Ep. 1065 - Democrats Push For A Great Replacement
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
168.56847
Summary
Roe v. Wade has been overturned, and this battle is now finally finally leaving D.C. and going to the grassroots. Today on the Matt Welch Show, Chuck Schumer says that American birth rates are too low and the only solution is to import workers from the third world to replace declining populations. Also, 12 Republican senators officially get on board with the federal government codifying same-sex marriage. And a church in Canada comes up with a prayer to bless and encourage assisted suicide. And San Francisco now has a guaranteed income program for trans people.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Today on the Matt Wall Show, Chuck Schumer says that American birth rates are too low and the
00:00:04.680
only solution is to import workers from the third world to replace declining populations.
00:00:09.660
That sounds an awful lot like a certain theory we aren't supposed to talk about. Also, 12 Republican
00:00:13.660
senators officially get on board with the federal government codifying same-sex marriage. What use
00:00:17.840
are Republicans if this is what they're going to do for us? And a church in Canada comes up with
00:00:22.360
a prayer to bless and encourage assisted suicide. And San Francisco now has a guaranteed income
00:00:27.900
program for trans people. I looked at the application form for this program, and it's
00:00:32.300
even crazier than you might think. All of that and more today on the Matt Wall Show.
00:00:45.060
Roe v. Wade has been overturned, and this battle is now finally leaving D.C. and going to the
00:00:49.960
grassroots. No group in America is better positioned than 40 Days for Life. With a million volunteers
00:00:54.460
in 1,000 cities, 40 Days for Life holds peaceful vigils outside abortion facilities. They have a
00:00:59.040
larger presence in blue states, with California being their largest state. Some former abortion
00:01:03.340
facility directors say these vigils can cause the abortion no-show rate to go as high as 75%,
00:01:08.620
which needless to say is detrimental to their abortion business. These law-abiding vigils have
00:01:13.040
closed many abortion businesses in America. Nearly half of those closed abortion facilities were in
00:01:17.440
liberal cities where abortion will remain legal, including closures in San Francisco, Chicago, and Seattle.
00:01:22.500
40 Days for Life is effectively changing hearts and minds in the grassroots to end abortion.
00:01:27.280
You can check out their locations, podcasts, and their free magazine at 40daysforlife.com. And
00:01:32.740
remember, this fight is not over, especially after what happened in the midterms. It's more
00:01:37.200
important than ever to stay engaged in the fight. And if you want more information about it, you can go
00:01:40.780
to 40daysforlife at 40daysforlife.com. So we hit a major milestone this week, and by we, I mean everyone
00:01:47.580
in the whole world, congratulations, the global population officially crossed the 8 billion mark.
00:01:53.280
So there are now 8 billion people on the planet. It took humanity until the 1800s to hit 1 billion,
00:01:59.220
but only 200 more years to multiply that number by 8. This, of course, has led to, as you might expect,
00:02:05.540
lots of frantic and feeble hand-wringing about the mythical threat of overpopulation, quote-unquote.
00:02:11.280
There are too many people on the planet, they cry. The whole planet is about to tip over on its axis
00:02:15.960
and will all slide off like dishes on an overturned table. Infamously, there was once an elected
00:02:20.820
Democrat who expressed a concern not far from that. Slightly less delusional, though still plenty
00:02:26.240
delusional, is the fear that we will run out of resources or habitable land for people to live on.
00:02:33.560
I mean, none of these scenarios are realistic. There is more than enough land, more than enough
00:02:38.120
resources to feed and house numbers even greater than 8 billion. If the land or resources are
00:02:43.880
misallocated or not properly utilized, or if people choose to huddle together in massive smelly urban
00:02:50.680
bundles, that's a different problem entirely that cannot be blamed on sheer numbers and also cannot be
00:02:56.200
solved by reducing the numbers. In fact, it's not just that overpopulation is a myth, one invented and
00:03:03.060
propagated by nihilists and eugenicists and Bill Gates, but I repeat myself. It's that the actual
00:03:08.260
crisis we face as a globe, as a world, as a planet, the real apocalyptic cataclysm on the horizon
00:03:14.680
is quite the opposite of overpopulation. Our problem is not that there are too many babies being born,
00:03:20.340
but that there are too few being born. The world's population is getting older. The average age of a
00:03:26.280
human on earth is a decade older now than it was in even the 1970s. Now, sure, that's partly a product of
00:03:32.120
modern medicine, which is good. People are living longer, but it's also a product of an aging population
00:03:36.860
that isn't having enough babies. And when the median age gets high enough, society becomes top
00:03:42.040
heavy with more elderly people than there are younger people to care for them. This is a problem
00:03:47.540
that developed countries like Japan are already dealing with. Many others will soon join them.
00:03:53.380
The whole world is trending in that direction. For all the talk about overpopulation, the population is
00:04:00.640
actually projected to start declining by the 2060s as global fertility rates dip below replacement
00:04:06.540
level. Understand this. Global populations have never declined due to declining fertility.
00:04:14.800
We've never seen a decline in the global population because of fertility or lack thereof.
00:04:19.880
The last decline was during the Black Plague 700 years ago, and that was because of a pandemic
00:04:24.560
that wiped out a quarter of human life on the planet. A decline due to people simply not having
00:04:30.360
babies is an entirely different matter, and it's never happened before through the whole history of
00:04:34.820
the human race. And it's not a good sign. Older, slower, top-heavy populations cannot thrive,
00:04:42.460
and after a while, they cannot survive. They can't sustain themselves. Human civilization is right now
00:04:48.760
essentially giving up on itself, throwing in the towel. And this, again, is not a positive
00:04:55.140
development. In the U.S., we're ahead of the population decline curve. We fell below replacement
00:05:00.440
level for fertility a couple of years ago, and actually farther ago than that, and we've been
00:05:07.200
notching record low birth rates every year since, or almost. I mean, birth rates hit another record low
00:05:13.580
in 2020, falling 4% below the previous year. However, in 2021, there was a slight uptick of 1%,
00:05:18.920
which is still 3% below 2019. It was the first increase in the birth rate since 2014,
00:05:24.880
but that was likely only a function of the fact that the year before that was so low.
00:05:29.320
Overall, the U.S. has been below replacement level, actually, for the most part, and there have been,
00:05:34.840
you know, there are peaks and valleys and everything, but for the most part, it's been below
00:05:38.000
replacement since really the early 1970s. And even with the occasional blip on the radar,
00:05:43.580
screen, a spike here and there, we are trending in the wrong direction, and fast.
00:05:49.080
Senator Chuck Schumer, of all people, has noticed this problem, and he made note of it yesterday
00:05:55.900
to reporters when he was giving a press conference. Given that Democrats despise the human species,
00:06:00.540
and especially those members of the species who are residents of their same country, those are the
00:06:05.000
humans that Democrats hate the most, we don't usually hear them lamenting declining birth rates.
00:06:09.960
In fact, they are engineering the decline. So what has awakened Schumer to this issue?
00:06:17.380
Why does he care about it all of a sudden? Well, that becomes obvious pretty quickly when you hear
00:06:24.080
Now more than ever, we're short of workers. We have a population that is not reproducing it on its own
00:06:33.480
with the same level that it used to. The only way we're going to have a great future in America is
00:06:39.200
if we welcome and embrace immigrants, the dreamers, and all of them, because our ultimate goal is to
00:06:44.900
help the dreamers, but get a path to citizenship for all 11 million or however many undocumented there
00:06:51.100
are here. So there you go. That explains it. The American population is declining. We are
00:06:58.780
short of workers. The senator is concerned, of course, that there won't be enough people
00:07:02.560
available to mow his lawn and clean his pool and dust his fireplace mantles. And his solution is to
00:07:08.180
import a peasant class, to import them rather than attempt to raise them organically the old-fashioned
00:07:13.800
way. He seeks to replace the American population with illegal immigrants. He wants to
00:07:20.040
replace them, replace us. He wants to replace them on a very large scale.
00:07:27.340
Replace them on a large scale. Even you might say, you know, a large, another synonym would be great.
00:07:32.580
He wants to replace the declining American population on a great scale.
00:07:40.320
Replace great, replace on a great scale. So it's like a great replacement, you might say.
00:07:45.240
That thing that we're not allowed to notice or mention, that's the thing that Chuck Schumer is
00:07:50.920
explicitly advocating for. And by the way, not for nothing, I should also say 11 million. We keep
00:07:56.840
hearing 11 million. There are 11 million illegals or undocumented immigrants, as they put it. They've
00:08:01.360
been telling us about the 11 million undocumented immigrants since I was in high school. That number
00:08:09.200
now is much higher than 11 million. We don't know exactly what it is, but probably closer to 50
00:08:13.680
million or higher. In any case, there are, of course, other ways to reverse the trend of population
00:08:21.180
decline. And the most simple strategy, and frankly, the most enjoyable, is for us American citizens to
00:08:27.400
get down to business and have babies, lots of babies. Not to brag, but I am already pulling more than
00:08:34.220
my fair share of the weight in this arena now that I have six kids. And my wife and I have,
00:08:38.900
in our family at least, tripled the replacement rate. And if you really want to encourage more
00:08:45.380
people to have babies, and if you want those babies to have the greatest chance of success in
00:08:51.360
life, that entails more people getting married and getting married younger. So we could create a society
00:08:58.440
that encourages marriage and incentivizes people to start families and to have children.
00:09:05.860
But that is not what we have done. Thanks to Chuck Schumer and his ilk, we've gone exactly the
00:09:11.060
opposite direction. To start with, we kill our babies in the womb. 60 million babies have been killed in
00:09:18.180
the past 50 years or so. That means we've erased not just 60 million human beings. I mean, we've erased
00:09:24.400
60 million to begin with, but actually we've erased hundreds of millions of potential humans.
00:09:30.040
A large portion of those babies, after all, would have grown up and had kids of their own.
00:09:35.040
And soon the kids of those kids would start having kids. Entire family trees have been uprooted
00:09:39.800
and tossed into the incinerator. The loss of human potential is absolutely staggering.
00:09:46.600
And yet Schumer and his party support, fund, and facilitate all of this, even as he laments or
00:09:51.240
pretends to lament, the declining populations. Not only that, but Schumer and his party have
00:09:56.740
attacked the nuclear family. They've encouraged sexual perversion and sexual dysfunction.
00:10:01.660
They have invented a human right to subsidized birth control. I mean, they want to give up birth
00:10:07.280
control in middle schools now. They've created an economy that forces millions of women out of the
00:10:11.660
home and into the workplace. Now they're even castrating and sterilizing people, including children,
00:10:16.340
in the name of gender ideology. This is all part of a deliberate plan. There's no escaping that
00:10:20.780
conclusion. And that's to say nothing of the drug epidemic, killing millions of Americans by,
00:10:26.660
or killing Americans by the thousands every single year, violent crime, which is doing exactly the
00:10:33.860
same. They are obviously aware that their policies are wreaking havoc on the birth rate while eliminating
00:10:43.540
in mass those who have managed to be born. They're aware that this creates a crisis situation for the
00:10:51.420
country. And here they are at the ready with the solution, which is to import Democrat voters from
00:10:59.360
the third world, send in the replacements. I mean, they're right. The grace, the great replacement theory
00:11:05.500
is outrageous. It's outrageous to talk about the great replacement theory. And that's because there is no
00:11:12.840
theory here. It's just a fact right in front of our faces. Now let's get to the five headlines.
00:11:20.120
Do you have a coffee lover on your holiday shopping list? Black Rifle has all the best brewing gear,
00:11:31.760
thermoses, mugs, and apparel designed for folks who love country and coffee. Black Rifle sources the
00:11:37.320
most exotic roast from around the globe. All coffee is roasted here in the U.S. by veteran-led teams of
00:11:42.100
coffee experts. Stuff your Christmas stockings with the latest from America's coffee for 10% off with
00:11:47.900
my code Walsh. Better yet, you can sign your secret Santa up for a coffee club subscription.
00:11:53.160
Imagine the joy of a pre-scheduled coffee delivery, your favorite roasts, when you need them most.
00:11:58.540
It's the gift that keeps on giving. It's all from Black Rifle. Black Rifle Coffee Company is
00:12:02.300
veteran-founded and operated. They take pride in serving coffee and culture to people who love America.
00:12:07.460
Every purchase you make with Black Rifle helps support veteran and first responder causes. So you can go to
00:12:12.640
blackriflecoffee.com, use promo code Walsh for 10% off coffee, coffee gear, apparel,
00:12:17.640
or anything else when you sign up for a new coffee club subscription. That's blackriflecoffee.com
00:12:23.460
with promo code Walsh for 10% off. Black Rifle Coffee, supporting veterans and America's coffee.
00:12:29.520
Well, we'll start here. Daily Wire reports a bill that would codify same-sex marriage protections
00:12:37.240
into law passed a procedural vote with the support of 12 Republican senators on Wednesday,
00:12:41.760
despite concerns that it would infringe on religious freedoms. The Respect for Marriage Act
00:12:46.840
would, ironically named, would repeal the Defense of Marriage Act, which is a 1996 law that legally
00:12:54.380
defined marriages between one man and one woman, and permitted states to not recognize same-sex
00:12:58.600
marriage from other states. The RMA would make it so that any person acting under color of state law
00:13:04.640
must fully recognize a marriage between two people in another state. It also makes it so that the
00:13:10.480
federal government must recognize marriages if they were valid in the state where the marriage took
00:13:14.820
place. The procedural vote passed 62 to 37. The Republican senators who voted to advance the bill
00:13:22.060
were Roy Blunt, Richard Burr, Shelley Moore Capito, Susan Collins, no surprise there, Todd Young,
00:13:30.860
Joni Ernst, also no surprise, Cynthia Loomis, Lisa Murkowski, another no surprise, Rob Portman,
00:13:36.820
same, Mitt Romney, same, Dan Sullivan, and Tom Tillis. Those are the senators who jumped on board
00:13:43.640
with the federal government redefining marriage. Greg Baylor, the senior counsel with Alliance
00:13:49.580
Defending Freedom, told the Daily Wire, quote, that the original version of the bill created serious
00:13:53.180
threats to religious liberty. The changes to the bill did virtually nothing to address those threats.
00:13:57.520
The amendments to the bill that purport to protect religious liberty are mere window dressing.
00:14:03.600
Okay, let's review just a few things here. First of all, the bill is, to begin with,
00:14:11.780
completely unnecessary. At least, if it really has the goal as stated, which is to protect same-sex
00:14:18.680
marriage, completely unnecessary. Even if you're an advocate of same-sex marriage,
00:14:23.660
you must see that it is unnecessary. Because the Supreme Court is not going to overturn
00:14:30.760
Obergefell. It's not going to happen. There aren't the votes to overturn it. They don't even have the
00:14:37.420
votes to take a case up. And there aren't any cases to take up on the subject. A case could only make
00:14:44.560
it to the Supreme Court if some state somewhere challenges the decision by trying to ban same-sex
00:14:49.840
marriage. None of that is happening or would happen. Simple as that. So my point is, even from the
00:14:57.940
perspective of an advocate of same-sex marriage, which obviously I am not one, but from your
00:15:04.120
perspective, it's still the case that this is at least unnecessary. And I am on principle opposed to
00:15:14.900
all unnecessary laws. I don't like the idea of politicians taking time up, wasting taxpayer money
00:15:23.140
to pass laws that are unnecessary. And one of the reasons for that is that if a law, if the stated
00:15:33.020
reason for a law doesn't make any sense, or we're protecting same-sex marriage, or the Supreme Court
00:15:39.760
doesn't, that doesn't make any sense because that's not happening. Well, that will cause you
00:15:46.160
to suspect that there's something else going on here. So what's the real point then? Why are they
00:15:52.780
doing this? Well, one is just sort of the principle of it, to codify same-sex marriage on the federal
00:15:58.120
level, to do it simply because they can, to use the bully pulpit of the federal government to send
00:16:04.060
the message that anyone who opposes same-sex marriage is a bigot, et cetera. That's part of
00:16:09.740
the point, and that's enough reason to oppose it. But the other point is to, yes, attack religious
00:16:15.820
liberty. Listen to the language in the bill that supposedly protects religious liberty, and this
00:16:21.200
is what allegedly convinced Mitt Romney and others to jump on board with it. Here's what the bill
00:16:26.600
actually says. I'm going to read the language of the bill. It says, consistent with the First Amendment
00:16:31.800
to the Constitution, non-profit religious organizations, including churches, mosques,
00:16:35.680
synagogues, temples, non-denominational ministries, inter-denominational and ecumenical
00:16:41.100
organizations, mission organizations, faith-based social agencies, religious educational institutions,
00:16:45.880
non-profit entities whose principal purpose is the study, practice, or advancement of religion,
00:16:49.400
and any employees of such an organization, shall not be required to provide services, accommodations,
00:16:54.020
advantages, facilities, goods, or privileges for the solemnization or celebration of a marriage.
00:16:59.660
Any refusal under this subsection to provide such services, accommodations,
00:17:03.980
advantages, facilities, goods, or privileges shall not create any civil claim or cause of action.
00:17:09.080
So that's what it says. And this is supposed to be the thing that protects religious liberty.
00:17:15.840
Even though we already have the First Amendment, which protects religious liberty. And even though
00:17:21.620
this bill also codifies same-sex marriage on the federal level. But look at who they're mentioning
00:17:31.420
here. Okay. They mention a bunch of people and they say that, okay, these faith-based organizations, and
00:17:36.360
then they list a bunch of things that count as faith-based organizations, which also means, by the way, that the
00:17:41.940
government is claiming the responsibility and the power to decide what counts as a faith-based
00:17:48.420
organization. But it says, if you're a faith-based organization, you won't be required to provide
00:17:55.100
services, facilities, et cetera, for the solemnization or celebration of a marriage. Again, however they
00:18:02.060
define solemnization or celebration of a marriage. But do you know who this wouldn't help? I mean, it
00:18:09.940
wouldn't help the people who have actually been under attack, whose religious liberties have actually
00:18:15.600
been threatened by the LGBT mob coming after them on this subject. Somebody like Jack Phillips,
00:18:21.340
for example, the baker in Colorado. Now, he runs a bakery. That's not a faith-based organization.
00:18:30.960
At least not according to the law. So it's just a private business. But he's a Christian.
00:18:39.860
And he has the right, according to the First Amendment, to run his business according to his
00:18:45.280
beliefs, to practice his religion, even in the context of his business.
00:18:53.340
But this part of the law here, this language, specifically excludes people like him,
00:19:01.240
which is a big signal to the left and to the LGBT activists that you can keep going after the
00:19:07.820
Jack Phillipses of the world. Because you only have religious liberty, according to this law,
00:19:14.480
you only have religious liberty, and you only have the right to not participate in or approve of a
00:19:20.600
same-sex marriage if you are directly affiliated with a faith-based organization. Religious liberty,
00:19:29.380
that's something that belongs in the churches, they're saying. It doesn't belong in your bakery.
00:19:35.000
But that's not what religious liberty means. It's not religious liberty if you can only practice it
00:19:39.240
when you're inside the walls of a church. Because that's not the only time when you have your faith
00:19:46.280
or you have your religion. At least it shouldn't be. If Christians are not able to live by their faith
00:19:54.820
and practice it in every context, then they don't have religious liberty. It doesn't exist.
00:20:00.120
You can practice your religious liberty inside the walls of this building. That's just another
00:20:06.160
way of saying you don't have religious liberty. It's like the farce of a college campus having
00:20:12.000
a free speech zone. Yeah, you have free speech, but we're going to draw a circle and chalk on the
00:20:17.000
ground here, and you've got to be inside that circle. Then you have all the free speech you want.
00:20:22.100
Well, it's limited to being inside the circle, which means that it's not free.
00:20:25.400
And that's obviously the case here. And there's another point, too, that
00:20:30.520
what they're trying to do here, although this is an assault on religious liberty,
00:20:36.140
the other goal is to send the message that you could only ever oppose same-sex marriage or have
00:20:44.340
a problem with it if you are religious, which isn't true. That's just not true.
00:20:50.260
This is part of what the conversation with Joe Rogan was about, that, yes, it is accurate that if
00:21:00.620
you're a faithful Christian, for example, or a member of any of the Abrahamic faiths or many other
00:21:06.900
religions, you cannot be an advocate for same-sex marriage because your religion forbids it.
00:21:11.640
But it's also true that you don't actually need to be an adherent to an Abrahamic religion
00:21:18.560
to see that same-sex marriage doesn't make any sense, to oppose it fundamentally.
00:21:25.320
Because there is a logical definitional argument here, which is that, as I've tried to explain,
00:21:33.020
the relationship between a man and a woman, that sort of relationship in principle,
00:21:37.540
principle is different from, it's different in kind, it's different in function from the
00:21:42.540
relationship between a man and a man and a woman and a woman because of the capacity that it has,
00:21:46.200
because of the potential that it has, because of its procreative capacity.
00:21:53.060
And because it has that capacity, it is a different sort of thing and should be called something
00:21:57.360
different and should be protected by society and given a pride of place and incentivized,
00:22:04.720
especially if you want to reverse the population decline, incentivized in a way that none of these
00:22:09.640
other relationships should be or need to be. There's no argument, there is no rational argument
00:22:16.440
for legally recognizing the love that a same-sex couple has for each other. Why does that need
00:22:23.940
to be legally recognized? Why do you need a piece of paper or a contract or anything that recognizes
00:22:30.000
that on a legal level? It's easy to understand why you need those sorts of protections for man-woman
00:22:38.980
relationships because they are procreative, they create babies, they are the fountain from which
00:22:47.140
the nuclear family springs, which lies at the foundation of human civilization. So that's why it's
00:22:52.700
different. And although it may be true that religious people are more likely to see this
00:23:00.480
reality, you don't actually need to be religious to see it. And the other thing too is that this is
00:23:08.680
all being done on dishonest grounds. And you know that if you listen to the people who push this. So
00:23:13.320
here's Senator Tammy Baldwin on the floor of the Senate making her pitch for this bill before it was,
00:23:18.900
before it passed the procedural vote. And listen to what she says.
00:23:23.480
Right now, millions of Americans, our family members, our neighbors, our congressional staff
00:23:29.680
members, and certainly our constituents are scared. Scared that the rights they rely upon
00:23:37.000
to protect their families could be taken away. And they are scared for good reason. The same legal
00:23:45.200
arguments that the Supreme Court rested upon to reverse Roe v. Wade could just as easily be applied
00:23:53.560
to reverse numerous other cases related to families, related to intimate relations, to contraception,
00:24:02.680
and marriage. The Supreme Court should not be in a position to undermine the stability of families
00:24:10.420
with a stroke of the pen. So now Congress must act. With the Respect for Marriage Act, we can ease the
00:24:18.660
fear that millions of same-sex and interracial couples have that their freedoms and their rights
00:24:26.260
could be stripped away. By passing this bill, we are guaranteeing same-sex and interracial couples,
00:24:34.320
regardless of where they live, that their marriage is legal, and that they will continue to enjoy the
00:24:42.380
rights and responsibilities that all other marriages are afforded.
00:24:48.360
So you hear what she's, and of course, we've heard this the whole time, but she mentions
00:24:52.820
interracial couples probably, I don't know, three or four times just in that clip alone.
00:24:57.780
And every time she says same-sex couples, she makes sure to include same-sex couples and interracial
00:25:02.440
couples. When there has just been no, there is no one who wants to abolish interracial marriages,
00:25:15.080
that argument isn't being made by anyone. I mean, there also, again, is no actual political threat to
00:25:22.160
same-sex marriage, because no states are going to do that. The Supreme Court wouldn't do that,
00:25:25.980
and the Republican Party, unfortunately, does not have the wherewithal to make this argument at all.
00:25:33.880
They refuse to make it. That's the case for same-sex marriages.
00:25:39.360
Interracial couples, there's just, no one's talking about that except on the left.
00:25:45.520
Because, again, an interracial coupling does, obviously, does not at all challenge
00:25:52.400
the fundamental definition of marriage. You know, a black man and a white woman,
00:25:59.940
in principle, can create babies, have procreative potential, just like two members of the same
00:26:04.820
race. And one other point about that, too, is that if anyone, I say that nobody's criticizing
00:26:09.980
interracial couples, and no one has a problem with that. It's actually not exactly true.
00:26:14.740
You know, you could go online and see people complaining, maybe, about that.
00:26:20.700
But they're almost always going to be on the left. Okay? It's on the left. It's the race
00:26:25.380
hustlers on the left. It's the proponents of critical race theory, and so on. If anyone is
00:26:29.620
going to criticize, in the year 2022, interracial couples, it's almost certainly going to be someone
00:26:35.660
on the left approaching it from that perspective. So, the challenge to interracial couplings,
00:26:45.300
if it exists at all, is coming from inside the House, if you're on the Democratic side.
00:26:50.620
All right. Daily Wire has this report. As Canada prepares to loosen laws related to medical assistance
00:26:56.680
in dying, prayers published by the United Church of Canada designed to help sick and disabled people
00:27:02.440
follow through with the lethal procedure are drawing criticism and shock. So, this is
00:27:08.060
a church, quote-unquote, that has come up with prayers encouraging people to kill themselves.
00:27:14.400
All right. Although euthanasia has been available to many Canadians for the past six years,
00:27:19.040
the nation's parliament considered amendments to the criminal code last year that would expand the
00:27:23.480
availability of the practice. Among other changes, a citizen possessing only a mental illness can now
00:27:28.600
request euthanasia starting next spring, whereas the practice was originally limited to individuals
00:27:33.400
with serious physical illnesses or disabilities. And we've been talking about this on this show,
00:27:38.580
that in Canada, you know, euthanasia is threatening to become, it already is one of the leading causes
00:27:45.560
of death in some provinces in Canada, as they are taking this, what they call the MAID law,
00:27:53.220
the MAID Act, medical assistance in dying, and they are progressively expanding it to include more
00:28:00.220
and more types of people. So, long gone are the days when euthanasia, when the euthanasia conversation
00:28:05.980
revolved only around people who are already on their deathbed, who are terminally ill, who are going to
00:28:11.700
die anyway within the next few weeks. It's long gone are the days when that's, when that is what the
00:28:16.500
euthanasia conversation is about. And even then, even when it was just focused on that population of
00:28:24.120
people, I opposed it. And this is one of the reasons why I opposed it. Because everything is a slippery
00:28:33.060
slope on the left. This, of course, is no exception. If we are saying that suicide, you know, that killing
00:28:43.500
someone can be a valid medical treatment, if that's what we're saying, then it's only a matter of time
00:28:51.180
before that is applied far beyond terminally ill people. The whole logic between, behind euthanasia
00:28:58.980
of a terminally ill is that they're, they're suffering, they don't want to live anymore, there's, there's no
00:29:03.740
point in living when, when they're suffering so much. And so, the best way to treat that suffering is
00:29:09.040
just to kill them. Well, it's not that far of a jump at all. In fact, it's not even a jump, it's just a
00:29:15.820
step. To see how, well, that, if that, if that's the truth for terminally ill people, then yeah, why not
00:29:21.240
someone who's depressed? Why not someone who's struggling with mental illness? They're suffering too.
00:29:27.400
As far as they can see it, there's no end of the suffering. Life is suffering.
00:29:31.060
suffering. And so, I will treat, this is how we will treat the suffering.
00:29:38.760
Anyway, back to the United Church of Canada. It's called The Prayer in the Midst of Fear,
00:29:46.020
which is co-authored by United Church of Canada minister and the former co-president of Dying
00:29:50.840
with Dignity, an advocacy group which supported the legalization of assisted suicide in Canada.
00:29:55.240
It can be described as an exercise in radical autonomy. The supplication centers upon asking
00:30:01.400
God that family members would accept their loved one's decision to kill themselves with the aid of
00:30:06.480
medical professionals. Making no mention of eternal life secured through the death and resurrection
00:30:10.620
of Jesus Christ, the prayer attempts to embrace an uncertainty about death. So, here's part of the
00:30:15.880
prayer. Again, this was devised by the United Church of Canada. It says, I am afraid. I feel fear
00:30:23.340
penetrating my mind and my heart. I feel fear in my gut. I am afraid to die. I do not know what lies
00:30:29.300
beyond the barrier of death. I am afraid to release myself to the great unknown. I am heartbroken and
00:30:35.620
afraid to leave my family. I am still needed. I have let go of hope and healing. I hold on to hope for
00:30:41.940
the next life. I am afraid that my family and loved one's children and grandchildren will be troubled
00:30:46.440
when I tell them I plan to die using medical aid in dying. But in the midst of my fear, I have hope that
00:30:52.620
my family and loved one's children and grandchildren will understand the choice to end my suffering.
00:30:57.140
I hope they will be proud of my decision and will understand that made is consistent with the love
00:31:02.080
and compassion of Jesus. And then I go, I can't even keep reading this. I mean, this is obviously not
00:31:09.340
a Christian prayer. This is a demonic incantation. This is a, you know, this is a mockery of Christianity.
00:31:20.120
This is Christianity turned on its head. Because Christianity is a, is a, is, is hope. It is a
00:31:28.620
religion, a faith of hope. And this is the abandonment of hope. It says, I hope that my family will be,
00:31:39.040
will be proud, that they'll be proud that I killed myself because I don't want to suffer anymore.
00:31:44.180
This is what happens when you, when you put, we talk about the slippery slope.
00:31:52.340
When you put doctors in charge of killing people, when you say to doctors that this is now a valid
00:31:58.680
treatment that could be available to some people, this is, this is where it leads.
00:32:03.020
And, uh, it was entirely predictable. All right. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has some thoughts about,
00:32:15.920
Is that the same folks who tell, who tell us and told us that COVID, COVID's just a flu,
00:32:23.860
that climate change isn't real, that January 6th was nothing but a tourist visit,
00:32:29.520
are the same, are now trying to tell us that transgender people are not real?
00:32:37.260
Much of that is, is correct. Um, climate change is a, is a, is a, a hoax. Well,
00:32:48.220
what we're told about climate change by the left, much of that is a hoax. That's correct.
00:32:53.540
Um, January 6th is a tourist visit. Well, no, it was a riot, but it was closer to a tourist visit
00:33:00.560
than it was to, uh, an insurrection that threatened to overturn, you know, the, the government of the
00:33:05.540
United States. If, if everything's on a spectrum, then it would be closer to the, to the tourist end,
00:33:12.240
the tourist expedition end of that spectrum than, uh, an insurrection that would have overturned,
00:33:16.540
uh, the government. And trans, trans people are not real. Well, this is, this is, this is what we
00:33:23.500
keep hearing from the labs. They're claiming that what we are saying is that trans people aren't real.
00:33:27.300
What the, it depends what you mean by that. We all agree that there are people in the country
00:33:34.780
who identify themselves as trans. So those people certainly exist. There are people who are
00:33:41.300
walking around and saying, I'm transgender. Yes, we all agree. That's not a figment of our
00:33:46.180
imagination. We're not hallucinating it. Um, we all agree. That's the case that those people exist.
00:33:53.820
However, the question is whether the claim that they're making about themselves is true.
00:34:00.960
And then the second question is related to the first, is it actually possible for a person to be
00:34:06.860
transgender? Is that a valid, uh, a, a legitimate, uh, a coherent kind of human identity?
00:34:17.540
What is trans, transgender, trans, it means beyond gender. You're, you're beyond it. You're something,
00:34:23.160
you're something past it, beyond it. Is it possible to be that? The answer is no, no one, no one is beyond
00:34:29.840
it because we're human beings and there are two options, male and female, and nobody exists beyond that.
00:34:36.860
So in that sense, uh, you know, trans in, if, if that's the sense that you mean that in that sense,
00:34:48.680
trans people don't exist in the sense that you, there are no people who actually exist
00:34:52.960
beyond the gender binary because the gender binary is real and we all are, are, are in it on one side
00:34:59.620
of it or the other. And yet the people who are confused about this, yes, they certainly do exist.
00:35:05.700
And if they didn't, then we wouldn't be having this conversation. Speaking of people who are
00:35:09.760
confused, here's something that's been making the rounds on, um, on Reddit. This is posted by a,
00:35:17.480
a, an account called males of Reddit. And it's a screenshot of someone on the, the trans forum,
00:35:25.260
the male to female transform on Reddit. And here's what they posted. They said,
00:35:30.100
I have successfully breastfed my child. This is a male again, by the way, my kiddo was born last
00:35:37.780
week and I was the first to breastfeed her. My partner and I gave her, well, they've, well, they've,
00:35:43.220
they are recognizing the sex of their daughter. So that's something at least you got to look for
00:35:50.300
the glimmers of hope where you can find them, especially in a situation like this. My partner
00:35:54.020
and I gave her 40 hours of continuous skin to skin after she was born. But after, after months
00:35:59.000
of preparation and trying, I was able to breastfeed my own kiddo from my breast. It's a wild feeling
00:36:04.660
that made me over the moon happy. She's a cutie. And then there's screenshots of a bunch of comments
00:36:11.800
saying that, uh, you know, how wonderful all this is. Now it should go without saying, but I feel that
00:36:18.560
I must say it anyway. Um, it is not possible for a man to breastfeed a child. Okay. That's not
00:36:26.720
something that can actually be done. You cannot sustain a child that way. Now, what is possible and
00:36:34.720
what has apparently happened in this case is that if you take, if you're a man and you take a whole
00:36:40.620
bunch of hormones and you drug yourself up this way, that, um, after a while you may start secreting
00:36:47.840
some, there may be some secretions that come out of your nipples, which is disgusting, but that's,
00:36:54.440
that, that may actually happen. So these are going to be hormone. These are going to be these
00:36:58.620
secretions, hormone laced with artificial hormones that are now being ingested by the child.
00:37:05.780
It could that possibly be remotely healthy for a newborn child to be ingesting that whatever that
00:37:16.640
is. Okay. And we're not going to call it's not, it's not, it's not, it's not, it's not,
00:37:20.380
it's not the mother's milk. It's certainly not that whatever you want to call that mucus,
00:37:23.780
those secretions, uh, is it healthy for a child to be ingesting it? Is there any reason to think that
00:37:31.840
it would be? Obviously not. But as always, it's not about the child. This is certainly extremely
00:37:42.120
physically unhealthy for the child, not to mention the psychological damage being done,
00:37:45.640
even at such a young age, but that doesn't matter. It's not about, uh, it's not about the child. It's
00:37:50.560
about this guy. No, this is a, this is a, a, a fetish for him. This is a desire that he has
00:38:00.320
and that he has now forced a newborn child to participate in.
00:38:07.160
I also want to play this clip for you. MSNBC, um,
00:38:12.400
this appears to be maybe turning on Ukraine ever so slightly. I thought this was an interesting
00:38:16.060
clip. Let's play this. Such an important point. The reason, if this was in fact a Ukrainian defense
00:38:20.980
missile that, uh, engaged in an accident, the reason they're firing those up is because Russia
00:38:25.940
is attacking Ukraine deep in its own territory near the Polish border, going after infrastructure
00:38:30.560
and civilian targets. Uh, just a couple of minutes ago, Richard, the Polish president,
00:38:34.600
president due to call this an unfortunate accident and not an intentional attack. This never made sense
00:38:41.660
to you even yesterday that it was a Russian attack. No, as Admiral Stavridi said, if you're going to do
00:38:46.300
an intentional attack attack, if you're Russia and you're going to risk taking on NATO. And by the way,
00:38:51.260
Russia can't defeat Ukraine. Why in the world would they take on NATO? Uh, it just makes zero, zero sense.
00:38:57.580
Uh, so yeah, it's just, there was no way this I thought could have been an intentional Russian,
00:39:03.580
uh, attack. I think the, the polls look studied, measured, which is what you want to look here.
00:39:09.660
NATO looks good. Ukraine looks a little bit too hot. The idea that the Ukraine's saying this has
00:39:14.620
to be a Russian, it almost looks as if they wanted this to be something more. So I think that's
00:39:19.500
unfortunate and that won't help their credibility. Uh, so look, I think this, the only other lesson
00:39:27.100
I take from this is anytime you've got a hot war stuff happens to use Mr. Rumsfeld's comment,
00:39:32.860
the danger of escalation is somehow implicit, the danger of accidents. And again, it's, it's the reason
00:39:38.380
you, you don't want to fly off the handle. When stuff happens, just, just get the facts and make
00:39:44.780
sure you're responding to something that was actual and if possible intentional. Uh, you don't want to
00:39:49.980
have inadvertent escalation here. So there's a little bit of a lesson, uh, when something hot is going on.
00:39:55.180
Well, I said ever so slightly, uh, that's, uh, probably turning on Ukraine as a, is, is an
00:40:02.620
overstatement. Um, but he does acknowledge that's yeah. Ukraine, they, it's almost like, uh, he says
00:40:10.780
they're, they were too hot. They were almost, they, it's almost like they, they wanted it to be a
00:40:14.300
Russian attack when the missile hit Poland and killed two people. And Ukraine, we immediately heard
00:40:20.140
from Ukraine and Zelensky is a Russian Russians. The Russians did it. It's almost like they wanted
00:40:24.220
it to be the case. Yeah. You think so? It's, it's not that they, they're the ones who launched the
00:40:29.900
missile. So it's not that they wanted that. They wanted us to think that they're the ones who launched
00:40:34.860
it. The only question about this is whether this was a false flag operation, that they launched it
00:40:42.220
intentionally so that they could blame Russia and draw Western governments into a world war with Russia,
00:40:47.500
or if, uh, if this was an accident and then Zelensky turned around with bad intel and, uh,
00:40:54.860
because he wanted it to be a certain way and he just told the world that, I mean, again, either way,
00:41:00.860
it's, it's really bad for Zelensky in Ukraine. But, you know, when there's a, when there's a
00:41:08.540
supposed, when someone makes a mistake that would work out really well for them, then I tend to think
00:41:14.460
that's not a coincidence. So it seems pretty clear to me that this was intentional. This,
00:41:20.460
so they were trying to hoax us into a world war. And although we might be hearing from the media now,
00:41:25.820
now they're saying, Oh yeah, I never thought it was. So of course it wasn't Russia.
00:41:30.200
That's not what they were saying on Tuesday when this news first came down.
00:41:35.260
I mean, on Tuesday, every corporate media outlet was ready for world war.
00:41:44.380
Not even stopping to think about it. Why would Russia, why would they even do this?
00:41:48.940
I guess if they're, if they're the comic book villains and, uh, and so they're just launching
00:41:54.180
missiles for no reason, but in the real world, Russia in this conflict with Ukraine, why would
00:42:00.780
they just randomly attack Poland? It never made any sense, but it's not just that Ukraine wanted it
00:42:08.020
to be a certain thing. It's that the media wanted it to be that too. All right, let's get to the
00:42:13.500
comment section. You know, relief band is the number one FDA cleared anti-nausea wristband. It's clinically
00:42:29.340
proven to quickly and effectively, effectively prevent or relieve nausea and vomiting associated
00:42:34.140
with motion sickness, anxiety, migraines, hangovers, morning sickness, and chemotherapy.
00:42:39.140
So whether you need everyday nausea relief or just an occasional cure, relief band is the way to go
00:42:44.220
because it's got patented technology that makes feeling sick a thing of the past. Like the name
00:42:48.460
says, relief band is legitimately just a band that you wear on your wrist to give you relief from nausea.
00:42:53.280
You can even change the intensity depending on how you're feeling. Relief band has an A plus rating
00:42:57.780
with the Better Business Bureau and over 100,000 satisfied customers. If you want the band that
00:43:03.820
actually works to relieve your nausea, check out relief band right now. You know, I've worked out
00:43:08.320
an exclusive offer just for my listeners as well. If you go to reliefband.com, use promo code Walsh,
00:43:12.220
you'll get 20% off plus free shipping and a no questions asked 30 day money back guarantee. You get all
00:43:18.460
of that, but you got to go to the website, go to R-E-L-I-E-F-B-A-N-D.com, use promo code Walsh for 20%
00:43:24.400
off plus free shipping. The Spirit of Traj says, the fact that girl wasn't forced off the stage
00:43:30.560
immediately but rather clapped for says everything. Yeah, that was the girl that was insulting and
00:43:38.420
attacking her own father at his funeral during the eulogy. Yeah, it's bad enough that they clapped,
00:43:44.160
but really somebody should have walked up onto the stage during that and just escorted her off the
00:43:50.720
stage. I think in many ways we need to become a more confrontational culture than we are,
00:43:56.880
more confrontational. What we usually hear is it's the opposite. It's too confrontational,
00:44:00.720
too divisive, and we all need to turn down the temperature quite a bit. That might be the case
00:44:05.960
on the internet. Okay, yeah, everyone is really confrontational on the internet, and if you say
00:44:10.440
one thing that they don't like, they're going to tell you that they hope you die of cancer and all
00:44:15.380
that kind of stuff. But in real life, it's really the opposite. Because people are hiding behind,
00:44:21.160
and they're kind of venting all their frustrations behind the comfort of their keyboards. In real life,
00:44:26.900
all of these people are a bunch of fainting little flowers. And so you could see something
00:44:33.860
like this happen, and a bunch of people just standing by and watching it. Because although they
00:44:41.760
might be eager to confront on the internet, most people don't want to confront in person.
00:44:49.220
We could actually use a lot more of that. CoolPapaJMagic says, I would so love to hear Matt
00:44:54.140
call this woman anti-white, which is what she is. The go-free lexicon is spreading, so it's just a
00:45:00.200
matter of time. When have I ever hesitated to call someone anti-white if they're anti-white?
00:45:04.960
Yeah, she's anti-white, obviously. I've talked about anti-white racism using that term many,
00:45:10.200
many times. I always find it funny when I hear this from people in the audience. Well,
00:45:16.020
Matt never talks about this. It's like, I talk about that all the time. I maybe haven't talked
00:45:21.600
about it in the last, I don't know, 48 hours, but that's not the same thing as never talking about it.
00:45:27.440
Owen says, I have a bad relationship with my father, but I have family members who do have
00:45:31.100
a good relationship with him, and I respect that. There's no possible way that anyone could
00:45:35.380
convince me to do what she did. Absolutely disgraceful. And that's a good point, too. It's not just
00:45:40.060
about, you know, the funeral is not just about honoring the dead. It's also about the living.
00:45:46.480
That's, you know, the people will say the funeral is only for the living. I disagree with that. I
00:45:50.200
think it also is about the dead. It's about honoring the dead. But the funeral is indeed in part for the
00:45:56.740
living. And so even if you didn't have a good relationship with this person, think about all
00:46:01.820
the other people who are there who don't feel that way and who, for them, it's going to help them
00:46:06.520
grieve to be able to honor this person. And you're just throwing a hand grenade into the middle of
00:46:14.220
that because it would make you feel better. Delta Nine says, that chick's eulogy could have come right
00:46:21.700
out of Mao's cultural revolution. I suppose she'd probably take that as a compliment. Well, she wouldn't
00:46:25.800
because she wouldn't know what Mao's cultural revolution is, even though she's participating in it.
00:46:30.860
Um, let's see. Majed says, Matt, I think it actually is in the best interest of some random
00:46:38.260
American sitting on his dinner table that Russia is punished, i.e. had its global presence diminished
00:46:43.080
because then the U.S. will directly benefit from weakening one of its main competitors on the global
00:46:47.760
stage. And that may translate into an improvement in terms of well-being for an average American.
00:46:53.460
Well, that's your assertion, I understand. And you have reasserted it. But how exactly does it help?
00:47:00.860
Um, so you're, you're asserting that it would improve the well-being of the average American
00:47:08.260
citizen if we are to, uh, punish Russia. Okay. So that's, that's your assertion. That's what you're
00:47:13.860
claiming. How exactly? Walk me through that. Give me the step-by-step process. Okay. I want,
00:47:21.380
I, you need to connect those dots for me because I'm not being facetious. I don't see it.
00:47:26.200
Um, Tyler says, sounds like Matt is that guy who's just losing his mind in my rear view mirror
00:47:34.480
because myself and the four cars in front of me are only going seven miles per hour over the speed
00:47:38.500
limit. I am absolutely that guy. How dare you go only seven miles? If you're going seven miles over
00:47:44.800
the limit, you're going at least 10 miles per hour too slow. That's my drive. That's my driving
00:47:53.460
safety recommendation. Um, let's see. Nikki says, I agree about people who drive too slow in the fast
00:48:02.300
lane, but the worst highway offenders are people who try to jump ahead in traffic by driving all the
00:48:07.100
way to the end of the merge lane slash ramp, and then cutting in at the last moment. But you,
00:48:13.320
you could not be more wrong, Nikki, I'm afraid to say you couldn't possibly be wronger. You have
00:48:18.460
gone as far from correct as you could possibly go. You have reached the absolute zero of wrongness.
00:48:25.080
The merge lane, the ramp, okay. It's there for a reason. You're supposed to use it. And if there's a
00:48:32.160
lot of traffic, uh, especially I'm, I always take the on-ramp all the way to the end before I cut in
00:48:39.560
because that's my lane and I have every right to it and I'm going to use it. And if I'm coming onto
00:48:44.240
the highway, um, I have a right to that lane and I will use it all the way to the end. I'll leap,
00:48:50.540
I'll leap in front of 50 cars, cut right in at the last minute. And I will do it without causing any
00:48:56.840
other car to break their stride or slam their brakes. I will do it with surgical precision
00:49:01.500
and you will look on in jealousy, but that's not my problem. So you're sitting in traffic and you're
00:49:07.640
just jealous of the people that are on the on-ramp and you see them whizzing by you and cutting in
00:49:12.140
front. But your jealousy is not my issue. No, the real problem with merging is, I think we've talked
00:49:18.080
about this before. It's when, and this is a, this is a big issue in Nashville. I think Nashville is
00:49:22.220
the capital of this and I'm not exactly sure why, but the real problem is when people are, they're
00:49:27.320
merging onto the highway and there's a lot of traffic. And for some reason they just kind of panic
00:49:32.460
and they get afraid. And so they come to a complete stop in the middle of the merge lane and sit
00:49:37.380
there with their dumb little blinker on like an idiot waiting to cut into the traffic. Meanwhile,
00:49:42.200
there's still like a hundred feet of runway in front of them that they refuse to use.
00:49:46.540
And so they're causing all the other cars that are coming on the on-ramp to have to slam on their
00:49:50.500
brakes. That's the real issue. You know, something smells over at my swag shack, something like sweet
00:49:58.100
baby spirit. That's right. Fuel tea to the SPG is in bloom this holiday season. So come as you are
00:50:03.560
and get yourself the sweet baby album tea. It's the perfect gift to yourself and everyone, you know,
00:50:10.220
because there's just something in the way they put my bearded infant self on a t-shirt that no one can
00:50:15.920
resist. So if you want to take part in this and help us to exploit your millennia nostalgia, head over
00:50:21.400
to my collection over dailywire.com slash shop and get the sweet baby gang album t-shirt or any of the
00:50:27.540
other amazing holiday offerings at the new and improved daily wire plus shop, like free shipping for
00:50:32.080
orders over $75 and a free leftist tears tumbler with all orders over a hundred dollars. Get your
00:50:37.040
shirt today and everything else. These are already closed to selling out. Again, go to dailywire.com
00:50:42.460
slash shop and get yours before they're gone. Also, if you follow the daily wire on social media,
00:50:47.620
you've surely seen the excellent work of our skilled content coordinators, most notably the work
00:50:52.520
featuring me and all of my heroic exploits. Well, we're currently looking to add one more
00:50:58.060
coordinator to the team. So if you have experience in social media marketing or content creation,
00:51:02.800
we want to hear from you. This is a Nashville, Tennessee based position where people actually
00:51:06.720
come into the office, put on their shoes. You better put them on if you want to come to the
00:51:10.660
office and do real work instead of attending struggle sessions on zoom all day. If you want
00:51:15.500
more information or if you want to apply, visit dailywire.com slash careers today. Now let's get to our
00:51:21.420
daily cancellation. Well, we flew into San Francisco yesterday for my speech at Berkeley tonight. We had
00:51:30.700
to drive downtown from the airport to get to our hotel. The GPS, it wasn't working, but fortunately
00:51:36.440
we were able to follow the stench of weed and feces and it led us right into the city. Truly San Francisco
00:51:42.780
is a God forsaken wasteland. It is like something out of Mad Max, but way gayer. If you didn't know any
00:51:49.160
better, you might think that the whole city is like some kind of penal colony. If I had to choose
00:51:54.080
between going to prison or moving to San Francisco, it would be a flip of the coin at least because
00:51:58.100
there is no discernible difference between the two. This is what a leftist utopia looks like and
00:52:02.540
what it smells like, like urine and garbage and despair. So what I'm trying to say is that I'm not
00:52:08.180
a big fan of this city. And so it should come as no surprise that I am canceling the city today, though
00:52:13.120
my reason for canceling has nothing to do with the trauma that I suffer every time I'm forced to come
00:52:17.600
here. It's really a coincidence, perhaps Providence, that I happen to be in the city on the day when
00:52:23.420
its reason for cancellation has presented itself. And here's that reason. It's a report from the local
00:52:28.580
ABC affiliate in San Francisco. It says, San Francisco Mayor London Breed announced the launch of a new
00:52:33.980
guaranteed income program for the city's transgender community on Wednesday. The Guaranteed Income for
00:52:39.420
Trans People gift program will provide low-income transgender residents with $1,200 each
00:52:47.160
each month up to 18 months to help address financial insecurity within the community.
00:52:52.460
In a statement, the city of San Francisco said, GIFT is one of several programs the city is
00:52:56.660
developing, implementing, and evaluating to identify how to best support San Francisco
00:53:00.860
residents and promote economic stability and recovery. The city also said that the new pilot
00:53:05.040
program is the first guaranteed income initiative to focus solely on trans people and will provide
00:53:09.120
55 eligible participants with temporary income. Additionally, the city said it will provide the same
00:53:13.820
individuals with wraparound direct services such as gender-affirming medical and mental health care,
00:53:20.240
case management, specialty care services, and financial coaching. Now, we're told the reason for
00:53:26.300
this program is that trans people are disproportionately impacted by poverty. We already know that trans people
00:53:32.140
are disproportionately impacted by everything, really. If there was a giant tsunami that obliterated the
00:53:37.200
whole city, not to get your hopes up, and everyone was washed away in the process, we would still be told
00:53:41.960
that trans people were disproportionately impacted. If a volcano erupted on an island in the Pacific and incinerated
00:53:48.100
a small village of 600 people and there were no trans people in the village at all, we would still be told that
00:53:54.880
trans people were disproportionately impacted somehow. As for poverty, the article says this, quote,
00:54:00.520
We know that our trans communities experience much higher rates of poverty and discrimination, so this program will
00:54:06.200
target support to lift individuals in this community up. We will keep building on programs like this to provide
00:54:11.960
those in the greatest need with the financial resources and services to help them thrive, said Mayor
00:54:15.960
London Breed in a statement. Transgender communities experience poverty and economic instability at
00:54:21.320
disproportionately high rates, according to the city. The U.S. Transgender Survey, which is the only
00:54:26.820
large-scale study of trans people in the U.S. in 2015, found that 33% of trans people in California
00:54:31.460
were living in poverty. All right. So we're supposed to assume that the higher rates of poverty
00:54:39.360
in the trans community are due to discrimination, transphobia, whatever. Even in a place like San
00:54:45.200
Francisco, where trans people are literally worshipped as deities, even here, the high rates
00:54:51.820
of poverty are because of bigotry. Yet, even the left will acknowledge that trans people, they also have
00:54:58.060
higher rates of mental illness and substance abuse issues. That would seem to explain why they're more
00:55:04.940
likely to have trouble holding down a job. And it's hard to see how handing them a check for $1,200
00:55:09.620
will solve that. And by the way, if we're providing financial advantages to groups that are more likely
00:55:16.260
to be homeless and impoverished, why not set up a program giving a monthly stipend to men? Quote,
00:55:22.380
cisgender men specifically. After all, men, as compared to women, suffer much higher rates of
00:55:29.040
homelessness and similar conditions. So why not give them a program? But no such program would or
00:55:36.480
ever could exist because the disproportionate impact game is rigged. In any case, we still haven't
00:55:42.680
gotten to the reason for this cancellation. Obviously, handing out free money to the gender
00:55:48.840
confused is an insane idea that will not solve any problem and will only make the existing problems
00:55:53.960
even worse. But if San Francisco wants to continue its march into insanity and oblivion, it is more
00:55:59.500
than welcome to do so. I have no interest in talking sense into them, nor could I even do that
00:56:03.960
anyway. That's why my focus is not on the program itself, but on the form you have to fill out in
00:56:10.680
order to be eligible for it. So if you want to take advantage of GIFT, you must complete a 10-page
00:56:16.660
form, which is available online in PDF form. So you can go see it. And the reason why, you might think
00:56:22.080
like 10 pages, that's a lot of pages. Why do you have to fill out 10 pages? Well, the reason that
00:56:26.760
it's 10 pages, that becomes immediately obvious when you skim through it. For instance, you're asked
00:56:33.000
to provide your pronouns, and the form gives you 15 options, including co-co-cos, z-zim-zis,
00:56:42.000
pur-pur-purs, and v-ver-viz. Now, these may sound like characters in a Dr. Seuss book, but instead
00:56:49.100
they are, in fact, made-up pronouns. Now, what is a v-ver exactly, and how is it distinguished from
00:56:54.360
a z-zim or a pur-pur-s? Nobody knows. Nobody can say. And of course, if 15 options aren't enough,
00:57:00.440
you can also check not listed as an option. Yet the list of pronouns seems downright limited compared
00:57:05.880
to the section for gender identity. There are, according to libs of TikTok, we took the time to count
00:57:11.160
them all. God bless her. There are 97 provided options for gender identity. 97 genders. And now,
00:57:20.140
in fairness, they've padded the stats here quite a bit. There will be, in many cases, four or five
00:57:25.520
different ways to phrase the exact same thing, such as transgender woman, woman of trans experience,
00:57:32.620
woman with a history of gender transition, or trans feminine. These are treated as discrete and
00:57:39.280
distinct identities, yet they're all the same brand of nonsense, rephrased in various different ways.
00:57:45.260
Other gender options include sister girl, feminine of center, brother boy, xenogender,
00:57:55.340
gender outlaw is an option. You can be a gender outlaw, multi-gender, omni-gender,
00:58:02.900
novi-gender. If you really identify with the, if you really love the month of November, I guess,
00:58:07.460
you're a novi-gender. And also, there's a gender called aggressive. That's, that's the gender,
00:58:13.580
aggressive. Aggressiveness is its own gender now. And if somehow none of those work for you,
00:58:19.660
you can always check, I don't use labels, or not listed. And then what about sexual orientation?
00:58:25.400
Well, here there are a quaint 17 options, a number inflated by the fact that non-monogamous,
00:58:31.800
pansexual, and polyamorous are all listed as separate options. Another sexual option, a sexual orientation,
00:58:37.340
option on the list. And I'm just telling you this, okay, this is, this is what's on the list.
00:58:40.800
This is what this government form says. This is a valid label according to the form.
00:58:46.520
And the label is faggot. That is on the sexual orientation checklist. Don't shoot the messenger.
00:58:53.060
I'm just, I'm telling you what the form says. That is now a sexual orientation that you can claim and
00:58:58.040
then get $1,200 from San Francisco if you do. Now, I've often said that many of these new gender
00:59:05.360
and sexual orientation labels are not really genders orientations, but actually personalities.
00:59:10.540
And there are others who say that they're not genders, sexual orientations, or personalities,
00:59:14.440
but really are mental illnesses. And I think both are the case. You know, you don't have to choose
00:59:18.440
between the two. But there's something else too. In many cases, take someone who identifies as a
00:59:24.380
pansexual, multi-gender, demi-boy with AM pronouns. I think it'd be almost making too much of it to call
00:59:31.580
it a personality or a mental illness. It's almost giving it too much credit. Because this is actually
00:59:37.800
just nothing at all. It doesn't mean anything. In so many cases, genders and pronouns now are like
00:59:45.900
hobbies these days. It's a recreational activity. People who have nothing better to do just
00:59:51.480
sit around coming up with and collecting new labels for themselves. It's like this generation's
00:59:56.960
Pokemon cards. Except it comes with an extra side of identity crisis. And maybe this is partly why
01:00:06.340
San Francisco has so many homeless people. People who can't get jobs. Because the entire city is
01:00:12.060
sitting around thinking about its pronouns and gender identities. These are the kinds of things
01:00:16.580
they're thinking about. Don't have the time to think about or worry about anything else. Like getting a
01:00:22.420
job or housing, for example. I think there may be more to that theory than you think. But we're not
01:00:29.880
going to flesh it all out now. For now, suffice it to say that San Francisco is, for this reason, and so
01:00:36.220
many countless others, canceled. And that'll do it for the show today. I'll be at Berkeley tonight. So
01:00:43.960
that'll be interesting. And if I don't see you there, I'll talk to you tomorrow. Godspeed.