The Matt Walsh Show - February 16, 2023


Ep. 1115 - Stop Sacrificing Truth On The Altar Of Nice


Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 2 minutes

Words per minute

184.2992

Word count

11,523

Sentence count

703

Harmful content

Misogyny

41

sentences flagged

Toxicity

31

sentences flagged

Hate speech

39

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

200 journalists write a scathing letter to the New York Times complaining about all of its anti-trans coverage. Plus, Don Lemon tries to criticize Nikki Haley but does it in a way that even upsets his leftist co-hosts. In our Daily Cancellation, a left-wing magazine takes a crack at answering the great question of our time.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Today on the Matt Wall Show, lots of people are very upset because of some things I said
00:00:03.660 on this show about the trans TikTok personality Dylan Mulvaney. Even conservatives are claiming
00:00:08.640 that I need to be nicer and more gentle in dealing with the trans agenda. Today, I'll explain why the 0.54
00:00:13.480 people making this claim are horrifically stupid and wrong. Also, 200 journalists write a scathing 1.00
00:00:18.680 letter to the New York Times complaining about all of its anti-trans coverage. What does it tell
00:00:22.880 us that even the New York Times can be considered anti-trans now? Plus, Don Lemon tries to criticize
00:00:28.200 Nikki Haley, but does it in a way that even manages to upset his leftist co-hosts. In our
00:00:32.520 Daily Cancellation, a left-wing magazine has taken a crack at answering the great question of our time.
00:00:38.280 We'll see how they did. All that and more today on the Matt Wall Show.
00:00:49.300 Well, I hate to break it to you, but you will die someday. Whether you're a first-time parent
00:00:53.460 earlier in your career or a recent empty nester, you need to make sure that you have a plan in
00:00:57.620 place for when you meet your demise. A will is not just about your stuff, and it's not just
00:01:02.420 for the elderly. When you leave a will behind, you leave behind a legacy as well. You ensure that
00:01:07.440 your wishes are honored when you're unable to see them through. You ensure that your loved ones are
00:01:11.180 taken care of even after you're gone. My partners at Epic Will will help you decide today how the
00:01:15.840 future will look if you die tomorrow. Did you know that 50% of Americans don't have a will?
00:01:20.220 Don't be another statistic. For just $119 in as little as five minutes, Epic Will can help you
00:01:25.400 create your last will and testament, your living will, and even health care power of attorney.
00:01:29.180 Their step-by-step online form makes it incredibly easy. All you got to do is fill in the blanks.
00:01:32.980 So go to EpicWill.com, use promo code Walsh to save 10% on Epic Will's complete will package.
00:01:37.480 That's EpicWill.com, promo code Walsh.
00:01:40.560 There's been a lot of discussion this week about the latest CDC report showing, as New York Times
00:01:45.120 headline put it, record levels of sadness among teenage girls in this country. From the Times,
00:01:50.760 it reports nearly three in five teenage girls felt persistent sadness in 2021, double the rate of
00:01:56.460 boys, and one in three girls seriously considered attempting suicide. The findings, based on surveys
00:02:01.560 given to teenagers across the country, also showed high levels of violence, depression,
00:02:05.380 and suicidal thoughts among lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth. More than one in five of these students
00:02:10.120 reported attempting suicide in the year before the survey. According to the agency, the Youth Risk
00:02:14.940 Behavior Survey was given to 17,000 adolescents at high schools across the United States in the fall of 2021.
00:02:21.520 The survey is conducted every two years, and the rates of mental health problems have gone up with
00:02:26.520 every report since 2011. Now, this is self-reported data, which always has its limitations. As it turns
00:02:33.420 out, people are not always the best judges of their own mental states and experiences, a point that is
00:02:38.720 probably doubly true for teenagers. But even with those limitations in mind, there is no question
00:02:44.060 that young people, especially adolescents, are in crisis. There's an epidemic of despair that has
00:02:50.220 seized hold of our society, and this mental and spiritual plague has infected children most of 0.55
00:02:55.880 all. It is not normal, or it should not be normal, and hasn't been normal historically, for millions
00:03:01.780 of kids in a generation to be chronically depressed, much less suicidal. It's become our normal, but it
00:03:08.860 shouldn't be. The big question, of course, is why this is all happening. I mean, what lies at the root
00:03:15.780 of a generation of teenagers who are basically ready to give up on life after having experienced so
00:03:21.560 little of it? And this is the part, the diagnostic process, where most of our institutional authorities,
00:03:28.700 like the CDC and the corporate media, become totally useless. You know, they can identify some of the
00:03:34.800 elements of the problem. Everyone seems now to agree, for instance, that shutting down schools,
00:03:39.800 locking kids in their homes for a year or two years was a very bad idea, which had and is still having
00:03:45.360 a disastrous effect on their mental health and their physical health and in their health in all
00:03:51.320 senses of the term. Now, many of us said that at the time. At the time, we said that this would happen,
00:03:56.780 but we were shouted down and we were silenced. And now many of the people who did the shouting
00:04:01.460 are echoing the very points that they shouted down. But the lockdowns don't tell the full story.
00:04:06.760 After all, these were all trends that were present before COVID. It was a fire already burning before
00:04:11.900 our government's COVID response poured gasoline onto it. So what else then? Well, you know,
00:04:17.500 there's the fact that kids spend 10 hours a day staring at their phones, that they have been robbed
00:04:23.380 of the true joys of childhood, that their lives have been consumed by these little glowing screens they
00:04:29.940 carry around. This is a major factor to go along with the breakdown of the family, the decline of
00:04:34.900 faith in our country, the general purposelessness and listlessness that defines modern American
00:04:40.120 culture. All of these are ingredients. And all of that goes along with the one major factor that the
00:04:48.960 CDC and the corporate media and the medical establishment will never mention. In fact, they're more likely to
00:04:55.420 present this as a cure rather than a cause. And that is, of course, the gender insanity that has 1.00
00:05:02.220 gripped hold of the youngest generations. It is absolutely not a coincidence that suicidal tendencies
00:05:08.580 and sadness and depression and anxiety are skyrocketing among adolescent children, especially
00:05:14.940 girls, at the same moment that trans and quote-unquote non-binary self-identification is also skyrocketing
00:05:21.340 among children, especially girls. These kids get sucked into this world. They contract the trans mental 1.00
00:05:29.180 virus from their peers and from TikTok and from other social media platforms and from Hollywood and the
00:05:36.520 school system. And they see it as a solution to their problems, you know, because they're unhappy, they're
00:05:42.380 confused, they feel self-loathing, they feel resentment that they don't quite understand. And in
00:05:47.680 transgenderism and gender fluidity, they think they've found a way out, a new beginning, a sort of
00:05:53.920 rebirth. But instead, they tumble directly into an identity crisis and the loss of whatever remnants of
00:06:02.280 meaning and purpose they had in their life before. They think they found the antidote because they've been
00:06:08.840 told that it's the antidote. But the antidote is poison. They're trying to escape whatever parts of
00:06:15.940 themselves they don't like. But the escape hatch is a door that leads to a world of confusion and despair
00:06:21.640 and regret far worse than what they were already experiencing. That's what's happening. And when
00:06:27.800 we're taking into account all of the many horrific consequences of the trans agenda and the stranglehold 1.00
00:06:33.780 that it has on our culture, this needs to be at the top of that very long list. That it is sending
00:06:40.280 children spiraling into anguish, despondency, self-destruction. Millions of children, and counting.
00:06:49.080 And that is also why, on a personal note, I don't pull any punches when I talk about this subject.
00:06:56.360 It's why I long ago decided to be direct, plain-spoken, honest in my opposition to the trans agenda, 1.00
00:07:03.220 even if it means being harsh, even brutal. We don't have the luxury of soft-pedaling this.
00:07:09.080 There isn't room, there isn't time to dance around the subject, as so many others have been doing for so
00:07:15.920 many years. Which brings me to the reason that I'm trending on social media today. Lots of people are
00:07:23.060 very upset about a segment from my show a few days ago where I addressed Dylan Mulvaney. Mulvaney is,
00:07:28.040 of course, the male TikTok guy who announced on TikTok several months ago that he's going to start
00:07:33.600 identifying as a woman. And every day since then, he has published one gross and degrading video
00:07:38.640 after another, making a sick mockery of womanhood, all in an effort to enrich himself, which he has 0.94
00:07:44.660 done with wild success, thanks to various corporate sponsorships and the like. And along with promoting
00:07:49.860 himself this way, he's also seeking to promote the concept of transgenderism. In his latest video,
00:07:58.240 he shows off his plastic surgery, declares that he's the hottest he's ever looked, and that he's so
00:08:02.740 attractive that women need to watch out because he might, quote, steal their husbands. Now, I issued 0.95
00:08:08.740 a brief response, which was succinct and to the point, I thought, and which has now ushered in
00:08:14.760 another round of trans activists wishing for my death, while even many of my fellow, quote, 0.84
00:08:19.540 conservatives are joining them in denouncing me for being mean and hateful and all the rest of it.
00:08:27.160 So I have something I want to say about all this, but in order to put it in proper context,
00:08:30.760 we should probably play that clip from the show. If you were watching a few days ago,
00:08:33.980 you already saw this, but for those who missed it, here's the clip that has everyone so upset.
00:08:39.220 Here it is. Dylan, if that is the most attractive you will ever look, then I don't even want to
00:08:46.560 imagine what you'll look like when you're at your ugliest. You do not pass as an attractive woman or as 1.00
00:08:53.740 a woman at all. Even with 50 pounds of makeup and plastic surgery and clever lighting tricks, 1.00
00:08:59.160 even then, you still cannot escape what you really are and what you will always be.
00:09:04.240 You have successfully shed whatever parts of you were masculine, perhaps, at least on the surface.
00:09:09.040 Nobody would ever describe you as masculine or manly, so you've got that going. But your femininity 0.86
00:09:13.460 quotient has not increased at a rate commensurate with the loss of your masculinity. You may not be
00:09:20.100 masculine, but you also aren't feminine. Instead, you are weird and artificial. You are manufactured and 0.99
00:09:27.440 lifeless. You are unearthly and eerie. You are like some kind of human deep fake. That's what you are. 0.98
00:09:34.280 You are a man deprived of all the best qualities of men, but without any of the best qualities of 0.59
00:09:40.080 women. Even your personality is contrived. Everything about you is fake. Nothing about you 0.99
00:09:44.940 rings true. Nobody buys the act. You'll never be accepted as a woman by anyone. Never by anyone. 1.00
00:09:49.700 Even the people who pretend to accept you as a woman are only pretending because they're afraid of
00:09:54.220 being lectured if they don't, or because they want to use you as a platform to virtue signal.
00:10:00.120 But everyone who looks at you will see something pitiable and bizarre, something utterly unfeminine 0.96
00:10:06.540 in every way. You will never be able to actually have the identity that you're trying to appropriate,
00:10:12.560 nor will you ever be able to fully escape the identity that you're fleeing. The best you can hope
00:10:17.820 for is some kind of limbo, the worst of all worlds. And yet, even in that limbo state,
00:10:22.680 you will still be a man. Just not one that any of us can respect or take seriously.
00:10:32.100 But other than that, champ, you're doing great.
00:10:34.520 Well, there it is. I've got to stop beating around the bush, I think, just to give you an idea of how
00:10:43.680 people are receiving this. I'll read a few of the angry responses. Keep in mind that, again, not all of
00:10:48.660 these are coming from self-described leftists. Some of them are coming from the right, allegedly. So
00:10:53.240 here's a sample. Quote, this is one of the ugliest videos I've come across in my lifetime thus far.
00:10:59.240 Matt Walsh deserves no respect for dehumanizing Dylan Mulvaney, for being transgender. She's an 1.00
00:11:04.420 effing human being, for crying out loud. Another one says, when people like Matt Walsh make videos
00:11:09.360 like this, it reinforces the idea that right-wingers are cruel, close-minded, and unlikable. It makes the
00:11:13.880 rest of their ideas seem toxic. It gives a hard-on to this tiny 2% online movement, and Matt thinks
00:11:19.860 it's a huge W, but it's not. Another says, as has been noted over and over, the cruelty is the point.
00:11:25.360 Anytime conservative reactionaries seem like they're gaining momentum culturally,
00:11:28.540 they can't hold back the gleeful vitriol. It's not surprising his insults are the exact things
00:11:33.260 he's insecure about. Beards aren't magic. Oh, but they are. Another one says, I disdain
00:11:40.540 everything about Dylan Mulvaney and what he stands for. This is one of those from one of the so-called
00:11:45.840 conservatives. But this is why I don't follow Walsh anymore. I know he thinks he's a hero saying
00:11:49.800 the truth that every conservative is thinking, but if you listen to his voice, it's just deep,
00:11:53.440 pure hate. He's no longer rational nor Christian, and if you think he doesn't feel this way 1.00
00:11:58.440 about regular gay people, you're fooling yourself. Another one says, I hope Matt Walsh's God actually
00:12:03.080 does exist so he'll burn in hell for eternity for being a soulless, heartless cretin who spreads 1.00
00:12:07.760 only hatred and fear. He makes the world a worse place with every single breath he takes. I can go on, 1.00
00:12:12.620 but you get the point. And if I went to my emails and DMs, that's where you'd really hear how people
00:12:17.000 feel. And it's not always pretty. So allow me to address these complaints. To begin with,
00:12:23.460 needless to say, I don't apologize at all, nor do I wish to amend what I said or soften my language.
00:12:28.500 I said exactly what I meant to say, exactly as I meant to say it. And I stand by every single word
00:12:33.400 without the slightest bit of equivocation. I will also note that I did not insult Dylan Mulvaney in
00:12:39.140 that clip. I merely described him as directly and honestly as I could. If honesty sounds insulting,
00:12:45.280 well, that only tells us something about the nature of what is being described. It doesn't
00:12:51.160 mean that we should stop being honest about it. Indeed, we need a lot more honesty, direct to the
00:12:56.760 point, brutal at times. Why is honesty and the truth brutal? Well, because the reality of what we're
00:13:04.180 dealing with is brutal. It is a brutal, horrific thing. And so there is no honest way of describing it
00:13:11.440 without sounding brutal yourself. We have gotten to this point where depraved lies and destructive
00:13:19.800 lunacy are destroying our country and consuming entire generations of children, largely because
00:13:24.300 people have been too afraid to speak honestly and to say out loud what they know to be true. We have
00:13:29.400 prioritized politeness and tolerance over truth. And look where it's gotten us. Look what it has
00:13:35.660 achieved. So if you, whoever you are watching this, and if you saw that clip of me addressing Dylan
00:13:45.580 Mulvaney and you thought to yourself, oh, that's mean. He shouldn't have said all that. I don't
00:13:51.460 necessarily disagree, but that's mean. Well, if that's your reaction, then all that tells me and
00:13:58.360 what it ought to tell you about yourself is that you are among the legions who have sacrificed truth
00:14:03.500 on the altar of nice. And the destruction that has followed from that decision is your fault.
00:14:11.500 Okay, this is not a, your cowardice is not a victimless crime. These kids who have been abandoned
00:14:16.800 to lies and despair and who are killing themselves because of it, that's on you and everyone like you.
00:14:24.720 Now, you can't undo the damage that your cowardice has done, but you can at least get on the right side
00:14:32.100 and start fighting for the truth now. You can stop cooperating with the harm and thereby causing harm.
00:14:40.600 Get on the right side of the issue. And you need to, because we are way, way past the point of being
00:14:49.620 able to worry about nice. I mean, that point never existed. It certainly doesn't exist now.
00:14:57.640 Now is a time for truth and nothing else. Now let's get to our five headlines.
00:15:05.620 If you've been paying attention to the news, you know that the FDA just declared a global shortage
00:15:15.640 of medication. Critical antibiotics are in extremely short supply. We all had a good laugh
00:15:20.260 when there were toilet paper shortages at the start of the pandemic. Then when there was a baby
00:15:23.960 formula shortage, things were not so funny anymore. What about when there's a shortage of emergency
00:15:28.420 medications like ibuprofen? That's when things really get serious. So you need to be prepared for
00:15:33.020 anything. And our partners at Jace Medical are here to help with that. A great way to start preparing
00:15:37.460 is with the Jace case, which is a pack of five different courses of antibiotics that you can use
00:15:42.120 to treat a whole host of bacterial illnesses, including UTIs and other illnesses as well. All
00:15:46.840 you got to do is fill out a simple online form. Your information will be reviewed by a board certified
00:15:51.280 physician and your medication will be dispensed by a licensed pharmacy by at a fraction of the regular
00:15:55.620 cost. The Jace case gives me peace of mind knowing that my family will have what we need if the worst
00:16:00.540 happens. You got to go to jacemedical.com, enter code Walsh at checkout for a discount on your order.
00:16:05.940 That's jacemedical.com, promo code Walsh. Well, we'll start with this. Speaking of the need for
00:16:11.660 direct and honest truth, I think this helps to underscore that point. Fox News reports nearly
00:16:16.240 200 liberal New York Times contributors signed an open letter bashing their own news outlet for its
00:16:21.800 recent coverage of trans issues. The letter claimed that the paper's coverage of the propriety
00:16:26.480 of medical care for trans children, quote unquote, has featured an eerily familiar mix of pseudoscience
00:16:32.840 and euphemistic charged language. Just to be clear, they're accusing those who oppose the trans
00:16:41.020 agenda, who oppose trans and kids. They're accusing us, and in particular those who have written in the
00:16:47.000 New York Times, which I haven't, but they're accusing us, our side, of using pseudoscience
00:16:53.820 and euphemistic language. We're the ones doing that. So they're castrating and mutilating kids and
00:16:59.120 calling it gender affirmation care, but we're the ones using euphemisms. They are trying to turn
00:17:06.200 males into females with drugs and surgery, but the pseudoscience is on our end.
00:17:16.180 I mean, they cannot define any of the terms they use, but we're the ones engaging in pseudoscience.
00:17:22.340 Right. Back to Fox, it says, those who signed the letter allege that the outlet has followed the lead
00:17:28.280 of far-right hate groups in presenting gender diversity as a new controversy. As Fox News Digital
00:17:34.060 reported last November, the Times faced blowback for one of its recent reports delving into the
00:17:38.740 potential consequences of puberty blockers. The blowback has now materialized in the February
00:17:42.700 15th letter signed by prominent lefty journalists and authors, including Ed Young, Lucy Sante,
00:17:49.760 Roxane Gay, and Rebecca Solnit. Personally addressed to the Times' associate managing editors for
00:17:57.120 Standards, Philip B. Corbett, the letter alerted him to serious concerns about editorial bias in the
00:18:02.720 newspapers reporting on transgender non-binary and gender non-conforming people. The aggrieved liberal
00:18:07.340 authors noted that though plenty of reporters at the Times cover trans issues fairly, they are
00:18:11.780 eclipsed, however, by what one journalist has calculated as over 15,000 words of front-page
00:18:16.260 Times coverage debating the propriety of medical care for transgender children in the last eight
00:18:21.920 months alone. Okay. This just like perfectly proves my point, doesn't it? Almost, you couldn't have
00:18:29.720 planned it any better. And it's really a profound statement, okay, that the New York Times, we're being
00:18:35.800 told, is biased against trans people, according to these journalists, okay, which shows you the level
00:18:43.880 of absolute, unquestioned, unthinking loyalty to their agenda that the left demands? Anything outside
00:18:54.260 of 100% conformity to everything they say, especially on the trans issue, but really on every other issue
00:19:01.680 too, particularly on this issue, there is no amount of leeway granted. You have to go along with everything
00:19:09.240 they say. And if you do anything outside of that, I mean, if you, if you venture even one inch off the
00:19:14.820 path that they have cut for you, then you are a radical extremist and you're going to get trans 1.00
00:19:19.500 people killed. What they're taking issue with here, and they even say it outright, that these are 0.99
00:19:25.380 articles, um, which, uh, which, okay, 15,000 words debating the propriety of medical care for trans
00:19:36.440 children. And that's what the articles actually do. That's correct. Now, the New York Times has not
00:19:43.920 published anything on the trans issue that any rational person could describe as right-wing or extreme
00:19:52.300 or anything like that, okay? They've not come close to it. The most they've done is just acknowledging
00:20:00.640 that there is a debate to be had about whether or not we should be mutilating and castrating
00:20:07.340 children. But, but really there is no debate to be had about that. There's no debate. It just shouldn't be
00:20:13.940 happening. It's, it's a horrific, these horrific Frankenstein medical experimentations on children
00:20:20.660 should not be happening. There's no rational debate to be had about it. But that's the point.
00:20:25.440 That all they're doing is saying, gee, you know, guys, uh, I know we're doing this to all these
00:20:31.520 kids, but maybe we should talk about it. Should we, should we take a second and just talk about it?
00:20:35.340 Should we, like, maybe there are people on the other side of this who might object and perhaps we
00:20:40.220 should listen to their objections, maybe. And all the articles I've read, we've, we've, uh, read many of
00:20:47.880 them on the show when they come up. And they couch, you know, anytime there's this one in particular,
00:20:54.900 they're upset about where they talk about, uh, the puberty blockers and even the writers of that
00:21:00.120 article, they never say categorically that we should never give these drugs to children.
00:21:06.320 Though of course that's correct. We should never give them to children. That's not what they say.
00:21:11.020 They're not calling for shutting it all down. They're just saying, well, maybe we should slow
00:21:14.200 it up a little bit and we should, uh, you know, we, uh, obviously they say there are times when this
00:21:20.160 is the right thing. And clearly there are kids with gender dysphoria and sometimes a medical
00:21:24.400 intervention is necessary. Clearly that's the case, but maybe there are times when, uh, kids are
00:21:29.120 getting these drugs and they shouldn't, and we should talk about it. That's the only thing they
00:21:31.560 say in the articles. And even that, like as that kind of criticism that is couched, that is, uh, that is,
00:21:39.120 uh, you know, uh, that is made to is presented in as soft a way as it possibly can be tiptoeing around
00:21:51.360 the issue. Like they're dancing over broken glass as they're talking about it, walking on eggshells,
00:21:57.020 whatever. Um, even that is, is too far. Even that is an assault on the very, uh, lives of trans people 1.00
00:22:07.260 and we'll get trans people killed. So what does that tell you? It tells you again that on the 1.00
00:22:14.600 left, this is the kind of conformity that they demand. There is no room for debate, no room for
00:22:21.160 discussion. And so they can come along out of the blue with some absurd, unheard of claim,
00:22:31.720 historically unprecedented, such as the claim that, Hey, you know, sometimes girls are actually 0.98
00:22:38.820 boys and we should chop their breasts off at the age of 14, like something like that to call that 1.00
00:22:45.180 extreme and radical would be, would be severely understating it, but then come along with a 0.99
00:22:49.240 statement like that. And, uh, you're not even allowed to question it. There, there, there cannot
00:22:53.040 even be a moment of discussion about it. So that's what it tells you about the left, which we already
00:22:58.920 know, but what does it tell you about what our response should be and what our approach should
00:23:05.960 be? You can couch your language all you want. You can be as polite and nice about it as you want,
00:23:11.600 and it won't matter. Okay. They are still going to shout it down and scream at you. They're not
00:23:19.200 going to be willing to hear it. So you might as well be direct and to the point and just say what is
00:23:25.280 true and put it out there and leave it there. Like you might as well just put the cards on the table
00:23:33.140 because any attempt that you make to be, to be, uh, nice about it, it won't matter anyway.
00:23:46.380 All right. This has gone viral. Another, uh, awkward exchange between Don Lemon and his female
00:23:50.960 co-hosts. And this one starts when Lemon tries to criticize Nikki Haley and manages to do it in a way
00:23:57.600 that, that offends even his leftist co-hosts. Uh, let's watch how that goes.
00:24:02.620 This whole talk about age makes me uncomfortable. I think that, I think it's the wrong road to go
00:24:07.560 down. She says people, you know, politicians or something are not in their prime. Nikki Haley isn't
00:24:11.700 in her prime. Sorry. When a woman is considered to be in her prime in her twenties and thirties and
00:24:15.840 maybe forties. That's not according to me. Prime for what? It depends. I mean, it's just like prime.
00:24:22.280 If you look it up, it'll say, if you look, if you Google, when is a woman in her prime, it'll say
00:24:26.040 twenties, thirties and forties. I don't necessarily agree with that. So I think she has to be careful
00:24:32.540 about saying that, well, you know, politicians aren't in their prime. You need to qualify. Are you
00:24:36.420 talking about prime for like child caring or are you talking about the facts are Google it? Everybody at
00:24:43.300 home. When is a woman in her prime? It says twenties, thirties and forties. And I'm just
00:24:46.900 saying Nikki Haley should be careful about saying that politicians are not in their prime and they
00:24:51.900 need to be in their prime when they serve because she wouldn't be in a prime according to Google or 1.00
00:24:57.140 whatever it is. Uh, you, you realize you can see the look on his face that he realized he stepped in
00:25:03.940 it. And, uh, it's, it's pretty great as he tries desperately to wiggle his way out of it.
00:25:09.400 Look it up on Google. Just Google it. I mean, Google knows about the prime.
00:25:13.300 It tells us what the prime is. Okay. These are the facts. They're facts about being in the prime
00:25:17.420 and women are not in the prime. Okay. After 40, it said, just look at Google. Google said it. 1.00
00:25:23.120 What are you talking about? Of course, conservatives, uh, are jumping on this one and they're doing the
00:25:28.600 whole, see Democrats are the real sexist routine. And, uh, and also the whole, um, well, imagine if the
00:25:34.400 scenario was reversed routine. And yeah, I mean, that's like, of course, if the scenario is reversed
00:25:38.280 and, um, Don Lemon had said this about a Democrat woman, uh, then there'd be a lot more outrage.
00:25:45.760 And we know that, I mean, like Kamala Harris, how old is Kamala Harris? She's, she's definitely 1.00
00:25:51.600 above, she's past her forties. That we can say, I think she's, she's approaching 60 at least. 0.95
00:25:57.140 Um, but Don Lemon is not saying that she's past her prime.
00:26:03.160 I can guarantee you that Don Lemon voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016. It was in her like
00:26:08.260 late sixties at the time. So yeah, there's a double standard. Um, but it's, it's always,
00:26:15.160 you know, I always cringe when I hear that. Oh, see there's sexist. Like accusing,
00:26:19.840 it doesn't work anyway. Um, it's not going to have the effect that you want,
00:26:25.560 but using the left's language, trying to use it against them. Hey, he's being a sexist.
00:26:32.540 Is he, is Don Lemon a sexist? Like, does he hate women or is it that he's just an idiot? 1.00
00:26:39.380 And he was, he was looking to criticize Nikki Haley because Nikki Haley is a Republican. 1.00
00:26:44.860 And so he just stumbled his way into this. I think it's more of that.
00:26:50.840 It's also true by the way, that there is a prime, uh, for politicians. Like everyone has
00:26:56.220 a prime and it, but it depends on the context we're talking about, you know? Um, so it's not
00:27:00.780 like there's one human, well, this is the prime for a person. It depends on what, in what context,
00:27:05.760 what are we talking about? If you're talking about a physical prime, um, are we talking about,
00:27:09.660 you know, what's the prime for a, for an NFL running back? Like it's good. All these things are
00:27:14.620 going to change. Um, but there is a prime for politicians and is it, is it, it's definitely
00:27:25.980 not 20 or 30, it's not 40, but one thing we can say for sure. And Nikki, Nikki Haley is not past
00:27:32.880 her prime. I mean, she, I don't think she's impressive in her prime, but there is a prime. 0.99
00:27:39.080 Um, and, uh, and the one thing that we can say, and we should say is that your late seventies
00:27:45.640 is past it. Whenever that period is like, you're not in your prime in your late seventies,
00:27:50.940 you're not going to be in your prime in really any context or any respect when you get into
00:27:55.320 your late seventies. And that's not a, that's, that's no disrespect. People in their late seventies
00:27:58.880 is no disrespect to elderly people. It's just a reality of aging. We're all going to be there
00:28:02.720 one day, unless we die before that. This is just, that's the reality. Either you die before
00:28:07.320 you really get past your physical and mental prime, or you get past your physical mental 0.99
00:28:11.520 prime and then you die. That's, that's what it means to be a mortal creature walking the
00:28:15.220 earth. And once you get into your late seventies, you are past your physical prime, you're past
00:28:20.100 your mental prime. Um, that's just it. And, uh, so Nikki Haley has nothing to do. There 0.99
00:28:29.440 are other reasons to criticize Nikki Haley's candidacy reasons that you're never going to hear
00:28:33.880 from a, from, you know, a Democrat, but we should absolutely be talking about the fact
00:28:40.800 that, uh, you know, once you get into your late seventies, it's just absurd. It's a, as
00:28:45.440 I've been saying for so long, it's absurd that we allow people in their late seventies to run
00:28:49.980 for office. We've seen how this plays out. It's played out with Joe Biden exactly. It was
00:28:54.160 as it was always destined to play out. Um, and as you get into your late seventies and your
00:28:59.340 early eighties, the physical and mental decline only accelerates and it accelerates if you're
00:29:04.900 retired and you spend your days sitting on your porch in a rocking chair as everyone in
00:29:09.980 their eighties should be like that's, you've earned that. That's how you should be spending
00:29:12.980 your days. How I want to spend my days if I make it to my eighties. Um, but if you, you
00:29:20.900 add on the, the mental and physical stresses of the presidency, which is one of the most high
00:29:27.560 pressure jobs in existence, and you add that on to what is already going to be a period
00:29:34.060 of mental and physical decline. It just, you end up with Joe Biden and it is, there is no,
00:29:40.960 I have not heard one good argument for allowing people past 75 to run for the presidency. 35
00:29:47.680 to 75. I think that's a good cutoff. I mean, you could argue for cutting it off sooner than
00:29:50.860 that, but I think 35 to 70 is pretty, gives you a nice round number 40, 40 years. You have
00:29:55.880 40 years to become president. You can't do it in that timeframe. Then, uh, well, it just
00:29:59.360 wasn't meant for you. And that's okay because you know, the vast majority of humans who have
00:30:03.740 ever existed in America are not going to be president. So you're just going to be one
00:30:07.700 of us. Um, all right. This is good stuff from a magazine called in these times, which
00:30:15.420 is like a commie magazine from the sixties or something that's still around now as a website.
00:30:19.860 And they ran an article calling out the, uh, the transphobes and it's titled transphobic
00:30:25.220 violence doesn't happen in a vacuum. And you're not going to believe this, but, uh, they do
00:30:29.460 criticize me in the article as a transphobe, you know, transphobe of the year. It's to be 0.99
00:30:34.220 expected, mostly boilerplate stuff, calling out transphobes, et cetera. But what, what this
00:30:40.560 one just takes up a notch because they throw the sweet baby gang into it. And I did, I did,
00:30:45.160 we don't often see that included, but it does seem like they're finally discovering the sweet
00:30:50.900 baby gang cult and they're not happy about it. So this is some of the articles is notoriously
00:30:56.380 anti-trans daily wire host, Matt Walsh speaks frequently to his audience of millions about
00:31:00.560 the horrors of drag and gender ideology, including right after the club Q massacre at Walsh's rally 0.77
00:31:05.720 to end child mutilation in Nashville, uh, last October attendees, not dressed in proud boy or
00:31:10.880 other militia branded clothing or wearing gear referencing the quote sweet baby gang, a name
00:31:16.620 some of Walsh's followers used to refer to themselves. Walsh, the demagogue has his constituency
00:31:21.360 clad in his image. The vilification creates an enemy and a scapegoat. Now that a constituency is
00:31:27.620 formed, the demagogue may proceed to heighten the rhetoric and disinformation creating and vilifying
00:31:32.280 an enemy. Quote, the hated target is first denigrated writes Burlett, then, uh, I don't know,
00:31:37.600 some author then vilified, then demonized and finally dehumanized. A constituency created
00:31:43.880 through the weaponization of shared rhetoric, rhetoric, like the avid fan base that listens
00:31:47.600 to Matt Walsh every day is primed to hear that an already targeted group is the cause of their
00:31:52.260 ills. For Christian nationalists, the targeted scapegoat is often said to harbor or outright be
00:31:57.020 the antichrist. Well, yeah, they are the antichrist, but you see, um, the point is that if you're in
00:32:04.080 the sweet baby gang, then you are under my control. You have played right into my hands. You're being 0.94
00:32:08.780 manipulated for my dastardly purposes. That's what they're claiming. And every member of the
00:32:16.720 SPG is thinking and listening to that and thinking, well, yeah, that's the whole idea. Although I do,
00:32:21.960 I do like the term constituency. So I'm sort of thinking about sweet baby gang. Should it be the
00:32:28.020 sweet baby constituency? Got kind of a mafia-esque ring to it. Maybe we'll stick, we'll stick with
00:32:36.060 the gang. I think, um, I also have this, uh, video that I've had for a couple of days. Maybe
00:32:44.540 you've seen it circulating. I just think it's pretty extraordinary and it's a great lesson for
00:32:49.080 all of us. This is a self-described quote unquote non-binary TikToker who came out as non-binary to
00:32:56.460 her family and yet has found that her grandmother is not going along with it. So granny ain't having 1.00
00:33:03.000 it basically. Uh, the TikToker then reads a letter that her grandma wrote to her, which we're supposed 0.99
00:33:08.600 to see the letter is like horrible and bigoted. It was actually one of the best examples of real
00:33:13.920 maternal love that I've heard in quite some time. So I want to go ahead and play that for you. Here it
00:33:19.420 is. Hi. So recently I texted my parents because I'm going to go home for Christmas. And I said,
00:33:26.180 Hey, do you mind calling me Mike when I come back for Christmas? And then when I got home today,
00:33:33.100 I got this letter from my grandma and it is addressed to miss old name. Not actually,
00:33:41.140 but you know, I don't want to say my real name on the internet. Dearest dead name on this, our
00:33:49.020 blessed mother's feast day. I am writing to tell you that I will not address you as Mike. My decision
00:33:55.200 is probably not a surprise to you. Others may comply with your request. My anguish in your chosen name
00:34:00.960 and what that means has to do with your eternal soul. Know that I love you more than words could ever
00:34:07.360 possibly convey to you. No matter how you decide to identify yourself does not change my deep love
00:34:12.540 for you, honey. Because of my concerns for your soul and your mental health, I am spending more time
00:34:18.420 with Jesus in adoration. The, my cousin's last names are doing the same for you. Um, then she lists my one,
00:34:28.220 two, three, four, five cousins that are below the age of 10 who are apparently, um, offering up special
00:34:36.760 personal sacrifices for me, who I didn't tell, um, that I wanted to go by Mike. I didn't want to. I haven't
00:34:44.280 talked with your godmother and her family, but I'm sure they would do the same for you. Do you know how much you
00:34:51.100 are cherished and loved? It would be a joy to see you and be with you during the, I mean, Christmas,
00:34:56.380 um, a celebration of her Lord's birth.
00:35:02.000 Uh, that is what, what love sounds like. That is true maternal and Christian love. That's exactly
00:35:11.160 what it sounds like from the grandmother. And this fits right into the theme of the show today,
00:35:16.020 I guess, about being a direct to the point and being honest and truthful. And that's exactly what
00:35:21.140 this grandmother is doing for her granddaughter. Something that, um, from the sound of it seems like
00:35:26.180 most people in her life are not willing to do. And this young lady is, um, going to be very upset 1.00
00:35:33.600 because she wants to engage in something self-destructive and she wants people to cooperate with her 0.95
00:35:40.420 delusion. And right now she is guarding that delusion jealously because she sees it as, uh,
00:35:46.640 she sees it, she wants it to be her identity and she sees it as her salvation. You know, whatever
00:35:52.000 she's trying to escape, she sees this as the way to escape it. And so anyone doesn't go along with it,
00:35:56.720 she's going to lash out and, uh, and be very angry and sad about it. But what we can hope and pray is
00:36:03.320 that, uh, and I think that there's a good chance of this, that, uh, as this young lady grows up,
00:36:09.740 eventually she's going, and this might happen when the grandmother is dead. You know, this might, this
00:36:16.640 might be after the, this might be years later after the grandmother has already, has gone on to her
00:36:21.000 reward. But, uh, there will come a time, I believe and hope when she will look back and realize
00:36:28.440 that her grandmother was perhaps the only person in her life who really loved her.
00:36:33.320 Um, and this, that's what this love does is like this great, the grandmother obviously wants a
00:36:40.880 relationship with her grandchild, obviously loves her, obviously wants to get along with her, wants
00:36:45.080 to see her and wants, wants everything to be happy and fine. But she's willing to sacrifice that for
00:36:50.300 the time being for the sake of, uh, her grandchild's mental, physical, and spiritual wellbeing in the long
00:36:57.680 run. And she's even willing because this grandmother obviously knows what's going on as a 1.00
00:37:03.900 very intelligent person. And so she knows that there's a possibility that this could sever the
00:37:09.820 relationship for the rest of the grandmother's life. And so if the time ever comes when that love
00:37:16.040 really sinks in and, and, and this, the, the, the girl has an awakening, the grandmother might not even
00:37:22.380 be around to see it, but this is the legacy that she's leaving behind. She is sacrificing something 0.74
00:37:27.860 in the moment for the sake of the girl's, uh, you know, ultimate betterment and for her salvation.
00:37:37.520 That's, that's what, that's what love is. That's what it sounds like. Um, it's no different than if,
00:37:45.380 you know, you're on a ship at sea with someone and, uh, let's say the grandmother, maybe the
00:37:51.360 grandmother and the grandchild are on a cruise together. And, uh, and the, the, the girl says
00:37:56.840 that, you know, she identifies suddenly as a dolphin. And so she's going to jump into the ocean
00:38:03.080 and, you know, she's going to jump into the middle of the sea and swim like a dolphin, you know, 1.00
00:38:08.580 the most loving response, obviously, no matter how much the girl believes that about herself,
00:38:15.060 no matter how much she wants to be seen as a sea creature, no matter how much she wants to be
00:38:19.020 seen that way, it's not true. And so if the grandmother goes along with it, all she's doing
00:38:23.600 is condemning this child to, to drown in the depths of the ocean as she jumps in and, uh, and drowns.
00:38:32.340 It's like, so is that love to condemn someone to sink into the dark depths of the ocean and die?
00:38:40.160 Is that, is that what love is?
00:38:43.880 But that is exactly what many people are doing to, to kids in the name of so-called love,
00:38:50.000 condemning them to sink into the darkness and despair and drown and die.
00:38:58.180 If you really love someone and you really care, you're going to be willing to tell them the truth.
00:39:01.460 All right. A little bit of a lighter note as we, uh, before we get to the comment section,
00:39:08.100 Sam Smith is back on TV again, and I'm loathe to play any more clips involving this freaking guy,
00:39:15.040 but I have to play this, um, as an angler myself, it just irked me. And so I can't help but play it.
00:39:22.640 Here it is.
00:39:23.940 You're a big fan of fishing.
00:39:25.040 I do love fishing.
00:39:26.660 Yes, I do.
00:39:27.620 Yeah, yeah. I'd love to be a fisher, fisher them.
00:39:29.680 What, like a fly fisherman?
00:39:31.820 I'd, I'd be, I'd be any type of fisher them. I think I would like to, one day I'd just like to end my days fishing.
00:39:38.740 Like, sitting on the back.
00:39:39.900 Do you fly fishing?
00:39:41.200 I do it on the sea and I do it in the lakes. I've never done it alone.
00:39:44.040 So cool.
00:39:44.860 Someone's always taught me.
00:39:46.400 Fantastic.
00:39:47.100 Yeah.
00:39:49.780 Fisher them.
00:39:50.620 Um, that's the kind of thing, like, if I found out that, uh, Sam Smith is a, is an angler, considers himself one.
00:40:02.200 I would say that as a, that's a joke that I would come up with to make fun of him.
00:40:06.020 I call it, well, yeah, fisher them.
00:40:08.120 But he's embraced it.
00:40:09.500 This is as, as, as these people just continue to be, to, to, uh, get to a point where it's just beyond,
00:40:14.800 there's no way to even satirize or mock them anymore effectively because it's beyond parody and mockery.
00:40:22.820 So he doesn't, he's not saying it as a joke.
00:40:25.480 He can't be saying it as a joke because then what would the punchline be?
00:40:28.680 The punchline would be, you know, the, the non-binary craze. 1.00
00:40:33.200 And obviously that's not the punchline.
00:40:35.960 So this is what, how he actually wants to be referred to.
00:40:39.380 Fisher them.
00:40:40.100 Um, and I'm sorry, I don't, I don't buy Sam Smith as a fisherman or fisher them.
00:40:47.240 You know, uh, I don't, I don't buy it at all.
00:40:49.600 This guy is not going out fishing.
00:40:51.040 I know he's not, maybe he's been out a couple of times.
00:40:52.960 Okay.
00:40:53.940 I've heard this from people before.
00:40:55.260 Oh, I love fishing.
00:40:56.040 And then like, you go out fishing with them.
00:40:58.000 And, uh, you know, for them fishing is like, you know, just a, uh, uh, a spin cast reel,
00:41:06.420 throwing it out into the middle of the, of the lake with a bobber on there.
00:41:09.900 And it's like, you know, that, that's the kind of thing that he's, he's doing actual
00:41:13.360 fishing.
00:41:13.760 I'll tell you why I know he's not a fisher, fisherman, um, it's because the, what makes
00:41:19.860 fishing enjoyable is that, you know, it's just like, it makes many hobbies enjoyable.
00:41:25.460 It's one of the fundamental joys of it is that you're, you're not thinking about yourself.
00:41:29.200 You are, um, focusing and concentrating on something other than yourself.
00:41:33.960 You know, it's the, it's the craft and the skill of fishing.
00:41:38.740 That's what makes it fun.
00:41:39.920 That's what makes it enjoyable.
00:41:42.100 But we know that a narcissist like that could never find joy in that because everything has
00:41:47.660 to come back to him.
00:41:48.920 Everything has to be about his own self-obsessions.
00:41:51.640 So anything that takes him out of that is going to be very disturbing.
00:41:55.820 We already know that.
00:41:56.420 So I do not accept him in the angler community. 0.97
00:42:00.740 I'm sorry.
00:42:01.500 We're a welcoming community for the most part, but we, we do draw the line somewhere.
00:42:06.280 We draw it at Fisher thems.
00:42:08.540 Let's get to the comment section.
00:42:09.760 If you're a man, it's required that you grow up in hay with a sweet baby gang.
00:42:20.060 LFTR says, my girlfriend liked Chelsea Handler and showed me some of, uh, the reality show
00:42:25.220 Chelsea had done that, that followed her daily life.
00:42:28.700 My God, that sounds horrific.
00:42:30.740 About five minutes in, I had realized I was watching one of the saddest and most miserable
00:42:34.900 people I'd ever seen.
00:42:35.860 At six minutes, I had succumbed to Handler poisoning and had to go stand in the sunlight
00:42:40.140 to halt the reaction.
00:42:42.740 Yeah, well, that's a red flag.
00:42:44.280 First of all, your girlfriend likes Chelsea Handler.
00:42:46.140 I mean, that's a comment.
00:42:46.700 I'm not saying you should break up with her on the spot because of that.
00:42:50.480 There are worse reasons to break up with someone, but I'm not necessarily recommending it,
00:42:53.820 but I would have a conversation.
00:42:54.580 I would really have a serious conversation.
00:42:56.780 So I would go to her today and say, listen, we need to talk about this Chelsea Handler stuff.
00:43:01.860 Like, what is it about her that you find?
00:43:03.960 How could you sit and watch, bad enough to watch her give an unfunny monologue, but you
00:43:10.500 want to watch and just watch her live her daily life? 0.92
00:43:14.980 It's not, it's, that's, that's the one thing. 0.98
00:43:16.740 Yeah, it's, it's, as we've reviewed, it's just sad and pathetic and trying to convince 0.89
00:43:20.160 everyone that she's happy, but it's also just the life that she's living. 0.57
00:43:26.100 It's, it's, it's so uninteresting.
00:43:27.540 It's not an interesting life.
00:43:29.360 Um, so at the very least, if you are, you say you're going to be childless or you're not
00:43:35.980 going to get married, you're not going to do any of that.
00:43:38.420 Okay.
00:43:38.820 Well, I don't know.
00:43:40.460 Go out and do something interesting.
00:43:42.020 The most interesting thing you can think to do with this quote unquote freedom that you
00:43:46.860 have, because, uh, there's no one in your life that you care about and love.
00:43:50.060 And there's no one who loves and cares you, cares about you.
00:43:52.320 I mean, you call that freedom.
00:43:53.200 I don't, but okay, let's call it freedom for a minute.
00:43:56.160 So the most interesting thing you can think to do with it is like to go to tourist spots.
00:44:02.100 Go do some, I mean, go, uh, I don't know, go explore some unexplored part of the Amazon
00:44:07.020 or something like do something like that.
00:44:09.120 Something really interesting.
00:44:12.080 That's a reality show that I would watch actually drop Chelsea Handler off in the Amazon. 1.00
00:44:17.360 I don't think it's a show that would last very long, but, uh, for as long as it lasts,
00:44:21.840 I think I might actually watch that.
00:44:23.760 Dallin says, I completely agree with Matt.
00:44:25.560 My stepdad is a mountaineer who's done four of the seven summits and many other high mountains,
00:44:30.440 and he still does it even with work, even with kids, even with gymnastics competitions
00:44:34.180 that my sister has or mountain bike races my brother and I have.
00:44:37.180 He's still actively there for us and prioritizes that, that, that over other things, but he also
00:44:42.840 plans time to do the things he loves.
00:44:45.960 Yeah.
00:44:46.160 All of that is, it's perfectly possible.
00:44:48.740 It's perfectly plausible.
00:44:49.540 Um, you don't need to give up, you know, again, I mean, if there are things that you
00:44:55.640 like to do that are unhealthy and not good and you shouldn't be doing, um, then like
00:45:03.180 binge drinking, for example, that is something that you should give up when you have, you
00:45:07.780 should give it up before you have kids.
00:45:09.020 Well, certainly if you have kids, you should give it up.
00:45:10.220 But if there's real, like, wholesome, fruitful hobbies and things that you like to do, there's
00:45:15.000 just no reason why you actually have to give up any of that when you have kids.
00:45:18.960 Um, you have to put it, you have to, uh, be a little more intentional with your time.
00:45:24.900 You have to plan things out more than you normally would, but that's also not a bad thing.
00:45:31.240 Um, it's just a, it's just a matter of like reprioritizing, but there's no reason, especially
00:45:37.820 if there's two of you, this is one of the, this is a one of the many advantages of having
00:45:43.300 children with someone and getting married and staying married because now there's two
00:45:47.480 of you and that's also going to, and if you're on the same page and you're on the same team
00:45:51.600 and you're looking out for each other and you're both realize, you know, both spouses
00:45:56.160 realize that the other needs break sometimes and needs to be, it needs to be able to get
00:46:00.220 out and do their own thing on occasion.
00:46:02.160 Um, and, uh, and so if you have that, then there's no reason why you can't do all of those
00:46:06.680 things.
00:46:07.740 And that also gives you things that as your kids get older, you can incorporate them into those,
00:46:12.400 those things as well.
00:46:14.700 Uh, William says about, uh, Chelsea Handler, like Norman O'Donnell said, women aren't good 1.00
00:46:20.960 comedians.
00:46:22.640 Yeah, well, I think it's, I mean, it is a fact that male comedians tend to be funnier.
00:46:26.620 You know, this is one of those many, one of the, one of the many, uh, controversial statements
00:46:31.280 that, that people act as though it's controversial, even though everyone knows that it's true and
00:46:35.740 agrees.
00:46:36.620 Like if you were to make a list of the twenties, 20 funniest comedians of all time, everybody
00:46:42.260 everybody's list, everyone's list would be a little bit different, but everyone's list
00:46:45.420 would, would be dominated by men. 0.96
00:46:47.540 That's the case for anybody.
00:46:49.700 Um, and if we weren't such a sensitive society, we might be able to have a conversation about
00:46:53.380 why that's the case because it is an interesting phenomenon.
00:46:56.200 You know, Christopher Hitchens back years ago wrote an article about this, about how women 1.00
00:47:00.800 aren't funny and, uh, and people were very upset about that.
00:47:03.960 And his argument was kind of, um, and this is not a surprise coming to Christopher Hitchens.
00:47:07.960 He, he saw it as kind of an evolutionary adaptation that men tend to be funnier because, um, they
00:47:13.680 need to be in order to attract a mate. 0.62
00:47:16.700 Whereas, whereas for women, it's not like that because men aren't typically ranking funniness
00:47:22.280 high on the list of qualities that they need in a woman. 0.98
00:47:25.860 Now, a good sense of humor, men want that. 0.96
00:47:28.880 They want a good sense of humor.
00:47:29.820 You certainly don't want to be with like a woman who's shrill and has no sense of humor 1.00
00:47:33.760 and is getting offended all the time.
00:47:34.840 Uh, you don't want to be like a feminist, for example, but a good sense of humor doesn't 1.00
00:47:38.840 necessarily mean that you yourself are funny.
00:47:40.400 Really, it means that you're going to, are you going to laugh at our jokes?
00:47:42.580 That's the first thing we're worried about.
00:47:44.740 Um, so I don't know, there might be something to that.
00:47:47.060 I think also female comedians, um, first of all, they tend, not always, but they tend to 0.96
00:47:56.540 structure their comedy around being masculine and man-like.
00:47:59.860 So it's a lot of, uh, a lot of jokes that are based, that basically boil down to, hey,
00:48:03.680 look how vulgar I am.
00:48:05.120 Listen to how frankly I talk about sex. 0.79
00:48:07.340 This is what men usually do, but I'm doing it. 1.00
00:48:09.080 Isn't that funny? 0.99
00:48:09.600 So it's a lot of that kind of thing and it gets kind of pathetic.
00:48:11.520 And then also I think self-deprecation is an essential ingredient in being funny.
00:48:16.700 Um, really funny comedians are extremely self-deprecating.
00:48:20.460 They're willing to make themselves the butt of the joke, but in particular, these feminist 1.00
00:48:25.340 comedians, they really struggle in that regard.
00:48:28.100 And so it's just not funny.
00:48:29.380 You heard in the Chelsea Handler clip yesterday, uh, one of the first, I don't know, jokes
00:48:33.280 that she makes is how she, she looks in the mirror and admires herself for being such a
00:48:37.760 dynamic woman.
00:48:40.520 And that's not supposed to be ironic.
00:48:42.440 It's supposed to be a kind of girl power empowerment thing. 1.00
00:48:45.880 Um, it's supposed to elicit, uh, clapping applause more than laughter.
00:48:53.180 And it's just, it's not funny like self-confidence, especially pretend self-confidence isn't funny.
00:48:59.520 There's nothing funny about that.
00:49:01.460 And if you can't laugh at yourself and see yourself as absurd, then you're not going to
00:49:07.200 be funny.
00:49:07.820 And I think that's one of the many problems that, uh, Chelsea Handler has. 0.97
00:49:12.280 Uh, finally, Captain Everyman says, dude, please, there is no utter disgrace in playing
00:49:16.560 lift every voice and sing.
00:49:18.600 You continue the tradition of conservatives being race baiters and undercover totalitarians.
00:49:23.260 The Star Spangled Banner is not appropriate for everyone.
00:49:26.440 It's a song written by a slave owner in 1812 that declared the U.S. the land of the free
00:49:30.720 while my ancestors were held in bondage as chattel slaves.
00:49:33.540 So let's get a new anthem we can all embrace.
00:49:36.320 The words of our national anthem speak to what the U.S. should not be.
00:49:40.160 What?
00:49:41.080 Lift every voice and sing speaks to what the U.S. should be.
00:49:44.440 I'm sorry, what part of the national anthem speaks to what the U.S. should not be?
00:49:47.880 Should it not be land of the free, home of the brave?
00:49:52.700 Now, your criticism, is your criticism that those words were written when it wasn't true?
00:49:56.760 Or is your criticism that the words shouldn't be true?
00:49:59.600 Because your criticism can't be both of those things.
00:50:01.500 It sounds like it's both, and that doesn't make a lot of sense.
00:50:04.300 Also, I'm wondering, by the way, this standard that you've applied to the national anthem,
00:50:08.180 where it was written and it's aspirational, talks about freedom and all these things.
00:50:13.500 But these aspirational principles were not consistently applied to everyone.
00:50:18.780 And so you say that means we need to throw out the national anthem.
00:50:21.240 Do you apply that to every country?
00:50:23.360 Is it just our own?
00:50:24.680 Like if I go and find other countries in the world that have their own national anthems
00:50:28.540 that were written at a time when there was slavery and segregation, all that kind of stuff,
00:50:33.060 are you going to say that those countries should also throw out their national anthems and get new ones?
00:50:37.080 Or is it just us?
00:50:37.860 Because I think probably you would tell us it's just us.
00:50:39.960 So you're again holding the United States to a standard that you don't hold any other country in the world.
00:50:44.860 And certainly African countries you don't hold to that standard.
00:50:47.400 And the utter disgrace is in giving racially segregated national anthems.
00:51:00.440 National anthems are supposed to be about the nation, about unity.
00:51:04.880 And having a black national anthem is meant to be, it's an attack on that very concept of national unity. 1.00
00:51:12.560 So that's why it's a disgrace, just to be clear. 0.53
00:51:15.000 Well, it seems that almost everywhere you turn, the world wants to make you woke.
00:51:19.140 But our good friend Dennis Prager is on a mission to make you wise instead.
00:51:22.580 And thankfully, Dennis has created a brand new series with Daily Wire Plus called The Master's Program,
00:51:26.860 which will do just that.
00:51:28.300 We've had a longstanding relationship with Dennis Prager for good reason. 0.99
00:51:30.700 He's been leading the charge against stupidity for longer than I've been alive. 0.97
00:51:33.840 And he's done it with content like Prager used five-minute videos and so many other things. 0.98
00:51:37.680 The Master's Program takes 40 years worth of wisdom and experience
00:51:40.180 from one of the most influential conservative thinkers in America today
00:51:42.940 and distills it all down in a way that is relevant and accessible.
00:51:47.220 Episodes explore topics like, is human nature basically good?
00:51:50.740 I think we can say for certain that I'm obviously good, but I can't speak for anyone else.
00:51:54.220 The series also covers the consequences of secularism,
00:51:56.540 which, by the way, are so dire and needed two episodes to explore.
00:51:59.780 A brand new episode of Prager U's Master's Program is available to stream right now,
00:52:04.300 but only on Daily Wire Plus.
00:52:05.420 So head to dailywireplus.com to become a member
00:52:07.360 and watch Prager U's Master's Program and more.
00:52:10.120 That's dailywireplus.com today.
00:52:11.900 Now let's get to our daily cancellation.
00:52:17.560 Today we cancel the website Covator,
00:52:20.320 which is, according to its About Us section,
00:52:22.640 is a multifaceted lifestyle brand that brings you insider access
00:52:26.800 to the people shaping today's cultural conversation.
00:52:29.640 Our goal is to reimagine luxury and take you behind the scenes with those in the know.
00:52:35.140 We celebrate independent expression in all its varied forms,
00:52:38.320 and we help pave the way for what's new and next.
00:52:42.100 Well, that all, of course, means nothing.
00:52:43.540 All you really need to know is that Covator is yet another leftist rag,
00:52:46.560 and it's another one that has decided to take a crack at answering the question of our time,
00:52:51.500 the great question, the ultimate question.
00:52:53.580 They've had months to think about it, lots of time to reflect,
00:52:55.940 to organize their thoughts, to plan what they're going to say.
00:52:58.360 And this week they unleashed their answer in an article
00:53:01.040 written by Harley Preston entitled,
00:53:03.800 What is a Woman? 1.00
00:53:04.420 Now, not to spoil the ending,
00:53:06.720 but you should know that Preston never really promises an answer exactly.
00:53:10.340 Instead, the subtitle promises, quote,
00:53:12.120 an exploration of how transness can expand our understanding of gender.
00:53:16.640 So we're not off to a great start, but Preston begins, quote,
00:53:19.180 as trans women like me struggle to be seen and respected as women,
00:53:22.640 the most frustrating conversation to witness has been the one
00:53:25.040 that probes at a trans woman's realness.
00:53:27.960 It's a question that is so seemingly simple yet insidious at its core
00:53:31.120 as violence towards trans women continues.
00:53:33.380 What is a woman? 1.00
00:53:34.940 This question brings divisiveness into the fold as people connect semantics with biology.
00:53:39.840 Linguistics and definitions become a hurdle for someone like me to overcome.
00:53:44.140 There is a silent threat in those four simple words that aims to dismantle the logic
00:53:48.760 that trans women are, in fact, women.
00:53:50.580 Well, yes, that's exactly the idea.
00:53:53.820 We are dismantling the logic of transgenderism, and we're doing it with one single question. 1.00
00:53:58.060 You know, an introspective person might here begin to wonder whether his logic is fatally flawed
00:54:03.420 if it can be dismantled by a question.
00:54:06.800 Because just think about that for a moment.
00:54:08.800 Preston has described a question as insidious and threatening and compared it to physical violence.
00:54:15.740 A question.
00:54:17.200 Now, I have never in my life described a question that way, any question, or thought of any question that way.
00:54:24.040 In fact, I quite welcome any question that anyone might ask about my ideas or my worldview
00:54:30.340 because the question only gives me the opportunity to say more about my ideas and my worldview.
00:54:36.000 Even if the question is asked in bad faith by someone not really interested in the answer,
00:54:40.720 still, by asking it, they have given me the floor to speak.
00:54:44.720 So, when the trans activist declares that he is threatened by a question,
00:54:50.040 he's really saying that he is threatened by whatever might come out of his mouth in response to the question.
00:54:55.360 He is threatened by the opportunity to speak.
00:54:58.880 And he's right. 0.99
00:54:59.700 But his worldview is so depraved and indefensible that it can only sound dumber and more depraved the more that he speaks. 0.99
00:55:07.020 And he knows that. 0.99
00:55:08.840 Back to the article.
00:55:10.540 As it is, common definitions of woman are often associated with an adult human female.
00:55:14.800 In other words, of or denoting the sex that can bear offspring or produce eggs.
00:55:19.060 Now, let's face the facts here.
00:55:20.780 I can't do either of those things.
00:55:22.220 I lack the ability to bear offspring, to produce eggs, or to menstruate.
00:55:25.100 And some people will use that very definition of woman as a weapon to attack the notion that I am deserving of womanhood. 0.96
00:55:30.740 And to complement that, this logic insinuates that I and women like me are nothing more than men with a mental illness.
00:55:37.720 To be a woman is much more nuanced and complicated than a mere biological function.
00:55:42.740 This rhetoric continued on into June, Pride Month no less, as Matt Walsh, a right-wing political commentator,
00:55:48.180 released his problematic documentary, What is a Woman?
00:55:50.440 In this film, Matt Walsh asked various people, from politicians to medical professionals, what is a woman?
00:55:56.240 He intended to poke holes into the trans movement with the mindless prejudices under the guise of common sense.
00:56:02.300 It was portrayed that no one was able to give a universal definition of woman.
00:56:06.020 The common response was that a woman is someone who identifies as a woman.
00:56:08.840 And while this makes sense to me, Walsh makes a point to show that this violates the rule
00:56:13.040 that you cannot define a word by using the same word or the definition,
00:56:16.680 and ultimately puts into question the legitimacy that trans women are women.
00:56:22.060 Yes, now you're getting it. That's exactly correct.
00:56:24.020 You cannot define a word by using the word you're supposed to be defining.
00:56:26.980 So, is this the part where Preston has his come-to-Jesus moment?
00:56:30.500 Do the mental clouds open up, allowing the sun to peek through?
00:56:34.420 He starts to finally get it?
00:56:36.620 Not exactly.
00:56:37.480 He goes on, quote,
00:56:38.220 This question began to feel cruel.
00:56:41.240 As you can imagine, witnessing these conversations made me viscerally frustrated
00:56:44.860 as I, too, struggled with finding an answer.
00:56:47.760 My womanhood was being perceived as having no logic or basis
00:56:50.920 because the English language failed to support or encompass my experience as a woman.
00:56:55.460 It was the obsession of some to debunk my womanly existence
00:56:58.840 with the exclusion of trans women from a definition in the dictionary
00:57:01.660 or because of biological limitations.
00:57:03.440 As politicians continued to argue my realness as well as assess my threat to society,
00:57:09.060 I grew obsessed with wanting to define woman through a transgender lens 0.86
00:57:12.240 and questioned whether that was even possible.
00:57:14.860 I wondered if I was asked such a question, what would I say?
00:57:18.040 There was a desire to go toe-to-toe with Walsh's pseudo-logic
00:57:20.680 that trans women need to fit into a singular definition or otherwise we are not women.
00:57:24.720 As I struggled to form an answer to Walsh's question,
00:57:26.860 I couldn't help but feel like this was a clear indication
00:57:28.800 that the English language sometimes does not appropriately grasp the nuances of gender.
00:57:34.780 Ah, well, there you go.
00:57:36.440 You know, it's not his logic that's the problem, it's the English language.
00:57:39.900 So if he's struggling to use the language to defend and communicate his point,
00:57:44.300 it must be because the language itself is deficient.
00:57:47.660 This reminds me of the argument that I made to my math teacher in middle school
00:57:50.320 when I failed to, you know, I failed all my algebra tests, basically.
00:57:54.960 I tried to explain that if I fail the test, that it must mean that there's something wrong with algebra.
00:58:00.900 Algebra isn't working right.
00:58:02.580 Algebra is broken.
00:58:04.240 Or maybe it's numbers.
00:58:05.480 You know, numbers are broken.
00:58:06.980 There's a problem with the numbers.
00:58:08.980 Can't you see that?
00:58:10.280 Whatever it is, it certainly can't be that I'm just bad at math.
00:58:14.180 Just as with Preston, whatever is the source of his inability to articulate his own point of view,
00:58:18.880 the problem simply cannot be his point of view.
00:58:22.860 That can't be it.
00:58:23.540 Of that much, he is sure.
00:58:25.720 And though the English language is woefully insufficient in conveying whatever the hell he's trying to convey,
00:58:30.900 he does make the best of the situation at the end of the article,
00:58:33.740 and he finally provides his own answer to the great question.
00:58:37.440 And remember, he admits he's been thinking about this for a long time,
00:58:41.300 gearing up for this, and this is what he comes up with.
00:58:45.720 Quote,
00:58:46.080 I am a woman because I know myself to be a woman.
00:58:50.400 I may not have what some women have. 1.00
00:58:52.360 I might not act how other women act. 1.00
00:58:54.000 But that cannot and should not dictate my life or my experience with life.
00:58:58.020 The definition of woman is found within me and within every person who identifies as a woman.
00:59:03.220 And the meaning that I place upon that word is what I decide it to be.
00:59:07.820 Suddenly, the word woman, something that was once aspirational but restrictive,
00:59:11.560 now feels limitless because I no longer need to fit into someone else's understanding of gender
00:59:16.580 simply because they lack the language to even begin to comprehend me.
00:59:20.900 I and every other single woman is a walking, changing, growing definition 1.00
00:59:25.080 of what it means to be a woman, and no two will ever be the same.
00:59:30.380 Okay, so this is a good time for what I call the toaster oven test.
00:59:36.220 And the toaster oven test goes like this.
00:59:38.300 If I can take the definition of woman that you have just offered,
00:59:41.820 and I can swap out woman with toaster oven, 1.00
00:59:44.680 and it makes just as much sense,
00:59:46.660 then your definition is not good.
00:59:49.060 So let's try it.
00:59:50.320 I am a toaster oven because I know myself to be a toaster oven.
00:59:53.820 I may not have what some toaster ovens have.
00:59:56.380 I might not act how other toaster ovens act.
00:59:58.360 But that cannot and should not dictate my life or my experience with life.
01:00:02.120 The definition of toaster oven is often found within me
01:00:04.820 and within every person who identifies as a toaster oven.
01:00:08.180 And the meaning that I place upon that word is what I decide it to be.
01:00:11.200 Suddenly, the word toaster oven,
01:00:13.340 something that was once aspirational but restrictive,
01:00:15.920 now feels limitless because I no longer need to fit into someone else's understanding of kitchen appliances
01:00:20.840 simply because they lack the language to even begin to comprehend me.
01:00:24.820 I and every single other toaster oven is a walking, changing, growing definition
01:00:28.920 of what it means to be a toaster oven,
01:00:31.000 and no two will ever be the same.
01:00:34.460 There you have it.
01:00:35.860 Either I have proven that I am a toaster oven,
01:00:38.420 or there is something wrong with the way you're defining your terms.
01:00:42.140 And I feel pretty confident that the latter is the case.
01:00:46.280 I am a woman because I know myself to be a woman is not a valid definition,
01:00:49.580 nor does the claim make any logical sense.
01:00:51.740 You can only know yourself to be something if you are that thing.
01:00:55.100 You are therefore trying to prove you are a woman 0.99
01:00:57.300 by offering evidence that can only be convincing to us
01:01:00.300 if we accept the very premise that we are challenging.
01:01:03.680 This is called begging the question.
01:01:05.360 It's also circular reasoning.
01:01:07.480 You cannot know that your inner experience is that of a woman 0.99
01:01:10.860 unless you are a woman and have access to a woman's inner experience. 0.87
01:01:14.360 This is where we start going around in a circle.
01:01:16.500 How do you know you're a woman? 0.80
01:01:17.500 Well, because you feel like one.
01:01:18.840 How do you know that you feel like one?
01:01:20.320 Well, because you are one.
01:01:21.380 But how do you know that you are one?
01:01:22.660 Well, because you feel like one.
01:01:24.200 Around and around we go logically
01:01:26.020 and on the logically incoherent carousel.
01:01:29.680 And at any rate, you certainly cannot know
01:01:32.840 that you are something if you can't define it.
01:01:35.400 How can you possibly come to the conclusion
01:01:37.180 that you are something if you don't know what that thing is?
01:01:39.840 I'm a woman.
01:01:40.360 What's that?
01:01:40.860 I have no idea.
01:01:42.300 You see the problem here?
01:01:43.780 Apparently not.
01:01:45.400 And that itself is the problem.
01:01:47.940 And that is also why this writer and this magazine
01:01:49.920 are all today canceled.
01:01:52.660 That'll do it for this portion of the show.
01:01:53.980 Let's move over to the members block.
01:01:55.340 If you're not a member yet,
01:01:56.260 you can become a member and use code Walsh at checkout
01:01:58.780 for two months free on all annual plans.
01:02:01.620 See you over the members block.
01:02:02.720 If not, talk to you tomorrow.
01:02:04.120 Godspeed.
01:02:04.400 All right.
01:02:17.560 Yeah.
01:02:18.080 Yeah.
01:02:18.580 Yeah.
01:02:19.100 Yeah.
01:02:19.300 Yeah.
01:02:19.780 Yeah.
01:02:20.460 Yeah.
01:02:20.720 Yeah.
01:02:21.380 Yeah.
01:02:21.820 Yeah.
01:02:22.220 Yeah.
01:02:28.360 Yeah.
01:02:29.160 Yeah.
01:02:29.800 Yeah.
01:02:30.180 Yeah.