal
00:11:25.280
and enlightenment and abstract and, you know, about freedom and everything. But the behavior of
00:11:30.920
America is a little different. It's a little more conservative. It's a little bit more about
00:11:35.360
tradition and way of life and these tightly knit communities. And so I sometimes fear that the
00:11:42.120
thing we want to regain is the traditional American way of life. But we believe, we believe our
00:11:48.520
forebears press releases. So we're falling for the abstract liberal philosophy when in fact what we
00:11:54.720
need to return to is tightly knit communities with families having lots of kids and going to their
00:11:58.840
churches. This critique of liberalism is true, is that liberalism unmoored from virtue turns into
00:12:05.460
moral relativism. Liberalism is basically the idea that a thousand flowers should bloom, that free
00:12:10.340
speech is a good thing in and of itself, that freedoms are used, that they're of inherent value.
00:12:14.860
Now, the reality is that without a framework of virtue, freedom is not of inherent value,
00:12:19.660
actually, because it turns out that when you freely choose to do something evil, it makes you a worse
00:12:23.840
person, not a better person. Freedom is not itself a virtue. Freedom is instrumental if you have
00:12:30.040
choices between a series of virtues and you can prioritize between those virtues. But freedom to
00:12:34.900
use pornography, for example, is not actually a well-used freedom or a true right in any serious
00:12:41.120
sense. What that means is that if you don't have that virtue, which is really what's falling away,
00:12:46.280
then what you end up with is this inability to choose between value systems. And so all value
00:12:51.340
systems are then treated as equivalent. And once all value systems are treated as equivalent, then you
00:12:55.240
basically have post-constructionism and the idea that everything is just a matter of grabbing power
00:12:58.960
and imposing it on people that you don't particularly like. The thing that I think everyone keeps
00:13:03.920
missing, and it's fascinating, I think there actually is some consensus in the United States, even with
00:13:08.780
many people that I truly disagree with, because I've had conversations with them about this, the
00:13:12.960
consensus is not about values so much as it is about localism. The reality is that
00:13:18.720
conservatism, that virtue, which I think conservatism really is about conserving. When
00:13:23.840
people say, what is conservatism conserving? The idea should be virtue, right? And it should be the
00:13:27.360
institutions within virtue that allow you the freedom within virtue to live a wonderful life
00:13:31.660
within this kind of virtuous framework. That's what we're trying to conserve. It's not merely the
00:13:34.900
institutions, it's also that framework. It's why when you read Locke sort of in a vacuum, for example,
00:13:40.060
you end up with the sort of Yoram Hazoni critique of Locke, which is that Locke is himself
00:13:43.820
attempting to destroy virtue, but that's not true. Locke was spending half of his time doing
00:13:46.620
Christian apologetics. So like the reality- Protestant apologetics, but sure, we digress.
00:13:52.380
But the sort of basic idea is that conservatism is built ground up and leftism is built top-down.
00:14:01.420
And so those two things are now in conflict. And the left has used the top-down structure in order
00:14:07.360
to quash the little platoons, right? So it's quash families and communities and religious institutions
00:14:12.560
and churches and all this sort of stuff. But I don't think that they've gotten quite as far as
00:14:16.680
either they think or as the right things. I think that they keep kicking the can down the road.
00:14:21.440
If they really wanted to, if they really had the power to do full tyranny, does anyone doubt
00:14:25.360
that if Joe Biden really had the true power, the real true power to do true tyranny, that he wouldn't
00:14:33.100
I think that he's a little tyrant in his heart. And I think that was certainly true of Barack Obama,
00:14:36.900
who was a big tyrant in his heart. But isn't there this problem?
00:14:38.720
But he does not have, he doesn't actually have the power or the approval from the American people
00:14:43.720
to do that, which suggests that this is not quite over yet.
00:14:48.520
What would count as true tyranny would be the federal government forcibly dissolving churches.
00:14:56.260
Forcibly dissolving. We couldn't have this conversation.
00:14:58.380
Right? Like, I don't think we're that far from it, but I don't think we're there yet.
00:15:01.240
Right? I think that you see, what you see is kind of little bubbles of tyranny that,
00:15:04.700
that bubble to the surface and pop. But I don't think that, that...
00:15:09.940
Well, I would argue we had true tyranny during COVID.
00:15:20.520
...the president of the United States at the time.
00:15:22.020
Right, but it's not just that. It's also that, that, that, that is also forgetting that
00:15:25.160
there are many states that did not go along with the true tyranny.
00:15:27.940
Meaning that I moved my entire family from California to Florida partially because Florida
00:15:33.500
was not a true tyranny in the way that California legitimately acted full, full-on tyrannically
00:15:39.340
during, during COVID. But even that was, as long as it was, it still was, it was a temporary
00:15:46.240
way station. Now, I think that there are other aspects of tyranny that are more permanent in
00:15:49.420
California than just a COVID lockdown. I think that was like the most open and obvious...
00:15:52.940
The real big reason I moved my family from California, aside from the tax regime, which
00:15:57.880
is a form of property tyranny, is that I think it's going to be nearly impossible to raise
00:16:02.660
a religious family in the state of California. I think they really will attempt to forcibly
00:16:05.840
dissolve churches and go after full-on religious institutions. And that will be tyranny.
00:16:10.400
But I don't think that at the top federal level, that power yet exists. I think that the founder's
00:16:15.020
system of checks and balances is still robust enough, despite all of the changes that have
00:16:18.220
been, I think, terrible for the country in terms of the administrative state and the executive
00:16:21.500
branch. That, that, I don't think that we're quite there yet.
00:16:25.180
But I would also, I would also argue that, just one quick thing, that they might not need
00:16:31.700
true tyranny because once you, once you sort of capture the hearts and minds of people and
00:16:37.620
you, you own them that way, you don't need true tyranny.
00:16:39.440
Once you just get us all addicted to drugs and...
00:16:41.420
Right. So, for example, shutting down the churches, well, we're at a point where they
00:16:45.880
don't, they don't need to do that because people have abandoned church on their own. It's
00:16:49.260
almost like a pointless endeavor. And they, they, they shut down the churches, they shut
00:16:53.360
down the churches during COVID and people stopped going and kind of went along with
00:16:57.240
it and they haven't gone back. Okay. But, you know, so...
00:16:59.460
But the thing is, there's a vacuum there. There is a difference between coercion and a
00:17:05.060
vacuum. The vacuum can be filled by a resurgence. Coercion prevents the resurgence, right?
00:17:12.860
True tyranny says you cannot come back to church. A vacuum is you left the church and now you're
00:17:17.020
not coming back. And that's on you. That's not on the government. Hey, like my, my shul
00:17:20.300
was closed during COVID and you know what happened? We all went back to shul and not only did we
00:17:24.020
go back to shul, my shul went from having had a hundred families to having almost 400 families
00:17:27.740
in the course of about three years. So like true, this is, this is where things get rebuilt
00:17:33.000
is at the local level. And because, you know, listen, we all talk about national politics
00:17:35.920
all the time and the elections are fun to talk about and they're interesting to talk about.
00:17:38.480
And of course they make a huge difference. I think the area where they actually make the
00:17:41.420
most difference is in foreign policy because the president has plenary power over foreign
00:17:44.280
policy as you can see from Joe Biden running around like a child with a lip match, you
00:17:48.440
know, in a factory of flammables on the international stage. But you know, domestically there is still
00:17:54.300
real capability. I mean, what the lives that you guys lead in Tennessee or the life that
00:17:57.980
you're leading in Virginia or life that I'm leading in Florida, this is not a life dominated
00:18:02.160
by tyranny. This is a life that I've built in my community that I think is quite rich and
00:18:07.880
filled with social fabric, but that's an act of will on my part. And it requires the vacuum.
00:18:11.720
And the point that I'm making is that vacuum still exists, but it has to be filled by a
00:18:15.580
I want to get to a corollary of all the stuff we're talking about because it's really important.
00:18:20.420
What you just said shows the fact that we have been making the wrong argument. I'm sure
00:18:24.860
you all saw Harrison Butker, the chief's kicker.
00:18:28.520
The Chad meme. You mean come to life with the yes.
00:18:32.400
The guy was great making a speech about the fact that the thing that women should be doing
00:18:36.400
is building, making homes and having children and being homemakers. The reaction to it shows
00:18:42.840
you exactly what they're afraid of, right? I mean, that is exactly the thing that they're
00:18:46.060
afraid of, which means that we've been arguing about the wrong thing for a long time. We've
00:18:49.840
been arguing about systems and systems, as you pointed out, don't do anything without the value
00:18:56.300
system in which they're enclosed and out of which they came. The systems came out of a form of
00:19:01.580
Christianity that basically said, oh, people are individuals. That individualism was created by
00:19:08.620
the Catholic Church, but it also led to Protestantism. So there was some kind of
00:19:12.320
syncretism there that we have to deal with. But I know you hate it.
00:19:15.020
Still kicking myself. I wasn't around at the time.
00:19:18.420
But the thing about it is when Butker made that speech and they jumped on him with the kind of
00:19:23.220
ferocity that lets you know immediately they were terrified. Immediately. This cannot be said.
00:19:28.540
It wasn't they said, we disagree. It was, this cannot be said. And the Kansas City Chiefs,
00:19:33.300
to their credit, said, well, you know, we believe in free speech. That's the wonderful
00:19:36.680
thing about this country. And conservatives cheered. Conservatives should not have cheered.
00:19:40.160
Their answer should have been, no, we believe this too. The owner of the chiefs said that. No,
00:19:43.880
he's right. This is what we should be doing. And it's what we should all be doing. In other words,
00:19:48.040
the system of free speech, I believe in free speech with all my heart, but I believe that we should
00:19:51.740
be using it not to defend free speech. We should be using it to defend the values that underpin free speech and keep it part of it.
00:19:57.320
What I'm not sure of is the contra argument. I'm not sure that you can use coercion to instill actual
00:20:05.000
values. I'll give you a great example of it. Just happened this week. Julia Fox, who I never heard
00:20:10.680
of before, but I think she dated Kanye West. That's the only way I've heard about her. And I think she
00:20:14.560
was an actress and a model or something. She came out, she just did a podcast. I covered it on the show
00:20:18.620
today where she said, I am celibate. I have now been celibate for years because the Supreme Court
00:20:26.340
overruled Roe v. Wade in the Dobbs decision. And my act to reclaim my power is I am going to be
00:20:33.540
celibate. And I thought, don't threaten me with a good time, honey, you know, to prove, you know.
00:20:40.560
Even though she lives in a state where she can still get an abortion.
00:20:42.260
Yes. And that's the key here. This is the national government versus the localism argument.
00:20:48.520
I guarantee Julia Fox lives in a state where she could get as many abortions as she wants.
00:20:52.700
And yet the law is a teacher. And that change in the law changed her behavior. I don't even think
00:20:58.360
she realizes it changed her behavior for the good, but it did change her behavior for the good. And
00:21:02.480
she sounds more normal, by the way, than the last time I heard her.
00:21:04.580
You know, it's funny. This is one of the arguments. So there's one of the things that's happening on
00:21:07.900
the right, the young right, is they've got a new name for racial thinking. It's a human
00:21:12.880
biodiversity, right? And so one of the things that they believe though, is that we're in a perfect
00:21:18.140
situation because the only people who could be having children are conservatives. And I think
00:21:22.980
there may be something to that. We may have them out. We may have them exactly where we want them,
00:21:26.940
you know. So here's the thing. There is one aspect of conservatism, as you talked about,
00:21:32.600
is the conservation of virtue. But another aspect of conservatism, as Russell Kirk, Catholic,
00:21:36.920
talked about, was the idea that there is a certain gradualism and carefulness when it comes to the
00:21:43.680
exercise of power. And so yes, the law is a teacher, but there is a difference between a teacher and a
00:21:50.700
jailer. And what I mean by that is that you can teach people, but you have to teach people sort of
00:21:56.160
where they are. I can't teach calculus to my 10-year-old. Evolution, not revolution kind of thing.
00:22:00.820
Well, it's just, you can lead the people, but you can't lead them from so far ahead beyond the
00:22:06.340
horizon that they can't even see you. And if you try to drag them from there, the chain's going to
00:22:11.060
break. It's too long a chain. And so the idea of the law compelling things that the public is just
00:22:17.460
not going to go along with, you will actually create a backlash instead of actually getting
00:22:21.880
people to where you want to go. But aren't there so many examples of the law doing exactly that,
00:22:27.060
where the law changes people's opinions about a thing and their values? I mean, you gave one
00:22:30.840
example. Another, maybe smaller example that I was thinking about recently is smoking cigarettes.
00:22:36.240
I mean, you can still smoke cigarettes, but in the younger generations, they just don't do it
00:22:41.540
anymore. Which was, 40 years ago, it's unthinkable that you would have a bunch of 25-year-olds that
00:22:48.360
But that's an excellent example of gradualism in the law. So they didn't just ban smoking outright in the
00:22:53.080
United States. But what they did is they put significant taxes on it, and they banned it for
00:22:57.540
people below a certain age. And then those people all aged up into-
00:23:01.800
But it was also, all the institutions of power had this relentless message that
00:23:06.700
this is bad and dirty and gross, don't do it. And it's over, just, you hear it over and over again.
00:23:10.940
By the way, I agree with that. So I agree with that. I agree that our institutions ideally,
00:23:15.860
and this is your point, Drew, our institutions ideally should be echoing virtue. And we've made a
00:23:20.580
mistake on the right by suggesting, again, it is not actually, this is what I was saying before,
00:23:25.580
the difference between an instrumental value and inherent value is very crucial.
00:23:29.160
An instrumental value is a value that you hold in order to get to something, right? Money has
00:23:33.420
instrumental value, not because you have a sack of cash in your backseat, but because you can use
00:23:37.000
that sack of cash to do things with, right? Freedom is an instrumental value. It is not an inherent
00:23:42.040
value. Just being free is not in and of itself valuable, because if you're on a desert island,
00:23:46.720
there's nothing else around. You're totally free, and it's of no value whatsoever.
00:23:49.080
However, it's object-oriented. You have to actually use it for something good. And so when you're
00:23:54.420
talking about education toward proper use of freedom, that's what all the institutions should
00:24:01.420
be doing. And that's why it's important. To give an example, when Joe, it was not enough to me,
00:24:06.880
Joe Biden gave a speech about, one of his terrible speeches, about the campus protesters. And he said,
00:24:12.280
it's just terrible that they're breaking the law, but also there is a right to free speech. Okay,
00:24:15.840
we all agree there's a right to free speech. That wasn't the question. The question is not even
00:24:19.640
whether they're breaking the law. The question is, are they assholes or not, right? Is what
00:24:22.700
they're saying right, or is what they're saying wrong? Because I promise you, if those were white
00:24:25.340
supremacists on the lawn at Columbia University, he wouldn't have been talking about the inherent
00:24:29.020
values of free speech versus lawbreaking. He would have been talking about the actual message.
00:24:32.360
I'm not sure I agree with you about freedom, though. I think freedom is an inherent value,
00:24:36.900
but in order to maintain it, the values that underlie it have to be in place. I mean,
00:24:42.840
you don't have freedom. I mean, I always, this guy is always saying you have the freedom to do the
00:24:47.120
right thing, but that's not freedom at all. So, yeah. Can I ask a freshman philosophy?
00:24:51.640
What's an inherent value? Friendship, family. What is freedom?
00:24:55.500
So the classical definition, I'm glad Drew brought this up as he was mocking me for articulating.
00:25:00.060
The classical conception of freedom is articulated not only by Lord Acton, who some of the
00:25:05.180
libertarians still like, but articulated by Dante, articulated by many classical thinkers,
00:25:10.360
is that freedom, and De Nozio Cortez puts this very well. Freedom is not just the ability to choose.
00:25:18.000
Freedom is willing, and willing is predicated on knowledge. So to bring that down to earth,
00:25:25.840
if freedom were just choosing, we would be freer than God, because God can't sin. I can sin.
00:25:32.800
Am I freer than God? I'm not freer than God. Freedom is willing, and willing is predicated
00:25:38.140
on knowledge. If you don't know anything, if you're totally ignorant, you can't really will.
00:25:41.340
This is why kids don't have freedom, right? That's why we have age of consent laws and things like
00:25:44.520
that. So God has perfect will in part because he has perfect knowledge. He's omniscient. So he's
00:25:52.220
perfectly free. I am not perfectly free. This is why it must be the case that freedom is,
00:25:58.440
to put it really bluntly, the ability to do what we ought to do, rather than just...
00:26:06.920
Because God knows what is right to do, and we don't. So the question is who decides,
00:26:11.760
and if the person who decides has complete control over you to make you choose what he decides is
00:26:25.020
So what I mean by that is that you don't want to delegate to any power the ability to define
00:26:30.220
right and wrong so narrowly that you can't choose between objects.
00:26:34.260
But you also don't want people to have the quote-unquote, it's not freedom to harm another
00:26:40.400
person. Why not? Why isn't it? But why not? Why shouldn't there be freedom to harm another
00:26:45.400
Because the logic, the same logic that creates freedom creates the right not to be harmed.
00:26:49.980
Okay. How about having a puppy? Do you have freedom to harm a puppy?
00:26:55.900
Yeah, take the human being out of it. There are certain things that we agree don't have
00:26:59.580
to do with consent, which we can get into later, but we don't believe that you have the freedom
00:27:03.680
to do those things because they are inherently harmful.
00:27:10.980
I think this is where Orthodox Jews and Catholics are united in their belief, but it is not a
00:27:17.080
Protestant belief and it is not a fundamentally American belief. The fundamental American conception
00:27:21.320
of freedom does include the, at least the, and the Protestant definition of freedom more
00:27:26.820
precisely includes freedom to fail. It isn't only freedom to succeed. It's not only freedom
00:27:34.300
Christ didn't just give us freedom from sin as though that only means that now you have
00:27:38.560
the opportunity to do what's right. He gave us freedom from sin and that he ameliorated the
00:27:43.140
If you went back, if you went back to the Mayflower, like these cigars, and you talked
00:27:47.120
to Governor Bradford and you asked him his definition of freedom, Governor Bradford,
00:27:51.300
who took toys away from children on Christmas because they had no right to play on Christmas
00:27:56.600
day, whose definition of freedom would the great pilgrim Bradford have agreed with?
00:28:01.200
There's no question. It would have been mine and Ben.
00:28:05.740
But I'm saying that's the American definition of freedom.
00:28:07.580
I'm interested in a biblical conception of freedom.
00:28:09.720
Hold on. Well, we are because that's what the American experiment is predicated on.
00:28:14.800
The biblical definition of freedom starts with the exodus and it is free from the tyrant.
00:28:18.860
It is, it is, it is, hold on, hold on. It's freedom. It's freedom from Pharaoh. And it's
00:28:24.120
a freedom that is accompanied by risk. And would that we were slaves again in Egypt. Because
00:28:28.280
when we were slaves again, when we were slaves in Egypt, we at least knew from whence our meal
00:28:33.400
And when they went and asked for a king, God said, they're not rejecting the prophet.
00:28:37.800
They're rejecting me because they're asking for a king.
00:28:42.740
Okay. So two things. One, you have to finish the verse. The verse in Exodus is,
00:28:47.180
let my people go so that they may serve me in the wilderness. Right. That's the actual finish
00:28:54.300
Which is, by the way, which is not what they did.
00:28:55.980
Right. They didn't do that. And God smacks them around for it.
00:29:03.980
it doesn't apply. It doesn't appear literally anywhere in the Bible. So far as I'm aware.
00:29:06.840
Cherut is a very modern term. And it really, when we talk about freedom in the, I do,
00:29:14.140
here's the reason I agree with Michael. It's because in consequence, it doesn't make so much
00:29:17.840
of a difference because what the founders were saying is that there have to be pragmatic limits
00:29:21.780
on the government because a government that is powerful enough to define virtue is also powerful
00:29:27.900
Right. That's the, but that is not an argument for the good of the freedom itself to sin.
00:29:32.760
That's not the same thing, right? This is two different types of right. And so you do have,
00:29:37.800
you do have an exemption from the government in the sense that you don't want the government to be
00:29:40.880
quite that powerful. But inside my own family, for example, my kids are free in the sense that
00:29:46.820
they can do good things, but they are not free to do anything. Does it make them unfree?
00:29:52.620
Yes. Of course they are. A parent is a tyrant and rightly so. Their children are not free.
00:29:59.480
Okay. But is my kid deprived? Or is that good for my kid? The point is that-
00:30:08.480
A parent is a parent. But the government is also not a parent.
00:30:11.540
Right. But the parent is the boss of the house. The point, this is why I hate so much when you hear
00:30:16.360
people on the left suggest that the government is a father and a mother, right? It's not. The
00:30:19.240
government is neither of those things. But that is, again, a more pragmatic- I keep coming back
00:30:24.040
to pragmatism because otherwise you have a universalist theory of what government can and
00:30:28.600
cannot do. And I don't believe in that. I think that local government, me and my friends in our
00:30:32.540
HOA, we get to make all sorts of rules the federal government does not get to make.
00:30:36.000
Why? Because we have a broader level of homogeneity and agreement about values,
00:30:40.500
which means that we can compel that there can't be a porn shop in the middle of our living
00:30:44.800
facility, right? But that's not true on the federal level because you have broader
00:30:48.380
disagreements and you have very pragmatic concerns about handing tremendous power to
00:30:52.300
the power- But there's certain things even your HOA can't compel you to do, rightly.
00:30:55.380
Yes, because they violate certain fundamental human virtues or the possibility thereof.
00:30:59.920
But here's where the disagreement lives. You posit that freedom is only freedom if it's
00:31:07.220
freedom to be virtuous. And I posit that there is no virtue apart from freedom, that this is a
00:31:12.500
chicken and the egg, that it's a cycle, that it can't be defined only in one direction.
00:31:16.120
It works in both directions. You can't compel virtue because it's unvirtuous to the exact
00:31:32.460
So doesn't it seem like the concept of freedom is just not a useful concept?
00:31:40.180
That's why many cultures throughout history, probably most of them, weren't focused. They
00:31:45.500
didn't talk about freedom at all. Even probably today, you go to most places on Earth and you
00:31:49.040
talk about freedom. It's not part of their language. They don't discuss it or worry about it.
00:31:54.180
It's not that it's useless. It's that it's now the victim of tremendous semantic overload.
00:32:00.880
But also, to the exact extent that we're told it is for freedom that Christ has made us free,
00:32:05.540
it's pretty central to Christian theology to say that freedom is not useful.
00:32:11.460
And all theology based on the Bible is that if you're not free, then your love of God
00:32:20.080
Yeah, but the freedom in the Bible is totally different.
00:32:22.480
Freedom of choice is vital to, you're correct, to achieve virtue. That is true.
00:32:28.060
But that does not mean that the freedom to sin is an inherent good.
00:32:33.500
No, but freedom of sin is a natural accompaniment to the freedom to choose.
00:32:38.000
Jeremy's point, I think, is very good, especially on Exodus. When you view Exodus as the figure of
00:32:44.600
history, this is a very, to quote my favorite, one of my favorite old dead men, Dante, you know,
00:32:50.400
he views Exodus, one of, yeah, he's pretty close to the top.
00:32:55.680
He views Exodus as the figure of history. You know, like all stories have a literal meaning,
00:33:01.560
they have an allegorical meaning, a moral meaning, all these different meanings.
00:33:04.260
And so what is the story of Exodus? It is literally the story of Moses leading the Israelites
00:33:10.280
out of Egypt from the Pharaoh toward the promised land. And it is allegorically the story of
00:33:16.660
God's chosen leader leading God's people to the promised land. And it is anagogically,
00:33:23.620
you know, from the perspective of the end times, telling us how we all escaped this slavery.
00:33:28.240
I'm going to tell you something you're going to hate. You're misreading Dante.
00:33:30.620
Dante. I'm mis, what are you talking about? I'm misreading. I probably am because I,
00:33:34.920
Dante. I'm going to, I'm going to let you argue about Dante because you have diverse
00:33:38.960
perspectives and diversification is key. One person who works the hard way is Isaac Newton,
00:33:44.720
who invested a large sum of money in the South Sea company. Unfortunately, when the South Sea
00:33:48.800
bubble burst in 1720, Newton lost a lot of money. This is why diversification is really important,
00:33:53.160
even for people like Isaac Newton. During times of economic uncertainty or market volatility,
00:33:57.460
investors tend to flock to gold as a safe haven asset. Its value tends to increase during
00:34:01.400
turbulent times, providing a buffer against those market downturns, which is why people are turning
00:34:05.120
to gold right now and why Birch Gold is busier than ever. Birch Gold understands that navigating
00:34:09.300
financial decisions can be incredibly daunting. Dante. That's why they're dedicated in-house IRA
00:34:15.060
department is there to guide you every step of the way. Birch Gold is committed to addressing
00:34:18.820
your questions and concerns promptly. Their team is always ready to provide answers and clarity,
00:34:22.580
whether it's about fees, tax on rollovers, or the timing of the process. They are here to ensure you feel
00:34:26.820
valued and well-informed. Text Ben to 989898 to talk to one of Birch Gold's experts in Claim,
00:34:32.160
your free info kit on gold. You'll learn how to convert an existing IRA or 401k into a tax
00:34:36.540
sheltered IRA in gold. The best part is, it doesn't cost you a penny out of pocket. Just text Ben
00:34:40.540
to 989898. That's Ben to 989898. You know how much gold they've sent me for all the work we've done
00:34:47.640
for the most? None gold. Zilch. No gold. I would just think every now and then you'd open a pack and
00:34:52.740
go, ah, gold. None. I said that at the 15-minute mark of the show, we were going to do something
00:34:58.300
big, something huge, something unprecedented. We're going to premiere the second greatest
00:35:04.480
commercial ever. And we didn't do that because it's now 40 minutes into it. But we're going to do it now.
00:35:10.540
This is, as I said before, we've been hard at work for two years on trying to move our
00:35:15.460
manufacturing out of China. And we've done just that. I'm going to tell you more about it.
00:35:19.320
Michael shaved with it. I've watched people shave with it. I have a beard. I mean, it's part of the,
00:35:23.320
it's part of my shtick. And we'll talk about that when we come back. But first, here it is.
00:35:27.320
We're proud to present the world premiere of the second greatest commercial ever.
00:35:31.140
Oh, hey, I'm Jeremy Boring, CEO of Daily Wire and founder of Jeremy's Razors. Woke razor
00:35:47.700
companies love to take your money while trampling on your values. Me? I just love your money.
00:36:20.860
Hey, hey, hey, hey, hey. Nobody calls cut on my set but me.
00:36:25.580
What, do you run Hollywood now? Two on the nose.
00:36:28.740
What is this? We're filming the commercial for the brand new second generation Jeremy's Razor.
00:36:33.680
Yeah, I get it. We moved our manufacturing out of China. Plus, with the new Sprint 3 and
00:36:37.740
Precision 5 blades, you can shave like a man, not a manifesto. But who's he?
00:36:43.280
I'm Black Jeremy, huge fan. Do you mind if we get a selfie?
00:36:48.340
Look, we talked about this. Customers want diversity. Customers want inclusion. Customers
00:36:57.840
And for the commercials to be less macho. Can we please lose the flamethrower and the car?
00:37:06.580
I'm Jessica. I've been following you around half naked for two years.
00:37:10.120
Hope that makes you some kind of expert on advertising. Besides, don't you think it's a little insulting
00:37:17.620
Don't you think it's a little insulting to Black people of color that instead of giving
00:37:20.800
them their own roles to play, you just recast them as a beloved white character?
00:37:27.040
We don't do it for people of color. We do it for liberal white women.
00:37:33.180
I'll spell it out for you. Liberal white women make most of the purchasing decisions for
00:37:37.100
the family, so happy commercials with people of color smiling at each other make them feel
00:37:46.220
That's why there's no white people in commercials anymore.
00:38:00.560
And don't forget Jeremy's shampoo and conditioner.
00:38:05.960
Hey, what if I play your character a little less bitchy?
00:38:22.320
So stop giving your money to woke corporations who hate you.
00:38:38.980
Go to jeremysrazors.com now and buy the new radically redesigned second gen razors featuring
00:38:45.180
sharper, longer lasting blades and superior durability.
00:38:48.700
Now in more inclusive three and five blade models.
00:38:58.580
That was a thing that happened in all of our lives.
00:39:05.940
You don't see any white people in commercials anymore.
00:39:07.660
And everybody says, oh, it's like they don't understand that white people are still their
00:39:18.460
We feel like our customer will probably appreciate the commentary.
00:39:23.100
In addition to rolling out the brand new Gen 2 razor, as I said before, it's a truly world
00:39:28.420
It's on par with anything else that you've tried.
00:39:34.800
So I've got the precision and I don't want to brag or anything.
00:39:41.660
I've got a little cute little baby face over here and I dry shave.
00:39:48.700
And I was a little nervous that I'd lose half the moneymaker.
00:39:51.880
You know, if I just, no, it's a beautiful shave.
00:39:58.260
I want to test this thing on my head for Friday show.
00:40:01.840
Give me the one that was going to work best on my head.
00:40:04.800
And in fact, co-CEO Caleb has been shaving his head with it.
00:40:13.120
We're doing something else new, which is we're selling on Amazon.
00:40:16.060
Here to four, you've only been able to go to jeremysrazors.com.
00:40:19.840
That's really important for us because we want, obviously, for the product to be accessible
00:40:24.000
And that's important, A, because it's how we keep the lights on around here.
00:40:27.220
It's also important, though, because we do have a mission with all of this.
00:40:30.800
And our mission is to actually create competition in the marketplace on behalf of conservatives.
00:40:34.860
For basically the last two decades, corporations have moved further and further and further to the left,
00:40:40.380
taking for granted fully 50% of their potential customers.
00:40:43.920
And this country, they've done so because they just assume that if they cater to the right,
00:40:47.680
the left will abandon them and have a lot of options in doing so.
00:40:50.780
But if they pander to the left, you have no option.
00:40:52.540
You're just going to keep buying their products here.
00:40:54.420
You keep giving them your money no matter what.
00:40:56.040
That's what we're trying to challenge by building these brands and these companies.
00:41:01.540
It's hard, you know, getting into a new platform like Amazon.
00:41:03.740
Obviously, everybody's there, but you need to trend.
00:41:06.120
We need it to be Prime eligible, which means that Amazon needs to see that there's demand for it.
00:41:11.020
This is what you're looking for, this lovely new box and the brand new Jeremy's Razor 2nd Gen Razor 2.0.
00:41:20.460
And, you know, if it's good enough for Michael Knowles, I mean, then it needs a better recommendation.
00:41:27.240
Well, I mean, producing that commercial was the seventh circle of hell.
00:41:34.940
By the way, you're really funny in the commercial.
00:41:37.680
When we started the company, I used to routinely tell people you were a terrible actor.
00:41:41.960
And I said so on account of you were a, I mean, truly bad.
00:41:49.100
I feel like in Lady Ballers, you were hilarious.
00:41:52.180
Again, if you just give me, like, a very, a person who's just pissed off to be there.
00:42:01.800
I had the most important role of the whole thing.
00:42:21.340
I was going to say, for a minute, I thought we'd let a black guy in here.
00:42:23.260
By the way, Siakka, who plays Black Jeremy and also had a very funny role in Jeremy's Razors,
00:42:35.180
Like, I think it's going to buy me a lot of freedom not to have to be in all the commercials.
00:42:45.740
And also, I will admit that I found it very funny when the actress says that she has been following her on
00:42:52.420
half-naked for two years and you never noticed.
00:43:02.340
So, the God King's McLaren is a bass boat blue.
00:43:06.920
I don't know if that's the official color, but I call it a bass boat blue McLaren 600.
00:43:12.160
And we thought that for black Jeremy that he needed something with a little more attitude.
00:43:21.100
Am I going to keep getting paychecks or is this?
00:43:31.480
It's hard to find money to pay you when we have to keep spending day after day to change
00:43:53.300
Dante, he fights at the Battle of Campaldino for the Pope, the Pope side.
00:43:59.820
Then he becomes like a rhino of the Pope side and he's pro-emperor side.
00:44:03.600
And then the Pope side kicks him out and sends him into exile.
00:44:06.300
So, the upshot of all of this is Dante argues, to the point of like pragmatic limitations
00:44:12.160
on power, for a kind of early separation of church and state.
00:44:17.540
He thinks the civil authority should receive light from the spiritual authority, should
00:44:22.040
be guided by the spiritual authority and illuminated by it, but that they're distinct.
00:44:26.360
That the state, the emperor, and the Pope, the spiritual authority, both receive their
00:44:32.880
And so, basically, the emperor doesn't have to answer to the Pope.
00:44:36.180
And this is a kind of early limitation on the power of government, though it's not this
00:44:42.300
total secular, you know, the church should have no say in anything.
00:44:46.740
First of all, we're having a kind of conversation at cross purposes because one thing we're talking
00:44:50.680
about is the nature of man before God, which is different than the nature of man before
00:44:55.420
So, that we're talking about two different things and the quality of freedom in those
00:44:59.080
two different situations is different, which is the problem with Catholic theocracy.
00:45:05.420
In Dante, Dante goes into hell and views the people who are damned for the choices that they
00:45:12.220
And because Dante is an actual great poet, the people come to life in such a way that you
00:45:19.540
But he's told not to feel pity for them because they have made their free choices.
00:45:24.720
So, they're obviously, the freedom is a good, even in hell.
00:45:28.620
And so, he's not saying that they only were given the freedom to do the right thing.
00:45:33.360
He's saying we don't pity them because they have chosen where they are and their humanity
00:45:41.320
I don't understand why that makes freedom to do the wrong thing itself a good as opposed
00:45:47.540
Because it naturally accompanies the freedom to do what's right.
00:45:50.580
Which is why in the Exodus, we see that God's people sin, even on their way out, and God
00:45:59.440
And in Christian theology, that's fulfilled in Christ, who, yes, gives us freedom to do
00:46:04.840
what's right, but that is accompanied by forgiveness for doing what's wrong.
00:46:11.680
There's a multiplicity of God just going hog wild on people.
00:46:14.560
I mean, okay, so the distinction that I was going to make about the definition of freedom
00:46:20.040
is that people misuse it because it's such a broad term.
00:46:23.960
And so, people mean a bunch of different things by it, right?
00:46:26.180
Sometimes what people mean is, I'm free to do whatever I want to do.
00:46:30.200
Sometimes it means that I need a freedom to have health care, right?
00:46:35.180
Which is, I want somebody else to do something for me.
00:46:37.200
Like, there are a bunch of different uses of the word freedom that are actually mutually
00:46:41.300
The two that I want to focus on that I think that get mixed up really easily in this particular
00:46:45.260
conversation are a right in the sense that you have no duty to do X, where you have two
00:46:53.220
choices that are both morally justifiable or interesting or irrelevant.
00:46:59.020
Like, whether you're going to have meat or whether you're going to have milk tonight,
00:47:01.160
Like, if you're a Jew, you're going to have meat or milk tonight.
00:47:03.520
You're going to have a cheeseburger or pork if you're a Christian.
00:47:05.540
Which is your, like, that has no moral qualifications and really has no moral importance.
00:47:14.660
So, the definition of that kind of freedom is you have a right to do X because you have
00:47:22.260
That is not the same thing as you have a freedom to sin.
00:47:26.180
You have freedom to choose among various different things because you have no duty not to do that.
00:47:31.080
So, in other words, I do have a duty not to sin.
00:47:34.080
I do have a duty not to sin, which means I don't have a right to sin.
00:47:39.080
That is different from the thing we're talking about on a governmental level, which is an
00:47:42.100
immunity, which is the government does not have the power to compel me to do this thing.
00:47:47.540
That's why I keep going back to the pragmatic thing.
00:47:49.500
Yeah, so there are two different kinds of freedom.
00:47:51.140
So, if you agree with that, then we're actually all in agreement.
00:47:53.320
So, then I think we basically, that goes back to my point, which is that when I say is it
00:48:00.100
a useful concept, I'm not saying it doesn't matter or it's unimportant, but in conversation
00:48:08.760
and in political debate, if the definition of freedom required, you know, we could debate
00:48:13.320
it for two hours and it has 50 different meanings and people mean 50 different things, it gets
00:48:18.320
to the point where just in common conversation when we're having a political debate and it
00:48:30.060
And that's why I've tried to not use that term as much and instead talk about responsibility,
00:48:35.580
which is the flip side of rights like you're talking about.
00:48:42.360
There is an important thing about this, going back to Polybius, because I think the cycle
00:48:53.860
When a democracy or whatever you want to call it, when it becomes chaos such that a strong
00:49:01.320
man has to be brought in and it then morphs into a tyranny.
00:49:05.020
I mean, Lord Acton's point in the fall of the Roman Republic that you were at three years
00:49:12.740
If you think the empire was bad, just wait till you hear about the Republic.
00:49:19.840
But my argument with Acton on this is that if you don't have the right to choose who governs
00:49:30.740
In the fall, in the morphing of a democracy into a tyranny, you have lost something of value.
00:49:36.380
And that's why I think before you let the democracy fall to bring order, you should actually try to
00:49:43.420
And there is something at least to, you know, I love American history.
00:49:47.200
We're talking about the pilgrims and the revolution and everything.
00:49:50.340
You know, America doesn't have a tradition of a king.
00:49:54.160
There were very serious founding fathers and framers who argued for it or for some kind of
00:49:58.520
elected monarchy or, you know, Washington is king or something.
00:50:03.740
I quite like the Windsors for all of their, you know, foibles and eccentricities.
00:50:08.820
I think they've been basically good for England over the last century or more.
00:50:14.140
So, you know, until Emperor Baron comes up, we've got to deal with our own political tradition.
00:50:19.000
But don't we see in Washington turning over his sword to the, you know, political authorities,
00:50:28.100
I mean, aren't we seeing something there that is unique in history, almost unique in history,
00:50:36.120
I mean, don't we see in that moment something that is inherently good?
00:50:39.860
And in the fall of the republic, don't we see something that is unfortunate?
00:50:43.140
King George is said to have remarked upon hearing that Washington handed over.
00:50:48.760
He said that Washington might be the greatest man in the world.
00:50:55.620
Well, I mean, listen, again, as a defender of the republic and a deep non-believer in
00:51:01.440
the return of a tyranny or a monarchy, just on a theoretical level, the idea that one form
00:51:06.860
of government is inherently better than another because you vote, I don't think is true.
00:51:11.960
Because I think that rights precede, if you like rights all that much, and I'm talking
00:51:16.480
here about, or structures of law, property, these things historically precede the form of
00:51:21.200
government, they don't act as a result of the form of government, historically speaking.
00:51:26.300
Meaning that if you want to look at the rights that existed for the British, those well pre-existed
00:51:32.180
They started with a bunch of oligarchic lords fighting with the king to dissemble power.
00:51:37.820
They weakened under the power of the growing power of parliament.
00:51:40.780
And by the way, I mean, one of the cases that you can easily make with regards to the American
00:51:43.880
Republic is that if you're looking at the rights, I mean, and here, obviously, you get
00:51:47.580
into very dicey territory because not everybody in America had rights.
00:51:51.880
But if you were looking at the inherent centralizing power of a tyrannical government, it was very
00:51:58.880
And one of the reasons that it was kind of weak early on is because not everybody could
00:52:01.600
One of the things that you get along with full suffrage is the ability to swamp rights in
00:52:10.840
But to hear that you don't support democracy is going to keep me awake at night.
00:52:13.540
And that's why I'm glad I have a Helix mattress.
00:52:19.180
And when I lie awake, I know how comfortable it is.
00:52:25.260
Helix harnesses years of mattress expertise to offer a truly elevated sleep experience or
00:52:30.880
The Helix Elite Collection includes six different mattress models, each tailored for specific
00:52:43.760
But I'm just telling you, if you're nervous about buying a mattress online, you don't
00:52:48.060
Helix has a sleep quiz that matches your body type and sleep preferences to the perfect mattress.
00:52:53.740
Why would you buy a mattress made for someone else?
00:53:00.640
They'll even pick it up for you if you don't love it.
00:53:02.360
But that's not going to be a problem because you will.
00:53:04.520
Helix's financing options and flexible payment plans ensure a great night's sleep is never
00:53:10.520
Helix is offering our listeners 30% off all mattress orders and two free pillows.
00:53:30.120
Nightline did a full episode on our good friend Andrew Tate the other day.
00:53:35.180
And it was, you know, mediocre as Nightline usually is.
00:53:38.500
And it included some interesting material and included some really dumb material from some
00:53:43.080
sort of gender studies professor who's explaining why feminism is good for us all, which is
00:53:47.740
Legitimately, it's like the episode was made about why Andrew Tate is evil.
00:53:56.720
And then the counter is not responsible manhood.
00:53:59.200
It's some dude being like, but feminism is a solution for everyone.
00:54:04.420
But the most interesting part of the doc was that there are all these outstanding sexual
00:54:11.180
assault warrants on the Tate and sex trafficking warrants on the Tate and all of this.
00:54:16.160
And there are a couple of the women who have come out and said, I was not sex trafficked.
00:54:21.860
And the prosecutor in that particular case says, well, it doesn't matter if you consented.
00:54:26.080
If you were convinced to come via the lover boy method to Romania and then serve effectively
00:54:31.440
as a prostitute on camera, it doesn't matter whether you wanted to do it or you didn't
00:54:38.540
And this raises the question of freedom because freedom always sort of implies with it consent,
00:54:45.420
So this goes back to, is consent the core value?
00:54:51.660
Because for the West, it's not just that even if you argue that it's an inherent value, it
00:54:59.040
And you can see the breakdown of that system of morality every single day, particularly with
00:55:03.740
young women who have been told their entire life that their consent is a binary question.
00:55:09.560
And then men look at that and they're like, okay, well, if consent is all that matters here,
00:55:15.000
So long as you consent to it and we are, our society no longer has the language to condemn
00:55:20.100
women for saying yes to the thing, or even more importantly, condemn men for taking advantage
00:55:26.200
of a woman who says yes to a thing is not taking advantage.
00:55:29.240
If she says yes to the thing and that's a, that's a sickness in a society.
00:55:33.160
This is if you read the New York times, the New York times writes like three or four sex
00:55:36.740
articles every week and every single one of them is musing over how things could have
00:55:45.000
And this is again and again in the New York times, which I take to be the voice of the
00:55:49.080
left as a, an old fashioned, they're kind of a fusty old paper.
00:55:52.780
They're dealing with leftism as it was 60 years ago, but now it's permeated our society.
00:55:57.100
But their, their idea is like sex is the only willed human action that takes place outside
00:56:03.740
So that if you have consent, you can do the, there's no such thing as if you dress up in
00:56:08.300
leather and have somebody stick cigarettes in you, you're not degrading yourself as long
00:56:12.460
as you can, and the idea that you can degrade, because if you have no soul, there's nothing
00:56:19.600
That's, I think the important, the important point is that they don't have the language,
00:56:25.180
But the, the only language they have to describe the concepts is consent.
00:56:28.780
That's how you end up with, you know, a woman who shacks up with a guy for a night, gets
00:56:33.520
drunk or whatever, college campus, and then wakes up in the morning and she's feeling, she
00:56:40.940
She feels like her dignity has been, has been violated.
00:56:44.900
She was not raped, but the problem is that consent is the only word she has to describe how she
00:56:51.300
And so she says, well, my consent was violated.
00:56:53.080
And so then this thing that is not rape becomes rape because that's just her way of condemning,
00:56:58.560
not, not just the guy, but also her own behavior.
00:57:01.560
But it, it, then it becomes, so then everything's a binary question.
00:57:04.800
It's either on this side of the consent line or on that side of the consent line.
00:57:07.540
But the reality is there's a whole, there's a whole X axis here, right?
00:57:11.840
You got the Y axis, which is like consent or not consent.
00:57:14.620
And then you have the X axis, which is degrading or not degrading.
00:57:18.780
And things can exist in all four quadrants, right?
00:57:21.280
You can have stuff that's consensual and not degrading, which is,
00:57:24.880
And then you have things that are consensual and degrading, which is a very real quadrant
00:57:29.160
And then you have things that are consensual and non-consensual and non-degrading.
00:57:40.660
Consensual and degrading is a really big quadrant.
00:57:43.120
Non-consensual and degrading is a very big quadrant.
00:57:45.200
But they've disappeared an entire quadrant from that part.
00:57:49.600
Like a cocktail waitress runs in here right now, clips a cigar, shoves it in my teeth,
00:57:55.500
lights it on fire, and forces me to drink a Macallan 25.
00:58:04.180
But that category of consensual and degrading just doesn't exist for these people.
00:58:13.080
And then because of that, because they've degraded themselves, it makes it very difficult
00:58:17.440
Also, the fact that men and women have a nature that if you get drunk with a bunch of guys,
00:58:25.000
It's just like walking down an alley at 3 o'clock in the morning and you get mugged.
00:58:30.380
And you've done something because there are muggers, because human beings are corrupt.
00:58:33.900
And, you know, that's not a place to be at 3 in the morning.
00:58:36.440
Walking out in a tsunami without an umbrella, I guess it's the weather's fault, you know,
00:58:44.280
Also, an umbrella in a tsunami is not going to do you much good.
00:58:47.640
But, you know, again, I think that does go to the, when you make freedom your highest
00:58:51.240
priority without any countervailing values, you end up in these very ugly places.
00:58:55.460
Well, again, I think that we're confusing the freedom that is part of the dignity of being
00:59:01.340
a human being and the freedom, the political freedom, which is, yeah, agreed, yeah, agreed.
00:59:08.100
What do you want to talk about that's not this?
00:59:11.760
I think we're talking about, I think we just have to excise Knowles.
00:59:17.580
I was launching an entirely new business while Jeremy's Razor 2.0.
00:59:21.320
When I said one minute before walking on set, well, let's just release the Razor, I didn't
00:59:27.680
realize that they'd need me to, like, send out tweets and give instructions to the team
00:59:32.800
I will say that when I host the show, I'm a little more involved than this.
00:59:37.380
You're a better host than I am in a lot of ways.
00:59:40.760
The only thing, the advantage that I have over you is that the less you know, the more
00:59:45.560
charming you can be, basically, for me, it just comes down to, like, I'm not going to
00:59:54.060
I know that's like a simple thing, but even my freedom to fail.
00:59:58.340
Economic freedom is an enormous part of freedom that I don't think you can maintain in a coercive.
01:00:04.420
I mean, you don't have economic freedom in Russia because if you even start to build a
01:00:09.320
successful business, Vladimir Putin comes and takes it away from you and makes it his
01:00:13.200
Yes, but in the year 900 BC, he owned that business.
01:00:34.220
Yeah, I don't, is there anything else in there?
01:00:35.480
I think the only thing we haven't talked about is Donald Trump's sex life.
01:00:37.840
So I think it's probably worth, like, just coming out of this beautiful, philosophical,
01:00:43.200
world that we've lived in and getting down into a really disgusting, salacious politics.
01:00:47.140
I have to admit, this Trump trial is making me nuts.
01:00:54.800
But it is the greatest violation of American norms and principles and ethics that I think
01:01:01.400
It reminds me of a Capra movie, you know, like Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, where everybody
01:01:13.080
They have turned this guy into a hero in the same way that Samson is a hero.
01:01:19.480
It's also true that if you shear him off his hair.
01:01:25.040
And so I can't wait for him to be put in the doorway of the courthouse.
01:01:29.060
He pushes down all of the pillars and all of the.
01:01:35.180
This is like a tsunami of oppression that has hit him.
01:01:40.040
Every single institution we have is trying to bring this guy down.
01:01:50.840
And I cannot think of another human being who with this kind of stuff thrown.
01:01:57.840
They want to put him in jail for 700 years or whatever.
01:02:10.200
A white guy, much less an orange guy, has not entered the South Bronx in probably 100 years.
01:02:15.700
And the reason I love the trial, it is so unjust and it's so absurd.
01:02:22.060
And their star witness has committed more egregious crimes than the guy they're actually trying to prosecute.
01:02:26.560
But, and unprosecuted, by the way, for their star witness.
01:02:29.380
Yeah, and basically just, like, can't help but talk about them.
01:02:33.520
And, like, with all of that, they are so farcically bad at prosecuting Trump.
01:02:41.760
Everyone, the AG, this judge is a complete joke.
01:02:45.360
The prosecution, like, didn't know what their star witness was going to say.
01:02:50.000
Like, they didn't realize the defense had prepared anything.
01:02:52.920
That every second this trial goes on, I feel that Trump gets stronger.
01:03:02.980
It's a massive blessing to his political campaign for a couple of reasons.
01:03:06.320
One, as you say, it's on its face an absurd charge.
01:03:10.120
Second, the coterie of witnesses that they have is legitimately a woman who sells sex for
01:03:15.260
money on camera and a lawyer who stole $60,000.
01:03:19.540
I mean, when she said that she was shocked, how did I find myself here?
01:03:22.440
How do you find yourself there every single day on camera?
01:03:26.580
Like, you found yourself shocked the same way I find myself shocked to be sitting behind
01:03:34.160
But it's also done him the favor of putting him, as he says, the icebox.
01:03:39.180
If I could have constructed a campaign wherein Twitter did not exist for him, he would be
01:03:43.780
forced into fake Twitter where no one was, and he would just tweet into it and no one
01:03:51.320
And he was then put into a room where he was literally not allowed to talk for multiple
01:03:57.920
But he could only emerge to speak about how he wasn't allowed to talk and then go back
01:04:02.920
And if he could do that for the rest of it, I hope that this trial lasts another seven
01:04:07.660
There's three or four more coming up right behind it.
01:04:21.460
I mean, the world is literally on fire and it's all his fault.
01:04:28.740
It's unbelievable how bad he is as a president.
01:04:30.560
Did you see he so he releases he's going to release a million barrels of oil from this
01:04:34.640
Northeast Reserve Joe Biden to bring it down by two cents.
01:04:39.140
But he needs to do it to have any shot of restoring gas prices.
01:04:43.040
And so he can't he can't just drill for more oil because the left won't accept that.
01:04:50.920
Then Joe Biden, he goes after the International Criminal Court because they seem to be getting
01:04:55.700
Even though Joe Biden is the one who rescinded Trump sanctions on the International Criminal
01:04:59.760
Court, then he's whining about how Russia invaded Ukraine.
01:05:02.420
Russia only invades Ukraine, according to Zelensky, because Joe Biden weakens America's stance
01:05:13.200
He's like, if it's just the tip, it's probably fine.
01:05:20.020
It should be it should it should about the strategic oil reserve thing.
01:05:23.760
And that should be an impeachable offense in a lot of ways.
01:05:25.660
So you're you're stealing from the strategic oil reserve to start your election during
01:05:31.620
Like, I know it's not impeachable, but it's he's explicitly trying to buy votes now, like
01:05:39.740
He's like, here's here's a student loan bailout.
01:05:49.400
I mean, it's so clear at this point that he's just handing out goodies to constituent groups.
01:06:02.220
I've been going to have re-election since like 2008, by the way.
01:06:04.560
But I think that I think he could could truly lose.
01:06:09.120
I the thing that concerns me, I'm deeply concerned about this early debate.
01:06:21.360
And and I fear Trump himself will go into the debate with the exact wrong set of expectations.
01:06:27.900
Every time there's a state of the union with Joe Biden, we're like, oh, I can't wait to watch this train wreck.
01:06:32.840
He's probably going to poop himself and fall off the stage.
01:06:49.880
And we keep going in with these like low expectations, like they won't give this guy a shot of adrenaline in the arm and he won't be able to perform.
01:06:56.020
And when you go in with those expectations, you lose every single time.
01:06:59.280
If you think there's no way Joe Biden can stand up to Donald Trump in a debate.
01:07:03.420
First of all, he did and became president probably in large part because of it last time.
01:07:10.000
Donald Trump has to go in here and fight for his life and win.
01:07:13.820
OK, so here's my suggested strategy for the Trump debate.
01:07:16.740
OK, so number one, he should go in and he should just be calm.
01:07:22.260
If he gets agitated, Biden is going to win because Biden, as you say, he's going to go in the back room.
01:07:25.820
He's going to find a youth and he's going to suck the blood from the youth.
01:07:31.220
He's not just going to smell the youth this time.
01:07:34.820
But the other thing is that I really believe that Donald Trump should push very hard to have RFK Jr. on that stage.
01:07:42.060
I think he should really push to have RFK Jr. on that stage.
01:07:45.700
Because RFK Jr. right now is drawing somewhere around 10 percent of the vote.
01:07:49.080
He seems to be drawing a little bit more from Biden than from Trump.
01:07:52.280
And I think that's only going to grow because it turns out there are many never Bidens,
01:07:56.140
more never Bidens than there are never Trumps at this point in time.
01:07:58.480
If you're voting for Trump, it's because you actually want to vote for Trump.
01:08:01.220
Like who's voting for Trump because they just they hate Joe Biden so much that they're voting for Trump.
01:08:06.780
Trump's base is mostly people who really, really like him.
01:08:11.640
Joe Biden's base is right now like 36, 37 percent.
01:08:15.000
And not only that, RFK Jr., he thinks that he is running for right wing votes,
01:08:20.200
which means that in a debate he's going to turn.
01:08:21.740
He's going to smack Trump when he turns and he smacks Trump.
01:08:31.540
will turn and he will clock Joe Biden on being a bad president.
01:08:34.880
And he will continue to believe Biden's voters.
01:08:41.520
And I think the more time I think Donald Trump in debate is pepper.
01:08:44.720
He's great in primary debates because he has about six minutes combined to talk.
01:08:49.080
And if you give him 40 minutes on a stage to debate,
01:08:52.040
I've never seen him be good in a debate that's 40 minutes.
01:08:55.480
I think Trump jumped on this because he smelled blood.
01:08:57.860
And I think he's right to smell blood, even though.
01:09:00.140
I don't actually think Trump is going to underestimate Biden.
01:09:02.980
I think he's, you know, he's going to make, he's foolishly saying he's not going to be any good.
01:09:08.200
But I think he knows that he has to do something here.
01:09:12.160
And this is an insight I've actually stolen from my son.
01:09:14.540
I'd let him say it, but he's in Edinburgh drinking McAllen.
01:09:26.500
He likes, he could eat coal as far as I'm concerned.
01:09:29.280
However, he pointed out that Trump has a new coalition.
01:09:32.380
That his, this is not just the minorities, but he also has a coalition of people who are
01:09:36.960
saying like, I don't like him, but I'm voting for him.
01:09:39.200
The first time that people said that in 2016, when we sort of said, you know, when I sort
01:09:44.200
of said, all right, I'm going to vote for him because he's better than Hillary.
01:09:45.900
We, we felt that we had to join the crowd of the people who loved him.
01:09:53.860
I mean, people yell at me for it, but I feel perfectly free to say, I don't think he's
01:09:57.460
You know, I don't think, you know, I thought he, I thought he did a good job for three
01:10:00.460
years, a decent job for three years, but I'm, I'll vote for him twice.
01:10:06.440
I mean, yeah, because, because it's just so obvious.
01:10:09.120
And I think if he can go on and basically make that case, make the cases like Joe, you
01:10:17.400
I think he, he just, he has to not get sucked into January 6th.
01:10:22.220
That's the big trap that Biden is going to set for him.
01:10:24.500
He's going to start off and he's going to say, he's going to say, you lost the election.
01:10:31.100
And Trump, because he's almost path, he's like Marty McFly in Back to the Future 2, right?
01:10:38.080
And then he's like, the Petzfeld Lynn, the Dolly Zoom.
01:10:43.660
If he can avoid that, if he can just say, listen, Joe, you and I disagree about who won the 2020
01:10:48.920
election, but there's one thing that everyone agrees about, and it's that you're a president.
01:10:54.420
And I agree that I think that this will be a disaster for Biden.
01:10:59.220
And it's different than 2020, for the most obvious reason that Biden now is fully senile.
01:11:08.780
And one gear is confused, doddering and confused and incoherent.
01:11:13.360
The other gear, and this is what we saw in the State of the Union, is angry and shouting.
01:11:16.820
And the only way that he's able to be coherent for a long stretch of time is to be angry and
01:11:22.460
He just did it at a commencement speech with Morehouse, where he just, it didn't make any
01:11:26.800
Like, he's angry and shouting at a commencement speech, because that's the only way that they
01:11:30.380
can get this guy to make sense for a long period of time.
01:11:32.620
So he's going to come into this debate, and he's going to be in angry shouting mode.
01:11:37.220
And if Trump can just be not only calm, but also sort of just his whimsical sort of self
01:11:42.500
with this angry shouting old man, I think the contrast will be really favorable to Trump.
01:11:47.800
Except that if Trump makes the election a referendum on Trump, he will lose.
01:11:52.600
If Trump makes the election a referendum on January 6th, or on 2020, broadly speaking,
01:11:58.280
And if Donald Trump makes the election a referendum on Joe Biden, he will be the 47th president.
01:12:05.500
The problem is, I've never seen Trump not make himself the center of whatever conversation
01:12:15.840
I'm not even sure it's going to happen, to be honest.
01:12:17.680
But like, I think if it happens, I think the minute Biden said it, you could tell he did
01:12:23.160
I mean, he would have no reason for him to do it.
01:12:24.880
And the way Trump jumped on it, I just thought, like, he smells blood.
01:12:29.120
And he is, you know, people keep saying he's not a politician, but he kind of is a politician.
01:12:34.060
You mean he was the president of the United States for four years?
01:12:40.400
Is there a world where a bad performance leads to a move to ouster Biden from the ticket
01:12:49.380
Well, because if you oust him, who are they going to put in place?
01:13:00.060
I think they're going to ride this horse past its death.
01:13:03.720
I would say they're going to ride this horse until it dies.
01:13:07.420
Ride this horse until the corpse is a skeleton.
01:13:09.220
We are going to be taking questions from our Daily Wire Plus subscribers.
01:13:14.980
If you're not yet a member, please head over to dailywireplus.com.
01:13:19.060
Our subscribers make it possible for us to continue to bring you this great content, to
01:13:23.020
continue to bring you this show, Ben's show, Drew's show, Matt's show.
01:13:35.120
But also, the entertainment that we're doing, if you haven't seen Mr. Burcham, please go
01:13:40.440
It's the fulfillment of Adam Carolla's really 30-year vision.
01:13:45.160
It's the character he first created that brought him into show business, and we've helped him
01:13:49.840
realize that with our first animated series for grown-ups, other than our children's animated
01:13:56.380
If you haven't seen Judged, Matt Walsh, the fulfillment of Matt Walsh's 30-year vision
01:14:01.820
to sit and condemn people, then please head over and give that a watch as well.
01:14:10.840
If they'd asked me at the premiere to say anything, I was going to bring up the fact
01:14:13.860
that the first time I met Adam Carolla, he charged me $15,000 for the privilege.
01:14:21.360
So Ben and I were running a thing called Truth Revolt at the David Horowitz Freedom Center,
01:14:25.740
and we were having a student conference at Pepperdine University, and Ben came up to
01:14:29.620
me and he said, well, I think maybe I said we should have a speaker, and Ben said, I'm
01:14:33.780
really good friends with Adam Carolla, but he would definitely come down.
01:14:36.160
It's a 23-minute drive, and he'll drive 23 minutes to do it for me.
01:14:43.800
I call up Adam's team, and they're like, yeah, 15 crinks.
01:14:57.680
The first time I met Adam, he charged me $15,000 for the privilege.
01:15:01.920
And here we are a decade later, and he charged me $9 million to get to go to one party with
01:15:17.740
Is it worth debating falsehoods about Trump, the drink-bleached falsehood, the fine people
01:15:23.960
falsehood, et cetera, with people who constantly complain about Trump and refuse to change their
01:15:28.800
minds no matter how many times you disprove their statements?
01:15:38.880
And that means there are a lot of people I know who are libs, because not in the Orthodox
01:15:44.120
community, but everybody else who's not in the Orthodox community is like 150% pro-Trump.
01:15:52.900
But there are some who are really, really mad at Biden, because they're looking at how
01:16:00.320
But because of what Biden has done on Israel, they are livid.
01:16:04.020
And I talked to some of them, and they're like, yeah, but I just can't vote for Trump.
01:16:10.080
And what I've said to them is, okay, so either stay home or vote for RFK Jr.
01:16:14.500
If you're not going to vote for Trump, do not give your vote to Joe Biden, because the
01:16:18.620
minute that you give your vote to a person with whom you heartily disagree, your vote
01:16:25.520
If they know they can just check you up in that comment.
01:16:26.880
I agree with this with someone with whom you, I would say, I'll give my vote to someone
01:16:33.120
I heartily disagree with Donald Trump quite often.
01:16:35.880
I would not give my vote to someone with whom I fundamentally disagree.
01:16:40.580
Also, when you're discussing, I, too, know many liberals for my sins.
01:16:44.220
And one of the things that I've decided is I never discuss personalities with them.
01:16:48.180
Because I'll say, the minute the conversation starts, I'll say, look, you're going to tell
01:16:55.620
There are many, many hateful things about them.
01:16:58.180
And then, if I can convince them on the principles, then I'll say to them, then just don't vote.
01:17:04.200
I think you could also, on the questioner's point of, do you fact check, you know, all
01:17:12.100
I think if you just calmly, you don't need to go tit for tat, because there will be 10
01:17:17.520
But if you just sort of calmly say, yeah, none of that's true, just none of it's true.
01:17:23.080
And I'm happy to disprove any number of them that you want.
01:17:26.840
But at a certain point, I just, you have to recognize the sources of your information
01:17:33.520
I know that you believe that they're true, but it's the bubble in which you operate.
01:17:38.980
I mean, even after this NPR thing came out, I would say to people that I've been telling
01:17:45.260
And when it came out that the woman who runs NPR is essentially a CIA operator, I said,
01:17:55.740
Those lies are just absolutely permeate the atmosphere.
01:17:58.980
Wait, you're saying that government-funded propaganda isn't wholly accurate?
01:18:04.740
But anti-American propaganda, that's the crazy part we're living in.
01:18:07.760
That's one of the big mistakes our deep state makes.
01:18:13.060
If the courts allowed Donald Trump to be kicked off the ballot in the swing states, do you
01:18:23.040
Look, I mean, our founders thought that a tax on Snapple or whatever tea they were drinking
01:18:30.660
I mean, you can make an argument that like the income tax justifies a revolt of some kind.
01:18:36.620
But, however, you have to ask questions like, does it have any chance of succeeding?
01:18:42.940
Does it have any chance of creating a better situation than what we have right now?
01:18:48.680
You have to start asking all those kinds of questions.
01:18:51.160
And I think that, you know, so then the answer is obviously no in that case.
01:18:56.520
If they prevent us from being able to function as a country, which removing the front runner
01:19:04.500
from one of the parties from being on the ballot unconstitutionally, you are getting,
01:19:09.540
if not fully there, very close to the point where the political system can no longer give
01:19:19.300
Like, it's just that's not what's going to happen.
01:19:22.400
And the court's going to get involved and the court's going to say, yeah, that's not
01:19:29.180
By the way, it's I think that that's it's such an important point because as seriously
01:19:33.520
as as we take the, you know, throwing Trump off the ballot thing is about they take the
01:19:41.480
Neither of those were destined to succeed or be in any serious way a threat to the working
01:19:47.500
And I'm so sick of this crap about how this is going to be the last election.
01:19:52.520
Not a single person in the United States believes that no one believes it.
01:19:56.440
When politicians say it, they don't believe it.
01:20:00.680
I promise you, it's not going to be the last election.
01:20:04.900
I will bet 100 percent that four years from now, we will be in the middle of another presidential
01:20:10.020
I'd be willing to bet everything that I own and all of my children's future ownings on that
01:20:14.640
And anybody who says different, I got to tell you, like, I don't believe you.
01:20:17.320
And if you really believe that, then I think that, you know, if you lose the election,
01:20:20.940
then right now, if you believe that Joe Biden is such a threat, for example, on the right
01:20:24.660
to democracy, that it's literally the end of the country, the end of the country, if
01:20:27.620
he gets elected, then you're then you have a duty to do something about it.
01:20:34.400
This is why the first guy who believes evil things and is going to do evil things.
01:20:38.880
This is why the first conversation of the night was important, because if you believe that
01:20:43.760
we can gain no more goodness out of our political system, then you have a duty to revolution.
01:20:49.820
When the founders did what they did, yes, it was over a one cent tax on Snapple.
01:20:57.440
But it wasn't really over the one cent tax on Snapple.
01:20:59.900
It was over the fact that they petitioned their government and petitioned their government and
01:21:08.160
There was nothing that they could do to have a say in how they were governed.
01:21:12.460
They could not affect political change in any way.
01:21:15.340
If they had been able to affect political change, if if George III and parliament had
01:21:20.820
just decided to give representation to the colonies in parliament, there would have been
01:21:27.740
no moral justification for the American revolution.
01:21:33.880
But they also but to go back to my point that the other thing they had going is that they
01:21:39.880
Now, it's quite amazing that they won, but they could they could win, given the situation
01:21:47.440
But, you know, the question that we have is that even if the government does something like
01:21:59.700
Can some sort of movement like that actually have any hope of succeeding?
01:22:10.980
There's no like we the people like your militia down in, you know, Plainview, Texas or something
01:22:25.080
And a move like that, if it were to have any chance of succeeding, would have to be a collection
01:22:32.720
And listen, you're talking again, you were talking about shooting your cousins.
01:22:35.380
I get a little frustrated when people act as though they look forward to the idea of
01:22:46.500
And it is not a moment that we should hope to find ourselves in.
01:22:48.680
We are in a moment where we are losing political battles at a rate that we need, that demands
01:22:55.780
At the same time, we're winning political battles all the time that still mattered.
01:22:59.360
Donald Trump was president three and a half years ago.
01:23:02.400
Roe versus Wade was overturned, which is something I frankly never thought was going to happen.
01:23:06.440
And so I'm sorry to disabuse everyone of their fantasy that they're, you know, that at 65 years
01:23:13.180
old, you with your semi-automatic AR-15, as long as you don't have to run more than
01:23:17.500
four steps uphill, are somehow going to overthrow the United States military that's not real
01:23:24.020
I'm hoping to be sent to France to flirt with the girls.
01:23:27.480
The good news, though, too, is the fact that Biden's freaking out over everything and, you
01:23:31.620
know, spilling oil from the Northeast and agreeing to the debates and everything, the
01:23:36.640
one thing it shows you, it's not that Trump is going to win.
01:23:47.500
Or they would not be behaving like, they wouldn't have reacted to Harrison Butker if they realized
01:23:52.480
Look what it took for Biden to win the first time.
01:23:55.200
And they will not succeed at shutting down the country again going into this election.
01:24:04.660
What are the chances that the debate gets canceled because of Trump's insistence on a drug test?
01:24:08.920
I think there's a high chance it'll get canceled, but I don't know if that'll be.
01:24:11.860
I think it's funny to demand a drug test, but if you think that Joe Biden couldn't pass a
01:24:19.340
Like, give me the guy a shot of adrenaline two minutes before he takes the stage.
01:24:32.200
If we lose this election, whose fault will it be in the night?
01:24:38.240
I was going to say, it's the fault of whoever you already didn't like.
01:24:49.180
And I base this on the fact that no matter what happens in politics.
01:24:56.020
You should have pushed harder for Ron DeSantis.
01:25:00.860
I literally voted for Ron DeSantis in the primary after he backed out, after he dropped
01:25:06.740
That's how much I wanted Ron DeSantis to be the nominee.
01:25:09.480
And then if I say that, people are like, you don't sufficiently support Donald Trump.
01:25:14.160
And I'm just like, guys, I am a mere shampoo self on the internet.
01:25:20.200
If you think that the Daily Wire being a little nicer to your preferred candidate would
01:25:26.440
change the fact that the base, the voters wanted Donald Trump.
01:25:32.020
I wrote an essay that said, I don't think Donald Trump.
01:25:35.220
I think Donald Trump should be disqualified on the basis of his behavior in 2020.
01:25:39.980
And by the way, some of your hosts have been very pro-Trump for many years.
01:25:42.860
And some have been very pro-Trump for many years.
01:25:50.660
It's not my job to get Ron DeSantis to be the nominee.
01:26:03.120
If you want to recast that question as, what can Donald Trump do to win?
01:26:07.800
And then, like, I think everybody understands that if he loses, then he bears a large percentage
01:26:17.700
But if there's one thing that he can do to win that is not just personality-driven, liberate
01:26:26.800
Build state parties that are not complete crap.
01:26:29.720
The biggest problem the Republican Party has right now is not Donald Trump as a candidate.
01:26:33.000
The biggest problem the Republican Party has right now is not even the media, although
01:26:38.540
The biggest problem the Republican Party has is that they destroyed their state parties in
01:26:42.080
places like Arizona and Michigan and Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, and you need people to go
01:26:49.080
That's what you need to do, because Democrats are doing that.
01:26:52.420
Because there's only one state in the country that did it right in 2022, and there was a
01:26:56.800
Everywhere else, they blew it, and they got this little pink trickle at best.
01:27:00.640
And so if Donald Trump wants to win, every dollar that is pouring into the RNC, every single
01:27:04.700
dollar should be a get-out-the-vote dollar in the swing states.
01:27:07.960
Donald Trump could lose and it not be his fault.
01:27:10.460
It is more likely, if he loses, that it will actually be his fault, because of his lack
01:27:15.500
of discipline and his inability to frame the conversation.
01:27:16.760
It's so funny that this is a controversial statement, because no one ever doubted this
01:27:19.300
for one second about John McCain, about Mitt Romney.
01:27:21.780
If George Floyd Bush had lost in 2004, people would have been like, ah, can't believe that
01:27:25.560
Part of it, though, is the extraordinary measures taken against Trump in 2020 and 2024.
01:27:35.720
The entire apparatus of the government is a raid against him.
01:27:40.660
So one thing you do, yes, you have to have the state parties to get out the vote.
01:27:46.920
This is, I remember in my early days in politics, working on campaigns-
01:27:54.780
But we would have the ballot integrity people, and we would catch people.
01:27:59.500
And we'd catch SEIU bussing in union members at a district and all that.
01:28:04.440
The Baltimore Board of Elections supervisor just got caught on camera this week.
01:28:08.460
And he said, yeah, there was some shady stuff that happened in that election.
01:28:12.280
Someone might have uploaded a thumb drive twice or whatever.
01:28:16.640
You know, to quote FDR's advice to LBJ after LBJ lost an important election to him,
01:28:22.520
FDR said, you ran fine, but you forgot to sit on the ballot box.
01:28:25.880
You forgot, in a way, it's actually, to FDR's credit, you forgot who counts the votes.
01:28:34.560
And then LBJ took an extreme lesson from that and stole the election in 1948.
01:28:40.280
Is the Democrats' election strategy delusional, or are they confident knowing it's already written?
01:28:47.320
I mean, the only thing delusional about it is that they thought Biden might be a good candidate.
01:28:52.120
But as you say, they have no one else to replace him.
01:28:55.440
Because a normal candidate would, like Joe Biden is,
01:28:59.440
I've been saying he's delusional for three years on a political level.
01:29:01.920
He won in 2020 because he ran against Bernie Sanders as a moderate.
01:29:05.500
And then he ran as a dead person against Donald Trump.
01:29:08.180
And what the American people wanted was a moderate dead person.
01:29:11.140
And instead what they got was a radical dead person.
01:29:13.460
And they don't like radical dead people, as it turns out.
01:29:15.800
It turns out that all the people that Joe Biden is pandering to are the least popular people in America.
01:29:21.620
People do not like the pro-Khamasniks in Dearborn, Michigan.
01:29:29.780
We've done this schtick so many times on the show, I won't repeat it.
01:29:33.580
Barack Obama changed the way Democrats think about elections
01:29:35.420
by basically cobbling together a coalition of the dispossessed
01:29:37.980
and doubling down on his base while ignoring the moderates.
01:29:40.700
And every Democrat since then has thought they can do that.
01:29:42.960
The only reason it worked in 2020 is because every voting rule changed.
01:29:45.820
And everyone voted nine months in advance of the election.
01:29:51.460
The delusional part is that he thinks that if he keeps doubling down on his base anymore.
01:29:56.740
The delusion is that Joe Biden thinks he's Barack Obama.
01:30:00.900
But the Democrats are scared out of their wits.
01:30:05.660
But all the people around him are fully delusional.
01:30:08.340
Because if they were smart, I mean, James Carville was saying this.
01:30:10.960
If they were smart, they'd be in his, Roy Teixeira is saying this.
01:30:13.780
They'd all be in his ear saying, dude, the votes you're losing are in the middle of the spectrum.
01:30:20.540
They're so wide open that RFK Jr. is running at 10%.
01:30:35.940
What do you make of big right-wing Twitter accounts starting to blame June for everything?
01:30:46.260
what i like what i like is that they hate jews for making money so they hate them for being
01:30:51.920
capitalists they hate them for being socialists it's like you can't win whatever whatever the
01:30:56.020
jews do generally yeah i mean anti-semitism to give a definition anti-semitism is a conspiracy
01:31:01.120
theory about the power of the jew in society whatever you hate most in society the jew is
01:31:05.200
behind it it is why it is distinct in definition from other forms of discrimination doesn't mean
01:31:08.980
it's better doesn't mean it's worse it is distinct because it is a distinct phenomenon again not
01:31:12.940
better not more important not worse just distinct okay the reason that you see right-wing twitter
01:31:17.580
accounts that are now doing this crap is because the right wing does now have a grievance mentality
01:31:22.900
part of that grievance mentality has been justified by the institutional dominance of the left and
01:31:27.400
right-wingers who rightly feel that they have been ground under the boot heel of a culture that
01:31:30.940
dispossesses particularly white christian males all of that is true but this has resulted in a quasi
01:31:36.380
intersectional philosophy wherein white christian males are at the bottom of the intersectional
01:31:40.360
hierarchy and those who are quote-unquote most successful in the society are to blame which is
01:31:44.720
identical to left-wing intersectional philosophy the only difference is who they think goes at the
01:31:48.440
bottom of the intersectional hierarchy and who's at the top of the intersectional hierarchy and so
01:31:51.880
grievance culture comes all the way around the only thing that the intersectional leftists and the
01:31:55.660
right-wing anti-semites agree on is that at the top of the hierarchy is the jews because the jews are
01:31:59.240
disproportionately successful the thing is the intersectional hierarchy they think that the jews are white so
01:32:04.160
they're disproportionately successful and the white supremacists and the the alt-righters and the
01:32:08.240
anti-semites think that the jews hate white people and therefore they're at the top of the
01:32:11.780
intersectional hierarchy but they all seem to agree that's power that's right you're at the top of
01:32:16.180
both hierarchies that's that's the famous that's the famous joke about the jew in 1939 who walks past
01:32:21.200
the other jews sitting on the park bench reading der stermer and he says to him why are you reading
01:32:24.560
der stermer he says look how much good news there is in here we run the banks
01:32:27.180
i i have to say i i do not agree with this thing about the source of anti-semitism it is a religious
01:32:35.240
thing it is because if you go back if you go back and see pre-nazis nietzsche schopenhauer all these
01:32:41.940
guys were saying this this weird religion christianity has come in and stolen our true german values and
01:32:50.160
it's all the fault of the jew that is what they say they say christianity is against our nature the
01:32:55.700
the blood of the germans the aryan blood is running in our veins it's all the fault of the jew who sold us
01:33:00.960
christianity and that's why the thing survives as long as it does and it is worse than other uh
01:33:07.200
than other forms of bigotry because it's a bigotry against god it is bigotry you know you and and just
01:33:12.140
one one other thing i have to say is that as far as i'm concerned the jews aren't powerful enough
01:33:17.740
my biggest problem with the order the elders of zion thing is that it's a forgery i like if i don't
01:33:25.400
understand where are the jews why do they make things run better i mean you use their space laser on
01:33:30.160
on rice's helicopter that was good but you missed the other two right intentionally well we we aren't
01:33:35.160
like we don't hit every time i will say i you know i take a i take a more limited and simpler view of
01:33:42.280
of anti-semitism uh and that i would classify it like like any other bigotry racism uh of course
01:33:51.300
racism is a big one um you know if you're an anti-black racist it's because you hate black people
01:33:57.960
you think that black people are inferior in some way and if that's what you think about black people
01:34:01.660
then you're racist now you might not hate black people but have other views about black people
01:34:08.800
some stereotypical views even and some of those views might even be like insulting but it doesn't
01:34:13.800
automatically make you a racist that's true um or or the example i give is like eight you know
01:34:18.020
let's say asians you might you might not hate asians however you might subscribe to the to the uh
01:34:24.000
stereotypical the stereotype that asians are bad drivers now are they actually bad drivers i don't
01:34:28.980
know they're probably not any worse than anybody else but if you believe that you just happen to
01:34:33.140
believe it doesn't mean that you're that you're you know racist or you know ethnocentric against
01:34:37.560
against asians and so i would say that anti-semitism is a hatred of jews okay the reason i'm gonna make
01:34:44.940
a distinction here no one ever says i hate blacks because they're too powerful that's generally not a
01:34:50.760
thing for for literally hundreds of years blacks were hated when they were slaves and not powerful
01:34:55.300
when it comes they're viewed as less right when it comes to jews the reason that that anti-semitism
01:34:59.820
has so often resulted in anti-jewish pogroms and violence and this is going back centuries i mean
01:35:04.060
there's nothing new the reason is because when you perceive a group as unjustifiably powerful
01:35:08.240
typically that means that you're going to drag them in the streets and kill them and so when
01:35:12.280
the russians they weren't powerful in russia when the cossacks came into their little village no no
01:35:16.220
wrong so this so if you go back to the history of the lithuanian polish commonwealth
01:35:20.080
second call back second call back then the claim of the cossacks was that the polish lithuanian
01:35:25.840
commonwealth was dominated at the top levels by merchant jews this was pushed by this was this
01:35:30.920
was pushed by by the cossack leaders is legitimately in their rhetoric so so again that that's true by
01:35:35.720
the way that goes all the way back to the bible i mean if you go if you want to go all the way back
01:35:38.780
pharaoh says it he says there are these jews and there are foreign people and they're going to become
01:35:42.020
powerful and they're going to rise up against us right that's his justification hayman's
01:35:45.560
justification in the book of esther is there's a people and they dwell among you and they're not
01:35:49.280
going to listen to your laws and they're going to rebel against you right every aspect of
01:35:53.280
anti-semitism is typically geared against the quote-unquote nefarious power of the jews which
01:35:57.460
of course is what hitler is talking about which is why hitlerian anti-semitism crosses streams with
01:36:01.280
these other forms of anti-semitism historically speaking muslim anti-semitism is much the same
01:36:05.060
thing as these perfidious jews who have somehow gained power over muslim holy sites and are using their
01:36:10.360
world powers in order to manipulate the reason that that anti-semitism crops this is why anti-semitism is is so
01:36:17.120
weird in a sense is that typically speaking when when you are racist against a group it's because
01:36:23.880
you look down on that group it's actually more akin if you're going to make it some an analogy
01:36:27.680
the analogy that you'd make is more like no nothing hatred of catholics in 1850 yeah that's actually
01:36:32.500
the better analogy with loyalty it's the whole same thing right matt frat has actually made this
01:36:37.080
point like this is this is this is a good it's i think it's a good analog if you substitute catholics
01:36:42.320
for jews then you'll understand this form of discrimination better because this actual
01:36:47.080
argument was made about catholics throughout the 19th century in an attempt to limit catholic
01:36:50.660
immigration suggesting that catholics were nefarious tools of the pope who are coming in taking over
01:36:55.420
the financial industry dominant in wide and varied industries in the united states and had to be
01:37:00.580
stopped because of that yeah you see check check check you see but isn't but is it yeah jeremy's on
01:37:06.580
board isn't that just a is that really different in kind from what people who are bigoted against the
01:37:12.260
group always do to the group now you're right that with jews or with catholics in this example
01:37:17.800
uh the they you know they're accused of being too powerful but what's really happening there
01:37:23.660
is that they're being blamed for whatever happens to be going wrong in society and i would argue that
01:37:27.860
um when people are bigoted against the group they tend to find a way to blame that group in some way
01:37:34.860
for the problems in society that's an argument now that's a better definition of racism than what
01:37:39.780
you were giving before i don't like the definition of racism which is just i hate people well no but
01:37:44.700
what i'm saying is that is that if you're racist legitimately racist against someone this is what
01:37:50.860
tends to happen next it's what it's what happens after the racism because you hate them now you want
01:37:54.960
to blame them for stuff but that's i'm not the blaming the blaming for stuff is not what the race
01:38:00.020
again though again this is the group again this is a again this is it therefore you hate the group
01:38:04.520
well no i'm talking about the group i am talking about the chicken and the egg thing because i don't
01:38:08.400
think that racism starts with i hate them in my heart and then i blame them for everything i think it
01:38:13.860
can start with blaming them for everything and then become hatred in your heart that's true that thing
01:38:17.960
that that cycle goes both directions and even even the whites who are holding black slaves in the
01:38:23.080
south feared their power it was they were going to cut your throat at night that was that they all
01:38:27.200
that appears in all of their letters they're going to there isn't that but isn't that that's more to
01:38:31.180
my that's more to my no and on your point matt look all stereotypes are true that's why they're
01:38:35.940
stereotypes you know that's how they became stereotypes there's an element of truth yeah and
01:38:39.980
so it obviously doesn't apply to individuals necessarily but but so that's that's part of it
01:38:44.240
another part of it is what drew says which is if you look into like esoteric nazism there is there
01:38:50.140
is a deeply anti-christian aspect in as much as it becomes pagan and well they said the head of the
01:38:55.640
head of the church uh advisory to hitler said this idea that christ is part of christianity makes me
01:39:01.900
laugh the furor is christianity yeah yeah positive christianity is there like kind of a cult version
01:39:06.400
of it so there's that aspect certainly but also then it comes down to me at this basic level of
01:39:12.680
different groups are different right and sometimes they have the same interests sometimes they have
01:39:17.500
different interests and when you're living together different groups find reasons to get frustrated
01:39:22.400
with each other so it's no surprise that groups with different religions find reasons to get a
01:39:27.560
little hostile to each other when when it comes to the modern again it's in niche segments of the right
01:39:34.120
but this this obsession with the state of israel i think what's the big problem with the state of
01:39:38.320
israel let's throw out as i do the theological claims for the state of israel because obviously
01:39:44.400
it's not my religion let's throw out even historical claims let's just get down to brass tax
01:39:50.100
the the right of conquest as we used to call it before 1947
01:39:54.000
the israelis went to a land that historically had been theirs and they went back to it
01:40:01.440
and they were granted this land by international bodies and then they fought a war and now it's
01:40:05.740
their land how does that how is that different from america going in and taking america but i would
01:40:11.040
go beyond that too though and the question that nobody seems to ask is which do you want the
01:40:16.000
world to look like the state of israel or everybody else yeah i guess this is my you can always get
01:40:19.880
into an argument because if the right of conquest is all that matters then why why not conquer it
01:40:24.360
it's not all that matters but i guess my point on this is the the very height of our civilization
01:40:29.200
was a period where we in christendom went to the holy land to take it away from muslims
01:40:36.300
so the notion that we're now saying that the muslims you're arguing is is correct in the sense that
01:40:40.680
when you talk i've said this before when i talk about israel it's the only country in the world
01:40:45.040
where i'm asked to explain the legitimacy of its existence right it never happens with literally
01:40:48.480
any place else nobody ever is like why is france deserve to be france what is france-ness
01:40:52.360
ukraine now right right you know i mean the united states gets the same challenge yeah i mean i would
01:40:58.060
on stolen land at a at a far lesser level even the people who argue that the united states is on
01:41:03.600
stolen land don't really yeah there are like there's not u.n there's not u.n charter or u.n
01:41:09.640
resolution after u.n resolution and also they're also that group of people who are
01:41:13.160
who are acknowledging stolen land they aren't immediately calling for the entire country to
01:41:17.560
be turned over to the tribe of the sioux in a real way yeah it's a bunch of bullshit they say
01:41:22.240
in order to please their left-wing friends and pretend that they give a shit which they don't
01:41:25.640
so this is so but when it comes to the state of israel suddenly you're forced to make these
01:41:29.360
arguments about like well is it based on history or is it based on religion is it based on that so
01:41:32.880
see your argument i agree if you win you exist end of story then then the only question becomes
01:41:39.580
does the world look better or worse if it looks like this thing or that thing and that's drew's
01:41:43.440
question and that's really the only question that we tend to ask generally in foreign policy
01:41:47.160
especially especially for us who aren't israel right as an american when i look at say ukraine
01:41:52.560
and russia i'm looking at america's interest now i can decide that differently than other people
01:41:56.480
but do i want do do i want ukraine to look more like ukraine or do i want to look more like russia
01:42:01.340
do i want china to look more like taiwan or do i want taiwan to look more like china right like these
01:42:05.920
are the questions that you typically ask when it comes to foreign policy when you look at israel
01:42:09.660
versus hamassistan in the gaza strip or the palestinian authority terror dominated areas
01:42:15.480
and the question is should there be a state there in a vacuum there shouldn't even be a state there
01:42:19.960
forget about israel i'm not for the establishment of any terror state anywhere i wasn't for the
01:42:24.920
establishment of isistan like this is so absurd and the claim that that somehow it's bad for the world
01:42:30.680
if israel thoroughly destroys and defeats a terror group that is currently holding five americans hostage
01:42:35.840
is so beyond reason it's so crazy to me and that doesn't mean you can't critique israel go ahead
01:42:40.980
fine critique it critique all these places critique america and france and uk do all of it the one
01:42:45.160
thing i will say is that the critiques that are brought against the state of israel are never
01:42:47.520
paralleled by any critiques anywhere else they're they're unique to the state of israel you never
01:42:51.800
see it brought on like obviously if you get me going on this topic it's incredibly annoying to me
01:42:56.600
and i and one of the things that makes it so incredibly annoying to me is that now that israel's at
01:43:01.080
the top of the news which has been since october 7th i talk about israel a lot i spent my entire
01:43:05.120
career not talking about israel literally my entire career if you go back through the first show
01:43:10.080
through show number whatever it was on october 9th the amount of time that i spent talking about
01:43:14.420
israel was i am sure less than one percent of the total runtime of my show and now you're well under
01:43:18.640
one percent and then i start talking about the thing that literally is on the front pages every
01:43:21.860
single day and critiques are brought against me personally that would not be brought against people
01:43:26.720
who are christian who say the exact same things right and there i find something peculiar
01:43:30.440
unless unless it's a catholic defending the pope right or something unless it's where you can invoke
01:43:35.160
dual loyalty there's something tragically comic about the fact that the jews are in position
01:43:39.000
as you say every country every great nation every great empire was built on conquest
01:43:45.080
somewhere along the line somebody conquered somebody so the jews are in the position of having
01:43:48.680
to do what you do at the beginning of a society but because many of the much of their leadership
01:43:52.920
is european based they actually have the mindset of people later on in society when they start to say
01:43:58.260
stupid stuff like maybe women should have power too and maybe maybe we should feel guilty about
01:44:04.120
killing our enemies you know those are things those are late stage civilizational things but they're in
01:44:08.600
a kind of first stage civilizational moment it's kind of tragic comic yeah yeah i need some advice
01:44:15.740
is it off-putting if the girl asks the guy out off-putting to the guy i suppose yeah or
01:44:25.300
towards the girl i would imagine this is a girl saying yes is it a problem if i ask a guy out yeah
01:44:29.820
that's got to be what this question is i never responded all that well to it on the it actually
01:44:34.860
happened on a few occasions good for you dude yeah thank you i'm i'm boasting a little humble brag
01:44:39.520
but it and actually i'm trying to think is it my my gut instinct says no that'd be great ladies if
01:44:45.440
i'm single ask me out but no actually when it happened i i did not like it there's a way to do it
01:44:51.520
there's a way to do it i mean how hot are we talking here
01:44:54.680
that's no principles you have no principles it would be a total deal killer to me if a woman
01:45:02.260
proposed marriage oh yeah for sure total deal killer yeah but if a if a gal came up to you and
01:45:08.880
said hey you know blah blah blah blah we ought to grab a drink sometime or whatever as a way of
01:45:13.000
party i'm going to you yeah breaking the ice or something you know or in some cases maybe the
01:45:17.200
girl knows that the guy's a little shy and i think that there's an appropriate there's an
01:45:21.720
appropriate version of that the problem with asking the problem with a woman proposing though
01:45:25.580
yeah yeah is now you've broken whatever those ices are early now you have to be in a position of
01:45:30.480
actually agreeing to the institution of marriage which is agreeing to a to a form of male headship
01:45:36.820
over the family yeah and so it is it is a kind of perversion if a woman could you imagine also
01:45:41.900
the also the let's be real about this a man entering into a marriage is generally making a
01:45:48.800
decision that that males are hesitant to make right yeah where women entering into a marriage
01:45:54.220
is a decision that women are generally very eager to make yeah generally like that doesn't mean true
01:45:58.640
in every certain circumstance but it that is generally the way the math works men are giving
01:46:02.200
up the field of women for this one woman and that is a very very important decision obviously and
01:46:07.400
women because they're not driven by the same impulses have found the person they wish to sire
01:46:11.160
children with so of course they want to get married so if they're saying to the man do you
01:46:14.660
want to get married to me that's a form of pressure that's not actually a form of proposal when a man
01:46:19.180
says that to a woman he's offering her a thing that she wants it's not it's how dare you generally
01:46:23.580
speaking how dare you for ben during your first book club you mentioned a dystopian sci-fi novel you
01:46:29.520
had written would soon be published did you scrap it or do you still plan to go ahead with it
01:46:33.620
that's that's for jeremy i mean so so i did i did write in fact a dystopian sci-fi novel it's been
01:46:38.480
done for like two years or something they sent it to you drew i like and yeah drew was kind enough
01:46:42.780
to pretend he liked it and uh and you know like maybe we'll do something with it or maybe we won't
01:46:47.160
it'll go along the alongside the other two complete books today ben writes books sometimes cuts uh this
01:46:52.760
question's for me so you redesigned the men's razor are you doing the same for the women's razor
01:46:56.100
indeed we are we will have a brand new women's razor hopefully in time for the holidays it's um
01:47:02.740
it's different in kind than the men's razor i think one of the problems with the original
01:47:07.080
women's razor that we released is that it was very similar uh to the men's razor and women's
01:47:12.780
shaving needs are different than men's so the the razor that we're going yeah the razor we're going
01:47:18.060
to release uh acknowledges those differences for the whole group what is the end game if all of
01:47:25.780
these nefarious characters are trying to bring down the country what do they stand to gain this country
01:47:30.020
makes them rich i can't imagine another country would offer them the same possibilities i'll offer my
01:47:35.240
thoughts and then i'll let everyone go around and answer this question i think that you start from
01:47:40.160
the assumption that politics are fundamentally rational and i don't think that they are fundamentally
01:47:46.740
rational i think that they're driven fundamentally by the spiritual and that it is the nature of man
01:47:53.420
uh uh we can argue about uh about what the pope said about man being fundamentally good or what
01:48:00.440
and he was right or what luther said about man being or calvin about man being depraved i think
01:48:05.500
they're both right uh as bishop baron as bishop baron pointed out today on x by the way uh but at the end
01:48:12.420
of the day man in his sin tries to accumulate material wealth to himself he tries to accumulate power
01:48:19.700
to himself he tries to advance his needs his wants his ego uh he tries to wheel and deal he tries to get
01:48:28.720
laid i mean you really can't imagine how much of human history has been driven just by some guy
01:48:34.020
in power trying to get laid yeah yeah i mean so much of what happens in politics does not happen
01:48:39.560
in a purely rational way people people will vote against their interests of course they will you
01:48:45.220
can't believe how much happens out of ideology which is things that people believe are true that
01:48:49.520
aren't and so they'll do something that harms them that they thought would help them
01:48:53.340
all of this is always at play in any instant in any institution that involves human beings and so
01:49:00.660
i just think you can't reduce our politics down to science it is like every other aspect of of the
01:49:07.580
human experience it's a spirit it's a projection of of underlying spiritual truths and people are
01:49:12.480
kind of a spiritual train wreck yeah i would say it's a little bit like asking what do what does
01:49:18.040
someone gain from revenge uh and it well they gain they gain revenge they get they gain it for its
01:49:24.020
own sake yeah and um and that's that's basically what's happening here you've got a lot of people
01:49:28.180
that feel that have told themselves a story uh that where they are the victims and they have all these
01:49:34.320
forces victimizing them and they seek to destroy those forces um just to destroy them because they feel
01:49:42.220
like it's the right thing to do and they have this this instinct of destruction i don't think they've
01:49:46.800
thought to your point i don't think they've thought much farther ahead than that like what happens next
01:49:52.000
what happens when you and we talk about this all the time you know they they tear down things they
01:49:56.580
they redefine things they don't really redefine they get rid of one definition replace it with nothing
01:50:01.060
and so um there is no there is no like step two it's just the step one of destruction and that's it
01:50:07.240
so i'll break it down into i think there are two distinct groups and i think that one usually leads and
01:50:12.620
then surrenders to the second so i think what you say about a certain group of people is totally true
01:50:17.740
those are the revolutionaries the revolutionaries don't care what comes next and the great lie they
01:50:21.800
say is there's going to be utopia after they tear everything down but all they really want to do is
01:50:24.720
just burn things because they hate the system in which they live and they have no idea for what
01:50:28.600
comes next but it's got to be better than this terrible thing that's victimizing me i agree with
01:50:32.260
you that's a revolutionary group then you have the elites and they're the ones who are the real
01:50:35.960
mystery right those are the people like the joe bidens of the world who have sat high on the hog for a
01:50:41.460
very long time or the idiots in hollywood or or the people on wall street who support this whole
01:50:46.100
agenda what are they doing and i think they're the answer is that they believe falsely as it turns out
01:50:51.920
that like elites do in nearly every society that ends up being transformed that they can channel the
01:50:56.900
passion of the revolutionaries into a gradualistic change in which they get to retain the levers of
01:51:02.140
power which is like the best of both worlds for them they get to retain the elite status they get to
01:51:06.180
retain the money and the power and all these things all they have to do is harness the 1.21 gigawatts
01:51:11.080
that is the college protesters and they can use that power in order to in order to forward the
01:51:16.840
mission of making the world a gradually better place and when you're in rooms with people like
01:51:20.400
this and i've been in a lot of rooms with people like this that is how they talk they talk about
01:51:23.160
not in revolutionary terms but we together can make the world a better place and there are people
01:51:27.480
who are agitating on the outside the arc of history begins toward justice right exactly and and i think
01:51:31.840
that that when when they say stuff like that what they fail to recognize is they have no systemic
01:51:36.920
immunity they have no immune system to the revolutionaries when confronted with them
01:51:40.900
which is why when you look at the college campuses in 1968 1969 or even today you're like why are these
01:51:45.980
administrators just handing over the place to the revolutionaries the answer is they agree with the
01:51:49.440
revolutionaries that it's not that they're handing it over they are the revolutionaries they just don't
01:51:53.500
have the balls or the willingness to give up what they have in terms of power in order to just join
01:51:57.520
the group and so when they're confronted with that reality their own hypocrisy they end up just
01:52:01.580
surrendering full scale to the revolutionaries i basically agree with jeremy on this i think that
01:52:06.620
the the things are the pope was utterly wrong and the reason the reason he was utterly wrong here
01:52:11.980
comes the calvinism here we go no it has nothing to do with calvinism it has nothing to do with
01:52:16.200
calvinism it's because he wasn't saying what all the slavish catholics who want to prove him right
01:52:20.320
say he was saying he was talking about people's behaviors he was not talking about the creation being
01:52:25.680
good he was saying that he said he said we were all sinners two sentences he said he said you have the
01:52:30.540
occasional sinner and afterward but before he said but he said you have the occasional sinner but the
01:52:35.380
thing is this is the problem everything ends up being a post-actual clarification it's jesuitical
01:52:39.420
this is the thing the thing that the thing that i saw in hollywood is that people who think they are
01:52:44.900
good usually have not had the offer of sex money and power and sex money and power on the table
01:52:53.200
i would say about 85 percent of people will sell every principle they have and so once you have the power
01:52:59.800
i think a lot of these people are just capturing the flow i think joe biden is a perfect example i
01:53:03.980
mean the guy's a weather vane but he thinks he's capturing the flow he does the guys who are
01:53:08.460
dangerous are guys like obama i think obama is actually in some ways has far more integrity
01:53:12.660
than joe biden because he he's a believer he believes that that we're a bad country and that
01:53:18.120
we're the problem and that's why he wanted to realign us with iran barack obama is the least
01:53:22.400
cynical yes evil president who did the most cynical thing to get reelected yeah yeah i agree you know it
01:53:28.540
pains me to say that i agree with everyone even drew spouting this calvinist nonsense but i but
01:53:33.680
especially i agree with your point jeremy that even even bringing up the pope who my my brief
01:53:39.720
defense of the pope which i'm obligated to do as a duly loyal uh is uh is it seems to me what he's
01:53:47.020
saying is man god doesn't make anything evil so god makes man and the whole creation good but man abuses
01:53:51.800
his free will and sins and sin and death pervade the world and so now we end up in this spot where
01:53:55.720
there's concupiscence and all and we're all just gonna like sell everything for sex and money and
01:53:59.900
everything but uh to know what the end game is you have to have some sense of the nature and the final
01:54:08.200
end of man yeah and so you know i have a sense of it i think we all have basically roughly the same
01:54:13.280
sense of it you know pretty close at least and uh for a lot of people though and especially for our
01:54:17.920
liberal friends they have a very different sense they deny original sin and they deny heaven and hell
01:54:22.980
so they're actually they disagree with us on both the the nature and the game from and where we're
01:54:28.000
going exactly yeah so then what's that we're all on the same page right now people are inherently good
01:54:32.420
and the kingdom of heaven can be made here on earth by my hands yep yeah the most give me the money
01:54:38.020
the most fundamental conservative belief is the belief that original sin is original sin
01:54:45.520
and that only god can redeem can redeem what's fallen like that that really is the the heart of the
01:54:52.100
whole thing and the left every ism of the left is a is an attempt to redefine what is original sin
01:54:58.140
even even libertarianism and i have a lot of libertarian lowercase l libertarian tendencies in
01:55:03.020
my theology and in my politics but libertarianism just says that original sin is coercion yeah just
01:55:10.140
like socialism says that the original sin is communism it's class and socialism it's the means of production
01:55:17.160
etc yeah like they they've all just come up with a if this hadn't happened everything would be good
01:55:21.840
yes and if we can overcome that everything will be good and the and the view of the men at this
01:55:27.740
table uh with with very important and notable theological distinctions between uh catholic protestant
01:55:34.900
and orthodox uh jewish perspectives i mean there are places where we wildly disagree but at a sort of
01:55:40.140
fundamental level we say no original sin is the thing that actually happened in the garden of eden
01:55:43.720
and the thing that man and his free will perpetuates and there is no one doing that by man there no
01:55:51.900
no thing that we accomplish as a society will change fundamentally what human beings are and that
01:55:57.960
ultimate redemption is in the hands of god and for the christian it's accessed by way of the cross of
01:56:03.560
christ uh and for the catholic it's got something to do with the cross of christ you said you said
01:56:10.480
it used to have something to do with the cross of christ but now no the thing the thing that
01:56:15.540
that protestant and catholic agree of course is that uh the the redemption of man is not in the hands
01:56:21.100
uh it's not man's problem to solve it's man's it's man's problem yeah yeah at some point we're
01:56:27.620
gonna have to do a seminar on like just the people with the religious differences on like the first
01:56:32.320
couple of chapters of genesis because it really is fascinating like the jewish take is pretty
01:56:35.340
different on some of this stuff it ends up in in much the same place well this i was i was careful to be
01:56:39.980
inclusive of you when i said that man perpetuates that sin uh through his through his free will
01:56:44.900
choices yes yes i understand that we don't we don't agree on the uh forward transmission of
01:56:50.160
original no no actually so actually i was gonna argue with the original sin part meaning that there
01:56:54.220
there's widespread sort of dissension inside orthodox jewish texts about origin whether human beings were
01:57:01.360
made good in the garden of eden and then brought sin about through the sin because or or whether human
01:57:07.520
beings were always conflicted and then they brought sin about because and they didn't bring sin about
01:57:11.940
they sinned by eating from the tree because that what that sin was was supplanting their own
01:57:16.820
conception of what the world should be for what god's conception of what the world oh that's my view
01:57:20.220
right i mean so yeah i think that what that's not no i think i think the important thing is that
01:57:25.220
when you put us all together our basic beliefs we're right i mean we are we are provably right about
01:57:31.920
the nature of mankind yes people are really people can be really really bad that's that's this notion
01:57:36.460
that people are naturally wonderful and tend toward the good yeah like in their actions that's false
01:57:42.320
like they they they they what call concupiscence call it the yates or hara in judaism call it
01:57:49.040
sinful nature of man and whatever you call it right human beings aren't take a room full of people and
01:57:54.960
they are not going to naturally do the good thing because of all of whatever you and no curing any
01:57:59.880
one particular flaw of man will lead to a utopia no system will no system i i will close with this
01:58:05.760
thought for you though which is that in my personal view of the garden it's not that man was sinful per
01:58:11.300
se uh or virtuous per se based on his actions or choices or predilections uh from the moment of
01:58:18.400
creation it's that righteousness by god was defined and declared by himself he made it he made man just
01:58:25.920
exactly how man was naked and dumb and tripping over rocks in the garden and lonely and prone to
01:58:31.300
who knows what kind of bad behaviors if it had all played out that wasn't the definition of what was
01:58:35.580
good to god god defined his creation as good based on his own declaration and the temptation of man was
01:58:41.720
the temptation to judge whether or not god was right it was to supplant god as the moral authority as the
01:58:47.780
judge and so i don't believe that man got worse when he ate it's not that i think his behavior got worse
01:58:53.000
it's that i think he the the deal that he made with the devil in some ways the devil the devil
01:58:58.740
was lying with truth he did suddenly see his nakedness he did suddenly see his failure to
01:59:04.140
measure up to god whereas before that the question of whether he measured up to god wasn't even on the
01:59:08.000
table which is why he was god made him and said he was good and that was good enough so i should read
01:59:11.440
the bible in the original hebrew the word for cleverness and the word for nakedness are the same
01:59:14.800
word it's a it's a room the same exact word in hebrew yeah at any rate we could probably fix it if we
01:59:21.840
just vote for the right guy thank you guys for hanging out with us here at daily wire backstage
01:59:25.700
we're going to do another one eventually and uh please head on over to amazon.com buy your second
01:59:30.580
gen jeremy's razors we'd really appreciate it support all of the sponsors uh from today's show helix sleep
01:59:36.680
uh and birch gold and uh go over and become a subscriber if you're not one now if you are thank