The Matt Walsh Show - September 13, 2023


Ep. 1221 - Dem Candidate Claims It's A 'Sex Crime' To Talk About The Fact That She's A Porn Star


Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 11 minutes

Words per minute

179.62488

Word count

12,833

Sentence count

816

Harmful content

Misogyny

54

sentences flagged

Toxicity

36

sentences flagged

Hate speech

19

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

A Democratic political candidate is also a porn star who prostituted herself on the internet for money. But now she claims that anyone who sees her videos or even talks about them is committing a sex crime against her. Also, a drag queen is arrested for exposing himself in public, and we ll talk about why that s not surprising at all.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Today on the Matt Walsh show, a Democratic political candidate is also a porn star who
00:00:03.860 prostituted herself on the internet for money, but now she claims that anyone who shares those
00:00:08.040 videos or even talks about them is committing a sex crime against her. We'll discuss. Also,
00:00:13.280 a drag queen is arrested for exposing himself in public. We'll talk about why that's not
00:00:16.960 surprising at all. Tim Scott claims he has a girlfriend, but no one has ever seen her.
00:00:21.440 Does that matter? A feminist complains that she is being violated and victimized by her 1.00
00:00:25.880 toddler children. And in the biggest news of the day, scientists in New Mexico have unveiled the
00:00:30.400 corpses of actual aliens. I have the full story about these aliens. We'll talk about all of that
00:00:35.940 and more today on the Matt Walsh show.
00:00:55.880 September, as you probably already know, is National Fruits and Veggies Month. Balance of
00:01:07.380 Nature fruits and veggies are a great way to make sure that you're getting essential nutritional
00:01:11.780 ingredients every single day. Through Balance of Nature's advanced cold vacuum process, the vitamins,
00:01:16.420 minerals, and phytonutrients of the fruits and vegetables are preserved so that you can get that
00:01:19.820 vital nutrition in each capsule. Balance of Nature is a whole food supplement with no additives, fillers,
00:01:24.880 extracts, synthetics, pesticides, or added sugar. Pure fruits and veggies are the only thing they
00:01:29.480 put in their capsules. Balance of Nature sent a bunch of their products down to the studio for my
00:01:33.720 team to try. We all love them. When you're disciplined enough to take care of your health,
00:01:36.900 you reap all kinds of benefits and your body will thank you for it. So go to balanceofnature.com,
00:01:40.980 use promo code Walsh for $35 off your first order as a preferred customer. That's balanceofnature.com,
00:01:46.980 promo code Walsh for $35 off your first preferred order.
00:01:50.760 One of the hallmarks of this new era of wokeism that we're all living through is that we're
00:01:56.140 constantly treated to new terminology for old concepts. Race riots have gotten a makeover,
00:02:01.720 of course. They're now BLM protests, goth kids, crossdressers, and other miscellaneous groups
00:02:06.920 now have all found new labels for themselves under the umbrella of gender identity. Anti-white and
00:02:13.120 anti-Asian racism, especially when enforced by the government, now goes by the name of equity.
00:02:17.160 Lots of examples like this, and maybe the farthest reaching rebrand, the one that really goes back
00:02:23.220 thousands of years, is that the modern left has managed to redefine the term prostitution. 0.66
00:02:29.080 And now instead of calling prostitutes prostitutes, we're supposed to call them sex workers. The idea 0.77
00:02:34.480 is to rebrand prostitution as something other than the morally depraved, reprehensible conduct that
00:02:40.720 no civilized society should ever tolerate, much less embrace. And as you might expect, many media outlets,
00:02:46.380 including the New York Times, are on board with this change in terminology. They're pushing it,
00:02:50.800 promoting it, actually. The paper of record recently ran a whole op-ed about the importance of
00:02:55.340 meeting the needs of sex workers. According to the piece, we need to end the social stigma
00:03:00.560 surrounding sex work. CBS News, for its part, has run several sympathetic stories about policies that
00:03:06.420 can, quote, legitimize the industry of sex work. Now, given all that, it's with great interest that I
00:03:13.040 checked out the websites of both the New York Times and CBS News last night to see how they were
00:03:18.400 covering the story of a Virginia Statehouse candidate named Susanna Gibson. Gibson, as you may have heard,
00:03:24.380 was just outed as a cyber prostitute, a porn star. She live-streamed videos on a porn website of herself 0.99
00:03:31.940 engaging in various sex acts with her husband in exchange for money from strangers, otherwise known 0.58
00:03:38.040 as prostitution. She even offered, at one point, to urinate for viewers if they paid up. And to be 1.00
00:03:44.760 clear, Gibson's husband was, of course, well aware that all this was happening. In fact, he solicited
00:03:49.720 donations at various points. And these were not private videos. They were not password protected.
00:03:58.060 They weren't videos that were just on their laptops and a hacker went in and stole them and put them
00:04:02.720 online. No, anyone could access them. And without going into too much detail, people could obtain
00:04:08.760 even more salacious footage if they threw money at Gibson in the form of what was called tokens on the
00:04:14.560 website. Gibson assured her audience that the money was going to a, quote, good cause, which perhaps was
00:04:21.280 her political campaign. We don't know. Now, if the New York Times and CBS News truly meant what they've been
00:04:27.740 saying all these years about the legitimacy of sex work, about the fact that it's an admirable
00:04:32.580 occupation that should not be stigmatized, you'd think that this would be the easiest imaginable
00:04:39.420 story for them to cover. Here you have a strong, independent woman engaging in consensual acts of 0.99
00:04:45.360 prostitution with a willing partner. What could be more liberating than that? Truly, this is what
00:04:50.440 decades of feminism have been leading to all along. This is the ultimate feminist success story. 1.00
00:04:55.380 A sex worker becomes a politician, which is really more of a lateral move, I guess. You're going from 0.56
00:05:01.340 one form of prostitution to another. But, you know, it's the new American dream. Except, strangely enough,
00:05:07.640 that's not how these outlets are covering this story. Instead of defending Susanna Gibson's conduct,
00:05:14.320 both the New York Times and CBS News are lying about it. They're denying it. And these are not subtle lies.
00:05:21.500 I mean, these are as obvious and lazy as they can possibly be. The Times decided to ignore the facts
00:05:27.140 of the whole situation and instead reported that Gibson's videos had been leaked. So this was their
00:05:33.400 headline, quote, State House candidate in Virginia condemns leak of sex tapes. Now, what they're doing is
00:05:40.380 hiding the fact that Gibson uploaded the footage herself. They're implying that someone else leaked
00:05:46.160 these videos, that someone secretly went in and obtained them and then distributed them to the
00:05:52.440 public, which is not what happened at all. And they know that. For its part, CBS News ran this headline,
00:05:58.300 quote, Virginia election candidate responds after a leak of tapes shows her performing sex acts with
00:06:04.520 husband. Now, below that headline, CBS News copy pasted an accurate Associated Press article
00:06:10.200 describing what actually happened. So CBS News's only contribution to the story was adding an
00:06:15.920 obviously false headline to mislead as many people as possible under the assumption that most people
00:06:21.420 wouldn't actually read the article. And of course, most people don't. Now, this is all more than a
00:06:26.220 little strange. I mean, here you have a perfect opportunity for both of these outlets, New York
00:06:29.980 Times and CBS News, to report honestly on the sex work that Susanna Gibson was engaging in. 1.00
00:06:36.120 That shouldn't be a big deal because as these organizations have established, sex work is as 1.00
00:06:40.740 noble as any other form of work. Sex work is real work, they say. But instead of doing that, 0.96
00:06:46.740 they're lying about the basic facts of the story. They're pretending that Gibson wasn't selling
00:06:53.180 pornographic videos for money. Instead, they're pushing the lie that she was hacked, that her private
00:06:59.400 videos somehow found their way on the internet. When in fact, again, they found their way on the
00:07:05.500 internet because Gibson put them there on purpose to make money off of them. In case you're keeping
00:07:14.000 track, these are the same outlets that went wall to wall on Donald Trump's so-called pee tape, which
00:07:18.920 didn't exist, by the way. Now they're telling you that you're not allowed to discuss a Democratic
00:07:23.740 Party candidate's actual pee tape, which she uploaded on the internet. I think the word brazen doesn't
00:07:31.280 even begin to describe this. But it gets even more brazen. Susanna Gibson herself has gone even further
00:07:37.760 than these outlets, and she claims that she is now the victim of a sex crime because people are
00:07:43.480 talking about videos that she put on the internet. She is now a sex crime victim. Watch. 0.99
00:07:52.040 A Virginia Democratic candidate is getting caught up in a porn scandal before her campaign can even begin.
00:07:57.600 Susanna Gibson is claiming the release of videos showing her and her husband performing sexual
00:08:03.120 acts live on a streaming site is an invasion of privacy. Gibson and her husband asked for tips
00:08:08.600 while performing sex acts for a live audience on Shatterbait. She was, quote, raising money for a
00:08:13.940 good cause. It is unclear when the live streams occurred. Gibson, who is running one of Virginia's
00:08:18.980 seven highly contested house races, said in a statement, the leaks of the online activity were,
00:08:24.040 quote, the worst gutter politics and an illegal invasion of my privacy designed to humiliate me
00:08:29.580 and my family. Gibson's lawyer said the release of the videos is a violation of Virginia's revenge
00:08:34.540 porn law, making it a class one misdemeanor to maliciously distribute nude or sexual images with the
00:08:40.200 intent to coerce, harass or intimidate. Gibson is facing Republican David Owen for the house seat in the
00:08:45.980 state's 57th district, which is outside of Richmond and primarily in Henrico County. It is one of the
00:08:51.800 seven toss-up seats in the 100-member house. Now, you notice, you know, I get in trouble all the
00:08:58.000 time for things that I post on the internet, which are not sex tapes, but, you know, like tweets. I'll
00:09:03.760 tweet something and then people get very upset about it. And many times the tweets are being
00:09:08.300 misconstrued deliberately. And so I'll object to that. But what I never do is claim that you're
00:09:15.740 invading my privacy by talking about tweets that I have myself written and published on the internet.
00:09:23.380 See, I never do that because it doesn't make any sense. Now, let's think about this for a second.
00:09:28.840 Susanna Gibson voluntarily uploads footage of herself having sex with her husband, with her 0.97
00:09:33.340 husband's consent, obviously, to a porn website. She and her husband both solicit money from anonymous 0.89
00:09:38.260 viewers on this website. In return, they promise to engage in even more sex acts. None of this is 0.95
00:09:43.380 occurring on some private channel. Anyone with a working internet connection can see it.
00:09:48.400 Some of these acts, by the way, were broadcast after Gibson announced her run for office in
00:09:53.580 Virginia. And now Gibson tells us it's a sex crime to share this footage. It violates Virginia's
00:09:59.240 revenge porn laws. If that's true, ironically enough, if that's true, it would mean that Susanna
00:10:04.580 Gibson and her husband are the ones guilty of sex crimes because they're the ones who shared the 1.00
00:10:09.540 footage. So they have committed sex crimes against themselves. Throw them in prison then, I guess.
00:10:17.720 So it's not just a facile argument that we're talking about here. It's completely and totally
00:10:21.740 absurd. It's the kind of argument you make when you're ashamed of what you've done and you know
00:10:25.780 there's no defense for it. So you blurt out the first thing that comes to mind. I mean, saying that
00:10:29.760 it's a sex crime for people to share a sex tape that you published on the internet, it's like selling
00:10:34.460 your car to someone. And then as soon as they're driving away, calling the police and claiming that
00:10:39.580 you're a victim of grand theft auto. Or perhaps you remember when Anthony Weiner claimed that he
00:10:44.660 was hacked because he had no defense for why he was sending pictures of his crotch to random women 0.92
00:10:48.960 on the internet. It's a bit like that as well. The level of desperation is really something to
00:10:55.880 behold. They're so desperate that they're co-opting the same terminology they told us was sacred,
00:11:00.640 the language of the Me Too movement, as a political cover for behavior that they know is repulsive.
00:11:07.820 They're saying we're all sex criminals for noticing what they're uploading on the internet.
00:11:12.440 Which is not simply hypocrisy. These are the panicked cries of feminists who are afraid to 1.00
00:11:17.980 confront the logical endpoint of their entire movement, which is that feminism doesn't actually 0.94
00:11:22.940 liberate women from anything. Instead, it encourages them to become slaves to their most degenerate 1.00
00:11:27.940 base sexual desires. A great illustration of this hypocrisy comes to us from the feminist blog 1.00
00:11:34.020 Jezebel. Jezebel, like the New York Times and CBS News, is currently claiming that Republicans are
00:11:38.980 demonizing Gibson for the crime of having sex with her husband. That's the straw man they're running 0.91
00:11:44.280 with, as unsurprising and predictable as it may be. And Jezebel, of course, repeats the line that
00:11:49.540 even talking about Gibson's videos might amount to a sex crime. What's especially interesting about
00:11:55.820 Jezebel's coverage, though, is that they just ran a long post about the personal life of presidential
00:12:01.480 candidate Tim Scott, saying that he needs to be more open about why he doesn't have a girlfriend
00:12:06.740 at the age of 57. Or I guess he claims he does have a girlfriend, so why isn't he married at the age
00:12:11.740 of 57? The piece mocks Scott for allegedly being a virgin until he was middle-aged. It also suggests that
00:12:18.040 he's suffering from marriage-related trauma from his upbringing after his father, a Vietnam War veteran,
00:12:23.220 developed a drinking problem. So the progressive feminists at Jezebel are allowed to mock Tim 1.00
00:12:28.900 Scott for all of these personal issues, which are actually personal, and they haven't even remotely
00:12:33.120 verified. But at the same time, Jezebel also says you can't talk about multiple sex tapes that a woman 0.99
00:12:39.180 running for office in the Democrat Party published for public consumption. And there's a lot of this on
00:12:46.160 the internet right now. The same media outlet saying that we should respect Susanna Gibson's privacy,
00:12:51.020 privacy, even though she didn't respect her own privacy, are also reporting incessantly about
00:12:57.640 their speculations about Tim Scott's private life. Now, to be clear, some questions about Scott's
00:13:04.360 personal life are legitimate. He seems very much to be lying about having a girlfriend who he refuses to
00:13:11.440 identify in any way. It does sound a bit like he's pulling the old, my girlfriend goes to another
00:13:17.100 school move. And if we're being honest, it's weird to have a 57-year-old bachelor running for president.
00:13:22.240 But at the same time, there's an obvious double standard in the way the media treats questions
00:13:26.300 about a politician's private life depending on their political party. Another example is the
00:13:30.460 incessant reporting on the whereabouts of Melania Trump, who's been absent from the campaign trail.
00:13:36.180 I mean, we really haven't seen her at all at Donald Trump's side, whether it's at rallies or
00:13:41.720 when he's showing up for these court appearances. And again, I think objectively, those are perfectly
00:13:47.620 valid questions. But by the same token, once we allow for all that, that it's clear that a political
00:13:53.000 candidate's history as a porn star is also very relevant. Now, there's a reason the left is denying
00:14:01.400 this, and it has nothing to do with one state-level candidate in Virginia. They're lying about what
00:14:07.100 Susanna Gibson did because her behavior highlights a very uncomfortable truth about the great experiment
00:14:12.320 the left has conducted for so many years. The truth is this. After multiple waves and generations of
00:14:18.460 feminism, which supposedly were all about treating women like people instead of objects, that's how 1.00
00:14:22.920 it was sold anyway, pornography has now become so normalized and mainstreamed in our society that we
00:14:28.820 have a bunch of soccer moms whoring themselves out on the internet for a few extra bucks. 1.00
00:14:33.120 These are not young girls getting sex trafficked or turning to street prostitution out of desperation.
00:14:39.900 These are bored, middle-class women with loose morals looking for validation and a little extra 1.00
00:14:45.840 spending cash. You know, I've talked many times about what I call the trajectory of leftism, and with any
00:14:52.600 item on their agenda, anything they promote, it always starts and ends the same way. So first they deny that
00:15:00.040 they're doing the thing. Then they admit they're doing it, but they insist that it's good. And then
00:15:05.020 they say that since it's good, it should actually be celebrated. And finally, they invite or demand that
00:15:10.260 we participate. So we go from denial to promotion to celebration to participation. And now we see that
00:15:20.160 pornography has followed this same path, and we've finally arrived at the participation stage where the
00:15:25.980 problem becomes terminal. First, they denied that they wanted to make hardcore porn mainstream and
00:15:31.440 accessible to everyone, including children. And then they said that, well, actually, porn is good, and it
00:15:35.940 should be mainstream. And then they demanded that we celebrate these porn stars and cyber prostitutes and 1.00
00:15:42.060 their free expression. And now porn has been opened up for all to actively participate in it, which is 0.98
00:15:49.340 an invitation that many attention-starved women like Susanna Gibson have responded to. The problem, one of
00:15:57.000 the many, many problems, is that selling your body to random creeps online is depressing and despair-inducing
00:16:06.680 and soul-crushing. Eventually, these women all get sick of it, and they want to move on. 1.00
00:16:11.600 And understandably so, but there is no moving on in the internet age. Everything you've done there,
00:16:20.980 you do forever. It lives on whether you like it or not. And that does not make you a victim or give
00:16:28.700 you the right to cry about invasions of privacy. It just means you need to make better choices,
00:16:35.760 as Susanna Gibson and many women like her have now discovered the hard way.
00:16:41.600 Now, let's get to our fight.
00:16:50.240 Most people only think about poor air quality when we have fires like the ones that just happened in
00:16:54.660 Canada, causing New York to be a strange orange color that made the air quality absolutely terrible.
00:16:59.560 But if you stop to think about the polluted air in your day-to-day life, you and your family's health
00:17:03.180 may be affected by the air quality in your home. Allergens and germs floating in the air
00:17:07.320 can make you sick. But the good news is that there's technology out there that helps you
00:17:11.820 purify your living space easily and affordable with EnviroCleanse. You'll never have to worry
00:17:16.920 again. EnviroCleanse is an in-home air purifying unit designed to destroy cold and flu viruses,
00:17:21.220 allergy-inflaming toxins, mold, and even more. EnviroCleanse promises far fewer colds, allergies,
00:17:26.120 and also better sleep. Their air purifiers come in all sizes, colors, and prices to fit every budget.
00:17:31.940 And they offer additional products like surface cleaner and laundry detergent as well.
00:17:36.620 EnviroCleanse is the air purifier we use in our home. Works great. Gives me the peace of mind
00:17:40.880 that I'm breathing in healthy air. And the last thing our family needs is to get sick. EnviroCleanse
00:17:45.840 offers a simple solution for keeping me healthy and all the family healthy and in tip-top shape.
00:17:51.140 Breathe in pure air and live a healthier life. Visit ekpure.com. Use code Walsh for 10% off your
00:17:56.400 EnviroCleanse home air purification unit. Right now, you'll also get their free air quality monitor,
00:18:01.120 plus fast, free shipping. That's $150 savings. ekpure.com. Code Walsh. That's ekpure.com. Promo
00:18:08.360 code Walsh. We begin, obviously, with this history-shaping, history-changing story from
00:18:14.600 The Independent. Reports, alleged non-human alien corpses have been displayed to Mexican politicians
00:18:21.320 at the country's Congress. The two small alleged alien corpses retrieved from Peru were presented
00:18:27.080 in windowed boxes in Mexico City on Wednesday, stirring excitement within the UFO conspiracy
00:18:32.200 theorist community. The event was spearheaded by a journalist and UFOlogist, Jamie Masson,
00:18:38.360 who testified under oath that the mummified specimens are not part of our terrestrial evolution,
00:18:42.880 with almost a third of their DNA remaining unknown, reported Mexican media. The claims by the
00:18:48.140 self-claimed UFOlogist have not been proven. Mr. Masson has previously been associated with
00:18:54.040 claims of discoveries that have later been debunked. Okay, first of all, that's a very rude
00:19:00.140 paragraph, I have to say. So you're telling me, if this guy makes one claim about aliens that's
00:19:05.800 debunked, allegedly, suddenly he's not allowed to present evidence of actual aliens that he finds?
00:19:11.700 Like, okay, so he made a claim about aliens that was debunked, and then he happened to find real
00:19:15.860 aliens. What do you want him to do? You want him to not tell us about it? Because he said,
00:19:19.960 well, I've been debunked once, so now I'm disqualified. It's like, you know, I understand
00:19:24.020 the boy who cried wolf, but if the boy cries wolf and he lies, and then the next day he brings the wolf
00:19:30.640 to you and says, here's a wolf, like, are you going to say, no, this is a psyop, right? I mean,
00:19:37.660 think about it. So continuing, at the public hearing, Mr. Masson showed U.S. officials and members
00:19:44.080 of the Mexican government several videos of UFOs and unidentified anomalous phenomena
00:19:48.080 before unveiling the alleged alien corpses. He said, quote, these specimen are not part of our
00:19:53.880 terrestrial evolution. These aren't beings that were found after UFO wreckage. They were found
00:19:58.200 in algae mines and were later fossilized. Mr. Masson told attendees the specimens have been studied by
00:20:04.660 scientists at the Autonomous National University of Mexico who were able to draw DNA evidence using
00:20:09.340 radiocarbon dating. After comparisons were made to other DNA samples, it was found that over 30% of
00:20:13.800 specimens DNA was unknown. And then he also showed x-rays and he said that bodies have eggs inside
00:20:21.800 while both were said to have implants made of very rare metals. Okay. And also these were a thousand
00:20:29.720 years old. They were able to date them to a thousand years old. Now, so this is tremendous. So we have
00:20:35.860 actual, so now we have the final piece. Everyone said that UFO sightings, that's not enough. I'm not
00:20:41.920 convinced. Uh, where are the actual alien bodies? Well, here you go. Here they are. What do you have
00:20:48.640 to say now? Uh, we have the actual video of him unveiling the, uh, alien corpses. So let's put that
00:20:53.840 up on the screen. You can see him there in the boxes laying very comfortably. There they are.
00:21:08.840 And if you don't speak Spanish, what he's saying, he's saying, uh, these are real aliens.
00:21:12.840 These are a hundred percent real. It's been proven. It's a fact. Ben Shapiro is wrong.
00:21:23.560 Look at this Ben Shapiro. What do you have to say now? Apologize to Matt Walsh. Apologize to him.
00:21:29.480 He says, and he continues along that way. Uh, so I'm, I'm bilingual. So a little bit of a
00:21:33.940 translation there. So I'll tell you, okay, so, uh, no, put the, put the picture back.
00:21:38.060 What do you, we have, we have images of actual aliens and we take them off the screen. Like
00:21:41.740 what? Put it on the screen the entire time. Can we see the images again of the aliens? Okay. Right
00:21:45.160 there. So, you know, what else do you need to see? That's the alien. And that's, so I'll say,
00:21:49.480 and I want to tell you exactly what happened. I'll tell you exactly what happened. So first of all,
00:21:54.060 we have to admit, I think for, for a thousand year old corpses, uh, you know, they're pretty cute
00:21:59.980 little guys, you know, and, and I mean, they look like a elf on the shelf or something. Uh, like they
00:22:05.460 could be, you know, like they're your friends who come to watch over you. And I can tell you just
00:22:09.660 from my own analysis that, uh, and you know, after having studied this or read the articles,
00:22:13.840 I've looked at these aliens. Um, I've looked at the DNA sequences and what I can tell from my own
00:22:20.020 research and studies is that these were definitely friendly aliens, a hundred percent, a hundred
00:22:24.420 percent guaranteed. And that's again, based on my own research. So these were, these were friendly
00:22:28.800 little guys who came to earth and, um, you know, I'm betting they had fun little names like, uh,
00:22:35.140 you know, like beep and bop or something were probably their names, I'm guessing. And so beep
00:22:39.420 and bop came all this way and they were just looking to make friends and they were just, you know,
00:22:43.380 they wanted to hang out and have a good time. And I'll tell you exactly what happened. So they landed
00:22:47.280 in pre-Columbian South America. And that is just, that's bad luck, man. That is, that is not where you
00:22:55.500 want to be. That's not the time you want to be. It's just, they're off. They're off by a few thousand
00:23:00.560 miles and a few hundred years. And, uh, they really got the wrong side of that coin flip. And now,
00:23:05.660 now this was in fairness to, uh, to Peru a thousand years ago, this was a thousand years ago. So if you're,
00:23:11.960 it's a thousand years ago and you're a tiny friendly alien from an advanced civilization,
00:23:16.200 there's not going to be anywhere on earth. That's great to land. There's not going to be any great
00:23:22.000 options for you. Uh, there's no ideal spot on the planet at that time, but you probably would
00:23:27.400 have been better off with medieval Europe. Um, I mean, you, you know, medieval Europe,
00:23:34.680 you probably still would have been captured and burned at the stake under the assumption that 0.64
00:23:37.880 you're a demon. Uh, but, uh, you might be able to reason with them. There's a chance, but landing in
00:23:43.360 Peru, now you're dealing with, I guess at that point, like the Inca, I think, or maybe whatever the
00:23:49.960 pre-Inca tribe was. And now you've got human sacrifices going on. So I guarantee, I guarantee 1.00
00:23:56.200 they landed and it was a whole group of them. These adorable little Ewoks, they landed and most
00:24:02.300 of them were immediately captured and scalped and butchered. And you could just imagine them
00:24:06.960 strolling up to the Incan, uh, death temple and just naively. And they're like, Hey folks, just,
00:24:12.900 uh, stopping by from planet Neptune or whatever. Just wanted to say hi. And then boom,
00:24:18.500 one of them is hit in the face with a spear and it's a bloodbath. And the two survivors,
00:24:23.140 they run into a cave and they hide and they're just looking at each other like, Holy crap, man, 0.84
00:24:28.260 what the hell kind of planet is this? We, this is not, this is the wrong solar system. We need to get 0.64
00:24:33.760 out of here. And you can actually see them. You can see them cringing. You know, he's, he died
00:24:38.800 cringing. They're just cringing. They're like, geez, this place is rough. And they died of starvation
00:24:45.060 or whatever, you know, or of exposure. They died of the cold and maybe they got bit by a rattlesnake
00:24:49.280 or something. That's my theory. And, um, and that's it. And that's what happened. And that's
00:24:54.780 my analysis. And I'm happy to provide this testimony, uh, to the Mexican government. Um,
00:24:59.720 that's the whole story of beep and bop that I've spent seven minutes on what, during what's supposed
00:25:07.660 to be a new segment. Anyway, moving on. Uh, if we can even move on from that, I don't know. How do
00:25:14.920 you move on from, Oh, we proved aliens. Let's talk about something else. All right. Uh, daily wire has
00:25:21.000 this report, an active member of the sisters of perpetual indulgence, uh, a group of predominantly
00:25:26.240 gay men who openly mock Catholics were arrested in California last month for indecent exposure after 0.88
00:25:31.620 witnesses say he masturbated in public for an hour. According to a sheriff's office report obtained 0.98
00:25:36.840 by the daily wire, the man, 53 year old Clinton Monroe, Ellis Gilmore was arrested by police at
00:25:42.920 a, uh, you think that's enough names for this guy, Clinton Monroe, Ellis Gilmore, a lot of names.
00:25:49.880 And he's still just a freak was, was arrested by police at a beach side park after they received
00:25:54.640 a report of a male exposing himself in the driver's seat of a parked vehicle. According to numerous,
00:25:59.460 uh, witnesses, Ellis Gilmore had been at the location for approximately one hour sitting in his
00:26:03.400 truck with the door open masturbating. According to a sheriff's report on the incident, which took
00:26:07.800 place on August 12th at around 6 41 PM, the conduct does not appear to have been directed at anyone in
00:26:13.000 particular. That's an odd phrase. Okay. His public masturbation was not directed at anyone in
00:26:19.660 particular. How would it, what do you mean direct? What would it be to direct it at someone? Anyway, 0.84
00:26:25.820 he was publicly masturbating at this point. The arrest took place at a table bluff County park 0.69
00:26:32.580 in, uh, Loletta, California with over an hour of daylight still left. Google lists the park as a,
00:26:37.460 as good for kids and home to kid friendly hikes. And this is where this guy decided to pull up and
00:26:43.060 open his car door and, uh, uh, masturbate. A mugshot obtained by the daily wire from Ellis Gilmore's 0.97
00:26:49.060 booking indicates that he was at least shirtless at the time of the arrest. Uh, the sisters,
00:26:52.480 perpetual indulgence made headlines early this year after the Los Angeles Dodgers decided to honor the
00:26:56.480 group at a pride event. The group makes fun of Christianity. Its members are men in traditional 0.52
00:27:00.480 nun clothing that frequently use sexually suggestive names. It won the support, however,
00:27:04.660 of many in the media, which defended the group from critics who said it was a pervert, perverted,
00:27:08.600 uh, hate group and, uh, celebrated it for its dedication, um, to community service. So,
00:27:15.320 and, and there's a lot more in this report, but I think you get kind of get the gist of it.
00:27:20.380 And there's a lot more also, by the way, about how this, uh, drag queen, you know, all, all this
00:27:25.860 other sexually suggestive stuff, the disgusting stuff that he's posted online and all the rest of 0.53
00:27:29.980 it, everything that you expect. I mean, the, the main point about this, of course, when we hear,
00:27:35.980 uh, another of these stories of one of these guys being a pervert, um, the, the headline,
00:27:42.680 the takeaway is that there's, there's nothing surprising about this at all. You know,
00:27:49.380 just the, the very act of dressing up like a drag queen and parading around in public, 0.95
00:27:56.500 you know, that is already, okay, here's the point. That is already a voyeuristic,
00:28:03.160 uh, sexually depraved act. Okay. This is, this is all fetish that these men are engaged in all of it. 0.54
00:28:12.700 That's the only reason they're doing it. Why else would they be doing it? So every single one of
00:28:19.640 them, whether it's the sisters of perpetual indulgence or any other drag queen anywhere else, 1.00
00:28:24.540 they're all doing it because they get a sexual thrill out of it. And, uh, and that is what, 0.53
00:28:30.820 you know, when it comes to transgenderism or all the, anything, all these other things,
00:28:34.700 the LGBT movement, uh, so much of the LGBT movement really is simply about validating,
00:28:41.720 uh, the sexual fetishes of men for the most part. It's about validating sexual fetishes of men
00:28:48.280 and, uh, and, and providing them platforms to engage in those sexual fetishes publicly
00:28:52.620 and demanding that people, uh, uh, you know, tolerated or even participate in their sexual fetishes.
00:28:58.380 That's what it is. And that, and so when you find out that one of them is masturbating in public, 0.88
00:29:04.480 it's like, like, well, of course he was doing that. Like the, the drag itself is a form of public
00:29:10.400 masturbation. Essentially it is, it is a, it is a fetish that you're engaging in publicly, 0.88
00:29:15.560 which is also why it is always inappropriate, uh, to, to have kids anywhere near this.
00:29:23.840 It doesn't matter what the drag, what else the drag queen is doing. You know, a lot of these 1.00
00:29:29.360 videos that we've seen, the drag queens are twerking or whatever, they're dancing, they're 1.00
00:29:33.080 having money thrown out at them like they're strippers and there are kids there and that's
00:29:36.620 awful. Um, but even if the drag queens are just quote unquote reading a story and even if the story 1.00
00:29:43.940 is something innocuous, even if they're reading a cat in the hat or whatever, it still is wrong
00:29:50.860 because this is, they, it is still part of their fetish of their kind of sexual role play that
00:29:56.020 they're engaging in front of kids. All right, CNN, this is from Daily Wire, CNN anchor Poppy, uh,
00:30:02.760 Harlow forced Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham into a corner over her recent order calling gun violence, 1.00
00:30:08.980 a public health crisis and effectively suspending second amendment rights in Albuquerque and the
00:30:12.960 surrounding County. Uh, so it's not often that you see any kind of semi-difficult question from a CNN
00:30:19.220 anchor to a Democrat, but that's what happened here. Let's watch the, uh, tape. Are you overreaching?
00:30:25.040 Let me give you a hypothetical, right? You're a democratic governor who's doing this. What if a
00:30:29.040 Republican governor of a state declares a health emergency and unilaterally, uh, outlaws abortion
00:30:36.920 in that state where the legislature has not done so by statute, following your logic, would that also
00:30:43.220 be sound? Uh, in, in this situation, honestly, I don't think so, but that is what's happening in this
00:30:54.040 country. Yeah, she has, she has no real answer to it. She says, well, no, that wouldn't be legit. She
00:30:59.740 can't explain why, because there is no answer. Once you've set the precedent that you can, that a governor
00:31:05.480 can just unilaterally declare something a public health emergency and, and ban something outright
00:31:12.400 because of it, then, um, then you, it's, there's no, that is not a self-limiting principle. It's
00:31:19.860 designed to not be. There's, there's, there's no limitation on it. It just has to do with the
00:31:25.120 individual judgment of governor and what he or she considers a public health emergency to be.
00:31:29.760 And there are legitimate, like, for example, um, the, the castration and mutilation of children
00:31:37.760 is a public health, is an actual public health emergency. And so if Democrats can do this, then
00:31:45.140 the Republican governor should just say, there's a public health emergency. We're banned. We don't
00:31:49.040 need to go through any kind of legislative procedure here. We don't need to pass a law.
00:31:53.560 I'm saying right now it's banned because it's a public health emergency. And that again is an actual
00:31:58.560 public health emergency. So if that's the precedent that you've set, then that's where it goes.
00:32:06.100 The interesting thing about this now, look, uh, the fact that a governor tried to do this
00:32:10.840 is already big news, something that we should pay attention to. And I mean, obviously speak out
00:32:15.300 against at a minimum, but this is not going anywhere, uh, for her. She's, she's a, all of the law
00:32:24.800 enforcement basically at every level, right up to the, I believe the attorney general of the state
00:32:28.540 in New Mexico, they've all said that they're not going to enforce this. The sheriffs have all said
00:32:33.260 that the DAs, they're not going to enforce it. It's unconstitutional. They can't enforce it.
00:32:37.420 So we have that. So it's, it's unenforceable. She does no enforcement mechanism. Um, and she has 0.98
00:32:44.640 a bunch of people on her own side, like Democrats, including, uh, gun control wackos,
00:32:51.540 like David Hogg have spoken out against this. So this particular thing is not going anywhere
00:32:58.000 for her. Um, it's just going to die on the vine and that's going to be it. I guess not my guess.
00:33:04.140 She put up this 30, it's a 30 day suspension. Um, and people are just ignoring it as they should.
00:33:12.100 And she'll probably just let the 30 days go up and then that she'll move on and she'll declare some
00:33:16.340 kind of victory, you know, over those 30 days, if she can look at the quote, gun violence stats
00:33:22.600 and find that there was even like one fewer, like there was just one less person than average
00:33:28.520 was killed, then she could declare a victory. And if she looks at gun violence stats and, uh,
00:33:33.720 she doesn't see that, then she can just lie about the stats. Uh, you know, and she can always do 0.99
00:33:37.820 that. So she'll find a way to declare victory and she'll move on. 1.00
00:33:39.680 But does that mean that the threat posed by this move is, uh, has been neutralized? And the answer
00:33:51.200 is no, because like we talked about on Monday, when we first discussed this, you know, there was a
00:33:57.140 coordinated response from Democrats, from prominent Democrats about this move by the New Mexico
00:34:03.960 governor, New Mexico governor. And so coordinate, you could tell it was coordinated because they were
00:34:08.660 using almost identical language when they denounced it. And remember, then you even heard it there too,
00:34:15.700 I think. But the thing that they always threw in, right, is, well, there's no authority to do this
00:34:22.520 at the state level, right? A state government can't do this. There's no state exception to the
00:34:29.500 constitution. The governor of a state doesn't have this. So they're always throwing in the state part of
00:34:35.300 it. Because what they're setting up, it will seem like this was, um, a major defeat for the Democrats.
00:34:45.740 They tried it. It didn't work. But on the surface, in the short term, it is a defeat.
00:34:53.440 But they're trying to set up a precedent where, yeah, states can't do this. The federal government can.
00:35:01.020 Which is always what the left prefers to do anyway. Like, they don't even want the states to exist in
00:35:06.860 the first place. They don't want states' rights they don't believe in, and they never have. So they
00:35:11.520 would prefer for everything to be happening, and for all the laws and all the edicts to be passed down
00:35:16.280 from a centralized, from a massive behemoth centralized federal government. And so that's what
00:35:20.960 they're setting up. And that's why they always qualify it by saying states can't do it. Federal
00:35:26.780 government can. Um, okay, we mentioned this, but maybe a little bit more to say about it. I want
00:35:36.000 to play this clip for you. This is from the Daily Wire. The View host Whoopi Goldberg offered a rare
00:35:39.760 defense of a Republican on Tuesday, standing by Senator Tim Scott amid questions about his
00:35:43.380 relationship status. Scott, who's not married, has filed a number of questions about that over the
00:35:47.700 years. Um, and Goldberg waved the question away. So there's two clips. Let's play the first clip
00:35:53.760 from this discussion. The other ladies of The View talking about whether it's a problem that 0.96
00:36:00.900 Tim Scott is single, and whether we should even be asking questions about it in the first place.
00:36:06.660 Let's play this. We met your mom. Will we meet her? Will we meet your girlfriend?
00:36:11.960 You will, of course, at some point. Okay. Great.
00:36:14.540 Where's she hiding? Why is, wait, why is Brian Kilmeade single shaming him? This reminds me of my
00:36:19.420 mom before I met my husband. Like, headline, Alyssa is still single. Well, it does remind you of every
00:36:23.860 woman that's ever walked the earth has been asked, well, where's the man who finds you? But it's,
00:36:27.880 again, it can be very important because of the pillow talk that happens. And if she's a lunatic. 1.00
00:36:34.080 Yeah, but Abigail Adams was a huge influence on her husband. You could, since the beginning of 0.88
00:36:37.820 time. Eleanor Roosevelt. Eleanor Roosevelt. And that's why it's important to know. I will say
00:36:42.700 the Post reporter, Ben Terrace, wrote that he left an interview with Tim Scott, unsure whether Scott's
00:36:48.420 girlfriend actually exists. And he wrote this. Technically, I can't verify that she exists,
00:36:53.900 except to note that for a presidential campaign to essentially reverse catfish America would be
00:36:59.380 insane. The Washington Post- Would it, though?
00:37:01.680 The Washington Post reports that six friends of Scott's said they didn't know about a woman in
00:37:07.360 his life. Why are they investigating? So, in fact, I just want to make one note about that
00:37:13.780 before we talk in broad terms about it. But I thought it was funny. We heard from one of the
00:37:19.240 hens on the view there that, well, this is something every woman has to deal with since the beginning of 1.00
00:37:23.480 time. All these questions about her relationship status. And she says that, and she doesn't even
00:37:28.700 notice that, okay, what we're seeing here is evidence that, you know, you have turned this
00:37:34.660 into a gender thing. You've turned this into questions about relationship status. You've just 0.99
00:37:39.640 always told yourself that, oh, only women. That's scrutiny that only women deal with. 1.00
00:37:44.560 The Tim Scott story is proof that it's not just a woman thing. Okay, this is, if you get to a 1.00
00:37:49.480 certain age, whether you're a man or a woman, and you're not married, people start asking questions.
00:37:55.260 They're like, what's going on with that? Why didn't you get married? And these are valid questions.
00:37:59.960 They are valid. And so, Tim Scott is proof that it's not just women. But rather than realizing
00:38:07.440 that, rather than saying, oh, okay, well, apparently women are not being uniquely persecuted with this
00:38:10.820 question. It turns out that men are asked, people ask these questions about men also. Rather than saying
00:38:15.140 that, they have to insist that, well, this is the exception. This is the one time, this is the one
00:38:20.320 time anyone has ever asked this question about a man. Anyway, but then we have Whoopi Goldberg chime
00:38:25.540 in and say that her rare occasion of defending a Republican. Let's watch.
00:38:30.860 Here's my question. I don't care. This is the issue. And it's a big issue in the country.
00:38:37.840 Why is my private life of so much interest to you that you can't get past the fact that I may not be
00:38:48.080 interested in being married? I might not want a spouse. That doesn't mean I can't do the job.
00:38:55.080 It doesn't mean I don't have people who can meet and greet all those folks that come. You know,
00:39:00.480 there have been several presidents in our, not our lifetime, I don't think, not even George's lifetime.
00:39:07.840 Well, that's true. Joy always says, Joy always says, you know, she used to go with Lincoln.
00:39:13.080 James Buchanan. James Buchanan. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. I did. I did. Did you date him too?
00:39:17.700 Do you have more time? Do you have more energy? Yes. I was much more productive when I was single
00:39:21.460 and hiding in a job than I do now. I just, I just don't think it's right for, for people to invest
00:39:28.860 that kind of stuff in, into anyone until you know what. So we get the idea, but, but
00:39:37.460 ultimately they are having this long conversation about Tim Scott and his, and his, uh, his relationship
00:39:42.080 status. And as we already covered in the, uh, as in, in the opening, there's the underlying hypocrisy
00:39:49.300 here that once again, he's Republican. So we're having this conversation, uh, when it comes to
00:39:54.440 Democrats, there's supposed to be just a, a veil of silence and secrecy over their entire,
00:40:02.320 you can't ask any questions about the private life at all. Uh, certainly we know that Barack Obama
00:40:07.040 benefited greatly from that double standard and no questions about, you know, this guy just shows
00:40:13.960 up on the scene and everyone's asking like, where did he come from? What's his deal? What's his
00:40:17.680 background? Can we find out any discussion about what this guy was doing prior to yesterday
00:40:25.000 is, uh, irrelevant than innovation and privacy. So we know about that double standard and that's been
00:40:29.980 established and it's, you know, and we have to always mention it. Um, that said, uh, again,
00:40:37.340 if this is being applied consistently, these are, it's, of course it matters. Okay. Just speaking
00:40:45.720 objectively, putting all the double standard stuff aside, of course your private life matters.
00:40:52.320 Of course it matters. Of course it matters for politicians, especially, obviously it does.
00:40:57.260 So you take Tim Scott. Now, again, it's pretty clear to me, I don't know this, but from my
00:41:04.600 perspective, it certainly seems that he is lying about having this girlfriend. Uh, and if you watch
00:41:10.780 that whole interview with, uh, the whole exchange with Brian Kilmeade on Fox, you could just, you could
00:41:16.740 tell it's, you could tell it is very obvious. And he's, are we going to meet your girlfriend? Oh yeah.
00:41:22.600 Sure. Uh, it seems very clear that something is up with this, uh, quote unquote girlfriend.
00:41:30.480 And, and obviously if you want to be president and you're allegedly in a romantic relationship
00:41:35.440 with someone, we want to know who that person is, who is someone that you're spending a lot of time
00:41:40.120 with that has a lot of influence on you as it would in any romantic relationship. Who is that?
00:41:45.040 It's, we would like to know that we actually have a right to know that if you want to be president,
00:41:50.700 if you want to have the, if you want to have, uh, be in the most powerful position in the country,
00:41:54.820 uh, and potentially whoever this person is, is going to be coming with you into the white house
00:41:59.820 or certainly be visiting very often. Who is the person? You really have to tell us that you can't
00:42:06.460 just keep it a secret. If you want to have all that stuff, be a secret, don't run for president.
00:42:10.540 Um, and beyond that, it's just, it's, it's absurd. It's an absurd conversation because it's absurd
00:42:20.320 to even question whether a political candidate's private life is relevant for discussion. Of course
00:42:27.160 it is. Uh, their private life speaks to who they are in many ways. You could make the argument
00:42:36.840 that a politician's private life is even more relevant than, and more important than what he's
00:42:45.380 done publicly. It's certainly more important than what he says publicly. Now I think ultimately the
00:42:50.220 most important thing for a politician is going to be the policies that he's supported, the policies
00:42:55.720 that he's pushed through, the laws that he's, uh, he's written or signed, you know, that's always
00:43:00.400 going to be the most important thing. But a real close second on that list is going to be that
00:43:07.080 person's private life, who they are privately. And that is more important than what he, than what
00:43:11.600 that person says publicly. Like we all agree that someone's running for office and they say something
00:43:17.840 publicly, whatever they've said is open for scrutiny and it does matter. Is what they said true? Are they
00:43:24.620 lying? Are they telling the truth? You know, um, are they making an argument for something that makes
00:43:29.820 sense or not? I mean, we talk about all these things, but even more relevant is how does that
00:43:36.100 person conduct themselves in their private life? Which is another way of saying, what kind of person
00:43:40.320 is this? Um, and when you want to be president, you're on the clock 24 seven, unless you're Joe Biden
00:43:49.960 and you take, uh, you take 23 days of vacation every month. Most of the time, and for most cases,
00:43:59.820 you're basically on the clock as president 24 seven. So actually you don't really have a private
00:44:04.880 life. That's what you're signing up for. I mean, it's one of the many reasons why I would never want
00:44:09.600 to be president. And I sort of like question it. This is one, this is the paradox to begin with
00:44:14.940 of having an office like the presidency, that if someone who would seek it in the first place
00:44:20.180 is automatically suspect. The fact that you would even want that job, uh, I think immediately calls
00:44:25.680 into question your judgment and all the rest of it. But you know, it's just, you have to deal with
00:44:29.080 that paradox. Um, but one of the consequences is that you have no private life. You're on the
00:44:34.980 clock all the time. You're the president all the time. You wield a lot of authority and power all
00:44:39.140 the time, 24 seven, every second of the day. And so everything about you matters. Uh, and to me,
00:44:48.420 that's again, pretty obvious. Let's get to the next step.
00:44:56.640 You know, one thing we're always talking about over here is a delicious all American meat. Do you
00:45:01.520 know what, uh, we all like even more when that American meat is free? That's why we love Good
00:45:06.420 Ranchers. They source the best meat in America and deliver it right to your door. Even better right now,
00:45:10.480 they're offering two years of free ground beef to anyone who subscribes. That's a $480 value. I can
00:45:16.340 tell you the ground beef beef is delicious as well. I use it in my chili. I only put the best meat in
00:45:20.600 my chili. Just made some, uh, this past Sunday and, uh, it was the best chili of all time as every
00:45:26.320 batch of chili I make is. Not only are you going to get the best cuts of meat from a trusted 100%
00:45:30.880 American source company, but you're also going to lock in your price for two whole years when you
00:45:34.900 subscribe to any of their boxes. That's two years of free high quality ground beef and a locked in
00:45:39.240 price. No other meat company guarantees you a hundred percent American meat and a locked in price.
00:45:42.440 That's because no one else is Good Ranchers. You can save on your beef, chicken, and pork by locking
00:45:46.540 in your price today. Every single steakhouse quality cut is individually wrapped and flash
00:45:50.620 frozen to make mealtime easy. Subscribe to Good Ranchers to get a guaranteed price and a trusted
00:45:54.980 100% American source for your favorite cuts. Go to GoodRanchers.com and use my code Walsh for $25
00:46:01.280 off and free ground beef for two years. Remember, subscribe to any box to lock in your price on
00:46:06.580 America's best meat for two whole years as well. That's GoodRanchers.com today and use my code
00:46:12.320 Walsh for over $500 in savings. Subscribe to Good Ranchers, American Meat Delivered.
00:46:18.060 Was Walsh wrong? I haven't been wrong yet since we've started this segment, surprisingly,
00:46:23.480 but let's find out if today is the day. So we have a couple of responses to two different
00:46:27.700 points made on the show yesterday. So Mr. Big Deal says, how is manifesting any different than praying?
00:46:35.920 Why is praying considered normal but manifesting isn't? By the way, I think both are most likely scams.
00:46:40.040 And another comment says, isn't that what prayer does? I mean, I know Christians will spin it, 1.00
00:46:45.380 but I'm a Christian and prayer literally brings manifestation. So do you mean their way of doing
00:46:49.860 it is wrong and fake? Yes, that is what I mean. Their way of doing it is wrong and fake. I think I
00:46:57.320 explained this already in pretty extensive detail. Certainly, I think I clearly explained it. The
00:47:05.340 difference between this new age, modern notion, this TikTok thing of manifesting and praying on the
00:47:11.660 other hand. And probably the number one biggest difference is that when you're praying, you are
00:47:19.980 beseeching an authority, you know, the ultimate authority, God. You're reaching out to God, a being,
00:47:27.880 right? With manifesting, you're reaching out to nobody, to nothing. It is a prayer being offered
00:47:35.340 up to empty space, to no one, to, again, the universe itself. So that's the difference. Are you
00:47:42.880 going to pray to the creator of the universe or to the actual universe? It's a little bit like,
00:47:49.620 I don't know, somebody builds a house and you can go and if you need a favor, you can go and ask for
00:47:58.760 the favor from the guy who built the house, you know, the carpenter, the builder, or you can go
00:48:04.680 ask for the favor from the house itself. And I think if you stand at the house and say, hey, can you help
00:48:09.580 me with something? Nothing's going to happen because it's a house. It's an inanimate object. If you go up to
00:48:14.860 the guy who built it, maybe he'll help you out. Maybe he won't, but it's an actual person. It's a being.
00:48:19.620 Right? So that's the biggest difference. But there are other differences too. And probably
00:48:25.780 the second biggest is that in prayer, first of all, not all prayer from the Christian conception
00:48:32.280 is supposed to be a prayer. Not all prayers are prayers of petition. That's a type of prayer
00:48:37.220 where you are petitioning, you're asking for something. But there's always the understanding
00:48:41.400 that the answer can be no. And I know, you know, certainly in my own life, prayers of petition,
00:48:46.160 you know, probably like 90%, 90% of the time, the answer ends up being no, or, or, or at least
00:48:51.220 if not, no, the answer very often will be not yet. Um, um, or not like that, or, you know,
00:48:56.640 not exactly in the way that you want. So it's, it's, it's, you know, you're not always going
00:49:00.740 to get an exact yes. Uh, and Christians understand that with manifesting, right? Remember all this 0.99
00:49:06.400 manifesting tick tocks we played, it was like, say this exact phrase and you'll get exactly what you
00:49:11.600 want. You know, put, put in mind this precise thing that you want. You want, right? You're a
00:49:17.880 woman and you want this guy to text you and say this phrase. And that particular guy will text you 1.00
00:49:24.780 because he will be, uh, taken over by the forces of the universe in some cosmic, mysterious way
00:49:30.180 and compelled to text you. Uh, so it's a kind of a form of like cosmic kidnapping that's going on.
00:49:37.780 Um, so there's no, there's no, there's no room for, for getting a no, another difference,
00:49:43.120 which then leads to the other big difference, which is that there's no humility. So
00:49:46.460 in prayer is an act, if it's being done correctly, prayer is an act of humbling yourself before, um,
00:49:53.780 a power greater than yourself. And so it's an act, if it's actual prayer, if you're praying the right
00:49:59.560 kind of way, then you are humbling yourself before God. Um, this manifesting thing takes
00:50:05.360 the human, takes God out of it. Uh, it takes any possibility of disappointment out of it,
00:50:10.740 right? It's all, you're always going to get a yes. So, so it's very self-serving and all that,
00:50:15.460 but also there's no humility. Okay. Remember what we heard from those manifesting gurus.
00:50:21.840 What do they all say? They said, well, this is what you deserve. This is what you should have
00:50:26.280 because you're so special and the universe owes this to you. And so when you, when you, um,
00:50:32.660 when you manifest, you're declaring to the universe, how great you are and what you're owed.
00:50:39.800 That is not what praying is. It's not what a Christian does in prayer. I tell you something 1.00
00:50:42.780 as a Christian, if you approach prayer that way, if you go to God, say, God,
00:50:46.640 I'm great. I think we both agree. So here's what I need from you. Um, if you go to God that way,
00:50:54.620 then you're certainly not going to get what you want. And most likely you'll get, uh, repudiation,
00:50:59.620 you know, you'll get something that you didn't want. So I think there's a number of significant
00:51:04.800 differences. Uh, now we talked a little bit about 9-11 conspiracy theories, a couple of comments
00:51:09.700 about that. Dad Bear says, President Kennedy's assassination by the U S government was kept
00:51:13.440 secret for 60 years. So why is it so incomprehensible that 9-11 has been kept secret for 20 years,
00:51:18.340 Matt? Tommy says, hope they're paying you enough for 9-11 stuff. None of the theories make sense.
00:51:23.620 How about building seven, Mr. Intuitive? Nothing hit that building. You really believe
00:51:27.860 the debris, but Matt, you're losing credibility by the day. Uh, who do you think is paying me? Yeah,
00:51:32.160 I'm a, you're right. Uh, Tommy, I'm part of the conspiracy. The government is paying me to,
00:51:37.040 to, they've paid me to do that one segment in my whole life. You know, so I talked about 9-11
00:51:44.100 conspiracy theories for like three minutes, probably for the first time in my public life. I've
00:51:49.340 mentioned it one time and I'm being paid. I'm in on it. The FBI has come to me and they said,
00:51:55.920 we'll give you a $10 million to talk about this for three minutes on your podcast. That's how
00:52:01.100 influential you are, Mr. Walsh. Here's the 10 million. That's exactly what happened. Uh, so you
00:52:06.200 caught me. Um, to the other question, no, it's not incomprehensible that the government could keep a
00:52:14.220 secret. Uh, I think we've shown the government's very bad at keeping secrets and that there are,
00:52:20.860 it leaks like a sieve. I mean, think about especially all through the Trump administration,
00:52:24.860 just leaks coming from everywhere all the time. Um, and as the government grows and grows and
00:52:30.700 grows, you get more and more of that. Cause it's just the gut, when we're talking about the
00:52:32.960 government, we're talking about a massive behemoth, uh, blob like organism that it's just,
00:52:40.360 it's impossible to, to keep it all silent. Um, but when it comes to 9-11, it's not just the
00:52:47.520 secret, it's the coordination. So I think it is true that the government has, is very bad at
00:52:53.000 keeping secrets, but they're even worse at coordinating and achieving something like doing,
00:53:00.860 putting a goal in mind and then coordinating amongst all these different limbs and things.
00:53:06.080 And we're more like tentacles. You got all these tentacles spread out all over the place,
00:53:09.560 coordinating all these tentacles to then go and achieve something. And that's why I talk about
00:53:15.420 the government. It's more like, it's not an octopus. You think of tentacles, you think of an
00:53:18.040 octopus, but an octopus, it's not because octopus, it's got many brains and each of these tentacles
00:53:23.600 in some way is like autonomous, but they all work together in this sort of hive mind, mysterious kind
00:53:29.080 of way. That is not how the government works. Um, each tentacle has its own designs and they're not
00:53:35.860 coordinating at all and they're all going off in different directions. So the coordination
00:53:39.040 okay to, that you're talking about for this 9-11 conspiracy where they've rigged all the buildings
00:53:45.020 with explosives and they're pretending that planes are flying. Maybe planes really are flying into some
00:53:49.780 of these buildings, but elsewhere they're not. So the Pentagon didn't get hit with a plane, right?
00:53:53.940 They got hit by a missile somehow. Uh, and then we're pretending. So you're, you're taught to,
00:53:59.580 to do all of this, right? You would need coordination from thousands of people. I mean,
00:54:08.800 from everyone, from the people that are putting, setting up the explosives to the building managers
00:54:13.360 in these buildings to the airlines themselves who are going along with the claim that a plane hit the
00:54:20.240 Pentagon and really didn't. So they've made up an entire plane that never existed. Uh, it's just
00:54:24.860 thousands of people, thousands are coordinating to pull this off. And, um, that alone is just,
00:54:33.460 anytime I hear a theory like that, my immediately red flags go up. And I think that is not the
00:54:39.560 incompetent, clumsy, oafish bureaucracy that I have come to know and loathe through my 37 years on earth. 0.63
00:54:47.380 Um, but then there's also just, as I said yesterday, the, the, it's not even clear what
00:54:54.020 the theory is. Like it doesn't even make any sense. I mean, they rigged the building with
00:54:57.960 explosives. They still fly planes into them, but then they rigged building seven with explosives
00:55:02.060 and they don't bother flying a plane into that one. And then they detonated anyway. Why? So there's
00:55:07.520 the question for people who believe in the nine 11 conspiracy where they say, well, why did building
00:55:11.520 seven, seven fall? And I think it's pretty obvious debris fell. It's, it, it lit on fire. Uh,
00:55:17.080 and then it fell. Okay. You don't buy that. But then I would throw the back on you. Why would
00:55:21.840 they, why is that part of it? Why would they do that? Why? So they have this whole big plan where
00:55:27.700 they're flying planes into buildings and then detonating them. I don't know why you need to do
00:55:31.380 both, but then they have building seven and they say, and they're coming up with their plan and they
00:55:36.460 say, are we going to take that building down too? Uh, oh yeah, we've got to take that building
00:55:39.500 down. Are we going to fly a plane to that one? No, we don't need to fly a plane. We'll just take
00:55:42.320 that one down without the plane. Why did they do that just so they could leave the, leave the
00:55:48.500 breadcrumbs so that you, Tommy could, uh, could figure this out and expose it. It doesn't make
00:55:53.880 any sense. It's kind of like, um, you know, the conspiracy theories that popped up about Sandy
00:56:00.840 Hook where people said that Sandy Hook never happened and it's crisis actors and it was all
00:56:04.740 nonsense. And one thing that they said, uh, early, early on is that there were articles about Sandy
00:56:11.320 Hook that were posted before Sandy Hook, Sandy Hook happened. And, and of course the explanation
00:56:17.960 is very simple that timestamps on articles are very often wrong. They're very often wrong. It's
00:56:22.700 not that confusing. And so there were some articles about Sandy Hook that came up and the
00:56:26.740 timestamps were wrong and they seem to indicate that the article was published before Sandy
00:56:30.100 could happen. And so that makes sense to me. But then I throw it back at the conspiracy
00:56:33.540 theorist and I think what? So if this is all a big staged thing, why would the
00:56:40.300 conspirators publish the article before they even, uh, committed the fake mass shooting?
00:56:48.580 So how does that make any sense on your theory? So these are evil geniuses that are able to hatch
00:56:54.900 this plan and carry it out and fool everybody. And yet they still do something really obviously
00:56:59.940 stupid, like publish the article about it before it even happens. You see, that makes less sense 0.98
00:57:06.300 on your theory than it does on mine. And mine is just the reality.
00:57:11.860 Grand Canyon University is an affordable private Christian university that is located in beautiful
00:57:15.460 Phoenix, Arizona, has a vibrant and expansive campus ranked top 20 in the country, according
00:57:19.680 to niche.com. Praise for its culture and community giving an impact. GCU integrates a free market system
00:57:25.920 and a welcoming Christian worldview perspective into over 320 academic programs with more than 260
00:57:31.620 programs online. As of March, 2023, you can earn your bachelor's master's or doctoral degree where
00:57:37.100 you can engage with faculty and connect with your own university counselor who takes a personalized
00:57:40.760 approach for your success. Find your purpose at Grand Canyon University, private Christian affordable,
00:57:46.600 visit gcu.edu. That's gcu.edu. Also, despite the lackluster economy, the daily wire is thriving. And not only
00:57:55.680 that, we are hiring. We're currently looking for an inside sales rep to join our fast growing sales
00:58:00.520 department. As an inside sales rep, you will identify and solicit new client direct business. This is a
00:58:06.380 unique opportunity to engage with clients nationwide to discuss advertising opportunities across multiple
00:58:11.960 platforms, including podcast, display, email, video, and more. The position is based in Nashville,
00:58:18.520 Tennessee. You will report directly to me and I will have all hiring and firing decisions are reserved
00:58:23.800 for me as they all are with all positions here. If you're interested in joining our team, visit
00:58:28.180 dailywire.com slash careers. That's dailywire.com slash careers today. Now let's get to our daily
00:58:34.960 cancellation.
00:58:42.180 When I first saw this article in the Guardian, in a brief moment of hopeless optimism, I thought, based on the
00:58:48.160 title, that it might be making a valid and important point. And here's the title. When I became a mother, I lost
00:58:54.900 my body and realized it never belonged to me. Now, that's actually true. As a woman, your body does not 0.99
00:59:01.900 belong entirely to you. As a man, your body doesn't belong entirely to you. You are not an autonomous
00:59:09.920 island floating alone out in the sea. Neither am I. I have responsibilities. I have obligations. I owe
00:59:16.040 myself to others, especially my family. And when I say I, that includes my body as I am not in this life
00:59:24.620 separable from my body. There is no I that exists separate of my body. They're one in the same. I am
00:59:31.480 my body. This is why bodily autonomy is a misnomer. It's a myth. It's incoherent. To be entirely
00:59:38.580 autonomous in your body is to be entirely autonomous in your person, as these are one in the same. But no
00:59:44.540 person is autonomous. We all have duties that transcend whatever claims we might want to make to autonomy.
00:59:49.700 Like there are lots of things that you can be forced to do. And if you are forced to do it,
00:59:56.500 then your body is forced to do it. Because again, you exist and your body exists. They're one in the
01:00:01.960 same. You are your body. And this is especially true if you're a mother and a wife or a father and a
01:00:08.420 husband. Though it's also true of everybody, no matter their relationship status. I, that is my mind,
01:00:14.960 soul and body all together. They're a package deal. I get up every morning and care for my family. I go
01:00:21.840 to work. I, I do things around the house. I, I, I pick up the sleeping three-year-old from the couch
01:00:26.980 and I carry her to bed. I lift heavy things that need to be lifted, whether physically or
01:00:30.660 metaphorically. I do all of this and many other things with my body as my body. And I have no right
01:00:36.860 legally or morally to just up and declare one day that I don't want to do anything for anyone else.
01:00:41.840 I don't want to be forced to do anything, uh, even for my own kids or my wife. That would make
01:00:46.940 me neglectful and derelict and criminally so. There are also laws and other legal obligations
01:00:52.600 that I'm expected to fulfill and obey with my body as I do everything with my body as, as my body,
01:00:59.200 because again, I am my body. Once again, these, these are obligations that supersede any notion of
01:01:04.960 autonomy. So, so yes, it's true in this sense that my body does not belong only to me as I myself do
01:01:14.100 not belong only to myself. I am not a self-created being existing only for whatever purpose I decide
01:01:20.520 and neither is the author of this article. And I thought that maybe that was the realization she
01:01:26.400 had come to and decided to write about, but I was wrong. Instead, the author, a feminist named Amanda, 0.89
01:01:32.960 Amanda Monte has written, not a revelation that she is a child of God who exists for a higher purpose,
01:01:39.340 but rather a lament that everybody in the world, including her children, especially her children,
01:01:44.460 are using and victimizing her. This is not an expression of motherly love, but a long, weird,
01:01:50.280 and weirdly sexualized whine. It is, in other words, exactly what you expect from a feminist. 1.00
01:01:56.540 Uh, let me read just a few passages. Quote,
01:01:58.360 Quote,
01:02:28.340 Now, this is a theme that she returns to over and over again. She compares her young children
01:02:41.060 to the men that she had unpleasant sexual experiences with. And these comparisons get 0.95
01:02:46.260 even more disturbing and specific as the article goes on. Listen to this, quote,
01:02:51.620 Quote,
01:02:52.620 I got home at the end of a long day, working at the daycare. I let my daughter have her way with me. 1.00
01:02:57.580 Exhausted from many sleepless nights, tending to my baby, I lay on the floor of her room,
01:03:02.580 let her pat me to sleep. I did as I was told, eyes closed, half awake. When the game was finished,
01:03:07.620 she ascended me, requesting books on laps, a ride around the apartment, more breast. 1.00
01:03:12.600 I called on, I called on coping mechanisms, old coping mechanisms. In my twenties, I had learned
01:03:17.700 methods for disassociating. I studied corners of the room while men got themselves off inside me.
01:03:23.560 I listened to their heavy breathing, calculating how much longer, moaning here and there to help
01:03:27.480 them along, moving my hips methodically or going limp. I had cleaved myself from my body long ago.
01:03:33.520 This was nothing new. Now, it's bad enough that she needs to develop a coping mechanism to deal with
01:03:39.900 the awful burden of spending a few minutes with her daughter. Even worse, she directly compares this
01:03:45.600 time with her daughter to other times when men, and I, quote, got themselves off inside her. 0.95
01:03:51.640 And she keeps going on this note, quote, most of our sexual encounters are spent in calculations.
01:03:56.280 The feminist theorist and co-founder of the Wages for Work movement, Silvia Federici, writes of women,
01:04:01.900 we sigh, sob, gasp, pant, jump up and down in bed. But in the meantime, our minds keep calculating how
01:04:07.940 much, how much of ourselves can we give before we lose or undersell ourselves? How much will we get in
01:04:13.180 return? Motherhood was filled with an agonizing sense of calculation, of waiting, of pushing my
01:04:18.600 body to the brink of what it could take, of counting down the minutes, and of doing things I did not want
01:04:22.340 to do repeatedly. I tried to make myself into an object that was accommodating and agreeable, but
01:04:26.360 over time, I found myself wondering whether life, for some women, was just a series of moments in which 0.74
01:04:31.080 we grit our teeth and watch the clock. Now, there's a lot more like this. It's all woven throughout the
01:04:35.700 article, which apparently the author has adapted from an entire book she wrote on the subject, and she
01:04:39.840 doesn't seem to understand why normal people consider it extremely disturbing to compare playtime
01:04:45.260 with your toddler to an awkward hookup you had with some guy. She doesn't understand this because
01:04:51.340 to a feminist, this is second nature. They sexualize absolutely everything. They can't help themselves. 1.00
01:04:58.440 I mean, they see sexual competition and sexual tension and sexual conquest and sexual mind games
01:05:06.440 in everything they do, everything that happens to them. Everything is sexual all the time. This is
01:05:13.580 the kind of neurosis that they bring into motherhood, and it's why their children invariably 0.99
01:05:18.460 grow up to despise them, and justifiably so. But the article isn't all just this weird, wildly out of
01:05:24.980 place and inappropriate sex talk. There's also quite a lot of melodramatic complaining. This is the other
01:05:30.440 specialty of a feminist, self-martyrdom, putting themselves up on the cross. And she climbs up on 1.00
01:05:37.000 many crosses all throughout the article. A quick sample, quote, avoiding my own needs and desires
01:05:42.720 have become a method of survival. What I wanted in early motherhood more than anything was to feel as
01:05:48.180 though I fully inhabited and had my body, but all the ideas about how I should act as a mother, how I
01:05:54.400 should respond to near constant requests, demands for attention, volatile emotions, hands down my shirt,
01:05:59.340 smushing my face, not to mention the complete dissolution of self I experienced outside my
01:06:03.480 role as mother, made me feel so small. I struggled with the physicality of caring for children, which
01:06:08.500 was worsened by the isolation and alienation I felt as friends and colleagues disappeared, and as my
01:06:12.600 husband and I, despite our best efforts, fell into a rather traditional division of labor in the home.
01:06:17.740 She also complains that her children are ravenous beasts who devour her. Reading, quote,
01:06:22.620 Marguerite de Ross wrote that in motherhood, a woman gives her body over to her child until they're on her, 0.99
01:06:27.840 as they might be on a hill, in a garden. They devour her, they hit her, they sleep on her.
01:06:32.980 Though my child's touch began as something invited, as I lost control of my life, every request,
01:06:38.280 every tug felt like a violation. She lets herself be devoured, de Ross writes. Nothing like this
01:06:43.480 happens with fathers. I didn't want to be devoured. I tried very hard not to be devoured. I would not say
01:06:49.400 that I let it happen. And she ends on this note, quote, at least on the surface, the love I shared with
01:06:54.420 my young children felt uncomplicated by gender. It was my sudden, lonely housewifery that felt
01:06:59.120 forced, compulsory, staged, inescapable, and recognizable. I was living a life that seemed,
01:07:05.160 as de Ross put it, to have been written down and described already. And as with my early sexual
01:07:10.140 encounters, the experience of getting what I wanted was immediately tainted by what I hadn't known
01:07:15.600 before consenting. Okay, so we see here all of the hallmarks of feminism. One, as I already 0.66
01:07:23.040 mentioned, is the compulsion to sexualize everything. Another is a fundamental misunderstanding
01:07:27.960 about bodily autonomy. Namely, the feminist thinks that bodily autonomy, absolute bodily autonomy, 1.00
01:07:33.020 can actually exist or should exist, and it can't. And yet another is the insistence on being a victim
01:07:40.300 in all things, in all circumstances, no matter what. Notice how she describes all of her sexual
01:07:44.760 encounters as horrific drudgeries that she had to cope with and endure miserably. That's not because
01:07:50.800 the encounters were non-consensual. She did consent, but she is still a victim of them somehow.
01:07:57.080 She's the victim of everything. She's the victim of everything that she herself does.
01:08:01.980 She's the victim even of her own children's affection. She is cringing through life, waiting
01:08:07.720 for every moment to be done so that she can get to the next moment and complain about that one too. 0.97
01:08:12.780 She presents herself as an utterly insufferable person, a bitter, irritable, petulant harpy. 1.00
01:08:18.620 This is the picture she paints of herself, and I am quite sure that it's accurate. 0.96
01:08:23.920 Now, it is true, of course, that women carry their own special burdens. They have their own pains, 0.98
01:08:31.040 their own suffering. It's true that motherhood can be challenging, sometimes profoundly so. It's true
01:08:35.960 that being constantly needed by your children, constantly the focus of their attention, can at
01:08:41.300 times be draining and exhausting. Nobody denies any of that. But you don't get any credit for facing
01:08:50.020 those challenges or any sympathy for the suffering you experience if all you do is complain about it. 0.96
01:08:57.760 If you have a terrible attitude the whole time, if you are whiny and miserable and awful to be around, 0.68
01:09:03.860 then you receive no gratitude from your loved ones because you don't deserve any, okay? You don't 0.98
01:09:10.220 deserve it. We usually say children should be grateful to their parents, but if their parents
01:09:15.600 are just miserable and resentful all the time, you know what? Your children shouldn't be grateful for
01:09:20.380 you. They shouldn't. To be grateful for what? This is what happens with a woman like Amanda, 1.00
01:09:26.040 and there are many such cases. She experiences some of the ordinary hardships and difficulties that come
01:09:30.720 with being a mother and a wife, and she becomes immediately bitter about it, and then even more
01:09:35.640 bitter that her children and husband aren't appreciative and grateful for her sacrifices. But what are they
01:09:41.060 supposed to appreciate? You've met every challenge and hardship with the worst possible attitude in the
01:09:46.760 worst possible way, and you have brought misery and anger and resentment into the home. What do you want
01:09:53.260 them to thank you for? I mean, you should be apologizing to them, not expecting a thank you. You don't
01:09:59.480 get credit for simply experiencing a hardship. Everyone does that. Like, the fact that you're
01:10:04.480 just experiencing it. We all have to experience hardship. There's nothing special about that.
01:10:11.060 You get credit for enduring it with some semblance of dignity and strength and courage,
01:10:16.700 which it doesn't seem that Amanda ever has in her life. And this is a point that lots of people,
01:10:22.980 and not just feminists, need to understand. We all have crosses that we bear, and you can choose 1.00
01:10:27.920 to carry yours with grace, or you can whine and cry and milk it for every ounce of pity you can get
01:10:33.840 out of it. And if you choose the latter option, then it's all for nothing. You see, suffering is an
01:10:39.380 opportunity. It's an opportunity to become stronger, to gain wisdom, to gain perspective,
01:10:45.200 but you squander that opportunity if you whimper and moan and gripe the whole time.
01:10:51.560 Now, you still have to suffer, but you aren't even becoming a better person through it. You're
01:10:58.160 actually becoming a worse person. It's the worst of all worlds. So you get the suffering that we all
01:11:04.020 do, but none of the benefits, none of the bright side. You've only become smaller and weaker in the
01:11:11.040 process until you become an exceptionally small and weak person, like our friend Amanda, who is now today,
01:11:18.780 of course, canceled. And that'll do it for the show today. Thanks for watching. Thanks for
01:11:24.260 listening. Have a great day. Godspeed.