Ep. 1075 - Genocidal Anti-White Bigots Are Worried That There's Too Much 'Hate And Racism'
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 2 minutes
Summary
A Rutgers professor was on camera preaching anti-white racism. Also, leftist justices on the Supreme Court embarrassed themselves during oral arguments over a freedom of religion case. A former Twitter moderator talks about the trauma his job caused him. And I reveal the hidden brilliance behind Time Magazine s Entertainer of the Year, Meghan Markle.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Today on the Matt Wall Show, much has been said about the rise of hate and bigotry in America,
00:00:04.420
but most of the people lamenting this alleged phenomenon are themselves huge proponents of
00:00:08.980
bigotry and racism, so long as it's anti-white racism. We have some egregious examples for you
00:00:13.520
today. Also, leftist justices on the Supreme Court embarrassed themselves during oral arguments over
00:00:18.680
a freedom of religion case. A former Twitter moderator talks about the trauma his job caused
00:00:23.380
him. I reveal the hidden brilliance behind Time Magazine's Entertainer of the Year and King and
00:00:29.640
Queen Victim, Harry and Meghan, get ready to release their new docu-series because all they want is
00:00:35.240
privacy. We'll talk about all that and more today on the Matt Wall Show.
00:00:47.420
You know, using the internet without ExpressVPN, it's like taking a phone call on speaker in public.
00:00:52.420
You don't know who's around to listen in on your private conversation. And when you go online at
00:00:56.760
ExpressVPN, internet service providers, they can see every single website you visit. And what's more,
00:01:01.720
they can legally sell it information to ad companies and tech giants without your consent.
00:01:05.980
That's why I use ExpressVPN. ExpressVPN hides my online activity from internet service providers.
00:01:11.160
My identity is anonymized and my data is encrypted for maximum protection. If that sounds complicated,
00:01:16.360
I assure you it really isn't. All I have to do is fire up the app, click one button. It's as simple
00:01:20.480
as that. Then I'm free to roam the internet without any prying eyes. ExpressVPN works on all devices,
00:01:24.800
including phones, laptops, and routers so that everyone who shares your Wi-Fi can be protected.
00:01:29.800
So secure your online activity by visiting expressvpn.com slash Walsh today. That's
00:01:34.400
E-X-P-R-E-S-S-V-P-N.com slash Walsh to get an extra three months free of ExpressVPN. That's
00:01:43.380
Well, during all the recent controversy surrounding Kanye West and his statements,
00:01:48.880
we have heard quite a lot about the dangers of demonizing and scapegoating entire groups of
00:01:54.200
people. We've heard condemnations of hate and of hateful language. We've heard that there's a
00:01:59.040
rising tide of hate and prejudice and that it's getting worse by the day, especially now that
00:02:04.200
Elon Musk has taken over Twitter. Allegedly, that's made it all worse. And it's true, of course,
00:02:09.840
we shouldn't demonize groups. That part is true. I agree with the people who warn against such
00:02:16.680
bigotries. The problem is that many of those people do not agree with themselves. And if they
00:02:23.600
are wondering why their anti-hate sermons, their homilies of love and togetherness tend to fall on
00:02:29.680
deaf ears as the alleged hate tide continues to rise despite their protests, they may want to take
00:02:35.680
a long look in the mirror. The fact is that the very system now thrown into hysteria about the
00:02:42.320
dangers of fanatical racism has itself fanatically promoted racism for many years and continues to do
00:02:49.640
so today. Now, you can call this whataboutism. I don't really care. I am unapologetically saying
00:02:56.580
whatabout. Whatabout is a perfectly valid argument that needs to be brought up very often. So whatabout,
00:03:03.900
the openly genocidal racism that the corporate media, Hollywood, academia, the left generally
00:03:09.720
pushes without apology and without shame every single day? What about it? Are we ever going to
00:03:15.740
talk about it? Are any of the eager denouncers ever going to get around to denouncing that?
00:03:21.800
Well, I know the answer, but I asked the question anyway, rhetorically. Last night,
00:03:25.420
thanks to a repost from Chris Ruffo, a video went viral of a Rutgers professor named Brittany Cooper
00:03:31.160
speaking at an online conference hosted by a popular website called The Root. Now,
00:03:36.140
this video is actually from a year ago, went viral back then, but, and I may have even mentioned it on
00:03:41.860
the show back then, but the ensuing outrage, almost entirely coming from conservatives on social media,
00:03:47.900
amounted to absolutely nothing. Cooper was not fired, was not suspended, was not denounced,
00:03:54.160
or even lightly reprimanded. Nothing. She's still teaching college students today.
00:03:58.580
This in spite of the fact that she was on camera preaching the most virulent form of anti-white
00:04:09.060
I think that white people are committed to being villains in the aggregate, right? The real sort of
00:04:14.060
issue here, and I, you know, I've heard people sort of say it is one, I think that white people
00:04:18.720
viscerally fear. It's not that white people don't know, right, what they have done. They know.
00:04:23.940
They fear that there is no other way to be human, but the way in which they are human,
00:04:30.200
which is to, so, you know, like you talk to white people and whenever you really want to have a
00:04:34.200
reckoning about it, they say stuff like, you know, it's just human nature. If y'all had all of this
00:04:39.140
power, you would have done the same thing, right? And it's like, no, that's what white humans did.
00:04:45.080
White human beings thought there's a world here and we own it. Prior to them, black and brown people
00:04:51.800
have been sailing across oceans, interacting with each other for centuries without total
00:04:56.800
subjugation, domination, and colonialism. We have seen, uh, what a, what a show this iteration
00:05:04.780
of treatment of other human beings means. And that my hope is that we would do it differently,
00:05:14.100
you know, in the moments when we have some power.
00:05:18.680
White people are committed to being villains, she says. Now put any other group in that sentence
00:05:24.060
and she loses her job. Black people are committed to being villains. Asian people are committed to
00:05:31.700
being villains. Gay people are committed to being villains. Jews are committed to being villains.
00:05:37.780
Literally any other group at all in that sentence. And it becomes the sort of statement that her career
00:05:44.740
cannot survive. And we haven't even heard the worst of it yet. Not even close. Perhaps more troubling
00:05:51.280
given her profession is the hallucinatory, hallucinatory version of world history that
00:05:56.860
Brittany Cooper, who refers to herself, by the way, as Professor Crunk offers up. And we haven't heard the
00:06:01.460
worst of that yet either. She says that black and brown people were selling, sailing around the world
00:06:06.720
and interacting with each other without wars of conquest, without subjugation, without colonization.
00:06:13.180
There's nothing to say about that claim, except that it is totally, absurdly, ridiculously false.
00:06:20.240
There is not a shred of truth to it. Whichever groups qualify as black or brown, especially those
00:06:26.140
groups that lived in North America or Africa, what we know for certain is that they were slaughtering
00:06:31.360
and enslaving each other without mercy since time immemorial. European empires did not invent the
00:06:38.020
idea of subjugating a foreign land and turning it into a vassal state. And they didn't even practice
00:06:43.880
the most brutal form of the practice. This was utterly commonplace across the entire globe for millennia.
00:06:51.360
So Professor Crunk is either so dumb as to qualify as medically brain damaged, or she's a hateful,
00:06:58.040
lying propagandist, or perhaps some combination of both. And that's what I suspect. She continues by
00:07:03.380
offering her solution to the white problem, her final solution, we might say. Listen.
00:07:10.820
That's the thing that white people don't trust us to do because they are so corrupt. You know,
00:07:16.280
their thinking is so morally and spiritually bankrupt about power that they can't let, you know,
00:07:22.180
they fear viscerally, existentially letting go of power because they cannot imagine that there's
00:07:28.480
another way to be. It is either that you dominate or you are dominated. And isn't it sad that that is
00:07:35.660
spiritually who they are and that they can't imagine a sort of more expansive notion of the world?
00:07:40.520
The thing I want to say to you is we got to take these out. But I know, but like, we can't say that,
00:07:45.560
right? We can't say, like, I don't believe in a project of violence. I truly don't.
00:07:50.220
Because I think in the end that our souls suffer from that. The world didn't start when white people
00:07:55.660
arrived in America and tried to tell all the rest of us how things were going to go. There were people
00:08:02.160
out here making worlds, Africans and indigenous people being brilliant and, you know, libraries
00:08:08.800
and inventions and, you know, vibrant notions of humanity and cross-cultural exchange long before
00:08:15.420
white people showed up being raggedy and violent and terrible and trying to take everything from
00:08:18.980
everybody. So we hear again her fantasy land alternate retelling of world history, adding in
00:08:25.240
the detail that Africans somehow made it to North America before Europeans. She then imagines that
00:08:30.760
indigenous people had libraries, which would be difficult considering that most of the tribes
00:08:35.720
didn't even have a written language, much less that they have books. And she says that they lived
00:08:39.840
peacefully until raggedy white people introduced violence to the Western hemisphere. And she's right.
00:08:44.980
North America was entirely free of violence before first contact with Europeans. Free of violence if
00:08:51.280
you don't count scalping, cannibalism, human sacrifice, rape, pillage, murder, war, slavery,
00:08:57.360
conquest, etc. Other than all of that, it was quite peaceful, really. Not that Professor Kronk is an
00:09:03.400
advocate of peace. She says herself that she really wants to take these mother effers out.
00:09:08.180
That they are corrupt and she wants to take these mother effers out. Again, just imagine black people
00:09:14.880
are so corrupt. We need to take these mother effers out. Gay people are so corrupt. We need to take
00:09:19.900
these mother effers out. Jews are so corrupt. We need to take these mother effers out. Any of those
00:09:26.180
statements and you are done forever. You're never getting another job. You're getting deplatformed from
00:09:31.780
everything. You're losing your bank accounts. You are losing everything. Unless you put white people
00:09:39.100
in there. The only reason she stopped short of fully promoting such a strategy is that she can't
00:09:45.680
say that, she says. And besides, she's worried that exterminating white people might be injurious to
00:09:50.660
the souls of their exterminators. And she's right about that second part, but not the first. In fact,
00:09:55.760
she can say that she wants to murder all white people. She did say it. And she suffered no consequence
00:10:01.000
whatever for doing so. Later in the video, she speaks wistfully and hopefully about the coming
00:10:07.040
end of whiteness and assures herself and the audience that, you know, eventually white people
00:10:12.440
will be extinct and non-white people can get back to living in peace without the, quote, inconvenience
00:10:18.060
of their presence. It is, again, in summary, a genocidally hateful and racist diatribe. She is
00:10:26.700
calling for, or at the very least, fantasizing openly about the extermination of an entire race
00:10:34.140
of people. And she presented this to a media publication on video and suffered no consequence
00:10:41.280
for it. You can, in fact, in this country, openly call for the extermination of white people without
00:10:47.080
the slightest worry that any legal, professional, or reputational damage will result.
00:10:52.360
Just ask Nick Cannon. He is currently, as he has been for several years, the host of
00:10:58.900
The Masked Singer on Fox. He's had high-paying, high-profile jobs on national TV for the better
00:11:04.940
part of this century. And yet, infamously, he has openly called white people savages and
00:11:11.880
postulated that their lack of, quote, melanin makes them subhuman. Let's just take a trip down
00:11:17.720
memory lane and watch this again. It's from a couple of years ago. And here's what Nick Cannon
00:11:21.800
said. Melanin comes with compassion. Melanin comes with soul that we call it. We call it
00:11:27.580
soul. We soul brothers and sisters. That's the melanin that connects us. So the people that
00:11:31.800
don't have it have, are, are a little, and I'm going to say this carefully, are a little
00:11:39.000
less. And, and, and where the term actually comes from, because I'm bringing it all the
00:11:44.240
way back around to, to minister Farrakhan, to where they may not have the compassion or
00:11:50.240
the, the, when they were sent to the mountains of Caucasus, when they, when they didn't have
00:11:55.560
the power of the sun, that was, that the sun then started to deteriorate them. So then
00:12:02.260
they're acting out of fear. They're acting out of low self-esteem. They're acting out of a deficiency.
00:12:13.260
So therefore the only way that they can act is evil. The only way they can, they, they have
00:12:18.040
to rob, steal, rape, kill, and fight or flight in order to survive. Exactly. So then these people
00:12:24.580
who didn't have what we had, and when I say we, I speak of the melanated people, right? They had to
00:12:31.360
be savages. They had to be barbaric. They had, because they're in these Nordic mountains, they're
00:12:37.540
in these rough, uh, torrential environments. So they, they're acting as animals, right? So they're
00:12:44.520
the ones that are actually closer to animals. They're the ones that are actually the true savages.
00:12:54.580
Acting as animals, says the guy that has like 10 kids with six different women or something.
00:12:59.740
Um, after that podcast interview, Nick Cannon did for a short period, lose his job, which he
00:13:05.780
quickly regained and has gotten back to his TV career without any issue. But the momentary slap
00:13:10.840
on the wrist only came because during the same podcast, he said that black people are quote,
00:13:15.900
the true Hebrews, which is an incoherent talking point. We've also heard from Kanye West also not
00:13:21.020
nearly as vicious or hateful as what he said about white people generally.
00:13:24.580
So Cannon was chastised for the true Hebrew, Hebrews comment. Uh, he even brought briefly
00:13:29.540
lost his job for it, but there was never any chastisement, never any denouncement from any
00:13:34.800
notable person or organization for literally calling all white people subhuman animalistic
00:13:40.420
savages. Because that's the kind of thing you're allowed to say, not just allowed to say,
00:13:47.820
but rewarded for saying anti-white bigotry is not simply tolerated. It is celebrated. Professor
00:13:54.480
Kronk and Nick Cannon aren't living in a vacuum. These, these viciously anti-white sentiments can be
00:14:00.220
heard from celebrities, from college professors, from government officials, and many others.
00:14:04.520
The sentiments are expressed out loud, enacted into law. They are set as policy embedded into the
00:14:10.340
system. The Biden administration gave out COVID relief according to a racial hierarchy
00:14:14.180
with whites at the bottom, where I suppose these savage animalistic villains belong.
00:14:19.940
As far as interracial violence go, you know, because we hear that, uh, all these, it's all
00:14:24.320
the hate leading to violence. Well, okay, let's talk about that. Twice as many white people fall
00:14:29.240
victim to interracial homicide as committed. And that's just homicides. We haven't even, you know,
00:14:35.020
we've seen many videos of groups of people in one race stomping the hell out of an individual
00:14:40.420
of another race, but the victim in those videos is almost always white. We have rarely, if ever,
00:14:46.220
seen it go the other way. Certainly not recently. What this tells us is that anti-white racism is
00:14:54.200
permissible in our culture. Uh, it is the only totally permissible bigotry that remains because,
00:15:00.320
and because it is permissible, it is also dangerous. It is the most dangerous. You know, there, there,
00:15:08.060
there are other kinds of bigotry that exist, but if society generally condemns a form of bigotry,
00:15:15.800
then the danger that bigotry can pose is very much mitigated because it is condemned by almost
00:15:23.300
everyone and certainly by almost all the most powerful people. Somehow it goes with anti-white racism
00:15:29.140
and, and, and nobody who speaks out against racism, bigotry, and, and yet neglects to specifically
00:15:36.340
denounce anti-white racism should be taken seriously. That's what this comes down to.
00:15:45.180
If you're wondering why nobody can take you seriously, it's because you see what we just
00:15:50.480
played there and you either don't care or you applaud. And that's why. Now let's get to our five headlines.
00:16:00.140
The hard year in the economy means that, uh, essential practical gifts will be in high demand
00:16:11.240
this year. Give the most essential gift of all America's best meat and seafood from Good Ranchers
00:16:16.520
with discounts on orders of five boxes or more. You can save on gifts for the whole family. When you
00:16:22.060
give a box of Good Ranchers, you're giving them a true steakhouse experience with 100% American USDA
00:16:29.040
prime cuts of, uh, beef, chicken, and seafood, other meat delivery companies, and even your local
00:16:33.980
grocery store. What they're going to do is they're going to import lower quality meat from overseas.
00:16:38.280
Don't give your friends and family less than America's best this year. Not sure what to order?
00:16:42.140
Well, Good Ranchers now offers gift cards so you can let your friends and family members, uh,
00:16:45.800
choose for themselves, or you can give the gift of a subscription and inflation-proof someone's
00:16:50.860
meat budget for them. Go to GoodRanchers.com, use code Walsh to check out to get $35 off your gift.
00:16:56.360
That's GoodRanchers.com, code Walsh for $35 off. Good Ranchers, American meat delivered.
00:17:03.580
As we mentioned yesterday, the Supreme Court is hearing arguments in a religious liberty case
00:17:07.900
challenging Colorado's so-called anti-discrimination laws, which require Christian business owners to
00:17:12.560
participate in gay weddings. Uh, the challenge is being brought by a Christian web designer who
00:17:17.480
doesn't want to be forced to design a website to, uh, advertise or facilitate a gay wedding. Um,
00:17:23.920
and the oral arguments were, were pretty interesting. So I want you to, we'll play a couple of clips.
00:17:28.720
I want you to listen first to Kentonji Brown Jackson. And, uh, she, she manages to rope the film
00:17:34.520
It's a Wonderful Life into some kind of strange hypothetical, which is meant to prove that
00:17:40.540
Christian business owners shouldn't have religious liberty. And, and, uh, it's, you know, it's,
00:17:45.860
it's hard to connect these dots, but she tries it. Let's listen.
00:17:47.840
Hurley did the exact same analysis to say, is the parade organizers otherwise,
00:17:53.580
but Hurley was a private association. It wasn't a public business. What I'm asking you
00:17:58.280
is I have a public business. I'm a photographer. My belief is that, you know, uh, I'm doing,
00:18:04.600
it's a wonderful life scenes. That's what I'm offering. Okay. I want to do video depictions
00:18:09.720
of It's a Wonderful Life. And, um, I, knowing that movie very well, I want to be authentic.
00:18:15.620
And so only white children and families can be, uh, uh, uh, customers for that particular product.
00:18:23.840
Everybody else can, I'll give to everybody else. I'll sell them anything they want,
00:18:27.740
just not the It's a Wonderful Life depictions. Um, I'm expressing something, right? For your purposes,
00:18:34.360
is that, that speech. What about, uh, what's the other step? It's speech. And I can say
00:18:40.520
anti-discrimination laws can't make me sell the It's a Wonderful Life package to, uh, non-white
00:18:47.800
individuals. In the same way, I would say, first of all, in the same way that this court,
00:18:53.960
when there is a message and a status and it's overlapping, the court would say that message
00:18:59.000
wins in that instance. So I don't think that the message. So I don't have to sell it to white.
00:19:02.540
I don't think that that message is in that hypothetical.
00:19:06.060
Okay. Uh, we'll talk more about that in a second. So there's one other clip I want to play, but, uh,
00:19:10.400
so she's, she's imagining here a scenario where a photographer is doing some holiday photos
00:19:15.600
and has different packages available, uh, which, you know, as photographers do. And, uh, but this
00:19:21.280
photographer has, has the It's a Wonderful Life package, but you have to be white. So maybe there's
00:19:27.300
a black family that says, oh, the It's a Wonderful Life, uh, photos. We'd like to take some, sorry,
00:19:32.540
uh, you gotta be white for those. Uh, it's only for white people. Can I interest you with the,
00:19:35.940
uh, in the Black Panther package? That's, uh, that would be more suitable for you. This,
00:19:39.440
this is the, it's the situation she's imagining because right, that's, that's going to happen
00:19:44.820
somewhere. Um, and she also talks about this, this, this, this concept of a public business.
00:19:53.400
I don't even know what that means. It's it. We're talking about a private business.
00:19:57.160
What do you mean public business? They've invented like this category. It's a public
00:20:02.420
business. Well, it's public in the sense that the business exists in the public.
00:20:09.080
Okay. So what she's postulating is that, is it what would qualify as a private business?
00:20:15.080
If a web designer is, it's, she, she has her business. And as far as I know, it's just her
00:20:21.200
running. So it's a one woman show web designer. And if that doesn't qualify as a private,
00:20:27.160
private business, then what the hell does? Is it a business that is not open to anyone in the
00:20:33.580
public? So it's a business, but you won't sell anything to anyone or provide any services to
00:20:40.240
anyone. It's that sort of business. Now, just because you are a business that offers a good
00:20:46.440
or service doesn't make you public. It's still a private business because it is run by a private
00:20:51.640
individual. Um, anyway, we'll talk more about that, but there's another hypothetical she offers
00:20:58.820
and, uh, she has another sort of interesting business proposal. Uh, let's listen to this.
00:21:05.420
She is implicitly saying, you know, by selling this, I'm going to be, uh, violating my own beliefs.
00:21:13.480
Um, so let me just ask you another quick hypo. So I, I'm trying to understand the extent to which
00:21:18.900
this matters that she's a speaker, um, as opposed to a restaurant. So I sell food and one line of
00:21:25.520
products that I make is from scratch for particular customers that are based on my grandmother's
00:21:31.620
cherished family recipes. My dearly departed grandmother was clear that she only wanted to
00:21:36.840
provide this kind of nourishment for people who share our same religious heritage. So I call these
00:21:42.860
products, grandma Helen's Protestant provisions. And I sit with each customer who comes in and I hear
00:21:50.120
about their faith and their family, and I customize the recipe for them after having this discussion.
00:21:56.960
So the food is not expressive, right? I'm not speaking in my food, but I am trying to convey
00:22:03.500
that only certain people, um, get to partake in this product. Can I do that consistent with the
00:22:11.160
first amendment or not? No. And, and in this situation, as you said, the, in terms of a
00:22:16.100
caterer, the caterer is not engaging in speech. Okay. So there's, there's the business proposal
00:22:21.620
right there. So we've heard enough of that. Uh, I kind of liked that business idea, you know,
00:22:26.700
I'm fine with it. So you got a, a restaurant, you know, a chef and offers different, a different
00:22:34.260
menu items depending on your religion. So this is, these are the Protestant provisions. And if you're
00:22:39.840
sitting down, the waiter goes up to you, asks you about your faith. And if you reveal yourself to
00:22:45.600
be Protestant, then you get access to the whole menu. If you're Catholic, then, uh, they like will
00:22:51.060
give you a, an unleavened wafer. They say, well, this is what you're allowed to have because you're
00:22:55.260
Catholic. Uh, and if you're, if you're atheist, they, uh, invite you to the back in the kitchen and
00:23:01.400
they, they, uh, they have a, uh, they burn you at the stake actually back in the kitchen. Um,
00:23:06.200
they're not going to serve you then. It's like, they're not going to burn you and then serve you.
00:23:09.320
I'm saying they burn you at the stake and then they would, uh, uh, you know, maybe bury you in
00:23:13.480
the back or something. So that's, that's the business idea that she's, because that's totally
00:23:18.060
realistic, right? That would definitely happen in reality. This is the reason why I like these
00:23:28.540
hypotheticals. And there, there are many others like this. There were other hypotheticals that, uh,
00:23:32.760
Kentonja Brown-Jackson offered, uh, we've seen this on cable news when they're coming up with all
00:23:37.080
these, well, if we allow this, then what if this other thing happens? It shows how desperate they
00:23:43.740
are to come up with some kind of slip, some sort of plausible slippery slope scenario.
00:23:51.340
They are desperate to come up with something and they can't do it. They've had many shots at this
00:23:57.940
thing. And they can't come up with any actually plausible slippery slope scenario for it. We start
00:24:03.700
with giving basic religious freedom to private business owners. We give basic religious freedom
00:24:10.040
to a woman who designs websites. And then next thing you know, total chaos ensues. They're not able to
00:24:18.220
bridge that gap. They can't explain it. And so they end up with all these hypotheticals of things that
00:24:22.000
would never, ever really happen. And it is very possible also to separate the religious liberty
00:24:32.940
cases from all of these others, because there's a crucial distinction. We talked about it yesterday.
00:24:39.840
And in my mind, the crucial distinction is not even that it's based on religious conviction. That's
00:24:45.040
got nothing to do with it. The crucial distinction is that in all of the, all of the, the, the real life
00:24:51.260
cases, whether it's the ones that have ended up in front of the Supreme court or other ones that
00:24:55.200
haven't made it to the Supreme court and all of the real life cases, they are centered around gay
00:25:00.360
weddings. And it is about, it's about private business owners. It's about government entities
00:25:06.860
trying to force private business owners to participate in an event that they object to.
00:25:14.380
That's the difference. It's a very clear distinction. So it is easy to delineate between
00:25:23.140
a web designer doesn't want to, doesn't want to make, she doesn't want to be a participant in this
00:25:28.200
event and making a website for the event is, is to participate in it to some extent. She doesn't
00:25:33.060
want to do that. It's easy to distinguish between that and someone who says, oh, we're not going to,
00:25:36.640
we're not going to serve you any food at all because of your religious convictions or you can't
00:25:44.540
get these, uh, these photographs taken because you're black. Okay. You know, if someone is sitting
00:25:51.460
down in your restaurant and they're just trying to have lunch, that's not you part and you serve them
00:25:57.140
food. That's not you participating in some kind of formal event, unless you want to call lunch itself
00:26:02.080
a formal event. Um, the photographer taking pictures of a black family, that's not them
00:26:10.120
participating in some kind of event. However, if, if the black family or white doesn't matter the race
00:26:16.340
of the family, if a family said to them, we want you to come to this actual event that we're putting
00:26:22.220
on, we want you to take photographs at this event. Then of course the photographer should have every
00:26:26.980
right to say, well, what is the event? I'm not just going to like, I want to know about the event.
00:26:30.340
And if it's an event that I object to, whether you agree with my objections or not, obviously you
00:26:35.220
don't, cause you're the one throwing the event. If I object to the, that I'm not going to, I don't
00:26:38.300
want to be a part of it. And it wouldn't just, there are actual plausible scenarios. So the left,
00:26:46.160
they're trying to come up with their slippery slope and it's completely ridiculous. They have all
00:26:50.180
these things that would never happen. The slippery slope on the other end is, is actually plausible.
00:26:54.920
So if we say that, uh, the cake baker or the photographer or the web designer doesn't have
00:27:03.780
the right to say no to the gay wedding, what happens next? What's the slippery slope there?
00:27:09.620
Well, you don't even need a slippery slope because we've, we've already extinguished religious
00:27:13.700
liberty. So that's, that's not even a slope. We don't have to project about when that will
00:27:18.800
happen. We've already done it, but we can see where it would go next. For example,
00:27:25.160
like we talked about yesterday, divorce parties are a real thing that actually happen. And people,
00:27:32.020
and people have invitations for them. They make cakes for them. They have, they have photographs
00:27:36.820
taken. Should you be required to go and partake in a divorce party because you own a business?
00:27:43.800
What if it's some, what if you're a, a, a liberal business owner and some, one of these alleged far
00:27:53.420
right extremist groups comes along and says, Hey, we're having a big celebration. We need you to come
00:27:58.440
take pictures. We need you to bake a cake. Should you be required to be a part of it?
00:28:03.960
I mean, what if it's a speaking of far right extremists, you know, pro-lifers, far right,
00:28:11.380
dangerous, extreme, that's what we are. We're far right, dangerous extremists. Well, what if you're
00:28:14.780
a pro, a pro abortion, uh, Baker and, and, uh, Roe v. Wade was just overturned. And I, and I come to
00:28:23.960
you and I say, I need you to make a cake customized cake. And it needs to say on it, um, uh, hooray for
00:28:31.700
the end of abortion or the hooray for the end of, of Roe. Should I be able to compel you to make that
00:28:39.580
cake? If you say, I don't believe in that. I don't want to, I don't want to make that. You can,
00:28:43.280
there's a million other bakers out there. Go to one of them. Nope. You have to do it. You are forced
00:28:47.500
to do it. Get back there, slave and make it. But very, very easy to, to distinguish between these
00:28:55.840
two. But you shouldn't even need to, because as I said before, it's, it's, uh, you know,
00:29:04.340
the, the real answer, and this is not the answer the Supreme Court is going to, is going to arrive
00:29:08.200
at, but the, the correct answer is, is actually kind of the absolute position that you should be
00:29:15.180
able to deny service to anyone for whatever reason you want. And that should be it. Freedom
00:29:20.840
of association. You know, you shouldn't be required as a private business owner to provide a
00:29:25.100
serve, good or service to anyone, whatever your reason is for not wanting to. And if you have truly
00:29:30.740
awful, bigoted reasons, if you do hang up the sign that says no blacks allowed, no one is going to do
00:29:36.740
that. No business would actually do that. But if there was one in the whole country that did,
00:29:43.000
they would be out of business in 30 minutes because of it.
00:29:45.560
All right. So the White House has responded to questions about the Twitter files that were
00:29:53.060
released showing that the, um, Biden campaign and other political operatives had information
00:29:58.380
about Hunter Biden's laptop suppressed on Twitter at the behest, at their behest rather. So Karen
00:30:03.480
Jean-Pierre says that, uh, well, she says this was inappropriate and she issued a formal apology
00:30:08.440
from the White House. Just kidding. Of course, this is what she actually said.
00:30:11.200
Is it the White House view that these decisions were made appropriately in light of what has
00:30:17.140
come out? Which decisions? By whom? By Twitter. By Twitter on? Okay. So look,
00:30:24.160
we see this as a, uh, an interesting or a coincidence, if I may, that, uh, uh, that he would so haphazardly,
00:30:33.040
uh, Twitter was so haphazardly pushed this distraction, uh, that is a, that is a full of, uh, old news,
00:30:39.540
if you think about it. Um, and, uh, at the same time, Twitter is facing very real and very serious
00:30:45.660
questions, uh, about the rising volume of anger, hate and antisemitism on their platform and, uh, how
00:30:52.860
they're letting it happen. And, uh, you know, the president said last week, more leaders need to speak
00:30:58.700
out and reject this. And, uh, it's a very alarming and very dangerous.
00:31:04.960
Old news. She says it's old news. It's old news that we rigged the election by suppressing relevant
00:31:10.140
information and lying about it. Her defense is that, yeah, it happened, but it was, you know,
00:31:15.160
it's old news. We already knew about that. It's ancient history a couple of years ago.
00:31:20.000
And what is this rising hate claim? We hear it again, rising hate, but as we talked about in the
00:31:26.620
opening, there is rising hate in this country, but it's not the kind of hate she's talking about.
00:31:30.900
It's not the hate that she would acknowledge. How do you measure hate on Twitter? Cause she,
00:31:35.460
they're specifically telling us that there's more hate, there's more hate on Twitter than there was
00:31:40.540
before Musk took over. How do you measure that? What is the, what's the, uh, what, what,
00:31:45.860
what units of measurement do we use to measure hate on a social media platform? How do, how exactly do we
00:31:53.280
do that? Well, there's a, if you, if you measure on Twitter now, there's a, there, there are 89 hate
00:31:58.640
units, whereas before there was a 32. When was the utopian time of no hate or low hate on Twitter?
00:32:08.260
When was that exactly? Give me the, give me the years when that was the case. We can go back and,
00:32:13.480
and, uh, scroll through some, some tweets to see if that's actually true. Speaking of Twitter, I also
00:32:18.940
wanted to play this for you. Uh, maybe you've seen some of these clips. Uh, Yoel Roth is a former
00:32:24.440
Twitter official, former head of the trust and safety division. And he was at a conference
00:32:29.280
recently about, uh, conversations on democracy in the digital age, where he talks about the
00:32:36.500
justification, talks about many things. Um, one of those things is the justification for banning Trump
00:32:42.740
from social media. And, uh, it all has to do with the trauma that he and other members of, uh, of the
00:32:49.240
Twitter staff suffered. Let's listen to that. Donald Trump. That one, I don't think was a mistake.
00:32:55.300
January 6th. So it, it starts on the 6th, but it also starts prior to that. That's correct. In
00:33:01.220
the weeks leading up in the weeks between election day and January 6th, Twitter moderated hundreds. I think
00:33:09.300
the, the, the final number ended up was like 140 separate tweets from just at real Donald Trump
00:33:15.560
that violated various policies. Yes. He was good at that. Integrity policy. Every morning it was a new
00:33:21.220
tweet. Much of it was recirculating some of the same narratives and all of it was focused on the
00:33:28.200
ultimately false claim that the 2020 election had been stolen. And so we're going into the events of
00:33:34.900
the 6th. And there's that context. There's the centrality of his account. So you let him get
00:33:40.860
away with it for a long time. In other words. Well, we'd been enforcing on it, right? So we
00:33:45.520
restricted the tweets. We put warnings on them. You couldn't like them. You couldn't retweet them.
00:33:50.300
Um, but we didn't ban him because it was a relevant part of a moment in American politics,
00:33:58.000
right? The events of the 6th happen. And, um, if you talk to content moderators who worked on
00:34:04.820
January 6th, myself included, the word that nearly everybody uses is trauma. We, we experienced
00:34:11.300
those events, not some of us as Americans, but not just as Americans or as citizens, but as people
00:34:17.020
working on sort of how to prevent harm on the internet, we saw the clearest possible example of
00:34:23.520
what it looked like for things to move from online to off. We saw what was, we saw the way that rhetoric
00:34:30.320
about a stolen election was being mobilized on sites like the Donald dot win. Sure. We saw the
00:34:36.060
trafficking of this content. Terrible, uh, very, very tragic story there. So forget about, you know,
00:34:40.900
forget about, uh, young men storming the beaches of Normandy on D day. Um, that's not, you know, that's,
00:34:48.500
that's not the kind of trauma we're talking about in modern, in the modern world. People that are suffering
00:34:53.880
trauma are those who were content moderators on January 6th. That's the story. Our grandparents
00:35:00.840
told stories of world war two. Uh, but for our generation, we will be telling our grandchildren
00:35:07.080
stories of, um, you know, moderating content on January 6th. Traumatized. No, you're not traumatized.
00:35:16.140
First of all, you have no trauma. You're just a huge, fragile, overgrown baby. That's what you are.
00:35:21.340
You are an emotionally manipulative child. You know how to define trauma just for the record.
00:35:28.360
What is trauma? Well, here's how, cause I looked it up. Here's how the American psychological
00:35:32.580
association defines it. Not that I see them as a much of an authority on most things these days,
00:35:36.640
but here's what they say. If you're curious, trauma is an emotional response to a terrible
00:35:41.720
event, like an accident, rape, or natural disaster. Immediately after the event, shock and denial are
00:35:48.560
typical longer term reactions include unpredictable emotions, flashbacks, strained relationships,
00:35:53.720
and physical symptoms like headaches or nausea. Now you notice, first of all, that, uh, trauma is
00:36:00.120
associated with events that you were a part of. So you had a terrible accident. You were raped. Uh,
00:36:06.780
you were involved in a natural disaster. And that's where the trauma comes from. Now we have people
00:36:12.100
talking about being traumatized by things that they were nowhere in the vicinity of.
00:36:17.420
And are you having flashbacks now because of news reports about January 6th? Are you experiencing
00:36:21.980
headaches and nausea two years out still today because some people trespassed in the Capitol
00:36:27.640
while you were thousands of miles away in San Francisco? Is that so really?
00:36:33.220
And besides, how was your personal trauma, even if you were traumatized, which you weren't,
00:36:42.140
how is that a reason to de-platform someone? Your own personal trauma is, means that you can
00:36:47.480
de-platform someone. Uh, he also talked a little bit about Babylon Bee and how they ended up being
00:36:55.340
de-platformed. Let's hear some of that. Okay. Babylon Bee, which is what got him to buy the thing,
00:37:01.700
I think. That's the, that's right. The one which is, which was not particularly funny. The Babylon
00:37:07.180
Bee's man of the year is Rachel Levine. Not funny. Yeah. Um, and, and you can ask. I didn't agree
00:37:13.920
they should have taken that down, but go ahead. You know, it's interesting. Uh, it's interesting
00:37:18.460
to think about what the competing tensions around that are. And I, I want to start by acknowledging
00:37:23.360
that, um, the targeting and the victimization of the trans community on Twitter is very real,
00:37:28.600
very life-threatening and extraordinarily serious. Um, we have seen from a number of Twitter accounts,
00:37:36.660
including libs of TikTok, notably that there are orchestrated campaigns that particularly are
00:37:42.220
singling out a group that is already particularly vulnerable within society. And so, yeah, not only is
00:37:48.600
it not funny, but it is dangerous and it does contribute to an environment that makes people
00:37:54.420
unsafe in the world. So let's start from a premise that it's fucked up, but then again, let, let's look
00:38:01.420
at what Twitter's written policies are. Twitter's written policies prohibit misgendering, full stop.
00:38:08.460
And the Babylon Bee, in the name of satire, misgendered Admiral Rachel Levine.
00:38:15.220
Nominally, but it's still misgendering. Okay. And, you know, you can, there can be a very long and
00:38:22.360
academic discussion of, of satire and sort of the lines there. Interestingly, uh, Apple tried to tease
00:38:29.080
out this question of satire and political commentary in their own guidelines, which I think are, are also
00:38:34.000
fraught. But, you know, we landed on the side of enforcing our rules as written. And that's how it got
00:38:40.380
bought by Elon Musk, just in case you're interested. Um, he was mad about that. I remember that.
00:38:44.560
Yeah. We will never be a thriving society or civilization, as long as people like that
00:38:51.820
are running things. And as it stands right now, that is that people like that are running things.
00:38:59.500
These, uh, emotionally fragile, utterly narcissistic, um, cry bullies.
00:39:11.340
And, and also, do any of them strike you, either one of the people on the stage, do they strike you
00:39:17.380
as, uh, experts on comedy? It's not funny. That's not funny at all. If you have, if you have an idea
00:39:26.960
for a joke, are you going to run it by those two? And of course, it's also not true. So what it's,
00:39:33.640
it's being confirmed here. And there are many other cultures, you don't have to play them all.
00:39:36.220
So you've probably seen enough. It's being confirmed. What we already knew, which is that
00:39:39.720
this was, that they were moderating, they're moderating things, uh, intensely ideological,
00:39:45.700
their moderation policies, and also based on emotion, based on the emotional whims of whoever
00:39:50.700
happens to be, um, in charge of moderating. So that's, that's what's being, that's what's
00:39:56.840
being confirmed there. We should also say for the record that this nonsense about it's a life
00:40:01.120
threatening. The trans people are targeted by, by, on Twitter, it's threatening their lives.
00:40:06.900
You got to explain that to me exactly. How, how is your life threatened by a tweet?
00:40:11.800
Now your life can be threatened by actual death threats, but the thing about the trans community
00:40:17.820
on Twitter is that they are much more likely to be sending the death threat than to be receiving it.
00:40:22.400
I mean, far in a way, you want to talk about abuse and hate and all that. The most abusive,
00:40:31.000
hateful, vicious group of people on Twitter. And in fact, across the entire country are trans activists,
00:40:39.300
not even close. Of course they're going to be vicious and hateful. I mean, think about how,
00:40:46.940
how much they've been empowered. And these are mostly the, mostly men.
00:40:53.020
You know, it's mostly men identifying as women who are the most absolutely vicious
00:40:59.520
because they've been empowered in this way. They've already been empowered to appropriate
00:41:04.500
the identities of women. They've already been, you know, they, they've, they've declared that
00:41:10.700
they want to act out their fetishes in public and, and, and, and the entire culture has bowed before
00:41:17.060
them in that regard. Already narcissistic going in. And so we've only, we've only just pumped up
00:41:26.920
their egos even more and their, their sense of entitlement and, and all of that. And that comes
00:41:34.000
through in the way that they operate on Twitter. All right. I gotta, I, I, I do need to mention
00:41:39.620
this because this is the most important story of the day. And every day I'm reminded that I am an
00:41:43.320
old man and I'm getting older. And this is my reminder for today. CNN has the report, global pop
00:41:50.060
sensation. Blackpink have been chosen as Time Magazine's 2022 entertainer of the year, making
00:41:56.900
the four woman band, the second K-pop artist to earn the title after BTS in 2020. Selected by YG
00:42:04.680
Entertainment, a big South Korean label that screens performers for star quality and trains them
00:42:09.160
intensively. The quartet, Jenny, Jesu, Lisa, and Rosé found international stardom quickly after their
00:42:15.840
2016 debut. Their first LP, the album, sold more than 1 million copies in less than a month after
00:42:21.340
2020 release. Now I've honestly never heard of this group. Um, they are entertainers of the year,
00:42:25.960
global sensations. I've never heard of them. I've been deprived of this sensational music.
00:42:32.520
I'm pretty upset about that. I gotta be honest. They, they named their first album album. So that
00:42:38.920
shows you that these girls are creative geniuses. And I'd like to learn more about them, learn more
00:42:43.760
about these artists. So I thought that we could together listen to what is, I guess, their biggest
00:42:47.680
hit to this point. It's called Pink Venom. So Blackpink, Pink Venom. They certainly seem to enjoy
00:42:53.680
the color pink. What else do they have to say? And I was really hoping that we could listen to some,
00:43:12.880
Kick in the door, wave in the cocoa. Popcorn이 난 챙겨 껴들 생각 말고. I talk to talk. Runways I walk, walk.
00:43:21.460
눈 감고 pop, pop, pop. 안 봐도 참. By one and two, by two.
00:43:28.480
가짜 쇼, 지금 화렬. It makes no sense. You couldn't get a dollar out of me.
00:44:01.620
Blackpink, Blackpink, Blackpink, Blackpink, Blackpink.
00:44:11.140
Makes no sense. You couldn't get a dollar out of me.
00:44:34.700
And maybe that causes you to fall into despair and wish you were never born.
00:44:38.060
Maybe it makes death by woodchipper seem almost appealing by comparison.
00:44:41.900
Maybe, or maybe you're like me and you listen to the words and you hear the deeper meaning.
00:44:46.680
Like, they say, they say Blackpink, Blackpink, Blackpink, Blackpink, Blackpink.
00:44:52.380
They're boldly announcing, proclaiming their existence, their selfhood.
00:44:57.040
They're standing, staring into the void, saying, I am here.
00:45:04.040
And then they say, kicking the door, waving the cocoa.
00:45:08.300
There are multiple interpretations for every, every verse.
00:45:28.080
I mean, isn't, is not life itself a battle between joy and tragedy?
00:45:34.460
Is it a battle or is it a game, an interplay, a dance?
00:45:41.460
I want you to think about one other line, because this is the best.
00:45:43.060
They say, straight to your dome, like, whoa, whoa, whoa.
00:45:54.540
Because in modern culture, we're constantly bombarded by information, by noise, by messages,
00:46:15.920
Blackpink doesn't have an answer, because life is not about finding the answer.
00:46:20.840
It's about inhabiting the moment for all its pain and joy that it might bring.
00:46:30.900
Just insightful, beautiful, playful, yet tragic.
00:46:35.980
They are the entertainers of the year, and deservedly so.
00:46:44.300
Black Rifle Coffee Company is helping you knock out your holiday shopping with a ton of awesome new products this year.
00:46:58.540
Shop the best brewing gear, thermoses, mugs, and apparel designed for folks who love country and coffee.
00:47:05.260
Black Rifle Coffee sources the most exotic roast from around the globe.
00:47:08.860
All coffee is roasted here in the U.S. by veteran-led teams of coffee experts.
00:47:13.080
You can stuff your Christmas stockings with the latest roast from America's coffee for 10% off with my code Walsh.
00:47:18.920
Better yet, sign your Secret Santa up for a coffee club subscription.
00:47:22.940
Imagine the joy of a pre-scheduled coffee delivery, your favorite roast, when you need them most.
00:47:30.400
Black Rifle Coffee is a veteran-founded and operated company.
00:47:34.120
They take pride in serving coffee and culture to people who love America.
00:47:38.020
Every purchase you make with Black Rifle helps support veteran and first responder causes.
00:47:44.460
Use promo code Walsh for 10% off coffee, coffee gear, apparel, or when you sign up for a new coffee club subscription.
00:47:50.000
That's BlackRifleCoffee.com with promo code Walsh for 10% off Black Rifle Coffee, supporting veterans and America's coffee.
00:48:01.080
I guess TikTok having a whole different limited educational version for children in China wasn't a good enough hint for how detrimental it can be for youth if unrestricted.
00:48:09.180
You really need to spell things out for people nowadays.
00:48:14.120
If you go to a restaurant and you hear that none of the people working at the restaurant would ever eat the food, then that should really tell you something.
00:48:28.440
They're serving this dish to our kids here in the West, but they would never eat it themselves.
00:48:32.620
So they have a limited version of TikTok that is, as Chadius points out, it's educational, it's very toned down, very educational.
00:48:43.320
And yet they ship a totally different version to our country and to Western countries.
00:48:50.360
And then we, as the incredibly stupid parents, say, oh yeah, sure, go ahead.
00:48:57.980
Here's a phone with full unrestricted internet access.
00:49:00.880
Go ahead and spend six hours a day on this app from China that the Chinese won't even let their kids use, at least not in the form that I'm giving it to you right now.
00:49:09.720
Tommy Wiseau says, letting your children have a TikTok account is child abuse.
00:49:24.620
You know, I do think, and I don't say that lightly, but it is actually abusive.
00:49:28.940
To let your child be on TikTok is, I don't know how else to put it.
00:49:36.760
There's no chance of it doing anything but hurting them.
00:49:45.840
It's the only question of how much does it hurt them.
00:49:53.840
Shin to Skull says, some interesting usernames today.
00:49:57.020
Matt, I remember that when I was young in the 80s and 90s, dangerous and stupid stunts and dares were performed in front of a live group or crowd.
00:50:04.420
But there's a better chance someone would dissuade a potentially deadly stunt,
00:50:07.400
or if someone was in dire need during or after a stunt or dare, people were there to step in and help.
00:50:13.140
These kids are alone in their room with no other voice of reason or backup on hand.
00:50:20.100
Yeah, this is the point I was trying to point to yesterday.
00:50:21.920
And I think it's a very good point that we should think more about because, you know, if we're talking about the blackout game, the choking dare, whatever you want to call it,
00:50:31.480
and there were some comments pointing out, as I acknowledged yesterday, that TikTok didn't invent this.
00:50:36.900
The kids today that are doing this choke out thing are not the first ones to do it.
00:50:43.660
I never did it myself because it never seemed appealing to me.
00:50:47.260
Like, being choked never seemed appealing to me.
00:50:56.980
The difference is that, as you point out, it's a very important difference.
00:51:02.540
That, yeah, kids have always been doing stupid things, participating in dumb dares and stunts and everything, especially boys, but girls as well.
00:51:12.960
But with social media, it becomes a delivery mechanism for this stuff.
00:51:21.580
But then also, oftentimes kids are participating in these dangerous stunts and dares in isolation.
00:51:28.920
They're recording it so that they can post it online if they survive whatever stupid thing they're doing.
00:51:35.760
Whereas in the past, yeah, you know, because you only do this for an audience.
00:51:41.460
It's like because it's peer pressure and it's an audience and they're trying to get attention, like kids always have.
00:51:46.140
But in the past, if you wanted to have an audience and you wanted to get attention, then the audience was going to be in the room with you.
00:51:51.940
And so at the very least, if something went catastrophically wrong, you would hope that there'd be someone there to go get an adult, to call 911, whatever.
00:52:01.900
And oftentimes, you know, you put it in front of the audience after it's done.
00:52:07.500
Or even if it's being live streamed, they're not physically there.
00:52:12.880
Finally, Joshua says, wow, lol, I've been disappointed so many times today.
00:52:27.120
I don't know what part of the show this is in reference to.
00:52:31.420
Tell me it's because I said that my kids believe in Santa Claus.
00:52:35.000
I'm sorry we have to part ways, but please tell me that's the reason.
00:52:42.360
J-Man says, Matt would be a brutal dictator, probably would have to live exactly like he sees fit or not at all.
00:52:50.540
That's the whole theocratic fascist dictator deal.
00:52:55.120
The new Jeremy's range of hair, skin, and body products is here.
00:52:59.260
And no one will enjoy gifting it more this Christmas than me and the sweet baby gang.
00:53:04.380
Not just because gift bundles are 30% off right now, which is a great deal.
00:53:08.140
But because the new Jeremy's body wash and facial cleanser are made with bamboo charcoal.
00:53:16.480
That's right, the charcoal of bamboo plants, which is a thing, I guess.
00:53:21.060
The only thing standing between pandas and their well-deserved demise is bamboo.
00:53:26.540
So we're going to chop down all the bamboo, put it in a body wash, and all the pandas finally die as they deserve.
00:53:36.380
This Christmas, your family will love receiving a Jeremy's Razors gift bundle.
00:53:40.420
What's not to love about tea tree and peppermint shampoo and conditioner, oatmeal, and citrus body soap.
00:53:48.460
Every morning, as your family enjoys the freshness of an aloe vera-infused cleanser, you'll have the satisfaction of knowing that they're starving the world's remaining pandas to death.
00:53:57.920
And they're all going to die, not just die, but die agonizing slow deaths.
00:54:05.520
Give yourself the gift of giving Jeremy's 100% woke-free products and get 30% off gift bundles before December 15th to arrive in time for Christmas.
00:54:13.920
Just go to dailywire.com slash walsh and kill all the pandas.
00:54:19.800
You know, it's been nearly three years since Meghan Markle and Prince Harry dramatically announced that they were stepping down from their roles in the royal family and moving to America.
00:54:32.060
They said that they valued their privacy and could no longer tolerate living under the white-hot glare of the spotlight.
00:54:39.080
Their stated reasoning may have been, you know, convincing to you at the time if you were dumb enough to believe that Meghan Markle is the sort of girl who marries into royalty because she values her privacy.
00:54:49.120
But if you're at least intelligent enough to score higher than an earthworm on an IQ test, then you knew that Harry and Meghan were seeking attention, not shirking from it.
00:54:59.240
And if you're in this latter category, the smarter-than-an-earthworm demographic, you have not then been surprised to find that this private and humble ex-royal couple has spent the last couple of years seeking attention wherever they can find it.
00:55:13.760
They've done multiple tell-all interviews, one conducted by Oprah.
00:55:16.680
They've signed book deals, they've signed multi-million dollar podcast deals.
00:55:20.700
Meghan has posed for literally every magazine cover in existence outside of maybe Car and Driver magazine, although maybe she got around to that too.
00:55:28.520
They have sought a very peculiar form of privacy indeed.
00:55:33.060
A form that involves appearing on every sort of medium, willfully attracting attention, and then monetizing that attention.
00:55:40.200
This is the kind of private life they wish to lead.
00:55:42.140
And now they're going to continue their privacy tour by starring in a Netflix docu-series, which premieres this weekend.
00:55:49.660
It's really hard to look back on it now and go, what on earth happened?
00:55:58.060
That is the sound of hearts breaking all around the world.
00:56:11.900
You know, there's leaking, but there's also planting of stories.
00:56:14.580
There was a war against Meghan to suit other people's genders.
00:56:24.520
The pain and the suffering of women marrying into this institution, this feeding frenzy.
00:56:49.760
How many times are they going to milk this exact same?
00:56:55.520
We've heard you tell the supposed full truth about 46 times in the last year.
00:57:01.980
So I believe the official title of this is Give Me Attention, the movie.
00:57:05.640
Either that or they're just calling it Harry and Meghan, which is the same idea either way.
00:57:08.520
Of course, everything that Meghan Markle is involved in, starting with her marriage,
00:57:16.580
In fact, eagle-eyed viewers have noticed that between the two main trailers released for the series,
00:57:22.240
at least three of the images in these trailers of media harassing and hounding the couple
00:57:26.960
are taken out of context from events where neither Harry nor Meghan were even present.
00:57:34.880
A photograph of paparazzi appears in the first trailer, just before a clip of Harry,
00:57:39.920
saying he had to do everything that he could to protect his family.
00:57:43.080
However, it is said to have actually been taken at a Harry Potter premiere,
00:57:46.780
five years before the Duke and Duchess even met.
00:57:49.600
A clip in the second trailer, which apparently illustrates paparazzi hounding the couple,
00:57:53.080
was actually taken when former model Katie Price arrived at Crawley Magistrates Court last December.
00:57:58.660
Shortly before that shot, the Duke of Sussex is heard speaking of the pain and suffering of women
00:58:02.740
marrying into the royal family, adding that he did not want history to repeat itself,
00:58:07.060
as a clip shows men apparently chasing someone with cameras.
00:58:09.680
The clip was, in fact, recorded as Price arrived to be sentenced over a drunk driving charge.
00:58:15.100
One section of the second trailer also features clips of reporters, photographers, and cameramen
00:58:20.780
However, one media crush seen by viewers was not targeting the royal family, the royal couple,
00:58:25.980
but rather President Donald Trump's former lawyer, Michael Cohen, leaving his New York apartment in 2019
00:58:31.440
to serve time in prison for financial crimes, campaign finance violations, and lying to Congress.
00:58:36.720
So it's pretty hilarious that they crammed three misleading images just into the trailer.
00:58:42.260
Who knows how many lies they'll be able to pack into the full series?
00:58:45.580
It's also grotesque, but that's par for the course with Harry and Meghan.
00:58:48.800
And these two may have ostensibly stepped down from their royal occupation, but only to exchange
00:58:54.900
one throne and one crown for another, because they are now king and queen victim.
00:59:01.780
And it is a symbolic, figurehead-type position, just like the one they left.
00:59:07.380
But it also carries a considerable amount of power in our culture, not to mention profit potential.
00:59:11.520
They are, in many ways, the perfect representation of victimhood in modern Western culture.
00:59:19.700
This is the service they're providing us, is by showing us what victimhood really entails these days.
00:59:28.740
Immensely privileged, absurdly wealthy, living lives of unimaginable comfort, surrounded by ostentatious luxury.
00:59:37.540
They're celebrated by the media, they're fawned over, they're applauded, yet they can't stop whining.
00:59:46.780
None of their riches, no amount of public adulation will convince these spoiled, self-centered brats
00:59:52.200
that they're anything but oppressed and downtrodden.
00:59:56.820
And what's more, this is another hallmark of modern victimhood,
00:59:59.720
they maintain their victimhood delusions even as they viciously attack the ones they claim to be helplessly victimized by.
01:00:05.940
So Harry has turned on his own family, aired their dirty laundry, monetized its airing,
01:00:12.640
and yet still pretends to be somehow the injured party.
01:00:22.600
Yes, in the sense that Meghan Markle is a sociopath who has probably never experienced a fully authentic human emotion in her life.
01:00:28.480
But no in the sense that, you know, to the extent that they can feel emotions at all,
01:00:35.940
Because part of the curse of being a narcissist is that you're never satisfied.
01:00:40.720
No matter how much attention you get, it's never enough.
01:00:44.380
So long as you remain still standing on a planet that revolves around the sun rather than around you.
01:00:49.920
So long as there are people out there living lives that have nothing to do with you,
01:00:54.460
and talking about things other than you, and prioritizing their own well-being over yours.
01:01:00.100
So long as any of that remains the case, you will feel persecuted.
01:01:09.000
There are no happy narcissists, no content narcissists.
01:01:12.660
Whatever they have, they should always have more in their minds.
01:01:16.420
Whatever anyone else does or says, they should have always done or said something different.
01:01:24.740
Everyone is whispering about them behind their backs, they think.
01:01:30.220
Our culture of victimhood is really then a culture of narcissism.
01:01:35.380
And Harry and Meghan are its perfect representatives and creations.
01:01:44.620
And that'll do it for this portion of the show as we move over to the members block.