Julie Swetnick is a mentally unbalanced woman who s accused Brett Kavanaugh of engaging in systematic gang rape in their high school years. She has changed her story multiple times since she released her accusations, but MSNBC and NBC still aired an interview with her even though they knew she was lying.
00:00:00.000There's one thing I want to say just at the top here, that I, in the past, have been critical of some of Trump's rhetoric about the media.
00:00:10.820I've found that some of it has been a bit overblown, even dangerous at times.
00:00:17.460And although I agree in general with his criticisms of the media, I agree with anyone's criticisms in general of the left-wing media, but I thought that some of it was overblown.
00:00:28.920However, these last few weeks with the Kavanaugh story have, I think, vindicated everything that Trump has ever said about the media.
00:00:41.960Actually, he could probably go even further in his criticisms than he has gone.
00:00:46.780When you see what the media has done here, they have, with this Kavanaugh story, and of course it's not the first time they've done this, but it's just been so striking.
00:00:55.360They have completely discarded any semblance of integrity, objectivity, decency, honesty, ethics.
00:01:08.080They've just gotten rid of all of that.
00:01:10.860And now this is a straight-up, in-your-face, blatant, explicit smear campaign to destroy Brett Kavanaugh because he's not pro-abortion.
00:01:23.720That's what's going on with the media.
00:01:25.580So just another example of that, if you happen to be watching NBC or MSNBC on Monday nights, I don't know why you would do that, but if you did, you would have seen an interview with Julie Swetnick.
00:01:40.460Now, Julie Swetnick is the mentally unbalanced woman who's accused Brett Kavanaugh of engaging in systematic gang rapes and, in fact, paints a portrait of their high school years as a time when there was just gang rapes going on all the time.
00:01:58.480Every weekend there would be gang rape parties, and all the girls would come for some reason to these gang rape parties, and then they would be gang raped, but they would keep coming back.
00:02:07.200And Julie Swetnick, even though she's three years older, but she would come to these high school gang rape parties, and she kept coming, and then she was gang raped, and then she kept coming back even more, even after that.
00:02:14.620So that's her accusation, and ever since she released those accusations through Michael Avenatti, who's just a scumbag, lying, attention-starved, pretend lawyer.
00:02:30.860Ever since those accusations last week, we found out that, well, there was a restraining order.
00:02:39.060Her ex-boyfriend tried to get a restraining order against her because he says that she threatened him and threatened his child.
00:02:46.980We find out she was accused by her employer of making up false sexual harassment claims, and what the employer says is that she made up false—this, I think, is important, actually.
00:03:00.860According to her employer, back, I think it was maybe about 18, 20 years ago, she made up false sexual harassment claims because she had been sexually harassing a couple of men at work, and when they went and told on her, she made up this claim in retaliation.
00:03:22.340So, and then there are other details as well.
00:03:25.420Anyway, so MSNBC decides, let's do an interview with her.
00:03:29.700Now, they say, they tell us two things.
00:03:33.440Number one, they could not confirm or corroborate anything she said.
00:03:38.540They could not confirm a single detail that she told them.
00:03:42.680And number two, they also admit that what she says in the interview does not line up with the allegations that she released even a week ago.
00:04:08.780So they know, they know that this is not a credible story.
00:04:13.020They know that it cannot be confirmed.
00:04:15.580They have to know because if they have brains in their heads, they know that the story is just insane and ridiculous on its face.
00:04:22.520And they know she's already changed her story in a week.
00:04:25.960And yet they come out, they air the interview anyway because none of that matters to them.
00:04:30.580They just want to get it out there because they know that there are going to be a lot of stupid people watching who will see the interview.
00:04:38.360Even with the disclaimers of, oh, we couldn't confirm anything, she changed the story.
00:04:41.460A lot of stupid people are going to see the interview and that's not going to matter to them.
00:04:45.060They're going to, they're just going to glom on to these, um, to these lorid details.
00:04:51.200And so that's all they're interested in doing.
00:04:53.020Now I want to, um, let me read, uh, just one clip from this interview.
00:05:36.520Now, if you've been following these, uh, this story, that, that paragraph there sounds very familiar, doesn't it?
00:05:45.060What Swetnick has done is she has just repeated verbatim all the things that the media has already reported and the allegations that have already been reported about, about Kavanaugh in the last week.
00:05:57.860She's just taking those allegations and repeating them verbatim, sloppy drunk, mean drunk.
00:06:03.820Well, that's exactly what a couple of his acquaintances in college said about it.
00:06:13.180Well, that's what the media has been saying that all week, especially after his, after he, you know, had the gall to be angry at false allegations against himself at the hearing.
00:06:23.920Well, that was another unsubstantiated, ridiculous charge that someone came up with in 1998.
00:06:29.240You know, that was released last week.
00:06:31.000In 1998, supposedly he, uh, pushed somebody against the wall when he was drunk.
00:06:34.720Like, so she's just taking this, she's just repeating what she read, what, what she saw on cable news and she's just repeating it back to them.
00:06:44.680And they, and they aired the interview.
00:06:53.020I would say so, uh, whatever, whatever Trump has said about them.
00:06:57.640I think they have earned all of those labels and then some now.
00:07:02.380Um, so we heard yesterday from Rachel Mitchell, who's the prosecutor that was recruited by Republicans to question Christine Ford at the hearing.
00:07:14.560And she came out with a very thorough report, uh, where she's talking about all the many holes in Ford's testimony.
00:07:21.600And, um, she says in fact that the case, it's not even a, he said, she said the case, according to Rachel Mitchell.
00:07:28.660Now keep in mind, Rachel Mitchell is a sex crimes prosecutor.
00:07:32.600So she is, you know, she knows the law, but she also deals with these kinds of claims all the time.
00:07:41.040So she, she hears these kinds of claims all the time.
00:07:44.120She could, she can differentiate between credible claims and not credible.
00:07:48.620And she's saying as someone who does this every day, these are not credible.
00:07:51.920In fact, she says it's even weaker than a, he said, she said, and that no reasonable corrupt prosecutor would bring a case based on the story that she tells.
00:08:02.660The memo is, is, is, is just devastating for Ford and for Democrats, or it would be devastating if the media would report on it, which they have.
00:08:09.560And of course, cause they're too busy, uh, listening to, um, you know, Julie Swetnick talk about the gang rapes, but, um, very, very devastating.
00:08:17.200And she goes through all of the inconsistencies in Ford's story.
00:08:23.640Um, I want to read, here's, uh, I just want to read some of her bullet points on that, on, um, in particular.
00:08:33.060Now she talks about all the inconsistencies, but she, she, she also discusses inconsistencies and memory lapses and blank spots from just the last few months.
00:08:42.380Forget about 35 years ago for just the last few months.
00:08:44.560So here are some of the bullet points from that part of the memo, talking about the last few months, uh, reading now from the daily wires report on this.
00:08:53.140It says, uh, Dr. Ford has struggled to recall important recent events relating to her allegations and her testimony regarding recent events raises further questions about her memory.
00:09:02.960Dr. Ford struggled to remember her interactions with the Washington post.
00:09:06.600Dr. Ford could not remember if she showed a full or partial set of therapy notes to the Washington post.
00:09:12.700She does not remember whether she showed the post report of the therapist notes or her own summary of those notes.
00:09:18.660She does not remember if she actually had a copy of the notes when she texted the Washington post, uh, on July 6th.
00:09:24.460Dr. Ford refused to provide any of her therapy, therapy notes to the committee.
00:09:28.860Dr. Ford's explanation of why she disclosed her allegations the way she did raises questions.
00:09:33.300She claimed originally that she wished for her story to remain confidential, but the person operating the tip line at the Washington post was the first person other than her therapist or husband to whom she disclosed the identity of her alleged attacker.
00:09:44.200She testified that she had a sense of urgency to relay the information to the Senate.
00:09:47.840She did not contact the Senate, however, because she claimed she didn't know how to do that, but she doesn't explain how she knew how to contact her Congresswoman, but not her Senator.
00:09:55.880I mean, presumably she just went online and Googled it and then, and then went through the channels, but she said she didn't know how to do that with her Senator.
00:10:04.440She couldn't, she couldn't figure out how to Google that, but she could Google her Congresswoman.
00:10:08.520Um, Dr. Ford could not remember if she was being audio or video recorded when she took the polygraph and she could not remember whether the polygraph occurred the same day as her grandmother's funeral or the day after her grandmother's funeral.
00:10:18.640Um, and then also it, it notes that it would have been inappropriate to administer a polygraph to someone who was grieving.
00:10:28.920Uh, I mean, no competent polygraph examiner would give you a polygraph on the day that you come home from a funeral for your grandmother.
00:10:38.480I mean, there's no, no, that's a joke.
00:10:41.560Nobody would do that because a polygraph is measuring all of the, you know, it's, you know, it's the things that it's measuring.
00:10:48.240If you're, if you're, you know, if polygraphs were actually real science, which they aren't, but, um, if you're grieving, that's going to mess up the whole thing.
00:10:59.860So there are a lot of really important points.
00:11:03.780And this is not just about poking holes in her memory.
00:11:06.340There's also the whole thing about the therapist notes.
00:11:09.020Now we only know she, she's telling us that she told this story to her therapist and that she even, and then, well, maybe she mentioned Kavanaugh's name to a therapist.
00:11:24.760Husband says she did whatever, but we only know that because she's telling us that she's claiming that she told her therapist about this, right?
00:11:32.440She claims that she told her therapist, at least the whole story, even if she didn't mention the guy's name.
00:11:40.120Um, so obviously the question is, well, can we see those notes?
00:11:45.880Can we see what you actually told your therapist to make sure number one, that you really told your therapist at all?
00:11:52.500And number two, did the story you're told, you told your therapist, does it line up?
00:11:57.880Well, we already know it doesn't line up completely because the number of people involved has changed.
00:12:01.540But, um, you know, for instance, I mean, this is just, just hypothetical, but what if she told her therapist the story, but then said something like, yeah, I don't, you know, indicated that she wasn't actually sure completely who did it.
00:13:09.800So I think we are clear to speculate either that she never gave her therapist notes to anyone.
00:13:17.100So there's so her what she's telling us about what she told her therapist could be completely bogus or she did give her therapist notes to the Washington Post.
00:13:26.460And now those notes are being hidden for some reason.
00:13:30.160Either way, it doesn't look good for her.
00:13:31.620Now, here I think is the, and I talked about this last week, but I want to focus in on it again.
00:13:41.060I think the most important, the most important inconsistency or hole in the story that could possibly be a lie is this.
00:13:58.680And Mitchell points it out in her memo.
00:14:02.040Ford claims to not remember how she got home from the party after the alleged assault occurred.
00:14:09.520This detail is very crucial because the house, she says, was near a country club.
00:14:16.000And we know that the country club was a 20 minute drive from her home.
00:14:18.860It was like six or seven miles, right?
00:14:21.400Which if you're going residential roads, it might take you 20 minutes.
00:14:23.920So that means that someone had to pick her up and drive her home.
00:14:29.760There's no way that she walked seven miles home.
00:14:32.840And if she did walk seven miles home after, you know, according to her, right after being sexually assaulted,
00:14:38.460I think that seven mile walk home, she would remember that, but she doesn't remember how she got home.
00:14:44.040So we, we, we can only assume that she was driven home by someone.
00:15:28.740Maybe Ford wouldn't have told the person.
00:15:30.800Maybe the floor was said, uh, I'm fine.
00:15:33.560You know, but, but whoever that person was, they would be able to tell, okay, this girl's crying.
00:15:39.800Uh, she's, I mean, she, she, she's obviously distressed about something.
00:15:47.380Now, the main reason why, why Juanita Broderick's allegation against Bill Clinton was and is so believable and credible is that Broderick was found by her friends moments after Clinton allegedly raped her.
00:16:02.080And those friends have come out and corroborated her account and they confirmed that she did, you know, that they did find Broderick crying and in a state of shock on the night in question.
00:16:13.200Now, Broderick also told them at the time, Bill Clinton did this to me, which I mean, which basically makes it a hundred percent like this, it happened.
00:16:23.900Um, but even if she hadn't, I mean, even if she had, even if she had said, oh, something horrible happened to me, but she didn't, she didn't give specifics or she didn't say who it was.
00:16:33.960The fact that she was found by her friends on that day, bleeding, bruised, crying in a state of shock.
00:16:42.840I mean, that is very significant evidence in her favor.
00:16:48.280Is it, is it believable that a 15 year old girl could pull herself together and present herself as totally fine moments after running out of a house to escape two drunken rapists?
00:17:03.960Um, we must then logically conclude, uh, either that somebody witnessed Ford in a state of shock or that nobody witnessed it because it didn't happen.
00:17:19.200Now, Ford claims she can't remember who picked her up, but she remembers hiding in the bathroom after the assault.
00:17:25.300She remembers hearing the two boys laughing and talking as they left the room.
00:17:28.960She remembers running down the stairs.
00:17:56.200So either she, so she says she ran right out of the house.
00:17:58.820Well, she, she must've gone into the kitchen first to use the landline or she went to somebody else's house or something, went to a pay phone.
00:18:04.840I mean, but, but again, uh, if she's walking down the street and searching for a pay phone or if she's knocking on someone else's door to use a phone, she would remember that.
00:18:12.520But she, she would have had to call somebody unless she had already arranged for someone to pick her up.
00:18:18.880And it just so happened coincidentally that that person happened to show up right after she had been sexually assaulted, uh, which again is hard to believe.
00:18:27.040So she would have had to call somebody, um, uh, so, but she doesn't remember what must've been a rather panicked phone call.
00:18:36.300And she doesn't remember what had to have been the most uncomfortable and difficult car ride of her life.
00:18:44.400But she remembers that the house was sparsely furnished and she remembers precisely how many beers she consumed, which she says was only one.
00:18:57.640It was a long time ago, but it is very interesting that key details, which could corroborate her account, just so happened to be completely blocked from her memory.
00:19:29.120Do we have two cases of convenient amnesia happening at the same time around the same event?
00:19:34.400The only way, okay, that a person might forget about the time that they picked up a traumatized 15-year-old girl is if there was no indication that she was traumatized.
00:19:47.840But if there's no indication of it, then that would seem to punch a humongous hole in Ford's story.
00:19:53.580But that brings us back to the question of whether or not it's believable that a girl might conceivably run out of a house fleeing two drunken rapists and then get into somebody's car and not give off any vibes at all that she had suffered some kind of terrible experience.
00:20:18.060That's just, again, it's hard to believe.
00:20:19.980It's especially hard to believe, assuming that the person who picked her up was either a parent or one of her friends.
00:20:29.460Unless she hitchhiked or unless she called a cab to pick her up, the story doesn't add up.
00:20:39.220You know, if, I mean, you feel like you could have, there's a good chance it would have been a parent to pick her up at the age of 15.
00:20:45.680Well, look, I know that kids can hide things from their parents, but if you pick your daughter up mere moments after she was just sexually assaulted, you're going to notice that something is going wrong.
00:21:00.060Or if you're, if you're a girl and you pick up one of your girlfriends, you're going to notice.
00:21:08.600And it seems extremely likely that your friend's going to tell you something happened.
00:21:12.680But even if they don't tell you, you're going to notice something was wrong.
00:21:40.580I'm saying that it's, it's unreasonable to think that she was able to completely pull herself together to the point where nobody would notice that something was amiss.
00:21:48.340Well, she actually admits that she didn't pull herself together.
00:21:53.500She, she testifies that her grades in college suffered because of the attack.
00:21:58.020Now, oddly enough, the attack happened when she was 15 and she had two more years of high school in front of her.
00:22:03.240She doesn't say anything about her high school grades suffering, which is interesting, which would seem to indicate that her high school grades were fine.
00:22:09.860So if you, if you were to go back and look at her high school days, you would see that she did fine.
00:22:14.220And then she gets into college and she does poorly for a couple of years.
00:22:17.040Um, and, and we're supposed to believe that that was because of the sexual assault that had happened three years before, but in the intervening three years, you were fine.
00:22:24.740I mean, what, what, um, but that again, I think shows, shows calculation in her testimony.
00:22:32.300Like she's going back and she's thinking, okay, I know that I did well in high school, so I can, but I, I didn't do, I, I did get bad grades first two years of college.
00:22:39.320Someone could go look that up and see, oh, look, that vindicates me.
00:22:42.100Um, but you know, the real point is that she says she was devastated at the time to the point where her academics suffered.
00:23:00.320Then let's assume that she did hitch a ride home with a stranger and that the stranger has since, you know, moved to Mars or died or something.
00:23:16.840What about the next week or month or year or three years or five years or 10 years?
00:23:22.240She says she was traumatized this whole time.
00:23:25.280Why has nobody come forward and said, yeah, you know, um, uh, Christine, uh, she, she, she never told us what happened, but she did change.
00:23:33.580There was a sudden change in her, in her behavior.
00:25:32.920And then as a, as a corollary to that question, who has been coaching her about what information to say and what information to keep hidden?