The Matt Walsh Show - April 18, 2018


Ep. 12 - The Pitchfork Mob Comes For Starbucks


Episode Stats


Length

19 minutes

Words per minute

175.35834

Word count

3,450

Sentence count

211

Harmful content

Misogyny

2

sentences flagged

Hate speech

7

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode, I tell two harrowing stories from inside a Starbucks and explain why racism is the root cause of the Starbucks controversy. I also explain why Starbucks is closing more than 8,000 stores across the U.S. and the latest on the latest protests and boycotts.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Welcome to the show, everybody. Thank you for listening. Hope you've had a great morning so far.
00:00:04.200 I want to, I don't mean to disturb you, but I want to start with two stories.
00:00:11.440 They're sort of harrowing stories that I want to tell, just to start with, because it relates to
00:00:17.600 the subject at hand. So here's the first story. These are both true stories, by the way.
00:00:22.980 So last week I went into a cafe in DC and I really needed to use the bathroom. So I went in and I
00:00:33.360 said, where's your bathroom? And they said, bathrooms are for customers only. And so clearly the next
00:00:40.820 thing that I did was I called the FBI because it was a hate crime. I mean, what, how else are you
00:00:45.480 supposed to, how else can you respond to something like that? No, actually what I did was I said,
00:00:51.120 oh, okay. And then I bought a coffee and then I said, can you hold the coffee here for a minute?
00:00:56.560 I'm going to use the bathroom because it's, it's actually the concept of a restaurant or a store
00:01:03.540 only allowing customers to use the facilities. That's a really normal concept in the world that
00:01:10.000 I live in, which is just reality where a great many stores and restaurants have that policy.
00:01:15.940 Now here's the second story. Again, totally a true story. This didn't happen to me,
00:01:21.500 but I did witness it and I was traumatized by it. I was at a Starbucks a few months ago and I was
00:01:28.200 sitting there doing my work, minding my own business. There was a guy, it wasn't even that
00:01:32.820 busy by the way, but there was a guy at a table, a few tables over from me. And he was, I noticed he
00:01:39.960 was just sitting there at the table for a little bit. He wasn't drinking any coffee. He didn't buy
00:01:45.400 anything. And then he falls asleep and he's like sleeping at the table for only a couple of minutes
00:01:51.480 and until the manager comes over and wakes him up and says, you're going to have to leave. You can't
00:01:56.720 sleep here. And so the guy packs up his stuff and leaves. It was a white guy, by the way. But again,
00:02:03.140 you know, I didn't even realize it at the time, but, but apparently I witnessed a horrible human
00:02:09.340 rights infringement because this guy had a human right to come into private property and use it as
00:02:16.480 a, uh, you know, a camping ground if he wanted to. Now I tell these stories because they relate to the,
00:02:23.980 um, obviously the Starbucks controversy, which has been raging and still hasn't calmed down, um,
00:02:29.400 over the last few days. And the latest on that, let me see if I can find it. I was just looking at
00:02:33.860 the story. Uh, the daily wire has the story, uh, that on Tuesday, Starbucks announced that the
00:02:39.300 company is going to close over 8,000 stores across the United States next month to conduct racial bias
00:02:47.840 education geared toward preventing discrimination in their stores. Um, so that's approximately 175,000
00:02:58.600 Starbucks employees who now will have to undergo racial bias, um, or, you know, discrimination
00:03:05.600 training because of these two incidents that happened at, uh, two different Starbucks locations
00:03:12.360 over the last few days. If you're not familiar, just very quickly, I'll get you up to speed.
00:03:16.580 There have been protests and boycotts and everything because of these two incidents. The first incident
00:03:22.000 happened in a Starbucks in Philadelphia, a video surfaced and went viral of two black men
00:03:28.540 being escorted out of a Starbucks in cuffs. Um, they were being arrested in handcuffs. It's a,
00:03:36.660 you know, pretty short video and there's not a lot to it. There's not, you know, we don't see what
00:03:40.860 happened before then or after we just see these guys being escorted out. Not a lot of details,
00:03:47.100 but just the image of two black men being arrested and removed from a Starbucks. That was enough in the
00:03:55.280 minds of a lot of people in the minds of the pitchfork, pitchfork mob, especially that was
00:03:59.900 enough to prove that we'll clearly there's racism here. I mean, there couldn't possibly be any other
00:04:05.420 explanation at all. It must be racism because these two guys were black then. So that was, that was,
00:04:13.140 uh, that was enough of a controversy. And then on Monday, I don't know if it was on Monday, but
00:04:19.560 yeah, it was on Monday, a, um, a Starbucks in Los Angeles went viral because there was video,
00:04:29.340 uh, shot by a black man who went into this Starbucks, asked to use the restroom. And they
00:04:36.920 said, well, restrooms are for customers only now again, very normal policy, especially, especially
00:04:44.460 now maybe if you live in a more rural area, if you live in the suburbs, um, maybe you don't
00:04:49.400 encounter it as much, but at urban restaurants and stores where there are a lot of people coming in
00:04:54.800 and out, this is extremely common. In fact, it's the norm. It's, I can't remember the last time I
00:05:00.900 went into a, you know, uh, a, a restaurant in a city and they would just let anyone use the bathroom,
00:05:07.720 even if they weren't customers. So really normal policy, this guy, he could have responded the way
00:05:13.220 that I did when I was in DC. And I was told the same thing. And that is just buy something, buy a
00:05:17.040 coffee, buy a, you know, just buy a, buy a cup of yogurt. I mean, buy anything. And then you can
00:05:23.140 use the restroom, but that's not what this guy does. Instead. He pulls out a, his camera and,
00:05:29.180 um, he pulls out his phone and he starts taking video that a white guy walks out of the restroom
00:05:35.760 and without asking, by the way, you know, this, the, the black guy comes up to the white guy,
00:05:39.380 puts them on camera, doesn't ask his permission. And he finds out that the white guy apparently
00:05:45.040 hadn't bought anything either yet. He was allowed to use the bathroom. So that proves, um, racism
00:05:52.320 that he goes up to the manager who, by the way, does not appear to be white herself. She's a woman
00:05:57.860 appears to be not sure what her race is, but she appears to be a non-white woman.
00:06:02.760 And he starts berating her, um, for her supposed racial bias. And in both cases, that's enough for
00:06:09.960 the, uh, pitchfork mob. And so now, you know, Starbucks is in cleanup mode. The Starbucks CEO
00:06:17.040 just absolutely threw his own employees under the bus. This, the manager at the Philadelphia location,
00:06:23.400 he just threw her under the bus, didn't even try to defend her. And now he's been, he met with the
00:06:28.500 mayor of Philadelphia. Uh, he's met with, you know, activists. He met with the two men who were arrested.
00:06:33.620 He's been good. He was on good morning America. I mean, he's been meeting with, uh, he met with,
00:06:37.980 um, he met with, uh, I think he met with the King of Saudi Arabia as well. For some reason,
00:06:42.700 he's just meeting with everybody talking about this and just throwing his employees under the
00:06:47.560 bus in the process. And even this racial bias discrimination training, you're essentially
00:06:55.800 throwing your employees under the bus. Again, what you're implying, I mean, if you're forcing 175,000
00:07:02.060 employees to undergo this bias training, what you're insinuating is that a lot of them are racially
00:07:09.800 biased. Now here's the thing, a couple of things. First of all, I'm not a fan of Starbucks policy.
00:07:19.340 I do like their product. I'll admit, I know a lot of people don't, they say it tastes burnt,
00:07:23.840 but, uh, I guess I like burnt coffee. So I like their burnt coffee. Um, not a fan of their politics.
00:07:31.020 So I'm not one to usually defend Starbucks, but even less, am I a fan of pitchfork mobs?
00:07:39.840 And I know that sometimes conservatives will tend to, when they see something like this,
00:07:43.960 they see the liberal pitchfork mob coming after a liberal company. The conservatives will,
00:07:49.280 will sit back and say, Oh, isn't this nice? Isn't this nice to watch this happen? See,
00:07:53.420 they're being, being hoisted with their own petard. That's a, that's a nice thing to see.
00:07:57.160 Well, I think it's a really bad idea. I've said this many times. It's a bad idea to take the side
00:08:06.140 of the pitchfork mob in any situation, no matter who they're coming after. I mean, the pitchfork mob 0.59
00:08:12.000 should always be stood against. So that's the first thing. The second thing is, I, you know,
00:08:18.220 I don't know this, this manager, the Philadelphia location, she doesn't work there anymore. I guess
00:08:23.000 she got fired the manager at law in the Los Angeles location. Maybe they're racist. I, I don't know.
00:08:29.700 I can't, I don't know them personally. I can't say for sure they aren't, but there's, there are quite
00:08:35.760 a few reasons to suspect that there are probably other explanations and what we should do if we are
00:08:42.500 rational and honest people. Um, and we're, you know, and we're decent people as well,
00:08:49.180 then we're not going to immediately assume when something like this happens, we're not going to
00:08:54.260 immediately assume, Oh, well, it must be racism. We're not just going to leapfrog over all of the
00:09:00.080 other possible explanations and say, Nope, it's none of them. It's gotta be racism. So what are some
00:09:06.780 other possible explanations? We know in the, in the case of Philadelphia, let's take them one at a
00:09:11.520 time. Philadelphia, the two men were sitting in the store, taking up seats. Um, they hadn't actually
00:09:19.620 purchased anything. This is loitering. It's trespassing. The, these restaurants do not exist
00:09:28.500 as just public forums to, for you to just come in and hang out anytime you want it. They own it.
00:09:36.840 They set the rules for engagement and their rules for engagement are, I think pretty reasonable,
00:09:41.860 pretty clear, pretty simple. You got to buy something if you want to sit at the table,
00:09:45.260 because there are a lot of, here's what happens. There are a lot of customers who do buy something
00:09:49.520 and they would like to have a table to sit at, but you're taking up the table, even though you
00:09:54.020 didn't buy anything. And that's not fair. And so that's why these companies have rules against it.
00:09:59.620 Now, it just so happens that this particular location in Philadelphia has had apparently a problem
00:10:05.640 with loitering recently. And so this has been a policy that they've been focusing on more and
00:10:10.540 more. Um, and they've had to enforce. So the store employees tried to deal with the situation
00:10:18.660 calmly and peacefully and reasonably. And they told the men that, look, you know, if you're not going
00:10:25.300 to buy anything, then you have to leave. The two guys refused to leave. They refused to leave the store.
00:10:34.620 Okay. Even though they were told you got to buy something or leave. They said, apparently they
00:10:39.940 said, we're not going to buy anything and we're not going to leave either. And then the employee
00:10:44.160 said, okay, well then we're going to, we're going to, um, we're going to call the police.
00:10:49.020 And apparently what the two men said was, well, go ahead and call them. We're still not going to
00:10:52.560 leave. Then the police arrive and they're negotiating with these men for several minutes and saying,
00:10:58.820 look, you just need to leave. You can't, it's just not, it's private property. You can't just hang out here.
00:11:04.120 If you're not a customer and they still refuse to leave. So let, let, let's go, let's go through
00:11:10.700 the, let's go through the process here. Okay. Step one, we have them deciding not to buy anything
00:11:16.640 and take up a table. Step two, even when they're told, well, if you're not going to buy anything,
00:11:21.280 you got to leave. They still refuse to leave. Step three, the police show up and say, well,
00:11:25.480 you got to leave. And they still refused. So then they got arrested. Now, of course it's,
00:11:31.520 it's claimed that the white P that, um, it's claimed that, well, you know, white people loiter
00:11:37.300 at Starbucks all the time and they're never asked to leave. Really? I mean, do you know that
00:11:43.620 that's quite a thing to just declare? Well, white, white people are never told to leave Starbucks.
00:11:49.280 How do you know? You're, you're, you're telling me it never happens. You know, that for a fact,
00:11:53.980 you know, that at this location in Philadelphia, they have never asked white people to leave for
00:11:58.880 loitering. Do you know that? Because if you know it, I mean, let, please provide your evidence
00:12:03.420 because that would be very significant. I mean, if you had evidence that they frequently allow white
00:12:09.320 people to loiter and never enforce the rules against white people, but then they do against black 1.00
00:12:13.280 people. Well, then that is compelling evidence of racial discrimination. And then the protests are
00:12:17.840 warranted. Um, in fact, the protests wouldn't even be warranted even in that case, because it's,
00:12:23.860 that would still just be one manager who's now fired, who's guilty, but, um, at least they'd be
00:12:29.660 more warranted than they are now. So if you have evidence of that, then let me know. I can tell you
00:12:33.780 that I have, I just told you, I have seen myself at a Starbucks, a white person being kicked out for 0.68
00:12:39.620 loitering. So I know it does happen and I'm betting it's happened at this Philadelphia location
00:12:45.320 because that's, see, see, that's the thing. If let's say, um, this manager, whoever this person is,
00:12:55.380 is just uncontrollably, uncontainably racist. I mean, they're so racist that they would just,
00:13:02.940 that they would actually kick out two black men simply for being black. I mean, that is,
00:13:08.760 that's not just racist. That is, that's like racism on steroids. That is, you're so racist
00:13:13.940 that you're going to even give up your job because that's what you're doing. That's what the manager
00:13:19.020 will be doing in that case. The manager is saying, you know what, I'm going to forfeit this job just
00:13:23.380 so I can make a racist statement against these black men, which is possible. But then the question is, 1.00
00:13:30.480 how did this manager manage to survive and function at a Starbucks in Philadelphia
00:13:41.820 if they're that racist against black people? Because I would assume, and I'm just assuming,
00:13:49.660 but I think it's pretty safe assumption that this Starbucks in Philadelphia, we're not talking about
00:13:55.880 a Starbucks in the middle of a, you know, a town of 500 in North Dakota. Okay. Starbucks in Philadelphia,
00:14:01.180 they probably have black customers coming in and out of that store hundreds of times a week, if not a
00:14:07.480 day. And so has this manager, I mean, has she, does she always do this? If she's so racist against 1.00
00:14:17.160 black people, why is this the first time she's kicked out black people when there's been so many 1.00
00:14:21.800 others, she could have kicked out and she didn't. It just, it just doesn't make a lot of sense.
00:14:28.080 It's possible. It just doesn't make a lot of sense. Now, then we have the incident in Los Angeles.
00:14:35.580 Now that, that one to me is even less of a, I mean, that one to me is so clearly, it's very clear
00:14:41.720 that the guy came in looking for, he want, that's why he pulled out the video. It's not a normal,
00:14:47.680 if you're just innocently there and you just want to use the bathroom and someone
00:14:51.680 tells you, okay, well, um, you know, you got to buy something to use the bathroom.
00:14:56.900 If your response is to pull out a camera and start taking a video for Twitter,
00:15:02.540 that means that this is what you were looking for. Okay. This is not, this was not, this wasn't an
00:15:07.940 innocent request on your part. You were looking for this exact response so that you could try to
00:15:13.120 entrap them in some fake false racism claim. But if the question is, well, okay, well, why did they,
00:15:19.840 they said, they, they, they, they said no to the black guy, but the white guy was allowed to,
00:15:23.560 to use the bathroom, even though he didn't buy anything, you know, must be racism could be,
00:15:30.420 or, you know, there are other explanations. It's possible that the white guy is a regular customer.
00:15:34.960 He's there all the time. They know him. They know that he's going to buy something. So they let him
00:15:39.660 use the bathroom first. I mean, to me, as just a logical person, that would be my first assumption.
00:15:44.800 I would think it's probably that because regular customers frequently get privileges that non-regular
00:15:51.600 customers don't get. I have several coffee shops that I go to all the time and they'll have my
00:15:57.300 order ready for me before I even get up to the, to the, to the counter. I get free refills. Okay.
00:16:01.480 I get all this stuff because I'm there all the time and I'm practically keeping them in business on my
00:16:05.100 own. So could that be the explanation? Should we at least consider that explanation
00:16:13.220 before we leap right to, Oh, it must be racism. It must be that this non-white woman working at a 1.00
00:16:21.520 Starbucks in, in Los Angeles harbors this grudge against black people. I mean, it, again, possible,
00:16:30.140 but given the context and the situation, that would not even be close to my first assumption.
00:16:36.300 So of course, everything I'm saying, it doesn't matter because I can't, you know,
00:16:39.500 you can't calm down the mob and, uh, and these employees, they don't even have their CEO behind
00:16:45.280 them. So it's just, it's a done deal, but we do have to consider and think about, I mean, what's the,
00:16:53.780 what's the implication here? Because now what Starbucks has done now is they have now announced
00:17:00.640 that you're allowed to loiter in their stores. It's, this is what the CEO, by apologizing profusely
00:17:10.180 on behalf of a manager who was simply enforcing rules against loitering by doing that, what he has
00:17:17.780 declared to everybody in America is, well, at least if you're not white, you're allowed to loiter. 0.60
00:17:23.680 I mean, come on in, use the wifi, sit down, use the bathrooms. You don't have to buy anything.
00:17:27.940 In fact, bring your own packed lunch, bring a, bring your own dinner spread and just, uh, you know,
00:17:34.420 just sit out and bring the family and just set up, you could set up a, set up a blanket there on the
00:17:39.280 ground and have a picnic. It's basically what they've announced. They can't enforce
00:17:44.920 rules against loitering anymore. There's a reason why I, I, when it comes to situations like this,
00:17:54.800 I tend very often to fall on the side of the private company. I'll tell you something. I felt
00:18:04.000 the same. I was saying the same thing with that, with the whole controversy with, um, whatever
00:18:10.140 airline it was, I'm forgetting which airline was it where they dragged the guy out because he wouldn't
00:18:15.280 give up his seat. And I sided with the airline on that. You know why? Because even if it's an unfair
00:18:23.320 policy, when you're sitting in their establishment or in their airplane and they tell you to leave,
00:18:30.560 you have to leave. They own it. You don't, you can't exercise some right over and above their own
00:18:38.400 right to their own property. It's a very dangerous game. We start playing when we tell people that you
00:18:46.780 now have a human right to just march into a private establishment and just stay there. Even
00:18:53.180 if they tell you to leave, even if the police tell you to leave, you don't have to. No, I think that
00:19:00.380 that's a, the implications there are very dangerous. So most of the time I'm going to tend to side with
00:19:05.860 the private company, whether the policy is fair or not. At the end of the day, they, it's their
00:19:12.160 business. It's their building. It's their plane. They exercise authority over it. And you have to
00:19:18.660 play by their rules. If you want to use their property, this to me is just, is just a basic rule
00:19:25.440 of living in a free and decent and civilized society. But we live in such a society, uh, less and less,
00:19:32.440 I suppose. So there it is. There's my contrarian take on the Starbucks situation. Thanks for listening,
00:19:39.480 everybody. I'll talk to you tomorrow.