The Matt Walsh Show - December 15, 2022


Ep. 1082 - Yes, I Am Guilty Of ‘Hate Speech’


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 1 minute

Words per Minute

169.77264

Word Count

10,437

Sentence Count

739

Misogynist Sentences

31

Hate Speech Sentences

36


Summary

Today on the Matt Walsh Show: Democrats in the House hold a hearing on alleged anti-gay violence, blaming this made-up epidemic on hate speech. Also, the Senate moves to ban TikTok on government devices, but really it should be banned on all devices nationwide. So when are we going to do that? A new film starring AOC earns a staggering $10,000 in its first week of release across the entire country. Plus, Nancy Pelosi is caught on film degrading and dehumanizing white males. But what else is new?


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Today on the Matt Wall Show, Democrats in the House hold a hearing on alleged anti-LGBT
00:00:04.740 violence, blaming this made-up epidemic on hate speech. But what is hate speech and what's so
00:00:09.100 bad about it? Nothing, as it turns out. Also, the Senate moves to ban TikTok on government devices,
00:00:14.520 but really it should be banned on all devices nationwide. So when are we going to do that?
00:00:18.440 A new film starring AOC earns a staggering $10,000 in its first week of release across the
00:00:24.760 entire country. Plus, Nancy Pelosi is caught on film degrading and dehumanizing white males.
00:00:30.000 But what else is new? All of that and more today on the Matt Wall Show.
00:00:41.820 Hard year on the economy means that essential practical gifts will be in high demand this
00:00:46.280 year. Give the most essential gift of all, America's best meat and seafood from Good
00:00:50.020 Ranchers. With discounts on orders of five boxes or more, you can save on gifts for the whole family.
00:00:54.820 When you give a box of Good Ranchers, you're giving them a true steakhouse experience with 100%
00:00:59.020 American USDA prime and uppercut choices of beef, chicken, and seafood. Other meat delivery companies
00:01:04.140 and even your local grocery stores import lower quality meat from overseas. Don't give your friends
00:01:09.100 and family less than America's best this year. Not sure what to order? Well, Good Ranchers now
00:01:12.760 offers gift cards so you can let your friends and family choose for themselves what they want,
00:01:17.380 or you can give the gift of a subscription and inflation-proof someone's meat budget for them.
00:01:21.680 Go to GoodRanchers.com, use code Walsh at checkout to get $35 off your gift. That is GoodRanchers.com,
00:01:29.000 code Walsh for $35 off. Good Ranchers, American meat delivered.
00:01:33.060 Even after the White House was lit up like the gay pride rainbow and drag queens were invited for a
00:01:39.920 celebration of a bill codifying gay marriage and effectively abolishing religious liberty
00:01:45.000 nationwide, still Democrats in Washington decided that they had not done enough LGBT-related
00:01:51.120 virtue signaling this week. They'd done quite a lot of it, but not enough. You can never do enough in
00:01:57.340 their minds anyway. And so yesterday, a House of Representatives oversight committee held a hearing
00:02:02.340 on the subject of, quote, anti-LGBTQI plus violence and extremism. Now, much of this hearing
00:02:10.040 revolved around the Colorado Gay Club shooting, an attack that the media and the left are still
00:02:15.380 blaming on alleged anti-gay rhetoric, even though no actual motive has been identified or announced.
00:02:23.460 In fact, it's been several weeks now since this happened, and we've still been told almost nothing
00:02:28.300 about the guy who did it, who is still alive and in police custody and has been talking to police,
00:02:33.780 but we haven't heard anything about what he said, which is quite suspicious. But all of that, of
00:02:39.300 course, is unimportant to the propagandists. There were several notable moments to come out of the
00:02:44.720 hearing, and not all of it had to do with supposed anti-LGBTQ violence and extremism. For instance,
00:02:50.340 one witness, a woman named Jessie Pocock, with an activist group called Inside Out,
00:02:55.220 took the opportunity to effectively deny the existence of detransitioners. They don't exist,
00:03:01.360 she said. Listen. A lot of people in the news coming out detransitioning.
00:03:07.520 Could you speak to that phenomenon? And what's that person going through? Did they get it wrong?
00:03:18.340 Were they going through a period? Is it just a fluid thing? I mean, could you speak to that?
00:03:22.100 Well, you know, I can't really speak to an individual's personal experience. I mean,
00:03:27.980 you know, somebody's gender is just a really personal experience, but I can speak to you.
00:03:32.900 I've been in this work for a long time. I know a lot of trans folks, close friends, family members,
00:03:40.620 and I've just never heard a case of anyone detransitioning. So I honestly don't think it's a real...
00:03:47.300 There's a number of cases in the news right now where this is happening. And the concern for
00:03:53.960 parents have is, you know, we've all had awkward teen years where we've questioned things in
00:04:00.920 existence and a lot of things. And the question is, is kids who are maybe making a permanent
00:04:05.280 decision even without the input of their parents... Now, the congressman unfortunately speaks over
00:04:11.580 her at the end rather than allowing her to continue to bury herself with her own insanity. But she does
00:04:17.240 say, to quote her, I've never heard of a case of anyone detransitioning, so I honestly don't think
00:04:22.480 it's a real thing. Now, there are only two ways to interpret that claim. The first and most likely
00:04:28.400 interpretation is that she's simply lying and knowingly denying the existence of detransitioners
00:04:33.420 so that she can continue to trans the kids without impediment. The other possibility,
00:04:38.380 which really isn't any better, is that this woman lives in such an enclosed, sealed-off,
00:04:43.800 hermetically sealed bubble that she actually has managed to avoid ever hearing about any case of
00:04:50.460 any person regretting the fact that they mutilated themselves. Either way, whether she's a godforsaken
00:04:55.840 liar or oblivious in the extreme or some combination, she is not a credible voice on this subject. And yet,
00:05:02.040 she's been brought on as an expert witness at a congressional hearing. Somehow, though,
00:05:08.200 that wasn't the most disturbing thing that she said during that exchange. She was also asked about
00:05:13.100 the age of consent for gender transitions. And this is how she answered.
00:05:18.940 You know, we have to do everything we can to make sure that young person is safe and protected.
00:05:23.500 We have, we are constantly filing reports of abuse and neglect because of parents not seeing young
00:05:32.040 people who they are. It sounds like you're deflecting the question a little bit. I understand cases of
00:05:36.880 abuse. There's laws to protect the abuse. I mean, schools actually are legally obligated to report
00:05:42.060 cases of abuse, same for churches and the like, anyone who deals with young people. But, you know,
00:05:47.680 do parents have a right? Should they be informed about what's going on? Do they have a right to
00:05:54.260 know what's going on in their kids' lives? So, I think, again, those of us who are protecting and
00:06:01.540 supporting young people are there and trusted with the information of the things that they are
00:06:06.380 dealing with. In terms of parents' rights to know at schools, I mean, here in Colorado, parents don't
00:06:12.040 have the right. If a young person is questioning their gender or their sexuality, there are laws
00:06:18.800 in place that say that they have the right to process that with their trusted counselor and so
00:06:23.900 forth. You do a significant amount of your work with kids even starting at age 13.
00:06:29.760 What would be the age of consent then in your mind? In our community, the age of consent to mental
00:06:37.580 health therapy is 12 years old. So, we have laws that enable young people to connect with trusted
00:06:43.520 adults who can support them. That is just so important. It prevents suicide. And so, we serve
00:06:48.960 young people at 13 because we know they come to us and we can prevent negative health outcomes for
00:06:55.840 them. This is just so frustrating to watch and not even only because of the crazy nonsense she's
00:07:02.640 spewing there, but because her questioner bails her out time and time again, bails her out by cutting
00:07:08.020 her off. At the beginning of that clip, she says that she has filed numerous reports of abuse and
00:07:13.580 neglect against parents who don't accept their child's trans identity. I'd like to hear more about
00:07:19.660 that. What does that mean? So, if a, what, an eight-year-old boy says, Daddy, I'm a girl,
00:07:27.620 and is not immediately affirmed as such, you're going to file an abuse and neglect claim with CPS
00:07:33.360 over that? That doesn't surprise me. I know that they're doing that kind of thing. Let's talk about
00:07:37.620 that. Instead, he just moves on from that. And in fact, even agrees with it, says, well, we know that
00:07:43.060 abuse and neglect, of course, is bad. Though what she says later is just as shocking. Parents, she says,
00:07:49.780 don't have the right to know about their child's gender transition and that the transition can begin at
00:07:54.880 12, which is, according to her, the age of consent. Now, she says it's the age of consent for
00:07:59.040 mental health therapy. But what she's really talking about when she says mental health therapy
00:08:03.860 is the, you know, the indoctrination of a child into their trans identity. They are able to consent
00:08:14.080 to begin that process at the age of 12. But this is a direction that the Democrats didn't want the
00:08:20.280 hearing to go. What they wanted to focus on instead is all the dangerous rhetoric and hate
00:08:25.380 speech, which is giving rise to this purported epidemic of anti-LGBT violence. And to that end,
00:08:31.260 a trans activist named Olivia Hunt tried to explain how words like groomer are contributing to this
00:08:37.820 supposed problem. People who are already receptive to that message take it to heart and it reinforces
00:08:44.660 their prejudices. In their minds, trans people either become victims to be saved from ourselves or
00:08:49.640 villains to be punished. One example of this inaction is the misuse of the term groomer.
00:08:55.080 Anti-LGBTQ activists have appropriated this terminology used by survivors of childhood sexual
00:08:59.820 abuse and used it to slander LGBTQ people and our allies as predatory, harmful toward children.
00:09:05.960 In reality, trans people are significantly more likely to be the victims of sexual abuse than
00:09:10.300 perpetrators of it. And now this misused terminology has become part of the political discourse around
00:09:15.600 trans people and is invoked as a reason to further restrict our rights in the name of
00:09:19.560 protecting children. This same rhetoric has subsequently been used as justification for
00:09:24.560 violent anti-LGBTQ activism. Heavily armed protesters have made numerous attacks or attempts at intimidation
00:09:30.740 against family-friendly pride events and drag performances around the country. Even hospitals
00:09:35.480 have been targeted with bomb threats and intimidation tactics, based on social media figures spreading
00:09:39.920 baseless stories that the providers are, in their words, mutilating children. There's a straight line that can be
00:09:46.060 drawn from the legislation trying to strip trans people of our human rights, to the increasingly hostile and
00:09:51.060 inflammatory rhetoric portraying us as a threat to society, to the acts of violence that have taken far too many lives.
00:09:56.700 Okay, so a few quick points here. First of all, it's true that many trans people have a history of being
00:10:02.680 sexually abused. That's true. Now, if the psychiatric industry in this country had any moral courage or
00:10:10.320 intellectual curiosity, they might be investigating why exactly people who have experienced sexual trauma
00:10:17.840 are more likely to try and disassociate themselves from their own gender and claim a new identity.
00:10:25.160 Might there be some sort of connection there that's worth exploring?
00:10:29.860 Well, we don't explore it. It's just something we're not even supposed to talk about.
00:10:33.620 Second, it's not in our words that hospitals are mutilating children. They are, in fact, chopping the
00:10:39.340 breasts off of minors. They are, in fact, prescribing drugs that chemically castrate and sterilize kids.
00:10:43.400 The word mutilate means, according to the dictionary, until they change it, to inflict
00:10:48.880 serious damage on. That's what it means. All of these things constitute damage, and the damage is
00:10:55.420 both physical and serious. So when we use the term mutilate, we are using it because it is the most
00:10:59.080 accurate way to describe what is going on. And third, we hear again how rhetoric causes violence.
00:11:04.320 And this was, of course, the main theme throughout the hearing. And as one witness put it,
00:11:08.500 hate starts with speech.
00:11:12.920 Hate rhetoric from politicians, religious leaders, and media outlets is at the root of the attacks,
00:11:19.360 like at Club Cute, and it needs to stop now. Rhetoric that makes people less than for being
00:11:24.900 different. Rhetoric that threatens to silence what sports we can play, what bathrooms we can use,
00:11:30.700 how we define our family, and who I can marry. Every American, every American, especially those
00:11:39.660 elected to positions of power, has a responsibility and a choice to use their words consciously.
00:11:46.160 Hate starts with speech.
00:11:48.520 Hate starts with speech. Now, this was also the thesis of a Scientific American report published this
00:11:52.940 week titled, How Anti-LGBTQ Plus Rhetoric Fuels Violence.
00:11:57.240 And it warns that hate speech from the far right is increasing the risk of violence against
00:12:01.280 LGBTQ plus people, such as the Club Q shooting. Now, the report then, of course, as always,
00:12:07.480 specifically singles out myself, lives of TikTok, Tucker Carlson, the three foremost peddlers of
00:12:14.100 hate speech in the country, we're told. And it asserts that we have sparked an increasing
00:12:18.080 epidemic of anti-LGBT violence. Now, I say asserts because there is nothing like proof or evidence
00:12:24.040 provided, whether in the Scientific American report or in this hearing or any other time
00:12:27.700 they talk about this. There's certainly no evidence that we have inspired violence, much
00:12:31.860 less called for it. But there's also no evidence that the epidemic of anti-LGBT violence is even
00:12:36.760 occurring in the first place. Outside of the Club Q shooting, an event that, once again, we still do not
00:12:42.300 have a confirmed motive for, they don't give very many specific examples of actual acts of violence
00:12:48.700 violence carried out against gay or trans people. A picture is painted of a country where LGBT people
00:12:54.260 are being constantly assaulted and killed by right-wing bigots. And yet, the picture is quite
00:12:58.440 fuzzy. And there's not a lot of detail to it. That's because it is largely imaginary. They have
00:13:04.500 invented this crisis. They've invented it, which means that they can invent the cause too. And the cause is
00:13:11.900 me, libs of TikTok, Tucker, you, all of us who express views on gender and sexuality that they
00:13:18.740 disagree with, we are guilty because we are peddling hate speech. And that brings me to the crux of the
00:13:25.600 matter here. What is hate speech exactly? Well, hate speech is any speech that the left hates. And it
00:13:32.400 really is that simple. If you don't believe me, then go up to any leftist and really test me on this.
00:13:39.620 Go up to any leftist. Ask them if there is any criticism of gender ideology or the LGBT agenda
00:13:47.120 that they would not consider hate speech. Is there any way to, for example, object to the
00:13:54.760 transitioning of minors without engaging in hate speech? Is there, no, I know I get blamed for being
00:14:01.260 very abrasive and direct and blunt and inflammatory in the way that I phrase things. Fine, whatever.
00:14:08.100 Is there any way that I could phrase it that would be acceptable or at least not hate speech?
00:14:14.260 Is there any way to advocate for biblical marriage without engaging in hate speech? Is there any way
00:14:18.340 to defend the biological nature of womanhood without being guilty of hate speech? Have they ever in their
00:14:23.860 lives heard anyone ever express any of these views in a way that they did not consider hate speech?
00:14:30.940 The answer on all counts will be no. And I dare any of them to prove me wrong. I dare any of them to
00:14:38.380 provide an example of a fundamental criticism of their view on gender and sexuality that they do not
00:14:45.020 classify as hate speech. They can't. And that's because hate speech simply is, by definition,
00:14:52.580 the rejection of left-wing ideas. That's what hate speech is. And to be clear, when I say that,
00:14:58.100 okay, it's not that the left has misused or abused the term hate speech to support their causes.
00:15:04.060 That's not it. They invented the term. This is their term. It exists for no other reason
00:15:09.520 than to silence conservatives. That's the whole point of the concept.
00:15:14.940 There is no neutral or non-ideological or non-political way to understand the concept of
00:15:21.500 hate speech. The concept is nonsense when considered objectively. If you try to remove ideology and
00:15:26.740 politics from it and just think about it on its own terms, I mean, hate speech? What the hell is that?
00:15:32.780 So speech that expresses hate is hate speech? But how could you just lump all that into a category and
00:15:39.860 say, well, all that's bad. Aren't there things that are worthy of hate? Don't we all agree that there
00:15:44.440 are some things in life that we all should hate? If I use my speech to communicate my hatred of
00:15:50.960 slavery or rape, is that then hate speech? Well, in a literal sense, yes, I'm using speech. I'm saying
00:15:58.640 that I hate something. It's hate speech. But that's not what they mean. Because hate speech is, again,
00:16:05.740 speech they hate. I think we might better call it hated speech. So when you hear hate speech,
00:16:11.520 you think hated speech. And that's why I don't bother defending myself against the hate speech
00:16:19.500 charge. There are some on the right who do and who waste a lot of breath by saying, I don't engage
00:16:26.000 in hate speech. You engage in hate speech. You're the hate speecher, not me. I embrace it. So when they
00:16:33.840 say, oh, this hate speech, Matt, sure, okay. Yes, I say things the left hates. And yes, I myself express
00:16:40.800 hatred. I hate the abuse of children. I hate the assault on truth and science. I hate the left's
00:16:46.740 attack on common sense and reality and decency. I hate the trans agenda. I hate it with a passion.
00:16:57.680 Hate all of that. And I use speech to express that hatred. And it is speech that the left hates. So
00:17:05.540 the speech is hateful and hated. Hatred all around. Hate speech. Sure, fine. Guilty as charged
00:17:15.920 and proud of it. Let's get to five headlines.
00:17:26.360 A recent data breach has left 5.4 million Twitter users exposed to potential phishing attacks and
00:17:33.140 identity theft. It's just one example of how cyber criminals can easily access your personal
00:17:37.540 information. You need to make sure you're protecting your identity with LifeLock by Norton. LifeLock
00:17:42.100 detects and alerts you to potential identity threats you may not spot on your own, like loans taken out
00:17:46.520 in your name or crimes committed by thieves pretending to be you. If you do become a victim of identity
00:17:51.040 theft, a dedicated U.S.-based restoration specialist will work to fix it. Nobody can prevent all identity
00:17:56.860 theft or monitor all transactions at all businesses, but it's easy to help protect yourself with
00:18:01.020 LifeLock by Norton. Join now and save 25% off your first year at LifeLock.com slash Walsh. That's
00:18:08.820 LifeLock.com slash Walsh for 25% off. So the Daily Wire has this report. The Senate unanimously passed a
00:18:17.100 bill that would ban the use of TikTok on government devices amid growing national security concerns over
00:18:22.680 the Chinese-owned social media platform. The No TikTok on Government Devices Act, introduced by Senator
00:18:28.120 Josh Hawley, was passed late on Wednesday. It says, TikTok is a Trojan horse for the Chinese Communist
00:18:33.660 Party. It's a major security risk to the United States. And until it's forced to sever ties with
00:18:37.240 China completely, it has no place on government devices, Hawley said in a statement. States across
00:18:41.000 the U.S. are banning TikTok on government devices. It's time for Joe Biden and Democrats to help do the
00:18:44.880 same. The bill will need to be passed in the House and signed by President Joe Biden to become law.
00:18:49.880 And this is only just one bill related to TikTok. A group of bipartisan lawmakers is also leading a
00:18:57.140 drive to completely ban the use of TikTok nationwide for everyone. Senator Marco Rubio introduced the
00:19:02.760 legislation in the Senate this month. Representatives Mike Gallagher and Raja Krishnamoorthy, let's say,
00:19:09.640 introduced companion legislation in the House. The bipartisan anti-social CCP Act is a strong step in
00:19:17.100 protecting our nation from the nefarious digital surveillance and influence operations of
00:19:22.340 the solitary regimes. And Marco Rubio, I know, was on Tucker Carlson last night talking about this
00:19:26.180 bill to ban TikTok nationwide. So a few things. First of all, the great thing, and of course it
00:19:33.680 should be to begin with, banned on government devices. Even if it wasn't a communist Chinese
00:19:42.020 surveillance operation, which it is, we should still ban it on government. It's a government device.
00:19:47.260 Why should you have any kind of social media? Ban all social media on government devices. Let's do
00:19:51.920 that. And the really great thing about banning TikTok on government devices is that it will prevent
00:19:57.280 Gen Z from getting jobs in government. They're not going to want to work in government if they can't
00:20:02.020 have TikTok at the ready. So I consider that a benefit. But of course, it should obviously go beyond
00:20:08.180 that. And it should be banned nationwide. There's just, there's no arguments. I have not heard one
00:20:15.620 salient argument as to why TikTok should not be banned nationwide across the entire country.
00:20:26.260 I haven't heard it. And yet it remains unbanned. Yet it's still out there and we're allowed to use it
00:20:32.400 when there's no good argument for it. It is, once again, just a fact that it's a surveillance
00:20:39.640 operation by the communist Chinese government. That's what it is. That's how it's used. They're
00:20:45.700 using it to spy on us, to get access to our data, to our information, get access to our phones. That's
00:20:52.660 how it's being used. And on top of that, as if we need more reason to get rid of it, on top of that,
00:21:00.340 it's just absolutely toxic for kids. It's destroying kids. And it's not the only social
00:21:09.200 media platform. And of course, if you get rid of one, it'll just be replaced by another. We
00:21:12.000 understand that. But that's not a good enough reason to keep it around. So you've got something
00:21:21.200 that's poisonous to kids. That's just like ruining entire generations of kids who are addicted to this
00:21:28.720 thing. And also it's being used by an adversarial government to spy on us. And yet we're still
00:21:37.860 sitting around talking about, hmm, should we? Is it really the right thing to ban it though?
00:21:46.280 All right, let's move to this. So if hate speech makes no sense, neither does the category of hate
00:21:50.940 crime. And also at the aforementioned hearing, there was another witness who, and much of what
00:21:59.580 he says here, unlike some of the other witnesses of this hearing who just were, everything they said
00:22:04.960 was totally insane. Much of what he says here, I agree with. And he calls for the death penalty for
00:22:10.300 hate crimes. Let's listen.
00:22:11.000 At the population level, most people who hate will never convert their hate into a crime, meaning that
00:22:17.660 education produces little prevention per hour or dollar expended. Rather, the members of this
00:22:23.200 committee want to more effectively combat hate crime. They should do so by supporting the criminal justice
00:22:27.540 system. Increased funding for police hiring to remediate the decline in police employment per capita
00:22:32.500 since the Great Recession. Better fund police investigations integral to clearing hate crime cases.
00:22:37.980 Support state and local prosecutors in forming specialized hate crime bureaus, including by
00:22:43.000 coordinating information sharing in the challenging area of hate crime prosecution.
00:22:47.960 Increased federal hate crime penalties and encourage the Department of Justice to pursue hate crime
00:22:52.140 charges in states where local laws are insufficient, such as in New York State, where the Buffalo grocery
00:22:56.580 shooter cannot be executed for his heinous defense, a situation in our lab which also obtains in
00:23:00.620 Colorado. Hate crime against LGBTQ people and otherwise is a serious issue, and we must take it
00:23:06.860 seriously. Doing that means treating hate criminals like the criminals they are and bringing the full
00:23:12.460 power of the justice system to bear on them. Now, I agree that these mass shooters should be executed.
00:23:18.440 Absolutely. Execute them. Execute them. Do it swiftly. Do it publicly, as far as I am concerned.
00:23:24.040 Bring back public executions. I've long advocated for that, for mass shootings and for many other crimes as
00:23:32.880 well. But the issue is with the category of hate crime. As we've talked about on the show recently,
00:23:38.300 is there any motivation for a mass shooting that would be less bad than any other motivation?
00:23:48.680 Okay, is there a less bad version of a mass shooting?
00:23:52.000 Now, I'm not sure that I believe, as some will say, that all such crimes are motivated by hatred,
00:23:58.780 because that's one criticism of the hate crime category, is that, well, if you're killing people,
00:24:03.920 then obviously you hate them, so how can we even distinguish? I don't think I agree with that. I think
00:24:08.840 that crimes can be motivated by other things, indifference to human life, envy, a kind of
00:24:15.960 psychopathic boredom. I mean, these people are motivated by all sorts of things. It's hard to know exactly what's
00:24:21.560 going on in the mind of a mass murderer. Whatever's going on in there, it's dark and twisted and
00:24:25.980 horrifying. But why does it matter? I mean, imagine you have two mass shootings, okay? Imagine two mass
00:24:33.300 shootings on the same day, in the same town, killing the same number of people, okay, hypothetically. And
00:24:38.840 in one case, the mass shooter is a racist. And we know that because he's got the manifesto and
00:24:44.900 everything, and he's targeting black people, and he's very open about, that's why he's doing it.
00:24:49.280 In the other case, the mass shooter is, let's say, a psychopathic nihilist, indifferent to human
00:24:55.380 life, killing people of all different races, and doing it just for entertainment, and to feel a sense
00:25:01.560 of power and control in his life. Same number of dead people. Same trauma for the survivors. Same
00:25:09.660 bloodshed. Is the former crime really worse than the latter? Really? It's worse? I mean, how can it be
00:25:18.440 worse? How can either be worse than the other? It's as bad as you can possibly get. Should one be
00:25:25.520 treated harsher? Like, are you going to walk in onto the scene of the second shooting and go, oh my
00:25:30.360 God, what happened here? Why did he do this? And someone says, well, he's a nihilist, a psychopath.
00:25:35.920 He's indifferent to human life. Oh, so this wasn't hate. Well, phew, thank God. I thought he had a bad
00:25:41.900 reason to murder 32 people. In fact, if anything, if anything, it goes the other way. If anything,
00:25:48.820 we should be slightly less worried about the hate crime perpetrator. Because hatred can be redeemed.
00:25:56.980 A hateful person can be, in theory, reformed. Now, mass murder should all still be executed,
00:26:02.400 in my opinion. But my point is simply that of the two types of violent scumbags,
00:26:06.940 the hate crime bigot and the nihilistic psychopath, if we have to parse this and split
00:26:14.140 hairs and everything, and who's worse than the other, the latter probably poses the greater danger
00:26:19.640 and is less likely to be reformed. I think you could make a better argument for that.
00:26:27.640 But though, again, to my mind, they should be treated the same. Because this whole argument is,
00:26:32.580 you know, maybe it's interesting on an academic level. But when you try to put it into action,
00:26:37.320 the criminal justice system, it's just absolutely ridiculous. Because no matter why they did it,
00:26:44.260 it doesn't matter. It's just as bad, no matter what the reason was.
00:26:50.600 All right. The Daily Mail has this report. A documentary by Nancy Pelosi's daughter,
00:26:54.880 Alexandra, reveals that the House Speaker was speaking to President Barack Obama
00:27:00.100 after Democrats endured the famous off-year shellacking, and this is back in 2010,
00:27:05.780 blaming white male voters getting in a mood over the sour economy. Her assessment came after a
00:27:11.260 wipeout that cost the party its majority after enactment of Obama's signature Affordable Care Act,
00:27:15.740 then often derided as Obamacare by its opponents. So this documentary is apparently called Pelosi in
00:27:20.460 the House. And if you want to watch it for some reason, it's on HBO. So you can go. If you want to
00:27:25.020 watch a documentary about Nancy Pelosi, you can go do that. But here's the scene in question.
00:27:30.900 We're worried about the economy since the presidential office is not a good night.
00:27:35.760 We find the rate has been above 9%. Our members have said they don't regret their health care
00:27:40.620 bill got across the board. Even if we never passed health care reform, we were still going to lose
00:27:45.500 this election because of 9.5% unemployment. Because it wasn't about that. It was about jobs.
00:27:51.680 The white male thing is just, that's a dominant thing. And when they don't have a job,
00:27:56.620 they get in a mood. So we'll not have to make some decisions in our office about how we go forward.
00:28:05.320 The white male thing. She says the white male thing. When they don't have a job, they get in a mood.
00:28:13.260 Now, needless to say, this is a career killer, even for someone like Nancy Pelosi, if you put any other
00:28:18.800 group in that sentence. Imagine her saying, you know, the black male thing. They get in a mood sometimes.
00:28:26.620 She says that and it's done. It's over. This is someone who's been in the House of Representatives
00:28:33.560 for 350 years. Before it even existed, she was in it. And that would be enough to kill her career.
00:28:41.340 But you could say that about white males. And the thing is, they put this in a documentary. It's not
00:28:47.420 like this was some behind the scenes footage that she did. This is her daughter put this out there.
00:28:52.520 This wasn't some kind of expose. They have no problem with this. She would say this publicly.
00:28:56.620 The Democrats would say, she would say almost exactly that in front of a microphone at a press
00:29:01.660 conference. She has no problem with that. Because there's no penalty. There is no downside really
00:29:11.260 politically to heaping scorn and contempt on white males. The white male thing.
00:29:17.140 She's calling us things, just to be clear.
00:29:22.680 So why not? They're very open about it. And one of the reasons why they can be so open about it,
00:29:28.900 and why there is no penalty, is that Republicans don't have the guts or the brains to counter this.
00:29:37.540 You know, she can go out and say whatever she wants about white males,
00:29:42.540 because even her political opponents won't say anything about it. They're not going to stand up
00:29:47.520 there and say, she has hatred of white males. She is anti-white male. Okay, she's a racist and a
00:29:55.440 sexist. They're not going to get up and say that. They're not going to accuse her specifically by name
00:30:01.200 of anti-white male bigotry. They won't say it. Even though that's exactly what we just heard,
00:30:08.220 and Democrats could not be more clear about it, in villainizing and demonizing white males.
00:30:15.260 They're very open. But Republicans, of course, the media is not going to call her on it. So if the
00:30:21.520 media is not going to call her on it, and her political opponents won't call her on it, then
00:30:24.540 that's it. She's fine. And Republicans won't do that. They will not by name, they will not name
00:30:31.920 anti-white racism, and they will not name anti- especially anti-white male bigotry. They won't do
00:30:41.900 it. To their own detriment. Because, you know, they're afraid that if they do, they're afraid if
00:30:49.500 they get up there and they say, and they say, what we just heard is dehumanizing and bigoted
00:30:55.880 against white males. You know, white males, they are a group of Americans in this country. They
00:31:02.140 deserve to be defended. They don't deserve to be treated this way. The Republicans are afraid that
00:31:07.780 if they say that, that it's going to upset all the other groups that they're trying to win.
00:31:13.080 They're worried that it's going to alienate the black vote if they speak up for white males.
00:31:17.400 Which, by the way, like, even if it did from a political perspective, you know, as a Republican,
00:31:26.020 it's like, you're only going to win, you're only going to win a very small portion of the black vote
00:31:29.220 anyway. So even if it's true that it made your numbers go from 3% to 2%, politically, who cares?
00:31:37.500 Because the white male vote politically is more important to you because they're voting for you
00:31:41.740 in greater numbers. But more to the point, it's not true that it's going to alienate other groups.
00:31:49.680 Now, far-left activists, of course, if you speak up for white males, they're going to accuse you of,
00:31:53.840 well, you're saying that you, you're saying you don't hate white males? Well, that must mean that
00:31:57.820 you do hate black people. Yeah, far-left activists are going to play that game, but they're not going
00:32:02.920 to vote for you anyway. Who gives a damn what they say? Normal people aren't going to interpret it
00:32:08.220 that way. A normal black person, a normal woman, a normal person in any racial minority, they hear
00:32:15.520 you speaking up in defense of white males, especially when they're being degraded and dehumanized in that
00:32:21.160 way. Normal people in those groups, they're not going to, they're not offended by that. Of course
00:32:25.740 they're not. So you're not offending normal people, but you could actually be motivating white males,
00:32:35.140 which is an important voting block. It's a voting block that you need. If you don't have them, you
00:32:40.160 don't win. And that is also a voting block that has been demoralized and disenfranchised.
00:32:49.380 You know, this is one of the things that after 2020, we never talked about, you know,
00:32:56.340 because we talked about a lot of things with the election. We never actually talked about the fact
00:33:01.080 that, you know, Trump lost white males. He didn't lose them. He lost the, that white males were less
00:33:08.400 invested in that election than they had been in 2016. The numbers went down. We never had that
00:33:14.980 conversation. Um, which maybe we should. So maybe, maybe that's a group of people like
00:33:23.240 politicians specifically speak up in defense of every other group by name. They'll speak up for
00:33:30.360 black Americans. They'll speak up for women. They'll speak up for Asians. They'll speak up for every
00:33:34.600 group, but they will not speak up for white males by name. And it turns out that does have an effect
00:33:42.860 because when you've got a group of voters who feel like you don't give a crap about them,
00:33:47.660 that you won't even sit, you won't even acknowledge them by name. They're less motivated to vote for
00:33:53.900 you. It doesn't mean they're going to vote in Democrat. It just means that they're going to
00:33:58.020 stay home. They're not motivated. They don't feel represented. All right. What else do we got here?
00:34:08.460 Speak. Okay. Well, speaking of documentaries, since we're on the subject, maybe we should
00:34:11.660 mention this too. For this from the Daily Wire, the climate may be getting hot, but AOC's new movie
00:34:16.760 is most definitely not. Well done. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has a new documentary out
00:34:22.040 to the end. Um, and if movie theaters are paying attention to ticket sales, they realize it's already
00:34:27.400 run to the end. The flick opened on December 9th at 120 theaters. But since then it's made $9,667.
00:34:36.700 Okay. You know, it's about a week on over a hundred screens, it's made less than $10,000.
00:34:43.660 That is 80 bucks a screen. And let's say the tickets are 1625 as they are at Regal theaters.
00:34:49.340 That would equate to fewer than 600 people who actually saw it. So that's about, uh, do the math
00:34:55.500 on that. So that's like, um, just about five people, five or six people, a theater went to go see this
00:35:01.720 movie. Perhaps viewers just didn't want to sit through this. This is a, the movie synopsis says
00:35:07.240 stopping the climate crisis is a question of political courage and the clock is ticking
00:35:10.760 over three years of turbulence and crisis for young women fight for a green new deal and ignite
00:35:16.340 a historic shift in U S climate politics. Now the film drew 83% approval from a Rotten Tomatoes,
00:35:23.460 of course, but nobody actually wants to see this thing. And I know that you're really hoping that
00:35:29.080 you'll get a chance to watch the trailer of this because you're hearing the description.
00:35:32.080 You're thinking, I need to see some clips of this thing and don't worry. I got you covered. Uh,
00:35:36.640 here's the trailer.
00:35:39.940 Fighting for change politically requires faith.
00:35:45.060 We are building an army of young people to stop the climate crisis and create millions of good jobs
00:35:50.020 for our generation.
00:35:53.700 Everyone wants to talk about this dispassionately, but this is a world that I will raise my kids in.
00:35:59.080 The more centrist wing is arguing that they want to maintain the status quo.
00:36:04.300 Ain't nobody going to keep us down.
00:36:07.080 This is going to be the moonshot of our generation.
00:36:10.940 Moments of crisis crack open the window of possibility.
00:36:15.700 We just climbed that mountain.
00:36:18.520 Sometimes I feel like my job is to get my hands dirty.
00:36:22.000 You're not going to trick us.
00:36:23.640 Hell no.
00:36:24.300 Now is the time to leverage our power.
00:36:32.320 We have tens of thousands of new people joining.
00:36:36.980 We're in the battle for the soul of the democratic party.
00:36:40.180 Make them feel like they're going to lose their seats if they don't support this.
00:36:44.380 Let's stop.
00:36:44.940 Let's stop watching it.
00:36:46.000 So you've seen enough of it.
00:36:47.020 A few things.
00:36:49.160 First, interesting things going on here.
00:36:53.080 I mean, nothing interesting in the film itself.
00:36:54.780 But first, the Democrat party just doesn't have any stars at all.
00:37:00.220 They don't have any interesting people in the Democrat party.
00:37:04.760 AOC is the closest.
00:37:08.600 And yet, you know, she's probably the biggest star in the Democrat party.
00:37:14.600 She's not the one that has the most influence in Washington, for sure.
00:37:19.020 But she's the biggest star.
00:37:21.820 Most well-known, most famous, popular, I guess.
00:37:25.780 And yet still, she's the best they can do as far as that goes.
00:37:29.320 And yet, nobody cares because she's actually not interesting at all.
00:37:34.520 She's not an interesting person.
00:37:37.460 Part of the problem is that in order to be interesting, you have to have some rough edges.
00:37:41.940 You know, you need to have some aspects of yourself that aren't politically correct.
00:37:47.300 That's what makes someone interesting.
00:37:51.500 But when you perfectly fit yourself into this politically correct box,
00:37:56.480 it may prevent you from getting backlash.
00:37:58.740 It may make you above criticism in the mainstream, fine.
00:38:02.520 But she's like, it's not interesting.
00:38:06.400 And also, the left, once again, as we see, they find it difficult to make films
00:38:11.300 that preach their message in an appealing and entertaining way.
00:38:16.220 They didn't always have this difficulty because the left has been,
00:38:18.840 the Hollywood has been left-leaning for decades.
00:38:21.640 And they've been putting out films that, you know, propagandize in their direction.
00:38:30.640 And they've been doing that for decades.
00:38:32.020 But they used to be able to do it in a way that people found interesting and found entertaining
00:38:37.160 and wanted to go watch the movies.
00:38:38.660 And they're not as able to do that anymore.
00:38:43.440 Part of that is, like we always talk about, it's the kind of Christian film phenomenon
00:38:47.040 where they do the same thing in the reverse of what Christian films do.
00:38:50.660 They put the message before anything.
00:38:54.220 So they go message first.
00:38:55.800 They worry about getting the message across before they worry about actually putting out
00:38:59.700 an entertaining piece of content.
00:39:00.800 That's part of it.
00:39:02.580 I think also, you know, they don't think that the masses are worthy of being appealed to
00:39:10.760 in the first place, I think.
00:39:14.260 They think almost like they would be beneath them to try to appeal to the masses.
00:39:22.240 Because they have contempt for that.
00:39:23.800 They have too much contempt for the masses at this point to actually try to connect with them.
00:39:28.720 I think that's part of the issue.
00:39:29.600 All right, finally, this is from The Mirror.
00:39:32.960 It says, science fiction is about to match up with reality as the world's first artificial
00:39:36.500 womb facility has been announced, where you'll be able to choose your baby's characteristics
00:39:40.980 from a menu.
00:39:42.380 Ecto Life, the brainchild of Berlin-based Hashem El-Ghali, a biotechnologist and science communicator,
00:39:51.720 is a concept based on over 50 years of groundbreaking scientific research.
00:39:55.220 In theory, they'll be able to grow 30,000 babies a year in their lab.
00:39:59.600 And he believes the facilities would allow infertile couples to conceive a baby and become the true
00:40:04.160 biological parents of their own offspring.
00:40:06.600 But they also plan to offer an elite package that would allow you to genetically engineer
00:40:10.440 the embryo before implanting it into the artificial womb, with everything from eye and hair color
00:40:15.360 to strength, height, and intelligence as choices.
00:40:19.180 Hashem explains, introducing Ecto Life, the world's first artificial womb facility, which is powered
00:40:23.520 entirely by renewable energy.
00:40:24.740 According to the World Health Organization, around 300,000 women die from pregnancy complications.
00:40:28.600 Ecto Life, artificial womb, is designed to alleviate human suffering and reduce the chances
00:40:32.980 of C-sections.
00:40:34.980 With Ecto Life, premature birth and C-sections will be a thing of the past.
00:40:39.620 And so they want to farm all this out, rather than doing it the old-fashioned way of having
00:40:43.980 women gestating the children in their womb.
00:40:48.120 We don't need to do that anymore because they'll have artificial wombs.
00:40:51.040 So you make the baby, you know, it's like baking a cake or something.
00:40:56.060 You mix all the ingredients together, pop it in the oven, and you can go live your life
00:40:59.920 while they grow the baby in the artificial womb.
00:41:03.380 You know, I'm skeptical about whether this technology will ever actually be functional,
00:41:10.340 or if it will just continue to exist in theory.
00:41:15.060 They've been talking about doing things like this for decades, and maybe they're closer now
00:41:18.720 than they've ever been, but I'm skeptical of that.
00:41:21.560 Either way, I will never fail to appreciate the irony that we are, as a culture, obsessed with
00:41:28.140 organic, all-natural, you know.
00:41:32.700 We're obsessed with that when it comes to items you find at the grocery store.
00:41:36.800 We're obsessed with finding things that are not genetically engineered, unless we're talking
00:41:43.420 about human beings themselves, right?
00:41:46.400 As our food gets more organic, our manner of human reproduction, on the other hand, becomes
00:41:51.880 less organic.
00:41:53.120 So we can see the value of doing things organically when it comes to food, when it comes to cosmetics,
00:42:00.260 whatever.
00:42:01.340 But somehow, the very same people who see the value there, they can't see it when it comes
00:42:05.080 to themselves, and reproduction.
00:42:07.500 I mean, eventually, our salads will be more organic than the people eating them.
00:42:13.500 That's where we're headed.
00:42:16.300 And I think many people on the left in particular can't see a problem with this, because they
00:42:23.840 don't have any concept of human dignity to begin with.
00:42:29.320 They just have no concept of that.
00:42:30.780 And so, for those of us who have a concept of human dignity, even if we struggle to articulate
00:42:36.540 what human dignity is or why it's important, because it's something that, you know, for
00:42:43.940 most of human history, it was not something that was fundamentally challenged.
00:42:51.140 But now it is.
00:42:52.240 Like, well, you have people that are just flat out denying that human dignity exists in the
00:42:57.680 first place.
00:43:00.120 And so, but those of us who innately recognize it, it can be hard for us to understand.
00:43:08.160 And we see something like this, and we just, because we innately recognize the value of
00:43:11.940 human dignity, we see something like this, and we immediately see it as horrifying.
00:43:15.720 Like, of course.
00:43:16.160 You know, grow babies in an artificial womb and pick out what kind of people they're going
00:43:22.660 to be from a menu, and just, like, constructing them like Frankensteins.
00:43:25.160 It's horrifying.
00:43:27.640 We instinctively recognize that.
00:43:31.300 But people on the left, they don't, because they don't see human dignity as a thing.
00:43:36.480 And, you know, human dignity is rooted in the fact that we are made in the image and likeness
00:43:41.220 of God.
00:43:42.500 That's what it's rooted in.
00:43:43.620 But if you believe, as people on the left do, that there is no God, and that we are
00:43:51.340 gods ourselves, man, it makes kind of sense.
00:43:56.420 You know, we are gods.
00:43:58.020 There is no God, except the individual.
00:44:01.060 And so, I can make a person in my image, because I am the God.
00:44:07.900 I think that's what's happening here.
00:44:09.040 So, let's get to the comment section.
00:44:11.300 If you're a man, it's required that you grow a bit, hey, we're the sweet baby gang.
00:44:21.020 You know, women love getting new pajamas at Christmastime.
00:44:24.640 That's one thing I know for sure.
00:44:25.600 Pajamagram makes it really easy for us, man.
00:44:27.800 This year, I'm getting my wife a set of pajamas from their Naturally Nude line.
00:44:32.620 The texture and feel of these pajamas is so silky and smooth that I know she'll love them.
00:44:37.360 And if you have no idea what to get your girlfriend or wife this year, trust me, she wants these pajamas.
00:44:42.780 But you need to order today, because last year, they sold out before Christmas.
00:44:47.600 Order today, and Pajamagram will include a free matching Naturally Nude nightie.
00:44:52.060 With your order, that's $75 of savings on their best-selling holiday gift.
00:44:56.920 Pajamagram offers free gift packaging, so you can give your gifts and put them under the tree, and it's all ready to go.
00:45:03.440 So go to Pajamagram.com right now, order the Naturally Nude Pajamas.
00:45:07.660 That's Pajamagram.com for Naturally Nude Pajamas.
00:45:10.820 Don't forget to tell them Matt sent you.
00:45:13.900 Laura says,
00:45:14.860 I'm alarmed that the Christian group was denied service, but at least they didn't give their good, hard-earned money to those haters.
00:45:21.640 I live in Brooklyn, and one time several years back, I overheard two 20-somethings saying that they didn't and wouldn't patronize a certain very popular diner because they found out that the owner donated to pro-life organizations.
00:45:34.660 This is something that's happening more and more.
00:45:35.900 In fact, I didn't even know about this.
00:45:38.620 It was revealed on Backstage last night, our Christmas Backstage episode, if you watched it, that this happened.
00:45:45.700 Now, we had our Christmas party a couple days ago, and I didn't go because my wife's very pregnant, and she didn't want to go.
00:45:53.740 She wasn't feeling very well.
00:45:55.560 I could have still gone by myself, but parties are bad enough.
00:45:59.380 If I'm going to go to one, I need my wife there.
00:46:01.740 She's my pinch hitter.
00:46:03.400 She's the one who does all the talking.
00:46:05.120 So I couldn't go if she wasn't going, so I stayed home.
00:46:07.600 And so I found out about this after the fact, but apparently there was a nearby restaurant where some members of the Daily Wire were going to go, trying to reserve a table,
00:46:16.920 and were told by someone at the restaurant that essentially they're not welcome because they pose a, I think the phrase was, something like a danger to the staff.
00:46:28.520 You know, you're dangerous people.
00:46:31.720 So it seems to be happening with increasing regularity that people, whether because it's Christian or conservative, being denied service.
00:46:41.620 In this case, they'd already made the reservation, put down a deposit on it, told you're not welcome here.
00:46:48.860 So there are cases of that happening.
00:46:52.500 In fact, in our case, very close to home.
00:46:54.520 I'm not aware of any case anywhere in the country of something similar happening on the left side or to the left side of a Christian or conservative business owner saying to a group of people, you know, to gay people,
00:47:11.640 we're not going to serve you because you're gay, or even going up to left wing activists and saying, well, because of your ideological convictions, I can't in good conscience serve you.
00:47:19.480 I haven't heard of any case like that.
00:47:22.560 All right.
00:47:24.000 Gary Lancaster says, how can Media Matters watch Matt every day and not become fans?
00:47:30.720 I ask myself that same question.
00:47:34.840 Jenna says, what is your take on Knowles' tweet that he feels sorry for Sam Brinton?
00:47:40.200 Well, he's a nice guy.
00:47:42.340 I mean, he's based, don't get me wrong.
00:47:43.980 A dangerous right wing extremist, of course.
00:47:45.620 He's not even welcome in restaurants, but he's nice also, and I'm not as nice.
00:47:51.360 I have to say that I don't feel sorry for Brinton.
00:47:54.420 I understand the point, and I've heard this from other people, too, that he's a pathetic figure, and he is.
00:48:03.240 He's mentally deranged, and he lives in a culture that encourages and foments that derangement rather than helping him deal with it.
00:48:09.860 And so he is a pathetic, pitiful, strange freak of a person, and so it makes sense to pity him.
00:48:18.920 You know, it does, and I get that.
00:48:21.460 Perfectly justifiable way of looking at this.
00:48:24.680 But I don't, because I actually don't think that a guy like Brinton is crazy.
00:48:31.080 It's a reasonable theory that he's just mentally deranged and crazy.
00:48:37.160 I don't think that.
00:48:37.740 I think he's a deviant.
00:48:40.220 And deviance is, well, deviance is deviant, but it's not the same thing as being delusionally insane, right?
00:48:46.100 It's not the same thing as being psychotic.
00:48:48.880 It's not immoral to be insane.
00:48:50.900 You can't, it's not a moral judgment.
00:48:53.300 If somebody's actually insane, we're not going to pass a moral judgment on them for being insane.
00:48:58.240 It's not their fault.
00:48:59.700 It is immoral.
00:49:01.220 It is a moral choice to indulge your deviance the way that Sam Brinton has on the other hand.
00:49:07.580 So what I see rather is just a totally narcissistic guy who's chosen to act this way,
00:49:13.520 and he wants to act out his fetishes in public,
00:49:16.500 and he doesn't care how it makes anybody else feel, how uncomfortable it makes them.
00:49:20.540 He feels he's totally entitled to do whatever he wants.
00:49:22.440 That's what stealing the luggage is all about.
00:49:23.840 Just someone who's totally consumed by their own sense of entitlement.
00:49:29.300 And so I have a lot, a much harder time pitying someone in that case, I think.
00:49:37.500 And finally, Joe says, Matt, a month later, do you think it was a good idea for Trump to announce early?
00:49:45.320 Announce his candidacy early.
00:49:46.560 You know, we talked about this at the time when he announced his candidacy a month ago,
00:49:52.460 and I said it's definitely a risk because I understand the thought process.
00:49:57.820 The thought process is get out in front, try to crowd out the field before anyone else jumps in,
00:50:03.480 also change the subject from the midterm.
00:50:06.480 So that makes sense.
00:50:08.200 I understand the logic behind it.
00:50:10.080 But the risk is that you get in so early, and now you've announced, and now you're in your campaign mode
00:50:16.620 because you've announced your campaign, and now you've got to keep the momentum going for, like, two years.
00:50:22.660 That's a long time to have to try to draw that momentum out.
00:50:26.220 And you also don't have any other candidates in the field yet.
00:50:28.500 So there's no one to attack.
00:50:30.780 There's no one to be debating.
00:50:33.940 So you've got to totally on your own generate this excitement and momentum and keep it going.
00:50:41.280 The worst thing you could do is announce your candidacy and then just sort of disappear, and all the momentum dies.
00:50:49.340 And it seems like that's more of what has happened so far.
00:50:53.580 And it was kind of doomed to happen, though.
00:50:54.940 It's just not possible.
00:50:55.960 Even Trump, it's just like, how do you keep the momentum going that long?
00:50:59.180 So I think, in the end, it seems to me to have been a miscalculation, but in effect, what it means is that he's going to have to sort of relaunch his campaign at a later date.
00:51:12.820 He's already announced it, but then you're going to have to kind of, once we get closer to it, he gets to a point where he can actually maintain the momentum, then sort of relaunch it.
00:51:20.920 I think that's what he's going to have to do.
00:51:22.760 Have you been procrastinating your holiday shopping until the last minute?
00:51:25.780 Well, I'm here to tell you that the last minute is closer than you think.
00:51:29.720 Today is your last chance to guarantee that your Sweet Baby Gang swag shack items arrive before Christmas.
00:51:36.380 You've got to get them now.
00:51:37.200 Get my best-selling LGBT children's book, Johnny the Walrus.
00:51:40.860 It's a cuddly, plush walrus companion.
00:51:43.160 You can indulge in the nostalgia of the Sweet Baby album tea and find the epitome of the SBG with the Matt Walsh Superfan Bundle.
00:51:50.380 And for the Sweet Baby ladies in the audience who are struggling to find a gift for the men who aren't in the Sweet Baby Gang,
00:51:56.680 don't forget to check out Jeremy's new hair, skin, and body care gift bundles that are 100% woke free and now 30% off.
00:52:04.000 If they're in the Sweet Baby Gang, they can get that too.
00:52:05.620 I don't know why we're delineating that way.
00:52:08.440 Men need soap and shampoo, but they don't enjoy buying it for themselves,
00:52:12.400 and they especially don't enjoy buying it from woke corporations who hate them and their values.
00:52:16.380 Be it the luxurious Jeremy's Beard Kit, the Tea Tree and Peppermint Shampoo and Conditioner,
00:52:21.300 or my personal favorite, Bamboo Charcoal Body Wash, made from the primary food source of my least favorite animal, pandas.
00:52:28.300 We're starving more pandas by the day.
00:52:30.940 Buy them all up now.
00:52:32.100 Today is the last day to order and receive in time for Christmas, so don't procrastinate any longer.
00:52:36.380 Go to jeremysrazors.com, get 30% off your Jeremy's gift bundles today.
00:52:41.260 Now let's get to our daily cancellation.
00:52:46.380 White guilt is a scourge in this country and a problem we often talk about on this show.
00:52:51.680 A video that recently went viral from TikTok seems to have captured this phenomenon,
00:52:55.860 perhaps better than anything else we've seen.
00:52:59.140 Here it is.
00:53:00.520 You know what?
00:53:01.520 While we're on the topic of how white people are just f***ing the world up for everyone,
00:53:05.940 you're not one of the good white people.
00:53:08.680 There are no good white people.
00:53:11.180 There are only anti-racist white people and racist white people.
00:53:14.280 Anti-racism is a lifelong project, and the end goal is not for you to be good.
00:53:19.700 It's for society to be good.
00:53:21.360 De-center yourself.
00:53:23.800 Do the work.
00:53:25.380 It's hard.
00:53:26.440 You're going to get it wrong.
00:53:27.680 But if you are not out there every day actively trying to understand,
00:53:32.280 you're not a good white person.
00:53:36.260 Stop patting yourself on the back.
00:53:38.100 Stop congratulating each other.
00:53:39.700 Stop separating us from the bad white people.
00:53:43.440 Don't sit out there in comments and say, we don't claim them.
00:53:47.080 We are them.
00:53:48.380 We are them.
00:53:50.360 We are the ones shooting up schools.
00:53:52.800 We are the ones raping people.
00:53:55.460 We are the ones enslaving people.
00:53:57.820 We are.
00:53:58.800 We're them.
00:53:59.280 Well, speak for yourself, lady.
00:54:04.060 I have, in fact, never done any of those things.
00:54:06.560 And of the people who have done them, they are not exclusively white, not even close.
00:54:10.980 In fact, when it comes to mass shootings and violent crime in particular,
00:54:13.640 white people are underrepresented as a group in that category.
00:54:15.980 As for slavery, forms of the practice do still exist in the world,
00:54:19.640 but they are happening in parts of the world with names like India and Africa and Southeast Asia.
00:54:24.500 These are not predominantly white areas of the globe, just to be clear.
00:54:28.220 But I'm not really interested in fact-checking this poor, unfortunate,
00:54:31.180 I'm assuming quite lonely, white guilt-plagued woman.
00:54:35.060 This actually is someone that I feel sorry for.
00:54:38.840 Needless to say, you know, she has no notion of what actually happens in the world,
00:54:43.000 much less what has happened in the world.
00:54:44.760 Her grasp on history being even more precarious than her understanding of current events.
00:54:48.260 This is a person, like so many others in our culture, who exists in a bubble.
00:54:52.420 And the atmosphere inside that bubble is comprised almost entirely of self-loathing and narcissism.
00:54:58.740 It is a volatile, often quite confusing mix.
00:55:01.820 And that's why I'd really like to use this lady as a case study
00:55:05.000 and conduct something of a psychological evaluation of the white guilt brigade.
00:55:10.480 Every member of the brigade is an individual brought to this sorry state
00:55:13.560 through their own relatively unique set of circumstances.
00:55:15.640 Yet, there are some obvious through lines here.
00:55:18.800 Some things they all seem to have in common.
00:55:21.460 And we can see many of those things manifested in this video.
00:55:23.980 So let's go through this point by point, three points in particular.
00:55:27.800 First, white guilt can either be performative or sincere.
00:55:31.760 And sometimes, perhaps usually, a mix of the two.
00:55:34.320 The fully performative variety is usually found among the white people
00:55:37.680 who have gotten into the race hustling business
00:55:39.840 and who are profiting immensely off of it.
00:55:43.280 They're the ones who are writing the books.
00:55:44.560 They're the ones who are giving DEI seminars and so on.
00:55:47.540 And for them, this is a scam.
00:55:48.900 You know, it's a kind of a Ponzi scheme.
00:55:52.480 It's a business opportunity.
00:55:54.320 They're like the televangelists in the private jets.
00:55:56.760 They found a way to profit off of a belief system
00:55:59.400 that they probably don't subscribe to themselves.
00:56:02.780 But the disciples really do believe it, to some extent at least.
00:56:06.500 This woman, I'm going to assume, is not making millions,
00:56:08.920 selling anti-racism books or hosting anti-racism seminars.
00:56:11.800 She's the person buying the books and attending the seminars.
00:56:16.300 She's spending money on the racket, not making it.
00:56:20.420 And that's because, as you can tell just from that one-minute clip,
00:56:23.120 she really does buy into this nonsense.
00:56:24.680 She actually does hate herself.
00:56:26.560 And that's the point.
00:56:27.580 The anti-racism snake oil salesmen are exploiting the self-loathing of people like this.
00:56:35.720 She was already lonely.
00:56:36.880 She already had a low self-image.
00:56:38.260 She already hated herself before she ever discovered anti-racism
00:56:41.060 or learned the vapid, meaningless mantras like, do the work.
00:56:45.800 Anti-racism simply gave her a way of understanding her own self-loathing.
00:56:49.180 It gave her something to channel it into and through.
00:56:52.740 So what she gets out of the deal is, if not financial profit,
00:56:55.780 at least, and if not emotional stability or happiness,
00:56:58.580 at least she gets a feeling of unearned moral superiority.
00:57:02.720 She hates herself.
00:57:04.480 That much is clear.
00:57:05.280 But she also gets to feel superior to other white people
00:57:07.940 who have not done the work as much as she has.
00:57:11.660 This is exactly the attitude that she's ranting against in the video,
00:57:14.700 but she is lecturing other white people for their feelings of superiority
00:57:17.480 while herself standing on a perch of moral superiority.
00:57:20.540 This is ultimately the promise of anti-racism.
00:57:23.980 This is the reward that it offers to white disciples.
00:57:27.180 It will not make you feel better about yourself.
00:57:29.200 It will not give you happiness,
00:57:30.320 but it will at least make you feel holier than those other white scumbags.
00:57:35.420 Second, it's interesting to note how white women in particular
00:57:41.760 seem to be so susceptible to this stuff.
00:57:44.840 Most of these sorts of videos, and I've seen too many of them,
00:57:48.660 are made by women.
00:57:49.560 And if you talk to anyone who's ever been to an anti-racism seminar,
00:57:53.640 they will tell you that it's usually a majority women.
00:57:57.340 And I think that's because most obviously women tend to be more emotional,
00:58:00.820 which is a good thing generally.
00:58:02.880 You know, a man might sometimes complain about the overly emotional women in his life,
00:58:06.360 but the truth is that he wouldn't want it any other way.
00:58:09.140 His wife or girlfriend's emotional outbursts might annoy him sometimes,
00:58:12.220 but he certainly would rather she be emotional than cold and distant.
00:58:15.980 This is the nature of the two sexes, right?
00:58:17.520 The things that frustrate us about each other the most
00:58:20.100 are the things that we love about each other the most.
00:58:23.900 But a woman's more emotional nature can make her easier to emotionally manipulate in this way.
00:58:29.460 And in particular, women are more naturally empathetic than men.
00:58:33.980 Now, this again is a positive trait.
00:58:36.040 It's something that men love about women.
00:58:39.100 Yet, that empathy, if not properly calibrated and pointed in the right direction,
00:58:44.340 can be exploited and weaponized and turned against itself.
00:58:48.460 White guilt is, in part, a sort of misplaced, mangled, perverse, deranged form of empathy.
00:58:55.320 It's not entirely unlike, you know, the psychology that leads some women to strike up love affairs
00:59:00.820 with murderers in prison.
00:59:03.120 Kind of a similar thing going on.
00:59:05.140 Third, final point.
00:59:08.160 Whether it's a man or a woman expressing their anti-racist white guilt,
00:59:12.840 what we're also seeing is the religious impulse at work.
00:59:16.740 This is maybe the most important point to understand.
00:59:18.500 There is no escaping the fact that man is religious by nature.
00:59:22.720 We naturally search for the transcendent truths that will give our lives meaning.
00:59:28.340 Not only that, but we naturally recognize our own sin, our own guilt.
00:59:33.240 And we look for ways of relieving ourselves of that burden.
00:59:37.320 We seek atonement.
00:59:38.540 We seek absolution.
00:59:40.820 We seek penance.
00:59:44.080 Anti-racism provides an outlet for those desires.
00:59:46.700 It's the wrong outlet.
00:59:48.080 It's wholly unsatisfying and insufficient.
00:59:50.400 But it's the sort of religion that non-religious secular liberals are stuck with.
00:59:54.860 This is all they got.
00:59:56.220 The religion has borrowed, you know, the concept of, it borrows a lot of the concepts
00:59:59.660 because it doesn't create anything of its own.
01:00:02.660 Leftism never does.
01:00:03.420 So it can only borrow from what already exists.
01:00:06.180 In this case, it borrows the concept of original sin from Christianity
01:00:10.940 and comes up with its own warped version.
01:00:13.980 Of course, in Christian theology, original sin is guilt shared by all people everywhere.
01:00:18.700 We are flawed.
01:00:19.760 We are a fallen race, you know.
01:00:21.840 And by race, we mean the human race.
01:00:24.280 But the leftist, anti-racist religion preaches about a flawed and fallen race,
01:00:29.420 meaning specifically the white race.
01:00:32.300 We, white people, are the carriers of original sin.
01:00:35.480 While the other races are angelic, guiltless, uncorrupted beings.
01:00:42.300 This is their mythology.
01:00:43.580 It's their creation story.
01:00:45.360 It's their religion.
01:00:47.200 Because we all need religion.
01:00:49.220 And we will end up with one, one way or another.
01:00:53.300 And so, in some ways, this person being liberal, lonely, sad, self-loathing, and also a woman,
01:00:57.580 she was destined to fall into the anti-racism religion, the anti-racism cult.
01:01:03.820 It was always going to end up this way these days.
01:01:06.920 And yet, she is still today, I must say, in spite of that, canceled.
01:01:11.600 And that'll do it for this portion of the show as we move over to the members' block.
01:01:15.320 Hope to see you there.
01:01:15.980 If not, talk to you tomorrow.
01:01:17.220 Godspeed.
01:01:17.540 Godspeed.
01:01:27.580 Godspeed.